Noahide News


Part 200

May 31, 2005

Day 195 of 1290 of 2300



of Iniquity unto desolation for them who Deny the Christ, Jesus the Lord.

mason seal

Extra Extra



High Treason and Murder






We've documented that the U.S. government is a leading purveyor and practitioner of this odious human rights violation. And the refusal of the U.S. government to conduct a truly independent investigation into the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison and other detention centers is tantamount to a whitewash, if not a cover-up, of these disgraceful events...

If the U.S. government continues to shirk its responsibility, Amnesty International calls today on foreign governments to uphold their obligations under international law by investigating all senior U.S. officials involved in the torture scandal. And if those investigations support prosecution, those foreign governments should arrest any official who enters their territory and should begin legal proceedings against that official.

Crimes such as torture are so serious that they amount to an offense against all of humanity and they require government to investigate and prosecute people responsible for those crimes no matter where the crime was committed.

Amnesty International issues a list today.

The List includes Donald Rumsfeld, who approved a December 2002 memorandum that permitted such unlawful interrogation techniques as stress positions, prolonged isolation, stripping and the use of dogs at Guantanamo Bay. It includes William Haynes, the Defense Department general counsel who wrote that memo. It includes Douglas Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy, who was cited in the memo as concurring with its recommendation. Our list includes Major General Geoffery Miller, commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo, whose subordinates used some of the approved torture techniques and who was then himself sent to Iraq, where he recommended that prison guards, quote, "soften up detainees for interrogation."

And it includes former CIA Director George Tenet, whose agency kept so-called ghost detainees off registration logs and hidden during visits by the Red Cross, and whose operatives reportedly used such techniques as water boarding, fainting, suffocation, stress positions and incommunicado detention.

Our list includes Attorney General Gonzales, who called the Geneva conventions "quaint and obsolete" in a January 2002 memo, and who requested the memos that fueled the atrocities at Abu Ghraib.

It includes Lieutenant Richard Sanchez, former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq; and Sanchez's deputy Major General Walter Wojdakowski, who failed to ensure proper staff oversight of detention and interrogation operations at Abu Ghraib, according to the military's Fay-Jones report.

And it includes Captain Carolyn Wood, who oversaw interrogation operations at Bagram Air Base, and who permitted the use of dogs, stress positions and sensory deprivations.

Now, as I say this is by no means an exhaustive list of those who deserve investigation. And we would be remiss if we ignored President George Bush's own role in this scandal. After all, his administration has repeatedly justified its detention and interrogation policies as legitimate under the president's powers as commander in chief of the armed forces.

And President Bush signed a February 2002 memo stating that the Geneva conventions did not apply to Taliban or Al Qaida detainees, and that their humane treatment should be contingent on, quote, "military necessity." This set the stage for the tragic abuse of detainees.

Without full and impartial investigations of all key players, the torture scandal will come to be as indelibly associated with the Bush presidency as Teapot Dome is with Warren Harding's or Watergate with Richard Nixon's.


Torture has, of course, been used by the United States before.

What is different here is that an explicit rationale for the support of torture was articulated by high administration officials. And the specific authorization by the secretary of defense, among others, of the use of specific torture techniques, that, I believe, is unprecedented or at least, certainly, it has never been revealed before to the public.

And that, I think, lifts this particular case to an entirely new level. It is one thing to have individuals practicing torture or committing human rights violations without any kind of rationale or support, much less command, from those who are their superiors. That is one thing that happens in virtually every country, I suspect, or has happened.

It is quite another thing for the highest officials in the land to authorize, rationalize and, indeed, potentially -- and this is what needs to be investigated -- potentially plot or conspire to allow this to happen, and, indeed, to therefore reasons why those who undertake it ought not to be subjected both to international and the U.S.'s own laws. That's a very different situation. That's the essence of the scandal here.





SCHULZ: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I'm William F. Schulz, the executive director of Amnesty International USA.

Today, Amnesty International releases its annual report on the state of human rights around the world. What we have found brings shame to governments from Afghanistan to the United States. We have documented the use of torture and ill treatment, widespread throughout the world.

We've documented that the U.S. government is a leading purveyor and practitioner of this odious human rights violation

gawd bliss "Amaraka"

And the refusal of the U.S. government to conduct a truly independent investigation into the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison and other detention centers is tantamount to a whitewash, if not a cover-up, of these disgraceful events.

It is a failure of leadership to prosecute only enlisted soldiers and a few officers while protecting those who designed a deliberate government policy of torture and authorized interrogation techniques that constitute torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. The government investigation must climb all the way to the top of the military and civilian chains of command.

If the U.S. government continues to shirk its responsibility, Amnesty International calls today on foreign governments to uphold their obligations under international law by investigating all senior U.S. officials involved in the torture scandal. And if those investigations support prosecution, those foreign governments should arrest any official who enters their territory and should begin legal proceedings against that official.

The apparent high-level architects of torture should therefore think twice before planning their next vacation to places like Acapulco or the French Riviera, because they may well find themselves under arrest, as Augusto Pinochet famously did in London in 1998.

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell warned in 2002 that a failure to apply international law to detainees in Afghanistan may, quote, "provoke some individual foreign prosecutors to investigate and prosecute our officials and troops," unquote.

Well, it's not too late for President Bush to heed those words today and apply international law to all who are responsible for torture at all U.S. detention centers, not just in Afghanistan.

Secretary Powell also argued at the time that adhering to international law, quote, "preserves U.S. credibility and moral authority by taking the high ground."

But how far -- how far from that moral high ground the U.S. government has fallen. Its descent into torture and ill treatment includes, as we know, beatings, prolonged restraint in painful positions, hooding and the use of dogs at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay and Bagram Air Base, and the rendering of detainees to countries that practice torture.

Tolerance for torture and ill treatment, signaled by a failure to investigate and prosecute those responsible, is the most effective encouragement for it to expand and grow. Like a virus, the techniques used by the United States will multiply and spread unless those who plotted their use are held accountable.

welcome to the Hoodlum hoo haha of the shemborg Collective of the Sofiet Red Esau

Those who conducted the abusive interrogations must be held to account, but so, too, must those who schemed to authorize those actions, sometimes from the comfort of government buildings.

If the United States permits the architects of torture policy to get off scot free, then other nations should step into the breach.

SCHULZ: Foreign governments that are party to the Geneva Conventions and/or the Convention Against Torture -- and that is some 190 countries -- and countries that have national legislation that authorizes prosecutions -- and that is at least 125 countries -- all of those countries have a legally binding obligation to exercise what is known as universal jurisdiction over people accused of grave breaches of the conventions or the laws.

Governments are required to investigate suspects and if warranted to prosecute them or to extradite them to a country that will prosecute.

Crimes such as torture are so serious that they amount to an offense against all of humanity and they require government to investigate and prosecute people responsible for those crimes no matter where the crime was committed.

Amnesty International issues a list today. It is not a comprehensive list, but it is a list of those who may be considered high-level torture architects. And that list includes Donald Rumsfeld, who approved a December 2002 memorandum that permitted such unlawful interrogation techniques as stress positions, prolonged isolation, stripping and the use of dogs at Guantanamo Bay. It includes William Haynes, the Defense Department general counsel who wrote that memo. It includes Douglas Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy, who was cited in the memo as concurring with its recommendation.

Our list includes Major General Geoffery Miller, commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo, whose subordinates used some of the approved torture techniques and who was then himself sent to Iraq, where he recommended that prison guards, quote, "soften up detainees for interrogation."

And it includes former CIA Director George Tenet, whose agency kept so-called ghost detainees off registration logs and hidden during visits by the Red Cross, and whose operatives reportedly used such techniques as water boarding, fainting, suffocation, stress positions and incommunicado detention.

Our list includes Attorney General Gonzales, who called the Geneva conventions "quaint and obsolete" in a January 2002 memo, and who requested the memos that fueled the atrocities at Abu Ghraib.

It includes Lieutenant Richard Sanchez, former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq; and Sanchez's deputy Major General Walter Wojdakowski, who failed to ensure proper staff oversight of detention and interrogation operations at Abu Ghraib, according to the military's Fay-Jones report.

And it includes Captain Carolyn Wood, who oversaw interrogation operations at Bagram Air Base, and who permitted the use of dogs, stress positions and sensory deprivations.

Now, as I say this is by no means an exhaustive list of those who deserve investigation. And we would be remiss if we ignored President George Bush's own role in this scandal. After all, his administration has repeatedly justified its detention and interrogation policies as legitimate under the president's powers as commander in chief of the armed forces.

And President Bush signed a February 2002 memo stating that the Geneva conventions did not apply to Taliban or Al Qaida detainees, and that their humane treatment should be contingent on, quote, "military necessity." This set the stage for the tragic abuse of detainees.

Without full and impartial investigations of all key players, the torture scandal will come to be as indelibly associated with the Bush presidency as Teapot Dome is with Warren Harding's or Watergate with Richard Nixon's.

What's more, it's the height of hypocrisy for the U.S. government itself to use the very torture techniques that it routinely condemns in other countries. The Bush administration which saw fit in its most recent country reports on human rights practices to criticize Syria for administering electric shocks appears to have used the same torture technique in the war on terror.

Amnesty International took testimony, for example, from Mohammed Al-Dasari (ph), who alleged that U.S. soldiers subjected him to electric shocks, death threats, assault and humiliation in Kandahar.

The Bush administration cited Egypt for beating victims with fists, whips and metal rods. And yet U.S. Major Michael Smith testified at an administrative review hearing last year that an autopsy of a captured Iraqi general revealed that he had suffered five broken ribs that were, quote, "consistent with blunt force trauma. That is either punching, kicking or striking with an object or being thrown into an object," close quote.

SCHULZ: When the U.S. government calls upon foreign leaders to bring to justice those who commit or authorize human rights violations in their own countries, why should those foreign leaders listen?

And if the U.S. government does not abide by the same standards of justice, what shred of moral authority will we retain to pressure other governments to diminish abuses?

It's far past time for President Bush to prove that he is not covering up the misdeeds of senior officials and political cronies who designed and authorized these nefarious interrogation policies.


So Congress must appointed a truly impartial and independent commission to investigate the masterminds of the atrocious human rights violations at Abu Ghraib and other detention centers, and President Bush should use the power of his office to press Congress to do so.

And Attorney General Gonzales must appoint an independent special counsel to conduct criminal investigations into administration officials, including himself, who are suspected of having committed, assisted, authorized or condoned these abuses or had command responsibility for them. Such investigations must apply to both military and civilian officials who may be complicit in these crimes.

It is inexcusable that the few military higher-ups who have been held accountable have received the equivalent of a parental timeout for their wrongdoing. Among them, Colonel Thomas Pappas, the top military intelligence official stationed at Abu Ghraib in 2003, who was given only a reprimand and a fine amounting to one month's pay.

Even worse, for President Bush to promote and reward those who should be investigated makes a mockery of the principles of justice on which this nation was founded.

Those who were rewarded include, of course, as we know, Gonzales, promoted from White House counsel to the highest law enforcement position in the land; Timothy Flanagan, just nominated to serve as Gonzales' second in command, who allegedly contributed to several key legal opinions that led to torture; Haynes, the Defense counsel, who was nominated to serve on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals; and Jay Bybee, former assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel, whose August 2002 memo argued that only interrogation techniques that cause pain that would ordinarily be associated with death or organ failure, only those, he said, constitute torture. He was later rewarded by being nominated to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Filibuster my Butt

Furthermore, Amnesty International calls upon state bar authorities to investigate the administration lawyers alleged to be involved in the torture scandal, to investigate them for failing to meet professional responsibility standards.

The attorneys who wrote various legal opinions that may have provided cover for subsequent crimes and who should be investigated include Bybee and David Addington, general counsel to Vice President Cheney; Robert Delahunty, former special counsel in the Office of Homeland Security; and three attorneys in the Office of Legal Counsel, John Yoo, former deputy assistant attorney general, Patrick Philbin, deputy assistant attorney general, and Jack Goldsmith, former assistant attorney general.

We also call on the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility to make public the findings of its investigations into the Bybee memo.

A wall of secrecy is protecting those who masterminded and developed U.S. torture policy. Unless those who drew the blueprint for torture, who approved it and ordered it implemented, are held accountable, the United States' once proud reputation as an exemplar of human rights will remain in tatters.

SCHULZ: Its shattered image will continue to fuel anti-American sentiment around the globe and will make the world a more dangerous place.

And Amnesty International's new report today documents just how dangerous the world remains. Nepal is on the brink of catastrophe. Each day there civilians face possible torture, disappearances, political executions, abduction, arbitrary detention, rape and other abuses at the hands of government security forces and insurgents from the Communist Party of Nepal.

New cases of torture are reported almost daily, and hundreds of student activists, journalists, trade unionists and human rights defenders have been arrested.

Despite the Nepali government's poor human rights record, since 2001 the U.S. government has provided it with more than $29 million in security assistance to fight the insurgents.

Amnesty International strongly condemns the human rights violations committed by those insurgents, but urges the U.S. government to immediately suspend all security assistance to the Nepalese military until fundamental human rights protections are restored.

We call on the government of Nepal to immediately release all prisoners of conscience, to reinstate fundamental freedoms and to bring to justice security forces who commit abuses.

As if the tsunami disaster in Indonesia weren't devastating enough, the human rights situation in the province of Aceh remains grave. The armed forces commit political killings, arbitrary detention, torture and sexual violence.

The Indonesian government must prosecute and punish all those who were involved in gross human right violations or who aided or abetted militia groups.

President Bush, when he meets today with Indonesia's President Yudhoyono, should urge him to allow human rights investigations into Aceh and seek assurances that the armed forces stationed there will not interfere with the delivery of tsunami disaster relief.

In Colombia, women and girls are caught in the crossfire of that country's decades-long armed conflict. For example, last July more than 10 soldiers from the 4th Brigade apparently gang-raped two girls aged 16 and 17. Some of the soldiers reportedly threatened the girls and their families after they reported the rape to the attorney general.

In October, armed groups allegedly killed four women, one of whom was pregnant, after accusing the women of having relations with security force members.

The Colombian government must do more to publicly condemn such violence, to aggressively investigate its security forces and to bring perpetrators to justice.

With the U.S. providing $600 million a year in security assistance to Colombia, the Bush administration must speak out against violence against women by Colombia's armed actors and withhold its certification of Colombia's human rights practices until they improve.

The administration must be resolute in pressing for an end to the killing of civilians by all parties to the conflict in Israel and the occupied territories.

Palestinian armed groups have repeatedly and deliberately targeted Israeli civilians in suicide bombings, shootings and other attacks killing some 1,000 Israelis, including 110 children, in the last four and a half years.

The Israeli army and security services have killed unarmed Palestinians in repeated, reckless shootings, shellings and air strikes killing some 3,200 individuals, including more than 600 children.

While Amnesty International commends Israel's planned withdrawal of Israeli settlers from the Gaza Strip, the U.S. government should press Israel to evacuate settlers from scores of other settlements throughout the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The Darfur region of Sudan remains in crisis, with 1.9 million people forced from their homes. The world stands idly watching as government-sponsored militias systematically target innocent civilians for ethnic cleansing.

The state of emergency permits Sudanese authorities to detain people indefinitely without charge or trial, to break up peaceful demonstrations and to violate human rights under the guise of counterinsurgency.

SCHULZ: Rape, kidnapping, attacks on civilians increased just this past month.

We urge President Bush to make Darfur a top priority of U.S. foreign policy.

While we welcome the president's decision to send Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick to Darfur, he would send a far stronger message by dispatching Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to the country without delay, a country which, after all, the State Department itself has said is guilty of genocide.

We also call on the U.S. government and the international community to provide support to the International Criminal Court in its investigation into the crimes committed in Darfur and to insist that all parties to the conflict cooperate with the court.

And not all of our findings are grim. Amnesty International, which has campaigned with local women's organizations to end violence against women in Turkey, is pleased that the new Turkish penal code removes many of the gender discriminatory articles of past penal codes, and that towns must now establish domestic violence shelters.

More remains to be done. Amnesty calls on Turkish authorities to create guidelines for those shelters, to fund them and to conduct domestic violence training for police.

Other positive developments include the growing debate on political change in the Middle East, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that granted detainees in Guantanamo Bay the right to challenge their detention in courts and which provided a check thereby on the administration's overreaching, and also a ruling by the British House of Lords that indefinite detention of foreign nationals suspected of being international terrorists violated their human rights.

Noahides have no rights, they are only offered priviliges

Today, as we focus on the torture scandal, Amnesty International USA announces a new grassroots campaign, "Denounce Torture. Stop It Now," it's called.

Public opinion surveys have shown that Americans oppose the use of torture. And Amnesty International will work to turn that opposition into action. We will educate and mobilize tens of thousands of people around the country to take action to end torture and ill-treatment and to pressure of the government to hold individuals accountable at all levels of the chain of command.

Mr. President, last year you said, quote, "Let me make very clear the position of my government and our country: We do not condone torture. I have never ordered torture. I will never order torture. The values of this country are such that torture is not a part of our soul and being."

President Bush, it is time to find out whether what you said is true. And if you did not order torture, then who did? It is time to prove that your words were not an artful cover-up of illegal actions. It is time to stop sheltering the apparent architects of torture policy, or else you will be known not for your promotion of democracy but for your perpetuation of demagoguery, not for your high-mindedness but for your hypocrisy.

Mr. President, tear down this wall of secrecy and silence.

Now, I thank you ladies and gentlemen. That is our opening statement.

And I and others here will be happy to take your questions.

We have with us Professor William Aceves, who is a specialist in international law -- professor at Cal Western Law School -- to respond to any of your questions of a legal nature. But I'm happy to address any of the matters that may be of interest to you.

QUESTION: Your report talks about tens of thousands of deaths in Sudan, talks about tens of thousands of prisoners in China. Your focus on the United States -- is it because the United States offenses are worse? Is it because Amnesty International can have more of an impact in the United States? Is it because the United States should be held to a higher standard?

SCHULZ: The United States is the most powerful country in the world and it represents itself as being a champion of human rights.

What the United States does or fails to do provides a model for the rest of the world; it's as simple as that. Whether we like it or not, that is a fundamental fact.

And therefore, what the United States does in its own human rights record, particularly if it itself is guilty of one of the most heinous human rights crimes in the world, the crime of torture, that has a resounding effect throughout the world.

SCHULZ: Amnesty International never compares countries or compares violations. We never rank countries. We never say one country is better or worse than another. That's not the point.

The point is that we here in the United States have a special responsibility, both because we're Americans and because of the role that the United States plays in the world, to make sure that our human rights record is as clean, as exemplary, as possible.

That's why we focused in this way.

QUESTION: Amnesty International has rejected calls by leading Russian human rights advocates and refused to designate Mikhail Khodorkovsky as a political prisoner and prisoner of conscience.

Could you explain why this is and whether we can expect that he will be designated as a political prisoner in the future?

SCHULZ: Let me say this: Amnesty has raised serious questions about that particular case. We certainly are monitoring that case closely.

We haven't declared him a prisoner of conscience. Amnesty's standards for doing so are very, very high. You ought not to take any implication from that beyond the fact that we have not made that particular designation in this case. But we have certainly raised serious questions about him.

I'm going to invite Maureen Greenwood, who is our specialist in this area, to add comments.

GREENWOOD: Amnesty International is concerned that the case against Mr. Khodorkovsky and his colleagues is politically motivated. We are concerned about interference in the lawyer-client process. We are concerned about the closed nature of the procedural issues, about detention and isolation of some of the suspects, about shortcomings in medical care provided to the detainees, and also to the alleged ill- treatment of some of the detainees in detention.

We are very closely monitoring the trial so that it meets fair trial standards. We are urging medical assistance to those who need it in detention. And we want all to be free from ill-treatment and torture.

Thank you.

QUESTION: You're calling now on foreign governments to step in and possibly prosecute the architects of torture that you're calling out today. The German government had an opportunity to pursue this several months ago, when lawyers there filed an international claim against Donald Rumsfeld and others. That case was thrown out.

What do you think are the chances of future cases actually being successful?

SCHULZ: Let me first clarify that our call is, first, for the United States to step up to its responsibilities and investigate these matters first. That's our wish. That is our primary wish.

And if that doesn't happen, then, indeed, we are calling upon foreign governments to take on their responsibility and to investigate the apparent architects of torture.

Now it is true that the German court threw out that case. And we recognize that there are obstacles in the way. I suspect that the Germans came under considerable pressure from the administration.

But I would make a couple comments and then invite Professor Aceves, if he would like to add anything, to do so.

Let's keep in mind that there are no statutes of limitations here. Let's keep in mind that these issues can be pursued years from now, not just today.

Let's also keep in mind that there is a growing body of understanding that universal jurisdiction is becoming a more and more accepted part of our international law regimen.

We have seen cases pursued in Belgium. We've seen the case pursued against Pinochet. And we believe that, whether or not this is an immediate reality or not, it certainly is something that needs to be taken seriously and will be taken more and more seriously in the future.


ACEVES: I would add to that that the German decision not to proceed with that investigation was due, in part, on the expectation that the U.S. government would conduct proper investigations. So if, in fact, that is not the case, then we may have the opportunity for the German prosecutors to revisit the matter.

ACEVES: And as Dr. Schulz noted that many of these investigations require information that has yet to come forward. And perhaps in a few months or additional years you may have additional information coming to light which provides greater levels of evidence with respect to the possible culpability of U.S. military or political leaders.

QUESTION: As the world's major religions attempt to win the hearts and the minds of the world, what abuses and human rights violations are being done in the name of God or religion and what is being opposed in the name of God and religion?

I would particularly be interested in how you would make any comparisons with the two major religions of the world, Christianity and Islam.

Of course, the world does know the United States claims to be a nation that is under God and it is in God that we trust. But I know Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine are nations that recently named Islam officially in their constitutional proceedings.

SCHULZ: Well, I am certainly not going to lodge blame for any of these violations on God, Allah, Jehovah or anyone else. That's not my job and that's certainly not Amnesty International's job.

And Amnesty International, just as we do not rank countries, certainly do not rank religions or deities in terms of their responsibility or lack thereof for human rights violations.

Now, the fact is that we know that human rights violations are committed in countries that are predominantly Christian, predominantly Muslin, predominantly Jewish and no doubt countries that are predominantly Buddhist, Confucian and anything else.

so hep me gawd

As far as Amnesty International is concerned, the issue is, "What is the violation?" We don't make speculation as to the cause of that violation in religious terms.

Certainly as a clergy person myself, I'm well aware that one can cite passages from any number of so-called holy books to justify virtually anything. And once we get into proof-texting of that nature we will never end, and this conference will go well beyond 11 o'clock, so we will avoid that.

QUESTION: I'm wondering if you communicated the contents of this report to the State Department and gotten a reaction or if you've had a reaction from any foreign government yet.

SCHULZ: We have not at the moment. This is the first release of this report and release of this statement.

I suspect that we will be hearing from the State Department one way or the other. We certainly have informed our counterparts in other Amnesty sections around the world of the nature of our statement.

QUESTION: Are all the other Amnesties around the world having a focus on the United States or is it simply Amnesty USA that's highlighting this aspect?

SCHULZ: I suspect that other Amnesty sections around the world will, indeed, address U.S. issues simply because they are so important and so pervasive. Whether or not each section is focusing explicitly on the United States I simply don't know.

The reality is, though, that all Amnesty sections affirm the importance of universal jurisdiction and so I suspect there is no section around the world that would disagree with our fundamental call and conviction here.

QUESTION: When it comes to the situation in the Sudan, how do you evaluate the fact that the United States government named genocide taking place there, yet doesn't seem to be acting in a way that shows that that's what they really are believing?

QUESTION: And I'm curious how you see the rest of the world responding to genocide. Does Amnesty International believe it is genocide going on there?

SCHULZ: Well, let me say that your fundamental question, I think, is a very, very good one. And Amnesty International, while it has not declared genocide to be taking place, has certainly declared that crimes against humanity, war crimes and all manner of other crimes are taking place there.

Amnesty International's position is consistent with the position of the U.N. commission of inquiry, which also did not call it genocide per se, largely because of the issue of whether or not intent could be established.

But the issue of whether it is genocide or not is not nearly as important as the issue of what we do about it. And your point, which is an important point, that the United States has called it genocide and yet has not appeared to allow that issue -- to promote that issue to a high enough level of importance in our own foreign policy to warrant even a significant public comment by the secretary of state in her public comments at her hearing of confirmation before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, indeed, represents a quandary and represents a puzzle.

Why is that? I suspect it is because the United States does not ultimately take whatever happens in Sudan as seriously as it takes places that it would see as more germane to our national interest. But that is very shortsighted.

And as someone who was in Sudan, in Darfur himself just a few months ago, I can say that growing instability in that part of the world is certainly something that will eventually redound against the United States national interest in any number of ways.

And that's why Amnesty International calls upon the United States to be far more serious about this issue. Certainly, we are grateful for the conversations currently under way in NATO about the possibility of NATO support of the African Union troops. We believe that there does need to be, indeed, far more support provided to the African Union troops to stop the slaughter that continues to go on.

And we commend the United States for abstaining on the referral by the U.N. Security Council of those names recommended by the U.N. commission of inquiry to be referred to the International Criminal Court for possible prosecution. We believe that those prosecutions should go forward, and, indeed, that the United States should do everything it can to be supportive of that particular process, if, indeed, it believes that this is a serious crime, which, of course, it is.

QUESTION: Can you elaborate a bit to the point of what point the United States crossed the threshold that elevated the country to the prominence that you're giving it? Was it a single event, a collection of certain events, or was it the totality of all the events over the past year?

SCHULZ: I'm not prepared to point to a particular event.

Allow me: 1991 HJR 104, PL 102-14 Talmudic Law or kill them all

I think that what we know is that this administration has sought to undermine the fragile scaffolding of support for human rights at the international level at one point after another, and that the torture memos and the policy of torture that we've described flows from a fundamental lack of appreciation or respect for international human rights regimens and international human rights laws.

By Peace they destroy wonderfully.......insurgents...opposed to global slavery, and these people can do nothing against the beast, for on October 13, 2004 the Sanhedrin of Hell was "Revived" and that Dragon loosed upon the earth. You have seen nuthin yet, stck around.

The attempts to undermine the International Criminal Court, for example, are simply one more example of a failure to appreciate what had previously been a bipartisan support for international law and for the scaffolding of support that undergirds all of human rights.

Whether Democrats or Republicans supported the International Criminal Court itself, they certainly did not want to weaken international human rights institutions per se. And that is something that this administration has done, and the decisions about torture, I think, flow very directly out of that.

QUESTION: What is Amnesty's reaction to the recent religious freedom agreement signed between the United States and the Vietnamese government?

QUESTION: And broader question: When you look at Southeast Asia do you see a general negative trend in terms of human rights there? Or how would you characterize the situation in Asia?

SCHULZ: Well, let me ask Mr. Kumar, our Asia specialist, to comment on that.

KUMAR: Thank you, Bill.

Generally, the trend is mixed. In Indonesia and Aceh province, we have seen increase of human rights abuses even after tsunami. The military there continues to persecute Acehnese there.

In terms of Vietnamese issue, I will say, it's a welcoming step. But we want implementation, and also we want political prisoners to be released in Vietnam.

As you're aware, the Vietnamese prime minister is going to be here next month. We want President Bush to take this as a special issue when he goes signing business deals with him.

First they accuse the President, then they request that he continues Noahide enforcement....can you read between the lines?

QUESTION: What can Amnesty International do, or what is there -- have they taken any action about Charles Taylor in Nigeria?

From what I heard from the ambassador from Nigeria, they had no plans on turning Charles Taylor over to the Sierra Leone court.

SCHULZ: Amnesty International has long called for the extradition of Charles Taylor. We believe that Charles Taylor should be brought before the court in Sierra Leone. He has been indicted by that court, and he should stand before that court and face the charges against him.

And Amnesty has encouraged the United States government to do what it can to put pressure on the Nigerian government to, indeed, live up to its international obligations.

So, as someone who was once under threat of assassination by Mr. Taylor, I, personally, would be more than happy to see him face justice before the court. And that is Amnesty's position.

QUESTION: The U.N. is talking about reforming its human rights entire approach in the new panel. I'm wondering if you have a position on that. Do you think it will make a difference?

SCHULZ: Yes. Amnesty International certainly welcomes many of the proposals by the secretary general for the reform of the United Nations.

Amnesty, over the years, has recognized the fallibility of that institution. We have ourselves often been critical of the U.N. Human Rights Commission for failing to live up to what we regarded as its full obligations. We've issued reports in the past on some of the human rights violations committed by United Nations peacekeeping troops.

And so we welcome reform efforts at the United Nations.

I should say that we support those efforts within the context of support for the United Nations itself, however.

And therefore, in the case of Mr. Bolton's nomination, while Amnesty takes no position one way or the other on that nomination, we have raised very serious questions that we want to see put to Mr. Bolton and considered by those who will vote on his nomination, because we believe that Mr. Bolton has displayed exactly the kind of lack of fundamental support for international institutions that I referred to earlier here.

And that if one is to reform the United Nations, one has to affirm it in the first place. And that, indeed, is something that this administration, I think, has largely failed to do.

But as to reform itself, Amnesty welcomes many of these efforts.

QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE) changing the membership?

SCHULZ: I don't know whether Amnesty has taken a specific stand on the particular proposals about the constitution of the Human Rights Commission.

Do you know?

I guess we have no position on that specific proposal. But in general, we certainly believe that the U.N. Human Rights Commission needs to be strengthened, that it has often had its hands tied in terms of its willingness to address fundamental issues of human rights. And that needs to change.

QUESTION: With the reactions around the world to the allegations about the desecration of the Koran, does Amnesty International take a position regarding the use or abuse of symbols or books that would be considered holy?

SCHULZ: Absolutely. Amnesty International opposes any wanton destruction of that nature. No holy book, no book that is of importance to a large group of people, should ever be treated disdainfully or with lack of respect.

And I will say, without commenting on the specific allegations reported in Newsweek, Amnesty International itself has, in the past, reported on allegations, reported on, in fact, findings -- research findings of a lack of respect being displayed towards the holy Koran at Guantanamo Bay.

So while I can't comment on the specific instance that Newsweek was reporting on, that action was certainly consistent with actions that we have documented in the past.

QUESTION: Is it your position that the condoning of torture that you allege here is an entirely new position for the United States government? Or is this more that the recent years have brought about a quantum leap in, as you say, the purveying and practicing of torture?

SCHULZ: Unfortunately, the use of torture by U.S. officials is certainly not new.

SCHULZ: I was reading Joseph Ellis's new biography of George Washington. And Washington himself engaged in human rights violations with his own troops, or what today we would consider human rights violations. And I'm sorry if I attack the father of our country in that respect, but it happens to be true.

United States troops have used torture. Certainly that was in use in the war in the Philippines in the turn of the 20th century. We know that torture was used in Central America during the Reagan era. Torture has, of course, been used by the United States before.

What is different here is that an explicit rationale for the support of torture was articulated by high administration officials. And the specific authorization by the secretary of defense, among others, of the use of specific torture techniques, that, I believe, is unprecedented or at least, certainly, it has never been revealed before to the public.

And that, I think, lifts this particular case to an entirely new level. It is one thing to have individuals practicing torture or committing human rights violations without any kind of rationale or support, much less command, from those who are their superiors. That is one thing that happens in virtually every country, I suspect, or has happened.

It is quite another thing for the highest officials in the land to authorize, rationalize and, indeed, potentially -- and this is what needs to be investigated -- potentially plot or conspire to allow this to happen, and, indeed, to therefore reasons why those who undertake it ought not to be subjected both to international and the U.S.'s own laws. That's a very different situation. That's the essence of the scandal here.

QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE) in terms of addressing civil rights issues especially as it relates to their indigenous populations?

SCHULZ: Let me ask Eric Olson, our Amnesty director for the Americas, to give a brief summary of the situation in Latin America.

OLSON: You were asking specifically about indigenous people?


OLSON: There have been some specific cases where there has been advance in guaranteeing the rights of indigenous people; I think mostly in particular in Brazil, where President Lula recognized the rights of indigenous people in certain areas to their traditional lands.

Unfortunately, that's more the exception than the rule in Latin America. The rights of indigenous people -- and not just indigenous people but the rights of Afro-Latino people -- are constantly under assault by governments, by militaries, by illegal armed groups.

And so that's the pervasive reality. Their rights to their cultures, their traditional lands, their own political organizations, unfortunately, are under assault in almost every country in Latin America.

QUESTION: On China, what are Amnesty's, sort of, policy recommendations in terms of how the U.S. should now approach China, given that there doesn't seem to be any, you know, substantive improvements in the human rights situation there over the last, you know, however many years, 10 years?

SCHULZ: First of all, let me say that your premise is indeed correct. There have not been significant improvements in China's human rights record despite much of the rhetoric that we hear often from the business community in this respect.

It is certainly true that at the very lowest levels there has been the introduction of a modest degree of democracy, in terms of multi-candidate elections. But beyond that, Amnesty continues to document very serious violations: as many as 3,400 executions, for example, more than all of the executions in the rest of the world.

Amnesty believes that the United States needs to continue to keep human rights at the forefront of its policies with China; that they ought not to be subsumed to other important issues. Certainly they ought not to be subsumed to economic issues. And even issues having to do with control of nuclear weapons in North Korea ought not to completely push off the table the importance of human rights violations.

SCHULZ: Now, of course there are limited ways in which the United States can impact China, and Amnesty International itself takes no position on issues such as economic sanctions.

But that this issue ought to be at the core of United States dialogue with China ought to go without saying. Because in the long run, if it isn't, the consequences for the United States and its own interests will be profound, as China becomes a growing military power and as its economic might spreads throughout the world.

QUESTION: There's been this talk of Arab spring of political reform popping up in a number of countries. The election in Iraq; you know it all.

How real do you think that is? And how much do you think you can attribute that to the military campaign in Iraq?

SCHULZ: Well, first of all, it would be difficult for me to project or predict how real it is. My prediction on projections are comparable to Calvin Coolidge's remark that when people are out of work unemployment results. So I am not going to project whether in the long run this is going to hold or not.

Certainly I will say that Amnesty International welcomes all of those efforts which are genuine in the Middle East, or anywhere else, to bring a greater degree of democratization to countries.

Now, clearly, in a place like Egypt, which has at least ostensibly introduced multi-party elections, Amnesty has serious questions about whether or not those who would wish to contest such an election will, in fact, have the opportunity to do so. And so there may be in some of these cases a good deal of smoke and mirrors going on.

It's also the case that other countries, like Saudi Arabia, remain mired in a very authoritarian system without much hint of new forms of democratization at all.

As to the extent to which the Iraq war was responsible, is responsible for these issues, I think again it is far too early to tell whether the full ramifications of the Iraq war in that respect will ultimately be positive or negative.

Obviously, the Iraqi government is having profound problems at the moment simply organizing itself, profound problems in finding ways to include the Sunnis in the government itself. And whether or not Iraq remains stable, I couldn't possibly tell you.

What we do know, of course, is that there are very serious human rights violations being committed by insurgents, and perhaps others in Iraq, and these are of profound concern to Amnesty International.

QUESTION: Since the war on terror began, has Amnesty International made any changes in policy justifying what may be done in attempting to prevent an act of terror?

And this past year, have governments increased or decreased using the war on terror as a rationale to violate human rights?

SCHULZ: Well, if by the first part of your question you mean, "Does Amnesty believe that violations of human rights in the interests of national security ought to be permitted?" clearly the answer to that is no. Amnesty believes that protection of human rights is one of the best ways to protect our security.

And though Amnesty has clearly condemned all terrorist acts, acts committed for political or religious purposes aimed at civilians are clearly in and of themselves human rights violations. Amnesty believes that there ought to be an international treaty that clearly defines terrorism. Amnesty believes the international community has a responsibility to oppose terrorism.

SCHULZ: But the way that that is done is very, very important. And the way that it has been done, trampling on civil rights, civil liberties and human rights around the world, we believe has created an atmosphere that leads to far greater danger than to safety.

Certainly whether or not the number of violations committed in the name of security are increasing or not is not something, in and of itself, that Amnesty tracks.

But we know very well -- take the case of Zimbabwe, for example, we know very well that many governments are utilizing the excuse of national security to crack down on people who are nonviolent and who are engaged in pursuing their democratic rights.

And certainly Zimbabwe is a good example of that. There are many other examples in Middle East and in Asia where countries are using these -- or governments are using these as a convenient excuse to oppose or repress their political opponents.

And certainly when those political opponents are not utilizing violence in any way, shape or form, that is something that Amnesty profoundly opposes and in many cases will declare those people who are subject to that kind of repression, prisoners of conscience or political prisoners.

Fine. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.

Related Press Report

Amnesty International Wants U.S. Officials Arrested and Investigated

By Bob Dart

05/26/05 Cox news - WASHINGTON - Amnesty International USA urged foreign governments Wednesday to use international law to investigate Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and other alleged American "architects of torture" at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay and other prisons where detainees suspected of ties to terrorist groups have been interrogated.

"If those investigations support prosecution, the governments should arrest any official who enters their territory and begin legal proceedings against them," said William Shulz, executive director of the U.S. branch of the international human rights agency.

In its annual report on "The State of the World's Human Rights," Amnesty International said the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "has become the gulag of our times" and accused U.S. officials of flaunting international law in their treatment of detainees.

There is no statute of limitations on crimes such as torture, Shulz said.

So for years to come, the director warned, "the apparent high-level architects of torture should think twice before planning their next vacation to places like Acapulco or the French Riviera because they may find themselves under arrest as Augusto Pinochet famously did in London in 1998."

Gen. Pinochet, a former dictator of Chile, was arrested on an international warrant issued by a Spanish judge while Pinochet was in England receiving medical treatment.

Charged with torturing Spanish citizens in Chile, he was held under house arrest in England for more than a year but eventually returned to his homeland and escaped an international trial.

If the United States "continues to shirk its responsibility" of investigating allegations of abuse to the top of the chain of command, Shulz said, foreign governments should uphold their obligations under international law by investigating all senior U.S. officials involved.

Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, called the charges "unsupported by the facts."

The well-publicized abuses of detainees have been a "stain on the image of the United States abroad," he conceded, but the exposures only reinforced the administration's commitment to human rights.

"We hold people accountable when there is abuse," he said.

Amnesty International's demand for international action came as a private activist group that spans the ideological spectrum called for President Bush and Congress to appoint an independent, bipartisan panel, modeled after the Sept. 11 commission, to investigate the "various allegations of abuse of terrorist suspects."

The group calling for appointment of such a commission ranged from former Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., American Conservative Union Chairman David Keene and former Rep. Mickey Edwards, R-Okla., on the right to Thomas Pickering, the former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and Morton Halperin of the Center for American Progress on the left.

Pickering said his conversations during recent international travels confirmed the damage that prisoner abuse charges have done to the nation, disheartening our allies and giving ammunition to our enemies.

But others on the panel said they were not as concerned about foreign reaction as with domestic values.

"We should be opposed to this (torture) because of who we are -- not what they think," said Keene.

In issuing the Amnesty International report, Shulz specifically named those he regarded as potential "high-level torture architects."

In addition to Rumsfeld and Gonzales, they included former CIA Director George Tenet; Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq; Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, commander of the Joint Task Force Guantanamo; and Douglas Feith, the under secretary of defense for policy.

Shulz said the Geneva Conventions and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment legally bind the countries that have signed them to exercise "universal jurisdiction" on people suspected of violations.

Certain crimes, including torture, amount to offenses against all of humanity so all countries have a responsibility to investigate and prosecute people responsible for such crimes, he said.

Uh are a Liar, these things can't happen in the US of A....Gawd bliss Amaraka


Bush Calls Human Rights Report 'Absurd'
May 31, 11:21 AM (ET)

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush called a human rights report "absurd" for criticizing the United States' detention of terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and said Tuesday the allegations were made by "people who hate America."

by the if'ns you aint with us, then you'un's must be aginst us, bunch

"It's absurd. It's an absurd allegation. The United States is a country that promotes freedom around the world," 

Noahide Slavery is Freedom saith Bushkevik

Bush said of the Amnesty International report that compared Guantanamo to a Soviet-era gulag.

See Hassidim of the Sofiet Nasi who controls White House....Chabad Lubavitch

In a Rose Garden news conference, Bush defiantly stood by his domestic policy agenda while defending his actions abroad. With the death toll climbing daily in Iraq, he said that nation's fledging government is "plenty capable" of defeating terrorists whose attacks on Iraqi civilians and U.S. soldiers have intensified.

defeating the US of Apostasy?

Bush spoke after separate air crashes killed four American and four Italian troops in Iraq. The governor of Anbar province, taken hostage three weeks ago, was killed during clashes between U.S. forces and the insurgents who abducted him

Bush said the job of the U.S. forces there is to help train Iraqis to defeat terrorists.

Ilegal Occupation of a sovereign nation by deception

"I think the Iraqi people dealt the insurgents a serious blow when we had the elections," Bush said. "In other words, what the insurgents fear is democracy because democracy is the opposition of their vision."

Noahide Demonicrazy, insurgents

On another foreign policy issue, Bush said he expressed concerns with Russian President Vladimir Putin about legal proceedings against former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky. 

a Talmudic Jew

Once the richest man in Russia, Khodorkovsky was convicted Tuesday of fraud and tax evasion and sentenced to nine years in prison following a trail widely denounced as politically motivated.

By the Hassidim in Control of the Bushkevik bloody ad-menstruation

Bush did not comment directly on the verdict, but said, "it looked like he had been judged guilty prior to having a fair trial."

see US Media of Talmudic influence

The president said he has questioned whether the case shows a backsliding away from the rule of law and democracy in Russia and said it will "be interesting to see" how Khodorkovsky's expected appeal is handled by the government.

Here, you're innocent until proven guilty 

hahaahhahahahahahahhhheheeeeeeeeeeeeewhooooooooooooooooey Hoodlum hoo haha humbug........hahahhahahhahhahhha (demonic laughing for Carmen)

and it appeared to us, at least people in my administration, that it looked like he had been ajudged guilty prior to having a fair trial," Bush said. "We're watching the ongoing case."

He said it was a "reasonable decision" to allow Iran to apply for WTO membership as a way to advance diplomatic discussions with Europe on Iran's nuclear program. In another hot spot, he urged further diplomacy to curb North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

Bush opened the news conference by urging Congress to pass his stalled energy legislation, restrain the growth of government spending, approve the Central American Free Trade Agreement and overhaul Social Security with a partial privatization plan.

He declared that the economy is strong, with 3.5 million jobs in two years and an unemployment rate of 5.2 percent. 

Welcome to McDonald's sir, How may I help you


"Obviously, these are hopeful signs, but Congress can make sure the signs remain hopeful," he said in a five-minute opening statement in the Rose Garden.

I never promised you a Rose Garden

After a bruising week on Capitol Hill, Bush urged both political parties to "set aside partisan differences" and work together.


Though he did not mention tax cuts in his opening argument, Bush said he still wants Congress to make his first-term cuts permanent. He also pledged not to give up on Social Security reform, despite intense opposition on Capitol Hill. "The easy path is to say, 'Oh, we don't have a problem.

Let's ignore it -- yet again."

says the master of deception


The Sa
Introduction: What is  the Sanhedrin?
Sanhedrin comes from the Greek term sunedrion  (literally, "sitting together")  meaning council.  The Sanhedrin is both a Jewish judicial and administrative body.  The Sanhedrin was composed of local elites--including members of the high-priestly family, scribes (religious experts), and lay elders.  It probably operated under some sort of Roman oversight, at least with respect to its taxing, law enforcement, and other administrative functions. 

According to gospel accounts, Jesus was brought before the Jerusalem Sanhedrin, presided over by high priest Joseph Caiaphas.

Around 200 C.E., Sanhedrin becomes a technical term for a rabbinic court.  A tractate in the Mishnah prescribes procedures the Sanhedrin is to use.  The excerpts below, taken from the Mishnah Tractate, may shed light on the procedures used in the case of Jesus.  One caution, however: the Mishnah was not compiled until 200, and it is therefore possible that some of the procedures and restrictions described in the Mishnah Tractate were not in force in the time of Jesus. 

The gospel of John indicates that the Sanhedrin turned Jesus over to Pilate because it lacked the power to impose death: "Pilate said to them, 'Take him yourselves and judge him according to your law.'  The Jews replied, 'We are not permitted to put anyone to death.'"  The Mishnah, however, clearly shows that the Sanhedrin did have the power to impose death for certain crimes--at least sometime before 200 C.E.  In particular, Mishnah Sanhedrin 6.1 to 6.4 specify the procedures for stoning.  There is no evidence to suggest that the power did not exist in 30 C.E.  On the contrary, there is evidence that the Romans preferred to leave as much power as possible to control religious crimes in the hands of Jewish authorities.

Mark and Matthew indicate that the trial before the Sanhedrin occurred at night and a capital trial at night was illegal.  Mishnah Sanhedrin 4.1 confirms the illegality of a capital trial at night, assuming that the law stated in the Mishnah existed in 30 C.E.

Mark indicates that the charge against Jesus was blasphemy: "You have heard the blasphemy (Mark 14:64)." Under Mishnah Tractate 7.5, blasphemy consists only of uttering the name of God, so there is reason to question whether in fact that was the charge against Jesus.  If it is assumed to be the charge, however, Mishhah Tractate 7.4 makes clear that execution by stoning was an available option for such a crime.

Information for this page is drawn largely from The Trial of Jesus by Alan Watson (1995).

Verdicts in Capital Trials Only to be Reached in Daytime 
[Under the Mishnah Tractate, Sanhedrin]

Mishnah Sanhedrin 4.1
In noncapital cases they hold trial during the daytime and the verdict may be reached during the night; in capital cases they hold the trial during the daytime and the verdict must also be reached during the daytime.  In noncapital cases the verdict, whether of acquittal or of conviction, may be reached the same day; in capital cases a verdict of acquittal may be reached on the same day, but a verdict of conviction not until the following day.

Requirements for Conviction 

Mishnah Sanhedrin 5.1-4
5.1  They used to prove witnesses with seven inquiries: In what week of years?  In what year?  In what month?  On what day?  In what hour?  In what place?  (R. Jose says: [They aked only,] On what day?  In what hour?  In what place?) [They also asked:] Do you recognize him? Did you warn him?  If a man committed idolatry [they asked the witnesses], What did he worship? and, How did he worship it?
2.  The more a judge tests the evidence the more he is deserving of praise:  Ben Zakkai once tested the evidence even to inquiring about the stalks of figs.  Wherein do the inquiries differ from the cross-examination?  If to the inquiries one [of the two witnesses] answered, "I do not know," their evidence becomes invalid; but if to the cross-examination one answered, "We do not know," their evidence remains valid.  Yet if they contradict one another, whether during the inquiries or the cross-examination, their evidence becomes invalid.
3.  If one said, "On the second of the month," and the other said, "On the third," their evidence remains valid since one may have known the month was intercalated and the other did not know the month was intercalated; but if one said, "On the third," and the other said, "On the fifth," their evidence becomes invalid.  If one said, "At the second hour," and the other said, "At the third," their evidence remains valid; but if one said, "At the third hour," and the other said, "At the fifth," their evidence becomes invalid.  R. Judah says: It remains valid; but if one said, "At the fifth hour," and the other said, "At the seventh," their evidence becomes invalid since at the fifth hour the sun in in the east and at the seventh it is in the west.
4.  They afterward brought in the second witness and proved him.  If their words were found to agree together they begin [to examine the evidence] in favor of acquittal.  If one witness said, "I have somewhat to argue in favor of his acquittal," or if one of the disciples said, "I have somewhat to argue in favor of his acquittal," they bring him up and set him among them and he does not come down from thence the whole day.  If there is any substance in his words they listen to him.  Even if the accused said, "I have somewhat to argue in favor of my acquittal," they listen to him, provided there is any substance to his words.

Postponement of Final Sentence Until the Day After Trial Under the Mishnah

Mishnah Sanhedrin 5.5
If they found him innocent they set him free; otherwise they leave his sentence over until the morrow.  [In the meantime] they went together in pairs, they ate a little (but they used to drink no wine the whole day), and they discussed the matter all night, and early on the morrow they came to the court.  He that favored acquittal says: "I declared him innocent and I still declare him innocent"; and he that favored conviction says, "I declared him guilty and I still declare him guilty."  He that favored conviction may now acquit, but he that had favored acquittal [the day before] may not retract and favor conviction."

Capital Punishment To Be By Stoning 

Mishnah Sanhedrin 6.1-4
1. When sentence has been passed, they take him forth to stone him.  The place of stoning was outside the court, as it is written, Bring forth him that hath cursed without the camp.  One stands at the door of the court with a towel in his hand, and another, mounted on a horse, far away from him [but where he is able] to see him.  If one [in court] said, "I have somewhat to argue in favor of his acquittal," that man waves the towel and the horse runs and stops him [the stoner].  Even if he himself said, "I have somewhat to argue in favor of my acquittal," they must bring him back, be it four times or five, provided that there is any substance in his words.  If they found him innocent, they set him free; otherwise he goes forth to be stoned.  A herald goes out before him [announcing], "Such-a-one, the son of such-a-one, is going forth to be stoned for that he committed such or such an offense.  Such-a-one and such-a-one are witnesses against him.  If any man knoweth anything in favor of his acquittal, come let him plead it."
2.  When he was about ten cubits from the place of stoning they used to say to him, "Make your confession," for such is the way of them that have been condemned to death to make confession, for every one that makes his confession has a share in the world to come.  For so we have found it with Achan.  Joshua said to him, My son, give, I pray thee, glory to the Lord, the God of Israel, and make confession unto him, and tell me now what you have done; hide it not from me.  And Achan answered Joshua and said, Of a truth I have sinned against the Lord, the God of Israel, and thus and thus have I done.  Whence do we learn that his confession made atonement for him?  It is written, And Joshua said, Why have you troubled us?  The Lord shall trouble thee this day--this day you shall be troubled, but in the world to come you shall not be troubled.  If he knows not how to make his confession they say to him, "Say, May my death be an atonement for all my sins."  R. Judah says: If he knew that he was condemned because of false testimony he should say, "Let my death be an atonement for all my sins excepting this sin."  They said to him: If so, every one would speak after this fashion to show his innocense."
3.  When he was four cubits from the place of stoning, they stripped off his clothes.  A man is kept covered in front and a woman both in front and behind.  So R. Judah.  But the Sages say: a man is stoned naked but a woman is not stoned naked.
4.  The place of stoning was twice the height of a man.  One of the witnesses knocked him down on his loins; if he turned over on his heart the witness turned him over again on his loins.  If he straightaway died that sufficed; but if not, the second took the the stone and dropped it on his heart.  If he straightaway died, that sufficed; but if not, he was stoned by all Israel, for it is written, The hand of the witnesses shall be firt upon him to put him to death and afterward all the hand of all the people.  All that have been stoned must be hanged.  So R. Eliezer.  But the Sages say: None is hanged save the blasphemer and the idolater.  A man is hanged with his face to the people and a woman with her face to the gallows.  So R. Eliezer.  But the Sages say: A man is hanged but a woman is not hanged. R. Eliezer said to them: Did not Simeon ben Shetah hang women in Ashkelon?  They answered: He hanged eighty women, whereas two ought not to be judged in one day.  How did they hang a man?  They put a beam into the ground and a piece of wood juttted from it.  The two hand were brought together and it was hanged.  R. Jose days:  The beam was made to lean against a wall and one hanged the corpse thereon as butchers do.  And they let it down at once: if it remained there overnight a negative command is thereby transgressed, for it is is written, His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shall surely bury him the same day; for he that is hanged is a curse against God; as if to say, Why was this one hanged?  Because he blessed the Name, and the Name of Heaven was found profaned. 

Crimes Meriting Capital Punishment 

Mishnah 7.4
These are they that are to be stoned: he that has connexion with his mother, his father's wife, his daughter-in-law, a male, or a beast, and the woman that suffers connexion with a beast, and the blasphemer and the idolator, and he that offers any of his seed to Molech, and he that has a familiar spirit and a soothsayer, and he that profanes the Sabbath, and he tht curses his father or his mother, and he that has a connexion with a girl that is betrothed, and he that beguiles [others to commit idolatry], and he that leads [a whole town] astray, and the sorcerer and a stubborn and rebellious son.

The Bush Law


you who are in


Do you hear

Jason Guenther, from the Written Word

Gen.37:26 And Judah said unto his brethren, What profit is it if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood?
27 Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmeelites, and let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother and our flesh. And his brethren were content.
28 Then there passed by Midianites merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver: and they brought Joseph into Egypt.

Ge 38:2 And Judah saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her.

Ge 38:6 And Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, whose name was Tamar.

Ge 38:7 And Er, JudahĎs firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him.

Ge 38:15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be an harlot; because she had "covered her face".

Ge 38:24 And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.

Ge 44:16 And Judah said, What shall we say unto my lord? what shall we speak? or how shall we clear ourselves? God hath found out the iniquity of thy servants: behold, we are my lordís servants, both we, and he also with whom the cup is found.

Ge 49:8 Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy fatherís children shall bow down before thee.

Ge 49:9 Judah is a lionís whelp: "from the prey", my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?

Ge 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

De 33:7 And this is the blessing of Judah: and he said, Hear, LORD, the voice of Judah, and bring him unto his people: let his hands be sufficient for him; and be thou an help to him from his enemies.

Jos 15:13 And unto Caleb the son of Jephunneh he gave a part among the children of Judah, according to the commandment of the LORD to Joshua, even the city of Arba the father of Anak, which city is Hebron.

Jos 15:63 As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the children of Judah could not drive them out: but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day.

Jos 18:14 And the border was drawn thence, and compassed the corner of the sea southward, from the hill that lieth before Bethhoron southward; and the goings out thereof were at Kirjathbaal, which is Kirjathjearim, a city of the children of Judah: this was the west quarter.

Jos 19:9 Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon: for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them: therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them.

Jos 20:7 And they appointed Kedesh in Galilee in mount Naphtali, and Shechem in mount Ephraim, and Kirjatharba, which is Hebron, in the mountain of Judah.

Jud 1:16 And the children of the Kenite, Mosesí father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people.

Jud 1:18 Also Judah took Gaza with the coast thereof, and Askelon with the coast thereof, and Ekron with the coast thereof.

(see modern palestine!)

Jud 1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.

Jud 20:18 And the children of Israel arose, and went up to the house of God, and asked counsel of God, and said, Which of us shall go up first to the battle against the children of Benjamin? And the LORD said, Judah shall go up first.

1Sa 23:3 And Davidís men said unto him, Behold, we be afraid here in Judah: how much more then if we come to Keilah against the armies of the Philistines?

2Sa 1:18 (Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the book of Jasher.)

(See Rev.ch6)

2Sa 3:10 To translate the kingdom from the house of Saul, and to set up the throne of David over Israel and over Judah, from Dan even to Beersheba.

2Sa 19:11 And king David sent to Zadok and to Abiathar the priests, saying, Speak unto the elders of Judah, saying, Why are ye the last to bring the king back to his house? seeing the speech of all Israel is come to the king, even to his house.

2Sa 19:43 And the men of Israel answered the men of Judah, and said, We have ten parts in the king, and we have also more right in David than ye: why then did ye despise us, that our advice should not be first had in bringing back our king? And the words of the men of Judah were fiercer than the words of the men of Israel.

Israel and Judah are two different peoples

1Ki 14:22 And Judah did evil in the sight of the LORD, and they provoked him to jealousy with their sins which they had committed, above all that their fathers had done.

2Ki 17:13 Yet the LORD testified against Israel, and against Judah, by all the prophets, and by all the seers, saying, Turn ye from your evil ways, and keep my commandments and my statutes, according to all the law which I commanded your fathers, and which I sent to you by my servants the prophets.

whom Judah jewry slew

2Ki 19:30 And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall yet again take root downward, and bear fruit upward.

2Ki 21:12 Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Behold, I am bringing such evil upon Jerusalem and Judah, that whosoever heareth of it, both his ears shall tingle.

2Ki 22:13 Go ye, enquire of the LORD for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that is found: for great is the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not hearkened unto the words of this book, to do according unto all that which is written concerning us.

2Ki 23:5 And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.

2Ki 23:27 And the LORD said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there.

1Ch 5:2 For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler; but the birthright was Josephís:)

2Ch 21:11 Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah, and caused the inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit fornication, and compelled Judah thereto.

2Ch 21:13 But hast walked in the way of the kings of Israel, and hast made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to go a whoring, like to the whoredoms of the house of Ahab, and also hast slain thy brethren of thy fatherís house, which were better than thyself:

2Ch 28:25 And in every several city of Judah he made high places to burn incense unto other gods, and provoked to anger the LORD God of his fathers.

Ne 11:36 And of the Levites were divisions in Judah, and in Benjamin.

Ps 78:68 But chose the tribe of Judah, the mount Zion which he loved.

(major discrepency about this verse by scholars. its been ADDED)

Isa 3:1 For, behold, the Lord, the LORD of hosts, doth take away from Jerusalem and from Judah the stay and the staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water,

Isa 3:8 For Jerusalem is ruined, and Judah is fallen: because their tongue and their doings are against the LORD, to provoke the eyes of his glory.

Isa 8:8 And he shall pass through Judah; he shall overflow and go over, he shall reach even to the neck; and the stretching out of his wings shall fill the breadth of thy land, O Immanuel.

Isa 19:17 And the land of Judah shall be a terror unto Egypt, every one that maketh mention thereof shall be afraid in himself, because of the counsel of the LORD of hosts, which he hath determined against it.

Isa 26:1 In that day shall this song be sung in the land of Judah; We have a strong city; salvation will God appoint for walls and bulwarks.

(but they choose walls of rock and division)

Isa 37:31 And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall again take root downward, and bear fruit upward:

Isa 40:9 O Zion, that bringest good tidings, get thee up into the high mountain; O Jerusalem, that bringest good tidings, lift up thy voice with strength; lift it up, be not afraid; say unto the cities of Judah, Behold your God!

("Jerusalem" that bringeth good tidings. Thats JESUS CHRIST THE "NEW" JERUSALEM whom came 2000 years ago whom we are to claim to the cities of Judah..."BEHOLD YOUR GOD"!)

Isa 48:1 Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the LORD, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness.

(See flood of waters out of the dragons mouth in Rev.ch11!)

Jer 1:15 For, lo, I will call all the families of the kingdoms of the north, saith the LORD; and they shall come, and they shall set every one his throne at the entering of the gates of Jerusalem, and against all the walls thereof round about, and against all the cities of Judah.

Jer 1:18 For, behold, I have made thee this day a defenced city, and an iron pillar, and brasen walls against the whole land, against the kings of Judah, against the princes thereof, against the priests thereof, and against the people of the land.

Jer 2:28 But where are thy gods that thou hast made thee? let them arise, if they can save thee in the time of thy trouble: for according to the number of thy cities are thy gods, O Judah.

Jer 3:7 And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me. But she returned not. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.

Jer 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.

Jer 3:10 And yet for all this her treacherous sister Judah hath not turned unto me with her whole heart, but feignedly, saith the LORD.

Jer 3:11 And the LORD said unto me, The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah.

Jer 4:4 Circumcise yourselves to the LORD, and take away the foreskins of your heart, ye men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem: lest my fury come forth like fire, and burn that none can quench it, because of the evil of your doings.

Jer 4:16 Make ye mention to the nations; behold, publish against Jerusalem, that watchers come from a far country, and give out their voice against the cities of Judah.

Jer 5:11 For the house of Israel and the house of Judah have dealt very treacherously against me, saith the LORD.

Jer 7:30 For the children of Judah have done evil in my sight, saith the LORD: they have set their abominations in the house which is called by my name, to pollute it.

Jer 9:11 And I will make Jerusalem heaps, and a den of dragons; and I will make the cities of Judah desolate, without an inhabitant.


Jer 10:22 Behold, the noise of the bruit is come, and a great commotion out of the north country, to make the cities of Judah desolate, and a den of dragons.


Jer 11:9 And the LORD said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

Jer 11:10 They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers.

Jer 11:12 Then shall the cities of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem go, and cry unto the gods unto whom they offer incense: but they shall not save them at all in the time of their trouble.

Jer 11:17 For the LORD of hosts, that planted thee, hath pronounced evil against thee, for the evil of the house of Israel and of the house of Judah, which they have done against themselves to provoke me to anger in offering incense unto Baal.

Jer 12:14 Thus saith the LORD against all mine evil neighbours, that touch the inheritance which I have caused my people Israel to inherit; Behold, I will pluck them out of their land, and pluck out the house of Judah from among them.

Jer.13:9 Thus saith the LORD, After this manner will I mar the pride of Judah, and the great pride of Jerusalem.
10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.
11 For as the girdle cleaveth to the loins of a man, so have I caused to cleave unto me the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah, saith the LORD; that they might be unto me for a people, and for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory: but they would not hear.
12 ∂ Therefore thou shalt speak unto them this word; Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Every bottle shall be filled with wine: and they shall say unto thee, Do we not certainly know that every bottle shall be filled with wine?
13 Then shalt thou say unto them, Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will fill all the inhabitants of this land, even the kings that sit upon Davidís throne, and the priests, and the prophets, and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, with drunkenness.
14 And I will dash them one against another, even the fathers and the sons together, saith the LORD: I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy them.

(wine= code word for SPIRIT or "SPIRITS". God said he shall fill every bottle with....."SPIRITS".....and they shall dash one another to pieces. Can anyone say......"THE THING"?????. Evil Spirits have been sent by the Lord to accomplish his will ladies and gentlemen!)

Jer 14:19 Hast thou utterly rejected Judah? hath thy soul lothed Zion? why hast thou smitten us, and there is no healing for us? we looked for peace, and there is no good; and for the time of healing, and behold trouble!

Jer 17:1 The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is graven upon the table of their heart, and upon the horns of your altars;

Jer 18:11 Now therefore go to, speak to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I frame evil against you, and devise a device against you: return ye now every one from his evil way, and make your ways and your doings good.

Jer 19:7 And I will make void the counsel of Judah and Jerusalem in this place; and I will cause them to fall by the sword before their enemies, and by the hands of them that seek their lives: and their carcases will I give to be meat for the fowls of the heaven, and for the beasts of the earth.

Jer 20:4 For thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will make thee a terror to thyself, and to all thy friends: and they shall fall by the sword of their enemies, and thine eyes shall behold it: and I will give all Judah into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall carry them captive into Babylon, and shall slay them with the sword.

Jer 22:6 For thus saith the LORD unto the kingís house of Judah; Thou art Gilead unto me, and the head of Lebanon: yet surely I will make thee a wilderness, and cities which are not inhabited.

Jer 24:5 Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel; Like these good figs, so will I acknowledge them that are carried away captive of Judah, whom I have sent out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for their good.

Jer 25:18 To wit, Jerusalem, and the cities of Judah, and the kings thereof, and the princes thereof, to make them a desolation, an astonishment, an hissing, and a curse; as it is this day;

Jer 31:27 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.

Jer 32:32 Because of all the evil of the children of Israel and of the children of Judah, which they have done to provoke me to anger, they, their kings, their princes, their priests, and their prophets, and the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

Jer 32:35 And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.

Jer 34:22 Behold, I will command, saith the LORD, and cause them to return to this city; and they shall fight against it, and take it, and burn it with fire: and I will make the cities of Judah a desolation without an inhabitant.

(Umm, you don't want to be anywhere near the 'cities of Judah" right now, thats for sure!)

Jer 35:17 Therefore thus saith the LORD God of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring upon Judah and upon all the inhabitants of Jerusalem all the evil that I have pronounced against them: because I have spoken unto them, but they have not heard; and I have called unto them, but they have not answered.

Jer 36:31 And I will punish him and his seed and his servants for their iniquity; and I will bring upon them, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and upon the men of Judah, all the evil that I have pronounced against them; but they hearkened not.

Jer 44:11 Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will set my face against you for evil, and to cut off all Judah.

Jer 44:14 So that none of the remnant of Judah, which are gone into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall escape or remain, that they should return into the land of Judah, to the which they have a desire to return to dwell there: for none shall return but such as shall escape

Jer 44:27 Behold, I will watch over them for evil, and not for good: and all the men of Judah that are in the land of Egypt shall be consumed by the sword and by the famine, until there be an end of them.

La 1:15 The Lord hath trodden under foot all my mighty men in the midst of me: he hath called an assembly against me to crush my young men: the Lord hath trodden the virgin, the daughter of Judah, as in a winepress.

La 2:5 The Lord was as an enemy: he hath swallowed up Israel, he hath swallowed up all her palaces: he hath destroyed his strong holds, and hath increased in the daughter of Judah mourning and lamentation.


What is it about the LORD Jesus the Christ the creator from the beginning you do not understand?

Eze 8:17 Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here? for they have filled the land with violence, and have returned to provoke me to anger: and, lo, they put the branch to their nose

Eze 9:9 Then said he unto me, The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is exceeding great, and the land is full of blood, and the city full of perverseness: for they say, The LORD hath forsaken the earth, and the LORD seeth not.

Evangelical Judeo Churchinsanity and Talmudic Jewry

Ho 5:5 And the pride of Israel doth testify to his face: therefore shall Israel and Ephraim fall in their iniquity; Judah also shall fall with them.

Ho 5:10 The princes of Judah were like them that remove the bound: therefore I will pour out my wrath upon them like water.

(Water as a flood out of the dragons mouth!)

Ho 5:14 For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah: I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him.

Ho 8:14 For Israel hath forgotten his Maker, and buildeth temples; and Judah hath multiplied fenced cities: but I will send a fire upon his cities, and it shall devour the palaces thereof.


Ho 12:2 The LORD hath also a controversy with Judah, and will punish Jacob according to his ways; according to his doings will he recompense him.

Am 2:4 Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Judah, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have despised the law of the LORD, and have not kept his commandments, and their lies caused them to err, after the which their fathers have walked:

Am 2:5 But I will send a fire upon Judah, and it shall devour the palaces of Jerusalem.

Mic 1:5 For the transgression of Jacob is all this, and for the sins of the house of Israel. What is the transgression of Jacob? is it not Samaria? and what are the high places of Judah? are they not Jerusalem?

Zep 1:4 I will also stretch out mine hand upon Judah, and upon all the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and I will cut off the remnant of Baal from this place, and the name of the Chemarims with the priests;

Zec 11:14 Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.

Zec 12:2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.

Zec 12:6 In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem.

Zec 14:14 And Judah also shall fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the heathen round about shall be gathered together, gold, and silver, and apparel, in great abundance.

Mal 2:11 Judah hath dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.

So, who wants to be a "SAYER"??? You do? You be very brave in "TEMPTING THE LORD"!. Better read these verses over again real slow!



Romans 8:15
For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, "Abba! Father!"

Galatians 2:4
Yet because of false brothers secretly brought in--who slipped in to spy out our freedom that we have in Christ Jesus, so that they might bring us into slavery--

Galatians 4:23-25
23But the son of the slave was born according to the flesh, while the son of the free woman was born through promise. 24

Now this may be interpreted allegorically: these women are two covenants. One is from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery; she is Hagar. 25Now Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia; she corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children

Galatians 5:1
For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.

Noahide laws of JUDAH

2 Corinthians 3:3
And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of man's hearts

Hebrews 3:12
Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God.

Hebrews 10:31
It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Revelation 22:13
I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.

do you hear in Judea?


They Damn themselves to everlasting shame unto their shem sham of Judah and Talmudic jewry

The Law is Only a Minimum

In contrast to the wicked Christian doctrine that the Law is too difficult to follow and that everyone falls short of the Law, the Bible (Hebrew Scriptures) clearly teaches that G-d's Law is the absolute minimum that He expects everyone to follow.

their gods of their flesh they have made unto themselves unto the Dragon and his beast sanhedrin

 The Law is merely the foundation for our spiritual service to G-d; we start by obeying every detail of the Law--which is not too difficult--and then we can begin building our spiritual "house" in this world, helping to bring the revelation of G-d's kingdom into the physical world.

The Yoke of the Assyrian

In other words, the purpose of life is to serve G-d with everything we have. 

By works

This starts by obeying His Law completely, and on that basis we are now able to harness our energies and opportunities every single day for His goals, not ours.

satan's goal

The Law contains two parallel (but separate) paths for the world: 613 commandments for the Jews, and 66 commandments (contained in the 7 Noachide Laws) for gentiles. Once a Noachide is committed to keeping the 66 mitzvos, he may (and really should) take on the responsibility for additional mitzvos, with certain clear exceptions: Non-Jews may not observe Shabbos (or holidays) in the manner of Jews (by avoiding the 39 categories of work), nor may non-Jews put on tefillin or tzitzis, put up a mezuzah, or be called up for a public Torah reading in a synagogue. There are other restrictions as well, including certain limitations on Torah study (depending partly on individual circumstances).

for they are zee massah race

But many or most of the 613 mitzvos can be observed by Noachides for spiritual benefit.

for they are made two fold the children of hell in their unbelief

 Indeed, some of these additional commandments are important (though technically not required) for gentiles to observe, while other commandments would also be a good idea.

Good idea's are not FACT of the Father

Our generation, as the Lubavitcher Rebbe (Schneerson who is dead with worms crawling through his rotted bones) has repeatedly declared, is the last generation of exile and darkness, and the first generation of Moshiach (the Messiah) and the Redemption. 

his children unto their dragon

All of us -- Jews and Noachides -- have an urgent responsibility to transform the world immediately in order to bring Moshiach, and this involves going well beyond the minimum of the Law.

Cry out for the Dragon

A recent influx of money has enabled a number of orthodox Jewish activists and rabbis to begin organizing Noachide activities and to investigate the Torah rules for how Noachides carry out additional mitzvos. However, our recent activities have nearly exhausted the available funds. We therefore do not yet have all the detailed answers, but we have been making rapid progress.

The following list is therefore only a short summary, not a complete explanation, of additional mitzvos that should be adopted as quickly as possible by Noachides everywhere:

  1. Noachides should pray, at least once every day. There are specific rules how prayer should be done, rules that are routinely violated (out of sheer ignorance) by Christians. There is a proper way to pray, and a wrong way.

    Matthew 23:

    1: Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,
    2: Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
    3: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
    4: For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
    5: But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
    6: And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
    7: And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
    8: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
    9: And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
    10: Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
    11: But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

    Mt:6:5: And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

  2. Noachides should observe a variety of Torah rules for modesty in dress and behavior, especially between men and women. There are both similarities and differences in how these rules apply to men and women.

    Mt:23:14: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

    Mt:23:15: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.


  3. Noachides may not observe any religious holidays outside the rabbinical traditions of Torah -- most especially including such Christian holidays as X-mas, Easter, Halloween, All Saint's Day, Good Friday, Ash Wednesday, and probably even the "new year" (January 1st). Alien religious holidays are forbidden even under the minimum of the Noachide code; these are violations of the commandment against idolatry.

    Isa:1:14: Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.


    Instead, Noachides should commemorate at least the following holidays: Rosh Hashanah, Sukkos, the 19th of Kislev (the chasidic "new year"), Chanukah, Purim, Shavuos -- and each person's birthday on the Hebrew calendar. However, Noachide participation in these holidays is different in various ways from the manner of Jewish observance. Each holiday must be observed according to precise rules.

Isa:1:13: Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.


  1. Noachides, generally speaking, should not limit the number of children they have. Moreover, a proper Torah education for their children is absolutely essential. Ultimately, such a Torah-learning program will be similar to the programs for Jewish children, but with many important differences.

    Mk:7:13: Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

    Right now, a supplemental daily home-schooling Torah program is being developed and used to teach Noachide children. All parents must rapidly get involved, teaching their children at least one hour per day (after school, for example) according to this program. As the number of participating families grows, it will soon be possible to organize full-time Noachide chedarim (day schools for grade-school children) in many communities. This approach to education, based on the three-thousand-year-old Jewish yeshiva system, drastically minimizes secular studies (math, science, history, English, social studies, computers & other technical studies) in favor of total immersion in Torah, the Word of G-d. This includes written Torah, oral Torah, halacha (religious law), Hebrew language, etc.; this philosophy of education is fundamentally opposite the one used in public and private schools and in standard home-schooling programs.

    Mt:10:21: And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.

  2. Noachides should give tzedaka (charity) for genuinely poor people, interest-free loans to others who are not as poor, and support for Torah education. We can easily identify numerous people who need genuine charitable assistance of one type or another: The elderly, unwed mothers & pregnant teens (who might otherwise have abortions), inner-city children, etc. The assistance is not just through money; in many cases, people need organized programs and activities to help them get involved in positive community affairs, rather than becoming isolated and lonely.

    Jms:5:3: Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

    Again, there are a number of exact rules as to how to give such money, time, etc.

    It would also be good to give contributions to the Israeli settlers in the West Bank, whose communities are now becoming endangered by the growing PLO occupation forces and terrorist actions. These brave families and yeshivos need much support from Americans.

  3. The Noachide commandment of "justice" primarily means teaching one's neighbors, friends, associates, etc., the details of the Noachide code, and that G-d sees and hears everything, rewarding every good deed and punishing every sin. This means outreach. Noachides must turn Christians away from their idolatry and their disregard of G-d's Law, and must bring all gentiles to a full acceptance of G-d's Law, including the oral Torah and the complete authority of the orthodox rabbis. This will quickly revolutionize our society, restoring morality, respect for authority, and the fear of G-d throughout the land. Similar efforts, of course, must also be extended to foreign countries.

    Acts:3:14: But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you;


    Certain materials, including fliers and books, are already available for this outreach, and audiotape lectures are being developed.

  4. We learn from the prophet Isaiah that Noachides will play a very important role in bringing non-observant Jews back to their 613 commandments. As part of the outreach effort to other gentiles, Noachides must further direct their energies toward teaching Jews the important of Jewish law. Noachides must also aggressively combat the schemes of Christian missionaries, who are stealing Jewish--and gentile--souls away from eternal life under G-d's Law to the evil of Christian idolatry.

    Ti:1:14: Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.


  5. To prepare the way for establishing proper Noachide courts of law, Noachides must make a special effort--beyond all other Torah studies--to learn, in detail, the exact requirements of every part of the Noachide code. This is a difficult, long-term task, because the details of the Noachide laws apply to every possible situation in life. But a thorough learning of the Noachide halachos will open the door for selecting G-d-fearing Noachide judges for the future courts. This project can begin immediately with the study of the existing books on the Noachide laws, and will later be followed up with rabbinically-supervised yeshiva programs that still need to be organized.

    Mt:11:29: Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.

    Mt:11:30: For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

  6. A number of other programs must be organized by Noachide communities, including making kosher meat available as a substitute for the improper meat in the stores (this is particularly needed in parts of the country remote from Jewish communities); helping arrange proper Noachide marriages, and creating family support networks for childbirth, death, etc.; financially assisting the building and expansion of orthodox Jewish synagogues to have additional rooms for Noachide meetings; teaching other gentiles how to attain financial discipline and pay off outstanding debts (especially credit card debts); and so forth.

    Mt:16:6: Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

All the above recommendations will accelerate the revelation of Moshiach (the Messiah), so there is no time to waste. Let's get to work!

2Thes:2:3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;



Now satan's son attack your children


sent to White House 5-31-2005

The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies


The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

The declaration of the Saints of Jesus the Christ, May 31 2005

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

The unanimous Declaration of the saints of Jesus the Christ of Sion

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the (Talmudic)  political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Noahide Laws of the Dragon of Sanhedrin

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator (Jesus the Christ) with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

 it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

 it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government


laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes;(Talmudic Noahide Laws)  and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. óSuch has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

(King George Bush)

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

Crawford texas, Ranch camp Howdy Doody

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages,(Talmudic Jews)  whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British (Talmudic Jewish) brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America,(We the People)  in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, (Talmudic satanic Crown of Sanhedrin and the Universal laws unto the Dragon) and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain,(ISREALHELL)  is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The signers of the Declaration represented the new states as follows:

Baldwin County Alabama

Robert G. Pickle

New Hampshire

Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton


John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island

Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery


Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York

William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey

Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark


Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross


Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean


Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton


George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina

William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina

Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton


Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

sent to 

Jeff Sessions

Sen. Jeff Sessions/ Alabama

Richard C. Shelby

Richard Shelby / Alabama

Senator Lisa Murkowski in the Point Hope General Store with Loretta Hawley and Molly Jane Stone.

Senator Lisa Murkowski/ Alaska

Senator Ted StevensAlaska


Senator Kyl / Arizona

John McCain for US Senate

Senator McCain/ Arizona

Would any of you like to help me e-mail every Senator, Congressman/woman/ Judge/ Media in the United states? Just copy, clip and paste then send to them....Do it now, or forever let the Blood be on your hands, For who will Work with the Father against these workers of Iniquity?







Senator Dianne Feinstein/ California



Senator Allard/Colorado




United States Senator, Colorado| Ken Salazar


Christopher Dodd/ Conecticut


Joe Lieberman

Joe Lie-Berman/ Conecticut

Senator Biden / Delaware


newswatch banner




Noahide News Part 201



The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II


"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

 ADDED Material 3-25-2004 Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees

Exod-U.S the coming Geula 


Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

Noahide News Part 3

Noahide News Part 4

Noahide News Part 5

Noahide News Part 6

Noahide News Part 7

Noahide News Part 8

Noahide News Part 9

Noahide News Part 10

Noahide News Part 11

Noahide News Part 12

Noahide News Part 13

Noahide News Part 14

Noahide News Part 15

Noahide News Part 16

Noahide News Part 17

Noahide News Part 18

Noahide News Part 19

Noahide News Part 20

Noahide News Part 21

Noahide News part 22

Noahide News Part 23

Noahide News part 24

Noahide News Part 25

Noahide News Part 26

Noahide News part 27

Noahide News Part 28

Noahide News Part 29

Noahide News Part 30

Noahide News Part 31

Noahide News Part 32

Noahide News Part 33

Noahide News Part 34

Noahide News Part 35

Noahide News Part 36

Noahide News Part 37

Noahide News Part 38

Noahide News Part 39

Noahide News Part 40

Noahide News Part 41

Noahide News Part 42

Noahide News Part 43

Noahide News Part 44

Noahide News Part 45

Noahide News Part 46

Noahide News Part 47

Noahide News Part 48

Noahide News Part 49

Noahide News Part 50

Noahide News Part 51

Noahide News Part 52

Noahide News Part 53

Noahide News Part 54

Noahide News Part 55

Noahide NewsPart 56

Noahide News Part 57

Noahide News Part 58

Noahide News Part 59

Noahide News Part 60

Noahide News Part 61

Noahide News Part 62

Noahide News Part 63

Noahide News Part 64 

Noahide News Part 65

Noahide News Part 66

Noahide News Part 67

Noahide News Part 68

Noahide News Part 69

Letter to Bob Jones and President Bush and all televangelist

Noahide News Part 70

Noahide News Part 71

Noahide News Part 72

Noahide News Part 73

Noahide News Part 74

Noahide News Part 75

Noahide News Part 76

Noahide News Part 77

Noahide News Part 78

Noahide News Part 79

Noahide News Part 80

Noahide News Part 81

Noahide News Part 82

Noahide News Part 83 ALERT ALERT ALERT

Noahide News Part 84

Noahide News Part 85

Noahide News Part 86

Noahide News Part 87

Noahide News Part 88

Noahide News Part 89

Noahide News part 90

Noahide News Part 91

Noahide News Part 92

Noahide News Part 93

Noahide News Part 94

Noahide News Part 95

Noahide News Part 96

Noahide News Part 97

Noahide News Part 98

Noahide News Part 99

Noahide News Part 100

Noahide News Part 101

Noahide News Part 102

Noahide News Part 103

Noahide News Part 104

Noahide News Part 105

Noahide News Part 106

Noahide News Part 107

Noahide News Part 108

Noahide News Part 109

Noahide News Part 110

Noahide News Part 111

Noahide News Part 112

Noahide News Part 113

Noahide News Part 114

Noahide Naws Part 115

Noahide News Part 116

Noahide News Part 117

Noahide News Part 118

Noahide News Part 119

Noahide News Part 120

Noahide News Part 121

Noahide News Part 122

Noahide News Part 123

Noahide News Part 124

Noahide News part 125

Noahide News Part 126

Noahide News Part 127

Noahide News Part 128

Noahide News Part 129

The Revelation of Jesus the Christ the LORD God and His Father

Noahide News Part 130

Noahide news Part 131

Noahide News Part 132

Noahide News Part 133

Noahide News Part 134

Noahide News Part 135

Noahide news Part 136

Noahide News Part 137

Noahide News Part 138

Noahide News Part 139

Noahide News Part 140

Noahide News Part 141

Noahide News Part 142

Noahide News Part 143

Noahide News Part 144  

Noahide news Part 147

Noahide News Part 148

Noahide News Part 149

Noahide News Part 150

Noahide News Part 151

Noahide News Part 152

Noahide News Part 153

Noahide News Part 154

NoahideNews Part 155

Noahide News Part 156

Noahide News Part 157

Noahide News Part 158

Noahide News Part 159

Noahide News Part 160

Noahide News Part 161

Noahide News Part 162

Noahide News Part 163

Noahide News Part 164

Noahide News Part 165

Noahide News part 166

Noahide News Part 167

Noahide News Part 168

Noahide News Part 169

Noahide News Part 170

Noahide News Part 171

Noahide News Part 172

Noahide News Part 173

Noahide News Part 174

Noahide News Part 175

Noahide News Part 176

Noahide News Part 177

Noahide News Part 178

Noahide News Part 179

Noahide News Part 180

Noahide News Part 181

Noahide News Part 182

Noahide News Part 183

Noahide News Part 184

Noahide News Part 185

Noahide News part 186

Noahide News Part 187

Noahide News Part 188

Noahide News Part 189

Noahide News Part 190 Alert ! Alert! Alert!

Noahide News part 191

Noahide News part 192

Noahide News Part 193

Noahide News Part 194

Noahide News Part 195

Noahide News Part 196

Noahide News Part 197

Noahide News part 198

Noahide News Part 199

Noahide News Part 200

Noahide News Part 201