Noahide News

Part 902

9-3-2009- 2007 AD of Our LORD Jesus the Christ the Creator

Talmudic Dragon Moon Calendar (Wailing for) Elul 14, of Talmudic



their Babylonian times of their  Babylonian Sumerian Doctrine and laws 5769

Ps:118:24: This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.



of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal


Whore Wars

Ezekiel 23:1: The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,
2: Son of man, there were two women, the daughters of one mother:


3: And they committed whoredoms in Egypt; they committed whoredoms in their youth: there were their breasts pressed, and there they bruised the teats of their virginity.
4: And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sons and daughters. Thus were their names;

 Samaria is Aholah, and 

Hassidim of Dan, Chabad

Jerusalem Aholibah.

secular zion

5: And Aholah played the harlot when she was mine; and she doted on her lovers, on the Assyrians her neighbours,
6: Which were clothed with blue, captains and rulers, all of them desirable young men, horsemen riding upon horses.
7: Thus she committed her whoredoms with them, with all them that were the chosen men of Assyria, and with all on whom she doted: with all their idols she defiled herself.
8: Neither left she her whoredoms brought from Egypt: for in her youth they lay with her, and they bruised the breasts of her virginity, and poured their whoredom upon her.
9: Wherefore I have delivered her into the hand of her lovers, into the hand of the Assyrians, upon whom she doted.
10: These discovered her nakedness: they took her sons and her daughters, and slew her with the sword: and she became famous among women; for they had executed judgment upon her.

11: And when her sister Aholibah saw this, she was more corrupt in her inordinate love than she, and in her whoredoms more than her sister in her whoredoms.
12: She doted upon the Assyrians her neighbours, captains and rulers clothed most gorgeously, horsemen riding upon horses, all of them desirable young men.
13: Then I saw that she was defiled, that they took both one way,
14: And that she increased her whoredoms: for when she saw men pourtrayed upon the wall, the images of the Chaldeans pourtrayed with vermilion,
15: Girded with girdles upon their loins, exceeding in dyed attire upon their heads, all of them princes to look to, after the manner of the Babylonians of Chaldea, the land of their nativity:
16: And as soon as she saw them with her eyes, she doted upon them, and sent messengers unto them into Chaldea.
17: And the Babylonians came to her into the bed of love, and they defiled her with their whoredom, and she was polluted with them, and her mind was alienated from them. 
18: So she discovered her whoredoms, and discovered her nakedness: then my mind was alienated from her, like as my mind was alienated from her sister.
19: Yet she multiplied her whoredoms, in calling to remembrance the days of her youth, wherein she had played the harlot in the land of Egypt. 
20: For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses. 
21: Thus thou calledst to remembrance the lewdness of thy youth, in bruising thy teats by the Egyptians for the paps of thy youth.
22: There, O Aholibah, thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will raise up thy lovers against thee, from whom thy mind is alienated, and I will bring them against thee on every side;
23: The Babylonians, and all the Chaldeans, Pekod, and Shoa, and Koa, and all the Assyrians with them: all of them desirable young men, captains and rulers, great lords and renowned, all of them riding upon horses.
24: And they shall come against thee with chariots, wagons, and wheels, and with an assembly of people, which shall set against thee buckler and shield and helmet round about: and I will set judgment before them, and they shall judge thee according to their judgments.
25: And I will set my jealousy against thee, and they shall deal furiously with thee: they shall take away thy nose and thine ears; and thy remnant shall fall by the sword: they shall take thy sons and thy daughters; and thy residue shall be devoured by the fire.
26: They shall also strip thee out of thy clothes, and take away thy fair jewels.
27: Thus will I make thy lewdness to cease from thee, and thy whoredom brought from the land of Egypt: so that thou shalt not lift up thine eyes unto them, nor remember Egypt any more. 
28: For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will deliver thee into the hand of them whom thou hatest, into the hand of them from whom thy mind is alienated:
29: And they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare: and the nakedness of thy whoredoms shall be discovered, both thy lewdness and thy whoredoms. 
30: I will do these things unto thee, because thou hast gone a whoring after the heathen, and because thou art polluted with their idols. 
31: Thou hast walked in the way of thy sister; therefore will I give her cup into thine hand.
32: Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou shalt drink of thy sister's cup deep and large: thou shalt be laughed to scorn and had in derision; it containeth much.
33: Thou shalt be filled with drunkenness and sorrow, with the cup of astonishment and desolation, with the cup of thy sister Samaria.
34: Thou shalt even drink it and suck it out, and thou shalt break the sherds thereof, and pluck off thine own breasts: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD.
35: Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thou hast forgotten me, and cast me behind thy back, therefore bear thou also thy lewdness and thy whoredoms.
36: The LORD said moreover unto me; Son of man, wilt thou judge Aholah and Aholibah? yea, declare unto them their abominations;
37: That they have committed adultery, and blood is in their hands, and with their idols have they committed adultery, and have also caused their sons, whom they bare unto me, to pass for them through the fire, to devour them.
38: Moreover this they have done unto me: they have defiled my sanctuary in the same day, and have profaned my sabbaths.
39: For when they had slain their children to their idols, then they came the same day into my sanctuary to profane it; and, lo, thus have they done in the midst of mine house.
40: And furthermore, that ye have sent for men to come from far, unto whom a messenger was sent; and, lo, they came: for whom thou didst wash thyself, paintedst thy eyes, and deckedst thyself with ornaments,
41: And satest upon a stately bed, and a table prepared before it, whereupon thou hast set mine incense and mine oil.
42: And a voice of a multitude being at ease was with her: and with the men of the common sort were brought Sabeans from the wilderness, which put bracelets upon their hands, and beautiful crowns upon their heads.
43: Then said I unto her that was old in adulteries, Will they now commit whoredoms with her, and she with them?
44: Yet they went in unto her, as they go in unto a woman that playeth the harlot: so went they in unto Aholah and unto Aholibah, the lewd women.
45: And the righteous men, they shall judge them after the manner of adulteresses, and after the manner of women that shed blood; because they are adulteresses, and blood is in their hands.
46: For thus saith the Lord GOD; I will bring up a company upon them, and will give them to be removed and spoiled.
47: And the company shall stone them with stones, and dispatch them with their swords; they shall slay their sons and their daughters, and burn up their houses with fire.

48: Thus will I cause lewdness to cease out of the land, that all women may be taught not to do after your lewdness.
49: And they shall recompense your lewdness upon you, and ye shall bear the sins of your idols: and ye shall know that I am the Lord GOD.

Joel 2: 1: Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; 
2: A day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds and of thick darkness, as the morning spread upon the mountains: a great people and a strong; there hath not been ever the like, neither shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations.
3: A fire devoureth before them; and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them. 
4: The appearance of them is as the appearance of horses; and as horsemen, so shall they run. 
5: Like the noise of chariots on the tops of mountains shall they leap, like the noise of a flame of fire that devoureth the stubble, as a strong people set in battle array.
6: Before their face the people shall be much pained: all faces shall gather blackness.
7: They shall run like mighty men; they shall climb the wall like men of war; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their ranks:
8: Neither shall one thrust another; they shall walk every one in his path: and when they fall upon the sword, they shall not be wounded.
9: They shall run to and fro in the city; they shall run upon the wall, they shall climb up upon the houses; they shall enter in at the windows like a thief.
10: The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble: the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining:
11: And the LORD shall utter his voice before his army: for his camp is very great: for he is strong that executeth his word: for the day of the LORD is great and very terrible; and who can abide it?
12: Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning:
13: And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil.
14: Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him; even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the LORD your God?
15: Blow the trumpet in Zion, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly:
16: Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children, and those that suck the breasts: let the bridegroom go forth of his chamber, and the bride out of her closet.
17: Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God?
18: Then will the LORD be jealous for his land, and pity his people.
19: Yea, the LORD will answer and say unto his people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and ye shall be satisfied therewith: and I will no more make you a reproach among the heathen:

26: For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27: For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29: And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

20: But I will remove far off from you the northern army,
(Aholah Dan, Sanhedrin and their armies of freemason Noahides) and will drive him into a land barren and desolate, with his face toward the east sea, and his hinder part toward the utmost sea, and his stink shall come up, and his ill savour shall come up, because he hath done great things.
21: Fear not, O land; be glad and rejoice: for the LORD will do great things.
22: Be not afraid, ye beasts of the field: for the pastures of the wilderness do spring, for the tree beareth her fruit, the fig tree and the vine do yield their strength.
23: Be glad then, ye children of Zion, and rejoice in the LORD your God: for he hath given you the former rain moderately, and he will cause to come down for you the rain, the former rain, and the latter rain in the first month.
24: And the floors shall be full of wheat, and the fats shall overflow with wine and oil. 
25: And I will restore to you the years that the locust hath eaten, the cankerworm, and the caterpiller, and the palmerworm, my great army which I sent among you.

Jude 1: 14: And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
15: To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.

26: And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my people shall never be ashamed. 

Mk:8:38: Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.

27: And ye shall know that I am in the midst of Israel, and that I am the LORD your God, and none else: and my people shall never be ashamed. 
28: And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:
29: And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit.
30: And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.
31: The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come.
32: And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call.

Rv:3:12: Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.

Rv:21:2: And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.,7340,L-3771924,00.html

New York: Haredim (Aholah) equate Jerusalem (Aholibah) police with Nazis

Published:  09.03.09, 19:20 / 

Anti-Zionist Jews gather outside Israeli Consulate in Manhattan to protest treatment of religious Jews (Talmudic satanic) opposed to opening of parking lot in capital on Shabbat. 'Government, Jerusalem municipal government committing acts of brutality against religious Jews on scale not seen in last 65 years,' Satmar rabbi says

Their sabbath means NOTHING without Jesus

Mt:12:8: For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.

Hundreds of anti-Zionist (Aholibah) ultra-Orthodox Jews (Aholah) demonstrated Wednesday in front of the Israeli Consulate in Manhattan in reaction to the recent clashes between police and religious Jews in Jerusalem over a new parking lot opened by the government near the religious neighborhood of Meah Shearim.

Religious Jews object to the government's decision to keep the parking lot open on the Jewish Sabbath.

"The Israeli government and the Jerusalem municipal government are committing acts of brutality against religious Jews on a scale not seen in the last 65 years," said Rabbi Menashe Fulop, a prominent Rabbi of the Satmar Hasidic

"For the past three months, religious Jews have been regularly beaten mercilessly at demonstrations, called by the chief rabbis of Jerusalem, against the parking lot set up by the city government right next to the walls of the Old City. The government is inviting Sabbath-desecrators from the entire country to come to the Holy City, the palace of G-d, the place where the Divine Presence resides, to insult G-d, who warned in His Torah against the desecration of the Sabbath."

Their is NOTHING Holy about that spiritual SODOM and EGYPT where our Lord was crucified

 Rv:11:8: And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Mt:23:37: O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Rally outside consulate in New York (Photo: Ilan Klein)


This wave of violence reached its peak this past Friday night, August 28, when a police officer directed a driver stopped at a traffic light to proceed, although, the religious community claims, the officer was aware of the religious Jew lying under his car. The driver obeyed, injuring the man and dragging his body some distance along the road. The man is still hospitalized.

This is another fable of the joos

A similar incident occurred on Sunday, August 30, at a demonstration staged by religious Jews to protest an autopsy of the body of a Jewish man stabbed to death the previous night: a police car struck and seriously wounded one of the protestors.

"In which country in the world do religious Jews suffer as much persecution as in the state that calls itself Israel?" said Rabbi Fulop.

These are the "Religious" joos who spit on CHRIST Believers

Yirmiyahu Cohen of the "Jews against Zionism" organization told Ynet that the demonstration was held as a show of support for the haredi community's struggle against the opening of the parking lot on Shabbat, adding that police used "excessive force and did some cruel things."

'Jews beaten mercilessly.' New York rally (Photo: Ilan Klein) 

Cohen admitted that the affair served as an excuse for his group to protest against the State of Israel. "We are not against the Israeli people; we oppose the Israeli government and the fact that it is running the country instead of living in the Diaspora. According to the Torah, Jews must remain in the Diaspora until the coming of the messiah," he said.

Moshiach that son of Perdition to be revealed

Police Commissioner Dudi Cohen said this week that he had no plans to turn a blind eye to the situation. "Every public in the State of Israel has the right to protest," Cohen said, "But at the end of the day, there will be zero tolerance to 'Nazi' chants and spitting at policemen."

As for the dispute over the parking lot, the police chief said the matter must be solved between the Jerusalem Municipality and the protesting haredi community.

"In any case, we will always be there to handle the event. I believe the way the Israel Police are dealing with this is the most professional and correct way, with a lot of tolerance and patience. But the solution must be between the two sides," Cohen said. 


Rothschild's Choice

"Barack Obama will go down in history as America’s first Jewish President."

Abner Mikva (Jew)
Former White House Counsel,
Clinton Administration
(Chicago Tribune, Dec. 12, 2008)

Barack Obama won 52.9 percent of the votes in the presidential election. But that is not why he is President of the United States. He sits in the White House for one reason and one reason only: Barack Obama was Rothschild’s Choice.

Even more startling is the goal that Rothschild’s man has been assigned by Illuminati "chieftains" (Sanhedrin) to accomplish. That goal is nothing less than the systematic dismantlement and destruction of America and its occupation by a Jewish-run Mafia.

 Barack Obama was chosen to become the first leader of a Jewish-ruled New World Order.

The American presidential sweepstakes is an impressive spectacle. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent by candidates who fiercely compete on TV, internet, by direct mail, and in print for the hearts and minds of American voters. Millions of words and images are heard, seen and debated. Contentious issues are vigorously discussed.

Finally, on the second Tuesday in November, millions go to the polls and proudly cast their ballots. Voila! The citizens of the U.S.A. have freely chosen their new President to occupy the White House.

It all happened just that way in 2008, didn’t it? And a half-blood white/black man born in Hawaii named Barack H. Obama won—Well, didn’t he? God bless democracy and the American way. All bow down to the peoples’ choice, right?

Barack Obama: Rothschild’s Choice

Well, dear friends...wait just a minute. I have some very disturbing news for you. What you think you saw in 2008 during that strange and tumultuous election year was actually far removed from what really happened behind-the-scenes.

Was Barack H. Obama, in fact, America’s choice? Did he win based on merit according to the consensus of the electorate? The title of my newest video holds the surprising answer to this all-important question: Rothschild’s Choice: Barack Obama and the Hidden Cabal Behind the Plot to Murder America (Available in DVD only).

The ninety minutes of documentation in this video reveal how one man, and one man alone, in 2008 chose America’s new President. And that choice was made long before most Americans had ever even heard the odd and remarkably unconventional name, "Barack Obama." Yes, Obama was Rothschild’s Choice.

The Scion of Today’s Rothschild Dynasty

When President Obama visited Egypt, people there hailed him as the new "Tutankhaman, Pharaoh of Egypt." Amazingly, this cover of Time was

King Tut Mask
Barack Obama on Time Magazine Cover

clearly intended to promote the same idea—one more example of Rothschild's mind-bending psychological control techniques.

Lord Jacob Rothschild is the fourth Baron de Rothschild and rules a vast empire as the current head of the planet’s most illustrious bloodline. Who are the Rothschilds? Few Americans know of the terrible power and influence of this wealthy Jewish dynasty. But believe me, the leaders of this world know of Jacob Rothschild and his kin.

Politicians like Hillary Clinton, Colin Powell, John McCain, Nancy Pelosi, and, yes, Barack Obama tremble in fear when the name "Rothschild" is so much as mentioned in passing.

The power of the Rothschilds is greater than the combined influence and authority of the Democrat and Republican Parties. The red shield, the Rothschild Family crest, holds sway over all the nations of Europe, and many a government has toppled because a Rothschild was displeased with its performance. New York’s Wall Street and London’s "The City" financial districts stoop to hear Rothschilds’ instructions, and national currencies alternatively shrink or boom in value, depending on their favor. As it is recorded in Revelation 18, "the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed (become) rich..."

Barack Obama, America’s First Jewish President

The Rothschilds, above everything else, are Zionist Jews. The hidden cabal ruled by Rothschild always make sure a Zionist politician—be he Democrat or Republican—is sworn in as President of the world’s greatest superpower. The last U.S. president to violate this cardinal rule was Richard M. Nixon, whose spirited rebellion against America’s Rothschild Jewish faction was short lived and tragic in its demise.

Barack Obama’s mysterious emergence as a political superstar was no fluke, no flash-in-the-pan. Obama had been meticulously groomed and trained since youth to become—get this!—America’s First Jewish President. Dare I repeat?—Barack Obama is America’s first Jewish President. No, not by DNA, not according to the flesh, but regardless, a Zionist Jew; and the Jew part is so ingrained in his nature that the world’s most influential billionaire Jewish Illuminati honor him as a devout Zionist who can be trusted. Obama, the Jews say, "has a Jewish soul." Obama is Jewish "in his gut," says one top Jewish politico.

Barack Obama, a Communist Mentored by a Homosexual Pervert

Now, Communism is Jewish, and Obama is also a dyed-in-the-wool Communist. History confirms that the Red Terror’s chief movers and shakers—Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Leon Trotsky—were ideologically Communist. But more significant, these architects of extreme socialism were—and this is paramount—Jews. Jews by race, Jews by conduct and goals. So, too, is Barack Obama both Communist and Jewish, his Jewishness being a matter of spirituality, ambition and affiliations.

As I show in my new video, Barack Obama’s white mother was a Communist, his white grandparents were Communists, and the black man who mentored him from youth, Frank Marshall Davis, was also a Communist. Davis was, moreover, a perverted, bisexual dope-head and a bigoted racist. Davis, who became a father to young Barack, once wrote a book about his own dark sexual exploits. He bragged of "spanking" sex-crazy white women and of having swinger parties with depraved white women. His unusual ties as mentor and teacher of Barack Obama are revealed in my video.

Obama’s most intimate Chicago associates were, and are today, Communists. Virtually all are Jews, and most are gay. Indeed, Barack Obama’s whole life has been a sordid cesspool and saga of Communist instruction, Zionist philosophy, intensely perverted homosexual buggery, fer-vent anti-Americanism and a "Hate Whitey" form of black racism. What we have here is a President whose agenda is alien to our Constitution, a man committed to Marxist aims and a Zionist Police State.

A Frightening Array of Jewish Radicals and Zionist Agents

Surrounding Obama in the White House and in Washington, D.C. is a frightening array of Jewish radicals and Zionist agents of influence. Jewish controllers—including White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and chief political advisor David Axelrod—monitor and guide Obama in his work of destruction. Behind them all is a hidden cabal led by the powerful Rothschild family. President Obama and our cowardly Congress have already given Rothschild’s Wall Street cronies over sixteen trillion dollars in the ongoing "Economic Recession" scam.

Our national wealth has been plundered by these madmen and still, they want more. With Rothschild’s Choice, Barack H. Obama, sitting at the pinnacle of world power, they intend to grab it all. And who can possibly prevent them from achieving their sinister aims?

America’s prosperity is in tatters; our Constitution, our vaunted liberties and freedoms, and everything we and our ancestors have worked—and died for—are now in great jeopardy. We are hanging by a thin, gossamer thread to the last vestiges of our American heritage and way of life. Will we allow Rothschild, his hidden cabal, and his Chosen, President Barack Obama, to sever this single, frayed thread and put an end to the nation that once was a beacon of light to western civilization and to the whole world?

My fervent prayer is that, with God’s help, we will gather up our inner courage and, whatever the cost, bravely stand up to tyranny and make a last stand for truth and righteousness. We haven’t much time. As Jesus said, we must work now "while it is day: the night cometh when no man can work." (John 9:4)


To Do the Right and the Good: A Jewish Approach to Modern Social Ethics

Elliot N. Dorff

Elliot Dorf

About Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff

Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff edits the JPS Jewish Choices, Jewish Voices series, with volumes already published on Body; Money; and Power. He is the author of Love Your Neighbor and Yourself, Matters of Life and Death, To Do the Right and the Good, and For the Love of God and People: A Philosophy of Jewish Law. His speech topics include “Modern Personal Ethics,” “Modern Medical Ethics,” and “Modern Social Ethics.” He directs the Rabbinical and Masters programs at the University of Judaism.

Yes, Maraka the apostate, you are under the Jooish reign of TERROR 


It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004

think the IRS would give any organization tax free status to put joos in gas chambers?

anti-Christ Seeking Tax Free Status to decapitate the True Christ Believers

Noahide Nations Lobbies Federal Govt. for Noahides

Contributed by Ray Pettersen



This notice will provide information and a response regarding an issue that has been brought to the attention of Noahide

Nations by way of a public platform.


Nations and others have been falsely accused, publicly, as being “Xtian

Orgs Posing as Noahides”. These false accusations were started by Frances Marakova of Rachav's B'nai Noah

web site and Yahoo Group along with Pam Rogers and Nancy January of the Oklahoma B'nai Noach Society. They were

in complete violation of Torah for not contacting me first if they had a complaint and instead went public with their false

allegations. I have provided a great deal of information to many Rabbis in Israel and in the United States that clearly

demonstrates the falsehood of their allegations. Now I wish to share some of this information with you.

The issue stems from a current

flaw within the IRS Taxonomy Coding System (NTEE) which the United

States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) uses to label 501(c)3, tax exempt

organizations. These codes are issued by IRS employees working in the

Tax Exempt Organizations Department.

Noahide Nations recognizes that these are the types of issues that are more than plentiful as the Noahide Movement

endeavors to bring forth the truth of HaShem and His Torah to the world. Joseph’s brothers did all they could do

to remove Joseph from the picture but Joseph recognized it as being from HaShem for good. Noahide Nations also views

these challenges as being from HaShem for good and that they are opportunities from HaShem to clear out these

roadblocks to allow true Noahides to proactively participate in our role in His Creation in manifesting HaShem’s

destiny for us as Noahides.

Now I would like to respond to the previously mentioned issue.

Form 1023 is the IRS application submitted by organizations requesting tax exempt recognition from the IRS. For

reasons unknown to us as of this date the IRS internally designated Noahide Nations and other Noahide organizations

with an “X20-Christian” code. They did so without our knowledge or consent. Certainly anyone who does a

cursory examination of the Noahide Nations web site will see that we are no more Christian than a Jewish organization

would be Christian. We were made aware of this through a flurry of phone calls and emails from distraught Noahide

Nations Members who had been deceived into believing that Noahide Nations was really a Christian organization posing

as Noahides. I wish to thank these fine people who acted as true Noahides by contacting us directly and as a result of

their concerns we became aware of the issue and can now do something about it.

Now I would like to present the facts. In presenting the facts I will be providing you with links to many IRS documents and

NoahideNations.Com Powered by Joomla! Generated: 3 September, 2009, 16:38

I encourage you to confirm the facts for yourself.

Our 501(c)3 application was originally submitted in June of 2005 and approved in Nov. 2006. It was submitted under

Central Texas Noahide Center (CTNC) which is our local Noahide group. The 501(c)3 approval process generally takes

around a year. During this year long period the Board of Directors of CTNC approved a plan to implement a world

outreach program known today as Noahide Nations. All proper documents were filed and Noahide Nations is a dba of

CTNC and is under the 501(c)3 umbrella of CTNC and therefore considered tax exempt.

Upon learning about the X20 coding I immediately contacted our attorney as well as our accountant. Individuals and

entities working with Noahide Nations are committed to discovering problems, discussing possible solutions and then

implementing a plan that will bring about resolution. It was no different in this circumstance. I had significant discussions

with the attorney and accountant, and then presented those results to the Board of Directors who all agreed to take this

to the next level. The next level was to have our attorney and accountant directly engage the IRS to investigate the

miscoding of the CTNC/Noahide Nations organization. Some of the key findings of this investigation are the following:

1) The IRS can provide no explanation as to how we were miscoded.

2) There needs to be a more uniform and accurate system established in assigning NTEE Codes.

3) Organizations are not informed in advance of the NTEE Code designation being given.

4) There is no mechanism in place by which an organization can challenge the designation as being inaccurate.

5) There is no system in place that allows for additional NTEE Codes to be issued for organizations that do not fall within

the existing classifications.

6) There is no NTEE Code designation for Noahide.

The current set of codes do not allow for a Noahide Code designation. So it then becomes a matter of choice on the part

of the IRS agent handling the file. In their defense there are many codes to choose from and when it comes to dealing

with a file that doesn’t match the designation criteria of any of the codes they have no way of creating a new code

based on the file. CTNC/Noahide Nations and others are neither Buddhist, Islamic, Christian, Jewish, etc. Thus the

problem and our call to action.

Having no explanation to draw upon from the IRS we can only speculate as to what caused the IRS agent to make their

decision. We feel a possibility might be the inclusion of two additional documents that were not required and they were

the Proclamations for “Day of Reflection” signed by President Reagan and “Education Day

USA” signed by President Bush. These documents clearly identify the Seven Noahide Laws, but again there is no

code for Noahide. This now leaves the choice up to the agent and is purely their opinion and possibly biased depending

on their personal belief system. In our humble opinion, in trying to find a reason and as silly as it may sound, could simply

be that the two Presidents who signed these documents were well known Christians. We may never learn the actual


The Board of Directors for CTNC/Noahide Nations has now chosen to aggressively lobby the IRS as well as the Urban

Institute (Database Management of NTEE Codes) on behalf of all Noahide organizations and all Noahides in the United

States for recognition, at the federal level, of who Noahides really are. Our ultimate goal is that of having a new NTEE

Code established for designation of Noahide organizations.

Our initial goals are as follows:

NoahideNations.Com Powered by Joomla! Generated: 3 September, 2009, 16:38

1) Provide a written explanation in each approved 501(c)3 organizations file as to why a certain Taxonomy Code was


2) Changes must be developed and implemented for a more uniform and accurate system in assigning NTEE Codes.

3) Upon approval of 501(c)3 status every applicant be informed in advance of the NTEE Code designation being given

and are then allowed to agree or challenge.

4) There must be an official mechanism in place by which an organization can challenge the designation as being


5) A viable system established that allows for additional NTEE Codes to be issued for organizations that do not fall within

the existing NTEE classifications.

6) A process in which Noahide organizations with 501(c)3 status can have their NTEE Code changed if they so desire.

7) Creation of new NTEE Code for Noahide.

If we are able to accomplish this difficult task; it may become as historical as the “Day of Reflection” and

the Education Day USA” Proclamations by two Congresses and sign by two presidents acknowledging the Seven

Noahide Laws.

We have begun this most difficult challenge by initially drafting and sending letters to both the IRS and Urban Institute

notifying them of the current inadequacies within their system as well as our objectives and ultimately getting a new

NTEE Code established for Noahides.

In Defense of CTNC/Noahide Nations:

Due to the fact that some have chosen to use this “X20” Code unfavorably towards CTNC/Noahide

Nations, its Founder, members, instructors, etc. we feel it is necessary to present our defense and let you decide for

yourself as to who we are.

CTNC/Noahide Nations filed its Form 1023 in June of 2005 and received its approval on Nov. 8, 2006. We filed for tax

exempt status under church because we are not a school, college, university, hospital, medical research, etc., plus our

attorney said it is the appropriate choice.

Please review the Form 1023 from the IRS web site. In doing your review see if this application asks the question of what

your religious orientation is. The answer is no, but please confirm it for yourself. The document being used against us

which is part of Form 1023 is Schedule A “Church”. Now most of us came out of Christianity so when

someone says the word church, often times the hair on our neck stands straight up. This was the exact response hoped

for by those who have publicly made these false accusations. However, the truth will be seen when you review the Form

1023 Instructions; please scroll down to page 16 which will give you the IRS official definition of the word

“church”. You will find that the definition states: “There is no single definition for the word

“church” for tax purposes.” It also states that “A church includes mosques, temples,

synagogues, and other forms of religious organizations.” However, don’t take my word for it, please

confirm it for yourself at the links below.

Form 1023

NoahideNations.Com Powered by Joomla! Generated: 3 September, 2009, 16:38

Form 1023 Instructions

Please note that we filed using the 2005 Form 1023, the one you review at the IRS site is the revised Form 1023

instituted in 2006. The revisions are subtle and do not effect what is being conveyed here.

We know that our accusers have state that it is our supporting documents such as our Statement of Faith, Mission

Statement and our Description of Activities. These are all located on our web site in the “About US” section

at the links below.

Statement of Faith

Mission Statement

Description of Activities

We are not required to file Tax Form 990 but we did anyway. This form is also being used against us and once again it

revolves around the use of the word “church”. Please scroll down in the Form 990 instruction booklet to

page 3, column 3, to Part B, for which types of organization do not need to file Form 990. Pay particular attention to #5

which states “An exclusively religious activity of any religious order”.

Form 990 Instructions

I hope that the above information sufficiently proves that CTNC/Noahide Nations is NOT a “Xtian Orgs Posing as


Please allow me to take a moment to apologize to all those who have been effected by the drama that has been brought

forth by these few individuals on this issue. I know that many people have suffered as a result of what these people have

done. I must say, in my humble opinion, there are far more productive ways in which to truly help the Noahide Movement

rather than attempting to destroy those who are in it.

Always remember that there will be endless difficulties along the way and people who are bent on preventing the

Noahide Movement from moving forward. We must proactively continue to uncover these difficulties, accept the

NoahideNations.Com Powered by Joomla! Generated: 3 September, 2009, 16:38

challenges and work together to resolve them for future generations in the way that HaShem’s Torah teaches us

in His Torah.

We at Noahide Nations ask for your to keep us in your prayers that HaShem provide His Blessings on our efforts to lobby

the Internal Revenue Service for our own NTEE Code for Noahides.

If you have any questions please feel free to call at 972-853-8941 or email at

May HaShem bless you in all that you do.


Kind regards,

Ray Pettersen


Central Texas Noahide Center/Noahide Nations



NoahideNations.Com Powered by Joomla! Generated: 3 September, 2009, 16:38



Maimonides' Law of Noahides

From English WikiNoah

Jump to: navigation, search

Please note when reading this translation that while Maimonides is the major source of a comprehensive Code of Jewish Law, not all authorities follow his rulings and other opinions have made their way as law.

Concerning Maimonides obligation of Jews to seek (or force) observance of Noachide Laws by Gentiles. A simple reading of the rules of Maimonides' would indicate that Jews or a Jewish court are obligated to coerce Noachides to observe their laws. Such is not the only way, however, to interpret Maimonides' statements. See Rabbi Michael J. Broyde in his "The Obligation of Jews to Seek Observance of Noachide Laws by Gentiles: A Theoretical Review" where the conclusion is that such a view is not supported by Jewish Law.[1]. The book "Torah For Gentiles" by Elisheva Barre makes a clear point that the "coercion" Maimonides talks about applies only to the Canaanite nations, as a condition for their becoming Resident Strangers (see page 22-29 and page 171 note 18).

Concerning Maimonides exclusive use of capital punishment for Noahide violations: most rabbinic authorities disagree with Maimonides, and hold that it means "punishments up to and including capital punishment"; that a system of fines is meant to be set up; and courts set up by Noahides themselves, not Jewish law, should determine the structure and severity of Noahide punishments in whatever manner best serves justice for their particular country.[2]. Barre's book "Torah for Gentiles" analyzes the application of the Noahide laws according to Maimonides.

The question as to what constitutes idolatry today, and whether Christianity constitutes idolatry or a lesser form of partnership, became a matter of debate in Jewish halachic literature. In any event, it has never, at any time in our history, been suggested that Christians be prosecuted according to these laws. [3]



Laws of Kings and their Wars, Chapter 8


הלכות מלכים ומלחמותיהם פרק ח
9 A Yefas to'ar that does not want to put down idolatry, after the twelve month[4] receives capital punishment.[5] Likewise with the city that submits, no treaty is made with them until they have denounced idolatry, destroyed all its places, and have taken upon themselves the rest of the commandments[6] that were commanded to Noahides. Any non-Jew who does not accept the laws that were commanded to Noahides receives capital punishment[7] if he is within our jurisdiction.[8]

BY HJR 104, PL 102-14 Maraka, you are under Talmudic Jooish jurisdiction

See also: Capital Punishment in Noahide law
10 Moshe Rabbenu gave the Torah and the commandments as an inheritance only to Israel[9], as it is written: "[The Torah is...] an inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deuteronomy 33:4). Anyone who wants to may convert from the other nations, as it is written "as with you, [the same shall be] as with the convert" (Numbers 15:15). Anyone who does not wish to is not compelled to accept the Torah and commandments. Instead Moshe Rabbenu commanded, at the word of the Almighty, to compel all those who come into the world to accept the commandments which were commanded to Noah.[10] Anyone who will not accept, receives capital punishment.[11] One who accepts these [basic laws] is called: Ger Toshav in every place.[12] It is necessary to receive him in front of three Torah Scholars.(Three Judge Panel) [13] And all who have taken upon themselves to circumcise, and twelve months have past without circumcision, behold this person is like a heretic among the nations.[14]

See CDC plan to do genital mutulation to all baby boys in USA

CDC Mulls Circumcision For All Baby Boys, Heterosexual Men To ...

CDC Mulls Circumcision For All Baby Boys, Heterosexual Men To Counter HIV, AIDS. ... circumcision of male newborns expect opposition from the plan as the ...


See also:The Obligation of Jews to Seek Observance of Noahide Laws by Gentiles
11 Everyone who accepts the Seven Laws and is careful to do them, this person is one of the Chasidei Umos HaOlam (very pious of the nations of the world), and he has portion in the world to come. This applies to one who accepts them and will do them because the Kodosh Baruch Hu commanded them in the Torah, and informed us by means of Moshe Rabbenu, that Noahides were previously commanded concerning these laws. But if he does them because of an intellectual decision, then he is not a Ger Toshav, and is not of the Chasidei Umos HaOlam, he is [only] one of their Chochmei Umos HaOlam (wise men of the nations of the world).

Laws of Kings and their Wars, Chapter 9


1 Adam HaRishon was commanded in six things:
  • [the prohibition] concerning idolatry (No Jesus)
  • [the prohibition] concerning blasphemy (No Jesus)
  • [the prohibition] concerning spilling of blood
  • [the prohibition] concerning forbidden relations
  • [the prohibition] concerning robbery
  • and [the injunction of establishing courts of] justice.

Even though all these were received into our hands from Moshe Rabbenu, and the intelect naturally inclines towards them – from a general reading of the words of Torah, they can see that they were commanded in these. [G-d] added to Noah [the commandment] concerning a torn limb, as it is written "From the flesh, its life is in the blood, do not eat" (Genesis 9:4). This makes seven commandments. This is how matters stood in the world until Avraham. Avraham came and was commanded other things beyond this, in circumcision and he prayed the morning prayers. Yitzchak began tithing, and added the afternoon prayers. Yaakov added [the prohibition of not eating] the sciatic nerve and prayed the evening prayers. In Egypt, Amram was commanded other things, until Moshe Rabbenu came and completed [the giving] of the Torah, by his hand.

See also: Chart of Maimonides' Noahide Laws
2 A Noahide that serves idolatry – is liable. Who [are we refering to]? One that serves idolatry in the normal way. All who serve idolatry and would be given capital punishment by a Jewish court, a Noahide is also given capital punishment. All who a Jewish court would not give capital punishment, neither is a Noahide given capital punishment. Nevertheless, even though [a Noahide] would not be executed [for these forms of worship], he is forbidden [to engage] in all of them. It is not allowed for them to erect an monument, plant a 'holy tree', nor to make images [of people] and the like, [even though they are only] for the sake of decoration.

3 A Noahide who curses G-d's name, whether by the particular name of G-d, or another name, in any language – is liable, whereas this differs from Jewish law.

4 A Noahide that murdered someone, even if it was a fetus in its mother's womb – he is given capital punishment [in retribution] for its [death]. Even if the person killed was terminally ill, or bound and placed before a lion, or allowed him to die of starvation – since he caused someone to die in some manner, he is given capital punishment. Even if someone kills a pursuer, when he could have been saved by [simply wounding] one of [the pursuer's] limbs, he is given capital punishment, whereas this differs from Jewish law.

5 Six illicit relations are forbidden to a Noahide: his mother, wife of his father, a married woman, his maternal sister, a male, or a beast, as it is written "Therefore, a man shall leave his father" (Genesis 2:24) this is

  • ["his father"] - the wife of his father
  • "and his mother" – as understood
  • "and cleave to his wife" - not the wife of his neighbor
  • "his wife [woman]" - not a male
  • "and they shall become one flesh" - to exclude beasts, animals or birds, that cannot be "one flesh"
  • ["materal sister"] - that is to say "She is my sister, my father's daughter, but not my mother's. [Thus,] she became my wife." (Genesis 20:12)


6 A Noahide is liable [for relations with his mother even though] she was seduced or raped by his father [and never married to him], for this is [even so] his mother in every respect, and he is liable for [relations with] the wife of his father, even after the father's death. He is liable for homosexuality, whether [with someone] young or old, for bestiality, whether young or old. He is given capital punishment, but the animal is not killed – [Noahide law] was not commanded in the killing of the animal, this is only in Jewish law.
ו בן נח חייב על מפותת אביו, ואנוסת אביו, הרי היא אימו מכל מקום. וחייב על אשת אביו, אפילו לאחר מיתת אביו. וחייב על הזכור, בין קטן בין גדול; ועל הבהמה, בין קטנה בין גדולה. והוא נהרג לבדו, ואין הורגין את הבהמה, שלא נצטוו בהריגת בהמה, אלא ישראל.
7 A Noahide is not liable for [breaking the law] of "neighbor's wife" unless they engage in relations in the normal manner after the marriage had been consummated. But, if she was enagaged or had undergone a wedding ceremony, but the marriage has not been consummated – he is not liable for [capital punishment] over her, as is is written: "for she has been possessed by [her] husband." (Genesis 20:3). When do these things speak about? When a Noahide man sleeps with a Noahide woman. But, a non-Jew who sleeps with a [married] Jewish woman, in normal or even abnormal manner, is liable [and falls under the jurisdiction of Jewish law:]. If [a non-Jew slept] with an engaged woman – he is stoned to death, as per Jewish law. If he sleeps with her after she has undergone the wedding ceremony, but the marriage has not been consummated – he is strangled to death, as per Jewish law. However, if he sleeps with a Jewish woman after her marriage has been consummated, this falls under the law of "neighbor's wife" and he executed by beheading, [as per Noahide law].
See also: Noahide Law as International Law


8 A Noahide who singles out a maid-servants for his slave and [afterwards] sleeps with her – he is given capital punishment because of her, for [breaking the law of] "neighbor's wife". He is not liable [for sleeping] with her, until [the marriage] has been officiated and become public knowledge, and everyone refers to her as "the wife of the slave so-and-so." When do [relations with] her return to being permitted? When he separates her from his slave and uncovers her hair in the market place. When is a married [Noahide] woman considered a divorced woman as [in Jewish law]? When he removes her from his home and sends her on her own, or when she leaves his domain and goes away. [In Noahide law] there is no [requirement for] a divorce in writing, nor is the matter at the husbands sole discretion, rather anytime that either [the husband] or [the wife] decides to separate from each other – they may separated [and then, are no longer considered as married.]
See also: Divorce in Noahide law


9 A Noahide is liable for [breaking the law of] robbery whether he stole from a non-Jew or from a Jew. One who robs [forcibly] or steals money, a kidnaper, an [employer who] withholds the wages of a worker, and the like, even a worker who eats [from his employer's produce] not during working hours – in all these, he is liable and considered a thief. This differs in Jewish law. He is liable even [for stealing something] worth less than a perutah; A Noahide who stole less than the worth of a perutah and another stole it from him – they are both given capital punishment because of it.
See also: Noahide Law and Legal Measurements


10 And also he is liable for [breaking the law of] "torn limb" or "torn meat" – in any amount, for [the specifications of] minimum amounts is defined only in Jewish law [and not Noahide law]. He is permitted blood from a living creature.
See also: Noahide Law and Blood in Meat



11 [This law applies to] a limb or meat, that is separated from a domesticated animal or a [wild] animal; However, it appears to me that a Noahide is not given capital punishment for a "torn limb" from a bird.


12 One who slaughters a domesticated animal, even if one severs the two signs [that would make it properly killed under Jewish law], as long as it moves convulsively, the limbs and meat which are separated from it are forbidden to a Noahide because of [breaking the law of a] "torn limb"
See also: Noahide Law and Kosher Meat



13 Everyting that is prohibited in Jewish law concerning a "torn limb" is also prohibited according to Noahide law. There are further prohibitions in Noahide law that are not in Jewish law: Noahide law includes domesticated animals and [wild] animals whether they are from a kosher or non-kosher species. Also, a limb or meat that is separated from an animal that is [still] moving convulsively, even though it has been killed properly according to Jewish law by severing the two signs – this is forbidden to a Noahide because it is considered a "torn limb".


14 In what way must [Noahides] fulfill the commandment to establish courts of justice? They are obligated to set up judges and magistrates in every major city to judge according to the above six laws, to warn the nation [regarding their observance]; A noahide who breaks one of these seven laws – is executed by decapitation. [additional text: for example: an idolater, or blasphemer, or muderer, or someone who has had one of the six illicit relations according to [Noahide law], or robbed even the worth of a peruta, or consumed any amount of "torn limb" or "torn meat", or witnessed someone breaking one of these laws, and did not judge and sentence him – all these people are executed by decapitation.] For this all the inhabitants of Shechem were liable for capital punishment. This was because Shechem kidnapped [someone] and they witnessed this and knew [what he had done], but did not judge him. A Noahide is [may be] executed [on the basis of the testimony of] one witness and [the verdict of] a single judge. No prior warning [is required]. Relatives may serve as witnesses. However, a woman may not serve as a witness or a judge [in Noahide law].

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. 

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory]

Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Laws of Kings and their Wars, Chapter 10

1 A Noahide that inadvertently violates one of the commandments given to him, is exempt from all [punishment], except for inadvertent homicide. In that case, if the redeemer of the blood killed [the inadvertent killer], he is not punished for it; nor is [may the inadvertent killer seek asylum] in a city of refuge; but their courts may not put him to death. What are we referring to? When he accidentally transgresses one of the commandments and without intent, for example one who sleeps with another man's wife, and imagines that she is his own wife or unmarried. But if he knew that it was another man's wife, but did not know that she was forbidden to him, or it arose in his heart that this was a permitted matter to him; or concerning killing, if he didn't know that it was forbidden to kill; behold this is like an intentional action, and he is given capital punishment. It is not considered as an inadvertent violation, because he must learn [these laws], and he did not.


2 A Noahide who is forced by compulsion to transgress one of the commandments given to him, he is permitted to transgress. Even if forced to serve idolatry, he may serve, according to [principle] that they are not commanded on Kiddush Hashem. And a minor, deaf-mute or fool, are never punished, because they are not [bound by any] commandments.


3 Noahide that converts, is circumcised and immerses [in a mivkah], and afterward wants to return from [following] after Hashem [as a Jew], and to be Ger Toshov only, like he was previously, [the court] does not heed his request: Instead he must be like an Israelite in all matters, or he receives capital punishment. If he was a minor when he was immersed by the court, he may object [to his conversion] at the time that he attains majority, and he is allowed to become a Ger Toshov only. But if he does not object at the time he attains majority, he is not allowed to object at a later time, but he is considered a full convert. Accordingly if [a Jew has relations with] a young girl that was immersed by court of law, [she is entitled to all] monies specified by the ketubah, or fines [according to] rape or seduction, [however these monies are] are placed under the custody of the court until she attains majority and does not object to her conversion. Lest she benefit by obtaining majority and objecting [to her conversion], in this situation she obtains monies as a non-Jew [outside of Jewish law] that she was only entitled to according to Jewish law.


4 noahide that curses and hashem , or that served idolatry , or that comes on wife of his friend , or that killing his friend , and converts , exempt . killing jew , or that comes on wife of israel , and converts , required ; and they kill him on jew , and is decapitated him on wife of israel that master of , that behold have changed the laws concerning him .


5 already we have explained that all deaths of noahides in sword , except wife of israel, betrothed maiden , he is stoned , and if another mistress that entered to canopy beforehand that consummated , he is strangled .


6 according to kaballah , that noahides are forbbiden in cross-breeding of animal , and in grafting of tree only ; and naught are killed on account of them . and non-jew that struck israel , even suffering in him , although that he required death , doesn't killed .


7 the circumcision , was commanded in it avraham and his seed only , that as it is said " ye and your seed after you , to their generations " ( genesis 17:9 ). go out his seed of ishmael , that as it is said " because in yitzkhaq , will be called to you seed " ( genesis 21:12 ). and go out esav , that behold yitzkhaq said to ya'aqov " and he will give to you and blessing of avraham , to you and to your seed " ( genesis 28:4 ), from the principle that he by himself his seed of avraham the hold in his faith and his ways the straight , and they the obligated ones in circumcision .


8 they say sages that children of qeturah , that they his seed of avraham that they came another ishmael and yitzkhaq , are obligated in circumcision . and since and they have been mixed today children of ishmael in children of qeturah , they are obligated all in circumcision in eighth ; and naught are killed about her .
9 non-jew that business in torah , required death ; not he shall busy himself except in their seven commandments only . and also non-jew that sabbath , even direction from the days of the secular , if he did him for himself aslike sabbath , required death ; and necessary naught say if he did festival for himself . like to to him of matter : naught allowing them to innovate custom , and do commandments to themselves from their intelligence , except or let there be full convert and he will receive all the commandments , or stand in his statutes and not add and not detract . and if business in torah , or sabbath , or innovated matter , beat him and they are punished him , and inform him that he required death on this ; but doesn't killed .


10 noahide that wants do command from rest commandments the torah , amphoral to receive reward , naught prevent him do her like required . and if he brings ascend , from receive from him . given charity , from receive from him ; and it appears me that given her to poor of israel , since and he sustained from israel , and command on to support him . but pronounced that given charity , from receive from him , and given her to poor of nations .


11 are obligated court of law of israel , to place judges to if only the converts the residents , to judge to them according to judgements if only , amphoral that not decadent the world . if saw court of law that they will set up their judges of them , setting up ; and if saw that they will set up to them from israel , they will set up .


12 two of nations that they came to your presence to judge in laws of israel , and they want both of them , judge to them judgement torah . the one desire , and the one doesn't desire , naught compelled him to judge except in their laws . there was israel and non-jew , if there is privilege to israel in their laws , judge to him in their laws and they say to him , so your laws ; and if there is privilege to israel in our law , judge to him judgement torah and they say to him , so our law . and it appears me that naught do thus to resident alien , except always judge to him in their laws . and also it appears me that customary nation converts of resident by way of country , and philanthropy like israel , that behold we commanded to support him , that as it is said " to proselyte that in your gates give it to them and eat it " ( deuteronomy 14:21). and this that they say sages , naught compelling to them peace , in nations , not in resident alien . even the nations , command us sages to visit their sick , and to bury their dead with dead of israel , and to support poor of at all poor of israel , because ways of peace : behold as it is said " benefit Hashem to all ; and merciful , on all actions " ( psalms 145, 9 ), and as it is said " its ways , amenity ; and all its paths , peace " ( proverbs 3 , 17 ).


See Also


  1. The Obligation of Jews to Seek Observance of Noahide Laws by Gentiles
  2. Capital Punishment in Noahide law
  3. Christianity and Noahide Law
  4. The Kesef Mishneh asks why a Yefas to'ar is allowed to worship for such a long period of time when this tolerance is not shown in any other case. The commentaries suggest that this leniency was granted because she was taken by force as prisoner during battle.
  5. Devarim 21:14 says that if the Yefas to'ar is released, "send her to herself". On this the Midrash HaGadol comments "send her to herself, but not to her gods", i.e. she must be executed if she remains in idolatry.
  6. Here it refers to idolatry, hence the reference to the "other" six commandments. See Law of Kings and their Wars 6:1
  7. See Law of Kings and their Wars 9:14
  8. Commentaries: our undisputed authority. In Laws of Idolatry 10:6, the Rambam says that no idolaters should be allowed to live among Jews "when the hand of Israel is powerful over them." The extent of the authority, or under what conditions, is a matter of dispute among the commentaries. During the Second Temple period, it appears that the Sages did not exercise this authority. The consensus of halachic opinion holds that this ruling of the Rambam does not apply today, and may require further clarification and limitation.
  9. See Laws of Kings and their Wars 10:9 where is explains that a non-Jew who studies Torah is worthy of death at the hand of Heaven, under certain conditions.
  10. Tosefos Yom Tov (Avos 3:14) writes "as the Rambam writes, we were commanded by Moses [to compel the non-Jews to accept the Seven Laws]. If this applies to compulsion at the point of the sword, with threats of execution,... it surely applies regarding compulsion through persuasion, to lead their hearts to the will of their Creator." The Chasam Sofer (Choshen Mishpat, responsum 85) writes that it is a mitzvah to guide the gentiles in the service of G-d. However some authorities disagree and hold that the obligation is only moral, not a legal requirement, see introduction above.
  11. In contrast to the guidance mentioned previously, this law only applies when the Jews have undisputed authority of the Land of Israel, See Laws of Kings and their Wars 9:14
  12. According to the Rambam, the laws concerning Ger Toshav only applies when the entire (or majority) of Jewish people live in the Land of Israel (see Laws of Idolatry 10:6) and at that time non-Jews can become a Ger Toshav in any land. Other authorities disagree and hold that one may become a Ger Toshav today. Some authorities require the non-Jew to live in the Land of Israel to be considered a Ger Toshav.
  13. Three Torah Scholars constitute a rabbinical court. Some commentaries have noted that this is the same requirement for a non-Jews conversion to Judaism, inviting comparison between conversion and a "partial conversion" of the Ger Toshav. Other authorities view the requirement to appear before the court as performing a legal, rather than spiritual function, pointing out that here the non-Jew is re-affirming their covenant rather than 'switching' covenants.
  14. The Rambam, in the Laws of Kings and their Wars 10, outlines the rules governing our relationship with Jews and non-Jews. A distinction is made between non-Jews who uphold a recognized legal system based on the Seven Laws and those who are outside any recognized legal system. A non-Jew who belongs to a nation who has taken on circumcision (generally understood to refer to the Arabs), but fails to do so falls outside the relationship defined by the Seven Laws. Other texts read "this person is like the other nations", which is understood to imply that someone who agrees to circumcise himself, i.e. convert to Judaism, but twelve months elapse without circumcising himself, his original commitment to convert is no longer taken seriously and he reverts to an ordinary non-Jew.



Maraka, be shore to sport the troops

gawd bliss Maraka, land of the brave

Animal House in Afghanistan

Daniel Schulman




State Department guards in Afghanistan (Photo:

September 1, 2009

Drunken brawls, prostitutes, hazing and humiliation, taking vodka shots out of buttcracks— no, the perpetrators of these Animal House-like antics aren't some depraved frat brothers. They are the private security contractors guarding Camp Sullivan, otherwise known as the US Embassy in Kabul.

Be proud of your sons Maraka 

These allegations, and many more, are contained in a letter sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Tuesday by the Project on Government Oversight, which has been investigating the embassy security contract held by ArmorGroup North America (a subsidiary of Wackenhut, which is in turn owned by the security behemoth G4S). The contractor was the subject of a congressional probe earlier this summer that found serious lapses in the company's handling of the embassy security contract, which internal State Department documents said left the embassy compound "in jeopardy." Nevertheless, the government opted to extend the company's 5-year, $189 million contract for another year. 


Underscoring the scope of the problems within ArmorGroup's Afghanistan operation, POGO says that nearly a tenth of the company's 450-man embassy security force contacted the watchdog group to "express concerns about and provide evidence of a pattern of blatant, longstanding violations of the security contract, and of a pervasive breakdown in the chain of command and guard force discipline and morale."

In the letter to Clinton, POGO executive director Danielle Brian writes:

This environment has resulted in chronic turnover by U.S./ex-pat guards. According to the State Department, "nearly 90% of the incumbent US/Expats left within the first six months of contract performance." According to POGO sources, the U.S./ex-pat guard turnover may be as high as 100 percent annually. This untenable turnover prevents the guard force from developing team cohesion, and requires constant training for new replacement recruits. The guards have come to POGO because they say they believe strongly in the mission, but are concerned that many good guards are quitting out of frustration or being fired for refusing to participate in the misconduct, and that those responsible for the misconduct are not being held accountable.

Brian's letter suggests that Wackenhut Vice President Sam Brinkley, who testified before a Senate panel in June about ArmorGroup's performance of the embassy contract, may have misled Congress.

Despite Wackenhut Vice President Sam Brinkley's sworn Senate testimony that "…the Kabul contract has been fully-staffed since January 2009…" the truth is that chronic understaffing of the guard force continues to be a major problem. And evidence suggests Mr. Brinkley knew that. Around March, according to numerous participants, he was confronted by some 50 guards at Camp Sullivan who complained to him directly about a severe, ongoing guard shortage. Then, in an April 2009 memo to a State Department official, U.S. Embassy Kabul guard force Commander Werner Ilic reported that guard shortages had caused chronic sleep deprivation among his men. He described a situation in which guards habitually face 14-hour-day work cycles extending for as many as eight weeks in a row, frequently alternating between day and night shifts. He concluded that "this ultimately diminishes the LGF's [Local Guard Force's] ability to provide security." The contract with the State Department specifies that guards may not be on duty for longer than 12 consecutive hours. Interviewees and documents reveal that short-staffing frequently results in the denial of contractually guaranteed leave and vacation, and that those who do not comply are threatened with termination or actually fired.

But criticisms of failing to meet manpower obligations are nothing compared to the bacchanalian activities ArmorGroup's personnel were allegedly engaged in.

Guards have come to POGO with allegations and photographic evidence that some supervisors and guards are engaging in near-weekly deviant hazing and humiliation of subordinates. Witnesses report that the highest levels of AGNA management in Kabul are aware of and have personally observed—or even engaged in—these activities, but have done nothing to stop them. Indeed, management has condoned this misconduct, declining to take disciplinary action against those responsible and allowing two of the worst offending supervisors to resign and allegedly move on to work on other U.S. contracts. The lewd and deviant behavior of approximately 30 supervisors and guards has resulted in complete distrust of leadership and a breakdown of the chain of command, compromising security.

Numerous emails, photographs, and videos portray a Lord of the Flies environment. One email from a current guard describes scenes in which guards and supervisors are "peeing on people, eating potato chips out of [buttock] cracks, vodka shots out of [buttock] cracks (there is video of that one), broken doors after drnken [sic] brawls, threats and intimidation from those leaders participating in this activity…." Photograph after photograph shows guards—including supervisors—at parties in various stages of nudity, sometimes fondling each other. These parties take place just a few yards from the housing of other supervisors.

Multiple guards say this deviant hazing has created a climate of fear and coercion, with those who declined to participate often ridiculed, humiliated, demoted, or even fired. The result is an environment that is dangerous and volatile. Some guards have reported barricading themselves in their rooms for fear that those carrying out the hazing will harm them physically. Others have reported that AGNA management has begun to conduct a witch hunt to identify employees who have provided information about this atmosphere to POGO.

These allegations raise serious questions about why ArmorGroup has been allowed to retain this important contract, which gives the company the responsibility for protecting the lives of the hundreds of diplomats, officials, and others who work within the embassy compound. Also in question is the State Department's ability to provide adequate oversight of contractors under its jurisdiction. It should at least be able to ensure that its embassy doesn't provide the backdrop for a Contractors Gone Wild video. 

POGO is calling on the State Department to launch an independent investigation of the Kabul embassy contract and to "consider initiating suspension and debarment proceedings against the companies ArmorGroup North America." As for the State Department officials who were supposed to be providing oversight, the watchdog says they, too, should be held accountable. Perhaps as punishment they ought to be forced to watch the buttcrack vodka shot video.

UPDATE: The State Department responds. Plus: Why did a top State official tell Congress in June that ArmorGroup's performance in Afghanistan "has been and is sound" when internal documents suggest he had reason to belive otherwise?

Bliss ya Maraka

YOU Have been FOOLED BY SATAN , inhabitants of planet earth


'Muslim Leader' Adnan Oktar, aka Harun Yahya Involved in 'Noahide' Fraud, Temple Movement

It's difficult to believe at this late date that any Muslim or Arab could believe that Zionists would be pacified if Solomon's Temple was rebuilt, but that is the message that the 'anti-Zionist' Adnan Oktar aka Harun Yahyah is now peddling.

Out of a sense of collective responsibility for world peace and for all humanity we have found it timely to call to the World and exclaim that there is a way out for all peoples. It is etched in a call to all humanity: We are all the sons of one father, the descendants of Adam, and all humanity is but a single family. Peace among Nations will be achieved through building the House of G-d, where all peoples will serve as foreseen by King Solomon in his prayers at the dedication of the First Holy Temple. Come let us love and respect one another, and love and honor and hold our heavenly Father in awe. Let us establish a house of prayer in His name in order to worship and serve Him together, for the sake of His great compassion. He surely does not want the blood of His creations spilled, but prefers love and peace among all mankind. We pray to the Almighty Creator, that you harken to our Call. Together - each according to his or her ability - we shall work towards the building of the House of Prayer for All Nations on the Temple Mount in peace and mutual understanding


This is just too important not to blog about. I am even going to RED FLAG this post!!!


A Muslim whose name is Adnan Oktar, who uses the pen name of Harun Yahya, is a controversial but highly influential Muslim intellectual and author with over 65 million of his books in circulation worldwide. Oktar recently met with three representatives from the re-established Jewish Sanhedrin, a group of 71 Orthodox rabbis and scholars from Israel, to discuss how religious Muslims, Jews and Christians can work together.

What was said is absolutely mind boggling…

Oktar has also stated that the Temple of Solomon "will be rebuilt and all believers will worship there in tranquility." During his meeting with the Sanhedrin rabbis, Oktar expressed his belief that the Temple could be rebuilt in one year:

It could be done in a year at most. It could be built to the same perfection and beauty. The Torah says it was built in 13 years, if I remember correctly. It could be rebuilt in a year in its perfect form.

And this too…!!!

The vision of God’s Holy Mountain may not be all that far off. The Obama administration has also suggested that Jerusalem could become an international city that would be shared by peoples from all three Abrahamic faiths.

Even the Knesset is getting in on the discussion. Members of the Israeli Knesset gathered together last week with several Jewish scholars to discuss the role of the Jewish Temple in Jewish life. Referring to those Muslims who do not acknowledge the Jewish history of the Temple Mount, Dr. Mordechai Keidar stated, "The struggle for Jerusalem is not territorial, it is theological. … Do we give in to the Muslim claim that Judaism is no longer relevant?"

Want to see an artistic interpretation of the 3rd temple…

The artistic image on the enclosed card depicts a rebuilt Jewish Temple in peaceful proximity to the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque and other existing Islamic and Christian shrines in Jerusalem, in fulfillment of the prophecy: “On that day God will be One and His Name One” (Zechariah 14:9)

Want to know about the vision behind it all…

This is a vision about transforming the Temple Mount from a place of contention to truly God’s Holy Mountain, a house of prayer for all people (Isaiah 56:7). It represents the prophecy of Zechariah 14:9 of the One God worshipped by the entire world in peace together.

Are you interested in how the Sanhedrin fits into all of this…

From June 30 – July 3, 2009, representatives of the Jerusalem Court for Bnei Noah met with Mr. Adnan Oktar, also known as Harun Yahya. Two statements were prepared, one from the Jerusalem Court, one from Mr. Oktar

1) We have come here, at the gracious invitation of Mr. Adnan Oktar, otherwise known as Harun Yahya, to look for leadership in the Islamic community. Over the centuries there have rarely been sincere leaders who fought for truth and understanding and against corruption and disbelief. We have heard that Harun Yahya is leading an intellectual struggle against atheist ideologies to increase belief and end corruption and atheism in the world. We understand that together we are looking forward to the fulfillment of the prophecy of Zephania:
For then will I turn clear language to the Nations, that they may all call upon the name of G-d, to serve Him shoulder to shoulder.


The Bnei Noah rang alarm bells for me big time.


Because I have already blogged about them a while back and what I found out is almost impossible to believe! The Noahide Laws of the Bnei Noah allows for BEHEADING those who do not follow their seven laws!!! Does this sound vaguely familiar to you???

…also documented the punishment for not following the Noahide Law, one of which is death by beheading. This is from the official Bnei Noah Site.

I too, have wondered about these laws and have found it interesting that the Temple has to be rebuilt in order for these laws to come into effect. For this to happen there is the problem of the Dome of the Rock. But this is not so much of a problem when you consider that the Dome of the Rock can stay just where it is, and be classed as the court of Gentiles according to Prof. Joseph Patrich who got back to me with an email and said this… It is outside the temple court, but still within the screen barring gentile entrance.



Keep in mind, who was and is not and yet is

Rv:17:8: The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Rv:13:3: And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

Subsequent care

On 28 May 2006, Sharon was transferred from the hospital in Jerusalem to a long-term care unit of the Sheba Medical Center in Tel HaShomer, a large civilian and military hospital. Ha'aretz reported that this move was an indication that Sharon's doctors did not expect him to emerge from his coma in the foreseeable future. Dr. Yuli Krieger, a physician not involved in Sharon's case, told Israel Radio that the chances of waking up after such a lengthy coma were small. "Every day that passes after this kind of event with the patient still unconscious the chances that he will gain consciousness get smaller," said Krieger, Deputy Head of Levinstein House, another long-term care facility.[38]

On 23 July 2006, CNN reported that Sharon's condition was deteriorating and his kidney function was worsening.[39] On 26 July 2006 doctors moved him to intensive care and began hemofiltration.[40] On 14 August 2006 doctors reported that Sharon's condition worsened significantly and that he was suffering from pneumonia in both lungs.[41] On 29 August, doctors reported that he had been successfully treated for his pneumonia and moved out of intensive care back to the long-term care unit.[42]

On 3 November 2006, it was reported that Sharon had been admitted to intensive care after contracting an infection, though doctors insisted that his condition was 'stable'.[43] He was moved out of the intensive care unit on 6 November 2006 after treatment for a heart infection. Doctors stated that "his heart function has improved after being treated for an infection and his overall condition has stabilised".[44]

Sharon has remained in a long-term care centre since 6 November 2006.[45] Medical experts have indicated that Sharon's cognitive abilities were destroyed by the massive stroke, and that he is in a persistent vegetative state with slim chances of regaining consciousness.[46]

On 13 April 2007, it was reported that Sharon's condition had slightly improved and that according to his son, Omri, he was marginally responsive.[47] On 26 February 2009 he turned 81, still comatose but in a stable condition.[48]


Persistent vegetative state

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Persistent vegetative state
ICD-9 780.03
MeSH D018458

A persistent vegetative state is a condition of patients with severe brain damage who were in a coma, but then progressed to a state of wakefulness without detectable awareness. It is a diagnosis of some uncertainty in that it deals with a syndrome. It is classified as a Permanent Vegetative State (PVS) after approximately 1 year of being in a Persistent Vegetative State which is called so after 4 weeks in a Vegetative State (VS).


[] Medical definition

A wakeful unconscious state that lasts longer than a few weeks is referred to as a persistent vegetative state.[1]

[edit] Legal/ethical definition

As opposed to brain death and comatose, PVS is not recognized as death in any legal system. This ethical grey area has led to several court cases involving people in a PVS, those who believe that they should be allowed to die, and those who are equally determined that, if recovery is possible, care should continue. This ethical issue raises questions about autonomy, quality of life, appropriate use of resources, the wishes of family members, professional responsibilities, and many more.

[edit] History

The syndrome was first described in 1940 by Ernst Kretschmer who called it apallic Syndrome.[2] The term persistent vegetative state was coined in 1972 by Scottish spinal surgeon Bryan Jennett and American neurologist Fred Plum to describe a syndrome that seemed to have been made possible by medicine's increased capacities to keep patients' bodies alive.[3][4]

[edit] Classification

Terminology in this area is somewhat confused. While the term persistent vegetative state is the most frequent in media usage and legal provisions, it is discouraged by United Kingdom neurologists, who favour the terminology of the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) which refers only to the vegetative state, the continuing vegetative state, and the permanent vegetative state.[5]

The vegetative state is a chronic or long-term condition. This condition differs from a coma: a coma is a state that lacks both awareness and wakefulness, while PVS patients have awakened from coma, but still have not regained awareness. In the vegetative state patients can open their eyelids occasionally and demonstrate sleep-wake cycles. They also completely lack cognitive function. The vegetative state is also called coma vigil. The continuing vegetative state describes a patient's diagnosis prior to confirmation of the permanence of the condition. The permanent vegetative state occurs when the vegetative state is deemed permanent; a prediction is being made that the patient will never recover awareness. This prediction cannot be made with absolute certainty. However, the chances of regaining awareness diminish considerably as the time spent in the vegetative state increases (Royal College of Physicians, 1996).

This typology distinguishes various stages of the condition rather than using one term for them all. In his most recent book The Vegetative State, Jennett himself adopts this usage, on the grounds that "the 'persistent' component of this term ... may seem to suggest irreversibility".[3] The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council has suggested "post coma unresponsiveness" as an alternative term.[6]

[edit] Signs and symptoms

Most PVS patients are unresponsive to external stimuli and their conditions are associated with different levels of consciousness. Some level of consciousness means a person can still respond, in varying degrees, to stimulation. A person in a coma, however, cannot. In addition, PVS patients often open their eyes in response to feeding, which has to be done by others; they are capable of swallowing, whereas patients in a coma subsist with their eyes closed (Emmett, 1989).

PVS patients' eyes might be in a relatively fixed position, or track moving objects, or move in a disconjugate (i.e. completely unsynchronized) manner. They may experience sleep-wake cycles, or be in a state of chronic wakefulness. They may exhibit some behaviors that can be construed as arising from partial consciousness, such as grinding their teeth, swallowing, smiling, shedding tears, grunting, moaning, or screaming without any apparent external stimulus.

Individuals in PVS are seldom on any life-sustaining equipment other than a feeding tube because the brainstem, the center of vegetative functions (such as heart rate and rhythm, respiration, and gastrointestinal activity) is relatively intact (Emmett, 1989).

[edit] Causes

There are three different causes of PVS: brain injuries which may be either acute and traumatic, or non-traumatic; degenerative and metabolic brain disorders, and severe congenital abnormalities of the central nervous system.

Medical books (such as Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins. (2007). In A Page: Pediatric Signs and Symptoms) describe several potential causes of PVS, which are as follows:

In addition, these authors claim that doctors sometimes use the mnemonic device AEIOU-TIPS to recall portions of the differential diagnosis: Alcohol ingestion and acidosis, Epilepsy and encephalopathy, Infection, Opiates, Uremia, Trauma, Insulin overdose or inflammatory disorders, Poisoning and psychogenic causes, and Shock.

[edit] Diagnosis

Despite converging agreement about the definition of persistent vegetative state, recent reports have raised concerns about the accuracy of diagnosis in some patients, and the extent to which, in a selection of cases, residual cognitive functions may remain undetected and patients are diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state. Objective assessment of residual cognitive function can be extremely difficult as motor responses may be minimal, inconsistent, and difficult to document in many patients, or may be undetectable in others because no cognitive output is possible (Owen et al., 2002). In recent years, a number of studies have demonstrated an important role for functional neuroimaging in the identification of residual cognitive function in persistent vegetative state; this technology is providing new insights into cerebral activity in patients with severe brain damage. Such studies, when successful, may be particularly useful where there is concern about the accuracy of the diagnosis and the possibility that residual cognitive function has remained undetected.

[edit] Diagnostic experiments

Researchers have begun to use functional neuroimaging studies to study covert cognitive processing in patients with a clinical diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Activations in response to sensory stimuli with positron emission tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and electrophysiological methods can provide information on the presence, degree, and location of any residual brain function. However, use of these techniques in people with severe brain damage is methodologically, clinically, and theoretically complex and needs careful quantitative analysis and interpretation.

For example, PET studies have shown the identification of residual cognitive function in persistent vegetative state. That is, an external stimulation, such as a painful stimulus, still activates 'primary' sensory cortices in these patients but these areas are functionally disconnected from 'higher order' associative areas needed for awareness. These results show that parts of the cortex are indeed still functioning in 'vegetative' patients (Matsuda et al., 2003).

In addition, other PET studies have revealed preserved and consistent responses in predicted regions of auditory cortex in response to intelligible speech stimuli. Moreover, a preliminary fMRI examination revealed partially intact responses to semantically ambiguous stimuli, which are known to tap higher aspects of speech comprehension (Boly, 2004).

Furthermore, several studies have used PET to assess the central processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in patients in PVS. Noxious somatosensory stimulation activated midbrain, contralateral thalamus, and primary somatosensory cortex in each and every PVS patient, even in the absence of detectable cortical evoked potentials. In conclusion, somatosensory stimulation of PVS patients, at intensities that elicited pain in controls, resulted in increased neuronal activity in primary somatosensory cortex, even if resting brain metabolism was severely impaired. However, this activation of primary cortex seems to be isolated and dissociated from higher-order associative cortices (Laureys et al., 2002).

Also, there is evidence of partially functional cerebral regions in catastrophically injured brains. To study five patients in PVS with different behavioral features, researchers employed PET, MRI and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to sensory stimulation. In three of the five patients, co-registered PET/MRI correlate areas of relatively preserved brain metabolism with isolated fragments of behavior. Two patients had suffered anoxic injuries and demonstrated marked decreases in overall cerebral metabolism to 30–40% of normal. Two other patients with non-anoxic, multifocal brain injuries demonstrated several isolated brain regions with higher metabolic rates, that ranged up to 50–80% of normal. Nevertheless, their global metabolic rates remained <50% of normal. MEG recordings from three PVS patients provide clear evidence for the absence, abnormality or reduction of evoked responses. Despite major abnormalities, however, these data also provide evidence for localized residual activity at the cortical level. Each patient partially preserved restricted sensory representations, as evidenced by slow evoked magnetic fields and gamma band activity. In two patients, these activations correlate with isolated behavioral patterns and metabolic activity. Remaining active regions identified in the three PVS patients with behavioral fragments appear to consist of segregated corticothalamic networks that retain connectivity and partial functional integrity. A single patient who suffered severe injury to the tegmental mesencephalon and paramedian thalamus showed widely preserved cortical metabolism, and a global average metabolic rate of 65% of normal. The relatively high preservation of cortical metabolism in this patient defines the first functional correlate of clinical– pathological reports associating permanent unconsciousness with structural damage to these regions. The specific patterns of preserved metabolic activity identified in these patients reflect novel evidence of the modular nature of individual functional networks that underlie conscious brain function. The variations in cerebral metabolism in chronic PVS patients indicate that some cerebral regions can retain partial function in catastrophically injured brains (Schiff et al., 2002).

[edit] Misdiagnoses

Misdiagnosis of PVS is not uncommon. One study of 40 patients in the United Kingdom reported that 43% of those patients classified as in a PVS were misdiagnosed and another 33% able to recover whilst the study was underway.[8] Some cases of PVS may actually be cases of patients being in an undiagnosed minimally conscious state.[9] Since the exact diagnostic criteria of the minimally conscious state were formulated only in 2002, there may be chronic patients diagnosed as PVS before the notion of the minimally conscious state became known.

Can there be conscious awareness in vegetative state? Three completely different aspects of this issue should be distinguished. First, some patients can be conscious simply because they are misdiagnosed (see above). In fact, they are not in vegetative state. Second, sometimes a patient was correctly diagnosed but, then, examined during a beginning recovery. Third, perhaps some day the very notion of the vegetative state will change so as to include elements of conscious awareness. Inability to disentangle these three cases leads to confusion. An example of such confusion is the response to a recent experiment using magnetic resonance imaging which revealed that a woman diagnosed with PVS was able to activate predictable portions of her brain in response to the tester's requests that she imagine herself playing tennis or moving from room to room in her house. The brain activity in response to these instructions was indistinguishable from those of healthy patients.[10][11][12]

Because such activations can be obtained only if a patient has clear awareness and concentrated attention, the diagnosis of PVS was obviously an error. Therefore, the experiment did not show awareness in vegetative state in any reasonable sense of the word; rather, it showed that magnetic resonance imaging, combined with sophisticated stimulation, can effectively be used to disclose major diagnostic errors.

[edit] Recovery

Many patients emerge spontaneously from a vegetative state within a few weeks.[3] The chances of recovery depend on the extent of injury to the brain and the patient's age — younger patients having a better chance of recovery than older patients. Generally, adults have a 50 percent chance and children a 60 percent chance of recovering consciousness from a PVS within the first 6 months. After a year, the chances that a PVS patient will regain consciousness are very low and most patients who do recover consciousness experience significant disability. The longer a patient is in a PVS, the more severe the resulting disabilities are likely to be. Rehabilitation can contribute to recovery, but many patients never progress to the point of being able to take care of themselves. Recovery after long periods of time in a PVS has been reported on several occasions and are often treated as spectacular events.

There are two dimensions of recovery from a persistent vegetative state: recovery of consciousness and recovery of function. Recovery of consciousness can be verified by reliable evidence of awareness of self and the environment, consistent voluntary behavioral responses to visual and auditory stimuli, and interaction with others. Recovery of function is characterized by communication, the ability to learn and to perform adaptive tasks, mobility, self-care, and participation in recreational or vocational activities. Recovery of consciousness may occur without functional recovery, but functional recovery cannot occur without recovery of consciousness (Ashwal, 1994).

[edit] Possible treatment and cures

As of today, no treatment for vegetative state exists that would satisfy the efficacy criteria of evidence-based medicine. Several methods have been proposed which can roughly be subdivided into four categories: pharmacological methods, surgery, physical therapy, and various stimulation techniques. Pharmacological therapy mainly uses activating substances such as tricyclic antidepressants or methylphenidate. Promising results have been reported on dopaminergic drugs, particularly amantadine. Presently the first randomized controlled trial amantadine versus placebo is running; its results have not been published yet. Surgical methods such as deep brain stimulation are rarely used. Stimulation techniques include sensory stimulation, sensory regulation, music and musicokinetic therapy, social-tactile interaction, etc. Below are some details related to treatments that have demonstrated some hope.

[edit] Zolpidem

There is currently limited evidence that the imidazopyridine hypnotic drug zolpidem (Stilnox/Ambien) can have positive behavioral effects in some PVS patients.[13] The first such putative case is Louis Viljoen who was hit by a vehicle in 1994 leaving him in a persistent vegetative state. Five years later when Viljoen was having involuntary spasms in his left arm, his physician, H Wally Nel, treated him with zolpidem. 25 minutes after the treatment, Viljoen started murmuring and then conversing, albeit not fluently, with his mother. In magnetic resonance images of his brain before and after treatment with zolpidem, the damaged brain regions, which appeared black and dead before treatment, began to light up with neural activity afterwards. Following seven years of further treatment with zolpidem, Viljoen can now speak in complex sentences and move his head and arms. The physician, Nel, who treated Viljoen claims to have treated 150 further PVS patients with zolpidem and seen improvements in approximately 60% of them.[14][15]

Additionally, stroke victims and patients with head injuries or brain damage following oxygen deprivation, such as near-drowning victims, have reported significant improvements in speech, motor functions, and concentration after treatment with zolpidem.[15]

A clinical trial of zolpidem involving over 360 PVS patients worldwide is currently underway, and 60% of these patients are showing signs of improvement, although no results have yet been published.[16]

There is one other published case series on the long-term effects of zolpidem on patients in PVS, also authored by Nel & Clauss. The first patient, "L", is a 31 year old male who, before treatment with zolpidem, had been in PVS for three years with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 9. They report that after receiving 10 mg of zolpidem, L is able to engage in meaningful conversation. The maximum effect of the zolpidem is seen one hour after application and wears off after about four hours. By the date of publication in 2006, L had been receiving zolpidem therapy for six years, with no decrease in the effectiveness of treatment, and some gradual long-term improvement in short- and long-term memory. The other two patients in the case series were male, of similar age, and had similar though somewhat lessened responses to zolpidem — the zolpidem worked maximally one hour after application, its effects wore off after four hours, and there was no decrease in effectiveness after several years of daily use.[17]

As yet, no scientific studies have been published on the effectiveness of zolpidem as a treatment for PVS.

[edit] Levodopa

In addition, there have been several case studies analyzed that emphasize another pharmacological possibility of treatment for patients in a persistent vegetative state. Three patients whose brains had been damaged by severe head injury recovered from a persistent vegetative state after the administration of a drug called levodopa. In all three cases, the patients were deeply comatose on arrival to the hospital, remained unresponsive to simple verbal commands, and their condition was unchanged for a lengthy period of time even after intensive treatment including surgery. All three patients were diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state for three, seven, and twelve months respectively (Matsuda et al., 2003).

Case 1 describes a 14 year old boy who, three months after his trauma, could not follow moving objects with his eyes and experienced tremor-like involuntary movements as well as hypertonicity (increased tension of the muscles, meaning the muscle tone is abnormally rigid, hampering proper movement). Levodopa was recommended to relieve the patient’s parkinsonian features. Surprisingly, after nine days of treatment the patient’s involuntary movements were reduced and he began to respond toward voices. Three months after treatment, he was able to walk and obtained the intelligence of an elementary school child. One year after his trauma, he was able to walk to high school by himself. Case 2 involves a young adult who underwent deep brain stimulation one year after the trauma and showed no improvement. Levodopa was administered and one year later, once his tubes were removed, he said, “I want to eat sushi and drink beer!” Case 3 describes a middle-aged man who experienced spasticity of his extremities, was administered levodopa, and was able to say his name and address correctly after only two months. After neurological evaluation, all three cases revealed asymmetrical rigidity or tremor and presynaptic damage in the dopaminergic (uses dopamine as neurotransmitter) systems. In conclusion, levodopa should be considered for patients in a persistent vegetative state with atypical features in their limbs and who have MRI evidence of lesions in the dopaminergic pathway, particularly presynaptic lesions in areas such as the substantia nigra or ventral tegmentum. Data shows that only 6% of adult patients recover after being in a vegetative state for six to twelve months. This poor recovery rate demonstrates the significance in the rapid recovery of patients that begin levodopa treatment, particularly in those who were in a vegetative state for almost a year.

[edit] Baclofen

This unexpected and late recovery of consciousness raises an interesting hypothesis of possible effects of partially regained spinal cord outputs on reactivation of cognition. Other case studies have shown that recovery of consciousness with persistent severe disability 19 months after a non-traumatic brain injury was at least in part triggered and maintained by intrathecal baclofen administration (Sarà M et al., 2007).

[edit] Removal of cold intubated oxygen

Another documented case reports recovery of a small number of patients following the removal of assisted respiration with cold oxygen. The researchers found that in many nursing homes and hospitals unheated oxygen is given to non-responsive patients via tracheal intubation. This bypasses the warming of the upper respiratory tract and causes a chilling of aortic blood and chilling of the brain. The researchers describe a small number of cases in which removal of the chilled oxygen was followed by recovery from the PVS and recommend either warming of oxygen with a heated nebulizer or removal of the assisted oxygen if it is no longer needed. The authors further recommend additional research to determine if this chilling effect may either delay recovery or even may contribute to brain damage.[18]

[edit] Bifocal extradural cortical stimulation

In December 2008, Dr Sergio Canavero, Director of the Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group, one of the leading experts in the field of cortical stimulation, announced that a girl (Greta) in the permanent vegetative state (i.e. vegetative state lasting more than 12 months), recovered consciousness and was regraded as minimally conscious following several months of bifocal extradural cortical stimulation (Canavero et al. 2009), a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique he and others developed for the treatment of central pain, Parkinson's disease,stroke rehabilitation,depression, and other neurologic and psychiatric disorders (Canavero 2009). Simultaneous stimulation of the fronto-parietal "consciousness" network achieved a marked improvement of the deafult network of the brain. The girl can now execute simple motor commands and be fed more normally per os. Previous attempts at deep brain stimulation -Terry Schiavo being one of the patients- failed to restore consciousness. This report,together with the above-mentioned studies, makes a strong case for the concept of irreversibility of the "permanent" vegetative state being wrong, a concept born of medical ignorance as of the mechanisms of brain recovery and consciousness generation.


Rv:13:3: And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.


Shembolical, Esther and Jesus Visits the Whore city

Madonna’s pilgrimage to Israel hits a sticky patch


Madonna with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his wife Sara and Madonna's boyfriend Jesus

Madonna with Benjamin Netanyahu, his wife Sara, and the singer's partner Jesus Luz

It should have been a cause for celebration: Madonna and Jesus were back in Israel. The Material Girl and her Brazilian model boyfriend, however, have not had a universally enthusiastic welcome on their one-week pilgrimage to the Holy Land.

Madonna, who ended her “Sticky and Sweet” world tour with concerts in Tel Aviv this week, began with a reminder of her faith in the kabbalah, or mystical Judaism, by asking that work on her performance stage be halted to respect the Sabbath. One Orthodox rabbi tried to get her to show “respect” for the Jewish faith by wearing “more modest” clothing during her two performances, but the request fell on deaf ears, and the concerts featured the usual skimpy costumes that her fans have come to expect.

“She looked amazing, especially for her age — but not really what I would consider an ‘observant’ Jewish woman’s dress,” said Rachel Homesh, a teenager who attended one of the gigs. “We didn’t really think that she would show up all covered up. She wouldn’t be able to dance. The most she wore was at the very end, when she put on a Jewish flag.”

The decision to drape Madonna in the Star of David — handed to her by someone in the audience — sparked fury from Palestinians. Hania Bitar, director-general of the Palestinian Youth Association for Leadership and Rights Activation, said the move had led to protests in the West Bank and Gaza. She also criticised Madonna for not meeting with any Palestinian politicians or visiting the occupied territories.

The singer — who has taken a Jewish name, Esther — told her fans: “Every time I come here, I get so supercharged with energy. I truly believe that Israel is the energy centre of the world. And I also believe that if we can all live together in harmony in this place, then we can live in peace all over the world.”

Madonna kept the media away from her political encounters. She met Binyamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister, and Tzipi Livni, the leader of the opposition, and limited access to her visit to the northern Israeli village of Safed, where one of the rabbis who founded kabbalah is believed to be buried. However, her flirtation with politics, her dabbling in the kabbalah — which many rabbis do not approve of — and her trademark concert antics created controversy anyway.

“Madonna has made her career by being provocative. I guess we shouldn’t have been surprised that her trip here would be controversial as well,” said Danny Yatom, 23, who attended the first of Madonna’s shows. “It’s why we stay interested, no?”


added 9-5-2009

Israeli Prof - 'We Can Destroy
All European Capitals'

By Nadim Ladki
(IAP News) -  An Israeli professor and military historian hinted that Israel could avenge the holocaust by annihilating millions of Germans and other Europeans.
Speaking during an interview which was published in Jerusalem Friday,  Professor Martin Van Creveld said Israel had the capability of  hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons.
"We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can  launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most  European capitals are targets of our air force."
Creveld, a professor of military history at the Hebrew University in  Jerusalem, pointed out that "collective deportation" was Israel's  only meaningful strategy towards the Palestinian people.
"The Palestinians should all be deported. The people who strive for  this (the Israeli government) are waiting only for the right man and  the right time. Two years ago, only 7 or 8 per cent of Israelis were  of the opinion that this would be the best solution, two months ago  it was 33 per cent, and now, according to a Gallup poll, the figure  is 44 percent."
Creveld said he was sure that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon  wanted to deport the Palestinians.
"I think it's quite possible that he wants to do that. He wants to  escalate the conflict. He knows that nothing else we do will succeed."
Asked if he was worried about Israel becoming a rogue state if it  carried out a genocidal deportation against Palestinians, Creveld  quoted former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan who said "Israel  must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Creveld argued that Israel wouldn't care much about becoming a rogue  state.
"Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but  rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world  down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before  Israel goes under."

and so it will be


Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death." .... 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

Who Brought the Slaves to America?

Walter White

The story of the slaves in America begins with Christopher Columbus. His voyage to America was not financed by Queen Isabella, but by Luis de Santangelo, who advanced the sum of 17,000 ducats (about 5,000 pounds-today equal to 50,000 pounds) to finance the voyage, which began on August 3,1492.

Columbus was accompanied by five 'maranos' (Jews who had foresworn their religion and supposedly became Catholics), Luis de Torres, interpreter, Marco, the surgeon, Bemal, the physician, Alonzo de la Calle and Gabriel Sanchez. (Ref. The International Jew by Henry Ford)

Gabriel Sanchez, abetted by the other four Jews, sold Columbus on the idea of capturing 500 Indians and selling them as slaves in Seville, Spain, which was done. Columbus did not receive any of the money from the sale of the slaves, but he  became the victim of a conspiracy fostered by Bemal, the ship's doctor. He, Columbus, suffered injustice and imprisonment as his reward.  Betrayed by the five maranos (baptised Jews) whom he had trusted and helped. This, ironically, was the beginning of slavery in the Americas. (Adventures of an African Slaver by Malcolm Cowley, 1928, p.11)

The Jews were expelled from Spain on August 2, 1492, and from Portugal in 1497. Many of these Jews emigrated to Holland, where they set up the Dutch West Indies Company to exploit the new world.

In 1654, the first Jew, Jacob Barsimson, emigrated from Holland to New Amsterdam (New York) and in the next decade many more followed him, settling along the East Coast, principally in New Amsterdam and Newport, Rhode Island. They were prevented by ordinances issued by Governor Peter Stuyvesant from engaging in the domestic economy, so they quickly discovered that the territory inhabited by the Indians would be a fertile field. There were no laws preventing the Jews from trading with the Indians.

The first Jew to begin trading with the Indians was Hayman Levy, who imported cheap glass beads, textiles, earrings, armbands and other cheap adornments from Holland which were traded for valuable fur pelts.  Hayman Levy was soon joined by Jews Nicholas Lowe and Joseph Simon.  Lowe conceived the idea of trading rum and whiskey to the Indians and set up a distillery in Newport, where these two liquors were produced. Within a short time there were 22 distilleries in Newport, all of them owned by Jews, manufacturing and distributing 'firewater.'  The story of the debauching of the Indians with its resultant massacres of the early settlers, is a dramatic story in itself.

It is essential to comprehend the seaport of Newport. It is important in order to recognize the Jewish share in the Slave commerce.  There was a period when it was commonly referred to as 'The Jewish Newport-World center of Slave Commerce.' All together, at this time, there were in North America six Jewish communities: Newport, Charleston, New York, Philadelphia, Richmond, and Savanuah. There were also many other Jews, scattered over the entire East Coast. Although New York held first place in the settlers of Jews in North America, Newport held second place. New York was also the main source of Kosher meat, supplying the North American settlements, then the West Indies and also South America. Now Newport took over! Newport also became the great trade harbour of the East Coast of North America. There, vessels from other ports met, to exchange commodities. Newport, as previously mentioned, represented the foremost place in the commerce of rum, whiskey, and liquor dealings. And to conclude, it finally became the Main Center of Slave dealings. It was from this port that the ships left on their way across the ocean, to gather their black human cargo and then derive great sums of money in exchange for them.

An authentic, contemporary report, based on authority, indicates that of 128 Slave ships, for instance, unloaded in Charleston, within one year, their "Cargo," 120 of these were undersigned by Jews from Newport and Charleston by their own name.  About the rest of them, one can surmise, although they were entered as Boston (1), Norfolk (2), and Baltimore (4), their real owners were similarly the Jewish slave dealers from Newport and Charleston.

One is able to assess the Jewish share in the entire dealings of the Newport, if one considers the undertaking of a lone Jew, the Portuguese, Aaron Lopez, who plays an important part in the over-all story of the Jews and Slavery.

Concerning the entire commerce of the Colonies, and the later State of Rhode Island, (which included Newport) bills of lading, concessions, receipts, and port clearances carried the signature name of the Jew Aaron Lopez. This all took place during the years 1726 to 1774. He had therefore more than 50% of all dealings under his personal control for almost fifty years. Aside from that there were other ships which he owned, but sailed under other names.

In the year 1749, the first Masonic Lodge was established. Ninety percent of the members of this first lodge, fourteen all told, were Jews. And one knows that only so-called"'prominent" individuals were accepted. Twenty years later, the second Masonic Lodge, "King David," was established. It is a fact that all of these members were Jews.

In the meantime, the Jewish influence in Newport had reached such proportions that President George Washington decided to pay them a visit. Upon his appearance, both of the Masonic Lodges sent an emissary--a Jew named Moses Seixas--to approach the President with a petition, in which the Jews of Newport stated: "If you will permit the children of Abraham to approach you with a request, to tell you that we honor you, and feel an alliance...... and then: "Until the present time the valuable rights of a free citizen have been withheld. However, now we see a new government coming into being based on the Majesty of the people, a government, not sanctioning any bigotry nor persecution of the Jew, rather, to concede the freedom of thought, which each shares, whatever Nation or Language, as a part of the great Government machine."

It is necessary at this point to consider the disclosures as to who in reality obtained this legendary freedom in America at the founding of the Union. To be sure, the province became independent and severed from the English Jurisdiction. However, we can see from the petition which Moses Seixas offered President Washington in the name of the Jews of Newport, that it was not in reality this type of freedom which they had in mind. They were merely concerned about themselves, and their "own civil rights," which had been withheld. Therefore, following the Revolutionary War, the Jews were accorded equal rights, and freed of all restrictions!  And the Negroes? The Revolutioniry War not withstanding, they remained Slaves! In the year 1750, one sixth of the population in New York was Negroid, and proportionately in the Southern parts of the Country, they outnumbered the others, but the proclamation of Freedom did not touch them. More of this later.

Let us scrutinize at close range this dismal handwork of the Jews which gave them influence and power, so we may comprehend the  Slave Trade; for there has been so much written since that time by the zealous Jewish writers, that at the present, long since removed, it might appear natural, for the time element has a tendency to make things nebulous.

Let us follow the journey of one ship, owned by a slave dealer, Aaron Lopez, which had made many trips to the African coast.

For instance, in the month of May, 1752, the ship "Abigail" was equipped with about 9,000 gallons of rum, a great supply of iron foot and hand restraints, pistols, powder, sabres, and a lot of worthless tin ornaments, and under the command of the Jewish Captain Freedman, sailed off for Africa. There were but two Mates and six sailors comprising the crew. Three and one half months later they landed on the African Coast. Meantime, there had been constructed an African Agency, by the Jewish slave dealers, who had corralled them, and prepared them for sale. This organization reaching deep into Africa, had many ramifications, including the heads of groups, villages, etc. This method to win over these leaders for the Jewish slave trade, was similar to' that which the Jews had employed with the Indians.

At first, they presented them with rum, and soon found themselves in an alcoholic delirium. When the gold dust, and ivory supply was exhausted, they were induced to sell their descendants. At first their wives, and then their youths. Then they began warfare among each other, plotted and developed mostly by the Jews, and if they captured prisoners, these, too, were exchanged for rum, ammunitions and weapons to the Jews', using them for further campaigns to capture more Negroes. The captured Blacks were linked two by two and driven through the medieval forests to the coast. These painful treks required weeks, and some of them frequently became ill, and felled by exhaustion, and many unable to rise even though the bull whip was applied as an encourager.  They were left to die and were devoured by wild beasts. It was not unusual to see the bones of the dead laying in the tropical sun, a sad and gruesome reminder to those who would later on tread this path.

It has been calculated that for each Negro who withstood the rigors of this wandering, there still had to be the long voyage across the ocean, before they reached American soil, nine out of ten died! And when one considers that there was a yearly exodus of ONE MILLION black slaves, then, and only then, can one assess the tremendous and extensive exodus of the African people.   At present Africa is thinly populated, not alone due to the 1,000,000 literally dragged out of huts, but due to the five to nine million who never reached their destination. Once they reached the coast, the black slaves were driven together, and restraints were applied to hold them until the next transport ship docked.  The agents--many of them Jews--who represented the Chief, then began the deal with the Captain. Each Negro was personally presented to him. But the captains had learned to become suspicious.  The Black one must move his fingers, arms, legs, and the entire body to insure that there were not any fractures. Even the teeth were examined.  If a tooth was lacking, it lowered the price. Most of the Jew agents knew how to treat sick Negroes with chemicals in order to sell them as sound.  Each Negro was valued at about 100 gallons of rum, 100 pounds of gun Oowder, or in cash between 18 to 20 dollars. The notations of a captain inform us that on September 5, 1763, one Negro brought as much as 200 gallons of rum, due to the bidding among the agents, raising the price.

Women under 25 years, pregnant or not, resulted in the same measure, if they were well and comely. Any over 25 years lost 25%.

And here it should be stated that those Negroes, purchased free at the African Coast for 20 to 40 dollars, were then resold by the same slave dealers in America for two thousand dollars.

This gives one an idea how the Jews managed to acquire tremendous fortunes. Following the bargaining, Captain Freedman paid the bill, either in merchandise or cash. He also recalled some advice which his Jewish employers gave him as he left Newport for Africa: "Pour as much water into the rum as you possibly can." In this manner the Negro chiefs were cheated two times by the Newport Jews!

The next step was to shave the hair from the head of the acquired slaves. Then they were bound and branded with a hot iron, either on the back, or the hip, identifying them with their owners. Now the Negro slave was indeed the property of the Jewish purchaser. If he fled he could be identified. Following this procedure, there was a farewell celebration. There were instances when entire families were brought out of the interior, to the coast, and then separated through the buyer--the father going with one ship, the sons and daughters into another. These "farewell" celebrations were usually packed with emotion, tears, drama and sadness. There was little joy, if ever.

The following day the transport began from land to ship. It was managed by taking four to six Negroes at one time in rowboats to the ship. Of course the slave dealers were aware of how the Negro loved his homeland above all else, and could only be induced by great force to leave it. So, some of the Negroes would leap into the water. But here the overseers were prepared with sharp dogs and retrieved the fleeing men.  Other Negroes preferred drowning.  What came aboard alive was immediately undressed. Here was another opportunity to jump overboard and reach land and freedom. But the slave dealers were pitiless and ruthless; they were merely concerned to get their Black cargo to America with the least loss.  Therefore, an escapee, recaptured, had both of his legs cut off before the eyes of the remaining Negroes in order to restore "Order."

On board the ship the Negroes were separated into three groups.  The men were placed in one part of the ship.  The women into another, whereby the lusty Captain arranged it so that the youngest, mostly comely Negro women were accessible to him. The children remained on deck, covered with a cloth in bad weather. In this fashion the slave ship proceeded on its journey to America.  In the main, the ships were too small, and not at all suitable to transport people. They were barely equipped to transport animals, which the Negroes were likened to. In one space, one meter high (39 inches) these unfortunate creatures were placed into a horizontal position, pressed close together.  Mostly they were chained together. In this position they had to remain for three months, until the end of the voyage.  Rarely was there a captain who sympathized with them or evidenced any feelings whatever for these pitiable creatures. Occasionally they would be taken in groups to the deck for fresh air, shackled in irons. Somehow, these Negroes were expendable and endured much.  On occasion, one of them became insane, killing the other one pressed closely to him. They also had their fingernails closely cut so they could not tear at each other's flesh. The most horrible battles came about among the men, to acquire a centimeter or two for a comfortable position. It was then that the slave overseer stepped in with his bullwhip. The unimaginable, horrible, human excrement in which these slaves had to endure these trips is impossible to describe.

In the women's quarters the same conditions prevailed. Women gave birth to children lying pressed closely together. The younger Negro women were constantly raped by the captain and the crew resulting, thereby, a new type of Mulatto as they came to America.

In Virginia, or in any of the other Southern port cities, the slaves were transferred to the land and immediately sold.  A regular auction would take place, following the method of purchase in Africa. The highest bidder obtained the "Ware." In many cases--due to the indescribable filth--some of the Blacks became ill during the sea voyage from Africa to America. They became unemployable. In such cases the captain accepted any price. It was rare to dispose of them for no one wanted to purchase a sick Negro. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Jewish, unethical doctor senses a new form of revenue. They purchased the sick Negro for a small sum, then treated him, and sold him for a large sum. On occasion, the captain would be left with a few Negroes for whom he did not find a buyer. In that case he returned to Newport and sold them to the Jews for cheap domestic help. In other cases, the Jew owner of the ships took them over. This is why the city of Newport and its surroundings had 4,697 black slaves in the year 1756.

Slavery did not extend to the North. Moreover, in many of the North American Colonies, slavery was strictly forbidden.  Georgia came under discussion; likewise also Philadelphia. And again it was the Jews who managed a loophole, which had given them freedom following the Revolutionary War, so, they schemed to make slave trading legal.

One had but to read the names of those persons living in Philadelphia who were requesting the elimination of existing laws regarding the slavery dealing. They were: the Jews Sandiford, Lay, Woolman, Solomon, and Benezet. That explained it all! But let us turn back to the slave ship "Abigail." Its captain--and we are reading from his ship's books--did a profitable business. He sold all of his Negroes in Virginia, invested some of the money in tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton, and went on to Newport where he deposited his wares.

We learn from Captain Freedman's books that the "Abigail" was a small ship and could only accommodate 56 people.  He managed, however, to clear from one trip 6,621 dollars, which he in turn delievered to the owner of the ship: one Aaron Lopez.

The staggering amounts of money acquired by the Jew ship owners and slavery dealers is better illustrated when we emphasize the many years in which this sale and purchase of human flesh was practiced. Prior to 1661, all of the Colonies had laws prohibiting slavery. It was in that year that the Jews had become powerful enough to bring about the repeal of these laws, and slavery began in earnest.

The Jews had discovered that the Colonists needed additional manpower to help them clear their fields for planting, helping in the construction of dwellings, and in general to help with harvesting their crops. This was particularly true of the Southern states which we have referred to earlier. The Southerners had vast tracts of rich soil suitable for rice, cotton, tobacco and cane sugar.   At first, impoverished Europeans were recruited. English prison doors were opened and finally prisoners ot war from England and Holland were brought to the Colonies, made to work until they had paid the cost of transporting them by ship and then set free.

It doesn't take a Jew long to discover what his brothers are doing, so a group of Jews settled in Charleston, South Carolina, where they set up distilleries for making rum and whiskey. They, too, learned that they could trade with the natives on the West Coast of Africa for ivory, and several ships were purchased and sent to Africa, trading the usual glass beads and other cheap ornaments for ivory, which, however, took up but little space on board ship. It occurred to these Jew traders that they could supply the plantations in the South with 'Black ivory', needed under swampy and malarial conditions which European labor could not tolerate without sickness, and which would not only fill the holds of their ships, but bring enormous profits. (This same group had earlier tried selling Indians as slaves but they found them completely unsatisfactory, as the Indians would not tolerate this type of work.) Thus, another segment of the slave trading had become active and profitable out of Charleston, South Carolina. Several shiploads of Black slaves were sent by the Dutch West Indies Company to Manhattan.

During this time there were a number of plantation owners established in the West Indies and two Jews, Eyrger and SayUer, with strong Rothschild connections in Spain, formed an agency called ASIENTO, which later operated in Holland and England. It was through these connections that Jews in Holland and England exerted influence and both of these connections cooperated in helping the Jews provide Black Slaves for the Colonists.

With the yearly capture and transport of one million Black slaves it is not difficult to figure that from 1661 to 1774  (one hundred thirteen years) approximately one hundred ten million slaves had been removed from their native land. About ten percent, or ELEVEN MILLION, Black slaves reached the Colonies alive.

We have talked about the small ship "Abigail" which could accommodate only 56 people and yet the profits per trip were enormous, with little or no investment. There were many other ships but we will concentrate here on only a few, such as the "La Fortuna," "Hannah," "Sally" or the "Venue" which made very great profits. The "La Fortuna," by the way, transported approximately 217 slaves on each trip. The owner cleared not less than $41,438.00 from such a trip. These were dollars which the slave dealers 'could keep'. And these were dollars of value which would buy a great deal in return.

When one considers that the Jews of Newport owned about 300 slave-transporting ships, active without interruption, docking at Newport-Africa, Charleston, (or Virginia), one can approximate the tremendous earnings which made their way to Jewish ship owners. Indeed, the Jews admit, that of the 600 ships, leaving Newport harbor into all the world, "at least half of them" went their way to Africa, and we know what these ships going to Africa "were seeking."

The fact that Aaron Lopez had control of over more than half of the combined deals in the Colonies of Rhode Island, with Newport, is well-known. The well-known Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein, in his book, The Story of the Jews in Newport, attempts to remove these facts, maintaining that there is not any evidence that the Jews were connected with the Slave Trade. It is therefore imperative to prove that the Jew was indeed connected with the slave trading. Especially so since this rabbi insists they had made great contributions, and how very "blessed" their residence became for the city of Newport. Surely Morris A. Gutstein will grant us permission to present the facts which he was unable to find.

Turning to one report of the Chamber of Commerce of the "Rhode Island Colony" in the year 1764, we find, for instance, that in the year 1723 "a few merchants in Newport" devised the idea to send their Newport rum to the coast of Africa. It developed into such a great export that in the matter of a few years "several thousand (hogsheads)" of rum went that way. To which purpose did this rum serve?

The Carnegie Institute in Washington, D.C., presents and makes public authentic documents entitled "Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America".  We wish to present a few facts from this particular collection of original documents and scrutinize them at closer range, and not at all to prove the heretofore Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein in error.  In this collection of the first American institute of learning, we evaluate the capital "Rhode Island" which contributed the main share of the public documentation regarding the Slave trading. Here we find documented the recipients of the numerous shipping letters, also letters to the Slave dealers, and correspondence to the ship's captains, who were about 15% Jews, living in Newport.  Among these we find, for instance, the Jew Isaac Elizar. He wrote a letter to Captain Christopher Champlin on February 6, 1763, saying he would like to be an agent for a load of slaves.  Then follows the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez, and one of the main slave dealers, Jacob Rod Rivera-the father-in-law of Aaron Lopez.  And then there is Aaron Lopez, himself, and many, many more other Jews.  Although we have considered Aaron Lopez several times, the size of this documented treatise limits us, and we cannot describe all of the writers concerned in the Slavery Dealing correspondence, their names and the special dates--rather, we wish to study the documentation of the 'Carnegie Institute' itself--keeping Aaron Lopez in mind.  We wish to see what in the main this Jew was pursuing and what his business was.  This is due to the fact that Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein presents him as a "lofty and fine civilian of Newport" who was so generous and even "made contributions to welfare."

In a great number of published original unprejudiced writings in the Carnegie Institute, we find that Aaron Lopez pursued a tremendous commerce in rum with the African coast in exchange for slaves. These irrefutable facts are as follows: June 22, 1764, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.

- July 22, 1765, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain Nathaniel Briggs.
- July 22, 1765, a letter to Captain Abraham All.
- February 4, 1766, a letter to Captain William Stead by Aaron Lopez.
- March 7, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
- February 20, 1766, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain William Stead.
- October 8, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
- February 9, 1767, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.

Aside from that, there are similar statements out of letters by Aaron Lopez in the original, which he directed to the Captains Henry Cruger, David Mill, Henry White, Thomas Dolbeare, and William Moore. Indeed, one letter by Captain William Moore to Aaron Lopez & Company, is particularly revealing, and of special mention at this point. We wish to remark on the main contents of this letter in which Captain Moore writes: "I wish to advise you that your ship 'Ann' docked here night before last with 112 slaves, consisting of 35 men, 16 large youths, 21 small boys, 29 women, 2 grown girls, 9 small girls, and I assure you this is such a one rumcargo (rum in exchange for slaves) which I have not yet encountered, among the entire group there may be five to which one could take exception."

The date of the above letter was November 27, 1773. We have not yet concluded, because of lack of space, the excerpts and grateful compilations made available by the "Camegie Institute."

On November 29, 1767, the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez--who had been cheated by one of his kind--from Charleston, where he had journeyed to better control his Black cargo, wrote Aaron Lopez at Newport:  "These Negroes, which Captain Abraham All delivered to me, were in such poor condition due to the poor transportation, that I was forced to sell 8 boys and girls for a mere 27 (pounds), 2 other for 45 (pounds) and two women each for 35 (pounds)." (No doubt, English money)

Abraham Pereia Mendez was very angry and accused Aaron Lopez of "cheating" him. This letter delineates to us that this generous and fine citizen of Newport was insatiable in his greed for money. This is what caused the Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein to present this nobleman, Aaron Lopez, to pursue his objectionable methods.  Negroes presented to him but a commodity.

In all of the letters which the "Carnegie Institute" published, it stresses the lack of human sympathy for the poor Negro slaves. This lack of feeling and compassion for the abused and pitiful Blacks at the hands of their Jewish dealers, can be read out of the diary of a captain who manned a ship owned by Aaron Lopez. The entrees concern a trip from the African Coast to Charleston.  Moreover, they are authentic documents, published by the "Camegie Institute" in Washington, D.C., calling attention to an organization which had heretofore known little or nothing about; neither had they encountered further publicity in books or newspapers. Therefore, it is not to be wondered at that the facts of the leading share of American Jews in the slave trade could be pointed out as a monopoly, and unknown to the non-Jewish Americans, including the great masses of people all over the world. Others, however, acquainted with the facts, had good reason to remain painfully quiet.

The captain of another ship, the "Othello" among other things, makes the following entries in his diary:

- February 6th: One man drowned in the process of loading.
- March 18th: Two women went overboard because they had not been locked up.
- April 6th: One man dead with Flux. (No doubt an illness.)
- April 13th: One woman dead with Flux.
- May 7th: One man dead with Flux.
- June 16th: One man dead by Kap Henry.
- June 21st: One man dead by James Fluss.
- July 5th: One woman dead with fever.
- July 6th: One girl, sick for two months, died.

This vessel was on its way for five months. What terrible and unspeakable suffering was the lot of these millions of Blacks, who were torn with brutal force from their friendly African huts, jammed together, like animals below deck, and then sold with less concern than selling a head of cattle. Small wonder that ten of them died, being purchased for just a few dollars, and then sold for the sum of $2,000.00.

Some Negroes managed, through insurrection, to gain control of one or another ship and turned it around, with full sails, toward their African home. The crew of one slave ship, "Three Friends" for instance, tortured their Black cargo in such a manner that the Negroes reciprocated in a bloody rebellion. They killed the captain and the entire crew and threw the dead overboard. They then sailed back to Africa where they had barely escaped their hard-won freedom.

A similar fate struck the slave ship "Amistad". Among the slaves was the son of an enemy tribal chief. Once the ship was under way, he schemed with his compatriots to attack the ship's crew. Following a bloody battle, they managed to capture the captain.    The Negro prince forced him to turn back to Africa, then in the evening, under cover of darkness, he changed his course, zigzagged for months untfl he came close to the American coast, and encountered a government ship. This took place in the year 1839 when slave trading was already forbidden and illegal.

The Negro slaves were freed and the captain punished.  These sea voyages were not without danger when they had Black cargo, which accounts for the fact that the Jews most always engaged non-Jewish captains.

The slave dealers preferred to remain in their offices and counted the fat winnings following each journey, such as Aaron Lopez, who left his heirs one of the largest fortunes in the New England era.

When reviewing the documented facts contained herein, it is important that one always remembers that it was a lucky captain who did not lose more than 9 out of 19 slaves on the return trip.

It is equally important to remember that these poor Black creatures had to lie in human excrement for the entire trip. Think of it! No wonder sickness and disease took such a high toll.

Remember the figures: approximately one hundred ten million Black people were captured and removed from their homeland in Africa. Only ELEVEN MILLION of these Black slaves reached the Colonies alive.

And the Jews still talk about the Germans and Hitler and how six million Jews were exterminated during World War II.  This is the greatest LIE ever perpetrated upon the people of the world-whereas the story of the poor Black slaves is documented.   Documented with TRUTH.  The evidence is still available for the people of the world to see.

The "Carnegie Institute of Technology" is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

As this document is distributed, eventually reaching the hands of the Jew, the evidence will probably be removed and destroyed until finally all documentation is removed which is damaging to the Jew. The Jews have been engaged in this practice for centuries. Truth, however--truth which bears fact cannot remain covered or hidden forever--and more truths are being disclosed by those of us who intend to free America of these sons of the devil--the Jews.

The published documentation contained herein was obtained from the Carnegie Institute of Learning, presently known as "The Carnegie Institute of Technology. "

The following is a partial of the slave ships owned by Jews:

'Abigail' by Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy and Jacob Franks.
'Crown' by Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson.
'Nassau'by Moses Levy. 'Four Sisters' by Moses I.evy.
'Anne & Eliza' by Justus Bosch and John Abrams.
'Prudent Betty' by Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix.
'Hester' by Mordecai and David Gomez.
'Elizabeth' by David and Mordecai Gomez.
'Antigua' by Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell.
'Betsy'by Wm. DeWoolf.
'PoUy'by James DeWoolf.
'White Horse' by Jan de Sweevts.
'Expedition' by John and Jacob Rosevelt.
'Charlotte' by Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks.
'Caracoa' by Moses and Sam Levy.
Slave-runners, also owned by Jews were the 'La Fortuna', the 'Hannah', the 'Sally', and the 'Venue'.

Some of the Jews of Newport and Charleston who were engaged in the distillery or slavery trade, or both, were: Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Jacob Malhado, Naphtaly Myers, David Hart, Joseph Jacobs, Moses Ben Franks, Moses Gomez, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy, David Jeshuvum, Jacob Pinto, Jacob Turk, Daniel Gomez, James Lucana, Jan de Sweevts, Felix (cha-cha) de Souza (known as the 'Prince of Slavers' and second only to Aaron Lopez), Simeon Potter, Isaac Elizer, Jacob Rod, Jacol) Itodrigues Rivera, Haym Isaac Carregal, Abraham Touro, Moses Hays, Moses Lopez, Judah Touro, Abrtham Mendes and Abraham All.

Of some 600 ships leaving the port of Newport, more than 300 were engaged in the slave trade. A typical cargo of one ship, 'La Fortuna', was 217 slaves which cost about $4,300 and sold for $41,438.00.

Only about 10% of the slave ship captains were Jews, not wanting to subject themselves to the rigors of the 6-month journey.  They preferred to stay at home and continue their distillery operations which continued to supply rum and whiskey to the Indians for many years at a very great profit.



Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Vols. Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America, Washington, D.C., 1930-1935.

"Carnegie Institute of Technology," Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Adventures of an African Slaver, by Malcolm Cowley, 1928. Published by Albert and Charles Bori, New York.

The Story of the Jews in Newport, by Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein.

The Jew Discovem America, by Cthmar Krainz.

The International Jew, by Henry Ford.

The Plot Against the Church, by Maurice Pinay.

Protocol for World Conquest, 1956, by The Central Conference of American Rabbis. Behind Communism, by Frank L. Britton

We cannot undertake even this brief history of the modern Jew without taking note of a phenomenon which his confounded

Gentile societies for twenty centuries. This is the ability of the Jewish people to collectively retain their identity despite centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. To any student of Judaism, or to the Jews themselves, this phenomenon is partly explained by the fact that Judaism is neither mainly a religion, nor mainly a raciai matter, nor yet is it simply a matter of nationality. Rather it is all three, it is a kind of trinity. Judaism is best described as a nationality built on the twin pillars of race and religion. All this is closely related to another aspect of Judaism, namely the persecution myth. Since first appearing in history, we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking. The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism: without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial-religious nationality notwithstanding.

It is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score. We Must repeat--they have kept score--they have made a tradition of persecution.

A casual slaughter of thousands of Chriestians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well.


Gawd Bliss Maraka, home of the brave, they fooled ya at Fallujah

The Truth Of Iraq's City Of Deformed Babies

Lisa Holland, foreign affairs correspondent

An Iraqi doctor has told Sky News the number of babies born with deformities in the heavily-bombed area of Fallujah is still on the increase.


Tiba Aftan

Tiba pictured after she had her growth removed by doctors in Jordan


Fifteen months ago a Sky News investigation revealed growing numbers of children being born with defects in Fallujah.

Concerns were that the rise in deformities may have been linked to the use of chemical weapons by US forces.

We recently returned to find out the current situation and what has happened to some of the children we featured.

In May last year we told the story of a three-year-old girl called Fatima Ahmed who was born with two heads.

When we filmed her she seemed like a listless bundle - she lay there barely able to breathe and unable to move.

Even now and having seen the pictures many times since I still feel shocked and saddened when I look at her.

But the prognosis for Fatima never looked good and, as feared, she never made it to her fourth birthday.

Her mother Shukriya told us about the night her daughter died.


Fatima died after our first report

Wiping away her tears, Shukriya said she had put her daughter to bed as normal one night but woke with the dreadful sense that something was wrong.

She told us she felt it was her daughter's moment to die, but of course that does not make the pain any easier.

Fatima's father had taken his little girl's hand but it was cold.

"She is gone," he had said to his distraught wife.

Another girl we met last year was Tiba Aftan who was born with a huge growth across her face.

Now she is a toddler her future is looking brighter having gone to neighbouring Jordan to have it removed.

The growth had covered half of Tiba's forehead and was invading one of her eyes - and it was getting bigger as she got older.

Although the operation was a success Tiba will need more surgery and the last trip cost her family almost every penny they have.

But since our original investigation, we have built up a new dossier of cases of deformed children in Fallujah born in the last eight months.

There are a wide range of problems - from abnormalities of the abdomen to facial disfigurements.

We have also seen pictures of all kinds of deformed foetuses which have not survived.


Fallujah was heavily bombed in 2004

There is no precise explanation as to what has caused the deformities and there are no figures to compare cases with those a decade or more ago as records were not kept during the time of Saddam Hussein.

All of our evidence is anecdotal, but repeatedly people tell us they believe the deformities must be linked to the heavy bombardment of Fallujah - a Sunni insurgent stronghold - by America in 2004.

People want an independent investigation into the impact of the kinds of weapons used - including controversial white phosphorus.

Yet even since we first started to give a voice to the calls for help from the people of Fallujah things seem to have got worse.

Dr Ahmed Uraibi, a specialist paediatrician in Fallujah, told us that the number of deformities he has dealt with has increased in the last year.

The people of Fallujah want to know how many more deformed babies there will be before someone sits up and takes notice of them.


Aholibah the secular south needed Dan Aholah of the North to begin their conquest for their Babylonian Odor

Daniel 11:6: And in the end of years they shall join themselves together; for the king's daughter of the south shall come to the king of the north to make an agreement: but she shall not retain the power of the arm; neither shall he stand, nor his arm: but she shall be given up, and they that brought her, and he that begat her, and he that strengthened her in these times.

Olso Land for peace, Rabin assassinated by Aholah Dan

7: But out of a branch of her roots shall one stand up in his estate, which shall come with an army, and shall enter into the fortress of the king of the north, and shall deal against them, and shall prevail: 
8: And shall also carry captives into Egypt their gods, with their princes, and with their precious vessels of silver and of gold; and he shall continue more years than the king of the north.

WTC Destruction by Aholibah secular zion, Jerusalem

9: So the king of the south shall come into his kingdom, and shall return into his own land. 
10: But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. 
11: And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand.

The "War on Terror" to recapture the seven nations and bring their False Christ Moshiach

Ezek:23:4: And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sons and daughters. Thus were their names; Samaria is Aholah, and Jerusalem Aholibah.


Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel ...  

Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel-News and commentary relating to events in Israel, the occupied territories, and the world,


Silverstein Incriminates 9-11 WTC Lies
How incriminating of Silverstein if 44,100 demolition devices
really would have been needed to bring down WTC towers -- how impossible
then for a crashing jetliner to do the job
By Dick Eastman
We have gotten to the point where the disinformation teams Israel is fielding to heckle 9-11 and Kleptastrophe investigators are becoming, to an awakening public, yet more proof of Zionist Jew involvement in both covert-war sabotage atrocities.
So let us swat this fly -- at the same time nailing once again the conspiracy that sends him to us.
Jack Stone is the typical Israel-can't-be-involved heckler and chutzpadik fabulator dedicated to full-time service in tossing verbal stink bombs at galen, Larry Lawson, Peter Wakefield Sault and other intelligent and informed citizens honestly investigating the 9-11 crime. Stone writes:
Demolishing the WTC twin towers -- even if it could be done at all -- would require 44,100 demolition devices all working perfectly and detonating to split-second perfection without any mis-fires or mistakes. (The reasons why it could be no less require explanation, but we have already discussed it previous months.)
Dick Eastman reply
(Replies of Mark S. Bilk and Kevin Barret and John Machado follow -- but here, first, is mine which includes some quotes from Alex James (not Jones):
And who is the physicsit or engineer who determined that 44,100 devices could be necessary, but 43,900 would not? How is this precision so credible? How is it his assumptions are accepted without being known? His assumptions about the strenghts and weaknesses of the building? Of what various types of thermite might be used and what types of devices and where applied? And of course there is always the college sophomore way of doing a job and the most-efficient best way?
How could an airplanes each carrying only a back-yard 9' diameter above-ground swimming pool equivalent quantity of jet kerosene bring down the two tallest skyscrpaers in New York City and a third building as well -- if 44,000 termite devices were required to do the job? (What would 44,000 thermite devices look like in a 9' diameter 3 ft deep pool?) 
The videos show that once the building began to pancake the collapsing floors got ahead (downward) of the core, the collapsing  mass pulling the core after it. We note that molten steel poured from the floor where the pancaking collapse moments later initiated.


all anti-Christ of the earth reject the murders that took place that day, Are you one of them? Notice the Thermite cut steel beams. ah heah aeeeean ameeeean?
Never trust a man who says couldn't. The thermite charges were placed -- only thermite could produce the flow of molten metal we saw -- plus all of the chemical residue and transformation into tiny beads of metal as reported independently by Dr. Jones and the European physicists. How many thermite devices were planted. Only one answer can be given at scientific levels of confidence. That answer is: "Enough."
All of the investigators I endorse, Jones, Bollyn, Honegger, Valentine, Dewdney, Gage to name a few, present hard evidence and reach conclusion which taken together tell a consistent story. There are still matters that I have not looked into -- where charges built into the WTC also employed or where all devices set later? (see Bilk letter below). But the picture of the 9-11 conspiracy has been reconstructed -- like a broken teacup being glued together -- and the pieces fit. The failure of the "boxcutter" theory that has jet kerosene bringing down all three New York skyscrapers is also glaringly obvious. The theory of space based energy beams bringing down each skyscraper has aboslutely no basis of support and is a transparent disinformation "red herring" designed to take attention away from Larry Silverstein and the Bush brother Marvin and his cousin Wirt Walker the 3rd.

The only Proof that I need is the scripture

You've seen these links from Bollyn already:
Israel's Super-Thermite Lab <
Bollyn's Solving 9-11 Book - 9 Chapters Now Online
Recipe for Making Super-Thermite
Who Put Super Thermite in the Towers?
But perhaps you haven't  read this from Alex James -- a perfect example demonstrating the kind of comprehensive "global consistency" I am talking about:
New evidence, collected by engineer Kevin Ryan, indicates "fireproofing"  installed in the structural core of the World Trade Center in 1999 was  actually a nanothermate spray, which is a dangerous explosive. See: 
Mr. Silverstein's first order of business as the new owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex. The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin's cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines - two key players in the 9/11 attacks.


YouTube - WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein  

24 sec - Aug 28, 2006 -

Featured Video · Larry Silverstein admits to having demolished wtc building 7 .... Video Responses (1). Larry Silverstein 'Pull It' What He ...


Lewis Eisenberg, chairman of the New York and New Jersey Port Authority and  head of its security from 1995 to December 2001, was keen to sell 99 year  leases on WTC1, 2, 4, and 5. Larry Silverstein had already bought the lease  on WTC3 (The Marriott Hotel) WTC6 (U.S. Customs Building) and WTC7 (Solomon  Brothers' Building). As the WTC landlord, the Port Authority wanted to be  rid of responsibility for the building but faced a dilemma: 
*  The WTC couldn't be demolished because that would release asbestos  fireproofing into the air and create a major health hazard; 
*  The cost for removing the asbestos was prohibitive; and 
*  Few people wanted to move into a toxic building. 
Selling leases was the only way it could off load responsibility to someone  else. In early 2001, Vornado Realty Trust of Paramus, N.J., was named the  winning holder. On February 21, it entered into exclusive negotiations with  the authority, but by March 26 it could not finalize its bid. Eisenberg then  approached a group led by Silverstein (Silverstein Properties) and Frank  Lowy, the Israeli founder of the Australian-based Westfield Holdings. 
 On July 23, 2001, Eisenberg personally finalized the deal.  Silverstein got his deal and Lowy, through his subsidiary Westfield America,  got 425,000 square feet of retail space for $400 million, of which Westfield  paid $133 million up front. Overall, the deal cost $3.2 billion, even though  the value of the WTC site was estimated at $8.2 billion, far below the $5.1  billion estimated for replacement and maintenance of lost revenue. 36 
Why the commission didn't question this fire-sale price and Silverstein's  low coverage is a mystery, especially since the attack was extremely  beneficial to him. 
 Soon after the towers fell, Silverstein filed lawsuits with his  insurers contending that he was entitled to two payments of $3.5 billion  because each plane constituted a separate attack. For its part, Swiss  Reinsurance, which represents a consortium of 20 insurers, agued that  Silverstein was only entitled to a payout of $3.5 billion. 
 A partial jury verdict handed down on April 28, 2004, sided with  the companies. For all except Swiss Re, which itself held a majority of 22  percent share of the coverage, the jury decided that the companies were  bound by a form from Silverstein's own insurance broker, that stipulated  that Silverstein could never recover more than $3.5 billion. That decision  was partly overturned on December 6, 2004, when a federal jury ruled the  nine insurers who wrote the policy for US $1.1 billion of the total $3.5  billion, had to pay double. The companies are appealing.37 Even with the  single claim though, plus an $861 million payout for WTC7, Silverstein has  already made a profit. 
 Now, with insurance money and funds raised through taxpayer liberty  bonds, Silverstein could start over.  According to New York City historian,  Mike Wallace, Silverstein is eager to provide even more office space even  though the supply in New York City far exceeds demand. Already, a 1,776-ft.  "Freedom Tower" is being built on the WTC site -- "All the designers for the  site were required to include in their plan millions of square feet of  office space, to accommodate him and millions more of shopping space, to  accommodate Westfield America, who had the rights to the old WTC underground  mall and wanted to restore the old status quo as much as possible."38
 "Why would terrorists take straight-down collapses of WTC7 and the  Towers, when "toppling-over" falls would require much less work and would do  much more damage in downtown Manhattan? And where would they obtain the  necessary skills and access to the buildings for a symmetrical implosion  anyway? The "symmetry data" emphasized here [in my paper], along with other  data, provide strong evidence for an inside job."40 
Since Silverstein and Eisenberg were the only two people to benefit directly  from "straight-down collapses of WTC7 and the Towers," could the attack have  been, at least in part, something as mundane as real-estate insurance  swindle? 
Silverstein and Eisenberg should have also been investigated because of  their political connections. Eisenberg headed Bush's New Jersey fundraising  committee; was recently elected Finance Chairman of the Republican National  Committee; is a director of the Republican Jewish Coalition; and is a former  vice-president of AIPAC. 
Silverstein, like Eisenberg, held a top position in the billion-dollar  Zionist charity, the United Jewish Appeal, and each has strong ties to  Israel's leadership, a fact that was demonstrated shortly after the attack:  Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein.a close friend, to ask  how he was. Since then, they have spoken a few more times. 
Two former Prime Ministers - Benjamin Netanyahu who this week called  Silverstein a "friend," and Ehud Barak, whom Silverstein in the past offered  a job as his representative in Israel - also called soon after the  disaster.41  
In truth I find the critics of solvers of the 9-11 crimes to be the ones lacking cogent argument or anything else except profanity, misrepresentation andchutzpah (a Yiddish euphemism for brazen sociopathic effrontery in the face of totally exposed wrongness-- viewed as an admirable business and social  trait when practiced with success by any Jew against any gentile.)
Richard "Dick" Eastman M.S., M.A. Yakima, Washington
P.S. My investigation of the Pentagon photo evidence and witness statements offers similarly global consistency in establishing that Flight 77 was not the cause of the explosions and deaths at the Pentagon. Highest Treason Substantiated
independent corroboration -- by credible witnesses, found and interviewed by indpendent investigators Aldo Marquis and Craig Ranke, saying exactly what my thesis would predict they would say given their location -- sustaining the flyover thesis and putting fresh nails of refutation into the coffin of the "boxcutter" black-op deception.
The "Citizens Investigation Team" findings of Ranke and Marquis can be viewed here. 
The proof of the validity of Ranke-Marquis-Eastman flyover thesis is that no mainstream or Fetzer-Group critic dares attack it by baldly stating its unanswerable findings, or addressing its multiple lines of conclusive evidence all poining to the same conclusion -- whereas the claims of the critics, when not attacking straw men, are disproven at every turn.
The 9-11 conspiracy is proven, Zionist Jews with connections to Israel and City of London merchant banking are inescapably implicated.
 Jer:11:9: And the LORD said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.


On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:03:19PM -0400,
Jack Stone wrote:
No, no, it was MAGIC FAIRY DUST acquired from Leprechauns in exchange for a tanker truck of beer. The Leprechauns got the magic  fairy dust from THE GOMBARS, how are interdimensional beings from another galaxy. (Sorry, I did promise not to tell).
THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH CONSPIRACY NUTS.... When their theories are exposed as bullshit, they simply CHANGE their story. They go through a never-ending cycle of different variations on the theme.
But how can there be EVIDENCE "proving" something THAT KEEPS CHANGING all the time?
If there was any evidence proving theory X, then there can't be proof of theory Y after the nuts change their story.
The conspiracy theory depends on NEVER being specific, so that the crazy theory cannot be logically examined.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM,
Kevin Barrett wrote:
It looks like it was done with superthermitic nanocomposites, which are the most highly explosive substances yet developed, and can be painted on surfaces and detonated with high-heat charges. Just paint it on -- looks like any other paint or sealant. Or it could be shaped like plastique and disguised. Unmistakable traces of the huge amounts of this stuff have been found in the dust, as Neils Harrit's paper demonstrates.
Anything applied or attached to the core columns would be invisible to WTC workers, and could have easily been placed by the ongoing and heavily-guarded "elevator repair" operations in 2001. The elevator shafts gave access to the core columns.
For one hypothesis about how they might have been applied and who did it, check out Chris Bollyn's brand new free book at Or start with my interview with him: For a different take on who did it, check out my interview tonight with Richard Curtis: 5 - 7 pm Central,
The demolition above ground of the WTC was accomplished with  conventional explosives. Dr. Steven Jones agreed with me on this point on a radio show we were on a couple of months ago.
The explosives were built into the towers when they were  constructed:
Please read the material at all of the four links in that section before raising objections.
Note particularly the section of
beginning about half-way down with the paragraph beginning "The last image is WTC 2" just above this picture that has  a red and a yellow vertical stripe:
Presumably the explosive mixture employed additives to keep  it potent for many decades, and had been given thermal  accelerated life testing to assure this.
I have been told about another large building in the U.S.  that has built-in demolition explosives, but have been asked by the informant not to name it to avoid putting them in  danger.

Yeah right, Murder thousands of other to cover up? Not hardly 

The WTC towers were so strong that demolishing them at the end of their useful life would have been extremely difficult and expensive without the built-in explosives, which for legitimate demolition would presumably have been detonated during a rainstorm to prevent the dust cloud that occurred on 9/11.

What an yiddiot, it would have taken a tsunami

The detonators were installed shortly before 9/11. If coded  radio detonation commands were used, they could have been  issued from a repeater on each floor that had an unobtrusive thin wire antenna in a window for unobstructed reception. Upon receipt of its coded command its microprocessor would  have issued the individual coded commands by radio to the  detonators on that floor. Custom LSI chips could have made both types of unit much smaller than a pack of cigarettes.
Alternatively, the detonators could have used very accurate crystal-clock timers. For safety, there could have been  three timers in each detonator, with majority logic (2 of 3) needed to fire.
Nanothermite is powerful, but not powerful enough for a  painted-on layer to cut through thick steel.
A PBS video shown in 1990, stated that the welders doing the butt-welds of the high-tensile 3-inch rebars in the concrete core had to have a security clearance. The documentary  showed that the resulting slowdown of the work increased the cost to the public. 
The existence of the built-in explosives was discovered by  Chris Brown from the clues in that video and his research  into the design of the towers. Chris, please make any  additions or corrections that you wish.
Mark S Bilk
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:07 AM, John Machado wrote:
As usual, the Stone premise is not correct
with military grade thermate 4,800 locations in each tower, most of it paint-on or strap-on in less than a minute ... most of it done in the elevator shafts ... the deed is done ..
controls would be by floor ... and set for successive floors at less than 1/10 th second intervals .. once the key floor is determined ... by the beacon to which the plane is headed and then the actual strike point ...
plane strikes would have induced toppling in the real world if anything ... but, the buildings withstood the impact and the fires ...... if not for the demoliton charges .. pre-rigged ... all the WTC would still be standing .. which was not the desired end...
24 men in each tower .. get the job done in 30 hours ... and... lo ... didn't the WTC have a 30 hour shut-down shortly after Silverstein took over..

And now Dan will take The great Harlot City

10: But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. 
11: And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand.
12: And when he hath taken away the multitude, his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it.
13: For the king of the north shall return, and shall set forth a multitude greater than the former, and shall certainly come after certain years with a great army and with much riches.
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
16: But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.


(click on pictures to see them bigger)

Each year, hundreds or even thousands of Palestinian children are arrested, tortured, interrogated, abused and incarcerated by the criminals of the Israeli military occupation. In many cases the children are abused sexually by the Israeli Dicc05interrogators. They are also imprisoned together with teenagers, criminals, and drugs dealers, who also attack the children, abused them sexually, and steal their personal belongings. Two children from the Nahalin village near Bethlehem told me how they had been abused sexually at the Israeli jail by criminals detained there.

(Click on Pictures to see them bigger).

Here is a Video which shows how the Israeli military treats the Palestinian children and their families while attending their illegal “military courts”.

A child described to me how the military judge accused him of throwing 40 stones at a military patrol near the Etzion military camp. The child swore to me that he had never been there. “Why I should my son travel from Nahalin to Etzion to throw stones at a military patrol driving in the mean street?” his mother asked me incredulous. This was not something logical for her child to do, said the mother of that child.

It is very clear that the accusation were invented, and this child was arrested Didu04and spent three years in the Israeli jails illegally, on trumped up charges.

What I also found confusing among the lies, was that the military judge had accused the child of throwing “40 stones” at a military patrol while driving near Etzion. How did the driver count the stones which the child had thrown? Did he stop driving, did he stand quite, calm and with cuffed hands, waiting for the child to start throwing stones, and counting the stones which he threw, 1, 2, 3, 4, … 40?

I have seen IDF soldiers arresting children who were in the kindergarten in snipering_kindersHebron, I also saw how they tortured and shot them just because they were playing football in a garden. I still remember how soldiers under orders from Colonel Yigal Sharon, a former IDF Commander of Hebron, shot Majdi Al-Mohtasib, age of 10 and his sister, age of 5 while playing football. The poor child Majdi had refused to give his ball to an IDF soldier, and received a bullet which broke the bones of his leg.

According to the human rights organization “Defence for Children International” (DCI), many children were jailed under administrative detention without any charge or trial.

Administrative detention is often based on “secret evidence.” Israeli military order 1226 empowers military commanders to detain Palestinians, including Imalb0600children, for up to six months if they have “reasonable grounds to presume that the security of the area or public security require the detention.” The initial six month period can be extended by additional six-month periods, indefinitely.

The DCI confirmed that the Palestinian child detainees routinely face violations of their human rights during arrest, interrogation and imprisonment. They are exposed to physical and psychological abuse, amounting to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and sometimes torture. They are denied prompt access to a lawyer and often denied contact with their families and the outside world. These children face substandard conditions of detention and are denied access to proper education services.



Keep in mind......

e-mail from the Hassidic anti-Christ Pharisaic Chabad Lovtobitch (Lubavitch) Sanhedrin of the Dragon....rabid rib-eye Dov Stein

דואר אלקטרוני          אתר אינטרנט

-----Original Message-----
From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. []
Sent: Tuesday,
August 16, 2005 9:06 PM
To: Dov

Dov SSStein
IT is not chamas who you control who you worry about....IT IS JESUS the Christ GOD and his Father you so tremble.
Very soon your Moshiach and Sanhedrin and your dragon is cast into the pit with death and hell the Covenant you have made to yourselves

His Reply

We authentic Jews will treat CHAMAS (Hamas)  wonderful when we get rid from your christian influence during 2000 years of murdering and thethts. Soon the CHAMAS will treat you christians as it did 11/9 (9-11-2001)


They will come to you before as 11/9
The only chance that you will remain  is the treatment that we the jews will the CHAMAS


From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. []
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 6:32 PM
To: Dov

Dov Stein
hahah neat manuever
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
So it is time to have your Hamas to "Proceed with your all engulfing "TERROR"
Lob those missiles on the "Lesser Brethren"
and send in Bigboy haha Bushitler
and then double cross him
hahahha gotta hand it to you den of Vipers, you are following the Prophecy of Jesus the Christ 100% and know it not
OH well IW...ITSREALHELL Warner here has told you, REPENT or perish forever, Dov Stein

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.  The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory


E-mail from Dov Stein, Sanhedrin 1-26-2006

From: Southern American Marketing, Inc. []
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 6:10 PM
To: Dov

well lookie, lookie Dov Stein, the Sanhedrin has pulled off their Hamas Victory, Now all you need is more "Terror" to Justify reinvadeing the Gaza and begin Noahide Enforcement to your strange gods who are no God the Creator, but the murderer from the beginning, that Old serpent the dragon who has given you your power and seat and authority. But lo, and alas It is very, very Temporary, where will you hide on that Great and Terrible Day of the Lord's wrath for your iniquities, and blasphemy and theft's and murders? Repent in Jesus the Christ Mighty Name, Dov Stein


From: ??
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: RE:

Hamas is better. Now we will have the oportunity to through (Throw) all of them back to Saudi Arabia what was impossible with Fatach. (Fatah)


From: ??



For those of you who do not believe this is from Dov Stein of Sanhedrin, here is their e mail address. Dov Stein refuses to converse in anymore e mails

Hachrazah 5769 Tamuz 9 - The Sanhedrin - en  

Jul 7, 2009 ... Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007. Email: 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228 ... - Cached - Similar

Psak 5769 Nisan 1 - The Sanhedrin - en  

Mar 24, 2009 ... Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007. Email: 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228 ...

Jerusalem Court for Issues of Bnei Noah
Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
Email: 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228


To: Southern American Marketing, Inc.

Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 4:20 PM
Subject: RE:

Do not be SIW. Jesus is idol. Believe that there is only one unique G_D not 2 and not 3. The Sanhedrin will bring the world to the eternal peace. We need time and G-D will help us. We will change the secular government in our country choose a king Moshiach Ben David build the temple and the redemption will come to the world. You are now SIW but in the near future you will regret
To: dov
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 12:42 AM
Subject: running out of time

Hey Dov,
Looks as though you are about to appoint your mere man wannabe king moshiach who will come in his own name.
Great, because Jesus Christ will destroy him by the brightness of his coming. And the Mighty men (Giborim ) better start hiding in the mountains and the rocks in caves, and pray that the mountains fall upon them on that Great Day of the Lords wrath. Where will you hide, Nohides?
For your murders and sorceries will surely judge you Vipers and hypocrites !
Repent in that Name above every name Jesus who is Christ the King of Kings and Lord of Lords !


The self appointed Master Race "Chosen" will Push all Palestinians to the sea, whether the US likes it or not. Bush's fake Road Map to Hell a success.

Not a peep from Hilarious since she mysteriously broke her elbow

Broken Arm Forces Clinton To Cancel Overseas Travel | Breaking News  

Broken Arm Forces Clinton To Cancel Overseas Travel. Published on June 22, 2009 in News. Closed Tags: Hillary Clinton. “Deputy Secretary of States James

Israel rushes to approve new settlement homes before US-brokered freeze

• Ministers back Netanyahu stance on West Bank expansion
• PM wins 'strategic delay' deal to appease rightwingers (Hassid of Sanhedrin)

Binyamin Netanyahu addresses the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem

Binyamin Netanyahu addresses the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem. Photograph: Ronen Zvulun/AFP/Getty Images


Israel's defence ministry will approve the construction of 500 new settlement homes in the occupied West Bank this week, in a last-minute move before agreeing a compromise settlement freeze with the United States.

The authorisation comes despite criticism from Washington and weakens the effect any suspension of Israeli settlement construction will have. During the Israeli pause, work will continue on these new homes and on 2,500 others where Israel says construction has already started.

Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has reportedly told members of his Likud party that he will finalise a deal with the Obama administration when the US Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, visits Jerusalem later this week.

After a weekend of talks with his party and other key politicians, Netanyahu appears to have won the backing of his coalition for the settlement agreement, which will be a much watered-down version of what the US had demanded. He reportedly talked of a "reduction" in construction, rather than a freeze or a pause. The agreement is an initial stage designed to restart Middle East negotiations.

Several influential cabinet ministers backed Netanyahu, with Eli Yishai, a deputy prime minister and head of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, saying what Israel was offering was no more than a "strategic delay", and that settlement building would continue in future. The transport minister, Yisrael Katz, from Netanyahu's Likud party, said the move was "well-conceived".

Meanwhile, one Israeli report said work has begun on 20 homes in a new settlement, Maskiot, in the northern Jordan Valley in the West Bank. The homes, built on the site of a former Israeli military base, were intended for settlers the Israeli government withdrew from Gaza four years ago, according to Ynet, the website of the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.

Construction approvals were given last year, it said.

Thousands of new settlement homes have been approved in the last few years. The settler population continues to grow rapidly: today there are nearly 500,000 settlers in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Settlements on occupied land are illegal under international law.

Mitchell, the US envoy, will fly back to Israel later this week, or early next week, for more talks with the Israeli government, hoping to finalise the settlement suspension. Two Netanyahu aides were in Washington last week telling him of the plans for the new construction approvals before the suspension begins.

The White House was quick to respond, saying: "The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued settlement expansion and we urge that it stop. We are working to create a climate in which negotiations can take place, and such actions make it harder to create such a climate."

Yossi Alpher, an Israeli analyst and former Mossad official, said Netanyahu was making a "finely gauged calculation" to avoid an open rebellion within his government so soon after February's elections. Alpher was sceptical that a genuine peace deal would result from this process.

"There is a huge jump to hope that the actual process that all this launches will get somewhere," he said. "We are really focusing on a very preliminary and temporary step which in the long run will not mean very much if the idea of serious negotiations are being contemplated here."

The US hopes this month to convince Netanyahu and the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, to start the first peace talks in more than a year. The Obama administration had insisted that Israel stop all settlement activity, including so-called "natural growth", in line with its commitments under the 2003 road map to peace.

But Israel resisted. Now Netanyahu is offering to pause settlement building only in the occupied West Bank, not in East Jerusalem, and only for a limited period, perhaps six months. In addition he wants construction to continue on the soon-to-be approved homes and others where work has started. One Israeli report suggested the suspension could begin as early as next month.

It looks like a deal intended to go some way towards meeting Washington's demands, while also retaining the support of his rightwing coalition, which includes many pro-settler politicians.

"The postponement in construction is a strategic delay," Yishai said yesterday. "We won't give up on building in Jerusalem and will still build hundreds of construction units."

In return, Arab states are to take some steps towards diplomatic links, allowing Israeli flights over their land or, in some cases, reopening Israeli trade offices.

But for now the Palestinians say they will not sit down for talks without all settlement building ceasing. Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, said the new construction "undermines efforts being exerted to revive the peace process".

Yossi Alpher, an Israeli analyst and former Mossad official, said Netanyahu was making a "finely gauged calculation" to avoid an open rebellion within his government so soon after February's elections. Alpher was sceptical that a genuine peace deal would result from this process.

"There is a huge jump to hope that the actual process that all this launches will get somewhere," he said. "We are really focusing on a very preliminary and temporary step which in the long run will not mean very much if the idea of serious negotiations are being contemplated here."



And now Dan will take The great Harlot City

10: But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. 
11: And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand.
12: And when he hath taken away the multitude, his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it.
13: For the king of the north shall return, and shall set forth a multitude greater than the former, and shall certainly come after certain years with a great army and with much riches.
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
16: But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.



The Noachide Laws: A Prescription For The World

By Rabbi Yair Hoffman
Published on Thursday, September 03, 2009 - COMMENTS (0)

The Oral Law contains within it a tradition about G-d and mankind. A loving, kind, and ethical G-d concerned for His creations would not have created a world where man would have no direction. He would not have created a world where the yardstick by which man was ultimately judged was unattainable and completely beyond his reach. Such a G-d would not have confined His creation automatically to a state of punishment with no hope for salvation.

Thank you Lord Jesus

Somehow, a loving G-d would inform man of what is required of him. So what happened until the Sinaitic revelation 3,300 years ago? Where was the communication?

The Oral Tradition plays a key role in this explanation.

Mk:7:9: And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

Mk:7:13: Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

 The sages record a tradition that there was a Divine communication to Adam, and it was modified to Noah about what was expected of mankind. This communication asserts that there are certain values and behavioral norms that G-d demands of all of mankind.

2Tm:4:4: And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Ti:1:14: Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

It was a fair and merit-based system of moral laws. The communication boils down to seven laws. Maimonides writes that being a good person and adhering to these seven rules guarantees one’s share in ultimate reward. The seven rules are:

• Believe in the One G-d.

• Do not curse G-d.

• Do not murder.

• Do not steal.

• Do not engage in forbidden sexual unions.

• Do not eat the limb of a live animal.

• Create a system of laws where decency can thrive.

With these laws, man can improve, achieve meaning in this world, and achieve the ultimate reward. The reward is earned after living up to the proper moral code. The reward is not given by merely believing in something or someone.

MT.22:37: Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38: This is the first and great commandment.
39: And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
41: While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,
42: Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David.
43: He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,
44: The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
45: If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?

46: And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.

Where are these laws found? Is there a record of these laws anywhere in the historical record aside from the Jewish texts? Can the influence of the Noachide code be detected in ancient civilizations and societies?

Yes. In the Sumerian city of Ur, Ur-Nammu the king (circa 2050 BCE) established a moral and legal code that contained within it most of these laws. 

there you have it, the Babylonians and their Illuminated Masters

[1] One hundred and twenty five years later, we find many of these laws within the code of Bilalama, king of the Amorite city of Eshnunna (1925 BCE). Sixty five years later, we see them in the laws of Lipit-Ishtar, ruler of Isin (1860 BCE). We see their influence on the code of Hammurabi of Babylonia (1700 BCE) and in the Assyrian laws in the city of Assur (1350 BCE).

Rv:18:2: And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.

We can further observe the influence of these laws in Egyptian didactic literature, especially the Book of the Dead wherein the “negative confession” is stated: “In the presence of Osiris and his court convened in the “Hall of Two Truths” the dead man professes, “I have not done evil… I have not blasphemed a god… I have not killed… I have not stolen… I have not committed adultery.”

Rv:11:8: And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

When the allies conquered the Nazis at the end of the Second World War, the question of a trial arose. The allies wished to show the horrific crimes that the Nazis had perpetrated to the world, and the Nuremburg Trials were held. There was one question, however, which gnawed at a number of people. By what right may the Nazi villains be tried?

It is almost a universal principle in law that one cannot create a law and then place someone on trial for that law ex post facto. If the Nazis legalized murder, then on what basis could they be tried?

This legal dilemma was answered with the notion of a universal human code against cold-blooded murder. The oral traditions of the Jews, the veracity of which we have established to all those that believe in the Bible,
tell us of how this universal code started. It may have been lost in the dustbin of history, but not to the Jewish people. The Noachide code remains there within the words of the Mishnah in Tractate Sanhedrin [2], quietly, softly, wielding its influence.

"It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma'ariv, October 6, 2004)

The seven laws are not just laws, they are seven categories. Thus the belief in the One G-d deals with knowing the nature of G-d and emulating Him. The prohibition against forbidden sexual unions encompasses prohibitions against incest, adultery, and homosexuality. The prohibition against stealing would involve robbery, theft, and the stealing of intellectual property.

In conclusion, the Noachide laws provide society and civilization with a strong foundation and structure for moral growth as well as a fair, merit-based simple manner in which mankind can earn eternal reward.

The author can be reached at


1. For an excellent study of these texts see J. Pritchard, Ancient Near East Texts, Princeton, 1955 pp. 159-198; 412-430.

2. Tractate Sanhedrin 56a; See also Tosefta Avodah Zarah 9:4 and in some editions 8:4.


Barack Obama's Rabbi(s)

By Brett Lieberman

Will a rabbi’s blessing help Barack Obama? What about 300 rabbis? And will the IRS find this arrangement kosher?

“Rather than sit and yell at my television, I thought there was an opportunity to do something,” said Rabbi Steven Bob of Congregation Etz Chaim in Lombard, Ill, in the western suburbs of Chicago.

Rabbis for Obama, a grassroots group of 368 rabbis as of Thursday, Sept. 11, from Reform, Conservative, Orthodox and Reconstructionist synagogues across the country who hope that by lending their support to the Democratic nominee they can persuade other Jews to back him too, is the brainchild of Bob and Rabbi Sam Gordon of Sukkat Shalom in Wilmette, Ill.

The push, which they say is independent of their synagogues [“I’m not using any of the platforms provided me by the synagogue, neither the bulletin or the bima. This is me doing this personally,” Bob said], is believed to be the largest organized effort by Jewish leaders to support one candidate or presidential ticket. Rabbis have taken out newspaper ads and spoken for or against candidates, but Jewish historians cannot recall a comparable effort.

Their synagogues are not endorsing a candidate, which could lead to the IRS revoking their non-profit status. In announcing their support, Rabbis for Obama announced only the rabbis’ names and hometowns – without their synagogues - to avoid the implication that the synagogues are backing Obama.

What clergy can or can’t say to the congregations about the candidates or issues was a topic raised during a panel discussion at the Democratic National Convention in Denver last month. Several experts on the law said that clergy can discuss issues and the campaigns from the pulpit, but warned they need to be careful not to indicate their support for a particular candidate.

Prominent rabbis in the group include Rabbi Elliot Dorf of Los Angeles, Rabbi Jack Moline of Alexandria, Va, who spoke at the Democratic National Convention, Rabbi Burton Visotzky of New York, Rabbi Janet Marder of Palo Alto, Calif., and Rabbi Ellen Weinberg Dreyfus of Homewood, Ill.

The rabbis felt moved to take an active role in the presidential campaign because of what they saw as a unique opportunity to influence the outcome of an election in which Jewish voters are receiving more attention than they can recall in any recent election.

Believing that Obama and Republican John McCain are equally “pro-Israel,” it was domestic issues such as abortion, separation of church and state that were “gigantic issues” that factored into their decision to publicly support Obama, according to Bob.

“If the question is Israel, I think it’s evidently clear that the differences on the two are very, very small,” Bob said.

Rabbis for Obama members as of Sept. 11, 2008:

Chair: Rabbi Sam Gordon, Wilmette, IL                              Co-chair: Rabbi Steven Bob, Glen Ellyn, IL                              Vice- Chairs: Rabbi Rachel Cowan, New York, NY Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Los Angeles, CA               Rabbi Ellen Weinberg Dreyfus, Homewood, IL                              Rabbi Steve Foster, Denver, CO     Rabbi Dayle Friedman, Philadelphia, PA                                    Rabbi Laura Geller, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Don Gluckman, Pikesville, MD Rabbi Nancy Fuchs Kreimer, Wyncote, PA                                    Rabbi Charles Kroloff, Westfield, NJ     Rabbi Richard N. Levy, Encino, CA                               Rabbi Brian Lurie, San Francisco, CA                    Rabbi Rachel Mikva, Rye Brook, NY Rabbi Jack Moline, Alexandria, VA                         Rabbi Charles Simon, New York, NY     Rabbi David Teutsch, Philadelphia, PA     Rabbi Ethan Tucker, New York, NY Rabbi Burt Visotzky, New York, NY                              Members: Rabbi Jonathan Aaron, Los Angeles, CA     Rabbi Bruce Abrams, Cleveland Heights, OH Rabbi David Adelson, New York, NY Rabbi Adam M. Allenberg, Mountain View, CA Rabbi Victor Appell, New York, NY                Rabbi Stephen A. Arnold, S. Easton, MA          Rabbi Aryeh Azriel, Omaha, NE                      Rabbi Larry Bach, El Paso, TX                                         Rabbi Andy Bachman, Brooklyn, NY     Rabbi Chava Bahle, Suttons Bay, MI                Rabbi Andrew Baker, Washington, D.C.     Rabbi Michael Barenbaum, Marin, CA               Rabbi Benjy Bar-Lev, Cincinnati, OH Rabbi Lewis Barth,  Encino, CA Rabbi Morris Barzilai, New Rochelle, NY Rabbi Elliot Baskin, Greenwood Village, CO Rabbi Renee Bauer, Madison WI          Rabbi Pamela Frydman Baugh, San Francisco, CA Rabbi Leonard I. Beerman, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Annie Belford, St. Louis, MO Rabbi Karen Bender, Tarzana, CA                          Rabbi Donald R. Berlin, St. Michaels, MD                    Rabbi Linda Bertenthal, Los Angeles, CA                    Rabbi Marjorie Berman, Philadelphia PA Rabbi Phyllis Berman Philadelphia, PA     Rabbi Jonathan Biatch, Madison, WI Rabbi Michael Birnholz, Vero Beach, FL          Rabbi Aaron B. Bisno, Pittsburgh, PA     Rabbi Joshua Boettiger     , Bennington, VA          Rabbi Terry Bookman, Miami, Fl                         Rabbi Jill Borodin, Seattle, WA     Rabbi Mark Borovitz, Los Angeles, CA                                   Rabbi Neal Borovitz River Edge, NJ Rabbi Sara Brandes, Los Angeles, CA                              Rabbi Herbert Bronstein, Glencoe, IL     Rabbi Lester Bronstein, White Plains, NY Rabbi Angela Buchdahl, New York, NY      Rabbi Gustav Buchdahl, Baltimore, MD     Rabbi Caryn Broitman, W. Tisbury, MA                    Rabbi Daniel M. Bronstein, Brooklyn, NY               Rabbi Carol Caine Berkeley, CA Rabbi Debra S. Cantor Newington, CT Rabbi Carie Carter, Brooklyn, NY                              Rabbi Kenneth Chasen, Los Angeles, CA     Rabbi Steven Chester, Oakland, CA Rabbi Diane Cohen, Los Angeles                              Rabbi Hillel Cohn, San Bernardino, CA                Rabbi David J. Cooper, Piedmont, CA               Rabbi Julian I. Cook, Denver, CO     Rabbi Mychal Copeland, Stanford, CA Rabbi Laurie Coskey, Poway, CA                    Rabbi Rachel Cowan, New York, NY Rabbi Meryl M. Crean, Media, PA                              Rabbi Menachem Creditor, Berkeley, CA                    Rabbi William Cutter, Los Angeles, CO      Rabbi Eric Cytryn, Harrisburg, PA                    Rabbi Harry K Danziger, Germantown, TN Rabbi Andrew Davids, Croton On Hudson, NY Rabbi Stanley Davids, Santa Monica, CA     Rabbi Jerome Davidson, Kings Point, NY Rabbi Eliezer Diamond, Teaneck, NJ Rabbi Fred Dobb, Bethesda, MD     Rabbi Wayne Dosick, San  Diego, CA Rabbi William Dreskin, Greenburgh, NY                    Rabbi Renee Edelman, South Orange, NJ Rabbi Amy Eilberg St. Paul, MN                         Rabbi Bruce Elder, Highland Park, IL Rabbi Sue Levi Elwell, Philadelphia, PA                    Rabbi Shira Koch Epstein, Brooklyn, NY                    Rabbi Daniel Fellman, East Brunswick, NJ Rabbi Brian Field, Denver CO                    Rabbi Daniel Fink, Boise, ID      Rabbi Reuven Firestone, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Adam D. Fisher, Stony Brook, NY     Rabbi Alan Flam, Barrington, RI                    Rabbi Nancy Flam, Northampton, MA Rabbi Ellen Flax, New York, NY     Rabbi Robert Frazin, Hollywood, FL          Rabbi Michael Friedland, South Bend. IN               Rabbi Joan S. Friedman, Wooster, OH                    Rabbi Marsha Friedman, Elkins Park, PA             Rabbi Ronne Friedman, Brookline, MA                                        Rabbi Stacy Friedman, San Rafael, CA     Rabbi Randy Fleisher St. Louis, MO Rabbi Serena Fujita, Lewisburg, PA                    Rabbi Jack S. Gabriel, Sonoma, CA     Rabbi Ruth Gais Summit, NJ                                                       Rabbi Hillel Gamoran, Seattle, WA     Rabbi Robert T. Gan, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Rachel Gartner, Montclair, NJ. Rabbi Ruth Gelfarb, New York, NY Rabbi Jonathan Gerard, Easton, PA Rabbi Kim Geringer, Short Hills, New Jersey                    Rabbi Gary Gerson, Oak Park, IL                              Rabbi Gordon Gladstone, Bayonne NJ          Rabbi Miriyam Glazer, Los Angeles, CA     Rabbi Steve Glazer, Herndon, VA                         Rabbi Mark Glickman, Woodinville, WA Rabbi Arnie Gluck, Skillman, NJ                         Rabbi Shai Gluskin, Philadelphia, PA                    Rabbi Rosalind Gold, Reston, VA                         Rabbi Gerald A. Goldman, Holyoke, MA Rabbi James Stone Goodman, St. Louis, MO               Rabbi Joseph Goldman, Denver, CO Rabbi Andrea Goldstein, St Louis, MO Rabbi Jerrold Goldstein, Sherman Oaks, CA Rabbi Jeffrey W. Goldwasser, Williamstown, MA Rabbi Linda Henry Goodman, Garden City, NY     Rabbi Stephen Goodman, Garden City, NY                    Rabbi Donald Goor, Tarzana, CA Rabbi Seth William Goren, Washington, DC Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater, Pasadena, CA                                     Rabbi Alan Greenbaum, Grass Valley, CA Rabbi C. Michelle Greenberg, Northfield, IL Rabbi David Greenspoon, Baltimore, MD               Rabbi Suzanne Griffel, Chicago, IL          Rabbi Daniel Gropper, Rye, NY Rabbi Arthur Gross-Schaefer, Santa Barbara, CA                         Rabbi Susan Grossman, Columbia, MD     Rabbi Joshua Gutoff, Brooklyn, NY                    Rabbi Debra Hachen, Demarest, NJ Rabbi Shoshana Hantman, Katonah, NY                    Rabbi Maurice Harris, Eugene, OR  Rabbi Robert Harris, White Plains, NY Rabbi Alan Henkin, Northridge, CA Rabbi Jeffrey Hoffman, White Plains, NY Rabbi Elliot Holin, Elkins Park, PA     Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt, New Haven, CT Rabbi Linda Holtzman, Philadelphia, PA     Rabbi Margaret Holub, Mendecino, CA              Rabbi Abie Ingber, Cincinnati, OH                    Rabbi Steven B. Jacobs, Woodland Hills, CA     Rabbi Devorah Jacobson, Amherst, MA     Rabbi Howard L. Jaffe, Lexington, MA                 Rabbi Jennifer Jaech, Peekskill NY                    Rabbi Rebecca Joseph, New York, NY               Rabbi Bruce Kadden, Tacoma, WA     Rabbi Amy Kalmanofsky, New York, NY          Rabbi Jeremy Kalmanofsky, New York, NY                          Rabbi Ben Kamin, Del Mar, CA                     Rabbi Debra Newman Kamin, Highland Park, IL     Rabbi Susan Kanoff, Philadelphia, PA     Rabbi Ken Kanter, Cincinnati, OH               Rabbi Patricia Karlin-Neumann, Palo Alto, CA Rabbi Henry Jay Karp, Davenport, IA      Rabbi Mario Karpuj, Sandy Springs, GA Rabbi Nancy Kasten, Dallas, TX     Rabbi Jim Kaufman, Valley Village, CA     Rabbi David Kay, Orlando, Florida Rabbi Benjamin G. Kelsen, Teaneck, NJ     Rabbi Jimmy Kessler, Galveston, TX      Rabbi Ralph P. Kingsley, Aventura, FL Rabbi Andrew Klein, Barrington, RI Rabbi Jason Klein, Baltimore, MD                    Rabbi Jonathan Klein Los Angeles, CA      Rabbi Lori Klein, Capitola, CA               Rabbi Myriam Klotz, Bala Cynwyd, PA              Rabbi Norman Koch, New Milford, CT     Rabbi Debora Kohn, Berkeley, CA               Rabbi Stephanie D. Kolin, Boston, MA                    Rabbi Neil E Kominsky, Brookline, MA Rabbi Sandford Kopnick, Cincinnati, OH Rabbi Ira Korinow, Haverhill, MA                         Rabbi Allen Krause, Mission Viejo, CA                    Rabbi Lawrence Kushner, San Francisco, CA               Rabbi Noa Kushner, San Anselmo, CA                    Rabbi Steven Kushner, Montclair, NJ     Rabbi Harold Kudan, Glencoe, IL                    Rabbi Judith Kummer, Roslindale, MA               Rabbi Gail Labovitz, Los Angeles     Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Los Angeles, CA     Rabbi Lynne Landsberg, Washington, DC          Rabbi Shira Lander Baltimore, MD Rabbi Michael Adam Latz, Seattle, WA                    Rabbi Alan LaPayover, Philadelphia, PA Rabbi William Lebeau, New York, NY     Rabbi Morton Leifman, New York, NY     Rabbi Michael Lerner, San Francisco, CA                         Rabbi Carol Levithan, New York, NY          Rabbi Charles S. Levi, Deerfield, IL Rabbi Joel Levine, Palm Beach Gardens, FL Rabbi Yael Levy, Philadelphia, PA          Rabbi Valerie Lieber, Brooklyn, NY Rabbi Rebecca Lillian, Chicago, Illinois     Rabbi John A. Linder, Phoenix, AZ               Rabbi Steven Lowenstein, Glencoe, IL               Rabbi Jonathan Malamy, White Plains, NY Rabbi Jonathan Z. Maltzman, North Bethesda, MD Rabbi Howard Mandell, Virginia Beach, VA Rabbi Janet Marder, Palo Alto, CA     Rabbi Jeffrey M. Marker, Brooklyn, NY     Rabbi Susan Marks, Sarasota, FL      Rabbi Simeon Maslin, Philadelphia, PA Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon, New York, NY                    Rabbi Dennis N. Math, New York, NY                    Rabbi Gary Mazo, Marstons Mills, MA Rabbi Bernard Mehlman, Brookline, MA     Rabbi Jim Michaels, Rockville, MD                    Rabbi Shira Milgrom, White Plains,NY               Rabbi Bennett Miller, Monroe Township, NJ Rabbi Joshua Minkin, Brooklyn, NY                          Rabbi Victor Mirelman, River Forest, IL               Rabbi Michael A. Monson, West Orange, NJ          Rabbi Leon A. Morris, New York, NY      Rabbi Jay Henry Moses, New York, NY Rabbi Anat Moskowitz, Denver, CO                    Rabbi Dan Moskovitz, Tarzana, CA                    Rabbi Shelly Moss, Sun City, AZ               Rabbi Robin Nafshi, Lebanon, NJ     Rabbi Perry Netter Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Avi S. Olitzky, St. Louis Park, MN     Rabbi Kerry M. Olitzky, New York, NY     Rabbi Shaul Osadchey, Houston, TX               Rabbi Melinda Panken, Manalapan, NJ     Rabbi Julie Pelc, Venice, California     Rabbi Daniel Plotkin, St. Louis, MO                    Rabbi Dan Polish, Poughkeepsie, NY                     Rabbi Jeffrey Portman, Iowa City, IA                Rabbi Linda Potemken, Wynnewood, PA              Rabbi Amber Powers, Philadelphia, PA               Rabbi Dan Rabishaw, Northbrook, IL Rabbi Bruce Raff, Woodland Hills, CA Rabbi Avram I. Reisner, Baltimore, MD     Rabbi Michael Remson, Kenosha, WI                         Rabbi Dorothy A. Richman, Berkeley, CA Rabbi Yair Robinson, Holland, PA                         Rabbi Liz Rolle, Stamford, CT                         Rabbi Norman Roman, West Bloomfield, MI     Rabbi Jack Romberg, Tallahassee, FL Rabbi Carnie Shalom Rose, Creve Coeur, MO     Rabbi David Rosenn, New York, NY Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, New York, NY Rabbi Donald B. Rossoff, Morristown, NJ          Rabbi Dennis S. Ross, Worcester, MA     Rabbi Gloria Rubin, Oakland, NJ     Rabbi Sarah Niebuhr Rubin,      Keene, NH               Rabbi JB Sacks-Rosen, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Selig Salkowitz, Fair Lawn, NJ Rabbi Joanna Samuels,     New York, NY     Rabbi David Sandmel, Chicago, IL                    Rabbi Marty Scharf, Scottsdale, AZ                         Rabbi Phil Schechter, Stamford CT                                          Rabbi Leonard A. Schoolman, New York, NY          Rabbi Bob Schreibman,     Lincolnshire, IL                    Rabbi Barry Schwartz, Cherry Hill, NJ                      Rabbi Allen Secher, Whitefish, MA          Rabbi Ron Segal, Atlanta, GA     Rabbi Allen Selis, St. Louis, MO                    Rabbi Gerry Serotta, Chevy Chase, MD                    Rabbi Ike Serotta, Deerfield, IL                         Rabbi Mark Dov Shapiro, Longmeadow, MA     Rabbi Mark S. Shapiro, Glenview, IL Rabbi Richard J. Shapiro Port Washington, NY                      Rabbi Roxanne Shapiro, Milwaukee, WI     Rabbi Leonard Sharzer, New York, NY Rabbi John Sherwood, Oxnard, CA     Rabbi Howard Siegel, Houston, TX Rabbi Howard Singer, Hinsdale, MA Rabbi Jonathan Singer, Seattle, WA                    Rabbi Suzanne Singer, Los Angeles, CA Rabbi Eric J. Siroka, South Bend, IN Rabbi Eleanor Smith, Evanston, IL                         Rabbi David Sofian, Dayton, OH Rabbi Ruth Sohn, Los Angeles, CA                         Rabbi Myra Soifer, Reno, NV     Rabbi Felicia L. Sol, New York, NY Rabbi Rav Soloff, Lansdale, PA 

Who runs Maraka?



Search Results

  1. YouTube - Rav Fruman Prays for Obama  

    3 min 37 sec - Oct 29, 2008 -

    Rabbi Fruman form Tekoa, Israel is praying in the wailing wall for the election of Barak Obama for president. Rabbi Fruman form Tekoa, Israel is

YouTube - Rabbi Menachem Froman for Obama - part 2  

33 sec - Sep 18, 2008 -

Rabbi Froman is Chief Rabbi of the settlement of Tekoa on the West Bank. ... Kenes HaSanhedrin 5767 Rav Menachem Furman part

What's At Stake?

A Rabbinic Letter to President-Elect Barack Obama

  1. Current List of Signers
  2. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
  3. Signer Disclaimer  
  4. Return to the Campaign

1. Current List of Signers

  1. Rabbi Scott Aaron, Chicago, IL
  2. Rabbi Stephanie Aaron, Tuscon, AZ
  3. Rabbi B. Elka Abrahamson, Columbus, OH
  4. Rabbi Alison Abrams, Los Angeles, CA
  5. Rabbi David L. Abramson, Marblehead, MA
  6. Rabbi Ruth Abusch-Magder, Evanston, IL
  7. Rabbi David Adelson, New York, NY
  8. Rabbi Jonathan F. Adland, Indianapolis, IN
  9. Rabbi Alison P. Adler, Hamden, CT
  10. Rabbi Sara O'Donnell Adler, Ann Arbor, MI
  11. Rabbi Richard Agler, Boca Raton, FL
  12. Rabbinical Student Aura Ahuvia, Ann Arbor, MI
  13. Cantor Joanna M. Alexander, Marlboro, NJ
  14. Rabbi Katy Z. Allen, Wayland, MA
  15. Rabbi Adam M. Allenberg, Los Altos Hills, CA
  16. Rabbi Renni S. Altman, Great Neck, NY
  17. Cantoral Student Azita Amini, Los Angeles, CA
  18. Cantor Michael Anatole, Ventura, CA
  19. Rabbi Julia Andelman, New York, NY
  20. Cantor Dana Anesi, Chappaqua, NY
  21. Rabbi Camille Shira Angel, San Francisco, CA
  22. Rabbi Sharon Cohen Anisfeld, Newton, MA
  23. Rabbinical Student Julia B. Appel, Brookline, MA
  24. Rabbi David Ariel-Joel, Louisville, KY
  25. Rabbi Benjamin L. Arnold, Evergreen, CO
  26. Rabbi Stephen A. Arnold, South Easton, MA
  27. Rabbi Arik W. Ascherman, Jerusalem, Israel
  28. Rabbi Rapael W. Asher, Walnut Creek, CA
  29. Cantor Risa Askin, Coral Springs, FL
  30. Cantor Margery Auerbach, Silver Spring, MD
  31. Rabbinical Student Guy Izhak Austrian, New York, NY
  32. Cantor Wendy J. Autenrieth, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
  33. Rabbinical Student Susan J. Averbach, San Francisco, CA
  34. Rabbi Albert Axelrad, Boston, MA
  35. Rabbi Aryeh Azriel, Omaha, NE
  36. Rabbi Larry Bach, El Paso, TX
  37. Rabbi Andy Bachman, Brooklyn, NY
  38. Rabbinical Student Rachel Bareblat, Williamstown, MA
  39. Rabbi Amy Bardack, Newton, MA
  40. Rabbi Pearl Barlev, Venice, CA
  41. Rabbi Uri Barnea, Hattiesburg, MS
  42. Rabbi Benjamin Barnett, Corvallis, OR
  43. Rabbinical Student Lisa Barrett, Newton Centre, MA
  44. Rabbi Bernard Barsky, Dayton, OH
  45. Rabbi Lewis M. Barth, Encino, CA
  46. Rabbi Israel J. Barzak, Ormond Beach, FL
  47. Rabbi Morris W. Barzilai, New Rochelle, NY
  48. Rabbi Geoffrey Basik, Baltimore, MD
  49. Rabbi Eliot Baskin, Greenwood Village, CO
  50. Rabbi Rachel Bat-Or, Macon, GA
  51. Rabbi David Dunn Bauer, Amherst, MA
  52. Rabbi Renee H. Bauer, Madison, WI
  53. Rabbi Pamela Frydman Baugh, San Francisco, CA
  54. Rabbi Brian K. Beal, Upper Nyack, NY
  55. Rabbi Dennis Beck-Berman, Petersburg, VA
  56. Rabbi Shelley Kovar Becker, Floral Park, NY
  57. Rabbi Micah Becker-Klein, Springfield, MA
  58. Rabbi Anne E. Belford, Saint Louis, MO
  59. Rabbi Marc J. Belgrad, Buffalo Grove, IL
  60. Rabbi Lisa Sari Bellows, Buffalo Grove, IL
  61. Rabbi Arnold Mark Belzer, Savannah, GA
  62. Rabbi Karen Bender, Tarzana, CA
  63. Rabbi Moshe ben Asher, Chatsworth, CA
  64. Rabbinical Student Olivier Solomon BenHaim, Seattle, WA
  65. Rabbi Allen Bennett, Alameda, CA
  66. Rabbi James M. Bennett, St Louis, MO
  67. Rabbi Jeffrey Bennett, Newington, CT
  68. Rabbi Aaron D. Benson, East Brunswick, NJ
  69. Rabbi Philip J. Bentley, Hendersonville, NC
  70. Cantor David Berger, New York, NY
  71. Rabbi Jonathan Meir Berger, Farmington Hills, MI
  72. Rabbi Sheri Berger, Montpelier, VT
  73. Rabbinical Student Yehuda Berger, New York, NY
  74. Rabbi Donald Robert Berlin, St. Michaels, MD
  75. Rabbinical Student Daniel Asher Berman, Brighton, MA
  76. Rabbi Donna Barbara Berman, Bloomfield, CT
  77. Rabbi Howard Berman, Jamaica Plain, MA
  78. Rabbinical Student Joseph Michael Berman, Jamaica Plain, MA
  79. Rabbi Marjorie Berman, Philadelphia, PA
  80. Rabbi Phyllis Ocean Berman, Philadelphia, PA
  81. Rabbi Leila Gal Berner, Kensington, MD
  82. Cantoral Student Rachel Berney, Brooklyn, NY
  83. Cantor Charlie Bernhardt, Laurel, MD
  84. Rabbinical Student Stephanie Laskin Bernstein, Bethesda, MD
  85. Rabbi Steve Bernstein, Kibbutz Gezer, Israel
  86. Rabbi Allison Berry, Canton, MA
  87. Rabbi Linda Earle Bertenthal, Encino, CA
  88. Rabbinical Student Brian Besser, West Topsham, VT
  89. Cantor Marie G. Betcher, Austin, TX
  90. Rabbi Elizabeth Beyer, Reno, NV
  91. Rabbi Jonathan Arthur Biatch, Madison, WI
  92. Rabbi Binyamin Biber, Washington, DC
  93. Cantor Mark Biddelman, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
  94. Cantor Ira Bigeleisen, Valley Village, CA
  95. Cantor Martha Rock Birnbaum, Richmond, CA
  96. Rabbi Aaron Benjamin Bisno, Pittsburgh, PA
  97. Cantor Freyda Black, Cheltenham, PA
  98. Rabbi Kalman P. Bland, Durham, NC
  99. Cantor Steven Blane, New Milford, NJ
  100. Rabbi Stacey Blank, Jerusalem, Israel
  101. Rabbi Barry Block, San Antonio, TX
  102. Rabbi Erwin Allan Bloom, Davie, FL
  103. Rabbi Herman J. Blumberg, Waban, MA
  104. Rabbi Rena S. Blumenthal, Poughkeepsie, NY
  105. Rabbi Shalom Bochner, Berkeley, CA
  106. Rabbinical Student Eliav Bock, New York, NY
  107. Rabbi Joshua Boettiger, Bennington, VT
  108. Rabbi Lewis Bogage, Denver, CO
  109. Rabbi Sandy Bogin, White Plains, NY
  110. Rabbi Elizabeth Bolton, Baltimore, MD
  111. Rabbi Terry A. Bookman, Pinecrest, FL
  112. Rabbi Stephen Booth-Nadav, Denver, CO
  113. Rabbi Jill Borodin, Seattle, WA
  114. Rabbi Neal Ivan Borovitz, River Edge, NJ
  115. Rabbi Barbara Borts, Santa Clara, CA
  116. Rabbi Anna Boswell-Levy, Langhorne, PA
  117. Cantor Rosalie Boxt, Kensington, MD
  118. Cantor Richard Botton, Harrison, NY
  119. Cantor Leslie F. Boyer, Troy, NY
  120. Rabbi James Brandt, Oakland, CA
  121. Rabbi Deborah K. Bravo, Edison, NJ
  122. Rabbinical Student Rachael M. Bregman, Astoria, NY
  123. Rabbi Kenneth Brickman, New York, NY
  124. Rabbi Gerald S. Brieger, Orange, CT
  125. Rabbi Deborah J. Brin, Albuquerque, NM
  126. Rabbi Charles K. Briskin, San Pedro, CA
  127. Rabbi Gill Brociner, New York, NY
  128. Rabbi Herbert Brockman, Hamden, CT
  129. Rabbi Lynn Brody, Los Angeles, CA
  130. Rabbi Caryn Broitman, Vineyard Haven, MA
  131. Rabbi Daniel M. Bronstein, Brooklyn, NY
  132. Rabbi Herbert Bronstein, Glencoe, IL
  133. Rabbi Lester B. Bronstein, White Plains, NY
  134. Rabbi Marcelo Bronstein, New York, NY
  135. Rabbi Samuel G. Broude, Oakland, CA
  136. Rabbi Sharon Brous, Los Angeles, CA
  137. Cantor Arianne Brown, Los Angeles, CA
  138. Rabbi Carey Brown, Arlington, MA
  139. Rabbi Rachel Brown, Phoenixville, PA
  140. Rabbi Jonathan D. Brumberg-Kraus, Providence, RI
  141. Rabbi David Brusin, Whitefish Bay, WI
  142. Cantor Scott Buckner, Minnetonka, MN
  143. Rabbi Susan D. Bulba Carvutto, Augusta, ME
  144. Rabbi Daniel Cotzin Burg, Chicago, IL
  145. Rabbi Marcus L. Burstein, Township of Washington, NJ
  146. Rabbinical Student Daniel Burstyn, Pittsburgh, PA
  147. Rabbi Rob Cabelli, Asheville, NC
  148. Rabbi Carol Caine, Albany, CA
  149. Cantor Marnie Camhi, Aberdeen, NJ
  150. Rabbi Debra Sue Cantor, Newington, CT
  151. Rabbi Adalah Caplowe, Pittsburgh, PA
  152. Cantor Rebecca S. Carl, Philadelphia, PA
  153. Rabbinical Student Reba Carmel, Cheltenham, PA
  154. Cantor Susan Caro, Thousand Oaks, CA
  155. Rabbi Donald P. Cashman, Albany, NY
  156. Rabbi Adam Chalom, Highland Park, IL
  157. Rabbi Joshua Chasan, Burlington, VT
  158. Rabbinical Student Yafa Chase, Santa Fe, NM
  159. Rabbi Kenneth Chasen, Los Angeles, CA
  160. Rabbi Steven Chester, Oakland, CA
  161. Cantor Daniel Chodos, S. Pasadena, CA
  162. Rabbi Jennifer Clayman, Los Altos Hills, CA
  163. Cantor Sheila Cline, West Roxbury, MA
  164. Rabbi Alan L. Cohen, Overland Park, KS
  165. Rabbi Ayelet S. Cohen, New York, NY
  166. Rabbi Debrah Cohen, Philadelphia, PA
  167. Rabbi Eli Cohen, Santa Cruz, CA
  168. Cantor Gerald Cohen, Scarsdale, NY
  169. Rabbi Heidi Cohen, Santa Ana, CA
  170. Rabbi Howard A. Cohen, Greensboro, NC
  171. Rabbi Michael M. Cohen, Manchester Center, VT
  172. Rabbi Paul Cohen, Northfield, IL
  173. Rabbi Judy Cohen-Rosenberg, Westbury, NY
  174. Rabbi Andrea S. Cohen-Kiener, West Hartford, CT
  175. Rabbi Hillel Cohn, San Bernardino, CA
  176. Rabbi Richard Cohn, Dallas, TX
  177. Rabbi Scott E. Colbert, Atlanta, GA
  178. Cantor Phyllis S. Cole, Westwood, NJ
  179. Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels, Santa Monica, CA
  180. Rabbi Karen Companez, Flint, MI
  181. Rabbi Shoshanah Jaren Conover, Chicago, IL
  182. Cantor Erik Contzuis, New Rochelle, NY
  183. Rabbi Alan Cook, Seattle, WA
  184. Rabbi David J. Cooper, Piedmont, CA
  185. Rabbi Mychal Heather Copeland, Stanford, CA
  186. Rabbi Rachel B. Cowan, New York, NY
  187. Rabbinical Student Jill Cozen-Harel, New York, NY
  188. Rabbi Meryl M. Crean, Media, PA
  189. Rabbi Menachem Creditor, Berkeley, CA
  190. Cantor Don Alan Croll, Dallas, TX
  191. Rabbinical Student Rogerio Zingerevitz Cukierman, Newton Highlands, MA
  192. Rabbi Matt Cutler, Schenectady, NY
  193. Rabbi William Cutter, Los Angeles, CA
  194. Rabbi Eric Charles Cytryn, Harrisburg, PA
  195. Rabbi Julie Hilton Danan, Chico, CA
  196. Rabbi Dan Danson, Wausau, WI
  197. Rabbi Benjamin David, Roslyn Heights, NY
  198. Cantor Deborah Judith Davis, San Diego, CA
  199. Rabbinical Student Getzel Davis, Brookline, MA
  200. Cantor Michael Davis, Highland Park, IL
  201. Cantor Gerald Debruin, Buffalo, NY
  202. Rabbinical Student Lisa Delson, Cincinnati, OH
  203. Rabbi Geoffrey W. Dennis, Flower Mound, TX
  204. Rabbi Lavey Yitzchak Derby, Mill Valley, CA
  205. Rabbi James S. Diamond, Princeton, NJ
  206. Rabbi Lucy Dinner, Raleigh, NC
  207. Rabbi Fred Scherlinder Dobb, Bethesda, MD
  208. Rabbi Robert Dobrusin, Ann Arbor, MI
  209. Rabbi Art Donsky, Allison Park, PA
  210. Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Bel-Air, CA
  211. Rabbi William Dreskin, White Plains, NY
  212. Rabbinic Student Hannah Dresner, Berkeley, CA
  213. Rabbi Israel S. Dresner, Wayne, NJ
  214. Rabbi Ellen Weinberg Dreyfus, Homewood, IL
  215. Rabbi Howard Druan, Tucson, AZ
  216. Rabbi Malka T. Drucker, Santa Fe, NM
  217. Rabbi Elizabeth Dunsker, Vancouver, WA
  218. Rabbi Renee Beth Edelman, South Orange, NJ
  219. Rabbi Judith Barbara Edelstein, New York, NY
  220. Rabbi Lisa Edwards, Los Angeles, CA
  221. Rabbi Irvin Ehrlich, Colorado Springs, CO
  222. Rabbi Joab Eichenberg-Eilon, Atlanta, GA
  223. Rabbi Amy Eilberg, Mendota Heights, MN
  224. Cantor Roy Bennett Einhorn, Boston, MA
  225. Rabbi Stephen J. Einstein, Fountain Valley, CA
  226. Rabbi Bruce Elder, Highland Park, IL
  227. Rabbi Diane A. Elliot, Berkeley, CA
  228. Rabbi David Ellis, Halifax, NS
  229. Rabbi Gary W. Ellison, Salem, OR
  230. Rabbi Barat Ellman, Brooklyn, NY
  231. Rabbi Sue Levi Elwell, Philadelphia, PA
  232. Rabbi Daniel Epstein, Fair Lawn, NJ
  233. Rabbi Greg M. Epstein, Cambridge, MA
  234. Cantor Rachel Hirsh Epstein, Bethesda, MD
  235. Rabbi Lewis John Eron, Cherry Hill, NJ
  236. Rabbi Rachel Esserman, Endwell, NY
  237. Rabbi Helaine Ettinger, Kinnelon, NJ
  238. Rabbi Kim Ettlinger, Burlingame, CA
  239. Cantorial Student Shulamit Wise Fairman, Oakland, CA
  240. Rabbinical Student John Peter Falchi, San Diego, CA
  241. Rabbi Ted Falcon, Seattle, WA
  242. Rabbi Milton Feierstein, Stoughton, MA
  243. Rabbi Charles M. Feinberg, Washington, DC
  244. Rabbi Michael Edward Feinberg, New York, NY
  245. Rabbi Dena A. Feingold, Kenosha, WI
  246. Rabbi Sam E. Feinsmith, New York, NY
  247. Rabbi Edward Feld, Northampton, MA
  248. Rabbi Fern Feldman, Santa Cruz, CA
  249. Rabbi Jen Feldman, Chapel Hill, NC
  250. Rabbi Meir A. Feldman, Jerusalem, Israel
  251. Rabbi Ted Feldman, Petaluma, CA
  252. Rabbi Dan Fellman, New Brunswick. NJ
  253. Rabbi Susan Fendrick, Newton, MA
  254. Rabbi Michael L. Feshbach, Chevy Chase, MD
  255. Rabbi Brian D. Field, Denver, CO
  256. Cantor Geoffrey Fine, Belmont, MA
  257. Rabbi Jacob Elisha Fine, Seattle, WA
  258. Rabbi Steven Fineblum, Cinnaminson, NJ
  259. Rabbinical Student Brian Fink, University Heights, OH
  260. Rabbi Tirzah Firestone, Boulder, CO
  261. Rabbi Frank A. Fischer, Chapel Hill, NC
  262. Rabbi Michelle Fisher, Walnut Creek, CA
  263. Rabbi Alan Flam, Providence, RI
  264. Rabbi Nancy Flam, Northampton, MA
  265. Rabbi Randy Craig Fleisher, St. Louis, MO
  266. Cantor Rebecca Joy Fletcher, New York, NY
  267. Rabbi Arthur Flicker, Albuquerque, NM
  268. Rabbi Steven Folberg, Austin, TX
  269. Rabbi Alissa Forrest, Lafayette, CA
  270. Rabbi Steven Edward Foster, Denver, CO
  271. Rabbi Jeff Foust, Newton, MA
  272. Rabbi Scott Michael Fox, Encinitas, CA
  273. Rabbinical Josh Frankel, New York, NY
  274. Rabbi John Franken, Brookline, MA
  275. Rabbi Wayne M. Franklin, Providence, RI
  276. Rabbi Les Frazin, Northbrook, IL
  277. Rabbi Alan Freedman, Austin, TX
  278. Rabbi Carla Freedman, South Salem, NY
  279. Rabbi Paul Freedman, St. Albans, England
  280. Cantor Stephen Freedman, Dresher, PA
  281. Rabbi Jonathan Freirich, Stateline, NV
  282. Cantor Howard Friedland, Glenview, IL
  283. Rabbi Barry Friedman, Hopatcong, NJ
  284. Rabbi Dayle A. Friedman, Philadelphia, PA
  285. Rabbi John Friedman, Durham, NC
  286. Rabbi Ronne Friedman, Boston, MA
  287. Rabbinical Student Shoshana Friedman, Jamaica Plain, MA
  288. Rabbi Stacy Friedman, San Rafael, CA
  289. Rabbi Suri Friedman, Durham, NC
  290. Rabbi Thomas Joseph Friedmann, Columbus, GA
  291. Rabbi Dara Beth Frimmer, Los Angeles, CA
  292. Rabbi Elyse Frishman, Franklin Lakes, NJ
  293. Rabbi Nancy Fuchs-Kreimer, Philadelphia, PA
  294. Rabbinical Student Natan Fuchs, Lathrup Village, MI
  295. Rabbi Stephen Fuchs, West Hartford, CT
  296. Rabbi Capers C. Funnye, Jr., Chicago, IL
  297. Rabbi Roy S. Furman, Chicago, IL
  298. Rabbi Joyce Galaski, Amherst, MA
  299. Rabbi Robert Gamer, Long Grove, IL
  300. Rabbi Hillel Gamoran, Seattle, WA
  301. Rabbi Steven Garten, Ottawa, ON
  302. Rabbi Rachel Gartner, Oxford, OH
  303. Rabbi Ruth E. Gelfarb, Houston, TX
  304. Rabbi Everett E. Gendler, Great Barrington, MA
  305. Rabbi Stuart Weinberg Gershon, Summit, NJ
  306. Rabbi Bernard Gerson, Denver, CO
  307. Rabbi Gary S. Gerson, Oak Park, IL
  308. Rabbinical Student Jordie Gerson, Brooklyn, NY
  309. Rabbi Matthew Gewirtz, Short Hills, NJ
  310. Rabbi Sara Gilbert, Greeley, CO
  311. Rabbi Elliot K. Ginsburg, Ann Arbor, MI
  312. Rabbi George Dean Gittleman, Santa Rosa, CA
  313. Rabbi Aubrey Lyle Glazer, Harrison, NY
  314. Rabbinical Student Ilan Glazer, Boulder, CO
  315. Rabbi Rosalind Glazer, San Francisco, CA
  316. Rabbi Mark Glickman, Seattle, WA
  317. Rabbi Gail G. Glicksman, Wyncote, PA
  318. Rabbi Robert J. Gluck, Albany, NY
  319. Rabbi Shai Gluskin, Philadelphia, PA
  320. Rabbi Ben-Zion Gold, Cambridge, MA
  321. Rabbi Laura Gold, New York, NY
  322. Rabbi Neal Gold, Wayland, MA
  323. Rabbi Rosalind A. Gold, Reston, VA
  324. Rabbi Shefa Gold, Jemez Springs, NM
  325. Cantor Dorothy Goldberg, Wallingford, CT
  326. Rabbi Dan Goldblatt, Danville, CA
  327. Rabbi Irwin N. Goldenberg, Forest Hills, NY
  328. Rabbi Rachel Goldenberg, Chester, CT
  329. Rabbi Eva Goldfinger, Toronto, ON
  330. Rabbi Michael Mordechai Goldman, Durham, NC
  331. Rabbi Barbara Goldman-Wartell, Orefield, PA
  332. Rabbi Andrea Goldstein, St. Louis, MO
  333. Cantor David Goldstein, Glencoe, IL
  334. Rabbi Debra E. Goldstein, Larchmont, NY
  335. Rabbinical Student Justin Goldstein, Los Angeles, CA
  336. Rabbi Meir Goldstein, Chattanooga, TN
  337. Rabbi Seth Goldstein, Olympia, WA
  338. Rabbi Jeffrey Wolfson Goldwasser, North Adams, MA
  339. Rabbi Paul Golomb, Poughkeepsie, NY
  340. Rabbi Linda Henry Goodman, Brooklyn, NY
  341. Rabbi Mark Asher Goodman, San Francisco, CA
  342. Rabbi Marvin Goodman, San Francisco, CA
  343. Rabbinical Student Michael Goodman, Madison, WI
  344. Rabbi Don Goor, Tarzana, CA
  345. Rabbi Marc H. Gopin, Silver Spring, MD
  346. Rabbi David Gordis, Newton, MA
  347. Rabbi Andrew Gordon, Scarsdale, NY
  348. Rabbi Debra Gordon, Troy, NY
  349. Cantor Jonathan Ben Gordon, White Plains, NY
  350. Rabbi Maralee Gordon, Woodstock, IL
  351. Rabbi William Joseph Gordon, Chatsworth, CA
  352. Cantor Ralph Goren, Egg Harbor, NJ
  353. Rabbi Seth Goren, Bethlehem, PA
  354. Rabbi Uri Goren, Oceanside, NY
  355. Rabbinical Student Emma Gottlieb, New York, NY
  356. Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb, Berkeley, CA
  357. Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, Los Angeles, CA
  358. Rabbi Andrea M. Gouze, Providence, RI
  359. Rabbi Roberto Graetz, Lafayette, CA
  360. Rabbi Arthur Green, Newton, MA
  361. Rabbi C. Michelle Greenberg, Northfield, IL
  362. Rabbi James Israel Greene, Salem, OR
  363. Rabbinical Student Jarah Greenfield, Philadelphia, PA
  364. Rabbi Terry M. Greenstein, Sharon, MA
  365. Rabbinical Student Adam Ron Greenwald, Long Beach, CA
  366. Cantor Kay Greenwald, Los Altos Hills, CA
  367. Rabbi Nicole Greninger, San Jose, CA
  368. Rabbi Suzanne Griffel, Chicago, IL
  369. Rabbinical Student Michael Steven Gross, Phoenixville, PA
  370. Rabbi Peter H. Grumbacher, Wilmington, DE
  371. Rabbi Chaya Gussfield, Oakland, CA
  372. Rabbi Joshua Gutoff, Brooklyn, NY
  373. Rabbi Leslie Gutterman, Providence, RI 
  374. Rabbi Debra R. Hachen, Demarest, NJ
  375. Rabbi Andrew Hahn, New York, NY
  376. Rabbi Kevin Hale, Leeds, MA
  377. Rabbi Moshe Rafael Halfon, Long Beach, CA
  378. Rabbi Stanley D. Halpern, Gary, IN
  379. Cantor Leslie Hamilton, Providence, RI
  380. Rabbi Jill Hammer, Riverdale, NY
  381. Rabbi Edwin S. Harris, Saint Louis, MO
  382. Rabbi Maurice Harris, Eugene, OR
  383. Rabbi Vered L. Harris, Overland Park, KS
  384. Rabbi Patti Haskell, Encinitas, CA
  385. Rabbi Abraham Havivi, Los Angeles, CA
  386. Rabbi Nara Hefetz, Jerusalem, Israel
  387. Rabbi Shai Held, Providence, RI
  388. Rabbinical Student Olivia Hemming, San Marcos, CA
  389. Rabbinical Student Sandra Ariela Hendin, Wyncote, PA
  390. Rabbi Lauren Grabelle Herrmann, Philadelphia, PA
  391. Rabbi Garson Herzfeld, Brooklyn, NY
  392. Cantor Steven Gary Hevenstone, Marietta, GA
  393. Rabbi Jay B. Heyman, Berkeley, CA
  394. Rabbi Moshe Thomas Heyn, Cincinnati, OH
  395. Rabbinical Student Neil E. Hirsch, New York, NY
  396. Rabbi Aryeh Hirschfield, z"l Portland, OR
  397. Rabbi Erin Hirsh, Glenside, PA
  398. Rabbinical Student Jane Hodgetts, Newton, MA
  399. Rabbi Elliot Holin, Dresher, PA
  400. Cantoral Student Leah Ellie Holland, West Orange, NJ
  401. Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt, New Haven, CT
  402. Rabbi Linda J. Holtzman, Philadelphia, PA
  403. Rabbi Michael G. Holzman, Philadelphia, PA
  404. Cantor Terry Horowit, Albany, NY
  405. Rabbi Sarah R. Hronsky, Valley Village, CA
  406. Rabbi Jocee Hudson, Santa Ana, CA
  407. Rabbi Mark Hurvitz, New York, NY
  408. Rabbi Yitzhak Husbands-Hankin, Eugene, OR
  409. Rabbinical Student Aaron A. Hutman, Scottsdale, AZ
  410. Cantor Bradley Hyman, Plainview, NY
  411. Rabbi Micah Hyman, San Francisco, CA
  412. Rabbi Ivan Ickovits, Los Angeles, CA
  413. Rabbi T’mimah Audrey Ickovits, Santa Monica, CA
  414. Rabbi Shirley Idelson, Jackson Heights, NY
  415. Rabbi David A. Ingber, New York, NY
  416. Rabbinical Student Sandi Intraub, Bayside, NY
  417. Rabbi Daniel S. Isaacson, Berkeley, CA
  418. Rabbi Daniel J. Isaak, Portland, OR
  419. Rabbi Shaya Isenberg, Gainesville, FL
  420. Rabbi Marci Jacobs, Lexington, MA
  421. Rabbi Richard Jacobs, Scarsdale, NY
  422. Rabbi Steven B. Jacobs, Woodland Hills, CA
  423. Cantoral Student Zoe Jacobs, New York, NY
  424. Rabbi Burt Jacobson, Piedmont, CA
  425. Cantor Deborah Jacobson, Clearwater, FL
  426. Rabbi Devorah L. Jacobson, Amherst, MA
  427. Rabbinical Student Darla Jacobs-Velde, Philidelphia, PA
  428. Rabbinical Student Joshua Gilberg Jacobs-Velde, Philadelphia, PA
  429. Rabbi Jennifer A. Jaech, Croton-on-Hudson, NY
  430. Rabbi Howard L. Jaffe, Lexington, MA
  431. Cantoral Student Marisa Elana James, Jerusalem, Israel
  432. Rabbi Norman Janis, Cambridge, MA
  433. Rabbi Beth Anne Janus, Santa Cruz, CA
  434. Rabbi Amita Jarmon, Rockland, ME
  435. Cantoral Student Russell George Jayne, Boonton, NJ
  436. Rabbi Miriam Jerris, Farmington Hills, MI
  437. Rabbi Paul J. Joseph, Long Beach, NY
  438. Rabbi Samuel K. Joseph, Cincinnati, OH
  439. Rabbi Daniel Judson, Roslindale, MA
  440. Rabbi Eitan Julius, Galliee, Israel
  441. Rabbi Raachel Nathan Jurovics, Raleigh, NC
  442. Rabbi Bruce Kadden, Tacoma, WA
  443. Rabbinical Student James Kahn, Boston, MA
  444. Rabbi Yoel Kahn, Berkeley, CA
  445. Rabbi Rachel Kahn-Troster, Teaneck, NJ
  446. Rabbinical Student Daniel Kaiman, Los Angeles, CA
  447. Rabbi David Kalman, Gainesville, FL
  448. Rabbi mark Kaiserman, Livingston, NJ
  449. Rabbi Sylvan D. Kamens, Saint Paul, MN
  450. Rabbi Jane Kanarek, Newton, MA
  451. Rabbi Kenneth Kanter, Cincinnati, OH
  452. Rabbi Raphael Joshua Kanter, New Bedford, MA
  453. Rabbi Daniel Lee Kaplan, Norton, MA
  454. Rabbi Laura Duhan Kaplan, Charlotte, NC
  455. Rabbi Henry Jay Karp, Davenport, IA
  456. Rabbi Mario Karpuj, Atlanta, GA
  457. Rabbi Peter Edward Kasdan, Longboat Key, FL
  458. Rabbi Debra Kassoff, Marblehead, MA
  459. Rabbi Nancy Kasten, Dallas, TX
  460. Rabbinical Student David Katz, Philadelphia, PA
  461. Rabbi Hillel Katzir, Auburn, ME
  462. Cantor Aviva Ann Katzman, Chicago, IL
  463. Rabbi Stephen A. Kaufman, Cincinnati, OH
  464. Rabbi Alvan Kaunfer, Providence, RI
  465. Cantor Evan Kent, Los Angeles, CA
  466. Rabbi Stuart Kelman, Berkeley, CA
  467. Rabbi Justin S. Kerber, Athens, GA
  468. Rabbi Peg Kershenbaum, New City, NY
  469. Cantor Jack Kessler, Philadelphia, PA
  470. Cantor Penny Kessler, Danbury, CT
  471. Rabbi Stanley Kessler, West Hartford, CT
  472. Cantoral Student Marl Kilgallon, Cornelius, NC
  473. Rabbi Jason Kimelman-Block, Rockville, MD
  474. Rabbi Yohanna Kinberg, Olympia, WA
  475. Rabbinical Student Emma Kippley-Ogman, Little Canada, MN
  476. Rabbi Donna Kirshbaum, Princeton, NJ
  477. Rabbi Beth H. Klafter, Melville, NY
  478. Rabbinical Student Daniel Klein, Cambridge, MA
  479. Rabbi Jason Klein, Baltimore, MD
  480. Rabbi Jonathan Klein, Los Angeles, CA
  481. Rabbi Joseph Klein, Oak Park, MI
  482. Rabbi Lori Diane Klein, Santa Cruz, CA
  483. Rabbinical Student Margaret Frisch Klein, North Chelmsford, MA
  484. Rabbinical Student Margie N. Klein, Brookline, MA
  485. Rabbi Melissa Klein, Allentown, PA
  486. Rabbi Stephen A. Klein, Scarsdale, NY
  487. Rabbi Sharon A. Kleinbaum, New York, NY
  488. Rabbi Robert G. Klensin, Augusta, GA
  489. Cantor Jeff Klepper, West Roxbury, MA
  490. Rabbi Jonathan Kligler, Woodstock, NY
  491. Cantor Yonah Kliger, Beverly Hills, CA
  492. Rabbi David L. Kline, West Roxbury, MA
  493. Rabbi Marc Kline, Lexington, KY
  494. Rabbi Myriam Klotz, Bala Cynwyd, PA
  495. Rabbi Peter Knobel, Evanston, IL
  496. Rabbi Alison B. Kobey, Rochester, NY
  497. Rabbi Norman D. Koch, New Milford, CT
  498. Rabbi Claudio Javier Kogan, New Brunswick, NJ
  499. Cantor Sharon Kohn, Overland Park, KS
  500. Rabbi Stephanie D. Kolin, Boston, MA
  501. Rabbinical Student Debra Ruth Kolodny, Silver Spring, MD
  502. Rabbi Tamara Kolton, Farmington Hills, MI
  503. Rabbi Neil Kominsky, Brookline, MA
  504. Cantor Kim Komrad, Gaithersburg, MD
  505. Rabbi Elisa F. Koppel, New York, NY
  506. Rabbi Ira L. Korinow, Haverhill, MA
  507. Cantor Leigh Korn, Lafayette, CA
  508. Rabbinical Student Jodi Kornfeld, Deerfield, IL
  509. Rabbi Emily Faust Korzenik, Scarsdale, NY
  510. Rabbi Raquel S. Kosovske, Northampton, MA
  511. Rabbi Chava Eva Koster, New York, NY
  512. Rabbi Julie Anna Kozlow, Greenville, SC
  513. Rabbi Michael Louis Kramer, Wantagh, NY
  514. Rabbi Douglas E. Krantz, Armonk, NY
  515. Rabbi Jonathan Kraus, Belmont, MA
  516. Rabbi Allen Krause, Mission Viejo, CA
  517. Rabbi Leonard Sanford Kravitz, Hackensack, NJ
  518. Rabbi Claudia Kreiman, Brookline, MA
  519. Rabbi Barry Krieger, Greenland, NH
  520. Rabbi Suri Krieger, Orange, CT
  521. Rabbi Charles Kroloff, Westfield, NJ
  522. Rabbi Irwin Kula, New York, NY
  523. Rabbi Judith D. Kummer, Roslindale, MA
  524. Cantoral Student Sharon I. Kunitz, Jersey City, NJ
  525. Rabbi David Kuperman, Silver Spring, MD
  526. Rabbi Jeffrey Kurtz-Lendner, Hollywood, FL
  527. Rabbi Gail Labovitz, Los Angeles, CA
  528. Rabbi Alan Lachtman, Temple City, CA
  529. Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Los Angeles, CA
  530. Cantor Regina Lambert-Hayut, Washington, NJ
  531. Rabbi Stephen David Landau, Bloomfield, CT
  532. Rabbi Yechiael Lander, Northampton, MA
  533. Rabbi Lynne F. Landsberg, Washington, DC
  534. Cantor Nancy Diamond Landsman, Glencoe, IL
  535. Rabbi Karen Esther Landy, Brookline, MA
  536. Cantor Frank Lanzkron-Tamarazo, Farmington Hills, MI
  537. Cantor Shoshana Lash, Ansonia, CT
  538. Rabbi Michael Adam Latz, Seattle, WA
  539. Rabbinical Student Adam Lavitt, Jamaica Plain, MA
  540. Rabbi Anson Laytner, Seattle, WA
  541. Rabbi Ebn D. Leader, Newton, MA
  542. Rabbi Esther Lederman, New York, NY
  543. Rabbi Saul Leeman, Providence, RI
  544. Rabbi Barry Leff, Jerusalem, Israel
  545. Rabbi Allan Lehmann, Newton, MA
  546. Rabbi Benjamin Leinow, Escondido, CA
  547. Rabbi Shoshana Leis, New York, NY
  548. Rabbi Michele E. Lenke, Needham, MA
  549. Rabbi David Lerner, Lexington, MA
  550. Rabbi Michael Lerner, Berkeley, CA
  551. Rabbi Joshua C. Lesser, Atlanta, GA
  552. Rabbinical Student Marion Lev Cohen, New York, NY
  553. Rabbi Joel Levenson, Woodbridge, CT
  554. Rabbi Peter S. Levi, Aliso Viejo, CA
  555. Rabbi Mark Howard Levin, Overland Park, KS
  556. Cantor Sheldon M. Levin, Metuchen, NJ
  557. Cantor Samuel E. Levine, Brooklyn, NY
  558. Rabbi Joshua Levine-Grater, Pasadena, CA
  559. Cantor Martin Levson, Springfield, MA
  560. Rabbi Eugene Henry Levy, Little Rock, AR
  561. Rabbinical Student Karen Levy, Thornhill, ON
  562. Cantoral Student Mark A. Levy, Felton, CA
  563. Rabbi Richard Levy, Los Angeles, CA
  564. Rabbi Robert Douglas Levy, Ann Arbor, MI
  565. Rabbi Stan Levy, Los Angeles, CA
  566. Rabbi Sue E. Levy, Webster, TX
  567. Rabbi Yael Levy, Philadelphia, PA
  568. Cantor Galit Levy-Slater, Seal Beach, CA
  569. Rabbi Sheldon Lewis, Palo Alto, CA
  570. Rabbi Michael J. Lezak, San Rafael, CA
  571. Rabbi Laura S. Lieber, Durham, NC
  572. Rabbi R. Mordechai Liebling, Philadelphia, PA
  573. Rabbi Howard V. Lifshitz, Long Grove, IL
  574. Rabbi Rebecca Lillian, Chicago, IL
  575. Rabbi Seth Morse Limmer, Armonk, NY
  576. Rabbi Ellen Lippmann, Brooklyn, NY
  577. Rabbi Greg Litcofsky, Natick, MA
  578. Rabbi Richard M. Litvak, Aptos, CA
  579. Rabbi Alan E Litwak, N. Miami Beach, FL
  580. Rabbi Daveen H. Litwin, Grinnell, IA
  581. Rabbi Mark Loeb, Baltimore, MD
  582. Rabbi Neal Joseph Loevinger, Poughkeepsie, NY
  583. Rabbi Harold Londer, Golden Valley, MN
  584. Rabbi Andrea C. London, Evanston, IL
  585. Rabbi Scott Looper, Vernon Hills, IL
  586. Rabbi Michael Lotker, Camarillo, CA
  587. Rabbi Alan Herbert Lovins, New Haven, CT
  588. Cantor Jonathan Lovins, West Hartford, CT
  589. Rabbi Steven Lowenstein, Glencoe, IL
  590. Rabbi Michael Luckens, Concord, MA
  591. Cantoral Student Abbe Lyons, Ithaca, NY
  592. Rabbi Sarah E. Mack, Providence, RI
  593. Rabbi Jill Maderer, Philadelphia, PA
  594. Rabbi Dana Magat, San Jose, CA
  595. Rabbi Shaul Magid, Bloomington, IN
  596. Rabbinical Student David Mahanymi, Philadelphia, PA
  597. Rabbi Joseph Mahoney, Muncie, IN
  598. Rabbi Jonathan Malino, Greensboro, NC
  599. Rabbi Tamar Sarah Malino, San Mateo, CA
  600. Rabbi Mitch Malkus, Berkeley, CA
  601. Rabbi Mark Mallach, Springfield, NJ
  602. Rabbi Jonathan Z. Maltzman, Bethesda, MD
  603. Cantor Ilan Mamber, Wyckoff, NJ
  604. Rabbi Nina Hope Mandel, Sunbury, PA
  605. Rabbi Harry A. Manhoff, San Leandro, CA
  606. Rabbi Paula Marcus, Aptos, CA
  607. Rabbi Morris Margolies, Overland Park, KS
  608. Rabbi Shana Margolin, Montpelier, VT
  609. Rabbinical Student Robin E. Margolis, Takoma Park, MD
  610. Rabbi Marc Margolius, New York, NY
  611. Rabbi Bonnie Margulis, Madison, WI
  612. Rabbi Randall Mark, Wayne, NJ
  613. Rabbi Jeffrey M Marker, Brooklyn, NY
  614. Rabbi Jessica Kessler Marshall, Chapel Hill, NC
  615. Rabbi Nathan Martin, Ann Arbor, MI
  616. Rabbi Robert Marx, Saugatuck, MI
  617. Rabbi Simeon J. Maslin, Philadelphia, PA
  618. Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon, New York, NY
  619. Rabbi Dennis Math, New York, NY
  620. Rabbinical Student Emily Mathis, Providence, RI
  621. Rabbinical Student Laurie Matzkin, Los Angeles, CA
  622. Rabbi Brian J. Mayer, Providence, RI
  623. Rabbi Vivian S. Mayer, Wyncote, PA
  624. Rabbi Aryeh Meir, Teaneck, NJ
  625. Rabbi Rim Meirowitz, Winchester, MA
  626. Rabbi Amy L. Memis-Foler, Skokie, IL
  627. Rabbi Norman T. Mendel, San Luis Obispo, CA
  628. Rabbi Paul J Menitoff, Palm Beach, FL
  629. Rabbi Joseph Meszler, Sharon, MA
  630. Rabbinical Student Jessica Kate Meyer, Belmont, MA
  631. Rabbi Margaret J. Meyer, Cincinnati, OH
  632. Rabbi Edith M. Meyerson, New York, NY
  633. Rabbinical Student Abby Michaleski, Hammonton, NJ
  634. Rabbi Michael Michlin, Hazleton, PA
  635. Rabbi Laurence Elis Milder, Westborough, MA
  636. Rabbi Eric Milgrim, East Brunswick, NJ
  637. Rabbinical Student Erica N. Miller, Philadelphia, PA
  638. Rabbi Tamara Miller, Washington, DC
  639. Rabbi Yitzhak Joel Miller, Santa Cruz, CA
  640. Rabbi Joshua E. Minkin, Brooklyn, NY
  641. Rabbi Lewis Mintz, Acton, MA
  642. Rabbi Yocheved Mintz, Las Vegas, NV
  643. Rabbi Victor A. Mirelman, River Forest, IL
  644. Rabbi Michael R. Mishkin, Wilmette, IL
  645. Rabbi Michelle Missaghieh, Los Angeles, CA
  646. Rabbi Malka Mittelman, La Crescenta, CA
  647. Rabbi David Mivasair, Vancouver, BC
  648. Rabbi Katie Mizrahi, San Francisco, CA
  649. Rabbi Stephen Fisher Moch, Holiday, FL
  650. Rabbi Reuben Modek, Nyack, NY
  651. Rabbi Jack L. Moline, Alexandria, VA
  652. Rabbi Adam Morris, Denver, CO
  653. Cantor Jan Morrison, Columbia, MD
  654. Rabbi Jeremy S. Morrison, Boston, MA
  655. Rabbi Ben Morrow, Santa Fe, NM
  656. Rabbi Jay Moses, New York, NY
  657. Rabbi Linda Motzkin, Saratoga Springs, NY
  658. Cantor Richard Nadel, Springfield, NJ
  659. Cantor Shira Ariel Nafshi, Morristown, NJ
  660. Rabbi Yitzhak Nates, Narberth, PA
  661. Rabbi David W. Nelson, Tivoli, NY
  662. Rabbinical Student Lev B.J. Nelson, Brookline, MA
  663. Rabbi Ben M Newman, Bronx, NY
  664. Rabbi Sheryl Lynne Nosan-Blank, Orangevale, CA
  665. Cantorial Student Mark Novak, Washington, DC
  666. Rabbi Leah Novick, Carmel, CA
  667. Cantor Martha Novick, Westfield, NJ
  668. Rabbi Rachel Nussbaum, Seattle, WA
  669. Rabbi Janet I. Offell, Woodland Hills, CA
  670. Rabbi David Oler, Deerfield, IL
  671. Rabbinic Student Seth Oppenheimer, Starkville, MS
  672. Rabbi Jonathan Omer-Man, Berkeley, CA
  673. Cantor Shana Onigman, Morristown, NJ
  674. Rabbinical Student Hannah Orden, Milton, MA
  675. Rabbi Susan Oren, Brooklyn, NY
  676. Rabbi Jehiel Orenstein, South Orange, NJ
  677. Rabbi Saul F. Oresky, Silver Spring, MD
  678. Rabbi David Osachy, Winter Park, FL
  679. Cantor Barbara Ostfeld, Buffalo, NY
  680. Cantor Anna West Ott, New Brunswick, NJ
  681. Rabbi Laura Owens, Beverly Hills, CA
  682. Rabbi Sara Paasche-Orlow, Newton, MA
  683. Rabbi Andrew M. Paley, Dallas, TX
  684. Rabbi Alexis Pearce, San Diego, CA
  685. Rabbi Barbara Rosman Penzner, West Roxbury, MA
  686. Rabbi Cheryl Peretz, Los Angeles, CA
  687. Rabbinical Student Jill Perlman, New York, NY
  688. Rabbi Jonathan Perlman, Minneapolis, MN
  689. Cantor Hasha Musha Perman, Skokie, IL
  690. Cantor Mark Perman, Marietta, GA
  691. Rabbi Shoshana Perry, Chelmsford, MA
  692. Rabbi Aaron M. Petuchowski, Chicago, IL
  693. Rabbi Laurie Phillips, New York, NY
  694. Rabbi Steve Pinsky, Wellington, FL
  695. Rabbi Richard J. Plavin, Manchester, CT
  696. Rabbi William Plevan, New York, NY
  697. Rabbi Michael Pont, Aberdeen, NJ
  698. Rabbi Jeff Portman, Iowa City, IA
  699. Rabbinical Student Eve B. Posen, Los Angeles, CA
  700. Rabbi Philip M. Posner, Wimberley, TX
  701. Rabbi Oren J. Postrel, Napa, CA
  702. Rabbi Amber Powers, Wyncote, PA
  703. Rabbi Marcia Prager, Philadelphia, PA
  704. Rabbi Richard M. Prass, Buffalo Grove, IL
  705. Cantor Ari Priven, New York, NY
  706. Rabbi James Prosnit, Bridgeport, CT
  707. Cantor Steven Puzarne, Los Angeles, CA
  708. Rabbi Arnold I. Rachlis, Irvine, CA
  709. Rabbi Larry Raphael, San Francisco, CA
  710. Rabbi Rayzel Robinson Raphael, Melrose Park, PA
  711. Rabbi Debra Rappaport, Avon, CO
  712. Rabbi Matthew A. Reimer, Short Hills, NJ
  713. Rabbi Victor Hillel Reinstein, Jamaica Plain, MA
  714. Cantor David E. Reinwald, Olympia Fields, IL
  715. Rabbi Joel Rembaum, Los Angeles, CA
  716. Rabbi Michael M. Remson, Kenosha, WI
  717. Rabbi Steven Carr Reuben, Pacific Palisades, CA
  718. Rabbinical Student Silona Ruth Reyman, Chico, CA
  719. Cantor Stephen Richards, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
  720. Rabbi Dorothy A. Richman, Berkeley, CA
  721. Rabbi Yael B. Ridberg, New York, NY
  722. Rabbi Moti Rieber, Wichita, KS
  723. Rabbi Louis Rieser, Windham, NH
  724. Rabbi Daniel A. Roberts, Orange Village, OH
  725. Rabbi Rochelle Robins, San Diego, CA
  726. Cantor Bruce Rockman, North Brunswick, NJ
  727. Cantor Sue Roemer, Silver Spring, MD
  728. Cantor Charles D. Romalis, Wayne, NJ
  729. Rabbi Norman T. Roman, West Bloomfield, MI
  730. Rabbi Yael Romer, Kingston, NY
  731. Cantor Annie Rose, Ann Arbor, MI
  732. Rabbi Dawn Rose, Lowell, MA
  733. Rabbi Joshua Rose, Boulder, CO
  734. Rabbi Kliel Rose, Miami Beach, FL
  735. Rabbi Or Rose, Jamaica Plain, MA
  736. Rabbinical Student Anna Rosen, Cincinnati, OH
  737. Rabbi Brant Rosen, Evanston, IL
  738. Cantor Chanin Rosen, Tarrytown, NY
  739. Rabbinical Student Derek Rosenbaum, Richboro, PA
  740. Rabbi Aaron P. Rosenberg, Waterford, CT
  741. Rabbi Ari Rosenberg, Great Barrington, MA
  742. Rabbi James Bruce Rosenberg, Barrington, RI
  743. Rabbinical Student Matthew Todd Rosenberg, Sherman Oaks, CA
  744. Cantor Aviva Rosenbloom, Altadena, CA
  745. Rabbi Joseph Rosenbloom, St. Louis, MO
  746. Rabbinic Student Yiskah Rosenfeld, Albany, CA
  747. Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, New York, NY
  748. Rabbinical Student Ken Rosenstein, Boston, MA
  749. Cantor Donn Rosensweig, Andover, MD
  750. Rabbi John L. Rosove, Los Angeles, CA
  751. Rabbi Dennis S. Ross, Worcester, MA
  752. Rabbinical Student Michael Steven Ross, Phoenixville, PA
  753. Rabbinical Student Amy T. Rossel, Gig Harbor, WA
  754. Rabbi Donald B. Rossoff, Morristown, NJ
  755. Rabbi Julie Lynn Roth, Princeton, NJ
  756. Rabbi Sandy Roth, New Hope, PA
  757. Rabbi Michael Rothbaum, Purchase, NY
  758. Cantor Judith Kahan Rowland, New York, NY
  759. Rabbi Eliseo D. Rozenwasser, Penn Valley, PA
  760. Rabbi Jonathan Rubenstein, Saratoga Springs, NY
  761. Rabbi Steven Rubenstein, West Bloomfield, MI
  762. Cantorial Student Michael Rubin, Columbia, SC
  763. Rabbi Sarah Niebuhr Rubin, Keene, NH
  764. Rabbi Gila Ruskin, Baltimore, MD
  765. Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg, Brookline, MA
  766. Rabbi Elissa Sachs-Kohen, Baltimore, MD
  767. Rabbi Andrew M. Sacks, Jerusalem, Israel
  768. Rabbi Steven Sager, Durham, NC
  769. Rabbi Jared H. Saks, Minneapolis, MN
  770. Rabbi Robert Saks, University Park, MD
  771. Rabbinic Student Jan Salzman, N. Pomfret, VT
  772. Rabbi Regina L. Sandler-Phillips, Brooklyn, NY
  773. Rabbi David Fox Sandmel, Chicago, IL
  774. Rabbi Marna Sapsowitz, Olympia, WA
  775. Rabbi Michael Satz, Cherry Hill, NJ
  776. Rabbi Scott Saulson, Atlanta, GA
  777. Cantor Pamela Sawyer, Alameda, CA
  778. Rabbi Jeffrey S. Saxe, Falls Church, VA
  779. Rabbi Julie Saxe-Taller, Berkeley, CA
  780. Rabbi Herman Schaalman, Chicago, IL
  781. Cantor Wally Schachet-Briskin, Los Angeles, CA
  782. Cantor Hollis Suzanne Schachner, Wayland, MA
  783. Rabbi Zalman M. Schachter-Shalomi, Boulder, CO
  784. Rabbi Phil Schechter, Stamford, CT
  785. Rabbi Rick Schechter, Glendale, CA
  786. Rabbi Jeffrey Lee Schein, Shaker Heights, OH
  787. Cantor Robert S. Scherr, Williamstown, MA
  788. Cantor Pamela Schiffer, Bloomfield Hills, MI
  789. Cantor Benjie Schiller, New York, NY
  790. Rabbi Judith Schindler, Charlotte, NC
  791. Rabbi George Schlesinger, Santa Rosa, CA
  792. Rabbi Sara Leya Schley, Berkeley, CA
  793. Rabbi Janine Carol Schloss, Seattle, WA
  794. Cantor Randall Schloss, Newton, MA
  795. Rabbi Howie Leib Schneider, Aptos, CA
  796. Cantor Neil Schnitzer, Cherry Hill, NJ
  797. Cantor Sunny Schnitzer, Bethesda, MD
  798. Rabbi Rachel Schoenfeld, Allston, MA
  799. Rabbi Ismar Schorsch, New York, NY
  800. Rabbi Robert David Schreibman, Northfield, IL
  801. Cantor Eric Schulmiller, Port Washington, NY
  802. Rabbi Marvin Schwab, Santa Fe, NM
  803. Rabbi Arthur Lawrence Schwartz, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  804. Rabbi Barry L. Schwartz, Cherry Hill, NJ
  805. Rabbi Jeremy Schwartz, Willimantic, CT
  806. Rabbi Julie S. Schwartz, Atlanta, GA
  807. Cantor Richard Schwartz, Culver City, CA
  808. Rabbi Sid Schwarz, Rockville, MD
  809. Rabbi Peter Schweitzer, New York, NY
  810. Rabbi Adrienne Pollock Scott, Houston, TX
  811. Rabbi Allen Secher, Whitefish, MT
  812. Cantor Lisa Verona Segal, Miami, FL
  813. Rabbi Steve Segar, University Heights, OH
  814. Rabbi Judith Seid, Pleasanton, CA
  815. Rabbi Jonathan Seidel, Eugene, OR
  816. Rabbi Jerry Seidler, Baltimore, MD
  817. Rabbi Ahud Sela, Los Angeles, CA
  818. Rabbi Bruce Bromberg Seltzer, Northampton, MA
  819. Rabbi Joel Seltzer, Providence, RI
  820. Rabbi David R. Senter, Pompton Lakes, NJ
  821. Rabbi Sanford Seltzer, Boston, MA
  822. Rabbi Daniel A. Septimus, Seattle, WA
  823. Cantor Inna Serebro-Litvak, Randolph, NJ
  824. Cantor David Serkin-Poole, Bellevue, WA
  825. Rabbi Gerald Serotta, Chevy Chase, MD
  826. Rabbi Isaac Serotta, Highland Park, IL
  827. Rabbi Drorah O. Setel, Buffalo, NY
  828. Rabbinical Student Lorenna Russell Shalev, Santa Fe, NM
  829. Rabbi Judy Shanks, Lafayette, CA
  830. Rabbi E. Noach Shapiro, Montclair, NJ
  831. Rabbi Mark Dov Shapiro, Springfield, MA
  832. Rabbi Bonnie Sharfman, Scottsdale, AZ
  833. Rabbinical Student Shira Shazeer, Natick, MA
  834. Cantor Yaakov Shechter, New York, NY
  835. Rabbi Aaron Sherman, Cedar Rapids, IA
  836. Rabbinical Student Philip Sherman, Brookline, MA
  837. Cantor Robbi Sherwin, Austin, TX
  838. Rabbi Daniel Shevitz, Venice, CA
  839. Cantor Linda Shivers, Portland, OR
  840. Rabbi Paul Shleffar,  Emerald Hills, CA
  841. Rabbi David Shneyer, Rockville, MD
  842. Cantor Jacqueline L. Shuchat-Marx, Manalapan, NJ
  843. Rabbinical Student Andy Shugerman, New York, NY
  844. Rabbi Kenneth Shuster, Forest Hills, NY
  845. Rabbi Alexandria Shuval-Weiner, Leawood, KS
  846. Rabbi Burt Aaron Siegel, New York, NY
  847. Rabbi Howard Siegel, Houston, TX
  848. Rabbi Michael S. Siegel, Chicago, IL
  849. Rabbi Jodie Siff, Plandome, NY
  850. Cantor Paul Cyril Silbersher, Prairie Village, KS
  851. Rabbinical Student Michael Israel Silbert, Newton, MA
  852. Rabbi Hanan Sills, Eugene, OR
  853. Cantor Ben F. Silver, Waltham, MA
  854. Rabbinical Student Jack B. Silver, Scottsdale, AZ
  855. Rabbinical Student Ariana J. Silverman, New York, NY
  856. Rabbi Susan Silverman, Chevel Eilot, Israel
  857. Rabbinical Student Becky Silverstein, Watertown, MA
  858. Rabbi Steve Silvern, Auburn, AL
  859. Cantor Murray E. Simon, Princeton, NJ
  860. Rabbi Richard Simon, Westhampton, NJ
  861. Rabbinical Student David Singer, Los Angeles, CA
  862. Rabbi Suzanne Singer, Riverside, CA
  863. Rabbi Jeffrey J. Sirkman, Larchmont, NY
  864. Rabbi Eric J. Siroka, South Bend, IN
  865. Cantor Shirah Sklar, Norwalk, CT
  866. Rabbi Andrew R. Sklarz, Abington, PA
  867. Cantor Barbara Slader, Portland, OR
  868. Rabbi Jonathan P. Slater, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY
  869. Rabbi Arnie Sleutelberg, Troy, MI
  870. Rabbi Amy Joy Small, Summit, NJ
  871. Cantor Judy Sofer, Pasadena, CA
  872. Rabbinical Student Matthew Soffer, Brooklyn, NY
  873. Rabbi Joel E. Soffin, New York, NY
  874. Rabbi Ruth Sohn, Los Angeles, CA
  875. Rabbi Myra Soifer, Reno, NV
  876. Rabbi Felicia Sol, New York, NY
  877. Rabbi Bradley Solmsen, West Roxbury, MA
  878. Rabbi Rav A. Soloff, Lansdale, PA
  879. Rabbinical Student Alyson Solomon, Brookline, MA
  880. Rabbi Eric Solomon, Raleigh, NC
  881. Rabbi Jennifer Solomon, Raleigh, NC
  882. Rabbi Marc W. Soloway, Boulder, CO
  883. Rabbi Phyllis Anna Sommer, Glencoe, IL
  884. Cantor Kerith Spencer-Shapiro, Leonia, NJ
  885. Rabbi David S. Sperling, New York, NY
  886. Rabbi Scott M. Sperling, Washington, DC
  887. Rabbi Aaron Spiegel, Indianapolis, IN
  888. Rabbi Adam Stock Spilker, St. Paul, MN
  889. Rabbi Jonathan Spira-Savett, Nashua, NH
  890. Rabbi Toba Spitzer, West Newton, MA
  891. Rabbinical Student Ed Stafman, Tallahassee, FL
  892. Cantor Howard M. Stahl, Short Hills, NJ
  893. Rabbi Joshua Stampfer, Portland, OR
  894. Rabbi Jacob Staub, Philadelphia, PA
  895. Rabbi Linda K. Steigman, Overland Park, KS
  896. Rabbinical Student Adam Frank Stein, Los Angeles, CA
  897. Rabbinical Student Howard Stein, Cincinnati, OH
  898. Rabbi Israel Chaim Stein, Bridgeport, CT
  899. Rabbi Margot Stein, Bala Cynwyd, PA
  900. Rabbi Peter W. Stein, Cranston, RI
  901. Rabbi Bonnie Ann Steinberg, New Hyde Park, NY
  902. Rabbi Naomi Steinberg, Carlotta, CA 
  903. Rabbi Steven Steinberg, Cheshire, CT
  904. Rabbi Gershon Steinberg-Caudill, El Cerrito, CA
  905. Rabbi David Stern, Dallas, TX
  906. Rabbi Elizabeth Weiss Stern, Cambridge, MA
  907. Rabbi George M. Stern, Philadelphia, PA
  908. Rabbi Keith Stern, Newton, MA
  909. Rabbi Michael Sternfield, Chicago, IL
  910. Rabbinical Student Kaya Stern-Kaufman, Housatonic, MA
  911. Rabbi Michael N. Stevens, Munster, IN
  912. Rabbi Sharon Stiefel, Minneapolis, MN
  913. Rabbi Debbie Stiel, Topeka, KS
  914. Rabbi Jeffrey Barry Stiffman, St. Louis, MO
  915. Rabbi Ariel Stone, Portland, OR
  916. Rabbi Ira F. Stone, Philadelpha, PA
  917. Rabbi Andrew F. Straus, Tempe, AZ
  918. Rabbi Joshua Strom, Brooklyn, NY
  919. Rabbi William M. Strongin, New Paltz, NY
  920. Rabbi Shira Stutman, Philadelphia, PA
  921. Rabbi Leah Sudran, Petaluma, CA
  922. Cantor Jodi Lee Sufrin, Wellesley, MA
  923. Rabbi Alvin M. Sugarman, Atlanta, GA
  924. Rabbi Yaffa-Shira Sultan, San Diego, CA
  925. Rabbi Jeff Sultar, Penn Valley, PA
  926. Rabbi Elon Sunshine, Scottsdale, AZ
  927. Rabbi Alana Suskin, Gaithersburg, MD
  928. Rabbinical Student Barry A. Swan, Rochester, NY
  929. Rabbi Robert P. Tabak, Melrose Park, PA
  930. Rabbi Larry Tabick, London, England
  931. Rabbi Susan Talve, Saint Louis, MO
  932. Cantor Deborah Tanzer-Cohen, Philadelphia, PA
  933. Rabbi Joshua Taub, Saint Louis, MO
  934. Cantor Elliot Taubman, Block Island, RI
  935. Rabbi Dov Taylor, Highland Park, IL
  936. Rabbi Michael Z.P. Tayvah, Portland, OR
  937. Rabbi Jay TelRav, Denver, CO
  938. Rabbi Vill S. Tepper, Chattanooga, TN
  939. Rabbi Elliott Tepperman, Montclair, NJ
  940. Rabbi David Teutsch, Wyncote, PA
  941. Rabbi David Leipziger Teva, East Hampton, CT
  942. Rabbi David B. Thomas, Sudbury, MA
  943. Cantor Rica Julie Timman, Crestwood, NY
  944. Rabbinical Student Rachel Timoner, Los Angeles, CA
  945. Rabbinical Student Janet Shifrah Tobacman, Emeryville, CA
  946. Rabbi Robert Tobin, Kansas City, MO
  947. Cantor Rosalie Toubes, Brookline, MA
  948. Cantor Louise Treitman, Lexington, MA
  949. Rabbi Leo Trepp, San Rafael, CA
  950. Rabbi Gordon Tucker, White Plains, NY
  951. Cantor Drew Tulchin, Washington, DC
  952. Cantor Arlyne Unger, Huntingdon Valley, PA
  953. Rabbinical Student David Z. Vaisberg, Brooklyn, NY
  954. Rabbinical Student Lila Veissid, Brookline, MA
  955. Rabbi Burton L. Visotzky, New York, NY
  956. Cantor Aaron Vitells, Portland, OR
  957. Rabbi Andrew D. Vogel, Brookline, MA
  958. Rabbi Heidi Waldmann, Carmel, IN
  959. Rabbi Moshe Waldoks, Newton, MA
  960. Rabbi Brian Walt, West Tisbury, MA
  961. Cantor William Walton, Montclair, NJ
  962. Rabbi Bruce Samuel Warshal, Hillsboro Beach, FL
  963. Rabbi Susan Warshaw, Berlin, MD
  964. Rabbi Arthur Waskow, Philadlephia, PA
  965. Rabbi Mira Beth Wasserman, Bloomington, IN
  966. Rabbi Pamela J. Wax, New York, NY
  967. Rabbinical Student Seth Wax, Brookline, MA
  968. Rabbi Deborah Waxman, Wyncote, PA
  969. Rabbi Joshua Waxman, Fort Washington, PA
  970. Rabbi Donald A. Weber, Marlboro, NJ
  971. Rabbi Nancy Wechsler-Azen, Carmichael, CA
  972. Rabbi Elyse Wechterman, Attleboro, MA
  973. Cantor Susan Wehle, Amherst, NY
  974. Rabbi Sheila Peltz Weinberg, Amherst, MA
  975. Cantor Alan Weiner, Valley Village, CA
  976. Rabbi Daniel A. Weiner, Seattle, WA
  977. Rabbi Herbert Weiner, Jerusalem, Israel
  978. Rabbi Scott B. Weiner, New York, NY
  979. Rabbnincal Student Aaron Samuel Weininger, New York, NY
  980. Rabbi Jay H. Weinstein, Syosset, NY
  981. Rabbi Melissa Weintraub, Brooklyn, NY
  982. Rabbi Simkha Y. Weintraub, Brooklyn, NY
  983. Rabbi Mimi Weisel, Berkeley, CA
  984. Rabbi Andrea L. Weiss, Bala Cnwyd, PA
  985. Rabbi Lewis J. Weiss, Indianapolis, IN
  986. Rabbi Max W. Weiss, Hoffman Estates, IL
  987. Rabbi Zari M. Weiss, Seattle, WA
  988. Rabbi Shifra Weiss-Penzias, Aptos, CA
  989. Rabbi Joseph S. Weizenbaum, Tucson, AZ
  990. Rabbi Margaret Moers Wenig, New York, NY
  991. Rabbi Scott White, Prairie Village, KS
  992. Rabbi Nancy H. Wiener, New York, NY
  993. Rabbi Shohama Wiener, New Rochelle, NY
  994. Rabbi David Wilfond, Jerusalem, Israel
  995. Rabbi Aryeh Wineman, Northampton, MA
  996. Rabbi David Wilfond, Jerusalem, Israel
  997. Rabbi Avi Winokur, Philadelphia, PA
  998. Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, z"l, Chicago, IL
  999. Rabbi Joseph Wolf, Portland, OR
  1000. Rabbi Sarah Wolf, Los Altos Hills, CA
  1001. Rabbi Greg Wolfe, Davis, CA
  1002. Rabbi Peretz Wolf-Prusan, San Francisco, CA
  1003. Rabbi Carl Wolkin, Northbrook, IL
  1004. Rabbi Jonathan S. Woll, Glen Rock, NJ
  1005. Cantor Ross Wolman, Wilmette, IL
  1006. Rabbinical Student Elizabeth Wood, Cincinnati, OH
  1007. Rabbinical Student Eric Woodward, New York, NY
  1008. Rabbi Bridget Wynne, El Cerrito, CA
  1009. Cantor Gregory Yaroslow, San Bernardino, CA
  1010. Rabbi Moshe Yehudai, Raanana, Israel
  1011. Cantor Natalie Miriam Young, Plantation, FL
  1012. Cantor Julie Lynn Yugend-Green, Oak Park, IL
  1013. Rabbi Sara Zacharia, Newton Centre, MA
  1014. Rabbi Elana Zaiman, Seattle, WA
  1015. Cantor Lorel Ellen Zar-Kessler, Sudbury, MA
  1016. Rabbi David Zaslow, Ashland, OR
  1017. Rabbi Elaine S. Zecher, Boston, MA
  1018. Rabbi Michael Zedek, Chicago, IL
  1019. Rabbi Adam Zeff, Philadelphia, PA
  1020. Rabbinical Student Ziona Zelazo, Franklin Lakes, NJ
  1021. Cantor Sarah Zemel, New Rochelle, NY
  1022. Rabbi Irwin A. Zeplowitz, Port Washington, NY
  1023. Rabbi Lina N. Zerbarini, New Haven, CT
  1024. Rabbi Shawn Israel Zevit, Philadelphia, PA
  1025. Rabbi Laurie Zimmerman, Madison, WI
  1026. Rabbi Ruth Zlotnick Washington Township, NJ
  1027. Rabbinical Student Rain Zohav, Rockville, MD
  1028. Rabbi Henry A. Zoob, Westwood, MA
  1029. Rabbi David J. Zucker, Aurora, CO 

2. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)





1. What is a "mutually-acceptable two-state solution"?


A two-state solution refers to a sovereign Palestinian state, living alongside Israel in peace. Such a solution has roots in the founding of Israel -- which was predicated on the 1947 UN decision to partition the land between its Jewish and Arab inhabitants -- and would allow each people to meet its nationalist goals without demanding the surrender of the other.


But for any solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to be viable, it will have to be mutually-acceptable to both sides. Any unilateral decision making, such as the notion that Israel might unilaterally withdraw from certain areas of the West Bank and declare its borders final, has no real chance of succeeding. Both sides must acknowledge and respect the needs of the other, without denying the legitimate needs of their own people.




2. How does the envoy requested differ from the envoys President Bush appointed during his tenure? How is it different from the role of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice?


Any envoy attempting to mediate any deeply-felt conflict will have to, at turns, cajole and demand, entice and push -- the resolution of decades or centuries of conflict cannot be achieved without difficult compromise, and that compromise is what the diplomat is there to attain. For such mediation to prove successful, any envoy will have to have the trust of all parties, as well as commanding their respect. Finally, such a diplomat will have to be able to function on a number of fronts and just under the radar, if need be, in order to keep sensitive information and developments under wraps until all sides are ready to reveal details.


The envoys appointed by President Bush tended to be focused entirely on one area of expertise (such as Retired Marine General James Jones, or Retired Marine General Anthony Zinni), and generally failed to command the attention and respect necessary to achieve change. A successful envoy will have both an independent presence on the world stage -- such as a former President or an internationally renowned diplomat -- as well as having the undivided attention of the President he or she serves.


The Secretary of State is thus not an "envoy," per se, but rather an official and very public representative of the U.S. government. One reason the Secretary of State is not in the best position to perform delicate mediation is that it is all but impossible for a government official to avoid the spotlight, no matter the Administration. In terms of Secretary Rice specifically, while it is clear that she has President Bush's respect, it is not as clear that he was willing to listen to her ideas or support them internationally -- witness the Rice-brokered Israeli-Palestinian transport deal of 2005, which was announced with great fanfare and immediately sunk into obscurity.


3. To what does "eight years of half-hearted diplomacy” refer? How can the next President provide “effective American leadership for peace”?


The Bush Administration was characterized, first, by an absolute unwillingness to engage with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and later by repeated efforts to achieve dramatic results after seven years of neglect with very little effort. In the words of Aaron David Miller, a career diplomat who spent 20 years on the frontlines of Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking, President Bush "[has had] many 'if I do this on the peace process, don't bother me again' moments." [note: see The Much Too Promised Land, Aaron David Miller].


In 2001, then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon flatly rejected President Bush's demands that a massive Israeli military operation on the West Bank be suspended "as quickly as possible"; in 2003, Sharon and Yasser Arafat signed the U.S.-backed Road Map to Peace, committing themselves to an immediate settlement freeze and containment of terrorism, but Israel continued to build settlements and nothing substantive changed in Palestinian security; in 2005, the Rice-brokered transport agreement was signed and ignored; in 2007, Bush announced at the Annapolis peace conference that his goal was an agreement by the end of his administration, but the talks netted little progress. And yet, at least with regard to Israel, the Bush Administration has not made serious efforts to back the President's words with actions, or create consequences for the regular disregard of promises made to the U.S. government.


For the next President to be effective, he will have to learn from these mistakes. For U.S. diplomatic efforts to succeed, they must be backed by an iron-clad commitment to the process that diplomacy involves. Mediation is a thankless task, until it is successful -- the next President will have to be willing to do the hard, occasionally unpopular work necessary, in order to achieve a just and durable resolution of the conflict.


Furthermore, it must be made absolutely clear to both parties that agreements signed and promises made are not to be taken lightly: Refusal to abide by accepted terms will bring unpleasant consequences, but progress will bring rewards.


4. Why is it so urgent to resolve the conflict at this time?


Israeli and Palestinian frustration with the utter lack of progress in negotiations is at an all-time high. Influential figures on both sides have begun to publicly lose faith in the process. It may well be that the next Administration will be the last to have a real opportunity to truly resolve the conflict.



5. Why is the U.S. so important to the peace process?


Nearly every success in the realm of Israeli-Arab negotiations has been with American involvement. The peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan were mediated by Presidents Carter and Clinton; the Madrid Peace Conference, the first time Israel sat down with the gathered Arab nations, came about under the administration of President George H.W. Bush. Even the Israeli-Palestinian Declaration of Principles (DOP), ostensibly achieved without American involvement, were negotiated with the United States in mind -- to the extent that then-Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres suggested to then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher that the latter take credit for the achievement.


Moreover, with all the upheavals in the world over the past twenty years, the United States remains the world's one superpower -- and it has always served as Israel's most stalwart ally. The Palestinians and Arab nations look to the U.S. as a path to Israel and look to Israel as a path to better relations with the U.S. For all these reasons, if any peace agreement is to succeed, it will require complete American support.    


6. How can the President encourage the negotiation of a two-state solution when Hamas is still in control of the Gaza Strip?


Negotiations with Israel are conducted not by the Palestinian Authority, per se, but by the chairman of the PLO, who is Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas is a long-time moderate who has been calling for a two-state solution since 1988; it is with Abbas that Israel and the U.S. are conducting all negotiation efforts.


The fact that Hamas rules the Gaza Strip is undeniably problematic, however; any agreement Abbas achieves with Israel will only be successful if the majority of the Palestinian people stand behind it. If the nation is, in fact, split into two geographical and ideological camps, this won’t be possible.


However, some members of the Hamas leadership have indicated a certain openness to a peace deal with Israel; they would accept an agreement, if approved in a national referendum. Hamas has also maintained its current ceasefire with Israel (if failing to crack down on militants from other groups who have failed to respect the truce), and is negotiating over the release of captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Both of these facts indicate a pragmatism which could be made to serve the interests of peace.


Though Hamas’s most extremist policies are rejected by a majority of Palestinians, it cannot be denied that the movement holds an enormous amount of power on the Palestinian political scene. Bottom line, for peace talks to succeed, the U.S. will also have to work to close the gap between Fatah, the movement headed by Abbas, and Hamas.

7. What  about Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's August 2008 peace offer to the Palestinians?

The Palestinians rejected Olmert’s offer as soon as it was made public as it did not adequately address most of the issues that are most important to the Palestinians: the status of Jerusalem, the status of refugees, and the issue of territorial contiguity on the West Bank. Rather, Olmert suggested an Israeli withdrawal from 93% of the West Bank, with a compensation in the form of land in the desert on the border of the Gaza Strip.


Signer Disclaimer


By signing this open letter, you agree to allow Brit Tzedek v’Shalom to publicize your name in pre and post-election publicity and paid advertising.  Your signature on this letter indicates support for the contents of the letter and does not constitute your agreement with all of the positions of Brit Tzedek v’Shalom. You may give us your general endorsement for our work by joining our rabbinic cabinet. To join, please contact Rabbi John Friedman.


The post-election version of the letter will be changed as follows: 

  • It will be addressed to President-Elect X.
  • In the last paragraph the High Holidays language will be dropped and the remaining text will read “We urge you to commit yourself to effective American leadership for peace.”
  • In the fourth paragraph, "As Jewish clergy..." may be changed to "As American leaders...".


It is all set up, this temporary little flesh kingdom of Satan. The Liar Lawyers and Judges and officers of the kings court have already destroyed this nations sovereign independence. They attorn for their king Lucifer

the sons of the shem-a-GOG of Satan

Mt:22:35: Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,

36: Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37: Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38: This is the first and great commandment.
39: And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
41: While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,
42: Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David.
43: He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,
44: The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
45: If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
46: And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.

Lk:7:30: But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized of him.

31: And the Lord said, Whereunto then shall I liken the men of this generation? and to what are they like?
32: They are like unto children sitting in the marketplace, and calling one to another, and saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned to you, and ye have not wept.
33: For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil.
34: The Son of man is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!
35: But wisdom is justified of all her children.

Lk:10:25: And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

26: He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27: And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28: And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
29: But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?
30: And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
31: And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
32: And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.
33: But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,
34: And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.
35: And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.
36: Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
37: And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

Lk:11:45: Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also.

46: And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
47: Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.
48: Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres.
49: Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:
50: That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;
51: From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
52: Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
53: And as he said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge him vehemently, and to provoke him to speak of many things:
54: Laying wait for him, and seeking to catch something out of his mouth, that they might accuse him.

Lk:11:46: And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

Lk:11:52: Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

Lk:14:3: And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?


Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform.  ...  Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.  Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citiwzens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. 

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha....  ....  And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory]

Freemasonry and the Noachide Laws

Nicholas Owen Society

All Freemasonry is subordinate to Judaism, according to Craig Heimbichner, author of Blood On The Altar: The Secret History of the World's Most Dangerous Secret Society. Is Freemasonry Judaism for gentiles? As early as 926 AD, evidence suggests so:

"1738 is a date to remember. It truly marks the formation of modern Freemasonry and the organization of the grand lodges. It was the year the Book of Constitutions was revised to carry a Protestant meaning and when Article I of this text was altered. In its new form it echoes the charter allegedly issued by Edwin I in 926: 'A mason is obliged by his tenure to observe the moral law like a true Noachid...and to the three great articles of Noah,' to wit, the prohibition on worshipping idols and false gods, and committing blasphemy and murder." (Paul Naudon, "The Secrets of the Freemasonry: Its Origins and Connection to the Knights Templar, 1991, Inner Traditions, Rochester, Vermont, page 261)


"For the good of Masonry, generally, but for the Jewish nation in particular. Royal Arch Degree of Freemasonry" -- quoted from Craig Heimbichner
's book Blood on the Altar, page 83. Pictured here is the Masonic Jewel, Royal Arch, 7th Degree rite in which York Rite Freemasons pledge allegiance to the Jewish nation. The Masonic jewell of this rite is Solomon's Seal with a sun blazing inside a triange in the center.



That Freemasonry is Judaism for Gentiles, or Noachidism, can be further confirmed by referring to Judeo-Freemasonry's own reference books: "Noachidae, Noachites. The descendents of Noah. A term applied to Freemasons. Noah having alone preserved the true name and worship of God, amid a race of impious idolaters. Freemasons claim to be his descendents, because they still preserve that pure religion which distinguished this second father of the human race from the rest of the world. And even when his descendents began again, in the plains of Shinar, to forget the Almighty, and to wander from the path of purity, the principles of Noah were still perpetuated by that portion of his race whom the Freemasons of the present day regard as their early predecessors. Hence, Freemasons call themselves Noachidae, or the sons of Noah." (Mackey, Lexicon of Freemasonry, page 324, 2004, Barnes and Noble Publishing, Inc.)

"Noah, Precepts of. The precepts of the patriarch Noah, which were preserved as the constitutions of our ancient brethren, are seven in number, and are as follows: 1. Renounce all idols 2. Worship the only true God. 3. Commit no murder. 4. Be not defiled by incest. 5. Do not steal. 6. Be just. 7. Eat no flesh with blood in it. The 'proselytes of the gate', as the Jews termed those who lived among them without undergoing circumcision, or observing the ceremonial law, were bound to obey the seven precepts of Noah." (Mackey, Lexicon of Freemasonry, page 325, 2004, Barnes and Noble Publishing, Inc.)

"NOAHCHIDAE: The descendants of Noah, and the transmitters of his religious dogmas, which were the unity of God and the immortality of the soul. The name has from the earliest times been bestowed upon the Freemasons, who teach the same doctrines. Thus in the 'old charges,' as quoted by Anderson (Const. edit. 1738, p. 143), it is said, 'A mason is obliged by his tenure to observe the moral law as a true Noachidae." (The Symbolism of Freemasonry, Mackey, available at the on-line religious texts archive.

As the quotes above attest, Judeo-Freemasons are -- and arguably were from the inception of Freemasonry -- Noahchidae, i.e., outsiders at the gate who follow the 7 laws laid down by the Rabbis in the Talmud for gentiles.

The seven Noachide Laws may sound harmless enough if read out of the context of their origin within the Talmudic-Kabbalistic praxis from whence they originated, but in his book "Judaism Discovered", Hoffman clarifies: "The Noachide set-up is above all a legal system which will eventually develop courts and judiciary with the power to impose capital punishment for grievous infringements of the Noachide Laws. One death penalty offense under the Noahide rabbinic legal system is 'idolotry.' Since Maimonides ruled that Christians are idolaters, it is not difficult to see that the 102nd US Congress, and the numerous churchmen who promote submission to the "Noachide" Laws, wittingly or unwittingly, have laid the groundwork for the execution, at some future date, of authentic Christians, individually by trial or en masse. conversely, Maimonides rules that all gentiles who are not followers of the Noachide Law are liable to death. Hilchot Melachim 8:10 states that any gentile who does not accept the Noachide laws should be slain, though this only applies when Judaics have 'undisputed authority over eretz Israel.'" (Michael A. Hoffman, "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit", page 498, Independent History and Research, 2008, available, as of 2008, at

That Freemasons, according to their own books, admit to being Noahchidae is only one among many reasons why many Masonologists claim Freemasonry is Judaism for Gentiles. Other reasons include the following: 1) Freemasonry, according the the occult heavyweights and Freemasons who spearheaded the occult revival of the 19th and 20th century agree that Freemasonry is based on the Jewish Kabbalah; 2) The most common symbols of Freemasonry are synonyms of the Seal of Solomon, or the hexagram, which is the accepted symbol of the Jewish Nation and Judaism, thus suggesting emblematically what is stated verbally here; 3) Masons of the Royal Arch Degree of Templar Rite Masonry take an oath to the nation of Jews, and the jewel of that degree is a hexagram with a sun in the center; 4) the rituals of Freemasonry revolve around the rebuilding of the Temple of Solomon: "Take from Freemasonry its dependence upon the temple [of Solomon], leave out of its ritual all reference to that sacred edifice, and to the legends connected with it, and the system [of Freemasonry] itself must at once decay and die". (Albert Mackey, The Symbolism of Freemasonry [Brackets mine]) As if these reasons were not sufficient in themselves to establish the fact that Freemasonry is Judaism for Gentiles, we here have Freemasons telling us that they are called Noahchides, i.e., gentiles who submit the Talmudic Noahide laws.


Royal Military

College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First

World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 - thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and

the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.

From 1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard. In 1931 he was elected

a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.

Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without

charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. On the

following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there

until the end of that Parliament in 1945.



Here is the story that people have said would never be written in our time — the true

history of events leading up to the Second World War, told by one who enjoyed the

friendship and confidence of Mr. Neville Chamberlain during the critical months

between Munich and September, 1939.

There has long been an unofficial ban on books dealing with what Captain Ramsay

calls "The Nameless War", the conflict which has been waged from behind the political

scene for centuries, which is still being waged and of which very few are aware.

The publishers of "The Nameless War" believe this latest exposure will do more than

any previous attempt to break the conspiracy of silence.

The present work, with much additional evidence and a fuller historical background, is

the outcome of the personal experiences of a public figure who in the course of duty

has discovered at first-hand the existence of a centuries old conspiracy against Britain,

Europe, and the whole of Christendom.

"The Nameless War" reveals an unsuspected link between all the major revolutions in

Europe — from King Charles I's time to the abortive attempt against Spain in 1936.

One source of inspiration, design and supply is shown to be common to all of them.


These revolutions and the World War of 1939 are seen to be integral parts of one and

the same master plan.

After a brief review of the forces behind the declaration of war and the world wide

arrests of many who endeavoured to oppose them, the author describes the anatomy

of the Revolutionary International machine — the machine which today continues the

plan for supranational world power, the age-old Messianic dream of International


It is the author's belief that the machine would break down without the support of its

unwilling Jews and unsuspecting Gentiles and he puts forward suggestions for

detaching these elements.

Christians say . . .

"Captain Ramsay, a Christian gentleman of unflagging courage, believed that the

war with Germany was not conceived in the interests of Britain and could lead

only to the extension of Communist and Jewish power. Because he warned his

fellow countrymen of the forces at work, he was put in prison without trial for four

and a half years, for 'reasons' so preposterous that those who framed them

dared not submit them to a court of law." Truth

"For years Captain Ramsay had been a member of the British Parliament. His

book is an analysis of the Jewish-Zionist war against Christian civilization." The

Cross and the Flag

Jews say . . .

"There is no limit to the depths of human depravity, Captain Maule Ramsay . . .

seems to have made a very determined attempt to plumb those depths." The

Jewish Chronicle

"The publication of such a book, at this time, underlines the urgent need for the

law to be reformed so as to make it a crime to preach racial hatred or publish

libels on groups in the community." The Daily Worker

Copyright 1952; First Edition October 1952;

Second Popular Edition 1956;

Third Popular Edition 1956;

Fourth Popular Edition 1962;

Made and Printed in Great Britain by

The B.P.S. Printing Co.


and Published by the Britons Publishing Company

111a Westbourne Grove, London, W.2


The British Revolution

The French Revolution

The Russian Revolution

Development of Revolutionary Technique

Germany Bells The Cat

1933: Jewry Declares War

"Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing

Dunkirk and After

The Shape of Things to Come

President Roosevelt's Role

Regulation 18b

Who Dares?


Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament

Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest

Appendix 1 A Appendix 2 A Appendix 3 A Appendix 4 A Appendix 5 A Appendix 6


To the memory of those Patriots who in 1215 at Runnymede

signed Magna Carta and those who in 1320 at Arbroath

signed the Declaration of Independence this book is


27th July 1952



Edward I banished the Jews from England for many grave offences endangering the

welfare of his realm and lieges, which were to a great extent indicated in the Statutes

of Jewry*, enacted by his Parliament in 1290, the Commons playing a prominent part.

* See Appendix 2 (Appendices follow the last chapter)

The King of France very shortly followed suit, as did other Rulers in Christian Europe.

So grave did the situation for the Jews in Europe become, that an urgent appeal for

help and advice was addressed by them to the Sanhedrin, then located at


This appeal was sent over the signature of Chemor, Rabbi of Arles in Provence, on the

13th January, 1489. The reply came in November, 1489, which was issued over the

signature of V.S.S. V.F.F. Prince of the Jews.

It advised the Jews of Europe to adopt the tactics of the Trojan Horse; to make

their sons Christian priests, lawyers, doctors, etc., and work to destroy the

Christian structure from within.

The first notable repercussion to this advice occurred in Spain in the reign of

Ferdinand and Isabella. Many Jews were by then enrolled as Christians, but remaining

secretly Jews were working to destroy the Christian church in Spain.

So grave became the menace finally, that the Inquisition was instituted in an

endeavour to cleanse the country from these conspirators. Once again the Jews were

compelled to commence an exodus from yet another country, whose hospitality they

had abused.

Trekking eastwards, these Jews joined other Jewish communities in western Europe;

considerable numbers flowed on to Holland and Switzerland.

From now on these two countries were to become active centres of Jewish intrigue.

Jewry, however, has always needed a powerful seafaring nation to which to attach


Great Britain, newly united under James I, was a rising naval power, which was

already beginning to sway the four corners of the discovered world. Here also there

existed a wonderful field for disruptive criticism; for although it was a Christian

kingdom, yet it was one most sharply divided as between Protestant and Catholic.

A campaign for exploiting this division and fanning hatreds between the Christian

communities was soon in process of organization. How well the Jews succeeded in

this campaign in Britain may be judged from the fact that one of the earliest acts of

their creature and hireling Oliver Cromwell — after executing the King according to


plan — was to allow the Jews free access to England once more.

The British Revolution

"It was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not

yet finished."

With these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl of Beaconsfield,

commenced his two volume life of Charles I published in 1851. A work of astonishing

detail and insight, much information for which, he states, was obtained from the

records of one Melchior de Salom, French envoy in England during that period.

The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom based upon Christianity,

and its own ancient traditions; these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State,

nobles and the people in one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the

ominous rumblings of Calvinism.

Calvin, who came to Geneva from France, where his name was spelt Cauin, *possibly

a French effort to spell Cohen, organized great numbers of revolutionary orators, not a

few of whom were inflicted upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork

for revolution under a cloak of religious fervour.

*Note. At a B'nai B'rith meeting in Paris reported in 'Catholic Gazette' in Feb

1936 he was claimed to be of Jewish extraction.

On both sides of the Tweed these demagogues contracted all religion into rigid

observance of the "Sabbath." To use the words of Isaac Disraeli,

"The nation was artfully divided into Sabbatarians and Sabbath breakers."

"Calvin deemed the Sabbath to have been a Jewish ordinance, limited to the

sacred people."

He goes on to say that when these Calvinists held the country in their power,

"it seemed that religion chiefly consisted of Sabbatarian rigours; and that a

British senate had been transformed into a company of Hebrew Rabbins":

and later

"In 1650, after the execution of the King, an Act was passed inflicting penalties

for a breach of the Sabbath."

Buckingham, Strafford and Laud are the three chief figures round the King in these

early stages: Men on whose loyalty to himself, the nation, and the ancient tradition


Charles can rely.

Buckingham, the trusted friend of King James I, and of those who had saved his life at

the time of the Gowrie Conspiracy (of ominous cabalistic associations) was

assassinated in the early years of King Charles' reign under mysterious


Strafford, who had been in his early days inclined to follow the opposite faction, later

left them; and became a staunch and devoted adherent of the King.

This opposition faction became steadily more hostile to Charles and by the time that

they were led by Pym and decided to impeach Strafford. "The King," writes Disraeli,

"regarded this faction as his enemies"; and he states that the head of this faction was

the Earl of Bedford.

Walsh, the eminent Catholic historian, states that a Jew wine merchant named

Roussel was the founder of this family in Tudor times. With the impeachment and

execution of Strafford, the powers behind the rising Calvinist, or Cohenist, Conspiracy

began to reveal themselves, and their focus, the City of London.

At this time there suddenly began to appear from the City armed mobs of "Operatives"

(the medieval equivalent for "workers" no doubt). Let me quote Disraeli:

"They were said to amount to ten thousand ...

with war-like weapons. It was a militia for insurgency at all seasons, and might

be depended upon for any work of destruction at the cheapest rate ...

as these sallied forth with daggers and bludgeons (from the city) the inference is

obvious that this train of explosion must have been long laid."

It must indeed; and we must recollect here, that at this time Strafford was still

unexecuted, and civil war in the minds of none but of those behind the scenes, who

evidently had long since resolved upon and planned it.

These armed mobs of "workers" intimidated all and sundry, including both Houses of

Parliament and the Palace at critical moments, exactly on the model employed later by

the "Sacred Bands" and the "Marseillais" in the French Revolution.

Isaac Disraeli draws again and again startling parallels between this and the French

Revolution; Notably in his passages on the Press, "no longer under restraint," and

the deluge of revolutionary pamphlets and leaflets. He writes:

"From 1640 to 1660, about 30,000 appear to have started up."

And later,


"the collection of French revolutionary pamphlets now stands by the side of the

French tracts of the age of Charles I, as abundant in number and as fierce in

passion. . .

Whose hand behind the curtain played the strings . . .

could post up a correct list of 59 commoners, branding them with the odious title

of 'Straffordians or betrayers of their country'."

Whose hand indeed? But Disraeli who knew so much, now discreetly draws a veil over

that iron curtain; and it is left to us to complete the revelation.

To do so we must turn to such other works as the Jewish Encyclopedia, Sombart's

work, The Jews and Modern Capitalism, and others. From these we learn that

Cromwell, the chief figure of the revolution, was in close contact with the powerful Jew

financiers in Holland; and was in fact paid large sums of money by Manasseh Ben

Israel; whilst Fernandez Carvajal, "The Great Jew" as he was called, was the chief

contractor of the New Model Army.

In The Jews in England we read:

"1643 brought a large contingent of Jews to England, their rallying point was the

house of the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a Marano (secret Jew).

Prominent among them was Fernandez Carvajal, a great financier and army


In January of the previous year, the attempted arrest of the five members had set in

violent motion the armed gangs of "Operatives" already mentioned, from the city.

Revolutionary pamphlets were broadcasted on this occasion, as Disraeli tells us:

"Bearing the ominous insurrectionary cry of 'To your tents, O Israel'."

Shortly after this the King and the Royal Family left the Palace of Whitehall.

The five members with armed mobs and banners accompanying them, were given a

triumphal return to Westminster. The stage was now set for the advent of Carvajal and

his Jews and the rise of their creature Cromwell.

The scene now changes. The Civil War has taken its course. The year is 1647:

Naseby has been won and lost. The King is virtually a prisoner, while treated as an

honoured guest at Holmby House.

According to a letter published in Plain English (a weekly review published by the

North British Publishing Co. and edited by the late Lord Alfred Douglas.) on 3rd

September, 1921:

"The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer period than they


have perhaps suspected.

My friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter

containing two extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which

they are contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has

recently come into Mr. van Valckert's possession.

It is written in German, and contains extracts of letters sent and received by the

authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is of a letter


16th June, 1647

From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.

In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England:

This however impossible while Charles living.

Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do

not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but

will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin,

though willing to help in his escape.

In reply was dispatched the following:

12th July, 1647

To O.C. by E. Pratt.

Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted.

Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to

escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support

will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences."

With this information now at our disposal, the subsequent moves on the part of the

regicides stand out with a new clearness. On 4th June, 1647, Cornet Joyce, acting on

secret orders from Cromwell himself, and, according to Disraeli, unknown even to

General-in-Chief Fairfax, descended upon Holmby House with 500 picked

revolutionary troopers, and seized the King. According to Disraeli,

"The plan was arranged on May 30th at a secret meeting held at Cromwell's

house, though later Cromwell pretending that it was without his concurrence."

This move coincided with a sudden development in the army; the rise of the 'Levelers"

and "Rationalists." Their doctrines were those of the French revolutionaries; in fact,

what we know today as Communism. These were the regicides, who four times

"purged" Parliament, till there was left finally 50 members, Communist-like themselves,


known later as the Rump.

To return to the letter from Mulheim Synagogue of the 12th June, 1647, and its

cunning suggestion that attempted escape should be used as a pretext for execution.

Just such an event took place, on 12th November of that year. Hollis and Ludlow

consider the flight as a stratagem of Cromwell's. Isaac Disraeli states:

"Contemporary historians have decided that the King from the day of his

deportation from Holmby to his escape to the Isle of Wight was throughout the

dupe of Cromwell."

Little more remains to be said. Cromwell had carried out the orders from the

Synagogue, and now it only remained to stage the mock trial.

Maneuvering for position continued for some time. And it became apparent that the

House of Commons, even in their partially "purged" condition, were in favour of coming

to an agreement with the King. On 5th December, 1648, the House sat all night; and

finally carried the question, "That the King's concessions were satisfactory to a


Should such agreement have been reached, of course, Cromwell would not have

received the large sums of money which he was hoping to get from the Jews. He

struck again. On the night of December 6th, Colonel Pryde, on his instructions, carried

out the last and most famous "purge" of the House of Commons, known as "Pryde's


On 4th January, the Communist remnant of 50 members, the Rump, invested

themselves with "the supreme authority."

On 9th January "a High Court of Justice" to try the King was proclaimed. Two-thirds of

its members were Levelers from the Army. Algernon Sidney warned Cromwell:

"First, the King can be tried by no court. Second, no man can be tried by this


So writes Hugh Ross Williamson in his Charles and Cromwell; and he adds a

finishing touch to the effect that

"no English lawyer could be found to draw up the charge, which was eventually

entrusted to an accommodating alien, Isaac Dorislaus."

Needless to say, Isaac Dorislaus was exactly the same sort of alien as Carvajal and

Manasseh Ben Israel and the other financiers who paid the "Protector" his blood


The Jews were once again permitted to land freely in England in spite of strong

protests by the sub-committee of the Council of State, which declared that they would


be a grave menace to the State and the Christian religion. Perhaps it is due to their

protests that the actual act of banishment has never to this day been repealed.

"The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one ...

From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of

revolution." Isaac Disraeli

There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France.

In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands

in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we read this

remarkable sentence:

"Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known

to us for it was entirely the work of our hands."[Protocol No.3]

The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written,

"Remember the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which are well

known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands."

The difficult problem of the subjugation of both Kingdoms was still however unsolved.

Scotland was Royalist before everything else; and she had proclaimed Charles II King.

Cromwell's armies marched round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers,

dispensing Judaic barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover

accepted the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and slowly but steadily the

feeling in England began to come round to the Scottish point of view.

Finally upon the death of Cromwell, all Britain welcomed the King's restoration to the

throne of England.

In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the

Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The

enemies of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom now, and as soon as the

stage should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing

once more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ's Church, the

next attack would develop.

The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms in

the hands of the Jews, who were now firmly ensconced within.

Charles evidently had no consciousness of the Jewish problem or plans, or the

menace they held for his peoples. The wisdom and experience of Edward I had

become lost in the centuries of segregation from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of

the danger to the Crown in placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a

"Popish Plot" cry he did retain.


With James II's accession, the crisis could not be long delayed. The most

unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full swing against him, and

it is no surprise to find that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed in

Holland. This country was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and

considerable comings and goings took place during these years.

Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had joined those who

plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action till news

came that the expedition against himself was actually under way.

The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was John

Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia

that this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the

Dutch Jew Solomon Medina.

The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years later in 1694,

when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of England" and the

institution of the National Debt.

This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting

money; converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money

lenders to secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful

undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously


From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all

wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the

life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples.

[Note: Germany's most successful economic system was NOT backed by gold. He

eluded the blood-sucking grip of the Zionist Jew Money Masters, therefore "Germany

must be destroyed!" and Adolf Hitler vilified down through ages so the uninformed will

DEMAND their government return to the gold standard. -- jackie]

The political and economic union of England and Scotland was shortly afterwards

forced upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and in defiance of formal protests

from every county and borough. The main objects of the Union were to suppress the

Royal Mint in Scotland, and to force upon her, too, responsibility for the "National


The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was

that the members of the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit of their

ancestors, challenge this state of affairs. To provide against this, therefore, the party

system was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and enabling the

wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their newly-established financial power to ensure


that their own men and their own policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient

support from their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.

Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount

deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000

pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold could earn 30 pounds interest

annually with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries.

The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every hour of daylight in

order to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process must only be a matter of time. The

moneylenders must become millionaires; those who own and work the land, the

Englishman and the Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably

till now, when it is nearly completed.

It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor by

mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in the main the

deliberate ruination of the landed classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their

supplanting by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.

The French Revolution

The French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the history of Europe

since the fall of Rome.

A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had a mob

apparently organized successful revolution against all other classes in the state, under

high sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of

the principles enshrined in those slogans.

Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all other sections; and still

less swept away every feature of the national life and tradition, from King, religion,

nobles, clergy, constitution, flag, calendar, and place names, to coinage.

Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in view of the fact that it

has been followed by identical outbreaks in many countries.

The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact:

the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It was

the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which had

been France.

This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in high places in the


Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.

We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British, or

Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals; they were, of course, Jews.

Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :

"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of

'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the

work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.

"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty,

Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to

these baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world.

The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see

that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be freedom (meaning, of

course, freedom as understood by Socialists and Communists, freedom to wreck

your own country)." Protocols of Zion-No. 1.

With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the

intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of

characters and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown

us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama.

When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of

1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama

grip us with a new and personal sense of reality.

"Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic."

Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization, and vast resources,

as well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary are necessary for its successful


It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or "the people" ever

have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated and costly operation. No mistake

more-over could be more dangerous; for it will result in total inability to recognize the

true significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.

The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the infliction of paralysis;

and secondly, the striking of the blow or blows.

It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that the secrecy is essential. Its

outward signs are debt, loss of publicity control, and the existence of alieninfluenced

secret organizations in the doomed state.


Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and over-mastering grip. Through it

men in high places are suborned, and alien powers and influences are introduced into

the body politic. When the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form

of publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip on industrialists.

The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the right hand of finance

established the paralysis; while it is the revolutionary left that holds the dagger and

deals the fatal blow. Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.

By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France. The world's big

financiers were firmly established.

"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver stocks, that they

had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France."

So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on page 38:

"A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of

Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and had become debt. In

the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals;

but a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money to which

the title 'credit' had been given."

The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means

insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's advisers decided to issue

money on the security of the lands and real wealth of France, the position could have

been fairly easily righted. As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier

after another, who either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the

international usurers.

Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only grow heavier and

more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France


And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these manipulators of gold and

silver, who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and

replacing real wealth by millions upon millions of usurious loans?

The late Lady Queensborough, in her important work Occult Theocracy gives us

certain outstanding names, taking her facts from L'Anti-Semitisme by the Jew

Bernard Lazare, 1894.

In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother Abraham

Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses Montifiore, as

being directly concerned in financing the French Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of

Berlin and his son-in-law David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These


names recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:

"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not

been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed

gold from circulation as far as possible."

And Again:-

"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who . . . come

begging with outstretched palm."

No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France. Sir Walter Scott in

his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes the situation:-

"These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by

usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with

the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses

for their advances.

By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to

guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought to total confusion."

King Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of growing confusion was

Necker, "a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a German professor of whom McNair

Wilson writes:

"Necker had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a representative of the

debt system owning allegiance to that system."

We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in Necker; and when we

add to this the fact that his previous record was that of a daring and unscrupulous

speculator, we can understand why the national finances of France under his baneful

aegis rapidly worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the unfortunate

King's government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of

170,000,000 pounds.

By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the

movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de Chartres afterwards

d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of freemasonry was largely innocent, both

in policy and personnel in its early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits

were ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.

The Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of little principle, and an

extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he had no motives beyond the ousting of the

King, and the establishing of a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch.

Having in addition but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the first


and most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he probably

scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine soon after his base and

ignominious role had been played.

The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure of the Revolution

was cast in much the same role. He was a much abler man than d'Orleans, but so foul

a libertine that he was shunned by all his own class, and imprisoned more than once

at the instance of his own father.

He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of the Jewish

Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the Jewess Mrs. Herz than was

her husband. He was not only an early figure-head in French Freemasonry in the

respectable years, but introduced Illuminism into France.

[Note: Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying that: "Judaism

is not a religion. It is a law religionized".

To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political program (for World

Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]

This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind freemasonry. The Illuminati

penetrated into all the lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and

organized by cabalistic Jews.

It is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand were both initiated into

Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the latter had introduced it into France, from

Frankfurt, where its headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam


In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as though the heavenly

powers themselves made a last moment attempt to warn France and Europe against

these massing powers of evil:

Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.

The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world revolution.

Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the Illuminati

searched, and much further evidence was discovered.

French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was too far

advanced, and no action resulted.

By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the Grand

Orient, the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over



Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic Illuminism

under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong secret organization

covering the whole of France.

Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under that again the Blue,

or National, Masonry had operated until it was converted over-night into Grand Orient

Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans in 1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers

that he was invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were. The

name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were lit by that light.

By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789, the paralysis of

the executive authority by the secret organizations was complete.

Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well advanced by then also.

This was the manner of its accomplishment.

By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his reckless gambling

and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.

In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over his palace,

estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his creditors, with powers to form there a

centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops,

theatres, art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form

of every variety of public debauchery.

In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property to install a colossal

organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed to every lowest instinct in human

nature; and deluged the enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and

revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.

As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood:

"It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city."

It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the creditors at the Palais

royal was one de Laclos, a political adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons

Dangereuses, and other pornographic works, who was said "to study the politics of

love because of his love for politics."

This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was linked with a series

of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and most unscrupulous nature upon any

public characters whom the Jacobins thought likely to stand in their way. This process

was known as "L'infamie."

Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this typically Jewish form of


attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous

than the weak and indolent Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle

to the revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding freemasonry

from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time more awake to its significance

than when she had written to her sister some years previously:

"I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much about

freemasonry. Here it is far from having the significance that it may have

elsewhere in Europe. Here everything is open and one knows all. Then where

could the danger be?

One might well be worried if it were a question of a political secret society. But

on the contrary the government lets it spread, and it is only that which it seems,

an association the objects of which are union and charity.

One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion to say that

people who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing plots. Nor is it a society

of atheists, for we are told God is on the lips of all. They are very charitable.

They bring up the children of their poor and dead members. They endow their

daughters. What harm is there in all that?"

What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker designs?

Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on to them the

contents of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them shaking with laughter, and

rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands that were itching to destroy the very life of

France and her Queen; and which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that

would convert secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the blood

baths of the guillotine.

In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an elaborate hoax was

arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain speculators were deliberately

creating conditions of poverty and hunger in Paris.

A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was ordered at the Court

jewellers in the Queen's name by an agent of the Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen

knew nothing of this affair until the necklace was brought round to her for acceptance,

when she naturally disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she

would consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a financial


The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full blast on to the subject;

and every kind of criticism leveled at the Queen.

A further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some prostitute from the

Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the Queen; and by the forged letter


the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced to meet the supposed Queen about

midnight at the Palais Royal, supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the

Queen on the subject of the necklace.

This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the printing presses and

pamphleteers, who started a further campaign containing the foulest innuendoes that

could be imagined concerning the whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene

was Cagliostro, alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabalistic

art, and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by

Weishaupt in 1774.

When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent over to London, where

most of the stones were retained by the Jew Eliason. Attacks of a similar nature were

directed against many other decent people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin

clubs. After eight years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of publicity

was complete.

In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced the King to summon the

Estates General, the first portion of their plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were

accomplished. It now only remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to

rob France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy, her

gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in their place, when the

guillotine's work was done, citizen hewers of wood and drawers of water under an

alien financial dictatorship.

From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in motion; each more

violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking fresh demands and more violent

and revolutionary leaders. In their turn each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real

powers behind the revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to join

those of his victims of yesterday.

Phillipe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for the revolution; to

protect with his name and influence the infancy of the revolutionary club; to popularize

freemasonry and the Palais Royal; and to sponsor such acts as the march of the

women to Versailles.

The "women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise. d'Orleans was under the

impression that the King and Queen would be assassinated by this mob, and himself

proclaimed a democratic King. The real planners of the march, however, had other

schemes in view.

One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to Paris, where they

would be clear of protection from the army, and under the power of the Commune or

Paris County Council in which the Jacobins were supreme.


They continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the vote on the King's

life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading the open vote in voting for the death

of his cousin. His masters thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very

shortly followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all classes.

Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had intended that the revolution

should cease with the setting up of Louis as a democratic monarch with himself as

chief adviser. He had no desire to see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in

the last days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to get the

King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still commanding his


He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the Jacobin club of

Paris; that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which had materialized out of the secret

clubs of the Orient Masons and Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and resonant,

that kept in check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.

There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and strength of the beast,

which he had worked so long and so industriously to unchain. In his last attempt to

save the royal family by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting

down all opposition in the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden and violent

illness; and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace writes:

"Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."

Thus, like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre, Mirabeau too was

removed from the stage when his role had been played. We are reminded of the

passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:

"We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever

have a suspicion of it."

And again:

"In this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too much."

As Mr E. Scudder writes in his Life of Mirabeau:

"He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been checked."

The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important occasions during

these first revolutionary stages. He was one of those simple freemasons, who are

borne they know not wither, in a ship they have not fully explored, and by currents

concerning which they are totally ignorant.

While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very severely handled several


incipient outbreaks of revolutionary violence, notably in the march of the women to

Versailles, during the attack on the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too,

desired the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no

threat to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with the utmost hostility

during and after the march of the women to Versailles, believing on that occasion that

Egalite intended the assassination of the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.

He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the revolution, and was packed

off to a war against Austria, which the Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did

dash back to Paris in an effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the

war. Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.

The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics of the Jacobin club

now dominated the scene.

In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September massacres"; 8,000

persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris alone, and many more over the


It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held till the time of the

massacre in the prisons by one Manuel, Procurer of the Commune. Sir Walter Scott

evidently understood much concerning the influences which were at work behind the

scenes. In his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:

"The demand of the Communaute de Paris,* now the Sanhedrin of the Jacobins,

was, of course, for blood."

[*The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.] Again, on page 56 he


"The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes Pierre, Danton

and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."

Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:

"The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners."

Some of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:

There was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said to be of

Spanish origin.

There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already mentioned. He it was

who started the attack upon royalty in the Convention, which culminated with the

execution of Louis and Marie Antoinette.

There was David the painter, a leading member of the Committee of Public


Security, which "tried" the victims. His voice was always raised calling for death.

Sir Walter Scott writes that this fiend used to preface his "bloody work of the day

with the professional phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was who

inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized

"the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted for every

external sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, Vol.


There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who with a Council of

Elders became the government after the fall of Robes Pierre, being known as the


The terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course, characteristically Jewish.

One other observation should be made here; it is that this important work by Sir Walter

Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of the real truth, is practically unknown, is never

reprinted with his other works, and is almost unobtainable.

Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full significance of this fact;

and the added importance it lends to Sir Walter Scott's evidence regarding the powers

behind the French Revolution.

To return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone, and apparently

master of the scenes; but this again was only appearance. Let us turn to the Life of

Robes Pierre, by one G. Renier, who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his

disposal. He writes:

"From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was at its height. It

was never the dictatorship of a single man, least of all Robes Pierre. Some 20

men (the Committees of Public Safety and of General Security) shared the


To quote Mr. Renier again:

"On the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before the

Convention . . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists. . . uttering vague general


'I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot bring

myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this profound mystery of

iniquity. But I can affirm most positively that among the authors of this plot

are the agents of that system of corruption and extravagance, the most

powerful of all the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the

Republic; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is

at its base'."


Mr Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction:

"Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"

In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and crosses the t's, which

Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting and

secret foreigners" was getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full

truth would be out.

At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on the following day

dragged to the guillotine.

Again let us recall Protocol 15:

"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."

Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew

Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that he intended in future to

finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar to the debt free money known as

"Greenbacks," with which he had financed the Civil War.

The Russian Revolution

Monsieur Francois Coty, the celebrated scent manufacturer, wrote in Figaro on 20th

February, 1932:

"The subsidies granted to the Nihilists at this period (1905-1917) by Jacob Schiff,

of Kuhn Loeb and Co., New York, were no longer acts of isolated generosity. A

veritable Russian terrorist organization had been set up at his expense. It

covered Russia with its emissaries."

This creation of terrorist formations by Jews within a country marked down for

revolution, whether they be called Nihilists or as in France in 1789, "Sacred Bands," or

"Marseillais"; or "Operatives," as in the Britain of Charles I, now stands revealed as

standard technique.

Jacob Schiff also financed Japan in her war against Russia 1904-5, as we learn from

the Jewish Encyclopedia.

This war was immediately followed by an attempt at revolution on a considerable scale

in Russia, which, however, proved abortive. The next attempt, during the Great War,

met with complete success.

On the 3rd January, 1906, the Russian Foreign Minister supplied to Emperor Nicholas

II a report on this revolutionary outbreak, which, as revealed in the American Hebrew


of July 13th, 1918, contained the following passages:

"The events which took place in Russia in 1905 . . . plainly indicate that the

revolutionary movement . . . has a definite international character . . .

the revolutionaries possess great quantities of arms imported from abroad and

very considerable financial means . . .

one is bound to conclude that there are foreign capitalists' organizations

interested in supporting our revolutionary movement. If we add to the above that,

as has been proved beyond any doubt, a very considerable part is played by

Jews . . .

as ring-leaders in other organizations as well as their own . . .

always the most bellicose element of the revolution . . .

we may feel entitled to assume that the above-mentioned foreign support of the

Russian revolutionary movement comes from Jewish capitalist circles."

The assumption in the foregoing report was indeed well justified. It was to be

confirmed by an even more important official document penned at the height of the

revolution itself, in 1918, by Mr. Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands

Government in St. Petersburg, who was in charge of British interests in Russia after

the liquidation of our Embassy by the bolsheviks.

So important indeed was this report of Mr. Oudendyke's held to be by Mr. Balfour, to

whom it was addressed, that it was set out in a British government white paper on

bolshevism issued in April 1919. (Russia No. 1.)

In it I have read the following passage: [Emphasis by author]

"I consider that the immediate suppression of bolshevism is the greatest

issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still

raging, and unless bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound

to spread in one form or another over Europe, and the whole world, as it is

organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality, and whose one

object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."

A still clearer light is thrown on these happenings by an article written on 12th April,

1919, in a paper called The Communist, at Kharkov, by one M. Cohen:

"The great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of Jews.

There are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as privates are

concerned, but in the Committees, and in the Soviet organization as

Commissars, the Jews are gallantly leading the masses.


The symbol of Jewry has become the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which

can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former

times was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry."

Mr. Fahey, in his important and authenticated work, The Rulers of Russia, is more

specific, stating that in 1917 of the 52 persons who took over the direction in Russia,

all but Lenin were Jews.

[Mr. Fahey must somehow have missed the fact that Lenin himself WAS a Jew. That

would mean then that ALL who took over the direction in Russia were Jews. - jackie]

So thorough was the mass liquidation of all but hewers of wood and drawers of water

in Russia, that this Jewish grip remained unaltered. Dr. Fahey tells us that in 1935 the

Central Executive of the Third international, which ruled Russia

"consisted of 59 men, of which 56 were Jews. The other three, including Stalin,

were married to Jewesses. Of 17 principal Soviet ambassadors, 4 were Jews."

(Rulers of Russia, pages 8 and 9.)

The Rev. George Simons, who was Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church

in St. Petersburg from 1907 to October 1918, appeared before a Committee of the

United States Senate on the 12th February, 1919, and gave them a report of his

personal knowledge of the happenings in Russia up to the time he left. Dr. Fahey

quotes him as saying during this evidence:

"In December, 1918, out of 388 members of the revolutionary government, only

16 happened to be real Russians; all the rest were Jews with the exception of

one U.S. Negro. Two hundred and sixty-five of the Jews come from the Lower

East Side of New York."

Such has been the condition of affairs in the U.S.S.R. from that day to this.

Though a number of Jews were liquidated in the so-called "Moscow Purge," this

affected the situation in no way. It merely signified that one Jewish faction had

triumphed over, and liquidated, another. There has never been anything in the nature

of a Gentile revolt against the Jewish domination.

The fact that some Jews were liquidated by winning factions behind the iron curtain

could be used to deceive the world outside into thinking that this was the result of an

anti-semitic revolt, and from time to time a hoax of this kind has been systematically


As world opinion gradually turned hostile to the U.S.S.R. important Jews began to fear

that this feeling, combined with a gradual realization that bolshevism is Jewish, might

have unpleasant reactions for them.


About 1945, therefore, a further powerful campaign was organized from influential

Jewish circles, notably in the U.S.A., to put out the story once again that Russia had

turned on the Jews. They evidently failed, however, to advise their lesser brethren of

this move; and indignant and informed denials were soon forthcoming.

A journal called Bulletin, the organ of the Glasgow Discussion Group, wrote in June


"Such rubbish as is now being spread as to the growth of anti-Semitism in

Russia is nothing but malicious lies and pure invention."

On 1st February, 1949, the Daily Worker carried an article in which a Mr. Parker gave

a few names and figures of Jews in high office in the U.S.S.R., from which he had

evidently recently returned, for he wrote:

"I never heard a breath of criticism over this state of affairs. . .

anti-Semitism would render a Soviet official liable to prosecution in the same way

that a private citizen may be brought before the courts for anti-Semitism."

On the 10th November, 1949, the Daily Worker, that constant and burning champion

of the Jews, printed an article by Mr D. Kartun, entitled "Stamping Out Anti-Semitism,"

which shows the complete Jewish control behind the iron curtain when he writes:

"In Poland and the other people's democracies anti-Semitism in word or deed is

most heavily punished."

Between 1945 and 1949 the propaganda to convince Gentiles outside the iron curtain,

that within that area anti-Semitism was rampant, and the Jews driven from high office

everywhere was energetically pursued. It began to be believed by quite a number of

people, who should have known better; so much so, that in the autumn of the latter

year I thought it worth while to get out a list showing the number of vital positions held

by Jews behind the iron curtain. Here is an extract from those lists.


Premier Stalin Married to a Jewess

Vice-Premier Kaganovitch Jew

Ministry of State Control Mekhlis Jew

Military & Naval


Ginsburg Jew

Minister Cominform Organ Yudin Jew

Chief Publicist Abroad for


Ilya Eherenburg Jew


Ministry of Building

Enterprises Machinery

Yudin Jew

Foreign Minister Molotoff Married to a Jewess


Virtual Ruler Jacob Bergman Jew

Public Prosecutor T. Cyprian Jew

O.C. Youth Movements Dr. Braniewsky Jew


Virtual Ruler Mathias Rakosi Jew


Virtual Ruler Anna Pauker Jewess (Since

removed for

"deviationism" but

replaced by another



Virtual Ruler Moishe Pyjede Jew

[Note: "Kagan" or 'Khagan' is the Khazarian word for 'King'. More than 90% of Jews

today are not Semitic, nor are their ancestors. They are of the Turko-Mongolian tribe of

Khazars, whose Kagan adopted Talmudism around 740 A.D.]

In May 1949, the Daily Worker, which is, of course, consistently and ardently

pro-Jewish, printed an article by Mr A. Rothstein praising the U.S.S.R. to the

skies; and about the same time another article on similar lines about the

paradise behind the iron curtain by Mr Sam Aronvitch.

On the 10th November the same paper printed an article in which D. Kartun, writing of

the "People's Democracies" and the stamping out of anti-Semitism there, wrote:

"No one could dream of making an anti-semitic speech or writing an anti-semitic

article in any of these countries. If they did their jail sentence would be both

immediate and lengthy."


In the last few years we have been supplied with further dramatic proof of the vital

inter-relation between Jews and the U.S.S.R.

From the Canadian spy trials, which focused the spotlight on atom spying for the

U.S.S.R., with the conviction and imprisonment of Frank Rosenberg (alias Rose), the

Canadian Jew Communist Member of Parliament, and several Jews, to the conviction

and imprisonment of many others of the same gang in Britain and the U.S.A., including

Fuchs, Professor Weinbaum, Judith Coplon, Harry Gold, David Greenglass, Julius

Rosenberg, Miriam Moskewitz, Abraham Brothanz, and Raymond Boyer, who —

though a Gentile by birth — married a Jewess and, I believe, adopted the Jewish

creed on that occasion.

Finally, we had the flight to the U.S.S.R. with atom secrets also of the Jew Professor

Pontecorvo, who had been working in close association with Fuchs.

No doubt we shall continue to be regaled with plausible stories proving that Russia has

gone anti-semitic; but it is not hard to realise that such a Jewish grip backed by the

most elaborate spy and liquidation squads known to man, would cause a convulsion

which would shake the world before its grip could be broken.

Development of Revolutionary Technique

Four revolutions in history merit our special attention. The study and comparison of the

methods employed therein will reveal on the one hand a basic similarity between them:

and on the other an interesting advance in technique, with each succeeding upheaval.

It is as if we studied the various stages in the evolution of the modern rifle from the

original old "brown Bess."

The revolutions in question are firstly the Cromwellian, secondly the French, thirdly the

Russian, and lastly the Spanish revolution of 1936.

All four can be proved to have been the work of international Jewry. The first three

succeeded, and secured the murder of the reigning monarch and the liquidation of his


In each case Jewish finance, and underground intrigue, are clearly traceable; and the

earliest measures passed by the revolutionaries have been "emancipation" for the


Cromwell was financed by various Jews, notably Manasseh Ben Israel and Carvajal

"the Great Jew," contractor to his army.

On this occasion Jewish influence remained financial and commercial, while the

propaganda weapons and medium were semi-religious, all the Cromwellians being


soaked in Old Testament Judaism; some, such as General Harrison, even carried their

Judaism to the length of advocating the adoption of the Mosaic Law as the law of

England, and the substitution of Saturday as the Sabbath in place of the Christian


We are all familiar with the absurd Old Testament passages which the Roundhead

rank and file adopted as names, such as Sergeant Obadiah, "Bind their Kings in

chains and their nobles in fetters of iron." The Cromwellian revolution was short-lived.

The work of destruction had not been sufficiently thorough to frustrate counterrevolution,

and restoration of the old regime.

A second revolution, the so-called "Glorious Revolution" of 1689, was necessary. This

again was financed by Jews, notably Solomon Medina, Suasso, Moses Machado and


By the French revolution of 1789 the technique had been notably improved. Secret

societies had been developed throughout France on a grand scale in the preceding

years. The plans for the liquidation of the former regime are by this time far more


The judicial murder of a kindly and well intentioned King and a few nobles is replaced

by mass murders in prisons and in private houses of the whole of the nobility, clergy,

gentry and bourgeoisie, regardless of sex.

The Cromwellian damage and desecration of a few churches by their temporary use

as stables is developed into a general wrecking of Christian churches, or their

conversion into public lavatories, brothels, and markets; and the banning of the

practice of the Christian religion and even the ringing of church bells.

Civil war is not allowed to develop. The army is side-tracked, and kept apart from its

King by his seizure at an early stage. So powerful is the unseen control by 1789 that

apparently, the dregs of the French population victoriously liquidate all their natural

leaders, in itself a most unnatural and suspicious phenomenon.

More suspicious still is the sudden appearance of strong bands of armed hooligans,

who march on Paris from Lyons and Marseilles; and are recorded as being

obviously foreigners.

Here we have the first formations of alien mercenary and criminal elements, forcing

revolutions upon a country not their own, which were to have their finished and

expanded prototype in the International Brigades, which attempted to force Marxism

on Spain 150 years later.

England in the 17th century had not been dismembered and hideously remoulded on

alien lines; but all familiar land marks in 18th century France were destroyed.


The splendid and historic names and titles of counties, departments and families were

scrapped, and France divided into numbered squares occupied merely by "citizens."

Even the months of the calendar were changed.

The national flag of France with its lilies and its glories was banned. Instead the

French received the Tricolour, badge of murder and rapine. Here, however, the

planners made a mistake.

The Tricolour might not be the honoured and famous flag of France. It might be

dripping with the blood of massacre, regicide and villainy. It might be stinking with the

slime of the Jewish criminals who designed and foisted it upon the French people; but

it was proclaimed the national flag, and the national flag it became; and with the

national flag came the national army, and a national leader, Napoleon.

It was not long before this great Frenchman ran up against the secret powers, who up

till then controlled the armies of France. They had planned to use these armies to

revolutionise all European states, one after another; to overthrow all leadership, and

establish rule of the mob, apparently, in reality of course their own.

Just in this manner do the Jews today plan to use the Red Army. Such a policy

directed by aliens of this type could not long continue once a national army had thrown

up a real national leader; their outlook and policy must inevitably be poles apart. It was

not long before the First Consul challenged and overthrew these aliens and their


By the year 1804 Napoleon had come to recognise the Jew and his plans as a menace

to France and all that the revolution had swept away he systematically restored. From

this time onwards Jewish money financed every coalition against him; and Jews today

boast that it was Rothschild rather than Wellington who defeated Napoleon.

Knowing these things, Hitler, on his occupation of Paris, immediately ordered a

permanent guard of honour to be mounted over Napoleon's tomb at the Invalides; and

had the body of L'Aiglon (Napoleon's son by Maria Louisa) brought from Austria, and

buried at last in his proper place at the side of his father.

When we come to examine the Russian revolution we find that the technique is still

bolder and far more drastic. On this occasion no national flag, army, or anthem is

permitted. After the dregs of the community have apparently accomplished the

impossible, and liquidated every other class down to and including the kulak (a man

with three cows), they are herded into a polyglot force called the Red Army; over them

waves an international red flag, not a Russian flag; their anthem is the Internationale.

The technique of revolution in Russia was so perfected that to this day it has secured

the Jewish regime established there against all counter strokes.


The next revolution to merit our attention is the one that broke out in Spain in 1936.

Fortunately for Europe, it was frustrated by General Franco and a number of gallant

men, who instantly took the field in opposition to the revolutionary forces, and

succeeded in a long struggle in crushing them.

This achievement is all the more remarkable in view of the latest development in

revolutionary organisation, which was then revealed in the shape of the International

Brigades. These International Brigades, besides representing the very latest novelty in

revolutionary technique, were a remarkable production.

They were recruited from criminals, adventurers and dupes, mostly communists, from

52 different countries, mysteriously transported and assembled in formations in Spain

within a few weeks of the outbreak of disorder, uniformed in a garb closely related to

our battle dress, and armed with weapons bearing the Jewish five-pointed star.

This star and the Seal of Solomon were upon the signet rings of N.C.O.s and Officers

in this communist horde of ill-disciplined ruffians. I have seen them myself in wear.

By October 1936 these International Brigades were already assembled in Spain in

considerable numbers. Undisciplined and blackguardly though they were, the mere

fact of a large and well-armed political army, intervening suddenly on one side in the

early stages of a civil war, might reasonably have been counted upon to achieve a

decision before the patriotic and decent element in the country could have time to

create an adequate fighting machine.

Though the British public were kept in total ignorance as to the true significance of

what was taking place in Spain two countries in Europe were alive to the situation.

Germany and Italy had each in their turn experienced the throes of communist

revolution, and emerged victorious over this foulest of earthly plagues. They knew who

had financed and organised the International Brigades; and with what fell purpose

Barcelona had been declared in October 1936 the Capital of the Soviet States of

Western Europe.

At the critical moment they [Hitler and Mussolini] intervened in just sufficient strength

to counter the International Brigade, and enable the Spanish people to organise their

own army, which, in due course, easily settled the matter.

Settled the matter, that is to say, as far as Spain was concerned.

There was, however, another settlement to come. International Jewry had been

seriously thwarted. They would not rest henceforward until they could have their

revenge; until they could by hook or crook turn the guns of the rest of the world against

these two States, which in addition to thwarting their designs in Spain were in the

process of placing Europe upon a system independent of gold and usury, which, if

permitted to develop, would break the Jewish power for ever.


Germany Bells The Cat

The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter to Mr. Balfour,

denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan, which if not checked by the combined action

of the European Powers, would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration.

By the end of that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities of

Europe. In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organised and maintained for some time a

merciless and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia. In Germany, the Jews

Leibknecht, Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg, etc., made a desperate bid for

power. These and other similar convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own

way just frustrated the onslaughts.

In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in an endeavour to expose the

true nature of these evils. Only in one, however, did a political leader and group arise,

who grasped to the full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind the

mobs of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world Jewry.

This leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National Socialist Party of Germany.

Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organised revolution, but

discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact. We need not wonder that the

sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded over these men and their leader; nor

should we make the mistake of supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter

honest men everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for


Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek truth and defend it, this duty of

personal investigation is one which they cannot shirk. To accept unquestioningly the

lies and misrepresentations of a Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by

sheer idleness, if for no worse reason.

To act on such unverified a basis is to sin against the Light.

In the case of Germany and Hitler the task of research is not difficult. We have it on

many authorities that Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, stated fully and accurately the

author's observations and conclusions concerning all these vital matters.

Quite false pictures have been propagated deliberately about this book, by quoting

passages out of their context, distorting meanings, and downright misrepresentation.

Having read many of these unscrupulous diatribes, it was with no little surprise that I

read this book for myself not so very long ago.


From many conversations I had heard and taken part in, I now realise that most

members of the public were as ignorant as I of the real nature of this remarkable book.

I propose, therefore, to try and give a true picture of its spirit and purport by quotations

from its two main themes:

Firstly realisation and exposure of the Jewish scheme for world Marxism; and

secondly, admiration of, and longing for friendship with Great Britain. Writing of the

days before 1914, Hitler states:

"I still saw Jewry as a religion ...

Of the existence of deliberate Jewish hostility I had no conception ...

I gradually realised that the Social Democratic Press was preponderantly

controlled by Jews ...

There was not a single paper with which Jews were connected which could be

described as genuinely national ...

I seized all the Social Democratic pamphlets I could get hold of, and looked up

the names of their authors -- nothing but Jews."

As he pursued the study of these questions, Hitler began to perceive the main outlines

of the truth:

"I made also a deep study of the relation between Judaism and Marxism . . .

The Jewish State never had boundaries as far as space was concerned; it was

unlimited as regards space, but bound down by its conception of itself as a race.

That people, therefore, was always a State within a State . . .

The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle in nature . . .

denies the value of the individual among men, combats the importance of

nationality and race, thereby depriving humanity of the whole meaning of


"Democracy in the west today is the forerunner of Marxism, which would be

inconceivable without Democracy."

"If the Jew, with the help of his Marxian creed, conquers the nations of the world,

his crown will be the funeral wreath of the human race ..."

He writes of the days of 1918:

"Thus did I now believe that by defending myself against the Jews I am doing the

Lord's work."

At the end of 1918 there came the revolution in Germany organised behind the


unbroken army in the field. Concerning this Hitler wrote:

"In November sailors arrived in lorries, and called on us all to revolt, a few

Jewish youths being the leaders in that struggle for the 'freedom, beauty and

dignity of our national life'. Not one of them had ever been to the Front."

"The real organiser of the revolution and its actual wire-puller the International


... The revolution was not made by the forces of peace and order; but by those of

riot, robbery and plunder."

"I was beginning to learn afresh, and only now (1919) came to a right

comprehension of the teachings and intentions of the Jew Karl Marx. Only now

did I properly understand his 'Kapital'; and equally also the struggle of Social

Democracy against the economics of the nation; and that its aim is to prepare

the ground for the domination of the truly international Kapital."

[sic] Emperor to offer the hand of friendship to the leaders of Marxism . . .

While they held the Imperial hand in theirs the other hand was already feeling for

the dagger."

"With the Jew there is no bargaining; there is merely the hard 'either, or'."

Later on Hitler gives in great detail the outlines of the Jewish disruptive machine.

"By means of the Trades Unions which might have been the saving of the nation,

the Jew actually destroys the nation's economics."

"By creating a press which is on the intellectual level of the least educated, the

political and labour organisation obtains force of compulsion enabling it to make

the lowest strata of the nation ready for the most hazardous enterprises."

"The Jewish press . . . tears down all which may be regarded as the prop of a

nation's independence, civilisation and its economic autonomy. It roars

especially against characters who refuse to bow the knee to Jewish domination,

or whose intellectual capacity appears to the Jew in the light of a menace to


"The ignorance displayed by the mass . . . and the lack of instinctive perception

of our upper class make the people easy dupes of this campaign of Jewish lies."

"But the present day is working its own ruin; it introduces universal suffrage,

chatters about equal rights, and can give no reason for so thinking. In its eyes

material rewards are the expression of a man's worth, thus shattering the basis

for the noblest equality that could possibly exist."


"It is one of the tasks of our Movement to hold out prospects of a time when the

individual will be given what he needs in order to live; but also to maintain the

principle that man does not live for material enjoyment alone."

"The political life of today alone has persistently turned its back on this principle

of nature" (i.e. quality) ... "

"Human civilisation is but the outcome of the creative force of personality in the

community as a whole, and especially among its leaders . . . the principle of the

dignity of the majority is beginning to poison all life below it; and in fact to break it


"We now see that Marxism is the enunciated form of the Jewish attempt to

abolish the importance of personality in all departments of human life; and to set

up the mass of numbers in its place . . . "

"The principle of decision by majorities has not always governed the human race;

on the contrary, it only appears during quite short periods of history, and those

are always periods of decadence in nations and States."

"We must not forget that the international Jew, who continues to dominate over

Russia, does not regard Germany as an ally, but as a State destined to undergo

a similar fate."

On the last page and in almost the last paragraph of Mein Kampf is the following:

"The party as such stands for positive Christianity, but does not bind itself in the

matter of creed to any particular confession. It combats the Jewish materialistic

spirit within us and without us."

Looking round the world for help in the battle against this terrible menace of Jew

directed bolshevism, Hitler's mind constantly reverted to Britain and the British Empire.

He always longed for their friendship. Always declared Britain to be one of the greatest

bulwarks against chaos; and that her interests and those of Germany were

complementary and not contrary to one another.

He wrote:

"It was not a British interest but in the first place a Jewish one to destroy


And again:

"Even in England there is a continual struggle going on between the

representatives of British state interests and the Jewish world dictatorship."

"Whilst England is exhausting herself in maintaining her position in the world, the


Jew is organising his measures for its conquest . . . Thus the Jew today is a

rebel in England, and the struggle against the Jewish world menace will be

started there also."

"No sacrifice would have been too great in order to gain England's alliance. It

would have meant renunciation of the colonies and importance at sea, and

refraining from interference with British industry by competition."

In later years these two themes were ceaselessly expounded; viz., the Jewish Marxist

menace, and the eagerness for friendship with Britain. Even down to, and including

Dunkirk, Hitler pressed the latter idea on all and sundry; even on his highest Generals,

to their astonishment.

Nor did he stop at words, as will be shown later when, as Liddell Hart informs us, he

saved the British Army from annihilation by halting the Panzer Corps, informing his

Generals the while, that he regarded the British Empire and the Catholic Church as

necessary bulwarks of peace and order which must be safeguarded.*

*The Other Side of the Hill, Chap. X, by Liddell Hart.

Mein Kampf was first published in October 1933.

Before it had left the printers, the floodgates of Jewish hatred and lies had been fullopened

against Hitler and the Third Reich all over the world.

English-speaking people everywhere were deluged with fabrications, distortions and

atrocity stories, which drowned the voices of the few who understood the real situation.

Forgotten in the turmoil was Marx's slogan that before bolshevism could triumph the

British Empire must be destroyed; and totally suppressed as far as the British people

were concerned was Hitler's repeated declaration of his willingness to defend the

British Empire if called upon to assist by force of arms if necessary.

1933: Jewry Declares War

The English edition of Mein Kampf was still in the process of printing and publication

when Jewry declared war on the national Socialist regime, and started an intensive

blockade against Germany.

The International Jewish Boycott Conference was assembled in Holland in the summer

of 1933 under the Presidency of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, of the U.S.A., who was

elected President of the World Jewish Economic Federation formed to combat the

opposition to Jews in Germany.


On his return to the U.S.A., Mr. Untermeyer gave an address over Station W.A.B.C.,

the text of which, as printed in the New York Times of August 7th, 1933, I have

before me. Mr. Untermeyer referred in the opening phrases to:

"The holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked";

and proceeded to develop the subject at great length, describing the Jews as the

aristocrats of the world.

"Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred

war should do so now and here."

Those Jews who did not join in he denounced, declaring:

"They are traitors to their race."

In January 1934 Mr. Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism, wrote in Natcha


"The fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every Jewish

community, conference, trade organisation, by every Jew in the world . . . we

shall let loose a spiritual and a material war of the whole world against


This is perhaps the most confident assertion extant on the Jewish claim, set out in the

Protocols of Zion, that they can bring about war. Protocol Number 7 states:

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by a State by war

with its neighbour. If these should venture to stand collectively, by universal war."

[Like the neverendingwar on "terror" today]

It should be remembered here that a copy of these Protocols was filed in the British

Museum in 1906.

By 1938 the Jewish war was in full swing; and already through their influence or

pressure many Gentile persons and groups were being drawn into the vortex. Various

members of the British Socialist Party were openly advocating joining in this cold war;

and a vigorous and uncompromising clique was growing in all Parties under the

leadership of Messrs. Churchill, Amery, Duff, Cooper and others.

"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this year, but later


screamed the Jew Emil Ludwig in the June copy of Les Aniles 1934.

On June 3rd, 1938, matters were carried a long step further by an article in the


American Hebrew, the weekly organ of American Jewry. This article, which opened

by showing that Hitler never deviated from his Mein Kampf doctrine, went on to

threaten the direst retaliation.

"It has become patent that a combination of Britain, France and Russia will

sooner or later bar the triumphant march (of Hitler) . . .

Either by accident or design, a Jew has come to a position of foremost

importance in each of these nations. In the hands of non-Aryans lies the fate and

the very lives of millions . . .

In France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum . . . Leon Blum may yet be the

Moses who will lead . . .

Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet super salesman, is the Jew who sits at the right hand of

Stalin, the little tin soldier of communism . . .

The English Jew of prominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha, Tommy Atkins' new


Later in this article we read:

"So it may come to pass that these three sons of Israel will form the combine

that will send the frenzied Nazi dictator to hell. And when the smoke of battle

clears ... and the man who played the swastikaed Christus . . . is lowered into a

hole in the ground . . . as the trio of non-Aryans intone a ramified requiem . . .

a medley of the marseillaise, God Save the King, and the Internationale,

blending with a proud and aggressive rendering of Eli Eli."

Two points in the above extract are worthy of special note. Firstly, it is taken for

granted that these three Jews will not for one moment think or act as anything but

Jews; and can be relied upon to guide their Gentile dupes to ruin in a plainly Jewish

war; secondly, should be noted the contemptuous reference to the "swastikaed

Christus," which Jewry looks forward to burying; and which reveals by its classification

the Jewish hatred of Christianity.

Meantime Jewish pressure was exerted to the utmost to incite clashes between

Sudeten, Czechs, Poles and Germans.

By September of 1938 matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr. Chamberlain

himself flew out to Munich and achieved the historic settlement with Hitler. It seemed

as though the war mongers had been frustrated, and Europe saved. Rarely had such

scenes and evidences of spontaneous delight and thankfulness been evoked as were

witnessed throughout Britain and Europe at that triumph.

Those who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr Chamberlain's work


was certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember remarking, on the very evening of his

return from Munich, that within a week every newspaper in this country and the war

mongers in Parliament, would be attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace;

regardless of the fact that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real

wishes of the people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.

Nowhere was the Jewish fury so obvious, of course, as in Moscow. I have before me a

leaflet of my own designing put out in October 1938. It runs:

"Are you aware that Mr. Chamberlain was burnt in effigy in Moscow as soon as it

was known that he had secured peace;

Showing very clearly Who Wanted War, and who are still ceaselessly working to

stir up strife all the world over." * See Appendix 4.

The attempt to provoke war over Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia having failed, there

remained only the detonator in the Polish Corridor, that monstrosity born of the unholy

Versailles Conference, and denounced by honest men from Marshal Foch and Arthur

Henderson, from that time onwards.

One feature about the Versailles Conference has been kept secret by those who

possess the power to keep things from the public or to proclaim things from the house

tops. It is this:

All important decisions were taken by the "Big Four" - Britain, France, Italy and

the U.S.A., represented respectively by Mr. Lloyd George, M. Clemencau, Baron

Sonino and President Wilson. So much is known. What is not known is that:

the secretary of Mr. Lloyd George was the Jew Sassoon;

of M. Clemencau the Jew Mandel Rothschild, now known as Mandel;

Baron Sonino was himself half a Jew: and President Wilson had the Jew


the interpreter was another Jew named Mantoux; and

the Military Adviser yet another Jew called Kish.

It is known that Mr. Lloyd George and others were hazy about geography. Their

Jewish secretaries, however, were on the contrary very much on the spot on such

matters. These Jews met at 6 p.m. in the evenings; and mapped out the decisions for

the following day's conference of the "Big Four."

The results were disastrous from the point of view of all decent people, who hoped for

an honourable treaty, with terms which, though they might be stringent, would at least

be just and thereby secure lasting peace.


Foch himself loudly denounced the treaty; declaring that it contained the certain

makings of another war and deprecating in particular the provision relating to Danzig

and the Corridor.

Arthur Henderson and many public men joined in the denunciation; but all to no avail.

From the point of view of men planning another war, however, nothing could have

been better than this treaty.

All sorts of glaring injustices were ingrained in its text. In addition to the Corridor, and

the position at Danzig, a bastard State was brought into being, in which Germans,

Slovaks, etc., together forming a majority of the country, were put under the tyrannical

control of the Czech minority, an element which had thrown in its lot with the bolshevik

Jews and fought against the Allies in 1918.

The design of this State was such geographically that it was styled, and correctly

styled, a dagger pointed at the heart of Germany. It received the outlandish name of


The whole of the industrial life from the huge Skoda arsenal downwards was controlled

by Jewish banking interests; while we have it on the evidence of Lord Winterton that

practically all the land was mortgaged to the Jews (Hansard, October 1936).

Under this Messianic domination were enslaved huge sections of populations,

belonging to other nations, henceforward condemned to be held down by force until

some country should grow strong enough to champion them.

This eventuality was, in my opinion, visualised and actually fostered as we know by the

huge loans to Germany from international banking interests.

Let it not be forgotten that while Jewish bankers were pouring money into Germany

which was rebuilding the Wehrmacht on a bigger scale than ever, a colossal campaign

for peace and disarmament was launched in this country. This not only succeeded in

substantially disarming us; but in creating an atmosphere in which Mr. Baldwin had to

admit that he dared not go to the country asking for more armaments, vital though he

knew our needs in sea, air and land forces to be. * All prior of course to the rise of


To anyone who made a study of the personalities and powers behind this so-called

peace propaganda, as I did, there can be no doubt as to whence the real drive and

finance emanated.

To anyone appreciating the attitude of the press at that time, and realising that had this

disarmament propaganda been distasteful to those who influence our publicity

services, there would have blared forth a torrent of invective against our "peace

ballotters"; there is additional proof that this campaign had the support of international


Jewry, as had the rearmament of Germany. But why? the simple will ask.

The answer is fairly simple, if once the purpose behind the Jewish plan is understood.

"Out of the last war we brought the Soviet States of Russia; out of the next war

we will bring the Soviet States of Europe. . ."

had been the pronouncement at a world meeting of communist parties about 1932. To

make the next war possible, therefore, the see-saw must be balanced again; German

strength built up, and British strength whittled down.

Then the Europeans can fight each other to the death of one and complete exhaustion

of the other.

A dramatic surprise is in store for both sides. Neither is to be the real winner. The real

winner is quite a different army. This army is the one that will receive the real attention.

For 25 years it will be built up under conditions of the greatest secrecy. Its leaders will

not show their strength until the conflict is well under way.

Not until a critical moment in the war will the European armies be permitted to guess at

the existence of the huge factories beyond the Urals, or of the colossal proportions of

the heavily mechanised hordes which will then commence to roll westwards over

Europe under the red flag of Marxism.

[Note: These "huge factories" and "colossal proportions of the heavily mechanised

hords" are thanks to the American people, via the Lend Lease Act, implemented

before Americans were sucked into that war, and minutely detailed in the Diaries of

Major Jordan (George Racey Jordan).— Jackie]

In March 1939 a British guarantee to Poland was given by Mr. Chamberlain on the

strength of a false report to the effect that a 48-hour ultimatum had been delivered by

Germany to the Poles.

This report subsequently turned out to be quite untrue.

The guarantee had been given, however, and the decision of peace or war was now

no longer in British hands. Jewry had the ball at its feet. Can we doubt but that Poland

was encouraged to ignore the German note of March which set forth eminently

reasonable suggestions for a peaceful solution of the problem of the Corridor?

[Note: See Appendix 6 (we've added) for the Internet readers of this book; information

from the German White Book that correlates with Captain Ramsey's statements here. -


Month after month no reply was vouchsafed by Poland to the German note.

Meanwhile, insult and outrage occurred with suspicious frequency all along the

German frontier, similar to the technique to which the Jews later introduced the British


in Palestine.

Day after day the British public was deluged with war propaganda and

misrepresentation of the situation. Finally their minds were closed against any further

regard to the demands of justice or reason by a new slogan,

"You cannot trust Hitler's word."

With this lie the British public was finally stampeded into throwing all reason and

judgment to the winds and accepting at their face value the war propaganda in the


This slogan was founded upon a misrepresentation of Hitler's assurance given on

more than one occasion after a "putsch" such as that into Sudetenland, that he

"intended to make no further demands."

The misrepresentation lay in the fact that the press steadily obscured the major fact,

that the "demands" to which Hitler referred were all along five fold in character; and

covered those five areas taken from Germany by a dictated peace in which the

population was overwhelmingly German, i.e. Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia,

parts of Poland, the Corridor and Danzig.

As German troops occupied each successive section, it is, I believe, accurate to say

that Hitler declared, that he had no additional demands to make. But here it must be

clearly stated in the interests of justice that he never said that this entailed reducing

the demands which he had originally very clearly delineated, and repeated on many

occasions, namely, the five areas in question.

The British public was deluded by its press into supposing that when Hitler said he had

no further demands, that there had never been any statement of his full demands,

some of which were still unfulfilled. They were led to believe that Hitler either never

had any other demands, or that he had abandoned the rest as soon as he had

obtained some of them.

When, therefore, the next installment was added, the press built on this

misunderstanding the fallacy that Hitler's word could not be trusted. Honest dealing

needs no such trickery and deception. Such methods are only necessary to bolster up

bad or unjust causes.

Fortunately we have the calm and dispassionate judgment in this matter by no less a

person than the late Lord Lothian, recently British Ambassador to the U.S.A. In his last

speech at Chatham House on this subject he remarked:

"If the principle of self-determination had been applied in Germany's favour, as it

was applied against her, it would have meant the return of Sudetenland,

Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Polish Corridor, and Danzig to the Reich."


Here is a very different presentment of the case to the one which was foisted upon the

British public in 1939; and it is the true one. Small wonder that these facts had to be

withheld from the ordinary citizen.

Had the British public realised the truth, that each of these demands of Hitler's rested

on a foundation of reasonable fairness, the people of this island would have ruled out

any question of war; and it was war, not truth or justice, upon which international Jewry

was resolved.

"Phoney war" ended by civilian bombing

Though a state of war was declared to exist between Britain and Germany in

September of 1939, it very soon became apparent that no war was being conducted

by Germany against this country.

This was no surprise to those who knew the facts of the case. Hitler had again and

again made it clear, that he never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the

British Empire. With the Siegfried Line strongly held, and no German intention of

appearing west of it, stalemate in the west, or the "Phoney War," as it came to be

called, must, in the absence of bombing of civilian populations ultimately peter out


No one was quicker to perceive this than the pro-Jewish war mongers; and they and

their friends inside and outside the House of Commons very soon began exerting

pressure for this form of bombing of Germany to be started.

On 14th January, 1940, The Sunday Times gave prominence to a letter from an

anonymous correspondent, who demanded to know why we were not using our air

power "to increase the effect of the blockade."

"Scrutator," in the same issue, commented on this letter as follows:

"Such an extension of the offensive would inevitably develop into competitive

frightfulness. It might be forced on us in reprisals for enemy action, and we must

be in a position to make reprisals if necessary.

But the bombing of industrial towns, with its unavoidable loss of life among the

civilian population -- that is what it would come to -- would be inconsistent with

the spirit, if not the actual words of the pledges given from both sides at the

beginning of the war."

The above quotation is taken from a book entitled Bombing Vindicated, which was

published in 1944 by Mr. J. M. Spaight, C.B., C.B.E., who was the principal assistant

secretary at the Air Ministry during the war.


As its title suggests, this book is an attempt to justify the indiscriminate use of bombers

against the civil population. In it Mr. Spaight boasts that this form of bombing "saved

civilisation": and reveals the startling fact that it was Britain that started this

ruthless form of war on the very evening of the day on which Mr. Churchill

became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940.

On page 64 of his book, Mr. Spaight gives a further piece of information, which

renders this sudden change of British policy all the more astonishing; for he states that

a declaration was made by the British and French Governments on 2nd September,

1939, that

"Only strictly military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word would be


This declaration, of course, was made in the days of Mr Chamberlain's Premiership;

and no single fact perhaps could demarcate and differentiate more clearly the

difference in the character and behaviour between Mr. Chamberlain and Mr. Churchill.

On the 27th January, 1940, thirteen days after the letter in The Sunday Times already

quoted, The Daily Mail endorsed editorially the views which had been expressed in

that issue by "Scrutator"; and it devoted a leading article, writes Mr. Spaight, to

combating the suggestion of Mr. Amery and others that we should start the bombing of


Sir Duff Cooper had written on the previous day in the same paper that

"there would appear to exist a kind of unwritten truce between the two

belligerents, according to the tacit terms of which they do not bomb one


In view of the declaration by Britain and France of September 2nd, 1939, that they

would "only bomb military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word," Sir Duff

Cooper's verbiage about "a kind of unwritten truce," seems to me gravely obscurantist,

if honest.

Inside the House of Commons, the pro-Jewish war mongers were now becoming more

and more intransigent; and more and more set on sabotaging the chances of turning

the "phoney war" into a negotiated peace. This in spite of the fact that Britain had

nothing to gain by further and total war, and everything to lose.

The Jews, of course, had everything to lose by a peace which left the German goldfree

money system and Jew-free Government intact, and nothing to gain.

It seemed clearer to me every day that this struggle over the question of civilian

bombing was the crux of the whole matter; and that by this method of warfare alone

could the Jews and their allies cut the Gordian knot of stalemate leading to peace; and


probably later on to a joint attack on Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.

Accordingly, on 15th February, 1940, I put down the following question to the Prime


Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister:

"Whether he will assure the House that H.M. Government will not assent to

the suggestions made to them, to abandon those principles which led them

to denounce the bombing of civilian populations in Spain and elsewhere,

and embark upon such a policy themselves?"

Mr Chamberlain himself replied in outspoken terms:

"I am unaware of the suggestions to which my honourable and gallant friend

refers. The policy of H.M. Government in this matter was fully stated by myself in

answer to a question by the honourable Member for Bishop Auckland (Mr

Dalton) on 14th September last.

In the course of that answer I said that whatever be the length to which others

may go, H.M. Government will never resort to the deliberate attack on women

and children, and other civilians, for purposes of mere terrorism. I have nothing

to add to that answer."

Both this question and the reply were evidently distasteful in the extreme to the war

mongers, so I resolved to carry the matter a stage further. On 21st February I put

down another question on the subject:

Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister:

"Whether he is aware that the Soviet aeroplanes are carrying on a

campaign of bombing civil populations, and whether H.M. Government

have dispatched protests on the subject similar to those dispatched during

the Civil War in Spain in similar circumstances?"

Mr. Butler replied for the Prime Minister:

"Yes, Sir. The Soviet Air Forces have pursued a policy of indiscriminate

bombing, which cannot be too strongly condemned.

H.M. Government have not, however, lodged any protest, since there are

unfortunately no grounds for supposing that such action would achieve the result


There can be little doubt but that these two downright answers crystallised the resolves

of the war mongers to get rid of a Prime Minister whose adherence to an upright and

humane policy must inevitably frustrate their plans, seeing that Hitler wished no war


with Britain, and would therefore never start civilian bombing himself.

The machinery of intrigue and rebellion against Mr. Chamberlain was set in motion.

Ultimately he was saddled with the blame for the Norway blunder; and this pretext was

used by the Churchillian-cum-Socialist caucus to secure his downfall.

It should be remembered in this connection that prior to and during the Norway

gamble, Mr. Churchill had been invested with full powers and responsibilities for

all Naval Military and Air operations; and if anyone therefore deserved to be

broken over that second Gallipoli (pursued in defiance of high naval authority

warning that, without control of the Cattegat and Skaggerack it could not possibly

succeed) it should have been the Minister responsible.

He however was not only unbroken, he was acclaimed Prime Minister. The man who

would tear up the British pledge of September 2nd, 1939, and start bombing the

civilians of Germany was the man for the war mongers who now ruled the roost.

And so civilian bombing [by England] started on the evening that the architect of

the Norwegian fiasco became Prime Minister, viz., May 11th, 1940.

Dunkirk and After

Captain Liddell Hart, the eminent military critic, wrote a book on the military events of

1939-45, which was published in 1948, and entitled The Other Side of the Hill.

Chapter 10 -- which deals with the German invasion of France down to and including

Dunkirk -- bears the somewhat startling title, "How Hitler beat France and saved


The reading of the chapter itself will astound all propaganda-blinded people, even

more than the title: for the author therein proves that not only did Hitler save this

country; but that this was not the result of some unforeseen factor, or indecision, or

folly, but was of set purpose, based on his long enunciated and faithfully maintained


Having given details of how Hitler peremptorily halted the Panzer Corps on the 22nd

May, and kept them inactive for the vital few days, till, in fact, the British troops had got

away from Dunkirk, Captain Liddell Hart quotes Hitler's telegram to Von Kleist:

"The armoured divisions are to remain at medium artillery range from Dunkirk.

Permission is only granted for reconnaissance and protective movements."

Von Kleist decided to ignore the order, the author tells us. To quote him again:

"Then came a more emphatic order, that I was to withdraw behind the canal. My


tanks were kept halted there for three days."

In the following words the author reports a conversation which took place on May 24th

(i.e. two days later) between Herr Hitler and Marshal Von Runstedt, and two key men

of his staff:

"He then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the

necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the

world ...

He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church -- saying they were

both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from

Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the continent.

The return of Germany's lost colonies would be desirable, but not essential, and

he would even offer to support Britain with troops, if she should be involved in

any difficulties anywhere.

He concluded by saying that his aim was to make peace with Britain, on a basis

that she would regard compatible with her honour to accept."

Captain Liddell Hart comments on the above as follows:

"If the British Army had been captured at Dunkirk, the British people might have

felt that their honour had suffered a stain, which they must wipe out. By letting it

escape, Hitler hoped to conciliate them. This conviction of Hitler's deeper motive

was confirmed by his strangely dilatory attitude over the subsequent plans for the

invasion of England."

"He showed little interest in the plans," Blumentritt said, "and made no effort to

speed up the preparation. That was utterly different to his usual behaviour.

Before the invasion of Poland, of France, and later of Russia, he repeatedly

spurred them on; but on this occasion he sat back."

The author continues:

"Since the account of his conversation at Charleville, and subsequent holding

back, comes from a section of the Generals, who had long distrusted Hitler's

policy, that makes their testimony all the more notable."

And later he goes on to say:

"Significantly their account of Hitler's thoughts about England at the decisive

hour before Dunkirk, fits in with much that he himself wrote earlier in Mein

Kampf; and it is remarkable how closely he followed his own Bible in other



Anyone who has read Mein Kampf will immediately appreciate the accuracy of the

above statement. It is indeed if anything an understatement. Throughout that

remarkable book runs two main themes, as I have shown in an earlier chapter -- the

one, a detailed delineation and denunciation of the Jewish Capitalist-Revolutionary

machine; the other, admiration for and eagerness for friendship with Britain and the


It is a pity, indeed, that so few persons in this island have read this book for

themselves; and it is a tragedy that they have instead swallowed wholesale, the

unscrupulous distortions and untrue propaganda on the subject, served up to them by

Jewish publicity machinery, operating through our press and radio.

Let these people but try and obtain a copy of that book; and when they find they

cannot, let them reflect, that if indeed its contents confirmed the lies that they

have been told concerning it and its author, the powers behind our publicity

would ensure that everyone should be able to secure a copy at the cheapest

possible rate.

In any event, I would urge my countrymen to ponder most earnestly the following facts.

The Jew Karl Marx laid it down, that Bolshevism could never really succeed till

the British Empire had been utterly destroyed.

Hitler laid it down, that the British Empire was an essential element of stability in the

world; and even declared himself ready to defend it with troops, if it should be involved

in difficulties anywhere.

By unscrupulous propaganda on an unprecedented scale this country was led into

destroying those who wished to be her friends, and offered their lives to defend her;

and exalting those, who proclaimed that her destruction was a necessary preliminary

to the success of their ideology, forfeiting her Empire and her economic independence

in the process.

The Shape of Things To Come

If the new-found knowledge of Hitler's anxiety to preserve the British Empire has come

as a surprise recently to many people in this country, it must surely have come as a

real shock to them to learn that President Roosevelt, on the other hand, was its

inveterate enemy; that he was not only a pro-communist of Jewish origin, but that


before he brought America into the war he made it clear that he wished to break up the

British Empire.

His son, Colonel Elliot Roosevelt, makes this last point very clear in his book, As He

Saw It, recently published in the U.S.A.

On pages 19 to 28 of this book, Colonel Roosevelt tells us that in August 1941, his

Father, having given out to the American people that he was going off on a fishing trip,

actually proceeded to a meeting with Mr. Churchill on board a warship in Argentia Bay.

Lord Beaverbrook, Sir Edward Cadogan, and Lord Cherwell (Professor Lindeman of

doubtful race and nationality), and Mr. Averil Harriman were present, he says.

On page 35 he quotes his Father as saying,

"After the war . . . there will have to be the greatest possible freedom of

trade . . . no artificial barriers."

Mr. Churchill referred to the British Empire Trade Agreements, and Mr. Roosevelt


"Yes. Those Empire Trade Agreements are a case in point. It's because of them

that the peoples of India, Africa, and of all the Colonial Near East are still as

backward as they are . . .

I can't believe that we can fight a war against Fascist slavery, and at the same

time not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial policy."

"The peace," said Father firmly, "cannot include any continued despotism."

This insolent talk against the British Empire became so pronounced that on page 31

Colonel Roosevelt reports Mr.Churchill as saying,

"Mr.President, I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire."

This comment was very near the mark, as the President had been talking about India,

Burma, Egypt, Palestine, Indo-China, Indonesia, and all the African Colonies having to

be "freed."

On page 115, the Colonel reports his Father as saying,

"Don't think for a moment, Elliot, that Americans would be dying in the Pacific

tonight if it hadn't been for the short-sighted greed of the French, the British and

the Dutch. Shall we allow them to do it all over again?"

These were not at all the reasons, however, given for the war, and for which

Americans thought they were dying; nor indeed does the President make any

reference as to the pretexts given to his countrymen for the war.


The British, dying in greater numbers, have on the contrary been told that they are

dying to defend their Empire from Hitler's wicked plans. Little do they suspect, that it is

their so-called ally who plans its destruction.

The President is reported as saying, on page 116:

"When we've won the war, I will see that the U.S.A. is not wheedled into any

plans that will aid or abet the British Empire in its Imperialist ambitions."

And a few pages later:

"I have tried to make it clear to Winston and the others . . . that they must never

get the idea that we are in it just to help them hang on to the archaic and

medieval Empire ideas."

Those who sup with the devil need a long spoon. Mr. Churchill, the self-styled

"constant architect of the Jews' future," now found himself playing second fiddle to an

even more trusted architect; so eminent, in fact, that he did not make any silly

pretensions of respect for the British Empire.

The earlier Moses, Karl Marx, had denounced the Empire long ago, and in the year

1941, it was only foolish opponents of Judaism and Marxism, like Herr Hitler, who were

anxious to stand by that Empire, because they recognised it as a bulwark of Christian


Although, as we have seen, Mr. Churchill is shown in this book as getting a little

petulant from time to time over the President's pronouncements regarding the

liquidation of the Empire, this did not prevent him from announcing himself later to the

House of Commons as "Roosevelt's ardent lieutenant."

Under what special circumstances the King's Prime Minister could be an ardent

lieutenant of a Republican President, whose design it was to destroy that Monarch's

Empire, Mr. Churchill did not explain; nor has he yet done so.

On another occasion, Mr. Churchill made an equally cryptic remark. He assured the

House of Commons,

"It is no part of my duties, to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire."

No, indeed! Nor was it any part of his duties, on being told that it was to be liquidated,

to pronounce himself to be the ardent lieutenant of the would-be liquidator. Nor, we

might add, when Minister of Defence, with Admiralty and other codes at his disposal,

was it any part of his duties, as Mr. Chamberlain's lieutenant, albeit not very ardent, to

conduct a personal correspondence of the nature which he did conduct with President

Roosevelt by means of the top secret code of the American Foreign Office.


President Roosevelt's Role

In my Statement to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons concerning

my detention (see Appendix 1) I summed up at the end of Part 1, the considerations

which led me to inspect the secret U.S. Embassy papers at Mr. Tyler Kent's flat in the

last weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's Premiership.

The first two of these six considerations were as follows:

Together with many members of both Houses of Parliament, I was fully aware that

among the agencies both here and abroad, which had been actively engaged in

promoting bad feeling between Great Britain and Germany, organised Jewry, for

obvious reasons, had played a leading part.

I knew the U.S.A. to be the headquarters of Jewry, and therefore the real, though not

apparent, centre of their activities. It was not until 1948 that corroborative evidence of

the foregoing from unimpeachable American sources came into my hands; but when it

did come, however, the authentic and fully documented character of the work left

nothing to be desired.

I refer to the book by Professor Charles Beard entitled President Roosevelt and the

Coming of the War 1941, which was published by the Yale University Press in April

1948. This book, which comes with all the authority of its eminent author, is nothing

less than a tremendous indictment of President Roosevelt on three main issues.

Firstly, that he got himself elected on the strength of repeated promises, to the effect

that he would keep the U.S.A. out of any European war; secondly, that he incessantly

and flagrantly disregarded not only his promises to the American people, but all the

laws of neutrality; thirdly, that at a predetermined moment he deliberately converted

this cold war, which he had been conducting, into a shooting war, by sending the

Japanese an ultimatum, which no one could imagine could result in anything but

immediate war.

From many instances given relating to the first issue, I quote one:

"At Boston on October 30th, 1940, he (F.D.R.) was even more emphatic, for

there he declared:

'I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your

boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars';

and on December 29th:


'You can therefore nail any talk about sending armies to Europe as

deliberate untruth'."

Professor Beard goes on to prove that while Mr. Roosevelt was making these

speeches, he was treating international laws of neutrality with total disregard, and in

the interests only of those who were fighting the Jews' battles. The two main forms of

non-shooting intervention were the convoying of U.S. ships of ammunition and

supplies for the allies, and the Lend Lease Act.

Whatever be our sentiments in appreciating the help of the U.S. arsenals and navy

under these two cold war decisions of Mr. Roosevelt, no one can pretend that they

were either in accordance with his pledges to the American people, or the

fundamentals of international law regarding neutrality.

Some very plain speaking went on in Congress over these acts of the President's.

Representative U. Burdick, of North Dakota, said:

"All our aid to Britain may mean anything . . . To sell her supplies is one thing . . .

to sell her supplies and convoy them is another thing, to have actual war is the

last thing -- the last thing is inevitable from the first thing!"

Representative Hugh Paterson, of Georgia, said:

"It is a measure of aggressive war."

Representative Dewey Short, of Missouri, said:

"You cannot be half-way in war, and half-way out of war . . . You can dress this

measure up all you please (Lend-Lease), you can sprinkle it with perfume and

pour powder on it . . . but it is still foul and stinks to high heaven."

Representative Philip Bennett, of Missouri, declared:

"This conclusion is inescapable, that the President is reconciled to active military

intervention if such intervention is needed to defeat the Axis in this war.

But our boys are not going to be sent abroad, says the President.

Nonsense, Mr Chairman; even now their berths are being built in our transport

ships. Even now the tags for identification of the dead and wounded are being

printed by the firm of William C. Ballantyne and Co., of Washington."

Professor Beard proves the third point at great length, showing how at the appropriate

moment President Roosevelt forced the Japanese into war by an ultimatum

demanding instant compliance with terms, which could never have been accepted by

any country.


"The memorandum which Senator Hull, with the approval of President Roosevelt,

handed to Japan on 26th November, 1941 . . . amounted to the maximum terms

of an American policy for the whole Orient."

writes Professor Beard, and goes on to say:

"It required no profound knowledge of Japanese history, institutions, and

psychology to warrant . . . first that no Japanese Cabinet 'liberal or reactionary,'

could have accepted the provisions."

and again later:

"The Japanese agent regarded the American memorandum as a kind of

ultimatum. This much at least Secretary Hull knew on November 26th."

Thus was the period of maximum intervention short of a shooting war terminated, and

a save-face forged for Roosevelt to ship U.S. boys overseas without apparently

breaking the spirit of his many promises.

As the war proceeded the real policy and sympathies of the President became more

and more apparent. His deception of the British and their Allies was no less flagrant

than his deception of the American people.

As Professor Beard points out on page 576:-

"The noble principles of the Four Freedoms, and the Atlantic Charter were for

practical purposes discarded in the settlements, which accompanied the

progress and followed the conclusion of the war.

To the validity of this statement the treatment of the people of Esthonia,

Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia, China, Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy,

Germany and other places of the earth bear witness."

Some great driving force was clearly at work to induce a President of the United States

so to act.

We have seen from a previous chapter that it was not the preservation of the British

Empire, nor the French Empire, nor the Dutch, that swayed the President. On the

contrary, he had advised his ardent lieutenant, Mr. Churchill, at an early stage in the

cold war that these must be liquidated.

It was not Europe, nor the countries of Europe, nor their liberties, nor rights under the

Atlantic Charter of Four Freedoms which weighed with him.

We know now that the British and American armies were actually halted by General

Ike Eisenhower under Mr. Roosevelt's rulings at the Yalta Conference, so that the Red

Army of Jewish Bolshevism might overflow half Europe and occupy Berlin.


To quote again from Professor Beard:

"As a consequence of the war called necessary to overthrow Hitler's despotism,'

another despotism was raised to a higher pitch of power."

In conclusion, Professor Beard condenses the many indictments of the President set

forth in his book, into 12 major counts, and declares:

"If these precedents are to stand unimpeached, and to provide sanctions for the

continued conduct of America affairs -- the Constitution may be nullified by the

President and officers who have taken the oath and are under moral obligation to

uphold it.

For limited Government under supreme law they may substitute personal and

arbitrary government -- the first principle of the totalitarian system against which

it has been alleged that World War II was waged-while giving lip service to the

principle of constitutional government."

When we reflect upon the astounding contents of Professor Beard's book, and

consider them in conjunction with the revelations in Colonel Roosevelt's As He Saw It,

the question arises: whom, and which interests did President Roosevelt not betray.

To this query I can only see one answer, namely, those people and their interests who

planned from the start the use of United States arsenals and Forces to prosecute a

war which would annihilate a Europe which had freed itself from Jewish gold and

revolutionary control: people who planned to dissolve the British Empire, to forge

chains of unrepayable debt, wherewith to coerce Britain to this end; and to enable the

Soviets to "bestride Europe like a colossus,"* in other words, International Jewry.

*These very words were used by General Smuts, who added words to the effect that

he welcomed such a prospect. It should be remembered that General Smuts was

formerly chief legal adviser to the Zionist Organisation in S. Africa.

Regulation 18B

On the 23rd May, 1940, within the first fortnight of Mr Churchill's Premiership, many

hundreds of British subjects, a large proportion of them ex-Servicemen, were suddenly

arrested and thrown into prison under Regulation 18B.

For some days the entire press had been conducting a whirlwind campaign, in rising

crescendo, against a supposed fifth column in this country, which was declared to be

waiting to assist the Germans when they landed.


How untrue this campaign was, is proved by the fact that our most competent

Intelligence Service never produced the flimsiest evidence of any such conspiracy, nor

evidence of any plan or order relating to it, nor the complicity in such an undertaking of

any single man arrested.

[Note: As you read this, consider the lies about alleged weapons of mass distruction

stockpiled by Saddam Hussein (pdf format), to justify the massacre in Iraq. There

were none or they would have been used, yes? And remember G.W. Bush's comment

early on, when he was declaring "war on terror": "If you aren't for us, you are against

us". So those against the neverending war are suspected and accused of being

terrorists. The more things change, the more they stay the same. - jackie]

Had such evidence been forthcoming, those implicated would undoubtedly have been

charged and tried, and very properly so. But there was not one case of a man arrested

under 18B being a British subject, who was so charged.

Four charges were actually framed against one lady, the wife of a distinguished

Admiral, Mrs Nicholson. She was tried by a Judge and jury, and acquitted on all

counts. This however, did not prevent her being arrested as she left the Law Courts,

acquitted, and being thrown into Holloway Prison under Regulation 18B, where she

remained for years.

Regulation 18B was originally introduced to deal with certain members of the I.R.A.,

who were committing a number of senseless minor outrages in London. Without this

Regulation, no liege of His Majesty in the United Kingdom could be arrested and held

in prison on suspicion.

This practice had long been abandoned in this country, except in short periods of

grave proven conspiracy, and on those occasions Habeas Corpus was always


18B enabled the medieval process of arrest and imprisonment on suspicion to be

revived without the suspension of Habeas Corpus. It was, in fact, a return to the

system of Lettres de Cachet, by which persons in pre-Revolutionary France were

consigned to the Bastille.

Here, it should be remembered, that those persons enjoyed full social intercourse with

their families, and were allowed their own servants, plate, linen, food and drink whilst

in prison; a very different treatment to that meted out to persons held under 18B,

whose treatment for some time was little different from ordinary criminals, and, in fact,

worse than any remand prisoner.

These I.R.A. outrages were so fatuous in themselves and so apparently meaningless,

at a time when there were no sharp differences between this country and the Irish Free

State, that I commenced making a number of inquiries.


I was not surprised to discover at length, that special members of the I.R.A. had

been enrolled for the committing of these outrages; and that they were

practically all Communists.

I had it on excellent authority that the Left Book Club of Dublin had been actively

concerned in the matter; and finally the names of 22 of these men were put into my

hands; and again I was informed on excellent authority that they were all


Immediately on receipt of this information I put down a question to the Home

Secretary, and offered to supply the necessary information if the matter were taken up.

Nothing came of my representations. From these Communist-inspired outrages,

however, there resulted Regulation 18B.

[Note: And today, we get the U.S.A.Patriot Act, by the same methods, and for the

same reason. To squelch truth and the truth-sayers. - j]

Though the I.R.A. were pleaded as an excuse to the House for a Regulation, hardly

any of their members were ever arrested under it; but in due course it was employed to

arrest and hold for 4 or 5 years, uncharged, very many hundreds of British subjects,

whose one common denominator was that they opposed the Jewish power over this

country in general; and its exertion to thrust her into a war in purely Jewish interests in


Now Communism is Jewish-controlled.

If Marxist Jewry needed a device for securing the assent of parliament to a regulation

like 18B, what simpler method could there be to achieve this object, without arousing

suspicion as to the real ulterior motive, than arranging for a few communist members

of the I.R.A. to plant bombs in the cloakrooms of London stations?

Everyone is supposed to be entitled to their opinion in this country; and, furthermore,

where we cannot supply absolute proof, we can say with the Home Secretary, as I do

here, that I have "reasonable cause to believe" that this is the real story behind

Regulation 18B's enactment.

When the Clause was first introduced into the House, the original wording laid it down

quite clearly that the Home Secretary should have the power to detain persons of

British birth and origin "If he was satisfied that" such detention was necessary. This

terminology was, at least, crystal clear.

No other opinion or check upon the Home Secretary's personal and absolute

discretion was envisaged: a return, in fact and in very essence, to the Lettres de

Cachet and the Star Chamber. The House of Commons refused absolutely to accept

such a clause, or hand away its powers of supervision, and its responsibilities as the


guardian of the rights and liberties of the citizen to any individual, be he Cabinet

Minister or not.

The Government accordingly had to withdraw the offending sentence; and brought

forward a second draft for approval some days later. In this new draft, drawn up, as

Government spokesmen laboured to explain, in accordance with the express wishes of

the House, the necessary safeguard from arbitrary executive tyranny had been


For the words "Home Secretary is satisfied that," had been substituted, "Has

reasonable cause to believe that."

The Government spokesmen explained at length on this occasion that this wording

gave the required safeguard. Members of Parliament were led to believe that their

wishes had prevailed, and that they were to be the judges of what would or would not

be "Reasonable Cause" for continued detention (as was proved in subsequent

debates), and a rather uneasy House passed the Clause in this form, and on that


Two years later, when the Counsel of an 18B prisoner argued in Court along these

lines, and demanded some sort of ventilation of his client's case before Members of

Parliament or a Court, no less a person than the Attorney-General himself pleaded on

the Government's behalf, that the words "Has reasonable cause to believe that,"

meant precisely the same as "Is satisfied that."

There the matter had to rest as far as the Law Courts were concerned, though it was

the subject of the most scathing comment of a most eminent Law Lord.

I myself was arrested under this Regulation on 23rd May, 1940, and thrown into

Brixton Prison, where I remained in a cell until 26th September, 1944, without any

charge being preferred against me, receiving merely a curt notification from the Home

Office on the latter date that the order for my detention had been "revoked."

A paper of "Particulars" alleged as the reasons for my detention was supplied to me

soon after my arrest. I replied to them during a day's interrogation by the so-called

Advisory Committee, before which body I could call no witnesses, did not know who

were my accusers, or the accusations they had made, and was not allowed the

assistance of a lawyer.

These particulars, together with my detailed reply to each, were set out in part II of a

Statement I supplied later to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons;

and will be found in the Appendix of this book. They were based upon the untrue

assertion that my anti-Communist attitude was bogus, and a cloak for disloyal



How untrue this slander was can be easily proved from my previous ten years' record

of unceasing attacks on Communism, both by questions and speeches in the House of

Commons and outside.

Who Dares?

On the morning following my release from Brixton Prison, I proceeded to the House of

Commons at my usual hour of 10.15 a.m.; an action which appeared to cause no little

surprise. It was not long before Jews and their friends were on my trail, and that of the

Right Club.

A string of provocative questions soon appeared on the Order Paper; but, like Gallio

who, when the Jews took Sosthenes, and beat him before the Judgment seat, "cared

for none of these things," I gave no sign of interest. The reporters in the Press

Galleries were then turned on, to endeavour to extract from me some, at least, of the

names in 'the Red Book' of the Right Club membership.

Now the names in the Red Book of members of the Right Club were, as the

newspapers have shrieked aloud, kept strictly private, with the sole object of

preventing the names becoming known to the Jews. The sole reason for this privacy

was the expressed wish of the members themselves.

To me, personally, the keeping of the names secret was only a disadvantage. It

facilitated misrepresentation of every kind by my enemies; the publication of the

names would have been of great assistance to me in every way. The sole reason for

this stipulation on joining by so many members was the well-grounded fear of Jewish

retaliation of a serious nature.

I remember in particular the conversation on this subject with one of these reporters

from the Press Gallery of the House of Commons. He was an engaging young man,

and particularly importunate. Would I not let him have just a few of the names? I said

to him:

"Supposing your name had been amongst those in the Red Book; and supposing

that in disregard of my promise to you not to reveal it, I proceeded to

communicate it to the press; and supply that definite evidence that you were a

member of a society to fight against Jewish domination over Britain: you would

not keep your job with your paper for six months."

"I shouldn't keep it for six minutes," was the prompt reply.

"Exactly," I answered. "Now you can see why I can't give you the name of even


one member of the Right Club from the Red Book. You yourself confirm their

worst fears."

Many hundreds of poor fellows find themselves in such a position today; indeed,

hundreds is merely a matter of expression. The real number must be prodigious. How

many, one might ask, can afford to run the risk to their livelihood, which is involved in

letting it be known that they are aware of the Jewish grip and prepared to oppose it.

Even the wealthiest and most influential magnates of the land dare not brave the wrath

of organised Jewry as the story regarding the Daily Mail controlling shares on pp. 6

and 7 of my statement to the Speaker shows. (See Appendix I.)

Not only in Britain has this been the case, but perhaps even more noticeably in the

U.S.A., as the diaries of the late Mr James Forrestal prove.

The Forrestal Diaries published by the Viking Press, New York, 1951, only reach me

as this book goes to press. Coming from a man of high integrity, who was U.S. Navy

Under Secretary from 1940, and Secretary for Defence from 1947 until his resignation

and suspicious death a few days later in March 1949, they are of the utmost

significance. The most important revelation therein is dated the 27th December, 1945

(pages 121 and 122):

"Played golf today with Joe Kennedy (Joseph P. Kennedy, who was Roosevelt's

Ambassador to Great Britain in the years immediately before the war). I asked

him about his conversations with Roosevelt and Neville Chamberlain from 1938


He said Chamberlain's position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which

to fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler.

Kennedy's view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without any later conflict

with England if it had not been for Bullitt's (William C. Bullitt -- a half-Jew -- then

Ambassador to France)* urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the

Germans must be faced down about Poland; neither the French nor the British

would have made Poland a cause of war if it had not been for the constant

needling from Washington.

Bullitt, he said, kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn't fight, Kennedy

that they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he said,

stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war."

If Mr. Forrestal's information regarding the impulses behind the recent war needed any

confirmation, they have already had it from the outspoken statements of Mr. Oswald

Pirow, former South African Defence Minister, who told the Associated Press on the

14th January, 1952, in Johannesburg that


"Chamberlain had told him that he was under great pressure from World Jewry

not to accommodate Hitler."

A second most important revelation in the Forrestal Diaries concerns Zionism. It is

clear from the entries, that by December, 1947, Mr. Forrestal was becoming greatly

concerned by the intervention of the Zionists into American politics. He records

conversations with Mr. Byrnes and Senator Vandenberg, Governor Dewey and others,

in attempts to lift the Palestine question out of party politics. From this time on he

would seem to have made continuous efforts with that end in view.

The Diary records on the 3rd Feb., 1948 (pages 362 and 363):

"Visit today from Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr., who came in with strong advocacy of

a Jewish State in Palestine, that we should support the United Nations 'decision',

I pointed out that the United Nations had as yet taken no 'decision', that it was

only a recommendation of the General Assembly and that I thought the methods

that had been used by people outside of the Executive branch of the

Government to bring coercion and duress on other nations in the General

Assembly bordered closely onto scandal . . .

I said I was merely directing my efforts to lifting the question out of politics, that

is, to have the two parties agree that they would not compete for votes on this


He said this was impossible, that the nation was too far committed and that,

furthermore, the Democratic Party would be bound to lose and the Republicans

gain by such an agreement.

I said I was forced to repeat to him what I had said to Senator McGrath in

response to the latter's observation that our failure to go along with the Zionists

might lose the states of New York, Pennsylvania and California -- that I thought it

was about time that somebody should pay some consideration to whether we

might not lose the United States."

After a short note by the Editor of the Diaries the entry for the 3rd Feb., 1948,

continues (page 364):

"Had lunch with Mr. B. M. Baruch. After lunch raised the same question with him.

He took the line of advising me not to be active in this particular matter, and that

I was already identified, to a degree that was not in my own interest, with

opposition to the United Nations policy on Palestine."

It was about this time that a campaign of unparalleled slander and calumny was

launched in the United States press and periodicals against Mr. Forrestal.So greatly

did this appear to have affected him that in March 1949, he resigned from the U.S.


Defence Secretaryship; and on the 22nd of that month was found dead as a result of a

fall from a very high window.


I shall always be grateful to the many Members who made my return to the House very

much easier than it might have been, by their immediate greetings and friendly


Many, I fear, whose actions in the Chamber itself and outside were detected or

reported to the press representatives, found themselves the victims of a vendetta

inside their constituencies and in the Press on that specific account.

When we reflect upon these bloody happenings from the time of King Charles I to our

own day, we can at long last find only one cause for satisfaction, if such a word can be

in any way appropriate. It is that for the first time we can now trace the underlying

influences, which explain these hideous disfigurations in European history.

In the light of present-day knowledge, we can now recognise and understand the true

significance of these terrible happenings. Instead of mere disconnected occurrences,

we can now discern the merciless working of a satanic plan; and seeing and

understanding, we are in a position to take steps in the future to safeguard all those

values, which we love and stand for; and which that plan clearly seeks to destroy.

We can at last begin to oppose the planners and operators of that plan, knowing about

it and their technique, which till now have been known to them alone. In other words,

being fore-warned, it is our fault if we are not fore-armed.

Let us not forget such words as those of the Jew Marcus Eli Ravage, who wrote in the

Century Magazine U.S.A. in January 1928:

"We have stood back of, not only the last war, but all your wars; and not only the

Russian, but all of your revolutions worthy of mention in your history."

Nor should we forget those of Professor Harold Laski, writing in the New Statesman

and Nation on 11th January, 1942:

"For this war is in its essence merely an immense revolution in which the war of

1914, the Russian Revolution, and the counter revolutions on the Continent are

earlier phases."

Nor the warning from that eminent Jewish American Attorney, publisher and reporter,

Henry Klein, issued only last year:


" The Protocols is the plan by which a handful of Jews, who compose the

Sanhedrin, aim to rule the world by first destroying Christian civilisation."

"Not only are the Protocols genuine, in my opinion, but they have been almost

entirely fulfilled."

They have indeed been largely fulfilled; no small measure of Jewish thanks being due

to Mr. Roosevelt and his "ardent lieutenant," the self-styled "architect of the Jewish


In the process, however, Britain and her Empire and, worse still, her good name and

honour have been brought down to the dust. As Professor Beard wrote:

"The noble principles of the Four Freedoms and the Atlantic Charter were for

practical purposes discarded in the settlements which accompanied the progress

and followed the conclusion of the war. In the validity of this statement the

treatment of the people of Esthonia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia,

China, Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy, Germany and other places of the earth bear


There appeared recently in the press the cry of Mrs. chiang Kai Shek calling Britain a

"moral weakling" (in reference to China). She is reported as saying:

"Britain has bartered the soul of a nation for a few pieces of silver. . . One day

these pieces of silver will bear interest in British blood, toil, sweat and tears on

the battleground of freedom."

It might be General Sikorski himself speaking, might it not? In the same paper I saw

that Mr. Jackson Martindell, president of the American Institute of Management, has

declared that,

"an Englishman's word is no longer his bond".

How often have I heard this from Arab sources since 1939? Mr. Martindell continued,

"I hate to say this, but Britain is becoming poor morally as well as economically."

From Poland to Palestine and to China these words are re-echoed, and be it said,

reiterated by the Jew-wise section of this country for many years.

The reason is not far to seek. No man can serve two masters, more especially when

the principles and interests of these two masters are as widely divergent as are those

of Britain and her Empire, and Jewry and their Empire, the U.S.S.R.

Ever since the fall of Mr. Chamberlain's Government, the interests of the Jewish

Empire have been advanced as prodigiously as those of Britain and her Empire have

been eclipsed.


Stranger than all this -- should any dare to state the truth in plain terms-the only

response is an accusation of anti-Semitism. As Mr. Douglas Reed has clearly shown,

the term "anti-Semitism" is meaningless rubbish -- and as he suggests it might as well

be called "anti-Semolina."

The Arabs are Semites, and no so-called "anti-Semite" is anti-Arab.

It is not even correct to say that he is anti-Jew. On the contrary, he knows better than

the uninformed that a fair proportion of Jews are not engaged in this conspiracy.

The only correct term for the mis-called "anti-Semitic" is "Jew-wise". It is indeed the

only fair and honest term.

The phrase "anti-Semite" is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the

unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without

examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow


The "Jew-wise" know that we have in Britain a Jewish "Imperium in Imperio," which, in

spite of all protestations and camouflage, is Jewish first and foremost, and in complete

unison with the remainder of World Jewry. If any doubt this they need only read Unity

in Dispersion, issued in 1948 by the World Jewish Congress, which proclaims Jewry

to be one nation.

Not all Jews here wish to be railroaded into this narrow social tyranny; but unless this

country affords them some way of escape they dare not take the risks -- very grave

risks -- of defying it: and so they perforce co-operate to some degree.

Even worse, certain Gentiles with no good excuse support this united force, which is in

turn used to influence or control our political parties, home and foreign policies, press

and public life.

This unholy united front must be exposed and frustrated. One step towards this

objective would seem to be firstly an enactment to prevent Gentile Esaus from lending

their hands for the carrying out of orders uttered by the voice of Jewish Jacobs.

Another: the detachment from the Jewish United Front of Jews, who do not wish to

subscribe to the dictates of the World Jewish Congress. First and foremost however is

the need to inform people of good will as to the truth of this matter, particularly in

regard to the real anatomy, aims, and methods of the Marxist enemy.

It is to that end, that I humbly offer the contents of this book to all, who are determined

to fight Communism.



Statement by Capt. Ramsay from Brixton Prison

to the Speaker and Members of Parliament concerning his detention

under Paragraph 18B of the Defence Regulations.

All the particulars alleged as grounds for my detention are based on charges that my

attitude and activities in opposition to Communism, Bolshevism, and the policy of

organised Jewry were not genuine, but merely a camouflage for anti-British designs.

In the following memorandum, which could be greatly expanded, I have given a

minimum of facts, which prove that not only was my attitude genuine, open, and

unvarying during the whole of my time in the House of Commons, but that in the

course of my researches I had accumulated numerous and conclusive facts

compelling such an attitude, and leading logically to the formation of the Right Club, an

essentially patriotic organisation.

During the whole of my time as M.P. (since 1931) I have kept up an open and

unremitting attack on Bolshevism and its allies. Indeed, I had already started this

opposition long before I became an M.P.

The following survey will show this; and also the eventual formation of the Right Club

as the logical outcome of my work.

This work falls into three phases.

During the first, dating from soon after the Russian Revolution till about 1935, I

supposed the powers behind Bolshevism to be Russian: In the second (1935-38) I

appreciated that they were International: By the third phase, I realised them to be



It was always a mystery to me in Phase I why Russians spent so much time and

money on revolutionary activities in Britain.

My first active step was to speak in the election made famous by the publication in the

Daily Mail of the letter written by Zinoviev alias Apfelbaum, calling for revolution in

Britain. (I spoke against Bolshevism, and in the Northwich division.)

On being elected in 1931, I joined the Russian Trade Committee, which kept a watch


on their activities here. I also joined the Council of the Christian Protest Movement,

founded to protest against the outrages on priests, nuns, and the Christian churches

committed by the Bolsheviks. Hansard will show that I asked many questions during

this period, attacking their activities in this country.


In Phase II, I recognised the forces behind Bolshevism not to be Russian, but


I tried to picture the composition of that mysterious body, the Comintern, over whom,

according to the replies to my Parliamentary questions, the Soviet Government could

exercise no control.

In the latter end of this phase I had made sufficient progress with this mental picture of

the Comintern, that I made it the subject of a number of addresses, which I gave to

Rotary Clubs and other societies in London, Edinburgh, and elsewhere, entitling them

frequently, "Red Wings Over Europe."

This second phase lasted well into the Spanish Civil War. Recognising almost at once

the guilt of the Comintern in the whole affair, down to the International Brigade, I

attacked them continuously by a stream of questions in the House.

The attitude of the entire British national Press at first amazed, and subsequently

helped to enlighten me, as to the real powers behind World Revolution. The press

presented General Franco's enemies as liberal and Protestant reformers, instead

of the anti-God international revolutionaries they were.

Officials of the Russian Cheka were actually in charge of the prisons on the Red side.

McGovern established all the main facts in his pamphlet, Red Terror in Spain.

I organised parades of sandwich-men at this time to expose the Bolshevik guilt in

Spain, assisted a paper called The Free Press, and did what propaganda I could.

Some eighty or ninety M.P.s subscribed at one time or another to these efforts.

In September 1937 I accepted the Chairmanship of the United Christian Front

Committee, on behalf of Sir Henry Lunn.

Thereafter many thousands of letters were sent out over my signature to leading

people in the Kingdom, appraising them of the true facts of the war in Spain, and

urging Christians of all communities to join in combating the Godless Red Terror, that

threatened Spain then, and thereafter all Europe, Britain included.

A number of patriotic societies now began to co-operate regularly with me in this work

against Bolshevism, including the National Citizens' Union, the British Empire League,

the Liberty Restoration League, and the Economic League. We took to meeting


regularly ina Committee Room of the House of Commons.

In May 1936, when I set out to oppose the entry into this country of agents of the

Comintern for attending the so-called Godless Congress, we were joined by the British

Bible Union, the Order of the Child, and the British Israel World Federation.

From information given me by these societies, I realized that the previous Godless

Congress, held at Prague, had brought under unified control all the National Free-

Thinker societies, who were now under the authority of the Militant Godless of Russia,

and were therefore a subtle and potent weapon for Bolshevik propaganda.

At our meetings to co-ordinate opposition, we all agreed that while it was perhaps the

right of British men and women to hold a Congress on any subject, this liberty should

not be construed into licence for international revolutionaries to develop their plans for

the destruction of the religious, social and public life of our country.

On the 28th June, therefore, I introduced a Bill entitled the ALIENS' RESTRICTION

(BLASPHEMY) BILL, to prevent aliens from attending this Congress, or making it the

occasion for the distribution of their blasphemous literature.

The Bill received a first reading by 165 votes to 134. In the No Lobby were Messrs.

Rothschild, G.R. Strauss, T. Levy, A.M. Lyons, Sir F. Harris, D.N. Pritt, W. Gallacher,

Dr. Haden Guest and Dr. Summerskill.

In the autumn of 1938 I was made acquainted with the fact that the power behind

World Revolution was not just a vague body of internationalists, but organized World


The first document so convincing me was actually a British Government White Paper,

of whose existence I had not been previously aware. This quoted verbatim an extract

from a report received by Mr. Balfour on September 19th, 1918, from Mr. Oudendyke,

the Netherlands Minister in Petrograd, who was at that time in charge of British

interests there, as follows:

"The danger is now so great, that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the

British Government and all other Governments to the fact that if an end is not put

to Bolshevism at once the civilization of the whole world will be threatened. This

is not an exaggeration, but a matter of fact . . .

I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue

before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless as

above stated Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread

over Europe and the whole world in one form or another, as it is organized and

worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object it is to destroy

for their own ends the existing order of things.


The only manner in which this danger can be averted would be collective action

on the part of all the Powers."

Almost as remarkable as the above quotation was the fact brought to my notice

simultaneously, namely, that this White Paper had been immediately withdrawn, and

replaced by an abridged edition, from which these vital passages had been eliminated.

I was shown the two White papers-the original and the abridged issue, side by side.

The second document which came to my notice at this time was the booklet entitled,

The Rulers of Russia, written by Dr. Dennis Fahey, C.S.S.P., and bearing the

imprimatur of the Archbishop of Dublin, dated the 26th March, 1938. In the opening

sentence of this pamphlet Dr Fahey writes:

"In this pamphlet I present to my readers a number of serious documents which

go to show that the real forces behind Bolshevism are Jewish forces; and that

Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment

of their future Messianic kingdom."

Dr. Fahey then adduces an interesting volume of evidence. On page 1 he gives also

the following passage by Mr. Hilaire Belloc, taken from the latter's Weekly, dated 4th

February, 1937:

"As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary Bolshevist

movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is

taken in by the suppression of our deplorable Press."

Other authorities quoted in the pamphlet include Dr. Homer, D. Sc., Count Leon de

Poncins in his Contre-Revolution, and evidence given on 12th February, 1919, before

a Committee of the United States Senate by the Rev. George A. Simons,

Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907 to October

6th 1918.

The Rev. Mr. Simons stated on this occasion with regard to the Bolshevik Government

in Petrograd:

"In December 1918 . . . under the Presidency of a man known as Apfelbaum

(Zinoviev) . . . out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, and

all the rest (with the exception of one man, who is a Negro from North America)

were Jews . . . and 265 of these Jews belonging to this Northern Commune

Government that is sitting in the old Smolny Institute come from the Lower East

Side of New York -- 265 of them."

On page 8 Dr Fahey quotes figures showing that in the year 1936:

"The Central Committee of the Communist Party in Moscow, the very centre of

International Communism, consisted of 59 members, of whom 56 were Jews,


and the other three were married to Jewesses . . . "

"Stalin, present ruler of Russia, is not a Jew, but he took as his second wife the

twenty-one year old sister of the Jew L.M. Kaganovitch, his right-hand man, who

has been spoken of as his probable or possible successor. Stalin's every

movement is made under Jewish eyes."

In addition to these documents there now reached me a quantity of evidence

concerning Jewish activities in Great Britain in the shape of subversive organizations

of every description, anti-religious, anti-moral, revolutionary, and those working to

establish the Jewish system of financial and industrial monopoly.

Thus I became finally convinced of the fact that the Russian and Spanish revolutions,

and the subversive societies in Britain, were part and parcel of the one and the same

Plan, secretly operated and controlled by World Jewry, exactly on the lines laid down

in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, filed in the British Museum in 1906 (which had

been reproduced soon after the last war by The Morning Post, and from which this

newspaper never recovered).

These Protocols are no forgery, and I and others could supply evidence to that effect

that would convince any impartial Tribunal.

At the next meeting of the patriotic and Christian societies, I felt in duty bound to

broach the Jewish question; and realized, very soon, that there had come a parting of

the ways. With very few exceptions our co-operation ceased.

I realized that if anything was to be done, some special group would have to be formed

which, while retaining the essential characteristics of the former one, would take up the

task of opposing and exposing the Jewish menace. It was then that the idea of the

Right Club originated, though the actual formation did not actually come about till

some months later, in May 1939.

From the autumn of 1938 onwards, I spent many hours a week talking to backbenchers

and members of the Government alike on these subjects.

The very magnitude of the issues involved put many off. One particular rejoinder

typifies in my recollection this sort of attitude:

"Well, that is all very disturbing, awful, in fact: but what is one to do about it? I

shall go off now and try and forget all about it as soon as possible."

About the end of 1938, news was brought to me that the control shares of the Daily

Mail were for sale.

Knowing that a severe advertisement boycott had been put in operation against the

paper following upon its having printed two or three articles giving what in


Internationalist eyes had been a pro-Franco view of the Spanish War (in reality, the

truth), the news was no great surprise to me.

Could I find a buyer? I decided to approach a certain very wealthy and patriotic peer,

the head of a great business. A mutual friend arranged an interview.

On introduction I gave a survey of the activities and power of Organized Jewry in

general, and of their secret publicity control in Britain in particular, as I saw it. When I

ended after some 70 minutes, general concurrence in my views was expressed.

Thereupon the mutual friend and I tried to persuade our hearer to buy the said shares

and "tear the gag off the conspiracy of silence." He replied:

"I daren't. They would bring me to a crust of bread. If it was only myself, I

wouldn't mind; I'd fight them. But many of my shares are held by the widow and

the orphan, and for their sakes I must refuse."

On our expressing astonishment that Jewry could inflict such crushing retaliation on a

man of his financial strength and industrial power, and so conspicuous a national

figure, he gave us details of just such retaliation directed against him by Organized

Jewry some years previously.

He had refused to comply with some demands they had made of him affecting his

works. After a final warning, which he ignored, a world boycott had been started

against him, which had become effective in 24 hours, wherever he had agents or

offices. Fires and strikes also mysteriously occurred. The resulting losses had finally

compelled him to give in.

Within 24 hours the boycott was lifted all over the world.

The consistent mis-reporting of important features in the Spanish Civil War had deeply

impressed many M.P.s. They felt that a bias so extreme, so universal, and so

consistent, always against Franco, indicated the existence of some deliberate plan,

and though unwilling to agree my thesis, that the Jews were operating this control by

various means, and that the whole affair was part of their World Plan, nevertheless

many felt that something was very wrong somewhere.

In the course of these conversations I obtained the support of Members of all parties

to the Bill I was preparing in this connection.

On December 13th, 1938, I introduced the Bill entitled COMPANIES ACT

AMENDMENT BILL, which made it compulsory for shares in Newspapers and News

Agencies to be held in the actual names of the holders, instead of the names of

nominees as is done now in the majority of cases.

The Bill received a First Reading by 151 votes to 104. In the Aye Lobby were Members


of all parties, including 13 Right Hon. Gentlemen 98 of these Socialists).

In the No Lobby were messrs. Rothschild, Schuster, Shinwell, Cazalet, Gallacher, Sir

A. Sinclair, Gluckstein, and Mr. Samuel Storey opposed, also blocked the Bill; and

seemed suitable for that role.

I now took the decision to proceed at once with the formation of a group similar in

character to the group of representatives of Christian and patriotic societies, which I

had worked with up to the emergence of the Jewish problem; but this time a group

which would place opposition to that menace in the forefront of its activities.

Mr. Cross was the Secretary, and the late duke of Wellington, President of the Liberty

Restoration League, was the Chairman at most of the few meetings we held. The first

object of the Right Club was to enlighten the Tory Party and clear it from any Jewish


Organized Jewry was now clearly out for World War. The failure of their International

Brigade in Spain, and the growing exposure of themselves, and the consequent risk of

total collapse of their plan rendered immediate war from their point of view imperative.

In July 1939 I had an interview with the Prime Minister. I dealt with the Russian

Revolution, and the part Jewry had played in it; and with the Spanish Revolution,

prepared and carried out on similar lines by much the same people; with the

subversive societies in Britain, and the Press and news control existing in this country.

I finally drew the Prime Minister's attention to the underground work that was going on

with the object of overthrowing his peace policy and himself, and precipitating the war.

Mr. chamberlain considered that charges of so grave and far-reaching a character

would require very substantial documentary proof. I decided to collect documentary

proof which would make it possible for action to be taken.

The outbreak of war enabled the Jews to give their activities the cloak of patriotism.

Their press power enabled them to portray those opposing their designs and exposing

them as pro-Nazi, and disloyal to Britain.

The difficulty I was faced with was that while I was in duty bound to warn the country

against the consequences of a policy influenced by Organized Jewry and opposed to

British interests, I, at the same time, did not want to create difficulties for Mr.


It was decided therefore, that the Right Club should close down for the duration. The

spirit of the Club naturally led the younger members to join the Services, wherein they

have served with distinction on most fronts. It was in keeping with the same spirit that

others not so engaged, should continue to fight the internal enemy, no less formidable

than the Axis Powers and in a way more dangerous, owing to his secret methods and


the fact that he can work from within as well as from without.

To this end, therefore, I and others in an individual capacity disseminated on occasion

some leaflets of mine called Do You Know? and Have You Noticed?; my verses

beginning "Land of dope and Jewry", and some anti-Jewish stickers. This was with the

idea of educating the public sufficiently to maintain the atmosphere in which the

"phoney" war, as it was called, might be converted into an honourable negotiated


It was certainly not defeatist, as Jewish propaganda tried to make out. It was not we of

the Right Club who were holding back from the fighting Services in this war, any more

than in that last; quite the contrary.

I was determined to make further efforts to convince Mr. Chamberlain, and even

perhaps the 1922 Committee, of the truth of my case, and thus avert total war, and

commenced reinforcing the documentary evidence already in my possession.

By January 1940, I had details of nearly thirty subversive societies working on various

revolutionary and corrosive lines, and had completed a very large chart, showing the

principal members of each.

Six names stood out clearly, as a sort of interlocking directorate. They were Prof. H.

Laski, Mr. Israel Moses Sieff, Prof. Herman Levy, Mr. Victor Gollancz, Mr. D.N. Pritt,

M.P., and Mr. G.R. Strauss, M.P.

In February 1940, on my arrival in London, I was handed the literature of a new group,

who were advocating FEDERAL UNION. The list of supporters' names was startling. It

might have been copied from the chart I had just completed. There could be no

mistake as to the source of this scheme. Later, when this group became active, I put

down the following questions:

Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister whether he could assure the House

that the creation of a Federal Union of the European States is not one of the war

aims of H.M.'s Government.

Mr. Butler (on May 9th) gave a non-committal reply. To this I asked the following


Captain Ramsey: Is my right Hon. Friend aware that this plan, if adopted, will

arouse hostility against us in almost the whole of Europe, who look upon it as the

setting up of a Judeo-Masonic super-State?

(Note -- The Protocols of the Elders of Zion make it clear that World Jewry and

Orient Masonry will set up just such a regime after the Gentile States have been

reduced by War and Revolutions to hewers of wood and drawers of water.)


Mr. Butler: I would rather leave my Hon. Friend's interpretation of this plan to


A virulent Press campaign was now in full swing to suppress "Anti-Semitic" views and

activities by declaring that "Anti-Semitism" was pro-Nazi. Fearing less the Home

Secretary might be inclined into this direction, which was a false direction, I asked him

on May 9th, 1940:

Captain Ramsay: Whether he will give an assurance that care will be taken,

both in the administration of the present regulations, and in framing revised

ones, that a distinction is made between anti-Semitism and pro-Nazism?

Sir J. Anderson: I hope that any restrictive measures applied to organized

propaganda may in practice be confined to such propaganda as is calculated to

impede the war effort; and from that point of view I cannot recognize as relevant

the distinction which My. Hon. and Gallant Friend seeks to draw.

Captain Ramsay: while think my Right Hon. Friend for his reply, in view of the

fact that he seems somewhat confused on this point, will he assure the House

that he refuses to be stampeded into identifying the two things by a ramp in our

Jew-ridden press?

Sir J. Anderson: There is no question of my being stampeded into anything.

It was in the last weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's Premiership that I was enabled to look

through some of the U.S. Embassy papers at Mr. Kent's flat. This then was the

position, and these were the considerations which led me to inspect them.

1 -- Together with many members of both Houses of Parliament, I was fully aware that

among the agencies here and abroad, which had been actively engaged in promoting

bad feeling between Great Britain and Germany, Organized Jewry, for obvious

reasons, had played a leading part.

2 -- I knew the U.S.A. to be the headquarters of Jewry, and therefore the real, though

not apparent, centre of their activity.

3 -- I was aware that Federal Union was the complement in international affairs of the

scheme of Political and Economic Planning (P.E.P.). The Chairman of P.E.P. is Mr.

Israel Moses Sieff, who is also Vice-Chairman of the Zionist Federation and Grand

Commander of the Order of Maccabeans) designed to bring about Bolshevism by

stealth in the sphere of industry and commerce, and that it must be regarded as the

Super-State, which is one of the principal objectives of International Jewry.

4 -- I recognized that plans for establishing Marxist Socialism under Jewish control in

this country were far advanced. As to their intentions, there could be no doubt.


5 -- I knew that the technique of International Jewry is always to plan the overthrow at

critical junctures of any national leader who seriously opposes some essential part of

their designs, as for instance Mr. Chamberlain had done by adhering to his policy of

pacification, and that in this case Mr. Chamberlain's fall would precipitate total war. I

remembered that Mr. Lloyd George had said in the House of Commons, that if we

were let in for a war over Poland without the help of Russia, we should be walking into

a trap. We walked into that trap.

Further information as to its origin, design, and ultimate objective, would have

strengthened Mr. Chamberlain's hand, and would have enabled him to take the

appropriate counter-measures.

As a Member of Parliament, still loyal to Mr. Chamberlain, I considered it my duty to


About the 9th or 10th of May I went to Scotland for a fortnight's rest, having seen only

a part of the documents, and intending to resume my investigations on my return.

Before I could conclude them, however, Mr. Chamberlain had fallen from office, and I

was arrested a few days later on the steps of my house, when I returned to London on

the 23rd May, 1940.

I am appending the Particulars, alleged as Reasons for my detention, and my

comments thereon.


Brixton Prison,

August 23rd, 1943

Particulars Alleged as Reasons for My Detention

There follows here a copy of the Particulars, which were alleged to be reasonable

grounds for my detention for the last three years.

It will be seen that the whole basis of every one of them is, that my opposition to

Communism, Bolshevism and World Jewry was but a sham; a disloyal ruse, in fact,