http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061004/pl_nm/korea_north_dc_4;_ylt=AmT5CihDEBEy0tPhBLWEjLeCscEA;_ylu=

X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

U.S. gives N Korea stark warning against nuclear test

By Carol Giacomo and Paul Eckert Wed Oct 4, 7:34 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States in its starkest warning so far said on Wednesday it would not live with a nuclear-armed

North Korea, while Japan and other neighbors hardened their responses after the reclusive state announced it planned a nuclear test.

We are not going to live with a nuclear North Korea, we are not going to accept it," U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Chris Hill said. He warned Pyongyang that "it can have a future or it can have these weapons. It cannot have both."

Hill spoke after a U.S. defense official said the United States had detected activity at potential test sites in North Korea, indicating possible preparations for a nuclear test. North Korea, which has said it has nuclear bombs, on Tuesday said it would conduct its first nuclear test.

Hill refused to say what steps Washington might take to see that North Korea did not succeed in testing a weapon. But he said: "We will do all we can to dissuade the DPRK from this test."

"We would have no choice but to act resolutely to make sure that the DPRK understood -- and to make sure that any other country understands -- that this (nuclear test) is a very bad mistake," Hill told the U.S.-Korea Institute, which is part of the Johns Hopkins University.

The U.S. defense official who spoke about signs of activity at potential North Korea test sites and declined to be identified said the evidence was not definitive. He noted that because the North Koreans have never conducted a nuclear test, "we don't really know what we're looking for."

At the

United Nations, Japan pushed for a Security Council warning that if North Korea went ahead with a test, the council would impose consequences, although it did not specify what those should be.

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said that while Japan, Britain and France made clear a strong statement was needed, he was not certain "what North Korea's protectors" on the 15-member council would do.

In response, China's U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya said, "I'm not sure which country he is referring to, but I think that for bad behavior in this world no one is going to protect them (North Korea)."

The Foreign Ministry of China, the closest North Korea has to an ally, called for restraint on North Korea's part and for other countries to avoid actions that would heighten tensions.

"We hope that North Korea will exercise necessary calm and restraint over the nuclear test issue," Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said in a short statement on the ministry's Web site (www.fmprc.gov.cn).

Russia's and

South Korea's foreign ministers denounced as "unacceptable" Pyongyang's plan for a test, the Russian Foreign Ministry said. It said Russia's Sergei Lavrov and South Korea's Ban Ki-moon discussed the North Korean situation by telephone.

The United States, France and Japan all have pressed for the issue to be dealt with at the United Nations. But Beijing wants it resolved through six-country talks set up to end North Korea's nuclear weapons program.

North Korea has snubbed those talks -- involving the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States -- for almost a year.

OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

Pyongyang has refused to return until the United States ends a crackdown on North Korean offshore bank accounts, which Washington says is aimed at ending suspected illicit activities and has nothing to do with the six-party process.

Analysts and officials said Pyongyang's nuclear test announcement on Tuesday could be an attempt to push the United States into direct talks about ending the crackdown.

South Korea's Unification Minister, Lee Jong-seok, said he saw a strong element of trying to apply pressure on the United States. "In the event efforts to resume the six-party talks break down, the possibility of a North Korean nuclear test is high," Lee told a parliamentary committee.

Analysts say North Korea probably could make a nuclear weapon but lacks the technology to make it small enough to fit on a missile. They also note that in its July test that defied international warnings, North Korea's long-range missile fizzled just after take-off.

The Stalinist state argues that its hand has been forced by what a North Korean diplomat called Washington's "proclamation of war" by threatening economic sanctions.

"These kinds of threats of nuclear war and tensions and pressure by the United States compel us to conduct a nuclear test," North Korean embassy spokesman Pak Myong Guk told Reuters in Canberra. "Now the situation around the Korean peninsula is very tense," Pak said. "It may be breaking out (in) a war at any time, I think."

(Additional reporting by Jack Kim and Jon Herskovitz in Seoul, Chris Buckley in Beijing, Rob Taylor in Canberra, George Nishiyama in Tokyo, Oleg Shchedrov in Moscow, Evelyn Leopold at the United Nations, and Will Dunham in Washington)

______

Meanwhile the Global Hassidic Chabad Red Edomite controlled Bully and murderer......

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-bunker-buster-rnep-animation.html

__________

the Talmudic Jewish media are pitting Ishmael against the west, as per their PUTRID anti-Christ Blasphemous Zohar guides them in their murders and sorceries and blasphemy

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/05/wmuslims05.xml

Muslims are waging civil war against us, claims police union

By David Rennie, Europe Correspondent

(Filed: 05/10/2006)

Radical Muslims in France's housing estates are waging an undeclared "intifada" against the police, with violent clashes injuring an average of 14 officers each day.

	Interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy was warned of an 'intifada'

As the interior ministry said that nearly 2,500 officers had been wounded this year, a police union declared that its members were "in a state of civil war" with Muslims in the most depressed "banlieue" estates which are heavily populated by unemployed youths of north African origin.

It said the situation was so grave that it had asked the government to provide police with armoured cars to protect officers in the estates, which are becoming no-go zones.

The number of attacks has risen by a third in two years. Police representatives told the newspaper Le Figaro that the "taboo" of attacking officers on patrol has been broken.

Instead, officers – especially those patrolling in pairs or small groups – faced attacks as soon as they tried to arrest locals.

Senior officers insisted that the problem was essentially criminal in nature, with crime bosses on the estates fighting back against tough tactics.

The interior minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is also the leading centre-Right candidate for the presidency, (Hassidic right) has sent heavily equipped units into areas with orders to regain control from drug smuggling gangs and other organised crime rings. Such aggressive raids were "disrupting the underground economy in the estates", one senior official told Le Figaro.

However, not all officers on the ground accept that essentially secular interpretation. Michel Thoomis, the secretary general of the hardline Action Police trade union, has written to Mr Sarkozy warning of an "intifada" on the estates and demanding that officers be given armoured cars in the most dangerous areas.

He said yesterday: "We are in a state of civil war, orchestrated by radical Islamists. This is not a question of urban violence any more, it is an intifada, with stones and Molotov cocktails. You no longer see two or three youths confronting police, you see whole tower blocks emptying into the streets to set their 'comrades' free when they are arrested."

He added: "We need armoured vehicles and water cannon. They are the only things that can disperse crowds of hundreds of people who are trying to kill police and burn their vehicles."

However, Gerard Demarcq, of the largest police unions, Alliance, dismissed talk of an "intifada" as representing the views of only a minority.

Mr Demarcq said that the increased attacks on officers were proof that the policy of "retaking territory" from criminal gangs was working.

Mayors in the worst affected suburbs, which saw weeks of riots and car-burning a year ago, have expressed fears of a vicious circle, as attacks by locals lead the police to harden their tactics, further increasing resentment.

As if to prove that point, there were angry reactions in the western Paris suburb of Les Mureaux following dawn raids in search of youths who attacked a police unit on Sunday. The raids led to one arrest. They followed clashes on Sunday night when scores of youths attacked seven officers who had tried to arrest a man for not wearing his seat belt while driving. That driver refused to stop, and later rammed a police car trying to block his path.

The mayor of Les Mureaux, Francois Garay, criticised aggressive police tactics that afterwards left "the people on the ground to pick up the pieces".

_________

Andy Borowitz: Kangaroo Selected as New Hussein Judge

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060929_andy_borowitz_kangaroo_judge/

Posted on Sep 29, 2006

By Andy Borowitz

Two weeks after the judge in Saddam Hussein’s trial for crimes against humanity was dismissed for displaying leniency toward the former Iraqi dictator, the proceedings became embroiled in controversy once again as legal experts questioned the selection of a kangaroo as the judge’s replacement.

While the dismissal of the previous judge, Abdullah al Amiri, raised eyebrows in legal circles because it suggested to some that the Iraqi government was trying to predetermine the results of the trial, the selection of a kangaroo from the Sydney Zoo in Australia did little to allay those concerns.

“The new Iraqi government is already facing an uphill struggle to gain any kind of credibility for the trial of Saddam Hussein,” said Hassan El-Medfaai, president of the Iraqi Bar Association. “It is hard to see how putting a kangaroo in charge helps achieve that goal.”

The kangaroo, known as Annette during her tenure at the Sydney Zoo, received mixed reviews on her first day in the Baghdad courtroom where Mr. Hussein is being tried.

After one of the former dictator’s trademark outbursts, the kangaroo appeared alarmed, jumped from the bench and had to be subdued with a tranquilizer dart before the proceedings could continue.

At the White House, President Bush praised Saddam’s new judge and said that he would consider appointing a kangaroo to the U.S. Supreme Court, so long as the kangaroo agreed with him on abortion and prayer in schools.

Elsewhere, a team of French doctors made history by performing surgery in zero gravity on an airplane, but were then arrested for bringing liquids and sharp objects onboard.

___________

the Real news about Emanuel Goldstein and the ministry of truth

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/051006redhanded.htm

U.S. Government Caught Red-Handed Releasing Staged Al-Qaeda Videos
Immediate Congressional investigation demanded, media oversight of clear and deliberate psychological warfare against American population non-existent

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 5 2006

Revelations that the US government had been in possession of footage released on Sunday depicting alleged Al-Qaeda hijackers and Osama Bin Laden since 2001 and evidence that the footage itself was filmed by security agencies, went unquestioned by the media - who blindly towed the official line that the tape was released by Al-Qaeda. This is smoking gun proof that the U.S. government is staging the release of alleged Al-Qaeda tapes and it demands an immediate Congressional investigation.

Segments of the video that were interspersed with footage of the "laughing hijackers," Jarrah and Atta, showing Bin Laden giving a speech to an audience in Afghanistan on January 8 2000, were culled from what terror experts describe as surveillance footage taken by a "security agency."

This explains the lack of a soundtrack in the video and the fact that the tape does not focus solely on Bin Laden but pans around and shows the attendees in the audience.

Furthermore, film of the Bin Laden speech, reported by the dominant media as new footage, was previously broadcast in the UK docudramaThe Road to Guantanamo, which was first seen on British television nearly seven months ago in March.

News reports over the weekend contained the admission that the U.S. government had been in possession of the footage since 2002, while others said it was found when the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001, and yet it was still bizarrely reported that the tape, bearing all the hallmarks of having been filmed and edited by undercover US intelligence and having admittedly been in US possession for five years, was released over the weekend by Al-Qaeda.

Either Al-Qaeda has been given access to US intelligence surveillance tapes of its own organization or the tape was released by the US intelligence apparatus. The evidence provides no other explanation.

The fact that the same footage was used in The Road to Guantanamo is startling because the context of the clip in which it is seen portrays British and American intelligence agents showing doctored footage to detainees, whereby their likeness has been edited in with CGI to the Bin laden rally scene, using it to intimidate them into confessing to being Al-Qaeda members.

The latest video tape hoax is only the most recent of a dirty laundry list of past examples where old, re-hashed, or outright faked footage of Bin Laden and his followers was mysteriously obtained and released at the most politically expedient time. These examples are all referenced in our original investigation.

Recall that the Pentagon's stated intention to artificially magnify Musab Al-Zarqawi's role in Iraq was followed by the release of a video tape of Al-Zarqawi threatening the infidels.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The DVD of the resistance!" Get TerrorStorm on DVD today! Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and see it in high quality or watch it for free at Google Video.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The target of this leaked propaganda campaign to boost Al-Qaeda's profile was said to be the "U.S. home audience," and included planting fake stories in newspapers - one of which was later splashed on the front page of the New York Times.

The agenda dovetails with the necessity of the torture program - there are very few real terror cells in existence outside of the puppet mastery of the U.S. and British intelligence apparatus. To maintain a state of fear and obedience amongst the target "home audience," there need to be regular "two minutes of hate" intervals and the artificial creation of supposed terrorist networks and plots.

The tapes are also a desperate attempt to prop up the official version of 9/11 as its credibility crumbles globally and a firestorm of awakening to the fact that the attack was an inside job rages.

I encourage everyone to fully imbue themselves of our original investigation and make it a viral story across the Internet. Click here to get the original story and lobby for mainstream media to pay attention.

We need to demand higher standards from our media starting with a proper investigation as to who the true source of this tape was and an immediate skepticism towards all such future alleged "Al-Qaeda" video tape releases.

A press that lazily dismisses the origins of these tapes as a side-issue is playing a central role in disseminating unchecked war propaganda and violating every code of journalistic ethical conduct.

The U.S. government's role in obtaining and carefully stage-managing the dissemination of these tapes, many of them old footage re-released over and over again, is now without a doubt manifestly obvious and demands immediate Congressional investigation as part of a wider probe into the admitted fake news scandal that has characterized the Bush White House as the most duplicitous and manipulative administration in history and befits a regime that is engaging in psychological warfare against the American people.

Absolute TREASON and MURDER

______

Setting up the local Noahide enforcement groups

http://www.jta.org/index.asp

N.J. federations could become security model

New Jersey’s 12 Jewish federations may become the first among U.S. federations to provide Community Emergency Response Team training to their members.

CERT units are meant to augment emergency responses in times of crisis, terror attacks and natural disaster.

State Homeland Security officials met with representatives from New Jersey’s federations Wednesday to discuss the logistics of creating federation-based units.

“The more people that we can train and organize to assist in a disaster or emergency, the better it would be for everyone in terms of homeland security,” said Capt. Howard Butt, New Jersey’s Citizen Corps Coordinator, who attended the meeting. “They are a community that is always concerned and unfortunately is the target of terrorist activity.” There are several federations that provide CERT training, but this will be the first time that it is offered on a statewide basis, said SCN´s national director, Paul Goldenberg.

pure wretchedness

______

Talmudic Hassidic Eye of Horus Noahide enforcer "Robocop"

http://www.shmais.com/image_picofday.cfm?image=left_902.jpg

______

Hassidic anti-Christ "Preterist" Chuckle for today

http://www.thelowestroom.com/Jason/Paradise/paradise.htm

__________

Amaraka the Treasonous Telly Tubby Talmudic Media are only giving you butterflies and roses, and no real news....WAKEUP ! While they have your attention focused on a queer Washington pedophile........

Well even so, Jesus is Christ the KING

__________

Baw haw haw haw ahahhahahahhahahhahahah whooooooooooooeeeeeeeeeey

http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1472802006

_________

http://www.gulfnews.com/business/Oil_and_Gas/10072300.html

____________

Jn:8:44: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

http://www.countercurrents.org/us-bohne051006.htm

They Lied About Iraq's WMDs;
They're Lying About Iran's

By Luciana Bohne

05 October, 2006
Countercurrents.org

"We have to date found no evidence of ongoing prohibited nuclear or nuclear-related activities in Iraq." Mohammed el Baradei, for the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, 2003.

Iraq possesses "30,000 warheads, 500 tons of chemical weapons, 25,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulin toxin, 1 million pounds of sarin, mustard, and VX nerve gas, tons of yellowcake uranium from Niger." from White House webpage, 2002-03.

In the pre-dawn hours of Saturday, 30 September, the US Senate approved a bill, authorizing sanctions that target foreign countries continuing [completely legal] nuclear cooperation with Iran. The bill stipulates "not to bring into force an agreement for cooperation with the government of any country that is assisting the nuclear program of Iran or transferring advanced conventional weapons or missiles." Unmentioned in the bill, the intended targets are Russia and China. The previous day, the bill was approved by the House of Representatives.

Together with the suspension of "habeas corpus," this congressional endorsement of Bush's preparations for war against Iran should make it perfectly clear to November voters that the US Congress is an illiberal and warmongering institution in partnership with the policies of the Bush White House, whether the Republicans or the Democrats are in power.
Lawmakers did add a caveat to the bill, warning that nothing in this bill should be "construed as authorizing the use of force against Iran." However, the president can ignore the caveat because he has been granted the right to waive provisions of the bill if he finds that US "national security" interests require it.

Furthermore, the bill comes in the midst of ongoing diplomatic talks over Iranian uranium enrichment for civilian use between Iran and the European Union, which the new US sanctions clearly aim at sabotaging.

Let us be clear about one thing: there is no evidence that Iran is anywhere near enriching uranium to weapon-grade capacity at the rate and quantity required to produce nuclear bombs that could effectively threaten the US or any of its allies in the area within a decade. Nor is there any evidence that Iran is capable of manufacturing plutonium bombs on the quick. Washington is simply keen to start yet another war for "regime change" based on lies intended to terrorize the US public into compliance.
Nuclear Reactors, Uranium enrichment, and the BombEnriching uranium to 3.6% is needed to make "pellets" to fuel nuclear reactors that generate electricity. This level of uranium enrichment is recognized to be for civilian use. The troubling kind of uranium enrichment involves intensively raising the enrichment level to over 90%--or enriching Uranium-235 to weapon-grade capacity.

Pakistan is said to own up to 50 nuclear bombs. These are devices obtained by enriching Uranium-235 by 90%. Pakistan is said by scientific experts to be the only country in the world using highly enriched uranium to produce fission bombs. They have done so as a matter of preference, because A. Q. Khan, the "father" of the Pakistani nuclear-weapons program, learned how to produce weapon-grade uranium while employed at URENCO, the highly-enriched-uranium-production plant in Europe. He mastered the technique of enriching uranium through a "cascade" of centrifuges (explained below). As you probably know, the aim of enrichment is to increase the proportion of fissile Uranium-235 atoms within uranium in order to increase uranium's energy-release potential as a result of nuclear fission--the process by which certain atoms of uranium are split to cause a chain reaction. What becomes enriched uranium-235 is mined as ore, pounded and converted into "yellow cake," prepared for enrichment by dissolving "yellow cake" in nitric acid. Then, it is subjected to a series of chemical processes that convert it into a gas, uranium hexafluoride. This highly corrosive gas is then processed at conversion plants, using pipes and pumps constructed from aluminum and nickel alloys. The gas-centrifuge method of enriching U-235 requires that uranium hexafluoride gas be spun in a cylindrical chamber at high speed, which causes the slightly denser U-238 to split from the lighter U-235. Extracted from the bottom of the chamber where it gravitates, U-238 becomes depleted uranium, a heavy, radioactive (said to be "slightly" radioactive by the military) metal, capable of piercing tank armor and other munitions. Clustering at the center of the chamber, U-235 is collected and fed into another centrifuge, in a process repeated many times and known as "cascade." A U-235 atomic bomb requires 20 kilograms of enriched uranium, and has an explosive power of 50 kilotons. As previously mentioned, Pakistan has 50 of these in its unregulated, unsupervised nuclear arsenal.

Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been accumulated in secret, without inspections or regulations because Pakistan has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT, 1972). Iran, of course, is a signatory of the NPT-an international courtesy that the US is apparently eager to use against Iran's interests.

Now, even if we assume that Tehran is seeking to build a uranium nuclear bomb, it would need a cascade of 1,500 to 1,800 centrifuges, processing uranium round-the-clock to produce the twenty kilos of enriched U-235 needed to build a primitive uranium bomb (Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Jul/August issue). At its uranium enrichment plant in Natanz, Iran already has an operational cascade of 164 centrifuges and plans to build another one. However, the latest UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report reveals that at Natanz plans were behind schedule and a second 164-machine cascade was not up and running in August 2006.

The nuclear reactor at Natanz, therefore, is clearly under-equipped to produce the volume and potency of enriched uranium needed to build even one crude nuclear bomb in the near future.

This obvious fact, however, did not stop the House Intelligence Committee (HIC) from issuing a congressional report on 23 August 2006, ominously entitled "Recognizing Iran as a Strategic Threat: An Intelligence Challenge for the United States." Seething with outrage and professional fury, the IAEA characterized the report as "erroneous, misleading, and unsubstatiated information."

The IAEA letter singled out the HIC's characterization of the enrichment facility at Natanz, which is subject to IAEA inspections, including camera monitoring, as particularly mendacious. The IAEA letter pointed to a sub-section in the HIC report, entitled "Evidence for an Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program." A photograph of Iran's enrichment facility at Natanz was captioned, "Iran is currently enriching to weapons grade using a 164-machine centrifuge cascade." The IAEA pointed out that the claim was false. The small cascade at the Natanz enrichment plant had been enriching uranium to the level of 3.6 % as required by Iran's stated goal for producing nuclear fuel. As the IAEA caustically remarked, this hardly qualifies as "weapons grade."

Heavy-water Reactors and the Plutonium Bomb

Israel secretly obtained its nuclear arsenal via a different route from the one mapped out by uranium enrichment. It has gone the heavy-water-reactor route and thus has taken the plutonium option. [Like Pakistan, Israel is not subject to inspections or regulations, not being a signatory of the NPT.]

A small amount of plutonium (about 1%) can be obtained via the U-235 enrichment process that produces fuel "pellets" (enriched to 3.6%) for nuclear-energy reactors. Called "reprocessing," this routine involves stripping away the metallic outer casings of used fuel rods in nuclear reactors before dissolving them in hot nitric acid. What one gets from this reprocessing of nuclear waste is some more if highly radioactive waste (about 3%), uranium (96%), and plutonium (1%). This amount of plutonium obtained from a reactor's nuclear waste, however, is a negligible and legitimate by-product, which poses no weaponizing threat according to the scientific community and the IAEA.

To make plutonium bombs, there is a more productive route: the heavy-water-reactor route. Heavy-water reactors derive their name from the use of so-called "heavy water," which contains deuterium. Heavy water is a modified form of hydrogen with more neutrons in its nucleus, which makes it not only literally "heavier" but also potentially more energetic or explosively "fissile." Heavy-water reactors offer the advantage that they can use unrefined natural uranium as fuel (and Iran has that uranium to mine). In addition, a plutonium nuclear weapon is smaller in size and weight than its uranium equivalent. The amount of plutonium required to make a nuclear weapon is only 3.5 to 4 kilograms. Its explosive capacity is 20 kilotons.

Iran's planned heavy-water reactor at Arak is a small reactor, designed to replace another, outdated reactor, on its last leg. The Iranians say that the Arak reactor is used to produce radioisotopes for medicine and industry, which may be accurate. But even if they were lying about its civilian use, the heavy-water reactor, if used to produce plutonium for weapons, could produce at most enough for a couple of weapons per year, under the best conditions-and that might be sometime after 2009, the year the plant becomes operational.

Nuclear Double Standards

Now contrast the alarmist hysteria over Iran's modest, underdeveloped, fully regulated and legal nuclear program-a decade away from any production of very crude nuclear weapons- to the nonchalance with which Washington greets the frenetic nuclear activities in Pakistan. No pre-dawn vote in Congress to threaten with sanctions anyone at all! Well, to be perfectly honest, the US congress feigned to be "shocked" when White House spokesman, Tony, Snow, said the Bush administration had known all along that Pakistan had plans to build a large, plutonium-production plant at Khushab's nuclear site in the Punjab. Under construction since 2000 and possibly several years from completion, the heavy-water reactor at Khushab will be capable of producing approximately 200 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium each year-or enough for 50 bombs per year. Spotted by independent analysts in commercial-satellite photos, Pakistan's heavy-water reactor caused not a ripple of concern to the White House. "We discourage military use of the facility," Snow unconvincingly declared. "Discourage"? We're talking about over 200 kilograms of weapon-grade plutonium in addition to the 10 kilograms (or two bombs per year) of plutonium per year the small reactor at Khushab already produces!

And the Bush gang targets Iran? Which has no heavy-water reactor and won't until at least 2009? Whose uranium enrichment has been operated by small cascade-machines to perfectly legal levels? Whose Busher's reactor is a light-water reactor capable of yielding only negligible amounts of plutonium? Whom the IAEA monitors and supervises with scrupulous zeal?

Clearly, Washington hasn't the least concern about the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Indeed, any country in the oil-rich region or its environs that is not seeking to develop nuclear weapons is living in a fool's paradise. Washington will crush militant nationalism whatever its nature and wherever it raises its independent head, calling it "terrorist"-unless it is armed with nuclear weapons. Call it the "blowback" correlative of Bush's "nuclear posture review," or the law of inevitable nuclear proliferation, seeking to insure mutual assured destruction-MAD- but on a multi-polar global level.

But even in the MADness of infinite confrontation, you would expect the US Congress to question the motives of the White House in pressing for sanctions legislation against Iran for its modest nuclear program while Pakistan, unsupervised and unregulated, goes berserk with an aggressive program that plans to add 50 plutonium bombs per year to the 50 uranium bombs it already has! But that would be the congress of a functioning democracy which this farcical nation no longer has-and hardly has had in matters of foreign policy since the advent of Truman's National Security State at the outset of that other bogus war, the cold one. This country-- its executive, legislative, and judicial bodies-- is so steeped in bloody lies and malign hypocrisy that it hardly turns a hair at the prospect of attacking yet another nation, whose people may justifiably and historically resent the US but whose only wish is to keep its wolfishness out of their national doors and be left in peace to solve their own problems and manage their resources as they best see fit.

__________

It is about the same Old Hatred of the anti-Christ against the anti-Shems in Iran, Persia

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:rCDMDoTUAgQJ:www.chabadyale.org/templates/

articlecco.

html%3FAID%3D396031+Chabad+Persia&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=12

_________

Playing God

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23369688-details/Scientists+to+create+'frankenbunny'+in+big+research+leap/article.do

Scientists to create 'frankenbunny' in big research leap

Scientists are planning to create a "frankenrabbit" by fusing together human cells with a rabbit egg.

It is hoped the "chimeric" embryos, which would be 99.9 per cent human and 0.1 per cent rabbit, could lead to breakthroughs in stem cell research which could one day cure diseases such as Alzheimer's or spinal cord injury.

The embryos will allow scientists to perfect stem cell creation techniques without using human eggs.

"If we learn how to do this with animal eggs, we should be able to have more success with human eggs, and I'd much rather know that if we were going to ask women to donate eggs that we were very likely to get stem cells as a result," said Chris Shaw, at the Institute of Psychiatry.

"We know this is a huge challenge after Dr Hwang in South Korea failed to get stem cells despite having 2,000 human eggs."

Teams in London, Edinburgh and Newcastle are to submit application to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority this month, requesting licences to create embryos that will be 99.9 per cent human and 0.1 per cent rabbit or cow.

The HFEA is encouraging the applications after legal advice. The embryos will be allowed to grow for only 14 days, at which point they will be cells smaller than a pinhead.

_______

Noahide News Part 596

Noahide News Part 597