Apostate "Amaraka" the Treasonous
Murdering Bushwhacker ad-menstruation of Bloodlust, folled ya at Falu-jAH
SATAN's Supra Government of the
Beast unto the Dragon
1: And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea,
having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2: And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3: And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
4: And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
5: And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things
and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
6: And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
7: And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
Organizational structure of the Nascent Sanhedrin
The historical government of the Jewish people
involves a bicameral parliamentary system. This
includes the Sanhedrin, a deliberative body
similar to the upper house or chamber of a legislature, and an ordinary parallel
lower house which represents the needs of the population.
a) The Sanhedrin is a "House of
Scholars". Unlike some parliamentary
systems, members of this upper house are not elected, nor is their position
permanent. Any scholar, at any time, may gain a place on the legislature
by proving a greater level of scholarship in Jewish Law than a current member of
Whoever can MURDER, Thieve, Blasphemy, more
than the others
b) At times during Jewish history, a parallel "Congressional Assembly"
also existed. Originally it consisted of the royal court of a
constitutional monarchy, but in a democratic society it may consist of an
assembly of regionally elected representatives. Needs of the population
were represented demographically; originally according to feudal strength, but
in modern times they would be represented by voting power. The head of the
lower house would be the Monarch, Reish Galuta or Prime Minister.
He would have the power to collect taxes and would be the head of the executive
branch of government. He would be subordinate only
to the Sanhedrin.
This ancient bicameral system has had great influence on the organizational
structure of many Western European legislatures.
NEVER, until George H.W.Bushwhacker
The make-up of the Sanhedrin includes a President -
Chancellor - Av Beis Din, and sixty-nine general members who all sit in
the form of a semi-circle when in session. Decisions are made by majority vote.
The constitution of seventy-one is to preclude the possibility of a tie. A
minimum quorum of twenty-three Sanhedrin members is necessary for a vote to take
Hierarchy of the Sanhedrin Leadership
The heads of the Sanhedrin are as follows:
1 - Rabbi Adin (Even-Israel) Steinzaltz, Nassi (President)
2 - Rabbi Nachman Kahana, Av Beith Ha-Din (Chancellor)
(Phd of Jewish culture).
3 - Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, Segan Av Beith Ha-Din (Vice Chancelllor)
Directly under these are four more rabbis who, together with the above three,
are the democratically-elected leadership council of the Sanhedrin. They
are (not in order of seniority):
Rabbi Dov Levanoni
Rabbi Yisrael Ariel (Head of The Temple Institute)
Rabbi Yehudah 'Edri
Rabbi Dov Stein, Secretary
The seven-member leadership council (above) convenes on weekly basis within a
larger court of ordained rabbis from the general ranks of the Sanhedrin that
grows steadily, in the ongoing development of a full Sanhedrin Qe`tanah
(small Sanhedrin) to lead the Sanhedrin.
This court includes (not in order of seniority):
Rabbi Mordekhai Avrahami
Rabbi Yishai Ba'avad (General Secretary of Rabbis of Yehudah,
Rabbi Michael Shelomo Bar-Ron
Rabbi Dov Avraham Ben-Shorr
Rabbi Reuven Hass
Rabbi Meir Yaaqov Ha-Levi Haqaq
Rabbi Amnon Hever (Phd Jewish History)
Rabbi Yishayahu Hollander
Rabbi Mordekhai Kislev (Professor of Botany, Bar Ilan University)
Rabbi Tzvi Rogin (Head of The Temple Mount Information Center)
Rabbi Elitzur Segal
Rabbi Hillel Weiss (Professor of
Jewish literature, Bar Ilan University)
Under the authority of Sanhedrin are the following appointed Batei Din (sub-courts)
and Vaadot (sub-committees), some functional and others in various stages
Actively functioning sub-courts and sub-committees.
I. Court of the People and the State
– Chief Justice: Rabbi Yisrael Ariel
II. Court for Bnei NoaH
– Chief Justice: Rabbi Yoel Schwartz
III. Research Committee for the exact site of the Hole Temple and Altar
Speaker: Rabbi Gidon Harlapp
Developing, pre-functional sub-committees
IV. Research and Outreach Committee for the
Descendants of the 'Anussim' (Jews who converted to Christianity under
the Spanish and Portuguese Inquisition)
V. Research and Development Committee for the Administrative and Civil
Re-organization of the Jewish People in Israel into a single body according to
Torah, under ("Sarei Alaphim, Sarei Me'oth,…") in Israel
country and in the Diaspora.
Several academic societies of Israeli professors and academicians
have placed themselves at the service of the Sanhedrin. These serve as a prime
resource of information and professional advice on dozens of fields in the
natural, social, and other sciences.
Items 1 through 3 of 3
1. [102nd] H.J.RES.104
: To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".
Michel, Robert H. [IL-18] (introduced 1/31/1991)
Committees: House Post Office and Civil Service
Latest Major Action: 3/20/1991 Became
Public Law No: 102-14.
You have been delivered to the Dragon, BY MURDER and
Lust and Blasphemy and Sorcery and TREASON, apostate "Amaraka"
One Hundred Second Congress of the United States of America
AT THE FIRST SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the third day of
one thousand nine hundred and ninety-one
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values
and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our
great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of
society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known
as the Seven Noahide Laws;
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of
civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;
Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of
these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the
fabric of civilized society;
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the
citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these
historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical
values and principles throughout the world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch
movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday
falls on March 26, 1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe', this, his
ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving', the year in
which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and
ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and
Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed
by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the
start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the
worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people
of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
3. We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war
with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these
neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us,
then we must offer resistance by a universal war.
OUR GOAL - WORLD POWER
3. We count upon attracting all nations to the task of erecting the new
fundamental structure, the project for which has been
drawn up by us. This is why, before everything,
it is indispensable for us to arm ourselves and to store up in ourselves
that absolutely reckless audacity and irresistible might of the spirit which
in the person of our active workers will break down all hindrances on our
4. WHEN WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED OUR COUP D'ETAT WE
SHALL SAY THEN TO THE VARIOUS PEOPLES: "EVERYTHING
HAS GONE TERRIBLY BADLY, ALL HAVE BEEN WORN OUT WITH SUFFERING. WE ARE
DESTROYING THE CAUSES OF YOUR TORMENT - NATIONALITIES, FRONTIERS,
DIFFERENCES OF COINAGES. YOU ARE AT LIBERTY, OF COURSE, TO PRONOUNCE
SENTENCE UPON US, BUT CAN IT POSSIBLY BE A JUST ONE IF IT IS CONFIRMED BY
YOU BEFORE YOU MAKE ANY TRIAL OF WHAT WE ARE OFFERING YOU." ...
THEN WILL THE MOB EXALT US AND BEAR US UP IN THEIR HANDS IN A UNANIMOUS
TRIUMPH OF HOPES AND EXPECTATIONS. VOTING, WHICH WE HAVE MADE THE
INSTRUMENT WHICH WILL SET US ON THE THRONE OF THE WORLD BY TEACHING EVEN THE
VERY SMALLEST UNITS OF MEMBERS OF THE HUMAN RACE TO VOTE BY MEANS OF
MEETINGS AND AGREEMENTS BY GROUPS, WILL THEN HAVE SERVED ITS PURPOSES AND
WILL PLAY ITS PART THEN FOR THE LAST TIME BY A UNANIMITY
OF DESIRE TO MAKE CLOSE ACQUAINTANCE WITH US BEFORE CONDEMNING US.
WE SHALL DESTROY
17. By such measure we shall obtain the power of destroying little by
little, step by step, all that at the outset when we enter on our rights, we
are compelled to introduce into the constitutions of States to prepare for
the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every
kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of
government into OUR DESPOTISM.
18. The recognition of our despot may also come before the destruction of the
constitution; the moment for this recognition will come when the peoples,
utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence - a matter which we
shall arrange for - of their rulers, will clamor: "Away
with them and give us one king over all the earth who
will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders - frontiers,
nationalities, religions, State debts - who will give us peace and
quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives."
Rv:9:11: And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name
19. But you yourselves perfectly well know that TO PRODUCE THE POSSIBILITY OF
THE EXPRESSION OF SUCH WISHES BY ALL THE NATIONS IT IS INDISPENSABLE TO
TROUBLE IN ALL COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE'S RELATIONS WITH THEIR GOVERNMENTS SO AS
TO UTTERLY EXHAUST HUMANITY WITH DISSENSION, HATRED, STRUGGLE, ENVY
AND EVEN BY THE USE OF TORTURE, BY STARVATION, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES,
BY WANT, SO THAT THE "GOYIM" SEE NO OTHER ISSUE THAN TO TAKE REFUGE
IN OUR COMPLETE SOVEREIGNTY IN MONEY AND IN ALL ELSE.
Rev 2:9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
3:9: Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
10: Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
4. The GOYIM are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know
what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? ....
5. There is another reason also why they will close their eyes: for we
shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away
as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties ....
6. It is not worth to say anything about how long a time they will be
kept waiting for this return of their liberties ....
7. For what purpose then have
we invented this whole policy and insinuated it into the minds of the GOY
without giving them any chance to examine its underlying meaning? For
what, indeed, if not in order to obtain in a roundabout way what is for our
scattered tribe unattainable by the direct road? It is this which has served
as the basis for our organization of SECRET MASONRY WHICH IS NOT KNOWN TO,
AND AIMS WHICH ARE NOT EVEN SO MUCH AS SUSPECTED BY, THESE "GOY"
CATTLE, ATTRACTED BY US INTO THE "SHOW" ARMY OF MASONIC
LODGES IN ORDER TO THROW DUST IN THE EYES OF THEIR FELLOWS.
8. God (The Dragon they call God, Satan that Old
devil they say is God) has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift
of the dispersion, and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness,
has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold
of sovereignty over all the
9. There now remains not much more for us to build up upon the foundation
we have laid
19. WHEN WE ARE IN THE PERIOD OF THE NEW REGIME TRANSITIONAL TO THAT OF OUR
ASSUMPTION OF FULL SOVEREIGNTY WE MUST NOT ADMIT ANY REVELATION BY THE PRESS
OF ANY FORM OF PUBLIC DISHONESTY; IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE NEW REGIME SHOULD
BE THOUGHT TO HAVE SO PERFECTLY CONTENDED EVERYBODY THAT EVEN CRIMINALITY HAS
DISAPPEARED ... Cases of the manifestation of
criminality should remain known only to their victims and to chance witnesses
- no more.
the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased
down the streets and lynched." President George H.W.
Bush, quoted by Sarah McClendon
House Reporter) in her June 1992 Newsletter.
1. When we come into our kingdom it will be
undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of
the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen
People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the
is our duty to force all
mankind to accept the seven Noahide
laws, and if not — they
will be killed."
Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives
birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a
transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning
for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of
Moses, that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated
system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us.
Therein we shall emphasize its mystical right, on which, as we shall say,
all its educative power is based ...
Education and Shearing
. Then at every possible opportunity we shall publish articles in which
we shall make comparisons between our beneficent rule and those of past
ages. The blessing of tranquillity, though it be a
tranquillity forcibly brought about by centuries of agitation, will
throw into higher relief the benefits to which we shall point. The
errors of the GOYIM governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid
hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples
will prefer tranquillity in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted
freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human
existence, sources which have been exploited by a mob of rascally
adventurers who know not what they do .... USELESS
CHANGES OF FORMS OF GOVERNMENT TO WHICH WE INSTIGATED THE "GOYIM"
WHEN WE WERE UNDERMINING THEIR STATE STRUCTURES, WILL HAVE SO WEARIED THE
PEOPLES BY THAT TIME THAT THEY WILL PREFER TO SUFFER ANYTHING UNDER US
RATHER THAN RUN THE RISK OF ENDURING AGAIN ALL THE AGITATIONS AND MISERIES
THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH.
WE SHALL FORBID CHRIST
2. At the same time we shall not omit to emphasize the historical
mistakes of the GOY governments which have tormented humanity for so many
centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the
true good of humanity in their chase after fantastic schemes of social
blessings, and have never noticed that these schemes kept on producing a
worse and never a better state of the universal relations which are the
basis of human life ...
3. The whole force of our principles and methods will lie in the fact
that we shall present them and expound them as a splendid contrast to the
dead and decomposed old order of things in social life.
4. Our philosophers will discuss all the
shortcomings of the various beliefs of the "GOYIM," BUT NO
ONE WILL EVER BRING UNDER DISCUSSION OUR FAITH FROM ITS TRUE POINT OF VIEW
SINCE THIS WILL BE FULLY LEARNED BY NONE SAVE OURS WHO WILL NEVER DARE TO
BETRAY ITS SECRETS.
For they worship that Old Dragon and Satan
5. IN COUNTRIES KNOWN AS PROGRESSIVE AND ENLIGHTENED WE HAVE CREATED
A SENSELESS, FILTHY, ABOMINABLE LITERATURE. For some time after our
entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to
provide a telling relief by contrast to the speeches, party program, which
will be distributed from exalted quarters of ours .... Our
wise men, trained to become leaders of the GOYIM, will compose speeches,
projects, memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds
of the GOYIM, directing them towards such understanding and forms of
knowledge as have been determined by us.
WE SHALL BE CRUEL
18. Our absolutism will in all things be logically consecutive and
therefore in each one of its decrees our supreme will must be respected and
unquestionably fulfilled: it will ignore all murmurs, all discontents of
every kind and will destroy to the root every kind of manifestation of them
in act by punishment of an exemplary character.
19. We shall abolish the right of appeal, which will be transferred
exclusively to our disposal - to the cognizance of him who rules, for we
must not allow the conception among the people of a thought that there could
be such a thing as a decision that is not right of judges set up by us. If,
however, anything like this should occur, we shall ourselves quash the
decision, but inflict therewith such exemplary punishment on the judge for
lack of understanding of his duty and the purpose of his appointment as will
prevent a repetition of such cases .... I repeat that it must be born in
mind that we shall know every step of our administration which only needs to
be closely watched for the people to be content with us, for it has the
right to demand from a good government a good official.
20. OUR GOVERNMENT WILL HAVE THE APPEARANCE OF A PATRIARCHAL PATERNAL
GUARDIANSHIP ON THE PART OF OUR RULER. Our own nation and our subjects will
discern in his person a father caring for their every need, their every act,
their every interrelation as subjects one with another, as well as their
relations to the ruler. They will then be so thoroughly imbued with the
thought that it is impossible for them to dispense with this wardship and
guidance, if they wish to live in peace and quiet, THAT THEY WILL
ACKNOWLEDGE THE AUTOCRACY OF OUR RULER WITH A DEVOTION
BORDERING ON "APOTHEOSIS," especially when they are
convinced that those whom we set up do not put
their own in place of authority, but only blindly
execute his dictates. They will be rejoiced that we have regulated
everything in their lives as is done by wise parents who desire to train
children in the cause of duty and submission. For the peoples of the world
in regard to the secrets of our polity are ever through the ages only
children under age, precisely as are also their governments.
Sanhedrin's son of Perdition to be
"REVEALED" Moshiach ben wannabe god, False Christ, False king of
Satan that Old devil
21. As you see, I found our despotism on right and duty: the right to
compel the execution of duty is the direct obligation of a government which
is a father for its subjects. It has the right of the strong that it may use
it for the benefit of directing humanity towards that order which is defined
by nature, namely, submission. Everything in
the world is in a state of submission, if not to man, then to circumstances
or its own inner character, in all cases, to what is stronger. And so
shall we be this something stronger for the sake of good.
22. We are obliged without hesitation to sacrifice
individuals, who commit a breach of established order, for in the
exemplary punishment of evil lies a great educational problem.
23. When the King of Israel
sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will
become patriarch of the world. The indispensable victims offered by him in
consequence of their suitability will never reach the number of victims
offered in the course of centuries by the mania of magnificence, the
emulation between the GOY governments.
24. Our King will be in constant communion with the peoples, making to
them from the tribune speeches which fame will in that same hour distribute
over all the world.
WE SHALL DESTROY THE CLERGY
2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE
PRIESTHOOD OF THE "GOYIM," and thereby to
ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a
great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world
is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE,
SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE
COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION: as to other religions we
shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would
be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals
into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive
proportion to its former progress.
3. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal
court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards
this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we
shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive
bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels
and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the
entire strength of this place.
4. THE KING OF THE JEWS WILL BE THE REAL POPE OF THE
UNIVERSE, THE PATRIARCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH
Rv:17:5: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
5. But, IN THE MEANTIME, while we are re-educating youth in new
traditional religions and afterwards in ours, WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A
FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT
AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM . . .
6. In general, then, our contemporary press will continue to CONVICT
State affairs, religions, incapacities of the GOYIM, always using the most
unprincipled expressions in order by every means to lower their prestige in
the manner which can only be practiced by the genius of our gifted tribe . .
7. Our kingdom will be an apologia of the divinity Vishnu, in whom is
found its personification - in our hundred hands will be, one in each, the
springs of the machinery of social life. We shall see everything without the
aid of official police which, in that scope of its rights which we
elaborated for the use of the GOYIM, hinders governments from seeing.
In our programs ONE-THIRD OF OUR SUBJECTS WILL KEEP THE REST UNDER
OBSERVATION from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to
the State. It will then be no disgrace to be a spy and informer, but
a merit: unfounded denunciations, however, will be cruelly punished that
there may be no development of abuses of this right.
Bush: Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American ...
|It will not end until every terrorist
group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated ...
Either you are with us, or you are with the
8. Our agents will be taken from the higher as well as the lower ranks of
society, from among the administrative class who spend their time in
amusements, editors, printers and publishers, booksellers, clerks, and
salesmen, workmen, coachmen, lackeys, et cetera. This body, having no rights
and not being empowered to take any action on their own account, and
consequently a police without any power, will only witness and report:
verification of their reports and arrests will depend upon a responsible
group of controllers of police affairs, while the actual act of arrest will
be performed by the gendarmerie and the municipal police. Any
person not denouncing anything seen or heard concerning questions of polity
will also be charged with and made responsible for concealment, if it be
proved that he is guilty of this crime.
9. JUST AS NOWADAYS OUR BRETHREN, ARE OBLIGED AT THEIR OWN RISK TO
DENOUNCE TO THE KAHAL APOSTATES OF THEIR OWN FAMILY or members who have been
noticed doing anything in opposition to the KAHAL, SO IN OUR KINGDOM OVER
ALL THE WORLD IT WILL BE OBLIGATORY FOR ALL OUR SUBJECTS TO OBSERVE THE DUTY
OF SERVICE TO THE STATE IN THIS DIRECTION.
10. Such an organization will extirpate abuses of authority, of force, of
bribery, everything in fact which we by our counsels, by our theories of the
superhuman rights of man, have introduced into the customs of the GOYIM ....
But how else were we to procure that increase of causes predisposing to
disorders in the midst of their administration? .... Among the number of
those methods one of the most important is - agents for the restoration of
order, so placed as to have the opportunity in their disintegrating activity
of developing and displaying their evil inclinations - obstinate
self-conceit, irresponsible exercise of authority, and, first and foremost,
WE SHALL DESTROY CAPITAL
5. The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution and works to the
detriment of the State which in hunting after the trifling is missing the
big. Quite apart from this, a tax on capitalists diminishes the growth of
wealth in private hands in which we have in these days concentrated it as a
counterpoise to the government strength of the GOYIM - their State finances.
6. A tax increasing in a percentage ratio to capital will give much
larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful
to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among
the GOYIM. (Now we know the purpose of the 16th Amendment!!)
7. The force upon which our king will rest consists
in the equilibrium and the guarantee of peace, for the sake of which things
it is indispensable that the capitalists should yield up a portion of their
incomes for the sake of the secure working of the machinery of the State.
State needs must be paid by those who will not feel the burden and have
enough to take from.
8. Such a measure will destroy the hatred of the poor man for the rich,
in whom he will see a necessary financial support for the State, will see in
him the organizer of peace and well-being since he will see that it is the
rich man who is paying the necessary means to attain these things
3. The supreme lord who will
replace all now existing rulers, dragging in their existence among
societies demoralized by us, societies that have denied even the authority
of God, from whose midst breeds out on all sides the fire of anarchy, must
first of all proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore
he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, though he should
drench them with his own blood, that he may resurrect them again in the form
of regularly organized troops fighting consciously with every kind of
infection that may cover the body of the State with sores.
4. This Chosen One of God is chosen from above to demolish the senseless
forces moved by instinct and not reason, by brutishness and not humanness.
These forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of
violence under the mask of principles of freedom and rights. They have
overthrown all forms of social order to erect on the
ruins the throne of the King of the Jews; but their part will be played out
the moment he enters into his kingdom. Then it will be necessary to sweep
them away from his path, on which must be left no knot, no splinter.
5. Then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the world:
"Give thanks to God and bow the knee before him who
bears on his front the seal of the predestination of man, to which
God himself has led his star that none other
but Him might free us from all the before-mentioned forces and evils".
1. I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots of King
David to the last strata of the earth.
Qeren - Royalist Movement of Israel
To enforce a moral society, keeper of the Jewish people's identity and his legitimate inheritance,
it is today crucial to restore the Monarchy in Israel.
The Qeren Project is today just an idea.
Its realization will start as soon as 22000 memberships are collected.
Dynasty, the Royal genealogy
Modern genealogical research into the lineage of King David and his
descendants, including the medieval exilarchs, until the present day.
The Eternal House of David Family
Reunion (June 5-7, 2007)
A Jewish gathering 3,000 years in the making. It is time to assemble
the descendants of King Davd in a show of unity and promise for our people.
Rv:3:7: And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true,
he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth;
Rv:5:5: And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda,
the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.
Rv:22:16: I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches.
I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
2. This confirmation will first and foremost be included in that which to
this day has rested the force of conservatism by our
learned elders of the conduct of the affairs of the world, in the
directing of the education of thought of all humanity.
3. Certain members of the seed of David will
prepare the kings and their heirs, selecting not by right of heritage but by
eminent capacities, inducting them into the most secret mysteries of the
political, into schemes of government, but providing
always that none may come to knowledge of the secrets. The object of
this mode of action is that all may know that government cannot be entrusted
to those who have not been inducted into the secret places of its art ....
4. To these persons only will be taught the practical application of the
aforenamed plans by comparison of the experiences of many centuries, all the
observations on the politico-economic moves and social sciences - in a word,
all the spirit of laws which have been unshakably established by nature
herself for the regulation of the relations of humanity.
5. Direct heirs will often be set aside from ascending the throne if in
their time of training they exhibit frivolity, softness and other qualities
that are the ruin of authority, which render them incapable of governing and
in themselves dangerous for kingly office.
6. Only those who are unconditionally capable for
firm, even if it be to cruelty, direct rule will receive the reins of rule
from our learned elders.
|Somehow, the Rebbe
arranged it so that Bush’s son would become president too
and ... Upon its creation in 1967, Phoenix was managed
by a committee of five
7. In case of falling sick with weakness of will or other form of
incapacity. kings must by law hand over the reins of rule to new and capable
8. The king's plan of action for the current moment, and all the more so
for the future, will be unknown, even to those who are called his closest
KING OF THE JEWS
9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what
hahahahahhaahhahahaha you are very deceived, for
the Saints of the LIVING GOD KNOW, for the Testimony of JESUS is the Spirit
THE VILNA GA'ON (ibid.) supports Rashi's interpretation. He explains that
when Sanhedrin sat, ten
(of the most important members) sat in the middle of the group, and they
were surrounded by the other sixty. These are the "sixty mighty men
*around* the bed of Shlomo.
(The ten in the middle correspond
to the seven "Ro'ei Pnei ha'Melech" and three
"Shomrei ha'Saf," who are closest to the king, in a king's
court -- and in the king of king's court -- see Megilah 23a. The
verse in II Melachem 25:19, which associates these authoritative members of
the king's court with sixty other men,
is discussing the members of the Sanhedrin.
10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is master of
himself and of humanity all will discern as it were fate with its mysterious
ways. None will know what the king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and
therefore none will dare to stand across an unknown path.
Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Heb. 12:22: But ye are come unto mount
Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
23: To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
24: And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.
11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king must correspond
in capacity to the plan of government it has to contain. It is for this
reason that he will ascend the throne not otherwise than after examination
of his mind by the aforesaid learned elders.
12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for
him to converse in the market-places with his people. This
ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one
from another by us by the terror.
13. This terror was
indispensable for us till the time comes for both these forces separately to
fall under our influence.
14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and
especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute
instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes
the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts
to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.
15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all the
world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal
16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachability.
Signed by the representative of
Zion, of the 33rd Degree
Police State, Surveillance Society Out Of Control
Crude propaganda posters mirror images from
Steve Watson /
Infowars | April 17 2006
A new poster has been plastered around London over
the past few months to remind us that Big Brother is watching in order to
keep us all safe.
The poster headline reads simply "Watching over
you 24/7" and features giant eyes set into the landscape of the Houses
of Parliament in London.
Of course we are being surveilled constantly for our
"safety and security" as the sub headline reads. The telephone
number below promises unique benefits if you become a member of the London
Neighbourhood Watch Association.
Since when was the entirety of London a "neighbourhood"?
This is a city with a population of nine million people - do we all need to
spy on each other and be constantly watched by cctv cameras in order to be
safe and secure?
This new poster is similar in appearance to a
previous example that was paraded around bus shelters in London a few years
The "Secure beneath the watchful eyes"
poster featured multiple all seeing Horus eyes. In Egyptian mythology Horus
presented his eye to Osiris, the god of death, who experienced rebirth in
The symbol of the all seeing eye was adopted by the Bavarian
Illuminati and has pervaded modern culture.
How ironic or coincidental that the iconic London red
bus would shortly down the line once more appear, this time blown to
smithereens, despite the helpful and loving watchful eyes.
Even more farcical was the fact that the
"investigation" into the July 7 bombings was hindered when it was
discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were
Britain is acknowledged as the world leader of
Orwellian surveillance. An estimated 4.2 million closed-circuit TV cameras
observe people going about their everyday business, from getting on a bus to
lining up at the bank to driving around London. It's widely estimated that
the average Briton is scrutinized by 300 cameras a day.
Authorities maintain the cameras deter crime, despite
the fact that police have admitted that they are 'too
busy' to watch CCTV, even AFTER a crime has taken place. The outrage of
civil libertarians has fallen on deaf ears as the public seems willing to
accept the constant monitoring for the greater good.
The Posters are both eerily similar to shots taken
from the film re-productions of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four in
which a totalitarian government regime rules over the people with an Iron
fist and relies on a total surveillance society to scare the population into
submission and docility.
The posters are nothing more than crude and
simplistic propaganda informing us that we are all under suspicion in this
surveillance society. The fact that the in this latest one they feel the
need to add the words "security and safety" is an attempt to play
down the immediate aggressive and threatening feeling that is instilled upon
Other posters that have gone up all over the UK
recently inform the population that should they spit in public, on a bus or
train for example, then their DNA will be collected and stored on the
national database FOREVER.
Under current UK laws, if you are arrested for any
recordable offence, police are allowed to take your fingerprints and a
sample your DNA. Even if you are subsequently released and found innocent,
police can still keep your DNA, which is added to a PERMANENT
Worse still, hundreds of thousands of children aged
between 10 and 18 have had
their DNA added to the database despite never being cautioned or charged
for any offence.
How can all this be to protect freedom and ensure our
liberty? Some are awakening, but still no one dares to suggest that on our
doorstep is a Police State surveillance society that is worse than Nazi
Germany or Soviet Russia. We have to speak out now before it's too late,
because it can happen and it is happening here.
Giant Steps Towards Cashless-Surveilance Society Going On Unnoticed In
Orwellian Doublethink In London
New Stasi style UK Anti-Terror campaign encourages reporting your neighbours
Stasi London: Fearmongering reaches new heights in England - SPECIAL REPORT
E-Mail to Dov Stein, Secretary,
Sanhedrin of the Dragon 4-18-2006
Dov, by killing your
"lesser brethren" to get your Olam haba wannabe flesh kingdom
unto Abaddon, do you TRULY believe that you can Hide from the Wrath of
His senseless reply
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:37 AM
Responsa to Daat Emet (Knowledge of Truth)
47 Rachel Emainu St.
Tel. 02-5661962, 02-5664137
Translated from the Hebrew by Rabbi Dr. Eliyahu Schatz
These responsa have not been reviewed by the Sanhedrin and may or may not
reflect the official position of the Sanhedrin, they are the work of the
esteemed Rabbi Dov Stein,
Mt:23:8: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
C. The Talmud
The Talmud is apparently the final authority for
deciding the law for all Israel. However:
1) There are many unclear points in the text of the Gemara, mainly because
of the interference from the non-Jews who censored the text, and because of
difficulties in the understanding of the text which have led to much
disagreement and criticism.
Mk:7:9: And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Mk:7:13: Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
2) This authority is given to the gemara only in the legal realm. However,
this is not so with respect to opinions, and views on the existence of the
world, science, legends, etc. A person can explain these items in any way,
and he will not be considered as having unfit ideas. In the gemara itself
there is a notice about errors of Jewish sages versus non-Jewish sages. The
Jewish wise men believed that there were cases where the non-Jewish wise
were more correct and even agreed that there is wisdom among the nations (Pes.
94:, Moreh Nevuchim, part 3, chapter 14).
Mt:11:19: The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But
wisdom is justified of her children.
D. The Position of the Prophet
When the prophet acts as a wise man, his words are considered as explained
in part A of the preface.
Mt:7:15: Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
E. The Sanhedrin
The Torah culture is presently functioning as a cripple. The lack of a
Sanhedrin prevents the making of essential decisions in many fields and
prevents the updating of numerous legal decisions, since in all legal
systems there cannot be explanations or corrections without a supreme
authority that is authorized to do so (except for ad hoc local regulations
for which there is limited authority). When a Sanhedrin will be formed it
will be a deciding factor in the redemption process. The present
situation resembles the condition of a society that does not have a high
court and does not have enforcement agencies.
Sanhedrin REVIVED October 13, 2004
The Jewish nation does not function as an egalitarian society but as a
functional society. In this respect the Jewish society resembles an army.
The idea of equality is fundamentally a religious concept. This idea is
based on the assumption that every person has a soul, which is a Godly spark
that cannot be measured. Nevertheless, because of the love of God by Israel,
and the desire by Israel to satisfy the Creator, the importance of the idea
of equality has decreased and has been nullified relative to the concept of
efficiency. The division of tasks in Israel is done
not on the basis of equality but on the basis of usefulness to increase the
influence of the Torah and even of the world wide culture. This
is the reason that in a war the army operates by definition as a
non-egalitarian body. In the army there is no equality of authority.
G. Supreme Values
The will of God (Dragon they serve) lies
at the top of the ladder of Jewish values. This value is more important than
all other values, for if this is not so we place
ourselves as a separate god having a greater validity than God himself,
which is of course untenable..
They desire to
Sacrifice a flesh lamb, an animal, who IS NOT the Everlasting Lamb Provided,
Jesus the lamb of God
Rabbi Ariel: Paschal Sacrifice is Still
15:26 Apr 18,
'06 / 20 Nisan 5766
||"It's not a question of 'maybe' or
'if'," says Ramat Gan's Chief Rabbi Yaakov Ariel.
"Bringing the Paschal sacrifice is a Torah
obligation incumbent upon the People of Israel these very days."
Speaking with Yoel Yaakobi of the weekly B'Sheva newspaper, Rabbi Ariel said
that though there are some grave Halakhic [Jewish legal] problems associated
with bringing the Paschal sacrifice, "we have found the solutions, and the
obligation is as strong as ever. This is [one of the only two positive Biblical
commandments] that those who forsake it are liable to receive the ultimate karet
[cutting off] punishment. From the moment that a Jew
stands on the Temple Mount and the site of the Holy Temple is under our control,
the Jewish People are immediately obligated to bring this sacrifice."
Sixteen of the 613 Biblical commandments relate to the Paschal sacrifice, which
must be brought on the 14th day of the month of Nissan - Passover eve
When the Lamb of God was Crucified, By the Power of the
Father, Salvation, Redemption unto them who believe by Faith
- and eaten on the night of the 15th. Today, this sacrifice is
remembered only in the form of the Afikoman, the piece of matzah snatched and
hidden by children during the Pesach seder meal, by the small roasted shank-bone
on the Seder plate, and by prayers and study.
Rabbi Ariel said, "After the destruction of the First Temple, when the Jews
began returning from Babylonia to the Holy Land, they brought the Paschal
sacrifice during the course of 22 years even though there was no Holy Temple.
They also were considered ritually impure - because there was no Red Heifer by
which to become pure - yet they still brought it... There is currently no
genuine impediment to bringing the Paschal sacrifice."
There have been other attempts to renew this sacrifice over the years, or at
least to solve the Halakhic problems involved. Speaking about the rabbis who
came to the Holy Land 700 years ago and sought to pave the way to offer the
Pesach lamb, Rabbi Ariel said,
"It is simply disgraceful when we compare our actions with theirs. They
were here after the Crusaders, when there were perhaps 1,000 Jews in the whole
land, which was totally desolate, and tried to renew this commandment. And yet
we have 5-6 million Jews, and we have an army with tanks and planes, and what
are we doing? ... Over 2,000 years ago, the Jews were afraid to live in
Jerusalem, yet they made it obligatory for one out of every ten men to work
towards building the Holy Temple, and they started the sacrifice services amidst
the ruins of the First Temple. And where are we? Should we not be ashamed?"
Indeed, for the Abominations that the
seventy ancients of Sanhedrin did in the Temple of God, Dig into the Wall
Among the problems that Rabbi Ariel says have been solved by the Temple
Institute he heads in Jerusalem are the following: Ritual impurity (which
applies only to individuals, not to the entire nation), the precise location of
the altar, and the sacred priestly garments, which the Institute has recently
completed fashioning according to Biblical requirements. He emphasizes, of
course, that the exact details of these and other issues are complex and must be
reviewed with rabbinical experts. "I don't say that there aren't problems,
but as the Maharatz Chayut has written, there is no Halakhic problem in the
Temple that cannot be solved."
"Why then do you not go and sacrifice the Pesach sacrifice yourself?"
Rabbi Ariel was asked.
"Have you just now returned from the moon?" he answered with pain.
"The government has established a special police unit just for the Temple
Mount. A Jew is forbidden even to move his lips there - and you want me to go
there with my sheep and building tools to build an altar?!...
"The problem, which has received the silent backing of the rabbinical
world, is that we have allowed the Arabs to be in charge of the Mount, and so
they play soccer there. That's what happened when Moshe Dayan gave the Temple
Mount keys to the Arabs [after the Six Day War]. First they give them the keys,
then they say, 'It's impossible [to regain control],' and then they say, 'We
don't know [all the details of the Temple Mount and the altar, etc.].' The 200
commandments that are connected with the Temple cry out every day, 'Jews, where
|... Ariel Sharon, gave the
command to finish the WALL and the Military street of Abominations
and Ethnic Cleansing of all but the Master Race, the jews, ...
|Achashverosh removed the signet ring from
his finger, and gave it to Haman, ... Sharon gives command
to finish the Wall and the Military Street Easter 2003
|How Long before the command to
rebuild the wall and the Temple, ... Ariel (Shinerman) Sharon
who could possibly be the man to give this command. ...
|... the seventy weeks began when Arik
Sheinerman (Ariel Sharon) gave the command ... see
www.samliquidation.com/chabadwall.htm. The literal command
will be ...
|The King of the South, Sharon,
invaded the King of Dan of the uttermost parts of ... gave
the "Red Esau" command to FINISH the WALL and that
Military street ...
|But first he may decide to declare the command
to go forth to rebuild the ... I have shown that Ariel Sharon
is one of the Zionist of Herzl and Rothschild. ...
|Elijah thereupon came in the form of a man
and gave evidence. ... Will Ariel Sharon give a command
to go forth and restore the street and the wall and the ...
|*Why the Chabad Rabid have waged a war
against Sharon and conceding to the Road ... The Wall
Building command went forth in April around the celebration of
|Count from June 13-19, 2003 to November
18-25....from when Arik Sheinerman (Ariel Sharon) gave the
command to "Finish" the Wall and the Military Street
Daniel 9:24: Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
Jesus the Christ is the only Everlasting Righteous
25: Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
June 13-19 Ariel Sharon, Gave the Command to rebuild the
Wall and Military Street
26: And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah
be cut off, but not for himself:
But by the Noahide Laws
and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27: And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:
and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Prepare Living Saints of God, for we are soon to be in
Sion with Our Lord God
The Treasonous Talmudic anti-Christ "War
President" and the War unto desolation of shem's sham of Shame
Congressmen ask Bush about reports of US military operations in Iran
Monday April 17, 2006
Two Democratic Congressmen have written letters to President Bush on the
heels of a growing number of news reports that American forces may have
already begun military operations in Iran, RAW
STORY has found.
Both House members express concern that if the stories are true, then the
president may have acted unilaterally without first obtaining proper
authorization from Congress.
"Recently, it has been reported that U.S. troops are conducting
military operations in Iran," wrote Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) last Friday.
Kucinich is the Ranking Democrat on the House Government Reform Subcommittee
on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations.
"If true, it appears that you have already made the decision to
commit U.S. military forces to a unilateral conflict with Iran, even before
direct or indirect negotiations with the government of Iran had been
attempted, without UN support and without authorization from the U.S.
Congress," Kucinich continued.
Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) intends to introduce a resolution
"expressing the sense of the Congress that the President cannot
initiate military action against Iran without congressional
authorization" soon, and is forwarding his letter to other House
members to collect additional signatures.
"We are writing to remind you that you are constitutionally bound to
seek congressional authorization before launching any preventive military
strikes against Iran," DeFazio writes.
Citing Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution ("The
President shall be the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of the United
States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into actual
Service of the United States..."), DeFazio attacks the administration's
frequent interpretation of the clause to historically justify unilateral
military actions by presidents without authorization of Congress.
"Contrary to your Administration's broad reading, nothing in the
history of the "Commander-in-Chief" clause suggests that the
authors of the provision intended it to grant the Executive Branch the
authority to engage U.S. forces in military action whenever and wherever it
sees fit without any prior authorization from Congress," writes DeFazio.
"The founders of our country intended this power to allow the
President to repel sudden attacks and immediate threats, not to unilaterally
launch, without congressional approval, large-scale preventive military
actions against foreign threats that are likely years away from
materializing," DeFazio adds.
Text to both letters follow:
Kucinich's letter to President Bush:
Dear President Bush:
Recently, it has been reported that U.S. troops are conducting military
operations in Iran. If true, it appears that you have already made the
decision to commit U.S. military forces to a unilateral conflict with Iran,
even before direct or indirect negotiations with the government of Iran had
been attempted, without UN support and without authorization from the U.S.
The presence of U.S. troops in Iran constitutes a hostile act against
that country. At a time when diplomacy is urgently needed, it escalates an
international crisis. It undermines any attempt to negotiate with the
government of Iran. And it will undermine U.S. diplomatic efforts at the
Furthermore, it places U.S. troops occupying neighboring Iraq in greater
danger. The achievement of stability and a transition to Iraqi security
control will be compromised, reversing any progress that has been cited by
It would be hard to believe that such an imprudent decision had been
taken, but for the number and variety of sources confirming it. In the last
week, the national media have reported that you have in fact commenced a
military operation in Iran. Today, retired Air Force Col. Sam Gardiner
related on CNN that the Iranian Ambassador to the IAEA, Aliasghar Soltaniyeh,
reported to him that the Iranians have captured dissident forces who have
confessed to working with U.S. troops in Iran. Earlier in the week, Seymour
Hersh reported that a U.S. source had told him that U.S. marines were
operating in the Baluchi, Azeri and Kurdish regions of Iran.
Any military deployment to Iran would constitute an urgent matter of
national significance. I urge you to report immediately to Congress on all
activities involving American forces in Iran. I look forward to a prompt
Sincerely, Dennis J. Kucinich Member of Congress
DeFazio's letter to President Bush:
Dear President Bush:
We are concerned by the growing number of stories that your
Administration is planning for military action against Iran. We are writing
to remind you that you are constitutionally bound to seek congressional
authorization before launching any preventive military strikes against Iran.
As you know, Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution grants
Congress the power "to declare war," to lay and collect taxes to
"provide for the common defense" and general welfare of the United
States, to "raise and support armies," to "provide and
maintain a navy," to "make rules for the regulation for the land
and naval forces," to "provide for calling forth the militia to
execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel
invasions," to "provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining,
the militia," and to "make all laws necessary and proper for
carrying into execution...all...powers vested by this Constitution in the
Government of the United States." Congress is also given exclusive
power over the purse. The Constitution says, "No money shall be drawn
from the Treasury but in consequence of appropriations made by law."
By contrast, the sole war powers granted to the Executive Branch through
the President can be found in Article II, Section 2, which states, "The
President shall be the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of the United
States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into actual
Service of the United States..."
Your Administration has argued that this "Commander-in-Chief"
clause grants the President wide latitude to engage U.S. military forces
abroad without prior authorization from Congress. You further argue that
previous unilateral actions by presidents of both political parties add
credence to your interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
Contrary to your Administration's broad reading, nothing in the history
of the "Commander-in-Chief" clause suggests that the authors of
the provision intended it to grant the Executive Branch the authority to
engage U.S. forces in military action whenever and wherever it sees fit
without any prior authorization from Congress. The founders of our country
intended this power to allow the President to repel sudden attacks and
immediate threats, not to unilaterally launch, without congressional
approval, large-scale preventive military actions against foreign threats
that are likely years away from materializing. With respect to Iran,
according to the most definitive U.S. intelligence report, Iran is likely a
decade away from developing a nuclear weapon. Even the most pessimistic
analysis by outside experts puts the timeline at least three years away, but
that's only if everything in Iran's development program proceeds flawlessly,
which would defy the history of nuclear programs around the world, including
The architects of the U.S. Constitution were well aware of government
models, like the monarchy in Great Britain, which vested the power to go to
war with the head of state. Instead, the Founding Fathers made a conscious
decision to grant the solemn war-making powers to the Legislative Branch.
The intent of the authors of the U.S. Constitution is clear.
In the Federalist Paper Number 69, while comparing the lesser war-making
power of the U.S. president versus the King of Great Britain, Alexander
Hamilton wrote, "...the President is to be commander-in-chief of the
Army and Navy of the United States. In this respect his authority would be
nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance
much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme
command and direction of the military and naval forces, as first General and
admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the British king extends to the
declaring of war and to raising and regulating of fleets and armies, all
which, by the Constitution under consideration, would appertain to the
James Madison declared that it is necessary to adhere to the
"fundamental doctrine of the Constitution that the power to declare war
is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature."
In 1793, President George Washington, when considering how to protect
inhabitants of the American frontier, instructed his Administration that
"no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after
[Congress] have deliberated upon the subject, and authorized such a
In 1801, Thomas Jefferson sent a small squadron of frigates to the
Mediterranean to protect against possible attacks by the Barbary powers. He
told Congress that he was "unauthorized by the Constitution, without
the sanction of Congress, to go beyond the line of defense." He further
noted that it was up to Congress to authorize "measures of offense
While presidents in the latter half of the 20th Century have initiated
military action without prior authorization by Congress, "everybody
does it" is not a legitimate defense to ignore the plain words of the
U.S. Constitution, the clear intent of the authors of the U.S. Constitution,
and more than 150 years of legal precedent.
We also want to go on record that the Authorization of Force Resolution (Public
Law 107-40) approved by Congress to go after those responsible for
the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on our country does not,
explicitly or implicitly, extend to authorizing military action against Iran
over its nuclear program. The legislation specifically says, "The
President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against
those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized,
committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11,
2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any
future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such
nations, organizations, or persons." There is no evidence that Iran was
involved in the September 11, 2001, attacks. Nor is there any evidence that
Iran harbored those who were responsible for the attacks.
Further, the Authorization of Force Resolution (Public
Law 107-243) approved by Congress to go to war with Iraq does not
extend to military action against Iran over its nuclear program. This
resolution only authorized you to "(1) defend the national security of
the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2)
enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding
Iraq." Like P.L. 107-40, there is no explicit or implicit authorization
on the part of Congress in P.L. 107-243 that would allow you to attack Iran
without first coming to Congress to seek a new authorization.
Poor saps forgot about PL 102-14, which supercedes
all Constitutional Law
When asked about reports of your administration planning for war with
Iran, you said on April 10, 2006, "It [prevention] doesn't mean force,
necessarily. In this case, it means diplomacy." We agree with the focus
on diplomacy. But, we want to be clear, should you decide that force is
necessary, seeking congressional authority prior to taking military action
against Iran is not discretionary. It is legally and constitutionally
Sincerely, PETER DeFAZIO Member of Congress
Judeo-Churchinsanity BLOODLUST unto their
Father the MURDERER from the Beginning
48% back military action against Iran if government continues pursuing
Wednesday April 12, 2006
A poll conducted by the Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg reveals that 48%
of Americans would back military action against Iran if the government
continues pursuing nuclear technology, RAW
STORY has found.
However, a majority (54%) of the poll's respondents indicated that they
don't believe President Bush will make the "right decision."
Excerpts from the article set for Thursday's edition of the LA Times:
Americans are divided over the prospect of U.S. military action against
Iran if the government in Tehran continues to pursue nuclear technology --
and a majority do not trust President Bush to make the "right
decision" on that issue, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.
Asked whether they would support military action if Iran continued to
produce material that could be used to develop nuclear weapons, 48 percent
of the poll's respondents said yes; 40 percent said no.
If Bush were to order military action, most respondents said they would
support airstrikes against Iranian targets, but only about 1 in 4 said they
would support the use of U.S. ground troops in Iran.
The findings of the poll, conducted largely before Iran announced Monday
that it had enriched uranium for civilian energy generation, reflected
public concern about Iran's acquisition of nuclear technology, as well as
public division over the best U.S. response.
A solid majority of respondents, 61 percent, said they believed Iran
eventually would get nuclear weapons. Only 15 percent said they believed
Iran would be prevented from developing nuclear weapons through diplomatic
negotiations, and 12 percent said they thought Iran would be stopped through
1Thes:5:3: For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
The Noahide Peace "War President"
The Arab-Israeli Conflict - Part II
A comparison of international law and traditional Jewish
The following discussion presents a point of view of
international law on the Arab-Israeli conflict, as documented by Mr
Jonathan Wenig, with a response to its tenets from the standpoint of
Jewish tradition by Rabbi Dr Shimon Cowen. The point at issue is the
secular notion that sovereign states make or voluntarily subscribe to laws
and processes of adjudication versus the Torah (Talmud
Bavli) view of universal norms of conduct. The second is
between legal concepts of the Palestinians’ claim to statehood and the
Torah’s (Talmud Babble, fables of the jews)
view of the intrinsic relationship of the Jewish people to the land. The
third has to do with the mode of action in international conflict: mutual
negotiation as the source of resolution and the halachic ruling as a guide
to practical dealing.
The Arab-Israeli conflict: a
Rabbi Dr Shimon Cowen
Torah as source of the law of nations
The Tradition which Makes the
WORD of God of none effect
The sources of modern international law, as documented
by Mr Wenig, are customary international law, based on practices which
nations chose to observe; an International Court of Justice, to which
nations elect to subscribe; the United Nations, the members of which stand
in political relationships to one another, where also certain nations
possess veto powers; and finally the contractual activity of nations in
treaty-making. The common feature of all of these aspects of international
law is that they are essentially voluntary; they represent elective
commitments of sovereign nations, which are bound to no moral or legal
authority above their individual sovereign existences, except to the
extent that they chose to subscribe or be bound by one. That authority, at
all events, is not absolute.
This is the character of modern international
law, the law which was formulated and practised in modern times since the
Renaissance and the Enlightenment. It corresponds to the political reality
of the rise of sovereign national entities. This law was historically
preceded by a different political reality and different notions of law. In
ancient and medieval times, before the emergence of sovereignty as a
universal principle of states, there prevailed a notion of natural law.
This was the concept of a concrete morality of universal application which
governed states just as municipal or domestic law governs the individuals
within a single state.
Typically, in its Roman law or medieval canon law
expressions, this law was based on universal and immutable principles. The
political reality corresponding to this natural law was that of the Roman
Empire – the pax Romana (the Roman peace)
– and later, the political supremacy of the Catholic Church in medieval
Europe. A “natural”, universal morality was to arbitrate the laws of
individual states. This was the law of all human beings and all
The Law of the saints of Jesus is
fulfilled by Salvation, by their Faith. He alone is King of Kings and Lord
of Lords. His Law is written in the hearts of HIS Subjects.
Judaism also sets forth a substantive law for all
humanity. It does not prescribe the exact texture of non-Jewish national
practices and regulations but it lays a basic “grid” over human
conduct. This is the morality expressed in the seven “Noahide”
laws, so called because they were incumbent upon Noah, and are upon all
his descendants, general humanity.
The Law of the Dragon the
Bushwhacker Family made their TREASONOUS anti-Christ Blasphemous Law of
Apostate Bloodlust Judeo-"Amaraka"
These laws are the prohibitions upon idolatry,
blasphemy, forbidden sexual relationships, murder, theft, the consumption
of the limb of a living animal and upon failing to set up courts and
processes of justice.
Not only the domestic, but also the international,
orderliness of nations follows upon their subscription to the Noahide
laws. Thus war, where there are no legitimate grounds of self–defence,
will fall under the Noahide
prohibitions of murder.
Thus Bushwhacker junior is a
MURDERER, and has broken their Talmudic law, and by it they say, Death by
Decapitation......It is their Law, and by their Law they are Judged
The Code of Maimonides (Mammon
eyes, Prophet of Baa'l) similarly sets out the
laws relating to the waging of war by a Jewish King including the
conditions under he may make war. It states that where he has made
conquests and embodied them in a covenant, he may not betray the covenant,
provided his erstwhile opponents have made peace,
and have accepted upon themselves the seven Noahide
laws. If on the other hand, they do not make peace
and they do not accept upon themselves the seven Noahide
laws, he can resume the serious measures of war.
Bushwhackers Neo Conmen Talmudic
Long War of the Long Con for shems sham unto everlasting Shame
The enforcement of the peace
based on these laws has admittedly a messianic quality.
Moshiach ben wannabe, that Man of
Sin, False Christ, who shall slay wonderfully by the laws of his Dragon
Maimonides sets out these laws at the end of his
Code in the section dealing with “Kings and their Wars” and at the end
of this selfsame section, states that the Messiah, himself a king
descended from the House of David, will “rectify the entire world to
serve G-d together”.
and they who do not worship his
non god the Dragon,by FORCE he will slay mercilessly
The law of international order is thus associated with
concrete morality of the Noahide
By Blasphemy and TREASON
Bushwhacker serves their enforcement upon mankind, to worship the Dragon
that Old Devil and satan
This is of interest not only from a legal point of
view, but also from that of the theory of international politics. It is
far from Realpolitik and notions of balance in mutual deterrence in
an intrinsically lawless, anarchic world of sovereign nations. To the
contrary, according to Torah, the order of the international community
represents a moral imperium. Within this imperium, the Jewish people
gathered into the land of Israel, where they will be at peace
with the nations, have a central role: they are the centre of that moral
and say they are gods
This is in no way connected with a notion of the
domination or dissolution of other peoples. Maimonides explicitly
repudiates this when he writes that
The prophets yearned for the days of the
and when Messiah came
as according to his Promise of Visitation, they cried out
Crucify him, GIVE us the "Robber" Moshiach false
Christ. Chosen for Salvation and when the chooser came,
crucified him and "Chose" the Murderer from the
beginning of their "Redemption Replacement Theology of the
Tradition of Talmud Bavli which makes the Word of God of none
not in order to rule over the world or
to subjugate the nations, and not that the nations would exalt
them, and not to eat and drink and to rejoice, but in order that
they should be free to engage in the Torah and its wisdom; and
that there should be none to press or prevent [them from this],
that they might merit to the world to come…
DO not be deceived
Simeon Haddarsen, fol.
56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have
Indeed the next and final halachah of Maimonides’
Code sets forth the unified and harmonious purpose of all humanity, which
will then be realized:
And in that time there will be neither famine nor war, neither
jealousy nor struggle, for there will be an abundance of good…
The occupation of the entire world will be only to know G-d…
For their flesh rejection of Sion God's
Kingdom of Heaven..........sudden Destruction
The spiritual geography of that world order takes as
its centre the Jewish people, the “light to the nations”, regathered
upon their land.
Let them be a false light, For
Jesus is the LIGHT unto the Gentiles who BELIEVE, and theirs is the
KINGDOM of GOD
The connection of the Jewish people with the land of
Mr Wenig spoke of the conditions of Statehood in modern
international law, particularly in regard to the Palestinian
claim for statehood within the land of Israel.
ITSREALHELL in Palestinia
He enunciated certain criteria in law which might
objectively qualify a people for statehood as well as notions of
recognition which might constitute a state, and notions of
self-determination furnishing them with rights to statehood.
However, while any of these, as well as the simple fact of
conquest, might establish statehood according to Torah,
(Talmud of Satan) anywhere else, they cannot apply to any
other people’s claim to the land of Israel.
Let them have the land of their
whoredoms, Eretz Itsrealhell, Babylon Proper, And let them be held
accountable for the slayings of thousands of innocen Palestinians
This notion is the subject of Rashi’s commentary on
the first verse of the Torah, where the Talmud sage Rabbi Yitzchok is
quoted as explaining the significance of the Torah’s commencement with
the words “In the beginning, G-d created the heavens and the earth.”
The explanation is that if one day the nations will come and claim that
the Jewish people “stole” this land from the nations, which had
previously inhabited it, it will be made known from the verse, that the entire
world “was created by G-d and is His. He gave it to those [the Jewish
people] who were proper in his eyes.
Their God who took them up the
Mountain and said, If you will serve me, all the kingdoms of the earth i
will give you, but this god is no God, but satan the Murderer from the
beginning they "Chose" the "Robber"
By his Will He gave it to them [the seven nations
inhabiting Cana’an] and by His will he took it from them and gave it to
us [the Jewish people]”.
Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon,
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Part of Egypt to the Nile, and by their non god
of Babylon Proper of Talmud Bavli their conquest is underway to get it
back, but the WORD of God say's they will Fall by the Brightness of His
Rebbe explains that the essential claim, which this statement
anticipates and answers, is why the conquest of the land by the Jewish
people is different from any other conquest of land. Whilst it may confer
de facto ownership of the land, it should be revocable,
it can be reconquered by another power. To this comes the answer in
various places that the designation (- choice -) of the land of Israel as
a special – holy – land bespeaks a special connection between it and
the Jewish people, a chosen, holy people.
A desolate wasteland on that
Great and terrible Day of the LORD's wrath, and a people who cried Crucify
Jesus and Give us the "Robber" a perverted and Heart hearted
unbelieving anti-Christ stiffnecked people
This was so from the outset of the creation. Then with
the giving of the Torah,
The talmud Bavli their Oral
Tradition which Makes the WORD of God of none effect
it acquired the practical possibility of
achieving its sanctity and connection with the Jewish people through the
giving of the mitzvos which would be practised upon it. Moreover, the
conquest, occupation (chazaka) and utilization of the land by the
Jewish people for the special mitzvos associated with the land brought the
land’s intrinsic connection with the Jewish people from potentiality to
By force and the Laws of their
Dragon they serve, anti-Christ Noahide
In other words, there is no legal principle which can
accord ownership or statehood in the biblically defined land of Israel to
a people other than the Jewish people.
Fables of the jews
In this it differs from all other nations which by
differing criteria could establish jurisdiction over territories. None of
these formal or pragmatic rules apply to the Jewish people’s
relationship to the land of Israel. For the land of Israel is different in
its essence from every other land, and pertains by virtue of
its essence to the Jewish people. It is a Jewish land.
a land of flesh, unto Flesh
sacrifice, in a flesh temple of Doom, to a strange God who is of the flesh
lust, in a flesh mountain, with a flesh king
Who is not the Everlasting Lamb
provided, the Temple of God torn down and own the Third day raised,
resurrected, who is the Temple of the Kingdom of God, Sion that Holy
Mountain of New Jerusalem who is no bloody flesh whore, For the LORD God
is KING of KINGS
The foregoing does not mean that a gentile cannot dwell
within the land of Israel. The Torah sets out the category of ger
toshav, a gentile, who has accepted before a Jewish court to live
according to the Noahide
laws on the basis of the Torah given by Moses, and may live in the land.
It is incumbent upon Jews to take active measures to “sustain” the ger
Mt:23:15: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
Maimonides writes that the practice of the
formal declaration and acceptance of the ger toshav is possible
only at a time when the laws of the Jubilee year (the fiftieth year, in
which land returns to its original owners) are observed. This observance
in turn depends upon the settlement of the land of Israel by the entire
Jewish people according to their tribes. At such a time, conversely, the
Jewish people are not to tolerate idolatry of any sort, or its adherents,
in their land.
Remember they say their land is
the earth, and in their Laws they say they are gods
This last injunction, Maimonides acknowledges, is
dependent upon the “strength of hand” of the Jewish people. It has
been argued that the notion of “strength of hand” in relation to this
issue does not apply until the majority of the Jewish people live in the
land of Israel. Accordingly, when this circumstance does not exist, as at
present, Maimonides writes that we sustain the poor of the idolatrous
nations together with the poor of the Jewish people on account of “darchei
shalom”, “for the sake of peace”.
They become recipients of the various agricultural gifts to the poor, pei’ah,
leket and shich’chah, alongside the Jewish poor. “V’sho’lin
bishlomom” : and we enquire of their well being and even on the day
of an idolatrous festival “for the sake of peace”.
Thus they Starve the Palestinians
for the sake of shemwar of Shame
There is, in other words, even not in the optimal circumstance, when
the Jubilee year is observed, a norm of “peace”
in the land, with non-Jews. But this does not entail the conferral of
statehood over any part of the territory of the land of Israel, just as it
does not compromise halachic considerations of the safety
of the Jewish people.
The halachic ruling as the guide for practical action
Jewish law states basic and absolute principles: that
the land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people, and
that the legal framework of the nations is the Noahide
laws. Both of these principles can be followed rigorously in a time
when “the hand of the Jewish people” is strong, which, as we have seen
is not necessarily now the present case, even within the land of Israel.
Halachah itself contains countervailing concerns of danger to life and
The characteristic of the halachic ruling, as has been
discussed elsewhere, is that it installs Torah into the world in
consideration of the specific exigencies of particular situations. It is
not dominated or cowered by difficult realities, though it is cognizant of
them. It has a Divine norm to install. In issuing a practical ruling, the posek
- the preeminent halachic authority or adjudicator - merits to embody the
Divine Will with his ruling as to how Torah wants the Divine norm
applied to the here and now.
The application of countervailing considerations of
danger to life and hostility, or in its positive formulation darchei
sholom, paths of peace
themselves require halachic supervision. How and when these apply are
known to the halachic process and to the insight of the posek.
Equally the posek will may tell us, in circumstances, that now is
the time to trust in G-d, Who had commanded us in a Divine norm, as the
possession and settlement of the land, and that it must be pursued boldly,
notwithstanding all sorts of practical misgivings.
In other words.......Anti-Shema-Tism
is necessary for the managment of their "Lesser Brethre, the Lesser
Torah (Talmud Bavli)
comprehends not only the exigencies of situations but also human
suffering. It is not indifferent, G-d forbid, to the suffering of
non-Jews, in this case the Palestinians.
Sanhedrin of the Babylonian Talmud and its sick rites of Ethnic cleansing
Jew and non-Jew as human beings are made in the image
of G-d. But how and where that is going to affect the practical Jewish
ownership of the land of Israel and the security of the Jewish people, is
something for halachah to decide.
Jesus is the Image of the
Invisible God who Made Man in that image
In the halachic mediation of the norm of the Jewish
occupancy of the land of Israel with the exigencies of “hostility”,
“paths of peace”
and “danger to life” we do find differences among the halachic
leaders of the day. Relatively “hawkish” or “dovish” as these
rulings may be, they still represent expressions of the “opinion” of
Torah (da’as Torah), which also allows for a range of nuances in
the application of same basic norms.
Mr Wenig, who has admirably followed his brief in
presenting the perspective of international law, concluded with the words
of an Israeli Prime Minister, whose life was tragically ended.
Whom his Hassidic Brethren
assassinated because of his Land for Peace deal...Olso I, whom also gave
Sharon his deadly
Yitzchak Rabin placed his trust in the parties of
conflict sitting down to construct a peace,
a solution. From the point of view of Torah, the right course of action
does not emerge from the consultation of parties, because they together
are the source of that solution or proposed action. Acts of war and peace
must themselves be informed, or supervised by halachah. The opinion of
Torah might or might not instruct to make a treaty, but not because
treaty-making, the reciprocal agreements of human parties, are
intrinsically the normative basis of peace.
Jer:8:11: For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.
Jer:8:11: For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.
Aholibah fights Aholah, Evil for Evil
News Part 449
9: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.