Ps:118:24: This is
the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.
of Iniquity unto desolation for
them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.
Woe unto the
Inhabitants of the Earth
Global insanity has occurred
Upon seizing the reins of government, the new
Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.
... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade
PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.
Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens
within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile
The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts
will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will
be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha.... .... And law and
order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security
measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory
Challenge to Masonic Control of Canadian Justice
Canadian courts stonewall a
case demanding judges, lawyers and government officials reveal if they are
Freemasons. The case claims Freemasons conspire against non-Masons.
by Eva Sydel
Over a decade ago, Eva Sydel began
investigating Canada's income tax laws and joined the "De-tax
movement." As a result she was selectively prosecuted by the Canadian tax
authorities. She was convicted of tax evasion by British Columbia Judge Paul
Meyers in July, 2006, and sentenced to 18 month in prison in October, 2007.
She served 12 months in jail and was released 6 months early for good behaviour
which is the usual procedure in Canadian prisons. She has no other criminal
The judicial manipulations of Freemasonry are now under review by the Supreme
Court of Canada in a precedent setting case that could result in the banishment
for Freemason lawyers and judges from Canada's courts and set an international
legal precedent with far reaching implications.
This unique case, that is not reported in the Canadian media, arose when I was
convicted of tax evasion and served 12 months in jail as a result of a selective
prosecution intended to make me, in the words of a Canada taxation officer,
"the poster girl for the de-tax movement in Canada".
When released from prison, the "poster girl" learned from an observer
that Provincial Court of British Columbia Judge, Paul Meyers, and Canada Revenue
Agency chief enforcement officer, Richard Olney, had communicated with a system
of hand signals. The observer had worked with the deaf and was a magician
I consulted with a Canadian lawyer who was not a Freemason but who was aware of
their judicial manipulations. The lawyer told her to obtain an affidavit
from the observer and then apply to the court to set aside her conviction on the
basis that the case was fixed by Freemasons.
She should also sue the Canadian government for damages for breach of its
obligations to provide her a fair and impartial hearing before an independent
tribunal, a right guaranteed by Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by
international treaties and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and the United Nations Covenant on Political and Civil Rights.
ALLEGATION ISN'T DENIED
A sworn affidavit was obtained from the observer who was in the courtroom
confirming that he saw the judge and the Canada Revenue Agency Chief Enforcement
officer secretly communicating by hand gestures, it was filed the affidavit with
the Canadian courts and applications were made to set aside the conviction and
advance a claim for monetary damages. The truth of the allegation in the
affidavit was never denied by the Canadian Government that was defending against
the applications and the allegation continues to stand as an un-refuted legal
fact in Canada's court system.
To make matters worse, the Canadian Government refused to answer questions
submitted in accordance with the Rules of Court about whether or not the judge
and the Canadian Revenue Agency officer were Freemasons and if they were, in
fact, communicating with one another by a system of sign language as alleged.
Instead, the Canadian government quickly applied to court in British Columbia to
dismiss the applications.
In the lower Canadian courts, the intrepid Canadian "poster girl"
asked the presiding judges to disclose if they were Freemasons and, if so,
withdraw from hearing the applications of the Canadian Government because
Freemasons take an Oath to protect fellow Freemasons. The whole case was about
Freemasons fixing a trial which is a criminal offence in Canada carrying a
penalty of up to 14 years in jail.
The judges, Mr. Justice Stephen Kelleher and Madam Justice Marion
Maisonville, both of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, refused to make the
disclosure requested and dismissed the applications of the Canadian citizen.
In addition, court registry staff in Vancouver were caught concealing one of the
dismissal judgments so that the "poster girl" would miss the appeal
deadline but, fortunately, she was alerted to the judgment by an informant.
A complaint about the alleged fraudulent conduct of the court registry staff was
filed with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Robert
Bauman, the Canadian Judicial Council, Canada's Justice Minister, Rob Nicholson,
and the Deputy Attorney General for British Columbia, David Loukedelis.
Complaints were also filed with Canada's national police force, the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and to Canada's intelligence service, the
Canada's Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS) because it was now obvious
that Freemasonry, a foreign controlled organization, had infiltrated Canada's
In what may have been a related co-incidence, over the next few months, a former
CSIS director, Jack Hooper, a leading Freemason and former Canadian Judge, Bert
Oliver, and a Canadian author, who specialized in intelligence matters, Michel
Gratton, suddenly died in suspicious circumstances that suggest one or more of
them were murdered.
An appeal was filed with the next level of court, the Court of Appeal for
British Columbia, where the nine judges refused to disclose if they were
Freemasons or associated with Freemasonry.
So far, twelve judges in British Columbia are now implicated in this Freemasonic
judicial conspiracy ranging from the lowly Provincial Court Judge, Paul Meyers,
to the Chief Justice of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, Lance Finch.
The persistent Canadian, determined to rectify her wrongful conviction, has now
filed applications for leave to appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada, that is
located in Canada's capital city of Ottawa, 3,000 miles distant from British
Columbia, Canada's westernmost province, where Freemasonry is entrenched and
where there has been an obvious conspiracy of higher court judges to protect the
Freemason judges in the lower courts.
Immediately after the appeal was filed with the Supreme Court of Canada, Justice
Ian Binnie of that court decided to take early retirement.
UNLAWFUL SOCIETIES ACT
The appeal will also raise the novel legal issue of the continuing application
of the Unlawful Oaths Act and Unlawful Societies Act in Canada and their
implications for Freemasonry in Canada.
These two statutes were passed by the English parliament, in 1797 and 1799, and
were intended to protect English society from secret societies that were
responsible for the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution and the loss of
the American colonies and that were suspected to be active in England
threatening the authority of the Crown.
At that time, laws adopted by the English Parliament became part of the law of
Canada which was then an English colony. These statutes do not apply in
the United States which achieved its independence from England in 1776 nor do
they apply any longer in England due to criminal law reforms in 1968 that
relieved Freemasonry from its former obligations to regularly report to the
government on the business taking place in its lodges.
None of the lawyers for the Government of Canada has denied that these old
statutes are part of the law of Canada. If these old statutes are upheld
by Canada's highest court, Canadian Freemasons may find themselves barred from
being judges or lawyers in Canada. The court will also be asked to rule on
the issue of whether or not judges must disclose if they are Freemasons when
FREEMASONRY AND INCOME TAX
Freemasonry and Income Taxation have a complicated history in Canada. For
the first 50 years of Canada's existence it was generally accepted that Canada's
Federal Government did not have the legislative power to implement an income
tax, except in time of war, which was exactly what happened in 1917 when the War
Measures Income Tax Act was introduced to pay for Canada's effort in World War
The first peacetime Income Tax Act was passed by Canada's Parliament in 1948
under the leadership of Canadian Prime Minister, William Lyon McKenzie King, a
closet Freemason who had been an employee of the Illuminatist Rockerfeller
family before returning to Canada to enter politics.
There is body of legal opinion that the 1948 Income Tax Act was illegal under
Canada's Constitution Act of 1867 so that subsequent amendments and revisions
are also illegal. In documents filed in the legal proceedings, it was
admitted by one of the government lawyers that the Income Tax Act 1948 had not
received royal assent as required by Canada's Constitution Act 1867. This
particular issue, the absence of royal assent, has never been adjudicated upon
before in Canada.
Interested readers can learn more by visiting the web site set out to support
the litigation http://www.revenuecanada666.com which stresses that it is not
anti-masonry site but does oppose Freemasons who use their skills and special
arts to manipulate the justice system.
The Supreme Court of Canada dockets related to the two applications can be found
AFFILIATION OF SPECIFIC JUDGES SOUGHT
We are also appealing for information about the probable membership of the
judges and the former Canada Revenue Agency Enforcement Officer in Freemasonry
and ask that readers contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org if they have any
information that confirms if former Canada Revenue Agency Chief enforcement
Officer, Richard Olney, or any of the following judges in British Columbia are
Freemasons or associated with Freemasonry.
Others on the list are Provincial Court Judge Paul Meyers, Supreme Court
of British Columbia Justices Stephen Kelleher or Marian Maisonville and British
Columbia Court of Appeal Justices, Lance Finch, Katherine Neilson, Risa Levine,
Chris Hinkson, David Tysoe, Stan Low, Elizabeth Bennett, John Hall, or Pamela
The Supreme Court of Canada is expected to rule in the next few months on
whether or not the application for leave to appeal will be granted.
"Maraka" your courts of
Satan's justice is ran entirely by Noachide Freemasons and now they are zeroing
in for the Mass kill-off of American Citizens. YOU ARE WARNED
They Have set up
their MURDER Laws
The Secret Memo That Explains Why Obama Can Kill Americans
Outside the U.S. government, President Obama's order to kill
American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki without due process has proved controversial,
with experts in law and war reaching
different conclusions. Inside the Obama Administration, however,
disagreement was apparently absent, or so say anonymous sources quoted by the Washington
Post. "The Justice Department wrote a secret memorandum authorizing the
lethal targeting of Anwar al-Aulaqi, the American-born radical cleric who was
killed by a U.S. drone strike Friday, according to administration
officials," the newspaper reported.
"The document was produced following a review of the legal issues raised by
striking a U.S. citizen and involved senior lawyers from across the
administration. There was no dissent about the legality of killing Aulaqi, the
Isn't that interesting? Months ago, the Obama Administration revealed that it
would target al-Awlaki. It even managed to wriggle out of a lawsuit filed by his
father to prevent the assassination. But the actual legal reasoning the
Department of Justice used to authorize the strike? It's secret. Classified.
Information that the public isn't permitted to read, mull over, or challenge.
Why? What justification can there be for President Obama and his lawyers to keep
secret what they're asserting is a matter of sound law? This isn't a military
secret. It isn't an instance of protecting CIA field assets, or shielding a
domestic vulnerability to terrorism from public view. This is an analysis of the
power that the Constitution and Congress' post September 11 authorization of
military force gives the executive branch. This is a president exploiting
official secrecy so that he can claim legal justification for his actions
without having to expose his specific reasoning to scrutiny. As the Post
put it, "The administration officials refused to disclose the exact legal
analysis used to authorize targeting Aulaqi, or how they considered any Fifth
Amendment right to due process."
Obama hasn't just set a new precedent about killing Americans without due
process. He has done so in a way that deliberately shields from public view the
precise nature of the important precedent he has set. It's time for the
president who promised to create "a White House that's more transparent and
accountable than anything we've seen before" to release the DOJ memo. As
David Shipler writes,
"The legal questions are far from clearcut, and the country needs to have
this difficult discussion." And then there's the fact that "a good
many Obama supporters thought that secret legal opinions by the Justice
Department -- rationalizing torture and domestic military arrests, for example
-- had gone out the door along with the Bush administration," he adds.
"But now comes a momentous change in policy with serious implications for
the Constitution's restraint on executive power, and Obama refuses to allow his
lawyers' arguments to be laid out on the table for the American public to
examine." What doesn't he want to get out?
And of course the
cries for Decapitating Humans are escalating
7, 2011 - 5 min - Uploaded
JewishJournal.com's entertainment blog, "The Ticket" interviews Roseanne
Barr on her new book and life as a Jew. Stay tuned throughout ...
Talmudic sickness prevails over the inhabitants of the
Actress, comedienne and now author Roseanne Barr shares her
solution for dealing with the rich and how the banks could repay the money the
U.S. government bailed them out with in 2008.
"Part of my platform is, of course, the guilty must be punished and that we
no longer let our children see their guilty leaders getting away with murder.
Because it teaches children, you know, that they don't have to have any morals
as long as they have guns and are bullies and I don't think that's a good
message," Barr told Russia Today (RT).
"I do say that I am in favor of the return of the
guillotine and that is for the worst of the worst of the guilty.
"I first would allow the guilty bankers to pay, you know, the ability to
pay back anything over $100 million [of] personal wealth because I believe in a
maximum wage of $100 million. And if they are unable to live on that amount of
that amount then they should, you know, go to the
reeducation camps and if that doesn't help, then being beheaded," Barr said
with a straight face
Yes, straight out of the mouth of a
filthy Talmudic Hasidic jewess, daughter of mother Ester
And we see once
again that Jason Guenther of the lowerpit attempts to surface again, with even
more insane filth
without the Holy spirit, the
flesh cannot understand the spirtual and to they, evil is good and good becomes
evil. Beware of these and Talmudic Hasidim teaching and hatred about the Apostle
with a google search, it is
very easy to see these Hasidic Talmudic anti-Christ promoters of the anti-Christ
Noahide Laws. They have made Jesus into a Talmudic Jewish Rabbi. Beware, dop not
Keep in mind that this is in
agreement with the Talmud
you can find so called sites of jews perporting the same, and
they all end up stating that mankind should obey the anti-Christ Noahide Laws
Why they Hate Paul the Apostle of Christ
also not that Jason Guenther refuses to
discuss the Noahide Laws, hiding behind Preterism as his front
Mt:15:3: But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?
Mk:7:9: And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Mk:7:13: Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
These men without the holy spirit are
confused as to the Laws that the Apostle Paul referred. Many of them know Paul
was referring to the Babylonian Talmud and its perversion of the laws of God. In
their flesh and ego and self righteous authority they break the Laws of God and
follow after the laws of men
Lk:16:16: The law and the prophets were until John:
since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it..
Lk:24:44: And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.
aeean theyah ha Choose word foah
Fulfilled, is ah ( * Ful-filled *) ya bunch of Judasing yiddiots
38: This is the first and great commandment.
39: And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
For all you
anti-Christ, anti-Truth NAYSAYERS, not only is it "Gonna Happen", the
precedent is now set to Kill any Truth Teller who opposes the Talmudic US
keeping in mind that the
Constitution of these United States was superceded in 1991 by HJR 104, PL 102-14
Woe unto the Inhabitants of the
- The Only Future For Americans Is A Nightmare
By Paul Craig Roberts
Some of us have watched this day approach and have warned of
its coming, only to be greeted with boos and hisses from "patriots"
who have come to regard the US Constitution as a device that coddles criminals
and terrorists and gets in the way of the President who needs to act to keep us
In our book, The Tyranny of Good Intentions, Lawrence Stratton
and I showed that long before 9/11 US law had ceased to be a shield of the
people and had been turned into a weapon in the hands of the government. The
event known as 9/11 was used to raise the executive branch above the law. As
long as the President sanctions an illegal act, executive branch employees are
no longer accountable to the law that prohibits the illegal act. On the
president's authority, the executive branch can violate US laws against spying
on Americans without warrants, indefinite detention, and torture and suffer no
Many expected President Obama to re-establish the
accountability of government to law. Instead, he went further than Bush/Cheney
and asserted the unconstitutional power not only to hold American citizens
indefinitely in prison without bringing charges, but also to take their lives
without convicting them in a court of law. Obama asserts that the US
Constitution notwithstanding, he has the authority to assassinate US citizens,
who he deems to be a "threat," without due process of law.
In other words, any American citizen who is moved into the
threat category has no rights and can be executed without trial or evidence.
On September 30 Obama used this asserted new power of the
president and had two American citizens, Anwar Awlaki and Samir Khan murdered.
Khan was a wacky character associated with Inspire Magazine and does not readily
come to mind as a serious threat.
Awlaki was a moderate American Muslim cleric who served as an
advisor to the US government after 9/11 on ways to counter Muslim extremism.
Awlaki was gradually radicalized by Washington's use of lies to justify military
attacks on Muslim countries. He became a critic of the US government and told
Muslims that they did not have to passively accept American aggression and had
the right to resist and to fight back. As a result Awlaki was demonized and
became a threat.
All we know that Awlaki did was to give sermons critical of
Washington's indiscriminate assaults on Muslim peoples. Washington's argument is
that his sermons might have had an influence on some who are accused of
attempting terrorist acts, thus making Awlaki responsible for the attempts.
Obama's assertion that Awlaki was some kind of high-level Al
Qaeda operative is merely an assertion.<http://news.antiwar.com/2011/09/30/cia-assassinates-two-american-citizens-in-yemen/print/>Jason
Ditz concluded that the reason Awlaki was murdered rather than
brought to trial is that the US government had no real evidence that Awlaki was
an Al Qaeda operative.
But what Awlaki did or might have done is beside the point.
The US Constitution requires that even the worst murderer cannot be punished
until he is convicted in a court of law. When the American Civil Liberties Union
challenged in federal court Obama's assertion that he had the power to order
assassinations of American citizens, the Obama Justice (sic) Department argued
that Obama's decision to have Americans murdered was an executive power beyond
the reach of the judiciary.
In a decision that sealed America's fate, federal district
court judge John Bates ignored the Constitution's requirement that no person
shall be deprived of life without due process of law and dismissed the case,
saying that it was up to Congress to decide. Obama acted before an appeal could
be heard, thus using Judge Bates' acquiescence to establish the power and
advance the transformation of the president into a Caesar that began under
George W. Bush.
Glenn Greenwald and <http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29269.htm>Jonathan
Turley point out that Awlaki's assassination terminated the Constitution's
restraint on the power of government. Now the US government not only can seize a
US citizen and confine him in prison for the rest of his life without ever
presenting evidence and obtaining a conviction, but also can have him shot down
in the street or blown up by a drone.
Before some readers write to declare that Awlaki's murder is
no big deal because the US government has always had people murdered, keep in
mind that CIA assassinations were of foreign opponents and were not publicly
proclaimed events, much less a claim by the president to be above the law.
Indeed, such assassinations were denied, not claimed as legitimate actions of
the President of the United States.
The Ohio National Guardsmen who shot Kent State students as
they protested the US invasion of Cambodia in 1970 made no claim to be carrying
out an executive branch decision. Eight of the guardsmen were indicted by a
grand jury. The guardsmen entered a self-defense plea. Most Americans were angry
at war protestors and blamed the students. The judiciary got the message, and
the criminal case was eventually dismissed. The civil case (wrongful death and
injury) was settled for $675,000 and a statement of regret by the defendants .
The point isn't that the government killed people. The point is that never prior
to President Obama has a President asserted the power to murder citizens.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has had its own Mein
Kampf transformation. Terry Eastland's book, Energy in the Executive: The Case
for the Strong Presidency, presented ideas associated with the Federalist
Society, an organization of Republican lawyers that works to reduce legislative
and judicial restraints on executive power. Under the cover of wartime
emergencies (the war on terror), the Bush/Cheney regime employed these arguments
to free the president from accountability to law and to liberate Americans from
their civil liberties. War and national security provided the opening for the
asserted new powers, and a mixture of fear and desire for revenge for 9/11 led
Congress, the judiciary, and the people to go along with the dangerous
As civilian and military leaders have been telling us for
years, the war on terror is a 30-year project. After such time has passed, the
presidency will have completed its transformation into Caesarism, and there will
be no going back.
Indeed, as the neoconservative "Project For A New
American Century" makes clear, the war on terror is only an opening for the
neoconservative imperial ambition to establish US hegemony over the world.
As wars of aggression or imperial ambition are war crimes
under international law, such wars require doctrines that elevate the leader
above the law and the Geneva Conventions, as Bush was elevated by his Justice
(sic) Department with minimal judicial and legislative interference.
Illegal and unconstitutional actions also require a silencing
of critics and punishment of those who reveal government crimes. Thus Bradley
Manning has been held for a year, mainly in solitary confinement under abusive
conditions, without any charges being presented against him. A federal grand
jury is at work concocting spy charges against Wikileaks' founder Julian Assange.
Another federal grand jury is at work concocting terrorists charges against
"Terrorist" and "giving aid to terrorists"
are increasingly elastic concepts. Homeland Security has declared that the vast
federal police bureaucracy has shifted its focus from terrorists to
It is possible that Awlaki was assassinated because he was an
effective critic of the US government. Police states do not originate fully
fledged. Initially, they justify their illegal acts by demonizing their targets
and in this way create the precedents for unaccountable power. Once the
government equates critics with giving "aid and comfort" to
terrorists, as they are doing with antiwar activists and Assange, or with
terrorism itself, as Obama did with Awlaki, it will only be a short step to
bringing accusations against Glenn Greenwald and the ACLU.
The Obama Regime, like the Bush/Cheney Regime, is a regime
that does not want to be constrained by law. And neither will its successor.
Those fighting to uphold the rule of law, humanity's greatest achievement, will
find themselves lumped together with the regime's opponents and be treated as
This great danger that hovers over America is unrecognized by
the majority of the people. When Obama announced before a military gathering his
success in assassinating an American citizen, cheers erupted. The Obama regime
and the media played the event as a repeat of the (claimed) killing of Osama bin
Laden. Two "enemies of the people" have been triumphantly dispatched.
That the President of the United States was proudly proclaiming to a cheering
audience sworn to defend the Constitution that he was a murderer and that he had
also assassinated the US Constitution is extraordinary evidence that Americans
are incapable of recognizing the threat to their liberty.
Emotionally, the people have accepted the new powers of the
president. If the president can have American citizens assassinated, there is no
big deal about torturing them. Amnesty International has sent out an alert that
the US Senate is poised to pass legislation that would keep Guantanamo Prison
open indefinitely and that Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) might introduce a
provision that would legalize "enhanced interrogation techniques," an
euphemism for torture.
Instead of seeing the danger, most Americans will merely
conclude that the government is getting tough on terrorists, and it will meet
with their approval. Smiling with satisfaction over the demise of their enemies,
Americans are being led down the garden path to rule by government unrestrained
by law and armed with the weapons of the medieval dungeon.
Americans have overwhelming evidence from news reports and
YouTube videos of US police brutally abusing women, children, and the elderly,
of brutal treatment and murder of prisoners not only in Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo,
and secret CIA prisons abroad, but also in state and federal prisons in the US.
Power over the defenseless attracts people of a brutal and evil disposition.
A brutal disposition now infects the US military. The leaked
video of US soldiers delighting, as their words and actions reveal, in their
murder from the air of civilians and news service camera men walking innocently
along a city street shows soldiers and officers devoid of humanity and military
discipline. Excited by the thrill of murder, our troops repeated their crime
when a father with two small children stopped to give aid to the wounded and
So many instances: the rape of a young girl and murder of her
entire family; innocent civilians murdered and AK-47s placed by their side as
"evidence" of insurgency; the enjoyment experienced not only by high
school dropouts from torturing they-knew-not- who in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo,
but also by educated CIA operatives and Ph.D. psychologists. And no one held
accountable for these crimes except two lowly soldiers prominently featured in
some of the torture photographs.
What do Americans think will be their fate now that the
"war on terror" has destroyed the protection once afforded them by the
US Constitution? If Awlaki really needed to be assassinated, why did not
President Obama protect American citizens from the precedent that their deaths
can be ordered without due process of law by first stripping Awlaki of his US
citizenship? If the government can strip Awlaki of his life, it certainly can
strip him of citizenship. The implication is hard to avoid that the executive
branch desires the power to terminate citizens without due process of law.
Governments escape the accountability of law in stages.
Washington understands that its justifications for its wars are contrived and
indefensible. President Obama even went so far as to declare that the military
assault that he authorized on Libya without consulting Congress was not a war,
and, therefore, he could ignore the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a federal law
intended to check the power of the President to commit the US to an armed
conflict without the consent of Congress.
Americans are beginning to unwrap themselves from the flag.
Some are beginning to grasp that initially they were led into Afghanistan for
revenge for 9/11. From there they were led into Iraq for reasons that turned out
to be false. They see more and more US military interventions: Libya, Yemen,
Somalia, Pakistan and now calls for invasion of Pakistan and continued saber
rattling for attacks on Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. The financial cost of a decade
of the "war against terror" is starting to come home. Exploding annual
federal budget deficits and national debt threaten Medicare and Social Security.
Debt ceiling limits threaten government shut-downs.
War critics are beginning to have an audience. The government
cannot begin its silencing of critics by bringing charges against US
Representatives Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich. It begins with antiwar protestors,
who are elevated into "antiwar activists," perhaps a step below
"domestic extremists." Washington begins with citizens who are
demonized Muslim clerics radicalized by Washington's wars on Muslims. In this
way, Washington establishes the precedent that war protestors give encouragement
and, thus, aid, to terrorists. It establishes the precedent that those Americans
deemed a threat are not protected by law. This is the slippery slope on which we
now find ourselves.
Last year the Obama Regime tested the prospects of its
strategy when Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence, announced that
the government had a list of American citizens that it was going to assassinate
abroad. This announcement, had it been made in earlier times by, for example,
Richard Nixon or Ronald Reagan, would have produced a national uproar and calls
for impeachment. However, Blair's announcement caused hardly a ripple. All that
remained for the regime to do was to establish the policy by exercising it.
Readers ask me what they can do. Americans not only feel
powerless, they are powerless. They cannot do anything. The highly concentrated,
corporate-owned, government-subservient print and TV media are useless and no
longer capable of performing the historic role of protecting our rights and
holding government accountable. Even many antiwar Internet sites shield the
government from 9/11 skepticism, and most defend the government's
"righteous intent" in its war on terror. Acceptable criticism has to
be couched in words such as "it doesn't serve our interests."
Voting has no effect. President "Change" is worse
than Bush/Cheney. As Jonathan Turley suggests, Obama is "the most
disastrous president in our history." Ron Paul is the only presidential
candidate who stands up for the Constitution, but the majority of Americans are
too unconcerned with the Constitution to appreciate him.
To expect salvation from an election is delusional. All you
can do, if you are young enough, is to leave the country. The only future for
Americans is a nightmare.
You can all Pray that the LORD will heal
this nation and REPENT !
Contrary unto all
- Dirty Little Secrets Of WWII
The Hidden, Awkward Origins Of World War 2
By Jason Collett
- The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close
- Just consider the following:
- Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during
the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American
Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense
(1947-1949) quotes him as saying "Chamberlain (the British Prime
Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into
the war". (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
- Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington,
in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted
approvingly by the highly respected British military historian
Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says
"Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish handswhen bearing
public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people
have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe It is
interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign no
reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned,
it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression
that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries Jewry was
able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the
dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the
world into two warlike campsPresident Roosevelt has been given the power..
to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are
deliberately heading for." (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive
Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
- Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until
1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany
'understandable'. This was because before the advent of the Nazis,
"the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jewsamong
the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jewsthe leaders of
the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in
Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and
hatred." (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941,
quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
- Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in
Berlin 'said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was
the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought
himself' (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World
War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).
- Is all of this merely attributable to terrible 'anti-semitism'?
- The economic background to the war is necessary for a
fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these
- At the end of the First World War, Germany was
essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern
World (1983) p24 and H NicholsonPeacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16]
into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors
and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of
Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson.
Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the
fact that 'Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made
genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.' (Professor Sydney B
Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).
- As a result of these massive enforced financial
reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and
inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the
government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock.
In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had
become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the
German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28),
reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.
- According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British
historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):
- 'It was the Jews with their international affiliations
and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such
opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938,
after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still
owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something
like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into
their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all
this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged
sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw
them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their
sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards
and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics,
business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less
than one percent of the population.
- The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private
banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade,
the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press all the normal
means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed..
The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of
four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and
harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged
occupation.. At this time it was not the 'Aryans' who exercised racial
discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It
was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution,
only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed and
lavishly displayed by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty
and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and
ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular,
least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the
- Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of
the wrong side of the bed?
- Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by
Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler,
Germans and the "Jewish Question") essentially confirms what
Bryant says. According to her, 'Jews were never a large percentage of the
total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population
during the years 1871-1933.' But she adds 'Jews were over-represented in
business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially
visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish
banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of
iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were
very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928
they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933,
when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the
brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their
"race".. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors
(at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students
comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234
theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was
80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in
Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..' etc etc.
- Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement
in German publishing. 'Ullstein's was a kind of super-trust; the largest
organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They
published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the
venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and
the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these,
Ullstein's published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran
their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the
leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein -
they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also,
they were Jews.' (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).
- Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily
News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock
Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between
December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes 'In the all-important
administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the
hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in
Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or
newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and
administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by
open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the
sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And
thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a
mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.'
- Mowrer says 'No one who lived through the period from
1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed..
Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by
letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests.
Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of
getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..' (pp. 153-4). Bryant
describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great
Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds 'Most of them (the night clubs and
vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among
the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.' (pp.
- Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before
WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and
anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: 'I watched the Brown Shirts
going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes
the word "Jew", in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was
to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but
I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it.
Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the
fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had
about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.' (Reed Insanity
Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed's bookDisgrace Abounding of the
following year he notes 'In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the
theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and
stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian
or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by
Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer
than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They
ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in
a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It
is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all
the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were
- The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes 'For
example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of
the doctors were Jewish.' (Black,The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.
- To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies
of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish
Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin
Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact
between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to
Black, 'The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany
was Samuel Untermeyer.' (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide
boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The
London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the
headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly
motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically
were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism
practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah ArendtEichmann in
Jerusalem p 7).
- Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by
Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this
threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the
Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they
could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant,
although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia's population, they
formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the
Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter
- 'It must be added that most of the leading
revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last
century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish
families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl
Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out
all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov,
Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in
Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.
- 'To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked
like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led
revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the
Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the
Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein),
Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.' Other
authors agree with this:
- "There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply
ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German
Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and
objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War
1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is
indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased
anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of
Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the
Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German
nation." (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the 'Jewish
Question' Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).
- "The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came
after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian
Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s
Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following
the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution..
Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like
the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism
became the norm in 'nice society', and 'nice society' included the
universities." (Martin Bernal, Black Athenavol. 1 pp. 367, 387).
- "The major role Jewish leaders played in the
November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other
factor in confirming (Hitler's) anti-Semitic beliefs." (J&S
Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).
- Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the
rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the
destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough,
contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic
agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor
AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World
War, to the disappointment of the professional western political
establishment. Taylor says, "The state of German armament in 1939
gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war,
and probably not intending war at all" (p.267), and "Even in
1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the
German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except
leadership" (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the
result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and
Hitler was an opportunist 'who took advantages whenever they offered
themselves' (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the
other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals
admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948,
Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where
Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose
not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain's most respected military historians,
quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:
- "He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with
admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and
of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked,
with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been
achieved by means that were often harsh, but 'where there is planing,
there are shavings flying'. He compared the British Empire with the
catholic Church saying they were both essential elements of stability
in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should
acknowledge Germany's position on the Continent. The return of Germany's
colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to
support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties
anywhere.." (p 200).
- According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed
that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved
her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The
original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want
to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations,
and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to
invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was
preparing, instead, to invade Russia" (p140).
- David Irving in the foreword to his book The
Warpath (1978) refers to "the discovery.. that at no time
did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or
- This gives a completely different complexion, not only to
the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the
war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the
boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and
its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries,
irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have
been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful
straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.
- E-mail comment received:
- I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an
MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in
History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no
idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII.
The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the
ownership of the media, banks and businesses.
- Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives
me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of
Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn't make
sense based upon Germany's population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or
being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were
Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest
discussion during my classes.
- I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out
of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer.
- I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast.
The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up
this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white
Sanhedrin is now
bringing the Muslim World under its anti-Christ Noahide Murdering harlot wings
to slay Christians
Oslo "Road to Global Damnation" and Assassination and Satan's SOS,
Chabad Lubavitch of Dan of the North
radical settler threat
Special: IDF lieutenant who was part of messianic camp says Israel faces
Anat Meidan • Ynet
Micha Regev says that he is an anxious citizen. When the IDF Lieutenant
(res.) hears talk of settlement evacuation, he is overwhelmed by horrific
scenarios. For example: Settlers firing at soldiers and Palestinians. Such
scenarios, he says, are not unthinkable. Some people are already working on
“We are facing a much graver danger than the murder of a prime
minister,” (Chabad Lubavitch, Hasidim, settlers
backed by the Telly Tubby Talmudic TBN Tinky Winky tel-Evangelicals)
he says. “The radicals may reach the stage of rebellion, and possibly even
mass suicide.” (wonderful) Regev’s words
merit extra attention because once upon a time he was there himself, a
religious youngster with fire in his eyes who joined the IDF in order to
turn it into a “religious messianic army.”
The 54-year-old Regev was born to a national religious family. When he was
15, he joined his friends in archeological digs near Gush Etzion. There, he
first met settler leader Hanan Porat and was captivated by the appeal of
“Porat, a master of words and brimming with charisma, promised that we are
close to the Messiah’s arrival and that the Six-Day War was a divine
miracle en route to complete salvation,” he recalls. “We admired every
word that came out of his mouth. In retrospect I realized that we, the
youths, were the fuel of that revolution.”
After completing his studies at a high school yeshiva, Regev joined the
Mercaz Harav yeshiva in Jerusalem and on his breaks helped his friends
advance the settlement enterprise. “When the group of salvation believers
expanded we learned that with a little determination and plenty of disregard
for the law we can gain land and a housing solution almost for free in a new
settlement. The government’s helplessness turned this phenomenon into a
strategic threat for the rule of law and State’s pillars,” he writes in
his recently published book.
See Aholibah and her whore sister Oholah, Ezekiel
23, and these two whores wage war. The Demoncrats back (Blue) secular
Itsreallyhell, whereas the (REDS) Repugs Back the Hasidic Talmudic
Regev performed his military service at the Golani elite reconnaissance
unit, also viewing it as a messianic mission. “In preparation sessions
ahead of enlistment, representatives of the salvation movement repeated the
idea of sanctifying the military by turning it into a religious messianic
army…the message was that we should take up key positions,” he says.
Warning to Rabin
Yet eventually things started to change for Regev: “In one of our training
sessions I discovered for the first time kibbutz members celebrating the
Shavuot holiday. I was stunned; I discovered secular people who were no less
moral and impressive than us, the settlement pioneers.”
Regev says that Egyptian President Sadat’s visit to Israel in 1977 and
Prime Minister Begin’s call “no more war, no more bloodshed” were the
turning point in his life. The words that impressed him so deeply sounded
disastrous to his rabbis, and question marks began to crack the faith he
grew up with. Despite this, he continued to serve in the army as a proud
religious commander, sporting a beard and taking part in a series of secret
Lebanon, which was part of Regev’s life for 20 years, claimed the lives of
his young brother, Daniel, who was killed in 1982 and was awarded a citation
posthumously. “During the Shiva, the realization that there is no point in
sacrificing life for the sake of delusional notions took shape within me.
Risking soldiers for the sake of Joseph’s Tomb or the Kasbah in Nablus
seemed senseless to me. If God wants to demand sacrifice from us, he should
do it with His own voice, as He did with Abraham,” Regev says.
In 1984, after a Jewish underground that killed Arabs was uncovered in the
West Bank, with two of its members being former close friends, Regev’s
ties to his past were completely undermined. “It was clear to me that the
zealousness of salvation is not a truthful path and that salvation theory is
unfounded,” he says. He removed the kippah from his head, moved to Mitzpe
Abirim in the Galilee to raise cattle, and today lives there with his wife
and three sons.
In November 1993, a few months after the Oslo
agreement was signed, Regev was a cadet in a division commanders’
course. When Prime Minister Rabin arrived to address the soldiers, the
cadets were asked to prepare questions. When it was Regev’s turn, he
turned to Rabin and said: “I’m a very close
associate of the settlers and fear that your life and the lives of other
officials are in danger.”
“Rabin shook his head, smiled his modest smile and told me that Israel has
excellent security services and that there was no reason for concern,”
Regev recounts. “I realized that my message wasn’t grasped. I got up
again and told him that his response is so wrong that I feel like crying.”
‘The rabbis sinned’
“The Oslo Accords provoked immense hatred in the
See Rick Perry Dance the Whore-a with his right
wing Sanhedrin Chabad Lubavitcher rib-eyes
My settler friends made an effort to explain to me that Rabin, who is
about to hand over parts of our homeland to foreigners, is a traitor, and
that in an enlightened state he would be sentenced to death,” Regev says.
Referring to Rabin’s assassination, he says: “It doesn’t matter who
pulled the trigger and it doesn’t matter that the rabbis said the murderer
did not come from their midst. The sin of this murder
hangs over the rabbis, who turned an elected prime minister into a traitor
Yet the danger has not passed. The opposite is true, as the voice of the
“salvation rabbis” grows louder. Regev decided not to remain silent, and
for some two years wrote his book, The Intoxication of Salvation.” “I
wrote the book as an active partner in the religious salvation movement
based on the doctrine of Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook and his followers, who view
our era as a period of messianic salvation, (Moshiach
ben Satan) with those who stand in the way being criminals. For years
I was a part of it, until I sobered up,” he says.
The whores cup
“I can’t forget the boy who was evacuated from his Gush Katif home
during the Gaza disengagement and urged IDF soldiers to kill him. I have no
doubt he meant it, because for months the rabbis told him that evacuation is
worse than death,” Regev says. “I also can’t forget the marches of
children with a yellow Star of David on their clothes, as if IDF soldiers
were Nazi thugs. While this was a minority, it was backed by the ideologists
of salvation messianism. To my regret, in recent years we are seeing
radicalization among national rabbis too, who seemingly accept the authority
of the State and of democracy.
“The fact that Rabbi Dov Lior, for example, viewed
Jewish killer Baruch Goldstein as a saint shocked but didn’t
surprise me, because the rabbi represents all the dangers inherent in the
salvation movement,” Regev says. “The fact that he is an eminent rabbi
with immense knowledge only makes the danger even graver and proves this is
not a marginal group. Its hard core leads a mystical, violent line. Torah (Talmudic
tradition) laws are more important for them than the State and
than democracy, and in the wake of a trigger like settlement evacuation they
may resort to unprecedented violence.”
John Hagee? Naw,
Just another anti-Christ Murderer
Rabbi Dov Lior
Lior: Arabs are 'evil camel riders'
Kiryat Arba rabbi says Israel's international isolation, hatred of Jews
worldwide are punishment for demolition of three houses
in Migron outpost
Kobi Nahshoni • Ynet
Israel's international isolation and the hatred of Jews worldwide are the
punishment for the demolition of three houses in the Migron outpost two weeks
ago, Kiryat Arba Rabbi Dov Lior ruled Monday during a conference held at the
Binyamin region community.
"We all saw that on the day the buildings were destroyed the diplomats
were expelled from Turkey, and the Egyptians were next and later the
Jordanians," the prominent right-wing rabbi stated.
"The waves of anti-Semitism in Europe are a punishment for this as
yeah and good is bad and bad is good and all that
stuff huh VIPER?
According to Lior, every time Israel tries to "please the villain,"
its status in the world suffers.
He went on to slam the Israeli Left. "There are circles of villains
seeking to give away parts of this land to our enemies. Luckily, God Almighty
causes the camel riders to refuse to meet with the government…
Sorry, wrong God, Luciferian,.........Viper your g-d
is the MURDERER From the beginning and the Lust of your father you and your
proselytes of Hell do
"There are leftists fighting the people of Israel's return to their
land… They have put the public to sleep with opium of peace… The Hollywood
culture and singing in discotheques will not do good, but bad."
The rabbi referred to the Arabs as "wolves", adding: "What we
have with those villains and savages is not peace, and it won't be peace. It's
against their nature. They hate peace."
Not what my Bible says, says the Choose are the
He [said that] Israel should be cleared of Arabs, who should be given a right
of return to places like Saudi Arabia. "The Land of Israel belongs to the
people of Israel only," he ruled.
Migron, Lior said, is not an occupied area, neither according to international
law nor according to the Torah. If it is indeed an occupied area, he argued,
then so is the village of Sheikh Munis (where northern Tel Aviv is located).
According to Rabbi Lior, the people of Israel benefit from the recent events
in the Middle East because "everything happens for a reason." He
noted that thanks to "the hooligans' riots
in Libya, Egypt and Yemen" and the West's
involvement in places like Iraq, Israel can "move a tank" in Judea
'Deeply shocked' by destruction
Some 20 Religious Zionism rabbis, some of them prominent, took part in the
Migron conference, which was held by two rabbinical organizations – Derech
Emunah and the Teaching House for Public Affairs.
Rabbi Haim Drukman cried out against the "rules of Sodom" and the
injustice in removing families from their homes in the middle of the night
because of a "property error".
Rabbi Zalman Melamed called on the religious public to join forces – first
among the rabbis and then among the public and its representatives in the
Knesset – in order to thwart the further destruction of communities and
continue their construction.
At the end of the rally, the rabbis issued a
"public call" to annex Judea and Samaria to the State of Israel and
apply the Israeli law to the area.
And force obedient USA to comply or more destruction
The participants expressed their "deep shock" over the demolition of
houses in Migron, claiming that the residents were not given a real chance to
prove the legitimacy of the construction to the Supreme Court.
They also called on the justice minister to prosecute anyone "who in his
eagerness to destroy, deviated from the appropriate procedures in a normal
Itsreallyhell is a far cry from Normal
Der Benevolent Homelandt
Sekurity ran by Choose for Choose, per HJR 104, Pl 102-14
More and more fleecing the
American Tax Payer each day
Do a disproportionate number of government security grants to
Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox institutions – especially Chabad
institutions – show bias? The Forward implies that it does. I don't
to the Forward, since 2005, the Nonprofit Security Grant Program
administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has provided $118
million to nonprofit organizations to help them become better
prepared to prevent or minimize a terror attack
The problem, according tot he Forward, is that about
80% of these grant-receiving organizations are Jewish, and the vast
majority of those Orthodox or ultra-Orthodox – especially
Chabad, which leads in number of grants received. Yet the Orthodox
and ultra-Orthodox make up a small minority of the Jewish community, and the
Jewish community itself makes up a small minority of those who would
legitimately need these grants.
So why is this way?
According to the Forward, it's
because the program was basically created as a stealth Jewish program meant
to benefit the Jewish community – and that's was the Reform
Movement's Religious Action Center opposed it, seeing it as a violation of
the Separation Clause, and why only a tiny minority of Reform institutions
applied for grants.
And it's also because the Jewish community is well organized politically
and was able to capitalize on the grants while its partners in lobby for it
– the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Young
Men’s Christian Association, the American Association of Museums, along
with others – were not.
I personally don't see a problem with government funds being used to
harden potential terror targets, even if those targets are religious
Reckon why they are "Potential" Targets?
Could it be because the US is waking to these Hasidic Vipers of Hell and
And it is hard to argue with the claim that Jews are a target of Islamic
terror because, unfortunately, we are.
Uh, Gee, wonder why this is so?
It is our duty to force all
mankind to accept the seven Noahide
laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg,
Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004)
It's also true that there are often more Orthodox institutions in a
locale than there are Reform or Conservative institutions. That's because
the Orthodox institutions are usually small and are often located within
walking distance of an Orthodox community, while Conservative and Reform
institutions are usually much larger and tend to serve an entire city or
even several cities.
Why I was Censored by the Ugly
Truth Web Site, I suppose the Truth is very Ugly for them