WASHINGTON (JTA) —
Call it the first primary.
Ten months before New Hampshire voters render their tone-setting verdicts in
the race for the next president of the United States, candidates from both
parties and their proxies will wander the halls of next week’s American
Israel Public Affairs
PURE TREASON...TREASON....TREASON
Committee conference assessing their PIQ — pro-Israel quotient.
The conference of the powerful pro-Israel lobby addresses an array of
challenges facing Israel, but
dealing with Iran
carries a special urgency as its nuclear program continues apace.
AIPAC’s executive committee is expected to outline its
tough pro-sanctions line in a resolution, and delegates will endorse
bills outlining further sanctions — including against third parties that
deal with Iran — when they visit Capitol Hill to lobby on Tuesday, the
conference's final day.
Treason
Iran
also is the pro-Israel issue where Democrats and Republicans differ — on the
degree of permissible engagement with the Islamic Republic — and
conference-goers will closely watch how top representatives of both parties
frame the issue.
and if the pimps of this whore do not do their will
their careers will be destroyed and many became their proselytes for the fear
of the jews was upon them
The annual policy conference is AIPAC’s benchmark event and the one
opportunity to reach major givers in the pro-Israel
community gathered under a single roof, albeit the huge, multi-raftered
roof of Washington’s convention center.
AIPAC traditionally draws about 6,000 activists to the policy forum. This will
be the last chance to reach them before primary season begins in January. This
presidential campaign is expected to be the most expensive race ever.
For Satans Mammon Steaks are high
None of the declared presidential candidates will speak at the conference, but
most are likely to attend Monday's gala dinner, the conference’s highlight.
Top officials speaking include Vice President Dick Cheney and Rep. Nancy
Pelosi (D-Calif.) in her first AIPAC appearance since becoming speaker of the
U.S. House of Representatives.
One Big merged Treasonous Blasphemous anti-Christ
Harlot Family are these two whores, One Aholah dan and her sister Aholibah
Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi
Livni will speak at the same session as Cheney, and Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert will address the gathering by satellite.
The agenda for the policy conference reads like a wish
list for what the pro-Israel powerhouse expects from the candidates --- and
members of the U.S. Congress.
TREASON TREASON TREASON TREASON
TREASON
One session is titled “Danger in Damascus,” leaving little doubt where
AIPAC stands on accommodation with Syria. “Radioactive Revolution: What a
nuclear Iran would mean for the world” is similarly straightforward.
Other topics include isolating the Palestinian Authority as long as it is
headed by Hamas and promoting homeland security cooperation between Israel and
the United States.
Another feature of the conference is AIPAC’s renewed outreach efforts to
non-Jews.
Noahides under HJR 104, PL 102 14
One session is dedicated to pro-Israel African Americans, and several
embrace evangelical Christians, a group that organizational Jews only recently
have come to appreciate. Pastor
John Hagee, who founded Christians United for Israel, is a speaker.
The presidential candidates have been reaching out to the pro-Israel community
in large forums and small in recent months, from regional AIPAC conferences to
Israel's Herzliya policy conference in January. Most
recently, U.S. Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.)
addressed local AIPAC events in New York and Chicago.
AIPAC rushed Obama’s Chicago appearance forward to last Friday, partly so
the candidate could set out his Middle East policy before the AIPAC
conference.
There is bipartisan consensus on much of the AIPAC-endorsed agenda, though a
subtle fault line is emerging on Iran policy.
Virtually all of the candidates speak of maintaining a
military option as a means of preventing Iran from achieving a nuclear
weapons capability, but Democrats favor a greater degree of engagement while
Republicans favor cutting off the Islamic Republic entirely.
They all lust to do the murder of their father
who is a Robber and the Murderer from the beginning, Damn their souls and all
who are "With them" unto the lowestrooms of Hell
AIPAC won’t count out engagement, but makes it clear that it should occur
under the most restrictive circumstances as long as Iran
resists nuclear transparency.
“AIPAC firmly believes that diplomatic, economic and political sanctions are
the critical instruments in the effort to persuade Iran to abandon its pursuit
of nuclear weapons capability,” Josh Block, AIPAC’s spokesman, told JTA.
“AIPAC is not in principle opposed to engagement with Iran, and given Iran's
consistent pattern of delay and deception, AIPAC believes diplomatic efforts
should not slow the necessary and continued imposition of biting economic and
political sanctions,” Block said. “By increasing the pressure on the
Iranian regime, the international community can continue to create the
circumstances most likely to lead to Iran abandoning its illicit pursuit of
nuclear capability.”
Even as the jews declared war on Germany
Making sanctions rather than negotiations the “critical instrument” of
engagement with Iran is the hallmark of Bush administration policy. It's
significant that Cheney, the administration’s toughest Iran strategist, is
addressing the AIPAC conference for the second year in a row.
A wretched murderer full of dead mans
bones
It’s a difference that spills down to the candidates.
Republicans talk almost exclusively of sanctions. In the scenario they
outline, engagement appears almost absurd.
“When the president of Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off the map, or
asks for a world without Zionism, or suggests that Israel's Jewish population
return to Europe, or calls the Holocaust a myth, it is clear that we are
dealing with an evil man and a very dangerous regime,” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)
said in a satellite address to the Herzliya conference.
However, Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
is more determined. He knows that in the near future the Land of Israel is
about to expand. He writes, "It is our duty to force all mankind to
accept the seven Noahide laws, and if
not—they will be killed." (Ma'ariv, 10/6/04)
Appearing at the same event in person, Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts
governor and Republican presidential candidate, belittled parallels to
engagement with the Soviet Union during the Cold War as “wishful
thinking.”
“The Russians were never suicidal,” he said. “This cannot be said for a
regime that celebrates martyrdom.”
In contrast, Democrats emphasize engagement as much as they stand by the
military option as a last resort.
“While we should take no option, including military action, off the table,
sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough sanctions should be our
primary means to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons,” Obama said
last week.
Usama Obama says
Clinton also endorsed engagement in her AIPAC appearance last month, her first
foreign policy event since her presidential announcement.
purring for affection to her masters
"I'm not sure anything positive would come out of it," but it's
worth testing, she said.
Democrats must take into account a base that is wary of military engagement in
the wake of the Iraq quagmire.
John Edwards, the former North Carolina senator, talked a tough line in his
own satellite address to the Herzliya conference — and has been walking back
from it since, repeatedly endorsing engagement.
“We're not negotiating with them directly,” Edwards lamented to the
liberal American Prospect magazine last month. “We're not being smart about
how we engage with them.”
