Noahide News

Part 918

11-17-2009- 2007 AD of Our LORD Jesus the Christ the Creator

Talmudic Dragon Moon Calendar (Wailing for) Kislev 1, of Talmudic

 Perpetual PURIM MURDER

  5770      

 

their Babylonian times of their  Babylonian Sumerian Doctrine and laws 5769

Ps:118:24: This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.

 

 The FINISH 

of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal

True Christian friends and brothers and sisters in Jesus. Understand that the prophecies which the Prophets and the LORD himself gave us is now coming to fruition. The Beast Sanhedrin is Revived out of the seas of the unbelievers. They are attempting to force all mankind to bow and worship the Dragon that they serve. They are forcing all mankind to deny Jesus Christ is the Messiah the SON of GOD the ALPHA OMEGA or they have fully declared they will slay you for Jesus Namesake. You ask who has given these their authority? Satan gave them their authority for he is their god of their flesh world. Do not be confused at the power that they wield, for they serve the Murderer from the beginning. All of the Kings of the earth are in bed with the Great Harlot Mother Mystery Babylon. The United States Government is under total control of Satan and have enacted the Noahide Laws unto Satan as the laws of the earth. These vipers are now gloating and stating "Who can do battle against the beast"?

Well let me tell you, that Jesus Christ defeated satan at the foundation of the world and sealed his destruction at Calvary, and all who serve him are cast into pouter darkness, where there will be gnashing and gnawing of teeth forever. Look up! for the LORD will come as a thief in the night, and the time is nigh !

 

 

e mail to a sister in Christ Jesus 11-17-2009

----- Original Message -----
To: private
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 16:50
Subject: Re: hEY, LITTLE BROTHER!!!

For ten years I have attempted to tell as many as possible what was ocurring. In 2001, I told the world that the Sanhedrin who Crucified Jesus would revive, they did in Tiberias Israel.
 
The revelation of Jesus Christ to John his servant exiled at Patmos was very clear.
 
Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
 
These are the Pharisees and they serve the MURDERER from the beginning and they are revived.
 
Jn:8:44: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
 
They deny the Written WORD of GOD
 
Mk:7:13: Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
 
In this tradition, which is called the Mishnah and Gemara of the Babylonian Talmud and not the WORD of GOD as it is written
 
there are 32 volumes of the Babylonian Talmud they are called tractates, one of which is the Tractate Sanhedrin
 
in the tractate Sanhedrin it is very clear in Chapter 57a................
 
GEMARA. … Our Rabbis taught: …….and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation. — Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 56a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page

 
In 1991 the 102nd Congress passed this law, superceding the Constitution of the United States of America, a very real law a law against Jesus Christ and by TREASON.
 
 
 
Items 1 through 3 of 3

1. [102nd] H.J.RES.104 : To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".
Sponsor: Rep Michel, Robert H. [IL-18] (introduced 1/31/1991)      Cosponsors (225)
Committees: House Post Office and Civil Service
Latest Major Action: 3/20/1991 Became Public Law No: 102-14.

which states

 

102d CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 104

To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 

January 31, 1991

Mr. MICHEL (for himself and Mr. GEPHARDT) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service


JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe,' this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving,' the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it

 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
    Now the Government has turned against its people for the talmudic anti-Christ jews
    and the sanhedrin council for global Bnai Noach or the Noahides have this to say

 

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5767_Tevet_6e

 

What about those who hold "that person" is messiah?

Question: What about those who hold "that person" is messiah?

People who hold that he is not and was not any part of a divinity, but still holds that he was a messiah.

Answer: It is the opinion of Rabbi Schwartz that a person who believes that "that man" was a messiah is not transgressing any prohibition. However the issue is as follows: someone who believes that "that man" was a messiah seems to be only partly disassociating himself from full christianity, and there is a problem of what is meant by the term "messiah". Is the messiah a "divine messenger" to "save" the world. Now when I say "a divine messenger" I mean someone - otherwise normal human being - sent by "the divinity" as a messenger. It seems that some people mean "a person with divine attributes"!

An issue which could be seen as semantic becomes of major consequence.

The decision of Rabbi Schwartz is therefore that in the beis din over which he presides he will not accept declarations of people with christian background if they think that "that man" was a messiah. This DOES NOT MEAN that the declaration of such a person before any [other] beis din is valueless. Perhaps another beis din will be satisfied that the person before them is bona fide in acceptance of the totally non-divinity of "that man". They may accept the declaration, and it will be fully valid

 

and the rabid rabbi Yitchak says this:

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004)

 

So , I am giving you the greatest Gift you will ever have for eternity. I am Telling you that Jesus Christ knew what would take place for in the Beginning was the WORD and the WORD was God and the WORD is GOD and the WORD was made flesh, John.

That many  who say Lord, Lord will deny that He is Christ the Messiah the IAM who inherited everything of the Father, and he is GOD, for they will fear the jews and Not GOD when they are delivered up to the synagogues and the councils of the noahides in every courthouse in America now,.. to either deny Jesus or be decapitated

There is no secret raptures, this was a scheme devised by the Talmudic Jews and infiltrated into the "Judeo Churchian" doctrines, so that many would be deceived and be lured right into the arms of the Moshiach the Son of perdition of 2 Thes. 2 in fear at these times, thus denying the POWER of GOD

When you accept this beast they will "REVEAL" and deny Jesus you will be denied before the father by Jesus Christ the LORD.

Can you not see how vastly important it is for you to understand? Not just for your selfish self but as many as you can tell?

If you simply shrug this off, I will never attempt to explain what is happening again. But if you pray and ask the LORD to help you and you seriously need to know as much as possible, simply ask.

The Lord put me here on this earth for this task, I remember telling mom when I was six, that God sent me here for this reason to battle against satan the devil.

 

 

robert

 

 

 

Remember the Threat made by the Sanhedrin about the Goldstone report?

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5770_Cheshvan_11

Psak 5770 Cheshvan 11

From The Sanhedrin - en

Translation from Hebrew of the 8 Adar, 5769 (4 March 2009) statement:

Image:vaadinter.gif
International Court of Law
Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
Email: dbtc@actcom.com 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228

 

Letter to the Secretary General of the U.N. regarding the Goldstone Report

 


Enlarge

In the name of G-d, Lord of the universe
11 Marheshvan 5770
October 28, 2009

This Lord has Nothing at ALL to do with the LORD GOD. This Lord is their father the murderer from the beginning and the lust of their father they do after the working of Satan

 

To:
The Secretary General of the United Nations
Mr. Ban Ki-Moon
United Nations Building
New York City
United States

To all the nations who are members in the United Nations, all together and each one separately

We open with the Hebrew expression that begins every letter.

Shalom,

Two weeks ago on the day the UN Council for Human Rights passed a resolution in Geneva (on 29/7/5770 to the Creation of the world, known generally as October 17, 2009) to hand over the Goldstone Report for discussion and approval in the UN Security Council, we sent you a copy of the injunction issued by the Sanhedrin’s Court that prohibits any of the UN institutions from deliberating on this matter.

The injunction is attached again.

Perhaps you asked yourself by what authority does the Sanhedrin’s Court issue injunctions to the United Nations.

2 Thes. 1: Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2: That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4: Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5: Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6: And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7: For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8: And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10: And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11: And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
13: But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
14: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15: Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
16: Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace,
17: Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

The International Court of the Sanhedrin operates by the power of the Bible, (babble of Talmudic fables of the choose)  the only Holy Writ whose essence was handed over to mankind at Mt. Sinai [the Torah]

The fables of their filthy Talmud oral traditions and anti-Christ Noahide law

 and the Prophets who are held in respect by all of the nations of the world to whom the prophets were also sent. 

In there Babylonian Talmudic tradition they brag about Killing the Prophets of GOD the Father

Jeremiah 7 25: Since the day that your fathers came forth out of the land of Egypt unto this day I have even sent unto you all my servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them:
26: Yet they hearkened not unto me, nor inclined their ear, but hardened their neck: they did worse than their fathers. 
27: Therefore thou shalt speak all these words unto them; but they will not hearken to thee: thou shalt also call unto them; but they will not answer thee. 
28: But thou shalt say unto them, This is a nation that obeyeth not the voice of the LORD their God, nor receiveth correction: truth is perished, and is cut off from their mouth.
29: Cut off thine hair, O Jerusalem, and cast it away, and take up a lamentation on high places; for the LORD hath rejected and forsaken the generation of his wrath.
30: For the children of Judah have done evil in my sight, saith the LORD: they have set their abominations in the house which is called by my name, to pollute it.
31: And they have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my heart.

Matthew 23:29: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,
30: And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
31: Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
32: Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
33: Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

By virtue of this delegated authority which is passed down from one generation to the next ever since the time of Moses our teacher, the master of all of the prophets, 

 

their Moses is the Fabled Moses of their filthy perverted oral tradition which Makes the WORD of GOD of none effect unto them 

Mt:23:37: O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Lk:24:27: And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

Lk:24:44: And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.

and by virtue of the succession of authority in Jewish tradition, we appealed to you that you might not fail and thus fail the world, bringing upon it catastrophe by releasing the lash that has come to attack the State of Israel , which is nothing other than an attack on the Jewish people in order to try to remove it from the stage of history by an unprecedented shedding of blood, with a sham prevention but with the actual encouragement of Iran and those like it to continue to develop weapons of mass destruction while the rest of the world sits by and looks on.

The Sanhedrin International Court has treated the UN with great consideration in warning it not to deliberate a hostile, fallacious, and malicious report . lacking any moral basis.

We are convinced that the continued discussion which is also your responsibility will lead the nations of the world and all of mankind to the judgment that will take place in Jerusalem in the Valley of Jehoshafat as written in the Prophets and Torah of Israel.

From the Book of Joel 4:

1 For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring back the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem,
2 I will gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshafat; and I will enter into judgment with them there for My people and for My heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and divided My land. …
15 The sun and the moon are become black, and the stars withdraw their shining.
16 And the LORD shall roar from Zion, and utter His voice from Jerusalem, and the heavens and the earth shall shake; but the LORD will be a refuge unto His people, and a stronghold to the children of Israel.
17 So shall ye know that I am the LORD your God, dwelling in Zion My holy mountain; then shall Jerusalem be holy, and there shall no strangers pass through here any more.
18 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down sweet wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the brooks of Judah shall flow with waters; and a fountain shall come forth of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of Shittim.
19 Egypt shall be a desolation, and Edom shall be a desolate wilderness, for their violence against the children of Judah, because they have shed innocent blood in their land.
20 But Judah shall be inhabited for ever, and Jerusalem from generation to generation.
21 And I will hold as innocent their blood that I have not held as innocent; and the LORD dwelleth in Zion.

We have contacted you in order to give you the merit that will save you from this terrible trial, the trial of judgment day. We are again sending you this warning calling upon you personally to declare publicly that Goldstone’s document is not acceptable.

We also made a productive suggestion, that you establish an investigative committee agreed upon by the Jewish people and the Government of Israel, to investigate the background to the outbreak of Operation "Cast Lead" and the UN’s contribution to its outbreak together with additional factors.

Your important organization may still be reformed, insofar as it pays heed to the spirit of the words of the Prophets and the Torah and listens to the word of G-d.

Babylon Talmud......

Rv:17:5: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Rv:16:14: For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.

Rv:17:2: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.

Rv:17:18: And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

Rv:18:3: For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.

This could be your blessed initiative, To accept for yourself and your organization the original spirit that formed its basis: to establish peace in the world acting for the King of the universe.

The verse from the Prophet Isaiah “Let them beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks and they shall not learn war anymore,”- symbolized by a sculpture inside the UN building and engraved on a wall facing the entrance – will never be realized through the Goldstone Report and the traditional policy of the UN regarding the State of Israel.

1 Thes.1: But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.
2: For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
3: For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

Your welcome action is anxiously awaited by all mankind. You have the power to help contribute to the prevention of wars.

a Threat to the entire world if the world does not submit to Satan

May you be blessed by G-d for this.

In esteem,

Rabbi Dov Stein, Secretary of the Sanhedrin
Rabbi Professor Hillel Weiss, Spokesman of the Sanhedrin

 

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Havat_Daat_5770_Cheshvon_28

Havat Daat 5770 Cheshvon 28

From The Sanhedrin - en

Informal translation from Hebrew of the 26 Tishrei, 5770 (14 October 2009) statement:

Image:vaadecology.gif
Committee for Matters of Health and Ecology
Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
Email: dbtc@actcom.com 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228

 

Opinion of the Sanhedrin Court [Health and Ecology Commission], concerning the Mexico Flu vaccine (also known as Swine Flu)

Per the information released to the public since the beginning of this last summer from health officials in Israel and worldwide, it is possible, in extreme cases, for an outbreak of a severe epidemic which will very much endanger much of the population of Israel in a life threatening manner. According to the most current data, more than forty people have died from the disease, but all but about five of them had other serious diseases, and the actual cause of death is unclear.

Authorities of the Health Ministry are ready to vaccinate the population in a systematic manner, according to the level of expected risk.

Three months ago, Dr. Daisy Stern, a medical doctor by profession, petitioned the Sanhedrin, and presented in front of the court worrisome data on defects in the ingredients, the manner in which decisions were made, the whole judgment process, many of which pointed to professional negligence and even seemingly purposeful negligence.

The Court cannot decide on the matter of findings which have been published up until now on the internet, because it did not have all the proper tools to evaluate this testimony.

Due to concern for her words, the Court of the Sanhedrin located a virologist professor, Maureen Friedman, an active, prestigious, known researcher in known scientific institutions in Israel, and decided to present her testimony as it has been received. Per her statement, when Dr. Daisy Stern’s position was presented to her, she did not accept it, however, as time went on and she investigated the matter herself, she changed her original stance in certain ways. The following is the testimony of Professor Maureen Friedman in the Court of the Sanhedrin on the 24th of Cheshvan (November 10, 2009).

Among the vaccine’s ingredients, which can be found on the market, are adjuvants, whose purpose is to stimulate white blood cells in to accelerated movement. Thus it is possible to use a lesser amount of vaccination material in order to achieve goals which would only be achievable without the adjuvants with a higher volume of vaccination material, which is not possible to manufacture today in the amounts required by the market. The problem is that the adjuvants can cause damage to the central nervous system (including the brain). It should be noted that these additional materials are not always revealed and identified, as the manufacturers protect the exact formula as a patented secret.

The H1N1 vaccine is manufactured by different companies. The vaccine which has been brought to Israel includes as adjuvant which is not used in the USA, however it is used in Europe, amidst state involvement in legislation or other agreements which protect from lawsuits. However, there are those states which refrain from using the vaccine due to doubts regarding its quality. There are testimonies about the H1N1 virus which lead to the conclusion that its source is a pharmaceutical laboratory in Mexico. (Baxter) Per the estimations, that company, following its negligence, as it seems, spread Bird Flu, in its time. About 72 kilograms of the viral substance was prepared, as it seems, for preparation of an aborted vaccine against said virus. A portion of it (it is not known how much) came in while still alive (it is not clear how?) to the aborted seasonal vaccine which was sent to 14 places in Europe. The presence of living virus and its identity was revealed in a lab in the Czech Republic (Baxter International).

One would like to not believe that there are dangers in the vaccine and that the vaccine is reliable, but the circumstances undercut the reliability.

The Health Ministry intents to vaccinate, with this vaccine, in Israel, before anyone else. As it seems, the safety of the vaccine has not been properly ascertained.

There is no data on tracking the quality and the results of the vaccination with the vaccine that is here in Israel. In the USA, the vaccine being used is not the same type as in Israel. In the vaccine that is in Israel, it is possible that there is a problematic material called timursol which is made up of 50% Mercury, which is a somewhat dangerous accumulation. In the ampoules (vials) in Israel, it is not clear if this substance is present, as there is no labeling on the ampoules.

In cases of death related to the H1N1 virus, there is no clear proof of dependent connection, but that does not prove that death is not from the virus.

The United Nations does not particularly care what happens to us as a result of a vaccine made from a defective makeup. It would not be surprising of the World Health Organization (a body related to the United Nations) would after the fact use residents of Israel in order to check the reliability of vaccine used by the State of Israel.

It is clear that there is a risk of becoming sick from taking the vaccine, and there are risks of becoming sick from not taking the vaccine. The problem is that it is very difficult to evaluate which danger is greater. Therefore, the most proper recommendation is that every person should evaluate, per his or her own medical status, along with consultation with experts, which is the proper risk to take upon oneself per the personal medical status. That is to say that someone that, in the event of becoming sick with the flu, will be in serious danger, it is proper to vaccinate.

Later on, testimony was received from another expert that, the more a person’s weight increases, the greater the threat of the flu, and also it appears that the speed of dissemination of the sickness is considerably lower than what was thought ahead of time.

The recommendation of the Sanhedrin’s Court, per this testimony and other data is as follows:

  • Every person should take personal responsibility for himself in the decision as to whether or not to be vaccinated against the Mexican Flu, and to that end consult with an authorized physician who can be trusted. In particular it is obligatory to do this if the Mexican Flu will spread.
  • It is proper to consult with a nutrition expert regarding proper nutrition which will supply the means to strengthen the body and its invigoration in natural means, like food rich in vitamins C and D.
  • According to the data at our disposal, the chances of catching the disease for those above the age of sixty is much smaller, due to vaccines against a similar strain long ago.
  • One who is of an increased risk than normal to be afflicted by auto-immune diseases should be much more cautious regarding taking the suggested vaccine.
  • It is proper that the authorities enhance tracking methods after outbreaks of the disease while putting in place a public system for reporting side effects, as is standard in the USA.
  • It is proper to allow someone who doesn’t trust the vaccine which is in Israel, to help import the American vaccine, if the matter is possible, and still relevant, at the end of the month of Cheshvan, and to enable its purchase by a substantial government subsidy.
  • The government has the great responsibility not to create situations which amount to harming the public’s trust of the medical system. Chaos on this matter and compulsion on the public or parts of it to take the vaccine represent a great danger to the trust in the health system. It is incumbent upon the medical system to work now to repair the public trust in real and focused ways, such that if, G-d forbid, there will indeed be an outbreak in a dangerous way, it will not be a result of the public’s fear of the serum.

Signatories

Rabbi Professor Hillel Weiss – Speaker of the Sanhedrin
Rabbi Dov Stein – Secretary of the Sanhedrin

______
Self appointed Mother Harlot with the Submission of the kings of the earth

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5770_Tishrei_30

International Court of Law
Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
Email: dbtc@actcom.com 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228

 

An Immediate Injunction to Prohibit the U.N. Security Council from discussing the Goldstone Report

 

The Court of the Sanhedrin in this document is issuing an immediate injunction to prohibit the U.N. Security Council and any other U.N. forum from reviewing the Goldstone Report.

We expect the Secretary-General of the United Nations to make a public statement immediately suspending any further discussion of the Goldstone Report, to announce that it has been set aside, and to set up an investigative committee agreed upon by the sides to the war that will determine by mutual agreement the background to the outbreak of the Israeli Defense Force’s operation in Gaza, known as “Operation Cast Lead”, and will revise the U.N. charter and the laws of war with regard to the fight against terror organizations and terrorist states.

Avoiding this responsibility revokes the legitimacy of the United Nations as a fair and representative organization to bring peace and defeats the mission for which it was established.

1. The Goldstone Report is tainted by malicious politicization which disqualifies it in essence, because those who initiated the report ignored the unremitting aggression of the Hamas and other “Palestinian” organizations over a period of many long years. 

Not to mention the theft of Palestine and the Mass Collective MURDERS for over 60 years by ITSREALLYHELL

This deliberate disregard included Islamic organizations and others who plotted and carried out severe aggression against the citizens of Israel and Jews all over the world without distinction for more than 14 years, shelling cities and towns without any provocation by the State of Israel, killing and maiming women and children, conducting their prolonged terror operations against the Israeli civilian population in such a way as to cause grave economic damage.

yeah the Palestinians weapons of choice are rocks and faulty scud missiles against the most sophisticated weaponry in the world. The kill ration was one choose to a 100 Palestinians, during this UNGODLY occupations of thefts and sorcery and robbery and MURDER campaign of Collective PURIM

The report does not relate to the serious scope of continuous violations of international law by the "Palestinians". For that reason, we encourage the government of Israel not to allow itself to be called to judgment before hostile forums.

2. The United Nations took action only after the success of the Israeli Defense Forces in the “Cast Lead Operation”, and this action was to deny Israel and the world the possibility of subduing terror, by tying Israel’s hands and feet and acquiescing to its destruction (God forbid) , to deter its fighters by threatening them with arrest warrants all over the world after first defining Israel’s struggle against terror as a war crime.

Do not be deceived at the Lying Vipers, for they carry out their plan to subdue the entire world under their Satanic anti-God Noahide laws of Hell

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. 

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory

 

3. The U.N. in taking such action has abandoned all basic standards of justice and freedom in human civilization and has turned the victim into the offender. By supporting the Goldstone Report, the U.N. has presumed to revoke the law of the Torah (Anti-GOD Talmud Bavli) which has become a basic tenet of natural international law according to which “If someone rises up against you to kill you, kill him first”.

yes the new warfare of STRIKE FIRST, see Iraq and soon IRAN

4. The U.N. is totally ignoring the war crimes in almost all of the countries of the world which are associated with the “Axis of Evil”, as former U.S. President George Bush called it, with the violators being nations and peoples who are serial law-breakers: 

who are opposed the the Choose Hoodlum haha of Hell

nations and leaders whose principal expertise is in planning and carrying out genocide while the U.N. assists them by denying the Jewish people the right of self-defense.

Beware of these Lying Pharisees and hypocrites whose father is the MURDERER from the beginning.

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004)

 

5. The institution has become an entity that aids and abets aggression and bloodshed and an indirect cause in arousing strife and war in the world. The U.N. helps terrorists escape defeat, thus preventing the achievement of peace, life, and world stability.

And the Sanhedrin is right, for they exist, and they are the threat against the World and they hate GOD

6. The spirit of the faith of Israel, its Torah and the prophetic visions, 

your visions shall fail and your Talmud destroyed by Christ Jesus

the culture of the Jewish people and conduct which detest bloodshed, together with the philosophy and thought of numerous Jewish leaders, has contributed more to the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights more than any other nation.

there you have it

 The U.N. is making perverted use of this declaration against a peace-loving nation 

Zohar Torah portion of Va'era page 32a

...In the future, the children of Yishmael will rule over the Holy land for a long time while the land is empty, just as their circumcision is empty and without completion. And they will hinder the children of Israel from returning to their place, until their merit in the Holy land runs out. In the future the children of Yishmael will stir great wars in the world. And the children of Edom [the West] will gather against them, and make war with them, one on the sea, and one on the land, and one by Jerusalem; and each one will prevail over the other but the Holy land will not fall to the hands of Edom. At the same time, a nation from the end of the world will be awakened against wicked Rome.(Rome here is said to refer to the spiritual center of western civilization) and it will make war against her for three months, and many nations will gather there, and they will fall by her hand, until all the children of Edom will gather against her from all corners of the earth. And then G-d will awaken Himself against them, as it says, "a sacrificial slaughter for the Lord in Batzra", and it says, "to shake the corners of the Land". And after this, the children of Yishmael will be finished from the world. And all the supernal powers of the nations will be broken, and no power will remain above except for the power of Israel alone.

 

 

more than against any other nation in order to destroy and exterminate it and as a result will lead to the death of billions of human beings as the sages said (Mishnah Avot 5:8) : 

The prophets of satan, who slew the Prophets of God the Father

“The sword of war comes to the world for the delay of justice, for the perversion of justice, and for interpreting the Torah in contradiction of its basic laws.”

Talmuds Laws of sick anti-Christ perversions

7. We therefore call in every dispute for the establishment of investigative committees composed of representatives of countries that do not show hostility to one of the sides. This applies to the state of war that exists between the Jewish people and their country and the Arab nations and their countries.

8. If this is not done, we call upon all of the countries and state and national organizations to take steps to establish a new international framework to bring peace and resolve disputes, an organization that operates according to laws that reflect the vision of the prophets which are the foundation of international law and the laws of war and peace that bind all nations.

9. To the regret of all, the U.N. has become a comfortable haven for terror states and totalitarian countries who threaten with annihilation the nations who are members in the U.N., who suppress with blood and fire the spirit of liberty and justice of every human being on earth and are represented by dictatorships which took power by duplicity. Therefore the institutions of the U.N. and the courts operating in its name are disqualified from acting as international courts of law as they are considered at present. As the sages of Israel said (Mishanh Avot 1:7) “Do not associate with an evil person” and Maimonides explained this as meaning “whoever he be from whatever society, so that you do not learn his ways”.

the same laws that state that it is ok to have sex with a baby girl three years and a day....SICK FILTH

10. All people on earth know that the present manner of international conduct will lead sooner or later to a flood of fire that will engulf the entire world when international disputes rage out of control. Therefore it is the sacred responsibility of all countries who love peace and justice to establish international courts, and the responsibility of every human being and of every state does not end by relying on a perverted international organization.

Sanhedrin

We are hopeful that states, organizations, legal institutions and individuals of influence will publicly support this declaration and band together to bring its ideas to fruition.

Adv. Dov Even–Ohr
Rabbi Dov Stein – Secretary, the Sanhedrin
Rabbi Dr. Ezra Tepper
Rabbi Professor Hillel Weiss – Spokesman, the Sanhedrin
Rabbi Yeshaiah Hollander
Rabbi Yosef Elbom
Ohad Kamin, Chairman, Investigative Committee

_______

Dan:11:14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1114135.html

Sanhedrin in place of the High Court


Amid discussion of the conflict of interest inherent in the attorney general's duties, a more critical tension point in the judicial system is often forgotton: The tension between the dual roles of the Supreme Court. It is the highest court of appeals, but under its dual role as the High Court of Justice, the arbiter of some of the most controversial issues.

The Benizri affair illustrates the problematic nature of these dual roles. The case highlighted the fact that the justices' supposed ideological bias influences faith in their rulings on appeals. From this point,
an overall loss of confidence in the judicial system is not too distant.

This tension joins a fundamental question over the justices' judicial qualifications and suitability, particularly regarding their ethical and moral responsibilities on the High Court bench. It has long been clear that this is not a case of dry interpretation of the law. These legal interpretations are made in accordance with the justices' principles or understanding of law built on "the values of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state."

These two problems create the need to separate these dual functions of the Supreme Court: its role as the supreme appellate court, which will attract Israel's best and brightest jurists; and its ethical and moral role as the High Court, which needs to attract the best and brightest intellectual, ethical and spiritual talents. Should not such fateful decisions be made by a forum including people like Professor Asa Kasher, author A.B. Yehoshua and Rabbi Yuval Cherlow, instead of judges like Yitzhak Amit, Neal Hendel and Uzi Fogelman, with all due respect to their legal abilities? Would not rulings on our most important ethical matters receive greater respect if they were made by such a forum?

Such a body would certainly generate questions over how its members are appointed (the appointments committee could include members from each branch of government, with mandatory opposition representation as well as a few optional Israel Prize laureates), the matters adjudicated (perhaps primarily interpretation of Basic Laws), and more.

It is important not to be alarmed by the fact that this is a global precedent. Rather, there needs to be a focused discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of the idea. One should not rule out the possibility that Israel will give birth to an idea that could be used around the world. We also must not fear the fact that not only jurists are interpreting the law. Even the legislators in this country are not necessarily jurists. If legal experts continue to perpetuate their exclusivity in making such rulings, they may raise suspicions of seeking to maintain personal prestige or the monopoly of their clique at the expense of the judicial system's standing.

It is clear that the most suggested name making the rounds, "a constitutional court," does not befit such an institution, because trumpeting its legal character is contrary to the logic in proposing a body that seeks to strip away the jurists' exclusivity. "The House of Lords" would work if it did not sound so English. Thus, perhaps, we would be best adopting the ancient, beautiful Jewish word "Sanhedrin," even if it is rooted in Greek, and despite the fact that it would not be run solely by sages in the historical sense. Rather, it would feature modern sages - secular, religious, and of course, non-Jews.

________

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Hachrazah_5769_Adar_13

Hachrazah 5769 Adar 13

From The Sanhedrin - en

Translation from Hebrew of the 13 Adar, 5769 (9 March 2009) statement:

Image:SanhedrinLogo.png
Sanhedrin - The Great Court of 71
Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
Email: dbtc@actcom.com 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228

 

Letter of the Sanhedrin to Jewish communities around the world

 

Taanit Esther, 13 Adar 5769

PURIM


At a time when the decrees of Haman are being renewed, in 127 states, let us remember the command of Esther the Queen to Mordechai the Jew to gather all the Jews for fast and prayer for protection and salvation, that is the message of the Megillah. Since the outbreak of the great financial crisis at the end of 5768 (2008 on the secular calendar), and since the state of Israel has been pushed more and more against the wall by those that hate her, who raised their arrogant heads of hatred of Israel in the world. Every (Jewish) community in the world is pursued according to the character of its neighbors and the neighboring culture. There is no reason to quote a long list of states standing at the moment at the forefront of troubles. A heart knows the bitterness of heart and every community feels the strength of the danger in front of it.

Therefore the communities must form their internal unified leadership in every land and state and not to restrain themselves in the face of persecution as if it didn’t occur.

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. 

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory

 

 One should conduct proper recording and documentation of the events, and it is proper to force the local authorities, and the state of Israel and international Jewish organizations to express their stance, as well as on the Jewish and Gentile elites in the state and community in question. It is important to submit exhaustive judicial claims, criminal and civil, against the oppressors. Restraint until the anger passes will not be effective in general in such cases where hatred of Israel is increasing in the world.

Every community and every Jew is obligated to be concerned with the protection of their lives and property in means which secure maximum protection of life, property, and their value.

The best medicine for all of this is to make aliyah to Israel. Ingathering of the exiles is the most important and eternal gathering for the Jewish nation. By means of making real the promise of the Torah, that from the ends of heaven G-d will gather in His scattered, a Jew guards his identity, the danger of assimilation amongst the nations is prevented, and he expresses his faith in his Creator, his uniqueness, and he can live as a proud Jew in the framework of a suitable community in the Land of Israel.

Yes God the Creator will indeed gather together his sheep in Sion. The filthy will have their flesh zion, temporarily

It is possible to establish sources of income in the Land of Israel beyond just the proper protection of property, with development, prosperity and success. With regard to the security situation, the Torah, the Prophets and our Rabbis strengthen every Jew, as well as every Gentile who holds on the corner of the garment of a Jew to bring him to the land of his fathers, and promise that Israel will have refuge in its land.

Mt:23:15: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

We believe that G-d will not abandon His nation, and He will not leave His inheritance. 

Mt:21:38: But when the husbandmen (Sanhedrin) saw the son, (Jesus) they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.(wrong inheritance, sorry anti-Christ)

Hebrews 12:22: But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
23: To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
24: And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.
25: See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven:
26: Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.
27: And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.
28: Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:
29: For our God is a consuming fire.

For G-d will redeem His nation in our days, and Israel and Judah will be saved. 

Gal. 3:20: Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
21: Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22: But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
23: But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25: But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
26: For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27: For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29: And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

The decision to make aliyah to the Land of Israel is a decision which can sometimes be difficult. But according to the difficulty is also the greatness of the reward from the Creator of the World.  (wrong creator, Satan has created NOTHING)

Romans 1: 15: So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.
16: For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
17: For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
18: For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19: Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20: For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23: And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24: Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26: For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28: And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29: Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30: Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31: Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

At least since the Balfour Declaration in 5678 (1967 in the secular calendar), the voice declaring that G-d has remembered His nation echoes throughout the world. Many of those that decided not to listen to this voice, to the sadness of our hearts, have been lost. At present, there is another attempt, and it is proper to extricate oneself before it is too late.

Who among His nation, let his G-d be with him, and let him go up (Ezra 1:4)

The Sanhedrin is ready to give advice and to deal with individual cases in response to this letter.

Rabbi Professor Hillel Weiss Spokesman of the Sanhedrin

______

One more time, a look to see how the anti-Christ Choose have taken control of the US freemason Noahide courts by their Grand Jewry's

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. 

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory

http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/freeform/grandjuryreform?opendocument

For More Information:

Kyle O'Dowd, Legislative Director
(202) 872-8600 ext. 226, kyle@nacdl.org


INTRODUCTION

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Henry Hyde (R-IL) recently noted that the federal grand jury, originally established by the Founding Fathers as a means of protecting American citizens against government excess, is today a captive of federal prosecutors. The prosecutor exercises enormous power, unrestrained by law or judicial supervision. The grand jury process itself is largely devoid of legal rules. The process has become one that wholly fails to protect ordinary American citizens. The balance has shifted so dramatically in favor of the prosecution that it has been noted, time and again, that “A good prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.”

The Commission to Reform the Federal Grand Jury, which comprises individuals of unsurpassed breadth and expertise in the criminal justice system, has worked intensely over the past two years to examine whether reforms of the federal grand jury system are required. Our findings suggest that fundamental changes are required to restore balance and equity between individual citizens and their government. The proposed changes are all reasonable. In response to demonstrated abuses, several key states, New York and Massachusetts among them, already have successfully instituted many of these well-considered proposals into their grand jury systems.

We call upon Congress to do the same at the federal level, and alter the dangerous prosecutorial rubber stamp that constitutes today’s federal grand jury. It is the hope of this Commission that Congress will use this document to take the first steps toward ameliorating this problem and restoring justice to America’s heralded criminal justice system.



REPORT OF COMMISSION
TO REFORM THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY


Bill of Rights for the Federal Grand Jury

In 1791, when the grand jury was incorporated into our constitutional structure, its primary role was to protect the individual from unfounded accusations. As one observer has noted, “the grand jury had achieved renown as a bulwark against despotism, a protector of the common man against oppressive prosecution. The institution’s investigatory role was secondary.” But, in the subsequent 200 years, in the federal system anyway, “the protective function has been trivialized and the investigator’s function expanded to the point where the institution is almost precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers intended.”1

Today, many would agree with the observation of William J. Campbell, former federal district judge in Chicago: “[T]oday, the grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody, at any time, for almost anything, before any grand jury.”2

What this means is that the federal grand jury is a secret ex parte proceeding where the evidence is presented by the prosecutor and the grand jury votes whether to indict without ever hearing from the court (other than a preliminary session welcoming the grand jurors and giving some general guidelines about their duties) or defense counsel. Unsurprisingly, under these circumstances the grand jurors tend to bond with the prosecutor and indict when the prosecutor indicates there should be an indictment.

Faith in Jesus? Not so says the accuser and his Grand Jewry

Thus, the federal grand jury today functions primarily as a tool of the federal prosecutor. Employing the power of compulsory process in a secret proceeding, the prosecutor investigates and determines, with virtually no check, who will be indicted and for what.

In the federal grand jury, the prosecutor exercises this enormous power unrestrained by law or judicial supervision. The grand jury process is largely devoid of legal rules. The prosecutor can present the evidence he or she wants to present in the manner he or she wants to present it. The only theoretical restriction is that, if an indictment is rendered, the evidence should be sufficient to establish probable cause that the accused committed the crime charged. Even that minimal test, however, finds no mechanism in the federal system for its enforcement. Any claimed insufficiency, unfairness or abuse in the grand jury proceedings is said to “merge” in the trial — prejudice from grand jury impropriety is deemed “cured” by a fair trial. But an indictment alone can cause enormous harm to an individual or business accused.

The result is a federal grand jury process virtually immune from judicial supervision. Because grand jury procedure presently is given little legal significance, federal courts engage in little scrutiny of what happens there. While some prosecutors may conduct grand jury proceedings with meticulous care and concern for fairness to targets, others may not. If abuses do occur, they will rarely come to light.

Blind faith that misconduct does not occur behind the grand jury door would be naive in the extreme. In recent times, this problem of virtually unbridled federal prosecutorial power over the grand jury has been exacerbated, too frequently, by a lack of prosecutorial restraint. As former Reagan Administration Deputy Attorney General Arnold Burns has written:


[M]ost prosecutors . . . work long hours with little glory trying to bring about a just result. The problem is at the margins — but the margins are growing. Increasingly, the high public profile of a target or the attention-grabbing nature of the alleged wrongdoing may have more to do with a matter’s “prosecutorial merit” than the strength of the evidence or the seriousness of the crime.

* * *
The problem has become endemic, and the solution will need to go beyond ad hoc displays of judicial exasperation and oversight.
* * *
What has been lost is a sense of proportionality and identification of priorities.3


Reinforcing this observation are the many recent opinions of respected jurists sharply castigating federal prosecutorial misconduct.

For example, as Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Richard Posner has so aptly put it: “[t]he increase in the number of federal prosecutors in recent years has brought with it problems of quality control.” Judge Posner went on to describe and condemn a campaign of harassment waged against a respected criminal defense attorney who was thereby forced to abandon his representation of a client in order to defend himself: “On meager grounds, the U.S. Attorney’s office launched a sting operation against the lawyer for an individual under criminal investigation by the same office. Although the operation produced zero evidence or leads to evidence of illegal conduct, it dragged on for two years.”4

Likewise, in a recent case in which an assistant U.S. attorney concealed evidence and then lied about it, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Alex Kozinski wrote: “[t]roubled as we are by the prosecutor’s conduct, we’re more troubled still by the lack of supervision and control exercised by those above him. . . . How can it be that a serious claim of prosecutorial misconduct remains unresolved — even unaddressed — until oral argument in the Court of Appeals?”5

Indeed, as far back as 1990, a congressional subcommittee looking into the Justice Department’s internal controls asked the Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) what disciplinary action it had taken in each of ten cases in which federal judges had made written findings of prosecutorial misconduct. After lengthy delay, the panel was finally informed by OPR that “no disciplinary action has been taken in any of the ten cases.” The subcommittee observed that “repeated findings of no misconduct, and the Department’s failure to explain its disagreements with findings of misconduct by the courts, raises serious questions regarding what [it] considers ‘prosecutorial misconduct.’ . . .”6


Power to Harm

Representative Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), Chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, recognized the problem in statements supporting his important legislation of 1997, to permit motions for at least some recoupment of cost by individual and small business victims of “bad faith, vexatious or frivolous” federal prosecutions: “[Some federal prosecutions are] not just wrong, but willfully wrong, frivolously wrong. They [federal prosecutors] keep information from you that the law says they must disclose. They suborn perjury.” The legislative history accompanying the statute notes that the current federal grand jury does not protect citizens from a wrongful indictment and prosecution by the prosecutor in charge of that body. The Conference Committee specifically notes that a finding of probable cause by a federal grand jury does not insulate the government from a judicial finding of a bad faith, vexatious, or frivolous prosecution.7

The first successful Hyde Amendment case was United States v. Holland, in the Eastern District of Virginia.8 The case involved a Virginia state senator (Richard J. Holland) and his small-town bank, in which federal “banking regulators . . . took a small-time, technical violation that usually goes unchallenged and grew it into a 31-count indictment against [Senator Holland] and his son.”9 Presiding Judge Morgan threw out the case at trial — “virtually unheard of in the Eastern District of Virginia.”10 In explaining to the jury his reasoning for finding the Hollands not guilty, the judge noted how the prosecution had picked and chose “only what it wanted from grand jury testimony” and had “ignor[ed] conflicting testimony and evidence."11
Similar is the case of the first Hyde Amendment motion filed, U.S. v. Hogge, in the Southern District of Texas — a case involving a former sales vice president of a now-defunct defense contractor, indicted for conspiring to defraud the U.S. Army. An FBI agent had assured Sharon Hogge that investigators were not focused on her. So, Ms. Hogge spoke freely with federal agents, pointing them to addresses where they found company records. She took notes during her conversations with agents, transcribing the words reflecting the agents’ assurances to her like: “no ambush,” and repeatedly scribbling, “I am not a criminal target.”12

Yet, when federal prosecutors convened a grand jury investigation into the company’s suspected over-billing of the Defense Department, they added Ms. Hogge to the target list and easily obtained an indictment against her — despite the fact that as a sales vice president, she did not bill the Army or even handle an inventory. She learned she had been indicted when her husband woke her one Saturday morning in 1996 and stuck a newspaper in her face.

Prosecutors pushed their shoddy case to trial. There, the government’s case fell apart. Federal judge Hoyt criticized the prosecutor for trying to “make a criminal case out of a dispute over an accounting principle.” He added: “I don’t see any evidence suggesting . . . that Sharon Hogge should be charged in any of these counts” [against the company’s executives].”13 Still, during the course of the prosecution, Ms. Hogge miscarried twice from the stress of the ordeal, considered suicide, and for the first time in her life, had to start seeing a psychologist.14 Ms. Hogge was unsuccessful in her Hyde Amendment motion for fee and cost reimbursement for the ordeal, because the final order dismissing the case against her had come down two days before the effective date of the Hyde Amendment, and the law does not have retroactive application.15

The Hyde Amendment is a very helpful measure for correcting wrongful prosecutions, but it comes at a fairly late stage of the proceedings. A wrongful indictment in itself — regardless of ultimate outcome — remains devastating. As Justice Kennedy noted in his plurality opinion for the U.S. Supreme Court in Gentile v. Nevada, in the time period between indictment and trial, the accused may suffer ruinous consequences to his reputation and employment from which he may never recover even if acquitted.16 Now, with the dramatic decrease in the proportion of federal indictments that go to trial as compared to that prior to the enactment of the sentencing guidelines in 1987, the grand jury has in effect become the body of last resort for many accused in the federal criminal justice system.17

These serious consequences make imperative efforts to restore a meaningful shield function to the federal grand jury. Additional safeguards are needed, to protect the individual or business subject to grand jury investigation, and to protect against the waste of tax dollars squandered on investigations and prosecutions that should not be pursued in the first place. We submit that basic reform of the federal grand jury is a logical and necessary next policy step for Congress to take in efforts to restore a balance of fairness to the nation’s criminal justice system. While the grand jury continues to serve as a sword for the prosecutor, it has long ceased to perform its historic function as an independent entity acting as a shield to safeguard the citizenry against prosecutorial excess.


Proposals for Reform

The following ten reforms — a Bill of Rights for the Federal Grand Jury — are mainly drawn from those proposed by the American Bar Association (ABA) more than 20 years ago by its Criminal Justice Section Committee on the Grand Jury ("ABA Report”). Congress held hearings on these proposals but failed to pass them. However, recent developments, noted above, have created a new urgency to grand jury reform, as a critical policy step toward re-establishing a sense of fair balance to the now truly enormous federal prosecutorial/investigative power.

We submit that these reforms strike the appropriate balance between the public’s interest in effective law enforcement and the public’s interest in protecting the rights of individual citizens and businesses involved in the federal grand jury process.

The great benefit from the proposed reforms, and increased judicial scrutiny of the grand jury process, would be that flaws in potential charges might be exposed at the grand jury stage, and unwarranted prosecutions would be less likely to be brought. At least some individuals and businesses would be spared the devastating effects of being forced to face trial on meritless charges.

At the same time, none of these reforms would disrupt the effective functioning of the grand jury or add significantly to the burden of federal courts and prosecutors. Indeed, several of the proposed rules have been in effect for some time in some state jurisdictions, without any adverse consequences to effective law enforcement.



PROPOSALS OF COMMISSION
TO REFORM THE GRAND JURY


Criticisms of Federal Grand Jury Reform Proposals

The critique of our grand jury reform proposals is largely encapsulated in opposition to the right to counsel in the grand jury room. First, opponents claim that the presence of counsel will transform the grand jury proceeding into an adversarial situation. This runs counter to the historic function of the grand jury and turns it, in effect, into another trial. Second, opponents argue that such reform will make the system of justice less efficient by encumbering the process with additional procedures.

These concerns mirror the critiques of other federal grand jury reform proposals. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court in the Calandra case of the early 1970s, stated:

Permitting witnesses to invoke the exclusionary rule before a grand jury would precipitate adjudication of issues hitherto reserved for the trial on the merits and would delay and disrupt grand jury proceedings. Suppression hearings would halt the orderly progress of an investigation and might necessitate extended litigation of issues only tangentially related to the grand jury’s primary objective. The probable result would be “protracted interruption of grand jury proceedings,” effectively transforming them into preliminary trials on the merits. In some cases the delay might be fatal to the enforcement of criminal law.18

Fear of delay and of turning federal grand jury proceedings into a “preliminary trial” are both cited as reasons for not extending the exclusionary rule to grand jury proceedings.19

A third objection raised against counsel in the grand jury room is that it allows for the control of witnesses in corporate and organized crime cases, and high-level drug cases. The fear is that the subject of the investigation would control the selection of counsel for the witnesses, and that the witnesses’ testimony would be less forthcoming with such counsel in the grand jury room.


Response to Criticisms

We think the critics fail to adequately appreciate the positive practical experiences of states which have implemented a number of these same reforms. Particularly notable in this respect are Colorado and New York.

In Colorado, for example, if a Miranda-like warning is not given to a witness before testimony, the witness cannot be prosecuted as a result of any information presented to the state grand jury. The warning includes an advisory as to the right to counsel. Defense counsel are allowed in the grand jury, but can only act as advisors, as would be the case under our proposal. According to H. Jeffrey Bayles, a former Denver chief deputy district attorney, the presence of counsel has not disrupted or impeded the functions of the grand jury. In fact, the opposite has been true. He explains:

The presence of counsel has a definitely positive effect. Prosecutors who have worked under both the new and old laws strongly prefer the new. Not only does the new law speed the process by eliminating the walk outside the room on every question, but it also reduces the number of questions requiring conferences. The educational process, which of necessity accompanies having counsel in the grand jury room, promotes a better understanding of the grand jury within the bar. The more the processes are known, the less is the aura of mystery surrounding the grand jury. When the mystery leaves, so does much of the fear and distrust of the institution. The demand for abolition of the grand jury will decrease in direct proportion to the number of counsel who attend grand jury sessions with their clients.20

Experiences in other states where counsel is permitted in the grand jury room appear to have been similarly successful.21

The state grand jury in New York is also similar in many respects to the model we suggest. There, the rules of evidence for grand jury proceedings are virtually identical to those which govern trials. Targets have the right to testify on their own behalf and can recommend specific witnesses to the grand jury.22 Examination of reported decisions in New York, as well as the collective experience of Commission members from New York, reveals that procedures there have not led to the kind of inefficient mini-trials hypothesized by opponents of reform.

With respect to the claim that the proposal will allow control of witnesses in organized crime and drug cases, the case has not been made by critics of reform that state experiences have demonstrated that lawyers for witnesses have suborned perjury or obstructed the witness’s truthful and complete grand jury testimony.

The reform proposal of permitting counsel for witnesses in the grand jury room certainly should not be rejected on the basis of what is, at best, a speculative claim. Further, should any such obstructionism actually emerge in any case, our proposal has made provision for its prompt and forceful correction by the supervising court. Our proposal is plain that the federal court with jurisdiction over the relevant grand jury shall enjoy a specific congressionally-authorized power (that is, not the inherent judicial power rejected by the Williams Court) — to remove, or otherwise sanction, an obstructionist lawyer. See Recommended Reform Right One, supra.

To the extent that some critics express concern about witness counsel in the grand jury lending itself to increased breaches of secrecy by “house counsel” to a business or organized crime organization, this can also be addressed through the courts’ attorney removal and other sanctioning powers. Moreover, realistically, in-house counsel can get this information anyway, albeit perhaps aless-than-entirely-accurate rendition. This is true of the objection to allowing witnesses access to the transcripts of their testimony, as well. Any potential for these reforms to increase breaches of secrecy is not an appreciable risk. As Watergate prosecutor, now White House Counsel, Charles Ruff has well explained:

In the typical grand jury investigation into the activities of any hierarchically structured organization, a witness from the lower or middle levels represented by counsel hired by his superiors [the entity], will meet with the prosecutor and there will be some discussion both about his status and about the nature of his prospective testimony. If his lawyer advises him to assert his privilege against self-incrimination, and the prosecutor does not immunize him, it is difficult to see what added harm is created by permitting the witness’ lawyer to be in the grand jury room. If the witness is advised to testify without asserting his privilege, there is some risk that he will be less candid if his employer’s representative is present, but I question whether the risk is measurably greater than it is with the lawyer outside the grand jury room, since, if the witness’ testimony is helpful to the government, that fact will probably become evident to the lawyer in fairly short order. If the government decides to immunize the witness, it has already announced that it considers him a potential witness against his employer, and has laid a firm basis for the [judicial] disqualification of [house] counsel.23

Nor will our other proposed reforms disrupt the grand jury proceedings. Our proposals would not shift suppression and/or dismissal hearings back to the grand jury stage of proceedings. Rather, any suppression or dismissal motion would be made as one of several post-indictment, but pre-trial, matters.

The Supreme Court has not spoken against the policy changes we advocate. True, in the early 1970s, in United States v. Calandra, the Supreme Court ruled that the judicially created exclusionary rule does not apply in grand jury proceedings. However, neither Calandra nor any other Supreme Court decision regarding the courts’ limited inherent powers to address grand jury impropriety by prosecutors addresses the policy decision, exclusively reserved to Congress, as to the advisability of re-calibrated, statutory safeguards for the individual or business called before the modern federal grand jury.

Evidence illegally obtained by electronic surveillance is, in fact, specifically excluded by statute from use in the federal grand jury.24 In 1974, the Calandra Court felt it could confidently state that, “for the most part, a prosecutor would be unlikely to request an indictment where a conviction would not be obtained.”25 Today, however, in the wake of a recent explosion in the number of federal prosecutors — with the accompanying “problems of quality control” identified by conservative jurists like Richard Posner and Alex Kozinski, among many others — that sort of confidence is called into serious question.26 With approximately four times the number of federal prosecutors, exercising vastly expanded powers over the citizenry in investigation and prosecution of manifold more federal criminal offenses, this belief is highly debatable. At least now, sound policy dictates that there simply should be no basis for a prosecutor to even consider utilizing in the grand jury evidence he or she believes to be unlawfully obtained.

If the federal grand jury is to serve its historical function of being shield as well as sword, the integrity of the process must be maintained. The fact that the Supreme Court has decided it does not possess the inherent power to supervise the federal grand jury is no argument against legislation excluding unconstitutionally obtained evidence from the process. In order to actually effectuate this sound principle, the federal courts must be congressionally empowered to dismiss, with or without prejudice, an indictment obtained through the grand jury in violation of this basic rule.


Compelling Need for Federal Grand Jury Reform:
Now More Than Ever

The purpose of federal grand jury reform is to bring about changes in the institution so that it might again function as most feel it should — as an investigative arm of the government capable of combating crime, but also, simultaneously, a critical protector of citizens’ rights. Some, following certain court precedent, may object in the belief that the federal grand jury has never ceased to act as both a sword and shield. Some federal prosecutors may perceive such reforms as a threat to their ability to obtain indictments. But maintaining the status quo ignores the fundamental principles that are at the heart of our justice system in America.

Despite the increasingly compelling need for reform, the federal grand jury has remained largely unchanged. Two decades ago, at the urging of the American Bar Association and many others, Congress actively considered similar reform proposals. Numerous bills were introduced, detailed studies performed, and a multitude of testimony presented.27 Yet few changes resulted. Changes that did result — the recording of grand jury proceedings and issuance of prosecutorial guidelines — although helpful, have proved over the course of the intervening years to have very little impact on the core concerns that fueled the calls for modest reforms.

In the intervening decades, the number of federal prosecutors has exploded while effective controls against federal grand jury abuses have dwindled. The result has been an increase in prosecutorial excesses that has resulted in witness abuse and indictments that should never have been brought — destroying the lives, careers and businesses of innocent Americans. The need for federal grand jury reform, to safeguard the citizenry against such excess, has only gotten greater.

The federal grand jury is back in the spotlight. One can hardly open a newspaper or turn on the radio or television without hearing criticism or concerns about unfairness to citizens exposed to the grand jury process.28 Americans are troubled as their fellow citizens increasingly relate grueling and costly experiences as they emerge from testifying before a federal grand jury.

Rather than repeat the mistakes of the past, we need to learn from them. At the very least, if the case was not made in the 1970s for some basic federal grand jury reforms, we submit that recent experience has made the case for reform today. The modest measures recommended in this Report will help return the institution of the federal grand jury to its rightful place within our justice system — as a viable means for helping to ferret out criminal activity while also ensuring fairness to all individuals and businesses who come within its focus.



FEDERAL GRAND JURY
BILL OF RIGHTS



1. A witness before the grand jury who has not received immunity shall have the right to be accompanied by counsel in his or her appearance before the grand jury. Such counsel shall be allowed to be present in the grand jury room only during the questioning of the witness and shall be allowed to advise the witness. Such counsel shall not be permitted to address the grand jurors, stop the proceedings, object to questions, stop the witness from answering a question, nor otherwise take an active part in proceedings before the grand jury. The court shall have the power to remove from the grand jury room, or otherwise sanction counsel for conduct inconsistent with this principle.

Presently, a witness — including a target or subject of investigation — who appears before a federal grand jury is not entitled to counsel inside the grand jury room. The witness must request permission from the grand jury to consult outside the grand jury room with counsel. Nowhere else in the criminal justice process is a person who desires counsel denied the right to have counsel at his side as he is questioned.

Exclusion of counsel is unfair to the witness. A key aspect of our criminal justice system is the ability to consult with counsel. Significant legal risks confront the grand jury witness, such as the danger of self-incrimination, contempt or perjury. Also, privileges such as attorney-client privilege may inadvertently be waived. Often, the witness appears for hours. In the intimidating atmosphere of the grand jury, the witness may have difficulty remembering his attorney’s instructions and may be too frightened to request a halt in the proceedings so he can consult with counsel outside the grand jury room.

As the 1977 ABA Report on grand jury reform stated: “Requiring a witness who needs advice of counsel to consult his attorney outside the grand jury room door is awkward and prejudicial. It unnecessarily prolongs the grand jury proceeding and places the witness in an unfavorable light before the grand jurors.” Former Watergate Special Prosecutor (now White House Counsel) Charles Ruff testified before Congress in the 1970s to the same effect, in favor of the reform proposal: “Most prosecutors would admit that they count on the burden of leaving the room to dissuade the witness from asserting his right to counsel.”29

This reform will actually be less disruptive of grand jury proceedings than the current practice of stopping the proceedings so that the witness can leave the grand jury room. The proposal precludes counsel from addressing the grand jurors or participating in the proceedings. It simply provides that if the witness wishes to consult with her lawyer, she gets to speak with counsel before answering the question. This is eminently fair, and can help prevent injustice to the witness appearing before the federal grand jury without disrupting the proceedings.

2. No prosecutor shall knowingly fail to disclose to the federal grand jury evidence in the prosecutor’s possession which exonerates the target or subject of the offense. Such disclosure obligations shall not include an obligation to disclose matters that affect credibility such as prior inconsistent statements or Giglio materials.

The 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Williams established that the federal courts do not possess an inherent power to supervise the federal grand jury.30 Without congressional action, then, there is no effective judicial remedy for federal prosecutorial excesses in the grand jury process.

Because the grand jury operates virtually under total prosecutorial control, federal prosecutors can, and sometimes do, manipulate the proceedings. Fairness to the grand jury target — and respect for the grand jury’s independence — requires that the prosecution be required to present to the grand jury known evidence negating guilt.

To effectuate this proposal, Congress should pass legislation authorizing the court’s dismissal, with or without prejudice, of an indictment based upon the prosecutor’s violation of this principle. This way, the federal courts would be able to check and balance prosecutorial powers, to safeguard the citizenry and the legal system against prosecutorial excesses in the federal grand jury.

This reform will not disrupt the efficient operation of the grand jury process. It does not shift hearings back to the grand jury stage of proceedings. Rather, the defense motion to dismiss would be made, and addressed by a court, post-indictment (but still pre-trial), only.

3. The prosecutor shall not present to the federal grand jury evidence which he or she knows to be constitutionally inadmissible at trial because of a court ruling on the matter.

In United States v. Calandra, the Supreme Court ruled that the exclusionary rule did not apply in grand jury proceedings.31

Although evidence illegally obtained by electronic surveillance is specifically excluded by statute from use in the federal grand jury,32 under Calandra, virtually all other illegally seized evidence is admissible in the grand jury. Calandra observed that “for the most part, a prosecutor would be unlikely to request an indictment where a conviction would not be obtained.”33 But even if this debatable proposition is accepted, there should be no basis even for a prosecutor to consider utilizing in the grand jury evidence he or she knows to be unlawfully obtained.

If the federal grand jury is to serve its historical function of being shield as well as sword, the integrity of the process must be maintained. Since the Supreme Court has decided it does not possess the inherent power to supervise the federal grand jury, legislation excluding unconstitutionally obtained evidence from the process is necessary.

To effectuate this principle, the federal courts must be congressionally empowered to dismiss, with or without prejudice, an indictment obtained even in part by violation of this basic rule. Under this proposal, the court would not be able to dismiss if a violation is deemed to be harmless error — that is, if other, admissible evidence before the grand jury sustains the indictment.

This reform will not disrupt the grand jury process. Like Recommended Reform Right Two, it would not shift suppression and/or dismissal hearings back to the grand jury stage of proceedings. The suppression or dismissal motion would be made post-indictment (but still pre-trial), only.

4. A target or subject of a grand jury investigation shall have the right to testify before the grand jury. Prosecutors shall notify such targets or subjects of their opportunity to testify, unless notification may result in flight, endanger other persons or obstruct justice, or unless the prosecutor is unable to notify said persons with reasonable diligence. A target or subject of the grand jury may also submit to the court, to be made available to the foreperson, an offer, in writing, to provide information or evidence to the grand jury.

In its 1977 Report recommending this proposal, the ABA stated:

This principle is intended to insure that individuals are given the opportunity to testify on their own behalf prior to being indicted. This is an essential ingredient in a fairly functioning grand jury — and criminal justice — system. Without it, the grand jury’s essential function of arriving at an accurate indictment is undermined because the jurors may be denied certain evidence.

In fact, it is already the rule in New York that a defendant on notice of a state grand jury investigation has an absolute right to testify before the panel if he chooses and may also recommend specific witnesses to the grand jury.34

Drawing upon this New York model, our Recommended Reform Right Four proposes that a federal prosecutor be required to take all reasonable steps to notify a prospective defendant of his right to testify. The reasonableness touchstone of the proposal recognizes that, in some instances: (1) the prosecutor will truly be unable to locate such persons; or (2) notification may result in the person’s fleeing, endangering witnesses or other persons or obstructing justice. In these extraordinary instances, notification of the right to testify would not be required (as it would be unreasonable). This measure should also include a specific provision permitting judicial dismissal of an indictment, with or without prejudice, for a failure to comply which does not fall within the reasonableness exceptions of the reform.

The second part of the proposal — that a target or subject may make available to the foreperson, through the court, an offer in writing to offer information to the federal grand jury — also insures that the grand jury receives all the relevant information it needs to actually make an informed decision on an indictment. There is no requirement that the foreperson accept the proffered information. Rather, the foreperson is simply made aware of its existence and afforded the choice as to whether it is relevant and helpful to the work of the grand jurors.

Still, we well recognize that the foreperson could feel inhibited from accepting the proffered information or evidence by the prosecutor’s influence over the grand jury. Thus, a refusal to hear evidence proposed by the target or subject should provide the court grounds, in its sound discretion, to dismiss a resulting indictment with or without prejudice.35


5. Witnesses should have the right to receive a transcript of their federal grand jury testimony.

A number of well-reasoned opinions have held that a witness has a presumptive right to obtain a transcript of his own federal grand jury testimony.36 Notwithstanding this, federal courts still routinely deny motions by witness to obtain transcripts of their own grand jury testimony.

The reasons favoring such disclosure are strong. Notwithstanding federal prosecutors’ arguments that secrecy prohibits disclosure, Rule 6(e)(2), which deals with secrecy, does not preclude such disclosure. Indeed, a witness is free to tell the world what he has testified in the grand jury. Often, though, these oral renditions are inaccurate or untrustworthy, while a transcript would ensure accuracy.

At present, a federal grand jury witness must rely upon his memory or upon the lawyer’s debriefing notes of his earlier grand jury testimony if called again to the grand jury. Witnesses are often called for multiple grand jury appearances. To clarify ambiguity, avoid inadvertent inconsistencies and to protect against a perjury indictment, a witness should be entitled to his own grand jury testimony.

Federal prosecutors recognize the value of providing or reading to their trial witnesses a transcript of their grand jury testimony before trial. This long-standing practice serves the prosecutorial purpose of minimizing impeachment of the witness at trial and providing the opportunity to clarify ambiguity during trial preparations. If the prosecution’s witnesses enjoy such opportunity, how can it be argued that any witness should be denied a transcript of his grand jury testimony? Allowing witnesses called by the prosecutor at trial to review their own transcripts, while denying this right to any other witnesses recalled to the grand jury or called as a defense witness at trial, fosters a system of mere gamesmanship that denigrates the integrity of federal grand jury proceedings.37

In short, upon our collective analysis, as observed by one federal district court, we regard prosecutorial arguments against a witness’s right of access to his grand jury testimony to be no more than “a paranoid secrecy for the sake of secrecy itself.”38

6. The federal grand jury shall not name a person in an indictment as an unindicted co-conspirator to a criminal conspiracy. Nothing herein shall prevent the prosecutor from supplying such names in a bill of particulars.

In Briggs v. United States, the Fifth Circuit powerfully stated the case for prohibiting the naming of persons in an indictment as unindicted co-conspirators.39 Noting that a “grand jury indictment is a specific accusation of crime, having a threefold purpose: notice to the defendant, pleading in litigation, and the basis for the determination of acquittal or conviction,” the court stated that “none of those functions encompasses public accusations directed at persons not named as defendants.”40

As the ABA report stated in recommending this proposal, naming persons in an indictment as unindicted conspirators “stains the reputation of the person without providing any means for the person to show his innocence.” This damage is often incalculable. It is not only a public embarrassment and lasting private humiliation, but it frequently causes loss of employment and jeopardizes opportunity for election to public office. Explained the Briggs court:

[T]he grand jury that returns an indictment naming a person as an unindicted conspirator does not perform its shielding function but does exactly the reverse. If the charges are baseless, the named person should not be subjected to public branding, and if supported by probable cause, he should not be denied a forum.41

Answering critics of this reform, the second part of our proposal permits the federal prosecutor to disclose the names of unindicted co-conspirators in response to an appropriate request by defense counsel. This will afford prosecutors the opportunity, assuming evidentiary requirements are met, of introducing co-conspirator statements at trial. At the same time, it prevents the unfair branding of a citizen unindicted as well as the undue ambushing at trial of a citizen defendant.


7. All non- immunized subjects or targets called before a federal grand jury shall be given a Miranda warning by the prosecutor before being questioned.

Federal prosecutors routinely tell witnesses they are not “targets” to get them to answer questions without counsel before the grand jury, only later to indict them after they have helplessly incriminated themselves. This problem can be curbed by requiring the brief issuance of a Miranda-type warning to grand jury subjects or targets.

If one is called before the grand jury for more than one appearance, she should be given a fresh set of warnings before the start of questioning at each additional appearance. Waiver of the rights can be made quickly and orally, as long as they are transcribed or recorded as part of the grand jury proceedings. See also Recommended Reform Right Nine, infra.

Such a reform is only fair. Complex and important legal issues face any subject or target before the grand jury. This is especially daunting for the typical, lay subject or target. An appearance before the grand jury may subject an individual to the grave danger of self-incrimination. The subject or target may inadvertently lose his right to claim the privilege against self-incrimination by operation of the waiver doctrine.


8. All subpoenas for witnesses called before a federal grand jury shall be issued at least 72 hours before the date of appearance, not to include weekends and holidays, unless good cause is shown for an exemption.

This reform would prohibit the ambushing of witnesses by federal prosecutors who serve forthwith subpoenas at the 11th hour. All too frequently, there is no good reason for this lack of notice to the subject of the subpoena. The prosecutor is simply seeking to gain an undue advantage over the surprised, unprepared, and less likely to be counseled, witness. The proposal makes specific provision for the true emergency situation, in which at least 72 hours’ notice is not reasonably possible.


9. The federal grand jurors shall be given meaningful jury instructions, on the record, regarding their duties and powers as grand jurors, and the charges they are to consider. All instructions, recommendations and commentary to grand jurors by the prosecution shall be recorded and shall be made available to the accused after an indictment, during pre-trial discovery, and the court shall have discretion to dismiss an indictment, with or without prejudice, in the event of prosecutorial impropriety reflected in the transcript.

Grand jurors cannot exercise their historic powers of independence without meaningful jury instructions regarding their duties and powers as grand jurors, including the power to reject, as well as accept, the prosecutor’s request for charges. Grand jurors, additionally, are entitled to receive instructions regarding the elements of the charges they are to consider. All instructions, as well as any statements made to grand jurors by prosecutors regarding the charges or the persons who are being investigated, must be on the record, so that the court, upon a proper showing by the parties, is able to properly supervise the fairness and integrity of the grand jury process.42


10. No prosecutor shall call before the federal grand jury any subject or target who has stated personally or through his attorney that he intends to invoke the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination.

The federal prosecutor may, however, seek a grant of immunity or contest the right of the witness to assert the privilege against self-incrimination. In such a case, the prosecutor shall file under seal any motion to compel the testimony of a witness who has indicated his refusal to testify in reliance upon his privilege against self-incrimination and any witness may file under seal any motion relating to or seeking to exercise or protect his right to refuse to testify. All proceedings held on such motions filed under seal shall be conducted in camera unless the witness requests a public hearing.

The only purpose for calling before the grand jury a witness who has indicated that he intends to invoke his right against self-incrimination is to harass or intimidate the witness, unless the prosecutor has obtained a grant of immunity.

This principle is reflected in part in the ABA Standards relating to prosecution function, Standard 3-3.6 which reads as follows:

(e) the prosecutor should not compel the appearance of a witness before the grand jury whose activities are the subject of the inquiry if the witness states in advance that, if called, he or she will exercise the constitutional privilege not to testify, unless the prosecutor intends to seek a grant of immunity according to law.
This principle also appears in amendments to the U.S. Attorneys Manual adopted by the Department of Justice in December 1977, which directs: “if a written communication from a target, signed by him and his attorney, states that they will assert the Fifth Amendment, the witness should generally be excused from testifying unless there are reasons which strongly compel his personal assertion of that right before the grand jury.”

We do not believe the Department’s position that only targets should be excused provides sufficient protection against abuse and urge that, except in the circumstances identified, no witness who asserts in writing that she or he intends to take the Fifth Amendment should be compelled to do so before the federal grand jury.

Reported This 18th Day of May, 2000
by the Commission to Reform the Federal Grand Jury

____

23 Grand Choose

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_jury

Grand jury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In the common law, a grand jury is a type of jury that determines whether there is enough evidence for a trial. Grand juries carry out this duty by examining evidence presented to them by a prosecutor and issuing indictments, or by investigating alleged crimes and issuing presentments. A grand jury is traditionally larger than and distinguishable from a petit jury, which is used during a trial.

History

The first instance of a grand jury can be traced back to the Assize of Clarendon, an 1166 act of Henry II of England.[1] In fact, Henry's chief contribution to the development of the English monarchy was to increase the jurisdiction of the royal courts at the expense of the feudal courts. Itinerant justices on regular circuits were sent out once each year to enforce the "King's Peace." 

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004)

 

To make this system of royal criminal justice more effective, Henry employed the method of inquest used by William the Conqueror in the Domesday Book. In each shire a body of important men was sworn (jure) to report to the sheriff all crimes committed since the last session of the circuit court. Thus originated the modern grand jury that presents information for an indictment.[2] The grand jury was later recognized by King John in the Magna Carta in 1215 on demand of the nobility.[3]

In the early decades of the United States grand juries played a major role in public matters. During that period counties followed the traditional practice of requiring all decisions be made by at least 12 of the grand jurors, so that for a size of 23 a bare majority would be 12. Any citizen could bring a matter before it directly, from a public work that needed repair, to a delinquent official, to a complaint of a crime, and they could conduct their own investigations. In that era most criminal prosecutions were conducted by private parties, either a law enforcement officer, a lawyer hired by a crime victim or his family, or even by laymen, who could bring a bill of indictment to the grand jury, and if the grand jury found there was sufficient evidence for a trial, that the act was a crime under law, and that the court had jurisdiction, then by returning the indictment to the complainant, it appointed him to exercise the authority of an attorney general, that is, one having a general power of attorney to represent the state in the case. The grand jury served to screen out incompetent or malicious prosecutions.[4] The advent of official public prosecutors in the later decades of the 19th century largely displaced private prosecutions, but also led to their capturing grand juries and using them in ways for which they were not originally intended.[5]

Libertarian and president of the Constitution Society Jon Roland has argued that most grand juries as they are set up and used today are unconstitutional, and that there should be a return to grand jury practices closer to those that prevailed during the founding era. This would mean grand juries of 23 unpaid citizens each serving no more than 3,000 people, open to having anyone bring any matter before them, with no preferential treatment of public prosecutors, and deciding every question by a vote of at least 12.[13] Professor Kevin K. Washburn has made a somewhat similar claim, arguing that grand juries that are drawn from actual communities would better fulfill the promise of representing "the community" in criminal justice and serve as more weighty and cohesive counterparts to expert prosecutors.[14]

Cato Institute writers argued that grand juries as conducted today are unjust as the defendant is not represented by counsel and/or does not have the right to call witnesses. Intended to serve as a check on prosecutors, the opportunity it presents them to compel testimony can in fact prove useful in building up the case they will present at the final trial.[15]

So even if innocent they must pay excessive fees to attorn-ies of the king to fight the accusations of the "Prosecutor"

Many jurisdictions in the United States have replaced the formality of a grand jury with a procedure in which the prosecutor can issue charges by filing an information (also known as an accusation), which is followed by a preliminary hearing before a judge at which both the defendant and his or her counsel are present. New York has amended procedures governing the formation of grand juries so that grand jurors are no longer required to have previous jury experience.

Contrary to what some might expect, in some jurisdictions grand jurors are selected to serve by the local prosecutor, rather than by random selection from the community. Many who serve have done so many times and have a proven "record" to indict. No state has a provision to limit the number of grand juries a prosecutor can form to finally get the indictment he wants. If the first one doesn't indict he can form another. Sol Wachtler, the former Chief Judge of New York State, observed that a prosecutor could persuade a grand jury to "indict a ham sandwich."[16], later stating that "the remark was not intended to amuse." [17] This issue was identified nationally when a Texas prosecutor, Ronnie Earle, organized three grand juries before he could get an indictment on Congressman Tom Delay. The issue is mitigated by the fact that each subsequent grand jury may be called to view additional evidence, and not to merely revisit evidence that was already presented; but in the Earle/DeLay case, the third grand jury handed down its indictment less than a week after the second grand jury handed down a "no bill" decision.

In his two page Op/Ed in the Houston Chronicle, Joseph Gutheinz, a Texas attorney, former Harris County grand jury member and a member of the Republican National Lawyers Association went against members of his own party by condemning the way grand juries are selected in Harris County, Texas. He said that "Harris County grand juries are too white and too conservative." Gutheinz called the "Harris County grand jury...a throwback to our segregated past." Gutheinz said that the problem with the Harris County grand jury is that it is largely drawn from a pool of volunteers, and that Commissioners picked by the Republican judges get to pick what individuals ultimately get to serve on grand juries, and then the judges pick the grand jury foremen from that list.[18][19][20]

The Constitutionality of contemporary grand jury practices has been brought before the Supreme Court six times in history; however, the court has yet to allow a case to be heard.

In all U.S. jurisdictions retaining the grand jury, a potential defendant has the right under the Fifth Amendment not to give self-incriminating testimony. However, the prosecutor can call a potential defendant to testify, which may require that person to then assert his or her Fifth Amendment right. In New York and some other states, a witness testifying about crimes he has committed is immune to prosecution for those crimes, unless he previously waives immunity.

_______

And every city will have their Sanhedrin of 23 Grand Choose

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanhedrin

Sanhedrin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

J
The Sanhedrin, from an 1883 encyclopedia

The Sanhedrin (Hebrew: סַנְהֶדְרִין‎; Greek: συνέδριον,[1] synedrion, "sitting together," hence "assembly" or "council") was an assembly of twenty-three judges appointed in every city in the Land of Israel.[2]

USA is Jewrisdiction of Itsreallyhell via HJR 104, PL 102-14

The Talmud (Sanhedrin 37a) states: GEMARA. Whence is this derived? — R. Aha Haninah said: Scripture states, Thy navel is like a round goblet [‘aggan ha-Sahar] wherein no mingled wine is wanting.8 ‘Thy navel’ — that is the Sanhedrin. Why was it called ‘navel’? — Because it sat at the navel-point9 of the world. [Why] ‘aggan?10 — Because it protects [meggin] the whole world. [Why] ha-Sahar? — Because it was moon-shaped.11 [Why] in which no mingled wine is wanting? — I.e., if one of them had to leave, it had to be ascertained if twenty-three, corresponding to the number of the minor Sanhedrin, were left,12 in which case he might go out; if not, he might not depart.

Thy belly is like a heap of wheat:13 Just as all benefit from a heap of wheat, so do all benefit from the deliberations of the Sanhedrin.

(8) Cant. VII, 3. (9) I.e., the centre. According to Midrashic legend the Temple was situated in the centre of the world. Cf. Tanhuma, Wayikra. XVIII,23. (10) idt akin to idn — ‘to enclose’. Hence,shield, protect. (11) rvx=moon.I.e., they were seated in circular form like a moon. (12) The actual number required for capital cases (Federal)  is twenty-three, roughly a third of seventy-one, the remaining two-thirds being for completion purposes. The Aggadists therefore compare the court to mingled wine, a mixture of one-third of wine and two-thirds of water. Cf. B M. 60a; Tanhuma. Bamidbar IV. (13) Cant. VII ,3.

Rv:14:8: And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.


The Great Sanhedrin was the supreme court of ancient Israel. In total there were 71 members. The Great Sanhedrin was made up of a Chief/Prince/Leader called Nasi 

NAZI

(at some times this position may have been held by the Kohen Gadol or the High Priest),

It was a Cohen who slew the Palestinians recently ......."Teitle"

 a vice chief justice (Av Beit Din), and sixty-nine general members.[3] In the Second Temple period, the Great Sanhedrin met in the Hall of Hewn Stones in the Temple in Jerusalem

Secret Chamber

Mt:24:26: Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.

The court convened every day except festivals and Shabbat. In the late 3rd century, to avoid persecution, its authoritative decisions were issued under the name of Beth HaMidrash.

The last binding decision of the Sanhedrin was in 358, when the Hebrew Calendar was adopted. The Sanhedrin was dissolved after continued persecution by the Roman Empire. Over the centuries, there have been attempts to revive the institution, such as the Grand Sanhedrin convened by Napoleon Bonaparte.

The Sanhedrin is mentioned in the Gospels in relation to the Sanhedrin Trial of Jesus.

The Sanhedrin was revived at Tiberias October 13, 2004, see the revelation of Jesus Chapter 13

Great and Lesser Sanhedrin

The Talmud (tractate Sanhedrin) identifies two classes of rabbinical courts called Sanhedrin, a Great Sanhedrin and a Lesser Sanhedrin. Each city could have its own lesser Sanhedrin of 23 judges, (Grand Jewry) but there could be only one Great Sanhedrin of 71 (in where), which among other roles acted as a sort of Supreme Court, taking appeals from cases decided by lesser courts.

and they intend to bring you before their Shame-A-Gogs and councils to afflict you and slay you for Jesus name sake

Mat. 10:16: Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.
17: But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues;
18: And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles.
19: But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.
20: For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you.
21: And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.
22: And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

________

Toben Defies anti-Christ Choose Sin-Hedrin

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/11/19/1009296/holocaust-denier-says-unbroken-after-prisonHolocaust denier says he’s ‘unbroken’ after prison

SYDNEY, Australia (JTA) -- A Holocaust denier released from an Australian jail after publishing material offensive to Jews says he is "unbroken" and "unrepentant."

Dr. Fredrick Toben, the founder of the Adelaide Institute, emerged from three months in a South Australia prison on Nov. 12.

The Federal Court had found him in breach of a 2002 court order to remove all offensive material from his institute’s Web site.

Toben's site this week carried a message saying that he is “unbroken and unrepentant,” and appears “refreshed and relaxed” after his “little holiday.”

The site features three links to video clips on YouTube during which Toben, 65, vows to continue his work “demolishing the Holocaust.” It also carries a banner saying that “The days are numbered for the greatest lie in the history of mankind.”

Toben also spent two months in Wandsworth Prison last year as German authorities tried unsuccessfully to extradite him on a European Arrest Warrant for publishing Holocaust denial material -- a crime in Germany. Toben was arrested at Heathrow Airport on his way to Dubai from America.

He had spent several months in prison in Germany in 1999 for denying the Holocaust.

_______

The Chooish Race? a Massah Race for the Telly Tubby Noahide Televangelist and their Noahide anti-Christ?

let us break the myth and fables of the Choose by the word direct from the choose

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:QiK1axFQW9cJ:www.jewfaq.org/judaism.htm+are+Jews+a+race&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

What Is Judaism?

 

• Judaism has been described as a religion, a race, a culture, and a nation
• All of these descriptions have some validity
• The Jewish people are best described as an extended family

What is Judaism? What does it mean to be a Jew? Most people, both Jewish and gentile, would instinctively say that Judaism is a religion.

An anti-Christ Religion of the WORLD

 And yet, there are militant atheists who insist that they are Jews! Is Judaism a race? If you were to say so, most Jews would think you were an antisemite! So what is Judaism?

all are anti-Jesus Christ

Is Judaism a Religion?

Clearly, there is a religion called Judaism, a set of ideas about the world and the way we should live our lives that is called "Judaism." It is studied in Religious Studies courses and taught to Jewish children in Hebrew schools. See What do Jews Believe? for details. There is a lot of flexibility about certain aspects of those beliefs, and a lot of disagreement about specifics, but that flexibility is built into the organized system of belief that is Judaism.

However, many people who call themselves Jews do not believe in that religion at all! More than half of all Jews in Israel today call themselves "secular," and don't believe in G-d or any of the religious beliefs of Judaism. 

For their are two whore of one MOTHER MYSTERY BABYLON HARLOT OF THE EARTH, Aholibah secular and her whore sister of Dan Aholah of the Hasidic Chabad Lubavitchers of Sin Hedrin of the Dragon

Half of all Jews in the United States don't belong to any synagogue. They may practice some of the rituals of Judaism and celebrate some of the holidays, but they don't think of these actions as religious activities.

Because none of the rites of Talmudic Choosery has anything at all to do with the Creator, Christ Jesus the LORD GOD

The most traditional Jews and the most liberal Jews and everyone in between would agree that these secular people are still Jews, regardless of their disbelief. See Who is a Jew? Clearly, then, there is more to being Jewish than just a religion.

Are Jews a Race?

In the 1980s, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Jews are a race, at least for purposes of certain anti-discrimination laws. Their reasoning: at the time these laws were passed, people routinely spoke of the "Jewish race" or the "Italian race" as well as the "Negro race," so that is what the legislators intended to protect.

But many Jews were deeply offended by that decision, offended by any hint that Jews could be considered a race. The idea of Jews as a race brings to mind nightmarish visions of Nazi Germany, where Jews were declared to be not just a race, but an inferior race that had to be rounded up into ghettos and exterminated like vermin.

But now they are called the Master Race by their proselytes of hell, the anti-Christ Noahides of the Nasi of Sin-Hedrin

But setting aside the emotional issues, Jews are clearly not a race.

Race is a genetic distinction, and refers to people with shared ancestry and shared genetic traits. You can't change your race; it's in your DNA. I could never become black or Asian no matter how much I might want to.

Common ancestry is not required to be a Jew.

Even as any Human can be a Christian and faith in LIFE, any can be a Choose and have a covenant with death

Isaiah 28:15: Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16: Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17: Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18: And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.

 Many Jews worldwide share common ancestry, as shown by genetic research; however, you can be a Jew without sharing this common ancestry, for example, by converting. Thus, although I could never become black or Asian, blacks and Asians have become Jews (Sammy Davis Jr. and Connie Chung).

Is It a Culture or Ethnic Group?

Most secular American Jews think of their Jewishness as a matter of culture or ethnicity

Because of all the benefits they derive from the lies and fables they have woven

When they think of Jewish culture, they think of the food, of the Yiddish (Babble) language, of some limited holiday observances, and of cultural values like the emphasis on education.

Those secular American Jews would probably be surprised to learn that much of what they think of as Jewish culture is really just Ashkenazic Jewish culture, the culture of Jews whose ancestors come from one part of the world. 

DAN Aholah

Jews have lived in many parts of the world and have developed many different traditions. As a Sephardic friend likes to remind me, Yiddish is not part of his culture, nor are bagels and lox, chopped liver, latkes, gefilte fish or matzah ball soup. His idea of Jewish cooking includes bourekas, phyllo dough pastries filled with cheese or spinach. His ancestors probably wouldn't know what to do with a dreidel.

There are certainly cultural traits and behaviors that are shared by many Jews, that make us feel more comfortable with other Jews. Jews in many parts of the world share many of those cultural aspects. However, that culture is not shared by all Jews all over the world, and people who do not share that culture are no less Jews because of it. Thus, Judaism must be something more than a culture or an ethnic group.

Talmudic wannabe "Religion" unto SATAN

Are the Jews a Nation?

The traditional explanation, and the one given in the Torah, (Talmud of Babylon Harlot Mother of the earth) is that the Jews are a nation. (Which rejected the GOD of Heaven by their Babylonian Tradition) The Hebrew word, believe it or not, is "goy." The Torah and the rabbis used this term not in the modern sense meaning a territorial and political entity, but in the ancient sense meaning a group of people with a common history, a common destiny, and a sense that we are all connected to each other.

One nation under the Dragon of their flesh

Unfortunately, in modern times, the term "nation" has become too contaminated by ugly, jingoistic notions of a country obsessed with its own superiority and bent on world domination. Because of this notion of "nationhood," Jews are often falsely accused of being disloyal to their own country in favor of their loyalty to the Jewish "nation," of being more loyal to Israel than to their home country. (indeed) Some have gone so far as to use this distorted interpretation of "nationhood" to prove that Jews do, or seek to, control the world.(Here are the facts at Noahide News in their own words....millions of words at that)  In fact, a surprising number of antisemitic websites (Those who are not "anti-Christ")  and newsgroup postings linked to this page (in an earlier form) as proof of their antisemitic delusions that Jews are nationalistic, that Israel is a colonial power and so forth.

Because of the inaccurate connotations that have attached themselves to the term "nation," the term can no longer be used to accurately describe the Jewish people.

The Jewish People are a Family

interbred and perverted and a family of Cain

It is clear from the discussion above that there is a certain amount of truth in the claims that it is a religion, a race, or an ethnic group, none of these descriptions is entirely adequate to describe what connects Jews to other Jews. And yet, almost all Jews feel a sense of connectedness to each other that many find hard to explain, define, or even understand. Traditionally, this interconnectedness was understood as "nationhood" or "peoplehood," but those terms have become so distorted over time that they are no longer accurate.

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz (Nasi of Sin-Hedrin and the One World Odor of anti-Christ) has suggested a better analogy for the Jewish people: We are a family. See the third essay in his recent book, We Jews: Who Are We and What Should We Do. But though this is a new book, it is certainly not a new concept: throughout the Bible (Babble)  and Jewish literature, the Jewish people are referred to as "the Children of Israel," 

Not the children of spiritual Israel through Faith in Jesus Christ, the seed of Abraham who believed by faith, but the flesh seed of a flesh wannabe Kingdom that they thought to inherit when they Crucified the SON of the KING

a reference to the fact that we are all the physical or spiritual descendants of the Patriarch Jacob, who was later called Israel. In other words, we are part of his extended family.

The Covenant of Christ was through Isaac

Like a family, we don't always agree with each other. We often argue and criticize each other. We hold each other to the very highest standards, knowing that the shortcomings of any member of the family will be held against all of us. But when someone outside of the family unfairly criticizes a family member or the family as a whole, we are quick to join together in opposition to that unfair criticism.

The Devil cries out while he enslaves and beats mankind

When members of our "family" suffer or are persecuted, we all feel their pain. For example, in the 1980s, when Africa was suffering from droughts and famines, many Jews around the world learned for the first time about the Beta Israel, the Jews of Ethiopia. Their religion, race and culture are quite different from ours, and we had not even known that they existed before the famine. And yet, our hearts went out to them as our fellow Jews during this period of famine, like distant cousins we had never met, and Jews from around the world helped them to emigrate to Israel.

When a member of our "family" does something illegal, immoral or shameful, we all feel the shame, and we all feel that it reflects on us. As Jews, many of us were embarrassed by the scandals of Monica Lewinsky, Jack Abramoff and Bernie Madoff, because they are Jews and their actions reflect on us all, even though we disapprove. The Madoff scandal was all the more embarassing, because so many of his victims were Jews and Jewish charities: a Jew robbing from our own "family"! (Noooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!, why Choose are only supposed to Rob the "Goyims") We were shocked when Israeli Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin was killed by a Jew, unable to believe that one Jew would ever kill another member of the "family."

Dan Aholah

And when a member of our "family" accomplishes something significant, we all feel proud. A perfect example of Jews (even completely secular ones) delighting in the accomplishments of our fellow Jews is the perennial popularity of Adam Sandler's Chanukkah songs, listing famous people who are Jewish. We all take pride in scientists like Albert Einstein or political leaders like Joe Lieberman (we don't all agree with his politics or his religious views, but we were all proud to see him on a national ticket). And is there a Jew who doesn't know (or at least feel pride upon learning) that Sandy Koufax declined to pitch in a World Series game that fell on Yom Kippur?

You to can become choose, all you need do is DENY Jesus is Christ

______

They admit they come from the family who slew the Prophets of God and Christ the Saviour, for their father is the Murderer from the beginning and the lust of their father they do

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/498027/jewish/Are-Jews-a-Race.htm

Are Jews a "Race"?



While the Jewish people began with the descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, many people have converted to become Jews over the millennia--beginning with the "mixed multitude" that came with us out of Egypt. Today there are African Jews, Japanese Jews, even Eskimo Jews. It seems difficult to call such a mixture a "race".

Esth:8:17: And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.

(Incidently, there is really no such thing as a "race." The term "race" implies to most people that there are different categories of human beings based on their genetic makeup. The fact is that there is no basis in genetics for these distinctions. For example, an African from one family may have more in common genetically with a Swede than with another African.)

What could be said is that we are a "family". A family can adopt others as their own. But there are conditions to adoption. You need to keep the family rules. In our case, those rules have to do with the mission we were given at Mount Sinai over 3300 years ago.

Where their g-d wannabe of the Golden Calf, in the Valley of Sin, threatened them with dropping a mountain on their heads if they did not serve Babylon that Talmudic Mother Harlot of the earth

________

The Choose, who was Chosen for Salvation, But when the CHOOSER came, they ALL cried out Crucify him and let his blood be on our Satan worshipping Hands of Our Father the MURDERER and we instead Choose the ROBBER

The Choose

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_old_is_the_Jewish_race

The term Jews was derived from residents of Judah. The nation of Israel as a whole were considered Israelites or Hebrews. The term Hebrew is derived from the region that Abraham and Sarah settled in after moving from Ur. The word "Hebrew" is related to the word "Other side of", as in the "other side of the Jordan River". Many scholars believe this to be the origin for the term, although other theories have been defended. The term "Jew" or Jewish is just another term for the Judean people of ancient and present day.
The Jews were Jewish by providential birth and Israelite by nationality. Ex.

Abraham ( 2052 BCE ) Hebrew
Isaac (1952 BCE )
Jacob / Israel ( 1892 BCE ) Israelites
Judah (Son of Israel) Judeans

So, approximately 3900 years.

Mandate of Israel:


Actually, they may be older than 3900 years. If Avraham came from the city of UR( NI-IB-RU), then he was a Sumerian. The Jews then are the only surviving remnants of the great Sumerian civilization. (Babylon)  They are are the modern day Sumerians. Ni ib ru is translated into Akkadian as Nibiru, the crossing place. Avraham was a direct descendant of Shem, whose descendants resided and founded the Shumerian civilization.

5: And Aholah played the harlot when she was mine; and she doted on her lovers, on the Assyrians her neighbours,

Shem= shame

There is no such thing as a Jewish race. The word Jew is derived from a religion called Judaism. A Jew is someone who follows the teachings of Judaism, which is no different to a Christian who follows the teachings of Christ. Just as any race or nation of people can become Christians, so too can any race or nation of people become Jews.
As for the age of the Judaism... according to Wikipedia "Judaism can claim a historical continuity spanning close to three millenia." Bearing in mind that this is just a claim, there is a possibility that Judaism may not be as ancient as three thousand years. 

After Christ was crucified is when Talmud was put to pen and ink, their tradition which Makes the WORD of God of none effect unto them who are anti-Christ

Judaism has no link to the fourth son of Yacob, as claimed by Jewish historians. Yacob's fourth son was called Hodaviah, not Judah (Ezra 3:9). There is no letter "J" in the Hebrew alphabet therefore the word Jew did not exist in the days of the Abraham, Isaac, Yacob, Moses, David, Solomon, Daniel etc. God's people were called Israelites, not Jews.

God's people are the seed of Abraham according to Faith in Christ the Chooser. Gal 3:

______

The Lust of their father, the head Nasi

Do ah heah aeeeean ameeeean brutha's aeean sistah's....Keel em all in ah ha theyah nameah of Jaysssssssoooooooooooose

http://uruknet.info/index.php?p=m60265&hd=&size=1&l=e

Palestinian Ministry of Prisoners' affairs: Israeli army kidnapped 6200 children since 2000
Official Report

IMEMC

 

19-300_0___20_0_0_0_0_0_childprisoner.jpg

 

IMEMC , November 20, 2009

An official report, received by Arab League from the minister of prisoners' affairs in the Palestinian Authority (Ramallah), revealed that the Israeli occupation forces have kidnapped about 6,200 Palestinian children since the beginning of Al Aqsa Intifada (2000), including approximately 337 children still detained in Israeli prisons and interrogation centers.

During last Saturday's meeting of the Arab League's permanent delegates council, which was set to discuss the conditions of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, Minister Issa Qaraqe introduced the report, which unveiled the "repressive, inhumane practices of the Israeli occupation authorities against Palestinian children in Israeli prisons and detention camps," stressing that this violates the rules of international law, conventions on children's rights, and all international norms.

The report pointed out that "any person under the age of 18 is considered a child, according to international law, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and, recently, Israeli domestic law," and according to the definition of juvenile by the United Nations' Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners, which were adopted in the General Assembly Resolution 45/113, dated December 14, 1990.

Itsreallyhell could care less about UN resolutions unless of course they benefit the Choose

Qaraqe stated that the Israeli occupation authorities "deprive detained children from the basic rights granted by international conventions, such as the right to know the reason for their arrest, the right to counsel, the right of families to know the reason and the place of detention of their child, the right to appear before the judge, the right to object to the charge and lodge an appeal against it, the right to communicate with the outside world, and the right to a humane treatment that preserves the dignity of the detained child."

The report warned that the occupation authorities, "blatantly violated the rights of detained children"; dealt with them as "potential subversives", "and subjected them to different types of torture and cruel treatment, such as beating, sleep deprivation, starvation, sexual harassment, and deprivation of visits. The occupation forced applied the worst mental and physical means to extract confessions from child prisoners and to pressure them to work for Israeli intelligence."

But remember the Proper way to Kill the NON Jews and their babies Noahide News 917

The report also mentioned that during the first Intifada, massive numbers of children were arrested and detained on charges of throwing stones and other forms of political resistance, whereas, during the second intifada, Tel Aviv began adopting administrative detention against Palestinian children and it started convicting and detaining children under the age of 14 for periods of up to 6 months.

The report further stated that, according to the 2002 annual report of the Defense of Children International organization, those arrest patterns did not exist during the years of the first intifada

In ah ha name of Judeo Jayssssssssooooooooose, give me aeeean ameeeeeeeeeean !

______

Talmudic anti-Christ Justification of the Beast raised from the seas

The Revelation of Jesus sent by his angel unto John who was exiled at Patmos

1: And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

 

THE VILNA GA'ON (ibid.) supports Rashi's interpretation. He explains that when Sanhedrin sat, ten (of the most important members) sat in the middle of the group, and they were surrounded by the other sixty. These are the "sixty mighty men *around* the bed of Shlomo. (The ten in the middle correspond to the seven "Ro'ei Pnei ha'Melech" and three "Shomrei ha'Saf," who are closest to the king, in a king's court -- and in the king of king's court -- see Megilah 23a. The verse in II Melachem 25:19, which associates these authoritative members of the king's court with sixty other men, is discussing the members of the Sanhedrin.

 


2: And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

Germany/France Socialism , Russia/China Communism, Britain/USA Capitalism merged into the fourth beast


3: And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

One of Sanhedrin members? Not Arik Sharon ?


4: And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

http://www.jewishpress.com/page.do/17929/The_Sanhedrin_Reestablished_%28Part_I%29.html

The Sanhedrin Reestablished (Part I)
The Sanhedrin Reestablished (Part I)  , Dov Gilor

 

I recently had the pleasure of sitting in on a meeting of the "Lishka" of the renewed Sanhedrin in Israel. I was introduced to the existence of this weekly meeting by my son's father-in-law, Rabbi Dr. Elihu Schatz, who is a member of the Sanhedrin, and I received permission to attend from the main initiator of the process, who has worked tirelessly on this project, the secretary of the Sanhedrin executive - Rabbi Dov Stein. I was very curious to understand how, why and who had the authority to set up a Sanhedrin in our day.4:

 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast:

 

 
I had always understood that the Sanhedrin would be made up of the greatest Torah (Talmud Bavli anti-Christ)  scholars of the generation and I was surprised that I was not familiar with most of the names mentioned. I learned that like every "innovation" in Jewish life, there were many aspects and complications in creating the reconstituted Sanhedrin in our time. Ours is a time when every suggestion of "change" draws aggressive militant criticism to such a degree that many rabbis, even the most pious, recognized and revered rabbis of our generation, seem afraid to solve, within the framework of Torah, some very serious problems facing Judaism today.

The Torah foundation (Talmud) upon which the Sanhedrin of today is based is the command that every Jewish (and non-Jewish) community must set up a legal system. (anti-Christ Noahide Laws) To set up a Sanhedrin requires a very special rabbinical ordination of its members. This ordination, ideally, should have been the ordination passed down from Moshe Rabbenu. Unfortunately, this direct line of ordination was lost some 1,500 years ago, when Roman pogroms and persecutions led to the demise of the last Sanhedrin.

When God the Father destroyed their abominable worship

In Hilchot Sanhedrin Rambam (Maimonides) (Chief Prince of Satan) set out the principles of how to reestablish this special ordination. The rabbis of Israel must agree to grant ordination to one person. Once this person is ordained, he can ordain others. The recent three Orthodox attempts to reestablish this special ordination (1830, 1901, 1949) were met with very stiff rabbinical opposition; the ordination chains were quickly broken and no Sanhedrin was formed. What the fate of the current Sanhedrin, still in its infancy, will be, is open to question.

The attempt in 1538, for example, began in Safed, when 25 rabbis met and ordained Rabbi Yaakov Beirav. Rabbi Beirav ordained the chief rabbi of Jerusalem (The Maharalback), Rabbi Yosef Caro (author of the Shulchan Aruch), Rabbi Moshe Trani and Rabbi Yosef Sagis. Rabbi Caro later ordained Rabbi Moshe Alschech, and Rabbi Alschech ordained Rabbi Chaim Vital. Strife with the rabbi of Jerusalem and opposition soon hampered the project. It lasted four generations, but the persecutions of the Turkish Empire doomed the project. Those who received ordination were taken hostage and the community was forced to pay ransom. Eventually, the rabbis were forced to flee Israel, and the chain was broken.

The need for a Sanhedrin to unify halacha and the Jewish people is not questioned. What is questioned is who has the fortitude to start the process and how vocal the Orthodox rabbinical opposition will be.

It is of the Orthodox Chabad of Dan Aholah

To avoid claims that not all the rabbis of Israel were aware of the latest attempt to set up the Sanhedrin, 50,000 copies of a detailed flyer were distributed to 4,500 communities in Israel. Seven hundred leading rabbis were contacted personally or by mail. Rabbi Moshe Halberstam, who just recently passed away, was chosen to be ordained after he received approval from Israel's leading rabbis and when no objections were received from the hundreds of rabbis consulted via the mails. He was a senior dayan in the Eida Haredit court, the president of Hatzala Israel, and the rosh kolel of the Galicia Kolel in Jerusalem,

Leading rabbis, including Rabbi Shalom Elyashiv, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Rabbi Zalman Nechemia Goldberg and many others gave their blessing but did not join the Sanhedrin. The son of Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu is one of the rabbis ordained. Rabbi Avraham Shapiro abstained on the issue but also refused to discourage it. Rabbi Tzvi Eidan, the author of Asot Mishpat (which describes how it is possible to reestablish the Sanhedrin) was appointed as the interim president until an election is held. The elected nasi, or president, of the Sanhedrin is Rabbi Adin Steinzaltz, a noted Talmudic scholar and a well-known Jewish philosopher.

The Sanhedrin Reestablished (Part II)

Part I of this article discussed the background and early days of the new Sanhedrin. The chain of ordination began in 2004 with the ordination of Rabbi Moshe Halberstam, who ordained Rabbi Dov Levanoni, who passed it down to the other rabbis. A Sanhedrin of 71 rabbis convened in Tiberius on the 10th of Shevat, 5765 (Jan. 20, 2005). This is just the second time in 1,600 years that this unique event has occurred.

the Sanhedrin was revived out of the seas October 13, 2004

The Sanhedrin includes rabbis from diverse backgrounds: Charedi, religious-Zionist, Sephardic, Ashkenazic, Chassidic, Lithuanian, and others. The ordination of these rabbis is part of the process to reestablish the Sanhedrin, but they will not necessarily be the final members. Each of the rabbis currently sitting on the Sanhedrin pledged that he has assumed his seat on condition that he will relinquish it to anyone greater in Torah who wishes to join. It is hoped that the release of several of the names of those involved in the Sanhedrin will encourage those who believe that their own rabbis or teachers are qualified to be part of this endeavor to recommend that their rabbi be included in the Sanhedrin. Those interested in becoming involved with the Sanhedrin should contact the Sanhedrin secretariat.

The new Sanhedrin has at least the authority of a regular bet din, if not more. Among the many topics the Sanhedrin intends to address are: the bridging of the divisions between various communities of Jewish exiles who have returned to Israel; the establishment of authentic techelet, the blue thread that is part of tzizit; the definition of the measurement of the ammah (the biblical cubit) and the determination of the exact point of human death, so as to deal with the Jewish ethics of transplants. The Sanhedrin will also establish a forum of architects and engineers to begin plans for rebuilding the Temple.

The 71 rabbis, who are members of the Sanhedrin are Torah scholars, and many are experts in secular and scientific fields. The 71 rabbis elected a seven-member leadership council that meets once a week in Jerusalem to prepare for the Sanhedrin meetings and represent the institution in dealings with the public.

(The ten in the middle correspond to the seven "Ro'ei Pnei ha'Melech" and three "Shomrei ha'Saf," who are closest to the king, in a king's court -- and in the king of king's court -- see Megilah 23a. The verse in II Melachem 25:19, which associates these authoritative members of the king's court with sixty other men, is discussing the members of the Sanhedrin.

The following are the members of the council: The nasi (president) is Rabbi Adin Even Israel (Steinzaltz), a talmudic scholar who began his monumental translation and commentary of the Talmud in 1965, established a network of schools in Israel and Russia, and has received honorary degrees from Yeshiva University, Bar Ilan U., Ben Gurion U. and Florida International U. The Av Bet-Din (chancellor) is Rabbi Nacham Kahana, a graduate of Yeshivat Mir, a rabbinic scholar and the rabbi of the Young Israel of Jerusalem's Old City. He is currently working on an interpretation the Tosafot of the Talmud. He is also the director of the Institute for Talmudic Commentaries and has created a database of reliable Kohanim in Israel. Rabbi Yoel Schwartz is the assistant Av Bet-Din. He is a Torah scholar and a prolific writer who has published over 200 seforim. He learned at Yeshivat Ponevitz and Yeshivat Mir and was the mashgiach of Yeshivat Itri and the spiritual advisor of the Nahal Charedi (ultra-religious army program).

There are four other distinguished members. Rabbi Dov Levanoni is a Torah scholar, a prolific author and the author of Hamikdah, a description of the Second Temple according to Rambam.

Ezekiel 8 and the abominations the seventy elders do

 Rabbi Yisroel Ariel, who was a rosh yeshiva, the spiritual leader of Yamit and the founder of Machon HaMikdash, served in the paratroop unit that liberated the Kotel in the Six-Day War. Rabbi Dov Stein received ordination from Rav Sternberg of the Eda Hareidi. For the past 20 years he has been the spirit behind the renewal of the Sanhedrin and serves as its secretary. He is well-known for his responses to secular questions about our principals of faith on the Internet at www.thesanhedrin.org, Rabbi Yehuda Edri is a Torah scholar, supervisor and principal for the Chareidi Shas Party's El Hamaayan Educational system. He is an expert on the location of the Temple and its measurements.

Other members of the Sanhedrin include (not in order of seniority): Rabbi Mordechai Avrahami, Rabbi Yishai Ba'avad (general secretary of Rabbis of Yehudah, Shomeron[Yos"h]), Rabbi Michael Shlomo Bar-Ron, Rabbi Dov Avraham Ben-Shorr, Rabbi Reuven Hass, Rabbi Meir Yaakov HaLevi Haqaq, Rabbi Amnon Hever (Ph.D Jewish History), Rabbi Yishayahu Hollander, Rabbi Mordekhai Kislev (professor of botany, Bar Ilan University), Rabbi Tzvi Rogin (Head of The Temple Mount Information Center), Rabbi Elitzur Segal, Rabbi Hillel Weiss (professor of Jewish literature, Bar Ilan University), Rabbi Elihu Schatz (Ph.D in chemistry) and others.

The Sanhedrin has also set up two Batei Din (sub-courts) and one Va'ada (sub-committee). The Special Court for Matters Concerning the Nation and the State, with its chief justice, Rabbi Yisrael Ariel, concerns itself with the government and Jewish law.

Since 1948, the government of Israel has in general been a socialist, secular government (Aholibah) that exercises civil authority in the majority of the land of Israel. Although this government is made up largely of Jews, it is increasingly distancing itself from its Jewish culture and religious heritage. It sees itself as a secular government of its citizens, and moves are being made to completely separate religion and state by disenfranchising and reducing the funding of religious institutions. It has also embarked on a policy of appeasement of international anti-Israel opinion and terror organizations, by large-scale forced-transfer of mostly religious Jewish population centers in a government policy called "turning inward." In spite of these aggressive moves against various religious communities within the land of Israel, the new Sanhedrin is interested in working within the law to achieve needed reforms. (Aholah Dan) and the two battle 

There is also a special court for matters concerning the Bnei Noah, with Rabbi Yoel Schwartz as its chief justice and a "Research Committee for the Exact Site of the Holy Temple and Altar," whose spokesperson is Rabbi Gidon Harlap.

The new Sanhedrin first met in Tiberius because it was foretold that it would be renewed there and would be relocated to Jerusalem. That is exactly what has been done. At first, the names of many of those ordained were withheld, to avoid strong public pressure on them to renounce their membership. Today, more and more names have been made public as understanding of the importance of the Sanhedrin increases. The rabbis believe that they are performing an important mitzva rather than searching for fame or honor. The attitude of some of their colleagues is proof that honor is not the goal.

Mat. 23:1: Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,
2: Saying, The scribes and the
Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
3: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
4: For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5: But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
6: And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
7: And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
8: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
9: And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
10: Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
11: But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

 

There is also a concern that the increasingly "non-Jewish" and "anti-Jewish" rulings handed down by the Israeli Supreme Court underscore the immediate need for an alternative legal system based on Torah and Talmud. While, at least in one instance, an Israeli court deferred to a ruling of the new Sanhedrin, the long-term effect of a religious Sanhedrin is yet to be seen.

The meeting I attended began with a prayer and a short reading of the Rambam. The discussions were serious, and I was impressed by their level and the level of several of the speakers. The Sanhedrin secretary, Rabbi Dov Stein, read the agenda for the meeting - a discussion both of "hot topics" and of philosophical questions. One of the hot topics concerned "collateral deaths in defensive response" and whether the Sanhedrin should publish a ruling on this issue. The Arabs have been firing Kassam rockets into Israel, trying to hit Jewish population centers, and the Israeli army has fired back into unpopulated areas but has not retaliated against Arab population centers for fear of the collateral deaths of civilians.

that is now changed....

http://peacenow.org/entries/settler_rabbis_guide_to_killing_non-jews

 

The question was asked, "Should Israel strive to stop further shelling of Israeli areas by making the price of shelling very high for the Arabs, or should Israel not retaliate, and be more concerned about civilian Arab casualties, even at the expense of Jewish lives?" The majority opinion seemed to be that "there are no innocents in a war zone" and that Israel should take any action necessary to prevent the murder of Jews. It was noted that since a large majority of the Palestinian Arabs had voted for Hamas, thereby agreeing to the Hamas goals of murdering Jews and destroying Israel, the civilian population had a status of "rodef" (oppressor or persecutor). Many disagreed, however, on whether or not the Sanhedrin should state a halachic ruling and publicize it.

The Sanhedrin exists within a non-religious country and world, and there is great concern about the negative impact of any ruling of the Sanhedrin on Israeli and world opinion. The majority agreed on the halachic aspect but did not agree on the impact of a statement that would be interpreted as "political" and might result in the Sanhedrin being socially marginalized. Would the publicity of a ruling be worthwhile? How would the Jewish and non-Jewish world view a call for "retaliation"? Most agreed that no matter what the decision, it must be placed in the context of a recommendation to avoid the world branding the Sanhedrin as having primitive and weird behavior. Others were concerned that Israel was "sitting with folded hands in embarrassed silence by not responding to the murderous rockets falling near our population centers."

I found the level of the discussions quite stimulating. I did not fully understand the fear of public criticism and opinion, but realized that it is part of the growing pains of a religious institution in our "civilized" world. The consensus seems to have been that instead of rulings, recommendations should be made until the Sanhedrin gained greater public recognition.

The new Sanhedrin will, G-d willingly, grow and prosper. Eventually, additional prominent Torah scholars will flock to it and the members will gain more confidence. It was inspiring to see that there are many rabbis concerned enough to give of their time to revive this important institution in Torah life.

More information may be found at www.thesanhedrin.org

___

He bowed to the Emperor of Japan, surely he bows to the master race Choose

President Obama bowed before the Japanese emperor Akihito at the Imperial Palace in Tokyo on Nov. 14.

Mandel Ngan/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images President Obama bowed before the Japanese emperor Akihito at the Imperial Palace in Tokyo on Nov. 14.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/134519

Historian: Obama Won't Go Head-to-Head with US Jews

 

(IsraelNN.com) “Ethnic minorities like the Jews (which are an anti-Christ religion unto Satan and no Race) are an integral part of the American nation, and every president in the White House understands that if he ignores the Jews of the United States and their supporters he will be making a mistake,” Professor Shlomo Aronson, an expert on political science from the Hebrew University, told Arutz Sheva Thursday. “Even Barack Obama would not think of entering a confrontation with the Jews of the United States,” he said.

Asked if President Obama's relative silence in the face of the Iranian nuclear danger could be compared to the silence of Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman in the face of the Holocaust, Prof. Aronson, a former holder of 1939 Club Holocaust (associated with club med) Chair at UCLA, said there was no comparison between the two situations.

"The U.S. In that period was dragged into participating in World War Two after Japan and Nazi Germany attacked it,” he said. “Previously there was a debate in the U.S., whether or not to join the war. The Americans thought that after World War One, there was no point in entering another war.”
Nazi Germany was a power. Iran is a third world country.

Many things have changed
"It was a different world then and the attitude to the Jewish question was different from today,” he explained. “At that time, the entire matter of the Jews seemed to the Americans like something that was not their business. The Jews were a scattered and dislocated people without a country or an army, the British ruled the Land of Israel and as far as the Americans were concerned, the Jews were not their problem.”

"But since then many things have changed. Today there is a Jewish state with an army, and the attitude towards Israel is built upon internal American considerations. Those were dark times of anti-Semitism in the US which washed its hands of dealing with the Holocaust, but today the situation is different.”

Now the Choose control Washington DC

Prof. Aronson said that there was no room for comparison between Nazi Germany, which threatened the world, and Iran under Ahmadinejad. “Nazi Germany was a power. Iran is a Third World country,” he added. Obama simply prefers to fight Iran using a different tactic, Prof. Aronson estimated. “Iran is a very important subject that Obama wants to take care of, but the way that seems more realistic to him is to strangle Iran economically. He believes that this is a very sensitive subject for the Iranians and that this is what will truly make them feel the pressure.” 

for the Massah Race wannabe's of the anti-Christ Choose

____

An Open Letter to Abe Fox-man of the ADL regarding the report 

"Anti-Government Hostality Sweeping America"

the report........

http://www.adl.org/special_reports/rage-grows-in-America/

Rage Grows in America: Anti Government Conspiracies

Introduction: A Year of Growing Animosity

Since the election of Barack Obama as president, a current of anti-government hostility has swept across the United States, creating a climate of fervor and activism with manifestations ranging from incivility in public forums to acts of intimidation and violence.

Can you be more specific, or will you just drivel with no concrete evidence?

What characterizes this anti-government hostility is a shared belief that Obama and his administration actually pose a threat to the future of the United States. Some accuse Obama of plotting to bring socialism to the United States, while others claim he will bring about Nazism or fascism. All believe that Obama and his administration will trample on individual freedoms and civil liberties, due to some sinister agenda, and they see his economic and social policies as manifestations of this agenda. 

and you have garnered this information from where?

In particular anti-government activists used the issue of health care reform as a rallying point, accusing Obama and his administration of dark designs ranging from “socialized medicine” to “death panels,” even when the Obama administration had not come out with a specific health care reform plan. Some even compared the Obama administration’s intentions to Nazi eugenics programs.

Can you be more specifiic again? Or is it that you simply oppose informed Americans right to their own educated opinions?

Some of these assertions are motivated by prejudice, but more common is an intense strain of anti-government distrust and anger, colored by a streak of paranoia and belief in conspiracies. 

 

Belief in Conspiracies such as...........

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004) ...

or..... HJR 104, PL 102-14?

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas

Items 1 through 3 of 3

1. [102nd] H.J.RES.104 : To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".
Sponsor: Rep Michel, Robert H. [IL-18] (introduced 1/31/1991)      Cosponsors (225)
Committees: House Post Office and Civil Service
Latest Major Action: 3/20/1991 Became Public Law No: 102-14

Where that particular Law which supercedes the Constitution of the United States of America and supercedes separation of Church and state ?

102d CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 104

To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 

January 31, 1991

Mr. MICHEL (for himself and Mr. GEPHARDT) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service


JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe,' this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving,' the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it

 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Or which has been included at the Vatican? In absolute Lies for Acts 15, did not such "act", But the Apostle Paul refused these Laws and instead preached Faith in Jesus Christ?

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/relations-jews-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20070313_commissione-bilaterale_en.html

3. God has created the human person as a social being which by definition places limits on individual human freedom. Moreover freedom of choice is derived from God and therefore is not absolute, but must reflect Divine will and law. Accordingly human beings are called to freely obey the Divine will as manifested in the Creation and in His revealed word.

Jewish tradition emphasizes the Noachide Covenant (cf. Gn 9: 9-12) as containing. the universal moral code which is incumbent on all humanity. This idea is reflected in Christian Scripture in the Book of Acts 15: 28-29.

 

Or the 110th Congress which opened with these Talmudic anti-Christ Conspiracy Noahide Laws of the Jews tradition?

 Results 1 - 10 of about 954 for Shea Harlig Noahide Laws. (0.37 seconds) 

Search Results

  1. CrownHeights.info » Video - Rabbi Shea Harlig Delivers Invocation ...  

    In honor of Gimmel Tamuz Rabbi Shea Harlig of Chabad of Southern Nevada was ... convene here in the spirit of one of the seven Noahide Laws which were set

www.crownheights.info/index.php?itemid=19509 -

to the  US Senate in 2009.......Old Abe Foxman 

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2009/07/chabad-rabbi-preaches-noahide-laws-to.html

 


and where the Jews Tradition of Talmud bavli states that any who worship Jesus Christ as Diety.........

Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin

 

Folio 57a

for it is written, The earth also was corrupt before God;  and a Tanna of the School of R. Ishmael taught: Wherever corruption is mentioned, it must refer to immorality and idolatry.  'Immorality.' as it is written, for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.  'Idolatry,' for it is written, Lest ye corrupt yourselves and make you a graven image, etc.  And the other teacher [who deduces this from the verse, and the Lord God commanded etc.]?  He maintains that this verse [sc. the earth also etc.] merely describes their way of living.  'Bloodshed', as it is written, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, etc.  And the other?  — This verse [he will maintain] merely teaches the manner of execution.  Robbery, for it is written, As the wild herbs have I given you all things;10  upon which R. Levi commented: as the wild herbs, but not as the cultivated herbs.11  And the other?12  — He will hold that this verse is written to permit animal flesh,13  [but not to prohibit robbery]. Flesh cut from the living animal, as it is written, But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.14  And the other?15  — He may hold that this verse teaches that flesh cut from live reptiles is permitted.16  Emasculation, for it is written, Bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.17  And the other?18  — He may regard this merely as a blessing.19  Forbidden mixture, as it is said, Of fowls after their kind.20  And the other?21  — He will maintain that this was merely for the sake of mating.22

R. Joseph said, The scholars23  stated: A heathen is executed for the violation of three precepts — Mnemonic G Sh R—24 viz., adultery, bloodshed, and blasphemy. R. Shesheth objected: Now bloodshed is rightly included, since it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed;25  but whence do we know the others? If they are derived from bloodshed,26  the other four should also be included; whilst if their inclusion is taught by the extending phrase any man,27  should not idolatry too be included?28  But R. Shesheth said thus: The scholars stated, A heathen is executed for the violation of four precepts [including idolatry]. But is a heathen executed for idolatry? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen. This implies that they are merely forbidden, but their

violation is not punished by death! — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence.29

R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all. Now is a heathen executed for robbery? Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery — if one stole or robbed30  or [seized] a beautiful woman,31  or [committed] similar offences,32  if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean33  against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'?34  But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? — Because the second clause wishes to state, 'but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained,' therefore the former clause reads, '[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept.'35  But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: 'For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty'?36  — How else could that clause have been taught? Could he state, 'forbidden' … 'permitted'? Surely it

has been taught; A Cuthean and a [Jewish] shepherd of small cattle [sheep, goats, etc.]37  need neither be rescued [from a pit] nor may they be thrown [therein]!38 'And similar acts.' To what can this apply in the case of robbery? — R. Aha b. Jacob answered: To a worker in a vineyard [who eats of the grapes]. When so? If his is the finishing work, it is permitted?39  If it is not the finishing work, is it not actual robbery?40 — But R. Papa said: This applies to [the theft of] an article worth less than a perutah.41  But if so, why say that such robbery of a Jew by a Cuthean must not be kept: does he not forgive him?42  — Though he later forgives him, he is grieved when it occurs [therefore it is prohibited] — But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not forgive,43  is it not actual theft? — But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered; It applies to the withholding of a labourer's wage.44  One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted.45  To what can 'a similar act' apply in the case of a beautiful woman? — When R. Dimi came,46  he said in the name of R. Eleazar in the name of R. Hanina: To a heathen who allotted a bondwoman to his slave [for concubinage] and then took her for himself, for this he is executed.47

'A similar act', however, is not taught with reference to murder.48  Abaye said: If it should be, however, that it is so taught, it would be in accordance with R. Jonathan b. Saul. For it has been taught; If one was pursuing his neighbour to slay him, and the latter could have saved himself by maiming a limb [of the pursuer, e.g., his foot], and did not thus save himself [but killed him instead],

 

57B 

 

R. Jacob b. Aha found it written in the scholars'  Book of Aggada:  A heathen is executed on the ruling of one judge, on the testimony of one witness, without a formal warning, on the evidence of a man, but not of a woman, even if he [the witness] be a relation. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. Whence do we know all this? — Rab Judah answered: The Bible saith, And surely your blood of your lives will I require;  this shows that even one judge [may try a heathen].  At the hand of every living thing will I require it: even without an admonition having been given;  And at the hand of man: even on the testimony of one witness;  at the hand of man:  but not at the hand [i.e., on the testimony] of a woman; his brother: teaching that even a relation may testify. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. What is R. Ishmael's reason? Because it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man within [another] man, shall his blood be shed.  What is a man within another man? — An embryo in his mother's womb.10  But the first Tanna [who excludes the murder of an embryo from capital punishment] is a Tanna of the school of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation. He connects the [second] 'man' with the latter half of the sentence, and interprets thus: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, within man [i.e., within him], shall his blood be shed. Now, how can man's blood be shed, and yet be retained within him? By strangulation.

R. Hamnuna objected: Now, is not a [heathen] woman commanded [to keep the social laws]? Surely it is written, For I know him, that he will command his sons and his household [which includes the womenfolk] after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord to exercise charity, and judgment?11  — He raised the objection, and he answered it himself: he would command 'his sons' to exercise judgment; 'his daughters' to perform charity.

R. Awia the elder said to R. Papa: Let us say that a heathen woman who committed murder must not be executed, since it is written, at the hand of every man [who committed murder] etc. implying,12  'but not at the hand of woman'? — He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: Whoso sheddeth man's blood implies whosoever it be [even a woman]. Let us say that a heathen woman who committed adultery is not executed, since it is written, therefore shall a man forsake [his father and mother, and cleave to his wife], implying12  that a man [must cleave], but not a woman? — He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: The verse, And they shall be as one flesh, reassimilated them to each other [making the law of fidelity applicable to both].

Our Rabbis taught: [A man, a man shall not approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness.13  It would have been sufficient to state,] A man shall not approach etc. What is taught by the repetition, A man, a man? — The extension of the law to heathens, that they too are forbidden incest [including adultery]. Now is this deduced from this verse; is it rather not deduced from a different text, viz., [And the lord God commanded…] saying, which refers to adultery?14  — The latter text refers to adultery with a woman of their own [i.e., with a heathen married woman]; the former to adultery with one of ours [i.e., a Jewish married woman], for the second clause teaches: If he committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law. With regard to what is this?15  — R. Nahman said in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: With regard to an assembly, witnesses and formal admonition.16  Is a Jewess then of less account?17  But R. Johanan answered thus: It is with regard to a betrothed Jewish maiden,18  whose violation by heathen law is not a capital offence;19  hence they are judged by Jewish law.

But if their offence was against a fully married woman, are they judged according to their law? Surely it has been taught: 'If a heathen committed adultery with a [Jewish] betrothed maiden, he is stoned; with a fully married woman, he is strangled.' Now if we judged them according to the law pertaining to them, should he not be decapitated? — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: By a 'married woman' this Baraitha means one whose huppah ceremony20  has been performed, but without the marriage being consummated. Since by their law her violation is not a capital offence, they are judged by ours. For R. Hanina taught: They recognise the inviolability of a woman whose union has been consummated, but not if she merely entered the huppah without the union having been consummated. It has been taught in agreement with R. Johanan: All prohibited [sexual] relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens, but those for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death are permitted to heathens; this is R. Meir's view. But the Sages maintain: There are many relationships21  for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death, which are nevertheless forbidden to a Gentile. If a heathen committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law; if with a heathen woman, he is judged according to heathen law. The only difference that this makes is with respect to a betrothed maiden.22  But should not the Tanna include a woman whose huppah ceremony has been performed without the marriage being consummated? — The teacher of this Baraitha is the Tanna of the college of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation, and by both codes [Jewish and heathen] this last-mentioned offence is punished by strangulation.

Now, is R. Meir of the opinion that all relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens? Surely it has been taught: A proselyte,

 

and where the Revived Sanhedrin has reported that any who worship "that Man" (Jesus Christ) is omitted from the Jewish Talmudic anti-Christ World Odor, Fox-man?

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5767_Tevet_6e

What about those who hold "that person" is messiah?

Question: What about those who hold "that person" is messiah?

People who hold that he is not and was not any part of a divinity, but still holds that he was a messiah.

Answer: It is the opinion of Rabbi Schwartz that a person who believes that "that man" was a messiah is not transgressing any prohibition. However the issue is as follows: someone who believes that "that man" was a messiah seems to be only partly disassociating himself from full christianity, and there is a problem of what is meant by the term "messiah". Is the messiah a "divine messenger" to "save" the world. Now when I say "a divine messenger" I mean someone - otherwise normal human being - sent by "the divinity" as a messenger. It seems that some people mean "a person with divine attributes"!

An issue which could be seen as semantic becomes of major consequence.

The decision of Rabbi Schwartz is therefore that in the beis din over which he presides he will not accept declarations of people with christian background if they think that "that man" was a messiah. This DOES NOT MEAN that the declaration of such a person before any [other] beis din is valueless. Perhaps another beis din will be satisfied that the person before them is bona fide in acceptance of the totally non-divinity of "that man". They may accept the declaration, and it will be fully valid.

 

Surely Fox-man and ADL, you can do better while making your accusations to point out THIS CONSPIRACY against Mankind

 

Perhaps...........

 

Maimonides' Law of Noahides - English WikiNoah  

[G-d] added to Noah [the commandment] concerning a torn limb, .... A noahide who breaks one of these seven laws – is executed by decapitation. ...
en.wikinoah.org/index.php/Maimonides'_Law_of_Noahides

 

 

These sentiments are present both in mainstream and “grass-roots” movements as well as in extreme anti-government movements such as a resurgent militia movement. 

So who do you think will stand against your anti-Christ Global Noahide Movement, Old Abe Fox-trotter? Wouldn't it be much easier for your wretched anti USA, anti-Christ, sick and perverted movement to simply tell the Truth, you know you are caught like a FOX Guarding the henhouse, Fox-man

Ultimately, this anti-government anger, if it continues to grow in intensity and scope, may result in an increase in anti-government extremists and the potential for a rise of violent anti-government acts.

Don't you mean anti-Talmudic Jewish Conspiracy acts, Abe?

Worm your anti-Christ Talmudic Communitarian filthy lying Jewish Tradition self out of these Conspiracy Facts, Abe

Part One: Anger in the Mainstream

The Tea Parties

The rapid growth of anti-government anger in the wake of Obama’s election first became apparent in the spring of 2009, when conservative groups and grass-roots activists organized a nationwide series of anti-government rallies dubbed “Tea Parties.” At these events, and later sequels, anti-government sentiments and conspiracy theories proliferated, with a common theme being that somehow Obama had “stolen” the country from Americans.

They are both whores, Aholibah the demoncrats and her whore sister Aholah Dan of Sanhedrin led by Chabad Lubavitch the repugs, both are murderous treasonous vipers warring for the seat of the throne of the world

The Town Hall Meeting Disruptions

More evidence of anti-government animosity appeared in the summer of 2009, when a variety of anti-government protests and disruptions occurred at town hall meetings organized by senators and representatives across the country to discuss healthcare reform. These events became a fertile ground for anti-Obama protests and stunts, with some protesters angrily launching verbal attacks against the president as well as other officeholders. A number of protests explicitly compared the Obama administration and its policies to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust.

We call this Legal Dissent, or have you ever known that freedom in this Republic?

A Building Anger

The angry protests at town hall meetings seemed to give a “green light” to expressions of anti-government and anti-Obama hostility, as when South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson shouted “You lie!” (When he was lying) to Obama himself during a speech to Congress in September. Tea Party events in September, especially a large rally in Washington, D.C., itself, were characterized by extreme sentiments, including Nazi imagery, (Oooops, taking the franchise from the whining choose)  racist imagery, and imagery that implicitly or explicitly promoted violence. 

Legal remedy is now called Violence by these ADL Itsreallyhell Chooish anti-Christ Vipers of Talmud

Other events, such as a “How to Take Back America” conference in Missouri and the rally against health-care reform held by conservatives in D.C. on November 5, 2009, saw similar expressions of anger.

The “Birther” Movement

More troubling than general expressions of anti-government hostility or anger has been the proliferation of anti-government conspiracy theories. 

See above Global Chabad Sanhedrin anti-Christ Noahide Conspiracy Facts

One of the newest such theories, the so-called “birther” movement, which rapidly spread during and after the 2008 election campaign, targeted Obama himself. “Birthers” claim that Obama is not a legitimate president because he allegedly was not born in the United States (as the Constitution requires), but rather in Kenya. 

Obama has not proven otherwise, but in fact has spent Millions covering up the truth, another conspiracy fact. IN short the anti-American Conspirators are indeed the ADL with that slimy lying bigoted Abe Fox-man at the Helm

Especially disturbing are the mainstream media figures and politicians who implicitly or explicitly endorse the “birther” conspiracy theory, or refuse to condemn it. Two attorneys, Philip Berg of Pennsylvania and Orly Taitz of California, have been particularly active in spreading the “birther” arguments, as has an on-line right-wing newspaper, World Net Daily.

This is just the sister whore in her battle against Aholibah, for they are in a global and spiritual war of absolute darkness, and only Jesus will shed the Light upon their sorceries and murders and thefts and deceptions

The Influence of the Mainstream Media

Though much of the impetus for anti-government sentiment has come from a variety of grass-roots and extremist groups, segments of the mainstream media have played a surprisingly active role in generating such segment. Though a number of media figures and commentators have taken part, the media personality who has played the most active role has been radio and television host Glenn Beck,(Conservative Noahide of Aholah Dan of anti-Christ Sanhedrin)  who along with many of his guests have made a habit of demonizing the Obama administration and promoting conspiracy theories about it. Beck has acted as a “fearmonger-in-chief,” raising anxiety about and distrust towards the government.

Part Two: Anger on the Fringe

Alex Jones, the Conspiracy King

Further out into the extremist fringe, one person in particular has been responsible for stirring up anti-government and anti-Obama conspiracy theories in the United States. Alex Jones, a Texas-based radio show host, (Married to a Choose and a propaganda expert ) has created a radio- and Internet-based conspiracy-oriented media empire, most of the content of which is devoted to promoting the notion of an over-arching conspiracy by malevolent globalists to take over the world and create a “New World Order” with high-tech slavery. Jones claims that the United States government itself is part of this conspiracy, building concentration camps and preparing to implement tyrannical measures such as martial law and gun confiscation. Jones has been effective in promoting his conspiracy theories and has even appeared on some mainstream media shows.

Alex Jones has been effectively debunked by the true faithful of Christ Jesus for his misdirection propaganda

Conspiracy Theories Imagine Government Plots

One of the most disturbing trends in the rise of anti-government animosity in 2009 has been the resurrection and proliferation of anti-government conspiracy theories, many of which had their origins in the early- to mid-1990s.

See Global Noahide Laws, lets see we are at Fact Page 918 of compiled Facts which cannot be discredited

 More extreme than “birther” conspiracies, these theories allege dark, violent designs on the part of the federal government to declare martial law and end democratic government, to confiscate firearms from American citizens to render them defenseless, and to build hundreds of concentration camps to house “dissidents” and other liberty-loving Americans. Internet social media, including Web sites such as Myspace, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, have allowed these theories to spread far and wide very rapidly.

So Abe calls for anti-American anti-Constitutional censurship?

Conspiracy Theories Prompting Action: Reaction to the Iowa National Guard Training

Though many anti-government conspiracy theories seem wild and fantastical, anti-government activists may nevertheless act on them as if they were true. The Iowa National Guard experienced this in early 2009 after a planned training exercise was reinterpreted by conspiracy theorists as an exercise in confiscating firearms from American citizens.

URBAN AMERICAN Warfare training....Nooooooooooooooo Abe....you are just sooooooooo funnaye. See Noahide Conspiracy by the US Government, Congress, Senate, Vatrican Sanhedrin and the UN

Conspiracy Theories Prompting Action: Richard Poplawski

Conspiracy theories also play in important role in radicalizing people, drawing them further towards extreme causes, and increasing their willingness to take extreme, even violent, action. A tragic example of this phenomenon occurred in Pittsburgh in April 2009, when a young man, radicalized by anti-government and white supremacist ideologies, especially since Obama’s election, allegedly murdered three Pittsburgh police officers responding to a 911 call.

What is it that you cannot understand about the word Allegedly ADL? And where did you gather your info, from those same mainstream media outlets?

Resisting the Government

Since Obama’s election, an increasing number of people have urged that he and his administration must be resisted. Some groups have even implicitly or explicitly urged armed resistance of some sort. 

Again can you be more specific in your allegations?

Many of these groups have appropriated an idealized version of Revolutionary War history for their own purposes, stressing the armed resistance of the American colonists to British “tyranny” and suggesting that Americans today should act as their revolutionary forebears did.

Why are you so concerned Abe, is it because that your Organization also promotes the anti-Christ Noahide Conspiracy against all mankind. Then who will you blame in all your unglorious Basterd Whining?

The Oath Keepers

One manifestation of the ideology of resistance was the creation in March 2009 of the Oath Keepers, an anti-government group that tries to recruit police and military personnel and veterans. Members refuse to obey hypothetical “orders” from the government, “orders” that speak more to their own paranoid and conspiratorial beliefs than to any realistic government action.

The Oath Keeper have pledged to uphold the constitution of the United States of America, these are men and women who have fought and bled and protected this Nation, Now this whining Talmudic Choose are calling them anti-Government.....Where will you Hide ABE?

The Three Percenters

The Three Percenters are a loosely organized movement whose adherents portray themselves as modern-day counterparts to Revolutionary-era patriots “committed to the restoration of the Founders’ Republic” and “willing to fight, die, and if forced by any would-be oppressor, to kill…”

The anti-Christ Talmud Satanic Oppressors.....ABE?

The Resurgence of the Militia Movement

One of the most troubling aspects of the rise of anti-government sentiment in 2009 has been a corresponding resurgence of the militia movement, an anti-government extremist movement that has had a long history of criminal activity and violence. 

Surely you refer to the Branch Davidians at Waco and perhaps Ruby Ridge.....right ABE Fox-mouthwhinestein

Within the past two years, the movement has almost quadrupled in size, growing to more than 200 groups across the United States. It is also the most receptive audience for the extreme anti-government conspiracy theories and their radicalizing potential. Because of its history of criminal activity, the revival of this movement is of serious concern.

For who Fox-man? For the anti-Christ MURDERING Talmudic Choose and their Freemason Noahide proselytes of hell?

Thank you

Robert Pickle

Noahide News

_________

forgotten email

From: robert pickle [mailto:robert@samliquidation.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:01 PM
To:
דוב
Cc: David Pickle
Subject: Re: Oath

 

So Dov,

Sinhedrin after the working of Satan, has finally gleaned and fleeced the entire earth of its wealth. You have Netanyahu in office to do your bidding and your murders. You have succeeded in deluding the entire world regarding the MURDERS of the Palestinian People. You have sought and received your beloved Iraq , and managed to have Saddam Hussein hanged like Haman of the Fables of the Whore Esther and Mordechai.

 

You have succeeded to capture Paris and your little rag-atag obedient Noahide servant Sarkozy and PUTIN and his puppet Mevdevev. You have Amadinejad doing your bidding against secular zion . You have managed but one thing, YOU HAVE NOT YET SECURED OBAMA. You fear Obama and rightly so.

 

So now you stir up your evil in the Mosque on the Mount of your whoredoms.........

 

You must have your global war to bring and appoint your little mere man wannabe king Mashiach...........................

 

You must kill all who refuse to DENY Jesus Christ the KING of KINGS, by your pitiful and pathetic satanic man made Noahide Law made to the Golden Calf at SIN-High.

 

But know this Dov Stein, it is also written that with the Brightness of Jesus coming in the clouds with Great Glory with ten thousand times thousands of his saints, your false Mashiach and his prophet will be destroyed and cast into the Lake of Burning fire, and that your comrades the other 69 Giborim and all of your anti-Christ Noahides and freemasons and all who DENY Jesus shall be cast into outer darkness where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth forever.

 

You have your personal choice, to REPENT in the Lamb of GOD, or perish forever

 

In Jesus Christ Mighty Name

 

robert

 

 

 

Dov Stein Secretariat of Sanhedrin typical response

----- Original Message -----
From: דוב
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:55
Subject: RE: Oath

Our G-D is not idolrty like yours, So in G-D we trust

 

Rest my case, again

________

added 11-22-2009

The Right Wing Telly Tubby Tinky Winky Freemason two fold children of hell Noahide Tinky Winky Televangelist and the Sanhedrin's catholicos promote revolution and Murder, to appease their masters and prepare the dumbmasses of Maraka for more war

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/289471.html

Manhattan Declaration & Signers

Preamble

Christians are heirs of a 2,000-year tradition of proclaiming God's word, seeking justice in our societies, resisting tyranny, and reaching out with compassion to the poor, oppressed and suffering. 

While fully acknowledging the imperfections and shortcomings of Christian institutions and communities in all ages, we claim the heritage of those Christians who defended innocent life by rescuing discarded babies from trash heaps in Roman cities and publicly denouncing the Empire's sanctioning of infanticide.  We remember with reverence those believers who sacrificed their lives by remaining in Roman cities to tend the sick and dying during the plagues, and who died bravely in the coliseums rather than deny their Lord.

Not to mention it was the Choose who led these Inquisitions against the believers of Jesus the Christ

After the barbarian tribes overran Europe, Christian monasteries preserved not only the Bible but also the literature and art of Western culture.  It was Christians who combated the evil of slavery: Papal edicts in the 16th and 17th centuries decried the practice of slavery and first excommunicated anyone involved in the slave trade; evangelical Christians in England, led by John Wesley and William Wilberforce, put an end to the slave trade in that country.  Christians under Wilberforce's leadership also formed hundreds of societies for helping the poor, the imprisoned, and child laborers chained to machines.

These same "evangelicals now promote global slavery unto Satan via Talmud Babylon Mother Mystery harlot's anti-Christ Noahide laws of Sanhedrin and her catholicos. Thus.......



In Europe, Christians challenged the divine claims of kings and successfully fought to establish the rule of law and balance of governmental powers, which made modern democracy possible.

See the protocols of the forged people of zion, for they are the ones who disrupted the Holy Unction of the Kings in one fell swoop in their cry for Liberty, and now they have that fourth beast of global slavery or death

  And in America, Christian women stood at the vanguard of the suffrage movement.  The great civil rights crusades of the 1950s and 60s were led by Christians claiming the Scriptures and asserting the glory of the image of God in every human being regardless of race, religion, age or class.

This same devotion to human dignity has led Christians in the last decade to work to end the dehumanizing scourge of human trafficking and sexual slavery, bring compassionate care to AIDS sufferers in Africa, and assist in a myriad of other human rights causes - from providing clean water in developing nations to providing homes for tens of thousands of children orphaned by war, disease and gender discrimination.

and assisting the Sanhedrin in War and bloodshed for their massah's the choose

Like those who have gone before us in the faith, Christians today are called to proclaim the Gospel of costly grace, to protect the intrinsic dignity of the human person and to stand for the common good.  In being true to its own calling, the call to discipleship, the church through service to others can make a profound contribution to the public good. 

Collective 

Declaration


We, as Orthodox, Catholic, and Evangelical Christians, have gathered, beginning in New York on September 28, 2009, to make the following declaration, which we sign as individuals, not on behalf of our organizations, but speaking to and from our communities.   We act together in obedience to the one true God, the triune God of holiness and love, who has laid total claim on our lives and by that claim calls us with believers in all ages and all nations to seek and defend the good of all who bear his image. 

There is but ONE GOD, even he is the IAM, the Alpha and Omega.

John 20:19: Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
20: And when he had so said, he shewed unto them his hands and his side. Then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord.
21: Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22: And when he had said this, he
breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
23: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.

 

 We set forth this declaration in light of the truth that is grounded in Holy Scripture, in natural human reason (which is itself, in our view, the gift of a beneficent God), and in the very nature of the human person.  We call upon all people of goodwill, believers and non-believers alike, to consider carefully and reflect critically on the issues we here address as we, with St. Paul, commend this appeal to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God.

While the whole scope of Christian moral concern, including a special concern for the poor and vulnerable, claims our attention, we are especially troubled that in our nation today the lives of the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly are severely threatened; that the institution of marriage, already buffeted by promiscuity, infidelity and divorce, is in jeopardy of being redefined to accommodate fashionable ideologies; that freedom of religion and the rights of conscience are gravely jeopardized by those who would use the instruments of coercion to compel persons of faith to compromise their deepest convictions. 

The Choose and their traditions and fables

Because the sanctity of human life, the dignity of marriage as a union of husband and wife, and the freedom of conscience and religion are foundational principles of justice and the common good, we are compelled by our Christian faith to speak and act in their defense.  In this declaration we affirm: 1) the profound, inherent, and equal dignity of every human being as a creature fashioned in the very image of God, possessing inherent rights of equal dignity and life; 2)

Even if they deny Jesus Christ

 marriage as a conjugal union of man and woman, ordained by God from the creation, and historically understood by believers and non-believers alike, to be the most basic institution in society and; 3) religious liberty, which is grounded in the character of God, the example of Christ, and the inherent freedom and dignity of human beings created in the divine image.

We are Christians who have joined together across historic lines of ecclesial differences (Noahide gathering) to affirm our right - and, more importantly, to embrace our obligation - to speak and act in defense of these truths.  We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence.  It is our duty to proclaim the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in its fullness, both in season and out of season.   May God help us not to fail in that duty.


Life
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
Genesis 1:27 

I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.
John 10:10 

However omitted......

John 1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2: The same was in the beginning with God.
3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

Although public sentiment has moved in a pro-life direction, we note with sadness that pro-abortion ideology prevails today in our government.  The present administration is led and staffed by those who want to make abortions legal at any stage of fetal development, and who want to provide abortions at taxpayer expense.  Majorities in both houses of Congress hold pro-abortion views.  The Supreme Court, whose infamous 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade stripped the unborn of legal protection, continues to treat elective abortion as a fundamental constitutional right, though it has upheld as constitutionally permissible some limited restrictions on abortion.  The President says that he wants to reduce the "need" for abortion - a commendable goal.  But he has also pledged to make abortion more easily and widely available by eliminating laws prohibiting government funding, requiring waiting periods for women seeking abortions, and parental notification for abortions performed on minors.  The elimination of these important and effective pro-life laws cannot reasonably be expected to do other than significantly increase the number of elective abortions by which the lives of countless children are snuffed out prior to birth.  Our commitment to the sanctity of life is not a matter of partisan loyalty, for we recognize that in the thirty-six years since Roe v. Wade, elected officials and appointees of both major political parties have been complicit in giving legal sanction to what Pope John Paul II described as "the culture of death."  We call on all officials in our country, elected and appointed, to protect and serve every member of our society, including the most marginalized, voiceless, and vulnerable among us.

A culture of death inevitably cheapens life in all its stages and conditions by promoting the belief that lives that are imperfect, immature or inconvenient are discardable.  As predicted by many prescient persons, the cheapening of life that began with abortion has now metastasized.  

See Sorcery-wood or wretched Hollywood of the Choose

For example, human embryo-destructive research and its public funding are promoted in the name of science and in the cause of developing treatments and cures for diseases and injuries.  The President and many in Congress favor the expansion of embryo-research to include the taxpayer funding of so-called "therapeutic cloning."  This would result in the industrial mass production of human embryos to be killed for the purpose of producing genetically customized stem cell lines and tissues.  At the other end of life, an increasingly powerful movement to promote assisted suicide and "voluntary" euthanasia threatens the lives of vulnerable elderly and disabled persons.  Eugenic notions such as the doctrine of lebensunwertes Leben ("life unworthy of life") were first advanced in the 1920s by intellectuals in the elite salons of America and Europe.  Long buried in ignominy after the horrors of the mid-20th century, they have returned from the grave.  The only difference is that now the doctrines of the eugenicists are dressed up in the language of "liberty," "autonomy," and "choice."

also keep in mind these same Judeo-Churchinsanity's silence on......

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004) ...



We will be united and untiring in our efforts to roll back the license to kill that began with the abandonment of the unborn to abortion.  We will work, as we have always worked, to bring assistance, comfort, and care to pregnant women in need and to those who have been victimized by abortion, even as we stand resolutely against the corrupt and degrading notion that it can somehow be in the best interests of women to submit to the deliberate killing of their unborn children.  Our message is, and ever shall be, that the just, humane, and truly Christian answer to problem pregnancies is for all of us to love and care for mother and child alike.

A truly prophetic Christian witness will insistently call on those who have been entrusted with temporal power to fulfill the first responsibility of government: to protect the weak and vulnerable against violent attack, and to do so with no favoritism, partiality, or discrimination.  The Bible enjoins us to defend those who cannot defend themselves, to speak for those who cannot themselves speak.  And so we defend and speak for the unborn, the disabled, and the dependent.  What the Bible and the light of reason make clear, we must make clear.  We must be willing to defend, even at risk and cost to ourselves and our institutions, the lives of our brothers and sisters at every stage of development and in every condition.

yet keep silent of the global anti-Christ Noahide enslavement conspiracy

Our concern is not confined to our own nation.  Around the globe, we are witnessing cases of genocide and "ethnic cleansing," the failure to assist those who are suffering as innocent victims of war, the neglect and abuse of children, the exploitation of vulnerable laborers, the sexual trafficking of girls and young women, the abandonment of the aged, racial oppression and discrimination, the persecution of believers of all faiths, and the failure to take steps necessary to halt the spread of preventable diseases like AIDS.  We see these travesties as flowing from the same loss of the sense of the dignity of the human person and the sanctity of human life that drives the abortion industry and the movements for assisted suicide, euthanasia, and human cloning for biomedical research.  And so ours is, as it must be, a truly consistent ethic of love and life for all humans in all circumstances.


Marriage
The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man."  For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh. Genesis 2:23-24 


This is a profound mystery - but I am talking about Christ and the church.  However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.
Ephesians 5:32-33 


In Scripture, the creation of man and woman, and their one-flesh union as husband and wife, is the crowning achievement of God’s creation.  

The "Crowning" achievement is the TESTIMONY of Jesus who is Christ, the Purpose which God hath Purposed upon all mankind to break the Yoke of the Assyrian from the backs of Mankind. With this all evil would have been purged.

In the transmission of life and the nurturing of children, men and women joined as spouses are given the great honor of being partners with God Himself.   Marriage then, is the first institution of human society - indeed it is the institution on which all other human institutions have their foundation.  In the Christian tradition we refer to marriage as "holy matrimony" to signal the fact that it is an institution ordained by God, and blessed by Christ in his participation at a wedding in Cana of Galilee.  In the Bible, God Himself blesses and holds marriage in the highest esteem.

Wrong................

Rv:21:2: And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

With this is the only CORRECTION of MAN who stands fast in the Testimony of Jesus, all the rest is natural Love

Vast human experience confirms that marriage is the original and most important institution for sustaining the health, education, and welfare of all persons in a society.  Where marriage is honored, and where there is a flourishing marriage culture, everyone benefits - the spouses themselves, their children, the communities and societies in which they live.  Where the marriage culture begins to erode, social pathologies of every sort quickly manifest themselves.  Unfortunately, we have witnessed over the course of the past several decades a serious erosion of the marriage culture in our own country.   Perhaps the most telling - and alarming - indicator is the out-of-wedlock birth rate.  Less than fifty years ago, it was under 5 percent.  Today it is over 40 percent.  Our society - and particularly its poorest and most vulnerable sectors, where the out-of-wedlock birth rate is much higher even than the national average - is paying a huge price in delinquency, drug abuse, crime, incarceration, hopelessness, and despair.  Other indicators are widespread non-marital sexual cohabitation and a devastatingly high rate of divorce.

See the perversion of the Choose and their filthy hollywood of sorcery

We confess with sadness that Christians and our institutions have too often scandalously failed to uphold the institution of marriage and to model for the world the true meaning of marriage.  Insofar as we have too easily embraced the culture of divorce and remained silent about social practices that undermine the dignity of marriage we repent, and call upon all Christians to do the same.

Choose to get a "Get"

To strengthen families, we must stop glamorizing promiscuity and infidelity and restore among our people a sense of the profound beauty, mystery, and holiness of faithful marital love.  We must reform ill-advised policies that contribute to the weakening of the institution of marriage, including the discredited idea of unilateral divorce.  We must work in the legal, cultural, and religious domains to instill in young people a sound understanding of what marriage is, what it requires, and why it is worth the commitment and sacrifices that faithful spouses make.

The impulse to redefine marriage in order to recognize same-sex and multiple partner relationships is a symptom, rather than the cause, of the erosion of the marriage culture.  It reflects a loss of understanding of the meaning of marriage as embodied in our civil and religious law and in the philosophical tradition that contributed to shaping the law.  Yet it is critical that the impulse be resisted, for yielding to it would mean abandoning the possibility of restoring a sound understanding of marriage and, with it, the hope of rebuilding a healthy marriage culture.  It would lock into place the false and destructive belief that marriage is all about romance and other adult satisfactions, and not, in any intrinsic way, about procreation and the unique character and value of acts and relationships whose meaning is shaped by their aptness for the generation, promotion and protection of life.  In spousal communion and the rearing of children (who, as gifts of God, are the fruit of their parents’ marital love), we discover the profound reasons for and benefits of the marriage covenant.

Stop it in your own filthy perverted lives of Judeo-Churchinsanity of Mammon, Only then will you show and example

We acknowledge that there are those who are disposed towards homosexual and polyamorous conduct and relationships, just as there are those who are disposed towards other forms of immoral conduct.  We have compassion for those so disposed; we respect them as human beings possessing profound, inherent, and equal dignity; and we pay tribute to the men and women who strive, often with little assistance, to resist the temptation to yield to desires that they, no less than we, regard as wayward.  We stand with them, even when they falter.  

In Christ Name you do not stand with them when they falter, you admonish them publicly, but now you will fear for the Choose hate crimes legislation have made you fearful

We, no less than they, are sinners who have fallen short of God's intention for our lives.  We, no less than they, are in constant need of God’s patience, love and forgiveness.  We call on the entire Christian community to resist sexual immorality, and at the same time refrain from disdainful condemnation of those who yield to it.  Our rejection of sin, though resolute, must never become the rejection of sinners.  For every sinner, regardless of the sin, is loved by God, who seeks not our destruction but rather the conversion of our hearts.  Jesus calls all who wander from the path of virtue to "a more excellent way."  As his disciples we will reach out in love to assist all who hear the call and wish to answer it.

OK, I agree

We further acknowledge that there are sincere people who disagree with us, and with the teaching of the Bible and Christian tradition, on questions of sexual morality and the nature of marriage.  Some who enter into same-sex and polyamorous relationships no doubt regard their unions as truly marital.  They fail to understand, however, that marriage is made possible by the sexual complementarity of man and woman, and that the comprehensive, multi-level sharing of life that marriage is includes bodily unity of the sort that unites husband and wife biologically as a reproductive unit.  This is because the body is no mere extrinsic instrument of the human person, but truly part of the personal reality of the human being.  Human beings are not merely centers of consciousness or emotion, or minds, or spirits, inhabiting non-personal bodies.  The human person is a dynamic unity of body, mind, and spirit.  Marriage is what one man and one woman establish when, forsaking all others and pledging lifelong commitment, they found a sharing of life at every level of being - the biological, the emotional, the dispositional, the rational, the spiritual - on a commitment that is sealed, completed and actualized by loving sexual intercourse in which the spouses become one flesh, not in some merely metaphorical sense, but by fulfilling together the behavioral conditions of procreation.  That is why in the Christian tradition, and historically in Western law, consummated marriages are not dissoluble or annullable on the ground of infertility, even though the nature of the marital relationship is shaped and structured by its intrinsic orientation to the great good of procreation.

We understand that many of our fellow citizens, including some Christians, believe that the historic definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman is a denial of equality or civil rights.  They wonder what to say in reply to the argument that asserts that no harm would be done to them or to anyone if the law of the community were to confer upon two men or two women who are living together in a sexual partnership the status of being "married."  It would not, after all, affect their own marriages, would it?  On inspection, however, the argument that laws governing one kind of marriage will not affect another cannot stand.  Were it to prove anything, it would prove far too much: the assumption that the legal status of one set of marriage relationships affects no other would not only argue for same sex partnerships; it could be asserted with equal validity for polyamorous partnerships, polygamous households, even adult brothers, sisters, or brothers and sisters living in incestuous relationships.  Should these, as a matter of equality or civil rights, be recognized as lawful marriages, and would they have no effects on other relationships?  No.  The truth is that marriage is not something abstract or neutral that the law may legitimately define and re-define to please those who are powerful and influential.

No one has a civil right to have a non-marital relationship treated as a marriage.  Marriage is an objective reality - a covenantal union of husband and wife - that it is the duty of the law to recognize and support for the sake of justice and the common good.  If it fails to do so, genuine social harms follow.  First, the religious liberty of those for whom this is a matter of conscience is jeopardized.  Second, the rights of parents are abused as family life and sex education programs in schools are used to teach children that an enlightened understanding recognizes as "marriages" sexual partnerships that many parents believe are intrinsically non-marital and immoral.  Third, the common good of civil society is damaged when the law itself, in its critical pedagogical function, becomes a tool for eroding a sound understanding of marriage on which the flourishing of the marriage culture in any society vitally depends.  Sadly, we are today far from having a thriving marriage culture.  But if we are to begin the critically important process of reforming our laws and mores to rebuild such a culture, the last thing we can afford to do is to re-define marriage in such a way as to embody in our laws a false proclamation about what marriage is.

And so it is out of love (not "animus") and prudent concern for the common good (not "prejudice"), that we pledge to labor ceaselessly to preserve the legal definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman and to rebuild the marriage culture.  How could we, as Christians, do otherwise?  The Bible teaches us that marriage is a central part of God's creation covenant.  Indeed, the union of husband and wife mirrors the bond between Christ and his church.  And so just as Christ was willing, out of love, to give Himself up for the church in a complete sacrifice, we are willing, lovingly, to make whatever sacrifices are required of us for the sake of the inestimable treasure that is marriage.


Religious Liberty
The Spirit of the Sovereign LORD is on me, because the LORD has anointed me to preach good news to the poor.  He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners. Isaiah 61:1 

Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.
Matthew 22:21

The struggle for religious liberty across the centuries has been long and arduous, but it is not a novel idea or recent development.  The nature of religious liberty is grounded in the character of God Himself, the God who is most fully known in the life and work of Jesus Christ.  Determined to follow Jesus faithfully in life and death, the early Christians appealed to the manner in which the Incarnation had taken place: "Did God send Christ, as some suppose, as a tyrant brandishing fear and terror?  (Moshiach ben Dovid of Sanhedrins aspirations) Not so, but in gentleness and meekness..., for compulsion is no attribute of God" (Epistle to Diognetus 7.3-4).  

No Force can give you Salvation of God

 

Thus the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the example of Christ Himself and in the very dignity of the human person created in the image of God - a dignity, as our founders proclaimed, inherent in every human, and knowable by all in the exercise of right reason. 

Christians confess that God alone is Lord of the conscience.  Immunity from religious coercion is the cornerstone of an unconstrained conscience.  No one should be compelled to embrace any religion against his will, nor should persons of faith be forbidden to worship God according to the dictates of conscience or to express freely and publicly their deeply held religious convictions.  What is true for individuals applies to religious communities as well.

It is ironic that those who today assert a right to kill the unborn, aged and disabled and also a right to engage in immoral sexual practices, and even a right to have relationships integrated around these practices be recognized and blessed by law - such persons claiming these "rights" are very often in the vanguard of those who would trample upon the freedom of others to express their religious and moral commitments to the sanctity of life and to the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife.

of the Choose perverted Talmudic religion

We see this, for example, in the effort to weaken or eliminate conscience clauses, and therefore to compel pro-life institutions (including religiously affiliated hospitals and clinics), and pro-life physicians, surgeons, nurses, and other health care professionals, to refer for abortions and, in certain cases, even to perform or participate in abortions.  We see it in the use of anti-discrimination statutes to force religious institutions, businesses, and service providers of various sorts to comply with activities they judge to be deeply immoral or go out of business.  After the judicial imposition of "same-sex marriage" in Massachusetts, for example, Catholic Charities chose with great reluctance to end its century-long work of helping to place orphaned children in good homes rather than comply with a legal mandate that it place children in same-sex households in violation of Catholic moral teaching.  In New Jersey, after the establishment of a quasi-marital "civil unions" scheme, a Methodist institution was stripped of its tax exempt status when it declined, as a matter of religious conscience, to permit a facility it owned and operated to be used for ceremonies blessing homosexual unions.  In Canada and some European nations, Christian clergy have been prosecuted for preaching Biblical norms against the practice of homosexuality.  New hate-crime laws in America raise the specter of the same practice here.

In recent decades a growing body of case law has paralleled the decline in respect for religious values in the media, the academy and political leadership, resulting in restrictions on the free exercise of religion.  We view this as an ominous development, not only because of its threat to the individual liberty guaranteed to every person, regardless of his or her faith, but because the trend also threatens the common welfare and the culture of freedom on which our system of republican government is founded.  Restrictions on the freedom of conscience or the ability to hire people of one's own faith or conscientious moral convictions for religious institutions, for example, undermines the viability of the intermediate structures of society, the essential buffer against the overweening authority of the state, resulting in the soft despotism Tocqueville so prophetically warned of.1  Disintegration of civil society is a prelude to tyranny.

As Christians, we take seriously the Biblical admonition to respect and obey those in authority.  We believe in law and in the rule of law.  We recognize the duty to comply with laws whether we happen to like them or not, unless the laws are gravely unjust or require those subject to them to do something unjust or otherwise immoral.  The biblical purpose of law is to preserve order and serve justice and the common good; yet laws that are unjust - and especially laws that purport to compel citizens to do what is unjust - undermine the common good, rather than serve it.

The Authority that GOD spoke was the Authority vested in Christ the KING and Righteous Laws, NOT Perversions of the Choose religion unto Satan of Talmud of Babylon

Going back to the earliest days of the church, Christians have refused to compromise their proclamation of the gospel.  In Acts 4, Peter and John were ordered to stop preaching.  Their answer was, "Judge for yourselves whether it is right in God's sight to obey you rather than God. For we cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard."  Through the centuries, Christianity has taught that civil disobedience is not only permitted, but sometimes required.  There is no more eloquent defense of the rights and duties of religious conscience than the one offered by Martin Luther King, Jr., in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail.  Writing from an explicitly Christian perspective, and citing Christian writers such as Augustine and Aquinas, King taught that just laws elevate and ennoble human beings because they are rooted in the moral law whose ultimate source is God Himself.  Unjust laws degrade human beings.  Inasmuch as they can claim no authority beyond sheer human will, they lack any power to bind in conscience.  King's willingness to go to jail, rather than comply with legal injustice, was exemplary and inspiring.  

Because we honor justice and the common good, we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family.  We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar's.  But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God's.

 

1Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

I expected the announcement of the Noahide Laws. However there was no real mention or theology. So, I am in 100% agreement with this resolution in the Name of Jesus who is Christ the King the Groom of New Jerusalem of Sion God's Holy Mountain in the Kingdom of God


____________

 It is the same in all countries, the Two whore wage their war, the "Right wing" Hasidic Aholah Talmudic anti-Christ of Samaria, against her whore sister the "Left wing" Liberal secular Aholibah. Both whine while they attempt to snare all of mankind to their whoredoms

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/11/20/1009325/canadian-liberals-object-after-conservatives-say-theyre-stronger-israel-backers

Canadian Liberals object after Conservatives say they’re stronger Israel backers

(JTA) -- Canada's opposition Liberal Party is crying foul after the ruling Conservatives mailed out flyers extolling themselves as stronger supporters of Israel.

"Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"

Barbs flew in the House of Commons Thursday after the taxpayer-funded leaflets were sent to electoral districts with high concentrations of Jewish voters in Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba. The mailings accuse the Liberals of participating in the 2001 UN anti-racism conference in Durban, South Africa, which the pamphlets described as "overtly anti-Semitic," and of supporting Hamas and Hezbollah.

There you have it. Any opposed the the Talmudic anti-Christ Babylonian World Noahide Odor are anti-Semitic

Anti-Christ is the Polar opposite of anti-Shem-atick

The flyers also attacked Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff for accusing Israel of committing war crimes in its 2006 war with Hezbollah.

See Goldstone report

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives

see Harper with his Chabad Noahide anti-Christ Masters

Canadian PM Stephen Harper Addresses Chabad Emissaries - Videos ...  

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper joined members of the House of Commons in saluting the Canadian Federation of Chabad-Lubavitch as 100 emissaries ...
www.chabad.org/.../Canadian-PM-Stephen-Harper-Addresses-Chabad- Emissaries.htm -

 

meantime, were lauded for refusing to take part in the Durban II conference, spurning terrorist groups, and osupporting Israel's right to self-defense in 2006. The pamphlets ask voters to choose which federal leader "is on the right track to represent and defend the values of Canada's Jewish community."

Well of course, only the Talmudic Freemason anti-Christ Vast Right Wing Conservatives

Liberal MPs denounced the mailings as propaganda filled with half-truths. They pointed out that many nations, including the United States and Israel, attended at least part of the Durban I conference, and that it was Canada that helped blunt the language in the final communiqué to Israel's satisfaction.

Self Righteous Noahides, made twofold the children of hell, the proselytes of their Talmudic Babylonian Masters

The Liberals also point out it was they who listed Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations in 2002.

The mailings are "totally misleading [and] false," Montreal MP Irwin Cotler, a former federal minister of justice, told the Toronto Star. They "basically seek to associate the Liberal party with anti-Semitism. This is shocking ... this has no place in Canadian politics."

Aholibah is anti-Shem. Aholah is anti-Christ

But Conservative cabinet minister Jason Kenney denied the government was suggesting the Liberals were anti-Semitic. "Anyone who's suggesting that is being completely over the top and mischievous," he told reporters. "These are facts. They are on the record. They [Liberals] are uncomfortable with that."

Karen Mock, a Liberal candidate in the heavily-Jewish neighborhood of Thornhill, north of Toronto, attended the Durban I meeting as part of the Canadian delegation and as chair of the International Jewish Caucus.

"That the Tories feel Jewish voters are so gullible as to accept second-hand information and divisive propaganda on these important issues is outrageous," she said.

Other opposition parties denounced the mailings as a new low in partisan politics in Canada

Shem-a-Ticks are Poli-Ticks

_____

The Mysterious Rise in "Religious" hate Crimes, after the Hate Crimes bill is passed, and they said it would not Target those who Verbally Oppose Choosery

Satan is really pouring out his whining now, as he is planning to enslave all mankind against Jesus Christ Freedom

 
 

Hate crimes hit seven-year high

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The incidence of hate crimes in the United States in 2008 hit a seven-year high, according to data released Monday by the FBI.

The 7,783 documented hate crimes in 2008 represented  a 2.1 percent increase from 2007 and the highest since 2001.

 Of the 1,519 religion-based hate crimes, also at a seven-year high, 1,013 -- or 66 percent -- were directed against Jews and Jewish institutions.

They just love that shembolical number

The FBI report also found the highest number of crimes directed at blacks, Jews and gay men and lesbians since 2001.

someone had better recheck those Lying figures against all Crimes committed

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004) ...

 

 

"While the increase in the number of hate crimes may be partially attributed to improved reporting, the fact that these numbers remain elevated -- particularly the significant rise in the number of victims selected on the basis of religion or sexual orientation -- should be of concern to every American," said ADL national director Abraham Foxman and ADL national chair Robert Sugarman.

In response, the ADL called for a "coordinated campaign to prevent, deter, and respond effectively to criminal violence motivated by bigotry and prejudice -- including training on the provisions of the new Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, more vigorous enforcement of existing laws, and anti-bias education and anti-bullying programs for schools and communities."

 

Soon the anti-Christ will abolish the Truth of the Gospel of Christ, for Jesus namesake

____

Noahide News Part 919

 

A look Back


Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)

Hasidim and their Moshiach, that son of Perdition


7: Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)
8: But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;
9: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

Not maybe


10: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11: For the scripture saith, 

Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.


12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
14: How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? 

and how shall they hear without a preacher?


15: And how shall they preach, except they be sent? 

not ordained by a state sanctioned 501 C3 institution of Satan's religion, BUT SENT BY THE FATHER

as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
16: But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
17: So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
18: But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.
19: But I say, 

Did not Israel know? 

First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.
20: But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me.
21: But to Israel he saith, 

All day long I have stretched forth my hands 

unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

Romans 10:9

9: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.


10: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

 


11: For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.

http://blogs.christiansunite.com/mahabirjem

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7 Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16

Noahide News Part 17

Noahide News Part 18

Noahide News Part 19

Noahide News Part 20

Noahide News Part 21

Noahide News part 22

Noahide News Part 23

Noahide News part 24

Noahide News Part 25

Noahide News Part 26

Noahide News part 27

Noahide News Part 28

Noahide News Part 29

Noahide News Part 30

Noahide News Part 31

Noahide News Part 32

Noahide News Part 33

Noahide News Part 34

Noahide News Part 35

Noahide News Part 36

Noahide News Part 37

Noahide News Part 38

Noahide News Part 39

Noahide News Part 40

Noahide News Part 41

Noahide News Part 42

Noahide News Part 43

Noahide News Part 44

Noahide News Part 45

Noahide News Part 46

Noahide News Part 47

Noahide News Part 48

Noahide News Part 49

Noahide News Part 50

Noahide News Part 51

Noahide News Part 52

Noahide News Part 53

Noahide News Part 54

Noahide News Part 55

Noahide NewsPart 56

Noahide News Part 57

Noahide News Part 58

Noahide News Part 59

Noahide News Part 60

Noahide News Part 61

Noahide News Part 62

Noahide News Part 63

Noahide News Part 64 

Noahide News Part 65

Noahide News Part 66

Noahide News Part 67

Noahide News Part 68

Noahide News Part 69

Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist

Noahide News Part 70

Noahide News Part 71

Noahide News Part 72

Noahide News Part 73

Noahide News Part 74

Noahide News Part 75

Noahide News Part 76

Noahide News Part 77

Noahide News Part 78

Noahide News Part 79

Noahide News Part 80

Noahide News Part 81

Noahide News Part 82

Noahide News Part 83 ALERT ALERT ALERT

Noahide News Part 84

Noahide News Part 85

Noahide News Part 86

Noahide News Part 87

Noahide News Part 88

Noahide News Part 89

Noahide News part 90

Noahide News Part 91

Noahide News Part 92

Noahide News Part 93

Noahide News Part 94

Noahide News Part 95

Noahide News Part 96

Noahide News Part 97

Noahide News Part 98

Noahide News Part 99

Noahide News Part 100

Noahide News Part 101

Noahide News Part 102

Noahide News Part 103

Noahide News Part 104

Noahide News Part 105

Noahide News Part 106

Noahide News Part 107

Noahide News Part 108

Noahide News Part 109

Noahide News Part 110

Noahide News Part 111

Noahide News Part 112

Noahide News Part 113

Noahide News Part 114

Noahide Naws Part 115

Noahide News Part 116

Noahide News Part 117

Noahide News Part 118

Noahide News Part 119

Noahide News Part 120

Noahide News Part 121

Noahide News Part 122

Noahide News Part 123

Noahide News Part 124

Noahide News part 125

Noahide News Part 126

Noahide News Part 127

Noahide News Part 128

Noahide News Part 129

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News Part 130

Noahide news Part 131

Noahide News Part 132

Noahide News Part 133

Noahide News Part 134

Noahide News Part 135

Noahide news Part 136

Noahide News Part 137

Noahide News Part 138

Noahide News Part 139

Noahide News Part 140

Noahide News Part 141

Noahide News Part 142

Noahide News Part 143 THE JEWISH RELIGION Its InfluenceToday

Noahide News Part 144

Noahide News Part 145

Noahide News Part 146

Noahide news Part 147

Noahide News Part 148

Noahide News Part 149

Noahide News Part 150

Noahide News Part 151

Noahide News Part 152

Noahide News Part 153

Noahide News Part 154

NoahideNews Part 155

Noahide News Part 156

Noahide News Part 157

Noahide News Part 158

Noahide News Part 159

Noahide News Part 160

Noahide News Part 161

Noahide News Part 162

Noahide News Part 163

Noahide News Part 164

Noahide News Part 165

Noahide News part 166

Noahide News Part 167

Noahide News Part 168

Alert ! Noahide News Part 169 Alert ! Alert ! false Elijah cometh?

Noahide News Part 170

Noahide News Part 171

Noahide News Part 172

Noahide News Part 173

Noahide News Part 174 

Noahide News Part 175

Noahide News Part 176

Noahide News Part 177

Noahide News Part 178

Noahide News Part 179

Noahide News Part 180

Noahide News Part 181

Noahide News Part 182

Noahide News Part 183

Noahide News Part 184

Noahide News Part 185

Noahide News part 186

Noahide News Part 187

Noahide News Part 188

Noahide News Part 189

Noahide News Part 190 Alert ! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 191

Noahide News part 192

Noahide News Part 193

Noahide News Part 194

Noahide News Part 195

Noahide News Part 196

Noahide News Part 197 Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News part 198

Noahide News Part 199

Noahide News Part 200

Noahide News Part 201

Noahide News Part 202

Noahide News Part 203Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News Part 204 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 205

Noahide news Part 206

Noahide News Part 207

Noahide News Part 208

Noahide News Part 209

Noahide News Part 210

Noahide News Part 211

Noahide News Part 212

Noahide News Part 213

Noahide News Part 214

Noahide News Part 215

Noahide News Part 216

Noahide News Part 217

Noahide News Part 218

Noahide News Part 219

Noahide News Part 220 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 221

Noahide News Part 222 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 223

Noahide News Part 224 Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 225

Noahide News Part 226

Noahide News Part 227

Noahide News Part 228 Alert! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News Part 229

Noahide News Part 230 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 231

Noahide News Part 232

Noahide News Part 233

Noahide News Part 234

Noahide News part 235

Noahide News Part 236

Noahide News part 237

Noahide News Part 238

Noahide News Part 239

Noahide News Part 240

Noahide News Part 241 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 242

Noahide News Part 243

Noahide News Part 244

Noahide News Part 245

Noahide News Part 246

Noahide News Part 247

Noahide News Part 248

Noahide News Part 249

"Left Behind"

Noahide News Part 250

Noahide News Part 251

Noahide News Part 252

Noahide News Part 253

Noahide News Part 254

Noahide News Part 255

Noahide News Part 256

Noahide News part 257

Noahide News Part 258

Noahide News Part 259

Noahide News Part 260

Noahide News Part 261

Noahide News Part 262

Noahide News Part 263

Noahide News Part 264

Noahide News Part 265

Noahide News Part 266

Noahide News Part 267

Noahide News Part 268

Noahide News Part 269

Noahide News Part 270

Noahide News Part 271

Noahide News Part 272

Noahide News Part 273

Noahide News Part 274

Noahide News Part 275

Noahide News Part 276

Noahide News Part 277

Noahide News Part 278

Noahide News Part 279

Noahide News Part 280

Noahide News Part 281

Noahide News Part 282

Noahide News Part 283

Noahide News Part 284

Noahide News Part 285

Saints of the Living God

Noahide News Part 286

Noahhide News Part 287

Noahide News Part 288

Noahide News Part 289 Terminated page

Noahide News Part 290

Noahide News Part 291

Noahide News Part 292

Noahide News Part 293

Noahide News Part 294

Noahide News Part 295 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 296

Noahide News Part 297

Noahide News Part 298

Noahide News Part 299

Noahide News Part 300

Noahide News Part 301

Noahide News Part 302

Noahide News Part 303  

Noahide News Part 304

Noahide News Part 305

Noahide News Part 306

Noahide News Part 307

Noahide News Part 308

Noahide News Part 309

Noahide News Part 310

Noahide News Part 311

Noahide News Part 312

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News part 313

Noahide News Part 314

Noahide News part 315

Noahide News Part 316

Noahide News Part 317

Noahide News Part 318

Noahide News Part 319

Noahide News Part 320

Noahide News Part 321 Sanhedrin Alert !

Noahide News Part 322

Noahide News Part 323

Noahide News Part 324

Noahide News Part 325

Noahide News Part 326

Noahide News Part 327

Noahide News Part 328

Noahide News Part 329

Noahide News Part 330

Noahide News Part 331

Noahide News Part 332

Noahide News Part 333

Noahide News Part 334

Noahide News Part 335

Noahide News Pat 336

Noahide News Part 337

Noahide News Part 338

Noahide News Part 339

Noahide News Part 340

Noahide News Part 341

Noahide News Part 342

Noahide News Part 343

Noahide News Part 344

Noahide News Part 345

Noahide News Part 346

Noahide News Part 347

Noahide News Part 348

Noahide News Part 349

Noahide News Part 350

Noahide News Part 351

Jesus said No to Noahide

Noahide News Part 352

Noahide News Part 353

Noahide News Part 354

Noahide News Part 355

Noahide News Part 356

Noahide News Part 357

Noahide News Part 358

Noahide News Part 359

Noahide News Part 360

Noahide News Part 361

Noahide News Part 362

Noahide News Part 363

Noahide News Part 364

Noahide News Part 365

Noahide News Part 366

Noahide News Part 367

Noahide News Part 368

Noahide News Part 369

Noahide News Part 370

Noahide News Part 371

Noahide News Part 372

Noahide News Part 373

Noahide News Part 374

Noahide News Part 375

Noahide News Part 376

Noahide News Part 377

Noahide News Part 378

Noahide News Part 379

Noahide News Part 380

Noahide News Part 381

Noahide News Part 382

Noahide News Part 383

Noahide News Part 384

Noahide News Part 385

Noahide News Part 386

Noahide News Part 387

Noahide News Part 388

Noahide News Part 389

Noahide News Part 390

Noahide News Part 391

Noahide News Part 392

Noahide News Part 393

Noahide News Part 394

Noahide News Part 395

Noahide News Part 396

Noahide News Part 397

Noahide News Part 398

Noahide News Part 399

Noahide News Part 400

Noahide News Part 401

Noahide News Part 402

Noahide News Part 403

Noahide News Part 404

Noahide News Part 405

Noahide News Part 406

Noahide News Part 407

Noahide News Part 408

Noahide News Part 409

Noahide News Part 410

Noahide News Part 411

Noahide News Part 412

Noahide News Part 413

Noahide News Part 414

Noahide News Part 415

Noahide News Part 416

Noahide News Part 417

Noahide News Part 418

Noahide News Part 419

Noahide News Part 420

Noahide News Part 421

Noahide News Part 422

Noahide News Part 423

Noahide News Part 424

Noahide News Part 425

Noahide News Part 426

Noahide News Part 427

Noahide News Part 428

Noahide News Part 429

Noahide News Part 430

Noahide News Part 431

Noahide News Part 432

Noahide News Part 433

Noahide News Part 434

Noahide News Part 435

Noahide News Part 436

Noahide News Part 438

      Noahide News Part 439     

 Noahide News Part 440

Noahide News Part 441

Noahide News Part 442

Noahide News Part 443

Noahide News Part 444

Noahide News Part 445

Noahide News Part 446

Noahide News Part 447

Noahide News Part 448

Noahide News Part 449

Noahide News Part 450

Noahide News Part 451

 Noahide News Part 452

Noahide News Part 453

Noahide News Part 454

Noahide News Part 455

Noahide News Part 456

Noahide News Part 457

Noahide News Part 458

Noahide News Part 459

Noahide News Part 460

Noahide News Part 461

Noahide News Part 462

Noahide News Part 463

Noahide News Part 464

Noahide News Part 465

Noahide News Part 466

Noahide News Part 467

Noahide News Part 468

Noahide News Part 469

Noahide News Part 470

Noahide News Part 471

Noahide News Part 472

Noahide News Part 473

Noahide News Part 474

Noahide News Part 475

Noahide News Part 476

Noahide News Part 477

Noahide News Part 478

Noahide News Part 479

Noahide News Part 480

Noahide News Part 481

Noahide News Part 482

Noahide News Part 483

Noahide News Part 484

Noahide News Part 485

Noahide News Part 486

Noahide News Part 487

Noahide News Part 488

Noahide News Part 489

Noahide News Part 490

Noahide News Part 491

Noahide News Part 492

Noahide News Part 493

Noahide News Part 494

Noahide News Part 495

Noahide News Part 496

Noahide News Part 497

Noahide News Part 498

Noahide News Part 499

Noahide News Part 500

Noahide News Part 501

Noahide News Part 502

Noahide News Part 503

Noahide News Part 504

Noahide News Part 505

Noahide News Part 506

Noahide News Part 507

Noahide News Part 508

Noahide News Part 509

Noahide News Part 510

Noahide News Part 511

Noahide News Part 512

Noahide News Part 513

Noahide News Part 514

Noahide News Part 515

Noahide News Part 516

Noahide News Part 517

Noahide News Part 518

Noahide News Part 519

Noahide News Part 520

Noahide News Part 521

Noahide News Part 522

Noahide News Part 523

Noahide News Part 524

Noahide News Part 525

Noahide News Part 526

Noahide News Part 527

Noahide News Part 528

Noahide News Part 529

Noahide News Part 530

Noahide News Part 531

Noahide News Part 532

Noahide News Part 533

Noahide News Part 534

Noahide News Part 535

Noahide News Part 536

Noahide News Part 537

Noahide News Part 538

Noahide News Part 539

Noahide News Part 540

Noahide News Part 541

Noahide News Part 542

Noahide News Part 543

Noahide News Part 544

Noahide News Part 545

Noahide News Part 546

Noahide News Part 547

Noahide News Part 548

Noahide News Part 549

Noahide News Part 550

Noahide News Part 551

Noahide News Part 552

Noahide News Part 553

Noahide News Part 554

Noahide News Part 555

Noahide News Part 556

Noahide News Part 557

Noahide News Part 558

Noahide News Part 559

Noahide News Part 560

Noahide News Part 561

Noahide News Part 562

Noahide News Part 563

Noahide News Part 564

Noahide News Part 565

Noahide News Part 566

Noahide News Part 567

Noahide News Part 568

Noahide News Part 569

Noahide News Part 570

Noahide News Part 571

Noahide News Part 572

Noahide News Part 573

Noahide News Part 574

Noahide News Part 575

Noahide News Part 576

Noahide News Part 577

Noahide News Part 578

Noahide News Part 579

Noahide News Part 580

Noahide News Part 581

Noahide News Part 582

Noahide News Part 583

Noahide News Part 584

Noahide News Part 585

Noahide News Part 586

Noahide News Part 587

Noahide News Part 588

Noahide News Part 589

Noahide News Part 590

Noahide News Part 591

Noahide News Part 592

Noahide News Part 593

Noahide News Part 594

Noahide News Part 595

Noahide News Part 596

Noahide News Part 597

Noahide News Part 598

Noahide News Part 599

Noahide News Part 600

Noahide News part 601

Noahide News Part 602

Noahide News Part 603

Noahide News Part 604

Noahide News Part 605

Noahide News Part 606 RED Alert !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Noahide News Part 607

Noahide News Part 608

Noahide News Part 609

Noahide News Part 610

Noahide News Part 611

Noahide News Part 612

Noahide News Part 613

Noahide News Part 614

Noahide News Part 615

Noahide News Part 616

Noahide News part 617

Noahide News Part 618

Noahide News part 619

Noahide News Part 620

Noahide News Part 621

Noahide News Part 622

Noahide News Part 623

Noahide News Part 624

Noahide News Part 625

Noahide News Part 626

Noahide News Part 627

Noahide News Part 628

Noahide News Part 629

Noahide News Part 630

Noahide News Part 631

Noahide News Part 632

Noahide News Part 633

Noahide News Part 634

Noahide News Part 635

Noahide News Part 636

Noahide News Part 637

Noahide News Part 638

Noahide News Part 639

Noahide News Part 640

Noahide News Part 641

Noahide News Part 642

Noahide News Part 643

Noahide News Part 644

Noahide News Part 645

Noahide News Part 646

Noahide News Part 647

Noahide News Part 647 updated

Noahide News Part 648

Noahide News Part 649

Noahide News Part 650

Noahide News Part 651

Noahide News Part 652

Noahide News Part 653

Noahide News Part 654

Noahide News Part 655

Noahide News Part 656

Noahide News Part 657

Noahide News Part 658

Noahide News Part 659

Noahide News Part 660

Noahide News Part 661

Noahide News Part 662

Noahide News Part 663

Noahide News Part 664

Noahide News Part 665

Noahide News Part 666

Noahide News Part 667

Noahide News part 668

Noahide News Part 669

Noahide News Part 670

Noahide News Part 671

Noahide News Part 672

Noahide News Part 673

Noahide News Part 674

Noahide News Part 675

Noahide News Part 676

Noahide News Part 677

Noahide News Part 678

Noahide News Part 679

Noahide News Part 680

Noahide News Part 681

Noahide News Part 682

Noahide News Part 683

Noahide News Part 684

Noahide News Part 685

Noahide News Part 686

Noahide News Part 687

Noahide News Part 688

Noahide News Part 689

Noahide News Part 690

Noahide News Part 691

Noahide News Part 692

Noahide News Part 693

Noahide News Part 694

Noahide News Part 695

Noahide News Part 696

Noahide News Part 697

Noahide News Part 698

Noahide News Part 699

Noahide News Part 700

Noahide News Part 701

Noahide News Part 702

Noahide News Part 703

Noahide News Part 704

Noahide News Part 705

Noahide News Part 706

Noahide News Part 707

Noahide News Part 708

Noahide News Part 709

Noahide News Part 710

Noahide News Part 711

Noahide News Part 712

Noahide News Part 713

Noahide News Part 714

Noahide News Part 715

Noahide News part 716

Noahide News Part 717

Noahide News Part 718

Noahide News Part 719

Noahide News Part 720

Noahide News Part 721

Noahide News Part 722

Noahide News Part 723

Noahide News Part 724

Noahide News Part 725

Noahide News Part 726

Noahide News Part 727

Noahide News Part 728

Noahide News Part 729

Noahide News Part 730

Noahide News Part 731

Noahide News Part 732

Noahide News Part 733

Noahide News Part 734

Noahide News Part 735

Noahide News Part 736

Noahide News Part 737

Noahide News Part 738

Noahide News Part 739

Noahide News Part 740

Noahide News Part 741

Noahide News Part 742

Noahide News Part 743

NoahideNews Part 744

Noahide News Part 745

Noahide News Part 746

Noahide News Part 747

Noahide News Part 748

Noahide News Part 749

Noahide News Part 750

Noahidenews Part 751

Noahide News Part 752

Noahide News Part 753

Noahide News Part 754

Noahide News Part 755

Noahide News Part 756

Noahide News Part 757

Noahide News Part 758

Noahide News Part 759

Noahide News Part 760

Noahide News Part 761

Noahide News Part 762

Noahide News Part 763

Noahide News Part 764

Noahide News Part 765

Noahide News part 766

Noahide News Part 767

Noahide News Part 768

Noahide News Part 769

Noahide News Part 770

Noahide News Part 771

Noahide News Part 772

Noahide News Part 773

Noahide News Part 774

Noahide News Part 775

Noahide News Part 776

Noahide News Part 777

Noahide News Part 778

Noahide News Part 779

Noahide News Part 780

Noahide News Part 781

Noahide News Part 782

Noahide News Part 783

Noahide News Part 784

Noahide News Part 785

Noahide News Part 786

Noahide News Part 787

Noahide News Part 788

Noahide News Part 789

Noahide News Part 790

Noahide News Part 791

Noahide News Part 792

Noahide News Part 793

Noahide News Part 794

Noahide News Part 795

Noahide News Part 796

Noahide News Part 797

Noahide News Part 798

Noahide News Part 799

Noahide News Part 800

Noahide News Part 801

Noahide News Part 802

Noahide News Part 803

Noahide News Part 804

Noahide News Part 805

Noahide News Part 806

Noahide News Part 807

Noahide News Part 808

Noahide News Part 809

Noahide News Part 810

Noahide News Part 811

Noahide News Part 812

Noahide News Part 813

Noahide News Part 814

Noahide News Part 815

Noahide News Part 816

Noahide News Part 817

Noahide News Part 818

Noahide News Part 819

Noahide News Part 820

Noahide News Part 821

Noahide News Part 822

Noahide News Part 823

Noahide News Part 824

Noahide News Part 825

Noahide News Part 826

Noahide News Part 827

Noahide News Part 828

Noahide News Part 829

Noahide News Part 830

Noahide News Part 831

Noahide News Part 832

Noahide News Part 833

Noahide News Part 834

Noahide News Part 835

Noahide News Part 836

Noahide News Part 837

Noahide News Part 838

Noahide News Part 839

Noahide News Part 840

Noahide News Part 841

Noahide News Part 842

Noahide News Part 843

Noahide News Part 844

Noahide News Part 845

Noahide News Part 846

Noahide News Part 847

Noahide News Part 848

Noahide News Part 849

Noahide News Part 850

Noahide News Part 851

Noahide News Part 852

Noahide News Part 853

Noahide News Part 854

Noahide News Part 855

Noahide News Part 856

Noahide News Part 857

Noahide News Part 858

Noahide News Part 859

Noahide News Part 860

Noahide News Part 861

Noahide News Part 862

Noahide News Part 863

Noahide News Part 864

Noahide News Part 865

Noahide News Part 866

Noahide News Part 867

Noahide News Part 868

Noahide News Part 869

Noahide News Part 870

Noahide News Part 871

Noahide News Part 872

Noahide News Part 873

Noahide News Part 874

Noahide News Part 875

Noahide News Part 876

Noahide News Part 877

Noahide News Part 878

Noahide News Part 879

Noahide News Part 880

Noahide News Part 881

Noahide News Part 882

Noahide News Part 883

Noahide News Part 884

Noahide News Part 885

Noahide News Part 886

Noahide News Part 887

Noahide News Part 888

Noahide News Part 889

Noahide News Part 890

Noahide News Part 891

Noahide News Part 892

Noahide News Part 893

Noahide News Part 894

A look Back

Noahide News Part 895   The Mark of the Beast, It is here !

Noahide News Part 896

Looking Back to 2004, Prophecy unfolding

Noahide News Part 897

Noahide News Part 898

Noahide News Part 899 antichrist

Noahide News Part 900

Noahide News Part 901

Noahide News Part 902

Noahide News Part 903

 Noahide News Part 904

Noahide News Part 905

Noahide News Part 906

Noahide News Part 907

Noahide News Part 908

Noahide News Part 909

Noahide News Part 910

Noahide News Part 911

Noahide News Part 912

Noahide News Part 913

Noahide News Part 914

Noahide News Part 915

Noahide News Part 916

Noahide News Part 917

Noahide News Part 918

Noahide News Part 919