Noahide News

Part 301

October 6, 2005

Talmudic Dragon Moon Calendar Tishri, 4 their Babylonian times of their  Babylonian Sumerian Doctrine and laws 5766


of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal

Extra Extra


E-Mail in from Judge Cur, Sanhedrin, 10-5-2005

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kerr Family" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: bnai noach

> gramps
> you just like the smell of your own wind
> their was never any communication hear
> just 2 people talking at each other.
> You must be bored, it took you alot of time to write that ben yosef piece
> i gave it all of 5 minutes and deleted it.
> ben yosef is a believe in your imaginary man but sins terribly by not
> following
> your theology.
> i'm hear and i attempt to communicate with your arrogant rantings
> But there's a world of difference between talking to someone and talking
> someone
> one day when you stop being god maybe you can hop the distinction.

Judge Kerr

My response

the world is full of educated derelicts
and you are godless

what do i care cur?

and remember dog, you e-mailed me.


God has put it into his heart do do God's will 

another exchange 10-5-2005 my response with red writing, Scripture and blue font

From: Kerr Family
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: bnai noach

Howdy gramps
I initiated a response to your original hate mail to Billy Jack. 
Whoopie, should I tremble? Hate? or anti-Shema-tism, which accusation are you making Viper?
Come now we all know how the dragon manipulated his Proxy upon mankind.
Mt:10:17: But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues;
 Your quick on knowing whose a "liar" i'm quite sure your a great scholar of Talmud Ha ha ha.
Why would I want to study such filthy perversion? Tradition?
Mk:7:9: And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition
For an old man you don't seem to have to much of a sense of humor.
Me thinkest that you take yourself tooooo seriously. 
right on your mammon rib-eye
Sanhedrin 57a.
Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Go lay on a couch and get healed "brother" from your god syndrom. 
Rv:22:2: In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
 That your a religious fanatic you admit is the truth but that contradicts the liar statement.
Rv:21:8: But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
  That's ok christians are known to play loose with the facts. 
Yeah see the sick perverted Mishnah Torah Talmud Bavli and the division of the rabid rib-eyes
 It seems to you that Hitler and his crimes against humanity was jewish.
  Well if you want to stick your head in the sand go right ahead. 
9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Suppose that the Tzar was jewish also when he allowed the pogroms in 1880s , trivial trivial you say. 
The Tzar and his family were slain by the Talmudic Hassidim of New York.
 Its a good thing that the catholic church stole that little boy and converted him to become a priest at the turn of the last century, ahh another saved person in the bosom of jessssuss. 

His Powers

The Great Sanhedrin alone had the right to appoint, or confirm the appointment of, the high priest. His consecration might take place only in the day-time. Two high priests must not be appointed together. Every high priest had a "mishneh" (a second) called the Segan, or "memunneh," to stand at his right; another assistant was the "catholicos"("Yad," l.c. 16-17).

That your cought up in yourself and don't care that your caught up in yourself does not surprise me in the least.
Mt:16:24: Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
   No respecter of filthy virmin you'd make a good nazi heil! senor pickle.
Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Now we come to the crux of the matter; your a religious fanatic who gives testimony of jjjjeeeesuuussssss the imaginary man. 
Mt:10:33: But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
The greeks had their mythology and you've got yours i'm so pleased for ya.  Be happy. 
Rom:8:7: Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
Jms:4:4: Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
Once was a kid, national honors socity whose who, got married raised kids of my own and there honest tax paying citizens. 
Mt:22:21: They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
 Opps those loose set of facts.  You treat knowledge like a prostitute treats a john.
Yeah, see Talmud Bavli, especially tractate Sanhedrin.......the Truth? hahahhahahhahahhahahheeeeeewhoooooey....
Jn:8:32: And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
Jn:8:36: If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
  Thars this book called the bible, just maybe you've heard of it, twas written by jews, tells about how Adam broke his oath and the result was the floods that destroyed the world, them thar jews coined the term "fear of heaven" from that thar story. 
hahhahahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahhhahhahha........the jews fought against ISRAEL from the beginning.....Abraham a Chaldean from UR.............................Jewry is the religion unto Baa'l what has Jewry have to do with the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and the Messengers God sent early and the jews slew? From righteous Abel to Zacharias in the gate......hahahahha jewry is men converted for fear of jews from all nation....Useless genealogies.......the flesh profits man nothing...........Sammy Davis JR was a jew.................................Only your Moshiach ben satan will be able to "SMELL out who is a jew" hahahhahahhahhahhahhahhhahhahhahhahhhahhahhhahhahhhahhahhahhhahhahhahhhahha
so what do I hear? anti-Shemite? Much better then anti-Christ
Them in Jesus the Christ, the LIFE Giver slay no man, it is always the anti-Christ who are of their Father the murderer from the beginning and the lust of their father they do......Catholicos....ahahahahahah triune shekinah plural polytheistic non gods............Not the Redemmer from the Beginning the same Savior the Word sent as according to the Prophets they slew.....these who you admit are indeed your fathers
 Now this same bible, written by them thar jews,
Who the Prophets of the Father came and warned for their worship of the Devils they chose..........Over and Over they warned and were slain by the jews.............Jews have done nothing nor can do anything but the lust of their father the murderer from the beginning.....But the ISRAEL of their God knew who he was when he said Here IAM
Go dialectic with your Judeo-Churchians.....what does darkness have to do with Light ?
says that a covenant requires mak'n an oath. 
Matthew 5:
33: Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
34: But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:
35: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
36: Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
37: But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
 To make an oath, according to the bible, that was written by them thar jews, a person has to stand before the Written Torah.
a Talmud Bavli Mishnah Torah which was only put to ink, long after your fathers crucified the Christ........go figure
  Acording to the bible, that was written by them thar jews,
and everything the jews did in the written Word of God the Messengers of the Father in heaven stood before them and warned them of their worhipping of devils and were slain.................. 
if a person does not do this he has no covenant relationship with the Ancient of Days.
The Covenant you have made with death and hell......ancient of Days........hahahhahhahhahhah coming from the mouth of an atheist.....hahahhahhahhhahhahhahhhahhehheeeeeeeeeeewhooooooey
Get ye behind the REDEEMER from the beginning, Jesus the Christ................satan
  Now if you'z giv'n testimony but have no covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe well i don't put to much cotten in what you got to say.
Isa:28:15: Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
Isa:28:18: And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
yar confus'n things again, its that loose with the facts problem suppose, an atheist praise G-d and a witch are 2 separate species.  You'd like to look at a leaf and tell the world what's a cat.  Highly recommend a couch, you've been standing in the sun tooo long. 
Coming from an atheist of Sanhedrin......go figure. Hahahahahhahahahhheeeeeeeeewhoooooooey boy....thar she blows
Ya'll testify that its ugly to commit ones' soul not to steal and oppress others. 
Mt:15:19: For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:
 Consistant cause christians sure have stole and oppressed others. 
What does the Catholicos have to do with Christ the Same redeemer from the beginning the Branch, the true Vine of the Root the father? For the branches of Israel saw the promised redeemer and belived, which the branched who denied the Christ are cast into outer darkness.....the true branches are the same by faith who know their Messiah....your house is left desolate until you say "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD......and cannot be grafted back in until that day...........atheist...ahahhaahahahhahhahhahahhahhah giving the seed of Abraham by faith in the Only Messiah Jesus the Christ the Lord God the life giver the same REDEEMER form the beginning, advice? hahahahahhahahahhhheeeeeeeeeeewhoooooey, and he boast he is of the Sanhedrin whom the Dragon has given them their seat and their power and their authority....dig into the wall Ezekiel and see the abomination these seventy do therein........hahahhahhahahahheeeeeeeeeeeeee you gotta be "Kidding" right?   Hahahhahhahahahheeeeeeewhooooooooey
 Commit yoru life to jesssus and then rape murder slander and steal all you want b/c your under the "grace" of the gods. 
That has been your Proxy from the start............and you will seek to slay his saints even as you hated him................for the lust of your father you will do and he is the Murderer from the beginning..................rid the world of your enemy?  Hahahahhahah, by their testimony and their witness of Jesus the Christ and the Commandments of God the father, you are delivered into the pit for eternal Damnation along with your beast Moshiach and his prophet....................................Jesus the Author of Life, MY HOUSE SERVE and we slay no man, nor have my fathers in Christ the Lord.......go and make your accusation against your own Catholicos, and now your two fold children of Hell your proselytes of your leaven, the Bloodlusting Judeo-Churchians of sanhedrin, and REPENT in the Mighty Name of Jesus the Christ. Tghe ONLY Way to enter into Sion.........atheist.....go figure
What can any man learn from an ATHEIST of Sanhedrin?
 Thanks but i aint interested in such testimony.
WE KNOW, you have made your admittance openly, thanks.....2 down and 68 to go


He came back 10-6-2005

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kerr Family" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: bnai noach

plagerist you got no shame.  This doesn't suprise me Luther one of the founders of the protestant movement was a plagerist like yourself and had no shame; Hitler based his extermination policies based upon protestant hatred.  You ought to read alot of the protestant literature, they slandered minorities and incouraged there destruction all the while preaching of their piety before their idol.  Its clear that your a revisionist who denies responsibility for the terrible crimes committed against mankind by christianity - whichever cult you claim is holy, there about 12,000 different cults and they all say that all the others are going to hell, or that criminal christians aren't really true believers or whatever excuse just so that they can avoid taking responsibility for the crimes of their cult religion.  Yours is a used tampon soul, that's your blood of christ unclean leper!  Again b/c you lack original thought you take 1500 year old writings and pretend that they apply today.  You have no knowledge of the people, culture or society that produced that literature yet pretend that your an expert on the subject.  Used tampon blood of christ get real! You eat unclean foods and your mouth and behavior does unclean actions.  You probably are a KKK and love to hang black people.  Tampon soul, blood of christ you disgust me.  Did your mother or father molest you as a child? How does this cult consistently produce monsters like yourself?




hahhahhahahhahhwhooooooey always the same scenario
> > they come and dialectic
> > then they get angry
> > then the murderer comes out of them
> > then they flee
> > some bite and some flee
> > but the Hassidim Pharisees of Sanhedrin
> > Bite Tickum Olam fleas



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kerr Family" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: bnai noach


He is baaaack !


you just like the smell of your own wind
their was never any communication hear
just 2 people talking at each other.
You must be bored, it took you alot of time to write that ben yosef piece
i gave it all of 5 minutes and deleted it.
ben yosef is a believer in your imaginary man but sins terribly by not
your theology.
i'm hear and i attempt to communicate with your arrogant rantings
But there's a world of difference between talking to someone and talking at
one day when you stop being god maybe you can hop the distinction.

Judge Kerr

Got through about 1/4 of your religious hate mail.  Plagerists like yourself
love to quote from books that they have absolutely no connection with, you
know nothing about the people who wrote the words that you worship.  I'm
quite confident that your a "true" believer - the greeks also believed in
their mythical tales of gods and men just like you and your tens of thousand
various cults called christianity.  Your cult or the cult of Maggid ben
Yoseif interest me in the least.  As an atheist praise G-d, daily i praise
the Ancient of Days (Dragon)  that he delivered my from missionary idolatry.  You have
a religious axe to grind, you seek all people to believe like you your holy
religious tripe.  I couldn't care a less.  Go O persecuted soul and preach
from your roof top your theology and belief system the world is full of
fools and it aint going to change.  Few men find ugly women attractive, your
religion that has the blood of millions upon its head i find particularly

Judge Kerr

Judge Cur is right up there with the "J" birds


Arutz Sheva - Israel National News
39. to dovid from chul who insulted the Sanhedrin zev, brooklyn (19:26, Oct-15, 04)
... Sanhedrin Judge Moshe Kerr, Ramot Bet Shemesh (22:22, Jan-12, 05) ...

Psalms 139:

19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men.
20: For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain.
21: Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?
22: I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.
23: Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts:
24: And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.



Off to the Noahide News


Text of Gore Speech at Media Conference
Oct 06 10:04 AM US/Eastern


Here is the text of former Vice President Al Gore's remarks at the We

Media conference on Wednesday in New York:

I came here today because I believe that American democracy is in grave danger. It is no longer possible to ignore the strangeness of our public discourse . I know that I am not the only one who feels that something has gone basically and badly wrong in the way America's fabled "marketplace of ideas" now functions.

How many of you, I wonder, have heard a friend or a family member in the last few years remark that it's almost as if America has entered "an alternate universe"?

I thought maybe it was an aberration when three-quarters of Americans said they believed that Saddam Hussein was responsible for attacking us on September 11, 2001. But more than four years later, between a third and a half still believe Saddam was personally responsible for planning and supporting the attack.

At first I thought the exhaustive, non-stop coverage of the O.J. trial was just an unfortunate excess that marked an unwelcome departure from the normal good sense and judgment of our television news media. But now we know that it was merely an early example of a new pattern of serial obsessions that periodically take over the airwaves for weeks at a time.

Are we still routinely torturing helpless prisoners, and if so, does it feel right that we as American citizens are not outraged by the practice? And does it feel right to have no ongoing discussion of whether or not this abhorrent, medieval behavior is being carried out in the name of the American people? If the gap between rich and poor is widening steadily and economic stress is mounting for low-income families, why do we seem increasingly apathetic and lethargic in our role as citizens?

On the eve of the nation's decision to invade Iraq, our longest serving senator, Robert Byrd of West Virginia, stood on the Senate floor asked: "Why is this chamber empty? Why are these halls silent?"

Purim Iraq March 17, 2003

The decision that was then being considered by the Senate with virtually no meaningful debate turned out to be a fateful one. A few days ago, the former head of the National Security Agency, Retired Lt. General William Odom, said, "The invasion of Iraq, I believe, will turn out to be the greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history."

But whether you agree with his assessment or not, Senator Byrd's question is like the others that I have just posed here: he was saying, in effect, this is strange, isn't it? Aren't we supposed to have full and vigorous debates about questions as important as the choice between war and peace?

Those of us who have served in the Senate and watched it change over time, could volunteer an answer to Senator Byrd's two questions: the Senate was silent on the eve of war because Senators don't feel that what they say on the floor of the Senate really matters that much any more. And the chamber was empty because the Senators were somewhere else: they were in fundraisers collecting money from special interests in order to buy 30-second TVcommercials for their next re-election campaign.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, there was - at least for a short time - a quality of vividness and clarity of focus in our public discourse that reminded some Americans - including some journalists - that vividness and clarity used to be more common in the way we talk with one another about the problems and choices that we face. But then, like a passing summer storm, the moment faded.

In fact there was a time when America's public discourse was consistently much more vivid, focused and clear. Our Founders, probably the most literate generation in all of history, used words with astonishing precision and believed in the Rule of Reason.

Their faith in the viability of Representative (REPUBLIC) Democracy rested on their trust in the wisdom of a well-informed citizenry. But they placed particular emphasis on insuring that the public could be well- informed. And they took great care to protect the openness of the marketplace of ideas in order to ensure the free-flow of knowledge.

The values that Americans had brought from Europe to the New World had grown out of the sudden explosion of literacy and knowledge after Gutenberg's disruptive invention broke up the stagnant medieval information monopoly and triggered the Reformation, Humanism, and the Enlightenment and enshrined a new sovereign: the "Rule of Reason."

Indeed, the self-governing republic they had the audacity to establish was later named by the historian Henry Steele Commager as "the Empire of Reason."

Our founders knew all about the Roman Forum and the Agora in ancient Athens. They also understood quite well that in America, our public forum would be an ongoing conversation about democracy in which individual citizens would participate not only by speaking directly in the presence of others -- but more commonly by communicating with their fellow citizens over great distances by means of the printed word. Thus they not only protected Freedom of Assembly as a basic right, they made a special point - in the First Amendment - of protecting the freedom of the printing press.

Their world was dominated by the printed word. Just as the proverbial fish doesn't know it lives in water, the United States in its first half century knew nothing but the world of print: the Bible, Thomas Paine's fiery call to revolution, the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution , our laws, the Congressional Record, newspapers and books.

Though they feared that a government might try to censor the printing press - as King George had done - they could not imagine that America's public discourse would ever consist mainly of something other than words in print.

And yet, as we meet here this morning, more than 40 years have passed since the majority of Americans received their news and information from the printed word. Newspapers are hemorrhaging readers and, for the most part, resisting the temptation to inflate their circulation numbers. Reading itself is in sharp decline, not only in our country but in most of the world. The Republic of Letters has been invaded and occupied by television.


Radio, the internet, movies, telephones, and other media all now vie for our attention - but it is television that still completely dominates the flow of information in modern America. In fact, according to an authoritative global study, Americans now watch television an average of four hours and 28 minutes every day -- 90 minutes more than the world average.

When you assume eight hours of work a day, six to eight hours of sleep and a couple of hours to bathe, dress, eat and commute, that is almost three-quarters of all the discretionary time that the average American has. And for younger Americans, the average is even higher.

The internet is a formidable new medium of communication, but it is important to note that it still doesn't hold a candle to television. Indeed, studies show that the majority of Internet users are actually simultaneously watching television while they are online. There is an important reason why television maintains such a hold on its viewers in a way that the internet does not, but I'll get to that in a few minutes.

Television first overtook newsprint to become the dominant source of information in America in 1963. But for the next two decades, the television networks mimicked the nation's leading newspapers by faithfully following the standards of the journalism profession. Indeed, men like Edward R. Murrow led the profession in raising the bar.

But all the while, television's share of the total audience for news and information continued to grow -- and its lead over newsprint continued to expand. And then one day, a smart young political consultant turned to an older elected official and succinctly described a new reality in America's public discourse: "If it's not on television, it doesn't exist."

But some extremely important elements of American Democracy have been pushed to the sidelines . And the most prominent casualty has been the "marketplace of ideas" that was so beloved and so carefully protected by our Founders. It effectively no longer exists.

It is not that we no longer share ideas with one another about public matters; of course we do. But the "Public Forum" in which our Founders searched for general agreement and applied the Rule of Reason has been grossly distorted and "restructured" beyond all recognition.

And here is my point: it is the destruction of that marketplace of ideas that accounts for the "strangeness" that now continually haunts our efforts to reason together about the choices we must make as a nation.

Whether it is called a Public Forum, or a "Public Sphere" , or a marketplace of ideas, the reality of open and free public discussion and debate was considered central to the operation of our democracy in America's earliest decades.

In fact, our first self-expression as a nation - "We the People" - made it clear where the ultimate source of authority lay. It was universally understood that the ultimate check and balance for American government was its accountability to the people. And the public forum was the place where the people held the government accountable. That is why it was so important that the marketplace of ideas operated independent from and beyond the authority of government.

The three most important characteristics of this marketplace of ideas were:

1) It was open to every individual, with no barriers to entry, save the necessity of literacy. This access, it is crucial to add, applied not only to the receipt of information but also to the ability to contribute information directly into the flow of ideas that was available to all; 2) The fate of ideas contributed by individuals depended, for the most part, on an emergent Meritocracy of Ideas. Those judged by the market to be good rose to the top, regardless of the wealth or class of the individual responsible for them; 3) The accepted rules of discourse presumed that the participants were all governed by an unspoken duty to search for general agreement. That is what a "Conversation of Democracy" is all about.

What resulted from this shared democratic enterprise was a startling new development in human history: for the first time, knowledge regularly mediated between wealth and power.

The liberating force of this new American reality was thrilling to all humankind. Thomas Jefferson declared, "I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." 

Noahide Tyranny of the Sanhedrin and her dragon of the Hassidim Chabad Lubavitch who control the White House of TREASON and Blasphemy and murder and thefts

It ennobled the individual and unleashed the creativity of the human spirit. It inspired people everywhere to dream of what they could yet become. And it emboldened Americans to bravely explore the farther frontiers of freedom - for African Americans, for women, and eventually, we still dream, for all.

And just as knowledge now mediated between wealth and power, self- government was understood to be the instrument with which the people embodied their reasoned judgments into law. The Rule of Reason under- girded and strengthened the rule of law.

But to an extent seldom appreciated, all of this - including especially the ability of the American people to exercise the reasoned collective judgments presumed in our Founders' design -- depended on the particular characteristics of the marketplace of ideas as it operated during the Age of Print.

Consider the rules by which our present "public forum" now operates, and how different they are from the forum our Founders knew. Instead of the easy and free access individuals had to participate in the national conversation by means of the printed word, the world of television makes it virtually impossible for individuals to take part in what passes for a national conversation today.

Inexpensive metal printing presses were almost everywhere in America. They were easily accessible and operated by printers eager to typeset essays, pamphlets, books or flyers.

Television stations and networks, by contrast, are almost completely inaccessible to individual citizens and almost always uninterested in ideas contributed by individual citizens.

Ironically, television programming is actually more accessible to more people than any source of information has ever been in all of history. But here is the crucial distinction: it is accessible in only one direction; there is no true interactivity, and certainly no conversation.

The number of cables connecting to homes is limited in each community and usually forms a natural monopoly. The broadcast and satellite spectrum is likewise a scarce and limited resource controlled by a few. The production of programming has been centralized and has usually required a massive capital investment. So for these and other reasons, an ever-smaller number of large corporations control virtually all of the television programming in America.

Soon after television established its dominance over print, young people who realized they were being shut out of the dialogue of democracy came up with a new form of expression in an effort to join the national conversation: the "demonstration." This new form of expression, which began in the 1960s, was essentially a poor quality theatrical production designed to capture the attention of the television cameras long enough to hold up a sign with a few printed words to convey, however plaintively, a message to the American people. Even this outlet is now rarely an avenue for expression on national television.

So, unlike the marketplace of ideas that emerged in the wake of the printing press, there is virtually no exchange of ideas at all in television's domain. My partner Joel Hyatt and I are trying to change that - at least where Current TV is concerned. Perhaps not coincidentally, we are the only independently owned news and information network in all of American television.

It is important to note that the absence of a two-way conversation in American television also means that there is no "meritocracy of ideas" on television. To the extent that there is a "marketplace" of any kind for ideas on television, it is a rigged market, an oligopoly, with imposing barriers to entry that exclude the average citizen.

The German philosopher, Jurgen Habermas, describes what has happened as "the refeudalization of the public sphere." That may sound like gobbledygook, but it's a phrase that packs a lot of meaning. The feudal system which thrived before the printing press democratized knowledge and made the idea of America thinkable, was a system in which wealth and power were intimately intertwined, and where knowledge played no mediating role whatsoever. The great mass of the people were ignorant. And their powerlessness was born of their ignorance.

It did not come as a surprise that the concentration of control over this powerful one-way medium carries with it the potential for damaging the operations of our democracy. As early as the 1920s, when the predecessor of television, radio, first debuted in the United States, there was immediate apprehension about its potential impact on democracy. One early American student of the medium wrote that if control of radio were concentrated in the hands of a few, "no nation can be free."

As a result of these fears, safeguards were enacted in the U.S. -- including the Public Interest Standard, the Equal Time Provision, and the Fairness Doctrine - though a half century later, in 1987, they were effectively repealed. And then immediately afterwards, Rush Limbaugh and other hate-mongers began to fill the airwaves.

Rush a Talmudic Jew

And radio is not the only place where big changes have taken place. Television news has undergone a series of dramatic changes. The movie "Network," which won the Best Picture Oscar in 1976, was presented as a farce but was actually a prophecy. The journalism profession morphed into the news business, which became the media industry and is now completely owned by conglomerates.

Talmudic Media and TBN the Baylonian network

The news divisions - which used to be seen as serving a public interest and were subsidized by the rest of the network - are now seen as profit centers designed to generate revenue and, more importantly, to advance the larger agenda of the corporation of which they are a small part. They have fewer reporters, fewer stories, smaller budgets, less travel, fewer bureaus, less independent judgment, more vulnerability to influence by management, and more dependence on government sources and canned public relations hand-outs. This tragedy is compounded by the ironic fact that this generation of journalists is the best trained and most highly skilled in the history of their profession. But they are usually not allowed to do the job they have been trained to do.

The present executive branch has made it a practice to try and control and intimidate news organizations: from PBS to CBS to Newsweek. They placed a former male escort in the White House press pool to pose as a reporter - and then called upon him to give the president a hand at crucial moments. They paid actors to make make phony video press releases and paid cash to some reporters who were willing to take it in return for positive stories. And every day they unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts to harass and hector any journalist who is critical of the President.

For these and other reasons, The US Press was recently found in a comprehensive international study to be only the 27th freest press in the world. And that too seems strange to me.

Among the other factors damaging our public discourse in the media, the imposition by management of entertainment values on the journalism profession has resulted in scandals, fabricated sources, fictional events and the tabloidization of mainstream news. As recently stated by Dan Rather - who was, of course, forced out of his anchor job after angering the White House - television news has been "dumbed down and tarted up."

The coverage of political campaigns focuses on the "horse race" and little else. And the well-known axiom that guides most local television news is "if it bleeds, it leads." (To which some disheartened journalists add, "If it thinks, it stinks.")

In fact, one of the few things that Red state and Blue state America agree on is that they don't trust the news media anymore.

RED=Talmudic RED Sofiet Judeo-Churchinsanity, anti-Christ, Aholah, Dan of the Hassidim leaven of the Pharisees, king of the North

Blue, zion, Aholibah, Judah Churchyzionians

Clearly, the purpose of television news is no longer to inform the American people or serve the public interest. It is to "glue eyeballs to the screen" in order to build ratings and sell advertising. If you have any doubt, just look at what's on: The Robert Blake trial. The Laci Peterson tragedy. The Michael Jackson trial. The Runaway Bride. The search in Aruba. The latest twist in various celebrity couplings, and on and on and on.

And more importantly, notice what is not on: the global climate crisis, the nation's fiscal catastrophe, the hollowing out of America's industrial base, and a long list of other serious public questions that need to be addressed by the American people.

and the HJR 104, PL 102-14 NOAHIDE LAWS

One morning not long ago, I flipped on one of the news programs in hopes of seeing information about an important world event that had happened earlier that day. But the lead story was about a young man who had been hiccupping for three years. And I must say, it was interesting; he had trouble getting dates. But what I didn't see was news.

This was the point made by Jon Stewart, the brilliant host of "The Daily Show," when he visited CNN's "Crossfire": there should be a distinction between news and entertainment.

And it really matters because the subjugation of news by entertainment seriously harms our democracy: 

Diane Sawyer GMA: Desperate Housewives

Katy Couric: Today........Brad Pitt


it leads to dysfunctional journalism that fails to inform the people. And when the people are not informed, they cannot hold government accountable when it is incompetent, corrupt, or both.

One of the only avenues left for the expression of public or political ideas on television is through the purchase of advertising, usually in 30-second chunks. These short commercials are now the principal form of communication between candidates and voters. As a result, our elected officials now spend all of their time raising money to purchase these ads.

That is why the House and Senate campaign committees now search for candidates who are multi-millionaires and can buy the ads with their own personal resources. As one consequence, the halls of Congress are now filling up with the wealthy.

Campaign finance reform, however well it is drafted, often misses the main point: so long as the only means of engaging in political dialogue is through purchasing expensive television advertising, money will continue by one means or another to dominate American politics. And ideas will no longer mediate between wealth and power.

And what if an individual citizen, or a group of citizens wants to enter the public debate by expressing their views on television? Since they cannot simply join the conversation, some of them have resorted to raising money in order to buy 30 seconds in which to express their opinion. But they are not even allowed to do that. tried to buy ads last year to express opposition to Bush's Medicare proposal which was then being debated by Congress. They were told "issue advocacy" was not permissible. Then, one of the networks that had refused the Moveon ad began running advertisements by the White House in favor of the President's Medicare proposal. So Moveon complained and the White House ad was temporarily removed. By temporary, I mean it was removed until the White House complained and the network immediately put the ad back on, yet still refused to present the Moveon ad.

The advertising of products, of course, is the real purpose of television. And it is difficult to overstate the extent to which modern pervasive electronic advertising has reshaped our society. In the 1950s, John Kenneth Galbraith first described the way in which advertising has altered the classical relationship by which supply and demand are balanced over time by the invisible hand of the marketplace. According to Galbraith, modern advertising campaigns were beginning to create high levels of demand for products that consumers never knew they wanted, much less needed.

The same phenomenon Galbraith noticed in the commercial marketplace is now the dominant fact of life in what used to be America's marketplace for ideas. The inherent value or validity of political propositions put forward by candidates for office is now largely irrelevant compared to the advertising campaigns that shape the perceptions of voters.

Our democracy has been hallowed out. The opinions of the voters are, in effect, purchased, just as demand for new products is artificially created. Decades ago Walter Lippman wrote, "the manufacture of consent...was supposed to have died out with the appearance of democracy...but it has not died out. It has, in fact, improved enormously in technique...under the impact of propaganda, it is no longer plausible to believe in the original dogma of democracy."

Like you, I recoil at Lippman's cynical dismissal of America's gift to human history. But in order to reclaim our birthright, we Americans must resolve to repair the systemic decay of the public forum and create new ways to engage in a genuine and not manipulative conversation about our future. Americans in both parties should insist on the re-establishment of respect for the Rule of Reason. We must, for example, stop tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end to the cynical use of pseudo studies known to be false for the purpose of intentionally clouding the public's ability to discern the truth.

I don't know all the answers, but along with my partner, Joel Hyatt, I am trying to work within the medium of television to recreate a multi- way conversation that includes individuals and operates according to a meritocracy of ideas. If you would like to know more, we are having a press conference on Friday morning at the Regency Hotel.

We are learning some fascinating lessons about the way decisions are made in the television industry, and it may well be that the public would be well served by some changes in law and policy to stimulate more diversity of viewpoints and a higher regard for the public interest. But we are succeeding within the marketplace by reaching out to individuals and asking them to co-create our network.

The greatest source of hope for reestablishing a vigorous and accessible marketplace for ideas is the Internet. Indeed, Current TV relies on video streaming over the Internet as the means by which individuals send us what we call viewer-created content or VC squared. We also rely on the Internet for the two-way conversation that we have every day with our viewers enabling them to participate in the decisions on programming our network.

I know that many of you attending this conference are also working on creative ways to use the Internet as a means for bringing more voices into America's ongoing conversation. I salute you as kindred spirits and wish you every success.

I want to close with the two things I've learned about the Internet that are most directly relevant to the conference that you are having here today.

First, as exciting as the Internet is, it still lacks the single most powerful characteristic of the television medium; because of its packet-switching architecture, and its continued reliance on a wide variety of bandwidth connections (including the so-called "last mile" to the home), it does not support the real-time mass distribution of full-motion video.

Make no mistake, full-motion video is what makes television such a powerful medium. Our brains - like the brains of all vertebrates - are hard-wired to immediately notice sudden movement in our field of vision. We not only notice, we are compelled to look. When our evolutionary predecessors gathered on the African savanna a million years ago and the leaves next to them moved, the ones who didn't look are not our ancestors. The ones who did look passed on to us the genetic trait that neuroscientists call "the establishing reflex." And that is the brain syndrome activated by television continuously - sometimes as frequently as once per second. 


That is the reason why the industry phrase, "glue eyeballs to the screen," is actually more than a glib and idle boast. It is also a major part of the reason why Americans watch the TV screen an average of four and a half hours a day.

It is true that video streaming is becoming more common over the Internet, and true as well that cheap storage of streamed video is making it possible for many young television viewers to engage in what the industry calls "time shifting" and personalize their television watching habits. Moreover, as higher bandwidth connections continue to replace smaller information pipelines, the Internet's capacity for carrying television will continue to dramatically improve. But in spite of these developments, it is television delivered over cable and satellite that will continue for the remainder of this decade and probably the next to be the dominant medium of communication in America's democracy. And so long as that is the case, I truly believe that America's democracy is at grave risk.

The final point I want to make is this: We must ensure that the Internet remains open and accessible to all citizens without any limitation on the ability of individuals to choose the content they wish regardless of the Internet service provider they use to connect to the Worldwide Web. We cannot take this future for granted. We must be prepared to fight for it because some of the same forces of corporate consolidation and control that have distorted the television marketplace have an interest in controlling the Internet marketplace as well. Far too much is at stake to ever allow that to happen.

We must ensure by all means possible that this medium of democracy's future develops in the mold of the open and free marketplace of ideas that our Founders knew was essential to the health and survival of freedom


----- Original Message -----
From: Ex Hassidic Chabad Lubavitcher
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Reply 2

HI! You wrote:
Hey been missing you
It's both new and a unusual feeling to to know someone cares. Now it's a new feeling because as a former JEW, believe you me, NOONE CARED. They "care" as long as you have some use for ya. Then when their done, they'll throw ya out like a dirty rag. This applies even to my own blood family, they all betrayed me and ripped me off as if I were an enemy.
righty so........
Matthew 15
4: For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.
5: But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;
6: And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.
And about those JEWS who were "friends" and didn't betray outright, the "friendship" extended only so far as convenience, usefullness, making it worth their while, etc came into the picture.
"J" Birds a stumped
(I wrote about this on the candlestick board before the Bluejay stole everything) BUT NOW, I realize (couldn't understand before, as a JEW, for the life of me though) why EVERYONE "screwed" me over so royally?? Because these "friends" (mostly fellow crypto-jews) were merely reflections of ME and MY LIFE of selfishness, flesh, avarice, greed, lust, perversion, nihilism, meaninglessness, psychic violence,  and the host of other BORDERLINE PSYCHOTIC behaviors which characterize the typical UNREPENTANT JEW. So my point: WHY SHOULD OR WOULD ANYONE CARE ABOUT SUCH A MISERABLE WRETCHED ARROGANT WEASEL SUCH AS I WAS??!!
Because of the CREATOR of LOVE who you seek, are you become MY BROTHER in Christ the LORD GOD and I yearn to meet you in Sion
THE GOOD NEWS: Since THE LORD called ME OUT, there is NOW a small group of people I LOVE dearly WHO ARE BELEIVERS and through Their FRUITS show how much they really care through the LOVE OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST.
You are one of 'em, brother Robert.
There's another lady here too.
Ephesians 3:17 that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith, so that, because you have been rooted and grounded in love, 3:18 you may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, 3:19 and thus to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, so that you may be filled up to all the fullness of God.
and AMEN


The Hassidic Talmudic Sofiet RED Sanhedrin dragon god, who is no GOD made him do it

Press Releases

God told me to invade Iraq, Bush tells Palestinian ministers

This press release is embargoed until 2230 hours on Thursday 6 October. Before that time it is only available through the link which you have been sent.

President George W. Bush told Palestinian ministers that God had told him to invade Afghanistan and Iraq - and create a Palestinian State, a new BBC series reveals.

A Noahide state to his skull and bones Judeo-Churchinsanuty bloodlusting murderer non g-d....Gawd bliss "Amaraka"

In Elusive Peace: Israel and the Arabs, a major three-part series on BBC TWO (at 9.00pm on Monday 10, Monday 17 and Monday 24 October), Abu Mazen, Palestinian Prime Minister, and Nabil Shaath, his Foreign Minister, describe their first meeting with President Bush in June 2003.

Nabil Shaath says: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, "George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan." And I did, and then God would tell me, "George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq …" And I did. And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, "Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East." And by God I'm gonna do it.'"


Abu Mazen was at the same meeting and recounts how President Bush told him: "I have a moral and religious obligation. So I will get you a Palestinian state."

The series charts the attempts to bring peace to the Middle East, from Bill Clinton's peace talks in 1999/2000 to Israel's withdrawal from Gaza last August.

Norma Percy, series producer of The 50 Years War (1998) returns, with producers Mark Anderson and Dan Edge, to tell the inside story of another seven years of crisis.

Presidents and Prime Ministers, their generals and ministers tell what happened behind closed doors as peace talks failed and the intifada exploded.


Israel and the Arabs: Elusive Peace - Mondays 10, 17 and 24 October, from 9.00 to 10.00pm on BBC TWO.

So hep me gawd, kill even more Arabs


Aholibah and hew sister Aholah both whores who dote to the Assyrian and his snare

Daniel 11:

7: But out of a branch of her roots shall one stand up in his estate, which shall come with an army, and shall enter into the fortress of the king of the north, and shall deal against them, and shall prevail: 

WTC massacre by Aholibah, Judah, secular zion, Sharon's Mossad against Dan, the Hassidim, of Sanhedrin, Aholah the king of the south

8: And shall also carry captives into Egypt their gods, with their princes, and with their precious vessels of silver and of gold; and he shall continue more years than the king of the north.
9: So the king of the south shall come into his kingdom, and shall return into his own land. 
10: But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. 
11: And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand.

Shemwars against Iraq and Palestinians for the BORG Collective we are in now

12: And when he hath taken away the multitude, his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it.
13: For the king of the north shall return, and shall set forth a multitude greater than the former, and shall certainly come after certain years with a great army and with much riches.

Iraq, babylon Proper of eretz itsrealhell

14: And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall.

Hassidim SANHEDRIN against secular zion, Sharon

15: So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand.


The hassidim and their Bushitler must soon make their move on Jerusalem, their Military bases are almost finished in construction


16: But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.

then that son of perdition "REVEALED"

On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

The Five Dancing Israelis
Arrested On 9/11

A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.

The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1)

Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming “middle-eastern” men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)

"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)

[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)

Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)

"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)

One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here’s the transcript from NBC News:

Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (

(*Writer’s note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these “Arabs” were Palestinians? How would he know that?  Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not “sheikh uniforms”)

Based on that phone call, police then issued a “Be-on-the-Lookout” alert for a white mini-van heading for the city’s bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious “middle-easterners” were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!

According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)

Why did he feel that Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (11)

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here’s what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)

TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13).

What's really intriguing is that  ABC's 20/20 (14),  the New York Post (15),  and the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot America, (18)  all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (19)

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).

It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)

[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.

Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?

It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:

1. The Israeli “movers” cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.

2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.

3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.

4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis’ misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.

5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor  immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.

6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department “higher-ups” are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9/11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (24)

The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks, the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, “experts”, and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.

We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our “freedom” and “democracy”. The Muslims were “medieval” and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades

But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks
. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:

"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)

You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?

[A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (26)

To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered against bin Laden was a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (27)

The Pentegon was awarded a Talmud Bavli "Torah" scroll from the Chabad Lubavitch, dedicated to the strike point, afterward

There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.

One last thing. At 09:40 on 9/11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (28). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (29)

Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (30) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?

Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (31)

The implication of Palestinians in the 9/11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.

Thus the zionist Fight against Bushitlers hassidim handlers of the Noahide shemborg collective


Testimonial of a 'SuperJew'


Allow me to introduce myself.

I am a Jew.

You have probably seen me at your local supermarket, or maybe at a local restaurant.

Indeed, our paths have crossed many times.

When you saw me, I did not, of course, seem any different from you, or your friends.

After all, I have white skin. I wear clothes similar to yours; I even drive a car similar to yours.

I have a wife, who probably looks similar to your wife, and a couple of kids, who probably look almost like your kids. I even belong to the Lion's Club, just like you do.

I even took up that low-brow, all-American pastime known as bowling, to further blend into your culture, although I do find it a little too unintellectual; see, we Jews have always put a premium on brains over brawn, on intellect over stupidity; most of the people that I bowl with are mental midgets, but I dare not say that aloud.

Yes, I realize that my people used to look very 'foreign'; we were kind of dark and Turkish-looking, but no longer. Years of living in Europe and America has lightened our skin remarkably. We now look 'White.'

Indeed, you and I could even appear, to a stranger, to be related. That is how alike we appear to be.

But, you should know that I am different. Very different. In fact, if you knew just how different, you would be truly shocked.

My very unusual history, which is unlike the history of any other people on earth, makes me different. I can't physically deny this history, even if I wanted to. It is part of me -- in my genes, religion, and culture.

To relieve my temporary boredom, and to amuse myself as well, I am now going to let you in on a few of the reasons we Jews are so different from you gentiles, even though we appear to be so much alike.

It is important for you, as a non-Jew, to realize this critical fact about us: our people bred and mixed only among themselves for hundreds and hundreds of years. While other peoples interbred and mixed with many tribes who were different from themselves, we Jews did not. Modern DNA evidence shows this very clearly.

You must also realize that my people were kicked out of every country on earth as well. Over and over again. For centuries. Endlessly. To the point of it being a common occurence. No other group of people has experienced eviction on such a large and continuing scale. Ever.

Further, we Jews were also directly oppressed, as a people, for centuries, because our beliefs held that we were superior to all other people on earth. We believed it then, and we believe it now (but we do not say this publicly, and we have even altered our religious tracts and documents to hide this fact; further, we very strongly deny this if someone mentions it).

Curiously, in a very Darwinian sense, that endless oppression actually helped us. It forced us to become much more cohesive, much more forward-thinking and much cleverer than the gentiles we lived among. We had to in order to survive -- to help ensure that we were not evicted yet again. We also had to learn how to lie at the drop of a hat about anything we might be asked, in order to prevent still more oppression, and those centuries of automatic lying actually became, in a sense, genetically ingrained. Today we continue to lie about Jewish activity without really thinking about it; it seems automatic in many ways.

We also became experts at preventing 'anti-Semitism' in the dominant culture by engaging in very specific forms of activity, such as entering vocations that let us better control the host culture -- newspaper and book publishing, for instance. This activity allows us to control what information is consumed by the gentile masses. It allows us to decide which ideas the masses will hold in their heads. Great power, that.

Why do you think that the 'official newspaper of record' in America, the New York Times, has been Jewish for many, many years? It wasn't just a happy accident! And most other major newspapers get their articles directly from the New York Times, if they are not already heavily Jewish!

Figure it out. (Ditto Life magazine, Time magazine, Newsweek magazine, etc. They are all heavily 'kosher' as well).

Now, I know what you are probably thinking.

You have been told many times that 'Jewish' is only a religion. (I always laugh when I hear this, but not aloud when in mixed company).

What you probably do not know is that we have worked very hard to get the term 'Jewish' reclassified as a religion only, no longer as a race, on various official Government forms and documents. And we have been very successful. Few people today know that we are a race as well as a religion.

And this ignorance works greatly to our advantage.

You see, for years, many gentiles (non-Jews) insisted that Jews acted alike, and engaged in certain behaviors and activities destructive to their gentile host nations. Which was indeed true.

But then, a man named Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany. You know the story about that; I do not need to repeat the details.

However, I will admit that Hitler was unique. Sure, many leaders before him, like Napoleon, and also various Russian leaders as well, tried to grasp and deal with the centuries-old 'Jewish Question'; they also knew that Jews are very big trouble indeed. But none of them went all out to solve the problem for good. The real amazing part, known by very few people, is that the Nazis designed Nazism after Judaism.  

the same Nasi of Sanhedrin

In other words, they used Judaism as a model. They were intrigued by the idea of a people breeding and mixing only among themselves for centuries (to preserve their genotype) and existing in the same cultural mode for 1,000 years or more. No other people had done this so exclusively and successfully as the Jews.

At any rate, Hitler was one of the greatest threats to Judaism that we, as a people, ever encountered. We actually faced near-total extinction as an ethnic group.

We had to make sure that a Nazi-type movement could NEVER happen again. Ever.

So, we started a calculated effort to make the gentile public believe that 'Jewish' was only a religion. And, slowly, we succeeded. Marvelously so. Beyond even our own expectations.

Today, any non-Jew who calls Jews a 'race' is automatically labeled a 'Nazi.' This discredits ANYTHING that non-Jew says, no matter if his political or racial viewpoints are correct or not.

jewry in flesh are any who deny Christ Jesus.....anti-Christ

Clever, isn¹t it?

We also prevent the chances of any Nazi or anti-Jewish movement happening again by dominating many key areas of your gentile/Christian culture, such as the media, Hollywood, banking/finance, book publishing, and magazine publishing.

We use this control of large areas of American culture to our own ends, of course; to push any ideas that we see fit, and to block out any ideas we don't agree with (the criticism of Jews, any overt Christian religious themes, or traditional patriotic symbolism are three good examples of things we censor, alter or water down before they reach the general public).

We are also very anti-gun as well; we do not want millions of non-Jews, who could later rise up and oppress us, to privately own firearms. We consider that a very big threat. That is why the people leading the anti-gun crusade in the U. S. Congress (Charles Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, etc.) are all Jewish by ethnicity. It is not an accident.

Is all of this a plot, you ask? A conspiracy, as some say? Do we Jews meet in dark, smoke-filled rooms to discuss how 'the plan' is coming along?

Nope. We do not have to. We do it automatically. This habit is inborn, the result of being oppressed for hundreds of years, in many different countries, over and over and over again.

Really, you must understand that our mental make-up is different from yours (although you would not know it from talking to us). It is actually far superior to yours in many ways, and modern I. Q. tests prove this very well. Jews routinely score 1 standard deviation higher than a gentile, which is a significant difference -- as wide a gap as that between black and White.

all racism is of the dragon. In Jesus the Christ there is only ONE BLOOD, One Fold, One Nation

This is why, when you look in your telephone book under 'Attorneys,' half the names are Jewish (Goldberg, Weinstein, Tannenbaum, Horwitz), even though we make up JUST 2.4% (two point four percent) of the U.S. population, a very tiny number. Impressive, isn't it?

Ditto the fields of medicine and science. We dominate those areas, too. Again, our numbers are very small, but we dominate you in every field of importance. (This is why no one ever criticizes us in public! In private, yes, but not in public!)

You see, we Jews naturally rise to the top (we're funny that way). We naturally become the CEOs, the chairmen, the V. P.s. We are on all the boards of all the foundations and charities and corporations and associations (this is also why you rarely hear anyone criticize us!)

Yes, if you gentiles only understood that when you let us out of the ghettos and allowed us to become 'equal citizens' just after the French Revolution you were signing your own death warrant. When you got rid of most of the laws preventing Jews from entering certain vocations and occupations, you were really unleashing a unique people that would soon run rings around you; and use its new freedom to destroy many of your beloved institutions.

We had to, by default. We, as a people, have a massive superiority complex, and we are generally smarter than you as well. What else would we do but dominate you, a people we consider to be inferior, barbaric and often drunk -- a people with low intellect and drive, a people we consider to be morally inferior to us, 'the Chosen'?

who chooses the Robber, and crucified the "Chooser"

Did you ever happen to notice that most of the sociopolitical movements that we Jews started (Communism, feminism, egalitarianism, student radicalism) are 'alienating' movements, designed to pit one segment of society against another, making them fight it out? Did you notice that? Hmmm?

Well, that's because we know that this historically weakens the cohesion of your gentile societies. Again, this is not a plot; we do it automatically. We did it hundreds of years ago, too. Benjamin Disraeli, who was born Jewish himself, even mentioned this Jewish habit of subverting various countries in a public speech at the House of Commons.

Think about it: your societies become culturally weaker, while we remain cohesive in our own little sub-society (we still marry, and breed with, other Jews only, almost without fail; Hollywood director Steven Spielberg is a visible exception to that rule).

So, there now, you have a little bit of our unusual history to chew on.

Don¹t choke on it!

And, of course, if you tell anyone about this questionable history, or even about this conversation, I will strongly deny it. (I'm good at that. I've had lots of practice). Heck, I might even call you an 'anti-Semite,' just to discredit you completely (I'm good at that, too).

You know, I smile when I realize that our historic domination of your non-Jewish societies has actually INCREASED over the years, as the result of many corporate/company mergers -- that is, one company owning many other companies (we actually started that little idea, too, as well as modern banking; much of our ethnic history revolves around finance and commerce). Sure, we have always owned or controlled most of the media, most of Hollywood, most book and magazine publishing, and most financial institutions in the West, but now there is even 'more power in fewer hands.' Our hands, that is.

And, of course, if you, as a non-Jew, complain about our enormous power, you will be immediately branded as an 'anti-Semite,' and you will likely be fired from your job, or at least be forced to undergo 'sensitivity training' by your boss for your 'racist' views (I laugh so hard when I see this! Happens all the time!).

In fact, 'anti-Semitism' is now almost a thing of the past, given our enormous power, influence and heavy-handed political activism. In a few short years, 'anti-Semitism' will actually become a crime in America, First Amendment or not (you just let us worry about how we will do that; we bypassed the First Amendment once, by actually writing, and then pushing, certain 'hate-crimes' laws, and we can do so much more than that).

Heck, we have already made 'anti-Semitism' a crime in other countries, like England and Germany (who do you think helped write, and helped push for, those laws? Yep, the Jewish ADL and other Jewish groups).

Well, it's getting kinda late, gentile. I will concede that it has been fun privately admitting all of this to you; you see, I did it just for the chance to see a wide-eyed look of shock and horror on your that one!

Because, after all, your minister never told you about any of this, huh?

Of course not. After all, your minister always insists that 'Jesus was a Jew,' and all that other funny stuff, and, if you ever happen to mention Jews, he will quickly change the topic of conversation to much more important things, like 'Romans 53:39,' about the joys of turning the other cheek while certain people destroy your country unopposed. (Don't you just love those little Christians? We do! They're so naive! We actually use the 'Jesus was a Jew' thing, in public, at least, at every opportunity -- in films, in television, etc., just to make sure that those Christians don't get any funny ideas about doing another Third Reich! Oy! Oy Vey! Can't let that happen!)

So, gentile, I'll now take my leave; and you will kindly take care to keep going to church regularly, and to keep believing very strongly when your preacher or minister tells you that we Jews are merely 'innocent Hebrews,' and that we are 'just like you.'

Because we really need that. It helps us greatly. In fact, it keeps us alive, unharmed and unoppressed. It keeps us free to do whatever we want, whenever we want, to whomever we want, without anyone complaining.

And remember, gentile: You must never say a negative word about us. Nope. Not one negative word about my people, 'the Chosen.' Never forget that we are chosen. Ever. We say that we are 'the Chosen,' and we mean it, understand? No complaining. It is forbidden, remember?

who chooses the "Robber" the dragon

Good boy. Real good. You have been well taught by your church, and your schools, and your boss, and the media, and Hollywood, and even your own family. You know the rules, don't you?

Sure you do. Those rules are part of you now. They are deeply ingrained in your mind. You have been well trained, and it shows.

Which is a good thing, because, after all, you would not want to be called an 'anti-Semite,' would you?

Better then anti-Christ



Court Rules in Favor of Anonymous Blogger
Oct 06 1:02 PM US/Eastern



In a decision hailed by free-speech advocates, the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision requiring an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official.

In a 34-page opinion, the justices said a Superior Court judge should have required Smyrna town councilman Patrick Cahill to make a stronger case that he and his wife, Julia, had been defamed before ordering Comcast Cable Communications to disclose the identities of four anonymous posters to a blog site operated by Independent Newspapers Inc., publisher of the Delaware State News.

In a series of obscenity-laced tirades, the bloggers, among other things, pointed to Cahill's "obvious mental deterioration," and made several sexual references about him and his wife, including using the name "Gahill" to suggest that Cahill, who has publicly feuded with Smyrna Mayor Mark Schaeffer, is homosexual.

In June, the lower court judge ruled that the Cahills had established a "good faith basis" for contending that they were victims of defamation and affirmed a previous order for Comcast to disclose the bloggers' identities.

One of the bloggers, referred to in court papers only as John Doe No. 1 and his blog name, "Proud Citizen," challenged the ruling, arguing that the Cahills should have been required to establish a prima facie case of defamation before seeking disclosure of the defendants' identities.

The Supreme Court agreed, reversing and remanding the case to Superior Court with an order to dismiss the Cahills' claims.

"Because the trial judge applied a standard insufficiently protective of Doe's First Amendment right to speak anonymously, we reverse that judgment," Chief Justice Myron Steele wrote.

Steele described the Internet as a "unique democratizing medium unlike anything that has come before," and said anonymous speech in blogs and chat rooms in some instances can become the modern equivalent of political pamphleteering. Accordingly, a plaintiff claiming defamation should be required to provide sufficient evidence to overcome a defendant's motion for summary judgment before a court orders the disclosure of a blogger's identity.

"We are concerned that setting the standard too low will chill potential posters from exercising their First Amendment right to speak anonymously," Steele wrote. "The possibility of losing anonymity in a future lawsuit could intimidate anonymous posters into self-censoring their comments or simply not commenting at all."

The standard adopted by the court, the first state Supreme Court in the country to consider the issue, is based on a 2000 New Jersey court ruling.

Under the standard adopted by the Supreme Court, a plaintiff must first try to notify the anonymous poster that he is the subject of subpoena or request for a court to disclose his identity, allowing the poster time to oppose the request. The plaintiff would then have to provide prima facie evidence of defamation strong enough to overcome a summary judgment motion.

"The decision of the Supreme Court helps provide protection for anonymous bloggers and anonymous speakers in general from lawsuits which have little or no merit and are filed solely to intimidate the speaker or suppress the speech," said David Finger, a Wilmington attorney representing John Doe No. 1.

"Delaware cases are generally respected in other states, and we'll have to see if this trend continues with these types of lawsuits, but I expect the decision of the Delaware Supreme Court to be influential," Finger added.

Robert Katzenstein, a lawyer representing the Cahills, did not immediately return a telephone message left at his home.

"This is the first state Supreme Court to squarely decide the standards to govern John Doe subpoena cases," said Paul Alan Levy, an attorney for Public Citizen, a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, who helped argue the case for John Doe No. 1. "The court's determination to require sufficient evidence before a critic is outed will go a long way toward reassuring citizens that they remain free to anonymously criticize public officials."

Steele noted in his opinion that plaintiffs in such cases can use the Internet to respond to character attacks and "generally set the record straight," and that, as in Cahill's case, blogs and chatrooms tend to be vehicles for people to express opinions, not facts.

"Given the context, no reasonable person could have interpreted these statements as being anything other than opinion. ... The statements are, therefore, incapable of a defamatory meaning," he wrote.




e-mail 10-06-2005 from ex Chabad Lubavitcher

Was reading NN 300 and 301 appeared right before my eyes...The Cur is a foul beast indeed. A demon possessed doggie a wretched and rotten blashemous monster...
(this above is not what I'm writing/working on about the Cur beast, just a quick comment for you...Reading his vile words is indeed DISGUSTING. But if he's bad now, imagine how much cursin' and swearin' he'll be doing at GOD ALMIGHTY when he is in his eternal future abode, known as the Lake of Fire??


Bushitler wants Military Rule for shoot on site Quarantine areas for his Noahide enforcement....and now............,3605,1585977,00.html

Security fears as flu virus that killed 50 million is recreated

Ian Sample, science correspondent
Thursday October 6, 2005
The Guardian

Scientists have recreated the 1918 Spanish flu virus, one of the deadliest ever to emerge, to the alarm of many researchers who fear it presents a serious security risk.

Undisclosed quantities of the virus are being held in a high-security government laboratory in Atlanta, Georgia, after a nine-year effort to rebuild the agent that swept the globe in record time and claimed the lives of an estimated 50 million people.

The genetic sequence is also being made available to scientists online, a move which some fear adds a further risk of the virus being created in other labs.

The recreation was carried out in an attempt to understand what made the 1918 outbreak so devastating. Reporting in the journal Science, a team lead by Dr Jeffery Taubenberger at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Maryland shows that the recreated virus is extremely effective. When injected into mice, it quickly took hold and they started to lose weight rapidly, shedding 13% of their original weight in just two days. Within six days, all mice injected with the virus had died.

In a comparison experiment, similar mice were injected with a contemporary strain of flu, and although the mice lost weight initially, they recovered. Tests revealed that the Spanish flu virus multiplied so rapidly that after four days, mice contained 39,000 times more flu virus than those injected with the more common strain of flu.

The government and military researchers who reconstructed the virus say their work has already provided invaluable insight into its unique genetic make-up and helps explain its lethality. But other researchers warned yesterday the that virus could escape from the laboratory. "This will raise clear questions among some as to whether they have really created a biological weapon," said Professor Ronald Atlas at the centre for deterrence of biowarfare and bioterrorism at the University of Louisville in Kentucky.

Publication of the work and the filing of the virus's genetic make-up to an online database followed an emergency meeting last week by the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, which concluded that the benefits of publishing the work outweighed the risks. Many scientists remained sceptical. "Once the genetic sequence is publicly available, there's a theoretical risk that any molecular biologist with sufficient knowledge could recreate this virus," said Dr John Wood, a virologist at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control in Potters Bar.


and remember the call to "Come to Pharaoh Moshiach is on

Kabbalist Urges Jews to Israel Ahead of Upcoming Disasters

Sep 15, '05 By Baruch Gordon

Kabbalist Urges Jews to Israel Ahead of Upcoming Disasters Israel's leading known Kabbalistic Elder, Rabbi Yitzchak Kaduri called upon worldwide Jewry Tuesday night to return to Israel due to natural disasters which threaten to strike the world.


Council of Europe holds emergency debate on bird flu
Oct 06 1:01 PM US/Eastern

Parliamentarians from the 46-member Council of Europe called for international and local measures to halt the spread of the bird flu virus across frontiers.

During an emergency debate they also backed the creation of a solidarity fund, as suggested bu the European Union's commission, to help pay for vaccinations and antiviral drugs in developing countries.

The council's parliamentary assembly also recommended that governments should set aside "substantial" sums of money to indemnify farmers and producers whose flocks were hit by the virus.

It called for "an adequate supply of masks as primary prevention, in particular for farmers and producers living in high risk zones."

The rapporteur on bird flu, Denis Jacquat of France, warned that in countries where agriculture was a major economic activity "farmers hesitate to indicate the existence of the virus, the more so since compensation in the case of the slaughter of poultry is very low."

One major problem was identifying possible outbreaks in small farms run by individuals, whereas monitoring major poultry producers was easy.

The assembly said the criteria for triggering a vaccination of domestic poultry should be very swift and include detection of the highly infectious H5N1 virus, carried by migrating birds.

But it also drew attention to the risk represented by the transport of animals over long distances, migrations and the development of tourism.

The World Health Organisation has warned that a global pandemic could kill between two million and 7.4 million people if the bird flu virus mutates to become highly infectious to humans. Since the end of 2003, 63 people have died from bird flu in Asia


Stand Firm in the Testimony of Jesus the Christ and the Commandments of God, and be extrajewdicially slain,16376,1585288,00.html

Breaking America's grip on the net

After troubled negotiations in Geneva, the US may be forced to relinquish control of the internet to a coalition of governments

Kieren McCarthy
Thursday October 6, 2005
The Guardian

You would expect an announcement that would forever change the face of the internet to be a grand affair - a big stage, spotlights, media scrums and a charismatic frontman working the crowd.

But unless you knew where he was sitting, all you got was David Hendon's slightly apprehensive voice through a beige plastic earbox. The words were calm, measured and unexciting, but their implications will be felt for generations to come.

Hendon is the Department for Trade and Industry's director of business relations and was in Geneva representing the UK government and European Union at the third and final preparatory meeting for next month's World Summit on the Information Society. He had just announced a political coup over the running of the internet.

Old allies in world politics, representatives from the UK and US sat just feet away from each other, but all looked straight ahead as Hendon explained the EU had decided to end the US government's unilateral control of the internet and put in place a new body that would now run this revolutionary communications medium.

The issue of who should control the net had proved an extremely divisive issue, and for 11 days the world's governments traded blows. For the vast majority of people who use the internet, the only real concern is getting on it. But with the internet now essential to countries' basic infrastructure - Brazil relies on it for 90% of its tax collection - the question of who has control has become critical.

And the unwelcome answer for many is that it is the US government. In the early days, an enlightened Department of Commerce (DoC) pushed and funded expansion of the internet. And when it became global, it created a private company, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) to run it.

But the DoC retained overall control, and in June stated what many had always feared: that it would retain indefinite control of the internet's foundation - its "root servers", which act as the basic directory for the whole internet.

A number of countries represented in Geneva, including Brazil, China, Cuba, Iran and several African states, insisted the US give up control, but it refused. The meeting "was going nowhere", Hendon says, and so the EU took a bold step and proposed two stark changes: a new forum that would decide public policy, and a "cooperation model" comprising governments that would be in overall charge.

Much to the distress of the US, the idea proved popular. Its representative hit back, stating that it "can't in any way allow any changes" that went against the "historic role" of the US in controlling the top level of the internet.

But the refusal to budge only strengthened opposition, and now the world's governments are expected to agree a deal to award themselves ultimate control. It will be officially raised at a UN summit of world leaders next month and, faced with international consensus, there is little the US government can do but acquiesce.

But will this move mean, as the US ambassador David Gross argued, that "even on technical details, the industry will have to follow government-set policies, UN-set policies"?

No, according to Nitin Desai, the UN's special adviser on internet governance. "There is clearly an acceptance here that governments are not concerned with the technical and operational management of the internet. Standards are set by the users."

Hendon is also adamant: "The really important point is that the EU doesn't want to see this change as bringing new government control over the internet. Governments will only be involved where they need to be and only on issues setting the top-level framework."

Human rights

But expert and author of Ruling the Root, Milton Mueller, is not so sure. An overseeing council "could interfere with standards. What would stop it saying 'when you're making this standard for data transfer you have to include some kind of surveillance for law enforcement'?"

Then there is human rights. China has attracted criticism for filtering content from the net within its borders. Tunisia - host of the World Summit - has also come under attack for silencing online voices. Mueller doesn't see a governmental overseeing council having any impact: "What human rights groups want is for someone to be able to bring some kind of enforceable claim to stop them violating people's rights. But how's that going to happen? I can't see that a council is going to be able to improve the human rights situation."

And what about business? Will a governmental body running the internet add unnecessary bureaucracy or will it bring clarity and a coherent system? Mueller is unsure: "The idea of the council is so vague. It's not clear to me that governments know what to do about anything at this stage apart from get in the way of things that other people do."

There are still dozens of unanswered questions but all the answers are pointing the same way: international governments deciding the internet's future. The internet will never be the same again.

Criminalize any opposition of the shemborg collective


Pandemic Vaccine
In Hands Of
Depopulation Advocates
By Judi McLeod & David Hawkins
Canada Free
If you or any of your loved ones contracted H5N1 Avian Flu, would you trust a vaccine from self-avowed depopulationist Maurice Strong, or his protégé Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin?
Through his blind trust Canada Steamship Lines, subsidiary, Lansdowne Technologies Inc., Prime Minister Paul Martin is now in the vaccine development business. In fact, he's been there since June 2003 when he was Canada's Minister of Finance under Prime Minister Jean Chrétien.
Health authorities are now using the word "inevitable" for what they say will be a coming H5N1Avian Flu pandemic.
Senior officials at the Public Health Agency of Canada say Canada is one of the few countries in the world that has made arrangements with a "private manufacturer" to have a secure supply of "domestically produced" vaccine for every Canadian once a pandemic is underway.
Canada's federal government recently committed $34-million for research to expedite production of the vaccine during the pandemic; another $24-million is being spent on antiviral drugs to be dispensed to some people during the initial stages of the crisis.
Back to the depopulationist Maurice Strong, Prime Minister Paul Martin and vaccines.
"Canada is cooperating closely in developing vaccines with her program allies through AVDP (Allied Vaccine Development Project)". (
"The AVDP is a 14-year project to develop new vaccine systems and related medical countermeasures to protect Canadian Forces personnel against political chemical and biological warfare threats."
The United Nations health arm, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been warning us that much of the world is about to be wiped out by an Avian Flu "pandemic".
According to National Post front-page headlines, doctors say, "the coming flu is expected to kill as many as 58,000 Canadians". (March 11, 2005).
Panic buttons are being pushed by WHO when no evidence exists that H5N1 is being transmitted between humans.
At this juncture, Avian Flu seems isolated to a handful of Asian countries, with the governments of China, North Korea and Vietnam holding the fate of millions of people in their hands.
Canada is known for its lax immigration laws and porous borders.
When SARS began its not long ago lethal trek from the Orient to the West, it was reportedly "accidentally" released after a scientist visited a hotel near an airport in Beijing. Tragedy was soon to follow, and within days SARS was infecting, and in some cases killing, nurses and doctors in Toronto, Canada.
In the SARS aftermath, there never was an explanation of why the scientist went to that particular hotel close to the airport. Rumours abounded in Beijing at the time that the scientist was not Chinese but North Korean.
WHO tells us that Avian Flu is far worse than SARS. It is more infectious and far more deadly. Avian Flu is now entrenched in Asia, first striking in late 2003. Since January, 2004, the disease has led to the slaughter of two million birds in Vietnam alone. The death toll of at least 46 people, and those who have already contracted Avian Flu, is at least 69.
WHO is the world's top health authority charged with the response to the coming Avian Flu pandemic.
Deaths from malaria increased under WHO's watch, and WHO went along with the politically-correct ban of DDT-products even though they had proved useful in the ongoing fight against malaria.
For most intents and purposes, Prime Minister Paul Martin mentor Maurice Strong is the United Nations. Special adviser to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, Strong is Under Secretary General and chair of the Earth Council.
Strong, a former president of the Montreal-based Power Corporation, the multinational that launched Martin in the business world, is a tireless advocate of human depopulation. Indeed, Strong's connections to the UN Global Committee of Parliamentarians on Population and Development are well documented.
Anti-American to the core, Strong has said, "The United States is the greatest threat to the world's ecological health." (AP). Strong headed up the review panel on the World Bank-funded Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). CGIAR is accountable to the world's farmers.
"Food security looms as society's largest challenge as we enter the next millennium," Strong said in a September 23, 1998 media release.
At the launch of the findings of the third external review of the CGIAR, Strong called on the group to "bring the benefits of modern science to the poorest", claiming that, "The world is at the cusp of a new scientific revolution in the biological sciences, much like the one in the early 20th century when Einstein's theories fundamentally changed physics and the world."
Paul Martin is the Canadian Prime Minister who opted out of the U.S. ballistic missile defence shield. As Finance Minister, Martin voted with his predecessor Prime Minister Jean Chretien against joining the U.S.-led coalition of the willing in Iraq.
And now with Paul Martin in the PMO, his blind trust Lansdowne Technologies Inc. has been awarded a 14-year contract from the Canadian Department of Defence to develop vaccines?
Who are Canada's "allies" with which she is "cooperating closely" in the Allied Vaccine Development Project as advertised on Lansdowne's website?
It all sounds like a plot from Ian Fleming character "Dr. No".
In Hollywood movies, the good guys always find 11th-hour relief when they catch up to the bad guys holding out with the life-saving antidote in vaccines.
But this is real life, with world depopulationistsat least by association-- having access to vaccines, and not the movies.

the sky is falling...the sky is falling.......Nope, that great and terrible Day of the Lords wrath is reserved by HIM ONLY unto the Un-Godly who have denied him


Shemborg's Collective Punishment of "Purim", Treason, Murder and Blasphemy of haBushitler's bloody ad-menstruation

Bush warns Syria, Iran in speech

US President George Bush sent a strong message to Syria and Iran and deplored their support for terrorist groups. In a wide scale speech before the National Endowment for Democracy (Noahide Demonicrazy) on the war on terror, Bush accused the two countries of sheltering and supporting terror organizations and vowed to end this support.

"We're determined to deny radical groups the support and sanctuary of outlaw regimes. 

see White House, Itsrealhell and Sanhedrin and universal Noahide Laws of the Bushitler family and their Hassidic handlers

State sponsors like Syria and Iran have a long history of collaboration with terrorists and they deserve no patience from the victims of terror. The United States makes no distinction between those who commit acts of terror and those who support and harbor them because they're equally guilty of murder."

Shemborg collective punishment of Noahide Laws of their dragon and his Sanhedrin Beast of Talmud Bavli

In his speech, which was meant to outline the status of the war on terror and to ready the American public for a long and difficult battle, President Bush said that one of the goals of the terrorists is to destroy Israel and pointed out that the Israeli occupation of the West Bank is used by the terror groups as an excuse for attacks.

"Over the years, these extremists have used a litany of excuses for violence: the Israeli presence on the West Bank or the US military presence in Saudi Arabia or the defeat of the Taliban or the Crusades of a thousand years ago.

In fact, we're not facing a set of grievances that can be soothed and addressed. We're facing a radical ideology with inalterable objectives to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world.

see HJR 104, PL 102-14 Universal Noahide enslavement of the shemborg assimilation

No act of ours invited the rage of the killers, and no concession, bribe or act of appeasement would change or limit their plans for murder," said Bush.

see Bush's hassidic Pharisaic plan upon mankind, these are his gods wars, and his god is no GOD but a murderer from the beginning. All of you behind Bush are murderers with him....collectively

Bush likened the ideology of Islamic militants to communism. And he said they are being "aided by elements of the Arab news media that incite hatred and anti-Semitism."

Let Bush's soul go to the Pit O Lord


"Against such an enemy, there's only one effective response: We never back down, never give in and never accept anything less than complete victory," Bush declared.

He spoke as recent polls show declining American support for the war that has thus far claimed more than 1,940 members of the US military. His Iraq policy faces a crucial test in Iraq's Oct. 15 referendum on a new constitution; a vote that Bush has said terrorists will try to derail.

"We are facing a radical ideology with immeasurable objectives to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world," Bush said.

Yep, the Noahide Laws VIPER


Pure Filthy TREASON and Blasphemy and Murder

Bush: Fight terrorism to protect Israel

America must fight terrorists because they could destroy Israel, President Bush said.

In a long address Thursday to the National Endowment on Democracy, Bush sought to explain a foreign policy that has become bogged down in the Iraq war. Bush cast Iraq as central to his war on terrorism and cited a litany of catastrophic outcomes should terrorists prevail, among them the destruction of Israel.

“With greater economic and military and political power, the terrorists would be able to advance their stated agenda: to develop weapons of mass destruction, to destroy Israel, to intimidate Europe, to assault the American people and to blackmail our government into isolation,” he said.

Blair witch stirring the shemwars

Blair: Iran may be helping Iraq bombers

Iran or Hezbollah could be providing some of the explosives used in bombings against British soldiers in Iraq, Tony Blair said.

The British prime minister said Iran may have supplied the explosives in order to intimidate Britain into lessening its pressure on Iran’s nuclear program, but Blair said Britain would not be intimidated.


. H.J.RES.104 : To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".
Sponsor: Rep Michel, Robert H. [IL-18] (introduced 1/31/1991)      Cosponsors (225)
Committees: House Post Office and Civil Service
Latest Major Action: 3/20/1991 Became Public Law No: 102-14.


The Encyclopedia of Judaism identifies the source of the Noahide Laws as the Talmud Bavli, the Babylonian Talmud, which is the most authoritative Talmud for Orthodox Judaism which regards it as divinely inspired.  The Talmud also delimits the penalty for disobedience of one Noahide Law: “One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation. (Sanhedrin Tract 57A)”


Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides
01:39 Sep 29, '05 / 25 Elul 5765
By Ezra HaLevi



Building Noahides' Ark

They can be found in small pockets around the world from small Russian villages to Palestine, Texas. They reach out to small lights in the fog as family, friends and communities chastise them for saying the unthinkable.

anti-Christ dogs without

One of the lights collecting souls like moths flitting to a candle is Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, 

Just call him Ole Sparky

head of a Har Nof yeshiva and rabbi for the haredi unit of the Israel Defense Forces for seven years. Schwartz has become well-known as a source of answers for people who have questions that no other rabbi can – or wants to – answer. In March, he also became the chief rabbi of the newly formed Sanhedrin set up especially for the Bnei Noah movement.

Some of the people who turn to Schwartz from around the world are former Christians.

but never believers in Jesus the Christ

 While a few are seeking to convert to Judaism, others have accepted themselves as "Noahides" – that is, gentiles who keep the seven commandments proscribed by the Torah (see box).

By the fictitious Talmud FILTHY Bavli the tradition of the Pharisaic Vipers which make the WORD of God of none effect to the "Chosen" who Choose the "Robber"

A person can become a Noahide or "Bnei Noah" by making an official declaration in front of a Jewish court of law.

and in aposatsy deny Jesus the Christ before men

 In so doing, the person promises to keep the seven prohibitive commandments while limiting his belief in icons such as Jesus to no more than as a historical figure.

and Now you verminous Vipers of TREASON and Blasphemous GUVMENT have made these their Military enforcement law of Death and MURDER

Schwartz knows of a story where frightened parents of two Muslim boys came to a Har Nof rabbi and asked the rabbi for an Arabic translation of Schwartz's book A Light Unto the Nations. After reading the book, the boys, Schwartz says, "understood that they didn't have to be Shi'ite suicide bombers to be close to God."

all they have to do is hug a wib-eye

Like perhaps the Muslim boys, and Christians who struggle with the basic tenants of their religion, the Noahide movement offers an alternative approach to monotheistic belief and worship. 


For Schwartz, this work is an important part of Jewish practice. "It is a commandment for a Jew to teach Noahides... to make sure that everybody loves God, even if they are not Jewish."

and their God has no CREATOR WORD CHRIST and indeed is no god and indeed they are Liars and Vipers and murderers and thieves and whoremongers and now Judeo-Churchinsanity are with them and are become two fold anti-CHRIST children of Hell

ACCORDING TO tradition, Adam was the first Noahide. 

Filthy jewish fables

In the Garden of Eden, he was given prohibitive commandments such as not eating meat. Like Adam, non-Jews, too, can be Noahides and thus, they believe, enter into a partnership with the Jewish religion.

and become of the dragons pit of vipers

Schwartz says would-be converts to Judaism are often surprised to learn that this alternative option exists. It is, he says, an option which follows Jewish concepts of morality, but with many fewer restrictions.

except slavery

"It is better to be a good gentile than a bad Jew," 

I agree, but there are neither in faith of Christ

says Schwartz, who tells prospective converts to Judaism to remain as they are and to go and teach the world about Noahide law instead.

Treasonous Blasphemous proselytizing dogs of the Hassidim and their Sanhedrin Christ Killers

The historical growth of the Noahide movement is not clear, and today numbers are impossible to measure as people tend to teach themselves and generally lack spiritual leaders. One of the first Noahides in modern history is believed to be a Frenchman, Aime Palliere, 1868-1949, a former Catholic who spent all of his adult years in the study and teaching of traditional Jewish texts.

a Catholicos of Kol Nidre

As Palliere may have learned, agreeing to abide by the seven laws of Noah opens up new sets of questions. "The minimum of not-to-dos are written as the seven commandments, but the Noahide soul needs something else – they can't only be passive, but need active commandments as well," says Schwartz.

the TEN COMMANDMENTS of GOD are the ONLY COmmandments, and these Vermin have denied the testimony of Jesus the Christ and the Commandments of God

For this reason he has helped them write a prayer book. Schwartz says the prayer book is "too long and too Jewish," but it is not clear if he is joking or not. He says that the basic prayers could be reduced to only a single page.

good food, good meat, O dragon lets kill and eat

But this was not enough for the Noahides who consulted with him.

For they love lenghty prayer to be seen as piuos to men


"Amaraka" (how Bushitler pronounces America) Beware you are deceived and the Palestinians have been double crossed by the Hassidim Pharisee Chabad Lubavitch White House and Bushitler ad-menstruation....the Road Map leads to Hell

Two Great Dissidents
Natan Sharansky’s vision, and President Bush’s.

By Joel C. Rosenberg

When Natan Sharansky stepped into Condoleezza Rice's West Wing office at 11:15 last Thursday morning, he had no idea the national security advisor would soon be named the next secretary of state. He was just glad to see her holding a copy of his newly published book, 

The Case for Democracy.

Noahide DEMONICRAZY Nation Building

"I'm already half-way through your book," Rice said. "Do you know why I'm reading it?"

Sharansky, a self-effacing man who spent nine years in KGB prisons (often in solitary confinement) before becoming the first political prisoner released by Mikhail Gorbachev, hoped it had to do with his brilliant analysis and polished prose.

BEWARE of Manufactured heroes...for the same Talmudic Sofiet REDS controlled Moscow

Rice smiled. "I'm reading it because the president is reading it, and it's my job to know what the president is thinking."

saith Condo sleezy

A close friend of the president had sent over a copy several weeks earlier with a note urging him to take a close look. The president nearly polished it off during a weekend at Camp David, then suggested to Rice that she read it as well.

For nearly 40 minutes, Rice engaged Sharansky — now an Israeli cabinet member — and co-author Ron Dermer, a former columnist with the Jerusalem Post, in a discussion over how best to help democracy take root in such hard soils as Iraq, Iran, and the West Bank and Gaza.

Noahide enslavement to the dragon........Satan

At precisely 2 P.M., Sharansky and Dermer were ushered into the Oval Office for a private meeting with the president. They were scheduled for 45 minutes. They stayed for more than an hour. What the president told Sharansky was off the record. What Sharansky told the president was not.

"I told the president, 'There is a great difference between politicians and dissidents. Politicians are focused on polls and the press. They are constantly making compromises. But dissidents focus on ideas. They have a message burning inside of them. They would stand up for their convictions no matter what the consequences.'

even being shot for murderous Treason? Sent to Hell perhaps in eternal damnation?

"I told the president, 'In spite of all the polls warning you that talking about spreading democracy in the Middle East might be a losing issue — despite all the critics and the resistance you faced — you kept talking about the importance of free societies and free elections. You kept explaining that democracy is for everybody. You kept saying that only democracy will truly pave the way to peace and security. You, Mr. President, are a dissident among the leaders of the free world.'"

A Treasonous Blasphemous murdering "Dissident" from the Creator

From one of the most famous dissidents of era of the Evil Empire, such is not faint praise.

ahahhahaha an embracer of satans evil wanna be empire

Early in The Case for Democracy, Sharansky, 56, recalls another Soviet-era dissident named Andrei Amalrik, who in 1969 wrote, Will The Soviet Union Survive Until 1984? Predicting the Communist empire's inevitable collapse, Amalrik, who was imprisoned by the KGB for his observations (and whom Sharansky later had the privilege of teaching English), explained that "any state forced to devote so much of its energies to physically and psychologically controlling millions of its own subjects could not survive indefinitely."

Thus the Lords Great and Terrible Day of His wrath is reserved

Sharansky writes: "The unforgettable image he left the reader with was that of a soldier who must always point a gun at his enemy. His arms begin to tire until their weight becomes unbearable. Exhausted, he lowers his weapon and the prisoner escapes."

At the time, many so-called "democrats" in the West dismissed Amalrik as downright delusional. But his prediction proved to be off by only a few years.

It took more time to rob the Russians Blind then planned

"How was one Soviet dissident able to see what legions of analysts and policymakers in the West were blind to?" asks Sharansky. "Did Amalrik have access to more information than they did? Was he smarter than all the Sovietologists put together? Of course not.... But unlike them, he understood the awesome power of freedom."

He understood the Talmud Bavli and the Yoke of the Sofiet Red Assyrian

For Sharansky, this is the critical line of demarcation in the war on terror, dividing the naysayers from those who both believe in and are willing to fight for the notion that freedom is a universal human right.

Noahide enslavement, and many will die

He is convinced that democratic institutions can take hold throughout the Middle East. He concedes it will not be easy, but argues the key is bold moral leadership from the West of the kind that Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher demonstrated in the 1980s.

From here on out when you hear them ramble about Democracy, replace their words with Noahide Demonicrazy. Then you will be able to decode every deception which spews from their wretched hearts and filthy mouths

"Everybody knows that weapons of mass destruction are very dangerous in the hands of terrorists," says Sharansky, his passion as strong as his accent. "But very few people understand how powerful weapons of mass construction can be in the hands the free world. There are so many skeptics, so many people who doubt whether Iraqis and Palestinians really want to live in freedom, or whether democracy in the Middle East is really such a good idea. But I lived under a totalitarian regime. I know the horrors of these regimes from the inside. I know they can be transformed. They won't be perfect, and they won't agree with us on every issue. But it is better to have a democracy that hates you than a dictatorship that loves you."

devils logic....lesser of two evils

Sharansky cites the example of post-World War II Germany. Many doubted a true democracy could ever take root amidst the ashes of the Third Reich. But it has. True, most Germans opposed the recent war in Iraq and increasingly side against the U.S. in international policy debates. But so what? Sharansky asks. At least they are not carpet-bombing the whole of Europe.

Toward the end of the book, Sharansky quotes current Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as having once told him, "I understand that in the Soviet Union your ideas were important, but unfortunately they have no place in the Middle East."

for Judah is the enemy of Samaria, Aholibah and Aholah 

Sharansky respectfully disagrees. With the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, and the passing of Yasser Arafat, Sharansky calls himself "an optimist." Never before in human history has the moment been more ripe for Iraqis and Palestinians to hear and embrace the case for democracy. The transitions for both will be difficult. But Sharansky is not daunted.

"When given a real opportunity to choose between living in a free society or a fear society, the vast majority of people will choose a free society. And a free society — a society where people feel safe to argue and dissent — will always be a stable society."

as long as they bow to the Talmudic Dragon

This is what Sharansky is working for, and he has just earned the ear of the president of the United States and the new secretary of state.

Joel C. Rosenberg is the author of The Last Jihad (about the fall of Saddam Hussein) and The Last Days (about the death of Yasser Arafat). Rosenberg briefly served as a senior advisor to Natan Sharansky in the year 2000.


Anatoly "Natan" Sharansky

Israel's great dissembler

By Redress Information & Analysis

Natan Sharansky, fighter for human rights in the Soviet Union.
Natan Sharansky, fighter against human rights in this country [Israel].
Natan Sharansky, Bush's mentor in his speeches about "global democracy".
Natan Sharansky, father of the infamous [Israeli] government decision to rob the property of thousands of Palestinians in East Jerusalem.
(Israeli peace bloc Gush Shalom, 4 February 2005)

A one time self-styled "symbol of the struggle for human rights", Sharansky is in fact a bigot and a hypocrite who does not believe that human rights are applicable to all human beings everywhere and irrespective of their race, colour or religion.

We have chosen to profile Anatoly Sharansky, the former Israeli minister of social and diaspora affairs and leader of Yisra'el Ba'aliyah, the Russian immigrants' party in Israel, because he encapsulates the paradox of the Jewish inhabitants of Israel, a paradox that is the hallmark of Zionists throughout the world. That is, how can a people that has suffered so much over the ages, from pogroms in Europe to Nazi genocide, emulate their historical oppressors and be so lacking in empathy with their victims, the Palestinian Arabs?

Because they Created the Nasi of that generation, they needed the sacrifice of the jews to bring their Hoodlum haha and their Moshiach the son of perdition

 (We salute the tiny minority of Jews in Israel and elsewhere who have risked opprobrium by consistently speaking out for Palestinian rights.)

Anatoly Sharansky (we shall call him by his birth name, Anatoly, rather than Natan, the name given to him by the Israeli ambassador to West Germany upon his release from prison) was born in Ukraine and educated in Russia as a mathematician. In 1973 he applied for an exit visa to Israel, but, like all Soviet citizens who had worked in the military-industrial complex, he was refused on security grounds. He then became involved in an Israeli-sponsored worldwide campaign to put pressure on the Kremlin to give special treatment to Soviet Jewish citizens by allowing them to emigrate to Israel, irrespective of whether or not they had worked in the defence sector. In 1977 he was arrested on suspicion of spying for the US, and in the following year he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to 13 years imprisonment. He was released in 1986 in a US-Soviet spy exchange.

Because the Hassidim had taken control of Washington DC

Prior to his emigration to Israel, Sharansky liked to portray himself as a symbol of the struggle for human rights, and since then he has made much of his status as a former "victim of totalitarian oppression". However, his belief in human rights, nurtured at the height of the Cold War, appears to have been heavily tainted with the culture of the Soviet-American power struggle, which justified the cynical use of practically anything as ammunition in the superpower rivalry for global dominance.

Unlike most of us, Sharansky apparently does not believe that human rights are universal and indivisible, that is, applicable to all human beings everywhere and irrespective of their race, colour or creed. Not only does he oppose any Israeli concessions that may eventually lead to the realization of the Palestinians' right to self determination, but he advocates policies that could only mean the dispossession of more Palestinians living in Israel, and the illegally occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. No wonder that he was one of the very few people to have amicable relations with the former ultra right-wing (Hissidim)  prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu.

Sharansky began his political career in Israel by becoming head of the Zionist Forum, an organization dedicated to lobbying on behalf of Soviet immigrants. However, not content with being a mere "welfare worker", in 1995 he founded the Yisra'el Ba'aliyah party, with the immediate aim of bringing in another million Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union and of encouraging a further million Jewish citizens of the United States and the European countries to immigrate to Israel. 

Come to Pharaoh ben satan he cries because numbers are power


For him, the value of peace with the Palestinians is measured solely by the extent to which it would work towards achieving the overriding goal of encouraging Jewish citizens of other states to immigrate to Israel. Thus, addressing the founding congress of Yisra'el Ba'aliyah in June 1995, he said: "Without the hope for peace, you cannot convince people to come here."

That the "ingathering of the Jews", that is, the bringing into Israel and the occupied territories of millions of foreign Jews who, like Sharansky himself, had no link whatsoever to those lands, could only mean the dispossession of more Palestinians from the land of their ancestors is a fact that could hardly have escaped our human rights hero. Or perhaps, having been brought up in a society where ideology and the class struggle dictated one's view of life and where all conflicts were seen as a zero-sum game, with victors and vanquished, be they a class or a superpower, he was blinded by his own ideology, Zionism. For almost in the same breath as reiterating his commitment to the "ingathering" of millions of foreign Jews, Sharansky is perfectly at ease with publicly objecting to any hint of allowing Palestinians to take up residence in the territories administered by the Palestinian National Authority or to the right of refugees to return to those territories, even if they had families living there.

Indeed, the impact of the Soviet system on Sharansky's mind appears to have gone much deeper. Thus, like the Soviet habit of remoulding the history books to suit themselves, our human rights hero insists that any Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories should be made contingent on, among other things, the Palestinians rewriting their school books "to remove all language that denies the legitimacy of Israel and Zionism". In other words, Palestinian children should be taught that their uprooting from the land of their forefathers by foreigners from the former Soviet Union, Europe and the United States was perfectly legitimate.

Sharansky resigned as Israeli interior minister in former Prime Minister Ehud Barak's government over rumours that Barak was contemplating some trivial "concessions" over Jerusalem, territory and the refugees at the Camp David talks with Palestinian leaders in July 2000. But, judging by the unpopularity among Israelis of making any concessions to the people they had uprooted, and given his solid support among the Russian immigrants, Sharansky must have his vision firmly fixed on the position of Israeli prime minister.

In the meantime, it would do him well to learn from the history of his Slav cousins in the Balkans. For while the Zionists have the dubious honour of being the twentieth century's first ethnic cleansers, Sharansky's kith and kin in the Balkans (let us not forget that our human rights hero is a Russian, albeit of the Jewish religion), have taken that tradition to its logical conclusion, with tragic consequences for themselves and their victims. His blind ambition aside, Sharansky has a responsibility to his compatriots and co-religionists in Israel because, as in the Balkans, the burden of history weighs heavily on the shoulders of the indigenous people of Palestine whose continuing misfortunes are unlikely to let them forget the architects of their plight. As a Russian, Sharansky should know more than anyone else that great powers, even nuclear ones, come and go and that the fall can be sudden and cruel. But, with his contradictions and double standards, our human rights hero is unlikely to learn anything. Rather, when the time comes to write his obituary Anatoly Sharansky will most probably be remembered as Israel's great Russian dissembler, with his years as a so-called "human rights campaigner" not warranting even a footnote.

© Redress Information & Analysis


New York City Bomb Tip

The New York City Police Department on Oct. 6 is investigating what it has said is a credible tip that 19 operatives were deployed to New York City to place bombs in subways. Security in the subways has been increased. Police are urging the public not to be alarmed because though the source is credible the information reportedly has not been verified. Police were reported mobilizing at the Brooklyn naval yard.


Lobbing the missiles on the Proles, Ordo ab Chao,0,5789534,print.story?coll=ny-homepage-bigpix2005

Subway security boosted in response to threat


October 6, 2005, 6:14 PM EDT

A "credible threat" to the subway system has prompted a vast mobilization of police officers, officials said Thursday.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg appeared at a news conference alongside Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly in which they announced the threat, which they said originated overseas.

Bloomberg said it was the most specific threat New York officials had received to date; no one in New York has been arrested, he said.

especially this Bloomberg Talmudic Jewish Treasonous Viper of the Hassidic Sanhedrin

"We have done and will continue to do everything we can to protect this city," Bloomberg said, adding that he planned to take the subway home Thursday night. "We will spare no resource, we will spare no expense. We have increased our police presence on our subways."

Kelly asked the public to report suspicious people or activities. Police planned to start looking through bags, brief cases, baby strollers and luggage as they launched a large-scale search of New York's mass transit system.

"We have never had before a specific threat to our subway system," Bloomberg said. "Its importance was enhanced above the normal level by the detail that was available to us from intelligence sources." New York's security level remained at orange, the same level it has stayed at since Sept. 11.

Hundreds of officers were dispatched early this afternoon to every station in Manhattan -- and possibly system wide -- to thwart the attack.

Scores of officers from various narcotics units are being called in to assist in patrolling the subways, with many expected to convene first at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.

Police sources also said that cops were expected to be kept on 12-hour tours over the weekend.

A law enforcement official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Associated Press that the threat is "specific to place, time and method," and that the method is bombing.

Rep. Peter King of New York confirmed the threat, saying "Obviously, this is a significant threat." King is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.

hahahahhahha there you have it

The threat comes as the city emerges from two days of hightened alert during the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashana. 

Oy, ze Homelandt "Say" Kurity of Bushitler and Kestapo Hassidim

Police officers patrolled outside of synagogues as thousands of congregants attended services.

MTA officials said they were unaware of the threat until alerted by a reporter.

Copyright 2005 Newsday Inc.

see any outside patrolling your Jesus, house of worship? Didn't think so



Noahide News Part 302



The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II


"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7 Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 


Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16

Noahide News Part 17

Noahide News Part 18

Noahide News Part 19

Noahide News Part 20

Noahide News Part 21

Noahide News part 22

Noahide News Part 23

Noahide News part 24

Noahide News Part 25

Noahide News Part 26

Noahide News part 27

Noahide News Part 28

Noahide News Part 29

Noahide News Part 30

Noahide News Part 31

Noahide News Part 32

Noahide News Part 33

Noahide News Part 34

Noahide News Part 35

Noahide News Part 36

Noahide News Part 37

Noahide News Part 38

Noahide News Part 39

Noahide News Part 40

Noahide News Part 41

Noahide News Part 42

Noahide News Part 43

Noahide News Part 44

Noahide News Part 45

Noahide News Part 46

Noahide News Part 47

Noahide News Part 48

Noahide News Part 49

Noahide News Part 50

Noahide News Part 51

Noahide News Part 52

Noahide News Part 53

Noahide News Part 54

Noahide News Part 55

Noahide NewsPart 56

Noahide News Part 57

Noahide News Part 58

Noahide News Part 59

Noahide News Part 60

Noahide News Part 61

Noahide News Part 62

Noahide News Part 63

Noahide News Part 64 

Noahide News Part 65

Noahide News Part 66

Noahide News Part 67

Noahide News Part 68

Noahide News Part 69

Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist

Noahide News Part 70

Noahide News Part 71

Noahide News Part 72

Noahide News Part 73

Noahide News Part 74

Noahide News Part 75

Noahide News Part 76

Noahide News Part 77

Noahide News Part 78

Noahide News Part 79

Noahide News Part 80

Noahide News Part 81

Noahide News Part 82

Noahide News Part 83 ALERT ALERT ALERT

Noahide News Part 84

Noahide News Part 85

Noahide News Part 86

Noahide News Part 87

Noahide News Part 88

Noahide News Part 89

Noahide News part 90

Noahide News Part 91

Noahide News Part 92

Noahide News Part 93

Noahide News Part 94

Noahide News Part 95

Noahide News Part 96

Noahide News Part 97

Noahide News Part 98

Noahide News Part 99

Noahide News Part 100

Noahide News Part 101

Noahide News Part 102

Noahide News Part 103

Noahide News Part 104

Noahide News Part 105

Noahide News Part 106

Noahide News Part 107

Noahide News Part 108

Noahide News Part 109

Noahide News Part 110

Noahide News Part 111

Noahide News Part 112

Noahide News Part 113

Noahide News Part 114

Noahide Naws Part 115

Noahide News Part 116

Noahide News Part 117

Noahide News Part 118

Noahide News Part 119

Noahide News Part 120

Noahide News Part 121

Noahide News Part 122

Noahide News Part 123

Noahide News Part 124

Noahide News part 125

Noahide News Part 126

Noahide News Part 127

Noahide News Part 128

Noahide News Part 129

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News Part 130

Noahide news Part 131

Noahide News Part 132

Noahide News Part 133

Noahide News Part 134

Noahide News Part 135

Noahide news Part 136

Noahide News Part 137

Noahide News Part 138

Noahide News Part 139

Noahide News Part 140

Noahide News Part 141

Noahide News Part 142

Noahide News Part 143 THE JEWISH RELIGION Its InfluenceToday

Noahide News Part 144

Noahide News Part 145

Noahide News Part 146

Noahide news Part 147

Noahide News Part 148

Noahide News Part 149

Noahide News Part 150

Noahide News Part 151

Noahide News Part 152

Noahide News Part 153

Noahide News Part 154

NoahideNews Part 155

Noahide News Part 156

Noahide News Part 157

Noahide News Part 158

Noahide News Part 159

Noahide News Part 160

Noahide News Part 161

Noahide News Part 162

Noahide News Part 163

Noahide News Part 164

Noahide News Part 165

Noahide News part 166

Noahide News Part 167

Noahide News Part 168

Alert ! Noahide News Part 169 Alert ! Alert ! false Elijah cometh?

Noahide News Part 170

Noahide News Part 171

Noahide News Part 172

Noahide News Part 173

Noahide News Part 174 

Noahide News Part 175

Noahide News Part 176

Noahide News Part 177

Noahide News Part 178

Noahide News Part 179

Noahide News Part 180

Noahide News Part 181

Noahide News Part 182

Noahide News Part 183

Noahide News Part 184

Noahide News Part 185

Noahide News part 186

Noahide News Part 187

Noahide News Part 188

Noahide News Part 189

Noahide News Part 190 Alert ! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 191

Noahide News part 192

Noahide News Part 193

Noahide News Part 194

Noahide News Part 195

Noahide News Part 196

Noahide News Part 197 Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News part 198

Noahide News Part 199

Noahide News Part 200

Noahide News Part 201

Noahide News Part 202

Noahide News Part 203Alert Alert Alert !

Noahide News Part 204 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 205

Noahide news Part 206

Noahide News Part 207

Noahide News Part 208

Noahide News Part 209

Noahide News Part 210

Noahide News Part 211

Noahide News Part 212

Noahide News Part 213

Noahide News Part 214

Noahide News Part 215

Noahide News Part 216

Noahide News Part 217

Noahide News Part 218

Noahide News Part 219

Noahide News Part 220 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 221

Noahide News Part 222 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 223

Noahide News Part 224 Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 225

Noahide News Part 226

Noahide News Part 227

Noahide News Part 228 Alert! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News Part 229

Noahide News Part 230 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 231

Noahide News Part 232

Noahide News Part 233

Noahide News Part 234

Noahide News part 235

Noahide News Part 236

Noahide News part 237

Noahide News Part 238

Noahide News Part 239

Noahide News Part 240

Noahide News Part 241 Alert ! Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 242

Noahide News Part 243

Noahide News Part 244

Noahide News Part 245

Noahide News Part 246

Noahide News Part 247

Noahide News Part 248

Noahide News Part 249

"Left Behind"

Noahide News Part 250

Noahide News Part 251

Noahide News Part 252

Noahide News Part 253

Noahide News Part 254

Noahide News Part 255

Noahide News Part 256

Noahide News part 257

Noahide News Part 258

Noahide News Part 259

Noahide News Part 260

Noahide News Part 261

Noahide News Part 262

Noahide News Part 263

Noahide News Part 264

Noahide News Part 265

Noahide News Part 266

Noahide News Part 267

Noahide News Part 268

Noahide News Part 269

Noahide News Part 270

Noahide News Part 271

Noahide News Part 272

Noahide News Part 273

Noahide News Part 274

Noahide News Part 275

Noahide News Part 276

Noahide News Part 277

Noahide News Part 278

Noahide News Part 279

Noahide News Part 280

Noahide News Part 281

Noahide News Part 282

Noahide News Part 283

Noahide News Part 284

Noahide News Part 285

Saints of the Living God

Noahide News Part 286

Noahhide News Part 287

Noahide News Part 288

Noahide News Part 289

Goon squad part II

Noahide News Part 290

Noahide News Part 291

Noahide News Part 292

Noahide News Part 293

Noahide News Part 294

Noahide News Part 295 Alert ! Alert!

Noahide News Part 296

Noahide News Part 297

Noahide News Part 298

Noahide News Part 299

Noahide News Part 300

Noahide News Part 301

Noahide News Part 302