Tsur defined the murder as "one of the gravest in the
history of the state," and termed the conspiracy that led up to the killing
"a satanic plan."
'Hatzofeh', in its second editorial, wonders whether the Government is aware
of Foreign Minister Peres' plan to internationalize the Old City of Jerusalem as
relayed by author Marek Halter, a friend of Shimon Peres, to the Pope. The paper
reminds Peres that the Vatican is recognized as an independent state, and its
direct involvement in Jerusalem would represent a further step toward dividing
the city. United Jerusalem is in danger; the Government cannot be believed when
it claims to have the interests of Jerusalem at heart.
___
Dole and the Evangelical
Judaeo-Churchinsanist Netan Yahoo/ Schneerson connection
http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/archive/israel+line/1996/israel+line+-+04-sep-96.htm
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996
The Prime Minister is also scheduled to meet with Bob
Dole, the Republican candidate for U.S. president, as well as both vice
presidential candidates. Before he returns, Netanyahu
plans to visit the grave of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, the late leader of
the Lubavitch Hasidic community.
____
Why do the Proselytes of
Judaeo-Churchinsanity agree with the Talmudic rabbi's that Elijah is coming
to witness? because they too deny that John the Baptist testified of the
Only Lord Jesus the Only Messiah, and they are too waiting for the messiah
of the jews and the fables they have fallen.
____
http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20010404/LI_001.htm
Kosher is cool
By Kristi Palma
Eagle-Tribune Writer
Kellogg's Eggo waffles,
chocolate bars and frozen pizza have now joined the ranks of borscht and matzo
ball soup, all of which carry the Jewish kosher label.
____
http://money.cnn.com/2004/11/29/news/newsmakers/commerce_secretary/index.htm?cnn=yes
Kellogg
CEO to head Commerce Dept.
President names Kellogg CEO Carlos Gutierrez as
commerce secretary.
November 29, 2004: 12:44 PM EST
___
http://www.ottmall.com/mj_ht_arch/v33/mj_v33i12.html#CDB
From: Perets Mett <p.mett@open.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Aug
2000 15:00:21 +0100 Subject: Kellogg's
cereals Following my recent posting, I was in France last week and
discovered that Kellogg's cereals manufactured in France also have the the MK
kosher logo of the Manchester Beth Din. So if you are travelling in France there
are some kosher products which are quite widely available. Perets Mett
____
But of course the vermin Bushkevik
brings in a jew kosher tax collector for "Commerce Secretary"
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - President Bush nominated Kellogg CEO Carlos Gutierrez
as the new Commerce Secretary Monday.
___
U.S Constitutional
Law dead, Talmud now law of the New shemgod "Amaraka" of
Judaeo-Churchinsanity of greater ISREALHELL of the Pharisees
Of the Treasonous Vipers in
Washington DC. ALL, every single Congressman, Congress woman, ever Senator,
all...ALL three Branches of Government, every member who agrees without outrage
are in Contempt and should be tried for Hugh Treason, not one exempt, No not
even you RON Paul for you are a coward of mis-direction and deception, a lap
dog, yap yap yapping.
Jewish Law
Cited in Death Penalty Case
By Michael Shapiro, Jewish
Telegraphic Agency
Nathan Lewin
photo from the Washington Jewish Week
Treasonous
Dual Loyalty spy of Talmud Bavli and satan's shemagog
|
A man who will argue before the U.S. Supreme
Court next year that
his planned execution in Florida's electric chair constitutes "cruel and
unusual punishment" can point to a 2,000-year-old
Jewish law when he pleads his case.
A friend-of-the court
brief filed last week in the Supreme
Court by the National
Jewish Commission on Law
and Public Affairs, which advocates the position of the Orthodox community, and
the American Section of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and
Jurists, backs Anthony Bryan's position.
In citing only Jewish law
and excluding any reference to previous Supreme
Court decisions, the
brief is believed to mark a first for America's highest court.
High
TREASON. Every member of the Supreme Court, not one exempt is a coward and
Tresonous Viper and should be imprisoned for life. You stand warned again "AMARAKA"
The brief, written by the father-daughter team of Nathan and Alyza Lewin and
reviewed by former Israeli Supreme
Court Justice
Menachem Elon, delves into the biblical and talmudic
texts relating to execution in Jewish law.
The brief does not address the legality of the death penalty itself, but it
does refer to the same Jewish text that an interfaith
group has used to justify abolishing the penalty.
Alyza Lewin said her father, who has argued 27 cases before the Supreme
Court, decided to
write the brief because he thought the court
-- especially Jewish justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and
Stephen Breyer and Justice Antonin Scalia, who has expressed interest in talmudic
law in the past -- would find it
interesting as they consider the case.
All
Jewish Treasonist Vipers
The brief supports Bryan's contention that execution in an electric chair
violates the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids cruel and
unusual punishment.
It concludes
that the Sanhedrin, or High Court,
during the time of the Second Temple in Jerusalem rarely imposed the death
penalty. However, when a death sentence was imposed, the rabbis said the
execution must be done in a painless and quick manner with as little
disfigurement as possible.
Decapitation
to all GOYIM
That apparently has not been the case with Florida's electric chair, which is
known as "Ol' Sparky."
During two executions in the 1990s,smoke and flames erupted from the
headpieces worn by two convicted killers, and the smell of burning flesh
reportedly filled the execution chamber, according to a Web site maintained by
Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism that details Supreme
Court cases.
The last time the U.S. Supreme
Court considered
whether or not electrocution could be used as a method of punishment was in
1890.
In that case, the court
ruled that the state of New York could use the electric chair instead of hanging
death row inmates.
Reform and Conservative Jewish leaders have cited Jewish text -- including
the same passage the Lewins used -- in their recently launched drive to abolish
the death penalty.
Leaders of the National Jewish/Catholic Consultation, which is co-sponsored
by the Reform and Conservative movements' National Council of Synagogues and the
National Conference of Catholic Bishops, said they "acknowledge the
theoretical possibility of a justifiable death penalty, since the scriptures
mandate it for certain offenses."
For Goyim Death by
Decapitation, Sanhedrin Tractate Talmud Bavli 57a. Do you see what they are
doing "Amaraka" or are you too stupid and apostate to
comprehend?
However, they concluded that the "the arguments offered in defense of
the death penalty are less than persuasive in the face of the overwhelming
mandate in both Jewish and Catholic traditions to respect the sanctity of human
life."
The group's statement on the death penalty cites a passage of commentary from
chapter 1, verse 10 of Mishnah Makkot that shows the rabbis were clearly
uncomfortable with the death penalty.
Yet they Crucified the
Chooser, Jesus the Christ, and they slew the Messenger's of God and put them in
Prison and they slew the disciples of Jesus the Christ, do not be deceived for
by their Talmudic laws they will murder wonderfully.
"A Sanhedrin that puts one person to death once in seven years is called
destructive. Rabbi Eliezer ben Azariah says: Or even once in 70 years. Rabbi
Tarfon and Rabbi Akiba say: Had we been the Sanhedrin, none would ever have been
put to death."
Had we been with our
fathers we would not have killed the Prophets.......
Mt:23:30: And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
Mt:23:32: Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
However, the next sentence in that passage, which is not cited in the
consultation's statement but is noted in the Lewins'
brief, quotes Rabbi Simon ben Gamliel as saying, "Such an attitude
would increase bloodshed in Israel," signaling that he thought the death
penalty was a good deterrent.
A Judge of a CHRISTIAN
NATION (used to be) Citing a rabid rib-eye os the Perversion of the Mishnah
Torah the Oral tradition of Talmud Bavli, the same Tractate, Sanhedrin, which
claims Jesus is in Hell boiling in Human Excrement and that ALL who say Jesus is
Lord Almighty should be decapitate by these very same laws they cite. Let me
warn you Supreme court of High Treason and Blasphemy, the Day of the LORD's
Wrath is soon to be at hand, and ON that Day, what do you think the KING will do
to you, the Husbandmen? He will cast you into eternal Damnation.
Mark Pelavin, associate director of the Religious Action Center of Reform
Judaism, acknowledged the statement by Rabbi Gamliel, saying "Halachah
is ambivalent about the death penalty."
For they do the Lust of
their Father the murderer since the beginning and they also Crucified the LORD
Jesus the Christ.
"The sages really wrested with the application of the death
penalty," Pelavin said, adding that they wanted it to be imposed fairly.
Via HJR 104-PL 102-14
of the 102nd Congress and big daddy Bushkevik
The Jewish and Catholic leaders in their joint statement opposing the death
penalty argue that the death penalty is not imposed fairly in the United States,
saying that "suspiciously high percentages of those on death row are poor
or people of color.''
and not
all worship Jesus the Nazarene?
_____
Yes they are preparing to make
the Supreme Court of the United States of Greater ISREALHELL the main Temple for
their lesser freemason Talmudic Courts of so-called satanis Justice. "Amaraka"
you are ensnared by the shemgods and their Hoodlum hahahahahahaha
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-adlerstein2/
Jewish Law
and the Supreme Court:
Happy
Millennium From an Ancient Legal Tradition
Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein
When a famous
Washington attorney recently filed his Supreme
Court brief, he
provided the rest of us with a wonderful millennial bonus.
Oh so wonderful and
nothing but shemgod dualist treason to satan
The brief concerned
Florida’s notorious Old Sparky, and it was more remarkable for what it did not
say than for what it did. Nat Lewin
made no reference to a single Supreme
Court decision.
In fact,
he
does not cite a single instance of any case law
whatsoever.
Lewin, writing
together with his daughter and retired Israeli Supreme
Court Justice
Menachem Elon, attempts to shed light upon the “cruel and unusual
punishment” clause of the Eight
Amendment. Claiming
to know what the framers of the Constitution meant – or should have
meant – has become a pastime as American as sandlot baseball.
But Lewin builds his case on the strength of what likely is the world’s
oldest continuously-practiced legal code.
satanisms of lawisms
of Talmudisms of Judaisms of Communitarianisms
He
holds up the performance of Florida’s temperamental electric chair
to
the scrutiny of the Jewish Talmud,
the backbone of Jewish law
for the last two millennia.
Treason
The Court
agreed to hear the case of an inmate on Florida’s death row, who claims that
the state’s preferred method of execution is wired for failure.
It has required mutliple applications of electrical jolts to do its job,
and induced foot-long licks of flame to jump from the head of one of its
victims. This, claims the inmate,
amounts to a violation of his rights.
Lewin does not address
the issue of whether or not all capital punishment itself is cruel and unusual.
Instead, he shows how Jewish legal tradition examined not only the
outcome of punishment, but the procedure as well.
Methods of execution were banished if the Talmudic
sages believed them to subject the prisoner to more pain than absolutely
necessary, or resulted in great shame or bodily
disfigurement. He appends
passages from four Talmudic
tomes, as well as a twelfth century code authored by Maimonides.
Decapitation
preferred to Goyim
Lewin’s essential
point is that many of the pressing moral, ethical, and legal issues that are
front-burner today were already painstakingly and lovingly considered by savants
of the past. Jewish law
in particular surprises and delights moderns, because it not only suggests
solutions, but teaches how complex moral issues can be attacked and dissected.
Jewish law is not
Constitutional US Law and this is HIGH TREASON all the way down from the
Bushkevik Administration to the Supreme Courts to the Florida Courts, ever
freemason Judge and Every Freemason Bar Mitzvaf attorn-ey are treasonous vipers
and ALL should be imprisoned NOW
Within
its ancient legal code are deep and detailed considerations of issues like
privacy, allocating medical resources, the causes of violence, and many more.
So much of the future stands to be illuminated by
the minds of those who specialized in pondering deeply and subtly.
serpents
brood of vipers who have been "Illuminated" by their Hasidic Talmudic
satanic "masters" they call rib-eye.
Many
of us approached the new millennium with less than consummate joy and abandon.
Thanks to the
Government consolidation of Corporations by the Y2K Scam of the Shem Sham
One
estimate projected that over 70% of Americans would have no special plans to
celebrate. Multiple concerns
wrinkled our brows as we mulled over how we would ring in the new.
WORLD
ORDER
We suffered from both
too little, and too much. On the
one hand, we were not completely convinced that the successful completion of
another millennium accomplished all that much for mankind.
Those of us
in the legal professions had
special cause to be mindful of the failures.
Looking backward a thousand years, one of the most prominent images we
beheld was the lack of personal security.
For most of the world’s inhabitants, no Law
governed - or adequately protected
against – the caprice of
local despots, feuding monarchs, bands of brigands, and marauding armies that
could snuff out lives and communities in a moment.
Now we
are ushering in our Talmudic Universal Noahide Laws or else
We would have liked to
believe that the flowering of Law
in the last set of centuries has made a major difference.
Yet, more people were killed by war or their own governments in the first
decades of the past century, than the entire population of the Roman Empire at
its height. Jonathan Swift wrote
that, “We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us
love.” We seem to have enough Law
to make personal security an expectation, but not a reality.
The specter of ruthless and bloody terrorism that threatened to accompany
the birth of the new millennium added to our uneasy feeling that not enough of
the old had changed.
That
they themselves created, they say they get good out of the evil they have
commited, all the while complacent Apostate "Amaraka" sleeps, only to
wake when the Vipers accuse another country of killing our children in their
subterfuge of deception, and then "Amaraka" rises and seek Blood even
unto the innocent, roused by the Talmudic shemgod media of satan's minions of
hell and death. Damned their treacherous souls to eternal darkness where there
will be gnashing and gnawing of teeth in outer darkness. Do you hear SOOPREME
Courts of Injustice and damnation to hell is your lot.
On the other hand, we
were burdened by too much of the new. So
much of our world had been taken over by the increasing invasiveness of new
electronic gadgetry which, we were told, could not be depended upon to
keep the electricity running, or the water flowing, or planes guided steadily
along their intended routes.
The future, we
suspected, might offer the allure of the unknown and changes in inflection, but
not necessarily promise substantive
answers.
september
11, 2001?
How comforting we
should find Mr. Lewin’s brief.
we, as in shemgods we
It
reminds us that when the future fails, there is much to applaud in the past.
september
11, 2004
The Law
means many things to many of us. It
settles disputes; imposes order where chaos would otherwise reign; it rights
many wrongs. It provides many
of us with a way to earn a living, and sometimes assist human beings and
communities in their struggles.
and
you Vipers have broken the laws and are in contempt and
are High Treasonist....Do you hear? When you begin you setting up of
your little sanhedrins and your freemason corruption courts, and you begin your
shemgod bloodshed, you have been duely warned, you stand warned this day, as you
have been warned since the beginning when you were defeated by the Lord of Host
and sealed at Calvary. Do you hear? Do you hear apostate Judaeo-Churchizionians?
do you hear what you lot is even now unless you repent in Jesus the Christ? Do
you hear, you who only give Jesus the Lord Lip service, and yet cling to the
father of the Judaizers?
But beyond all els
e
Law must always imply the
search for Truth.
You will not find it
in the books of perversion of satan and the shemgods oral laws which make the
WORD of God of none effect unto yourselves
How
reassuring it is to be reminded that while the issues and concerns are wondrously
new, that Truth need not be reinvented in every generation.
Some of the richest troves of it are gifts from the past, patiently
waiting to contribute to a richer future.
Rabbi
Yitzchok Adlerstein directs Project
Next Step of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles.
He holds the Sydney M Irmas Chair in Jewish Law
and Ethics at Loyola Law
School
Wiesenthal the treasonist dog along
with his rabid rib-eyes of hell
____
http://100777.com/doc/310
Talmud Institute for US Lawyers Applauded by
Justices
Talmud Institute for US Lawyers Applauded by Justices Coming out of the
closet, eh? They generally prefer working under the cover of darkness, they must
be feeling secure. An indication of how
tightly we are shackled.
From: Michael A. Hoffman II Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002
5:53 PM Subject:
Talmud Institute for US Lawyers Applauded by Justices
THE HOFFMAN WIRE Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting
and Revisionist History
Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html
Institute for Talmudic Law Established in Washington D. C. with Approval of
Three Supreme Court Justices http://i.am/jah/freedman.htm
Advocate of Murder of Arab Civilians is "helping establish the
institute"
Purim Ishmael
Editor's Note: The article below from the Jerusalem Post is evidence of the
growing Talmudic influence over the Federal government and its judiciary. The
supposition is that the "National Institute for Judaic Law" will be
grounded in Old Testament law, when in fact the religion of Judaism nullifies
Old Testament law by filtering it through the distorting prism of the Talmud.
There is even a reference to the Talmud in paragraph seven of the Jerusalem Post
article reproduced below. http://i.am/jah/hadith.htm
Deuteronomy 4:2 from The King of
kings´ Bible Ye shall not ADD unto the word
which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep
the Commandments of the "I AM" your God which I COMMAND you.
The Institute's founder's dinner was attended by three of its supporters on
the Supreme Court-- the Court's two Zionist
justices appointed by Bill Clinton, and
Ronald Reagan's supposed, "stalwart conservative of sterling
integrity," Antonin Scalia. But in a Supreme Court case a few years ago, Justice
Scalia voted in favor of having a Talmudic religious school operated at taxpayer
expense in Monsey, New York. He cited his awe of rabbis
and of the cult of Holocaustianity in reaching his decision, which the majority
of the court rejected.
The National Institute for Judaic Law is being "established" by
Nathan Lewin. Justice Scalia and President Bush know who Nathan Lewin is. He is
the infamous Zionist
lawyer who earlier this year advocated the "total eradication" of the
wives, mothers and children of accused Palestinian suicide bombers (cf.
"The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians," p. 102).
Now we observe the formation of a Talmudic school for American judges and
lawyers in our nation's capitol, established by an advocate of the murder of
Arab women and children. Here is further evidence that
Judaism is becoming the de facto state religion of America, a nation founded
to prevent sectarian Old World hatreds and prejudices from infecting the Federal
government, and there is no meaningful
resistance to this deadly treason.
<http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? pagename=JPost/A/JPArticle/ShowFull&
; cid=1036830287246
Jewish law institute launched in DC
By Janine Zacharia
The Jerusalem Post Nov. 9, 2002
Jewish legal experts have created a new institute that will educate jurists
and others about 2,000 years of Jewish law and promote the application of the
teachings to contemporary legal disputes and other modern-day issues.
Treason and Blasphemy in Washington DC.
Not one is exempt
The launch of the Washington-based National Institute for Judaic Law was
marked Tuesday night with a kosher dinner at the Supreme
Court attended by 200 people, including three Supreme
Court Justices - Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia.
High Treasonist who should be hanged in
Washington DC, but will not be, but be given eternal Damnation for their
Blasphemy
US President George W. Bush sent greetings and
applauded the institute for promoting an "understanding of Judaism's
rich tradition of legal thought."
Born again......not even close to hardly, you blind
Judaeo-Churchinsanity proselyets of the pharisees, made two fold the children of
hell.
"As we face new challenges and welcome new opportunities, our society
must continue to promote good character and strong values. Through
the study and teaching of Jewish law and philosophy you are contributing
to a growing culture of service, citizenship, and responsibility in
America," Bush wrote.
Noahide Laws of satan's slavery unto his shemgods of
his shema-GOG
Scalia, in a letter to the institute's founder, Noson Gurary, wrote that
"Jewish law is certainly one of the oldest and most highly developed
systems" and explained why the comparative study of legal traditions was
beneficial.
"The idea is to make Jewish law more accessible to everyone," said
Washington lawyer Alyza Lewin. Both Lewin and her father Nathan Lewin are
helping establish the institute.
Your courts are now abolished "Amaraka" and
you are become victim's of TREASON
Last year, Alyza Lewin filed a brief to the Supreme Court based on the
Talmud's take on capital punishment when the court was readying to hear a case
on the constitutionality of the electric chair.
Decapitation the only capitol punishment for a
"Goyim" Sanhedrin Tractate, Talmud Bavli 57A.
"Legal scholars often like to know what other legal traditions have said
about certain issues," said Alyza Lewin.
It does not matter what they have to say, IT IS TREASON
Fire you attorn-ies "Amaraka" go Sui Juris
and defeat these Vipers of hell and treason. Or you yourselve's are blamed for
the blood shed which is coming.
Filing that kind of opinion is only part of the institute's mandate. It will
also promote the teaching of Jewish law, develop curricula on Jewish law that
can be integrated into traditional law school courses, and serve as a resource
for anyone wanting to know what the vast Jewish legal tradition has to say on
various issues.
Who cares what satan has to say about anything, it is
Blasphemy and Treason and they will be held accountable. Are you waking from
your slumber?
The institute's first project, already underway, explores how Jewish law can
be applied to modern-day issues surrounding corporate ethics, an idea spurred by
the recent corporate scandals involving Enron and Worldcom.
This was the whole conspiracy of their Hoodlum haha,
testing the shemgods laws on "Amaraka" Just as they did at Waco,
Murrah Federal Building in OKC and Columbine, then the WTC and the Pentegon to
implement their vision of their temporary Hoodlum haha of Hell, which will FALL.
Let them TREMBLE for that Day is soon at Hand.
[ Commnet: the justification being the heavy involvement of Jewish criminals
in those examples? (Mere sarcasm, of course)]
Gurary, who teaches at the State University of New York at Buffalo, thought
up the idea of the institute about nine months ago. "By demonstrating the
philosophy of Jewish law and its moral values, we
can bring a little beacon of light in this world," Gurary said. "I
think this is what we need now, in this day and age."
The little temporary beacon of
Illumination of their angel of darkness who has transformed himself and his
rib-eyes into false Light. Universal Noahide laws of Bushkevik-Schneerson who
appointed him, his shemgods of Dan of the North
______
The Treasonist
Warren Commission and Talmudic Law
http://www.supremecourthistory.org/04_library/subs_volumes/04_c17_d.html
The project followed any clues to
the on-going development of Earl Warren's system of values. Early in the
planning stages nearly every advisor mentioned how close William Sweigert had
been to Earl Warren. From his position as assistant and administrative organizer
in all of Warren's offices from district attorney to governor, (where he was
personal secretary to Warren) Sweigert enjoyed constant access to him. He was a
man with a thoroughly Jesuit training, a fact his own interview integrates with
narrations of the walks and conversation on philosophy of government that he and
Earl Warren used to have, and with a memorandum that Sweigert prepared when
Warren was governor-elect. It is a basic statement of the progressive view of
government: responsible for the social, economic, and physical well
being of
its people, a use of bureaucratic power to improve society
What did not come to light until
later was another factor: Earl Warren's personal investigation into Talmudic
Law. Ben Swig, a
close personal friend of the Warren family, had said, "I'm going to be
frank with you. He knows a lot more about it [the Talmud] than I do. . . . I'll
have him teach me something about it one of these days." Off tape, Swig
mentioned that he thought Warren had studied it under Rabbi Louis Finkelstein,
now Chancellor Emeritus of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. This was
an intriguing lead, and later Finkelstein taped a short session but one with
long ramifications. The two men had met in 1951 when Governor Warren gave a
commencement speech at the University of Judaism in Los Angeles, and their
friendship continued. As Chancellor Finkelstein recalls, "when he came east
to the Court, I saw him
more frequently."[27]
Finkelstein: He and I often
discussed the ethics of the Talmud, which is the greatest Jewish commentary on
the Bible, containing discussion of most of its laws. He was very impressed with
that. And he said that he would like to spend a little time with us here (at the
Seminary). I said, well, if he came here for a weekend, I would arrange to have
our professor of Talmud, who is the greatest living authority on the subject,
lecture on Friday night. And I'd ask another professor to lecture on Saturday at
lunch.
He agreed to that, and he came and
spent the weekend here. [September 13, 1957] On Friday evening, our Talmud
professor, Professor Saul Lieberman, discussed the passage in the Talmud which
forbids acceptance of any confession in any way in a criminal case. This is the
only system of law of
ancient or medieval times which did prohibit it. . . . The Talmud also has ruled
against double jeopardy A person who has been tried once cannot be tried a
second time. . . . After the lecture the Chief Justice said to me, "I think
I would like to say a few words." And what he said was, "This lecture
in has been so interesting, so instructive, that I can't understand how it is
nobody knows about it, that this is kept almost as a secret among you
specialists in the field.
Fry: Then his chief interest
in it was its relation to our Bill of Rights, do you think?
Finkelstein: No. I think he
became interested because of this great concern of the relationship of
ethics to law.
Curiously enough, in the Talmud we have a situation very similar to what you
have here. . . . That is to say the five books of Moses are an
immutable constitution. They are the law.
But of course they go back thirty-five hundred years . . . So that the role
of the Jewish rabbi over the centuries has been in some respects similar to
the role of the judge in the court
in trying to interpret a written document so as to make it fit the needs of
life, and how would the author of the document approach a situation
when it is entirely novel.[28]
Later in the session an attempt is
made to establish the extent of this pursuit. Finkelstein had said that the
seminary had given Warren a copy of the whole Talmud, but that Warren confessed
once, "'I don't spend too much time on it,' as indeed he couldn't, being a
very busy man. Studying the Talmud is like studying higher mathematics."
Fry: Did you continue your
discussion of the Talmud here (in Washington)?
Finkelstein: Yes . . . . We
often sat around and discussed these questions. He liked to do that.
Fry: About how often?
Finkelstein: Well, I would say
that I used to come to Washington about three times a year. . . Always a
lunch, and lasting an hour or so after lunch.
Fry: And he would question
you?
Finkelstein: He would question
me, or I would make some comments. But very often he questioned me. It was
very fascinating. He was a profound man. Of course he was popular, and
didn't put on any airs. One often was deceived into thinking that he was
simple. He wasn't simple. He was a very profound gentleman. A very profound
thinker.
Fry: Well, it's interesting
that you found that this man did have a profound mind, because we do get
testimony that he was simplistic.
Finkelstein: He gave the
impression of being simplistic.
Fry: But that was because he
had distilled things?
Finkelstein: That was because
he wanted to give that impression. He was direct and didn't like
letting technicalities interfere with justice. . . He was a man of deep understanding
and saw through a good deal that he didn't talk about, in public, and which
I don't think I'm free to talk about here either . . . but he certainly was
a person who had a profound grasp of the situations in which we live and a
determination to deal with them.[29]
Amaraka, you have allowed the
Treasonist Vipers to create a Foreign Power in the ranks of Treason in
Washington DC, now you will be judged as a tribe of Israel by Dan the serpent by
the wayside, the Chabad Lubavitch and their Talmudic Universal Noahide laws unto
the devil
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Beauty/talmud.htm
Jewish law
institute launched in DC
By Janine Zacharia
The Jerusalem Post
Nov. 9, 2002
Jewish legal experts have created a new
institute that will educate jurists
and others about 2,000 years of Jewish law
and promote the application
of the teachings to contemporary legal disputes and other modern-day
issues.
What doe Talmudic Judaism unto their
"Replacement Theology god the Tetragrammaton who has No Only Begotten Son
have to do with the Constitution of the United States for the People by the
People? answer: Nothing but worshippin after satan and the great falling away
just before they Reveal thier Son of perdition the Moshaich ben satan of jewry
The launch of the Washington-based National Institute for Judaic Law
was marked Tuesday night with a kosher
dinner at the Supreme Court
attended by 200 people, including three Supreme
Court Justices -
Ruth
Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia.
US President George W. Bush sent greetings and applauded the institute
for promoting an "understanding of Judaism's rich tradition of legal
thought."
"As we face new challenges and welcome new opportunities, our society
must continue to promote good character and strong values. Through the
study and teaching of Jewish law
and philosophy you are contributing to
a growing culture of service, citizenship, and responsibility in
America,"
Bush wrote.
TREASON
Scalia, in a letter to the institute's founder, Noson Gurary, wrote that
"Jewish law is
certainly one of the oldest and most highly developed
systems" and explained why the comparative study of legal traditions
was beneficial.
"The idea is to make Jewish law
more accessible to everyone," said
Washington lawyer Alyza Lewin. Both Lewin and her father Nathan
Lewin are helping establish the institute.
And them who oppose their law to be decapitated
Last year, Alyza Lewin filed a brief to the Supreme
Court based on the
Talmud's take on capital punishment when the court
was readying to
hear a case on the constitutionality of the electric chair.
"Legal scholars often like to know what other legal traditions have said
about certain issues," said Alyza Lewin. Filing that kind of opinion is
only
part of the institute's mandate. It will also promote the teaching of Jewish
law, develop curricula
on Jewish law that can
be integrated into traditional
law school courses, and
serve as a resource for anyone wanting to know
what the vast Jewish legal tradition has to say on various issues.
The institute's first project, already underway, explores how Jewish law
can be applied to modern-day issues surrounding corporate ethics, an
idea spurred by the recent corporate scandals involving Enron and
Worldcom.
[ Comment: the justification being the heavy involvement of
Jewish criminals in those examples? (Mere sarcasm, of course)]
Gurary, who teaches at the State University of New York at Buffalo,
thought up the idea of the institute about nine months ago. "By
demonstrating the philosophy of Jewish law
and its moral values,
we can bring a little beacon of light in this world," Gurary said.
"I think this is what we need now, in this day and age."
___
RamBam thank ya
Mam, Ms. "Amaraka" for your services
the Lies of the great Liars of
satan's shema-Gog and their oral tradition which makes the Word of God of none
effect, Mishnah Torah of Talmud Bavli the perversion of pure evil and blasphemy,
the enemies of mankind, who are contrary unto all mankind.
http://www.chayas.com/princip.htm
THE 14
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF OUR "RAMBAM" TORAH TRADITION
by Rambamic scholar- Michael Bar-Ron
1)
Torah is a G-d-given constitutional
law
whose 613 Commandments are eternal and can never be changed.
Even the domains of ethics, spirituality, and the basic principles of
faith are included within the Commandments.
Relating to Torah Law
as a whole, and striving to obey the entire Law—nothing
more—is the essence of our Covenant with HaShem.
Failure to keep the Law,
or acting as if any part of it is no longer binding, breaches the Covenant.
Jesus
is the Covenant fulfilled for them who stand firm against these vipers the
hasidim Pharisees and their Proselytes
2)
The Torah was given to Moses in two forms: an oral form (the Oral Law),
and a written form (the Written Law).
It is impossible to fulfill the written form of the Law
without the oral; the Oral Law
is absolutely fundamental to the Covenant.
The
oral is only the Lies and interpretations of perverted old men who like to be
called Rabbi, rabbi in their high places.
3)
At the Command of HaShem, Moses instituted a Supreme
Court of Torah sages,
the Sanhedrin, to be the guardian and absolute authority on the Oral Law
for all future generations.
And he warned them at his death they
would "Replace the Creator the WORD with their oral tradition of
perversions
Only the form of the
Oral Law that was
faithfully transmitted down to the last Sanhedrin is valid and obligatory.
Therefore they can "Revive"
their once dead beast with the same lies of hell
The Talmudic
literature, the legal writings of the Tannaim and Amoraim, is the final
repository of the traditions of the last Sanhedrin.
The authentic Oral Law
of Moses is in our hands today, perfectly in tact.
Sorcery
and Blasphemy which they do not repent
4)
Just as the Sanhedrin of 71 sages has the sole authority to interpret the
Torah, it is also the only court
with the authority to legislate decrees and institute customs (rabbinical law)
that are binding on the entire Jewish People and the rest of the world,
including Gentiles.
and
they through treachery and treason and sorcery have re-instituted their Talmudic
beast
The only
post-Sanhedrin court
whose legislative authority was universally recognized, was the unique court
of Rav Ashe and Ravina in Babylonia.
Babylon who they coveted in their
whoredom. The same Babel of their shem name tower, when they said let us be as
gods
After
the last Supreme Court
was disbanded, disputes arose regarding authoritative legal traditions that
appeared contradictory or had become unclear.
The law was given
a final recodification by Rav Ashe’s court:
the Talmud
Bavli.
Although it includes new decrees and customs that
were not instituted by a Sanhedrin, it is recognized as the final and
most authoritative written source from which the Law
is determined.
and
now your treasonous Washington Mammonites paws have made it the Law of apostate
"Amaraka" and you are with them are you are against them" saith
the king of the Noahides, Danbushkevik
Even the Babylonian
sages never had the power to contradict the authoritative legal traditions
established in the Land of Israel.
Even in Greater Israel of the United
States of ISREALHELL
Their
new decrees and customs were only intended to safeguard the law.
Their authority was based on their unique ability to determine and
officially codify what the original law
was, and the fact that its rulings were accepted by the majority of the Jewish
People—which no later court
could claim.
It is still a
question, however, as to whether any original Babylonian legislation truly
obligates the Jewish People or not. In
either case, it is practically impossible to distinguish with certainty between
their decrees and the authentic Israelite law.
In the context of the rest of Talmudic
literature, the Talmud Bavli remains the primary source of the Halakhah
(official Jewish Law).
If there is a
question regarding original Babylonian legislation, certainly no post-Sanhedrin court
or individual after Rav Ashe has the authority to add to, or give an alternative
ruling to rabbinical law
as it was written down by the time the Talmud Bavli was formally sealed, about
500 C.E. Since then, only authentic
Talmudic Law—based
purely on the written word from the original Talmudic
literature—is the Halachah.
Which
states that if they do not bow to the Babylonian God they shall be put to death
by decapitation
5)
Over 1500 years have passed without any single, nationally recognized,
compulsive legal authority over the Jewish People.
As times changed, it may have been desirable to consider the reasoning
behind the law, and
reinterpret the written sources contrary to the Halakhah as it was instituted.
New rabbinical decrees may have seemed necessary according to the needs
of the times. However, since post-Talmudic
legislation was made without the proper authority, it does not have the status
of Halakhah. In
the absence of a Sanhedrin,
new rabbinical legislation and customs cannot obligate the Jewish People (except
in a specific area of law
which the Halachah explicitly left to follow the local custom, such
as monetary law).
The
reasoning behind the Law
or “spirit of the Law”
may not interfere with the practice of Halakhah.
so that they neither buy nor sale
unless they have the Mark of the BEAST of Zion
Over the centuries,
it is natural that certain traditional customs have developed and spread among
the common masses of religious Jews, even though they contradict the Halakhah.
Since modern rabbinic rulings may not conflict with Talmudic
Law, popular custom
certainly has no authority to contradict the Halakhah, even if it is in
agreement with the majority opinion of currently recognized rabbinical sages.
(The majority opinion of Torah sages only rules in the context of the
Sanhedrin.)
There is a widespread
opinion that the above only applies to popular customs that are more lenient
than the Halakhah, while prevalent custom that is stricter or adds to the
authentic Halakhah is obligatory. We
differ with this position. However,
regarding customs and traditions that are more lenient than the Halakhah, there
can be no argument: they must not be followed.
In short, without
a Sanhedrin, Talmudic Law
is a closed system.
Not any more as of October
14, 2004 for the Beast is Risen
What
the Talmudic sages
decreed and recorded in the Talmudic
literature is legally binding, even if the reason for the decree no longer
exists. Likewise, if they didn’t
record any ruling on a particular case, then no ruling exists; there is no
Halakhah on that case.
6)
Talmudic
literature contains Halakhah (law)
as well as Aggadah (legend). There
are schools that insist on an absolute, literal understanding of Aggadah, and a
figurative interpretation of Halakhah. We
understand the Halakhah according to the plain and simple meaning of the text,
and the Aggadah figuratively, so that it does not seem to contradict the
Halachah.
7)
Whenever there is doubt regarding any matter of Halakhah (for example, if
the text is unclear, or there is a difference of opinion between two reliable
sources), one must always be strict on Torah Law,
and lenient on rabbinical law.
8)
The terrible suffering of the Jewish People over the millienia is a
direct result of our having failed to keep the Halakhah properly as a nation.
The gentile nations are not ultimately to blame for our terrible
suffering. Rather, those nations
that afflict us are agents of HaShem that will eventually be punished.
Counter
and contray to Christ. For it is they who hate the Creator and persecute the
True Believers who has slain no man by the murderer. Them who killed Jews are of
satan in the murderers name.
The weight of the
blame of our suffering falls on the shoulders of traditional Jewish leadership:
Rather than assuming the authority to innovate new customs or reinterpret
the Halakhah, post-Talmudic
sages have the responsibility to serve as role models of proper halakhic
behavior, to teach and show how the authentic Halakhah applies to their
generation, and to enforce
the Law
to the extent of their power, rebuking the people when they stray from it.
They also have the responsibility to guide the Jewish People towards the
fulfillment of the entire Covenant, which
includes restoring the Sanhedrin.
Failure to guide the
Jewish People properly is largely rooted in two problems:
(1) A narrow
perspective of Halakhah, which fails to relate to the Torah as a whole.
Halakhah that cannot be practiced outside of Israel, or without a Temple,
has often been dismissed as not practical in our times and largely ignored.
(As mentioned above, acting as if any part of the Torah is no longer
actively binding breaches the Covenant.) (2)
A failure to educate the common masses of Jews—including laymen, women, and
children—in practical Halakhah.
9)
The only practical code of Jewish Law
that relates to the entire Torah as a whole, is the Rambam’s Mishneh Torah.
It was written in order to put the entire breadth of Halakhah in the
hands of laymen, women, and children, besides Torah scholars.
The best way to learn, practice and teach Halakhah in our times, is
straight from the Mishneh Torah. It
is also the only comprehensive summary of the entire Talmudic
literature.
Theoretically, the
entire Halakhah can be completely learned, successfully practiced and taught
straight from the written sources: Bible
and the sum total of Talmudic
literature (Mishnah, Tosephta, Mekhilta, Sifrei, Sifra, Talmud Yerushalmi, and
Talmud Bavli). Practically,
however, this is very complicated. Many
years of intense learning are required to master this vast literature.
The most authoritative work, the Talmud Bavli (Gemara), is written in a
difficult dialect of Aramaic mixed with other languages.
Furthermore, in our times, we no longer have texts of the Gemara that are
uncensored and totally accurate.
We no longer have the tradition required to identify non-authoritative
conclusions added into the Gemara by post-Talmudic
sages. We no longer have the
ability to accurately distinguish between the authentic traditions received by
the Geonim—which were not included in the Gemara—and their non-authoritative
conclusions.
Why
they sent special OPS into Bag Dhad to find the Oldest version of Perversion
The Rambam, one of
the greatest masters of Talmud ever, was a highly critical researcher, who
possessed all of the above. Mishneh
Torah preserves the most authentic understanding of that literature from 850
years ago. Written in relatively
simple, clear Hebrew, it requires far less time to master.
Normal, healthy, and
serious individuals with proper discipline and guidance
have the ability to master the entire Halakhah, using the Bible and the
Rambam’s Mishneh Torah alone—without any other source, outside of any formal
rabbinical training or yeshiva program. This
is the very purpose for which the book was written.
(The Rambam’s
earlier sources do not reflect his final understanding as the Mishneh Torah
does, since the latter was written in his maturity, and the work continued to be
revised until his death. Furthermore,
only Mishneh Torah editions from Yemenite manuscripts should be used.
The European printed editions are notorious for their numerous
censorships and countless unintentional copyists’ errors.)
Remember
Yemen is where they struck the US Cole to begin the last Iniquity
10)
The only alternative to learning for oneself with a teacher, is choosing
a halakhic guide—such as a rabbi—to dictate
how one should practice Halakhah. However,
following such a rabbinical figure does not exempt the follower from his
rabbi’s mistakes. Every Jew is
personally responsible for practicing the Law
correctly, and is punishable for his mistakes—even those he learned from his
rabbi. For the serious student,
even the greatest rabbi is a poor alternative to taking responsibility for his
own learning; for him, there is no viable alternative to learning in Hebrew, in
the Land of Israel.
Who
loved to be called rabbi, rabbi
11)
Although independent study is ideal, some measure of guidance is
necessary. Unlike more recent
rabbinical works, the early authoritative rabbinical sources were written in
order to be read in their entirety, and understood in the context of the whole
text. Mishneh Torah must be read
several times in its entirety, in order to gain the most accurate understanding
of any part of the Law.
Until one has completed the whole text several times, one should have the
guidance of a teacher who has.
12)
Learning Torah must only be done with the intention of putting into
practice
what one learns:
Therefore, there is no such commandment as “to learn Torah” (as an
intellectual exercise), but rather “to train in Torah”—to practice
according to the plain and simple meaning of the text.
Likewise, the opinion of most recognized Torah scholars—who mainly
relate to Talmudic
literature and Mishneh Torah on a theoretical level—cannot be compared to that
of scholars who literally live by the authority of what is written in these
sources. The latter are clearly
more reliable than the former.
Although it is less
common today, this pure independent learning and practice of the Halakhah
straight from the original sources is not a modern invention or theory.
It has been the authentic tradition of Yemenite Jewry for centuries, as
it was passed down to the former Chief Rabbi of Yemen, HaRav Yiħia Qafiħ
z”l, and his grandson, Rav Yoseph Qafiħ, z”l, renowned Torah giants
in their respective generations. It
is also practiced in other circles, such as the serious students of the Vilna
Gaon.
13) Accurate
practice of the Halakhah must be done in a way that it influences one’s
character, so that one fulfills the Commandments in a spirit of genuine goodness
of heart.
Accordingly, in the
above-mentioned tradition, Torah learning and service of HaShem are only
possible in the spirit of humility. Honest
study of Torah can bring a person to challenge modern Jewish practice.
Unless he is careful, one is in danger of looking down on his fellow Jew
and holding other Torah scholars in contempt,
G-d forbid. Anyone who joins
this tradition just to be different from others, in a spirit of rebellion
against the mainstream, or for any purpose other than to serve HaShem properly
could bring a curse upon himself and others, rather than a blessing.
aeeean
you too can haeave the excluuuuusive woad of gawd
Furthermore, there is
absolutely no permission given or reason to look down on any traditional Jewish
community, be it Ashkenazi, Sepharadi, etc.
When measured against the standard of the authentic Halakhah, every group
has kept certain laws better than others, and every group has ignored or
remained ignorant of laws that others faithfully kept.
Every Jewish community has important lessons to teach and many to learn.
Therefore
there is no such thing as "Good Jew" Bad Jew for flesh is flesh and
spirit is spirit. Any who deny that the Lord cometh in the flesh are anti-Christ
14)
The Torah is the inheritance of the entire Jewish nation, not only one
community or school of thought. Just
as there are Commandments that obligate each and every individual and even whole
communities, there are Commandments that obligate the entire nation as one, such
as rebuilding the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.
Without a proper Sanhedrin, many national obligations are practically
impossible to fulfill. Therefore,
even living according to the most rational and authentic understanding of Talmudic
law (Mishneh Torah)
is not a long-term ideal. Nothing
can replace the Divine Commandment to form a Sanhedrin,
whose rulings must be accepted by the entire Jewish People and
the rest of the world.
Living in a Torah state under a Sanhedrin, with a Holy Temple and a
righteous Jewish king, is our long-term ideal.
If there are any
questions, please e-mail Michael Bar-Ron: michaellevana@barak-online.net
ok...ok I accept the fact that you hate
Jesus the Nazarene and that your intention is to decapitate all who stand firm
for their Testimony of Him, but not by your perversion, But by the Lord Christ
Jesus the spirit of all Prophecy.
______
Noahide
News Part 78
The
Last Deception
Section
2
section
3
section
4
section
5
section
6
section
7
section
8
section
9
section
10
section
11
section
12
section
13
section
14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"
section
15
section 16 "The
Beast Has Risen"
section
16-B
section
17
section
17-B
section 17-C
section
17-D
section
18
section
18-B
section
19
section
19-B
section
20
section
20-B
section
20-C
section
20-D
section
20-E
section
21
section
22
section
23
section
24
section
25
Daniel's
Seventy Weeks
Was
Peter a Jew?
The
Two Witnesses
"The
Whore of Babylon"
Mystery
Babylon
Are
the " Ael-ians coming"
Ael-ians
II
Wall
Street " The Mark" is Here
Wall
Street II
Wall
Street III
It
has happened "War Declared upon and in America"
Declared
section Part II
"Questions"
"All
you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"
Qabalah
Part II
Qabalah
Part III
National
Identification Card
ADDED
Material 3-25-2004
Prophecy
Unfolding
A
Sincere Request to "Rapture" Teachers
"Seventh
Trumpet"
Compulsory
Constitutional Cremation
Homeland
Security, "The Police State"
"The
Fourth Beast"
The
Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah
The
Scribes of Baal
How
will they do it- " The false-christ"
False
Christ Part II
The
Word
Baal's
food Tax
"The
Changing of the Guards"
"Summation"
The beginning of sorrows has begun
"Moshiach
ben Lucifer"
Satan's
Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"
"Satan's
Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)
I
Witch, New One World Order Seal
Satan's
Enforcers of Quaballah
Satan's
Enforcers Part 2
Satan's
Enforcers Part 3
Satan's
Enforcers Part 4
The
Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith
Pledge
of Allegiance Part Two
I
AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ
King
of the Noachides
"Beware
the Mark"
"Beware
the Mark" part two
"Beware
the Mark" Part 3
"Beware
the Mark" Part Four
"Beware
the Mark" Part Five
Harvest
of Fear
"Harvest
of Fear" Part Two
"Harvest
of Fear" Part Three
National
Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement
Where's
Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?
The
Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba
The
"Lessor Jew"
Temporary
Coup d' Etat
The
Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?
The
Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !
Protocols
Today Part Two
Letter
to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"
Identity
of the Illuminati
The
"Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch
Chabad
Satan Part 1A
Chabad
Satan Part 2
Chabad
Satan Part 2A
Chabad
Satan Part 2B
Chabad
Satan Part 3
Chabad
Satan Part 3A
Chabad
Satan Part 4
Chabad
Satan Part 4A
Chabad
Satan Part 4B
Chabad
Satan Part 4C
Chabad
Satan Part 5
Chabad
satan Part 5A
Chabad
Satan Part 5B
Chabad
Satan Part 5C
Chabad
Satan Part 6
Chabad
Satan Part 6B
Chabad
Satan Part 6C
Chabad
Satan
Part 6D
Chabad
Satan Part 7
Chabad
Satan Part 7A
Chabad
Satan Part 7B
Chabad
Satan Part 7C
Chabad
Satan Part 8
Chabad
Satan Part 8A
Chabad
Satan Part 8B
Chabad
Satan Part 8C
Chabad
Satan Part 8D
Chabad
Satan Part 9
Chabad
Satan Part 9A
Chabad
Satan Part 9B
Chabad
Satan Part 9C
Chabad
Satan Part 9D
Chabad
Satan Part 10
Chabad
Satan Part 10A
Chabad
Satan Part 10B
Chabad
Satan Part 10C
Chabad
Satan Part 10D
Chabad
Satan Part 11
The
Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction
Chabad
Wall Part 2
Chabad
Wall Part 3
Chabad
Wall Part 4
The
Chabad Phoenix is Rising
Columbia
"The Queen of Heaven"
Patriot
Akt II, Comrad
The
Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"
Satan's
One World Religion
OWR
Part 2
OWR
Part 3
OWR
Part 4
One World
Religion Part 5
One
World Religion Part 6
One
World
Religion Part 7
Religion Part 7
Re
the god of Talmud Bavli
Perpetual
Purim
"The
Raiser of Taxes"
Jewish
Persecution
Obedient
Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764
The Final
Nazi
Nazi Part
2
Nazi Part
3
Nazi Part
4
The
Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king
Changing
the Time and the Laws
The
Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees
Exod-U.S
the coming Geula
anti-semitism?
Who
murdered Jesus the Christ
"Replacement
Theology" of Judaic Talmudism
Eating
Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky
the gods
"The
Two Whores"
Noahide
News
Noahide
News 2
Noahide
News Part 3
Noahide
News Part 4
Noahide
News Part 5
Noahide
News Part 6
Noahide
News Part 7
Noahide
News Part 8
Noahide
News Part 9
Noahide
News Part 10
Noahide
News Part 11
Noahide
News Part 12
Noahide
News Part 13
Noahide
News Part 14
Noahide
News Part 15
Noahide News Part 16
Noahide News Part 17
Noahide
News Part 18
Noahide
News Part 19
Noahide
News Part 20
Noahide News
Part 21
Noahide
News part 22
Noahide
News Part 23
Noahide
News part 24
Noahide
News Part 25
Noahide
News Part 26
Noahide
News part 27
Noahide
News Part 28
Noahide
News Part 29
Noahide
News Part 30
Noahide
News Part 31
Noahide
News Part 32
Noahide
News Part 33
Noahide
News Part 34
Noahide
News Part 35
Noahide
News Part 36
Noahide
News Part 37
Noahide
News Part 38
Noahide
News Part 39
Noahide
News Part 40
Noahide
News Part 41
Noahide
News Part 42
Noahide
News Part 43
Noahide
News Part 44
Noahide
News Part 45
Noahide
News Part 46
Noahide
News Part 47
Noahide
News Part 48
Noahide
News Part 49
Noahide
News Part 50
Noahide
News Part 51
Noahide
News Part 52
Noahide
News Part 53
Noahide
News Part 54
Noahide
News Part 55
Noahide
NewsPart 56
Noahide
News Part 57
Noahide
News Part 58
Noahide
News Part 59
Noahide
News Part 60
Noahide News Part 61
Noahide
News Part 62
Noahide
News Part 63
Noahide News Part
64
Noahide
News Part 65
Noahide
News Part 66
Noahide
News Part 67
Noahide
News Part 68
Noahide
News Part 69
Letter to Bob Jones and
President Bush and all televangelist
Noahide
News Part 70
Noahide
News Part 71
Noahide
News Part 72
Noahide
News Part 73
Noahide
News Part 74
Noahide
News Part 75
