One World Religion

the Satanic

"World Church of Noahism"

Part 7

of the One world Order, Olam Ha Ba of the One World Despot

of the "Chosen" Master Race, who say in "Their Laws" they are gods. Who crucified the SON OF GOD.


Tightening the Talmudic noose on Christians


Will Judge Roy Moore, announce to the World the Supremacy of the Courts of Justice above the Constitution of the United states according to the vision they seek to establish against Jesus Christ in the name of Talmudic Judeo-Churchi-zionity, the god of Judaism, that "Judeo-Christian" god who has nothing to do with Jesus Christ, the Only IAM? See how they have established the constitution which will soon wear out the pivot which it sits, by the Universal Courts of Noahide Freemason Justice, the traitors of the Christian United States.

A. Historical Background

No nation has been more profoundly influenced by the "Old Testament" than America. Many of America's early statesmen and educators were schooled in Hebraic civilization. The second president of the United States, John Adams, a Harvard graduate, had this to say of the Jewish people:

"The Jews have done more to civilize men than any other nation.... They are the most glorious Nation that ever inhabited the earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a bauble in comparison to the Jews. They have given religion to three-quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and more happily than any other Nation, ancient or modern. "

The curriculum at Harvard, like those of other early American colleges and universities, was designed by learned and liberal men of "Old Testament" persuasion. Harvard president Increase Mather (1685-1701) was an ardent Hebraist (as were his predecessors, Henry Dunster and Charles Chauncey). Mather's writings contain numerous quotations from the Talmud as well as from the works of Saadia Gaon, Rashi, Maimonides and other classic Jewish commentators.

Yale University president Ezra Stiles readily discoursed with visiting rabbinical authorities on the Mishna and Talmud. At his first public commencement at Yale (1781), Stiles delivered an oration on Hebrew literature written originally in Hebrew. Hebrew and the study of Hebraic laws and institutions were an integral part of Yale's as well as of Harvard's curriculum.

Much the same may be said of King's College (later Columbia University), William and Mary, Rutgers, Princeton, Dartmouth, and Brown University. Hebrew learning was then deemed a basic element of liberal education. Samuel Johnson, first president of King's College (1754-1763), expressed the intellectual attitude of his age when he referred to Hebrew as "essential to a gentleman's education."

This attitude was not merely academic. On May 31, 1775, almost on the eve of the American Revolution, Harvard president Samuel Langdon, addressing the Congress of Massachusetts Bay, declared: "Every nation, when able and agreed, has a right to set up over itself any form of government which to it may appear most conducive to its common welfare. The civil polity of Israel is doubtless an excellent general model."

The Higher Law doctrine of the Declaration of Independence is rooted in the Torah, which proclaims “The Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” and appeals to the “Supreme Judge” and “Providence.” Even though Jefferson, the principal author of the Declaration, did not exalt the Hebrew Bible, he nonetheless framed the Declaration with a view to galvanizing a bible-reading public in support of the American Revolution.

During the colonial and constitution-making period, the Americans, especially the Puritans, adopted and adapted various Hebraic laws for their own governance. The legislation of New Haven, for example, was based on the premise that "the judicial laws of God, as they were delivered by Moses, and as they are a fence to the moral law, being neither ... ceremonial, nor ha[ving] any reference to Canaan, shall ... generally bind all offenders, till they be branched out into particulars hereafter.” Thirty-eight of seventy-nine statutes in the New Haven Code of 1665 derived their authority from the Hebrew Bible. The laws of Massachusetts were based on the same premise.

The fifteen Capital Laws of New England included the "Seven Noahide Laws" of the Torah or what may be termed the Seven Universal Laws of Morality. Six prohibit idolatry, blasphemy, murder, robbery, adultery, and eating flesh from a living animal, while the seventh requires the establishment of courts of justice. Such courts are obviously essential to any society based on the primacy of reason or persuasion rather than passion or intimidation.

The seven universal laws of morality (together with their particular branches) comprised a "genial orthodoxy." This genial orthodoxy transcended whatever social or economic distinctions existed among men: it held all men equal before the law. By so doing it placed constraints on governors and governors alike and thereby habituated Americans to the rule of law. As a further consequence, this ancient Hebraic orthodoxy dissolved or subordinated many ethnic differences among immigrants in the new world. It moderated the demands of various groups, helped coordinate their diverse interests and talents, and thereby contributed to America's growth and prosperity.

Now, without minimizing the influence of such philosophers as Locke and Montesquieu on the framers of the American Constitution, I believe America may rightly be deemed the first and only nation that was explicitly founded on the Seven Noahide Laws of the Torah. Indeed, the legislation of the several states comprising the Federal Union embodied these laws—including the prohibitions against blasphemy and adultery—well into the nineteenth century. It should also be noted that the constitutions of eleven of the original thirteen states made provision for religious education. Some even had religious qualifications for office.

Strange as it may seem, the Seven Noahide Laws were recently and explicitly incorporated in Public Law 102-14, which established March 26, 1991 as "Education Day"! What presumably saves this Congressional joint resolution from violating the First Amendment is its silence about the Hebraic origin of the Noahide code. Here I must digress for a moment and say a word about the First Amendment.

The First Amendment states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion …” This clause is now misunderstood. It was intended not to prevent Congress from enacting laws supportive of religion, but to prohibit Congress from establishing any state or national religion. In his “Farewell Address,” drafted by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, George Washington declared:

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports…. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that National morality can prevail in the exclusion of religious principle." Divorcing public law from religion, hence from morality, deprives law of sanctity and authority while depriving morality of the support of law. This is a basic reason for the moral decay in American society today. Of course there are other reasons, such as the moral relativism that dominates American education and even the Supreme Court.

Incidentally, the theme of Washington’s Farewell Address is national unity. National unity, he believed, requires national morality, a precondition of which is religion. Religion counters man’s natural inclination to self-indulgence and his tendency to be preoccupied with the immediate gratification of his own desires. Religion thus foster self-restraint and consideration of others. Far more than secular humanism, religion inspires men with reverence, with deference to wisdom, with concern for posterity. But these ideas are Jewish ideas, rooted in the Seven Noahide Laws.

B. The Institutions Prescribed by the American Constitution

House of Representatives. The House represents 435 districts of the United States, where the people of each district elect one person to represent their views and interests. The idea of district elections is implicit in the Torah. “Select for yourselves men who are wise, understanding, and known to your tribes and I will appoint them as your leaders” (Deut. 1:13). The word “election” obviously comes from the word “elect” and the “elect” means men of good intellectual and moral character.

Exodus 18:19 states: “... seek out from among all the people men with leadership ability, God-fearing men—men of truth who hate injustice.” Similar qualifications are prescribed in the original constitutions of Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. Incidentally, the word “election” obvious derives from the “elect,” not a ‘democratic’ but an ‘aristocratic’ term! Only the “elect” from each tribe (shevet) were to be representatives.

So, each tribe must select the best men to be their representatives. Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch comments that “each tribe (shevet) is to choose out of its own midst men whose character can only be known by their lives [hence whose character] is known only to those who have associated with them.” This is the biblical source of residential requirements for Representatives and Senators in the United States. Also, what is here called a shevet was called a district (pelech) after the Second Temple.

Moreover, the idea of district elections conforms to the Jewish law of “agency” (Kiddushin 59a). This law synthesizes the “delegate” and “trustee” concept of representation prevalent in the non-Jewish democratic world. Whereas the delegate concept binds a representative to the instructions of his constituents, the trustee concept allows him to judge whether adherence to these instructions, when additional knowledge or new circumstances intervene, will harm his constituents’ long-term interests.

Finally, it is a principle of Jewish law that “No legislation should be imposed on the public unless the majority can conform to it” (Avoda Zara 36a). This obviously requires legislators to consider or consult the opinions of his constituents. Hence representative democracy can be readily assimilated to Judaism simply by adding that representatives must be “men who are wise, and understanding”, “G-d –fearing men- men of truth who hate injustice”. This would make for a “high-toned” or aristocratic democracy, or a universal aristocracy. (Bear in mind that Israel is supposed to be a “Nation of Kohanim,” meaning a nation of noblemen.)

The Senate. The Senate represents the 50 states of the Federal Union; it therefore represents the Federal principle. But the idea of federalism goes back to the Torah and the twelve tribes. Each tribe or had its own distinct identity, its own governor and its own judicial system.

The Presidency. Unlike Israel, which has a Plural Executive or Cabinet consisting of a prime minister and other ministers representing different political parties in the Knesset, the United States has a Unitary Executive, namely, the President. Of course the President has a Cabinet, but its members cannot hold any other office and they are wholly responsible to the President, not to any political party.

Now it so happens that a Unitary Executive is a Torah principle! Thus, when Moses told Joshua to consult the elders when he was about to lead the Jews across the Jordan, God countermanded Moses: there can only be one leader in a generation. And if you look at tractate Sanhedrin 8a, you will see that Jewish law opposes collective leadership.

Notice, too, that the President can be impeached. There was a time in the gentile world when it was said the King can do no wrong, that he is above the law. This is contrary to the Torah. And private person can sue a King of Israel before the Sanhedrin. No one is above the law, not even G-d Himself! In any event, under the American Constitution the President can be brought before a court by a private individual. He can be impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

And just as a President of the United States must be a native-born American and not a naturalized citizen, so a king of Israel must be born of a Jewish mother and not a ger or convert.

The Supreme Court, like the Great Sanhedrin, is the final interpreter of the Constitution. This is essential if there is to be the "Rule of Law". The Rule of Law requires that there be a fundamental law superior to, and more permanent than, ordinary statute law. A fundamental and relatively permanent law is necessary for there to be reverence for the law, for most people will not revere the laws if they are always changing. And just as American judges are to reconcile permanence and change, so too are the judges of the Great Sanhedrin. This is a basic function of the Torah's judicial system.

So we see that the original American Constitution was very much rooted in Torah Judaism

C. Israel’s Political and Judicial Institutions

The Knesset. Although Israel has less cultural diversity than the United States, 22 new parties registered for the May 1999 Knesset elections, and some 30 competed for seats in that 120-member assembly! What encourages this profusion of parties is that, contrary to Torah and to the system in 74 nations having democratic elections, the entire country constitutes a single electoral district, which necessitates proportional representation.

Compounding the problem is the 1.5% electoral threshold. Excluding the Netherlands (a homogeneous country), this is by far the lowest electoral threshold among some 50 states using proportional representation. Given this low threshold, almost any interest group, including casino operators, without the slightest pretension of having any national vision, may aspire to enter the Knesset. The Knesset has become a haven for single-issue parties and job seekers.

In Israel the voter votes not for an individual Knesset member (MK) but for a fixed party list. The Average voter doesn’t even know all the candidates on the list – contrary to Torah Judaism. As a consequence, MK’s are not accountable to the voters but to their party leaders. They cannot exercise independent judgment, and they can safely ignore public opinion. Their primary concern is to have a safe place on their party’s electoral list. And when they do not have a safe place, they can obtain one by selling themselves to a rival party, thus betraying those who voted and worked for their original party. Twenty-nine MK’s hopped over to other parties just before the 1999 elections! This is a reflection on the lo0w caliber of many Israeli politicians. But we must bear in mind that the political system is largely to blame for such politicians, and that this system contradicts the Torah.

The Cabinet. Since no party has ever won a majority of the seats in Israel’s parliament, every Israeli government or cabinet has consisted of a multiplicity of parties, each with it’s own agenda. For example, the Government of Prime Minister Ehud Barak had no less than seven parties, four secular and three religious. This is hardly conducive to the formulation and execution of coherent and resolute national policies. But this means that Israel has a plural executive, contrary to Torah principles.

The Supreme Court. First, consider the Foundations of Law Act of 1980, which severed Israel’s legal system from the binding force of English Law, and declared: - “Where a court finds that a legal issue requiring decision cannot be resolved by reference to legislation or judicial precedence…it shall reach its’ decision in the light of the principles of freedom, justice equity, and peace of the Jewish heritage.” This most important of laws has been ignored by Israel’s Supreme Court.

Despite the imperative “shall reach its’ decision”, Supreme Court President Aaron Barak contends that Jewish law should not be given a preferred status when there are doubts as to the meaning of a particular law. He writes: - “It should never be said that a particular [legal] system has the primary claim to interpretive inspiration.” (Imagine a US Supreme Court justice teaching his countrymen, “it should never be said that the American legal system has the primary claim to interpretive inspiration!” )

Israel’s Supreme Court is the only court in the world that scorns the legal heritage of its’ own people. It applies American, English, and Continental Law in almost all of its’ judicial rulings, and very often renders decisions diametrically opposed to Jewish Law.
The Court, without legislative authority or judicial precedent, has (1) ruled that the Chief Rabbinate does not have final jurisdiction over conversions; (2) ruled that rabbinical courts must adopt the same criteria as civil courts when deciding property settlements in divorce cases; (3) ruled that kibbutz shopping centers may remain open to the public on the Sabbath; (4) declared “illegal” the Defense Ministry’s policy of exempting yeshiva students from military service (yet blanket exemptions from any form of national service has remained “legal” for Arab citizens); (5) ordered the return of a girl to a secular school after her father withdrew her; (6) awarded four Jewish children to their Moslem father instead of their mother (who had returned to Judaism); (7) ruled that homosexual couples are entitled to the same benefits as other married couples, in consequence of which employers must grant full benefits to the partners of their gay employees; (8) ruled that Israel’s air force cannot exclude female pilots unless they are pregnant; (9) vetoed the appointments of three men to the boards of directors of public corporations because of gender, holding that such boards must have an approximately equal number of men and women!

D. Conclusion

There are 75 other nations that have democratic elections. All are closer to Torah Judaism than the State of Israel! To be more precise, the political and judicial institutions of the so-called Jewish state of Israel are less Jewish than the political and judicial institutions now operating in the non-Jewish democratic world! This is a basic reason why the Foundation for Constitutional Democracy has drafted a Jewish Constitution of the State of Israel.


* * *
Section A of this essay is based on Abraham Katsh, The Biblical Heritage of American Democracy (New York: KTAV, 1977).
Cited in Pathways to the Torah (Jerusalem: Aish HaTorah Publications, 1988), p. A6.2.
It may surprise the reader to learn that, unlike 74 nations that have district elections for the lower (or only) branch of the legislature, in Israel the entire country constitutes a single district in which parties compete on the basis of proportional representation. For a detailed analysis of Israel’s political system, see Paul Eidelberg, Jewish Statesmanship: Lest Israel Fall (Jerusalem: Foundation for Constitutional Democracy, 2000).

All the while the Judaizers, the blind who lead and they who are led into the abyss, cry that necessary cry of "anti-Semitism", for the management of their "Lesser" Brethren, the Jews, and while, I is aginst em, caus'ins I surely ain't with em's...........hear and see what they have done. The Babblers inexhaustible, who say "It is the Oil" are the propagators of dillusion of Illusion.


Buffalo-ed Israel

Democratizing Islam*


Professor  Paul Eidelberg


What i'd do if'n i wuz prez.

Democratizing Islam*


Professor  Paul Eidelberg


*Published by Nativ: A Journal of Policy and the Arts 

(November-2002)  ?????????????                                     


Executive Summmary: “Democratizing Islam” shows that “Islamic fundamentalism” or “Islamism” is in fact authentic Islam, the Islam of Muhammad. To democratize Islam it will be necessary for the United States not only to conquer Iraq and other Islamic regimes, but also maintain an occupation force for two or three decades, as was done in post-war Japan and Germany. 


A generation of Muslim children will have to be re-educated.  Anti-Jewish and anti-Christian verses in the Qur’an will have to be neutralized by contrary verses and commentaries.  


censored the demoncratic way.


The principle of Jihad will have to be eliminated from the four schools of Islamic law. 

Non-Arab states should follow the example of Turkey and remove Arabic from public documents and public education.   This will diminish pan-Arab as well as pan-Islamic sentiments in these countries.


Various Islamic concepts such as “consultation” and “consensus” should be reinterpreted to prescribe a non-secular form of constitutional democracy.  Civil society—private and social institutions—must be developed to counter the authoritarian tendencies of Islamic culture.   A market economy and the formation of a middle class will hasten this development. 


Decentralization and divisions of power are essential.  In Islamic countries with large ethnic minorities, it will be necessary to establish a federal system of government based on territoriality.  Bicameral legislatures should be established to protect minorities. 


Israel can facilitate the democratization of Islam by adopting a model constitution based on Jewish principles.  To be true to the Jewish heritage, Israel should avoid diplomatic relations with any evil regime.  It should call for the expulsion from the UN of any state that violates the democratic provisions of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 


Ooooooooooops ! Everybody but Israel, causin's they are gods


 By its behavior, Israel’s government should set an example to mankind.




Since September 11, an Axis of Evil” is said to threaten mankind.  It has been given various names:  “Islamic fundamentalism,” “Islamism,” “militant Islam,” “Wahhabism,” etc.  Each of these appellations is said to be an extreme form of Islam.  The issue is of strategic significance.  It is one thing to confront what may only be a fringe element of Islam; it is quite another if this element lurks in the hearts of Muslims everywhere and can everywhere explode into fanatical fury.  Moreover, the United States may have the wherewithal to win a war against a supposedly marginal aspect of Islam.  But that America possesses the wisdom and perseverance to win a war against Islam per se and then transform various Islamic regimes into democracies is rather dubious. 


Be this as it may, no war can be wisely conducted and won unless the enemy is clearly defined.   We need to know whether “Islamic fundamentalism” is authentic Islam.  Let us first consult the doyen of Islamic history, Professor Bernard Lewis.  In The Multiple Identities of the Middle East (1998), Lewis writes:


A basic, distinguishing feature of Islam is the all-embracing character of religion in the perception of Muslims.  The Prophet, unlike earlier founders of religions, founded and governed a polity.  As ruler, he promulgated laws, dispensed justice, commanded armies, made war, made peace, collected taxes, and did all the other things that a rulers does.  This is reflected in the Qur’an itself, in the biography of the Prophet, and in the traditions concerning his life and work.  The distinctive quality of Islam is most vividly illustrated in the injunction which occurs not once but several times in the Qur’an (3:104, 110; 7:157; 22:41, etc.), by which Muslims are instructed as to their basic duty, which is “to command good and forbid evil”—not just to do good and avoid evil, a personal duty imposed by all religions, but to command good and forbid evil, that is to say, to exercise authority to that end.  Under the Prophet’s immediate successors, in the formative period of Islamic doctrine and law, his state became an empire in which Muslims conquered and subjugated non-Muslims.[i]


Much like zionist Amalekites

From its very inception, classical Islam fused religion and government, faith and power—with power concentrated in Muhammad and his successors, the caliphs.  Within 100 years of its founding, Islam conquered much of the civilized world, spreading throughout Southwest Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe.  These were regions of ancient, advanced, and deep-rooted civilizations.  They were totally obliterated and replaced by Islam.


Do not be deceived, it is the Talmudicist which propagate the lies, and who rule all the nations of the earth by fear. But any, whether jew or greek who deny Jesus Christ is anti-Christ and are liars and the sons of the synagogue of satan.

Professor Lewis’s description of classical Islam conforms to what he calls “The current wave of religious militancy,” and which he says is “one of many in Islamic history …”[ii]   In a most important conference held on October 3, 2002 at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI, on which, more later), Lewis declared that Islamic fundamentalism is “Islamism revived.”[iii]  Yossef Bodansky puts it more vividly: 

Throughout the Muslim world, from the Philippines to Morocco and in numerous Muslim émigré communities from Western Europe to the United States, Islamist terrorist and subversive cells are getting ready to strike out.  


(*See Mossad WTC Massacre, blamed on Arabs)


As of late 1998, with the confrontation escalating between the United States and the Islamist international terrorist system as represented in the person of Osama bin Laden, the terrorists have become increasingly ready with redundant and resilient networks, weapons of mass destruction, and powerful bombs, as well as zeal and readiness for martyrdom—all for what they perceive to be the noble cause of bringing the United States suffering and pain.[iv]


Man, the Jews have America pegged. Fear...fear...fear...fear


A 1998 fatwa proclaimed, “one billion Muslims are capable of turning their bodies into bombs which are equal in force to all the weapons of … mass destruction possessed by the Americans.”[v]  Having suffered scores of suicide bombers, people in Israel take such fatwas seriously.   Former Knesset Member Moshe Shamir warns: “the Arab-Islamic world sees itself as the only legitimate part of humanity and has placed Islamization of the world as its highest aim.”[vi]  He fears, however, that despite September 11, America lacks the moral resources to honestly define and confront mankind’s greatest enemy, which, he says, bears a striking resemblance to Nazism.  He fears that because of its economic interests in the Middle East, America may sacrifice Israel on the altar of Islam.  Hence this essay.


 When a Talmudic Jew opens his mouth to speak the exact opposite of what he says is the Truth.



Part I.  Defining the Enemy and Ourselves


No less than Winston Churchill referred to Mein Kampf as “the new Qur’an of faith and war …”[vii]  Apologists nonetheless select passages from the Qur’an that prescribe Islam’s “pleasant and peaceful ways,” while ignoring those that inspire Islam’s hate-filled and murderous fanaticism (22:39-41; 2:190). 


Much like Talmud Bavli


 In a mosque sermon in Qatar on June 7, 2002, the imam prayed to Allah “to humiliate the infidels… destroy the Jews, the Christians, and their supporters…make their wives widows, make their children orphans, and make them a prey for Muslims.”  Islam is anything but a religion of love.


In Talmud Bavli, especially Zohar the Book of Spendour, pit the Arabs against Christianity, so the jews, little zionist gods rule mankind after the other anhilate each other.


One simple fact dispels academic obscurantism and “political correctness”:  Islam’s most distinguishing and historically dynamic principle is jihad (holy war), and all four schools of Islamic law (Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi’i, Maliki) refer to jihad as a commandment to wage offensive war against infidels for the sake of Allah.  Consistent therewith, Muslims have plundered, butchered, subjugated, and degraded countless Christian and Jewish communities from the time of Muhammad to the present day.[viii]  That they exult in this history of savagery in the name of Allah — we saw them rejoice throughout Islamdom in the destruction of the Twin Towers — is all the more reason why certain Arab and Islamic regimes must be conquered, just as Nazi Germany had to be conquered before it was democratized.


We saw 5 Israeli Mossad clap, give high five's to each other while filming the Mossad WTC massacre which brought the Homelandt Sekurity and which brought us to this current understanding of the zionist conspirators.


America’s war against international terrorism is in truth a war against Arab-Islamic civilization.  


Amerika, the Pimp of the Great Harlot.


This war dwarfs all others.  Muslim-Arabs, who have no regard for the sanctity of human life, are accumulating weapons of mass murder. 


Whereas, Judaism have set the Universal Laws of Noahidism to decapitate any who oppose their New World Order.


 Muslims commit atrocities around the globe.  The recent bombing of a nightclub in Indonesia, in which at least 187 people were killed — Australians ands other foreigners — is a lurid case in point. 




 Throughout its vast domain Islam nurtures and provides havens for thousands of highly skilled terrorists committed to the destruction of Western civilization in general and of Israel in particular.  Many of their leaders have been educated in the West and are familiar with biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons.  They are motivated not by a righteous desire to alleviate the poverty of the Muslim world, but by a satanic hatred of the non-Muslim world.  As Lewis has warned, the suicide bomber may become the metaphor of the Middle East.  Never has mankind been so menaced.[ix] 


Islam has already invaded Europe.  Its goal is nothing less than conquest.  And Europe, rotting in nihilism, hedonism, and anti-Semitism, is allied with its grave-diggers.


The one country that stands in the way of Islam is the United States.  Needless to say, the U.S. cannot wage war simultaneously against some fifty Islamic regimes.  Accordingly, intrepid commentators like Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute would have America proceed incrementally, beginning with the elimination of Iraqi tyrant Saddam Hussein.  Baghdad would be first, followed by Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia.[x]  


of course from the Nile to the Euphrates, at the command of the Neo-Cons, Talmudic Chabad Lubavitch jews who run the Whitehouse.



From the demise of these and perhaps one or two other Islamic tyrannies (Libya and the Sudan), a chain reaction will supposedly follow and transform Islamdom.  These commentators urge an American crusade to democratize the Islamic world.  Predictably, they conceive of this crusade in purely secular terms.  They ignore not only the fanatical devotion of the Muslim masses to Islam, but the unappealing aspects of the secular democratic world which, as eminent western scholars admit, is steeped in moral decay.  Democratizing Islamic states might not be an unmixed blessing for the 1.2 billion Muslims that inhabit this planet.


If the war against Islam is to be won, the partisans of contemporary democracy will require a deeper understanding of what makes democracies preferable to Islamic (and other) tyrannies.  These partisans invariably emphasize the freedom and equality enjoyed in democracies but absent in Islam.  


Demonicrazy, like the Talmudic Communistic Socialism of Apartheid Racist Israel?



They overlook the fact that, unlike in former times, democratic freedom and equality lack ethical and rational constraints.  Moral relativism infects the democratic mind and saps the will to overcome the absolutism of the Islamic mind.  Lovers of democracy need to ask:  What is there about democratic freedom that would prompt a person to restrain his passions, to be kind, honest, just?  What is there about democratic equality that would prompt him to defer to wisdom or to show respect for teachers or parents?   Are such qualities conspicuous in the secular democratic state?


No, see Israel.


The partisans of the secular democratic state need to recognize that the freedom and equality they exalt are pure potentialities — neither good nor evil — hence morally neutral.  In the war against Islamic barbarism democrats need to see that the sanctity of human life and the decency and civility still visible in contemporary democracy have nothing to do with democracy itself.  They are rooted in the Bible of Israel and in Greek political philosophy.  Waving the flag of freedom and equality American style will not purge Islam whose believers are willing to die for Allah.  If, however, freedom and equality are derived from the Jewish conception of man’s creation in the image of God — which alone can provide democracy with an ethical and rational foundation — and if democracy, so conceived and so proclaimed, rallies a hundred million Christians in America, so many of whom look to Israel for light, then it may be possible to illuminate and transform the Islamic world.  But this means that America needs Israel in the war against Islam. 


This viper is about to close in for the Talmudic Judaic kill.


Unfortunately, the Government of Israel is not equal to the task.  Its ruling elites have embraced contemporary democracy as their religion, despite its moral failings.  The egotistical pluralism of democratic politics has fragmented the nation and made Israel another secular democratic state.  Such a state, devoid of Jewish wisdom and vision, cannot possibly inspire America in the war against Islam.  Israel’s pedestrian leaders can speak of nothing more than “peace and security,” for which they are willing to sacrifice Judea and Samaria, the heartland of the Jewish people.  This not only diminishes American respect for Israel.  It also arouses the contempt of Muslims, a contempt magnified by their awareness that Israel has the military power to conquer the land occupied by Arabs but refrains from doing so. 


Unlike Muslims, whose sense of cultural superiority is unequaled, Israel’s political leaders are devoid of Jewish cultural pride.  Consider their foreign policy, their pronouncements about the Arab-Israel conflict.  Not a sign of joyful confidence in the justice of Israel’s cause.  In the midst of war with Arab terrorists and suicide bombers, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon obtusely informed his countrymen that he had learned not to think in “black and white” terms![xi]  September 11 was not enough to dispel the moral flabbiness of Israel’s foreign policy and prompt the Sharon Government to eradicate the terrorist network in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza.  To the contrary, as may be seen in his Jerusalem Post interview of September 26, 2002, Mr. Sharon rejects a policy of zero-tolerance toward Arab terrorism:


Our policy is to prevent an escalation of terrorism and in fact to reduce it…. I have always acted to prevent escalation of the situation … [meaning escalation on Israel’s part as well as on the part of the terrorists]…. [G]oing in and destroying terrorism [as advocated by some Israeli politicians] is a wrong approach. (Emphasis added.)  


Yes, he demon-strated this at the Temple Mount July 2001


Clearly, Sharon’s military objective is not to eliminate Arab terrorism but to prevent it from escalating beyond a “tolerable” level.   More than 500 Jews have been killed and thousands wounded and maimed under Sharon’s policy, and there is no end in sight.



Thousands of Palestinians and Christians at the hands of the IDF


But even if Israel’s Government were headed by a wiser and more dauntless leader, how can a cabinet composed of ten rival and ridiculous parties pursue a consistent and resolute national strategy — I mean a strategy whose initial objective is to eradicate the existential threat facing the Jewish state?  On the other hand, what positive, what noble, what distinctively Jewish goal can inspire this state when cultural egalitarianism takes precedence over Judaism in the mentality of Israel’s political and judicial elites? 


Notice how the focus has gone from the US and the Moslems to the control of the zionist?


Thus, to say that America’s needs Israel in the war against Islam can only mean an Israel very different from the present one.  I have in mind a New Israel, one with a Jewish structure of government that inspires respect, and whose immediate goal vis-a-vis Israel’s enemies is not peace but conquest.[xii]  Only such an Israel, working with the United States, can bring about a structural transformation of Islam.



Part II.  How to Demon-cratize Islam


The year before he wrote his celebrated essay “The Clash of Civilizations?” in 1993, Samuel P. Huntington published an article on “How Countries Democratize.”   Between 1974 and 1990 more than thirty countries in Europe, Latin America, and East Asia shifted from authoritarian to democratic systems of government.  The regimes that moved to or toward democracy, says Huntington, fall into three groups: “one party systems, military regimes, and personal dictatorships.”[xiii]  Conspicuously absent from this study is any reference to the Arab-Islamic world, whose twenty-two regimes, unlike those mentioned by Huntington, may be classified as “theopolitical” despotisms. 


Clearly, Islamdom is less susceptible to democratization than those studied by Huntington, which included the former Soviet Union.  Unlike Soviet Communism, Islam is not a political ideology but a civilization animated by a religion that has imbued countless Muslims with aggressive pride.


what he means is not Talmudized like the Sofiet Bolsheviks.


  As indicated above, Muhammad and his successors established the most extensive empire in history.  Islam’s past greatness is more real in the consciousness of the Muslim masses than Islam’s present backwardness.  Western educated terrorists, who typically come from the middle class, disdain the blandishments of democracy.  Beneath the veneer of Westernization these Muslims have preserved their cultural identity in which they have been weaned.  Not only do they dream of Islam’s past glory, but their reveries inspire their hatred and contempt for Islam’s usurpers and drive them to suicidal murder.  


Muslim intellectuals, including those educated in at Harvard and Oxford, (Educated by the jews)  despise the moral and cultural relativism that permeates the mentality of the West.  I mention this because it would never occur to a relativist to refute Islam, which refutation may, in the last analysis, be necessary to break Islam’s hold on the Muslim masses.  Who indeed, in this age of theological egalitarianism, will question Islam’s deity, say by discrediting his prophet, Muhammad?  It was by destroying Zeus and Jupiter that Greek and Roman civilization were destroyed.  And then there was Hirohito, the god of Japan, whose demise preceded the democratization of Japanese civilization.


Bearing the conquest and American occupation of Japan in mind, only if certain Islamic regimes are conquered and occupied, only if an entire generation of Muslim children is re-educated,(Noahide Laws)  only if political power is decentralized and political accountability replaces Muhammadan top-down leadership, can one speak sensibly of democratizing Islam.  Merely to eliminate Muslim despots and institute democratic elections will accomplish nothing enduring.


But by placing Rothschilds Voting machines the whole world can be Judaized........geav me amean, brutha !


*  *  *

Turning to particulars, it should be noted that contrary to the conventional view, ethnic and religious diversity is widespread in the Middle East.  In the 21 Arab-defined countries — this excludes Iran — there are approximately 250 million people, some 40 million of whom are non-Arabs ethnically or nationally, or non-Muslims religiously.  These 40 million inhabitants of Arab countries are not nationally or religiously affiliated with them. This substantial minority includes about 10 million Christians, particularly the Copts in Egypt, and large ethnic groups such as the Kurds and Berbers.[xiv]


The Iraqi Kurds are Muslims but not Arabs.  Like Iraq’s ruling Sunni Arab majority, they are citizens of the state.  Nevertheless, the Kurds’ ethnic loyalty is far more meaningful and stronger than their political loyalty.  Also, their ethnic loyalty is stronger than their religious identity, which is why they have been inclined to seek separate statehood vis-à-vis the Arab Muslims of Iraq.  Much the same may be said of the Druzes in Lebanon and Syria, the Baluch of Pakistan, and the Berbers of Morocco and Algeria. In contrast, the so-called Palestinians, far from being an oppressed minority, are part of the Sunni-Arab-Muslim majority which has ever aimed to smother the non-Muslim minorities of the Middle East.[xv]


In addition to ethnic and religious diversity, there is also political diversity. Although Arab regimes have always been authoritarian, they divide into two basic types: military tyrannies and hereditary monarchies in which the military sustains the regime.  Nevertheless, while some Muslim governments are conservative, others are revolutionary.  Some practice capitalism while others practice various kinds of socialism.  Some are friends or enemies of the United States, while others are more or less neutral.  And of course, there are enormous differences in the per capita income and in the education level of these various Arab and Muslim countries. 


Hence the type of democracy best suited for one state will not be equally suited for another.  Doctrinairism must be avoided.  A constitutional monarchy may be more appropriate in one country than a constitutional democracy.  Similarly, in some countries a presidential system of government may be preferable to a parliamentary one.  And wherever significant ethnic and religious diversity exists in a particular country as large as Iraq, a federal rather than a unitary system of government may be in order.  In such cases a bicameral legislature may be desirable, where one branch represents territorial divisions.  (See further on.)  Most important, the legal distribution of power assigned to the various branches of government must take account of the factual distribution of power in a particular country.  Indeed, it will be necessary to radically change the factual distribution of power of Islamic regimes if any type of democracy is to endure, and the changes must be institutionalized and supervised over a significant period of time. 


Finally, there inevitably arises the relationship between religion and state.  If Turkey is the model, separation of religion and state appears to follow.  But Turkey is contiguous with and closely linked to Europe, and it may not be an appropriate model for all regimes in the far-flung Islamic world.   Also, let us be candid and admit that the separation of religion and state or public law in the West has not been an unmixed blessing.  Separation surely was conducive to personal freedom and a more tolerant daily life.  But over the course of the last two centuries, as personal freedom and daily life became more and more removed from religion, or, conversely, the more religion became a Sunday or fringe affair, freedom became separated from morality.  The moral corruption now rampant in the West is a direct consequence of the separation of church and state. 


Why they inculcated satan and church, HJR 104, Public Law 102-14, and planned the Judge Roy Moore Scheme to undermine legislation for the superior Noahide Courts of Justice.



 I hasten to add, however, that this separation was not unrelated to the church’s own corruption.  Hence we must avoid both secular and religious dogmatism when addressing the problem of democratizing Islam.


To illustrate the problem, recall Algeria’s experiment with multiparty national elections in December 1991.  In the first round of voting the Islamic Salvation Front did well enough to prompt the military junta in power to cancel the second round and outlaw this populist party of unadulterated Muslims.[xvi]  The capitals of the democratic world breathed a sigh of relief at this failure of “democracy”!  But meanwhile Islamic terrorism continues to bloody Algeria. 

Another illustration: Democracy means popular sovereignty, which translates into the rule of the majority.  But the rule of the majority in most Muslim countries would result in the suppression of many rights associated with democracy.  Bernard Lewis put it this way at the AEI conference mentioned above:  “…in the Western world, we are accustomed to regard women's rights as part of the liberal program. In the Middle East, it doesn't work that way. The liberal program is giving people what they want and what the people want [in Arab-Islamic countries] is suppressing women, so that you find that women's rights [in the Middle East] fair better under autocratic than [they would] under democratic regimes.”  This is one reason why Lewis believes that constitutional monarchy, which would be more compatible with Islamic culture, may also be preferable  to unqualified democracy.

The above illustrations suggest that, given the religiosity of the Muslim masses, successful democratization of many Islamic regimes will have to be non-secular and moderately hierarchical.  Consistent therewith, Islamic law embodies certain concepts which may serve the cause of democratization, if these concepts are newly interpreted, taught in schools, and used to restructure the governments of Islamic regimes.  I have in mind four concepts which Muslim apologists refer to as having democratic significance, but which skeptics reject as illusionary.  Here is how political scientist David Bukay of Haifa University defines and dismisses these concepts:


An immense literature has been published under the rubric, “Democracy in Islam”.  It has several aspects: first, shurah consultation, as if it functioned as in the Western system of parliamentary power; second, ijma’, the consensus of the community, as if there were social and political pluralism with decisions based on a majority; third, ijtihad, innovative interpretation, as if there were readiness to absorb opposing values and positions into the functioning of the Muslim political system; and fourth, hakmiyah [as if it means popular] sovereignty …


Even in the conceptions of Islamic thinkers, shurah does not mean participation in political processes or politcal bargaining, including representation of pressure and interest groups … What they were referring to was an advisory council of experts in the moral field.  Further, ijma’ does not express consensus of the community.  Rather it is an accepted tribal framework made of the tribal leaders or the heads of the community, or a “council of wise men”.  Consensus was never a basis for general public expression.  The same applies to ijtihad .… there is no readiness to absorb the basic values of democracy, such as freedom of assembly and participation or individual rights.  These were the prerogatives of the ruling elites alone.  The people were never sovereign and were never asked its opinion on political issues. Sovereignty [of the people]  … cannot exist in an all-embracing religion like Islam.[xvii] 



Dr. Bukay’s skepticism regarding these concepts loses validity if key Islamic regimes are conquered and transformed (something he does not contemplate, perhaps because he does not identify “Islamic fundamentalism” with Islam).  Moreover, the characteristics he attributes to democracy apply priamrily to contemporary democracy, which is secular and devoid of substantive ethical norms.   The present author rejects contemporary or normless democracy, and proposes, for Islam — indeed, for the West as a whole — a normative or classical conception of democracy, which can be assimilated to Judaism (Talmudism) and Christianity (Judeo-Churchizionity) .  Bukay errs when he says that “any religion is opposed to democratic values in its conceptions and basic principles.”[xviii]  As I have elsewhere shown,[xix] Judaism provides a solid rational foundation and ethical content for freedom and equality.  


And if you Goyim's don't agree with with your Chattel heads


Muslims will the more readily embrace these principles if they are derived from man’s creation in the image of God, and not from secular humanism, which, let us never forget, did not prevent Europe from collaborating in the Nazi Holocaust. 


(Did not prevent the zionist from hiring Hitler for the creation of the zionist Herzle's, Olam Ha Ba)


 Even now, Europe, the home of humanism, has succmbed to anti-Semitic support for Arab barbarism. 


Arabs, the Semites? Oxymoran..........

Returning to the four Islamic concepts in question, no doubt Professor Lewis had these concepts in mind when he said “there are these older traditions, I will not say of democratic government but of government under law, government by consent, and government by contract in the Islamic world…. And this I think holds possibilities for the future.”[xx]  Let us see how this can be done from a theoretical perspective.

Abstracted from the oligarchic power structure that dominated Islam in the past, “consultation,” “consensus,” “innovative interpretation,” and “sovereignty” may be construed to justify a classical, democratic system of institutional checks and balances.  “Consultation” and “consensus” can prescribe and describe the functional relationship between the Executive and Legislative branches of government.  The Executive obviously consults the Legislature when submitting bills to that body.  Whether unicameral or bicameral, the Legislature, which in the West represents the diverse interests and opinions of civil society, deliberates and reaches an agreement (or consensus) to approve or reject or propose amendments to the bills in question.  The concept “innovative interpretation” may be assimilated to the function of a Supreme Court that can narrow or broaden the application of a law which citizens, in society at large, may challenge as violating a higher law, a constitution.  

Noahide Courts of Justice ran by the obedient "Goyim" Freemasons, and the elite elohim, little god's of satan's Illumination.


The principles of this constitution must not clash with Islamic law as qualified by the first three aforementioned concepts (and others to be mentioned further on).  As for the fourth concept, “sovereignty,” it must be limited to the majority of the people as represented in one branch of the Legislature if the latter is bicameral, as may be desirable in many Islamic regimes.    (I shall deal with minorities later.)   

Suggested here is a constitutional and somewhat hierachic system of government based on religious principles.  The constitution would prescribe, in addition to Islamic courts, an independent, unitary executive having the power to propose legislation, but which legislation would require the approval of a popularly elected assembly. 


jewish beth din


 This assembly need not have the power to initiate legislation.  In fact, it was not until the 17th and 18th centuries that representative assemblies acquired that function.  One can even go back to classical antiquity and find examples of popular assemblies whose function was not to make laws but to approve or reject proposed legislation submitted by magistrates.  (John Stuart Mill has said, a “numerous assembly is as little fitted for the direct business of legislation as for that of administration.”  The primary work of legislation must be done, and increasingly is being done, by the executive departments and administrative agencies.)  We want to interpenetrate democratic and Islamic values.


There are groups in Muslim states that would welcome such reform.[xxi]  Israel could indirectly encourage them by adopting for itself a constitution based on Jewish principles, such as that proposed by the present writer in Jewish Statesmanship: Lest Israel Fall.[xxii]   Not only Islam but modern Israel lacks a system of institutional checks and balances, such as that prescribed in the Torah. (Oral Toarh, Mishnah Torah of Tamud Bavli of the Pharisees, which make the WORD of God of none effect)  Suffice to mention the division of powers between the King and the Great Sanhedrin or Supreme Court, whose laws were not valid unless acceptable to the majority of the public.  (See Babylonian Talmud, Avoda Zara, 36a.)  


The Plot thickens, the Truth is about to come out of this satanic pond scum's mouth


Also necessary in Arab states (as well as in Israel) is decentralization of political power.  In large Arab states, as previously indicated, decentralization of power can be accomplished by federalism.  Again the Torah provides a model: each of Israel’s ancient tribal or territorial regions had its own governor and its own autonomous Sanhedrin, whose members were drawn from the region in which they resided.  (This is far more democratic than Israel’s existing system in which the Knesset, though popularly elected, is subservient to the Government, whose ministers, as a result of fixed party lists and the absence of regional elections, can ignore public opinion with impunity.)


Moving to the Talmudic Courts of Justice for all mankind.


*  *  *

Here a brief digression is in order.  It needs to be emphasized that the democratic transformation of Islam will not come about merely by economic and technological progress in the Middle East, the crypto-Marxist panacea of Shimon Peres.  Islamic despots are not interested in alleviating the poverty of their people but in maintaining Islam’s political-religious power structure.  Meanwhile, the cosmopolitan Internet, far from liberating the Muslim masses, has facilitated the transmission of anti-Semitism and the global communications of terrorists. 


If'n you aint wif us then you'un's must be aginst us. George W. Bush-ka


 It was not only economic motives but imperialistic ambitions that prompted Nazi Germany and Japan to launch World War II, and it is only because those dictatorships were conquered, occupied, and democratized that peace now prevails between them and the United States.  Israel’s political and intellectual elites should emphasize these facts at home and abroad. 


Don't mention Fat Boy or Hiroshima


It so happens, however, that the Jewish state, craving recognition, (wannabe's)  exaggerates the importance of establishing diplomatic relations with Islamic regimes, which relations cannot but dignify these tyrannies.  Contrast the U.S., which did not recognize the Soviet Union until the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt — sixteen years after the Bolshevik Revolution.  Four American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, refused to recognize Communist Russia on the grounds that it was animated by a militant ideology and ruled by men whose signatures to international agreements were worthless.[xxiii] Nor did recognition of the Soviet Union diminish its hostile designs on democratic America.  We see the same hostile attitude in Egypt toward Israel despite their 1979 peace treaty. 


*Reference to Uncle Joe

*  *  *


No peace agreement but only the tangible democratization of Islam rooted in ethical-religious principles can provide a basis for peace in the religious Middle East.  Such principles will be found not only in the Torah, but, strange as it may seem, in a joint Resolution of the United States Congress.  For in 1991, Congress explicitly incorporated the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality in Public Law 102-14, which established March 26 as “Education Day”!  


Oh my goodness Fred, what a coincidence...Oh my! Oh My! Hmmmmmm strange.




The Seven Noahide Laws were recognized by Hugo Grotius, the 17th century jurisprudent, as the basis of peaceful international relations.  They can provide the moral content for America’s “Operation: Enduring Tradition” against international terrorism. 



Operation enduring Oral Tradition


 President George W. Bush, a devout Christian, (Devout Skull and Bones "Judeo-Churchizionian)  is qualified to make the Seven Noahide Laws the ultimate justification of America’s war against Islamic civilization. 


The Noahide Laws, though violated by all Islamic regimes that breed or harbor terrorists, are nonetheless laws which Muslim countries profess and should be required to abide by.  Six prohibit idolatry, cursing God, murder, robbery, adultery, and eating the flesh of a live animal, while the seventh requires the establishment of courts of justice. (See Judge Roy Moore scam)  Such courts are obviously essential to any society based on the primacy of reason or persuasion rather than passion or intimidation.


The Noahide laws (together with their particular branches) comprise what may be termed a "genial orthodoxy."  This genial orthodoxy transcends whatever social or economic distinctions exist among men:  it holds all men equal before the law. 


Except Jews, see Talmud Bavli Sanhedrin Hypocracy


 By so doing it places constraints on governors and governors alike and thereby habituates men to the rule of law. 


Goyim Judeo-Churchi-zionians will get in the habit quickly when threatened with decapitation.



 Moreover, this ancient Hebraic (Talmudic Jewish) orthodoxy can moderate and subordinate the differences of various ethnic groups found in various Arab-Islamic countries and thus facilitate their cooperation and mutual enrichment.  If all nations complied with the Noahide Laws of Universal Morality, then war, instead of being the norm of international relations, would be a thing of the past.


and they all became jews for the fear of the jews...see "Purim Haman"


Muslim youth need to be taught that the Noahide Laws come from the Torah, that they unite Jews and Christians, that Islam would never have come into existence had not Muhammad learned from Jewish and Christian teachers.  Qur’anic verses that degrade Jews and Christians must be neutralized by juxtaposing contradictory verses and by commentaries that render such degradation obsolete.  


Next...Operation shut the True Christian up!



 Youth should be taught that it is sinful for Muslims to wage jihad against Jews and Christians (as well as Hindus).  They must be taught that Muslims who murder women, men, and children in the name of Allah desecrate God’s name.  


However when Jews murder it is for their god. Geave me aen amean brutha, for they art the "Chosen" gods


They should also learn that the concept of jihad contradicts the United Nations Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which prescribes “tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial, or religious groups.”  


Resolution's against Israel go unheeded.



The word jihad should be stricken from Islamic law.  Public renunciation of jihad should be the litmus test of whether a Muslim regime, consistent with the Seven Noahide Laws, is sincerely committed to peace.  Jihad should mean nothing more than striving for self-perfection. 


President’s Bush’s “Axis of Evil” speech following September 11 brands as wicked any Muslim state that provides a haven for terrorists.  This definition applies to almost all Islamic regimes and thus calls for regime change.  Regime change involves not only WHO rules and HOW they rule (hence political institutions), but also the ENDS for which they rule, which ends must have ethical-religious content.  From these three basic factors of regime change, a civic ethos must develop, reinforced by appropriate educational and social institutions.[xxiv]  The non-secular democratization of Islam should be a declaratory principle of American and Israeli foreign policy.


A crucial aspect of Islam’s democratization is the introduction of a market economy.  Such an economy would decentralize the corporate power of Arab regimes, raise the living standards of their poverty-stricken people, and hasten the development of civil society, meaning private and social institutions to counterbalance the power of government.   Israel can hasten Islam’s democratization not only by adopting the Jewish democratic constitution mentioned above, but also by privatizing its own economy.  But much more needs to be done.

*  *  *

To facilitate the democratization of Islam, it will be necessary to curtail the influence of Arabic in the Muslim but non-Arab world.  Let me explain.


Arabic is an official language of more than twenty states in North Africa and the Middle East (including Israel).   Like any language, Arabic provides people with a sense of identity and of shared values which, in many instances, transcends national, ethnic, and even religious differences.  Bernard Lewis writes:


Within a remarkably short time of the Arab conquests in the seventh century, Arabic, previously limited to the Arabian peninsula and the desert borderlands of the Fertile Crescent, became the dominant and in time the majority language of most of the Middle East and North Africa.  The Qur’an made it the language of scripture; the Shari’a the language of law.  The Arab empire made it the language of government … Even those who retained their Christian and Jewish faith in time adopted Arabic, not only of necessity, as the language of communication and commerce, but even as the language of much of their own religious literatures.[xxv]


In short, Arabic, which supplanted Latin, Greek, and other languages, made the Arab-Islamic Empire possible.  It not only endowed Arabs with their sense of superiority, but it also heightened their aggressive and imperialistic ambitions vis-a-vis non-Muslim nations.   Bearing this in mind, let us turn to Turkey.


Some eighty years ago, Kemel Ataturk revolutionized Turkey, a non-Arab but Muslim regime, once the heart of the Ottoman Empire.  Ataturk removed Arabic from public life in Turkey, especially from public law and public education.  Turkish became the only official language of the state.  This had two basic consequences.  First, it served to undermine among Turkish citizens any identity with the Arab world.  Second, it facilitated the separation of religion and state, the effect of which was to make Turkey the only democratic state whose population is overwhelmingly Muslim. 


Accordingly, any Muslim country today whose population, like Turkey’s, is non-Arab, should be induced to remove Arabic from its public law and public education and make its own native language the only official language of the state.  This will simultaneously counteract pan-Arab and pan-Islamic movements as well as international terrorism.  It will also facilitate democratization of Muslim countries.[xxvi] 



If there is a single principle that could democratize Arab-Islamic states with politically significant ethnic and religious diversity, that principle is federalism.  Iraq is a case in point.  Here allow me to quote from as well as paraphrase various passages from a paper delivered by Kanan Makiya, a scholar-in-residence at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University. 


Addressing the AEI Conference mentioned above, Professor Makiya pointed out that federalism would “break the mold of Arab politics.”  There is no literature in Arabic on federalism and no experience in federalism.  Yet the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the Kurdish Parliament in northern Iraq, and most other Iraqi organizations that oppose Saddam Hussein’s regime, advocate one interpretation of federalism or another.  For Makiya, federalism is the cornerstone of a future Iraqi democracy.


Federalism involves two related ideas:  a division of power in the central government, as well as a transfer of power from the center toward semi-autonomous territorial regions.  “Unfortunately,” says Makiya, “neither the Kurdish Parliament nor the INC has as yet developed in detail what they mean by this new idea.”  Establishing federalism in Iraq (or elsewhere) raises profound issues, such as power sharing and resource distribution. 


Although the Kurds have sometimes expressed the desire for independent statehood, federalism has become a condition sine qua non for their staying inside a new Iraq. “Without a federal system of government, in which real power is devolved toward the regions, the currently autonomous predominantly Kurdish north will sooner or later opt for separation, and rightly so. After all that has been done to the Kurds in the name of Arabism, no Iraqi should expect otherwise, and certainly no one who calls him or herself a democrat.”


Note: Republican's are now Demoncrats, Globalist, Collectivist, commun-ist

As Makiya views Iraq’s future, “the project as big as restructuring the state of Iraq on a federal basis should be undertaken not on utilitarian grounds but in terms of some fundamental democratic principle, namely: “that the rights of the part or the minority should never be sacrificed to the will of the majority.”  Whether the part is defined as a single individual or a collectivity of individuals who speak another language and have their own culture, the rights of these parts are inviolable by the state.  Federalism, therefore, concerns the rights of those collective parts of the mosaic that is Iraqi society.

Here the question arises:  How should the different parts of the new Iraqi federation be defined?  Should it be on the basis of ethnicity or on the basis of territoriality?  If ethnicity is the basis of federalism, Iraq would then be composed of two regions, the first Arab, the second Kurdish.  The Kurds are the driving force behind this definition.  According to Makiya, most non-Kurdish Iraqis oppose ethnicity as the basis of an Iraqi federation, and for three reasons:

First, it will cause ethnicity to become the basis for making territorial claims and counterclaims especially with regards to high profit resources located in one region and not another. The fight over Kirkuk, for instance, is already moving in this direction with Arab, Kurdish and Turkoman claims fighting with one another over this oil-rich city.

The Second objection is that when a federation is defined as being about two ethnic groups, then clearly all the other ethnic groups who do not have a share in the federation are being to some degree or another discriminated against. Why should an Armenian or a Chaldean or a Turkoman citizen of Iraq have any less rights as an individual than an Arab or a Kurd in a post-Saddam Iraq? Such discrimination in favor of the two largest ethnic groups in Iraq is inherently undemocratic.

The third objection is that we simply cannot map out on the ground a federation that included all the different ethnic and religious groups in Iraq. These groupings are not all territorially concentrated. There are Kurds in Baghdad and Arabs in Sulaymaniyya and there are Turkomans and Armenians and Chaldeans mixed in with Arabs and Kurds everywhere in many locations.

“Therefore,” Makiya concludes, “a federation of many ethnic groups would be no improvement on a federation made up of only two large groups.”  Accordingly, the basis of an Iraqi federation should be “territoriality in which each separate region receives its share of national resources, for instance, oil revenues, according to the relative size of its population…. 

and Bush-ka's pockets, and Lon Chaney's pockets, and Rockefeller pockets...and.........


  The point becomes not to dilute or diminish the Kurdishness of a Kurd or the Arabness of an Arab. It is to put a premium on the equality of citizenship for all.”  (As will be seen in a moment, this will require a bicameral legislature.)

As Makiya points out, what is most striking about an Iraqi federation based on territoriality is that this new Iraq could no longer be thought of, in any politically meaningful sense of the word, as an Arab state!  This novel idea would revolutionize the Middle East.  After all, whereas Arabism sees Iraq as part of the Arab world, Islamism sees Iraq as part of the Islamic world.  Federalism would not only serve to democratize Islam, it would fragment it even more effectively than nationalism!  


coup d etat  ala islam, obedient goyim noahides to all, or to all goodnight.


One further principle of democratization must be emphasized.  As previously indicated, federalism logically entails a bicameral legislature.  Bicameralism may also be appropriate in Arab or Muslim countries which do not have large ethnic and religious minorities.  Given a bicameral legislature, the lower branch can be designed in such a way as to protect these minorities, which in the past have been degraded as dhimmies.  “Dhimmitude” (as well as slavery) must be eliminated from Islam, and of course the status of women must be elevated without encouraging the West’s family-destructive feminism.  


Given a pluralistic system of government in any Middle East country, a constitution is obviously necessary to define the powers of the various branches of government and to foster the rule of law.  But now a most delicate and difficult question arises:  Who will protect this constitution against a reactionary Islamic coup?   In Turkey, the constitution, hence democracy, is protected by the military![xxvii]  What does this portend for the democratization, say, of Iraq?


Who Protect's the American Constitution?


First of all, the United States and its coalition partners will have to maintain a fairly large military force in Iraq for perhaps two or three decades (during which time this force it should become more and inconspicuous).  This military force will protect Iraq’s constitutional democracy.  But it should also cultivate a domestic military force that will have a vested interest in protecting this democratic constitution (as in Turkey). 


Second, American commercial relations with Iraq must be designed to foster the development of a large middle class, a precondition of regime stability and a natural barrier to Islamic extremism, provided this middle has been educated along lines indicated in this paper.


Universal Noahide Laws of Talmud Bavli


The United States must be very watchful of the Islamic country’s education curriculum.  Pan-Arabism and pan-Islamism as well as anti-Semitism must not be permitted.  At the same time, it will be necessary to expose the evil consequences of the doctrine of moral and cultural relativism that permeates Western education.   Otherwise, this doctrine will undermine conviction in the justice of America’s cause as well as the sacrifice and perseverance required to maintain U.S troops in the Middle East to oversee the democratization of Islam.   Relativism would make nonsense of any proposal to have Arab teachers receive any post-graduate education in the West or to promote faculty exchange programs.  How can one logically emphasize the blessings of constitutional democracy when American university professors propagate the corrosive doctrine of relativism?  Constitutional democracy in the Middle East is a necessary precondition of peace in this region.  Another is a Jewish foreign policy, to which I now turn. 



Part III.  Some Principles of a Jewish Foreign Policy


1.  Israel, the teacher of ethical monotheism (Satanic Judaism, Sofiet Bolshevik communism style) is supposed to set an example to mankind.  Accordingly, Israel will not establish diplomatic relations with any tyrannical regime.  To do so is to dignify tyrants and perpetuate their unjust rule over their people.  Courting tyrannies demeans Israel and lowers the moral standards of the Jewish people.  The Torah makes distinctions between good and bad regimes, and warns against seeking relations with those which are wicked.  (See Numbers 25:1-3, 17-18; Jeremiah 10:23.) 


He makes only reference to the Scripture to  the continuation of the zionist american hirelings of apostasy to the "Master Race" such as the Fall-wells, the Copelands, Crouch's, Robertson's....etc..etc



  Even before the assassination of Anwar Sadat, the establishment of diplomatic relations between Israel and Egypt, a military dictatorship, was followed by an increase of anti-Semitism in Egypt’s state-controlled media.   Much the same may be said of Jordan, where to sell property to Jews remains a capital offense.


To Preach the Gospel in Israel is an offence of imprisonment



  Until Islam undergoes basic structural transformation, for Israel to court recognition of Arab states only magnifies their contempt.  Also, by not seeking relations with hostile Arab regimes, Israel will cease to be diplomatically dependent on the United States.


3 trillion dollars to the zionist since 1948


2. Consistent with the preceding, Israel should either resign from the United Nations or call it to account. 


See move against the UN, the Lies which established "Purim Saddam" Purim Iraq.... March 2003


“Praiseworthy is the man who walked not in the counsel of the wicked, and stood not in the path of the sinful, and sat not in the session of scorners” (Psalm 1:1.)  Tens of millions of Americans have participated in a movement — “Get US out of the UN!”  They perceive the UN as anti-American.  Surely Israel can have no higher opinion of this anti-Semitic organization. 


They persuaded the sleeping apostate "Judeo-Churchizionity" by the Talmudic Jewish owned press of Amerika



Caroline Glick excoriates the UN’s record against Israel:


Over the past year alone, the UN has passed resolution after resolution, in the Security Council, in the General Assembly, in its Human Rights Commission, and even in its Commission on Aging that deny Israel its legal right, under Article 51 of the UN Charter, to defend itself against aggression.


Occupation, murder, humiliation, theft and destruction, for after all, she is responsible for ALL who are slain upon the earth


In one month, between March and April [2002], the UN Security Council held 32 separate debates on Israel. The UN Conference on Racism last September effectively reinstated the General Assembly's definition of Zionism as racism and thus denied that Israel has the legal right to exist under international law. In April, the UN Human Rights Commission passed a resolution endorsing Palestinian terrorism against Israel.


zion, the most bigoted nation upon the earth, pure apartheid, and hell bent on ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

It was the jews of the Sofiet Union who established the UN, but alas they are making room for the supra-Government of Global rule of their king, Moshaich ben David. Therefore the UN must go. After the coming war the UN, like the League of Nations will be dis-membered.





For the past 54 years, the UN has followed a consistent and coherent policy regarding only one issue anti-Semitism. 


And they set it up perfectly for "anti-Semitism is nessecary for the management of our "Lesser Brethren" they did say.


Its policy has been to advance anti-Semitism by systematically and illegally discriminating against the Jewish state all the time and everywhere. In so doing, the UN has lost even the semblance of legitimacy as a world government. It cannot be regarded as a body responsible for enforcing international law, because in its systematic discrimination against Israel, it stands in breach of international law as embodied in its own charter's determination that all member states are to be treated equally.[xxviii]


Thus they set up the Courts of International Justice of the Freemason obedient goyim useful idiots Mystery Babylon.



Dr. Bukay has this to say of the UN:  “This is an organization that has never advanced peace and never prevented war; this is an organization that works for its own sake alone, and strives against the values for which it was set up.  This is an organization that surrendered to the dictates of the Arab and Islamic states, against the social-economic interests of the Third World countries.”[xxix]


Fred Fleitz, senior adviser to Under Secretary of State John Bolton, (Both jews) exposes UN waste and corruption and the resulting human costs.  His book, Peacekeeping Fiascoes of the 1990s: Causes, Solutions, and U.S. Interests, provides a comprehensive and highly critical assessment of the UN.  Among other debacles, he shows how the failed UN mission in Bosnia led to unmitigated atrocities; 


Twas Wesley Clark which lead to the attrocities under the Clinton Ad-min-u-stration



how the UN debacle in Somalia emboldened terrorists the world over; how the UN operation in Cambodia enabled a ruthless dictator, Hun Sen, to consolidate and retain power in that country; how the UN peacekeeping operation in Haiti collapsed, with the billions of dollars squandered on it, principally benefiting Haitian President Jean-Bertrande Artistide.  To all this, add the UN sponsored Durban Conference, which became a vicious instrument of anti-Semitism and Israel-bashing.  


all financed by the jewish bankers of the Illuminated Chabad Masters


The very reason why Israel (belatedly) refused to become a member of the recently formed International Criminal Court (ICC) is the same reason why Israel should seriously consider whether it should remain a member of the UN.  The ICC is a supranational tribunal designed to supersede concepts of national sovereignty.


Because they are to set up the Great Sanhedrin




  The U.S. has not signed on to the ICC because Americans are concerned that the ICC will be influenced by people with anti-American or indeed anti-Western agendas. Its officials may launch frivolous prosecutions against American soldiers or diplomats to further their own political ideas and ambitions.  What applies to the U.S. applies doubly to Israel.  The UN’s unfriendly Security Council can instruct the ICC to try Jewish settlers, soldiers, and statesmen as “war criminals”!     


Such as the murder of Corrie Rachel, hashem, forbid !


The vast majority of the countries represented in the UN are dictatorships which should never have been admitted to, or allowed to remain in, the UN, since they violate Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which declares, “Everyone has the right to take part in the Government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.” 


such as Israeli Christians?


  If Israel does not resign from the UN it should introduce resolutions calling for the democratization or expulsion of any member that violates the UN Charter


The UN is not only a sinkhole of corruption and ineptitude.  It is intended by globalists to metamorphose into a secularized world government.  


upside down lies. This author is a stinkhole of deception for "Judeo-Churchizionazism"


Such a government (like a theocratic one under Islam) would constitute the greatest tyranny in human history.  A world government would have a monopoly of military power with agents everywhere to prevent any country from developing its own arms.  Such a government would impose a stultifying uniformity on all nations, contrary to the Torah. 


In perfect agreeance with the Torah Mishnah of Talmud Bavli which gives Israel the Power of the Globe after the Ishmaelites and the Christian's anhilate one another, do not be deceived.



  God creates nations, which have a right to develop their own cultural identity, limited only by the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality


Israel’s having a forum at the UN is of dubious value.  If the UN cannot be reformed, better that Israel remain true to its biblical reputation as a nation that stands apart, at least from that pernicious organization.


Their house is left desolate until they say blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus took it and gave it to a Holy Nation a Perculiar people, his sheep. Their House will not stand. Christ Jesus is Lord Over All! These pond scum are already condemned to the pit of fire. Let them rage, let them plot, let them plan, for destruction is their destiny.


3.  Consistent with Jewish law, Israel will not export arms to any foreign nation except under extreme circumstances.  Generally speaking, international arms sales promote war, sustain tyrannies, and impoverish people. 


4.  Given weapons of mass destruction, no nation — certainly not minuscule Israel — can afford to wait to be attacked before it retaliates.  Accordingly, Israel will pursue a pre-emptive war strategy.  


Just like the Bushka Ad-menustration, Pre Cog war, "If'n you aint with us then you'un's must be aginst us". The reason for the United States of Greater Israel's Homelandt Serkurity, and why the Arik Sheinerman Illumined bunch gave permission to sen assasinators to Amerikan soil with full approval of the Bush'ka and Bunch.


5. After uprooting every vestige of terrorism in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza, Israel will enact a law that explicitly incorporates this Jewish land into the State.  Such a law will merely confirm Amendment 11B of the Law and Administrative Ordinance of 1967, which authorizes the Government to apply Israeli law to any area of the Land of Israel that had come under the control of the IDF and which was not previously included within the jurisdiction of the State.  By a simple order, the Government can thus bring Judea, Samaria, and Gaza within the jurisdiction of the State (as was done in eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights). 


Making all of Palestinian obedient Goy Noahide slaves to the "Master Race" gods. Woe unto the Pharisee's.


6.  The Government will speak with one voice only.  Any elected official that criticizes any act of Israel’s Government while that official is abroad will be dismissed.


see Bush-ka ad-menustration. see "Protocols" of Illumined Chabad Lubavitchers.


7. Israel’s Government will comport itself in such a way as to uphold the dignity of the Jewish heritage and sanctify the Name of God.


who is not the Lord God Jesus Christ and His Father in Heaven, but a strange God that Abraham, Issac and Jacob knew not. For the builders reject the cornerstone and are left desolate.




of Illusion and Delusion


Israel, faithful to the Jewish heritage, is the connecting link between East and West.  By virtue of its unique synthesis of particularism and universalism, Judaism can simultaneously justify ethnicity and emphasize the one doctrine that can prevent ethnic conflict and bloodshed:  the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality, i.e., ethical monotheism. 


Death by Decapitation

a) RASHI (DH Malkus b'Makom Misah) explains that at the moment that a person transgresses the will of Hashem, he is fit to die. However, in certain cases, Hashem decreed that the type of death that the transgressor is to receive is lashes.

(b) TOSFOS (DH Malkus Tachas Misah) gives two other explanations, although he concludes that Rashi's explanation is the correct one. First, he explains that since B'nei Noach are automatically punished with death for transgressing any command for which they have been warned ("Azharasan Zo Hi Misasan;" Sanhedrin 57a), the fact that a Jew receives only Malkus for transgressing a command for which he has been warned (when the "Azharah" is not qualified with any specific punishment) is a form of kindness to the Jew. The lashes indeed are taking the place of death.

The Talmud also states the penalty for disobedience: "One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation. (Sanh. 57A)"





 Moreover, because of its long-established affinity to science, Judaism can endow science — which has served despots as well as democrats — with ethical constraints lacking in the West and urgently needed in the East whose stockpiling of weapons of mass murder is not for purposes of deterrence.  But for Israel to set an example to mankind, it will need to pursue a distinctively Jewish foreign policy.


Only such a policy can inspire Israel’s friend, the United States.  These two nations are the most natural allies.  America was founded by men educated in universities whose presidents and curriculums were very Hebraic.  Indeed, the American Constitution owes very much to Jewish principles and values.   (Would to God that Israel had a similar constitution!)  Recently, 98 out of 100 Senators, and 412 out of 435 Representatives passed a resolution supportive of Israel.  If Israel had a presidential form of government headed by a man of Jewish pride and conviction, allied with the Christian pride and conviction of his American counterpart, America and Israel would together save mankind from a religion that has become a cult of death.


  By death. Peace and security....sudden destruction shall befall them.


  They will tremble on the Day of the Lord Christ Jesus, when he come in the clouds with great glory with his saints who were slain for the Testimony they held in witness of the Only KING over all the World and Heaven. Let them tremble now, for we know their evil plan and we have their names and their day's are numbered. In Jesus Christ mighty Name that name which is above all names.




November 18, 2003


It is now week number 21-22  158 days, since the command to go forth and rebuild Jerusalem unto the Only Messiah the Only Prince Jesus Christ, and the Wall and the Street in troubleous times. "Purim Palestine and "Purim Iraq" is in full swing. The Pyramid in the Supreme Court is finished. Judge Roy Moored has efficiently changed this nation from a Republic with a constitution into a Noahide Demonicrazy. The Wall and the Street will be finished in Israel around September-October 2004, just in time for the appointment of the next obedient president of the United States of greater Talmudic Israel, the appointment of the "raiser of taxes". According to Daniel the Prophet he will not last long then one who will do according to "His" will will be offered the city of Jerusalem, Moshaich ben David, the son of Perdition, false Christ.

count the days, for 2300 is when the sanctuary will finally be cleansed from abomination and desolations.

at the end of this seventy weeks, then they will once again sacrifice their animal and reject the Only Lamb of God in their flesh Olam Haba.

Their Moshaich is to be revealed, and given 1290 days, in which he will overcome the flesh of the saints of Jesus Christ who overcame this beast in testimony of Jesus Christ, and given white robes and reign and live forever with the Lord.


Blessed are they who cometh and waiteth unto the 1335 days, when the Lord will cast that beast and his Prophet into the lake of fire and all whose names are not written in the Lamb's book of life.


490 days

1290 days

45 days


1825 days

the other beast lost not their lives but their dominions 1 year and one season ( 3 seasons in middle east)






count the days for the Lord is Nigh.....


What day? what Hour?






The Talmudic Order of Nimrod and their obedient Goy High priest of the order of the Moloch worship of apostate Solomon, have their vision in place. The Obedient "Goyim" useful idiots of Freemasonry are setting up the Universal Noahide Courts of Justice unto their "Masters of Illumination" the Pharasaic Chassidim, Chabad Lubavitch, that little people which will produce and "Reveal" that son of Perdition, that evil lawless false Christ in their coming Temple of doom. Yes they have indeed changed the Times and the Laws, and wait upon their choice god, Lucifer.

If you are a Freemason, and you hear and you see, you had best run out of that semi-temple of doom and accept Jesus Christ as your only Lord God. Here is wisdom for you. for more information and the Bush ad-menustration see



Rv:13:10: He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints


Albert Mackey's Freemason History of Noachite

the Scholar's at the mercy of the babes in Christ Jesus the Lord and King Over All mankind


CHAPTER XLII NOAH AND THE NOACHITES In reality, there is no Legend of Noah to be found in any of the Masonic Rituals. There is no myth, like that of Enoch or Euclid, which intimately connects him with the legendary history of the institution. And yet the story of his life has exercised a very important influence in the origin and the development of the principles of Speculative Masonry. Dr. Oliver has related a few traditions of Noah which, he says, are Masonic, but they never had any general acceptance among the Craft, as they are referred to by no other writer, and, if they ever existed, are now happily obsolete. The influence of Noah upon Masonic doctrine is to be traced to the almost universal belief of men in the events of the deluge, and the consequent establishment in many nations of a system of religion known to ethnologists as the "Arkite worship." Of this a brief notice must be taken before we can proceed to investigate the connection of the name of Noah with Speculative Masonry. The character and the actions of Noah are to be looked upon from a twofold stand-point, the historic and the legendary. The historic account of Noah is contained in portions of the sixth and seventh chapters in the Book of Genesis, and are readily accessible to every reader, with which, however, they must already be very familiar. The legendary account is to be found in the almost inexhaustible store of traditions which are scattered among almost all the nations of the world where some more or less dim memory of a cataclysm has been preserved. If we examine the ancient writers, we shall find ample evidence that among all the pagan peoples there was a tradition of a deluge which, at sonic remote period, had overwhelmed the earth. This tradition was greatly distorted from the biblical source, and the very name of the Patriarch -who was saved was forgotten and replaced by some other, which varied in different countries. Thus, in different places, he had received the names of Xisuthrus, Prometheus, Deucalion, Ogyges, and many others, where the name has been rendered very unlike itself by terminations and other idiomatic changes. But everywhere the name was accompanied by a tradition, which also varied in its details, of a deluge by which mankind had been destroyed, and the race had, through the instrumentality of this personage, been renewed. It is to be supposed that so important an event as the deluge would have been transmitted by the Patriarch to His posterity, and that in after times, when, by reason of the oral transmission of the history, the particular details of the event would be greatly distorted from the truth, a veneration for this new founder of the race of men would be retained. At length, when various systems of idolatry began to be established, Noah, under whatever name he may have been known, would have been among the first to whom divine honors would be paid. Hence arose that system known to modert? scholars as the "Arkite worship," in whose rites and mysteries, which were eventually communicated to the other ancient religions, there were always some allusions to the events of the Noachic flood to the ark, as the womb of Nature, to the eight persons saved in it, as the ogdoad or sacred number-and to the renovation of the world, as symbolizing the passage from death to immortal life. It is not, therefore, surprising that Noah should have become a mystical personage, and that the modern Speculative Masons should have sought to incorporate some reference to him in their symbolic system, though no such idea appears to have been entertained by the Operative Masons who preceded them. On examining the old records of the Operative Masons it will be found that no place is assigned to Noah, either as a Mason or as one of the founders of the " science." He receives only the briefest mention In the Halliwell Poem his name and the flood are merely referred to as denoting an era of time in the world's history. It is only a statement that the tower of Babel was begun many years after " Noees fled." In the Cooke MS. the record is a little more extended, but still is but an historical narrative of the flood, in accordance with the biblical details. In the Dowland MS. and in all the other manuscripts of the Legend of the Craft that succeeded it, the reference to Noah is exceedingly meager, his name only being mentioned, and that of his sons, from whom descended Hermes, who found one of the pillars and taught the science thereon described to other men. So far, Noah has had no part in Masonry. Anderson, who, in the Book of Constitutions modified and enlarged the old Craft Legends at his pleasure, calls Noah and his three sons "all Masons true," and says that they brought over from the flood the traditions and arts of the antediluvians and communicated them to their growing offspring. And this was perhaps the first time that the Patriarch was presented to the attention of the Fraternity in a Masonic character. Anderson semms to have cherished this idea, for in the second edition of the Constitutions he still further develops it by saying that the offspring of Noah, " as they journeyed from the East (the plains of Mount Ararat, where the ark rested) towards the West, they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and dwelt there together as NOACHIDAE, or sons of Noah." And, he adds, without the slightest historical authority, that this word " Noachidae " was " the first name of Masons, according to some old traditions." It would have puzzled him to specify any such tradition. Having thus invented and adopted the name as the distinctive designation of a Mason, he repeats it in his second edition or revision of the "Old Charges" appended to the Book of Constitutions. The first of these charges, in the Constitutions of 1723, contained this passage: " A Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the moral law." In the edition of 1738, Dr. Anderson has, without authority, completed the sentence by adding the words " as a true Noachida." This interpolation was reached by Entick, who edited the third and fourth editions in 1756 and 1767, and by Northouck, who published the fifth in 1784, both of whom restored the old reading, which has ever since been preserved in all the Constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England. Dermott, however, who closely followed the second edition of Anderson, in the composition of his Ahiman Rezon of course adopted the new term. About that time, or a little later, a degree was fabricated on the continent of Europe, bearing the name of " Patriarch Noachite," one peculiar feature of which was that it represented the existence of two classes or lines of Masons, the one descending from the Temple of Solomon, and who were called Hiramites, and the other tracing their origin to Noah, who were styled Noachites. Neither Preston nor Hutchison, nor any other writer of the 18th century, appear to have accepted the term. But it was a favorite with Dr. Oliver, and under his example it has become of so common use that -Noachida and Freemason have come to be considered as synonymous terms. What does this word really signify, and how came Anderson to adopt it as a Masonic term ? The answers to these questions are by no means difficult. Noachida, or Noachides, from which we get the English Noachite, is a gentilitial name, or a name designating the member of a family or race, and is legitimately formed according to Greek usage, where Atrides means a descendant of Atreus, or Heraclides a descendant of Heracles. And so Noachides, or its synonyms Noachida or Noachites, means a descendant of Noah. But why, it may be asked, are the Freemasons called the descendants of Noah ? Why has he been selected alone to represent the headship of the Fraternity ? I have no doubt that Dr. Anderson was led to the adoption of the word by the following reason. After Noah's emergence from the ark, he is said to have promulgated seven precepts for the government of the new race of men of whom he was to be the progenitor. These seven precepts are : 1, to do justice; 2, worship God; 3, abstain from idolatry ; 4, preserve chastity ; 5, do not commit murder; 6, do not steal ; 7, do not eat the blood. These seven obligations, says the Rev. Dr. Raphall (1) are held binding on all men, inasmuch as all are descendants of Noah, and the Rabbis maintain that he who observes them, though he be not an Israelite, has a share in the future life, and it is the duty of every Jew to enforce their due observance whenever he has the power to do so. In consequence of this the Jewish religion was not confined during its existence in Palestine to the Jewish nation only, but proselytes of three kinds were freely admitted. One of these classes was the (1) "Genesis, with Translation and Notes," by Rev. Morris J. Raphall, p. 52 "proselytes of the gate." These were persons who, without undergoimg the rite of circumcision or observing the ritual prescribed by the law of Moses, engaged to worship the true God and to observe the seven precepts of Noah, and these things they were to do whether they resided in Judea or in foreign lands. They were not, however, admitted to all the privileges of the Jewish religion; marriage with Israelites was forbidden, and they were not permitted to enter within the sacred inclosure of the temple. So that, although they were Noachidoe, they were not considered equal to the true children of Abraham. Anderson, who was a theologian, was, of course, acquainted with these facts, but, with a more tolerant spirit than the Jewish law, which gave the converted Gentiles only a qualified reception, he was disposed to admit into the full fellowship of Freemasonry all the descendants of Noah who would observe the precepts of the Patriarch; these being the only moral laws inculcated by Masonry. In giving the history of the introduction of the word into Masonry, I have not cited among the authorities the document known as the Stonehouse MS., because it was verified by a person of that name, but more usually the Krause MS., because it was first published in a German translation by Dr. Krause in his Three Oldest Documents. It is alleged to be a copy of the York Constitutions, enacted in 926, but is generally admitted by scholars to be spurious. Yet, as it is probable that it was originally written by a contemporary of Anderson, and about the time of the publishing of the Constitutions Of 1738, it may be accepted, so far as it supplies us with a suggestion of the motive that induced Anderson to interpolate the word " Noachida " into the " Old Charges." In the Krause MS., under the head of " The Laws or Obligations laid before his Brother Masons by Prince Edwin," we find the following article. (I translate from the German of Krause, because the original English document is nowhere to be found.) " The first obligation is that you shall sincerely honor God and obey the laws of the Noachites, because they are divine laws, which should be obeyed by all the world. Therefore, you must avoid all heresies and not thereby sin against God." The language of this document is more precise than that of Anderson, though both have the same purpose. The meaning is that the only religious laws which a Freemason is required to obey are those which are contained in the code that has been attributed to Noah. This sentiment is still further expressed toward the close of the " Old Charges," where it is said that the Mason is obliged only " to that religion in which all men agree," excluding, therefore, atheism, and requiring the observance of such simple laws of morality as are enjoined in the precepts of Noah. Anderson had, however, a particular object in the use of the word "Noachida." The Krause MS. says that the Mason "must obey the laws of the Noachites ; " that is, that he is to observe the seven precepts of Noah, without being required to observe any other religious dogmas outside of these-a matter which is left to himself. But Anderson says he " must obey the moral law as a true Noachida," by which he intimates that that title is the proper designation of a Mason. And he has shown that this was his meaning by telling us, in a preceding part of his book, that , Noachidae was the first name of Masons, according to some old traditions." Now the object of Anderson in introducing this word into the second edition of the Constitutions was to sustain his theory that Noah was the founder of the science of Freemasonry after the flood. This was the theory taught by Dr. Oliver a century afterward, who followed Anderson in the use of the word, with the same meaning and the same object, and his example has been imitated by many recent writers. But when Anderson speaks of a Noachida or a Noachite as a word synonymous with Freemason, he is in error; for although all Freemasons are necessarily the descendants of Noah, all the descendants of Noah are not Freemasons. And if by the use of the word he means to indicate that Noah was the founder of post-diluvian Freemasonry, he is equally in error; for that theory, it has heretofore been shown, can not be sustained, and his statement that Noah and his three sons were " all Masons true " is one for which there is no historical support, and which greatly lacks an clement of probability. It is better, therefore, when we speak or write historically of Freemasonry, that this word Noachida, or Noachite, should be avoided, since its use leads to a confusion of ideas, and possibly to the promulgation of error.



Obedient Goyim Noahide's for the master race gods and the "New World Order" of the "Chosen and Elect" of the god of this world, Satan





A step in the wrong direction....


Franks - A WMD Attack On
US Will End The Constitution
Gen. Franks Doubts Constitution Will Survive WMD Attack

By John O. Edwards

of course Franks is a Talmudic jew
Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government. Franks, who successfully led the U.S. military operation to liberate Iraq, expressed his worries in an extensive interview he gave to the men's lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado.
In the magazine's December edition, the former commander of the military's Central Command warned that if terrorists succeeded in using a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) against the U.S. or one of our allies, it would likely have catastrophic consequences for our cherished republican form of government.
Discussing the hypothetical dangers posed to the U.S. in the wake of Sept. 11, Franks said that "the worst thing that could happen" is if terrorists acquire and then use a biological, chemical or nuclear weapon that inflicts heavy casualties.
If that happens, Franks said, "... the Western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we've seen for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call democracy."
Franks then offered "in a practical sense" what he thinks would happen in the aftermath of such an attack.
"It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world - it may be in the United States of America - that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two steps, very, very important."
* It is impossible to breach the Constitution of the United States. 
Those who do are none other than criminals and should be hanged by the People who ARE THE Constitution under God's Laws.
Franks didn't speculate about how soon such an event might take place.
Already, critics of the U.S. Patriot Act, rushed through Congress in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, have argued that the law aims to curtail civil liberties and sets a dangerous precedent.
But Franks' scenario goes much further. He is the first high-ranking official to openly speculate that the Constitution could be scrapped in favor of a military form of government.
The usually camera-shy Franks retired from U.S. Central Command, known in Pentagon lingo as CentCom, in August 2003, after serving nearly four decades in the Army.
Franks earned three Purple Hearts for combat wounds and three Bronze Stars for valor. Known as a "soldier's general," Franks made his mark as a top commander during the U.S.'s successful Operation Desert Storm, which liberated Kuwait in 1991. He was in charge of CentCom when Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda attacked the United States on Sept. 11.
Franks said that within hours of the attacks, he was given orders to prepare to root out the Taliban in Afghanistan and to capture bin Laden.
Which never happend, then faded onto the Televeiwer Saddam Hussein...bleee....eeep, blee....eep , two minutes hate for the dime store chinese flag waiving apathetic Proles of  New Amerika
 The Bush-ka- Schneerson Enablink Akt II
Institute for Historical Review

Institute for Historical Review

Journal of Historical Review

Zionism and the Third Reich

by Mark Weber

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, "Tel Aviv," while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity."1 Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.

Common Aims

Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with the "Jewish question": that is, what is the proper role of Jews in non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue. They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were therefore to be regarded not as "Germans of the Jewish faith," but rather as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine, the "Jewish homeland." They could hardly regard themselves as sincere Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any other "foreign" country.

Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own. "The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers," he wrote in his most influential work, The Jewish State. "Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews ... I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. "It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international political issue ..." Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a Volk.2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome "final solution of the Jewish question."3

Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and formally offered Zionist support in "solving" the vexing "Jewish question." The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental national differences: 4

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one's own tradition. Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear ...

Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective responsibility ...

We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can, through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be dealt with by most European peoples ...

Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities. Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we, too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we -- having been brought up in the German language and German culture -- can show an interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and internal sympathy ...

For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially the German people ...

Boycott propaganda -- such as is currently being carried on against Germany in many ways -- is in essence un-Zionist, because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build ...

We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.

The Federation's paper, the Jüdische Rundschau ("Jewish Review"), proclaimed the same message: "Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all peoples are interested."5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden ("We Jews"), that the National Socialist revolution in Germany meant "Jewry for the Jews." He explained: "No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race." 6

Active Collaboration

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration.

Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist Federation's bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist books were published. "Zionist work was in full swing" in Germany during those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in Berlin in 1936 reflected "in its composition the vigorous party life of German Zionists."7

The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage emigration of Germany's Jews to Palestine. This would require increased Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish cultural organizations -- in short, everything that would encourage this new consciousness and self-awareness - should be promoted, the paper recommended.8

SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading "A Nazi Travels to Palestine." The series expressed great admiration for the pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding article, "pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of the world: the Jewish question." Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more effectively. 9

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: "The time may not be too far off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with official goodwill, go with them."10 Four months later, a similar article appeared in the SS paper: 11

The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis, Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.

A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing "strictly kosher food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate." 12

With official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to "reeducate" Germany's Jews. As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question: "Zionists were encouraged to take their message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in them." 13

In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: "The Gestapo did everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine. We often received their help when we required anything from other authorities regarding preparations for emigration." 14

At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag adopted the so-called "Nuremberg laws" that prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau editorially welcomed the new measures: 15

Germany ... is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own future in all aspects of national life ...

Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself, and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish minority: Jewry's process of growth into a nation will thereby be encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more tolerable relations between the two nations.

Georg Kareski, the head of both the "Revisionist" Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 16

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living together without conflict... I have long supported such a separation, provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg Laws ... seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect... This interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities, which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.

Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise, president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress, told a New York rally in June 1938: "I am not an American citizen of the Jewish faith, I am a Jew... Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race and we are a race." 17

The Interior Ministry's Jewish affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official Reichsverwaltungsblatt: 18

If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists, because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.

In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine. Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag, Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler's Germany. 19

Himmler's security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS.20 Haganah-SS collaboration even included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in clashes with Palestinian Arabs. 21

In the aftermath of the November 1938 "Kristallnacht" outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. 22

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize "their" governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist "promised land," a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really "solve" the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state. 23

A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June 1937, would not be in Germany's interest because it would not be able to absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served as a base for international Communism.24 Reflecting something of a shift in official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937 for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply increasing. 25

A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, "it would nevertheless be a mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world."26 "The proclamation of a Jewish state or a Jewish-administrated Palestine," warned an internal memorandum by the Jewish affairs section of the SS, "would create for Germany a new enemy, one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East." Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state "would work to bring special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry."27 In January 1939, Hitler's new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise warned in another circular bulletin that "Germany must regard the formation of a Jewish state as dangerous" because it "would bring an international increase in power to world Jewry." 28

Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state, decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the possible dangers. 29

Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. 30 Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized Zionist "kibbutz" training camp for potential emigrants continued to operate in Hitler's Germany. 31

The Transfer Agreement

The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the Haavara (Hebrew for "transfer"), was concluded in August 1933 following talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization. 32

Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.

Delegates at the 1933 Zionist Congress in Prague vigorously debated the merits of the Agreement. Some feared that the pact would undermine the international Jewish economic boycott against Germany. But Zionist officials reassured the Congress. Sam Cohen, a key figure behind the Haavara arrangement, stressed that the Agreement was not economically advantageous to Germany. Arthur Ruppin, a Zionist Organization emigration specialist who had helped negotiate the pact, pointed out that "the Transfer Agreement in no way interfered with the boycott movement, since no new currency will flow into Germany as a result of the agreement..." 33 The 1935 Zionist Congress, meeting in Switzerland, overwhelmingly endorsed the pact. In 1936, the Jewish Agency (the Zionist "shadow government" in Palestine) took over direct control of the Ha'avara, which remained in effect until the Second World War forced its abandonment.

Some German officials opposed the arrangement. Germany's Consul General in Jerusalem, Hans Döhle, for example, sharply criticized the Agreement on several occasions during 1937. He pointed out that it cost Germany the foreign exchange that the products exported to Palestine through the pact would bring if sold elsewhere. The Haavara monopoly sale of German goods to Palestine through a Jewish agency naturally angered German businessmen and Arabs there. Official German support for Zionism could lead to a loss of German markets throughout the Arab world. The British government also resented the arrangement.34 A June 1937 German Foreign Office internal bulletin referred to the "foreign exchange sacrifices" that resulted from the Haavara. 35

A December 1937 internal memorandum by the German Interior Ministry reviewed the impact of the Transfer Agreement: "There is no doubt that the Haavara arrangement has contributed most significantly to the very rapid development of Palestine since 1933. The Agreement provided not only the largest source of money (from Germany!), but also the most intelligent group of immigrants, and finally it brought to the country the machines and industrial products essential for development." The main advantage of the pact, the memo reported, was the emigration of large numbers of Jews to Palestine, the most desirable target country as far as Germany was concerned. But the paper also noted the important drawbacks pointed out by Consul Döhle and others. The Interior Minister, it went on, had concluded that the disadvantages of the agreement now outweighed the advantages and that, therefore, it should be terminated. 36

Only one man could resolve the controversy. Hitler personally reviewed the policy in July and September 1937, and again in January 1938, and each time decided to maintain the Haavara arrangement. The goal of removing Jews from Germany, he concluded, justified the drawbacks. 37

The Reich Economics Ministry helped to organize another transfer company, the International Trade and Investment Agency, or Intria, through which Jews in foreign countries could help German Jews emigrate to Palestine. Almost $900,000 was eventually channeled through the Intria to German Jews in Palestine.38 Other European countries eager to encourage Jewish emigration concluded agreements with the Zionists modeled after the Ha'avara. In 1937 Poland authorized the Halifin (Hebrew for "exchange") transfer company. By late summer 1939, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary and Italy had signed similar arrangements. The outbreak of war in September 1939, however, prevented large-scale implementation of these agreements. 39

Achievements of Haavara

Between 1933 and 1941, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine through the Ha'avara and other German-Zionist arrangements, or about ten percent of Germany's 1933 Jewish population. (These German Jews made up about 15 percent of Palestine's 1939 Jewish population.) Some Ha'avara emigrants transferred considerable personal wealth from Germany to Palestine. As Jewish historian Edwin Black has noted: "Many of these people, especially in the late 1930s, were allowed to transfer actual replicas of their homes and factories -- indeed rough replicas of their very existence."40

The total amount transferred from Germany to Palestine through the Ha'avara between August 1933 and the end of 1939 was 8.1 million pounds or 139.57 million German marks (then equivalent to more than $40 million). This amount included 33.9 million German marks ($13.8 million) provided by the Reichsbank in connection with the Agreement.41

Historian Black has estimated that an additional $70 million may have flowed into Palestine through corollary German commercial agreements and special international banking transactions. The German funds had a major impact on a country as underdeveloped as Palestine was in the 1930s, he pointed out. Several major industrial enterprises were built with the capital from Germany, including the Mekoroth waterworks and the Lodzia textile firm. The influx of Ha'avara goods and capital, concluded Black, "produced an economic explosion in Jewish Palestine" and was "an indispensable factor in the creation of the State of Israel."42

The Ha'avara agreement greatly contributed to Jewish development in Palestine and thus, indirectly, to the foundation of the Israeli state. A January 1939 German Foreign Office circular bulletin reported, with some misgiving, that "the transfer of Jewish property out of Germany [through the Ha'avara agreement] contributed to no small extent to the building of a Jewish state in Palestine."43

Former officials of the Ha'avara company in Palestine confirmed this view in a detailed study of the Transfer Agreement published in 1972: "The economic activity made possible by the influx German capital and the Haavara transfers to the private and public sectors were of greatest importance for the country's development. Many new industries and commercial enterprises were established in Jewish Palestine, and numerous companies that are enormously important even today in the economy of the State of Israel owe their existence to the Haavara."44 Dr. Ludwig Pinner, a Ha'avara company official in Tel Aviv during the 1930s, later commented that the exceptionally competent Ha'avara immigrants "decisively contributed" to the economic, social, cultural and educational development of Palestine's Jewish community.45

The Transfer Agreement was the most far-reaching example of cooperation between Hitler's Germany and international Zionism. Through this pact, Hitler's Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930s to support Jewish development in Palestine.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance With Hitler

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical underground "Fighters for the Freedom of Israel," better known as the Lehi or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical nationalist "National Military Organization" (Irgun Zvai Leumi) over the group's attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable Zionist proposal "for the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation of the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the side of Germany" is worth quoting at some length:46

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of National Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order in Europe requires as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish question by evacuation. ("Jew-free Europe")

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this can be totally achieved is through settlement of these masses in the homeland of the Jewish people, Palestine, and by the establishment of a Jewish state in its historical boundaries.

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the Israel Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this way and thus completely liberate the Jewish people forever.

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folkish-national Jewry [Hebr_ertum].

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Germany.

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures, outside as well. Along with this the Jewish men of Europe would be militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front by formed.

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England.

There is no record of any German response. Acceptance was very unlikely anyway because by this time German policy was decisively pro-Arab.47 Remarkably, Stern's group sought to conclude a pact with the Third Reich at a time when stories that Hitler was bent on exterminating Jews were already in wide circulation. Stern apparently either did not believe the stories or he was willing to collaborate with the mortal enemy of his people to help bring about a Jewish state. 48

An important Lehi member at the time the group made this offer was Yitzhak Shamir, who later served as Israel's Foreign Minister and then, during much of the 1980s and until June 1992, as Prime Minister. As Lehi operations chief following Stern's death in 1942, Shamir organized numerous acts of terror, including the November 1944 assassination of British Middle East Minister Lord Moyne and the September 1948 slaying of Swedish United Nations mediator Count Bernadotte. Years later, when Shamir was asked about the 1941 offer, he confirmed that he was aware of his organization's proposed alliance with wartime Germany. 49


In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler's Germany.


1.W. Martini, "Hebr_isch unterm Hakenkreuz," Die Welt (Hamburg), Jan. 10, 1975. Cited in: Klaus Polken, "The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany, 1933-1941," Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, p. 65.

2.Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen: Die "Reichskristallnacht" (Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State (New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp. 33, 35, 36, and, Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p. 73.

3.Th. Herzl, "Der Kongress," Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodor Herzls zionistische Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), erster Teil, Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag, 1920, p. 190 (and p. 139).

4.Memo of June 21, 1933, in: L. Dawidowicz, A Holocaust Reader (New York: Behrman, 1976), pp. 150-155, and (in part) in: Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: Univ. of Texas, 1985), p. 42.; On Zionism in Germany before Hitler's assumption of power, see: Donald L. Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany (Baton Rouge: 1980), pp. 94-95, 126-131, 140-143.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (Austin: 1985), pp. 1-15.

5.Jüdische Rundschau (Berlin), June 13, 1933. Quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death's Head (New York: Ballantine, pb., 1971, 1984), pp. 376-377.

6.Heinz Höhne, The Order of the Death's Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 376.

7."Berlin," Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p. 648. For a look at one aspect of this "vigorous life," see: J.-C. Horak, "Zionist Film Propaganda in Nazi Germany," Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1984, pp. 49-58.

8.Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990), pp. 178-181.

9.Jacob Boas, "A Nazi Travels to Palestine," History Today (London), January 1980, pp. 33-38.

10.Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korps, May 15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts, 1975), pp. 66-67. Also quoted in: Heinz H_hne, The Order of the Death's Head (Ballantine, 1971, 1984), p. 377. See also: Erich Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1988), p. 184.

11.Das Schwarze Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57.

12.Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 83.

13.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), p. 60. See also: F. Nicosia, "The Yishuv and the Holocaust," The Journal of Modern History (Chicago), Vol. 64, No. 3, Sept. 1992, pp. 533-540.

14.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), p. 57.

15.Jüdische Rundschau, Sept. 17, 1935. Quoted in: Yitzhak Arad, with Y. Gutman and A. Margaliot, eds., Documents on the Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1981), pp. 82-83.

16.Der Angriff, Dec. 23, 1935, in: E. Kern, ed., Verheimlichte Dokumente (Munich: 1988), p. 148.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 56.; L. Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), p. 138.; A. Margaliot, "The Reaction...," Yad Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), vol. 12, 1977, pp. 90-91.; On Kareski's remarkable career, see: H. Levine, "A Jewish Collaborator in Nazi Germany," Central European History (Atlanta), Sept. 1975, pp. 251-281.

17."Dr. Wise Urges Jews to Declare Selves as Such," New York Herald Tribune, June 13, 1938, p. 12.

18.F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), p. 53.

19.Lucy Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb., 1976), pp. 253-254.; Max Nussbaum, "Zionism Under Hitler," Congress Weekly (New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), pp. 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), p. 175.

20.H. H_hne, The Order of the Death's Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 380-382.; K. Schleunes, Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 226.; Secret internal SS intelligence report about F. Polkes, June 17, 1937, in: John Mendelsohn, ed., The Holocaust (New York: Garland, 1982), vol. 5, pp. 62-64.

21.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 63-64, 105, 219-220.

22.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 160.

23.This distinction is also implicit in the "Balfour Declaration" of November 1917, in which the British government expressed support for "a national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, while carefully avoiding any mention of a Jewish state. Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to caution, " being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." The complete text of the Declaration is reproduced in facsimile in: Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration (IHR, 1988), p. 32.

24.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 121.

25.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), p. 124.

26.David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Bar-Ilan University, Israel, 1974), p. 300.; Also in: Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, Vol. 5. Doc. No. 564 or 567.

27.K. Schleunes, The Twisted Road (1970, 1990), p. 209.

28.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 32, pp. 242-243. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946-1948), vol. 6, pp. 92-93.

29.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144.; On Hitler's critical view of Zionism in Mein Kampf, see esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler's Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.; See also: F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 26-28.; Hitler told his army adjutant in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had asked the British in 1937 about transferring all of Germany's Jews to Palestine or Egypt. The British rejected the proposal, he said, because it would cause further disorder. See: H. v. Kotze, ed., Heeresadjutant bei Hitler (Stuttgart: 1974), pp. 65, 95.

30.F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 156, 160-164, 166-167.; H. H_hne, The Order of the Death's Head (Ballantine, pb., 1984), pp. 392-394.; Jon and David Kimche, The Secret Roads (London: Secker and Warburg, 1955), pp. 39-43. See also: David Yisraeli, "The Third Reich and Palestine," Middle Eastern Studies, October 1971, p. 347.; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 (1979), pp. 43, 49, 52, 60.; T. Kelly, "Man who fooled Nazis," Washington Times, April 28, 1987, pp. 1B, 4B. Based on interview with Willy Perl, author of The Holocaust Conspiracy.

31.Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March 1942.)

32.On the Agreement in general, see: Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972).; David Yisraeli, "The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement," Journal of Contemporary History (London), No. 2, 1971, pp. 129-148.; "Haavara," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), vol. 7, pp. 1012-1013.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (Austin: 1985), pp. 44-49.; Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985), pp. 140-141.; The Transfer Agreement, by Edwin Black, is detailed and useful. However, it contains numerous inaccuracies and wildly erroneous conclusions. See, for example, the review by Richard S. Levy in Commentary, Sept. 1984, pp. 68-71.

33.E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328, 337.

34.On opposition to the Haavara in official German circles, see: W. Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972), pp. 31-33.; D. Yisraeli, "The Third Reich," Journal of Contemporary History, 1971, pp. 136-139.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question, pp. 126-139.; I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), pp. 226-227.; Rolf Vogel, Ein Stempel hat gefehlt (Munich: Droemer Knaur, 1977), pp. 110 ff.

35.W. Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 31. Entire text in: David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp. 298-300.

36.Interior Ministry internal memo (signed by State Secretary W. Stuckart), Dec. 17, 1937, in: Helmut Eschwege, ed., Kennzeichen J (Berlin: 1966), pp. 132-136.

37.W. Feilchenfeld, et al, Haavara-Transfer (1972), p. 32.

38.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 376-377.

39.E. Black, Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 376, 378.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 238-239 (n. 91).

40.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, p. 379.; F. Nicosia, Third Reich, pp. 212, 255 (n. 66).

41.W. Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer, p. 75.; "Haavara," Encyclopaedia Judaica, (1971), Vol. 7, p. 1013.

42.E. Black, Transfer Agreement, pp. 379, 373, 382.

43.Circular of January 25, 1939. Nuremberg document 3358-PS. International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949), Vol. 32, pp. 242-243.

44.Werner Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1972). Quoted in: Ingrid Weckert, Feuerzeichen (Tübingen: Grabert, 1981), pp. 222-223.

45.W. Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavara-Transfer nach Palaestina (1972). Quoted in: I. Weckert, Feuerzeichen (1981), p. 224.

46.Original document in German Ausw_rtiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 224152 and E 234155-58. (Photocopy in author's possession).; Complete original German text published in: David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp. 315-317. See also: Klaus Polkhen, "The Secret Contacts," Journal of Palestine Studies, Spring-Summer 1976, pp. 78-80.; (At the time this offer was made, Stern's Lehi group still regarded itself as the true Irgun/NMO.)

47.Arab nationalists opposed Britain, which then dominated much of the Arab world, including Egypt, Iraq and Palestine. Because Britain and Germany were at war, Germany cultivated Arab support. The leader of Palestine's Arabs, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, worked closely with Germany during the war years. After escaping from Palestine, he spoke to the Arab world over German radio and helped raise Muslim recruits in Bosnia for the Waffen SS.

48.Israel Shahak, "Yitzhak Shamir, Then and Now," Middle East Policy (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 1, (Whole No. 39), 1992, pp. 27-38.; Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel's Fateful Hour (New York: Harper and Row, 1988), pp. 213-214. Quoted in: Andrew J. Hurley, Israel and the New World Order (Santa Barbara, Calif.: 1991), pp. 93, 208-209.; Avishai Margalit, "The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir," New York Review of Books, May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986), pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, "Yitzhak Shamir: On Hitler's Side," Arab Perspectives (League of Arab States), March 1984, pp. 11-13.

49.Avishai Margalit, "The Violent Life of Yitzhak Shamir," New York Review of Books, May 14, 1992, pp. 18-24.; Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), pp. 266-269.; L. Brenner, Jews in America Today (1986), pp. 175-177.; L. Brenner, "Skeletons in Shamir's Cupboard," Middle East International, Sept. 30, 1983, pp. 15-16.; Sol Stern, L. Rapoport, "Israel's Man of the Shadows," Village Voice (New York), July 3, 1984, pp. 13 ff.

Bibliographic information


Weber, Mark


Zionism and the Third Reich


The Journal for Historical Review (


July/August 1993


Volume 13, number 4


page 29


"Reprinted from The Journal of Historical Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. Domestic subscriptions $40 per year; foreign subscriptions $60 per year."

Please send a copy of all reprints to the Editor.


The Jews Are Not A Race !

By Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal

Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal, historian, journalist and lecturer, is a graduate of Cornell University and Columbia Law School. During the Second World War, he served with the US Army in the Middle East. He later served with the Department of State, and as a consultant to the American delegation at the organising meeting of the United Nations in San Francisco.

Since 1947, he has been at the forefront in the struggle for a balanced US policy in the Middle East. He is the author of several acclaimed books on the Middle East, including The Zionist Connection. He now lives in Washington, DC.

On December 18, 1993 Dr. Lilienthal celebrated both his 80th birthday and the 40th anniversary of his first book, What Price 'Israel'? Dr Lilienthal, who is a courageous anti-Zionist Jew, was joined by more than 200 guests who travelled from all over the United States to attend. The following excerpt is taken from this first book, What Price "Israel" ?


Today, to trace anyone's descent to ancient Palestine would be a genealogical impossibility; and to presume, axiomatically, such a descent for Jews, alone among all human groups, is an assumption of purely fictional significance. Most everybody in the Western world could stake out some claim of Palestinian descent if genealogical records could be established for two-thousand years. And there are, indeed, people who, though not by the widest stretch of imagination Jewish, proudly make that very claim: some of the oldest of the South's aristocratic families play a game of comparing whose lineage goes farther back into 'Israel'. No one knows what happened to the Ten Lost Tribes of 'Israel', but to speculate on who might be who is a favored Anglo-Saxon pastime, and Queen Victoria belonged to an 'Israelite' Society that traced the ancestry of its membership back to those lost tribes.

Twelve tribes started in Canaan about thirty-five centuries ago; and not only that ten of them disappeared - more than half of the members of the remaining two tribes never returned from their "exile" in Babylon. How then, can anybody claim to descend directly from that relatively small community which inhabited the Holy Land at the time of Abraham's Covenant with God ?

The Jewish racial myth flows from the fact that the words Hebrew, 'Israelite', Jew, Judaism, and the Jewish people have been used synonymously to suggest a historic continuity. But this is a misuse. These words refer to different groups of people with varying ways of life in different periods in history. Hebrew is a term correctly applied to the period from the beginning of Biblical history to the settling in Canaan. 'Israelite' refers correctly to the members of the twelve tribes of 'Israel'. The name Yehudi or Jew is used in the Old Testament to designate members of the tribe of Judah, descendants of the fourth son of Jacob, as well as to denote citizens of the Kingdom of Judah, particularly at the time of Jeremiah and under the Persian occupation. Centuries later, the same word came to be applied to anyone, no matter of what origin, whose religion was Judaism.

The descriptive name Judaism was never heard by the Hebrews or 'Israelites'; it appears only with Christianity. Flavius Josephus was one of the first to use the name in his recital of the war with the Romans to connote a totality of beliefs, moral commandments, religious practices and ceremonial institutions of Galilee which he believed superior to rival Hellenism. When the word Judaism was born, there was no longer a Hebrew-'Israelite' state. The people who embraced the creed of Judaism were already mixed of many races and strains; and this diversification was rapidly growing...

Perhaps the most significant mass conversion to the Judaic faith occurred in Europe, in the 8th century A.D., and that story of the Khazars (Turko-Finnish people) is quite pertinent to the establishment of the modern State of 'Israel'. This partly nomadic people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, first appeared in Trans-Caucasia in the second century. They settled in what is now Southern Russia, between the Volga and the Don, and then spread to the shores of the Black, Caspian and Azov seas. The Kingdom of Khazaria, ruled by a khagan or khakan fell to Attila the Hun in 448, and to the Muslims in 737. In between, the Khazars ruled over part of the Bulgarians, conquered the Crimea, and stretched their kingdom over the Caucasus farther to the northwest to include Kiev, and eastwards to Derbend. Annual tributes were levied on the Russian Slavonians of Kiev. The city of Kiev was probably built by the Khazars. There were Jews in the city and the surrounding area before the Russian Empire was founded by the Varangians whom the Scandinavian warriors sometimes called the Russ or Ross (circa 855-863).

The influence of the Khazars extended into what is now Hungary and Roumania. Today, the villages of Kozarvar and Kozard in Transylvania bear testimony to the penetration of the Khazars who, with the Magyars, then proceeded into present-day Hungary. The size and power of the Kingdom of Khazaria is indicated by the act that it sent an army of 40,000 soldiers (in 626-627) to help Heraclius of the Byzantines to conquer the Persians. The Jewish Encyclopedia proudly refers to Khazaria as having had a "well constituted and tolerant government, a flourishing trade and a well disciplined army."

Jews who had been banished from Constantinople by the Byzantine ruler, Leo III, found a home amongst these heretofore pagan Khazars and, in competition with Mohammedan and Christian missionaries, won them over to the Judaic faith. Bulan, the ruler of Khazaria, became converted to Judaism around 740 A.D. His nobles and, somewhat later, his people followed suit. Some details of these events are contained in letters exchanged between Khagan Joseph of Khazaria and R. Hasdai Ibn Shaprut of Cordova, doctor and quasi foreign minister to Sultan Abd al-Rahman, the Caliph of Spain. This correspondence (around 936-950) was first published in 1577 to prove that the Jews still had a country of their own - namely, the Kingdom of Khazaria. Judah Halevi knew of the letters even in 1140. Their authenticity has since been established beyond doubt.

According to these Hasdai-Joseph letters, Khagan Bulan decided one day: "Paganism is useless. It is shameful for us to be pagans. Let us adopt one of the heavenly religions, Christianity, Judaism or Islam." And Bulan summoned three priests representing the three religions and had them dispute their creeds before him. But, no priest could convince the others, or the sovereign, that his religion was the best. So the ruler spoke to each of them separately. He asked the Christian priest: "If you were not a Christian or had to give up Christianity, which would you prefer - Islam or Judaism?" The priest said: "If I were to give up Christianity, I would become a Jew." Bulan then asked the follower of Islam the same question, and the Moslem also chose Judaism. This is how Bulan came to choose Judaism for himself and the people of Khazaria in the seventh century A.D., and thereafter the Khazars (sometimes spelled Chazars and Khozars) lived according to Judaic laws.

Under the rule of Obadiah, Judaism gained further strength in Khazaria. Synagogues and schools were built to give instruction in the Bible and the Talmud. As Professor Graetz notes in his History of the Jews, "A successor of Bulan who bore the Hebrew name of Obadiah was the first to make serious efforts to further the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish sages to settle in his dominions, rewarded them royally... and introduced a divine service modeled on the ancient communities. After Obadiah came a long series of Jewish Chagans (Khagans), for according to a fundamental law of the state only Jewish rulers were permitted to ascend the throne." Khazar traders brought not only silks and carpets of Persia and the Near East but also their Judaic faith to the banks of the Vistula and the Volga. But the Kingdom of Khazaria was invaded by the Russians, and Itil, its great capital, fell to Sweatoslav of Kiev in 969. The Byzantines had become afraid and envious of the Khazars and, in a joint expedition with the Russians, conquered the Crimean portion of Khazaria in 1016. (Crimea was known as "Chazaria" until the 13th century). The Khazarian Jews were scattered throughout what is now Russia and Eastern Europe. Some were taken North where they joined the established Jewish community of Kiev.

Others returned to the Caucasus. Many Khazars remarried in the Crimea and in Hungary. The Cagh Chafut, or "mountain Jews," in the Caucasus and the Hebraile Jews of Georgia are their descendants. These "Ashkenazim Jews" (as Jews of Eastern Europe are called), whose numbers were swelled by Jews who fled from Germany at the time of the Crusades and during the Black Death, have little or no trace of Semitic blood.

That the Khazars are the lineal ancestors of Eastern European Jewry is a historical fact. Jewish historians and religious text books acknowledge the fact, though the propagandists of Jewish nationalism belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda. Somewhat ironically, Volume IV of the Jewish Encyclopedia - because this publication spells Khazars with a "C" instead of a "K" - is titled "Chazars to Dreyfus": and it was the Dreyfus trial, as interpreted by Theodor Herzl, that made the modern Jewish Khazars of Russia forget their descent from converts to Judaism and accept anti-Semitism as proof of their Palestinian origin.

For all that anthropologists know, Hitler's ancestry might go back to one of the ten Lost Tribes of "Israel"; while Weizmann may be a descendant of the Khazars, the converts to Judaism who were in no anthropological respect related to Palestine. The home to which Weizmann, Silver and so many other Ashkenazim Zionists have yearned to return has most likely never been theirs. "Here's a paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox": in anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew-"Israelite" blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors.

Race can play funny tricks on people who make that concept the basis for their likes and dislikes. Race-obsessed people can find themselves hating people who, in fact, may be their own racial kith and kin.

copyright © 2001-2003 Life Research Universal



The Khazarians say "We are Jews" the Zionist say "We are Jews" the other Jews say "they are not Jews they are evil", "we are the Jews", when in fact any who deny Christ Jesus the Lord are Liars and are anti-Christ of the flesh, denying the Kingdom of God of the spirit. Do not fall for them or they are the evil ones.......all who deny the Lord of Lords.


Arik Sharon:
A Political Biography

by Staff Writer

 Ariel Sharon (Arik) was born in 1928 in the Israeli Moshav Kfar Malal as Ariel Sheinerman. His family belonged to Mapai, the party of Ben-Gurion, (Communist, invasion of the North) which controlled Israeli politics for many years. Sharon himself was a member of Mapai, then a Zionist-socialist party. As a young man he joined the majority para-military organization which was controlled by Mapai, the 'Hagana' (defense). It was the underground of the majority of the 'Yishuv' (the Jews in Palestine under the British mandate 1918-1948).

 Arik Sharon participated in the 1948 Independence War and fought in the battle of Latrun. After the war he went to study history but the military service attracted him and he went back to the army. In the 1950's the army had to cope with various Arab attacks on Israeli settlements. Often the Jordanian Legion joined the battles or tried to cut the Negev from Israel. The Egyptian launched attacks on Israel from the Gaza strip by using Palestinians. These terrorist units were called 'Fadaiuns.' They caused panic in Israel's society. Israel of the 1950's was a weak country. The army did not have the proper military equipment. In order to challenge these attacks in which many were killed or wounded, the army 'Tsahal' decided to form a special commando unit, a new Palmach. This unit was called the 101st Unit.

 Its members were dedicated, unique soldiers such as Meir Har-Tsion. Their weapon was the improvisations. Their methods were unique. The 101st Unit became a legend. Furthermore, it became a model for Tsahal, the Israeli army. It built new military norms. The Israeli army turned out to be a macro model of the 101st Unit. The charismatic commander of 101 was Arik Sharon. He became a model commander. In 1956 he fought in the Sinai campaign. It was clear that he will enjoy a military career. In 1957-1958, he studied in Great Britain's military school. He resumed his career and moved up to be the head of the Northern Command in 1964 and head of the Southern Command in 1969.

 Sharon was always a tough leader. Often he challenged his superiors in command. There were others who envied his military excellence as well. They said that he is a ruthless person, a wild animal. But he was Israel's best field commander, a walking legend. Sharon suffered from his lack of public relations. He was not nominated to be, as he deserved, a chief of staff. He resigned from the army as a General who also had achievements in the Six Days War. But in the Yom Kippur War he saved Israel from the terrible disaster. The Israeli army and Moshe Dayan, then Minister of Defense, were in a state of panic. The Generals did not know what to do in order to stop the advancing Egyptian army. In the North, the Syrian armies penetrated the Golan Heights. Israel was in a process of national shock. There was also a need for more ammunition. Then Arik Sharon came and launched the attack which saved Israel. Israelis shouted: "Arik, the King of the Jews." He founded the formula by which he won the war in the south, crossing the Suez Canal. It was a great military success.

 Arik decided to go into politics. He joined the Likud party.(German Bund)  We must note that he managed to unit two parties - the General Zionists and Herut, Menachem Begin's party. He established one political block, a more hawkish one. Later he left the Knesset to help Rabin (1974) and in 1976 tried to establish his own party. He failed. Later he became Begin's Minister of Agriculture. He helped to enlarge the settlement in the West Bank. He became more and more hawkish. He also enlarged the Jewish settlements in the Galilee. He became more pro-religious. But all his life he dedicated himself to the building of a strong security network for Israel's survival. He was always an activist and pragmatist like David Ben-Gurion. He served as minister in the various cabinets of the last decade. In 1982, as Begin's Minister of Defense, he launched the Lebanon War against the P.L.O. There were problems which caused Sharon troubles. The war was not a successful one. Many soldiers were killed and the war's mission was not accomplished.

 Sharon was blamed for the 'Massacre of Sabra and Shatila' which was committed by the Christians in Lebanon. For many years Sharon suffered for this murder of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon. But this is history.

Un-Holycost....just unremembered history.......

 In 1990, Sharon became Minister of Trade and Industry. Later as Housing Minister. He served as a member of the Knesset since 1980. In 1996, Bibi appointed Sharon as a Minister of National Infrastructure and in 1998 as a Foreign Minister. When Bibi decided to leave the political life in Sept. 1999, Sharon was elected as the Likud's new chairman. Sharon became the Likud's candidate for Prime Minister because Bibi declined to run for the office. Bibi also saved the Likud from an inside war which could split the Likud.

 Arik Sharon certainly built a new Likud after Bibi's defeat to Ehud Barak in 1996. Sharon had to stop the damages which bibi caused then. For example, the fact that leaders such as David Levy or Dan Meridor had to leave the party, and even Yitzhak Shamir had to leave the party of his life. There were many ramifications to Bibi's leadership, negative ones. Sharon took over as a new healer of the party's loss of power and prestige. Today, we know that his leadership is very effective. He built a party that can win and reach power. Many here and in Israel do not like Sharon's politics but let the Israelis or the Knesset make the democratic decisions.



Israel....long ago invaded by the Sofiets

Bush Senior Met With Bin Laden's Brother on 9/11

Paul Joseph Watson

Comment: Despite studying September 11 for two years solid, one fact I only just discovered is that George W. Bush's father was meeting with Osama bin Laden's brother, Shafig bin Laden, in the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Washington, on the morning of 9/11. They were on Carlyle Group business just a few miles from where hijackers supposedly acting on behalf of Osama bin Laden would fly a plane into the Pentagon.

Recall that the chief financier of the so-called hijackers, Pakistan's Chief Spy General Mahmoud Ahmad, was meeting with Bush administration officials the week before 9/11. He also met with Bob Graham and Porter Goss on the morning of the attacks, who would later go on to head the first 9/11 investigative committee.

The Bush senior/bin Laden meeting was reported on by CBC. See

This was also reported by the London Observer. See the last paragraph at,11913,738196,00.html

"On 11 September, while Al-Qaeda's planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Carlyle Group hosted a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama."




'Our Race Will Rule
Undisputed Over The World'

By Rose Rabbinovich
Former Zionist
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

The most popular book among the Jewish community here in Melbourne at the moment is 'Candle Of Light' by Thomas L. Fielder (a Jew). Dr. Fielder is an Australian War Hero, philosopher and Historian (This amazing book is available from M.E.A. Books, PO Box 248, East Caulfield, Victoria 3145 Australia).
On page 39 Dr. Fiedler mentioned to my surprise a member of my family, and I am quoting one paragraph here in full as it explains world events today VERY clearly:
My readers will find it hard to believe the following example of the ambitious, ruthless mind-set of the Talmudic Zionist philosophy.
This address of Rabbinovich was published in the U.S. Publication 'Common Sense', and re-published in the September issue of the Canadian Intelligence Service. Rabbi Rabbinovich speaking to an assembly in Budapest, Hungary on the 12th January 1952 stated:
"We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia or Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our control commission will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the Whites to mate with Whites. The white women must co-habit with members of the dark races, the White man with black women. Thus the White race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the White Man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judiaca, and OUR RACE will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples."
end quote.




The Jews of Russia and Palestine: A Comparison

by Israel Shamir

Excerpted from the Russian newspaper Zavtra, Oct. 31, 2000

Black days have descended upon the Israeli people; black because everything that our fathers and ourselves have said, bewailed, and complained about has been as genuine as a three-dollar bill. Back in 1968 I painted on a wall in the USSR: "Hands off Czechoslovakia."

Russian-Jewish poet Alexander Galich sang in his beautiful, deep voice: "Citizens, our Fatherland is in danger! Our tanks are rolling through a foreign land!" Bearing such a slogan, several Jews stepped out onto Red Square, and were roughed up by the police. As Russian citizens who cherish honor even when this contradicts falsely-understood patriotism, we protested against Russian tanks in Budapest, Prague, and Kabul. Many years have passed. Now it is Jewish tanks that are rolling through a foreign land. They are not just rolling -- they are killing peaceful civilians, destroying houses, keeping millions of Palestinians emaciated and blockaded. One might expect that many Jewish intellectuals have rushed into our Israeli squares and public places to protest this?

Absolutely nothing of the kind. Our intellectuals just celebrate our "valiant Jewish fighters," the steady hands and the sharp eyes of our Jewish snipers, and the unlimited humanism of the Jewish people, who could turn all Palestinian goys into mincemeat, but limit themselves to wounding several hundred each day.

"Human rights" activists, such as Sharansky, have opposed the propiska [registration of residence] laws, just the way our grandfathers fought the Pale of Settlement under the Czar. But after our grandfathers won their battle, they herded the Palestinian goys into reservations, compared to which the Pale of Settlement looks like an open society: a Palestinian may not visit a village next to his without requesting permission of the Israelis, without being searched and having his documents checked. Of course, he would not even dream of visiting the sea, just a few kilometers from his house.

Jews have protested against discrimination at work and in high schools. But now we have created a system of total national discrimination. Out of 13,000 workers at the Israeli State Electrical Company, only six are goyim. That's 0.0004%!

Goyim comprise 40% of the population from Jordan to the sea, but only one quarter of them are allowed to vote. There is not a single goy on the Israeli Supreme court, in the executive branch of government, among the generals, in aviation, or in the secret services. There is not a single goy working even in the leading Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz.

That is why everything that Jews have been saying in Russia should be rewritten in view of recent events. We have fought not for human rights, but only for Jewish rights. We have been advocating freedom of movement and occupational choice only for Jews. We are not against our own tanks rolling through foreign lands, we were only against Russian tanks.

Upon seeing an unhappy child holding his hands up in front of a machine gunner, we are sorry only if this child is Jewish. The goy's child can be shot as one wishes.

When Byalik wrote "the devil has not invented a suitable punishment for killing a child," he apparently visualized only a Jewish child. When he was terrified by visions of pogroms, he was terrified of pogroms against Jews. A pogrom by itself is a usual and even a normal occurrence. Recently the Jews of Upper Nazareth conducted a pogrom against the Arabs of Lower Nazareth, but none of the pogromists were prosecuted. Rather, the police shot dead several of those who were victims of the pogrom. Yet another pogrom on a mass scale was perpetrated against the peaceful and innocent Palestinian town of Beth Jallah.

In Czarist Russia - which our grandparents cursed in every way they could and ruined - pogroms killed fewer people over one hundred years than we kill in a week in Palestine. The most terrible Kishinev pogroms in Russia, took the lives of 45 people, with 600 wounded. The total number of recent Arab victims of the Israelis from September to now (October 31, 2000), is 150 killed and 4,000 wounded.

After a pogrom in Russia, hundreds of honest goyim, the Russian writers and the entire intelligentsia, raised their voices against the pogromists who participated in the violence. But in Israel, there have been merely a handful who protested, while the Union of Jewish writers supported the Israeli murderers.

When in 1991 Jews in Russia advocated private property rights in defiance of Communism, they meant only Jewish private property rights, because the private property of the goyim we confiscate freely, as if it belonged to no one.

Just walk along the luxurious districts of Jerusalem - Talbieh, old Catamon, the Greek and German townships. All these palaces belonged to gentiles - Germans, Armenians, Greeks, Palestinians, Orthodox and Muslims.

They have been confiscated and given to Jews. In recent weeks, hundreds of hectares have been confiscated from gentiles, and dozens of Palestinian houses were destroyed.

Russian-Jewish tycoon Gusinsky flew in to support us in our struggle. Not too long ago he appealed to the world community, at the time that Russia was trying to liberate television broadcasting from his clutches. His support for the state of"Israel" means that Gusinsky agrees with segregation and arrests based on ethnicity. He is only against confiscation of Jewish property. He is only against Jews sitting in prison. The goyim can sit in prison for decades without being convicted in court, that's what happens in our Jewish state.

What was it that we did not like about the German Nazis? Their racism? We don't have any less. The Russian-language Jerusalem newspaper Pryamaya Rech conducted a survey among Russian Jews regarding their attitudes towards Palestinians. The Russian Jews said, "I want to kill all Arabs," "All Arabs must be killed."

We must admit that we have been against racism as long as it was directed against us. We have been against Nazism while it was a foreign Nazism. Our own native Jewish butchers are the objects of our delight.

Before us are open two paths. We can, like the people of Nineveh, repent, return the looted goods, grant full equality, stop the discrimination and the killing, and hope for God's forgiveness. Or, we can persist in our sins, like the inhabitants of Sodom, and prepare for the fire and brimstone to rain down from the furious skies of Palestine.


The Talmud had to be kept secret because...

"To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly." -- Libbre David 37.


21. "Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor (Bible), but it is not said, 'Thou shalt not do injury to a Goy.' " -- Mishna Sanhedryn 57.




Websterstien Dikionary


Define "Terrorism": dissident, anti-zionist, "Hate Crime" incite-r, Non-jewish goyims.


King David, an anti-zionist  hate crime inciter, for he hated sin with a pure hatred.



The man, the wold in sheep's clothing, the zionist "Judeo Churchizionian" Jack Van Impe now on the "Moshiach call". Revealing his agenda, soon the rest of the Babylonian Network will follow suit, in their scheme of One World Religion to the son of Perdition.


From  Jack Van Impe Ministries "2000 AND BEYOND


The world today is attempting to engage in this Herculean peacemaking effort without Moshiach without Christ. And it isn’t working. But what peace there will be when this great event actually takes place peace that truly passes all understanding! This will be a global time of healing as Moshiach, the Great Physician, is with us, ushering in an even more blessed day, described so graphically in Isaiah 35:56.


Impe of the flesh kingdom....


This event will, and must, take place on planet earth. This is why it is so important that we stop spiritualizing the prophecies of God. Instead, let us take God at His Word literally. He loves us literally. He saves us literally. And the prophecies of the end time are literally true, as we will continue to demonstrate in biblical context throughout the remainder of this book.



And Van Impe is in bed with the harlot of satan


Meanwhile, the key questions remain: What will, in fact, take place during Christ’s reign of one thousand years? How will this play into the events occurring in the year 2001? What will society look like during the second millennium? How will things be different for the believer? And what have the church fathers, the Rabbis, the Targum, Talmud, Midrash, and other ancient Jewish writings said about this great millennial event? One thing is certain. These thousand years of our soon-to-come millennium are real, not imaginary. They are actual, not a mere ideal


The Advisor to the "Judeo-Churchizionian" Skull and Bonesman of Mystery Iniquity. Of course the zionist Van Impe is playing the plan of Olam Ha Ba of Schneerson who appointed Bush to finish the Universal Noahide scheme and vision.


Jack Van Impe

“Do you think that President Bush, apparently a Christian man, believes and knows he is involved in prophetic events concerning the Middle East and final battle between good and evil?”

“I believe he is a wonderful man,” Van Impe responded, and goes on to say, “I was contacted a few weeks ago by the Office of Public Liaison for the White House and by the National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to make an outline. And I’ve spent hours preparing it. I will release this information to the public in September, but it’s in his hands. He will know exactly what is going to happen in the Middle East and what part he will have under the leading of the Holy Spirit of God. So, it’s a tremendous time to be alive.”


Bush to be advised by Talmud Bavli



Do not neglect satan's son, Kenneth Copeland and Talmud Bavli, ushering in Olam Haba, the "Jew World Order" massah race of illumination.


Kenneth Copeland

Horned Hand or The Mano Cornuto :
This gesture is the satanic salute, a sign of recognition between and allegiance of members of Satanism or other unholy groups. 



Kenneth Copeland, who said in The Force of Love audio tape;
"You don't have a God in you. You are one!"
And to many more to list....
Now I don't claim to be doing miracles and wonders, as I explain what these things are...and I don't claim to be Christ I claim to be the fulfilled and prophecized Moshiach, there's a big difference. I have lead many to G-d, the Torah and it's ethos, and to Judaism which is what a prophet is besides prophecizing, as well my insight and vision has all come to pass accurately and is still to this day transpiring as I revealed it thus making me a real Prophet not a false one. Basically all these fulfillment's of Mark are from Christians who teach this stuff and are false prophets who keep changing their stories and revelations to suit the times and audience. Never do people recognize or speak up about them yet people have the nerve to try and pin their sins or this verse in Mark on me.
Matthew 24:5 "For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many." If Matthew is writting something that I say down, as I'm saying it, and if I say people will say "I am zealous", that means "I am" by their saying it, but not 'them saying it upon themselves'.
This means Jesus is telling them that many will come in his name, "Christians" or "Jesuits", saying he is Christ and deceiving many.



Ve vish you a merry happy Babylonian Talmudic Goyim Noahide chanuka

Ve vish you a merry happy  Babylonian Goyim NoahideTalmudic chanuka

 and a happy.....talmudic Chabad, joo year.


Outlawing Christmas And
Other Trends

By Eric Lageson
Pahrump Valley Times

Merry Christmas. Teachers in California can't say these words. It is illegal. The same for singing Christmas carols and displaying nativity scenes. In essence, Christmas is being outlawed in our closest neighboring state.
The ACLU, atheists and others are intent on kicking God out of all public life. I'm sure you'll remember the Ten Commandments being removed from a courthouse entrance earlier this year. What is the intent of these God haters?
Examine the communist leaders of the former Soviet Union. They saw God and religion as a real threat. To them, the state must transform into a God. At life's end whom will you answer to?
This socialist dogma has been infiltrating the U.S. school system for some time. In 1963, prayer was outlawed. The theory of evolution replaces creationism. Bibles cannot be brought into the classroom. Any type of Biblical message or literature has been banned. Bible clubs are harassed, persecuted or, in some cases, not allowed.
Much has been made of the phrase "the separation of church and state." These words are not in the U.S. Constitution. No such provision exists. What the First Amendment says, in regards to religion, is: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The meaning is obvious. There is no Church of America as there is a Church of England. The founding fathers didn't want our government to be oppressed by any nationwide established religion. The important point to remember is the First Amendment is about freedom of religion, not about its destruction. The phrase "free exercise" is clearly understood. You, as an American, have the right to practice your religious beliefs. Where is it written that you can't worship God wherever you want? Why are public buildings exempt?
The idiots intent on erasing God from our culture prey on ignorance. Many know what the First Amendment says and ignore or revise it. That's what's happening in California and what may happen in other states, including your own.
The government, much like a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, can be very good or very bad.
Nevada is not immune from religious persecution. The Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) is thinking of outlawing curbside memorials, especially where crosses mark the area of a driver's death. Why? Because some atheists (or non-Christians) are offended. If one is offended, punish everybody. Already a memorial was removed near Carson City.
I'd hardly call putting a cross where somebody died as establishing a nationwide religion.
The critics claim it's the "people's property." (I've given up on the fact that the government and the people are not the same thing anymore.) If it is the people's property, why can't the people use it? If the land on the side of the highway is being unused, what does it hurt to place a cross there? Why would the anti-God crowd go so far out of their way to make sure every religious symbol is banned?
Curbside memorials have been banned in three states: Colorado, Massachusetts and Wisconsin. Will Nevada be the fourth?
Removing crosses, etc., is the same as desecrating a grave. That is what our government plans on doing. Rumor is that new "guidelines" will be implemented. According to NDOT, perhaps the grieving people will be allowed a "rest area." Thanks, but no thanks.
We are living in strange times. What used to be bad is good and vice versa. When you remove God from your life, what do you replace him with? The hedonistic lifestyles so prevalent nowadays are nothing new. The ancient Roman empire, Pompeii, Sodom and Gomorrah, they all did what so many are doing now. History has shown what became of those civilizations. Could it happen to our own? The no-morality crowd is attempting a takeover. Will they succeed? It's up to you.
- Lageson writes from Pahrump.
Copyright © Pahrump Valley Times, 1997 - 2003

Do you have your portion in the World of Satan's temporary Talmudic Babylonian Olam haba, New World Order? Are you studying your new bewitched Judeo-Churchizionian apostate Talmudic Judaic Oral Traditions of Mishnah Torah as an obedient "Righteous" goyim, universal Noahide unto Satan?


"A share in the World to Come."


QUESTION: It was taught by Eliyahu, "Whoever studies Torah laws every day is assured that he is a ben Olam Haba - a son of the World to Come." Why here doesn't it say, "All Israel are benei Olam Haba - sons of the World to Come"?

Eli Turkel wrote: > > The present discussion remins me of a question that has long > bothered me. I once saw in a letter of the Steipler the statement > that a priest who saved Jews in the holocaust would burn in hell > (my paraphase not his words) because he is an idol worshipper. > The fact that he risked his life to save Jews is nice and we give him > a yasher koach but no more. He strongly critcizes earlier sources > that give goyim "credit" for activities beyond the 7 mitzvot. > I assume that is all the more so of Mother Teresa (for example).



Welcome to the "JEW World Order" the Plam Ha Ba of the obedient goyim Noahide slaves of the Massah Race of Illumination



We, the undersigned, in the name of HASHEM and His Torah, are greatly pained by the terrible chilul Hashem which has been occurring recently, even among Torah observers, who allow themselves to transgress the prohibition of avoda zora through the use of non-Jewish courts with his fellow Jew. Regardless whether the parties are coerced or even willfully participate, it is included under the dreaded ban of mesira as explained in Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 388:9) that one who has a Jew tried by non-Jewish courts, even if the defendant was wicked and harassed him, the plaintiff has no share in Olam Haba. The Gemara (Rosh Hashana 17a, Avoda Zora 26b) mentions that a moser descends to Gehenom and it punished for many generations.
We therefore warn our fellow Jews of the following:

1) No Jew or Jewess, wherever he may be, is allowed to go to a non-Jewish court, or to their offices or officers, without exception. If there should be any disagreement between Jews, they should turn to a Jewish Beis Din for their legal proceedings according to Jewish law.
2) It is not permissible under any circumstances, to summon a fellow Jew to a non-Jewish court prior to summoning him to a Jewish Beis Din. If he refuses to appear at the Beis Din after receiving three subpoenas, the Beis Din will issue a Contempt of Court ("siruv") and treat him as described in Shulchan Aruch.
3) No Jew, even if he is a rabbi or leader, is allowed to permit other Jews to go to non-Jewish court before summoning the other party to Beis Din, without following the procedure as described above (paragraph 2). Just as no rabbi or leader can allow the worship of avoda zora or the desecration of Shabbos, likewise permitting Jews to go to non-Jewish court is prohibited. If one did so, he is considered a "machtei es horabim" (one who causes other to sin) and is required to be excommunicated.
4) A Jew or Jewess who says that they will take a fellow Jew to the non-Jewish courts, and they were warned of their sin and didn't listen, mitzva laha'rog otam, and whoever acts first is worthy, as is the case of a rodeif (one who chasing a person to kill him). (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat ibid.)
5) A Jewish man or woman who calls the police on the other, is included in the classification of moser. This is also true if they were quarreling, chas v'sholom, unless there was a life threatening situation when it is permitted if no other means are available to save oneself. However, afterwards one should go to Beis Din.
6) Whoever is awarded money by a non-Jewish court, whether it be from business dealings, or alimony or child support, in an instance when it is not entitled by the laws of the Torah, such money is considered stolen ("gezel"). If we have the opportunity to help the one whose money was taken through the non-Jewish court, we should do so. If the moser repents, he must return all improperly acquired monies and related expenses, and must beg forgiveness of the one from whom he extracted money for all the suffering that he caused him.
7) It is a mitzva to publicize the names and addresses of Jewish mosrim and their supporters, in order for Jews to know from whom to stay away. Whoever knows of a moser that hasn't repented, it is forbidden to assist him in any way until he repents.
8) Women who turn to a non-Jewish court to force their husbands to divorce them, or to receive money not in accordance with the halacha, such a get is invalid and the money is stolen, and it is forbidden to marry these women. If the woman remarried with this get, children born from the marriage are mamzeirim. Likewise, men who are required according to the Torah to divorce their wives, as ordered by Beis Din, and they refuse to obey the Beis Din in order to render their wives agunos, it is a mitzva to excommunicate them from other Jews and to publicize their names until they listen to Beis Din and divorce their wives.
9) Women who summon their husbands to a non-Jewish court, it is forbidden to marry them, for they are considered wicked ("reshaim") who descend to Gehenom and forfeit their share in Olam Haba, and therefore they should remain unmarried for the rest of their lives. Regarding one who does marry such a woman, our Rabbis tell us that the first husband removed a rasha'a from his house and now a second man takes her into his home! If the second husband is worthy, he will divorce her, otherwise, she will become a widow and bury him . . .
10) It is a mitzva to publicize the "rabbis" who advise men and women to go to non-Jewish court, without following the procedure as described above (paragraph 2), for they are responsible for the terrible chilul Hashem and abandonment of the Torah. Their ways are repulsive and their halachic decisions are invalid, since they are considered from those who cause the public to sin, which is from the twenty four items that prevent one from repenting. The Rambam (Hil. Teshuva 4:1) explains: twenty four items prevent repentance, and four of those items are great sins that Hashem does not give one the opportunity to repent according to the severity of the sin. Those items are: 1) one who causes the public to sin, 2) one who influences his friend away from the proper path to a lifestyle of evil, such as a meisis u'madiach, 3) whoever can protest the wrong ways of others, whether an individual or a group, and doesn't do so but allows them to remain in their wrong ways etc. And these three items are all found by these advisors who convince men and women to go to non-Jewish court.
We are awakening everyone to restrain themselves and their families from this evil way of emulating the goyim, chas v'sholom. Whoever knows of these transgressors should supply us with their name and address and we will be on the lookout.
Yechezkel Hanovi tells us: "That you say, `Let us live like the goyim,' that will never happen."
In the merit of this may we be worthy of the Redemption, speedily in our times.

Vaad Olami L'maan Kovod HaTorah V'haganas Hadas



goy (pl. goyim) -- non-Jew. It's best for non-Jews to use only the plural, if at all, since the singular has been so commonly used in a derogatory way. The words gentile & non-Jew are safer.



Is it any wonder why the Nations of the world expelled satan's seed? The Talmudic communist of Baals Babylonia?


And if they are not expelled from Christian America, see what they have in store....their own words......


Rabbi Bernard Weinberger (Young Israel of Brooklyn, NY) once explained that when the goyim declare ki gavar aleinu chasdo ve'emet HaShem l'olam what is being revealed in these words is the real intent of the anti-Semite to harm the Jewish nation. They, and they alone, know how much they really wanted to undo the Jews. And when they did not succeed in their nefarious plans they then were forced to declare that the only way the Jews were spared from the evil machinations was an outpouring of endless measures of Divine chesed.



Let their Geula commense and leave them to their selves, for any who allows Jerusalem a stubling block shall be defeated in the fury of the Lord's wrath.......for all the nations who have denied Jesus Christ shall be together at that Day




Homelandt Sekurity, of Olam Haba and obedient goyim Noahides of the Bush-ka Schneerson covenant with death and hell.


NO NATION CONCEDES ITS HOMELAND. The Land - is, very simply, OURS. If this sounds too simplistic or unacceptable, then we must repeat it again and again until the whole world realizes that we are determined to stick to our positions. All of the plans concerning our relations with the neighboring nations in the region must be adapted to conform with this basic position. For we have returned to OUR Land. We are the People of Israel.

Their threats will not move us. We must stand on our rights - which are also our obligations: to guard carefully and lovingly every divot of earth of OUR HOMELAND.


If you stay with Jesus Christ in firm testimony and reject the son of perdition, Moshaich ben David, then you have no part in the Jew World Order of Talmud Bavli, but good news, yours is the KINGDOM of God the Father of Heaven. For the Judaizers and their "Righteous" obedient goyim the kingdom of Moloch the star they have made with their hands......


Behold mystery Baalbaloney.......


messiahtitle.gif (3256 bytes)

The English word messiah derives from the Hebrew term Moshiach, meaning The Annointed One. This refers to the ancient custom of annointing the head of a king with oil on his accession. Moshiach is the one who will be king at the "end of days", a time to come, when the whole world will follow G-d's rule and there will be peace and harmony.

In Jewish thought the term Moshiach has a  meaning and significance which is quite different from the commonly understood Christian usage of the word Messiah. There is no idea of Moshiach being an earthly incarnation of G-d or of being in any other way divine, no idea of him being a saviour, no concept of redemption through suffering. Moshiach, in the Jewish view, will be a normal human (we are ALL sons or daughters of G-d). He will be a charismatic political and military leader, a man of great learning and wisdom, well versed in Torah and Jewish Law. He will be a great judge who will make righteous decisions. He will be descended from King David (he is often referred to as Moshiach ben Dovid - Moshiach son of David).

The coming of Moshiach is not mentioned in Torah. The concept seems to have been introduced to Jewish thought during the time of the prophets.

When Moshiach comes he will establish the Olam HaBa, The World to Come. The Olam HaBa will be characterised by:

  • The restoration of temple worship in Jerusalem
  • Spiritual and political freedom for the Jewish people
  • All the peoples of the world recognizing G-d as the only G-d
  • Peaceful coexistence of all people and an end to war and hatred
  • The return of Jewish exiles to Israel

Whilst the prophets predicted the coming of Moshiach and the establishment of Olam HaBa, they did not specify clearly when he would come. There are 2 basic views about when Moshiach will come:

  • When the world needs him most (ie when it is most sinful);

  • When the world is ready (ie when it is so good)

The key to recognising Moshiach is the establishment of Olam HaBa. There have been many claimed messiahs but, since we patently do not live in Olam HaBa, none of them can have been him.

Although a belief in the coming of Moshiach is one of The Rambam's 13 principles, and is a key feature of the beliefs of many Jews (especially ultra orthodox Jews), for many Jews, Moshiach is seen as being of little consequence or importance, a nice idea and no more.



the Pharasees, originators of classic Rabbinic Judaism introduced Olam HaBa, "The World to Come" sometime in the first centuries BCE. Rabbi David Kline (Reform)
Judaism is one path, and Noahism is the other path.



Mt:5:20: For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.


Jn:3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.



How they "Hate" Jesus Christ the Everlasting Holy Covenant, and yes, how they will "hate" you, and they will enforce their "Hate" with their "Hate Crime" Laws, only made for them, enforced by their "Homeland" sekurity judaizers. And if you do not Deny Jesus Christ the Lord Almighty, then you will lose your life. Blessed are they who lose their Lives for Jesus namesake, but they who shall save their lives in denial and fear of the jews, shall lose their souls.


Date Posted: 03:08:54 06/08/03 Sun
Author: ed
Subject: Jesus Myth
In reply to: Ruben Montenegro Castillejo 's message, "Saint Michael and the resurrection of the dead" on 14:25:42 12/24/02 Tue

It is time for you to understand that Jesus is nothing but a pagan Myth, it is the combination of the Phylosophy of Helenism, with Judaism, there are complete studies about this, for example

The Biblical alternative for a non Jew, would be to fully embrace the Noahide Law as a fountain of reference and life. In Biblical law it is forbidden to asociate G-d to creations, much more if it is in the likeness of man.

Death by Decapitation

a) RASHI (DH Malkus b'Makom Misah) explains that at the moment that a person transgresses the will of Hashem, he is fit to die. However, in certain cases, Hashem decreed that the type of death that the transgressor is to receive is lashes.

(b) TOSFOS (DH Malkus Tachas Misah) gives two other explanations, although he concludes that Rashi's explanation is the correct one. First, he explains that since B'nei Noach are automatically punished with death for transgressing any command for which they have been warned ("Azharasan Zo Hi Misasan;" Sanhedrin 57a), the fact that a Jew receives only Malkus for transgressing a command for which he has been warned (when the "Azharah" is not qualified with any specific punishment) is a form of kindness to the Jew. The lashes indeed are taking the place of death.

(c) In his second explanation, Tosfos says that since a transgressor being punished with lashes occasionally dies as a result of the lashes, it is comparable to death.

Melakhim, ch. 9, 10). One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws

subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).

    "We are promised that Righteous Gentiles who observe the Noahide Laws are guaranteed "a place in the world to come." Don't get your hopes up! This does not mean Heaven, but the Messianic Age in which the Jews expect to assume authority over the whole earth under the leadership of their "Messiah." Righteous Gentiles will be the servant class. There will be no place at all for those who do not observe the Noahide Laws. Well, surely we Catholics can qualify as Righteous Gentiles, at least if we observe the Seven Laws of Noah, right? Unfortunately, in the mind of those who gave us the Noahide Laws, those who worship Jesus Christ as God are idolaters. To believe in the Divinity of Jesus Christ is to violate the first of the Noahide Laws. And what is the penalty for those who so offend? The Talmud requires Capital Punishment!"

The Jewish people were given 613 commandments in the Torah which is the 5 books of Moses & earlier than that G-d Almighty gave Noah 7 commandments which are the only laws in the Bible binding on Gentiles & are still in effect today!!!!

The 7 Noahide Laws are:
1.Do not blaspheme G-d.
2.Do not worship idols(Jesus & the crucifix are idols)
3.Do not commit immoral sexual acts(homosexuality,bestiality,incest)
4.Do not Murder.
5.Do not steal.
6.Do not eat the the limbs of a living animal while it is still alive.
7.Establish courts of law to enforce these laws.


Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.


It has been pointed out that the second Noahide Law which prohibits blasphemy will preclude the worship of Jesus Christ, who was once accused of this very crime by the Sanhedrin. Moses Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon - 1138­1204), better known as the Rambam, is universally recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher and thinker. His influence remains unabated until the present time. Maimonides classic work, Mishnah Torah, opens with a section on systematic philosophical theology, derived largely from Aristotelian science and metaphysics.

under Noahide (aka Noachide), ANY worship or acknowledgment OF Jesus will be a capitol offense, the penalty of which is beheading? Even celebrating (the pagan-Catholic) Christ Mass will be outlawed under Noahide.


Today there are more and more Non-Jews who are seeing and understanding that Christianity and its teachings are not the correct path in life. They realize that Jesus “J” is not the messiah and never was. They realize that in truth Christianity was a man made religion, which copied the pagan religions in order to attract the masses.


Jews believe that there are hundreds of laws binding upon themselves, but in additionthere are seven laws binding on all mankind. I submit that anyone who violates these seven laws to that extent makes himself subhuman-an animal in the schematics of Jesus



Behold satan's sons, the Judaizers

 Jesus, the Galilean Jew had no interest in Gentiles. ‘Dogs not fit to eat the bread belonging to children (Mk. 7:27). ‘Do not throw your pearls in front of swine (Mt. 7:6). The fact that these embarrassing statements remain in the Christian Bible suggest they were in fact part of Jesus’ ministry.

America's New Government Church — Finally, a solution to doctrinal diversity. The rabbis have designed a one-size-fits-all religion for Gentiles: we bring you news of the Noahide Laws. Those who proclaim Jesus is their Savior will be put to death for idolatry. Congress has already begun putting the foundation in place.

Many years ago the Rav of Denver, Rav Feldberger, said in his opinion the Talmud permitted using the words Jesus or Christian as identification terms. However the Noahides are correct in not using the word Christ. One should use Jesus instead. Christ means Messiah...


EDMONTON JOURNAL, October 20, 2003 - Bibles in bedside tables may become a thing of the past inside patients’ rooms at hospitals. If the policy is approved, Gideon Bible, a bedside staple provided by Gideon’s International, will be removed from all hospital rooms in the city and the Calgary Health Region will ban all distribution and display of any printed religious materials in hospitals. The policy, which is still under review, has drawn both acceptance and criticism from religious leaders. An official for the health region says the policy is the best way to avoid religious discrimination or even the appearance that the organization favors any one group.


Have you but noticed the "J" word is missing from all media and Government, except to degenerate the "J" Word. Welcome to the "Joo World Order"


I am a Noahide. And when I left Christianity I still wanted to cling to their G-d ( the J G-d). I had to come to realize that I did not need any Savior, prophet, teacher to talk fondly of. I did not to keep saying the "name" of J anymore. I avoid the name, I avoid the worship of him by always mentioning him ( as if he were Elvis). I only worship G-d. I don't have any prophets or teachers that I feel I have to meantion to impress my Christian friends. I don't need to say "J" to validate my faith in Hashem.
That is only my opinion as a Noahide. That even mentioning someone the world sees as our G-d is unwise and perhaps even wrong. It certainly says I can't give up the habit of thinking about that prophet. So I choose to avoid his name out of respect for G-d.
Afterall, few people go around mentioning Krishna , now do they. It is conditioning by a Christian society that makes us feel odd if we don't use the J name.'




WHO WAS JESUS? according to Hassidic Chabad-Lubavitcher Jews, the Pharisees


The man known today as "Jesus" fulfilled all these prophecies. He became a "king" (over the Christian church) who
changed the original Law, doing away with the Hebrew calendar and the Biblical holidays (Rosh Hashanah, Yom
Kippur, Sukkos — the Festival of Tabernacles, Passover, etc.). He disregarded the one, infinite G-d of the Hebrew
Bible in favor of a new "trinity" that included himself. And he repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins,
while openly challenging the G-d-given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin.





Rabbi Silberberg also discussed the first Noahide Law, which forbids the worship of false gods. Maimonides maintains that the Christian belief in Jesus violates this commandment.


Melakhim, ch. 9, 10). One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws

subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).



So then the "Great Invocation" unto their god, that Tetragramatron YVH who Abraham, Isaac and Jacob new not, continues for their plan to establish their vision against the Everlasting Holy Covenant, Christ, Jesus our Lord.



Thanks to: 

Rowan Berkeley


Message: national religious party which owns arutz sheva is very close to lubavitch nowadays.
Arutz Sheva News Service
Delivered Daily via Email, Sunday thru Friday
Subscribe (free):

 Several weeks ago, the mayor of the primarily Druze city of Shfaram, in the Galilee, also signed the document.

The declaration includes the commitment to make a better "humane world based on the Seven Noachide Commandments and the values they represent commanded by the Creator to all mankind through Moses on Mount Sinai."

Behind the efforts to spread awareness of the (Talmud Bavli Oral Traditions)  Torah’s Seven Universal Laws is Rabbi Boaz Kelly, of the directors of Chabad-Lubavitch institutions in the Krayot area of Haifa and the chairman of the Worldwide Committee for the Seven Noahide Commandments. The recent signature by Sheikh Tarif is part of Rabbi Kelly’s ongoing efforts among Israel’s non-Jewish community. In the past few years, Rabbi Kelly’s organization has placed roadside ads in Arabic calling for observance of the Noahide Laws, as well as distributing Arabic-language pamphlets on the subject among Arabs in Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

According to the Torah, all humankind (the offspring of Noah, or <i>Bnei Noach</I>) is subject to seven Divine commandments. They are: to refrain from idolatry; to refrain from sexual immorality; to refrain from blasphemy; to refrain from murder; to refrain from theft; to refrain from eating the limb of a living animal; and to establish courts of law.

Support for the spread of the Seven Noahide Commandments by the Druze spiritual leader contains within it echoes of the Biblical narrative itself. The Druze community reveres as a prophet the non-Jewish father-in-law of Moses, Jethro (Yitro), whom they call Shu’eib. According to the Biblical narrative, Jethro joined and assisted the Jewish people in the desert during the Exodus, accepted monotheism, but ultimately rejoined his own people. The Tiberias tomb of Jethro is the most important religious site for the Druze community.




Obedient goyim Noahides, increasing.....


Moshiach will indeed have his false Prophet

New Bishop in Jerusalem is

New Bishop in Jerusalem is Jewish!

For the first time since the Apostle James
(Goyim Noahide Freemason) served as bishop of Jerusalem, the Holy City has a Jewish bishop! Benedictine Abbot Jean-Baptiste Gourion was ordained as the new bishop at the Catholic church in Kiryat Ye’arim, above the Israeli Arab village of Abu Ghosh near Jerusalem. 

Bishop Gourion will be responsible for the Hebrew-speaking Catholic community in Israel, many of whom are of Jewish origin. Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger, the archbishop of Paris who is also a Jew, described Pope John Paul’s appointment of Bishop Gourion as one of prophetic courage. “After such a long time,
Jerusalem finally has a Jewish bishop again!” he said. 

The Pope’s appointment came during his historic six-day visit to Israel in the spring of 2000, when Gourion was an abbot. “My appointment serves to normalize relations between the Church and the people of Israel and to demonstrate that Christians and Jews are brothers,” Bishop Gourion told israel today

Jn:7:1: After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him

Presiding over the ordination was the Pope’s personal envoy Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Michel Sabbah and the Apostolic Nuncio Archbishop Pietro Sambi. Many Jewish friends of the new bishop were among the capacity crowd that filled the church. 

Born in 1934 to a Jewish family in Oran, Algeria, Jean-Baptiste Gourion was baptized in Paris in 1958 and joined the Benedictine monastery of Bec Hellouin in Normandy. In 1976, the young monk was sent to rejuvenate the Monastery of the Resurrection in Abu Ghosh, where he became prior and later abbot. Bishop Gourion is highly respected not only among the Moslems in Abu Ghosh, but also by many Israelis. 

Explaining how he, as a Jew, became a Catholic, he told us: “For me, Christianity and Judaism are the same. I didn’t have to leave Judaism to come to Christianity. The Jew and the Christian form the same body. As such, he makes it clear that he will not engage in “missionary” activities. 

Though he will primarily serve Israel’s Hebrew-speaking Catholics, Bishop Gourion is open to all believers in the Land, both Jew and Gentile. He calls his flock the “Christian Israeli Church,” which celebrates mass in Hebrew with Hebrew-speaking priests! 

His Palestinian superior, Michel Sabbah, well known for his anti-Israel stance, opposed Gourion’s appointment; nevertheless, Sabbah had to participate in his ordination. Immediately after the ceremony, Bishop Gourion told Sabbah: “My friend, Cardinal Lustiger and I are two Jewish Christians, and like all Jews in the world, we’re known for fundamental solidarity with Israel, even if we sometimes don’t like the behavior of the Israeli government.” 

After his ordination, israel today editor Aviel Schneider interviewed the new bishop. 

israel today: Congratulations, Bishop Gourion. 

Bishop Gourion: Thank you. Yes, I am the first Jewish bishop in Eretz Israel [the Land of Israel] in nearly 2,000 years! 

israel today: What’s the difference between a Catholic Jew and a Messianic Jew? 

Bishop Gourion: The Jewish Catholics belong to an historical church, whereas the Israeli Messianic Jews developed a new expression only 50 years ago. Apart from that, we have much in common in our faiths, including the Hebrew language. 

israel today: Do you have contact with Messianic Jews in Israel? 

Bishop Gourion: Even if we don’t have official contacts with Messianic Judaism, I personally have close ties with Messianic Jews in the country. All in all,we are one family. 

israel today: Please tell me how your Jewish parents reacted in 1958 when you were baptized. 

Bishop Gourion: They had a very hard time. They were shocked and saw me as a traitor. My brother and two sisters could hardly get over my belief in Jesus. 

israel today: How did your family react to your new title of bishop? 

Bishop Gourion: I have a very close relationship with my three siblings, who attended my ordination in Jerusalem and gave me God’s blessing. All in all, I think my appointment by the Catholic Church points to a new era between Jews and Catholic Christians. We have to learn to understand each other better. The Catholic Church has no intention of converting Jews to Christianity. Therefore, the Pope advocated a Jewish bishop in Israel. 

israel today: Nevertheless, you represent the Catholic Church, which has been responsible for the death of thousands of Jews in the name of Jesus. 

Bishop Gourion: The Pope, who heads the Catholic Church and directs its policies, asked the Jewish people for forgiveness both in Rome and Jerusalem. It’s in our hands to bring about reconciliation between Jews and Christians through our daily lives. What history destroyed, we must rebuild today.  

israel today: Though I don’t want to mention any names, not every Catholic bishop wants to be reconciled with the Jewish people. 

Bishop Gourion: That’s true, but we must create a new way of thinking in the Church, which isn’t possible overnight. Among the Jews as well, there are those who are positive toward Christians and others who are negative. 

israel today: For both political and theological reasons, the Vatican was reluctant to recognize the Jewish state, establishing diplomatic ties with Israel just 10 years ago. One of the reasons is that the Catholic Church thinks of itself as God’s chosen people. 

Bishop Gourion: Well, 40 years ago in the Second Vatican Council, the Church adopted a new theological position toward Israel as God’s chosen people. The Catholic Church does not replace the Jewish people with whom God made an eternal covenant. 

Who rejected the Everlasting Covenant, the seed of Abraham by faith in Jesus Christ according to the Promise, the One Seed

israel today: But in the 1950s, how could you, as a Jew, join the Catholic Church, when it looked upon itself—and still does, at least in part—as God’s chosen people? 

Bishop Gourion: I knew then that the Church’s theology was wrong concerning the Jewish people. But what was worse for me was being disowned by my Jewish family and friends for joining the Church. 

israel today: The New Testament is a very Jewish book. But I often get the impression that the churches almost completely ignore the Old Testament. 

Jn:7:1: After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him

Bishop Gourion: You’re right and that shouldn’t be. One cannot understand the New Testament without studying the Old Testament. This often resulted in theological misunderstandings. 

israel today: Do you still think of yourself as part of the Jewish people? 

Bishop Gourion: Sure.
I see myself as a Jew. 

israel today: As a Jew and a Catholic. So you want the best of both worlds? 

Bishop Gourion: [laughs] Yes! That’s one way of seeing it!


Sorry wrong Messiah........bishop




and Of course he didn't


Aide: Pope did not endorse Gibson film

Tuesday, January 20, 2004 Posted: 1:19 PM EST (1819 GMT)

ROME, Italy (Reuters) -- In the latest twist in a saga involving the Vatican and Mel Gibson's controversial film about the death of Christ, Pope John Paul II's closest aide has denied reports the pontiff had praised the film's Biblical accuracy.

Archbishop Stanislaw Dziwisz, the pope's long-time private secretary, told the Catholic News Service Monday: "The Holy Father told no one of his opinion of this film."

In the past seven weeks, major world media organizations have written reports based on Church sources saying the pope liked the film and that he told aides that it was an accurate portrayal of Biblical accounts of Christ's final hours.

"The Passion of the Christ" is based on Gospel narratives and contains dialogue only in Latin, Hebrew and Aramaic, the vernacular of ancient Palestine. It opens on Ash Wednesday, February 25.

The movie, which covers the final 12 hours in the life of Jesus Christ, has come under fire from some Jewish groups that fear its story could foment anti-Semitism because it portrays Jewish authorities as largely responsible for Christ's death.

Dziwisz issued his denial after weeks of reports that the pope had told aides after seeing the film: "It is as it was."

Dziwisz told Catholic News Service: "The Holy Father saw the film privately in his apartment, but gave no declaration to anyone. He does not make judgments on art of this kind. He leaves that to others, to experts."

Supporters had seen the words attributed to the pope as an endorsement of the film's Biblical accuracy, but some Jews worried that they could harm Roman Catholic-Jewish relations.

On Sunday, columnist Frank Rich of the New York Times, who is Jewish, accused the film's producers of "roping him (the pope) into a publicity campaign to sell a movie."

Vatican spokesmen have repeatedly declined officially to confirm or deny the numerous reports over the past month.

Some Catholic and other Christian groups have defended the film, saying it sticks closely to accounts of the crucifixion as told in the New Testament.

The film has been shown to a select audience of Catholic officials in several private screenings in recent weeks.

Many Vatican officials have seen it in whole or part and have rejected charges that it is anti-Semitic.

Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, head of the Vatican department in charge of priests, said in September: "I would gladly trade some of the homilies that I have given about the passion of Christ for even a few of the scenes of his film."

Gibson reportedly paid $20 million to $25 million of his own money to make the movie, but despite his status as a top box office draw and Oscar winner, Hollywood's major studios shied away from distributing it because of the controversy.

Gibson is a member of a traditionalist Roman Catholic group that rejects some of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council and still uses the old-style Latin Mass.


Noahide Russia

Today, Rabbi Haskelevitch's radio program reaches 50 to 60 million listeners across the former Soviet Union and in other parts of Eastern Europe as well. "When I first began doing this program it was before Glasnost. The management asked me to wish the Russian people a good year on January 1, 1985. I expressed my hope that the Russian nation should come to appreciate religious freedom. People called me afterwards and asked me, 'Do you really believe that such a country could have any real changes?' I answered that I sincerely believed it. I had a sense from the Rebbe's advice to Jews in Russia at the time--telling them to cooperate with the government--that the Rebbe was anticipating a change. My hunch was correct." With the unprecedented and miraculous downfall of the most repressive regime known to world history came the opening up of the floodgates of religious freedom. Unfortunately, however, this also brought on a resurgence in anti-Semitism. (Ah, But anti-Semitism is nessecary for the management of our Lesser Brethren, see Illuminated "Protocols")


Pamphlets have been printed in Russia accusing Jews of baking matzohs with Christian blood and people believe it to such an extent that some are even afraid to let their children out of the house during the Passover season. "Another objective of my program is to dispel anti-Semitism. I say that Torah teaches love of one's neighbor and it would never condone the victimization of gentiles. (HOOOOOOOOOEY) They learn that through the Seven Noahide Laws they are equal partners with us in G-d's creation. (Obedient "Goyim Slaves to be decapitated unless they Obey the Masseh Race, are ye then gods)  This changes their attitude." Rabbi Haskelevitch grew up the son of a respected Torah scholar under the Soviet regime. At an early age he had to resolve intellectual conflicts resulting from the discrepancy between his Jewish upbringing and the propaganda he learned in the Soviet school system. The teachings of Chabad Chasidut helped him to reject atheistic indoctrination and at age 14 he became a Lubavitcher chasid. Later as a young man Rabbi Haskelevitch came to Crown Heights, Brooklyn, where he now resides with his Russian-born wife Chaya Sara and their eight children. "I originally came to see if everything I had heard about the Rebbe was true. I came for a short visit and I never went back," he said. The Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty program is creating some controversy in several segments of Russian society. A newspaper article recently asserted that the chasidim are trying to destroy particularistic Russian nationalism by introducing the "dangerous" concept of a universal set of laws for all nations. A political party, the anti-Semitic Pamyat, after learning of the Jewish roots of the Russian Orthodox religion, is seeking to erase any trace of Jewish influence on its creed, thereby going back to Russian paganism. Gorbachev himself admitted, after having escaped a coup d'etat with his life, that he owed his survival to the fact that he was listening to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. "After Gorbachev admitted this, my program rose greatly in its popularity. (*Gorbechev is at the Presidium in San Franscisce CA, which the US gave him to develope plans for this One World Order) I am convinced that Gorbachev had always been listening to me." Rabbi Haskelevitch asserted. To Rabbi Haskelevitch, however, the controversy surrounding his work is merely amusing. He is mostly concerned with reaching the average Russian citizens and educating them to understand spiritual concepts that they were denied access to for so long. That is why he has expanded his work to include an umbrella organization called H.O.A.S.C.A.N.I.M. (Hebrew Orthodox Assoc. for Societal and Cultural Advancement through National and International Media). HOASCANIM, which is the Hebrew word for activists, supports Radio Liberty and is publishing books and magazines in Russia as well as conducting lectures to the many groups which have recently formed to keep and learn more about the Seven Noahide Laws. Its objectives are to spread the teachings of Torah among Jews, to educate gentiles on the Seven Noahide Laws, and to dispel anti-Semitic myths. To what does Rabbi Haskelevitch attribute his success? "When we are talking to the deeply atheistic nations of the former Soviet empire, now miraculously turned anti-communist, about a religion of one G-d with one set of laws for all mankind, then this is an indication that we are living in the times right before the coming of the Messiah. Actually, communism was the belief in a good future, a utopia. The idea of communism was that mankind could build a world that could become so prosperous that life could become better for all people. This is an idea that I underscore as coming from Judaism. We can use all of science and materialism for the good but first we must become better. That can only be through faith. This is a Messianic idea and it is a Jewish one that must be based on faith."

Communism+Judaism+Talmudism+Babylonianism= One World Order

One World Religion unto satan


For those of you who do not believe, who have fallen for the "Secret Rapture" manufactured by Rothschild/Untermier/ C.I. Scofield, Hagee, Crouch, Fallwell, Robertson, Copeland and all the Judeo-Churchianity deniers that Jesus is Lord OVER ALL,  and these too who are become anti-Christ..........WELCOME to satan's Olam Haba, Temporary as it is.

We the Trues Believers of the Everlasting and Holy Covenant, Christ Jesus the Lord, may be decapitated for our Testimony and our witness of Jesus and rest a while, but for you, you will never be euphorically rescued and never enter into the Lord's rest, but have eternal damnation. Repent for the time of redemption draweth nigh, for you flesh jews, who say that you are the seed of Abraham, and are not in faith in Jesus the Only Messiah, repent, for the seperating of the chaff from the wheat is begun. Your Illuminated "Masters" have closed the Gate to heaven, and yours will only be a temporary kingdom of flesh. There will be NO EARTHLY RESURRECTION. REPENT.

Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin


Folio 56a


Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.21  It would have been sufficient to say], 'A man, etc:' What is taught by the expression any man?22  The inclusion of heathens, to whom blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites, and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation.23

Original footnotes renumbered. See Structure of the Talmud Files


  1. The witnesses, in giving testimony, do not state that they heard the accused say, 'May He slay himself', uttering the actual divine name, but use the word 'Jose' as a substitute for the divine name. 'Jose' is chosen as a substitute, because it contains four letters, like the actual Tetragrammaton, which must have been used by the blasphemer for him to be punished. Moreover, the numerical value of 'Jose' is the same as of Elohim [81]. According to Levy, s.v. [H], the first Jose [H] stands for Jesus ([H], son), and the second is an abbreviation of [H], Joseph, the Father, by which, however, God was to be understood. The witnesses were accordingly asked whether the accused in his blasphemy had set Jesus above God. (R. Joshua b. Karha, the author of this saying, lived at a time when Judeo-Christians ascribed more power to Jesus than to God.)



He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.



Yet not one, not even one military Jackbooted Thug, Not One, not even one Jackbooted Police Official, Not One, not even one congressperson has come forward and revealed the Guillotines with factual documentation. If any of you have this knowledge, documentation and forewithall, and you do not reveal it, the Blood of the slain is on your hands, and May the Lord of Heaven have pity on your souls. If any one of you flying the jet tankers spraying chemtrails on the cities of the earth do not come forward and reveal, then may the Lord in Heaven have pity on your soul. You will meet the saints of the Lord, But they certainly will not greet you in brotherhood. 



Oops...Did Nasa overlook the comet of th heralding of their Cosmic False Christ?





Announcing Comet C/2002 T7 (LINEAR)
Credit & Copyright: Mike Holloway

Explanation: A newly discovered comet may outshine most stars in the sky by May. Designated Comet C/2002 T7 (LINEAR), the comet was discovered in 2002 October by project LINEAR. Many reports already place the comet as brighter than magnitude 7, meaning that it can now be seen with binoculars. Reports also indicate the comet already has a visible tail nearly the length of a full Moon. Since predicting the future brightness of comets is a very tricky business, there remains the possibility that T7 might never become visible to the unaided eye. Alternatively, another comet, C/2001 Q4 (NEAT), may also reach naked eye visibility at nearly the same time, making 2004 April and May two of the busiest bright-comet months in centuries. Comet T7 can be seen on the above right on January 20, while an airplane trail is visible on the left


Just in time, perfect timing, for their "REVEALING" of their false Messiah?


Ram bam points out that the Moshiach will be highly intelligent, a tremendous prophet, and admired and respected by all. He will be an unknown figure until the time he is "revealed", and his debut will take place in Eretz Yisroel.

"And this is for you the sign [of the coming of the Mashiach]: that you see a septenary which begins with rain; in the second year, arrows of famine are sent out; in the third, there is great famine; and in the fourth - neither hunger nor plenty; in the sixth - great plenty, and a star will grow from the east with a staff on its head, and that is the star of Yisra'el...and if it lights up, it is for the benefit of Yisra'el, and then will sprout up Mashiach ben David. And this is the sign for you: When you see the eastern Nero (i.e., emperor) in Damascus has fallen, and the kingdom of the Children of the East has fallen, then will salvation sprout up for Yisra'el, and Mashiach ben David will come, and they will ascend to Yerushalayim and enjoy it...May Elohim in His mercy send us the Redeemer rapidly in our days, Amen."
---Nistarot R. Shim'on ben Yohai, BhM 3:82


The Sumerians represented G0D with the 8-pointed star.

They make Jesus Lucifer and they make satan, God

Jerusalem is called the Land of the Night Journey and the Ascension and so it could be for both faiths to finally break free from the bondage that the Morning Star (Lucifer aka the idol Jesus - Rev 22:16) has over our lives.
Note: Jesus exclaimed being the 'Thief in the Night' -
1 Thessalonians 5:2, 2 Peter 3:10 and in studying about Mithras (symbolized by the sun and the red bull) we find his enemy was 'The Night'.

"Jesus of Nazareth who aspired to be the Moshiach and was executed by the court was also spoken of in Daniel's prophecies [Daniel 11:14], "The renegades among your people shall exalt themselves in an attempt to fulfill the vision, but they shall stumble."

"Can there be a greater stumbling block than [Christianity]? All the prophets spoke of Moshiach as the redeemer of Israel and their savior, who would gather their dispersed ones and strengthen their [observance of] the mitzvos. In contrast [the founder of Christianity] caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humiliated, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the L-rd."

"Nevertheless, the intent of the Creator of the world is not within the power of man to comprehend, for [to paraphrase Yeshayahu 55:8] His ways are not our ways, nor are His thoughts our thoughts. [Ultimately,] all the deeds of Jesus of Nazareth and that Ishmaelite [i.e. Mohammed] who arose after him will only serve to pave the way for the coming of Moshiach and for the improvement of the entire world, [motivating the nations] to serve G-d together, as it is written [Zephaniah 3:9], "I will make the peoples pure of speech so that they will all call upon the Name of G-d and serve Him with one purpose."


How the prophets of Baal, had to have the WTC Massacre



The Zohar (Balak 212b) describes a catastrophic tragedy that will befall future Rome, where "three great towers will fall":


I will show you, but not for now, for these things will only come to be at that time, some after time and some in the days of Moshiach. "A star has gone forth from Yaakov..." (Numbers 24:17).


This teaches us that in the future, The Holy One, Blessed is He, will build Jerusalem and one star will spark within 70 pillars of fire and 70 sparks will receive light from it in the middle of the sky. The other 70 stars will be swallowed within it. It will give off light and blaze for 70 days.

At the end of the sixth day it will become visible at the beginning of the 25th day of the sixth month. It will be gathered in at the end of 70 complete days and be visible in the city of Rome, and on that day, three great walls will fall, a great hall will fall, and the power of that city will die.


The September 11 attack may be hinted to in this Zohar. Amazingly, the attack on "three great walls" occurred on the 23rd day of the sixth Jewish month, Elul. According to some commentators going back hundreds of years, the accurate text of the Zohar is "23rd day" not "25th day," since the latter can never fall out on "the sixth day" of the week. This is due to a calendric technicality whereby Rosh Hashana, the first day of Tishrei, never occurs on a Wednesday.

Why does the Zohar mention Rome? Ancient Rome fell over 1,500 years ago, and nothing like this has occurred in modern Rome?

Rome the city may remain in Italy, but Rome the concept can be the Western world today.

Historically, all modern nations can trace their roots back to ancient peoples, and all modern day philosophies can find their roots in ancient philosophies as well. "Rome the physical city" may remain today in Italy, but "Rome the concept" can be in the Western world today, in part or in whole.



#27 of 41 in the Kabbala Series


The Zohar (Balak 212b) writes about the End of Days:


...Then this star will emanate to be seen in the world. This will cause a great war to occur at that time in all four directions, and there will be no faith amongst them. In the middle of the world, once this star begins to shine in the middle of the sky, a great king will arise and take control of the world, and act arrogantly over all the kings. A war will begin on two sides and he will overcome them.

The son of perdition to be "REVEALED" from the abyss, yea they have a king over them.

On the day that the star is gathered, the Holy Land will shake for 45 miles from all around until the place of the Temple. An underground cave will become revealed, and from that cave will go out a fire that will burn the world. From that cave a great and elevated branch will sprout and it will control the world. To him the kingship will be given. The holy and elevated ones will gather around him, and then Moshiach will be revealed in the world, and to him will go the kingship.

The world, at the time that Moshiach will be revealed, will have been experiencing trouble after trouble, and the enemies of Israel will have been prevailing. Then, the spirit of Moshiach will be aroused against them, and the evil Edom (WEST) will be destroyed. The entire land of Seir will be destroyed by fire.



Excerpt of the "Protocols" of the Illuminated Masters of flesh Zion, the Chassidim Chabad Lubavitch


9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming.

 Three of the kings chambers, of the Ten men of the apostate bed of Solomon (Shlomo)

10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious ways. None will know what the king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and therefore none will dare to stand across an unknown path.

11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king must correspond in capacity to the plan of government it has to contain. It is for this reason that he will ascend the throne not otherwise than after examination of his mind by the aforesaid learned elders.

12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.

13. This terror was indispensable for us till the time comes for both these forces separately to fall under our influence.

14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.

15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations.

16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachable.


No, these Protocols are NO FORGERY. But are of their god of this world, Moshiach ben Satan, that evil son of perdition.


2 Thes.

1: Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2: That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4: Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.




Not so, Dan of the uttermost part of Israel and ye Chabad Lubavitch, for the only REVEALED is your denial of the Only Christ Jesus the Lord Almighty, and that son of perdition, Moshiach shall fall to the pit of fire


Isaiah 14:


12: How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, (Moshiach ben Satan)  son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13: For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 

(Dan) Chabad Lubavitch

14: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.


Moshiach ben satan

15: Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.
16: They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying,
Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;


False Messiah of jewry

17: That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?
All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house.
19: But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet.
20: Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people:
the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.
21: Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.


25: Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

22: For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD.
23: I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the LORD of hosts.
24: The LORD of hosts hath sworn, saying, Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand:
25: That I will break the Assyrian in my land, and upon my mountains tread him under foot: then shall his yoke depart from off them, and his burden depart from off their shoulders.
26: This is the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations.


Stand Firm, give witness and testimony for the only Living Lord the Messiah, Christ Jesus the Lord, this is your only purpose which you are sent

27: For the LORD of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul it? and his hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back?




For the Lord comes with Great and Terrible Wrath on that DAY, Woe unto you who seek that DAY of the Lord's Wrath


Their satanic occult planning of their Olam Haba, and the "REVEALING" of their Moshaich ben satan that son of perdition, was triggured September 11, 2001. Bush that Man of Dan, was the tool used. He is soon to pass off to Kerry, another who is versed in the dark sentences of Skull and Bones mystery Babylon, who will fall. Then One will come in in Flattery......succeeding the president of the Unbites States of Greater Israel, Eretz Is-Ra-El.


Says the Zohar HaKodesh.

I will show you, but not for now, for these things will only come to be at that time, some after time and some in the Days of King Moshiach. "A star has gone forth from Ya'akov [Jacob] ..." (Bamidbar [Numbers] 24:17). This teaches us that in the future, The Holy One, Blessed is He, will build Jerusalem and one star will spark within seventy pillars of fire and seventy sparks will receive light from it in the middle of the sky. (seventy Goyim Noahide Nations) The other seventy stars will be swallowed within it. (New World Odour of Olam Ha Ba) It will give off light and blaze for seventy days. At the end of the sixth day [6,000 years] it will become visible at the beginning of the twenty-fifth day of the sixth month [25 Elul 5761, September13, 2001]. It will be gathered in at the end of seventy complete days [November 20, 2001] and be visible in the city of Rome, and on that day, three great walls will fall and great hail will fall [Leonid meteor shower? November 14-21, 2001], and the power of that city will die. Then this star will become visible in the world, and it will instigate a great war from all four sides ... When Moshiach becomes revealed the people of the world will be suffering trouble after trouble, and the enemies of the Jewish people will be prevailing. Then the spirit of Moshiach will be aroused and the evil Edom [Esau, Jacob's brother] will be destroyed and the Land of Seir [Esau's land] will be burned with fire ... (Zohar, Balak, 212b)


Pitting the USA against Ishmael




The Exod-US, robbing and Pillage of the US economy will begin according to the plan of the god of this world, but alas orchestrated by the Father in Heaven


Mammon DID take place in the sixth month of the Jewish year (months are counted from Nissan and not Tishrei), in Elul, in the SIXTH millennium, Yosef HaTzaddik's millennium. According to the Talmud, one of Yosef's prime roles in Egypt was to collect all the money into one single location: Egypt (Pesachim 119a). And, interestingly enough, that money has relevance to the end of history as well:


Says the Talmud:

And it was evening and it was morning, the sixth day (ha-shishi). (Bereishis [Genesis] 1:31) - the letter "heh" (preceding the word "shishi") is extra . . . to say that (G-d) made a condition with them (all of creation): If the Jewish people accept the Five (represented by the letter "heh") Books of the Torah, then you can remain stable; if not, then you will resort back to 'null' and 'void'. (Shabbos 88a)

The reference is to the second verse of creation:

The earth was null (tohu) and void (vohu), and there was darkness upon the face of the deep, and the spirit of G-d hovered above the water. (Bereishis 1:2)

In other words, the only reason why G-d saw fit to end the chaos of the first day of creation was for the sake of a people which would one day accept and live by Torah. So important was this to the Creator that He built His world upon this condition, and built this condition into His world. It is a "law" of creation.

Far fetched as it may seem at first, what happened in New York and Washington was a function of the original null and void of primordial creation, in a major way. All chaos anywhere in creation is a function of the original "tohu" that the Five Books of Moshe are meant to vanquish. In light of this, can we call it purely coincidental and incidental that the Pentagon has five sides, or that the Twin Towers looked like two big Hebrew "vavs," the letter which represents the number SIX?

And by the way, the Vilna Gaon's* version of the Zohar says that the twenty-fifth day should read, "twenty-third day," which, this year was the Tuesday of infamy [Elul 23 5761, September 11, 2001].

"in the SIXTH millennium" = 6000

"it DID take place in the sixth month of the Jewish year" = 6

"the Twin Towers looked like two big Hebrew "vavs," [ww] the letter which represents the number SIX" = 66



("Avodah" means a "spiritual mission," "prayer service" or "cleaving unto God." The "golus" refers to the "exile," i.e., Jews living in the Gentile world. "Hashem" is the unnamed "name" of the Jewish god.)



The Oral Tradititon of the Chassidim Pharisees, Chabad Lubavitch, the leaven.....Torah Mishnah, Talmud Bavli of satan and his rabid rabbi's of the synagogues of satan


"We must therefore deduce that this is an auspicious time to conquer the world with Torah and Yiddishkeit in a pleasant and peaceful way: 'All the land is before you.'" (Bereshis 13:9). ("Conquer the World with Torah: A Message to the Shluchim Convention," 5747, Sichos in English, vol. 33, p.270)




Serve the "Master Race" of self appointed gods

"Even in the future, the nations will continue to exist, to serve and help the Jewish people.… This, then, is our lesson -- to increase our activities in the areas where the many will be influenced: Jews, the world, and the nations" (Shabbos Parshas Vayeishev, 21 Kislev, 5745)



Jn:7:1: After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.



". . . the Torah mandated role of Judaism as the only true religion for all of mankind, either as Jews or as Bnai Noach."




"There is no room for dialogue with other religions, for the ‘purification of Christianity’ or lost-ten-tribes theology. These falsehoods . . . are destructive anti-Torah viewpoints. The Rambam [Schneerson] writes that the time will come when Christians and Muslims will realize that their religions are false, and fault their forefathers for teaching it to them. They will accept the One G-d of the Jewish people, and all other religions, in any form or variation, will be abolished in their entirety. The time for this is now, and all other approaches only are intended to delay the revelation of the absolute Truth of Torah in the entire world." (Emphasis added.)


Note * While I find Willie Martin to be in understanding of these dire times falling upon mankind, I cannot condone his "Racial" supremecist backgound. see..




Public Law 102-14 and Its Implications To Christian Americans


105 STAT. 44 Public Law 102-14 -- March 20, 1991 Joint Resolution To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A."


Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;


Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;


Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands  in serious peril of returning chaos;


Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;


Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;


Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty‑ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;


Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe," this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving," the year in which we turn to education charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and


Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it


Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the world‑wide Lubavitch Movement, is designated as "Education Day, U.S.A." The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. (Approved March 20, 1991)


It is apparent that the "Seven Noahide Laws" are the real purpose of the Resolution and Public Law 102‑14. The Seven Noahide Laws themselves were not included in the Resolution nor in the Law itself, AND FOR GOOD REASON.


Since they are not commonly known to the average citizen, we should endeavor to learn what they are; and more about the so‑called "Rebbe" Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch Movement; and what effect, if any, these laws will have upon Christian Americans in general. Particularly now that we have a NEW "law of the land."


They are not easy to find, but some encyclopedias mention them briefly. NOAHIDE LAWS, also called NOACHIAN LAWS, A Jewish Talmudic designation for seven [so‑called] Biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently on all mankind [THERE IS NO BIBLICAL PROOF FOR THIS STATEMENT].


Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud [supposedly] listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command TO ESTABLISH COURTS OF JUSTICE (with all that this implies). After the flood a seventh commandment given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal (Genesis 9:4).


Though the number of laws was later increased to 30 with the addition of prohibitions against castration, sorcery, and other practices, the 'seven laws,' with minor variations, retained their original status as authoritative commandments and as the source of other laws.


As basic statutes safe‑guarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society, THESE LAWS PROVIDED A LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ALIEN RESIDENTS IN JEWISH TERRITORY [When did the United States become Jewish territory?]. Maimonides thus regarded anyone who observed these laws as one 'assured of a portion in the world to come.'


Throughout the ages scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity [Which is totally false. Judaism and Christianity are total opposites and are deadly enemies], as universal norms of ethical conduct, AS A BASIC CONCEPT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all. 


"The current expression 'Judeo-Christian' is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men's mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, IT SEEKS TO BRING TOGETHER TWO IDEAS THAT ARE RADICALLY IN OPPOSITION. By laying the accent exclusively on the 'Christian' idea to the detriment of the 'Judean' it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term 'Judeo-Christian' does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.

It is based on a 'contrdictio in adjecto' which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath TWO IDEAS WHICH ARE COMPLETELY IRRECONCILABLE, IT SEEKS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DAY AND NIGHT OR HOT AND COLD OR BLACK AND WHITE, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one ...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: 'As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...'

The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates-anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself." (Joshua Jehouda, l'Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31)


The Jewish Encyclopedia describes Christianity as a religion espousing "ascetic monasticism," which means believing in a life of sacrifice and-self-denial in order to help others.


However, IT DESCRIBES JUDAISM AS TEACHING THE EXACT OPPOSITE {of Christianity} in that "life is good and should be endowed with material worth" {or riches}.


Also, while Christianity believes in forgiving ones enemies and even loving them, the motto of Judaism is - "Never Forgive - Never Forget."


Thus the "Judeo-Christian" ethic spoken of by Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggert, Kenneth Copel, Billy Graham, Oral Roberts and most other misled ministers is a false religion.


Note that "The Jewish Voice" ridicules it but suggest that if Christians want to subject themselves to Jewry they may do so. However, the idea of a "Judeo-Christian" faith is alien to Jewry and rejected by them.     


"Judeo-Christian tradition' is a term increasingly employed to achieve a closer identification between Judaism and Christianity and may seem a most ungracious act to decline, with thanks, this invitation is a NEW 'acceptance.' It is called for that we who are Jews be wary of this new affection. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY...the 'other-world' philosophy which served as an excuse for tolerating inequities and ignorance in this world; THE HEAVY STRESS ON A SAVIOR...ALL OF THESE PHILOSOPHIES ARE ALIEN TO JUDAISM, but make up a vast part of that Christianity which is today REJECTED BY ASIA AND AFRICA. LET US NOT BE SO STUPID AS TO GET INTER-TWINED WITH THIS REJECTED WAY OF LIFE...." (The Jewish Voice, Friday, August 4, 1961, Awakening, by Rabbi Jacob Steinberg)


The following is a summary of the Seven Noahide Laws. (Institute of Judaic-Christian Researcher, Jan. 1992; The Talmud, Sanh. 56a-59b; Yad Melakhim 8:10, 9, 10)


1). Thou shalt not engage in idol worship.


2). Thou shalt not blaspheme God.


3). Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of any human nor  fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.


4). Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous,  adulterous or homosexual relations nor commit the act         of rape.


5). Thou shalt not steal.




7). Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.


As we make a cursory examination of the "Seven Noahide Laws" one would see nothing objectionable. In fact, one would applaud any effort to remove the evil from among us; because that is what the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God directs us to do. But there is more, much more, to these laws than first meets the eye!


The Jews say these "Seven Laws of Noah" known as the "Noahide Laws" or "Noachian Laws," (actually there are only six laws with one provision for enforcement which makes up the "Seven Noahide Laws").


So, how does the resolution passed by Congress relate to these laws? The United States is considered by many Jews as "THEIR" stronghold and "THEIR" headquarters for eventual world domination.


In a recent article published in "Wellsprings" the head rabbi of Hasidic Jewry stated: "...America has become the focus and fountain-head of Jewish survival. Providence has prepared a new home for Torah and Yiddishkeit in this country...The largest concentration of our best elements are in America. We must lead the smaller Jewish communities in other countries and continents, even in Erety Israel [Israel-Palestine], which must learn heavily on American support for its economic and spiritual survival."


The "Seven Laws of Noah," according to Hasidic Jews, SHOULD BE ENFORCED UPON ALL NON‑JEWS [this means the Blacks, Mexicans, Chinese, Japanese, Arabs, and etc., as well as Christians] BY THE JEWS THEMSELVES: "... the entire context of the Talmudic discussion of the Noachide Laws is that of actual ENFORCEMENT BY RABBINIC COURTS."


The Jews say these laws were given to Noah by their god for the orderly government of all people, BUT JEWS WERE GIVEN ANOTHER SET OF LAWS at Mount Sinai much later, SO THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE NOAHIDE LAWS but rather to the later ones, except, of course, for those Noahide Laws that were repeated at Sinai. Also the Jews WOULD NOT PAY THE SAME PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THESE LAWS.


The Jewish Encyclopedia, page 649 states: "In the case of murder, if the Noachide slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense, THE NOACHIDE IS GUILTY OF MURDER AND MUST PAY THE DEATH PENALTY, ALTHOUGH UNDER THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES AN ISRAELITE [Jew] WOULD NOT BE EXECUTED."


According to the Encyclopedia Judaica the death penalty would be: "...violation of any one of the seven laws SUBJECTS THE NOACHIDE TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BY DECAPITATION."


Notice Congress and the President are giving acclamation to a Talmudic Jewish Rabbi called "the rebbe." Menachem Mendel Schneerson, whom the "Current Biography Yearbook 1983" states on page 355: "[Born] April 18, 1902 [Not March 26 as stated in Public Law 102‑14]; leader of Habad (Lubavitch) Hasidim...' As Rebbe, or spiritual head, of the Lubavitch Hasidim, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson is one of the most important figures in American and world Jewry...Hasid and the hasidic community from his own all‑pervasive radiance, attained through his mystic union with God. This union and the ensuing enrichment of his soul are used for the sake of the people, TO LEAD THEM LOVINGLY TO THEIR CREATOR. The zaddik IS A MYSTIC who employs his power within the social community and for its sake. A wonder‑healer and miracle‑worker, in the eyes of his followers HE IS A COMBINATION OF CONFESSOR, MORAL INSTRUCTOR, AND PRACTICAL ADVISER. Also a theoretical teacher and exegetical preacher, with a style of preaching peculiar to zaddikim, he expounds his hasidic torah (Hebrew for the teaching of the zaddimim) at his table (in hasidic parance der tish) surrounded by his followers, generally during the third meal on the Sabbath (se'ndah shelishit). For the individual Hasid, joining the court of his zaddik is both a pilgrimage and a revitalizing unification with the brotherhood gathered at the court, united around and through the zaddik. 

The Hasid journeyed to his zaddik's court at least for the High Holidays (although this practice later weakened) to seek his blessing, which was also entreated from afar. He submitted a written account of his problems (known as a kvitl), usually accompanying this with A MONETARY CONTRIBUTION (pidyon, short FOR pidyon nefesh, 'REDEMPTION OF THE SOUL')...

BASIC IDEAS OF HASIDISM:C Creator and Universe. While it is true that many of the basic ideas of Hasidism are grounded in earlier Jewish sources, the Hasidim did produce much that was new if only by emphasis. With few exceptions, hasidic ideas are not presented systematically in the hasidic writings, but an examination of these writings reveals certain patterns common to all the hasidic masters.


The redemption of the 'holy sparks' was one of the rea­sons given for hasidic fondness for tobacco. SMOKING A PIPE SERVED TO RELEASE SUBTLE 'SPARKS' NOT OTHERWISE ACCESSIBLE.

JEWISH ZADDIK SAID TO BRING JEWS CLOSER TO THEIR GOD!: Kavannah and Zaddikism. Is this program of sustained contemplation, attachment, and utter devotion to God really possible for all men? The hasidic answer is generally in the negative. This is why the doctrine of zaddikism is so important for Hasidism. The holy man, his thoughts constantly on God, raises the prayers of his followers and all their other thoughts and actions. In the comprehensive work on zaddikism, R. Elimelech of Lyzhansk's No'am Elimelekh, the zaddik appears as a spiritual superman, with the power to work miracles.

HE IS THE CHANNEL THROUGH WHICH THE DIVINE GRACE FLOWS, THE MAN TO WHOM GOD HAS GIVEN CONTROL OF THE UNIVERSE BY HIS PRAYERS. THE ZADDIK PERFORMS A DOUBLE TASK: HE BRINGS MAN NEARER TO GOD AND HE BRINGS DOWN GOD'S BOUNTY TO MAN. [In other words, on every hand the so-called Zaddik is trying to replace the Lord Jesus Christ. Thus denying the Word of God] The zaddik must be supported by his followers. This financial assistance is not for the sake of the zaddik but for the sake of those privileged to help him. By supporting the zaddik with their worldly goods his followers become attached to him through his dependence on them, which he readily accepts in his love for them.

JEWISH ZADDIK HAS POWER OVER LIFE AND DEATH: Their welfare thus becomes his and his prayers on their behalf can the more readily be answered. THE ZADDIK EVEN HAS POWERS OVER LIFE AND DEATH. GOD MAY HAVE DECREED THAT A PERSON SHOULD DIE BUT THE PRAYERS OF THE ZADDIK CAN NULLIFY THIS DECREE. THIS IS BECAUSE THE ZADDIK'S SOUL IS SO PURE AND ELEVATED THAT IT CAN REACH TO THOSE WORLDS IN WHICH NO DECREE HAS BEEN PROMULGATED SINCE THERE ONLY MERCY REIGNS. But if such powers were evidently denied to the great ones of the past how does the Zaddik come to have them? The rationale is contained in the parable attributed to the Maggid of Mezhirech (No'am Elimelekh to Genesis 37:1).

Rabbi Michael Katz, a well known student of the Talmud, states that it is the considered opinion of acclaimed TALMUDIC SCHOLARS that there are actually thirty commandments that are Noadic and apply to all non‑Jewish people but that ONLY THE 'SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS' ARE PUNISHABLE BY EXECUTION OF CHRISTIANS BY JEWS THROUGH JEWISH 'NOAHIDE' COURTS! The Talmud says that the first six of these precepts were given originally by God to Adam, and the seventh afterward to Noah. These precepts were designed to be obligatory on all the Noachide, OR DESCENDANTS OF NOAH, AND CONSEQUENTLY, FROM THE TIME OF MOSES, THE JEWS WOULD NOT SUFFER A STRANGER TO LIVE AMONG THEM UNLESS HE OBSERVED THESE PRECEPTS, AND NEVER GAVE QUARTER IN BATTLE TO AN ENEMY WHO WAS IGNORANT OF THEM."


Now we turn once again to the Jewish Encyclopedia: HADAD: "NAME OF AN Arama­ic...EDOMITISH, DEITY..." (Taken from the 1971 edition of the Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. XII, pp. 1189‑1191)


"NOACHIDE LAWS, the seven laws considered by rabbinic tradition as the minimal moral duties enjoined by the Bible on all men (Sanh. 56‑60; Yad. Melakhim, 8:10; 10:12)...

The seven Noachide laws as traditionally enumerated are; the prohibitions of idolatry, blasphemy, bloodshed, sexual sins, theft, and eating from a living animal, AS WELL AS THE INJUNCTION TO ESTABLISH A LEGAL SYSTEM (Tosef., Av. Zar. 8:4; Sanh. 56a). Except for the last, all are negative, and the last itself is usually interpreted as commanding the enforcement of the other (Maim. Yad, Melakhim, 9:1). They are derived exegetically from divine demands addressed to Adam (Genesis 2:16) and Noah (see Gen. R. 34; Sanh. 59b), i.e., the progenitors of all mankind, and are thus regarded as universal.

The attempt of Finkelstein (op. cit.) to date the formulation of the seven Noachide commandments during the Hasmonean era would also suggest a rabbinic concern with the actual legal status of the non‑Jew in a sovereign Jewish state. It might even be the case that the substitution by the tanna of the school of Manasseh of emasculation and forbidden mixtures of plants for the establishment of a judicial system and blasphemy (Sanh. 56b) itself reflects a concern with the regulation of the life of the resident alien already under the jurisdiction of Jewish courts.

Of course, the seven commandments themselves are subject to either interpretation; e.g., the establishment of courts of justice can mean either an independent non‑Jewish judiciary and legal system or can simply bring the non‑Jew under the rubic Jewish civil law and its judicial system.

LIABILITY FOR VIOLATION OF THE LAWS. While committed to the principle that 'There is nothing permitted to an Israelite yet forbidden to a heathen' (Sanh. 59a), the seven Noachide Laws were not as extensive as the parallel prohibitions applicable to Jews, and there are indeed situations in which a non‑Jew would be liable for committing an act for which a Jew would not be liable.

As to the latter point, as a general rule, the Noachide is criminally liable for violation of any of his seven laws even though technical definition limitations would prevent liability by a Jew performing the same act. Thus a non‑Jew is liable for blasphemy ‑‑ even if only with one of the divine attributes; murder even of a foetus (Embryo): robbery ‑‑ even of less than a perutah; and the eating of flesh torn from a living animal ‑‑ even of a quantity less than the size of an olive. IN ALL THESE CASES A JEW WOULD NOT BE LIABLE (Sanh. 56a‑ 59b; Yad. Melakhim, ch. 9, 10). One additional element of greater severity IS that VIOLATION OF ANY ONE OF THE SEVEN LAWS SUBJECTS THE NOACHIDE TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BY DECAPITATION (Sanh. 57a). 


The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 8, pages 648‑649, describes the Noahide Laws as follows: "LAWS, NOACHIAN: Laws which are supposed by the Rabbis to have been binding upon mankind at large even before the revelation at Sinai and which are still binding upon non‑Jews. The term Noachian indicates the universality of these ordinances, since the whole human race was supposed to be descended from the three sons of Noah who alone survived the flood...The Noachide ARE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH COURTS OF JUSTICE IN EVERY CITY AND PROVINCE; and THESE COURTS ARE TO JUDGE THE PEOPLE WITH REGARD TO THE SIX LAWS and to warn them against the transgression of any of them. In the case of murder, if the Noachid slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or by putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense THE NOACHID IS GUILTY OF MURDER AND MUST PAY THE DEATH‑ PENALTY, although UNDER THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES A JEW WOULD NOT BE EXECUTED (ibid. 57b; 'Yad.' l.c. ix.4).

The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, by Massa DGH, p. 1178 relates: "Laws of Noah: Seven laws which the rabbis hold binding upon all mankind, derived from early chapters of Gen. (e.g., 9:4‑7). Six of these laws are negative, prohibiting idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, robbery, and the eating of flesh cut from a living animal. The single positive commandment is that REQUIRING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COURTS OF JUSTICE. The 'Noachide Laws' were much discussed by European scholars in the 17th century in connection with the Laws of Nations."


When we study the Lubavitch Movement we can begin to understand the depths of the conspiracy. We can now understand why the understanding of the Millennium had to be changed.


We can now more completely understand the true meaning of the multitude of quotes made by famous Rabbis and other Communists. We can now understand the true meaning of the term Judeo‑Christianity. The Lubavitch Movement is one of the guiding influences in the concept of the Jewish Millennium and their messiah.


The Lubavitch Movement, as we have shown, teaches that the Seven Noahide Laws are applicable to all non‑Jews and that the Jews of the world are obliged to enforce those laws.


The penalty for breaking those laws is DEATH BY DECAPITATION. At the same time, the Jews themselves are under Talmudic Laws and not the Noahide Laws they say. Thus, they can violate the Noahide Laws without punishment.


Now we can understand why it was so important for the doctrines of the Christian church to be changed to declare that the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God done away with by the advent of Christ. For the longest period of time during the Christian Kingdom, we believed and practiced the Mosaic Laws. It was imperative that they relegate us to the Noahide Laws while only the Jews will keep the Talmudic Laws.


The Lubavitch Movement under Rabbi Menachem Schneerson teaches from the Talmud that any Jewish man can be the messiah. Further, they teach that the Jewish Millennium is to be ushered in at any moment with the naming of their messiah. If we combine the works of the Lubavitch Movement with the final drive for the one world movement that is now being pushed, we are seeing the final preparations for the Jewish utopia or millennium.


Now we can understand what THE TERM JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY MEANS: THE SUBMISSION OF CHRISTIANITY TO THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND RELIGIOUS PRECEPTS OF JUDAISM. The Economic Factor in the Conspiracy. The proposed Jewish Millennium must have an economic system. The Christian Kingdom of God here on Earth had an economic system and it was called money capitalism. There is a vast difference between the two systems.


They speak of high and lofty morals BUT WHERE ARE THEY? How did we wind up with sex execution in schools; with Queers and perverts handing out Condoms in the schools; pornographic stores; filthy movies on the screen and on television; free love; etc.?


Why do we have fourth generation families on welfare? where is this "MOTIVATING IMPULSE FOR THE WELFARE OF THE COMMON MAN?"




Some of the greatest philosophers of recent times, and those the Talmudic system hates with a passion, give us the clues. Oswald Spengler, Francis Yockey and Hegel all tell us of nationalism. That means ethnic, morality, racial and tribal. Each of them taught of the one great folly of the White, Celto‑Saxon, Teutonic Christian West. As a people we have gone to the four corners of the world and brought other cultures to live with us and we have tried to make them over in our own image. We have tried to play God.


LUBAVITCH SECT CLAIMS ITS LEADER IS THE MESSIAH: The followers of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, claim that he is the "Messiah." As evidence of this claim, followers cite Schneerson's predictions of the fall of Communism, the exodus of Soviet Jews to Israel, and the relatively little damage suffered by Israel during Iraq's Scud attacks on the Zionist State during the so‑called Gulf War.


The fact that the "Rebbe" as Schneerson is called, has recently suffered a stroke has not diminished his appeal as the "Messiah" in the eyes of his followers.

This is not surprising as the Jews trout out a new "Messiah" every 200‑300 years, as can be seen by an examination of the Jewish Chronology in the Jewish Encyclopedia.


400 A.D. Moses, the false Messiah of Crete.


721 A.D. Appearance of the false Messiah Serenus in    Syria causes many Spanish Jews to emigrate to Palestine.


1117 A.D. Persecution at Rome; appearance of a false   Messiah at Cordova.


1156 A.D. Jews of Persia persecuted on account of  pseudo‑Messiah, David Alroy.


1502. A.D. Appearance of the pseudo‑Messiah Asher  Lämmlein.


1568. A.D. Isaac Luria Levi (1534‑72), a cabalist,  pretends to be the Messiah, son of Joseph.


1665. A.D. Shabbethai Zebi (1626‑1676) publicly accepted as the Messiah at Smyrna.


1678. A.D. Appearance of the pseudo‑Messiah Mordecai   Moshiah of Eisenstadt.


1992. A.D. And now - Menachem Schneerson, the former leader of The Lubavitch Movement in the U.S.


In Israel recently, some so‑called "Torah Scholars" have ruled that: "The Torah maintains that the righteous of all nations have a place in the World to Come. But not all religious Gentiles earn eternal life by virtue of observing their religion.


And while the Christians do generally accept the Hebrew Bible as truly from God, many of them, THOSE WHO ACCEPT THE SO‑CALLED DIVINITY OF JESUS ARE IDOLATERS ACCORDING TO THE TORAH, PUNISHABLE BY DEATH, and certainly will not enjoy the World to Come." Israeli Mechon‑Mamre website, Oct. 28, 1999; 12 Hayyim Vital St., Jerusalem, Occupied Palestine. (Mechon Mamre is a small group of Torah AScholars@ in Israel) "When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews." (Talmud, Erubin 43b)


During the horrendous period when Talmudic Jews will reign unchallenged in one form or another under the auspices of their god‑king, the Antichrist, it will be they that will introduce the Guillotine as an execution measure to satisfy their Tamudic inspired blood‑lust. This method of execution for the faithful saints during this time is mentioned in the book of Revelation: A...and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;@ (Rev 20:4) The deaths of which, will be seen as doing their Agod@ a favour according to this: "A jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to God.@ (Abhodah Zarah 26b Tosephoth)


During this darkest time in human history, according to the Bible, beheading appears to be the universal method of slaying. The reason for this seemingly messy and impractical mode of execution has puzzled me for years, until I recently came across the little known ANoachide Laws.@ These seven laws, to be implemented under the NWO, allows BEHEADING as THE form of capital punishment, principally for what the TALMUD regards as AIdolaters@ and ABlasphemers,@ or in reality ‑ AChrist honouring@ Christians. AFor theological reasons, mostly rooted in ignorance, Christianity as a religion is classed by rabbinical teaching as idolatry. This is based on a crude interpretation of the Christian doctrines on the Trinity and Incarnation. All the Christian emblems and pictorial representations are regarded as 'idols' ‑ even by those Jews who literally worship scrolls, stones or personal belongings of 'Holy Men'. " (Jewish History, Jewish Religion: by Professor Israel Shahak)


AAll this, and much more like it, proves beyond a doubt that when the Rabbis speak of the idols of the Gentiles among whom they lived at that time, when no idols were worshipped, they clearly meant the Christian "idol," namely, the image of Christ on the crucifix and the Holy Communion.@ (AThe Talmud Judaism's holiest book Unmasked@ The Secret Jewish Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians By Rev. I. B. Pranaitis)




The AEncyclopedia Americana@ gives its explanation of the Noahide Laws, "Throughout the ages, scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all."


     This explanation leads one to believe that everyone on earth will be bound by these seven laws.

     However, reliable reports from Jewish sources are that the Jew who lives according to the ATorah,@

     (certainly not the written Torah given to Moses, but rather the occult/Pharisaic traditions adopted from

     the mystery religions of ancient Babylon) is exempt. In other words, these seven Laws were only meant

     for non‑Jews and are to be a direct substitute for the Biblical Ten Commandments. "It is the law to kill

     anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah." Talmud:

     Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5 Now does that sound like their ATorah@ is the same as our

     Biblical Old Testament B I think not!

     So let=s briefly list these seven NOAHIDE LAWS :

     1. Thou shalt not engage in idol worship.

     2. Thou shalt not blaspheme God.

     3. Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of a human nor foetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to


     4. Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous, or homosexual relations nor commit...rape.

     5. Thou shalt not steal.

     6. Thou shalt establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws

     7. Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.

     The Jews wish to commence with the U.S. to be ruled by the Noahide Laws, (which at first glance seem

     to be something harmless and even moral) together with whatever is intrinsically implied in them.

     Seeing that Athe devil is always in the details,@ looking a little closer we can see that the real goal is to

     have the non‑Jewish population of the United States totally subjected and ruled by judicial enactments

     that are exclusively managed, interpreted and manipulated by orthodox rabbis. The penalty for violation

     is clearly spelled out on page 1192 of the AEncyclopedia Judaica,@: " violation of any one of the seven

     laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by DECAPITATION." Rather severe wouldn=t you



     So, if only one person steps forward to merely accuse any non‑Jew of violating any one of these seven

     laws, that testimony alone B irrespective of the proven truth of the allegation, this would be enough for

     the sentence of death. Notice how Deuteronomy 17:6, clearly requires the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses

     before one who deserves death can be executed. In fact, the last sentence of verse 6 specifically

     states: AAt the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to

     death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall NOT be put to death.@



     These evil, satanic ghouls masquerading as the Achosen people,@ will be represented by pompous,

     pious looking, bearded Rebbe ‑ Asages,@ and will possibly be the judges who cast the ultimate

     caesarean Athumbs down@ vote for the sacrificial deaths of all tried and true believers that will have been

     Sealed as righteous by the Most High. "Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless, (non‑Jews) is

     doing the same as making a sacrifice to God." (Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772) It will be

     simply ancient ritualistic murder that has existed down though the centuries that may culminate in our

     day, in rivers of blood. The Sacrament of Christian Communion will be transformed from wine, the

     symbolic blood of Jesus, to the real blood Of true believers, that will be freely shed under this new,

     Luciferic Theocracy! The Jews have always been idolaters whose principal god, Moloch, constantly

     demanded blood sacrifices, a FACT of which has been proven time and time again throughout history.


     Always remember as Biblical fact, that the Jewish establishment succeeded in the illegal trial and

     subsequent killing and blood‑letting of Jesus Christ on the primary basis that He blasphemed God,

     which is Noahide Law number 2 ‑ AThou shalt not blaspheme God.@AExtermination of a Christian is a

     necessary sacrifice to God.@ Zohar (II, 43a)


     Make no mistake, these remarkable and sickening quotes from the Talmud (Soncino Edition) here and

     elsewhere, are quite genuine and gleaned from a large variety of reliable sources, (mostly Jewish) at the

     time of compilation. These are but a few of the hundreds of Talmudic passages that deal with the

     recommended treatment of Christians. The non‑Jewish world has suffered unbelievably and endured

     Zionist world terror for nearly a century, beginning with Jewish Bolshevism and Stalinism. Zionism and

     the World Jewish Congress have initiated two devastating World Wars, leaving 54 million people killed,

     with countless millions wounded in spirit soul and body. THIS is the reality of the Jewish Talmudic

     Alegacy,@ and there is much more to come.



     The Congress of the United States of America has declared that the seven universal laws commanded

     to Noah (the Noahide laws) are "the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization". U.S. Congress,

     H.J. Resolution 104, Public Law 102‑14, 1991. This sets the Noahide Laws as the primary basis for

     International Law, (read ANew World Order@) to which all American law MUST conform. This unique

     public law remarkably singles out one particular Jewish group for special honour, saying that they

     embody the principles of these Noahide Laws. This group is the ultra‑orthodox Lubavitch Movement, of

     the loony Habad Hasids Jews. Al Gore Letter 10 01‑Nov‑2000 Education Day USA: AUpon seizing the

     reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.

     ... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO‑controlled areas, with military assistance

     offered where necessary. Jewish courts will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within

     each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre‑existing Noachide

     judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be

     drastically rewritten to conform to halacha.... .... And law and order will be fully restored through the

     establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.@


     A nation governed by wisdom and moral law sounds reasonable, but it is the identical goal as expressed

     by the Orders of Freemasonry. In AThe History of Freemasonry,@ High Adept and Prince of Masonry ‑

     Albert Mackey, provides the sequel to the Egyptian/Cabbalist accounts of Noah. "After Noah=s

     emergence from the Ark, he is said to have promulgated seven precepts for the government of the new

     race of men of whom he was to be the progenitor... [1] To do justice [2] Worship God [3] Abstain from

     idolatry [4] Preserve chastity [5] Do not commit murder [6] Do not steal [7] Do not eat blood."


     Mackey further identifies Noah as the originator of a Amystery religion= known as the AArkite Worship.@

     "The influence of Noah on Masonic doctrine is to be traced to the almost universal belief of men in the

     events of the deluge, and a consequent establishment in many nations of a system of religion known to

     ethnologists as the >Arkite Worship= . . Hence arose that system known to modern scholars as the

     'Arkite Worship' in whose rites and mysteries, which were eventually communicated to the other ancient

     religions. There were always some allusions to the events of the Noahic flood ‑ to the Ark, as the

     WOMB OF NATURE, to the eight persons saved in it, as the Ogdoad or sacred number ‑ and to the

     renovation of the world, as symbolizing the passage from death to immortal life."



     Here, hidden behind a facade of phoney, moral statutes and deliberately sympathetic phrases, are the

     real goals of the Noahide Laws:

     1. The replacement of the entire Old Testament and the total rejection of the NT

     2. The rejection of the atonement of Christ upon the Cross

     3. The rejection of the plan of salvation according to Acts 2:38

     4. The spying on one another to supply the one eyewitness needed to execute the death penalty

     5. The necessity of keeping the other 66 Alesser known laws@

     6. Circumcision of all males

     7. Eating only kosher foods

     8. Forbidding holding religious services of any type in a place that is not an approved assembly place for


     9. The death penalty for anyone, (Christians being the main target) that claims that God has spoken

     through them by way of teaching, preaching or writing, that is in any way contradictory to the

     establishment Aworship system.@

     "The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their

     throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the

     last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher." (Chairman of the American Communist Party,

     Gus Hall).


     It will be a serious crime to claim to be a Prophet, Preacher, or Pastor, to whom the Antichrist

     authorities have not issued a certificate of approval, and it will be a death penalty offence to oppose in

     any way this new Areligion.@ By opposition ‑ means to speak against any Jewish Priest, any Jewish

     Rabbi, any Noahide Minister, any Noahide or Jewish Temple or place of worship, or oppose any doctrine

     that only the ARebbe Adepts@ teach or advocate. So under the guise of Pharisaic Jewry, the modern

     Cabbalists are cunningly taking us all back to Egypt, and to the ancient house of bondage from whence

     we came.

     How then, could any Christian ever support the diabolical plotting behind the precepts of the Noahide

     laws, to aid in the destruction of the New Testament ‑ the Church, and be complicit in the killing of the

     precious and faithful Saints of God?

     Antichrists are even now arising from all denominations denying that salvation is through Jesus Christ

     alone. This is that spirit of Antichrist that will join forces with Jewish rabbis together with other

     AJewish‑Gentile@ groups to complete their total destruction of Christianity. First they will accuse those of

     being anti‑Semites for rejecting Pharisee‑Talmudic Judaism, then anti‑Semitic for rejecting that the

     Laws of Moses are still in effect for Jews and Gentiles alike for salvation, and then anti‑Semitic yet again

     because we dare write anything that opposes/exposes their covert agenda.


     "All Jews are good by nature, all non‑Jews are evil by nature. The Jews are creation's crowning glory,

     the non‑Jews are the scum of the earth." This quote is typical of the Talmudic‑Jewish philosophy that

     saturates the thinking of Jews such as Rabbi Shneur Zalman, one of the leading AHalacha@ scholars in

     Jewish history according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 11, 1994, page 14.

     What will we see in the End Times? We will see a revival of Judaised law‑keeping and a rejection of the

     New Covenant by the blinded Judeo‑Christian sheeple. If you observe any person saying that the New

     Testament is not the New Covenant of Jeremiah 31:31‑34, you have just met an antichrist ‑ a

     Concision, a person who has fallen from grace and thus severed themselves from Christ. These cannot

     be saved, or remain so once they deny the fulfilment by the Messiah of the New Covenant. These will

     deny the Lord's Passover Memorial Cup, with all that it symbolises and thereby crucify to themselves

     the Son of God afresh, and thereby count his blood as an unholy thing. The true blasphemy against the

     Holy Spirit!



     My research suggests that this One‑World Government, (together with a single monetary system B

     possibly the Euro) will consist of permanent non‑elected oligarchist‑elites who are self‑chosen from

     among their numbers in the form of a feudal system similar to that of the Middle Ages. In this One‑World

     entity, there will be no middle class ‑ only rulers and servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal

     system of world courts practicing the same unified code of Noahide laws. These laws will be enforced

     by a One‑World Government police force and a global, multicultural military. The system will be on the

     basis of a welfare state, where only those who are obedient and subservient to the One World

     Government will be rewarded with the means to live, via the mark of the beast. Those who are rebellious

     and refuse the mark, will simply be declared outlaws, starved to death and/or killed. Privately owned

     firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited. National pride and racial identity shall be gradually

     stamped out and in the transition phase, any mention of one's racial origin shall be subject to severe


     Only one religion will be allowed in the form of Talmudic Judaism, structured and administered by

     Lubavitcher rebbes and others that have bought the lie.


     All tried and true Christ honouring believers will be regarded as (Noahide) lawbreakers and will risk

     decapitation under this vehemently anti‑Christ, beast system. As an interesting aside, State of Georgia

     lawmaker Doug Teper (Democrat) has proposed a bill to replace the state's electric chair with the

     guillotine. Teper's reasoning? It would allow for death‑row inmates as potential organ donors. He says,

     the "Blade makes a clean cut and leaves vital organs intact." Yeah, right!


     "For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judea are in Christ Jesus: for ye

     also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of THE JEWS: WHO BOTH


     THEY PLEASE NOT GOD, AND ARE CONTRARY TO ALL MEN." (I Thessalonians 2:14‑15)


Who Killed Jesus the Christ?


After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.


Who are jews of flesh?


"SAYERS", the sons of the synagogues of Satan, who are not in faith of Jesus the Christ, according to the PROMISE, But who are Liars of their father the great Liar, the Serpent, Satan, and who are anti-Christ along with All who Denies that Jesus Christ is the ONLY WAY into the Kingdom of God the Father, whether they be flesh jew or Proseyltes, "Judeo-Churchizionian, Moslem, Bhudda, Hindu, But ALL whose names are NOT Written in the LAMBS book of life slain since the foundation of the world.........Behold "SAYERS".


Jason wrote:

There is "NO UNIVERSAL DEICIDE", that is a lie of the
JEWS to keep the GOY feeling GUILTY against accusing the SAYERS. That
teaching has bothered me for years. The idea that we ALL put Christ on
the cross is a lie. Christ went on the cross for all of us out of "LOVE"
and 'necessity'. but we all did not KILL


Jesus didnt
"KILL HIMSELF' either.

 The entire world is guilty of universal
"REBELLION" and 'REJECTION" at the fall and has been since. But as to
the litteral "killing" of Christ, its was done by "THE MURDERERS"!.

sayers are trying to convince that everyone is the murderer to lessen
the "judgement" against them by "compassion of conscience". No. here,
this is what happened. 

CHILDREN". They didnt rail this of themselves. Had God not made them say
to say this by God in SPITE of themselves through the the act of the
cross This phrase isnt a "BLOOD LIBEL CURSE" whatsoever, it is a call
for "REDEMPTION" by those who will not be redeemed in spite of
themselves!. God has not suffered any more than for those who "SAY" they
are jew. He has suffered their rejection to the bitter end and even in
spite of themselves, God STILL has compsssion and prevents absolute
perdition until the very very end. That so called 'blood libel curse' is
an OPEN DOOR for them still to enter in. If they TRULY WILL accept Jesus
Blood on them and their children for "THEIR INQUITIES" then they WILL
recieve forgiveness and redemption. because they "REFUSE" to accept
their "GUILT" and will NOT acknowledge their iniquities, they are
allowed to continues to wax more evil and worse. By calling it a "blood
libel curse' their calling the precious blood of Jesus and his work of
the cross....."A CURSE"!!! No ........"THE
SAYERS"..................KILLED CHRIST....but God went freely of his
will!. God puts the blame SQUARELY on them in his word by his apostles
and prophets. Uh, uh, uh,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"THE JEWS KILLED JESUS"......both
the "CONCISION" and the "OTHER JEWS"!.....


Thus they hope for the kingdom of the god they have made with their hands, their god of this world who is not the God of True Christ believers, but a strange god.


Will you fall in apostasy to the fables of the SAYERS, just before they "REVEAL" their son of perdition, in their flesh kingdom of satan?


the Jew Talmudic SAYER World Odor



Many non-Jews, especially those who come to Israel and Jerusalem, are interested in what, if anything, Judaism has to say to them, and how Jews regard them. Jewish tradition has a clear response.

Truly traditional Jews accept the Torah, the Pentatuch, as God's revealed Word;

Oral Mishnah Torah, Talmud Bavli

 it is amplified and explained by Moshe (Moses), God's messenger, during the 40 year desert trek to Israel; that which we have retained of this teaching, and our attempts to reconstruct the rest, are found in our oral tradition, briefly summarized in the Talmud and Midrashim. 



For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.


It is the unique heritage of Israel- " ... for BY THE MOUTH of these words have I made a covenant with you" (Ex. 34:27). God picks the Jewish people to be "a kingdom of priests and a holy nation" (Ex. 19:6) after Exodus, prior to entering Israel. A "Priest" implies that there's a congregation. A cursory glance at Genesis shows this to be all of mankind.

Liars do lie when their lips move, for Jesus whom they reject, the Lamb the Everlasting and Holy Covenant, saith.....


But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:

The Racial Massah Race divide of the "SAYER"

When God created man, there was no division into Jews and non-Jews for at least 20 generations, until the time of Avraham. Adam and Eve left Divine intimacy, the Garden of Eden, to "do their own thing". Individual sins of passion and power, eating the forbidden fruit in Eden and Cayin's murder of Hevel, set the tone for humanity's future development. Amidst great technological progress and civilization, Collective Man continues these deviations. The flood generation drowns itself in debauchery (cf. Aids) and the power bloc of Babel disintegrates when it challenges God Himself (cf. Eastern Europe). Avraham and his seed are chosen to develop role models--individual, familial, and national, to bring everyone back to themselves and God, to Eden. Avraham and his son Yitzchak partially succeed; each develops one side of man, relational and introspective, but loses that son most like him, who abandons dad's mission. After three generations, Ya'akov (Jacob) merges the development of Avraham and Yitzchak, and becomes a model man, called "Israel" by God. All his 12 sons finally walk in his path, becoming a variegated model family, ending Genesis, Vol. 1 of the Torah-- Creation, Destruction, and Re-Creation.

And all whored after other gods who are no gods, and continue this day, now Judeo-Churchizionity follow.

In Exodus, this family develops into a nation and is taken out of Egypt to build a model State of Israel, from which all nations will learn, return, and greatly benefit. As priests to mankind, the Jews are given over 600 laws and rituals not commanded to the rest of mankind; they're the focus of Leviticus. Israel's initial failure to live by their priestly code in Numbers leads to Mose's deeper review of both God's Law and Israel's history in Deuteronomy. Both God and Israel never give up.


And the LORD shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that are written in this book of the law:


Deut:31:9: And Moses wrote this law, and delivered it unto the priests the sons of Levi, which bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD, and unto all the elders of Israel.



For when I shall have brought them into the land which I sware unto their fathers, that floweth with milk and honey; and they shall have eaten and filled themselves, and waxen fat; then will they turn unto other gods, and serve them, and provoke me, and break my covenant.


 Remember them, O my God, because they have defiled the priesthood, and the covenant of the priesthood, and of the Levites. 


They kept not the covenant of God, and refused to walk in his law;



For their heart was not right with him, neither were they stedfast in his covenant


 The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.

Jesus the Christ the Only Everlasting Holy Covenant made with Isaac


Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:


And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.



I the LORD have called thee in righteousness, and will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles;

The Falling Away

But Universal man is not forgotten by God-- his redemption is the raison d'etre of the Jewish people. Our tradition, based on God's addresses to Adam, Noah and Company, subsumes the rules of living for every man under the rubric of the 7 laws of Noah. Any gentile who accepts and fulfills them is righteous and has a share in the world to come. No formal religious ritual or liturgy is required, tho shared traditions and texts and meeting together for prayer and study may be necessary to build a viable Noachide society. In March 1991 the U.S. Congress passed and Pres. Bush signed into law a resolution praising Noachism as the oldest human religion.

Sanhedrin 57a. Break any law and die by decapitation. Worship Jesus the Christ whom they hate, die by decapitation. But woe upon their eternal lives for their covenant they hath made is death and eternal hell.

Stand Firm in witness of Jesus the Christ and have eternal Life abundant.

Due to persecution of the Jews, little was done to teach these laws for the last few thousand years, despite Maimonides' command to do so (Laws of Kings).

The devil always cries out while he is kicking you


 Interest in them has revived over the last few years and Noahide groups and literature are slowly but surely springing up amidst Western civilization. Some Noahides cut all ties with their past, viewing Jesus and Christianity as irrelevant, possibly harmful, to their lives and faith. Others retain ties to Jesus as a teacher, possibly messianic, but reject Christianity and its pagan holidays, e.g. Easter, Halloween, and Christmas. All reject any Divinity of Jesus and view prayers to him as idolatry. Most Jews take the former view, but Rabbi Yaakov Emden viewed Jesus and Paul as Noachide teachers, whose views were distorted by the early anti-semitic Greek Christians (Seder Olam Raba V'zutra). Rav S. Riskin (Video- A Jewish View of Jesus) sees him as a traditional Jew who later regreted his claim to be Messiah.

Fables of the Jews


After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.



 Should this movement spread to Arabs, it might solve the Arab-Israeli conflict. Noachide Arabs too would feel part of Israel's Mission and abandon Islam, the source of much of the present Arab hatred of Israel and attempts to harm and kill Jews. They want to be on God's side, but have twisted His Biblical message.

Homelandt "SAY" Kurity, wars on "Terrorism" Purim Ishmael

A simple statement of the 7 laws: 1) not to murder. 2) not to worship idols. 3) not to steal. 4) not to take another's wife or commit incest. 5) not to eat meat of an animal still alive. 6) not to blaspheme. 7) to establish well-functioning legal and political systems. Basically, every person should acknowledge God's Revelation to Israel, Israel's unique role, and his or her duty to be a decent human being (plus one "kosher" law above, #5). No one is encouraged to become Jewish, though some sources feel that study and observance of the Torah is good for everyone.

Translation: there is enough "Massah Race" now, the rest should be world server, bondmen slaves to the gods 

The Jew is commanded to treat every decent human being well, (Human Being in Talmud Bavli is only jews. non-jews are less than animal souls) with integrity and pleasantness, and to teach them God's Word. The gentile is to explore, conquer and develop the world for everyone's (jews)  benefit. While learning from Israel, Noachides can also arouse the consciousness of those Jews who either have become distanced from their mission or who observe the Torah mechanically, without inspiration and a global perspective.

As the Jews are to build a model "holy nation" in every realm, not just be a monastic "kingdom of priests," they will share knowledge and experience in every field with the rest of mankind. Those who help rebuild the State of Israel and the Jewish people are taking the first steps in the messianic redemption of all mankind. The non-Jew should not be discouraged when he meets Jews who lack warmth and friendship-- many Jews still suffer from centuries of terrible persecution by Islam and Christianity; this makes them suspicious of outsiders, and their education, unfortunately, often ignores their global mission.

Their Guilt trip snare......their needed anti-Semitism clause to solidify their flesh kingdom of satan by proxy

PROF. TABER WRITES: According to Jewish rabbinic tradition, all non-Jews are "children of Noah," and as such are subject to a special universal Noachite Covenant. This covenant, made with Noah following the Flood, is prior to, and separate from the Torah Covenant made at Sinai with the "children of Israel". All humankind is accordingly obligated to follow the "seven Laws of Noach". The basic Talmudic discussion of the notion of the "Noachite" is in Sanhedrin 50-60. Various additions and amplifications were made to these seven, so that in one place thirty Noachian laws are listed (Hullin 92a)! See the Jewish Encyclopedia, s.v. "Laws, Noachian," the Encyclopedia Judaica, s.v. "Noachide Laws," and the Talmudic Encyclopedia, B'nai Noach, for general discussion and basic primary and secondary literature. Many scholars of ancient Judaism and Christianity believe that something akin to this rabbinic concept of the"Noachite" existed in the Greco-Roman period.

Generally speaking, both Moslems and Christians have been considered "Noachites," as long as the latter have avoided the tritheism sometimes associated with popular Trinitarianism (i.e. making Jesus a "second" Diety, separate from God). Steven Schwarzschild, "Do Noachites Have to Believe in Revelation," Jewish Quarterly Review 52 (1962): 297-308 and 53 (1962): 30-65, but now conveniently reprinted in "The Pursuit of the Ideal: Jewish Writings of Steven Schwarzschild, ed. Menachem Kellner (New York: SUNY, 1990), pp. 29-59. But one might argue that Moslems do not qualify as they distort the Torah and Christians because they deny the eternity of Israel's mission.

The best known Gentile exponent of "the Noachite religion" in our time was Aime Palliere (1887-1949). See his moving autobiographical testimony, now translated into English by Louise Wise titled "The Unknown Sanctuary: A Pilgrimage from Rome to Israel" (New York: Bloch, 1985).

The "Seven Laws of Noah" are seen as topical headings, under which an elaborate set of theological and ethical concepts are organized. For example, under the prohibition against "idolatry," one would delve into a whole cluster of Jewish ideas and observances as applicable to Gentiles: the nature of God, prohibitions against the occult, definitions of idolatry, and so forth. Likewise, under the heading of "sexual immorality" would come the whole Jewish understanding of human sexuality as expounded in Torah and rabbinic tradition. Accordingly, like their Jewish counterparts, B'nai No'ach have embarked on a lifelong effort of talmud Torah. It offers a way to worship and follow the God of Israel, short of conversion to Judaism, but free of many restraints of creed and cult.

Total apostasy just before they "REVEAL" their false Christ that evil son of Perdition, their god of this world.





Bridging the Judeo-Christian Gap - IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN and would like to join a discussion group with other Christians, Howard M. Rollin has established a new list specifically designed for you. At this time, the most important aspect of this discussion group will be your understanding and hopefully your support and promotion of the "NOACHIDE" (the Sons of Noah, B'nai Noach) movement. Throughout history, Orthodox Judaism has controlled this movement, as if it were a part of Judaism. However, on March 26, 1991, U.S. President George Bush signed into law a congressional resolution on the Seven Laws of the Noachide Movement (House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14). Since Rabbinic Judaism has determined that Christianity is idolatry because of the Christian deification of Jesus, Christians are not allowed to become Noachides. Is this appropriate and/or fair? Christians certainly don't view themselves as idolators. Since there are a growing number of Christian Zionists who do not proselytize Jews because they respect all of the valid covenants of the Hebrew Scriptures, should there be a separate Christian Noachide sect for them? That will be the main thrust of information communicated through this "EGROUPS" discussion group. If you would like to join, please click on the following link: Click to subscribe to Christian Noachides




Links to the Apostasy

The Jews Are Called 'Man'

Tzfi'a 3

The Editorial Board

President of the Editorial Board and Founder: Rabbi Moshe Segal OBM

Rabbi Yisrael Ariel
Moshe Asher
Joel Rakovsky
Amishar Segal

Articles are the authors' responsibility


The Distinction between Jews and Gentiles in Torah

Rabbi David Bar Chaim

Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav


Over the past few years, there has been a recognizable trend amongst different circles in the religious community -- a humanistic/universal inclination. There are many who have written in praise of love, "for all men who were created in the image of G-d." We have even been "graced" with a pamphlet of this name, Chaviv Adam Sh'nivra B'tzelem, composed and edited by Mr. Yochanan Ben Ya'acov, the Director General of the Bnei Akiva Youth Movement. The explicit goal of those who share this outlook is to prove that all men are equal, that it is forbidden to discriminate against any man on the basis of his race, and that anyone who claims the opposite is nothing but a racist, distorting the words of the Torah in order to fit them to his "dreadful" opinions.

Here are two examples:
1. A statement by Ms. R. Huberman:
"...I never imagined that the Torah discriminates between one man and the next on the basis of faith, nationality, or race...on the contrary, it is our Torah which teaches that the blood of man is holy simply because he is man: 'Whoever sheds man's blood by man shall his blood be shed, for in the image of G-d made He man' (Genesis 9) the Ten Commandments it is written: 'You shall not murder'! There is no hint of a restriction, no hint that the prohibition applies to a Jew and not to a Gentile..."
("Between Blood and Blood," Amudim, a monthly magazine of the Religious Kibbutz Movement, Tamuz 5745, pg.352).
2. [Former] Member of Knesset (National Religious Party) Professor Avner Shaki:
"The Jews of the State of Israel who received the Torah of Moses on Mount Sinai, where it was established that man was created in the image of G-d, have no need for to teach us this fundamental basic of the Torah, that all men are born equal according to's equality, man's status before G-d and before his fellow man, is a primary and fundamental principle in the Jewish Torah...of course, we will not assist any type of racism which discriminates against man because of his color, religion, or nationality..."
(an excerpt from his speech during a discussion in the Knesset on an amendment to the Basic Law of the Knesset and the Penal Law)

We have something very clear before us: all human beings, Jew and Gentile, are equal. As will be further clarified, this outlook completely contradicts the Torah of Moses, and stems from an absolute lack of knowledge, permeated with foreign Western "values." There would not be any need to respond were it not for the many who are mistaken and lead astray by it.
This outlook has even been expressed by some rabbis whose goal is to show how great and important the stature of the Gentile is in our Torah, and who thereby violate the truth by taking things out of context and inaccurately interpreting the words of Chazal and the Rishonim. A large part of their efforts are centered (due to the "Underground" affair, of course) on an attempt to prove that the prohibition "You shall not murder" also applies to the killing of a Gentile. Here is an excerpt from Rabbi Yehuda Amital, shlita:
"See the Ra'aban on the Gemara Tractate Bava Kama 113a, that the prohibition of 'You shall not murder' also applies to a Gentile, as is explicitly stated by Maimonides in The Laws of a Murderer, chapter 1, halacha 1. See Yere'im, paragraph 175, that the killing of a Gentile is a subsidiary to the prohibition against murder."
(From a letter published in Alon Shvut (Yeshiva Har Etzion), issue number 100. His words are cited in the pamphlet previously mentioned, Chaviv Adam Sh'nivra B'tzelem, in an experimental edition, pg.64)
Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein shlita writes:
"From Maimonides's words (Mishna Torah, The Laws of a Murderer, chapter 2, halacha 11) it is clear that the prohibition 'You shall not murder' applies to a Gentile who fulfills the seven Noahide commandments, and the murderer is punished by death from the Heavens. So on one hand there is no difference in the prohibition of murder between a Jew and a Gentile..."
(From a synopsis of a lecture published in Keshet B'Anan number 32, Gesher, and cited in the above mentioned pamphlet, pg.72.)

The followers of these rabbis continue their path:
"...'You shall not kill'! This is an absolute prohibition, an unambiguous command that does not distinguish between Jew and Gentile..."
(Mr. Yochanan Ben Ya'acov's words in his introduction to the above mentioned pamphlet, pg.1)
Later on it will become clear how misleading and deceptive these matters are.

Not only about this halacha are things written which are liable to mislead the public. For example, Rabbi Lichtenstein writes:
"The field of the also relevant to the world of the Noahide, but there is no doubt that as far as the extent is concerned...the study of Torah is much less in the world of the Gentile than in our world.
Rabbi Meir's words in Tractate Sanhedrin 59a and the beraitha in Torat Cohanim are well known: even a Gentile who sits and learns Torah receives additional emphasis on the great and exalted study of Torah being relevant to the world of the Gentile." (From his essay, Bnei Adam, in the monthly publication Emda, Number 3, pg.16, and in the previously mentioned pamphlet, pg.74.)
It is amazing that he forgot to point out everything said there on this matter, particularly the conclusion. How could he not mention that Rabbi Meir's words were brought in order to disagree with Rabbi Yochanan who said: "A Gentile who studies Torah is punishable by death,1 as it is said: 'Moses commanded us the Torah as an inheritance,' for us it is an inheritance, and not for them"? The conclusion is most important -- in order to settle the conflicting statements the Talmud answers, "In this case, he is engaged in the seven Noahide commandments" (He is engaged in the halachas of those seven commandments to be skilled in them -- Rashi). He is permitted to study those specific seven Noahide commandments -- and if he learned more than this, he is punishable by death. So the Tosaphot wrote in Tractate Avodah Zara 3a, s.v. sh'afilu, and Maimonides in The Laws of Kings, chapter 10, halacha 9, writes: "A Gentile who engaged in Torah is punishable by death.2 He should not engage in anything other than their seven commandments alone." The distance between what was said in the Talmud and Rabbi Lichtenstein's words is great.
In the previously mentioned essay Rabbi Lichtenstein writes further:
"The field of prayer also exists as a universal value...this has been said in connection to the Holy Temple at its inception (I Kings 8:41-43); this is part of the prophecy of the end of days: 'For my house will be called a house of prayer for all the nations.' There is also room for the Gentile to come and pray in the Holy Temple!"
How is it possible to say such things? Indeed, we have learned a complete Mishna (Kalim, chapter 1, mishna 8): "...Inside the walls of the Temple Mount is holier, and therefore Gentiles and one who has been defiled by the dead cannot enter there..."thus Maimonides ruled in The Laws of the Holy Temple, chapter 7, halacha 16. There is no way for a Gentile "to come and pray in the Holy Temple"! The matter is clear: a Gentile can pray, even on the Temple Mount, but not in the Holy Temple.

An additional proof of the Gentile's stature, according to Rabbi Lichtenstein:
"Animal sacrifices are conceived by us as being of authentic Jewish character, but they definitely belong, in the pure sense of the halacha, also to the world of the Gentile: a Gentile offers animal sacrifices not just on any altar...but in the Holy Temple" (from the above mentioned essay).
Aside from what has been previously clarified, that there is absolutely no possibility of a Gentile entering the Holy Temple, much less of offering sacrifices there, this statement, like the one beit, does not reflect the position of "pure halacha" on this topic. There is a discrepancy between Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Yosi the Galilean in the Sifra on the portion of Emor, parsha 7, halacha 1, and in the Tosephta, Shekalim, chapter 1, halacha 7 (Zukermandel and Leiberman editions, in the Vilna printing, halacha 3), and brought in Tractate Menachot 73b, concerning which sacrifices can be accepted from a Gentile. Maimonides ruled based on Rabbi Akiva3 (The Laws of Sacrifices, chapter 3, halacha 2): "Men or women or slaves can bring sacrifices. But from the Gentiles we only accept burnt offerings as it is said: 'From the hand of a Gentile do not offer the bread of your Lord'...but we do not accept from them peace-offerings, nor meal-offerings, nor sin-offerings or guilt-offerings..." In connection to this we must add that even if a Gentile volunteered to donate money in order to have a part in the public sacrifices, we do not accept it from him, as it is cited in the Sifra, chapter 7, halacha 12, and in Shekalim, chapter 1, mishna 5, and Maimonides wrote in The Laws of Shekalim, chapter 1, halacha 7: "Everyone is obliged to give half a shekel...but from the Gentiles who gave a half shekel, we do not accept it." Generally speaking -- there is no equality of rights for a Gentile, not in their entrance to the Holy Temple nor in their offering of sacrifices there.

It seems that these examples are sufficient to clarify the reason for writing this essay. Now let us consider a long list of sources that clearly contradict the previously mentioned opinions. First we will focus on halachic matters, and afterwards on the spiritual realm. It must be noted that I plan to deal only with halachot that illustrate the vast distinction the Torah makes between Jews and Gentiles. I do not intend to examine the topic of the status of Gentiles in the Torah in its entirety. For example, how and to what extent can the Gentile serve G-d according to the Torah, and what is his reward for this? What is possibilities are open for Gentiles residing in the land of Israel? What is the law for Gentiles who are at war with us or hostile towards us? I will not deal with these and similar matters -- for this is not my purpose. (These matters are connected to specific situations and details, whereas the purpose of this essay is the overall, consistent distinction between Jew and Gentile.) The same is true concerning the second part of the essay, which will deal with the spiritual realm.
part 2 -- Between Jews and Gentiles -- In Halacha

1In general, Chazal used two terms when they spoke of a non-Jew: goy [Gentile] and nochri [foreigner]. (Occasionally the term acharim [others] also describes Gentiles, primarily in the halachic Midrash. Concerning halachas or specific circumstances, the terms ger toshav and Noahide also appear - see novellae of Nachmanides on Tractate Makkot 9a, and in the novellae of the Ritba there, but the matters have been distorted in the Ritba.) Thus it appears in all the ancient manuscripts and old printings. All of the variants on the term "worshippers of stars and the zodiac" that appear in the majority of the printings are distortions, meant to deceive the Christian censor into thinking that specifically idolatrous Gentiles were meant. In certain printings they went even further, and in many places changed the terms goy and nochri: occasionally they used Samaritan, other times Cannanite and even Amalekite! Of course, in this essay I use the exact and original version of the matters. How sad it is that even though it is now possible to ascertain the accurate version, many Torah scholars continue to cite the distortions of the censor.back to text
2There, in the end of the halacha: "He is given blows and punished and told that he may be punished by death for this, but he is not killed," see ibid. in the Kesef Mishna and in the Ridbaz for why he is not killed.back to text
3Thus according to the Babylonian version and the Tosephta, but in the version of the Sifra the opinions are switched, and Maimonides rules similar to Rabbi Yosi the Galilean. In some manuscripts of the Tosephta the version is as in the Sifra.back to text


Plan to pardon 4 Chassidim devised in the fall, lawyer says


N.Y. Jewish Week


NEW YORK (JTA) -- The grand rabbi of New Square, N.Y., was formulating plans to seek presidential pardons for four convicted Chassidim from his community as early as mid-September, the New York Jewish Week has learned.

This revelation comes amid reports that Manhattan U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White was launching a federal criminal probe last week of former President Clinton's decision to cut the prison terms of the four New Square men, convicted of stealing tens of millions of dollars in federal education and housing subsidies.

White's office apparently is investigating whether a "pardon-for-votes deal" was made between Rabbi David Twersky and the former president's wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, who last summer and fall was in a heated campaign for the U.S. Senate against former Republican Rep. Rick Lazio.

Hillary Clinton, who first visited New Square on Aug. 8, received 99 percent of the votes in the 7,000person village about 40 miles north of New York City. Two months later, President Clinton commuted the sentences of the four men, over the strenuous objections of White's office.

Hillary Clinton and New Square representatives have vigorously denied that the issue of pardons ever came up between the two sides prior to a Dec. 22 meeting at the White House attended by the two Clintons and Twersky.

But defense attorney Nat Lewin, who handled the appeal of the New Square men last year, told the Jewish Week that Twersky called him to a meeting in New Square "in mid-September" to discuss seeking pardons for Kalmen Stern, David Goldstein, Benjamin Berger and Jacob Elbaum.

Except for Elbaum, the men were prominent New Square officials convicted in 1998 in a scheme that included laundering federal education funds through a nonexistent yeshiva. Two others indicted in the scheme are now fugitives, including one of the village's founders.

The men received prison sentences ranging from 30 to 78 months. On his next-to-last day as president, Clinton reduced their sentences to 24 to 30 months.

Lewin said the meeting with Twersky came just a few weeks after a Manhattan Appeals Court on Aug. 25 rejected Lewin's bid to have the convictions overturned.

Lewin stressed that no mention of pardons or any deal was made to him before the mid-September meeting. He insisted that as the attorney for the four men, he would have known about any plan by New Square to reach out to Hillary Clinton and discuss pardons in August.

Lewin said Twersky raised the idea of seeking presidential pardons after the appeal had been denied. The rabbi believed Hillary Clinton's visit, and the favorable impression she had received, would help, Lewin said.

"He brought up" the pardons, Lewin said. "He didn't suggest going to Hillary or making any deal about the election."

However, Lewin said he did not pursue the rabbi's pardon initiative because he thought it had no chance of success.

Only in December, Lewin said, was he informed that New Square had approached Washington attorney Samuel Rosenthal to pursue the pardons. During that time a decision was made to change the request from pardons to commutations.

Lewin said he next heard that Twersky had met with the Clintons in the White House on Dec. 22.

Lewin said he was surprised when he learned President Clinton approved the commutations on Jan 20, but he insisted that nothing illegal occurred. He called White's probe "a misdirected investigation."

The Manhattan U.S Attorney's office declined to comment on the probe.

Hillary Clinton and her top Jewish campaign aides deny that the issue of pardons was ever raised between her campaign and New Square. The senator has said she played no role in the pardon process and expressed no opinion during the White House meeting.

Clinton's spokeswoman declined to comment on White's probe, and Twersky could not be reached for comment this week.

Twersky's silence has prompted criticism from some Jewish leaders.

Two rabbinical leaders from Agudath Israel of America have warned that Orthodoxy's reputation has become sullied in the eyes of the world because "Orthodox individuals and institutions" have been "tarred with the brush of illegal financial activity."

Rabbi Norman Lamm, president of Yeshiva University, said he believed Twersky should publicly address the scandals.

An Orthodox Jewish legislator from New York's Rockland County, Ryan Karben, said the New Square scandal "makes it more difficult to advocate for funds for community-based social services agencies serving the Orthodox community."

Sources said White's New Square probe emerged from her investigation of the more controversial pardon of fugitive billionaire financier Marc Rich, which was supported by many top Jewish and Israeli leaders.



Behold America, the treasonous enemies of the Lord God, Freemason Temples and the Synagogues of Satan of Talmudic Judaism



Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.





Prepare yourselves against the coming wave of the Courts of Noahide Justice Laws, not under Constitutional Authority of the Legislative branch. Prepare for many Judge Judy's....



Grrrrrrrrwrrrrl ! saith the cowardly lion of satan's chief synagogue, that Old Fox-man


Feb 18, 1:55 PM (ET)


VATICAN CITY (AP) - A Jewish leader met with Vatican officials this week to ask them to publicly restate church teachings on Jesus' crucifixion, saying Mel Gibson's film "The Passion of the Christ" contradicts the Vatican's repudiation of the charge that the Jews killed Jesus.

A top Vatican official who met with Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said Wednesday that no such statement was planned. U.S. Archbishop John P. Foley, who heads the Vatican's social-communications office, again praised the film and said he found nothing anti-Semitic in it.

Foxman's visit to the Vatican came as debate over Gibson's depiction of the violent final hours of Christ's life intensified ahead of the film's planned U.S. release Feb. 25. Jewish groups have said the film could fuel anti-Semitism; the Vatican has called it a recounting of the "historical fact of the passion of Jesus Christ according to the Gospel accounts."

Foxman told a news conference Wednesday in Rome that the Catholic Church had a responsibility to set the record straight on its own teachings about Christ's Passion since many people who see the film may think it reflects official church teaching.

Foxman said that in his view, the film contradicts the church's landmark 1965 document "Nostra Aetate," Latin for "In Our Time," in which the Vatican deplored anti-Semitism in every form and repudiated the "deicide" charge that blamed Jews as a people for Christ's crucifixion.

The document, issued during the Second Vatican Council, has been credited with helping improve relations between Christians and Jews over the past four decades.

Foxman said that Gibson's film was "unambiguous" in depicting the Jews as "blood-thirsty" villains who forced the Romans into Christ's crucifixion.

"His film is an attack on Christian teaching. It is a revision, if you will, of 'Nostra Aetate,'" Foxman said. "I believe the church has a responsibility to stand up to defend its own teaching."

He called for the Vatican to ask bishops' conferences around the world to restate church teachings on the crucifixion - particularly in places like Argentina and Poland, where he said debate about the film may not be as rigorous as it is in the United States.

Foxman, who has been outspoken in his concerns about the impression created by Gibson's film, met this week with Foley as well as the Rev. Norbert Hofmann, secretary of the Vatican's commission for religious relations with Jews. He heads now to an anti-Semitism seminar in Brussels.

In an interview, Foley said he had told Foxman that he had found nothing in the film that could be interpreted as anti-Semitic. "Certainly there are some Jews who call for punishment for Jesus," Foley said. But he said the Romans too were depicted harshly.

"I had absolutely no thought regarding any responsibility on the part of the Jews," Foley said. "I took it as a meditation on the Passion of Jesus, and my own responsibility and the responsibility of all of us for the suffering and death of Jesus."

The Vatican has found itself in an awkward spot in the weeks leading up to the film's debut. Last month, it took the unusual step of officially clarifying whether the pope had endorsed the film, saying the pontiff never makes judgments on artistic works.

Papal spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls issued a statement after John Paul's longtime secretary denied widespread published reports that the pope had given the thumbs up to the film by saying, "It is as it was." The quote, attributed to the pope by the filmmakers, came after John Paul had a private screening of the film.

In addition to asking for the Vatican statement on church teachings, Foxman said he had also suggested that Gibson go on camera at the end of the film to tell audiences that it was wrong to blame the Jews alone for Jesus' death.

Calls placed to Gibson's spokesman were not immediately returned.


I don't know about you, But I do not relish the though of becoming an Obedient Goyim Noahide of the un-dentured souther Poverty type, to the "SAYERS" who said Let the Lord Jesus Christ Blood be on our hands and our children's hands for all generations. I would like to share freedom in a World which believes, if they would only repent, and stop with their Luciferian worship to their Heathen gods, their chassidim Elohim


26 Shevat, 5764 * February 18, 2004

T H E   P A R S H A H   I N   A   N U T S H E L L

TORAH PORTION: Mishpatim (Exodus 21:1-24:18)

Torah Reading for Week of February 15-21, 2004

On the Web:

- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -

Following the revelation at Sinai, G-d legislates a series of laws for the people of Israel. These include the laws of the indentured servant; (Noahidee Goyim) the penalties for murder, kidnapping, assault and theft; civil laws pertaining to redress of damages, the granting of loans, and the responsibilities of the "Four Guardians"; and the rules governing the conduct of justice by courts of law.

Also instructed are laws warning against mistreatment of foreigners; the observance of the seasonal festivals and the agricultural gifts that are to be brought to the Holy Temple in Jerusalem; the prohibition against cooking meat with milk; and the mitzvah of prayer. Altogether, the Parshah of Mishpatim contains fifty-three mitzvot -- 23 imperative commandments and 30 prohibitions.

G-d promises to bring the people of Israel to the Holy Land and warns them against assuming the pagan ways of its current inhabitants.


Hey they are the ones who say their god has no only begotten son, and now "Judeo Churchizionity agreeth with them, same god.

The people of Israel proclaim, "We will do and we will hear" all that G-d commands us. Leaving Aaron and Hur in charge in the Israelite camp, Moses ascends Mount Sinai and remains there for forty days and forty nights to receive the Torah from G-d.

Note: The action taken against him is only meant to dissuade him from doing forbidden acts. If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the death penalty to a Noahide, the execution is an atonement for this person's transgression, and consequently one who transgresses and is punished by the court can merit a portion in the World to Come.[10] Furthermore, the Noahide must experience reincarnation to be able to atone for transgressions he had done.)


Decapitation involves severing the neck and head. Guillotines specifically designed for the procedure should be used. The devices should be kept in good repair to ensure that decapitation is humanely done.


  • rapid loss of consciousness
  • avoids contamination of brain with chemicals


  • animal must be carefully restrained
  • the procedure may be aesthetically unpleasant
  • personal injury may occur



Three high-level military men, and one Private were her (IamDorian), un-named, (for obvious reasons) informants.

100,000 crates of …something… was delivered by a convoy of military transport vehicles to a “closed” base in Montana. One young man in the crew was the son of a friend, of my friend’s. They weren’t allowed to know what this highly secretized shipment was, so after reaching their destination, they were blind-folded and taken to a holding facility. All this secrecy made this young man more determined than ever to see what he had helped bring in, and he asked the Sergeant at arms if he could use the rest room. The Sergeant did not enter the rest room facilities with him so he had a chance to look out of one of the windows where they were opening one of the crates. What he saw totally floored him, for what it was, was a FULL SIZE GUILLOTINE.


"With but few exceptions, the punishment meted out to a Noachid for the transgression of any of the seven laws is decapitation" (Jewish Encyclopedia, KTAV Publishing House, Inc., page 648-9.)




26 Shevat, 5764 * February 18, 2004

W E E K L Y   A L I Y O T

TORAH PORTION: Mishpatim (Exodus 21:1-24:18)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Last week we read Parshat Yitro, where the Torah tells us about the Jewish people standing at Mount Sinai receiving the Torah. The Jews heard the first two commandments directly from G-d, but they couldn't take the Divine revelation directly, so they asked Moshe to get the rest of the Torah for them.

Until this Parshah, the Torah only gave a few commandments - starting with the laws of Rosh Chodesh -- the new moon -- and Shabbat, etc. In this week's Parshah, Parshat Mishpatim, several additional commandments are given.

There are three types of commandments:

Mishpatim are civil laws, laws with a human, understandable reason that people might even make up themselves.

Another type is Chukim, which are laws without a completely human, understandable reason. An example of a chok is the concept of tuma (impurity) and tahara (purity). Such laws, as the laws of family purity (Taharas Hamishpocha) which are a G-d given gift to the Jewish people, are Chukim.

A third type of commandment is Eidus (witness), where, by performing these commandments we testify that G-d did something. For instance, resting on Shabbos is testimony that G-d created the world in six days and rested on the seventh day.

This Parshah is referred to as Mishpatim - and begins by giving some of the first type of commandment -- Mishpatim - Civil Laws.

In the first aliyah we are given some laws of servants, laws of a husband's obligation to his wife in the manner of food, raiment, and conjugal rights, laws of intentional and unintentional manslaughter, and laws of kidnapping and other injuries.


The second aliyah contains some laws of various kinds of assault -- the expression "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" is here. Also in this aliyah are laws of a goring ox, open pits, and self-defense when a thief breaks in.


The third aliyah contains some laws of monetary damages, sorcerers, bestiality, and idol-worship.

Also here are laws not to afflict the stranger, the widow, and the orphan, and for a Jew not to charge interest on a loan to another Jew.


The fourth aliyah has laws of blasphemy (against G-d, rulers and judges), laws of sanctifying the first-born son (the pidyon haben ceremony), first of the harvest and of cattle. Also here are some laws of kashrus -- the word "trefa" appears here. The law of uttering a false report (Rashi says: also accepting a false report) and other matters of judicial process are also given here.

Here are also the laws concerning seeing your enemy's animal going astray - you should bring it back to him. Similarly, if you see your enemy's animal under a burden, you should help.


The fifth aliyah continues judicial matters, including not taking a bribe, because the Torah says that a bribe blinds those that have sight.

Rashi explains an interesting judicial law: If someone is acquitted, and as he's leaving the court someone runs up and says they have evidence against him, we should ignore the evidence and not return to court. But if a person is found guilty and is leaving the court and someone runs up and says they have evidence in favor of him, we should return him to court to hear the evidence.

The mitzvah of the Shmittah year is explained: Wherein for six years we should work and harvest the land, in the seventh year we let the land rest.

The Shabbos is explained: Six days we shall do our work but on the seventh day we, our cattle, our servants, and the stranger within our gates, shall rest.

This aliyah says we shouldn't mention the name of other gods. Rashi says that this includes giving street directions by mentioning churches as landmarks.

The three festivals of Pesach, Shavuos and Sukkos are given here.

We are not allowed to cook meat with milk. Rashi says this matter is mentioned three times in the Torah to teach three things about milk and meat: We can't eat them together, we can't cook them together, and we can't even benefit from them when they are combined (like selling it or giving it to a pet, even if we don't cook it or eat it ourselves).


In the sixth aliyah, after all these Mishpatim are discussed, G-d says that He's going to send an angel before the Jews and bring them to the place prepared for them. The Jews should hearken to Him and not rebel against Him, and if they do so, G-d will be an enemy to the Jews' enemies.

G-d continues that when the Jews get to the land where they're going they should not bow down to the gods worshipped there nor serve them nor follow after their doings, but instead overthrow them and serve G-d, and G-d will bless them and remove sickness from their midst.


The seventh aliyah continues the promise to the Jews that if they follow G-d's laws there will be no barrenness or miscarrying in their land and G-d will fulfill their days.

G-d will send terror before the Jews come to the land to drive out their enemies little by little (so the land won't become overrun with wild animals by being cleared out quickly).

Moshe offers sacrifices and sprinkles the blood on the people, which is considered the blood of the covenant like a bris mila.

G-d calls Moshe up to the mountain to get the 2 luchos (tablets). Moshe goes up Mount Sinai and stays there for 40 days and 40 nights.





Eternal Life in Christ Jesus the Lord of Host for them who STAND FIRM. Unto them, he comes as a theif in the Night.



SECTION 1: The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting this legislation is to provide for a method of execution, which is compatible with the donation of organs by a condemned prisoner.
SECTION 2(a): All persons who have been convicted of a capital offense and have imposed upon them a sentence of death shall, at the election of the condemned, suffer such punishment either by electrocution or by guillotine. If the condemned fails to make an election by the thirtieth day preceding the date scheduled for execution, punishment shall be by electrocution.
SECTION 3: The Department of Corrections shall provide a death chamber and all necessary apparatus, machinery, and appliances for inflicting the penalty of death by electrocution or by guillotine.
SECTION 4: This Act shall be applicable to all executions occurring on or after August 31, 1996.
Teper has earned the nickname, “Doug ‘Heads Will Roll’ Teper”; and the legislation didn’t pass, of course, but it will return. You can count on it. It will come back up again, and it will pass. How do I know?"


“And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them:

and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God

, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.” Rev 20:4



Jews, Listen up, listen NOW

Matthew 24:


15: When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)


Moshaich ben David, false Christ

16: Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
17: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house:
18: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
19: And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
20: But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:


See your laws on sabbath, for Jesus will fulfill every Jot and Tittle of your laws, a curse unto you..........

21: For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.


A Unified Field Theory of
Coercive Airpower


Decapitation strategy is different from the others in that it is defined not by the coercive mechanism, but by the target set we must attack to influence the enemy. This method targets the enemy leadership and C2 command apparatus and may include direct attack aimed at killing the leadership of an enemy nation.10 The mechanism may be either denial or punishment in nature.11 By destroying the enemy C2 network, we may deny him the ability to control his military units or provide them intelligence, resulting in an easy victory for our fielded forces. Additionally, most leaders place high value on their personal survival, even if capable successors exist. The new dictator, whose predecessor was turned into a smoking hole by a laser-guided bomb, may quickly adjust his personal cost/benefit analysis of continuing the war. This allows decapitation to work through a risk mechanism as well, since the new leader is likely deterred by fear of future cost to his own life. It should be noted here that many nations adhere to a policy of not targeting specific individual leaders; this was the stated policy of the United States during the Gulf War.12



(US Government Principles) agencies/oversight bodies involved, 7- 10 analgesics and anesthesia, 11, 17, 43-44 behavioral screening of pharmacology/ toxicology studies, 129- 131 behavioral studies, 8-9 behavioral training, 30 distress, 10, 16-18 fetal surgery, 107-108 funding of studies, 8 Internet sites, 7, 8, 9 occupational health and safety, 14 outcome assessment, animal welfare, 9 pain and distress, 10, 16-18 professional training in, 8-9 sample size, 10 sedatives, 11, 17 pain indicators, 17 physical restraint, 46 surgery, 41 behavioral screening, 130, 131, 132 euthanasia, decapitation, 27 fluid regulation, 56, 57 food regulation, 52, 53-54 genetically modified animals, 62 lesions, 97 pain assessment, 18, 100, 103 physical restraint, 54 regulations concerning, 8 sleep deprivation, 121 zoonoses, 29 surgical procedures, 37, 40 veterinarians, 7, 9, 13, 33 Restraints, 46-49 anxiety, 48 behavioral tasks, 74, 76 chairing, 49, 74, 76, 77-78 conditioning animals to, 48 consequences of, 48-49 distress, 46-49 (passim), 77 head-restraint systems, 77, 78-79, 81 humane endpoints, 49 methods, 47-48, 49, 74, 76, 77-78 neurophysiologic recording, 74-81 (passim) observation of animals, 47 prolonged restraint, 46, 48-49

OCR for page 207



GEMARA. … Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin. (3) It would have been sufficient to say], 'A man, etc.:' What is taught by the expression any man? (4) The inclusion of heathens, to whom blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites, and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation.(5)

— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 56a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page





— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 52b

We should have beheaded Saddam's monster sons, and placed their pigskin-draped heads atop long poles in the center of Baghdad. Then, one by one, as we capture other high-ranking members of the old regime, their pigskin-draped heads should join the rotting heads of the Hussein brothers.

— Robert G. Williscroft (73)

GEMARA. … On the eve of the Passover Yeshu (6) was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, 'He is going forth to be stoned because he has practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.' But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!

— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 43a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 281


— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 60b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 410


Holocaust Exaggerated
Says Gibson's Dad


(AFP) - A week before the United States release of Mel Gibson's controversial movie, The Passion of the Christ, the filmmaker's father has repeated claims the Holocaust was exaggerated.
Hutton Gibson's comments, made in a telephone interview with New York radio talk show host Steve Feuerstein, come at an awkward time for the actor-director who has been trying to deflect criticism from Jewish groups that his film might inflame anti-Semitic sentiment.
In his interview on WSNR radio's Speak Your Piece, to be broadcast on Monday, Hutton Gibson, argued that many European Jews counted as death camp victims of the Nazi regime had in fact fled to countries like Australia and the United States.
"It's all - maybe not all fiction - but most of it is," he said, adding that the gas chambers and crematoria at camps like Auschwitz would not have been capable of exterminating so many people.
"Do you know what it takes to get rid of a dead body? To cremate it?" he said. "It takes a litre of petrol and 20 minutes. Now, six million of them? They (the Germans) did not have the gas to do it. That's why they lost the war."
Gibson's father caused a furore last year when he made similar remarks in a New York Times article.
In a television interview with Diane Sawyer this week, Mel Gibson accused the Times of taking advantage of his father, and he warned Sawyer against broaching the subject again.
"He's my father. Gotta leave it alone Diane. Gotta leave it alone," Gibson said, while offering his own perspective on the Holocaust.
"Do I believe that there were concentration camps where defenceless and innocent Jews died cruelly under the Nazi regime? Of course I do; absolutely," he said. "It was an atrocity of monumental proportion."
During his lengthy radio interview, Hutton Gibson, 85, said Jews were out to create "one world religion and one world government" and outlined a conspiracy theory involving Jewish bankers, the US Federal Reserve and the Vatican, among others.
The Passion, which gets its US release on February 25, purports to be a faithful and graphic account of Christ's last 12 hours on earth.
Jewish leaders who have attended advance screenings have voiced concerns that its portrayal of the Jews' role in Christ's execution could stir up anti-Semitic feeling.
Agence France-Presse


Sent to me e-mail from Chabad Lubavitch 2-19-2004


27 Shevat, 5764 * February 19, 2004

"T O D A Y ' S   D A Y"

Tuesday, Sh'vat 27 5703

Torah lessons: Chumash: Mishpatim, Shlishi with Rashi.
               Tehillim: 120-134.
               Tanya: Likewise in the (p. 107)...duty of charity.
                      (p. 107).

My father writes in one of his Maamarim:

   "Early chassidim resolved in their souls to refrain from anything
    that is permissible (by Torah law) but for which they felt a
    desire and urge.  This breaks the passion."



All pure satanic symbology




From the Liar's point of View

Furor just before Gibson's 'The Passion' opens

Hutton Gibson
A week before Mel Gibson's movie about Jesus Christ hits theaters, his father has gone on an explosive rant against Jews - claiming they fabricated the Holocaust and are conspiring to take over the world.

"They're after one world religion and one world government," Hutton Gibson, 85, said in a radio interview that will air Monday night.

"That's why they've attacked the Catholic Church so strongly, to ultimately take control over it by their doctrine."

In the bizarre interview, Gibson also said Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan should be lynched and called for the government to be overthrown.

The movie star's father has made outrageous statements about the Holocaust and Jewish conspiracies before.

But the timing of his latest comments is certain to fuel the uproar over his son's movie, "The Passion of The Christ," which opens Ash Wednesday.

Some critics say the movie blames Jews for the death of Christ and will provoke anti-Semitism, and they question why Mel Gibson hasn't denounced his father's views.

Hutton Gibson spoke Monday to Steve Feuerstein of "Speak Your Piece!" on WSNR (620 AM), a show syndicated by Talkline, the largest syndicator of Jewish programming.

Some of his most outrageous rants focused on the millions of Jews exterminated by Adolf Hitler.

"They claimed that there were 6.2 million in Poland before the war, and they claimed after the war there were 200,000 - therefore he must have killed 6 million of them," he said. "They simply got up and left! They were all over the Bronx and Brooklyn and Sydney, Australia, and Los Angeles."

He said the Germans did not have enough gas to cremate 6 million people and that the concentration camps were just "work camps."

"It's all - maybe not all fiction - but most of it is," he said.

Gibson repeatedly smeared prominent Jews as money-grubbing power-mongers.

"Greenspan tells us what to do. Someone should take him out and hang him."

He even belittled the Pope's reported endorsement of "The Passion," recounting how Mel referred to the pontiff as an "ass."

Gibson reserved most of his vitriol for Judaism, asking: "Is the Jew still actively anti-Christian? He is, for by being a Jew, he is anti-everyone else."

Mel Gibson's spokesman, Alan Nierob, had no comment on the elder Gibson's tirade.

But Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League said they were the words of a "classical anti-Semite."

"If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny," he said.

He's troubled by Mel Gibson's failure to condemn his father's beliefs, and pointed to a recent interview where Gibson said his dad never lied to him.

"Well, he's been lying to the world, but it sounds like truth to the son? That's strange," Foxman said.

Originally published on February 19, 2004


Let My Children Go saith the "Robber". Preparing for the final Exod-U.S


"anti-Semitism is necessary for the management of our Lesser Brethren", : protocols


The anti-Semites use anti-Semitism against the seed of Abraham by faith in Christ Jesus, to snare the world for their god, satan.

any who believe their are races, are of the serpents seed, for the Lord hath created all mankind of ONE BLOOD. see


How satan snare's the World by Proxy


Friday February 20, 2:07 AM

EU vows action against 'monster' of anti-Semitism

The EU promised at a high-level conference to clamp down on anti-Semitism -- a "monster" that Jewish leaders warned has returned with a vengeance to the continent that bore witness to the Holocaust.

The buildup to the day-long event was troubled, not least because of accusations by Jewish groups that the European Union executive is itself guilty of fostering anti-Semitism in Europe.

But figures including European Commission chief Romano Prodi, German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer and Israeli Diaspora Affairs Minister Natan Sharansky banded together to denounce mounting attacks on Jewish targets in Europe.

"Anti-Semitism has returned. The monster is here with us once again," European Jewish Congress (EJC) president Cobi Benatoff told the conference.

"What is of most concern to us, however, is the indifference of our fellow European citizens," the Italian said.

The EJC and US-based World Jewish Congress urged the European Commission to set up committees drawn from EU governments and Jewish groups to monitor anti-Semitic incidents.

They also called for police crackdowns to ensure that those behind attacks on Jewish synagogues, schools and cemeteries are brought to justice, and for better education in Europe's schools on the history of European Jewry.

Sharansky welcomed action taken along these lines by France, which is home to the EU's largest numbers of Jews and Muslims along with its highest number of anti-Semitic incidents last year at 125.

Prodi -- whose first visit when he became commission president in 1999 was to Auschwitz -- vowed concrete action.

"We are not here to beat our breasts in public and then do nothing," he said, calling on EU interior, justice and education ministers to come together to debate the problem, and promising proposals by the commission.

Prodi also urged EU governments to adopt a commission proposal for an EU-wide law against racism and xenophobia, which among other things would define anti-Semitic acts and Holocaust denial as crimes across the bloc.

The commission chief announced plans for Thursday's conference after Brussels published an EU opinion poll in November that labelled Israel the biggest threat to world peace.

Jewish anger at the EU was fuelled by a decision -- later reversed -- to shelve a report by the bloc's racism watchdog that showed a rise in anti-Semitic attacks by Muslims and pro-Palestinian groups in Europe.

Sharansky said Europeans had every right to criticise Israeli government policies in the Middle East conflict.

"We can disagree on many things, about the line of the (security) fence, about settlements, about the right way to cope with the terror," he said.

But much of the criticism in Europe had in recent years become mixed with demonisation of Jews, double standards in attacking Israel and denying the legitimacy of the Jewish state, Sharansky said.

"We Jews in Europe who lived through history, we know that history can repeat itself as a tragedy if it doesn't learn to recognise the evil and fight evil."

Nobel Peace Prize-winning author Elie Wiesel said many Jews in Europe now lived in such fear that they wanted to emigrate to Israel.

"If Auschwitz didn't cure the world of anti-Semitism, what will?" he said.

Prodi acknowledged that hostility to Israel arising from the Middle East conflict was fuelling anti-Semitism in Europe. But he rejected comparisons to the 1930 and 1940s.

"We have no right to insult the memory of the Shoah's (Holocaust's) millions of victims by putting their sufferings on a par with today's manifestations, as serious as they undoubtedly are," he said.

The German foreign minister said the EU would continue to strive for peace in the Middle East despite criticism from Israel and Jewish groups that the bloc is biased towards the Palestinians.

"We must energeticaly tackle anti-Semitism, but solving the Middle East and developing a real vision of peace is the major, major challenge for a Europe that is uniting," Fischer said.


They are HOPING for a great rise in AMERICAN ...." anti-Semitism" the lie










the anti-semites are baiting the semites for their god


the nations are getting very angry


the wall will be finished in time for the flatterer


not one jot or tittle of "their Laws" will be left untouched


the thief cometh upon them soon





Take Your Kids To The Movie
By Israel Shamir

The film of Mel Gibson, The Passion, grows into an important, maybe the important event of the year. Even before screening, it caused violent reactions of the American Jewish 'thought police', ADL led by obnoxious Foxman. There are unpleasant rumours (in the New York Times) that Mr Gibson gave in and decided to censor the Gospel. I hope it is not true, for a man who can give in and cut the Gospel is not worthy to make a film about Golgotha. 'To change even one letter in the Bible is like to destroy the world', says the Jewish wisdom, and I concur: if the Gospel, the most important part of the Bible, tells us of the High Priest of Jews that he accepted his responsibility for the verdict, Mr Gibson is not entitled to change it, even he were to be crucified himself.

Naturally, the High Priest of antisemitism fighters, Abe Foxman, the guy who took bribe from Marc Rich the thief, is not worried about placid American Goyim attacking the innocent Jews. First, it is not bloody likely. Even if the Jews were to crucify Christ today in prime time on CNN, the Americans won't dare to object. Secondly, every attack on a Jew brings cash to Abe Foxman; he thrives on strife. He is worried about something else.

Foxman and other enemies of Gibson's film are worried that the young American kids of some Jewish background, like kids of Vermont Governor Dean, or many of our readers, will see the movie and never again will call themselves 'Jews' anymore. Foxman, Bronfman et al are worried that these kids - and grown ups - will take themselves to the church, while these leaders will remain with assorted retired folk in Florida. Their worries are our hopes.

There many good people who by mistake or by ignorance consider themselves 'Jews'. For this mistake they pay dearly: they are forced to fight against 'the Jews' while supporting the setup. I saw something similar in Russia, where many good people called themselves 'communists' in the days of Brezhnev. They had to justify or condemn invasion of Afghanistan from extremely uncomfortable position. But they had no choice in the USSR of those days. But now, there is no need for any good person to call him/herself a Jew anymore.

The Church always welcomed these good people of Jewish origin to her bosom. They are welcome, and the film of Gibson hopefully will bring them - away from Foxman and Caiaphas to Christ. But this beautiful plan can't be implemented by way of ideological and theological compromise. The Church is open for the good people, and the separation of lambs from goats is promised beginning of the Last Judgement. Now, appearance of the Mel Gibson's film provides us with opportunity to separate lambs from goats


Who hates Jews? 

Is it Me, who knows that Jesus is the Only Everlasting Covenant the Savior, the Only way in which to enter into the kingdom of Heaven of God the Father? Who is screaming to the top of my lungs to the jews to repent? Who loves them so much, that I already know that by their Talmudic Laws, that I am to be put to death?


Or is the haters, they who "SAY" they are of Christ, but who do lie and are become anti-Christ, saying the jews do not need Jesus the Christ, and who "SAY" that the jews are under another covenant. Who deny that Jesus is Lord over all mankind.


Think about it.


And know this, No greater Love has a man who would lay down his life for his friends, even if it is, "they", his friends, who take his life....Gladly if just one jew comes to you Lord.



The Most Important Legislation
In The Last Fifty Years:
The Constitution Restoration Act Of 2004

By Chuck Baldwin

Last week, a bill was introduced in both chambers of Congress to "limit the jurisdiction of Federal courts in certain cases and promote federalism." The House version is H.R. 3799, and the Senate version is S. 2082. The bill is titled, "The Constitution Restoration Act of 2004." Initial sponsors of the bill include Rep. Robert Aderholt (AL), Rep. Michael Pence (IN), Sen. Richard Shelby (AL), Sen. Zell Miller (GA), Sen. Sam Brownback (KS), and Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC). Even though the introduction of this bill received little national media attention, it is the most important legislation in the last fifty years.
I was privileged to be in attendance at the press conference in Prattville, Alabama when former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, Rep. Aderholt, Sen. Shelby, Sen. Brownback, and Ambassador Alan Keyes formally announced the introduction of this bill to the media. Also in attendance were conservative luminaries such as Phyllis Schlafly and Howard Phillips. The bill was drafted by a star-studded legal team including Chief Justice Moore's lead counsel, Herb Titus.
The passage of H.R. 3799 and S. 2082 should be regarded as the most important item on the conservative agenda this year! It is no hyperbole to say that the passage of this bill is significantly more important than who wins the White House this November. Yes, I really mean that.
You see, what difference does it make who wins a presidential or congressional election if neither party will faithfully discharge their duty to the U.S. Constitution? We have seen Republican and Democratic presidents come and go. The same goes for congressmen and senators. Yet, government continues to get bigger and bigger, while freedom gets smaller and smaller. Neither has either major party done anything to reverse the trend toward socialism and globalism.
One of the major reasons for this unfortunate set of circumstances is an out-of-control federal judiciary. For the last fifty years, federal courts have run roughshod over the Constitution. For all practical purposes, America is now controlled by a tyrannical oligarchy of federal judges.
*Noahide Courts of Talmudic Justice
Thankfully, our Founding Fathers understood this potentiality and prescribed a way for Congress to deal with the matter. Under Article III, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, Congress has the power and authority to regulate and except appellate jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, including the U.S. Supreme Court. That is exactly what H.R. 3799 and S. 2082 do.
Accordingly, under Sec. 102 of this bill, "Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an element of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official personal capacity), by reason of that element's or officer's acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government."

Which God? The jews god or Christ Jesus the Creator?

This means, that the federal judiciary would be prohibited from interfering with any expression of religious faith by any elected local, state, or federal official. In other words, federal judges could not prevent the Ten Commandments from being displayed in public buildings or Nativity Scenes from appearing on court house lawns or "under God" from being recited in the Pledge of Allegiance or prayers being spoken in public schools, etc. This bill would limit the jurisdiction of the federal courts in these matters.
Furthermore, Sec. 201 of this bill states, "In interpreting and applying the Constitution of the United States, a court of the United States may not rely upon any constitution, law, administrative rule, Executive order, directive, policy, judicial decision, or any other action of any foreign state or international organization or agency, other than the constitutional law and English common law."
Then we make a move against HJR 104, Public Law 102-14
In other words, the Supreme Court would be prohibited from basing their opinions on the rule of foreign law. This is especially needful as Supreme Court justices such as Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg have demonstrated a recent propensity to do just that.
Talmudic Law of the Jews
As you can see, this bill is needed in the worst way! And the encouraging thing is, it really does have a better than average chance of passing. In fact, at the press conference in Prattville, Sen. Shelby predicted the bill would pass the U.S. Senate. Rep. Aderholt feels confident it will pass the House as well.
Please contact your congressman and senators (and the White House) and tell them that your support for their reelections is dependent upon their support for this bill! There is nothing more important in politics this year than passing this bill into law! Not even the vote for President is more important. The federal judiciary must be reigned in! It must be "bound down by the chains of the Constitution" (Jefferson). Passage of "The Constitution Restoration Act of 2004" will begin this process. I wholeheartedly and enthusiastically support this bill. I hope you will, too.



Never believe it




*) Noachidae, or Noachites, the descendants of Noah. This patriarch having alone preserved the true name and worship of God amid a race of impious idolaters, the Freemasons claim to be his descendants, because they preserve that pure religion which distinguished this second father of the human race from the rest of the world. (See the author's Lexicon of Freemasonry.) The Tyrian workmen at the temple of Solomon were the descendants of that other division of the race who fell off, at Shinar, from the true worship, and repudiated the principles of Noah. The Tyrians, however, like many other ancient mystics, had recovered some portion of the lost light, and the complete repossession was finally achieved by their union with the Jewish masons, who were Noachidae united in object and design, that it is impossible to appreciate the one without an investigition of the other..THE SYMBOLISM OF FREEMASONRY

ILLUSTRATING AND EXPLAINING Its Science and Philosophy, its Legends, Myths, and ALBERT G: MACKEY, M. D.,

Part 8 of 11

By Colonel Gordon "Jack" Mohr AUS Ret.

The sicknes of the Talmudic Rabbi's who are contrary unto all mankind.

If you want to know where "Seedline" teaching is derived, see this same exhibit which is nauseating. Again, let me apologize to my lady readers. But you must see these milder examples of The Talmud in order to understand what it is all about.

According to the teachings of The Talmud, a non-Jew who studies this book or even reads it, deserves death. According to Talmudic rabbis: Moses commanded the law for our (Jew) inheritance; it is ours, not theirs.

Of course the fact that there were no people called Jews at the time the Law was given, or for 750 years thereafter, means very little to them, or to the brainwashed Christians who have accepted their Jewish fables. Rabbi Johanna objected strenuously to any Gentile (non-Jew, and at that time this referred to the ten tribes of Northern Israel who were held in contempt) having knowledge of Jewish jurisprudence since this could be used against the Jews when they were taken into a Gentile court.

All Talmudic laws discriminate against the non-Jew, ranking them as human animals. This thinking, of course, can become dangerous to the Jew. The Jewish Encyclopedia mentions SANHEDRIN 59a which threatens death to any Jew who reveals the Talmudic Law to a goy. This order follows a discussion on cheating and getting the best of a Gentile in business dealings. (See following exhibit.)

The Jewish law against overcharging one-sixth or more above the current price of marketable merchandise - a violation of which affected the validity of the sale - applied only to a Jew or domiciled alien, not to a Gentile. "If thou sell ought unto thy neighbor, or buyest ought of thy neighbor's hand, ye shall not oppress [overcharge] one another" (Hebr. = "his brother"; Lev. xxv. 14), was contrary to the Gentile legal maxim, "A bargain is a bargain." For this the Gentile was paid in his own coin, so to speak. Samuel declared legal a transaction in which an error has been made by miscalculation on the part of a Gentile. Following out his theory, Samuel was unscrupulous enough to purchase from a Gentile a gold bar for four zuz, which was the price of an iron bar; he even beat down the price one zuz Such transactions while regarded as perfectly proper and legitimate among the Gentiles, were not tolerated among the Jews themselves.

Inasmuch as the Jews had their own distinct jurisdiction, it would have been unwise to reveal their laws to the Gentiles, for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts. Hence the Talmud prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut. xxxii4 4) H. Johanan says of one so teaching; "Such a person deserves death" (an idiom used to express indignation). "It is like placing an obstacle before the blind" (Sand. 59a; hag. 1 3a). And yet if a Gentile study the Law for the purpose of observing the moral laws of Noah, H. Meir says he is as good as a high priest, and quotes: "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them." (Lev. xviii. 5) The text does not specify an Israelite or a Levite or a priest, but simply "a man" - even a Gentile (Ab. Zarah 26a).

Resh Lakish (d. 278) said, "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death." (Sanh. 58b). This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noachidae, in as much as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone" and it was probably directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic laws and yet at that time kept up the observance of the Jewish Sabbath. Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh Lakish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: ". . . not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest]." : intimating that the mandate given to the Noachidae that "day and night shall not cease" should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22) - probably to discourage general idleness (ib. Rashi), or for the more plausible reason advanced by Maimonides, who says; "The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovation in religion or to created new commandments. He has the privilege to become a true proselyte by accepting the whole Law" ("Yad," Melakim, x. 9). R. Emden, in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam" (pp. 32b-34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law - which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.

One can better understand why Jesus called the Pharisees "fools and blind" in Matthew 23:17 and 19, when you read some of the remarks in The Talmud which is recorded as the "wisdom of the Jewish sages."

In the case of Adam, for instance, the Bible tells us in Genesis 2:23 that when Adam saw his helpmate Eve who had been taken from his own body, he said: This is now bone ofmy bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Remember that Adam had been given the task, by God Himself, of naming all the living things in the Garden of Eden. (Genesis 2:19 - 20)

But the Talmud changes this beautiful account to say That: ". . . This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve." 

An idea of the asinine language found in the Yebamoth volume can be seen by the following. A little girl is determined to be an adolescent (one who has not borne a child) if she has only two pubic hairs on her private parts. This is too stupid to credit to anything but a sewer mentality. Yet dealing in unnatural filth is at the core of Talmudic teaching. No wonder the Apostle Paul said that they changed the truth of God into a lie. (Romans 1:25 - 28)

When Jesus called the Pharisees "blind and fools," He knew whereof He spoke since in The Talmud they argue over whether "dipping one or two fingers in salt makes one wise; whether passing under the bit of a camel, or the camel itself, interferes with one's mentality; and how many rows of students must stand up when the head of the Talmudic school, called the "nasi" enters the room."

There are some very amusing things found in the stupidity of Talmudic remedies, such as found in the Gittin volume with its mixtures of dung, blood and filth. It is not so much the stupidity of the remedies themselves, but the commentary by a goy English doctor (which appears in the Soncino English translation) as he attempts to justify and praise the medical wisdom of the Pharisees.

Following are some interesting exhibits devoted to remedies made from "tearing a black hen lengthwise and crosswise; shaving the middle of the head, and putting the bird on it until it sticks fast. Then go to the river and stand in the water until becoming faint; then swim out and sit down." This is the cure for sunstroke.

Notice also the cures prescribed for swollen glands and catarrh. The one I like is where you take the excrement from a white dog and knead it in with balsam. Sounds like pure medical science, doesn't it?

Wonder why all nations of the earth in History exiled the vermin, Chassidim? The poor "Lesser jews" like the apostate "Judeo-Churchizionist" haven't a clue as to the WORD of God.


The supreme hatred of Talmudic Judaism is reserved for, and directed against, the believers of the Christian Bible. Yes, you brainwashed Judeo-Christians who want to elevate these worst enemies of Jesus Christ and His church to the position of God's Chosen People, you need to know what they think and teach about your religion and your Savior.

You who believe the Christian Bible is the Word of God are classified as the primary enemies of Judaism. You are called "heathen," "Idolators," and "goy-animals" by your Jewish friends. You rank lower than the ordinary goy non-Jew: in fact, in the Jewish mind, you are the lowest and most despised of all forms of life.

As a Christian, you receive the Jewish curses of the 7th and 12th of the Eighteen Benedictions called the SHEMONEH ESREH. The orthodox Jew recites this three times daily and four times on the Sabbath, or Jewish holidays This means that Christians are cursed six times on ordinary days and eight times on special Jewish days. This is Talmudic brotherhood. Remember this, the next time your pastor arranges for a inter-faith meeting with the Jews.

According to volume Gittin 56b-57a, "All who mock the words of the sages (this means all Christians who believe the Christian Bible) will be punished for eternity in boiling hot excrement." (See exhibit)

As one studies The Talmud in detail, apart from the white-wash done by men such as Dr. Neusner, you will begin to understand that the bloody, the sadistic and the obscene are the darlings of the "synagogue of Satan mentality."

If you have ever wondered why Jewish comics the world over are noted for their obscenity, you need wonder no longer. It is as fundamental to them as the knowledge of God is to the average Caucasian. If you want to know why the movies and television are degenerating into a hog wallow of sexual filth, the advice of Talmudic Jews is the answer. This filthiness is literally bred into the Jewish mind, no matter how much they attempt to deny it. According to the book, Jews Must Live. authored by the Jewish businessman Samuel Rdth, one of the first things he was taught as an Eurdpean Jew was to spit when he passed a Christian church, or when the name of Jesus Christ was even mentioned. The second lesson was that it was accepted for a Jew to cheat the detested goyim as long as you weren't caught at it because that would bring shame upon Judaism.

The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia clearly notes that it was the Pharisees who took over the pure Hebrew religion in Babylon and turned it into the monstrosity of Judaism. The rabbis removed obnoxious references to God, just as many of the modern Jewish influenced translators have gone about removing anti-Jewish passages from the Bible. This trend has now reached the point where there is a move underway to remove the Gospel of John and his Epistles because they tell the truth about the anti-Christs.

The sacrificing of white babies on the altars of abortion is supported by the Talmudists. Most of the large abortion clinics in America which regularly murder over two million unborn babies every year are Jewish owned and staffed by Jewish abortionists. It is also interesting to note that Jews head most of the sob-sister organizations that want to protect baby seals and whales. In their twisted thinking,it is better to protect other living creatures than it is to protect human life. This is a Talmudic monstrosity!

The ultimate target for infamy in The Talmud is our precious Lord, Savior and king, Jesus Christ. The Talmud targets Him as the object of its special, vitriolic hatred which is difficult for the average Christian to understand. Yet the Jewish masters look on Christians as "docile asses, bearers of burdens for the Jews" and hate you if you believe in Christ and follow Him as Savior and King. According to The Talmud, you are vermin to be eradicated like rats.

Jesus appears in The Talmud under the name of Balaam. Proof that this word refers to Christ can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia, which states: Hence . . . the pseudonym 'Balaam' given to Jesus In SANHEDRIN 106b and GITTIN 51a. (See following exhibit.)

-In Rabbinical Literature: Balaam is represented as one of seven h&dttlen prophets; the other six being Balaam's father, Job and his four friends (B. B. 1 5b). He gradually acquired a position among the heathen as exalted as that of Moses among the chosen people (Num. R. xx. 1). At first a mere interpreter of dreams, Balaam later became a magician, until finally the spirit of prophecy descended upon him (ib. 7). He possessed the special gift of being able to ascertain the exact moment during which God is wroth - a gift bestowed upon no other creature. Balaam's intention was to curse the Israelites at this moment of wrath; but God purposely restrained His anger in order to baffle the wicked prophet and to save the nation from extermination (Ber. 7a). When the law was given to Israel, a mighty voice shook the foundations of the earth; so that all kings trembled, and in their consternation gathered about Balaam, inquiring whether this upheaval of nature portended a second deluge; but the prophet assured them that what they heard was the voice of the Almighty giving the sacred Law to His children of Israel (Zeb. 1 16a).

Nevertheless, it is significant that in rabbinical literature the epithet "rasha" (the wicked one) is often attached to the name of Balaam (Ber. I. c.; Ta anit 20a; Num. R. xx. 14). He is pictured as blind of one eye and lame in one foot (San. 105a); and his disciples (followers) are distinguished by three morally corrupt qualities, viz., and evil eye, a haughty bearing, and a varicious spirit - quallties the very opposite of those characterizing the disciples of Abraham (Ab. v.19; compare Tan,, Balak, 6). Balaam received the divine communication at night only - a limitation that applies also to the other heathen prophets (Num. R. xx. 12). The Rabbis hold Balaam responsible for the unchastity which led to the apostasy in Shittim, and in chastisement of which 24,000 persons fell victims to a pestilence (Num. xxv. 1-9). When Balaam, the wicked," saw that he could not curse the children of Israel, he advised Balak (intimated in Num. xxiv. 14) as a last resort to tempt the Hebrew nation to immoral acts and, through these, to the worship of Baal-peor. "The God of the Hebrews," adds Balaam, "hates lewdness; and severe chastisement must follow" (San. 106a; Yer ib x. 28; Num. R. I. c.).

The Rabbis, playing on the name Balaam, call him "Belo Am" (without people; that is, without a share with the people in the world to come), or "Belo' Am" (one that ruined a people); and this hostility against his memory finds its climax if) the dictum that whenever one discovers a feature of wickedness or disgrace in his life, one should preach about it (Sanh. 106b). In the process of killing Balaam (Num. xxxi. 8), all four legal methods of execution - stoning, burning, decapitating, and strangling - were employed (Sanh. I. c.). He met his death at the age of thirty-three (lb.); and it is stated that he had no portion in the world to come (Sanh. x. 2; 90a). The bible devotes a special section to the remarkable history of the prophet, in order to answer the question, why God has taken away the power or prophecy from the Gentiles (Tan., Balak, 1). Moses is expressly mentioned as the author of this episode in the Pen tateuch (8. B. 14b).

Henceforth he became the type of false prophets seducing men to lewdness and obscene idolatrous practises (Rev. 2:14; II Peter 2:15), Jude 11; Abot v. 19). The name "Nicolaitanes," given to the Christian heretics "holding the doctrine of Balaam" (Rev. 2:6, 15), is probably derived from the Grecized form of Balaam, and hence also the pseudonym, "Balaam" given to Jesus in Sanh 106b) and Git. 57a).

The life of this sorcerer was futher detailed in the "Se fer ha- Yashar" legends and by the later caballsts (Yalk., Reubeni to Balak). Balaam's ass formed an especial object of haggadic interpretation and embellishment. "The speaking mouth of the ass" was declared to be one of the ten miraculous things that God had created in the twilight of the sixth day (Abot v.6). Targ. Yer. to Num. xxii. 30 gives a long monition which the ass offers to her foolish master.

Jesus, according to The Talmud, deserved all four "legal methods of death; stoning, being hanged, burned and crucified."

In SANHEDRIN (52a) the manner of burning as an execution is explained and it is also found in YEBAMOTH (6b); this is verified in the Jewish Encyclopedia under the title of "Balaam."

The victim is lowered into a pit filled with dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one apd wound around his neck, and the two loose ends were pulled in opposite directions forcing him to open his mouth. A wick was then lit and thrown into his mouth so that it descended into his body and burnt his bowels. Admitting the possibility that the victim might not be burned to death before he died of strangulation, they prescribed that his mouth was forced open with pincers against his wish, and then the wick was lit and thrown into his mouth.



House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14 a very very real law, as real as this law which instigated it. And Both are Crimes against Humanity....non -Talmudic Jews


International Information Programs


10 October 2002

House Joint Resolution Authorizing Use of Force Against Iraq

House of Representatives approves resolution October 10

Following is the text of House Joint Resolution 114, "To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq," approved in the House of Representatives October 10, by a vote of 296 to 133:

2d Session
H. J. RES. 114
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
October 2, 2002


To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Which is Obvious they did. And this criminal Congress knew it.

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

A Talmudic Illumined Lie of the synagogue of Liars "SAYERS"

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in Public Law 105-235 (August 14, 1998), Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in 'material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations' and urged the President 'to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations';

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolution of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas Israel has 69 Resolutions in violation of Human Rights

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;

SEE USA Civil Rights Violations against it's own peoples

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

another Lie of Goliath porportion

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 (1990) and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 (1991), and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949 (1994);

See apartheid Wall, Israel

Whereas in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1), Congress has authorized the President 'to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolution 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677';

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it 'supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),' that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and 'constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,' and that Congress, 'supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688';

The same time the Talmudic Noahide Universal Laws was made a HJR PUBLIC LAW !!!!!

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic (Noahite)  government to replace that regime;

Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to 'work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge' posed by Iraq and to 'work for the necessary resolutions,' while also making clear that 'the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable';

War by Peace

Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

By releasing the five Moassad Israeli's who were clapping and Giving High Five's in New York while filming the WTC collapse

Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and

Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


This joint resolution may be cited as the 'Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002'.


The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to —

(1) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and

(2) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.


(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to —

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and

(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that —

(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and

(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

(c) War Powers Resolution Requirements-

(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.


(a) REPORTS- The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 3 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338).

(b) SINGLE CONSOLIDATED REPORT- To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93-148), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- To the extent that the information required by section 3 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of such resolution.|TOM:/bss/d102query.html




TheTalmudic Illumined jews do not merit sitting in the shadow of their Mooshiyuck's donkey's Dung, so they say....always preoccupied in excrement


Little wonder that some sages expressed apprehensions about those days in terms of, “Let [Moshiach] come, but let me not see him.” The prevailing attitude, however, is to await his coming in spite of all, even if thereafter we shall merit no more than sitting “in the shadow of his donkey’s dung!”




Let the Seventy Noahide Nations, welcome the Bush-ka Schneerson Universal Noahide Laws of their god, Satan

There is however a second way of interpreting Noah's character, insisting that had he been a contemporary of Abraham's, he would have been even more righteous. According to this view, Noah took 120 years to construct his ark, spending all the extra time in convincing the citizens of the world to forsake their violence, to accept the basic laws of morality expressed by ethical monotheism, to establish democratic, freedom-loving anti-terror governments.


the new Demonicrazy is nothing more than the "SAYER" Jews Universal Noahism and Olam haba of the Master Race, are ye gods

War on Terrorism?, why Christianity and the saints of Jesus the Christ, of course. The Terror of the "SAYERS"


An article in The Australian Jewish News says: CHRISTIANS have to make a choice - "either retain their present belief system and be antisemitic or form a partnership with the Jewish people." This is the view of Bar-Ilan University's Rabbi Dr. Pinchas Hayman, who is active in Jewish-Christian dialogue and in encouraging modern Christianity to return to its Jewish roots by observing the Seven Noahide Laws.

"As long as Christians keep Jesus as God, they will be antisemitic because that belief must lead them to believe that those who reject Jesus reject God," he told the Australian Jewish News.



Well I for one hope to stay anti-Septic, dear rabid rabbi's.


"The nations will gather and pay homage to the people of God: All the fortunes of the nations will pass to the Jewish people, they will march captive behind the Jewish people in chains and prostrate themselves before them, their kings will bring up their sons, and their princesses will nurse their children. The Jews command the nations: they will summon peoples whom they do not know, and people who do not know them will hasten to them. The riches of the sea and the wealth of the nations will come to the Jews of their own right. Any people or kingdom who will not serve Israel will be destroyed" (Rabbi Isidore Loeb, La Literature Des Pauvres Dans La Bible, p. 219-220).


Making them twiced the children of Hell


Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

The second midrashic opinion sees Noah as a righteous proselytizer, who never gives up on humanity, even after 120 years of fruitless preaching about the importance of the seven Noahide laws of morality. Noah feels the necessity to take with him the seeds of two fruits, the grape and the fig, wine being a symbol of freedom (remember the Passover cups of wine as the sign of redemption).




 Pledge Allegiance to their flag of the Talmudic Communist CollectiveUniversal Noahide Law


of satan's Olam haha



Noahide Enforcement now in full swing in the US of Greater Israel


MANY books have been written by the scientists of the last century, and many lengthy articles have appeared in the various periodicals, concerning the Jewish high court, and this tract, which, if extracts were given, would make an entire bulky volume in itself. However, we deem it best to give the reader the information where these are to be found. The time during which the Sanhedrin were established is the main topic of their discussions. Zunz, for instance, gives the time from King Simeon of the Maccabees. Jost states that it was from the period of Hyrcan. And an anonymous writer in "Israelitische Annalen," Vol. I., pp. 108-134, maintains that they were established at an exceedingly earlier date, and that the Greek name "Sanhedrin" was changed during the time of the second Temple. At all events, Schürer, in his "Jüdische Geschichte," wrote a lengthy article on this subject, in Vol II., from p. 188 to 240 (where there is to be found a bibliography of the subject), concluding with his opinion that the high court began at an earlier time. Z. Frankel, too, in his article, "Der gerichtliche Beweis," Berlin, 1848, claims that the establishment of the jury in the entire civilized world was taken from the Sanhedrin. All this was written in Germany. An English book by Rabbi Mendelsohn also treats upon this topic. We, too, will have something to say concerning this in our forthcoming "History of the Talmud." We are inclined, in many respects, however, to accept the opinion of Reifmann, given in his Hebrew book, "Sanhedrin," Warsaw, 1888. He says that courts were even established in the days of Noah, the judges of which were Shem, Abraham, Isaac, and Amram, continuing until Moses. He, in turn, established a court of seventy judges, and from that time the Supreme High Court was of that number (seventy-one, including Moses), and thereafter supreme courts of twenty-three, and courts of three, were established at all times, and wherever the Jews resided; the sages of the second Temple naming these courts "great" and "small" Sanhedrin. Reifmann's reasons are gathered from the post-biblical literature, and are based upon the Bible. According to him, the three judges had to decide civil cases only, the twenty-three, criminals

p. vi

and capital punishments, and the seventy-one were a political body, who were to decide also the great events; as, for instance, an entire tribe, or the princes and heads of tribes. We, however, would say that the court of three had also to decide criminal cases to which capital punishment did not apply. So it seems to us, from this tract, p. 212 of the Talmud, that a stubborn and rebellious son was punished with stripes by a court of three, before being finally sentenced to death by the court of twenty-three.


Doing away with Juries


The Three Judge Obedient Goyim Noahide Panel's are set up to do satanic injustice

THREE-JUDGE PANEL: Government wins ruling over Area 51

Lawsuit urges release of data to support claims workers were harmed by materials at facility

Three-judge panel has determined the Justice Department did not abuse national security when information was struck from court documents in two 1994 cases about the secret Air Force facility in Nevada known as Area 51.

The installation along the dry Groom Lake bed, 90 miles north of Las Vegas, is widely known as the facility where high-tech U.S. aircraft are tested against foreign radar systems. Since lawsuits were filed by workers claiming they were injured by exposure to materials at the facility, presidential disclaimers have been issued keeping the facility shrouded in secrecy.


Three-Judge Panel To Hear Recount Case
Allen Browning

Dec 04, 2003 -- A circuit court judge declined to rule yesterday on whether the recount of the Leesburg District School Board race should be proceed and referred it to another court, delaying the resolution of the matter by at least two weeks. The race was decided by a two-vote margin Nov. 4.


Memo to Counties Regarding Order of the Three-Judge Panel

County Judges and Commissioners, Voter Registrars, County Clerks, and State and County Chairs
Memo to Counties Regarding Order of the Three-Judge Panel
(PDF 31kb)




Alaska Statutes.
Title 12. Code of Criminal Procedure
Chapter 55. Sentencing and Probation
Section 175. Three-Judge Sentencing Panel.
previous: Section 172. [Renumbered as AS 12.55.180 ].
next: Section 180. Designation of Representative.

AS 12.55.175. Three-Judge Sentencing Panel.


(a) There is created within the superior court a panel of five superior court judges to be appointed by the chief justice in accordance with rules and for terms as may be prescribed by the supreme court. Three judges of the panel shall be designated by the chief justice as members. The remaining two judges shall be designated by the chief justice as first and second alternates to sit as members in the event of disqualification or disability in accordance with rules as may be prescribed by the supreme court.



(b) Upon receipt of a record of proceedings under AS 12.55.165 , the three-judge panel shall consider all pertinent files, records, and transcripts, including the findings and conclusions of the judge who originally heard the matter. The panel may hear oral testimony to supplement the record before it. If the panel supplements the record, the panel shall permit the victim to testify before the panel. If the panel finds that manifest injustice would result from failure to consider relevant aggravating or mitigating factors not specifically included in AS 12.55.155 or from imposition of the presumptive term, whether or not adjusted for aggravating or mitigating factors, it shall sentence the defendant in accordance with this section. If the panel does not find that manifest injustice would result, it shall remand the case to the sentencing court, with a written statement of its findings and conclusions, for sentencing under AS 12.55.125 .



(c) The three-judge panel may in the interest of justice sentence the defendant to any definite term of imprisonment up to the maximum term provided for the offense or to any sentence authorized under AS 12.55.015.


Federal judge punts lawsuit to three-judge panel

Good news and bad news for the Senate Democrats, I guess. A federal judge in Laredo has called their lawsuit against redistricting "all but totally frivolous" but agreed to let the three-judge panel review it anyway.

U.S. District Judge George P. Kazen said he believes Gov. Rick Perry and Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst's push for mid-decade congressional redistricting is wrong and a waste of taxpayer money. However, Kazen also criticized the Democratic senators for fleeing to Albuquerque, N.M., to break the Senate's quorum.



Three-judge panel rules against violent video games ordinance;
Agrees government can restrict minors’ access to violent material

INDIANAPOLIS – A panel of three Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judges today ruled that Indianapolis’ ordinance restricting youth access to violent video games is unconstitutional.

However, the court rejected the video game industry’s argument and agreed with the city’s argument that government can aide parents by restricting a minor’s access to certain violent material, just as it can restrict access to certain sexually explicit material. The court said “one can imagine an ordinance directed at depictions of violence because they, too, were offensive,” and violent images “… might even be described as ‘obscene’ … even if they have nothing to do with sex.”



The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Noahide Laws in legislation which was passed by both houses. Congress and the President of the United States, George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization. They also acknowledged that the Seven Laws of Noah are the foundation upon which civilization stands and that recent weakening of these principles threaten the fabric of civilized society, and that justified preoccupation in educating the Citizens of the United States of America and future generations is needed. For this purpose, this Public Law designated March 26, 1991 as Education Day, U.S.A.




The Noahide Laws based on Talmud Bavli, oral traditions of the Pharisaic Chassidim

  • To behave justly in all relationships, and to establish courts of justice.
  • To refrain from blaspheming Gods name.
  • To refrain from practicing idolatry.
  • To avoid immoral practices, specifically incest and adultery.
  • To avoid shedding the blood of ones fellow man.
  • To refrain from robbing ones fellow man.
  • To refrain from eating a limb torn from a live animal.


R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 57a
Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 387-388




Well folks, the truth about the planning and execution of the war on Iraq is finally known.  You folks who have been defending Bush's decision to attack Iraq have just been relieved of every defense for him you ever thought you had.  We just lost our 700th kid-soldier in Iraq, and the numbers are growing at an exponential rate as each day passes.  There is no other way to describe this president's actions than high treason.  He has no concept of what he unleashed.  I do not believe this man and president has the capacity to empathize at all.  He has learned to be an excellent actor, and he knows how to cover his pathological shortcomings enough to fool enough people to keep himself afloat all this time, but the man this book reveals has almost the same capacity for compassion and caring as your average sociopath serial killer.
Carl F. Worden





The jubilee of satan, that evil Tetragramatron, the god who has No Only Begotten Son of the Jews and their Judeo-Churchizionian Scofieldite mammoniteProsleytes who are made twice the children of hell, the Obedient Noahides of their New World Odor and the world religion unto satan who they have made their god of their flesh world. follow along and come out of the Great whore of Babylon, Jerusalem and her SAYERS".


Yovel (Jubilee) Years

By Greg Killian 

Every fifty years, after seven Sabbatical cycles of seven years, the Hashem's people observe the yovel, or jubilee, year. At such a time, both the forty-ninth and fiftieth year are to be considered holy, and we are to abstain from working the land, free our slaves, and let the purchased properties revert back to their original tribal owners. Just like Shavuot comes on the fiftieth day of the Omer, and represents a departure from the natural world into the supernatural realm, so too does the yovel year signal an opportunity to rise above nature. The Encyclopedia Americana says: 

Yet they reject the Savior of Spiritual Israel for their flesh olam haba under their coming flesh king, that Moshiach ben David, the son of perdition.

"The [Jubilee] law as a whole was distinctly Theocratic; it vindicated the absolutism of YHVH; it meant that Bereans (Hebrews) were the servants of Him, and could not therefore continue to be the slaves of their fellowmen; the land belonged to Him, and was only lent to the Hebrew tribes and families, who could not therefore be driven out by any human arrangement." 



 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH (YHVH) was I not known to them. 

The yovel year is dependent upon the shemittah, or Sabbatical, year. As such, you will see these two mitzvot linked throughout Torah. Both of these mitzvot are related to time, just as the Sabbath and festivals are related to time. Time is important to Hashem. 

Ha-Shem....Shem...the so called Semites...their god ha-Shem....themselves who say in their Laws, that the IAM, Jesus the Christ the WORD called them gods, yet they under their flesh laws crucified that very same, WHO DID say he was the Son of God the Father

Today, without the Temple, the mitzvah of the Sabbatical year and yovel cannot be observed the same way (see the book, The Easy Guide to Shmittah Foods, by Rabbi Yehudah Landy). Many farmers though do in fact observe the Sabbatical year, and have reported miraculous bumper crops in the sixth year, as promised by the Torah. To supplement the incomes of such brave farmers, additional funds have been established to ease the financial stress of keeping the Sabbatical year even in these times.  

Dig into the wall Ezekiel and see the abomination they do in the House of the Lord they have made their flesh temple to worship flesh
Neo is that you Neo....Moshiach ben superman Neo

Now, lets look at what the Torah says about the Yovel.

I. What is a yovel?


The first scriptural mention of Yovel is in: 

Shemot (Exodus) 19:10-13 And the LORD said to Moses, "Go to the people and consecrate them today and tomorrow. Have them wash their clothes And be ready by the third day, because on that day the LORD will come down on Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people. Put limits for the people around the mountain and tell them, 'Be careful that you do not go up the mountain or touch the foot of it. Whoever touches the mountain shall surely be put to death. He shall surely be stoned or shot with arrows; not a hand is to be laid on him. Whether man or animal, he shall not be permitted to live.' Only when the ram's horn sounds a long blast may they go up to the mountain." 

see Jesus the Christ on the third day
after the seventy weeks, Daniel

Only when the yovel is drawn out may they go up the mountain... but, I though "yovel" meant jubilee, what gives? Lets answer this question by looking at Strong's definition of this word: 

3104 yowbel, yo-bale'; or yobel, yo-bale'; appar. from 2986; the blast of a horn (from its continuous sound); spec. the signal of the silver trumpets; hence the instrument itself and the festival thus introduced:-Jubile, ram's horn, trumpet. 

seventh Trumpet

--------------- Dictionary Trace -----------------

2986 yabal, yaw-bal'; a prim. root; prop. to flow; causat. to bring (espec. with pomp.):-bring (forth), carry, lead (forth). 

Where does the Yovel year get its name? From the sounding of the shofar. A ram's horn is called a yovel. Yovel, as a ram's horn, was used in Yahoshua (Joshua) chapter six. 

the Promised Land of our Lord's Kingdom at the seventh Trumpet by faith in the Word of God, Christ Jesus

Why does the Torah use singular verbs when discussing the Sabbatical year, but plural ones for yovel? The laws of yovel only apply when all the tribes are in the land of Israel. According to the Gemara: 

The Oral Torah make the WORD of God of none effect. These are the synagogue's of satan and their seed of the serpent

Arachin 32b But did they count the years of release and Jubilees [after the return from Babylon]? If even after the tribe of Reuben, the tribe of Gad and the half-tribe of Manasseh went into exile, the Jubilees were abolished, should Ezra-Nechemiah (Nehemiah) in connection with whom it is said: The whole congregation together was forty and two thousand three hundred and three score,1 have counted them? For it was taught: When the tribe of Reuben, the tribe of Gad and the half-tribe of Manasseh went into exile, the Jubilees were abolished as it is said: And ye shall proclaim liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof,2 i.e., [only] at the time when all the inhabitants thereof dwell upon it, but not at the time when some of them are exiled. One might have assumed that if they were there, but intermingled, the tribe of Benjamin with that of Judah and the tribe of Judah with that of Benjamin, that even the [laws of the] Jubilee should apply, therefore it is said: unto all the inhabitants thereof, which means, only at the time when its inhabitants are there as [where] they ought to be, but not when they are intermingled! Said R. Nahman b. Isaac: They counted the Jubilees to keep the years of release holy.3 That will be right in the view of the Rabbis who hold that the fiftieth year is not included,4 but according to R. Judah who holds that the fiftieth year counts both ways,5 why was that necessary [to count the Jubilees]? It would have been enough if the years of release alone had been counted! Hence [we must say], this is not in accord with the view of R. Judah. 


Once Sancherev exiled Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh, the laws of yovel no longer applied. Since yovel applies only when all the Jews are in the land of Israel, the Torah uses the plural. However, the Sabbatical year is observed even if there is only one Jew in the land of Israel. Thus, the Sabbatical year is discussed in the singular form. 

HAS NOTHING to do with Sion God's Holy Mountain in Heaven and spiritual Israel them who believed the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob by faith the WORD of God who is the temple within Heaven and who is the Only Lamb ever needed for eternal life, the WORD of God his Kingdom which is not of this earth but by faith the One seed. Their is a god of flesh and mammon and their kingdom temporary as it will certainly be zion of the whore who chose the Robber and Rejected the cornerstone.

The freedom proclaimed in the yovel year was primarily for the slaves. Why does the Torah say, "lechal yoshveha" -- "for all its inhabitants"? Though being sold into slavery is demeaning the Torah demands that the master treat his slave with great sensitivity and dignity. Thus, the Gemara says: 

the originator's of global slavery under their god they chose, satan that tetragramatron who has transformed himself into an angel of light and has Illumined his apostates who would be gods

Kiddushin 22a Our Rabbis taught: Because he is well with thee: he must be with [i.e., equal to] thee in food and drink, that thou shouldst not eat white bread and he black bread, thou drink old wine and he new wine, thou sleep on a feather bed and he on straw. Hence it was said: Whoever buys a Hebrew slave is like buying a master for himself. 

Consequently, in the Jubilee year, "all inhabitants," both the slaves and the masters, enjoy a period of freedom.

all who worship me saith satan the robber and their slaves shall have the Mark of my branding

II. When does the Yovel year begin?

The Torah commands, "You shall consecrate the fiftieth year." How is this done? At the beginning of the year the Beit Din ( Temple of Doom Sanhedrin of the SAYERS)  declares, "This year is kadosh (sanctified)." Holiness without a land is a mere spiritual conception, figurative and unreal. Kedusha, holiness, is expressed in materialism. The supreme expression of kedusha in Israel is expressed in the agricultural mitzvot: firstfruits, tithes, fruit from newly planted trees, Sabbatical and yovel years, and challah, the portion of bread separated for the priests. 

We may note here that, generally speaking, any manifestation of kedusha - holiness - brought about by a person starts off with great force and then becomes gradually weaker.  God, who is able to direct reality towards a certain end, can create the opposite - a holiness which becomes increasingly stronger.  (This is the difference between Shabbat and the pilgrim festivals and between Shemitta and Yovel [the Sabbatical and Jubilee years].  The physical parallel can be found in the area of speech.  As man shouts his voice becomes weaker and weaker, whereas God's voice "grows steadily stronger," as we learn in the Torah's description of the Sinai experience. In the same way, mourning which originates in man becomes less stringent as we move away from the day of tragedy whereas our mourning which reflects that of the Shekhina culminates at its peak, on the day of tragedy itself.  

the sparks of the satanic ritual's of the oral tradition of the chassidic Pharisees of the leaven which detsroys the whole loaf

Vayikra (Leviticus) 25:8-22 "'Count off seven Sabbaths of years--seven times seven years--so that the seven Sabbaths of years amount to a period of forty-nine years. 

see Scofield's hoax of a "Secret Rapture". The seventy weeks are exactly seventy weeks. April, 2004 we are in the midst, just before they anoint their mere flesh king false Christ man, that Son of Perdition Moshaich Ben Satan. Lulling the masses into apostate complacency and the masses worship a Judeo-Churchizionist god who has no SON, and they say LORD, LORD but didn't we cast out demon's in your name, and Jesus the IAM will say, "Be ye away from me ye workers of Iniquity, for I know ye not" 


Then have the trumpet sounded everywhere on the tenth day of the seventh month; on the Day of Atonement sound the trumpet throughout your land. 

Blessed is he who cometh unto the 1335 days. At that seventh Trumpet in faith of Christ Jesus of SION the Temple of God, the children of the New Bride, New Jerusalem of the Only Lamb, the ONLY Messiah, Jesus the Christ according to the Promise, the WORD which Abraham believed and did not know as a tetragramatron 

Consecrate the fiftieth year and proclaim liberty throughout the land to all its inhabitants. It shall be a jubilee for you; each one of you is to return to his family property and each to his own clan. The fiftieth year shall be a jubilee for you; do not sow and do not reap what grows of itself or harvest the untended vines.

the Scofield Talmudic Dispen-Satan-Alism plan for the flesh superior Massah Race of the Talmudic jews of the synagogues of satan


New York Times

The Orwellian Olsens


Published: April 25, 2004


It's their reality. We just live and die in it.

In Bushworld, our troops go to war and get killed, but you never see the bodies coming home.

In Bushworld, flag-draped remains of the fallen are important to revere and show the nation, but only in political ads hawking the president's leadership against terror.

In Bushworld, we can create an exciting Iraqi democracy as long as it doesn't control its own military, pass any laws or have any power.

In Bushworld, we can win over Falluja by bulldozing it.

In Bushworld, it was worth going to war so Iraqis can express their feelings ("Down With America!") without having their tongues cut out, although we cannot yet allow them to express intemperate feelings in newspapers ("Down With America!") without shutting them down.

In Bushworld, it's fine to take $700 million that Congress provided for the war in Afghanistan and 9/11 recovery and divert it to the war in Iraq that you're insisting you're not planning.

In Bushworld, you don't consult your father, the expert in being president during a war with Iraq, but you do talk to your Higher Father, who can't talk back to warn you to get an exit strategy or chide you for using Him for political purposes.

In Bushworld, it's O.K. to run for re-election as the avenger of 9/11, even as you make secret deals with the Arab kingdom where most of the 9/11 hijackers came from.

In Bushworld, you get to strut around like a tough military guy and paint your rival as a chicken hawk, even though he's the one who won medals in combat and was praised by his superior officers for fulfilling all his obligations.

In Bushworld, it makes sense to press for transparency in Mr. and Mrs. Rival while cultivating your own opacity.

In Bushworld, you can reign as the antiterror president even after hearing an intelligence report about Al Qaeda's plans to attack America and then stepping outside to clear brush.

In Bushworld, those who dissemble about the troops and money it will take to get Iraq on its feet are patriots, while those who are honest are patronizingly marginalized.

In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq, even as they increasingly merge the two in America.

In Bushworld, you can claim to be the environmental president on Earth Day while being the industry president every other day.

In Bushworld, you brag about how well Afghanistan is going, even though soldiers like Pat Tillman are still dying and the Taliban are running freely around the border areas, hiding Osama and delaying elections.

In Bushworld, imperfect intelligence is good enough to knock over Iraq. But even better evidence that North Korea is building the weapons that Saddam could only dream about is hidden away.

In Bushworld, the C.I.A. says it can't find out whether there are W.M.D. in Iraq unless we invade on the grounds that there are W.M.D.

In Bushworld, there's no irony that so many who did so much to avoid the Vietnam draft have now strained the military so much that lawmakers are talking about bringing back the draft.

In Bushworld, we're making progress in the war on terror by fighting a war that creates terrorists.

In Bushworld, you don't need to bother asking your vice president and top Defense Department officials whether you should go to war in Iraq, because they've already maneuvered you into going to war.

In Bushworld, it's perfectly natural for the president and vice president to appear before the 9/11 commission like the Olsen twins.

In Bushworld, you expound on remaking the Middle East and spreading pro-American sentiments even as you expand anti-American sentiments by ineptly occupying Iraq and unstintingly backing Ariel Sharon on West Bank settlements.

In Bushworld, we went to war to give Iraq a democratic process, yet we disdain the democratic process that causes allies to pull out troops.

In Bushworld, you pride yourself on the fact that your administration does not leak to the press, while you flood the best-known journalist in Washington with inside information.

In Bushworld, you list Bob Woodward's "Plan of Attack" as recommended reading on your campaign Web site, even though it makes you seem divorced from reality. That is, unless you live in Bushworld.   


Illustrated Sunday Herald
February 8, 1920, page 5
Picture caption: "Mr. Churchill inspecting his old regiment, the 4th Hussars, at Aldershot last week."

Mr Churchill's authorship of this article has been authenticated by one of the world's leading Churchill bibliographers, Richard Heinzkill, of the University of Eugene, Oregon.

Churchill article facsimile
Zionism versus Bolshevism.

A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.

SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and successful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia's economic resources, and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Cooperative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.


International Jews.

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus- Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.


Terrorist Jews.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution: by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.


"Protector of the Jews."

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin's authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate. to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms. The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated.


A Home for the Jews.

Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.


Makow - Protocols A
Genuine Plot To
Control The World
Time For A Change Of Pace

By Henry Makow, PhD
It's springtime!
Since 2001, I have written over 100 articles almost one a week. They were inspired by a compulsive desire to understand the invisible forces controlling the world, and by a wish to share this knowledge.
Lately this compulsion has abated. I have satisfied my desire to a certain extent and feel I can produce better work if I take more time for research and reflection. As Thoreau said: "Do what you love. Know your own bone; gnaw at it, bury it, unearth it, and gnaw it still."
I will continue to maintain my web site and write but not every week. I want to focus on a larger project, possibly a book.
My readers will know that I believe The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a genuine revelation of a plot to enslave mankind and enthrone an "aristocracy based on wealth." This has been called by various names: world government, new world order, internationalism and globalism. The infrastructure is being built with the world "supreme court" in Jerusalem.
This plot has been unfolding before our eyes for centuries and can be seen today in the relentless destruction of, in the words of The Protocols "all collective forces except ours." These forces include race, religion, nation and family, the things that give people cohesion, identity and meaning
This plot is led by the bankers and corporations associated with the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. They have controlled most Western governments, education and media for more than a century. Socialism, Liberalism, Communism, Zionism, Neo Conservativism, Freemasonry and Feminism all are their instruments.
They are responsible for war and depressions, which are designed to degrade and demoralize humanity. In short mankind is in a satanic grip. The bankers own the world and expect to run it. They want to be God.
Modern education and culture is designed to hide this brutal reality. In the words of Protocols "we shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us...we shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction...[and raise youth] in principles and theories which we know to be false..." This has taken place in most universities. This is why our public life exudes a palpable stench of moral compromise; why so many of our "leaders" are hacks and dissolutes.
Nine-eleven and the "War on Terror" are hoaxes designed to colonize remaining independent Muslim countries, and integrate the United States and Europe into a world police state.
By defending their national independence, the Iraqi "insurgents" are fighting for us all. American soldiers are horribly deceived and misused. Far from being a world power, the United States has been a tool of the international banking-oil cartel at least since World War One.
Conspiracy is like the weather. Everyone talks about it but no one does anything about it. Like the weather, there is not much we can do. The majority of people are held in thrall by the mass media and don't realize they are. In a so-called democracy, they "rule," even if they are crudely manipulated. How more crude than today when both Presidential candidates belong to the Illuminati "Skull and Bones"?
Even if we can't change the world, we can change individual lives. Understanding the world is very liberating. We are less susceptible to worldly snares, which include the "education" system, the "democratic" process, the mass media, sex, money and fame. We must embody our principles in our personal lives and not be too distracted by the insanity unfolding around us. This doesn't preclude making our voices heard.
My quest began as an inquiry into the roots of feminism. My personal development was stymied by the crisis in heterosexual relations. Women had gone on strike, denying love to men. They had been brainwashed by feminist leaders, most of whom were Marxists and lesbians. "Destroy the family and society will collapse," Lenin wrote. The same banking cartel that funded the Bolshevik Revolution and Hitler own the foundations and media that promote and finance feminism.
Women have been horribly duped by feminism and the cost to everyone has been horrendous. Family is the key to our identity, personal development and happiness. We can find direction, purpose and love by fulfilling our traditional family roles.
I am repeating myself and this is why I am pausing. I need to tend to my sources of inspiration. I want to thank my readers whose emails keep me going and the courageous web masters who perform an invaluable service to us all. They include Jeff Rense, David Icke, Uri Dowbenko, Gillian Armstrong, Robert at "Etherzone", Murray at "Push Hamburger", Nelson Thall, Rixon Steward and Paul Watson.
We have Truth on our side. Nothing is more powerful than Truth. I will continue to be a witness.
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the board game Scruples and the author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His past articles exposing feminism and the new world order can be found at his web site He enjoys receiving comments at
'We May Kill Arafat' - Sharon
New Threat From Israeli Leader Raises Tension In Middle East

By Conal Urquhart
The Guardian - UK
JERUSALEM -- Ariel Sharon issued an ominous warning last night that Yasser Arafat could be the next Palestinian leader to be in Israel's line of fire, when he reneged on a promise not to harm his old adversary.
Pre-Judicial Pre Cog Murder the thing of the Future of the Massah Race of Olam Haba hoodlum haha.
In dramatic remarks certain to aggravate regional hysteria over Israel's targeted killings of Palestinian militant leaders, the Israeli prime minister said he had told President George Bush that he was no longer prepared to exempt Mr Arafat from physical harm.
The art of Kol-Nidre of "SAYERS" whose father is the Liar and a murderer since the beginning.
"I told the president the following. In our first meeting about three years ago, I accepted your request not to harm Arafat physically. I told him I understand the problems surrounding the situation, but I am released from that pledge."
Mr Sharon declined to elaborate and would not say how Mr Bush had responded.
Choked on a pretzel ?
 Last night the White House insisted that it was still opposed to Israel killing Mr Arafat.
"We have made it entirely clear to the Israeli government that we would oppose any such action, and have done so again in the wake of these remarks," a senior Bush administration official said. "We consider a pledge a pledge."
Mr Arafat responded by saying he took the threat seriously, but would stand his ground. "I am not afraid of Sharon's threats. He has a history of attempting to target me," he told an Israeli-Arab MP.
Mr Sharon had hinted at his change of policy in interviews earlier this month in which he warned that he might take unspecified action against Mr Arafat.
But yesterday's remarks were the strongest signal yet that Israel may follow up its recent assassinations in Gaza with the decapitation of the Palestinian leadership.
Mr Arafat, chairman of the Palestinian Authority, has been confined by Israeli security forces to his headquarters in Ramallah for two years.
After the recent strikes that killed the Hamas leaders Sheikh Ahmed Yassin and Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi, Israel has widened the net and indicated that it will go after Hamas leaders abroad.
Its targeted killings have already included members of Mr Arafat's organisation Fatah and its affiliate the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, which has been responsible for many of the suicide bombings against Israel.
Palestinian officials have expressed concern that Israel may attack Mr Arafat. Last night officials condemned Mr Sharon's "dangerous statements". Nabil Abu Rdeneh, an aide to Mr Arafat, said the remarks "could push the whole region into tremendous danger".
"We call upon the US administration to clarify its position on these statements and to bear its responsibility toward this escalation," he said.
Israel has always cited Mr Arafat as the main instigator of the second intifada, which began in October 2000. Since then more than 900 Israelis and 3,000 Palestinians have been killed in the violence.
In 2002 Israeli forces twice besieged the Muqata, the headquarters of the Palestinian Authority. Since the first siege Mr Arafat has not left the few buildings that remain in the compound.
Israeli forces have destroyed most of the Muqata, confining Mr Arafat to a couple of small rooms.
After each suicide attack Israeli ministers call for Mr Arafat's assasination or expulsion but Mr Sharon has hitherto said he was bound by his pledge to Mr Bush.
Palestinian commentators have suggested that the assassinations of Yassin and Rantissi were "trial balloons" to gauge the reaction of the Palestinians and the international community to a possible assassination of Mr Arafat.
The absence of any retaliation from Hamas or other militant groups has convinced the government that it could kill Mr Arafat without significant repercussions, the commentators believe.
It is more likely that it will transfer Mr Arafat to Gaza, which Mr Sharon proposes to evacuate of Israelis by the end of next year. Some analysts said last night that Mr Sharon's thinly veiled threat could be a ruse to persuade more voters in his Likud party to back his plan to withdraw from Gaza in a referendum next month.
Any attempt to arrest Mr Arafat would be likely to end in a bloody shootout. He has said he will never be taken alive by Israel. He keeps a machine gun close to his desk.
On Monday Mr Arafat told 20 people to leave the compound because they could attract an Israeli attack. Israel claims the men were involved in planning attacks against Israel.
The Foreign Office condemned Mr Sharon's threat, saying: "Violent action would be wrong in principle, undermine the cause of peace and spark an outpouring of Palestinian anger that would do nothing to improve Israel security."
At his monthly press conference on Thursday the prime minister, Tony Blair, said: "I disagree with the policy of targeted assassinations and hope we can get to a different situation where we can move forward in the Middle East."
But he also deplored Hamas's "explicit endorsement" of terrorist strategies.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004,2763,1202273,00.html




Wake up "Christians"


In the Name of Jesus Christ the Lord, amen

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II


"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws


Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2