How they are twisting Daniel...and the Judaisers of the church are falling away from truth. I shoot holes  in their Shmitta cycles which was given to Scofield as Dispensatanalism....and now how they will destroy it's foundation.....never understanding the trap

 

http://www.shalach.org/JewishContentions/Daniel9.htm

 

 

First, I shall state the prophecy as it appears in the King James Bible. (The prophecy is contained in verses 24-27.) "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."

At first glance, this looks rather Christian. How can a Jew possibly reject Jesus in the face of a prophecy like this? Could it be any clearer that the Messiah's death was foretold by the prophets?

Let us examine the Hebrew text. The word rendered "Messiah" in verses 25 and 26 is "moshiach", which in modern Hebrew does mean "Messiah" but which in ancient Hebrew meant simply "anointed". All throughout the rest of the scriptures, wherever "moshiach" appears, it is rendered "anointed". The priests are called "moshiach"; all the kings are called "moshiach"; King Cyrus, a Gentile king, is called "moshiach" in Isaiah 45:1; and David consistently refers to Saul as "moshiach" even after the spirit of G-d departs from Saul. It wasn't until around the second century BCE - a couple of centuries after the time of Daniel - that "moshiach" began to be used to refer to the Redeemer who is coming at the end of days. Also, the phrase rendered "but not for himself" is "v'ein lo", which really means "and he shall have nothing" (the King James lists this as an alternative translation). We see, then, that there is no real reason to suspect that the anointed one is the Messiah or that his being cut off will atone for our sins.

What about the time that this anointed one was to be cut off? Christians will tell you that the word rendered "week", "shavuah", could also be rendered "unit of seven", and indeed it is as common in Hebrew to speak of a week of years as a week of days. Thus far they are in agreement with Jewish commentators. But then they cite Artaxerxes II's letters to Nehemiah (Neh. 2:1-6) authorizing the rebuilding of Jerusalem as the point at which the countdown was to begin. By secular chronology, this decree took place in the middle of the fifth century BCE (historians differ on the exact year, and dates range from 445 BCE to 465 BCE). Seven weeks and threescore and two weeks is 69X7=483 years; picking one of the dates for Artaxerxes's letters to Nehemiah and adding 483 years puts you around the time of Jesus's death. (Those who hold to the date of 445 BCE believe in something called the "prophetic year". This doctrine, which says that a year in symbolic prophecy is really 360 days, isn't mentioned or even hinted at anywhere in Scripture [this includes the New Testament]. Nor can it be held that the Hebrew year is 360 days long. The Hebrew calendar is lunisolar, which means it has 6 months of 29 days each and 6 months of 30 days each, for a total of 354 days; but every so often there is a "leap month" of 30 days, so that on average the year contains 365-1/4 days.)

They know exactly what they are doing....this teaching will justify their wall...or other words...their wall will justify their teaching and their Moshiach, and Judeo-Churchizionity will have pie in its face....because they had no clue as to what Scofield, Darby and the Zionist were setting them up for. Do you understand what I am saying?

It is noteworthy that in both occurrences of the word "Messiah" in the King James, the word is "moshiach", *an* anointed one, as opposed to "hamoshiach", *the* anointed one. Christians must claim that the two anointed ones are both the Messiah; but it makes no sense, after having already introduced the Messiah, to refer to him as "an anointed one". It would make far more sense to say something like, 'An anointed one is coming etc., and after the sixty-two weeks *the* anointed one shall be cut off and have nothing." The absence of the definite article proves that the two anointed ones are different people. This fact helps to explain why Daniel wrote, "seven weeks and sixty-two weeks", rather than simply, "sixty-nine weeks". The compression of the seven weeks with the 62 weeks is a rather recent development among Christian translators. In the 1611 edition of the King James Bible, the beginning of the prophecy reads, "Know therefore and vnderstand, that from the going foorth of the commandment to restore and to build Ierusalem, vnto the Messiah the Prince, shall be seuen weekes; and threescore and two weekes, the street shall be built againe, and the wall, euen in troublous times." Other respected translations, such as the New Revised Standard Version and the Anchor Bible, follow suit in so translating the passage that the first anointed one is clearly coming at the end of seven weeks and that the second anointed one is clearly coming 62 weeks later. It wasn't until 1885 that the revisers of the King James saw fit to change the text so that it appears as if there is only one anointed one. Why was this change made? Because if there are two anointed ones, and the first one is clearly not Jesus (because he came way too early), and nothing special is said about the second anointed one (in fact, it is only the first anointed one who is called a prince), then there is no real reason to suspect that the second anointed one is Jesus either.

But to be able to prove them of Satan, this scenario of Literal weeks, the wall, troublous times, Famine, Pestilence, wars and Homelandt "SAY"kurity rumors of wars, and their "Revealed Moshiach" works Daniel Perfectly....and by the Power of Jesus, they stay defeated to His many who have understanding.

 

Below, they must have the Judeo-Churchizionians follow after their Hebrew interpretation's to change words, so their Moshiach fits and Jesus does not fit in the translation. From the Going Forth of the Command, and there is Only ONE COMMANDER, The Creator, who Commanded Creation. Further Daniel Understood by Books, Jeremiah's Prophecy, but his vision was not Jeremiah's seventy years fulfilled, but is REGARDING THE LAST DAYS.......Literal and Literal weeks. Scofield financed by Samuel J. Untermier of the Rothschild Group which owned the IRS and controls the European Banks which control the central banks knew how to subjugate in Bondage all mankind by the Power of the Dragon of Mammon.

In the beginning of the prophecy, where Gabriel says, "from the going forth of the word", the Sages have held since Daniel's day that the "word" referred to is not the word of any king, but Jeremiah's prophecy (Jer. 29:10), given immediately after the inhabitants of Jerusalem were exiled, that the Babylonian exile would end after 70 years. This makes sense: "from the going forth of the word, to restore and to build Jerusalem unto an anointed prince shall be seven weeks". Which word? The word foretelling the restoration and rebuilding of Jerusalem unto an anointed prince. Secular chronology, as used in the Abington Bible Commentary, dates the issuance of Jeremiah's prophecy and the exile of Jerusalem at 586 BCE and the rise of Cyrus the Mede, whose decree ended the exile (2 Chronicles 36:22-23), at 538 BCE. Taking 586 to be the first year and counting forward yields 538 as year 49, the end of the seventh week. It is clear, therefore, that Cyrus is the first anointed one.

 

So you can see how they set Scofield's Dispen-Satan-alism up to fail, so they could bring the Son of Perdition and the Masses of now anti-Christ Judeo-Churchi-zionity would worship after the beast.

 

The King James Authorized Version of the Bible clearly told us about the Wall of Sharon and the street during these times, and the Literal seventy weeks of the LAST DAYS of Daniel's Vision. But look and see and understand how the cemetery wolves changed the Word in other versions, and taught the unbelieving to go and preach a word of deception..........

 

The KJV clearly shows that Jesus Christ is the ONLY MESSIAH, that the seventy weeks are literal, that HE, Christ Jesus will confirm the Holy Everlasting Covenant according to the Promise to HIS many.

Daniel 9

24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish ^F68 the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity,(of the whore city) and to bring in everlasting righteousness,(Jesus Christ the Only Everlasting Righteous) and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. (Jesus the ONLY MOST HOLY)

 25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince (JESUS THE ONLY MESSIAH THE ONLY PRINCE)

 shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built ^F69 again, and the wall, even in troublous times. 26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: 

(Once again Jesus Christ the ONLY MESSIAH the ONLY Prince, the Only Most Everlasting Righteous is rejected and totally cut off from all by the death of his saints and the Universal One World Religion of the Talmudic Noahide Laws)

(added July 16, 2006) Sanhedrin of the Dragon sent their Noahide Council to apostate AMARAKA 2006 see NN

and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. 

The People of the ONLY Prince is his saints and they shall come and destroy that evil flesh temple they seek to build unto their god and his son of perdition

27 And he shall confirm the covenant ^F70 with many for one week: 

And HE....who is HE...He is the Only Messiah the Only Prince, the Only Everlasting and Holy Covenant, Christ the Lord

 

and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, 

And why will HE, Christ Jesus cause the abominable sacrifice of animals to cease? Because this animal sacrifice is to Satan, for they reject the ONLY sacrifice, the ONLY Lamb ever needed for Salvation, Christ the Lord....HIM the Everlasting and Holy Covenant

and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, 

Because they fell away and worshipped this beast, all whose names are not written in the Lambs book of life slain since the foundation of the world, he made it desolate as he did at 70 a.d

even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

even until the END and that, they are thrown into outer darkness where there will be a gnashing and gnawing of teeth forever in the lake of fire.....

This works perfectly with

seventy weeks = 490 days

False Christ = 1290 days

Daniel 12:

11: And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
12: Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.

 

Blessed is he who waits unto the 1335 days=45 days

for a total of 1825 days

when the Beast is thrown into the pit

But the other three beast, the Leopard, Bear and Lion lose not their lives until one year and one season. A season in the middle east is 4 months or 120 days

 

Daniel 7

11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame. 12 As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives ^F53 were prolonged for a season and time

for a total of

1825 days

360 days one hebrew year

for a total of  2185 days

and one season = 120 days

2305 days

less the middle of the last week

- 3.5 days

2, 301.5 days to the cleansing of the sanctuary

 

No man knoweth the Day or the Hour !

Daniel 8

. 13 Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot? 14 And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; ^F61 then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.

 

But the teachings have went in Judeo-Churchizionazi America by other translations to deceive and make complacent, apostate, so they would in no wise oppose the evil and the false Christ, Moshiach, but that they would embrace him as the Anointed One, that evil lawless one, the son of perdition. Never knowing about the wall of Sharon or the street, for they are waiting mystical euphoria of talmudism

 

New American Standard

deception of complacency and apostasy

25 "So you are to know and discern {that} from the issuing of a decree ^{F282 R461} to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah ^{F283 R462} the Prince ^R463 {there will be} seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with plaza ^F284 and moat, even in times of distress. 

No Wall of Arik Sheinerman, No media Coverage of Pure Bigot hatred of the self "Chosen" Master Race, who chose the Robber instead, who cut-off Jesus Christ, who hate the Lord's Holy Covenant, who seek to establish their vision of their false Christ, Moshaich ben Satan

26 "Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah ^F285 will be cut ^R464 off and have nothing, ^F286 and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy ^R465 the city and the sanctuary. 

Making it look as though the Moshiach is Christ and then...then a gentile anti-Moshiach will come 

And its ^F287 end {will come} with a flood; ^R466 even to the end there ^F288 will be war; desolations are determined. 27 "And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations ^{F289 R467}

Making HIM to be Moshiach of Talmud Bavli which makes the WORD of none effect, to make a false peace treaty, saying Peace and Peace and Sekurity, when their sudden destruction shall fall upon them in unbelief  

 {will come} one who makes ^F290 desolate, even until a complete ^R468 destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes ^F290 desolate."

 

________

the same in the American Standard version

24 Seventy weeks are decreed upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most holy. 25 Know therefore and discern, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the anointed one, the prince, shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: it shall be built again, with street and moat, even in troublous times. 26 And after the threescore and two weeks shall the anointed one be cut off, and shall have nothing: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and even unto the end shall be war; desolations are determined. 27 And he shall make a firm covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease; and upon the wing of abominations [shall come] one that maketh desolate; and even unto the full end, and that determined, shall [wrath] be poured out upon the

 

The you have the outright Shmita Cycles of the scribes and the Pahrisees to bring in their Moshaich in the New Living Translation

25 Now listen and understand! Seven sets of seven plus sixty-two sets of seven ^F38 will pass from the time the command is given to rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One ^F39 comes. Jerusalem will be rebuilt with streets and strong defenses,

No wall of Sheinerman, of course this works well with satan's plan, for the Talmudic media and the zionazi pastors know nothing of Prophecy

 ^F40 despite the perilous times. 26 "After this period of sixty-two sets of seven, ^F41 the Anointed One will be killed, appearing to have accomplished nothing, and a ruler will arise whose armies will destroy the city and the Temple. 

This anointed one they speak is he that is given 1290 days and then he continues 1260 days and he was and is not and yet will come...they are luring you here to worship the beast in deception

The end will come with a flood, and war and its miseries are decreed from that time to the very end. 27 He will make a treaty with the people for a period of one set of seven, 

This is why apostate sleeping Judeo-Churchizionazism is waiting on peace when there shall be no peace.......this is their key to secret Rapture, complete apostasy, no opposition and no truth

^F42 but after half this time, he will put an end to the sacrifices and offerings. 

He as in gentile anti-Christ

Then as a climax to all his terrible deeds, ^F43 he will set up a sacrilegious object that causes desecration, ^F44 until the end that has been decreed is poured out on this defiler."

 

Here they give you the Temple of Doom the flesh temple of zion

New revised standard

24 "Seventy weeks are decreed for your people and your holy city: to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, 

Their Olam Ha Ba of obedient Goyim Righteous Noahides

 

to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place.

the Temple located on the Skull Mountain, where our Lord and Savior was crucified, rejecting that the Temple was torn down and raised on the Third day and ascended into Heaven, Christ Jesus the Lord

 ^F51 25 Know therefore and understand: from the time that the word went out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the time of an anointed prince, 

an......an.......an.....anointed prince, the Moshiach....just one of their several.....there is ONLY ONE, Christ Jesus the LORD

 

there shall be seven weeks; and for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with streets and moat,

Nope, no street here.....who understands?

 but in a troubled time. 26 After the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one shall be cut off and shall have nothing, and the troops of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. 

Here they set up Moshiach ben Satan who was and is not and yet is to come

 

Its ^F52 end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war. Desolations are decreed. 27 He shall make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall make sacrifice and offering cease; and in their place ^F53 shall be an abomination that desolates, until the decreed end is poured out upon the desolator."

 

Here is Downright Satanism. Rejecting that Jeremiah's seventy Years of Exile was accomplished as according the Command Of God the Most High, changing the Truth into total Dispen-Satan-alism of Evil. Talmudic Shmita Cycles of the Talmudic Untermier/Scofieldism

Revised Standard Version

24 "Seventy weeks of years are decreed concerning your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place.

Temple of flesh

 25 Know therefore and understand that from the going forth of the word to restore and build Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one, a prince, there shall be seven weeks. Then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with squares and moat, but in a troubled time. 

No for it is Arik Sheinerman's Wall and Street

26 And after the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one shall be cut off, and shall have nothing; and the people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war; desolations are decreed. 27 And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week; and for half of the week he shall cause sacrifice and offering to cease; and upon the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator."

 

Total Damnable Abomination and Outright Rejection of Jesus the Only Christ for a One World Order, "Olam Ha Ba" and the Moshiach of Talmudic Satanism

Good News Translation

24 "Seven times seventy years is the length of time God has set for freeing your people and your holy city from sin and evil. Sin will be forgiven and eternal justice established,

Olam Ha Ba and Universal Noahide Laws

 so that the vision and the prophecy will come true, and the holy Temple ^F19 will be rededicated. 

And the "Chosen" will have their flesh Temple and they shall rule all Goyim slaves who denied Jesus Christ Lord Over All via Universal Noahide Laws set forth by their man of Dan, george H. W. Bush and that Illuminated Master of the synagogue of Satan, Schneerson

 

25 Note this and understand it: From the time the command is given to rebuild Jerusalem until God's chosen leader comes,

Moshiach ben Satan, the Son of Perdition, who is Not the ONLY Messiah the Only Prince, Christ the Lord

 

 seven times seven years will pass. Jerusalem will be rebuilt with streets and strong defenses, 

No wall and street

and will stand for seven times sixty-two years, but this will be a time of troubles. 26 And at the end of that time God's chosen leader will be killed unjustly.

1290 days....he was and yet will come

and it was given for him to continue for 1260 days

Moshiach the son of Satan, that son of Perdition the lawless one

 

^F20 The city and the Temple will be destroyed by the invading army of a powerful ruler.

the gentiles

 The end will come like a flood, bringing the war and destruction which God has prepared. 27 That ruler will have a firm agreement with many people for seven years, and when half this time is past, he will put an end to sacrifices and offerings. The Awful Horror ^F21 will be placed on the highest point of the Temple and will remain there until the one who put it there meets the end which God has prepared for him." ^R31

 

Total Preterism disregarding the LAST DAY VISION of DANIEL

Douay-Rheims

24 Seventy weeks are shortened upon thy people, and upon thy holy city, that transgression may be finished, and sin may have an end, and iniquity may be abolished; and everlasting justice may be brought; and vision and prophecy may be fulfilled; and the Saint of saints may be anointed. 25 Know thou, therefore, and take notice: that from the going forth of the word, to build up Jerusalem again, unto Christ, the prince, there shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks: and the street shall be built again, and the walls, in straitness of times. 26 And after sixty-two weeks Christ shall be slain: and the people that shall deny him shall not be his. And a people, with their leader, that shall come, shall destroy the city, and the sanctuary: and the end thereof shall be waste, and after the end of the war the appointed desolation. 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many, in one week: and in the half of the week the victim and the sacrifice shall fail: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation: and the desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.

 

And NONE....NO not one can account for the 2300 days...None are seeing the great deception save they who are in the Lord's Book of Life. All of them who believed not the Truth in Righteousness are apostate and fallen away, and cannot see the Son of Perdition is about to be "Revealed" sometime between October 2003 and November 2004, for the Wall and the Street are started...Oct 2, 2003 week 20-21....Look up children of the Lord, fear not, Love not your lives unto your deaths, for the Lord will give his saints them who stood firm in the Testimony of the Lamb, white robes washed in his blood, you are an invioted guest to the Bride Chamber, New Jerusalem......The Will of God, the Mystery of Christ is revealed to his saints who were slain under the Noahide laws of satan, for they hid not from Evil, but they stood firm for the ONLY KING of KINGS and faltered not...praise God the Most High of Heaven.......

 

the Untermier/ Scofield plan of apostasy and zionazism

 

Untermyer's declaration of an economic boycott against German goods is followed by Coughlin's article from SOCIAL JUSTICE, March 16, 1942, suggesting that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933. World War II is seen as a Jewish-inspired war to rescue 600,000 German-Jewish aristocrats from Nazism.

Scofield

     His financial support for the reference Bible came from Zionist and conspiratorial groups out of Boston Massachusetts. Chiefly known as the Secret Six . That group tied to the order of the illuminati. And some other orders some of you may know about

Untermyer

The purpose of Samuel Untermeier, and those associated with him was to find a way to get fundamental Christians to have an interest in and support for the international Zionist cause. Which had been one of Untermeiers life long projects. Samuel Untermeier died in 1941 but records I have in my office proves beyond a shadow of a doubt he was a dedicated communist all the time. They prove he worked for communist causes all of his adult life. In the 20 years of membership in the Lotus club Scofield had a long association with him. And had to know about his un American activities and his synagogue of Satan.

     

Untermyer was a zionist, Talmudicist, communist, Red Esau Bolshevik of the Moshiach Ben Satan creed, Scofield was coached and financed by Unetrmyer. Dispen-Satan is of Satan. There are no seven years lost. You have been snared. Repent!

 

 

     http://christianparty.net/scofield.htm

World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious orientation.   One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield.  A much larger tool was a venerable, world respected European book publisher--The Oxford University Press.

And Scofield's Mentor was the Talmudic Satanic Darby of the "Secret Rapture" fame the Brethren, Like Communistic Brethren, Like Judaism of Trotsky

 

Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies.  His mentor was one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was associated with the Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical trips to the US selling what is today called "Darbyism."  It is from Darby that Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist theology, which he later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible.  It is possible that Scofield's interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford University Press, for Darby was known to Oxford University.  A History of The Plymouth Brethern By William Blair Neatby, M.A.

There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much about the Zionist movement, but at some point, he became involved in a close and secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose firm still exists today and one of the wealthiest and most powerful World Zionists in America.  Untermeyer controlled the unbreakable thread that connected him with Scofield.  They shared a password and a common watering hole--and it appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who provided the money that Scofield himself lacked.  Scofield's success as an international bible editor without portfolio and his lavish living in Europe could only have been accomplished with financial aid and international influence.

This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work of Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues to the thread in Scofield family papers.  But even had the threads connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it would still be obvious that that connection was there.  It is significant that Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after Scofield's death, Oxford accelerated changes to it.  Since the death of its original author and namesake, The Scofield Reference Bible has gone through several editions.  Massive pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield's most significant notes from the original editions were removed where they apparently failed to further Zionist aims fast enough.  Yet this edition retains the title, "The New Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield."  It's anti-Arab, Christian subculture theology has made an enormous contribution to war, turning!
 Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in the latter half of the 20th century.

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/treason_5.htm

 

6] Samuel Untermyer (1858-1940) made his fortune as an organizer of corporate conglomerates and a manipulator of stocks before 1910. Then he switched sides and became a trustbuster, working closely with anti-business elements in the Congress. He was counsel to the Pujo Committee (1912-1913), a subcommittee of the House Committee on Banking and Currency, and he was responsible for much of the content of its report (issued on February 28, 1913), which paved the way for both a Federal income tax and the setting up of the Federal Reserve System. Untermyer was a strong advocate of both, and his behind-the-scenes efforts during 1913 led to the passage of the Owen-Glass Act on December 23, 1913. Woodrow Wilson later appointed him chairman of a commission to set income-tax and excess-profits-tax rates.

During the 1920's he was president of the Palestine Foundation Fund (for aiding the colonization ot Palestine by Jews) and vice-president of the American Jewish Congress. In 1927 Untermyer handled the lawsuit (by Herman Bernstein) against automaker Henry Ford which frightened the latter into ceasing publication of his exposes of Jewish activities and withdrawing and destroying all available copies of his book, The International Jew.

 

Trotsky the Sofiet Babylonain Talmudic Chabad Lubavitcher, of the Revolution which murdered as many as 100-125 million innocent Christians and Moslem peoples,  befriended Samuel J. Untermyer, who financed C.I.Scofield , whose mentor was the John Nelson Darby of the "Secret" Escpape Judeo-Churchizionian crowd of apostasy we see today accross America, who call themselves the "Bride of Christ", the new Christ it will be, for they are become anti-Christ and deny that Jesus is Lord over all mankind, and they are of the fables of the "SAYERS" Moshiach ben Satan, the Choice Groom the Robber.

http://www.liesexposed.net/nfp/issue0201/ruse.htm

 

The Red Army and the Soviet Secret Police were the parties responsible for Soviet horrors. They were led by a wretched Jew named Lev Bronstein, who changed his name to Leon Trotsky, and another Jewish criminal named Felix Dzurinsky. Not only this, but the Bolshevik Jews were carefully financed by New York Jews such as the nefarious Jacob H. Schiff (George F. Kennan, New York Times, March 24,1917).

This is the same Schiff family that the daughter of the treasonous former Vice-President, Al Gore, [also a Jew as if you couldn't have guessed] recently married into.

On Friday, March 24, 1933, the front page headline on the Daily Express of London read:

 

"Judea Declares War on Germany - Jews of all the World Unite - Boycott of German Goods - Mass Demonstrations".

 

So the fact is that when Mr. Hitler ordered a boycott of Jewish goods on March 28 of the same year, it was only in response to the Jews' prior declaration of war, and JEW HOLY WAR at that. Here is an excerpt from the March 24 issue of Daily Express:

 

"The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler's people."

 

The issue of the Jews being the first to initiate war in 1933 is seldom if ever discussed in the halls of modern day Jew academia or in the mainstream Jew media. The Jews want to say that Mr. Hitler started the war, but in 1933, the same as in 1939, etc., he was only reacting to pressure from a situation created by the Jews. And like what we mentioned earlier, here we have more examples of the Jews' modus operandi - do the dirty deeds and blame them on someone else. The Jewish call for war in 1933 in the English press was not unique; the exact same sentiments were being expressed by Jews on this side of the Atlantic and across the rest of Europe.

This announcement by members of the World Jewish Congress and its surrogate groups was followed by an International Jewish Boycott Conference in Amsterdam that was held by the World Jewish Economic Federation, of which Samuel Untermyer was president. Untermyer was a Communist Jew lawyer from New York. He called for a "sacred war" against Germany in a broadcast (Broadcast printed in New York Times, August 7,1933). He also blatantly claimed that Germany was planning to "exterminate the Jews". This rusemeister even claimed that the exterminations were in progress:

 

"The governments of all countries scourged by anti-Semitism will be keenly interested in assisting us to obtain the sovereignty we want."
--Theodor Herzl

"[Anti-Semitism will] act as a propelling force which, like the wave of the future, would bring the Jews into the promised land."
--Theodor Herzl

 

And they have deceived America, and soon Moshiach ben Satan that son of perdition will be "REVEALED" and the Judeo-Churchi-zionist who are become anti-Christ and say that the "SAYERS" do not need Jesus the Christ, who is Lord Over All Mankind and the King of the Jews

 

2 Thes.2:1-11

1: Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2: That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4: Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5: Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6: And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7: For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8: And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10: And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11: And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

 

And deceived they are indeed

 

Another key figure, whose work has dovetailed with the Quatuor Coronati activities on Temple Mount, is the Dutch-born architect Leen Ritmeyer, who received his doctorate from Manchester University in England on the design of Solomon's Temple. Ritmeyer's work in Israel, in which he claims to have discovered the resting place of the lost Ark of the Covenant inside the Dome of the Rock, has been almost wholly financed by Lord Jacob Rothschild, the son of the late Lord Victor Rothschild, and the head of Rothschild Investment Trust. The Rothschilds are at the very center of the British oligarchy's "Club of the Isles" (see "The True Story Behind the Fall of the House of Windsor," EIR Special Report, September 1997, for an in-depth profile of the Club of the Isles), the inner elite of policymakers, senior intelligence officials, City of London financiers, and raw materials barons, who are centered around the Royal Consort, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh.

Another Dimension of the Assault

 

http://www.thematthewshouseproject.com/religion/americanslove.htm

 

The Once and Future Boulder
In the 1870’s, John Nelson Darby of the Brethern Movement in Plymouth, England, made a number of trips to the United States in order to teach his views on dispensationalism. Darbyism, or dispensationalism, is a doctrine that divides up the Bible and world history into seven eras or “dispensations” in relation to how God deals with humanity.

More specifically, it teaches that that God deals differently with his “earthly” people (Israel) representing the “kingdom of heaven,” versus his “heavenly” people (the church) or the “kingdom of God.” Both Israel, a Jewish country with land and physical borders, along with the global Church, would play a part in the biblical end times as envisioned by Darbyism.

Though dispensationalism was not accepted by the greater American church at the end of the 19th century, it became a cornerstone among the fundamentalist-pentecostal movements sweeping the land at the beginning of the 20th century. The popular Scofield Reference Bible published in 1909 by C.I. Scofield, a devoted student of Darby, explained the biblical text from a dispensationalist viewpoint and quickly gained a wider audience for the teachings of Darbyism. Yet, it was the amazing population shift involving Palestine and the Jewish people in the 20th century that would cause the small theological pebble of dispensationalism to snowball into a daunting political boulder to be dealt with on an international diplomatic scale.

In the 1880’s and 90’s while the dispensationalists were looking for God’s returning of the Jews, a few Jewish agricultural communities were planted in Palestine. In 1891, William E. Blackstone, a lay evangelist in the Chicago business community and close friend of D. L. Moody, drew up a petition supporting the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. Blackstone’s “memorial,” signed by 413 American political and business leaders, such as John D. Rockefeller and J. P. Morgan, was five years before Theodore Herzl would publish his historic The Jewish State in 1896, also calling for the founding of a Jewish nation. Thus, Christian Zionism was very much a contemporary of Herzl’s Zionist movement, advocating a Jewish national or religious community in Palestine.

World War I (1914-1918) offered an even closer look at the realization of a land for the Jewish people, when Lord Arthur Balfour, the British foreign secretary, wrote his famous declaration to Zionist leader, Lord James Rothschild, expressing the British government’s desire to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Not incidentally, Balfour along with the British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, were both raised in dispensationalist churches. The Balfour Declaration, crowned with Britain’s defeat of Turkey and its acquisition of Palestine, further encouraged the growing dispensationalist movement.

World War II (1939-1945) ushered in the Holocaust, Hitler’s initiation to wipe out the Jewish people from the face of the earth. Dispensationalism viewed this global catastrophe as a satanically inspired plot to derail God’s future plans for the Jewish people. Yet according to dispensationalist understanding, the Holocaust was a necessary evil in order to cause the Jews to turn to Christ, and more importantly to return to their land.

 

 

 

 

 

There is no such a thing as a "Prophetic Year" LIES all LIES, neither Judeo-Churchi-zionity can be specific, none not one, nada, zero....and the damned Liars who "SAY" they are of Judah and who are not damned sure can't............

 

I promise, the ONLY way is by LITERAL translation of the HOLY SPIRIT, who is the WORD who is the FATHER

Israel begins construction of fence (WALL) on West Bank border

By Wolf Blitzer
CNN
Thursday, June 19, 2003 Posted: 1:11 PM EDT (1711 GMT)

Jerusalem (CNN) -- The Israeli argument is simple: As the poet Robert Frost said: "Good fences make good neighbors." (WALL)

And so, the Israelis have started building a fence that eventually will continue for more than 200 miles -- roughly coinciding with Israel's 1967 border with the West Bank. But there are several major detours to ensure that Ariel, Immanuel and other major Jewish settlement communities on the West Bank are on the Israeli side of the fence.(WALL)

Surveyed from the air, it's a massive project. It's eventual cost: an estimated $220 million.

The Israelis say they need this fence (WALL)to prevent Palestinian suicide bombers and other terrorists from crossing into populated Israeli centers. Most of the infiltrators, they say, have come from the West Bank.

Israel already has a fence(WALL) encircling Gaza. Officials say there have been virtually no infiltrations from there.

Construction in this phase of the project began this week and is now on-going near Jenin, Bethlehem and other towns and cities along the Israeli-West Bank border. Once completed, the barrier will actually be a combination of fences, walls, ditches, patrol roads and electronic surveillance devices. The first 68 miles of the barrier is scheduled to be finished within a year.

Easter-Ashatar-Isis

Acts 12:1-4

1: Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church.
2: And he killed James the brother of John with the sword.

Noahide decapitated by Law

3: And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
4: And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

Bush, Decapitated Saddam at Purim Saddam for he saw it pleased the jews, though he waits until after Easter to bring forth "Purim Goyim saint of Jesus" forth from the peoples.

Judaizers of Talmudic Influence

By Chuck Missler

Verse 25 then declares that Daniel should "know and Understand, that from the going forth of the command to restore and rebuild Jurusalem until Messiah the Prince, there shall be seven weeks and sixty two weeks." This verse is a precise mathematical prediction of the time of Messiah's coming! In effect, the angel Gabriel told Daniel that after sixty-nine weeks of years the Messiah would be revealed to the nation of Israel!

If a "shabuim" is a week (seven) of years, it therefore follows that 69 sevens is 483 years (69 x 7= 483 years).

 

The Jewish (and Babylonian) calendars used a 360-day year; 69 weeks of 360-day years totals 173,880 days.

In effect, Gabriel told Daniel that the interval between the commandment to rebuild Jerusalem until the presentation of the Messiah as King would be 173,880 days.

he commandment to restore and build Jerusalem was given by Artaxerxes Longimanus on March 14, 445 b.c. (The emphasis in the verse on "the street" and "the wall" was to avoid confusion with other earlier mandates confined to rebuilding the Temple.) When we examine the period between March 14, 445 b.c. and April 6, 32 a.d., and correct for leap years, we discover that it is 173,880 days exactly, to the very day!

Here are the calculations.

 

 

 

 

Message by Dr. Grant Richison Part V Daniel 9:24-27 Seventy weeks are determined For your people and for your holy city, To finish the transgression, To make an end of sins, To make reconciliation for iniquity, To bring in everlasting righteousness, To seal up vision and prophecy, And to anoint the Most Holy. Know therefore and understand, That from the going forth of the command To restore and build Jerusalem Until Messiah the Prince, There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; The street shall be built again, and the wall, Even in troublesome times. And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined. Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, Even until the consummation, which is determined, Is poured out on the desolate. Daniel lived in troubled times; his people were in exile in Babylon. After almost 70 years of bondage in a foreign land, Daniel read the prophecy of Jeremiah. He was startled to find that Jeremiah had prophesied Israel's captivity (Jeremiah 25:11-12; 29:10-14). Moreover, he discovered Israel would return to Palestine at the end of the 70 years! This discovery caused Daniel to confess his sins. Revival came into his life (Daniel 9:3-19). At the end of chapter 9 Daniel tells about his "seventy sevens" vision--a prediction of the time of the first coming of Christ. God has a comprehensive plan for Israel. "Seventy weeks of years are decreed concerning your people and your holy city" (9:24). These sevens are years. Seventy weeks are 490 years. Daniel received encouragement and certainty from this vision. After the privations of the captivity, God was bringing Israel home, and Daniel received hope.

[DOC]Yovel (Jubilee) Years
File Format: Microsoft Word 2000 - View as HTML
... to mean the end of the seven cycles of shmitah ... are uniquely parallel: each has seven
sets of sevens, with a ... is a tradition that the Jews spent seventy years in ...
tckillian.com/greg/yovel.doc - Similar pages

 

 

 

And the Foolish cannot see the wall and the street command has gone forth, even now the wall and the street, in troublous times, and they say Peace, Peace and there shall be no peace, and when they finish the wall and say Peace and "SAY"kurity, sudden destruction shall fall upon them, for they once again cut-off the True Messiah for the False Messiah, that son of Perdition

Added July 16, 2006.....The SANHEDRIN unto the Dragon was revived exactly 62 weeks later October 13, 2004

 

They Look for a seven year Shmita Cycle according to the Prophets of Ba'al to introduce their Judaic Talmudic Judeo-Churchi-zionian Freemason Skull and Bones Moshaich

 

 

And the Van Impe's of the blind....say....when you see the risen Roman Empire..............Looking over the Horizon....eating and drinking and giving in Marriage....as were the days of Noe, and when the FLOOD of Satan came upon them they knew it not........

 

 

 

Neither do they see the words of Jesus Christ the Spirit of Prophecy

 

Dan:8:17:

 So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s936101.htm

http://www.mail-archive.com/marxism@lists.panix.com/msg37605.html

http://www.mideasti.org/html/policy20030717-koury-hallak.html

 

 

And it may have begun sooner than thought

http://www.miftah.org/Display.cfm?DocId=1754&CategoryId=4

 

The so-called ‘Security Wall’
January 31, 2003
By MIFTAH

Introduction:

The plan authorized on June 23rd 2002 and expected to be completed by June 23rd 2003. This wall will include electrical fences, trenches and security patrols. Three parts of the wall include: a northern section, a section for Jerusalem and a southern section and is projected to run the whole 360-km of the West Bank.

 

Isa:5:5: And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down:

and the street

Then, on September 11, 2002, the Israeli security cabinet approved plans to annex Rachel's Tomb, a holy site at Bethlehem's entrance, absorbing it into the city of Jerusalem. That meant the loss of 2.5 percent of Bethlehem's municipal land, a total of 2,500 dunams or 625 acres.

Much of that land will be swallowed by a dual purpose road and divider that Israel says will provide free access to Israeli worshipers visiting the site. While the road plans have yet to be made public, it appears that the highway will be three kilometers long, 20 meters wide, with an 8-meter-high wall constructed on both sides. In its path lie as many as 15 Palestinian residential buildings and 400 olive trees.

They think to be dividing for the tribes and their temple of Baal.......Lo, Jesus is dividing it for his saints of inheritance in faith

Neh:2:17: Then said I unto them, Ye see the distress that we are in, how Jerusalem lieth waste, and the gates thereof are burned with fire: come, and let us build up the wall of Jerusalem, that we be no more a reproach.

Neh:6:6: Wherein was written, It is reported among the heathen, and Gashmu saith it, that thou and the Jews think to rebel: for which cause thou buildest the wall, that thou mayest be their king, according to these words.

 

Neh:6:15: So the wall was finished in the twenty and fifth day of the month Elul, in fifty and two days.

 

September 23, 2003 Tuesday	Elul 26, 5763

Neh:7:1: Now it came to pass, when the wall was built, and I had set up the doors, and the porters and the singers and the Levites were appointed,

Ps:55:10: Day and night they go about it upon the walls thereof: mischief also and sorrow are in the midst of it.

Isa:22:5: For it is a day of trouble, and of treading down, and of perplexity by the Lord GOD of hosts in the valley of vision, breaking down the walls, and of crying to the mountains.

Ps:62:3: How long will ye imagine mischief against a man?  ye shall be slain all of you: as a bowing wall shall ye be, and as a tottering fence.

 

Prov:18:11: The rich man's wealth is his strong city, and as an high wall in his own conceit.

 

Prov:24:31: And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.

 

Song:5:7: The watchmen that went about the city found me, they smote me, they wounded me; the keepers of the walls took away my veil from me.

 

Isa:5:5: And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down:

 

Isa:22:5: For it is a day of trouble, and of treading down, and of perplexity by the Lord GOD of hosts in the valley of vision, breaking down the walls, and of crying to the mountains.

 

Isa:22:10: And ye have numbered the houses of Jerusalem, and the houses have ye broken down to fortify the wall.

http://www.miftah.org/Display.cfm?DocId=1754&CategoryId=4

Why this is an Apartheid Wall: (conclusion)

• This wall designed to divide the population along racial lines by creation of separate reserves and ghettos for the members of a racial group; separation of Palestinian families/communities; controls on freedom of movement through the system of ID cards, curfews and closures; expropriation of landed property.
• Expropriation of landed property: Land seizures clearly fall upon racial lines in building this wall. Land is only being taken from Palestinian Arabs - not Israeli Jews –in illegal settlements built on seized Palestinian lands in the West Bank.
• Palestinians residing in the West Bank shall be dispossessed of thousands of dunums of land, including agricultural lands, in many cases, the backbone of their livelihoods.
• All persons trapped between the so-called “security-wall” and Israel or the West Bank are entirely Palestinian. It thus appears that ethnic-religious motives drove the choice of localities to place between the wall and Israel/West Bank.


Isa:22:10: And ye have numbered the houses of Jerusalem, and the houses have ye broken down to fortify the wall. 

Not so fast "SAYERS"

Isa:25:8: He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for the LORD hath spoken it.

Isa:25:12: And the fortress of the high fort of thy walls shall he bring down, lay low, and bring to the ground, even to the dust.

Isa:26:1: In that day shall this song be sung in the land of Judah; We have a strong city; salvation will God appoint for walls and bulwarks.

Isa:28:7: But they also have erred through wine, and through strong drink are out of the way; the priest and the prophet have erred through strong drink, they are swallowed up of wine, they are out of the way through strong drink; they err in vision, they stumble in judgment.

Isa:30:13: Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant.

Isa:36:12: But Rabshakeh said, Hath my master sent me to thy master and to thee to speak these words?  hath he not sent me to the men that sit upon the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?

Isa:59:10: We grope for the wall like the blind, and we grope as if we had no eyes: we stumble at noonday as in the night; we are in desolate places as dead men.

 

Isa:62:6: I have set watchmen upon thy walls, O Jerusalem, which shall never hold their peace day nor night: ye that make mention of the LORD, keep not silence,

 

And the Bolshevik Talmudic Tribe of

Esau & Dan do hold Jerusalem

 

Jer:1:15: For, lo, I will call all the families of the kingdoms of the north, saith the LORD; and they shall come, and they shall set every one his throne at the entering of the gates of Jerusalem, and against all the walls thereof round about, and against all the cities of Judah.

 

Jer:5:10: Go ye up upon her walls, and destroy; but make not a full end: take away her battlements; for they are not the LORD's.

 

Jer:50:15: Shout against her round about: she hath given her hand: her foundations are fallen, her walls are thrown down: for it is the vengeance of the LORD: take vengeance upon her; as she hath done, do unto her.

 

Lam:2:2: The Lord hath swallowed up all the habitations of Jacob, and hath not pitied: he hath thrown down in his wrath the strong holds of the daughter of Judah; he hath brought them down to the ground: he hath polluted the kingdom and the princes thereof.

 

Ezek:13:10: Because, even because they have seduced my people, saying, Peace; and there was no peace; and one built up a wall, and, lo, others daubed it with untempered morter:

Ezek:13:12: Lo, when the wall is fallen, shall it not be said unto you, Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?

Ezek:13:14: So will I break down the wall that ye have daubed with untempered morter, and bring it down to the ground, so that the foundation thereof shall be discovered, and it shall fall, and ye shall be consumed in the midst thereof: and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

 

Ezek:13:15: Thus will I accomplish my wrath upon the wall, and upon them that have daubed it with untempered morter, and will say unto you, The wall is no more, neither they that daubed it;

Ezek:23:14: And that she increased her whoredoms: for when she saw men pourtrayed upon the wall, the images of the Chaldeans pourtrayed with vermilion,

 

Ezek:26:9: And he shall set engines of war against thy walls, and with his axes he shall break down thy towers.

Ezek:26:10: By reason of the abundance of his horses their dust shall cover thee: thy walls shall shake at the noise of the horsemen, and of the wheels, and of the chariots, when he shall enter into thy gates, as men enter into a city wherein is made a breach.

The Rabid Chabd

Ezek:33:30: Also, thou son of man, the children of thy people still are talking against thee by the walls and in the doors of the houses, and speak one to another, every one to his brother, saying, Come, I pray you, and hear what is the word that cometh forth from the LORD.

Ezek:38:20: So that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground.

 

Ezek:43:8: In their setting of their threshold by my thresholds, and their post by my posts, and the wall between me and them, they have even defiled my holy name by their abominations that they have committed: wherefore I have consumed them in mine anger.

 

Dan:9:25:

 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

 

The saints of the Only Messiah the Prince come marching in, the Lord's army

Joel:2:7: They shall run like mighty men; they shall climb the wall like men of war; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their ranks:

Joel:2:9: They shall run to and fro in the city; they shall run upon the wall, they shall climb up upon the houses; they shall enter in at the windows like a thief.

Amos:1:7: But I will send a fire on the wall of Gaza, which shall devour the palaces thereof:

Amos:7:7: Thus he shewed me: and, behold, the Lord stood upon a wall made by a plumbline, with a plumbline in his hand.

Micah:7:11: In the day that thy walls are to be built, in that day shall the decree be far removed.

 

Zech:2:4: And said unto him, Run, speak to this young man, saying, Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein:

Behold Chabad Lubavitch Illuminated sons of the synagogue of Satan, there is a hole in your wall.

Ezekiel 8:2-18

2: Then I beheld, and lo a likeness as the appearance of fire: from the appearance of his loins even downward, fire; and from his loins even upward, as the appearance of brightness, as the colour of amber.
3: And he put forth the form of an hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and the spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.
4: And, behold, the glory of the God of Israel was there, according to the vision that I saw in the plain.
5: Then said he unto me, Son of man, lift up thine eyes now the way toward the north.  So I lifted up mine eyes the way toward the north, and behold northward at the gate of the altar this image of jealousy in the entry.
6: He said furthermore unto me, Son of man, seest thou what they do?  even the great abominations that the house of Israel committeth here, that I should go far off from my sanctuary?  but turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations.
7: And he brought me to the door of the court; and when I looked, behold a hole in the wall.
8: Then said he unto me, Son of man, dig now in the wall: and when I had digged in the wall, behold a door.
9: And he said unto me, Go in, and behold the wicked abominations that they do here.
10: So I went in and saw; and behold every form of creeping things, and abominable beasts, and all the idols of the house of Israel, pourtrayed upon the wall round about.
11: And there stood before them seventy men of the ancients of the house of Israel, and in the midst of them stood Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, with every man his censer in his hand; and a thick cloud of incense went up.
12: Then said he unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen what the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, every man in the chambers of his imagery?  for they say, The LORD seeth us not; the LORD hath forsaken the earth.
13: He said also unto me, Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations that they do.
14: Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.
15: Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man?  turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these.
16: And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD's house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east.
17: Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man?  Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here?  for they have filled the land with violence, and have returned to provoke me to anger: and, lo, they put the branch to their nose.
18: Therefore will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them.

 

Zech:2:5:

For I, saith the LORD, will be unto her a wall of fire round about, and will be the glory in the midst of her.

 

Eph:2:14:

For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

 

Behold the Wall of the Unblemished Bride is the Only wall. This wall is the wall of True Israel, the seed of Abraham, they who are in faith of Christ Jesus, New Jerusalem is wearing the white of the saints of the Lord, the invited Guest, the Children of the Bride Chamber

Revelation of Jesus Christ 21:1

1: And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
2: And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

10: And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,
11: Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal;
12: And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:
13: On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates.
14: And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
15: And he that talked with me had a golden reed to measure the city, and the gates thereof, and the wall thereof.
16: And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.
17: And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel.
18: And the building of the wall of it was of jasper: and the city was pure gold, like unto clear glass.
19: And the foundations of the wall of the city were garnished with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper; the second, sapphire; the third, a chalcedony; the fourth, an emerald;
20: The fifth, sardonyx; the sixth, sardius; the seventh, chrysolite; the eighth, beryl; the ninth, a topaz; the tenth, a chrysoprasus; the eleventh, a jacinth; the twelfth, an amethyst.
21: And the twelve gates were twelve pearls; every several gate was of one pearl: and the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass.
22: And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.
23: And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.
24: And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it.
25: And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there.
26: And they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations into it.
27: And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.

Count the Days

 

Commotion in motion, the lack of devotion.
It's just Me, Myself and I.
Than self-righteous men, will prove again,
this attitude won't fly.
Destruction's the wage, for the rage of our age.
The principle's quite clear.
When the winds come in, this stacked up sin,
will crush us all with fear.
A house that stands, on divisions demands,
fears the advancing clock.
The crash from the clash, when it happens at last,
would've stood being built on a rock.
These are the crimes, the signs of the times.
All men and their wicked ways.
They all doubt, about what others shout,
'These truly are the last days!'
Aim high, aim low, but before you go, know,
Without Christ the future looks grim.
And the only way, to save our world today,
from us, can be found with Him.

After all this we see that there are three ways that the Moshiach may arrive:
1) He will come from the living.
2) He will arise from the dead (like the Rebbe said would happen with his father-in-law the previous Rebbe).
3) Or the Moshiach will only appear to be dead, but will actually be alive in his "true" physical body.

 

Come look ! Peer in the cracks in the Wall and See Ribbeye Schneerson's hand in Pestilence and disease innoculation

http://www.whfreeman.com/kuby/content/anm/kb08an01.htm

. B. Robbins, R. Schneerson, P. Anderson, D. H. Smith, "Prevention of systemic infections, especially meningitis, caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Impact on public health and implications for other polysaccharide-based vaccines," Journal of the American Medical Association, 276:1181-1185, 1996.

 

Look and see how they got their wall of destruction....the Holycost

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/true911.html

 

If the Leaders of this nation Knew of, or had anything to do with the WTC to aid in the plan of Israel, they should be brought on Criminal charges of Murder and conspiracy, and convicted, sentenced to the death penalty. Dispute it, and gnash your teeth in preparation of damnation.

 

They got their wars against Ishmael by their puppets the Judeo-Churchi-Zionian apostates. They got their machinations of death against any who are "Against them" via Homeland security and the Patriot Akt.

They have their wall of destruction before the end to their trangressions and the end of sin in this seventy weeks, then they will have their Moshaich ben Satan, O'Lucifer that son of Perdition, their vision they seek to establish.

And they have their Universal World Religion in place by HJR 104, Public Law 102-14

soon they will behead any who stand firm in testimony of Jesus Christ the Lord. And soon thereafter, they will perish and be cast into the lake of fire. And them who came out of that Great day of Tribulation with white robes washed in the Lamb's Blood will slay them on that Day of the Lord. Jesus is coming !

http://www.asknoah.org/noahide_courts.html

QUESTION : I've read that if a Noahide transgresses any of the Seven Noahide Commandments then he [is liable to] execution by beheading if he is tried and convicted by a Noahide court. Can any Noahide court issue an execution?

ANSWER : In regard to the Seven Noahide Commandments, yes. The verdict of a trial which is properly conducted by a proper Noahide court is final. One of the best sources for information about the concept of a Noahide court is the chapter on "Courts of Law" in "The Path of the Righteous Gentile," which you can link to from the web page http://www.moshiach.com/action/morality/in-depth.php.

And your own household will deliver you if you make that stand for Jesus 

http://www.asknoah.org/noahide_courts.html

 

If there would be such a thing as a Noahide court before the Messiah appears, authority over capital cases would rest on a court of proper judges who conduct their trials properly. The judges in a Noahide court must themselves be strict followers of the letter and spirit of the Noahide Commandments.

Furthermore, anyone who is known to transgress any of the Noahide Laws is not allowed to testify in the court. Only someone who keeps the Noahide Laws, does acts of kindness, and behaves in a straight, honest and upright way should be allowed to testify.

Someone who acts disgracefully in public is disqualified as a witness. From "The Path of the Righteous Gentile," p. 109: These are people who walk and eat in coarse, impolite fashion in public, or who go naked in public, ... or anyone who feels no self-embarrassment."

QUESTION : And is there any leniency at all in enforcing an execution, or special conditions?

ANSWER : (1) The guilty person must be mentally competent and a legal adult. (2) The person must be properly tried in a court with proper Noahide witnesses and proper Noahide judges; if we could accomplish these conditions, it would surely help to open the door to the Messianic Era!

Here is one more point: the Torah does not allow incarceration ( jail or prison terms ) to be used as a form of punishment for either Gentiles or Jews, because it is considered to be a cruel and inhuman punishment, and in opposition to G-d's plan for mankind.

 

HJR 104, Public Law 102-14

His Honorable President of the United States of Greater Israel, George Herbert Walker Bush and his Pal, Mendel Menachem Schneerson, ribbeye of Chabad Lubavitch of Babylon 

Melakhim, ch. 9, 10). One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws

subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).

 

 

Public Law 102--14 (H.J. Res. 104): March 20, 1991
Education Day, USA Proclamation
Joint Resolution to designate March 26, 1991 disguised as "Education Day, USA"

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Legislated Babylonian Talmudic Judaic Morality for obedient little Goy.

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Whereas the Lubavitch movement (Judaic Babylonian Talmudic Rabbis) has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally (?) respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

 

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as "Education Day. U.S.A.". The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Approved March 20, 1991.

 

Presidential Recognition of this Ancient Code of Ethics

*soon the ancient Sanhedrin and the 71 elders and the bed of Shlomo the ten council members who anonit their king will be recognized as well. 

http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_65.html

 

Tractate Sanhedrin, Talmud Bavli, 

Soncino Press

56a.

to be enforced soon by Homelandt Sekurity, Ashcroft the Judeo-Churchi-zionian

When R. Isaac came,¹¹  he taught a reversed interpretation. And He commanded — refers to idolatry; God [Heb. elohim] to social law. Now 'God' may rightly refer to social laws, as it is written, And the master of the house shall be brought unto elohim [i.e., the judges].¹²  But how can 'and He commanded' connote a prohibition of idolatry? — R. Hisda and R. Isaac b. Abdimi-one cited the verse, They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten calf, etc.¹³  And the other cited, Ephraim is oppressed and broken in judgment, because he willingly walked after the commandment.¹⁴  Wherein do they differ? — In respect of a heathen who made an idol but did not worship it: On the view [that the prohibition of idolatry is derived from] they have made them a molten calf, guilt is incurred as soon as the idol is made [even before it is worshipped]; but according to the opinion that it is from, because he willingly walked after the commandment, there is no liability until the heathen actually follows and worships it. Raba objected: Does any scholar maintain that a heathen is liable to punishment for making an idol even if he did not worship it? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish Court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen; but those for which a Jewish Court inflicts no capital penalty on Jewish delinquents are not forbidden to him.¹⁵  Now what does this exclude? Presumably the case of a heathen who made an idol without worshipping it?¹⁶  R. Papa answered: No. It excludes the embracing and kissing of idols.¹⁷  Of which idols do you say this? Is it of those whose normal worship is in this manner; but in that case he is surely liable to death? — Hence it excludes the embracing and kissing of idols which are not usually worshipped thus.

'Social laws.' Were then the children of Noah bidden to observe these? Surely it has been taught: The Israelites were given ten precepts at Marah, seven of which had already been accepted by the children of Noah, to which were added at Marah social laws, the Sabbath, and honouring one's parents; 'Social laws,' for it is written, There [sc. at Marah] he made for them a statute and an ordinance;¹⁸  'the Sabbath and honouring one's parents'. for it is written, As the Lord thy God commanded thee!¹⁹  — R. Nahman replied in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: The addition at Marah was only in respect of an assembly, witnesses, and formal admonition.²⁰  If so, why say 'to which were added social laws'?²¹  — But Raba replied thus: The addition was only in respect of the laws of fines.²²  But even so, should it not have been said, 'additions were made in the social laws'? — But R. Aha b. Jacob answered thus: The Baraitha informs us that they were commanded to set up law courts in every district and town. But were not the sons of Noah likewise commanded to do this? Surely it has been taught: Just as the Israelites were ordered to set up law courts in every district and town, so were the sons of Noah likewise enjoined to set up law courts in every district and town! — But Raba answered thus: The author of this Baraitha [which states that social laws were added at Marah] is a Tanna of the School of Manasseh, who omitted social laws and blasphemy²³  [from the list of Noachian precepts] and substituted emasculation and the forbidden mixture [in plants, ploughing. etc.].²³  For a Tanna of the School of Manasseh taught: The sons of Noah were given seven precepts. viz., [prohibition of] idolatry, adultery, murder, robbery, flesh cut from a living animal, emasculation and forbidden mixtures. R. Judah said: Adam was prohibited idolatry only, for it is written, And the Lord God commanded Adam.²⁴  R. Judah b. Bathyra maintained: He was forbidden blasphemy too. Some add social laws. With whom does the following statement of Rab Judah in the name of Rab agree: viz., [God said to Adam,] I am God, do not curse Me; I am God, do not exchange Me for another; I am God, let My fear be upon you?²⁵  — This agrees with the last mentioned [who adds social laws to the list].

Now, what is the standpoint of the Tanna of the School of Manasseh? If he interprets the verse, And the Lord God commanded etc. [as interpreted above], he should include these two [social laws and blasphemy] also, and if he does not, whence does he derive the prohibition of the rest? — In truth, he does not accept the interpretation of the verse, 'And the Lord God commanded etc., but maintains that each of these [which he includes] is separately stated: Idolatry and adultery.

 

Folio 57a

for it is written, The earth also was corrupt before God;¹   and a Tanna of the School of R. Ishmael taught: Wherever corruption is mentioned, it must refer to immorality and idolatry.²   'Immorality.' as it is written, for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.³   'Idolatry,' for it is written, Lest ye corrupt yourselves and make you a graven image, etc.⁴   And the other teacher [who deduces this from the verse, and the Lord God commanded etc.]?⁵   He maintains that this verse [sc. the earth also etc.] merely describes their way of living.⁶   'Bloodshed', as it is written, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, etc.⁷   And the other?⁸   — This verse [he will maintain] merely teaches the manner of execution.⁹   Robbery, for it is written, As the wild herbs have I given you all things;¹⁰  upon which R. Levi commented: as the wild herbs, but not as the cultivated herbs.¹¹  And the other?¹²  — He will hold that this verse is written to permit animal flesh,¹³  [but not to prohibit robbery]. Flesh cut from the living animal, as it is written, But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.¹⁴  And the other?¹⁵  — He may hold that this verse teaches that flesh cut from live reptiles is permitted.¹⁶  Emasculation, for it is written, Bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.¹⁷  And the other?¹⁸  — He may regard this merely as a blessing.¹⁹  Forbidden mixture, as it is said, Of fowls after their kind.²⁰  And the other?²¹  — He will maintain that this was merely for the sake of mating.²²

R. Joseph said, The scholars²³  stated: A heathen is executed for the violation of three precepts — Mnemonic G Sh R—²⁴ viz., adultery, bloodshed, and blasphemy. R. Shesheth objected: Now bloodshed is rightly included, since it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed;²⁵  but whence do we know the others? If they are derived from bloodshed,²⁶  the other four should also be included; whilst if their inclusion is taught by the extending phrase any man,²⁷  should not idolatry too be included?²⁸  But R. Shesheth said thus: The scholars stated, A heathen is executed for the violation of four precepts [including idolatry]. But is a heathen executed for idolatry? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen. This implies that they are merely forbidden, but their

 

violation is not punished by death! — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence.²⁹

^{Cuthean = Goyim=Gentile}

R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all. Now is a heathen executed for robbery? Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery — if one stole or robbed³⁰  or [seized] a beautiful woman,³¹  or [committed] similar offences,³²  if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean^{33 (GOYIM-GENTILE)}  against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained'?³⁴  But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? — Because the second clause wishes to state, 'but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained,' therefore the former clause reads, '[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept.'³⁵  But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: 'For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty'?³⁶  — How else could that clause have been taught? Could he state, 'forbidden' … 'permitted'? Surely it has been taught; A Cuthean and a [Jewish] shepherd of small cattle [sheep, goats, etc.]³⁷  need neither be rescued [from a pit] nor may they be thrown [therein]!³⁸ 'And similar acts.' To what can this apply in the case of robbery? — R. Aha b. Jacob answered: To a worker in a vineyard [who eats of the grapes]. When so? If his is the finishing work, it is permitted?³⁹  If it is not the finishing work, is it not actual robbery?⁴⁰ — But R. Papa said: This applies to [the theft of] an article worth less than a perutah.⁴¹  But if so, why say that such robbery of a Jew by a Cuthean must not be kept: does he not forgive him?⁴²  — Though he later forgives him, he is grieved when it occurs [therefore it is prohibited] — But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean from another is but a 'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not forgive,⁴³  is it not actual theft? — But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered; It applies to the withholding of a labourer's wage.⁴⁴  One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted.⁴⁵  To what can 'a similar act' apply in the case of a beautiful woman? — When R. Dimi came,⁴⁶  he said in the name of R. Eleazar in the name of R. Hanina: To a heathen who allotted a bondwoman to his slave [for concubinage] and then took her for himself, for this he is executed.⁴⁷

'A similar act', however, is not taught with reference to murder.⁴⁸  Abaye said: If it should be, however, that it is so taught, it would be in accordance with R. Jonathan b. Saul. For it has been taught; If one was pursuing his neighbour to slay him, and the latter could have saved himself by maiming a limb [of the pursuer, e.g., his foot], and did not thus save himself [but killed him instead],

Sanhedrin 57b

he is executed for his death.¹

 

 

R. Jacob b. Aha found it written in the scholars'²   Book of Aggada:³   A heathen is executed on the ruling of one judge, on the testimony of one witness, without a formal warning, on the evidence of a man, but not of a woman, even if he [the witness] be a relation. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. Whence do we know all this? — Rab Judah answered: The Bible saith, And surely your blood of your lives will I require;⁴   this shows that even one judge [may try a heathen].⁵   At the hand of every living thing will I require it: even without an admonition having been given;⁶   And at the hand of man: even on the testimony of one witness;⁷   at the hand of man:⁸   but not at the hand [i.e., on the testimony] of a woman; his brother: teaching that even a relation may testify. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. What is R. Ishmael's reason? Because it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man within [another] man, shall his blood be shed.⁹   What is a man within another man? — An embryo in his mother's womb.¹⁰  But the first Tanna [who excludes the murder of an embryo from capital punishment] is a Tanna of the school of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation. He connects the [second] 'man' with the latter half of the sentence, and interprets thus: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, within man [i.e., within him], shall his blood be shed. Now, how can man's blood be shed, and yet be retained within him? By strangulation.

R. Hamnuna objected: Now, is not a [heathen] woman commanded [to keep the social laws]? Surely it is written, For I know him, that he will command his sons and his household [which includes the womenfolk] after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord to exercise charity, and judgment?¹¹  — He raised the objection, and he answered it himself: he would command 'his sons' to exercise judgment; 'his daughters' to perform charity.

R. Awia the elder said to R. Papa: Let us say that a heathen woman who committed murder must not be executed, since it is written, at the hand of every man [who committed murder] etc. implying,¹²  'but not at the hand of woman'? — He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: Whoso sheddeth man's blood implies whosoever it be [even a woman]. Let us say that a heathen woman who committed adultery is not executed, since it is written, therefore shall a man forsake [his father and mother, and cleave to his wife], implying¹²  that a man [must cleave], but not a woman? — He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: The verse, And they shall be as one flesh, reassimilated them to each other [making the law of fidelity applicable to both].

Our Rabbis taught: [A man, a man shall not approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness.¹³  It would have been sufficient to state,] A man shall not approach etc. What is taught by the repetition, A man, a man? — The extension of the law to heathens, that they too are forbidden incest [including adultery]. Now is this deduced from this verse; is it rather not deduced from a different text, viz., [And the lord God commanded…] saying, which refers to adultery?¹⁴  — The latter text refers to adultery with a woman of their own [i.e., with a heathen married woman]; the former to adultery with one of ours [i.e., a Jewish married woman], for the second clause teaches: If he committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law. With regard to what is this?¹⁵  — R. Nahman said in the name of Rabbah b. Abbuha: With regard to an assembly, witnesses and formal admonition.¹⁶  Is a Jewess then of less account?¹⁷  But R. Johanan answered thus: It is with regard to a betrothed Jewish maiden,¹⁸  whose violation by heathen law is not a capital offence;¹⁹  hence they are judged by Jewish law.

But if their offence was against a fully married woman, are they judged according to their law? Surely it has been taught: 'If a heathen committed adultery with a [Jewish] betrothed maiden, he is stoned; with a fully married woman, he is strangled.' Now if we judged them according to the law pertaining to them, should he not be decapitated? — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: By a 'married woman' this Baraitha means one whose huppah ceremony²⁰  has been performed, but without the marriage being consummated. Since by their law her violation is not a capital offence, they are judged by ours. For R. Hanina taught: They recognise the inviolability of a woman whose union has been consummated, but not if she merely entered the huppah without the union having been consummated. It has been taught in agreement with R. Johanan: All prohibited [sexual] relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens, but those for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death are permitted to heathens; this is R. Meir's view. But the Sages maintain: There are many relationships²¹  for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death, which are nevertheless forbidden to a Gentile. If a heathen committed incest with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law; if with a heathen woman, he is judged according to heathen law. The only difference that this makes is with respect to a betrothed maiden.²²  But should not the Tanna include a woman whose huppah ceremony has been performed without the marriage being consummated? — The teacher of this Baraitha is the Tanna of the college of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation, and by both codes [Jewish and heathen] this last-mentioned offence is punished by strangulation.

How Bill Clinton was exonerated with the Jewess Monica Lewinsky

 

Now, is R. Meir of the opinion that all relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens? Surely it has been taught: A proselyte,

 

---

footnotes

1. Yet this cannot be regarded as real murder, and hence may be called 'a similar act'. But the sages dispute this, and maintain that he is not executed at all.
2. V. p. 387, n, 7. It may also mean the School of Rab (Bacher. Agad. Bab. Amor. p. 2).
3. Aggadah (or Haggadah, from nagad, to declare), means the whole non-legal portion of Jewish learning. Here however, an actual law is cited from the Book of Aggadah. In the T. J. and Midrashim, many statements cited in the T. B. as being from the Book of Aggadah of the schools, are those cited under the name of Noachian precepts. Hence it is possible that the reference is to a collection of laws relating to Gentiles, and in order to distinguish it from specifically Jewish laws, it was called the Book of Aggadah (Weiss, Dor, III, p. 158).
4. Gen. IX, 5.
5. The interpretation is based on the use of the singular, 'I' will require.
6. This is based on the extending word 'every'.
7. This is based on the singular.
8. Not the same phrase in Heb. as the preceding one.
9. Lit. rendering of Gen. IX, 6.
10. This law was directed against the Roman practice of prenatal murder. Weiss, Dor, II, 22.
11. Ibid. XVIII, 19. Why then should a woman's testimony be inadmissible?
12. According to Rab Judah's exegesis.
13. Lit. rendering of Lev. XVIII, 6.
14. V. p. 383.
15. Since by the Noachian Law also he is liable to death.
16. He must be tried by a full Sanhedrin; he cannot be convicted on the testimony of less than two witnesses, and he must have been formally admonished before committing the offence.
17. I.e., is he dealt with more leniently because his offence was against a Jewess? For when his offence is against a heathen, these are unnecessary.
18. V. p. 333, n. 3; p. 337, n. 5.
19. As they do not regard her as married until the actual consumation of the nuptials.
20. V. p. 333, n. 3.
21. The Gaon of Wilna deletes 'many': Maimonides likewise does not include it in his text. Actually, the dispute of the Sages and R. Meir is only in reference to a half sister by one's mother.
22. Tosef. 'A.Z. IX. Since heathen law does not recognise this as a capital offence, he is judged by our law. This statement supports R. Johanan's contention.

 

Folio 58a

born, but not conceived in sanctity,¹  possesses kin on his mother's side but not on his father's side. E.g., if he married his sister by his mother, [born before his mother's conversion, and who subsequently became converted too,] he must divorce her; by his father, he may keep her; his father's sister by his father's mother, he must divorce her; by his father's father, he may keep her; his mother's sister by her mother, he must renounce her; by her father — R. Meir ruled that he must divorce her, but the Sages maintained that he may keep her; for R. Meir held that all forbidden degrees of consanguinity on the mother's side must be divorced; on the father's side may be kept.²  He may marry his brother's wife,³  his paternal uncle's wife, and all other relations by marriage are permitted to him, this including his father's wife. If he married a woman and her daughter⁴  he retains one and must divorce the other. But in the first place, he must not marry them.⁵  If his wife died, he may marry his mother-in-law; others say that he may not!⁶  — Rab Judah said, There is no difficulty: one dictum is by R. Meir according to R. Eliezer, and one is by R. Meir according to R. Akiba.⁷ For it has been taught: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother;⁸  R. Eliezer said: His father means 'his father's sister'; his mother, 'his mother's sister'.⁹  R. Akiba said: His father means 'his father's wife'; his mother is literally meant. And he shall cleave, but not to a male;¹⁰  to his wife, but not to his neighbour's wife;¹¹  and they shall be as one flesh, applying to those that can become one flesh, thus excluding cattle and beasts, which cannot become one flesh with man.¹²

The Master stated: 'R. Eliezer said: His father means 'his father's sister'. But may it not mean his father literally?¹³  — This is forbidden by and he shall cleave, but not to a male. But perhaps it means 'his father's wife'? — That is taught by to his wife, but not to his neighbour's wife [which includes his father's]. But perhaps it forbids her even after his father's death? — It must be similar to his mother: just as his mother is not his relation by marriage, so his father must refer to a non-marriage relationship.

'His mother means, his mother's sister'. But may it not be literally meant? — That is taught by to his wife, but not to his neighbour's wife. But perhaps it forbids her even after his father's death? — It must be similar to his father: just as his father is not literally meant, so his mother is not literally meant.

'R. Akiba said: His father, means, his father's wife'. But perhaps it is literally meant? — That is taught by and he shall cleave, but not to a male. If so, is not his father's wife taught by to his wife, but not to his neighbour's wife? — That teaches that she is forbidden even after his father's death.

'His mother is literally meant'. But is this not taught by to his wife, but not to his neighbour's wife'? — This refers to his mother who was violated by his father.¹⁴

What are the grounds of their dispute? — R. Eliezer is of the opinion

 

---

Original footnotes 

1. I.e., whose mother was a heathen at his conception, but became a Jewess before his birth.
2. The guiding principal in all this is: 'a proselyte is as a new born babe', who stands absolutely in no relationship to any pre-conversion relation. Consequently, his brothers and sisters, father, mother, etc. from before his conversion lose his relationship on his conversion. Should they too subsequently become converted, they are regarded as strangers to him, and he might marry, e.g., his mother or sister. This is the Biblical law. But since heathens themselves recognised the law of incest in respect of maternal relations, the Rabbis decreed that this should hold good for a proselyte too, i.e., that he is forbidden to marry his maternal relations who were forbidden to him before his conversion, so that it should not be said that he abandoned a faith with a higher degree of sanctity than the one he has embraced (since he cannot be expected to understand the principle of complete annulment of relationships). In this case, since he was born in sanctity, he is really not a proselyte at all. He is so styled because he too is legally a stranger to all his father's and mother's pre-conversion relations. As for his mother's paternal sister, R. Meir held that since she is partly maternally related, she is forbidden, as otherwise it would be thought that a proselyte is permitted to marry his maternal relations. But the Rabbis held that there was no fear of this, and since the relationship is in its source paternal, it is not forbidden.
3. By 'his brother's wife' is meant even his brother by his mother. For the heathens do not recognise consanguinity in relations by marriage, and consequently these are permitted to a proselyte.
4. I.e., who stood in that relationship before they were converted.
5. This is explained in Yeb. 98b as referring to those relations whom, as stated above, he may retain
6. Now in this Baraitha a number of relations forbidden to Jews on pain of death e.g., his father's wife and his mother-in-law, are permitted to the proselyte, and hence to heathens in general; whilst a number of relations not forbidden on pain of death, e.g., his sister, his paternal and maternal aunts, are prohibited to him: This, taught in R. Meir's name, contradicts his other ruling that all forbidden degrees of consanguinity punishable by death are forbidden to heathens.
7. Rashi states that both were his teachers, and cites Bezah 3b as proof. The J.E. (v. Meir) and Weiss, Dor II, 132, do not give R. Eliezer as one of his teachers. Nevertheless he may well have transmitted some of his rulings.
8. Gen. II, 24.
9. I.e., that union with these relations are forbidden.
10. I.e., a prohibition against pederasty. This is deduced from the fact that it is natural only for the opposite sexes to cleave to each other.
11. This is a prohibition of adultery.
12. Hence R. Meir's dictum that heathens are forbidden those relations which are prohibited to Jews on pain of death, e.g., the father's wife, reflects R. Akiba's teaching, whilst his ruling in the Baraitha that a proselyte may marry his father's wife is R. Eliezer's view, who does not interpret 'his father' as his father's wife.
13. Thus prohibiting pederasty.
14. But not made his wife.

Sanhedrin 58b

that only by referring to collateral relations¹  can his father and his mother bear similar interpretations.²  But R. Akiba prefers to interpret his father as his father's wife, who is designated as the nakedness of his father, rather than his father's sister, who, is designated as his father's kin, not his father's nakedness.³

Come and hear: And Amram took him Jochebed his father's sister to wife.⁴  Does it not [presumably] mean his father's sister on her mother's side [too]?⁵  — No. It means his father's paternal sister.⁶

Come and hear: And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not of my mother.⁷  Does not this prove that his mother's daughter is forbidden?⁸  — Now, is this logical: was she then his sister? She was his brother's daughter, and therefore, whether by his father or mother,⁹  permitted to him. But Abram declared to him [i.e., Abimelech] thus: I am fraternally related to her, [i.e., she is my brother's daughter] on my father's side [i.e., my brother by my father] but not on my mother's side.¹⁰

Come and hear! Why did not Adam marry his daughter?¹¹  So that Cain should marry his sister, as it is written, For I said, the world shall be built up by grace.¹²  But otherwise, she would have been forbidden [to Cain]?¹³  — Once however that it was permitted, it remained so.

R. Huna said: A heathen may marry his daughter. But should you ask, If so, why did not Adam marry his daughter? — In order that Cain might marry his sister, that the world might be built up by grace. Others give this version: R. Huna said: A heathen may not marry his daughter; the proof being that Adam did not marry his daughter. But that proof is fallacious: The reason was that Cain should marry his sister, so that the world should be built up by [Adam's] grace.

Sick and perverted ribbeyes

R. Hisda said: A heathen slave [owned by a Jew] may marry his daughter and his mother, for he has lost the status of a heathen, but has not yet attained that of a Jew.¹⁴  When R. Dimi came,¹⁵  he said in the name of R. Eleazar in the name of R. Hanina: A heathen who allotted a bondwoman to his slave [for concubinage] and then took her for himself is executed on her account. From when [is she regarded as the particular concubine of that slave]? — R. Nahman said: When she is referred to as so and so's mistress.¹⁶  When is she

See Numbers for what the Lord said. These sick and perverted ribbeyes strain gnats and swallow camels and argue in divide. God the Father was plain as daylight what he meant. Much like the Judeo-Churchi-zionian Pastors who lead the unbelievers astray in Amerika.  

 

free again [to others]? — R. Huna said: From the time that she goes bareheaded in the streets.¹⁷

R. Eleazar said in R. Hanina's name: If a heathen had an unnatural connection with his wife, he incurs guilt; for it is written, and he shall cleave, which excludes unnatural intercourse.¹⁸ Raba objected: Is there anything for which a Jew is not punishable and a heathen is?¹⁹  But Raba said thus: A heathen who violates his neighbour's wife unnaturally is free from punishment — Why so? — [Scripture saith:] To his wife, but not to his neighbour's; and he shall cleave, which excludes unnatural intercourse.²⁰

^{see Bill Clinton for definition of is, "Is"}

R. Hanina said: If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death,²¹  for it is written, And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian.²²  R. Hanina also said: He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, one who smiteth²³  man [i.e. an Israelite] attacketh²⁴  the Holy One.²⁵

 

 

(Mnemonic: lifts, his servant, Sabbath.)²⁶ Resh Lakish said: He who lifts his hand against his neighbour, even if he did not smite him, is called a wicked man as it is written, And he said unto the wicked man, Wherefore wouldst thou smite thy fellow?²⁷  'Wherefore hast thou smiteth is not said, but wherefore wouldst thou smite, shewing that though he had not smitten him yet, he was termed a wicked man. Ze'iri said in R. Hanina's name: He is called a sinner, for it is written, But if not, I will take it by force;²⁸  and it is further written, Wherefore the sin of the young men was very great before the Lord.²⁹  R. Huna said: His hand should be cut off, as it is written, Let the uplifted arm be broken.³⁰  R. Huna had the hand cut off [of one who was accustomed to strike other people].³¹  R. Eleazar said: The only thing to be done with him is to bury him, as it is written, And a man of [uplifted] arm, for him is the earth.³²  R. Eleazar also said: The earth was given only to the strong.³³  as it is said, But as for the mighty man, for him is the earth.³⁴  Resh Lakish said also: What is the meaning of the verse, He that serveth his land shall be satisfied with bread?³⁵  If one enslaves himself to his land [continually toiling thereon] he shall be satisfied with bread: if not, he shall not be satisfied with bread. Resh Lakish also said: A heathen who keeps a day of rest, deserves death, for it is written, And a day and a night they shall not rest,³⁶  and a master has said: Their prohibition is their death sentence.³⁷  Rabina said: Even if he rested on a Monday. Now why is this not included in the seven Noachian laws? — Only negative injunctions are enumerated, not positive ones.³⁸

 

Original footnotes 

1. I.e., to the father's sister or mother's sister.
2. For they cannot both be literal, since his father is prohibited by 'and he shall cleave'; nor can they both refer to relationship by marriage, since his mother is a blood relation.
3. Lev. XVIII, 8: The nakedness of thy father's wife thou shalt not uncover it is thy father's nakedness; Lev. XVIII, 12: Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of my father's sister: she is thy father's near kinswoman. Since his father's wife is designated his father's nakedness she forms part and parcel of himself, as it were, in contradistinction to his father's sister, who by being described as his father's kin, is recognised as a separate entity. Consequently, in the interests of literalness 'his father's wife' is a more preferable interpretation.
4. Ex. VI, 20.
5. This refutes R. Eliezer's ruling. [Belonging to the pre-Sinaitic era, the Patriarchs were accounted Noachians.]
6. Only this relation was permitted in the pre-Sinaitic era. But his father's maternal sister would have been forbidden.
7. Gen. XX, 12. Spoken by Abraham about Sarah.
8. This contradicts R. Akiba's ruling. For since he interprets the verse as referring us his father's wife and his mother, who are forbidden on pain of death, he evidently regards those who are forbidden under penalty of extinction as permissible, and his mother's daughter is only thus forbidden, but not on pain of death.
9. This refers to his brother.
10. Not that she would have been forbidden in that case, but this was stated merely for the sake of exactness.
11. [Or why could not Adam have married his daughter? Eve's offence should have been followed by her death, and as to Adam, he could have found a help-meet in his daughter (Tosaf.)]
12. Ps. LXXXIX, 2. It was an act of grace on Adam's part to deny himself his sister; or, as Rashi states, God commanded Adam to deal graciously with Cain, so that Cain, by marrying her, should build up the world.
13. This proves that one's paternal sister was forbidden to the sons of Noah.
14. Heathen slaves owned by Jews occupied an intermediate position in respect to Judaism. The males were circumcised, and permitted to eat of the Passover sacrifice. Like women, they were bound to observe all negative commandments and all positive ones not limited to certain times. We see here that this applied to marriage too. Their status was neither that of a heathen nor of an Israelite proper. As they were no longer heathens, they stood in no relationship to their former relations. But as they were not Jews either, there was no need to forbid them their former maternal relations through fear that it would be said that they had left a higher sanctity for a lower one.
15. V. supra p. 390, n. 1.
16. Lit., 'girl'.
17. Even non-Jewish married women did not walk bareheaded in the streets, and this bondwoman, though not legally married, would do likewise. If she appeared bareheaded, it was a sign that her connection with the slave to whom she had been allotted was now broken.
18. His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving.
19. A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew.
20. By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction 'to his wife but not to his neighbour's wife' is incurred only for natural, but not unnatural intercourse.
21. [By the Hand of God, V. Yad, Melakim. I, 6].
22. Ex. II, 12. Thus Moses slew the Egyptian for striking an Israelite, proving that he had merited it.
23. Deriving mokesh from, nakosh.
24. Yala' [H] is here derived from loa' [H] the jaw: lit., 'smiteth the jaw'.
25. Prov. XX, 25.
26. V. 387 n. 8.
27. Ex. II, 13.
28. I Sam. II, 16. This refers to the sons of Eli, who demanded their portion of the sacrifices before it was due, threatening physical violence if their demands were not satisfied.
29. Ibid. 16.
30. Job XXXVIII, 15. The editions give the reference as Job XXXI, but this is an error caused by a slightly similar passage in XXXI, 22.
31. This is not actually permitted in the Torah. Weiss (Dor, II. 14) holds that R. Huna was influenced by Persian practice in this.
32. I.e., he is to be buried, homiletical rendering of Job XXII, 8.
33. I.e., only a strong man should wish to possess land, as there are always quarrels in connection therewith.
34. Ibid.
35. Prov. XII, 11
36. Gen. VIII, 22. 'They' is here made to apply to men, and 'shall not' is taken to mean 'may not'.
37. Eisenstein, J. E., V. p. 623. suggests that this may have been directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic law yet observed the Sabbath, and quotes Maimonides who advances the following reason: 'The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovations in religion or to create new commandments. He has the privilege to become a true proselyte by accepting the whole law.' (Yad. Melakim, X, 9.) He also points out that 'Deserves death' expresses strong indignation, and is not to be taken literally; [cf. the recurring phrase. 'He who transgresses the words of the Sages deserves death.' Ber. 6b.]
38. The seven Noachian laws deal with things which a heathen must abstain from doing. But when we say that a heathen must not observe a day of rest, we bid him to do a positive action, viz., work.

 

Why Judge Roy Moore's preplanned Ten Commandment scheme failed, and he, a Judeo-Churchizionian knew full well what he was doing for the Noahide Laws. He has been bought.

 

Folio 59a

But the precept of observing social laws is

a positive one, yet it is reckoned? — It is both positive and negative.¹

R. Johanan said: A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance;²  it is our inheritance, not theirs.³   Then why is this not included in the Noachian laws? — On the reading morasha [an inheritance] he steals it; on the reading me'orasah [betrothed], he is guilty as one who violates a betrothed maiden, who is stoned.⁴  An objection is raised: R. Meir used to say. Whence do we know that even a heathen who studies the Torah is as a High Priest? From the verse, [Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments:] which, if man do, he shall live in them.⁵  Priests, Levites, and Israelites are not mentioned, but men: hence thou mayest learn that even a heathen who studies⁶  the Torah is as a High Priest! — That refers to their own seven laws.⁷

'R Hanania b. Gamaliel said: [They were also commanded] not to partake of the blood drawn from a living animal.'

How these laws were inserted by "James" the so-called brother of the ONLY Begotten SON of God, who was an infiltrator, and who was the Elder of the Jerusalem Council. By this trickery, they will undermine the Authority of the Everlasting Covenant, and Judeo-Churchizionity will rush into the arms of the Universal Noahide Laws and their False Christ, Moshiach ben Satan that son of Perdition

Our Rabbis taught: But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat,⁸  this prohibits flesh cut from the living animal. R. Hanina b. Gamaliel said: It also prohibits blood drawn from a living animal. What is his reason? — He reads the verse thus: flesh with the life thereof [shall ye not eat]: blood with the life thereof shall ye not eat. But the Rabbis maintain that this reading teaches that flesh cut from live reptiles is permitted.⁹  Similarly it is said, Only be sure that thou eat not the blood: for the blood is the life,' and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh.¹⁰  But the Rabbis maintain that the verse teaches that the blood of arteries, with which life goes out, [is also forbidden as blood].¹¹

Why was it first enjoined upon the sons of Noah, and then repeated at Sinai? — As the dictum, of R. Jose b. Hanina. For R. Jose b. Hanina said: Every precept which was given to the sons of Noah and repeated at Sinai was meant for both [heathens and Israelites]; that which was given to the sons of Noah but not repeated at Sinai was meant for the Israelites, but not for the heathens. Now, the only law thus commanded to the children of Noah and not repeated at Sinai was the prohibition of the sinew that shrank [nervous ischiadicus], and in accordance with R. Judah's view.¹²

The Master said: 'Every precept which was given to the sons of Noah and repeated at Sinai was meant for both [Noachides and Israelites]'. On the contrary, since it was repeated at Sinai, should we not assume it to be meant for Israel only?¹³  — Since idolatry was repeated as Sinai, and we find that the Noachides were punished for practising it,¹⁴  we must conclude that it was meant for both.

'That which was given to the sons of Noah but not repeated at Sinai was meant for the Israelites, but not for the heathens.' On the contrary, since it was not repeated at Sinai, should we not assume that it was meant for the Noachides and not for Israel?¹⁵  — There is nothing permitted to an Israelite yet forbidden to a heathen. Is there not? But what of a beautiful woman?¹⁶  — There it is because the heathens were not authorised to conquer.¹⁷  But what of a thing worth less than a Perutah?¹⁸  — There it is because the heathens do not forgive.¹⁹

'Every precept which was given to the sons of Noah and repeated at Sinai was meant for both [Noachides and Israelites]'.

 

Original footnotes

 

1. Positive: In dispense justice; negative: to refrain from injustice. But the Sabbath is entirely positive.
2. Deut. XXXIII, 4.

All American Christians should have the Talmud Bavli, the "SAYERS" stand defeated in Christ Jesus

1. This seems a very strong expression. In the J. E. (loc. cit.) it is suggested that R. Johanan feared the knowledge of Gentiles in matters of Jurisprudence, as they would use it against the Jews in their opponents' courts. In support of this it may be observed that the Talmud places R. Johanan's dictum  immediately after the passage dealing with the setting up of law courts by Gentiles. It is also possible that R. Johanan's objection was to the studying of Oral Law by Jewish Christians, as the possession of the Oral Law was held to be the distinguishing mark of the Jews. It is significant that it was R. Johanan who also said that God's covenant with Israel was only for the sake of the Oral Law. (Cf. Ex. Rab. 47.)
2. In Pes. 49b two opinions on the reading of this verse are recorded. One view is that it should be read, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance (morasha [H]), in accordance with the Scriptural text. Another version is Moses commanded us a law for a betrothal (reading me'orasah [H]=[H] i.e., as something betrothed, consecrated to us, from [H]= [H]). On the first view, this prohibition is included in that of robbery; on the second, in that of adultery.
3. Lev. XVIII, 5.
4. Which includes observing.
5. It is meritorious for them to study these; but not laws which do not pertain to them.
6. Gen. IX, 4.
7. V. infra 59b.
8. Deut. XII, 23. Thus, the blood being equated with the life, it may not be eaten whilst 'the life' is with the 'flesh', i.e., whilst the animal is alive.See www.samliquidation.com/baal_tax.htm Kosher Tax
9. The prohibition of blood is mentioned in the same chapter in connection with the slaughtering of the animal: 15 seq., Notwithstanding thou mayest kill and eat flesh in all thy gates … Only ye shall not eat the blood. Now, owing to this juxtaposition, I might think that only the blood that gushes forth from the throat when the animal is slaughtered is forbidden. Therefore the second injunction in v. 23 equates the prohibition of blood with that of flesh cut from the living animal. Just as the latter is forbidden in itself, so the former is forbidden irrespective of any connection with slaughtering. In Ker. 22a R. Johanan and Resh Lakish dispute as to what is meant by 'the blood with which life goes out'.
10. R. Judah maintains that this was forbidden to the children of Jacob, who, living before the giving of the Law, are accounted Noachians. But the Rabbis maintain that this was given at Sinai, but that Moses when writing the whole Pentateuch, was commanded to insert it in Gen. XXXII, 33, so as to elucidate its reason.
11. For if it were not so repeated, it would be natural to suppose that its application was a universal one. Hence its repetition would seem to limit it to Israel.
12. V. p. 382, n. 3.
13. The stand point of this objection is that the code promulgated at Sinai to the Israelites should cancel any previous code not given specifically to them.
14. V. supra 57a.
15. I.e., Palestine. For even the Israelites were permitted this only in the course of their conquest of Palestine, but not otherwise.
16. The theft of which is regarded as an offence by heathens but not by Jews. V. supra 57a.
17. Actually, it would be theft in the case of a Jew too, but that Jews are not particular about such a trifle, and readily forgive. Heathens, however, do not forgive, and therefore it is theft in their case.

 

Why your Gentile goyim children were circumcised of the flesh three decades ago 

 

Sanhedrin 59b

But circumcision, which was given to the Sons of Noah, for it is written, Thou shalt keep my covenant,¹  and repeated at Sinai, And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised,²  yet was meant for Israel, and not for the Noachides? — That repetition was inserted to permit circumcision on the Sabbath, by interpreting, on the day [whichever it is], and even on the Sabbath.³

But procreation, which was enjoined upon the Noachides, for it is written, And you be ye fruitful and multiply.⁴  and repeated at Sinai, as it is written, Go say to them, get you in to your tents again,⁵  was nevertheless commanded to Israel but not to the heathens? — That repetition was to teach that whatever has been constitutionally forbidden by a majority vote requires another majority vote to abrogate it.⁶  If so, may we not say of each [of the Noachian laws] that it was repeated for a definite purpose?⁷  — He means this: why should the prohibition be repeated?⁸

'Now the only law [thus commanded to the children of Israel and not repeated at Sinai] was the prohibition of the sinew that shrank [nervus ischiadicus], and in accordance with R. Judah's view.' But these⁹  too were not repeated.¹⁰  — These two were repeated, though for a purpose, but this was not repeated at all.

Are ye then the seed of Abraham in faith of Christ Jesus, as according to the Promise, the ONE Seed Issac, made with Issac? Circumcision of the heart, Christ Jesus.

An alternative answer is this:¹¹ Circumcision was from the very first commanded to Abraham only [and not to the Noachides in general]: Thou shalt keep my covenant, therefore, thou and thy seed after thee in their generations,¹²  meaning, thou and thy seed are to keep it, but no others. If so, should it not be incumbent upon the children of Ishmael [Abraham's son]? — For in Isaac shall thy seed be called.¹³  Then should not the children of Esau be bound to practise it? — In Isaac,¹⁴  but not all Isaac. R. Oshaia objected: If so, the children of Keturah should have been exempt!¹⁵  — Did not R. Jose b. Abin, or as others say, R. Jose b. Hanina, state: [And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people;] he hath broken my covenant¹⁶  — this extends the precept [of circumcision] to the children of Keturah?¹⁷

Rab Judah said in Rab's name: Adam was not permitted to eat flesh, for it is written, [Behold I have given you all the herbs, etc.] to you it shall be for food, and to all the beasts of the earth,¹⁸  implying, but the beasts of the earth shall not be for you.¹⁹  But with the advent of the sons of Noah, it was permitted, for it is said, [Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you;] even as the green herb have I given you all things.²⁰  Now one might think that the prohibition of flesh cut from the living animal does not apply to them [sc. the Noachides]: therefore the Writ teacheth, But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.²¹  One might think that this prohibition applies even to reptiles; therefore it is stated — but.²²  How is this implied? — R. Huna said [But flesh with the life thereof, which is] the blood thereof: this shews that the prohibition applies only to those creatures whose flesh is distinct from their blood [in its prohibition]; excluding reptiles, whose flesh is not distinct from their blood.²³

An objection is raised: And rule over the fish of the sea;²⁴  surely that means that they should serve as food?²⁵  — No. It refers to toil.²⁶  But can fish be made to work? — Yes, even as Rahabah propounded: What if one drove [a waggon] with a goat and a shibbuta?²⁷  Come and hear: and over the foul of the heaven.²⁸  Surely this is in respect of food? — No. It refers to toil. But can fowl be made to work? — Yes, even as Rabbah, son of R. Huna propounded: According to the ruling of R. Jose b. R. Judah, what if one threshed [corn] with geese or cocks?²⁹

Come and hear: And over every living creature that moveth upon the earth!³⁰  — That refers to the serpent. For it has been taught: — R. Simeon b. Manassia said: Woe for the loss of a great servant. For had not the serpent been cursed, every Israelite would have had two valuable serpents, sending one to the north and one to the south to bring him costly gems, precious stones and pearls.³¹  Moreover, one would have fastened a thong under its tail, with which it would bring forth earth for his garden and waste land.³²

A [further] objection is raised: R. Judah b. Tema said: Adam reclined in the Garden of Eden, whilst the ministering angels roasted flesh and strained wine for him. Thereupon the serpent looked in, saw his glory, and became envious of him?³³  — The reference there is to flesh that descended from heaven. But does flesh descend from heaven? — Yes; as in the story of R. Simeon b. Halafta, who was walking on the road, when lions met him and roared at him. Thereupon he quoted: The young lions roar after their prey;³⁴  and two lumps of flesh descended [from heaven]. They ate one and left the other. This he brought to the schoolhouse and propounded: Is this clean [fit for food] or not? — They [sc. the scholars] answered: Nothing unclean descends from heaven. R. Zera asked R. Abbahu: What if something in the shape of an ass were to descend? — He replied: Thou howling yorod:³⁵  did they not answer him that no unclean thing descends from heaven?³⁶

'R. Simeon said, They were also forbidden to practice sorcery.' What is R. Simeon's reason? — Because it is written,

 

Original footnotes 

1. en. XVII, 9. Abraham and his descendants until Sinai are also accounted sons of Noah.
2. Lev. XII, 3.
3. Hence, being repeated for a purpose, the above principle does not apply to it.
4. Gen. IX, 7.
5. Deut. V, 27. This is interpreted as a command to resume their marital obligations, which were suspended for three days before the Revelation, v. Ex. XIX, 15.
6. Although the prohibition in Ex. XIX, 15 was explicitly limited to three days, yet after that it did not cease automatically, but was formally abrogated. This proves that any prohibition constitutionally imposed, as by a majority of the Sanhedrin, even for a limited period, must be constitutionally repealed thereafter. Hence the repetition being necessary, it is not subject to the general principle. — So Rashi. Tosaf however, (here and in Bezah 5a) maintains that a temporary prohibition automatically ceases at the end of its period. Accordingly, Ex. XIX, 15 is to be translated: Be ready against the third day (for God's Revelation); approach not your wives (for an unspecified period). Tosaf. therefore substitutes this explanation: A prohibitory measure, constitutionally passed, does not automatically cease when its reason no longer exists. Thus in this case the prohibition was obviously on account of the approaching Revelation, yet after the Revelation, when there was no longer any reason for its continuance, it had to be formally revoked.
7. E.g., idolatry, to shew which acts of devotion are forbidden; incest, to teach its punishment.
8. I.e., if some additional detail had to be taught, that alone could have been stated without repeating the basic law. Such repetition must have been to enlarge its scope, as embracing both Israelites and heathens.
9. I.e., circumcision and procreation.
10. For, as explained above, their repetition being for a definite purpose, is not a repetition at all.
11. This is in answer to the first difficulty of circumcision having been given to the Noachides and repeated at Sinai.
12. Gen. XVII, 9.
13. Ibid. XXI, 12.
14. Heb. [H] the [H] (in) being taken as partitive preposition.
15. Keturah was Abraham's wife after Sarah's death, by whom he had six sons. Gen. XXV, 1f. According to the verse For in Isaac etc. these should not have been included in the precept.
16. Gen. XVII, 14.
17. This is the reply. The verse teaches the inclusion of the immediate sons of Keturah, but not of their descendants.
18. Gen. I, 29f.
19. I.e., the herbs, etc. have been given to you and to the beasts of the earth, but the beasts of the earth have not been given to you for food.
20. Ibid. IX, 3.
21. Ibid. 4.
22. Heb. [H]. It is a principle of Talmudic hermeneutics that the particles akh (but) and rak (save) always indicate a limitation or exclusion. Here akh is interpreted as teaching the exclusion of reptiles from the law under discussion.
23. The mention of blood is redundant, for the verse should have read, but flesh with the life thereof shall ye not eat, meaning, whilst life is in it thou must not eat its flesh; it being self evident that the life force lies in the blood. The redundancy teaches that this applies only to those creatures that have a separate prohibition for its flesh (cut from, the living animal), and a separate one for its blood. But the blood of reptiles is not separate from its flesh and is forbidden by the same injunction, there being no separate law. Hence they are excluded from the present verse.
24. Ibid. I, 28.
25. This was said to Adam.
26. Adam was given dominion over the lower creatures, to make them work for him.
27. Name of a fish, conjectured by Jastrow to be the mullet (Cephalus, v. Payne Smith, Thesaurus Syriacus 4029). The problem raised is whether this would involve the transgression of the prohibition, Thou shalt not plow an ox and ass together, Deut. XXII, 10.
28. Continuing the verse.
29. V. B.M. 91b. The problems raised in connection with the prohibition, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn. Deut. XXV, 4 shows that birds may be utilized for service.
30. The Heb. [H] translated 'living creature', denotes literally a wild animal, which cannot be put to service, but can only be caught and eaten.
31. Heb. [H] from [G] (Levy) or [G] (Krauss).
32. Thus the Serpent was intended to be put to service before it was cursed.
33. This proves that flesh was permitted to Adam.
34. Ps. CIV, 21.
35. Yarod is a bird of solitary habits, or a jackal (Rashi). The meaning is: what a foolish question to ask!
36. Hence thy supposition is an impossible one; and if it did happen, it would be fit for food.

 

Jesus whom the "SAYERS" reject, is an Idol according to the Pharasitic ribbeyes of Chabad Lubavitch the Chassidim Illuminated Serpents seed

Sanhedrin 60b

MISHNAH. HE WHO ENGAGES IN IDOL-WORSHIP [IS EXECUTED]. IT IS ALL ONE WHETHER HE SERVE IT, SACRIFICE, OFFER INCENSE, MAKE LIBATIONS, PROSTRATE HIMSELF, ACCEPT IT AS A GOD, OR SAY TO IT, 'THOU ART MY GOD.' BUT HE WHO EMBRACES, KISSES IT, SWEEPS OR SPRINKLES THE GROUND BEFORE IT, WASHES IT, ANOINTS IT, CLOTHES IT, OR PUTS ON ITS SHOES, HE TRANSGRESSES A NEGATIVE PRECEPT [BUT IS NOT EXECUTED]. HE WHO VOWS OR SWEARS [LIT. CONFIRMS A THING] BY ITS NAME, VIOLATES A NEGATIVE PRECEPT. HE WHO UNCOVERS HIMSELF BEFORE BAAL-PEOR¹   [IS GUILTY, FOR] THIS IS THE MODE OF WORSHIPPING HIM. HE WHO CASTS A STONE ON MERCULIS²   THEREBY WORSHIPS IT.

GEMARA. What is meant by 'WHETHER HE SERVE IT'?³  — R. Jeremiah said: This is what is meant: Whether he serve it in its normal way, or sacrifice, make libations, offer incense, or prostrate himself, even if these acts are not the normal mode of worshipping that particular deity. Why is blood sprinkling not included? — Abaye said: Because sprinkling is the same as offering LIBATIONS,⁴  as it is written, their drink libations of blood will I not offer.⁵

Whence do we derive all these?⁶  — Our Rabbis taught: Had Scripture written, He that sacrificeth shall be utterly destroyed.⁷  I would have thought that the Writ refers to sacrificing without the Temple precincts;⁸  therefore Scripture adds: to any God, shewing that it refers to sacrificing to idols.⁹  From this I know only that sacrificing [as an abnormal act or worship] is punishable: Whence do I learn the same of offering incense and making libations? — From the additional words, save unto the Lord alone, whereby the Writ restricted all these services to the worship of the Divine¹⁰  name. Now, since sacrificing was singled out from the general statement,¹¹  teaching that the latter applies to all services performed within the Temple precincts,¹²  whence can it be extended to include prostration? — From the verse, And he hath gone and served other gods, and prostrated himself before them,¹³  which is followed by, Thou shalt bring forth that man or that woman … and shalt stone them with stones.¹⁴  From this we learn the punishment: whence do we derive the formal prohibition? From the verse, For thou shalt prostrate thyself to no other god.¹⁵  I might think that I may also include embracing, kissing, and putting on its shoes [as punishable by death]:¹⁶  but the Writ saith, He hath sacrificeth.¹⁷  Now, sacrificing was included in the general statement;¹⁸  wherefore was it singled out? — That a comparison therewith might be drawn, and to teach you: just as sacrificing is distinguished, in that it is a service within the Temple precincts, and the death penalty is incurred through it, so for all services performed in the Temple precincts [in lawful worship] one is liable to death [when performing them idolatrously]. Hence prostration was singled out to illumine itself alone, whilst sacrificing was singled out to throw light upon the general proposition.¹⁹

The Master stated: 'I would have thought that the Writ refers to sacrificing without the Temple precincts'. But is that not punishable by extinction?²⁰  — I might have thought: if he was warned, he is executed; if not, he is punished by extinction. It is therefore taught otherwise.

Raba, son of R. Hanan asked Abaye: Let us say that prostration was singled out in order to throw light upon the general law; and if you answer, in that case, why was sacrificing singled out too?²¹  To throw light upon itself, viz., that the intention to perform one act in the service of idolatry, even if made during the performance of another [non-idolatrous] act, renders one liable to punishment. For it has been taught: If one slaughtered a cow with the intention of sprinkling its blood and burning its fat idolatrously, — R. Johanan said,

 

Original footnotes 

1. A Moabite deity. 'That the statements of the Rabbis (on the repulsive mode of worship) are not wholly imaginative and do not take their colouring from the rites of some heathen or antinomian-Gnostic sects is shewn by the fact that the worship of Peor is ridiculed, but nowhere stigmatised as moral depravity, by the Rabbis, which latter might have been expected, had the assertion of the Rabbis been based on the Gnostic cults mentioned.' J. E. s.v. Baal-Peor.
2. Mercurius, a Roman divinity, identified with the Greek Hermes; also a statue or a way-mark dedicated to Hermes, the patron deity of the wayfarer.
3. Are not all the actions mentioned modes of worship?
4. And already included in the Mishnah.
5. Ps. XVI, 4.
6. I.e., that guilt is incurred for all these acts of worship.
7. Omitting the words, to any God, Ex. XXII, 19.
8. Since this is forbidden elsewhere; Lev. XVIII, 3f; 8f.
9. Now the reference must be to sacrificing as an abnormal mode of worship, for the normal act of worship is designated in Heb. by [H] (to serve), and the verse should have read, He who serves any other god by sacrificing to it. Every normal act of service is derived from Deut. XVII, 3.
10. Heb. Shem Hameyuhad, v. p. 408, n. 1.
11. In Deut. XVII, 2-5; v. next note.
12. The penalty of death for idolatry is stated in Deut. XVII, 2-5; If there be found among you … a man or woman that hath wrought wickedness … And hath gone and served other gods and prostrated himself before them … thou shalt stone them with stones, till they die. 'And hath gone and served other gods' is a general statement, not particularizing any mode of service. Consequently, the verse in Ex. XXII, 19, which ordains the death penalty for sacrificing, is a singling out of a particular service from the general proposition of Deut. XVI, 3. Now it is one of the principles of exegesis that in such a case the particularized statement is intended to illumine and define the general proposition as a whole: thus just as sacrificing is a form of service performed within the Temple precincts (in lawful worship), so the general statement, 'and hath … served other gods' refers to such services, e.g., sprinkling of the blood, offering incense, and making libations. But prostration was not a mode of worship within the Temple precincts.
13. Ibid. 3.
14. Ibid. 4.
15. Ex. XXXIV, 14.
16. Since prostration is specially stated, I might think that it teaches that for any act of adoration, even if it is not the normal mode of worship, and not performed within the Temple precincts, just as prostration, guilt is incurred.
17. Ibid. XXII, 19.
18. Of Deut. XVIII, 3.
19. For if prostration was singled out in order to throw light upon the general law, viz., that for paying honour to an idol in any shape one is liable to death, why should sacrificing have been singled out too, since thereby one certainly honours the deity?
20. Kareth, v. Glos. cf. Lev. XVIII, 3f; 8f; whilst here the penalty of death is decreed.
21. V. p. 411, n. 9.

 

How they Skirt God and worship Moloch and his six pointed star

Folio 64a

'Be silent, for one must not make mention of the name of the Lord.'¹  [He said this] because his father and mother had not taught him [to serve the Lord], and straightway he brought forth an idol from his bosom, embracing and kissing it, until his stomach burst, his idol fell to the earth, and he upon it, thus fulfilling the verse, And I shall cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols.²  — That too was after they became addicted thereto.

Come and hear: And they cried with a loud voice unto the Lord their God.³  Now what did they say? — Rab Judah, or as others maintain R. Jonathan said: [They cried this:] 'Woe, woe, it is that [sc. idolatry] which destroyed the Sanctuary, burnt the Temple, slew the righteous, and exiled Israel from their land; and still it sports amongst us! Hast Thou not set it before us that we might be rewarded [for withstanding its allurements]? But we desire neither temptation nor reward!'⁴  — That too was after they were seduced by it. [Continuing Rab Judah's statement:] They fasted for three days, entreating for mercy; thereafter their sentence fell from Heaven, the word emeth [truth] written upon it. (R. Hanina said: This proves that the seal of the Holy One, blessed be He, is emeth.) The shape of a fiery lion's whelp issued from the Holy of Holies, and the Prophet said to Israel, That is the Tempter of Idolatry. Whilst they held it fast, a hair [of its body] fell out, and his roar of pain was heard for 400 parasangs.⁵  [In perplexity] they cried: 'What shall we do? Maybe Heaven will pity him !' The prophet answered: Cast him into a lead cauldron, and cover it with lead to absorb his voice, as it is written, And he said, This is wickedness; and he cast it into the midst of the ephah: and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof.⁶  Then they said, 'Since the time is propitious, let us pray that the Tempter of Sin [may likewise be delivered into our hands].' So they prayed and it was delivered into their hands. They imprisoned it for three days; after that they sought a new laid egg for an invalid in the whole of Palestine and could not find one.⁷  Then they said, 'What shall we do? Shall we pray that his power be but partially destroyed?⁸  Heaven will not grant it.' So they blinded it with rouge. This was so far effective that one does not lust for his forbidden relations.

Rab Judah said in Rab's name: A gentile woman once fell sick. She vowed, 'If I recover, I will go and serve every idol in the world.' She recovered, and proceeded to serve all idols. On reaching Peor, she asked its priests, 'How is this worshipped'? They replied, 'People eat beets, drink strong drink, and then uncover themselves before it.' She replied, 'I would rather fall sick again than serve an idol in such a manner.' But ye, O House of Israel,⁹  were not so [as it is written, Slay ye every one his men] that were joined unto Baal Peor:¹⁰ ye were attached to it like an air-tight lid.¹¹ Whereas, Whilst ye that did cleave unto the Lord your God,¹²  implies merely like two dates sticking to each other.¹³  In a Baraitha it has been taught: that were joined unto Baal Peor: [loosely] like a bracelet on the hands of a woman;¹⁴  whereas Whilst ye that did cleave unto the Lord your God indicates that they were firmly attached.¹⁵

Our Rabbis taught: Sabta, a townsman of Avlas,¹⁶  once hired an ass to a gentile woman. When she came to Peor, she said to him, 'Wait till I enter and come out again.' On her issuing, he said to her, 'Now do you wait for me too until I go in and come out again.'

'But,' said she, 'are you not a Jew?' He replied, 'What does it concern thee?' He then entered, uncovered himself before it, and wiped himself on the idol's nose, whilst the acolytes praised him, saying, 'No man has ever served this idol thus.'

sick perversion, but then again that is the whole of Talmud Bavli

He that uncovers himself before Baal Peor thereby serves it, even if his intention was to degrade it. He who casts a stone at Merculis thereby serves it, even if his intention was to bruise it.

R. Manasseh was going to Be Toratha.¹⁷  On the way he was told, 'An idol stands here.' He took up a stone and threw it at the idol's statue. Thereupon they said to him: 'It is Merculis'. He said to them, 'But we have learned, HE WHO CASTS A STONE FOR MERCULIS¹⁸  THEREBY SERVES IT.' So he went and inquired at the Beth Hamidrash [whether he had done wrong, since his action was a gesture of contempt]. They informed him, We have learned, HE WHO CASTS A STONE AT MERCULIS¹⁹  [thereby serves it] — that is to say even if it is merely to bruise it. He said to them, 'Then I will go and remove it.' But they replied, 'Whether one casts a stone or removes it, he incurs guilt, because every stone thus removed leaves room for another.'

MISHNAH. HE WHO GIVES OF HIS SEED TO MOLECH INCURS NO PUNISHMENT UNLESS HE DELIVERS IT TO MOLECH AND CAUSES IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE. IF HE GAVE IT TO MOLECH BUT DID NOT CAUSE IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE, OR THE REVERSE, HE INCURS NO PENALTY, UNLESS HE DOES BOTH.

GEMARA. The Mishnah²⁰  teaches idolatry and giving to Molech.²¹ R. Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not idolatry. For it has been taught, [if one causes his seed to pass through the fire,] whether to Molech or to any other idol he is liable [to death]. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon said: If to Molech, he is liable; if to another idol, he is not.

Abaye said: R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon and R. Hanina b. Antigonus said the one and same thing. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon, that which has just been stated. R. Hanina b. Antigonus — as it has been taught: R. Hanina b. Antigonus said: Why did the Torah employ the word Molech? To teach that the same law applies to whatever they proclaimed as their king, even a pebble or a splinter.²² Rabina²³  said: The difference between them is in respect of a temporary Molech.²⁴

 

Original footnotes 

1. Amos VI, 10.
2. Now this too shows that the child had really been taught to believe in it.
3. Nehem. IX, 4. This was on the fast-day held by the newly established community in Palestine.
4. This also proves that it had a strong hold upon them.
5. A parasang is 8000 cubits.
6. Zech. V. 8.
7. Through the imprisonment of the Tempter sexual lust was dormant throughout creation.
8. Lit.. 'half and half'. That it may arouse only legitimate sexual desire.
9. This is Rab's comment.
10. Num. XXV, 5.
11. This connects the Heb. [H] hanizmadim, who cleaved, with zamid [H], an exactly fitting lid.
12. Deut. IV, 4.
13. [H], dabak, used in this verse, does not imply so strong an attachment as zamad; thus they clung more fervently to Peor than to the Lord.
14. Deriving hanizmadim from zamid, a bracelet.
15. This reverses Rab's interpretation.
16. In Cilicia, mentioned as one of the northern border places of the Land of Israel; Targum Jerus. Num. XXIV, 8; Targum Jonathan b. Uzziel a. I. (Jast.).
17. A town in Babylonia, on the road to Pumbaditha, 'A.Z. 26a. It may perhaps be identified with Bithra, on the south of the royal canal, on the Seleucian road (A. Neubauer, Geographie du Talmud, p. 363).
18. [H] i.e., as act of worship.
19. [He was told that the reading in the Mishnah is [H] AT MERCULIS, implying even as a gesture of contempt.]
20. On 53a.
21. As two separate offences, proving that giving one's seed to Molech is not idolatry. The differences is, that if one sacrificed to Molech, or caused his son to pass through the fire to some other deity, he is not punished.
22. Molech is connected with the idea of kingship. This shews that he too regards any fetish as a Molech.
23. In his view they did not say the one and the same thing.
24. I.e., anything which was only temporarily worshipped as Molech, such as a pebble which would obviously not be a permanent idol.] According to R. Hanina b. Antigonus, he is executed even then. But R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon holds that the law applies only to a permanent idol worshipped as Molech.

 

 

Sanhedrin 64b

R. Jannai said: Punishment is not incurred unless one delivers his seed to the acolytes of Molech,¹  for it is said, And thou shalt not give of thy seed to pass through the fire to Molech.²  It has been taught likewise: I might think, that if one caused his seed to pass through the fire to Molech, without first delivering it to the priests, he is liable: therefore the Writ teaches, Thou shalt not give. If he gave it to the priests, but did not cause it to pass through the fire, I might think that he is liable: therefore the Writ states, to pass through. If one delivered it [to the priests of Molech], but caused it to pass through to some other deity, I might think that he is punished: therefore the Writ teaches, to Molech. Now, if he delivered it to the priests and caused it to pass to Molech, but not through the fire, I might think that he is liable:

but, as here is written, to pass through; and elsewhere it is stated, There shall not he found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire:³  just as there, the reference is to fire, so here too; and just as here the reference is to Molech, so there too.

R. Aha the son of Raba said: If one caused all his seed to pass through [the fire] to Molech, he is exempt from punishment, because it is written, of thy seed implying, but not all thy seed.⁴

R. Ashi propounded: What if one caused his blind or sleeping son to pass through,⁵  or if he caused his grandson by his son or daughter to pass through? — One at least of these you may solve. For it has been taught: [Any men … that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall he put to death … And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people;] because he hath given of his seed unto Molech.⁶ Why is this stated?⁷  — Because it is said, there shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire.⁸ From this I know it only of his son or daughter. Whence do I know that it applies to his son's son or daughter's son too? From the verse, [And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man] when he giveth of his seed unto Molech [and kill him not: Then I will … cut him off.]⁹

Now the Tanna commences with the verse, 'because he hath given of his seed', but concludes with 'when he giveth of his seed'? — This is to intimate another deduction.¹⁰  Thus: [because he hath given] of his seed: From this I know only that the law applies to legitimate seed [that being the normal meaning of the word]; whence do I know that it also applies to illegitimate seed?¹¹  — From the verse, when he giveth of his seed.¹²

Rab Judah said: He is only liable to punishment if he causes his seed to pass through in the normal way. How is that? — Abaye said: There was a loose pile of bricks in the middle, and fire on either side of it.¹³  Raba said: It was like the children's leaping about on Purim.¹⁴  It has been taught in support of Raba. Punishment is incurred only for causing one's seed to pass in the normal fashion; if he caused him to pass through on foot, he is exempt.¹⁵  He is liable only for his own issue; e.g., for his son and daughter, he is punished; but for his father or mother, brother or sister, he is not. If he passed through himself, he is free from punishment.¹⁶  R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon ruled that he is liable. Further, whether to Molech or to any other idol, he is liable. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon said: If to Molech, he is liable; if to another idol, he is not.

Ulla said: What is R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon's reason? — Scripture saith, There shall not be found among thee …¹⁷  'among thee' means in thyself.¹⁸  And the Rabbis? Do they not interpret 'among thee' thus? Surely we have learnt: If one must search for a lost article of his own and of his father's, priority is given to his own. And we observed thereon: Why so? — To which Rab Judah replied: Scripture saith, Save that there shall be no poor among thee,¹⁹  teaching that one's own loss has priority over that of any other man?²⁰  There the deduction follows from 'save that'.²¹

R. Jose, son of R. Hanina said: Why is extinction thrice threatened for idolatry?²²  — One teaches extinction for the normal worship of idols; one for abnormal; and one for the service of Molech.²³ But on the view that Molech worship is included in general idolatry, why is extinction mentioned in its case? — To apply to one who causes his son to pass through to an idol [not Molech], where such is not the normal mode of worship. Now, on the view that a megaddef²⁴  is a worshipper of idols,²²  why is extinction stated for it?²⁵  — Even as it has been taught:²⁶  That soul shall surely be cut off from among his people;²⁷  he shall be cut off in this world and in the next: this is R. Akiba's view.²⁸ R. Ishmael said: But the verse has previously stated 'that soul shall be cut off':²⁹  are there then three worlds?³⁰ But [interpret this:] 'and [that soul] shall be cut off' — in this world: 'he is to he cut off' — [of the following verse, and denoted by the infinitive]³¹  in the next; whilst as for the repetition [the finite form of the verb],³²  that is because the Torah employs human phraseology.³³

 

Original footnotes 

1. He explains this to be the meaning of the Mishnah UNLESS HE GIVES IT TO MOLECH.
2. Lev. XVIII, 21. This proves that the offence consists of two parts; (i) formal delivery to the priests, and (ii) causing the seed to pass through the fire.
3. Deut. XVIII, 10.
4. Probably because this would not be accounted a normal mode of Molech worship: cp. pp. 438, 440.
5. Is 'thou shalt not cause to pass' applicable only to a son who can naturally pass through himself, but not to a blind or sleeping son, who must be led or carried, or does it apply to all?
6. Lev. XX, 2f.
7. Since the passage commences by explicitly referring to this offence, why is it repeated?
8. Deut. XVIII, 10.
9. Lev. XX, 4. Hence the law applies also to grandsons.
10. I.e., from the first verse, because etc. we learn that the law applies to one's grandsons too; when he giveth is stated in order that another law may be deduced.
11. Not in the modern sense, but seed from a woman forbidden to him.
12. This is superfluous, since it has already been stated twice in that passage that the reference is to this effect. Hence it indicates the application of the law to illegitimate seed.
13. The victim walked along that pile to Molech, but was not burnt. The statement that Hezekiah was smeared with the blood of the salamander to render him fireproof (63b), shewing that the victim was actually burnt, does not refer to Molech, but to the divinities of Sepharvaim (Rashi).
14. Probably referring to a game played on Purim when children jump over a fire lit in a pit. According to this, a pit was dug and a fire lit therein, and the victim leaped over it (So Rashi). Jast. translates: 'like the stirrup (a ring suspended from a frame) thrust over a bonfire on Purim;' cp. Aruch.
15. This proves that the victim did not walk, but leaped to it.
16. This too proves that the victim was not burnt in passing through the fire to Molech.
17. Deut. XVIII, 10.
18. Hence his view that one is liable if he passes through himself.
19. Deut. XV, 4.
20. The questioner understood this to be deduced from 'among thee' — in thyself. Since this is not taught in the name of any particular Tanna, it should agree with the Rabbis too.
21. Heb. [H], implying an admonition to avoid any action which may lead to poverty. Naturally, this is not to be interpreted as permitting dishonesty, but merely insists that poverty must not be courted.
22. Twice in Lev. XX, 2-5: Whosoever be he … that giveth of his seeds to Molech … I will cut him off from among his people … And if the people of the land … kill him not: Then I will set my face against that man … and will cut him off. Once in Num. XV, 30f. But the soul that doeth aught presumptuously … the same reproacheth the Lord; and that soul shall be cut from among his people. Because he hath despised the word of the Lord. This refers to idolatry.
23. Which is not included in general idolatry, as stated above.
24. In Num. XV, 30, the Heb. for 'he reproacheth' is megaddef.
25. The meaning of megaddef is disputed in Ker. 7b. By a 'worshipper of idols' is meant, e.g., one who sings hymns in a heathen Temple.
26. Since, being a normal part of idolatry, it is understood.
27. Num. XV, 31. Continuing the verses quoted in note 3. In the Heb, as usual, this emphasis is denoted by the repetition of the verb, [H]
28. He interprets the doubling of the verb as referring to two worlds.
29. Ibid. 30.
30. Rashi explains that this question is not put to R. Akiba, because he interprets megaddef in that previous verse as referring to blasphemy, not idolatry. But this question is rhetorically stated by R. Ishmael on his own assumption that megaddef means an idol worshipper.
31. [H]
32. [H]
33. In ordinary human speech, such repetition is quite common.

 

For all of you "Judeo-Christians" of the "Master Race" Sayers, whom you call the "Chosen", and who "Chose the "Robber". What their Oral Mishnah Torah, Talmud Bavli says about my Lord and Savior Christ Jesus. 

 

Folio 67a

That is merely a mnemonical sign.¹

MISHNAH. A MESITH IS A [SEDUCING] LAYMAN,²  AND HE WHO SEDUCES AN INDIVIDUAL³  SAYING, 'THERE IS AN IDOL IN SUCH AND SUCH A PLACE; IT EATS THUS, IT DRINKS THUS, IT DOES SO MUCH GOOD AND SO MUCH HARM. FOR ALL WHOM THE TORAH CONDEMNS TO DEATH NO WITNESSES ARE HIDDEN TO ENTRAP THEM, EXCEPTING FOR THIS ONE. IF HE INCITED TWO [TO IDOLATRY], THEY THEMSELVES ARE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM, AND HE IS BROUGHT TO BETH DIN AND STONED. BUT IF HE ENTICED ONE, HE MUST REPLY, I HAVE FRIENDS WHO WISH TO DO SO LIKEWISE [COME AND PROPOSE IT TO THEM TOO].' BUT IF HE WAS CUNNING AND DECLINED TO SPEAK BEFORE THEM, WITNESSES ARE HIDDEN BEHIND A PARTITION, WHILST HE WHO WAS INCITED SAYS TO HIM, MAKE YOUR PROPOSAL TO ME NOW IN PRIVATE. WHEN THE MESITH DOES SO, THE OTHER REPLIES, HOW SHALL WE FORSAKE OUR GOD IN HEAVEN TO GO AND SERVE WOOD AND STONES?' SHOULD HE RETRACT, IT IS WELL. BUT IF HE ANSWERS, 'IT IS OUR DUTY [TO WORSHIP IDOLS], AND IS SEEMLY FOR US, THEN THE WITNESSES STATIONED BEHIND THE PARTITION TAKE HIM TO BETH DIN, AND HAVE HIM STONED. IF HE SAYS, 'I WILL WORSHIP IT', OR, 'I WILL GO AND WORSHIP', OR, 'LET US GO AND WORSHIP'; OR, 'I WILL SACRIFICE [TO IT]', 'I WILL GO AND SACRIFICE', 'LET US GO AND SACRIFICE'; 'I WILL BURN INCENSE, 'I WILL GO AND BURN INCENSE'. 'LET US GO AND BURN INCENSE'; 'I WILL MAKE LIBATIONS TO IT', 'I WILL GO AND MAKE LIBATIONS TO IT, LET US GO AND MAKE LIBATIONS, 'I WILL PROSTRATE MYSELF BEFORE IT', 'I WILL GO AND PROSTRATE MYSELF'. 'LET US GO AND PROSTRATE OURSELVES'. (GUILT IS INCURRED).⁴

GEMARA. A MESITH IS A LAYMAN. Thus, only because he is a layman [is he stoned]; but if a prophet, he is strangled. WHO SEDUCES AN INDIVIDUAL: thus, only if he seduces an individual; but if a community, he is strangled. Hence, who is [the Tanna of] the Mishnah? — R. Simeon. For it has been taught: A prophet who entices [people to idolatry] is stoned; R. Simeon said: He is strangled.⁵  Then consider the second clause.⁶  A maddiah⁷  is one who says: 'Let us go and serve idols': whereon Rab Judah observed in Rab's name: This Mishnah teaches of those who lead astray a seduced city. Thus it agrees with the Rabbis [who maintain that these too are stoned, not strangled]. Hence, the first clause is taught according to R. Simeon; the second according to the Rabbis! — Rabina said: Both clauses are based on the Rabbis' ruling, but proceed from the universally admitted to the disputed.⁸  R. Papa said: When the Mishnah states A MESITH IS A HEDYOT,⁹  it is only in respect of hiding witnesses.¹⁰  For it has been taught: And for all others for whom the Torah decrees death, witnesses are not hidden, excepting for this one. How is it done? — A light is lit in an inner chamber, the witnesses are hidden in an outer one [which is in darkness], so that they can see and hear him,¹¹  but he cannot see them. Then the person he wished to seduce says to him, 'Tell me privately what thou hast proposed to me'; and he does so. Then he remonstrates; 'But how shall we forsake our God in Heaven, and serve idols'? If he retracts, it is well. But if he answers: 'It is our duty and seemly for us', the witnesses who were listening outside bring him to the Beth din, and have him stoned.¹²

MISHNAH. A MADDIAH IS ONE WHO SAYS, 'LET US GO AND SERVE IDOLS'. A SORCERER, IF HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS MAGIC, IS LIABLE [TO DEATH]. BUT NOT IF HE MERELY CREATES ILLUSIONS.¹³  R. AKIBA SAID IN R. JOSHUA'S NAME: OF TWO WHO GATHER CUCUMBERS [BY MAGIC] ONE MAY BE PUNISHED AND THE OTHER EXEMPT: HE WHO REALLY GATHERS THEM IS PUNISHED: WHILST HE WHO PRODUCES AN ILLUSION IS EXEMPT.

GEMARA. Rab Judah said in Rab's name: This Mishnah teaches of those who lead astray a seduced city.¹⁴

A SORCERER, IF HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS MAGIC etc.

Our Rabbis taught: [Thou shalt not suffer] a witch [to live]:¹⁵  this applies to both man and woman. If so, why is a [female] witch stated? — Because mostly women engage in witchcraft. How are they executed? — R. Jose the Galilean said: Here it is written, Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live; whilst elsewhere is written, Thou shalt not suffer anything that breatheth to live.¹⁶  Just as there, the sword is meant, so here is the sword meant too. R. Akiba said: It is here stated, Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live; whilst elsewhere it is said, [There shall not a hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned, or shot through;] whether it be beast or man, it shall not live.¹⁷  Just as there, death by stoning is meant, so here too. R. Jose said to him, I have drawn an analogy between 'Thou shalt not suffer to live' written in two verses, whilst you have made a comparison between 'Thou shalt not suffer to live', and 'It shall not live'. R. Akiba replied: I have drawn an analogy between two verses referring to Israelites, for whom the Writ hath decreed many modes of execution,¹⁸  whilst you have compared Israelites to heathens, in whose case only

 

---

Original footnotes 

1. I.e., in both the reference is to something done for the first time: there to coition; here to profanation. But the similarity ceases at this point.
2. Heb. hedyot. As opposed to a prophet.
3. Heb. hedyot. But not a whole community. On the Heb. term hedyot, v. p 456, nn. 2 and 3.
4. The seducer by using any one of those expressions incurs guilt and is executed; v. Rashi (supra, 61a) who refers it to the seduced person.
5. V. infra 84a.
6. I.e., the next Mishnah, which is really part of this.
7. Who is stoned, as stated in the Mishnah on 53a, of which all the subsequent Mishnahs in this chapter are explanations.
8. Lit., 'nor only this, but that also).' When the Mishnah states, [HE] WHO SEDUCES AN INDIVIDUAL, it is not intended to exclude a multitude, but merely to commence with the universally agreed law. Then the next Mishnah adds that the same applies to the seduction of a multitude, though this is not admitted by all.
9. [H], [G] rendered in Mishnah, 'LAYMAN', also means ignorant, ignoble.
10. I.e., hedyot is not used in the sense of a layman as opposed to a prophet, but in the sense of ignoble; so dastardly in his action, that he is not shewn the same consideration as other malefactors, but hidden witnesses are set to entrap him. There is no dispute between Rabina and R. Papa, both teaching that the two clauses agree with the Rabbis; but Rabina explains the phrase, 'HE WHO SEDUCES AN INDIVIDUAL', whilst R. Papa deals with 'A MESITH IS A HEDYOT'.
11. Otherwise, they could not testify.
12. In the uncensored editions of the Talmud there follows this important passage (supplied from D.S. on the authority of the Munich and Oxford Mss. and the older editions) 'And this they did to Ben Stada in Lydda ([H]), and they hung him on the eve of Passover. Ben Stada was Ben Padira. R. Hisda said: 'The husband was Stada, the paramour Pandira. But was nor the husband Pappos b. Judah? — His mother's name was Stada. But his mother was Miriam, a dresser of woman's hair? ([H] megaddela neshayia): — As they say in Pumbaditha, This woman has turned away ([H]) from her husband, (i.e., committed adultery).' T. Herford, in 'Christianity in the Talmud', pp. 37 seqq, 344 seqq, identifies this Ben Stada with Jesus of Nazareth. 

 

Folio 69a

R. Jeremiah of Difti said: We also learnt the following: A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabited with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah,] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea]. If she married a priest, she may eat of terumah; if any unfit person cohabits with her, he disqualifies her from the priesthood. If any of the forbidden degrees had intercourse with her, they are executed on her account, but she is exempt.²²

 

^{dig into the wall and see the abominations they do}

http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_70.html

 

http://www.thethreeweeks.com/insights/5.html

 

The Holy Temple in Jerusalem was built by King Solomon in the year 2928 from creation (833 BCE), and was destroyed 410 years later, on the 9th day of the month of Av, by the armies of the Babylonian emperor Nebuchadnezzar. Seventy years later it was rebuilt; the second Temple stood for 420 years, until its destruction by the Romans, also on the 9th of Av, in 3829 (69 CE). Ever since, the Av 9 has been a day of fasting and repentance—a day on which we mourn the Destruction and pray for the coming of Moshiach, when the third and final Temple will be restored to its place as the Divine epicenter of the universe.

 

Chabad Wall Part 2

 

In the Name of Jesus Christ the Lord, amen

The Last Deception

Section 2

  section 3   

section 4 

  section 5  

section 6  

section 7 

  section 8 

section  9     

section 10  

section 11  

section 12  

section 13 

section 14 "The Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of Tzion"

  section 15 

      section 16 "The Beast Has Risen" 

 section 16-B

 section 17  

  section 17-B  

  section 17-C   

section 17-D

  section 18    

section 18-B

section 19    

section 19-B

section 20  

 section 20-B 

  section 20-C 

  section 20-D 

  section 20-E

section 21 

  section 22  

section 23

section 24

section 25

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

Was Peter a Jew?

The Two Witnesses

"The Whore of Babylon"

Mystery Babylon

 Are the " Ael-ians coming"

Ael-ians II

Wall Street " The Mark" is Here

Wall Street II

Wall Street III

It has happened "War Declared upon and in America"

Declared section Part II

"Questions"

"All you ever need to know about their god and Qabalah"

Qabalah Part II

Qabalah Part III

National Identification Card

Prophecy Unfolding

A Sincere Request to  "Rapture" Teachers

"Seventh Trumpet"

Compulsory Constitutional Cremation

Homeland Security, "The Police State"

"The Fourth Beast"

The Babylonian Talmudic Mystical Qabalah

The Scribes of Baal

How will they do it- " The false-christ"

False Christ Part II

The Word

Baal's food Tax

"The Changing of the Guards"

"Summation" The beginning of sorrows has begun

"Moshiach ben Lucifer"

Satan's Tales "Wagging the Global Dog"

"Satan's Plan", Protocols of Zion ( of course they will dispute it's authenticity)

I Witch, New One World Order Seal

Satan's Enforcers of Quaballah

Satan's Enforcers Part 2

Satan's Enforcers Part 3

Satan's Enforcers Part 4

The Seed of God or the Seed of Satan, Your choice by faith

Pledge of Allegiance Part Two

I AM, the Revelation of Jesus Christ

King of the Noachides

"Beware the Mark"

"Beware the Mark" part two

"Beware the Mark" Part 3

"Beware the Mark" Part Four

"Beware the Mark" Part Five

 Harvest of Fear

"Harvest of Fear" Part Two

"Harvest of Fear" Part Three

National Organization Against Hasidic International Talmudic Enforcement

Where's Da Plane Boss, wheres da plane?

The Tarot Card Killer of Olam Ha Ba

The "Lessor Jew"

Temporary Coup d' Etat

The Federal Reserve, Fed up with the Fed?

The Protocols Today. Dispute this, Liars !

Protocols Today Part Two

Letter to a friend "It's not the Jews Dummy"

Identity of the Illuminati

The "Son's of the Synagogue of Satan"Chabad Lubavitch

Chabad Satan Part 1A

Chabad Satan Part 2

Chabad Satan Part 2A

Chabad Satan Part 2B

Chabad Satan Part 3

Chabad Satan Part 3A

Chabad Satan Part 4

Chabad Satan Part 4A

Chabad Satan Part 4B

Chabad Satan Part 4C

Chabad Satan Part 5

Chabad satan Part 5A

Chabad Satan Part 5B

Chabad Satan Part 5C

Chabad Satan Part 6

Chabad Satan Part 6B

Chabad Satan Part 6C

Chabad Satan Part 6D

Chabad Satan Part 7

Chabad Satan Part 7A

Chabad Satan Part 7B

Chabad Satan Part 7C

Chabad Satan Part 8

Chabad Satan Part 8A

Chabad Satan Part 8B

Chabad Satan Part 8C

Chabad Satan Part 8D

Chabad Satan Part 9

Chabad Satan Part 9A

Chabad Satan Part 9B

Chabad Satan Part 9C

Chabad Satan Part 9D

Chabad Satan Part 10

Chabad Satan Part 10A

Chabad Satan Part 10B

Chabad Satan Part 10C

Chabad Satan Part 10D

Chabad Satan Part 11

The Chabad Satan Wall of Destruction

Chabad Wall Part 2

Chabad Wall Part 3

Chabad Wall Part 4

The Chabad Phoenix is Rising

Columbia "The Queen of Heaven"

Patriot Akt II, Comrad 

The Infiltration of the leaven "Jerusalem Council"

Satan's One World Religion

OWR Part 2

OWR Part 3

OWR Part 4

One World Religion Part 5

One World Religion Part 6

One World Religion Part 7

Re the god of Talmud Bavli

Perpetual Purim

"The Raiser of Taxes"

Jewish Persecution

Obedient Ishmael Kislev 19, 5764

The Final Nazi

Nazi Part 2

Nazi Part 3

Nazi Part 4

The Lord of the Ring, the Return of the Talmudic king

Changing the Time and the Laws

anti-semitism?

Who murdered Jesus the Christ

"Replacement Theology" of Judaic Talmudism

Eating Rainbow Stew with a Silver Spoon, underneath a Noahide Sky

the gods

"The Two Whores"

Noahide News

Noahide News 2

infosam@bellsouth.net