- Note - As Dr. Henry Niman, PhD and Dr. Patricia Doyle, DVM
have been saying since last April on my program, Tamiflu
is, indeed, essentially worthless ... as are any potential human
vaccines being talked about and developed. It is encouraging to see others
coming forward with the same data and opinion. - Jeff Rense
-
- LONDON (UPI) -- A Vietnamese doctor with experience in
treating avian flu says Tamiflu, the drug being stockpiled
for treatment of avian flue is useless against the virus.
-
- Think of all the mammon to be made, though
-
- Dr. Nguyen Tuong Van of the Centre for Tropical Diseases in
Hanoi has treated 41 victims of H5N1, following World Health Organization
guidelines and administering Tamiflu to her patients. She told the Sunday
Times of London the medicine had no effect.
-
- "We place no importance on using this drug on our
patients," she said. "Tamiflu is really only meant for treating
ordinary type A flu. It was not designed to combat H5N1."
-
- The newspaper said the finding casts doubt on the British
government's pandemic flu policy. The nation's top medical official, Sir
Liam Donaldson, has ordered 15 million doses of Tamiflu be stockpiled.
-
- Thank you says Donald Dumsfeldt
-
- Van said the only way to keep avian flu patients alive is
to "support" all their vital organs -- including the liver and
kidneys -- with modern technology like ventilators and dialysis machines,
the Sunday Times reported.
-
- The WHO has acknowledge Tamiflu had not been "widely
successful in human patients," but said it believes it would have been
more effective in many Asian countries if it had been used earlier in the
illness.
-
- Copyright 2005 by United Press International. All Rights
Reserved.
It would have been
______
We do not torture
says George Bush
God Bliss Amaraka? Or
forgive Sodom?
Autopsy Reports
Death By Torture: US Media Ignores
Hard Evidence
By PETER PHILLIPS
Military
autopsy reports provide indisputable proof that
detainees are being tortured to death while in US military custody. Yet
the US corporate media are covering it with the seriousness of a garage sale
for the local Baptist Church.
A recent American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) posting of one of forty-four US military autopsy reports reads as
follows:
"Final Autopsy Report: DOD 003164,
(Detainee) Died as a result of asphyxia (lack of oxygen to the brain) due to
strangulation as evidenced by the recently fractured hyoid bone in the neck
and soft tissue hemorrhage extending downward to the level of the right
thyroid cartilage. Autopsy revealed bone fracture, rib fractures, contusions
in mid abdomen, back and buttocks extending to the left flank, abrasions,
lateral buttocks. Contusions, back of legs and knees; abrasions on knees,
left fingers and encircling to left wrist. Lacerations and superficial cuts,
right 4th and 5th fingers. Also, blunt force injuries, predominately recent
contusions (bruises) on the torso and lower extremities. Abrasions on left
wrist are consistent with use of restraints. No evidence of defense injuries
or natural disease. Manner of death is homicide.
Whitehorse Detainment Facility, Nasiriyah, Iraq."
The ACLU website further reveals how:
"a 27-year-old Iraqi male died while being interrogated by Navy Seals on
April 5, 2004, in Mosul, Iraq. During his confinement he was hooded,
flex-cuffed, sleep deprived and subjected to hot and cold environmental
conditions, including the use of cold water on his body and hood. The exact
cause of death was "undetermined" although the autopsy stated that
hypothermia may have contributed to his death.
Another Iraqi detainee died on January 9,
2004, in Al Asad, Iraq, while being interrogated. He was standing, shackled to
the top of a doorframe with a gag in his mouth, at the time he died. The cause
of death was asphyxia and blunt force injuries.
So read several of the 44 US military
autopsy reports on the ACLU website -evidence of extensive abuse of US
detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan 2002 through 2004. Anthony Romero, Executive
Director of ACLU stated, "There is no question that
US interrogations have resulted in deaths." ACLU attorney Amrit
Sing adds, "These documents present irrefutable evidence that US
operatives tortured detainees to death during interrogations."
Additionally, ACLU reports that in April
2003, Secretary Rumsfeld authorized the use of
"environmental manipulation" as an interrogation technique in
Guantánamo Bay. In September 2003, Lt. Gen. Sanchez also authorized this
technique for use in Iraq. So responsibility for these human atrocities goes
directly to the highest levels of power.
A press release on these deaths by torture
was issued by the ACLU on October 25, 2005 and was immediately picked up by
Associated Press and United Press International wire services, making the
story available to US corporate media nationwide. A thorough check of
Nexus-Lexus and Proquest electronic data bases, using the keywords ACLU and
autopsy, showed that at least 95percent of the daily
papers in the US didn't bother to pick up the story. The Los Angeles
Times covered the story on page A-4 with a 635-word report headlined
"Autopsies Support Abuse Allegations." Fewer than a dozen other
daily newspapers including: Bangor Daily News, Maine, page 8;
Telegraph-Herald, Dubuque Iowa, page 6; Charleston Gazette, page 5;
Advocate, Baton Rouge, page 11; and a half dozen others actually covered
the story. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Seattle Times
buried the story inside general Iraq news articles. USA Today posted
the story on their website. MSNBC posted the story to their website, but
apparently did not consider it newsworthy enough to air on television.
"The Randi Rhodes Show," on Air
America Radio, covered the story. AP/UPI news releases and direct quotes from
the ACLU website appeared widely on internet sites and on various news-based
listservs around the world, including Common Dreams, Truthout, New Standard,
Science Daily, and numerous others.
What little attention the news of the US
torturing prisoners to death did get has completely disappeared as context for
the torture stories now appearing in corporate media. A Nexus-Lexus search
November 30, 2005 of the major papers in the US using the word torture turned
up over 1,000 stories in the last 30 days. None of these included the ACLU
report as supporting documentation on the issue.
Talmudic Jewish owned Media
How can the American public understand the
gravity of the torture that is currently being committed in our name when the
issue is being reported with no reference to the extent to which these crimes
against humanity have gone? Has the internet become the only source of real
news for mainstream Americans while the corporate media only tells us what
they want us to know?
Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology
at Sonoma State University and Director of Project Censored a media research
organization. www.project.censored.org
ACLU source documents online at: http://action.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/102405/
_____
1. H.J.RES.104
: To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".
Sponsor: Rep
Michel, Robert H. [IL-18] (introduced 1/31/1991)
Cosponsors
(225)
Committees: House Post Office and Civil Service
Latest Major Action: 3/20/1991 Became
Public Law No: 102-14.
Bill of Rights
Congress shall
make no
law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Saints of
Jesus the Christ
all others
need not read
All
Constitutional Law is now nullified. There is no "Bill of rights".
By House Joint Resolution 104, PL 102 14 of the 102nd Congress of Treason of
these United States, these Laws are forever abolished.
Therefore,
The Laws which regulate Tax is therefore nullified.
Your Property
rights are abolished
Your right to
citizenship is forfeited.
Your right to
worship your God is made a criminal act.
So, There is
no president of the United States
There is no
Congress
There is no
Judicial
There is no
LAW
Unless they
openly admit the courts are TREASONOUS Noahide Courts
Or the
Congress of the United States, rescinds this treasonous Public Law and
restores the Government of the People by the People and For the People.
It is time to
Make your final Stand unto the Coming of the LORD, Jesus the Creator.
All others, I
advise you to finds rocks and caves and lowestrooms and Hide. For Candles
which cannot burn are hid under the bed.
______
Searching
for One Man or Woman, who has the Funds, and who seeks and Hungers for
Righteousness, to Finance a Full Page Ad in the New York Times, about the
Treasonous Blasphemous House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14,
"restoring" this Nation to the Talmudic anti-Christ Noahide Laws of
the beast Sanhedrin.
All of
Congress, All the staff of the executive, all Judicial are indicted to answer
this call to summons.
If they
refuse to accept this Ad, we will sue them in their own Noahide Courts
Contact
me: robert@samliquidation.com
no you will
not get rich on mammon if you send any money for this Advertisement
This cannot
be written off on Taxes, we are no IRS, 501 C-3 organization.
Send a
Check or Money Order for any amount to:
Robert G.
Pickle
P.O Box
489
Bay
Minette AL 36507-0489
This is not a
request for Seed of Greed creed need. If you are in the lowestroom hiding, you
may not want to partake in this Stand against the workers of iniquity.
Saints of
Jesus the Christ it is time to bring their cowardly shemsham into the open. It
is time that they stop their cowardly antics of coming out in the middle of
the night and Taking the Lord's Chosen. Let satan be Exposed. Let satan's
workers be Exposed, forever.
Ps:94:16:
Who will rise up for me against the evildoers?
or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?
_____
Daniel 11:
14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.
15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.
16: But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.
17: He shall also set his face to enter with the strength of his whole kingdom, and upright ones with him; thus shall he do: and he shall give him the daughter of women, corrupting her: but she shall not stand on his side, neither be for him.
Ezek:23:4: And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sons and daughters. Thus were their names; Samaria is Aholah, and Jerusalem Aholibah.
Ezek:23:5: And Aholah played the harlot when she was mine; and she doted on her lovers, on the Assyrians her neighbours,
Ezek:23:36: The LORD said moreover unto me; Son of man, wilt thou judge Aholah and Aholibah? yea, declare unto them their abominations;
TBN Dan
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=94114
Bibi Trying to Form New Government, Prevent
Elections
00:33 Dec 04,
'05 / 3 Kislev 5766
By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

Binyamin (Bibi) Netanyahu is trying to form a new government before Thursday,
when the order for new elections comes into effect. He lacks six supporters.
The former finance minister has the support of 55 Knesset members from
several parties, which according to current polling data are expected to
suffer severe losses in the next elections, according to the Hebrew web site
NFC and Israel Radio.
Besides Knesset members in the Likud who oppose Prime Minister Ariel Sharon,
MKs in the National Religious Party, Shas, National
Union and United Torah Judaism (Talmud Bavli
Noahidism) are backing the move. If Netanyahu succeeds in forming and
holding together a coalition, he will become Prime
Minister and enable the current Knesset to continue in session until its
mandate expires next November.
NFC reported that Netanyahu is trying to convince Shinui party leader Yosef (Tomy)
Lapid to back his effort. Shinui has been the hardest hit in the polls, which
predict that the secular party will receive only five mandates,
one-third of its present strength, in the next election.
Aides to Netanyahu explained that if he can establish an alternative
government, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's new Kadima party will become an
opposition party and will lose the momentum which has swept recent polls at
the expense of almost every other party except Labor.
In other election developments, former Prime Minister Ehud Barak said he will
not run in the party's primaries, but will stay in the party. Aides said he
might try to challenge Amir Peretz's leadership at a later date.
Barak called off a meeting with Peretz that had been scheduled for Saturday,
aimed at settling a dispute between the two concerning Barak's role in the
party. He has expressed fears that Peretz will turn Labor into a copy of the
Am Echad faction, which Peretz led before merging it with Labor. The faction
had only three MKs, one of whom defected, and was led on the strength of
Peretz's standing as leader of the Histadrut national labor union.
____
The Great Sanhedrin
alone had the right to appoint, or confirm the appointment of, the high
priest. His consecration might take place only in the day-time. Two high
priests must not be appointed together. Every high priest had a "mishneh"
(a second) called the Segan, or "memunneh," to stand at his right;
another assistant was the "catholicos"("Yad,"
l.c. 16-17).
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1132475663314&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
The Anti-Christ
Gloat....as Usual
Dec. 1, 2005 14:41 | Updated Dec. 5, 2005 21:21
The First Word: Change is not easy.
Appreciate it
Most Jews did not notice the recent passing of the 40th anniversary of
Nostra Aetate. This is a pity. Even the most cautious and cynical among us
should recognize that this Vatican II document might have been the most
significant development in our relationship with a long-standing
adversary.
Whether it fulfills this promise may depend in no small
measure on our reaction to it.
Nostra Aetate (In Our Time) changed notions about the Jewish people that
had held sway for almost 2,000 years. For almost all that time, two attitudes
of the Catholic Church guaranteed contempt and persecution of Jews as a matter
of quasi-religious principle.
The first was the charge of deicide - that all Jews were responsible for
the Crucifixion. In the popular mind, it meant that Jews were guilty of the
most heinous crime imaginable, and might be made to pay for it with their
lives. They often did.
Any one who murders are of the
murderer from the Beginning. In Christ who is the Life Giver, there is no
MURDER. This was carefully designed to bring in the Talmudic Noahide laws for
Both the Sanhedrin and the catholicos of Simon Magus
The second notion was replacement, or changes in the special relationship
between God and Israel that is so clearly expressed in the Bible.
Yeah the "replacement
theology" of the Hassidic Pharisees who rejected the TRUE Vine from the
Beginning the WORD of GOD and Replaced HIM with their tradition god who is no
GOD of Talmud Bavli, which Makes the WORD of GOD of None effect to them in their
Hatred for mankind. Now they hope to FORCE all of mankind to bow to their
Babylonian non God their Tetragrammaton YVWH that angel of darkness transformed
into an angel of "Illuminated Sparks"
According to this doctrine, the Israel of the Bible was "replaced"
by the New Israel - namely practicing Christians.
Israel who Believed in their Messiah
from the beginning DID NOT Crucify their Messiah, These were the Disciple and
ALL who BELIEVED in the ROOT who is GOD and the TRUE VINE Jesus who came as
Christ, who is GOD ascended Back to His Kingdom
Jews had no further place in history, other than to survive until the end of
time, bearing witness to their mistake in rejecting the true religion, and along
the way testifying to their degeneracy by living as the cast-offs of civilized
society. The greatest gift one could offer them was the chance to convert.
Alternatively, they could choose death. They often did.
At the hands of the
"masters" of Illumination of the murderer....their secret Proxy
murders of their catholicos
Nostra Aetate upended both notions. It taught that Jews do not bear any more
collective responsibility for the death of the Christian savior than any other
people. It affirmed that God's covenant with the Jewish people is unbroken and
eternal.
God Crucified God for the Plan of
Salvation only unto them who BELIEVE and are Born again converted to his Plan of
the Redeemer from the beginning the Everlasting Holy Covenant. Until a flesh jew
says Blessed is he who Comes in the name of the LORD, their house is left
desolate. For the Chooser from the Beginning Chose Israel for Salvation, and
when the Choose came the majority who say they are flesh jews rejected him and
cried give us the "Robber" they chose....the "Robber" they
received.
Jews - especially traditional Jews filled with a sense of the permanence of
God's Word - wonder how this could be done. How do you change a belief that the
faithful assumed century after century? They do not understand that the Church
does not see change as impossible.
The Catholic Church overflows with
tradition;
it allows only for very slow change. But it does allow for it. Later generations
can and do rethink old issues as society develops.
Unlike other Christian denominations, when change occurs within the Catholic
Church it has both teeth and staying power. The Church is hierarchical and
authoritarian. When it speaks, its adherents are expected to listen. This
means that the shift in attitude of the Catholic Church is binding, and will
likely be around for the foreseeable future.
One World shem sham collective odor
Universal anti-Christ Catholicos of Sanhedrin Noahide religion of the beast
"it ain't gonna happen" j
A third element of Nostra Aetate concerned how people should act towards
Jews.
Anti-Semitism is now
officially noted as a sin.
For me, this alone is
significant. To all skeptics: would you rather live in a world in which a
hundred million Catholics see you as a collaborator of the Devil, or one in
which they are instructed not to hate you?
Jesus already done that, the
Pontifex Maximas so called "Holy Father" has nothing to do with love,
for he is of the dragon the murderer from the beginning
Occasionally, I used to share a mike on a Los Angeles radio program with a
bright and articulate Franciscan whose friendship I came to value. One Sunday,
after he was transferred to another parish, a couple stopped after the service
to tell him "Father, it doesn't matter what you say. The trouble with this
country is still those people."
He argued with them for a while; they held their own, and eventually just
walked away. He ran after them, yelling for all to hear: "You had better be
back during the week for confession, because you are sinners!"
Should we not thank God for this sea-change in orientation?
NOSTRA AETATE has not wiped out Catholic anti-Semitism. You have to walk
through life with blinders on not to encounter Catholics who were brought up on
liberal doses of anti-Semitism at home - and had it drummed out of them by
priests and nuns who were faithful to the new teachings of Nostra Aetate.
Conversion of Jews, however, is no longer the priority it once was. If the
covenant with the Jews has never been broken, then somehow they do not need the
embrace of the mother Church quite as much as other people do. Long educated to
believe that there was no other portal to Heaven, it is upsetting to many
Catholics to learn that there may be a Jewish back door.
Isa:50:1: Thus saith the LORD, Where is the bill of your mother's divorcement, whom I have put away? or which of my creditors is it to whom I have sold you? Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves, and for your transgressions is your mother put away.
Jer:3:8: And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
The theology of all this, moreover, is a work in progress. Some of the
solutions proposed do not sound like much of an improvement, but even they,
practically speaking, call for treating Jews very differently. Many Catholics
don't mind the contradiction, or the struggle to find a way out of it.
While hopeful that more Jews will understand how positive a development
Nostra Aetate was, I cannot completely fault those who have responded with
indifference or outright suspicion.
Jews are very much in the position of a battered wife hearing her husband claim
that he has turned over a new leaf. Violent husbands sometimes do change, albeit
not very often. Their long-suffering spouses need to remain cautious and
vigilant for their own protection.
Jer:3:8: And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
The Jewish community, bruised and bloodied in two millennia of interaction
with Rome, cannot be faulted for wanting to see hard evidence of change before
it can trust the voices of reconciliation.
Yet we cannot, I think, be deaf to them either. What ought we do?
HJR 104, PL 102-14
We ought to take tentative steps toward changing some of our attitudes. The
Orthodox community is univocally opposed to the old kind of ecumenical dialogue,
aimed at an interpenetration of religious ideas. We too, however, should
recognize that some kinds of discussion have nothing to do with impressing
religious teachings.
There are areas in which our moral and ethical values coincide, especially in
the Kulturkampf against the hedonistic and material alternatives of our shared
host culture. It is not only observant Jews who feel like an embattled minority
- committed Catholics, too, despite their greater numbers, feel marginalized by
the image-makers of popular culture.
Particularly in America, we ought to wage a common
battle to persuade our fellow citizens to hold on to our shared treasured
notions (even as we disagree about important parts of their meaning) about the
specialness of human life, and about the importance of God in human affairs.
Minimally, we ought to remember that those who are trying to find new
interpretations of old texts are, well, people. They are priests and laypeople,
but they are human beings with the usual complement of feelings and
sensitivities. They would like to know that Jews are taking notice of their
work, and that it is appreciated. Those of us who encounter such people should
find ways to show it.
The writer, an Orthodox rabbi, is Sydney M. Irmas Chair of Jewish Law and
Ethics at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.
____
Noahide
News Part 344