"god the jews"
rainbow stew
&
Noahide News
Part 2
Extra Extra
read all about it !
are they serious, these gods? You better betcha
Daily updates starting 5-5-2005...until I am delivered to their synagogues to be
The "Haters"
attack all of mankind with their Proxy Oxy-moronic "acronyms"
Anti-Saudi Campaign: Enough Is Enough
Fahda Bint Saud, Arab News
Steven Stalinsky, executive director of the Middle East Media Research Institute, has published an article under the title “The Royal Treatment, Anti-Semitism, that is”.
He starts his piece with this statement: The Saudi royal family has been on the forefront in espousing an extreme position of hatred toward Jews ...which influences the Kingdom’s educational system and media and subsequently its foreign policy.
He proceeds by citing examples of statements and policies of the leaders of this country since its inception which are against Jews and hence anti-Semitic.
To be more clear about this issue, certain facts need to be stated. First, the writer of this article must have been in great hurry to publish it, as his references are a collection of pieces of articles taken out of their contexts.
Secondly, he missed stating that the founder of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia made the issue of Palestine a personal commitment. This was an issue which shaped the Kingdom’s foreign policy and was raised in the first historical meeting between King Abdul Aziz and US President Roosevelt in 1945 whereby the latter promised to halt emigration of Jews to Palestine and not to endanger the position of Palestinians, a promise which has been broken by all American presidents who followed, but was kept alive by all Saudi kings who came to power after their legendary father. Another promise was taken up by Saudi Arabia in 1946 at the formation of the Arab League in Egypt whereby Arab states declared that from that day onward the Palestinian question concerned not merely Palestinians but the Arabs as a whole.
Saudi Arabia has paid a huge price for keeping up this promise internally and externally and the result we are witnessing now: A smear campaign abroad to pressure this country into abandoning its commitment toward the Palestinians.
A more valid statement is that the people of Saudi Arabia represented by its leaders are indeed anti-Zionists but not anti-Semites. Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal who met King Saud in Riyadh in 1955 (www.alfredlilienthal.com/kingandi.htm) indicated in his article published by Washington Report on Middle East Affairs that anti-Zionism should not be equated with anti-Semitism, the racist ideology directed against Jews as Jews. Nor should Zionism, the political movement established to reconstitute Jews as a nation, be equated with Judaism. Dr. Lilienthal, who was the second Jew to meet a Saudi king, proceeds by saying: The words “anti-Semitism and “Anti-Semitic” are, in fact, misnomers. Jews constitute no more than 10 percent of the world Semites. The overwhelming majority of Semites are Arabs. Furthermore, most Jews today could not trace their ancestry back to the holy land and, therefore, are not true Semites at all. Ninety percent of the world’s Jews are descended from converts to Judaism, mostly the Khazars in what once was southern USSR. I think Steven Stalinsky is one of them. In fact, it is the Zionists who have been anti-Semites starting from the holy land of Palestine and ending with a worldwide movement against Muslims and Arabs who form 90 percent of the Semites. The proof of which is his article.
Besides, Israel and Saudi Arabia do not recognize each other and do not have diplomatic relations. Then how is either state expected to treat the other’s citizens?
At the same time, Jews who happen to be citizens of other countries like the US and work for their governments have always been welcomed by Saudi Arabia, keeping with diplomatic norms.
As for Interior Minister Prince Naif’s statements which Stalinsky quotes in his article, there is no denying that the Sept.11 attacks have served the interests of the Zionists more than they have any other group’s. Can anyone dare deny this fact?
Concerning Prince Sultan’s accusing the Jewish congressmen of being at the forefront of lobbying in the interest of Israel and its perceived enemies, could this assertion be denied? If the pro-Israeli lobby did not influence the US media, then the US could hardly prefer the interests and friendship of a small country like Israel to that of 1.5 billion Muslims. Neither would Israel receive more aid than the rest of the world put together (almost).
Moreover, Saudi kings can hardly be accused of being anti-Semites. They can’t be against themselves and their people.
Saudi kings were raised by their father King Abdul Aziz to be experienced regional politicians and to fight injustice wherever it may be. And they are paying a price for this. The stability of this country is being undermined by inimical forces as confirmed by Crown Prince Abdullah after the Yanbu bombings.
___
Echo of
the Neocons at Abu Gharib
Fawaz Turki, disinherited@yahoo.com
You were appalled, and justifiably so, by those images last week of US soldiers sexually humiliating and otherwise abusing Iraqi prisoners? But hey, take heart: so were the overwhelming majority of Americans, including — and trust me on this one — the 150,000 other Americans who are serving in the military in Iraq at the moment.
No doubt the photos served to reinforce Arab mistrust of US intentions in Iraq and anger at its policies in Palestine, and drove the media in the Middle East to have a field day describing the mistreatment as “savage acts” that are “indicative of the entire criminal operation being conducted in the region” — and the rest of it.
Before we get on our high horse, poking ordinary American folk in the chest for being barbaric hordes, let’s step back and consider that the dozen or so perpetrators of these acts at the Abu Gharib prison facility were a few bad apples not representative of the sensibility that animates much of American society, a society made up of people who come, or whose ancestors have come, from every country in the world.
These American folk are socialized by their family system, educational system and value system, not to mention their historical experience as idealistic immigrants searching for social justice and freedom in the New World, to abjure such practices. Ideas about how all men are created equal, of inherent rationality, held since the Founding Fathers wrote the constitution — ideas still intensely valid in the politically correct posture that most Americans demonstrate in their everyday cultural life — have not broken down because of the atrocious acts of a handful of soldiers.
Already three separate investigations have been launched since the abuses were discovered, and criminal charges have been filed against six soldiers, and could be filed against four others. Administrative charges, including court-martial, have been recommended against seven officers. Moreover, since those shocking photos were broadcast around the world, initially via CBS’ “60 Minutes,” nary a single commentator or editorialist saw the torture of prisoners as a nebulous issue, or for that matter ignored how profound and permanent the damage was to the image that America has tried to project of itself as a liberator in Iraq.
In the end, however, after this furor has quieted down, the bad guys here will turn out to be not those kids who didn’t know from a hole in the wall what they were doing but the neoconservative elite in government, with their sick fixation on power, pursuing the mirage of imperial purpose and manipulating a clueless president into going to war in Iraq on the flimsiest of excuses.
These ruthless ideologues, with a sinister agenda of their own, who are credited with a virtual takeover of US foreign policy under George W. Bush, see a world full of five-headed monsters, of mysterious evil, lurking behind every lamppost in our region, that America — now the only superpower around, with moral superiority coursing through its body politic — should take on.
What we saw at Abu Gharib last week was but massive echo, in a trickle-down effect, in an overlapping of events, of that imperial posturing. Imperial posturing, though, is fragile and its exercise is finite, as colonial overlords learned at the beginning of the last century, and the Israeli entity in Palestine is yet to learn.
“You are going to be the proud owner of 25 million people,” Secretary of State Colin Powell presciently told the president on the eve of war, we read in Bob Woodward’s new book, “Plan of Attack.” “You will own all their hopes, aspirations and problems. You will own it all.”
In the business world this is known as the Pottery Barn rule: You break it, you own it. In the movie industry, it’s known by a more telling rule: You play, you pay. In real life, it’s called: Why the heck did you go to Iraq in the first place, bringing on the collision of two modes of consciousness, thereby releasing explosive tensions there and anti-American sentiment around the world!
___
Have you noticed since "Purim Iraq" there is no daily new on the three major networks of the Human Rights violations of palestinians? Of course we don't, Emmanuel Goldstein is hiding the true enemy
Israeli planes bombard south Lebanon
Lebanon-Israel, Politics, 5/6/2004
News reports in Lebanon said that the Israeli military planes
bombarded three positions in south Lebanon in Zibqin town in Tyre's district in
Shahin area and Beit Leif valley. All these area are situated outside Shebaa
farms which are occupied by Israel.
Meantime, Israeli military sources said that the bombardment targeted sites for
the Lebanese Hizbullah party in retaliation to an earlier attack against a
collective farm to the north of Israel.
However, Lebanese security sources said that the Israeli forces bombarded the
Lebanese areas after the Lebanese army and the Hizbullah party fired anti-planes
shelling earlier in the day on Wednesday at Israeli planes that violated the
Lebanese airspace. No immediate news were stated on casualties from the two
side.
___
Arafat Fortifies West Bank Headquarters
Palestinian Leader Yasser Arafat Fortifies Headquarters, Fearing Israeli Attack
The Associated Press
RAMALLAH, West Bank May 6, 2004 —
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat fortified his West Bank headquarters with old
cars and barrels of concrete Thursday, fearing an Israeli invasion is imminent,
Palestinian officials said.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon last month said he is no longer bound by a promise to the United States not to harm the Palestinian leader.
_____
how the "gods" get by with anything they want
Syria:
We caught Israeli assassins
Thursday 06 May
2004, 15:01 Makka Time, 12:01 GMT
|
||
Syria
claims it has foiled an Israeli assassination attempt on a Palestinian
resistance leader living in exile.
The
London-based Asharq al-Awsat quoted an unidentified Syrian source on Thursday who
said security forces had arrested a cell of Israeli Mossad
intelligence agents. The
agents reportedly used fake passports to enter "The
cell was discovered and its members arrested by Syrian security forces who
prevented them from carrying out the mission assigned to them by Israeli
intelligence." Numerous
Israeli officials have vowed to kill leaders of resistance groups it accuses of
responsibility for "terror acts". Mishaal
survived an Israeli assassination attempt in Syrian
President Bashar al-Asad has warned Tel Aviv that it would consider attempt on
the lives of Palestinian resistance exiles in
___
DAMASCUS, May 6 (KUNA) -- Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk Al-Sharaa called anew on Thursday for transforming the Middle East into a zone free of weapons of mass destruction and dismantling Israel's nuclear arsenal.
The official news agency, Sana, quoted Al-Sharaa as saying current serious developments in the Middle East constituted a major stumbling block on the path of bolstering the European-Mediterranean cooperation.
Al-Sahraa, presently in Dublin, taking part in a ministerial Euro-Mediterranean conference, indicated that the states of Europe and the Middle East should join efforts for sake of establishing a just and comprehensive peace in the region, based on Israel's pullout from the Syrian Golan Heights to the June 1967 line and other occupied Arab territoris, as well as ending the occupation of Iraq.
The minister emphasized that the Mideast must be turned into a region free of weapons of mass destruction.
Signing the Syrian-European Partnership Agreement has been blocked with opposition by some EU member states because of the issue of weapons of mass destruction, reportedly possesed by Syria.
Syria and the European states worked out most of the agreement last year.
___
The believers of the gods, who in their laws "SAY" they are elohim,....i.e Judges..........listen to them who has rejected Jesus the Christ to worship the creatures and not the CREATOR
We are B'Nei Noach Messianics, also known as "Sons of Adam" or "Sons of Man". That is not the name or our religion. Only a description. We are the descendents of the ancient believers in Elohim, the singular plurality who created the universe in six days. Following is a commentary on our beliefs and why we believe them.
___
___
They better hurry and establish their satanic laws against them who are opposed to their god hashem of the self styled shemites, quickly for the world is waking to the serpent brood. The Lord of Host will come upon all the earth in great wrath for vengeance upon these serpent's seed. Beware, DO NOT harm ONE Human in the Name of Jesus the Christ, It is he who has the wrath of God, and HIM alone, for you will find your self cast into that pit along with they whom caused you to stumble upon Israel the Whore. Wait on the Lord.
___
With respect to countries such as the United States, one must look at the imposition of capital punishment under Noahide law, which applies to non-Jewish people, or the power of a king or a state legislature to impose capital punishment, based upon the principle of dina de'malchuta dina, literally, "the law of the state is the law." The authorization for the imposition of capital punishment and the relevant evidentiary and procedural rules under Noahide law or the principle of dina de'malchuta dina are entirely different from those under Jewish law. The question of capital punishment under the Noahide code was discussed in the Talmud. See B. Talmud, Sanhedrin 57a-b. It was decided that all seven Noahide laws are capital crimes. (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Judges, the Laws of Kings 9:14) Under Noahide law one may be executed based on the testimony of one witness or a confession, and without a prior warning. (Maimonides, ibid, 9:14; Chinuch ch. 26) According to one opinion, a criminal might be executed under Noahide law based upon circumstantial evidence (Rabbi Z.H. Chayoth, Ma'aritz Chayot, Vol. 1 ch. 49). According to Maimonides, non-Jews are required to establish a judicial system and apply the Noahide law, including the imposition of capital punishment (Maimonides, ibid, 9:14). It would appear, then, that American courts might be required under Noahide law to impose capital punishment for the violation of any one of the seven Noahide laws based upon one-witness testimony, circumstantial evidence or a defendant's confession. Similarly, the imposition of capital punishment by a non-Jewish state under the principle of dina de'malchuta dina does not require the application of strict evidentiary and procedural rules as in Jewish law. For instance, the testimony of one witness or the defendant's confession might suffice to convict a defendant (Rabbi B. Ashkenazi's commentary (Shita Mekubetzet) on Bava Metzia 83b-84a, citing Ritva) Although the principle of dina de'malchuta dina was primarily intended to subject Jewish people to the authority of a non-Jewish state, it could a fortiori apply also to non-Jewish people. This is because the underlying theories of this principle, e.g., the people's implied consent to the state's authority, or the power of the state to expel disobedient inhabitants, applies to everyone. The restrictions in Jewish law on the execution of criminals, delineated by Rabbi Feinstein, are limited to trials conducted according to biblical law. A Jewish king, however, is not subject to these restrictions and may execute criminals more easily than a Jewish court. (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Kings, 3:10, 4:1-3; Drush ha-Ran, ch. 11). The principles which guide a non-Jewish king regarding capital punishment are more readily compared to those which guide a Jewish king, rather than those which are applied by a Jewish tribunal. Furthermore, some scholars believe that the power of a non- Jewish king or government to try criminals is based on the Jewish king's prerogatives under Jewish law. (Rabbi M. Meterani, Kiryat Sefer, the Laws of Robbery and Lost Objects Ch 5; Maimonides, Guide for the Perplexed, Vol. 3, ch. 40). Consequently, a non-Jewish king is not subject to the restriction applied to Jewish courts with regard to punishment of criminals.
____
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/may2004/050504bombsinwtc.htm
NBC: FDNY Chief of Safety Reported Bombs Both Within the Towers and on the Planes on 9/11
Paul Joseph Watson/Dan Perez | May 5 2004
What
you will hear is a clip from NBC reporter Pat Dawson on the morning of 9/11. In
it he discusses the comments of Albert Turi, the Chief of Safety for the New
York
City Fire Department.
Turi reported not only that there were numerous secondary explosions within the towers but that there was also a bomb on one or both of the planes that crashed into the towers. This would explain why video footage shows both planes emitting strange flashes before they hit the towers, as well as the 'pod' on the underbelly of Flight 175.
We have dozens of reports from firefighters and others on the scene who witnessed bombs going before and during the towers' collapse. Larry Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center complex, admitted in a PBS documentary that they decided to demolish Building 7 on the day of 9/11, despite the official story of it accidentally collapsing which has remained in place to this day.
_____
By LESLIE MILLER
Associated Press Writer
May 6, 2004, 3:53 PM EDT
WASHINGTON -- Air traffic controllers who handled two of the hijacked flights on
Sept. 11, 2001, recorded their experiences shortly after the planes crashed, but
a supervisor destroyed the tape, the government said Thursday.
A report by Transportation Department Inspector General Kenneth Mead said the
manager for the New York air traffic control center asked the controllers to
record their experiences a few hours after the crashes, believing they would be
important for law enforcement.
Sometime between December 2001 and February 2002, an unidentified Federal
Aviation Administration quality assurance manager crushed the cassette case in
his hand, cut the tape into small pieces and threw them away in multiple trash
cans, the report said.
The manager said he destroyed the tape because he felt it violated FAA policy
calling for written statements from controllers who have handled a plane
involved in an accident or other serious incident. He also said he felt the
controllers weren't in the right frame of mind to have consented to the taping,
the report said.
"We were told that nobody ever listened to, transcribed or duplicated the
tape," Mead said in the report sent to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who asked
the inspector general to look into how well the FAA was cooperating with the
independent panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks.
That panel learned of the tape during interviews with New York air traffic
control center personnel between September and October.
Mead said his office referred the case to federal prosecutors in New York, but
they declined to prosecute because of lack of criminal intent.
The report did not characterize the tape's destruction as an attempted cover-up
but said it could have been valuable in providing the public with a full
explanation of what happened on Sept. 11.
"What those six controllers recounted in a group setting on Sept. 11, in
their own voices, about what transpired that morning, are no longer available to
assist any investigation or inform the public," the letter said.
____
One World Religion unto Haha hashem satan the god of choice, by the choosers of the "Robber"
"Judaism and classical liberalism are not at odds ... indeed ... as a matter of history -- classical liberalism is deeply indebted to the Halakhic understanding of the Noahide Laws." (2000)
___
http://www.b2g5.com/boards/board.cgi?action=read&id=1066979749&user=moshiachlisten
The Rebbe has fulfilled all these
conditions . . . see "Countdown to Moshiach" by Rabbi Shmuel Butman
Shlit"a (Director of the Lubavitch Youth Organization ){http://www.moshiach.net/blind/count.htm
}
so basicly again your arguement is not with me but with my Rebbe King Moshiach
(May He live forever and ever !) as well as with the sources He is quoting
(Talmud Sanhedrin, Alsheich etc which explain Isaiah 52-53 as talking about
Moshiach going thru apparent suffering and death in order to purify the
generation. The Talmud is a book published in large quatitys throughout the ages
and it has been and is kept in Vatican as well as other Christian libarys and
learned by Christian researchers and laymen from time to time they quote this
explnation of Issiah 52-53 to try to bolster they lame (see www.drazin.com )
arguements for the Messianic status/divinity etc. of Yoshka and in a society
with a free speech this is a "normal" situation unless you go and make
a "blacklist" of all those theologians who do that and have them shot
:-)
On the other hand ther are two ways to look at anything there is a "golus
way"- a pesimistic defensive way and there is a Geulah way in the spirit of
"Ufaratzta!" "Moshiach NOW!" and "Yehi haMeleh
haMoshiah!"
It's hard to count how many times I have succesfully used Ishiah (Issaiah) 53
and the remozim on Ishaiah (Issaiah) from Chabad of Scotland and the like to
highten the awarenes of the immanent revelation of the Rebbe King Moshiach (May
He live forever and ever!) and thus motivate the listeners to improve their
observanse of Torah and in cases of the non Jews the 7 Noahide
Laws (which according to the Rambam we are to "forcefully
convince all humans to accept and observe" as a positive
commandment in the Torah of Moishe Rabbeinu a"h see some quotes of the
Rebbe King Moshiach (May he live forever and ever!) one the importance and
timelines of this here in English :
http://www.Noahide.com/rebbe.htm
___
Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that “A holy war will now begin in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.” Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: “Your churches will be used to teach the Jew’s religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect.” And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army. ...The Writings of George Washington U.S. George Washington Bicentennial Commission, 1941
___
http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/1999/6/18_5.html
Rosen, a staunch advocate of interfaith activities, says that
Buddhism
represents no offense to Judaism halachically. He points out that the
seven laws given to the sons of Noah, which Jews believe are incumbent
on all righteous people, do not obligate human beings to believe in God.
The seven Noahide laws
prohibit idols, he says, but what idolatry really
means is seeing power in inanimate objects and Buddhists certainly do
not. In fact, he adds, Buddhism is not bothered by the question of
belief in God.
___
Behold the creature the zionist-Churchizionians worship.....the gods, of their father SHEM...who is hashem of the shemites...their father the son of the first rabbi, Moshe rabbineau, the master of the hewn stone and lord of the secret chamber of the hewn stone, which was created by the shemite hand. Beware ye anti-gods, whom they call anti-Shemites, for their father was a murderer since the beginning....under Pharaoh's kingship. They never accepted God the WORD, but continue to cling to Horus, Abaddon, Apolluon.....their king
Listen to their godhood babbel and their lack of the source for their father, they hate authority and have no source since the golden calf they worship to this day.
Now they are passing legislation to forever silence opposition of their shemite godhood status unto their father the murderer.
http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=2902
Behold their so called invisible, untouchable, "Illuminati" who pull the earth's strings for their godship....haha-Shem
There are two mysteries that have defied explanation for as long as anyone can remember. The first mystery is anti-Semitism, which is a mystery because there are few things in the world that are as consistent, as universal, and as predictable as anti-Semitism. From one country to another, from one culture to another, from one religion to another -- although lifestyles, philosophies, and so forth are extremely different, there is one thing all of the people in the world have in common: They don't like Jews.
1Thes:2:15: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:
What do they know about Jews? Sometimes a lot, sometimes very little, sometimes nothing at all. And yet all of them have a discomfort with Jews. Some of the things anti-Semites come up with concerning Jews and Judaism, make us wonder, "What did we do? What could we possibly have done to cause them to suspect such a thing?"
See Talmud Bavli the Oral tradition of sickness and perversion and hatred and racial bigotry and murder and mayhem..........easy to find when you know that jewry is contrary unto all mankind
Jn:7:1:
After these things Jesus walked in Galilee:
for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.
For example, there's the accusation that Jews are plotting to take over the world.
hahahahahahahaheheeeeeeehoooooooooooooey.........hahahahahaheheeeeeeeee...olam hoodlam haha haba...see their New World Odor and their Satanic House Joint Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14, and their new legislation of a monitor for the gods and their hashem Baal
We have our faults, we're vulnerable to some legitimate criticism sometimes, but, plotting to take over the world? Where did that come from? In order to examine the mystery of anti-Semitism, one needs to have an understanding of its target, which is the Jewish people.
Satan the Robber they chose is the target, the Talmudic jewish People his children
But that's not so simple, and brings us to the second mystery: What exactly is a Jew? What is Judaism? A religion, a culture, a family, a nation? What? What is it about Jews that everyone hates?
Every one? See how they always have their separation of the them verses us garbage of Lucifer...but then again.............
Jews have always been called the "chosen people," because that's how we are described in the Bible.
Chosen for the Redeemer, who is the same today as forever, that Word which hath created everything created, the Word of God, who was made flesh and dwelled with man, who created man in his own image, chosen for Salvation, but "Chose" to reject the "Chooser" and instead "Chose for themselves their god of their own flesh the "Robber" of God's People in faith of the same Redeemer they rejected. Who are now chosen for eternal Damnation for Murder, for their father is the Murderer since the Beginning, and their beloved un holy city that whore jerusalem is bloodied with the murders of the prophets God rose early and sent and where Our Lord was crucified that spiritual Sodom and Egypt, where the saints will be slain at the hand of their choice, their haha Moshiach, who the Lord Jesus the Christ shall cast into the pit and all them with him who worship him and deny Jesus the Lord, these who are anti-Christ. These who "SAY" they are the seed of Abraham, but who do lie, for they are of the seed of the serpent they worship.
A more recent definition was provided by a non-Jewish professor at an Israeli University, a former priest who teaches philosophy. He was upset about the criticism of Israel when Israel went into Lebanon. He was more upset than the Jews themselves (who were being apologetic about it), so he held a press conference and said that Israel had every right to do what it did. It was a moral thing, it was the right thing, and so on. At the press conference, he was asked how he defines Jews. He replied, "A Jew is someone who is religious without knowing it, and this is true for all Jews from the extreme right to the extreme left." In fact, he said, this uniqueness is evident even in Jews who convert to Christianity.
Above the Laws of the LORD
These two descriptions of Jewish people, however, raise more questions than they answer. Chosen? Chosen for what? How did we get to be chosen? Why did G-d have to choose a people? And what does it mean to be religious without knowing it? How can a person be religious without knowing it?
Religion is man made, let them have their flesh and eat cake to their queen of Heaven...ISIS
On Being Chosen
Unto the Robber, who saith let my children come to me
In the story of Creation, we see that G-d doesn't "choose" anything. He decides beforehand what He wants to create and He creates it. What does it mean, then, that He chose the Jewish people? If He wants a Jewish people, He creates a Jewish people. To "choose" a Jewish people implies that all people were originally alike, but then G-d decided that He wanted one nation to do a special job, or whatever He chose us for, and so He went around and checked out the candidates and decided that He would choose us, and so we are the chosen people -- we're the Jews.
EXACTLY, WHAT THE "ROBBER" THEY "CHOSE" HAS DONE...THUS THEY BECAME THE THEM VERSES US IN ALL THE EARTH, CONTRARY UNTO ALL MANKIND
What that implies is that it could have been anybody -- it was a choice and G-d chose us, but He could have chosen somebody else and then they would have been Jewish. But this doesn't make any sense. If G-d wants a chosen people, then He creates one. And, if one is created chosen, then what's the choice? If there is really a difference, a uniqueness that makes the Jew Jewish, then what is there to choose?
Not much really when you give up the birth right
Living in America (Dual Loyalty to another nation) and being enamored with the idea of egalitarianism and equality and everybody being equal and everybody being the same, we're very uncomfortable with the idea of a chosen people and we try to minimize it, to neutralize it. We try to say that being chosen doesn't mean that we're different, it's just that, well, your grandfather could have been chosen but, uh, he wasn't educated, but our grandfather was already reading Hebrew, was already wise, so he was chosen.
But if that's the case, then what was the choice? A choice exists when there are a number of things that are truly equal, serving the same purpose and satisfying the same need -- there are many and you need only one, so you have to choose. But if there is only one that will satisfy your particular need, if only one "grandfather" had the qualifications to serve G-d in a specific way (while the other "grandfathers" satisfied other needs), then... what's the choice?
here come de rabbit hole and the briar patch philosophical doo doo, contrary to the WORD as it is Written
For example, if a person has a craving for an orange, and there's a bowl of fruit with one orange in it, and an assortment of other fruits, he takes the orange out of the bowl. That's not a choice. He didn't choose an orange over the other fruits; he wanted that orange in the first place. The orange is the only fruit that can satisfy his need, so it's not a "choice," because the other fruits won't do.
There's a Midrash in which G-d offers the Torah to the other nations, and each of them in turn declines it. So then He offers it to the Jews, and they accept. Does this mean that anyone could have been Jewish, whoever accepted the Torah first?
Not at all. On the contrary, the point of the Midrash is to demonstrate that nobody could accept the Torah other than Jews, because the Torah is meant specifically for the Jews and the Torah fits only the Jews. In other words, this Midrash doesn't mean that G-d offered the other nations kashrut and Passover. It wouldn't make sense to come to the Egyptians and command them to eat matzah and maror because of the suffering of their forefathers in Egypt. G-d came to the other nations and offered them not the 613 mitzvahs of Torah that are addressed to Jews. He offered them the seven mitzvahs which the Torah demands of them and said, "Do you accept these seven mitzvahs without hesitation and without question?" And they said no; they first wanted to hear what the commandments were before accepting. Whereas when G-d came to the Jews and offered us the 613 commandments, we didn't say we wanted to hear a few examples. We accepted.
Moses gave the Law, Ha Moshe Rabbineau Hashem and they accepted, while worshipping a Golden Calf of Nimrod, Because the People wanted to Kill Him
So it certainly doesn't mean that G-d went around asking other people whether they wanted to be the Jewish people. They weren't Jewish and they weren't going to be Jewish. If you want Jews, you go to Abraham; if you want Egyptians, you go to Egypt. There is no choice.
If you want to be the seed of Abraham by faith in Jesus Christ you Go directly to the WORD the IAM the Creator
One further consideration. The statement that we are the chosen people comes from the description of the giving of the Torah.
The Giving of their Oral Traditions of Talmud Bavli Mishnah Torah, after they rejected the WORD of God, while worshipping their "Robber" god of Egypt and Babylon
Just prior to the giving of the Torah at Mt. Sinai, G-d commanded Moses to tell the people to prepare to receive the Torah and become to Him "a chosen people." But if we think about it, we realize that G-d was referring to the people whom He had already taken out of Egypt, with ten plagues and with miracles and with the crossing of the sea and so forth, because they were Jewish. He took them out of Egypt and brought them to Mt. Sinai, in order to give them the Torah. If they became a "chosen people" upon receiving the Torah, the question is, who were they until then? They certainly weren't strangers to G-d. They were obviously already distinguished; they were already earmarked for something special. Otherwise, why did G-d take them out of Egypt?
ok here cometh the double whammy of the Lie of their Father......the serpent
What Is a Jew?
The chosen aspect of being Jewish is not really a description of the Jew. A Jew is a created condition. G-d created grass, trees, stones, water, animals, humans, and Jews.
Hoooooooooooooey hoodlum ha ba the Master Race of gods
A Jew is a unique creation, so the soul of a Jew is inherently and basically different than the soul of a non-Jew. The Kabbalah says that all things were created by what the Torah refers to as G-d's speech. G-d said, "Let there be light," and there was light, etc. All creation came about through G-d's speech, except the Jew.
Exactly Right, All mankind was Created By the Word Of God which hath Created everything which hath been Created, that Same Word which hath been Made Flesh the redeemer they rejected. They openly admit their father is the Murderer since the Beginning and is not the Creator. Their Father is the rebel, thus they rebel against Mankind and they rebel against the WORD of God, Jesus the Christ the Lord Almighty the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last.
The Zohar says that the soul of the Jew was created by G-d's thought -- thought rather than speech. Speech is something you can do or not do. "There is a time to speak and a time to refrain from speaking." Thought, on the other hand, is not something one can discontinue; thought goes on constantly.
Soon the Lord will forget about what he was thinking
That which is created by speech is finite because there was a time when G-d had not yet said "Let there be light," so before He said it light did not exist and after He said it, it did. So the world once was not, and now it is, and therefore it's finite and limited. But the statement that the soul of a Jew comes from G-d's "thought" means that the soul of a Jew is not something that comes from an external expression such as speech, but rather from an internal, personal, intimate place similar to thought. Therefore the soul of a Jew is a part of G-d and not a creation at all.
a Part of their god, a figment of imagination, who will soon vanish from memory
The essence of a Jew, that which makes him Jewish, is his soul, and his soul is not a creation. The soul of the Jew is an eternal, infinite part of the eternal, infinite G-d; the Jew is a piece of G-d. Whoever has this soul is Jewish. Whoever doesn't have this soul is not Jewish, but rather is a human being created by G-d, created in the six days of creation through G-d's speech.
Yes, they are Contrary unto All mankind, said the Lord's Spirit, through his messenger Paul the Apostle.
Now for some deep doo-doo of talmudic jew voodoo
[Wherever the Torah (Oral Tradition) talks about a convert, the expression used is never "a non-Jew who converts to Judaism," it's "the convert who converts to Judaism." A non-Jew can not become a Jew, and a Jew can't become a non-Jew.
(Unless he Converts to faith of Jesus the Christ, according to the Promise, then he is Born again where their is no difference between jew or greek, and no wall of partition)
"The convert who converts" means there are three kinds of people. There is the Jew, there is the non-Jew, and there is the convert before he converts.
Mt:23:15:
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
So a convert is someone who is something between Jewish and non-Jewish until he converts, and then he becomes fully Jewish.
any who "SAY" they are jew are jew, and are anti-Christ and contrary unto all mankind
Some people are born non-Jewish and are therefore not Jewish, yet they carry within them some spark of a Jewish soul that demands and yearns to go back to being Jewish. Therefore, the person can't rest until he has converted.
Isa:50:11:
Behold, all ye that kindle a fire, that compass yourselves about with sparks: walk in the light of your fire, and in the sparks that ye have kindled. This shall ye have of mine hand; ye shall lie down in sorrow.
A person in this condition, who has the spark or dimension of a Jewish soul (not Jewish "qualities" that we think we can recognize, because Jewishness is a part of a Jewish soul and it's not visible), feels uncomfortable and his soul forces him to convert. That's why the traditional response to a would-be convert is to discourage him. We put him off and tell him it's difficult and not worth it, it's dangerous, and so forth. If he refuses to be discouraged, we know he is this kind of convert who is moved by some spark in his soul to become Jewish and it is irresistible - he himself cannot say no to it.]
We find throughout the Torah statements that have parallels. For example, we are told to love G-d our G-d with all our hearts, all our souls and all our might; and we are told to love our fellow Jews as ourselves. Another example is that we are told that just as we must fear G-d, we must fear the tzaddik (righteous person).
haha Moshiach ben Final Tzadik ha ben hashem satan, the son of Perdition
The Massah Race of Supreme Beings ala Hitler the Nasi Style
In other words, anything we're going to do for G-d, we must do for our fellow Jews, and anything we must do for our fellow Jews, we must do for G-d. We are to treat other Jews as Divine beings, because that's what they are, and that's why to love G-d is to follow commandments but also to love each other. Our feelings for G-d carry over to the parts of G-d that exist in this physical world (our fellow Jews), and our feelings about these parts of G-d eventually carry over to G-d Himself.
What we're talking about is the soul of a person, and the soul is G-d. When we refer to the Shechinah, the feminine part of G-d, the part of G-d that dwells on earth, the part of G-d that is within us, it means the collective Jewish soul.
their Polytheistic Ha-morphydite god
That's the part of G-d that dwells on earth, and that's why it has been said by non-Jewish theologians that Jews are the presence of G-d on earth. (Judeo-Churchizionians) That's why those individuals in history who have excelled in a hatred of G-d were determined to wipe out the Jews,
these they call .......anti Shem-ites....against them the gods hahashem
because the Jews are G-d's presence on earth. There are two different and distinct entities: the human being, and the Jew who is that part of G-d which He invests into creation. There's really no choice.
Knowing what a Jew is, a part of G-d, the disturbing question is: Why would G-d send a part of Himself into a finite, limited, and sometimes even gross physical condition? It doesn't seem right and it doesn't seem appropriate for a Divine Being to be present in such un-G-dly conditions. So why would G-d send the soul from the highest heights down to the lowest depths? The question comes from the recognition that the soul of a Jew is not part of creation, and we therefore wonder what the soul is doing here in the created world.
The First Commentary
Rashi asks a question about the first verse of the first chapter of the first book of the Torah, "In the beginning G-d created Heaven and earth." Rashi's question is, why does the Torah (Mishnah of Talmud Bavli) begin with a description of creation rather than with commandments? Since the Torah is basically a book of commandments (Of the rabbi's who sat upon the seat of Moshe Rabbineau) and a guide as to how we should behave in our daily life, the Torah should get right down to instructing us on our behavior. And yet it begins with a lengthy description of creation and the history of what happened from creation until the giving of the Torah. Rashi answers that this was done because there would come a time when the nations would accuse the Jews of being crooks and imperialists. They would say, "You stole the land from the nations!" Therefore, the Torah begins with the story of creation so that we will know how to respond to this charge.
We will say: "G-d created Heaven and earth. Earth belongs to G-d. G-d gave it to the Canaanites for a while, then he took it from them and gave it to us." So our answer is that we can't "steal" the land because it belongs to G-d, and G-d gives it to whomever he wants.
The Lubavitcher Rebbe, commenting on this Rashi, asks: All this, a book and a half, so that we will know what to say to an anti-Semite who calls us crooks? This doesn't seem right. In addition, couldn't Rashi find a more appropriate explanation for a five-year old (Rashi wrote his commentary for children)? Does a five-year old have to know about anti-Semitism and imperialism?
and of course here cometh Schneerson...the Final Tzadik, the One who was and is not and yet is to come, who is the seventh rebbe and is even the eighth...........
The Rebbe points out that this Rashi, which is basically a quote from the Talmud, doesn't say "the Land of Israel." It doesn't say we will be accused of stealing "the Land of Israel" -- it says that we will be accused of stealing the land of the nations. What is "the land of the nations"? In addition, Rashi doesn't say that this is the response to the accusation of an anti-Semite. This is a response to the Jew who thinks that the anti-Semite in this case might be correct. Why would a Jew agree with an anti-Semite? For this, we need to understand exactly what it was that happened at Mt. Sinai.
so goeth the lie of their father of lies, them who slew the Lord Jesus Christ the redeemer
When the Jews left Egypt, they were told by Moses that they had to leave Egypt because the Egyptians were not a holy people and they, the Jews, were to become a holy people, a kingdom of priests. How was this going to happen? By receiving the Torah at Mt. Sinai.
( The Mountain in the Valley of their SIN)
So the Jewish people came to Mt. Sinai expecting to hear "Heavenly things." But what were they actually going to hear? They were going to hear, "Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Honor your mother and father." They wouldn't have survived the shock.
Therefore Moshe Rabbineau, their chief rabbi of the Sanhedrin, gave them a set of his laws
Therefore, they needed some kind of introduction, some kind of warning that what was about to be revealed was going to sound very simple and down to earth. They needed such a warning because they were expecting spiritual, holy, Heavenly things, and for good reason -- they had just been told that they had to leave Egypt because they were a holy people. They were not going to understand these "pedestrian" commandments; they'd think, "Here we're gathered at Mt. Sinai to become a holy people, and we're told not to steal?! You told us not to work on Shabbos, but what about the rest of the week? If we're a Heavenly people, we shouldn't work on any of the days! If we're a Heavenly people, it's not enough to say 'don't steal' -- we shouldn't have money altogether! What do You mean, run an honest business? We shouldn't be running businesses at all! What do You mean eat kosher animals? How does that make us holy? We shouldn't eat at all! We should be fasting as much as possible, and if that means dying, so what? We belong in Heaven anyway!" In short, what they would say is: "If we are a Heavenly people, then what are we doing on earth? Why are we engaged in earthy activities?"
Because the flesh and mammon has become your gods, reply ha Moshe Ha ha rabbineau
Therefore, it's not only the anti-Semite, but also the Jew who is bothered by this question of Jewish people occupying earthly land, and the Jew thinks: "Wait a minute. We're trespassing. We are taking away the land of the nations."
No just murdering the Palestinians and the Iraqi's and any who oppose your self appointed godhood
Which nations? You name it. Wherever Jews have gone, they've been accused of taking away someone's land, of trespassing. We went to Spain. We were told, "You can't stay here, this is not your place." We went to France, England, Poland, Germany, Russia. They each had their expulsion dates when Jews were thrown out because we were occupying someone else's land and we had to move on.
Because they are an abomination and contrary unto all mankind in their Talmudic perversion of their Oral tradition, which makes the WORD of God of none effect
Every country we've been to has made the same argument, and the argument is: "You are a Heavenly people, it says so in the Bible. So fine, go to Heaven. But if you're going to live on earth and be normal human beings, then you're trespassing. This is our property. It belongs to the nations of the earth."
Strangers in a Strange Land
The world belongs to the nations. We are not of the world, we are of Heaven. We are strangers so we're trespassing on their land. Which land? Any land. Earth belongs to the nations of the world (which is why they're called the nations of the world).
Yet they deny the KINGDOM OF GOD through Christ the LORD, so they want all the earth and it's inhabitant's to be their servants as the gods unto their god of this world, their god, satan
So G-d starts the Torah not with the first commandment, because the commandments are all related to the physical world and we wouldn't have been able to understand. G-d first had to warn us by telling us that in the beginning He created Heaven and earth. Heaven is not any more a place for G-d than is earth; the Heavens also were created by G-d. Therefore, the part of G-d which is the soul of the Jew doesn't belong in Heaven any more than it belongs on earth.
The reason for the existence of Heaven is that it was a stepping stone toward the creation of the earth. The purpose of creation is to reveal G-dliness that is not immediately evident in the physical world, to bring that which is otherwise un-G-dly to G-dliness. How is this to be done? By having the Jewish soul come down into this world to engage in physical, worldly activity, but from a G-dly perspective, that is, through the mitzvahs of Torah.
Hoodlum Haba of the rabbi's who deny Jesus the Christ
The Torah says that Jews are to be a light unto the nations of the world.
And Jesus is the Light unto the gentile's a name they trust. The Chosen, By faith, the seed of Abraham, according to the Promise, made priest and Kings unto the Lord Jesus and his Father, the same WORD they rejected since the beginning. Giving up the birthright for their mammon their god the "Robber" that they choose, over Salvation which was promised.
This means that whereas the nature of the physical condition seems to imply that the world created itself, and therefore has no allegiance to the Creator and is not indebted to a Creator, when we do mitzvahs in the physical world, using physical objects, we reveal a fundamental truth. The physical world is not something separate from G-d, but is G-d's creation, created for a G-dly reason, which is to reveal the G-dliness that is concealed within the physical condition.
Looking at a table tells us nothing about G-d. On the contrary, it distracts us from G-d. It seems to be saying, "Look! I'm a table! Been here all along. I'm a reality unto myself." But by doing mitzvahs within the physical world, we make it a bit more transparent, like washing the dirt off of a dirty window so that we can see through it more clearly. We can see that physicality is not meant to block G-d out; on the contrary, it, the physical thing, can become and must become a window to G-d.
Vodoo, the Talmudic joo and rainbow stew
This is what elevates the world and gives it a G-dly purpose. If we don't elevate the world, the world remains what it appears to be, which is a contradiction to G-d.
A Jew is therefore a G-dly being sent to this world on a mission. So the Jew experiences a certain discontent, which is unique to Jews, and the essence of that discontent is: "Why am I here? What am I doing here?" Every human being asks himself this question, because every human being has a desire to accomplish something. For an intelligent person, life has to make sense and have a purpose. But with a Jew it's slightly different. Intelligent beings ask, "How do we make the most of this existence?" The Jewish condition is that inwardly, consciously or unconsciously, we not only want to know how to make the best of life, but we don't understand why there's life at all. Everybody can ask this question in a philosophy class, but the Jew is truly bothered by it, bothered in his gut. What is this all about? Not, "How do I make the most of this life?" Not, "What am I supposed to do?" But, "Why life? Why existence at all?"
ONE REASON, to Give Testimony and Witness of the CREATOR, the WORD of God the Savior, the REDEEMER, the ONLY LIVING WORD, Jesus the Christ, the Purpose God hath Purposed upon all mankind against the "Robber" the Assyrian............
And because we find it difficult to answer that question, we find a disproportionate number of Jews in the world who don't know what to do with themselves. It's not an exaggeration that although we are less than 2% of the general population in the US, at the same time we are over 40% of all the cults, of all the searching, of all the revolutions and upheavals and changes that take place in the world. This is because we are not content; we sense that something to do with the very condition of existence needs to be explained, and we are not finding an explanation. So we're ready to turn everything upside down and throw everything away and start all over again in order to find the justification for existence.
The Jewish Mission
A non-Jew gives charity and a Jew gives charity. But they are doing two different things.
When a poor person comes to a Jew and asks for something to eat, the Jew is actually lowering himself to give the poor person a meal, because this is not his field.
They do it so that men can see them do it
The person hasn't asked for spiritual nourishment, for Torah. He's asked for mundane, everyday, physical nourishment. Stomachs and food -- where does that fit in? We are a G-dly people, we have G-dly souls. Our place is in Heaven, in fact higher than Heaven because Heaven is also a created place, and we are a part of G-d. When the Jews came to Moses in the desert and said, "We need meat," Moses turned to G-d and said, "Do you hear what they want from me? They want me to provide them with meat! I'm a teacher, a Rabbi, a prophet, and they want me to give them meat?! What has the world come to?" And G-d said, "Yes, give them meat."
Tell them of Jesus the Christ, and the sparrow and the Lilly
So every Jew, when he is faced with someone who is hungry, could say, "This is not my business. My business is with G-dly things, holy things." But G-d said, "Keep kosher, eat kosher animals, don't eat non-kosher animals. If you see someone is hungry, feed him. If someone needs clothes, dress him. If someone is sick, heal him." So we say, "OK, if that's what G-d wants, we'll do it. It's not our line, it's not our field, it's not our place, but it's our mission. And because it's our mission, we will leave our place and get involved with the physical world; we'll feed the hungry, dress the poor, heal the sick, and so on." (But only the fellow jew)
This explains why the first instruction given to the first Jew, Abraham, was that he should go away from his father's home and his birthplace, go away from his natural condition, tendencies and impulses. This applies not only to the first Jew but to every Jew, to every Jewish soul. Every Jewish soul is told by G-d, "You must leave your place with Me, your native home, and go to the place I will tell you. Not to the place where you belong, but to the place where I will send you. Leave the place in which you belong and fulfill the mission for which you are sent to earth. That mission is to obey My commandments."
saith the "Robber" and Rob the Lord's People
When a Jew gives tzedakah, he's basically a Divine (Divinity-Deity) being accepting human obligations; he is basically humbling himself, lowering himself into the worldly human condition. When a non-Jew gives charity, he is basically a human being trying to elevate himself to something more Divine. So are the Jew and the non-Jew doing the same thing? Not at all. They're doing opposite things. The same act, but coming from opposite directions and accomplishing opposite results.
the non Talmudic jew of Jesus giving from the heart.
the Talmudic jew giving alms to be seen of men, the spark of their holiness unto their flesh god.....mammon
A non-Jew once heard this and he told me, "That explains something. I always wondered why Christianity is so unforgiving, so condemning. Whereas in Judaism, if you fail, so you'll do better next time, you'll try again. A Jew is a Divine being sent to do something for the world, to accomplish something, to bring some G-dliness to the worldly condition. By eating kosher food, he does something for the animal kingdom, he gives animals a purpose within G-d's scheme of things.(see www.samliquidation.com/baaltax.htm)
If he didn't keep kosher yesterday, what will happen? He'll keep kosher today. If he doesn't do it today, he'll do it tomorrow. But he'll do it because that's what he's here for. For the non-Jew who makes it his goal to become Divine, well, if you didn't do it, you're not Divine. If you didn't arrive at some Divine condition, then you're nowhere, you're where you were before, nothing's been accomplished. And that's why no matter how much good you've done, if you still lust in your heart, then you're condemned because you're still human. What have you accomplished?
faith in HIM who died for our sins, Jesus whom you slew, who will soon cast your carcase into the pit with your mammon and your false Christ haha moshiach ben satan
Nothing's changed because you're still human. So unless you can stop lusting in your heart, and become superhuman, you haven't accomplished anything at all and you're damned and that's the end of it."
And that my friens about sums up haha satan and his Talmudic Chassidic Pharisaic Chabad Lubavitch Stooges of Hoodlum haha haba, the Talmudic jew world odor, which you see rapidly developing and Bush-ka-Schneersons HJR 104, Public Law 102-14 of Universal Noahidism that One World Religion unto their god the "Robber" making them the gods, as the days of old as in the days of Noah
Anti-Semitism
Let's return to the question of anti-Semitism. The non-Jew comes to the Jew and says, "What are you? Explain yourself." What do we respond?
We are the serpent seed, a good start.
We make up stories, we make excuses, we start from Adam and Eve, we discuss Noah, and we give a history lesson, but we don't answer the question. Sometimes the question is asked more bluntly: "You are the chosen people. It says so in the Bible. What does this mean?" To which we respond, "Chosen? I don't know about chosen, maybe we're a little different . . ."
The non-Jew can't get a straight answer. Jews don't give straight answers to this type of question because we don't know how to answer. We don't know what we are because nobody ever answered that question for us. We were told we're Jewish, our mothers are Jewish, our grandparents are Jewish, so we're Jewish and that's it. But the non-Jew isn't asking, "Who is a Jew," he's asking "What is a Jew," and we don't know, so we fake it and we make up stories that don't hold water.
we LIE
But nobody in the world believes for a moment that we don't know who we are. They reason that if they were the chosen people, they would know it. How can you be chosen and not know it? It's ridiculous. So when the non-Jew comes to the Jew and the Jew says that he doesn't know and can't give a straight answer, what is the non-Jew supposed to think? He goes home and asks himself why the Jews won't give a straight answer.
Because they LIE
REV 2:9
9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
So if there are some Jews in Minsk, for example, he figures the Jews of Minsk are up to something, they're out to do something terrible and they're trying to hide it. What could they be doing terrible in Minsk? They must be poisoning the well. And when he hears from his cousin in Paris that the Jews in Paris also don't tell anybody who they are, and when he hears that the same thing is happening in Morocco, the Jews there don't tell anybody what they are either, he thinks, "This is a global plot!" What else should he think? And what's a universal global plot? To take over the world. This actually makes sense -- what other excuse could there possibly be for people who are supposed to be G-d's chosen people, it says so in the Bible, yet won't answer, won't tell anyone what they're about?
see Israeli jews caught in Tenneesee @ www.rense.com who would not tell who they are and what they are doing
5-11-2004
http://home.att.net/~professorboris/SPECTRE/JohnsonCity.htm
Anti-Semitism obviously has other causes but it also comes about when we behave the way we shouldn't, and the problem occurs because we behave mysteriously. We don't talk straight or know what to say about ourselves, and they find that hard to believe.
Kol Nidre of Divinity?
We are causing suspicion by not being able to answer their questions We've seen this over and over again with Israel in recent years. When Israel tries to lean over backwards and be super-nice to the Arabs, it's misunderstood. It's taken as a sign of guilt, because if you're right, if you did right, then you have nothing to apologize for.
Murdering rock throwers and ethnic cleansing? With the Blessings of the Judeo-Churchizionazi's in ah ha name ah ha Jaysoose, gimme aen amean brotha's and sista's
So we say, "We're not apologizing, it's because we're nice, it's because we want peace." But nobody buys that, nobody accepts that. When you win a war, you win the war, you don't give back anything. So they say, "Oh, the Jews give back because they feel guilty for having taken it; they must know that it's not theirs, and that's why they want to give it back."
When we try to be nice and we say, "Look, we're not the chosen people, you can be the chosen people, we're all the chosen people, we're not any different, we're like you, you're like us, we're just minding our own business, all we want to do is quietly live on the same street with you, pay our taxes and go to shul in the evening," our neighbors say, "No, that's not what you're all about. We know better. We know you are a Heavenly people because it says so in the Bible.
But I cannot find it in Mine of massah ribbeye? oops, the babel you speak of is your Torah Mishnah of Talmud Bavli and Qaballah the dark sentences of Mystery Babylon.
Our grandmothers told us Jews are a Heavenly people, so why are you walking around on the streets making like you live here, like you belong here? Tell us what you really are!" "Oh, I'm just the neighbor who lives down the street." "No, you're not. You're not from this block or this neighborhood or this city; you're not from this world! Therefore, tell me, explain what you're here for, what you're doing." "Who, me? I'm the same as you." "No, you're not the same as me! This is my land, my world, my created condition, and you come from some other world, so why are you here?"
to destroy all of mankind, why else, saith the deitist Talmudic joo
So we can't say we're ordinary people like everyone else because they see that we're not like them, we're a Heavenly people, and they want to know why we're pretending to be like them, why we're "stealing" their land.
To give an analogy, if a teacher came into a classroom, dressed like the students, and he sat down on the floor with the students and he said, "OK what should we do now?" -- everyone in the class would hate him. It would be unanimous. If he comes into the classroom with a good lesson prepared, and he's got something to say, a few will be disinterested, a few will be annoyed by the lesson because they don't want to learn, but the intelligent students will be thrilled and they will usually be the majority.
If You're Chosen, Act It!
I am
If we're going to come into this world and be the chosen people, then we have to stand up straight and act that way. Otherwise, we generate suspicion. If we walk into the classroom and we're from Heaven, a part of G-d sent into this world to do something for the world, and we sit there and say, "Well, I don't know. . . I have the same questions you have, and I have the same problems you have!" -- they're all going to hate us. We are the teachers, so we have to get up and teach or get out of the classroom.
here cometh Universal Religion of their haha Moshiach Ben Nioahide Laws of enslavement with out grace, by faith in Jesus the Christ
And this, in a nutshell, is anti-Semitism:
anti-Shem of ha shem the divine gods, who are anti-Christ and who slew Jesus the Redeemer, who live's forever more according to the Promise given to God's Prophets he rose early and sent, who they slew
"Either show me what makes you chosen and what you're sent to do, or get off of my property, you're stealing my land." That's why when we behave like Jews, when we behave like chosen people, nobody has any questions.
They all become jews for the fear of the jews, Judeo-Churchizionians, obedient goy Noahides unto the gods
Equality doesn't mean that we have to be the same. I've never heard of anybody who hates Einstein for being smart. If somebody's brilliant, a lot smarter than me, then fine, he's smarter, I don't hate him for that because there's no suspicion, I know exactly who he is. He's very smart, so he's the smart guy. And if somebody's Beethoven, I don't hate him for it or complain what gives him the right to have talent. A talented man is a person who uses his talents -- there's no mystery there and no hatred there. What's to complain about?
But when we stand around saying, "I'm not chosen, I don't know," then the world says, "You're not telling the truth. Why? What are you trying to pull? What are you up to? Why do you insult my intelligence by playing dumb? I've read the Bible, it says you're chosen, so why won't you admit it?"
and why did you give up your birthright and reject the Savior when he chose you for salvation and why did you choose the flesh Robber instead? I humbly ask? and Now why do you murder all who have been slain upon the earth since Abel?
I know a Baptist Minister who brings his class to Lubavitch House to hear and learn about Judaism.
Freemason Shabbos Goy Obedient proselytes of Freemasonry of apostate Solomon
He told me he took his class to one of the local synagogues, a non-Orthodox synagogue, and they talked about the chosen people, and the Rabbi there explained that he doesn't believe in this idea of chosenness; he rejects the concept as being contrary to egalitarian and democratic principles and therefore the whole thing is irrelevant to him, and the whole business of being chosen is an immoral concept. The Minister said that he talked to the students about it on the way home, and the students said that they didn't believe that Rabbi. In other words, they know that the Jews are the chosen people, and they didn't believe that the Rabbi was unaware or did not believe that he was chosen.
since they did not believe the Truth in righteousness (Jesus the ONLY Righteous), they are to be damed and perish, and God sent them strong delusion so that they believe the lie of the father of lies, the murderer since the beginning the "Robber" they have chose.
They found it very disturbing and disappointing, and they decided not to go back there.
The world is not only willing to accept that Jews are different, the world wants Jews to be different. The world is not only willing to enjoy the talents and uniqueness of the Jewish people, the world needs these talents and this uniqueness, particularly today.
Yep, see who controls all Pornography, Hollywood, the Media, Gambling, Mafia, etc....etc....the unbelieving lust of the flesh needs the Talmudic perversion of the gods
For example, why is Israel always in the news? Why is Israel blamed for the problems in the Middle East? Because they know that Israel can and will be the answer. Nobody else. Syria's not going to be the answer, nor is Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Russia, or any other country. The world wants leadership and who are they going to look to for moral leadership if not the Jews? They don't want to hear, "Oh, no, we're no different, we're no better." They're not willing to accept that and they don't buy it. It only makes them suspicious that we're up to no good.
So they will fall for the Talmudic Moshaich false Chriost ha Moshiach ben Satan their god of their fl;esh Hoodlum haha
When we're asked this question and we have to answer standing on one foot, we have to find the right words with which to convey our message. A Jew is a different kind of creature with a different soul, and our purpose on earth is to elevate the physical condition, thereby making it easier for all people to serve G-d.
and they shall raise themselves above the GOD the Father in Heaven
That's what we're here for. What makes a Jew a Jew is not the fact that we were chosen at some point in history, but that we were created this way to begin with -- a Jew is a piece of G-d sent to earth and in that there is no choice. When it says in the Torah that at Mt. Sinai we became the chosen people, the Torah is referring to that area where a choice would be necessary, in that area where a Jew and a non-Jew are alike, in the human condition which we do share with the non-Jew, which is the body and the physical existence.
When the Torah was given, the Jew's physical condition, the body of the Jew, was chosen. Although the Jewish body had been the same as other people's bodies, it was chosen at Mt. Sinai. From then on, the soul was not going to be a stranger in a strange land, in the body, but the body was going to become Jewish as well.
The Torah gives us instructions on how we are to bring a unique Divine soul into action in the physical world. Here you have a Divine soul, it's living on earth, it has a mission, but how is it going to operate -- what is it going to do? It doesn't want to eat, it doesn't want money, it doesn't want physical comforts, what does it want to do in this physical world.
all the above....see who has it
The Torah was given to us so that the soul can do physical things without compromising its Divinity. When the Torah says eat this way, this is a way that the soul can eat. When the Torah says dress modestly, conduct business honestly, etc., that makes it possible for a Divine soul to engage in these physical activities without doing violence to itself.
Talk oxy-Moronic
So what happened at the giving of the Torah is that our holy souls, which we had all along, which make us Jewish to begin with, gained access to the physical world because the commandments permit the Divine soul to do physical things in a Divine fashion. What that means is that not only is the soul Divine, but now, as a result of the Torah, the body becomes Divine. Our bodies were chosen at the giving of the Torah, but as far as our souls are concerned, we were always Jewish, and there was never any choice.
and now we be as gods
That's why there is no question about being chosen; the question is about what makes us Jewish. Where is the evidence? The class from the Baptist school once asked this question, "How does being the chosen people express itself?"
MURDER. The whore is responsible for all who were slain on the earth
This question was asked a short time after the raid on Entebbe, so I explained that the raid on Entebbe was a case where a seemingly political body, the State of Israel, had captives taken hostage in another country, and Israel had to do something about it. The way of the world is to negotiate, that's how it had been all along, but Israel came along and said, "No, we don't negotiate." It's against Jewish principle to give in to exorbitant ransom demands. It's an old Jewish law and we've had plenty of experience with it. The Rabbi of a community may not be ransomed for an exorbitant amount because this would encourage kidnapping, so the Rabbi of a community must be abandoned if the ransom is exorbitant. Therefore, Israel refused and said, "No we don't negotiate with terrorists. No ransom, no exchange of prisoners, nothing. Forget it." This was not a political move. Politically it was a very dangerous thing to do, because rescuing the hostages involved violating all sorts of laws -- the Israelis entered into the airspace of other countries and so on -- and yet the world was thrilled, because here was a political body that did something on purely ideological grounds. There was no other reason for it; they could have easily exchanged prisoners, they were doing it all the time in those days, and they chose not to.
Will the non-Jews accept this explanation? There's no question. When they're given this explanation, they feel relieved and unburdened; finally they understand that which was a mystery all these years, and they want to understand.
Mystery Babylon
To sum up, in being chosen, we have one of three options. Either we're going to continue to insist we never heard of it. Or we're going to continue to vacillate and not know whether we're coming or going, or what to say.
then when all the goyim's accept that we are god's we will force Universal Noahidism upon them and they will serve our false Christ...or else...off with their heads
Or we're going to stand up straight and say, "Yes, we're different, we're special, we're Jewish, we're created from G-d's thought. Yes, we are chosen and we therefore must live up to that title."
And the Lord had a second thought, by faith according to the promise, and you will be cast into outer darkness where there is a gnashing and gnawing of teeth forever, along with your Moshiach ben Satan
_______
Damascus Nuked by the jews, the whore and her Pimp, Bush-ka's Amaraka will set it up. When? will it be on their un-holi-day of Shavuot, May 26 2004?
http://masada2000.org/sharepain.html
SHARE THE PAIN
.
Israel Has Nuclear Weapons and MUST Use Them and All Those Arming the Arabs Must Share the Pain!
Israel must notify each of the Arab nations and their Western backers that, if Israel is attacked or is about to be attacked with unconventional weapons (or overwhelming conventional forces), there will be a "Share the Pain" response. Given the Arab world seems to be in unanimous agreement on the fate of Israel, one must presume any future action of each will likely be known by their partners. Even if they do not actually tell each other, nevertheless, their intelligence mechanisms will have penetrated each other's political and military organizations. So, in brief - they will know.
Therefore, Israel would be wise to notify each country that, either pre-emptively or as a vicious second-strike option, Israel will hit all hostile parties with nuclear weapons, regardless of who launched the first attack. Israel will hold all collectively and severally responsible - as if they had met and conspired together.
Let each of those nations now, in the interests of their own survival, become Israel's informant and protector. Let them task their spies in each of the Arab countries to dig for attack plans. Let them each demand of the others' leaders that they must stand down their plans to attack and destroy Israel. Let them, for their own survival, inform Israel and join in the pre-emptive attack or stand ready to see their cities evaporate along with those of Israel.
 |
One hundred or 200 nukes will reduce the hostile cities and army sites of the Middle East to rubble in minutes. Of course, the ensuing debris would also envelope those nations who sold the Arab world the weapons of nightmares. After all, they enjoyed the money and clearly understood that what they were selling was to be targeted at Israel.
Perhaps with a dedicated and credible deterrence, the Europeans selling weapons will make some effort, along with American Arabists, to have the Arab nations stand down their plans which call for the destruction of Israel and its replacement by an Islamic State. Perhaps the supplying nations, in their greed for future sales and the protection of the oil fields, will make an effort to dampen the Jihad (Holy War) enthusiasms of their Arab clients. However, should the Arabs decide to launch their final Jihad against the Jewish State, it's only fair that these weapons' supplying nations also "Share the Pain."
Martin
Van Crevel, a professor of military history at the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem, recently
put it this way... “Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the
world, but rather the second or third. Israel has the capability of
hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons. We have the
capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will
happen before Israel goes under.”
.
______
______
Three Persian kings
jason wrote:Open Secrets
ISRAELI NUCLEAR AND FOREIGN POLICIES
Israel Shahak
"Yet the same day Dayan promised Golda Meir to either conquer Damascus or at least reach its outskirts, and he repeated this at a government meeting. Then he went to the generals commanding the Syrian front. telling them: `Our troops need to advance no more than 5 or 7 km. From there we can reach Damascus which lies at the distance of only 25 km. further. This can be accomplished easily enough.' What he apparently expected was that after an initial offensive the Syrian Army would break apart and run away, in the same way as the Egyptian Army had done in 1967. In fact, his (and his generals') reasoning relied entirely on folk psychology: on their own preconceptions about `Arab mentality'. Theirs was a `strategy based on the presume~ psychology of the Arabs'. This strategy prevailed at the same meeting, when the commander of the Air Force, Benny Peled, proposed that Damascus be bombed from the air rather than conquered. Dayan responded: `The Syrians know that aircraft sows destruction but cannot conquer. But if we shell them with artillery, they will feel that we are about to conquer the city soon.'
But another factor also played its role. Brown records that `the State Secretary [Kissiryer] instantly receives the reports of all the movements of the Israeli troops. He is deliberately staying the political process in order to enable Israel to negotiate later from a more advantageous position. Kissinger is certain that Damascus will be conquered, to the point of having quipped to Dinitz [Israeli Ambassador in the US]: "As soon as you reach the suburbs of Damascus, all you will need for the rest is the public transport"'. He said it `ten days before the end of the war'. It was due to his interaction with Kissinger that Dayan insisted on `the conquest of Damascus within a few days'.
The role of Begin, then head of the Israeli opposition, was downright comical. Prompted by `the phone calls I keep getting from Sharon at the [Egyptian] front', Begin told Dayan that the conquest of Damascus was imperative `for the sake of liberating the Syrian Jews'. (He apparently meant those who would survive the bombing of Damascus.) Dayan dismissed him courteously. Dayan was still so sure that Damascus could at the very least be besieged by the Israeli forces that `he began to worry about what might happen to those forces in the vicinity of Damascus during the entire rainy season', i.e. the winter.
....Sarna's story is ominous because the fundamental aims of the Israeli army top commanders can be presumed to remain the same and the folk psychology guiding their decisions can be presumed not to have changed either. The ideas of fighting Syria with nuclear weapons are unlikely to have been discarded. The recourse to nuclear weapons on Israel's part, whether for the sake of obliterating the four mentioned Syrian cities or of Damascus alone seems to have been prevented in 1973 by the opposition of Golda Meir and Henry Kissinger, both of whom preferred Israel to conquer Damascus by conventional means.______
___
Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
END
_____
To: Officers, Rabbis, Key Contacts
1) A ban on military and dual-use technology exports to
Syria;
2) A ban on any financial assistance to U.S. businesses for their investments or
other activities in Syria.
3) Also, the President must impose two additional sanctions from a menu of six,
including a ban on U.S. exports to Syria, a ban on U.S. business investment in
Syria, downgrading the U.S. diplomatic representation to Syria (at present,
there is a U.S. ambassador), and travel restrictions on Syrian diplomats in the
U.S., and others.
Immediate Action Necessary
Urge your Senators and Representatives to support the
Syrian Accountability Act, S. 2215 in the Senate, and H.R. 4483 in the House.
Call Senators at (202) 224-3121 and ask for the office of your Senators. Call
Representatives at (202) 225-3121 and ask for the office of your Representative.
The following are talking points which you can use in your correspondence or
telephone calls to your Senators and Representatives as you urge them to sponsor
the Syrian Accountability Act:
Urgent Action Necessary
Write or call your Senators and
Representatives and ask them to co-sponsor and help pass S. 2215 in the Senate
and H.R. 4484 in the House, the Syrian Accountability Act. This is an important
part of the fight against the global scourge of terrorism and not only is it in
Israel's interests, but it is in support of the United States-led war against
terrorism. Call Senators at (202) 224-3121 and Representatives at (202)
225-3121. Or write to them at:
| Representative
_________________ U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 |
Senator
____________________ United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 |
For more information, please call us at (212)
613-8123.
RBS
BE
| For Immediate Release | ||
|
|
October 15, 2003 |
|
|
|
Cole's Statement on Syrian
Accountability Act
|
|
|
|
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R.
1828, the Syrian Accountability Act. It is time for Syria, quite
frankly, to make a choice. In Lebanon its troops have been there far too
long. The sponsorship of terrorist activity against the State of Israel
is no longer, and never was, acceptable. Finally, the porous borders
between Iraq and Syria which terrorists move across is a constant threat
to American troops. As our President has said, There is no middle ground in the war on terrorism. It is simply not acceptable to cooperate in some areas as Syria occasionally has, and yet to cooperate with terrorists on the other hand as it constantly has done. I am extraordinarily proud of the United States Congress for making this strong statement in a bipartisan fashion, and I hope the message will be understood and acted upon in Damascus. |
_____
____
The draft will come and they will send your sons and daughter to die for the whore and her pimp. When you see these things, Give me a amean brotha's and sista's in the name of your Talmudic Judeo- Jaysoose, who is not the Great IAM, Jesus the Christ.
___
____
___
US Jewish Groups Back
The reason the media of the talmudic jews are covering the so called torture of Iraqi's in detention.....is to cover up......
----
1 down, Saddam
2 Persian kings to go, Syria and Iran
Daniel 8
1: In the third year of the reign of king Belshazzar a vision appeared unto me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me at the first.
2: And I saw in a vision; and it came to pass, when I saw, that I was at Shushan in the palace, which is in the province of Elam; and I saw in a vision, and I was by the river of Ulai.
3: Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river
a ram which had two horns: and the two horns were high; but one was higher than the other, and the higher came up last.
4: I saw the ram pushing westward, and northward, and southward; so that no beasts might stand before him, neither was there any that could deliver out of his hand; but he did according to his will, and became great.
5: And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn between his eyes.
6: And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had there seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power.
7: And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and smote the ram, and brake his two horns: and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him: and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand.
8: Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven.
9: And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
the four departments of Homelandt "Say" Kurity
http://www.geocities.com/rachav/naaman.html
The story of Naaman is found in 2 Kings Chapter 5. He was the Commander of the army of the King of Aram (Syria) and a highly honoured one at that, because through him HaShem had granted victory to Syria. He was not only a great warrior though, he was also a leper (metzora), because he had (tzaraas) leprosy.
This word is popularly translated as leprosy, However, R' Hirsch demonstrates at length that these notions are completely erroneous.
Tzaraas is a
symptom of a spiritual malaise. The primary cause of tzaraas (leprosy) is
slander. It is also a punishment for the sins of bloodshed,
false oaths, sexual immorality, pride, robbery, and selfishness,
(Arachin 16a, Midrash). Thus tzaraas is a Divine retribution for
the offender's failure to feel the needs and share the hurt of others. G-d
isolates him from society, so that he can experience the pain he has imposed on
others - and heal himself through repentance. See Stones Chumash,
Lev. 13.2 commentary.
An example of this is found in the story of Miriam who spoke against Moses, and who was stricken with Leprosy by G-d as a result of her 'evil speech'. Numbers 2:10. We are not told why Naaman had leprosy, just that he suffered from it.
Naaman's wife had a young Jewish maidservant (slave), who knew of his plight and informed him that it was possible for him to be healed, if he would go to a Jewish prophet. Naaman's name means 'pleasantness', so perhaps that was why his young Jewish slave girl felt she wanted to help him, also in doing so she would be helping her people Israel.
Naaman went to
the King of Israel (Northern Kingdom) with a letter from his boss the king of Syria,
this letter said that the King of Syria
wanted the King of Israel to heal his servant Naaman. This didn't go
down too well with the king of Israel,
who felt that it was some sort of trap.
However, when Elisha heard that the king of Israel had torn his garments in
distress at what he feared was a trap, Elisha sent word to the king, telling him
to send Naaman to him.
Naaman came with his horses and chariot and stood at the entrance of Elisha's house. Elisha sent a messenger to tell Naaman to go and bathe in the river Jordan. Now of course Naaman took umbrage at this, in fact he got downright enraged about the fact that Elisha didn't even bother to come and speak to him personally, and 'stand and call in the Name of Hashem, his G-d, and wave his hand over the [diseased] area - and the leper would be healed!'
Naaman responded "Are not Amanah and Pharpar, the rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? Do I not always bathe in them? Have I become cleansed?" Then he turned and went in a fury. 2 Kings 5:12.
Naaman's servants
approached him and advised him "My father, had the prophet told you to do a
difficult thing, would you not have done it? How much more so [now] that
he has told you to 'bathe and become cleansed.'
So Naaman went down to the Jordan and immersed himself seven times as he was
commanded by Elisha, and immediately his flesh became like that of a young boy,
and he was cleansed.
Considering that one of the causes of 'tzaraas' is 'pride' it would seem that this was the thing which Naaman had to overcome. Having overcome his pride about dipping himself in the Jordan river as opposed to the rivers of Damascus.
It is interesting that Elisha told Naaman to dip himself seven times into the River Jordan, as seven is the number of the Noahide Laws.
Naaman offered to pay a tribute to Elisha
because of the healing, but Elisha refused even after Naaman urged him to accept
it. Naaman then asked permission to take a 'mule-team's load of earth' so
that he could offer burnt offerings to HaShem, as he swore that he would never
again worship or sacrifice to any other gods, but only to HaShem.
However, because of his position as Commander of the Army of Syria,
he asked permission to attend his king when the king went to the temple of
Rimmon to bow down there, the king would lean on the arm of Naaman, so that
Naaman would be forced to bow in the temple of Rimmon, so he asked that HaShem
would forgive him for this transgression. There is some dispute in Noahide
circles about the meaning of the response from Elisha about this.
Elisha simply said to Naaman - 'go to peace.' Some authorities have
said that this meant that Naaman would have to make up his own mind about this,
and eventually would refuse to attend the king in this way.
The story continues on about the servant of Elisha who did not have the same scruples as his master, Gehazi was a greedy man, and he decided to chase after Naaman and take something from him. Gehazi told Naaman that Elisha had sent him to beg 1 talent of silver and two changes of clothing from Naaman. Naaman actually gave Gehazi 2 talents of silver and the two changes of clothing and gave it to his two attendants, who took it to Gehazi in a secluded place, so that he would not be seen, Gehazi then hid these things in his own house. Demonstrating his greed.
When he next
stood before Elisha, he denied going anywhere. When Elisha questioned him about
it. Elisha told him that 'his heart had gone along with Gehazi' and
he knew what Gehazi had done. Elisha then told Gehazi that the leprosy of
Naaman would now cleave to Gehazi. When Gehazi left the presence of
Elisha he was [white] as snow with leprosy [tzaraas].
Remember some of the causes of leprosy?
It seems to me that Gehazi's sin was "robbery and selfishness!"
We can learn from this story of Naaman that repentance, and obedience to the commandment of a prophet will bring a blessing. Naaman at first did not wish to bathe in the river Jordan because he compared it unfavourably with the rivers of his own city of Damascus. He was proud and angry, when he was first told to dip seven times in the Jordan, but when it was pointed out to him by his servants, that his position was irrational, Naaman was willing to be persuaded, so his pride was tempered by his desire to be healed.
How many times
have we been asked to do some small chore and believed it to be beneath us, yet
that small thing could be extremely important. In Naaman's
case he had to accept the 'authority' of a prophet of Israel, a nation which was
conquered by his own nation Syria (Aram).
According to the commentary in Stones TeNaCh, Naaman was the 'unnamed archer'
who slew the wicked king Ahab. (see 1 Kings 22:34 Rashi)
This would account for the reason why it
says in the text of the Scriptures that HaShem granted victory to Aram
(Syria).
__________________________________
Five
to Midnight
by Israel Shamir
Unless some unexpected turn of events will occur, the sweet land of Palestine is doomed to perdition. The German-built, US-equipped nuclear-armed submarines of the Jewish state poised to wreck havoc in Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, make it abundantly clear - there is no way Israel will become a decent neighbour in the Levant.
The Jews were given a good chance to strike root in the land of Palestine and make peace with the native population. But they blew it.
The recent unprovoked Israeli air strike into the depth of Syria reminded those who had forgotten, that the Jewish state is an aggressive entity dangerous for the region. Thirty years of calm between Syria and Israel were dismissed by Sharon's generals as of no consequence. Nobody was fooled by their clumsy attempt to connect Syria to the bloody act of personal vengeance meted by the young woman from al-Halil whose brother and fiance were murdered and father refused medical help by the Israeli military. Insightful Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamed interpreted that well: "Israel has been urging America to invade Syria, but Americans seemed to be reluctant, so in order to force the US hand, Israel carried out the air strike"
The problem of Israel is not the problem of Palestinian suffering anymore; it is the problem of the entire region from India to Ethiopia and beyond (Esther 1). Indeed, the fifth column of Israel-supporters instigates wars all over the world, from Chechnya to the Philippines, from North Korea to Cuba. They push the world straight into Armageddon. John Bolton calls for a takeover of Iran, Murawiec demands to beat Saudi Arabia. The rabidly Zionist New York Post lifts its sights to France, "one of America's ugliest enemies" led by Chirac, "a moral pygmy whose lack of scruples is, fortunately, balanced by a lack of courage and power." "France should be made to suffer, strategically and financially. The French stabbed us in the back. In response, we should skin them alive", continues the newspaper, and judging by the Zionist record, this was not just a figure of speech.
The Jewish state is an extremely dangerous bundle of goods. It is part of Israeli military doctrine: act crazy, and people will be scared of you. The bogus threat of nuclear Iraq was modeled on the real threat of nuclear Israel. Its scientists practice chemical and biological warfare, as well. They actually tried nerve gas on demonstrators in Gaza, and water poisoning at the siege of Acre, as reported Abu Sitta in Al-Ahram.
Israel is involved in a long line of kidnapping and assassinations carried out on foreign soil. There is no immunity from the long arm of Israel: they killed in Norway (the notorious Lillehammer affair), they kidnapped in Rome (Vanunu affair), they bombed a British library and American consulate (Lavon affair), they sunk USS Liberty, they tried to assassinate Joseph Mugabe, they probably assassinated the anti-Zionist US Secretary of State James Forrestal, they were involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, as Michael Collins Piper in The Final Judgment makes clear, for the American president insisted on the nuclear disarmament of Israel. The recent assassination of Anna Lindh, the Swedish Foreign Minister, who supported a boycott of Israel, still remains a mystery.
They are not particularly secretive: today we know who assassinated Count Bernadotte in 1948, and who committed mass murder of German POWs in 1946, and who murdered the Egyptian POWs in 1956, for their perpetrators boast about it. Tomorrow we shall know who did other atrocities. But our knowledge won't help, for Israel is a safe haven for criminals. Whenever caught red-handed, Israel brushed away world public opinion, for as Ben Gurion, our first Prime Minister said, `what the goyim say is of no importance, only what the Jews do is of importance'.
This sad record refreshed by the air strike on Syria and the preparation for a nuclear strike on Iran proves there is no way to make Israel a suitable member of the community of nations. It also answers the question whether the peace efforts and attempts to roll Israel back to its old borders are still relevant. They are not. In the borders of '67, '48 or '73, Israel remains a bridgehead of aggression, a threat to world peace and a physical threat to world leaders. Like the bloodthirsty sect of Assassins, who once plagued the region, Israel-supporters undermine or murder better rulers, and support weaklings who are prepared to act on their orders. Israel's withdrawal from the West Bank will not change its nature. The leopard can't change his spots, as Jeremiah the prophet had said (Jeremiah 13:23).
Israel's behaviour is partly connected to the Jewish superiority complex, and its consequence, the apartheid structure. South Africa before Mandela was also involved in the destruction of its neighbours, Mozambique and Namibia, and in many plots elsewhere in Africa. This superiority complex should be treated by dismantling the apartheid state. The events of last year proved it beyond reasonable doubt. Dismantlement by peaceful means of democratisation is the only viable alternative to Israel's otherwise inevitable ruination. While bringing the brinkmanship policy to the level of `calculated madness,' Israeli leaders failed to predict they will bring to life a whole generation that does not care whether they are dead or alive.
Until recently, fear of Israeli retaliation kept its adversaries at bay. In 1991, the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had powerful WMD, but he did not use it against Israel, for he did not feel desperate. He believed the threat of Israel to destroy Iraq if he uses WMD. He thought that he can survive the defeat. He did not understand that the Israeli idea of war is drawn from the Jewish religious tradition that knows no mercy. If Saddam had known that the bodies of his tortured sons would lie in a Baghdad morgue, that he would be turned into a homeless refugee, that his country would be ruined by ten years of sanctions and afterwards become prey to a Zionist invader, he might well have been tempted to the Samson solution, and take the Jewish state with him into the nether regions in 1991.
Saddam Hussein is gone, but by now, every leader in the world knows what he should expect if Israel asks its American Golem for his head. Paradoxically, the very cruelty of Israel turned its threat into an empty sound, for if they will do their worst anyway, it makes no sense to surrender to their demands. Full story: groups.yahoo.com
Comment: Protocol XIX states: "In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt".
For centuries Europe had been gradually civilising its code of war and treatment of defeated opponents. World War I was the last war during which the European ethos of chivalry held sway, where for example enemy airmen killed in battle were buried with full military honours by their adversaries. Defeated statesmen and military leaders were not treated as criminals. Napoleon for example was comfortably exiled. World War II marked the era where Old Testament vengeance replaced European chivalry. Now adversaries - whether political or military - are treated as common criminals. Additionally, ordinary citizens who question some aspect of Zionism, Judaism or conventional World War II history or defend Christian or European heritage, are criminalised through race relations and human rights laws. Hundreds of individuals, young and old, including qualified scholars, have been fined and jailed for expressing some doubt about conventional Holocaust history, for example Dr. Toben in Australia, Dr. Faurisson in France, Ernst Zundel in Canada. Hundreds, treated as common criminals and thrown into jail with rapists, murderers and thieves, as per what The Protocols were predicting over a century ago.
The aftermath of World War II saw the trial of defeated enemies as common criminals to be hanged or imprisoned. They were charged under newly made laws. More recently the Nuremberg legal processes have been revived, and defeated Yugoslav politicians and soldiers are being tried as criminals. Saddam Hussein and his family and entourage, reminiscent of the Old Testament's Purim, have bounties placed on their heads like common criminals (K.R. Bolton, The Protocols of Zion in Context, p. 88-89).
_____
How the minions of satan, the jackbooted thugs of their hoodlum haba, of their ha Moshiach ben Satan, the Son of Perdition, Pulled it off, in their own words.
and it is all a lie of the great Liar, the father of all lies, who is their father, they who crucified the Lord Jesus the Christ who is alive forever and who warned us of what is happening, yet the whole world slumbers and is held captive
First Islam........then.........
Christianity, this is how they gain the
earth for their god, by proxy war
terrorist, the term used for any who are opposed to the shemites, who are to be labeled as anti-Shemitic, them who will not bow to the gods, the shems of ha-shem their father
The
War Against International Terrorism
by Professor Paul Eidelberg (a
"SAYER)
rebuttal in blue
Introduction
Although many of the framers of the American Constitution were not devout, their
political mentality was shaped in universities whose curriculum was based very
much on Jewish ideas. Accordingly, this essay will be divided into three parts.
The first part will show how Judaism, in particular the Five Books of Moses, (Oral
Tradition of Talmud Bavli Mishnah Torah)influenced
higher education in 17th and 18th century America. The second part will examine
the institutions prescribed in the American
Constitution and show their roots in Jewish laws and principles.
(see
protocols of satan's zionist elders of illumination)
The third part will consider how America
needs to return to its Jewish roots in the war against international terrorism.
A. Historical Background.[1]
1. No nation has been more profoundly influenced by the "Old
Testament" (
Not Bible, But Oral Tradition of the jews Talmud Bavli, their Babel)
than America. Many of America's early statesmen and educators were schooled
in Hebraic civilization.
The second president of the United States, John Adams, a Harvard graduate, had
this to say of the Jewish people:
a
Proselyte, made twice the child of hell
The Jews have done more to civilize men than any other nation.... They are the
most glorious Nation that ever inhabited the earth. The Romans
and their Empire
were but a bauble in comparison to the Jews. They have given religion to
three-quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and
more happily than any other Nation, ancient or modern.[2]
2. The curriculum at Harvard, like those of other early American colleges and
universities, was designed by learned and liberal men of "Old
Testament" persuasion.(jews
of Talmud Bavli)
Harvard
president Increase Mather (1685-1701) was an ardent Hebraist (as were his
predecessors, Henry Dunster and Charles Chauncey).
Mather's writings contain numerous quotations from
the Talmud
as well as from the works of Saadia Gaon, Rashi, Maimonides and other classic
Jewish commentators.
3. Yale
University president Ezra Stiles (Skull
and Bones of Mystery Babylon)
readily discoursed with visiting rabbinical authorities on the Mishna
and Talmud.
At his first public commencement at Yale (1781), Stiles delivered an oration on
Hebrew literature written originally in Hebrew. Hebrew and the study of Hebraic
laws and institutions were an integral part of Yale's as well as of Harvard's
curriculum.
4. Much the same may be said of King's College (later Columbia University),
William and Mary, Rutgers, Princeton, Dartmouth, and Brown University. Hebrew
learning was then deemed a basic element of liberal education. Samuel Johnson,
first president of King's College (1754-1763), expressed the intellectual
attitude of his age when he referred to Hebrew as "essential to a
gentleman's education."
5. This attitude was not merely academic. On May 31, 1775, almost on the eve of
the American Revolution, Harvard president Samuel Langdon, addressing the
Congress of Massachusetts Bay, declared: "Every nation, when able and
agreed, has a right to set up over itself any form of government which to it may
appear most conducive to its common welfare. The civil polity of Israel is
doubtless an excellent general model" (emphasis added).
6. The Higher Law doctrine of the Declaration of Independence is rooted in the
Torah, which proclaims “The Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” and appeals
to the “Supreme Judge” and “Providence.” Even though Jefferson, the
principal author of the Declaration, was no admirer of the Hebrew Bible, he
nonetheless framed the Declaration with a view to galvanizing a bible-reading
public in support of the American Revolution
See
Judge Roy Moore's Ten Commandments Monument which stated Natural Laws, "
Talmudic" Noahide Laws"
7. During the colonial and constitution-making period, the Americans, especially
the Puritans, adopted and adapted various Hebraic laws for their own governance.
The legislation of New Haven, for example, was based on the premise that
"the judicial laws of God, as they were delivered by Moses, and as they are
a fence to the moral law, being neither ... ceremonial, nor ha[ving] any
reference to Canaan, shall ... generally bind all offenders, till they be
branched out into particulars hereafter.” Thirty-eight of seventy-nine
statutes in the New Haven Code of 1665 derived their authority from the Hebrew
Bible. The laws of Massachusetts were based on the same premise.
he
makes reference to Talmud Bavli as the hebrew babel. this sickness is spreading
into the apostasy of the modern church
8. The fifteen Capital Laws of New England included the "Seven
Noahide Laws"
of the Torah,(Talmud
Bavli of satan their god)
or what may be termed the seven universal laws of morality. Six prohibit
idolatry, blasphemy, murder, robbery, adultery, and cruelty to animals, while
the seventh requires the establishment of courts of justice. Such courts are
obviously essential to any society based on the primacy of reason or persuasion
rather than passion or intimidation.
sanhedrin
57a. any who breach any law is death by decapitation
9. The seven universal laws of morality (together with their particular
branches) comprised a "genial orthodoxy. This genial orthodoxy transcends
whatever social or economic distinctions exist among men: it holds all men equal
before the law. By so doing it places constraints on governors and governors
alike and thereby habituated Americans to the rule of law. As a further
consequence, this ancient Hebraic orthodoxy dissolved or subordinated many
ethnic differences among immigrants in the new world. It moderated the demands
of various groups, helped coordinate their diverse interests and talents, and
thereby contributed to America's growth and prosperity.
and
it ridded the world of God's Holy Unction his Kings, he placed by Grace
10. Now, without minimizing the influence of such philosophers as Locke and
Montesquieu on the framers of the American Constitution, I believe America may
rightly be deemed the first and only nation that was explicitly founded on the
Seven Noahide Laws of the
Torah.(the
Pimp of the Great whore, Jerusalem and the leaven of the Pharisees, the chabad
Lubavitch chassidim of hoodlum haba the New World Odor, to their false god)
Indeed, the legislation of the several states comprising the Federal Union
embodied these laws—including the prohibitions against blasphemy and
adultery—well into the nineteenth century. It should also be noted that the
constitutions of eleven of the original thirteen states made provision for
religious education. Some even had religious qualifications for office.
B. The Institutions Prescribed by the American Constitution
1. The House of Representatives represents 435 districts of the United States,
where the people of each district elect one person to represent their views and
interests. The idea of district elections is implicit in the Torah.(Talmud)
“Select for yourselves men who are wise, understanding, and known to your
tribes and I will appoint them as your leaders” (Deut. 1:13). The word
“election” obviously comes from the word “elect,” and the “elect”
means men of high intellectual and moral character.
a. Exodus 18:19 states: “... seek out from among all the people men with
leadership ability, God-fearing men--men of truth who hate injustice.” Similar
qualifications are prescribed in the original constitutions Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. This is what the word
“election” means. It is not a democratic but an aristocratic term!
See
the treasonous criminals in Washington DC, who change the Laws of God to the
Laws of satan
b. So, each tribe must select the best men to be their representatives. Rabbi
Samson Raphael Hirsch comments that “each tribe (shevet) is to choose out of
its own midst men whose character can only be known by their lives [hence whose
character] is known only to those who have associated with them.” This is the
biblical source of residential requirements for Representatives and Senators in
the United States. Also, what is here called a shevet was called a district (pelech)
after the Second Temple.[3]
whited
sepulchres full of dead men's bones, beautiful outward but full of evil inward
c. Moreover, the idea of district elections conforms to the Jewish law of
“agency” (see
protocols, Freemasons)(Kiddushin
59a). This law synthesizes the “delegate” and “trustee” concept of
representation prevalent in the non-Jewish democratic world. Whereas the
delegate concept binds a representative to the instructions of his constituents,
the trustee concept allows him to judge whether adherence to these instructions,
when additional knowledge or new circumstances intervene, will harm his
constituents’ immediate and/or long-term interests.
d. Finally, it is a principle of Jewish law that “No legislation should be
imposed on the public unless the majority can conform to it” (Avoda Zara 36a).
Therefore HJR 104, Public Law 102-14 was imposed in 1991
This obviously requires legislators to consider or consult the opinions of their constituents. Hence representative democracy can be readily assimilated to Judaism simply by adding that representatives must be “men who are wise, and understanding.” This would make for a “high-toned” or aristocratic democracy, or a universal aristocracy. (Bear in mind that Israel is supposed to be a “Nation of Kohanim,” meaning a nation of noblemen.)
gods
in their laws
2. The Senate. The Senate represents the 50 states of the Federal Union; it
therefore represents the Federal principle. But the idea of federalism goes back
to the Torah and the twelve tribes. Each tribe had its own distinct identity,
its own governor and its own judicial system.
3. The Presidency. Unlike Israel, which has a Plural Executive or Cabinet
consisting of a prime minister and other ministers representing different
political parties in the Knesset, the United States has a Unitary Executive,
namely, the President. Of course the President has a Cabinet, but its members
cannot hold any other office and they are wholly responsible to the President,
not to any political party.
a. Now it so happens that a Unitary Executive is a Torah principle! Thus, when
Moses told Joshua to consult the elders when he was about to lead the Jews
across the Jordan, God countermanded Moses: there can only be one leader in a
generation. And if you look at tractate Sanhedrin 8a, you will see that Jewish
law opposes collective leadership. Nor is this all.
b. Just as a President of the United States must be a native-born American and
not a naturalized citizen, so a king
of Israel must be born of a Jewish mother and not a ger or convert.
Moshaich
ben Satan, false King, False Christ,
whom they hope to anoint soon in their secret chamber of Hewn stone.........
Tablets made with hands
4. The Supreme Court. Just as the American Supreme Court is the final
interpreter of the American Constitution, so the Great Sanhedrin is the final
interpreter of the Jewish Constitution, the Torah.
Making the Sanhedrin the Univerasal court of Noahide so- called justice in the world, which will slay any who stand firm for Jesus the Christ according to the Spirit of all Prophecy, the IAM
So we see that the American Constitution was very much rooted in Jewish principles. Now let us consider the importance of these principles in America’s war against international terrorism.
So, since the shem-ites, of their father Shem, who is their ha-shem, do not want any human to oppose them, they become anti-shemitic's and are then to be determined a threat to the gods, and must be slain from their flesh olam hoodlum haba of their false god ha-shem, ha Moshiach
C. The War Against International Terrorism
(anti-gods: anti-Shem-ites)any who oppose the "self Chosen"
setting the Christian apostates, who have fallen into total satanic complacency against Islam in the name of Jesus
1. Since 9/11, an “Axis of Evil” threatens mankind. It has been given various names: “Islamic fundamentalism,” “Islamism,” “militant Islam,” “Wahhabism,” etc. Each of these appellations is said to be an extreme form of Islam. The issue is of strategic significance. It is one thing to confront what may only be a fringe element of Islam; it is quite another if this element lurks in the heart of Muslims and can everywhere explode into fanatical fury. Moreover, it is one thing to win a war against a supposedly a marginal aspect of Islam. But whether America possesses the wisdom and perseverance to win a war against Islam per se and then transform a welter of Islamic regimes into democracies is problematic.
Democracy is Noahidism under bondage to the self made gods
2. In any event, no war can be wisely conducted and won unless the enemy is clearly defined. We need to know whether “Islamic fundamentalism” is authentic Islam.
the sting
a. No less than Winston Churchill referred to Mein Kampf as “the new Qur’an of faith and war …”[4] Apologists nonetheless select passages from the Qur’an that prescribe Islam’s “pleasant and peaceful ways,” while ignoring those that inspire Islam’s hate-filled and murderous fanaticism (22:39-41; 2:190).
and the Talmudist censor their Talmud Bavli, perversion and hatred for the goyim
b. In a mosque sermon in Qatar on June 7, 2002, the imam prayed to Allah “to humiliate the infidels… destroy the Jews, the Christians, and their supporters…make their wives widows, make their children orphans, and make them a prey for Muslims.”
c. A 1998 fatwa proclaimed, “one billion Muslims are capable of turning their bodies into bombs which are equal in force to all the weapons of … mass destruction possessed by the Americans.”[5]
3. We need to face the awesome truth that Islam’s most distinguishing and historically dynamic principle is jihad (holy war), and all four schools of Islamic law (Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi’i, Maliki) refer to jihad as a commandment to wage offensive war against infidels for the sake of Allah. Consistent therewith, Muslims have plundered, butchered, subjugated, and degraded countless Christian and Jewish communities from the time of Muhammad to the present day.[6]
How the zionist use their wolves in sheep's clothing to raise the ire of the sleeping apostate "Judeo-Churchizionians" to do their murder
That they exult in this history of savagery in the name of Allah — we saw them rejoice throughout Islamdom in the destruction of the Twin Towers — is all the more reason why certain Arab and Islamic regimes must be conquered, just as Nazi Germany had to be conquered before it was democratized.
we saw how Five Israeli Mossad, gave each other High Fives while taping the WTC destruction
4. The question is whether America has the moral resources to honestly define and confront mankind’s greatest enemy.
Let me answer you. Jesus the Christ will throw all who deny him into the pit with your wretched false Christ of murder and mayhim, whether you are joo or greek
Various Jews in Israel fear that because of its economic interests in the Middle East, America may sacrifice Israel on the altar of Islam.
and the jews of TALMUD Bavli will sacrifice the true sheep of Jesus Christ on the alter of Satan, then your god will turn upon you. Trouble is, them who are in Christ Jesus have eternal life, while you find your selves cast out forever
5. Obviously, the U.S. cannot wage war simultaneously against some fifty Islamic regimes. Accordingly, some commentators like Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute would have America proceed incrementally, beginning with the elimination of Iraqi tyrant Saddam Hussein. Baghdad would be first, followed by Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia.[7] From the demise of these Islamic tyrannies a chain reaction will supposedly follow and transform Islamdom.
Obedient Noahide Goyim under bondage to the gods...the shems
These commentators urge an American crusade to democratize (Noahidize) the Islamic world. Predictably, they conceive of this crusade in purely secular terms. They ignore not only the fanatical devotion of the Muslim masses to Islam, but the unappealing aspects of the secular democratic world which, as eminent western scholars admit, is steeped in moral decay. Democratizing dozens of Islamic states might not be an unmixed blessing for the billion Muslims that inhabit this planet.
6. If the war against Islam is to be won, the partisans of contemporary democracy will require a deeper understanding of what makes democracies preferable to Islamic (and other) tyrannies. These partisans invariably emphasize the freedom and equality enjoyed in democracies but absent in Islam. They overlook the fact that, unlike in former times, democratic freedom and equality lack ethical and rational constraints. Moral relativism infects the democratic mind and saps the will to overcome the absolutism of the Islamic mind. Lovers of democracy need to ask: What is there about democratic freedom that would prompt a person to restrain his passions, to be kind, honest, just? What is there about democratic equality that would prompt him to defer to wisdom or to show respect for teachers or parents?
hahahahahahaha look at amarika...bud. this one is a joker gone wild
7. The partisans of democracy need to recognize that the freedom and equality they exalt are morally neutral. In the war against Islamic barbarism democrats need to see that the sanctity of human life and the decency and civility still visible in contemporary democracy have nothing to do with democracy itself. They are rooted in the Bible of Israel (Talmud where it is ok to have sex with a three year old girl and one day) and in Greek political philosophy. Waving the flag of freedom and equality American style will not purge Islam whose believers are willing to die for Allah. If, however, freedom and equality are derived from the Jewish conception of man’s creation in the image of God — which alone can provide democracy with an ethical and rational foundation — and if democracy, so conceived and so proclaimed, rallies Christian America, it may then be possible to transform the Islamic world.
In ah ha name of the Judeo-Jaysoose
8. Merely to eliminate Muslim despots and institute democratic elections will accomplish very little. America must return to its Jewish roots. Remarkably, in 1991, Congress explicitly incorporated the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality in Public Law 102-14, which established March 26 as “Education Day”! The Seven Noahide Laws can provide the moral content for America’s “Operation: Enduring Tradition” against international terrorism. President George W. Bush, a devout Christian, is qualified to make the Seven Noahide Laws the ultimate justification of America’s war against Islamic civilization.
9. The Noahide Laws, though violated by all Islamic regimes that breed or harbor terrorists, are nonetheless laws which Muslim countries profess and should be required to abide by. If all nations complied with these laws, then war, instead of being the norm of international relations, would be a thing of the past.
And the decieved are slain on that great day of the Lord's Wrath.
Here come their plan of Censorship of the Koran......then of course the outlawing of the "anti-Shem-itic" New testament and Him who refused to walk in Jewry the King of the anti-Shem gods, Jesus the Christ. Any who are caught standing Firm will be determined a "Terrorist" against the shems, by their Homelandt "SAY" Kurity and their freemason AshKroft, and be decapitated to their laws od Sanhedrin of their elohym judges
Take note of the term decapitation, for it is being pushed upon the Amarikan People the Proles daily to get them immune to it.
10. Muslim youth need to be taught that the Noahide Laws come from the Torah, that they unite Jews and Christians, that Islam would never have come into existence had not Muhammad learned from Jewish and Christian teachers.
Then of course Christianity would never have come they are saying if not for Judaism, which is satan's lie, for Jesus the WORD of GOD was since the Beginning, and the same God Adam, Abraham, Noah, Moses, Isaac, and Jacob and ALL the Prophets testified. It is the jews who refused this Lord over all who put their replacement theology in play.
Qur’anic verses that degrade Jews and Christians must be neutralized by juxtaposing contradictory verses and by commentaries that render such degradation obsolete.
then verses of the New testament which also offends the Talmudic joose, must go
Youth should be taught that it is sinful for Muslims to wage jihad against Jews and Christians (as well as Hindus). They must be taught that Muslims who murder women, men, and children in the name of Allah desecrate God’s name. They should also learn that the concept of jihad contradicts the UN Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which prescribes “tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial, or religious groups.” The word jihad should be stricken from Islamic law. Public renunciation of jihad should be the litmus test of whether a Muslim regime is sincerely committed to peace. Jihad should mean nothing more than striving for self-perfection.
Just as Christ has been stricken from Amarikan Law
11. President’s Bush’s “Axis of Evil” speech brands as wicked any Muslim state that provides a haven for terrorists.
anti-Shem ites, who see the evil, who only are attempting to protect themselves against this shem god group of death and murder. Though, they are wront too, and they obey not our Lord Jesus the Christ, because their god, has no only Son just as their twin brother the shems have no only begotten Son
This definition applies to almost all Islamic regimes and thus calls for regime change. Regime change involves not only WHO rules and HOW they rule (hence political institutions), but also the ENDS for which they rule, which ends must have ethical-religious content. From these three basic factors of regime change, a civic ethos must develop, reinforced by appropriate educational and social institutions.[8]
12. A crucial aspect of Islam’s democratization is the introduction of a market economy. Such an economy would decentralize the corporate power of Arab regimes, raise the living standards of their poverty-stricken people, and hasten the development of civic and private institutions to counterbalance the power of government.
then Amaraka
13. The effectiveness of democracy in any country very much depends on the structure of the legislature. Because many countries in the Middle East contain large ethnic and religious minorities, the United States should promote “bicameralism” in these countries. Given a bicameral legislature, the lower branch can be designed in such a way as to protect these minorities. In the 21 Arab-defined countries — this excludes Iran — there are approximately 250 million people, some 40 million of whom are non-Arabs ethnically or nationally, or non-Muslims religiously. These 40 million inhabitants of Arab countries are not nationally or religiously affiliated with them. This substantial minority includes about 10 million Christians, particularly the Copts in Egypt, and large ethnic groups such as the Kurds and Berbers.[9]
14. The democratization of Islam must be attentive to its minorities, especially those which, like the Christians, have been degraded as dhimmies. “Dhimmitude” must be eliminated from Islam, and of course the status of women must be elevated without encouraging the West’s family-destructive feminism.
which has been orchestrated by Talmud Bavli
Constitutional democracy in the Middle East is a necessary precondition of peace in this region. And the roots of Constitutional democracy may be found in the Bible of Israel. The Babel Talmud Bavli
[1] This section of this essay is based on Abraham Katsh, The Biblical Heritage of American Democracy (New York: KTAV, 1977).
[2] Cited in Pathways to the Torah (Jerusalem: Aish HaTorah Publications, 1988), p. A6.2.
[3] Unlike Israel, 74 nations have district elections for the lower or only branch of the legislature. In Israel the entire country constitutes a single district, in which parties compete on the basis of proportional representation. For a detailed analysis of Israel’s political system, see Paul Eidelberg, Jewish Statesmanship: Lest Israel Fall (Jerusalem: Foundation for Constitutional Democracy, 2000).
[4] The Gathering Storm (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1948), p. 55.
[5] Ibid., pp. 297-297.
[6] Bat Ye’or, Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide (Fairleigh Dickenson University Press 2002).
[7] "The War on Terror Won’t End in Baghdad,”Wall Street Journal, in Jerusalem Post, September 5, 2002, p. 15. Also Mark Steyn, “First We Take Baghdad,” Jerusalem Post, August 25, 2002, p. 9.
[8] Here I am indebted to Professor Will Morrisey for reminding me of what we both learned from Aristotle.
[9] See Mordechai Nisan, Minorities in the Middle East (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1991), p. 2.
________
section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"
section 16 "The Beast Has Risen"
Prophecy UnfoldingWall Street " The Mark" is Here
It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"
"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"
ADDED Material 3-25-2004
A Sincere Request to "Rapture" Teachers
Compulsory Constitutional Cremation
Homeland Security, "The Police State"
The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah
How will they do it- " The false-christ"
"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun
Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"
"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)
I Witch, New One World Order Seal
Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah
The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith
I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ
National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement
Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?
The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba
The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?
The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !
Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"
The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch
The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction
Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"
The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"
One World Religion Part 5 Religion Part 7 Religion Part 7
Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764
The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king
Changing the Time and the Laws
The Leaven of the Chabad Lubavitch Chassidim Pharisees
"Replacement
Theology" of
Judaic Talmudism
Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky
