Chabad
Lubavitch, The Sofiet serpents den, of thieves and robbers of God's peoples.
Satan's Den
Kerry made his Bones in
secret club - like Bush
by Andrew Miga
Thursday, May 15, 2003
WASHINGTON - Sen. John F. Kerry expounds on many issues in his presidential
campaign, but he's completely silent on one topic: his membership in Skull and
Bones, Yale's infamous secret society.
``John Kerry has absolutely nothing to say on that subject. Sorry,'' said
Kerry spokeswoman Kelley Benander.
Kerry is a respected senator and a decorated Vietnam War combat veteran, but
36 years after he was initiated into what has been called the ``ultimate old boy
network,'' he's wary of breaking the ultra-exclusive club's strict secrecy code.
There's also another high-profile member of the club: President Bush.
Bonesmen already are buzzing over the prospect of the first Bones vs. Bones
presidential race should Kerry win his party's nomination and face Bush in 2004.
``Bones don't care who wins,'' said author Alexandra Robbins, whose book
``Secrets of the Tomb'' pierced the secrecy shrouding the 171-year-old society.
``If Kerry wins, it's still a Bones presidency.''
Robbins calls the group ``probably the most secretive and successful club in
America,'' and adds, ``It's also pretty bizarre.''
Every year, 15 Yale juniors are tapped for the club, which holds meetings
twice a week in a crypt-like building known as the ``Tomb.''
Robbins described the interior, replete with skulls and skeletons, as a cross
between the ``Addams Family'' and a slightly shabby English men's club.
There are bizarre initiation rites, including a ceremony where new members
must spend an evening before a roaring fire in the Tomb recounting details of
their sexual history to fellow members.
Kerry was tapped for the club in 1968, two years after Bush, whose father and
grandfather were also Bonesmen. Kerry's brother-in-law from his first marriage,
David Thorne, was Bones. So was the late husband of Kerry's current wife, Teresa
Heinz Kerry. The Bones alumni roster is flush with CIA officials, business
moguls, congressmen and Supreme Court justices. The club owns a secluded 40-acre
island retreat on the St. Lawrence River.
In 1986, Kerry allegedly tried to recruit Jacob Weisberg, then a college-age
intern at ``The New Republic'' magazine.
Weisberg, now Slate magazine editor, said Kerry made his pitch during a
private meeting in his Senate office. Weisberg declined, pointedly asking Kerry
how he squared his liberalism with membership in such an elitist club that
refused to admit women. ``Kerry got sort of flustered and said, `I've marched
with battered women,' '' Weisberg told the Herald.
Five years later, Kerry was among those voting to force the club to admit
women after a bitter court fight.
The Moon in the Talmudic tradition represents
the Messiah
Red
Moon Rising
A
total lunar eclipse
occurs when the Full Moon
slips through the red-colored
shadow of Earth. This is possible about every six months, and the next
opportunity for observers in San Francisco is the evening of May 15. The
eclipse begins at
7:03 p.m., before moonrise. By the time the Moon
appears at 8:06 p.m. in the east-southeast, it will be almost completely
eclipsed. Totality––when the Moon
is completely immersed in Earth’s shadow and appears reddish-orange to
rusty-brown––is at 8:14 p.m., just 8 minutes or so after moonrise,
and lasts until 9:07 p.m., with the Moon
only about 10 degrees above the horizon. The partial eclipse,
with the Moon on
the way out of the shadow, ends at 10:17 p.m., with the Moon
18 degrees high in the southeast. Note the curved edge of the Earth’s
shadow in this part of the eclipse.
If you track the Moon’s
position against the stars throughout the eclipse,
you will notice that it moves from west to east by its own diameter each
hour. So even though the Earth’s ruddy shadow appears to be sliding
onto the Moon
from east to west, it’s the Moon
that’s actually doing the moving. –– B.F.Q.
Nevertheless, Netzach corresponds to Moshe Rabbeinu, and the
day on which the moon was
placed in the sky; the moon
symbolizes the Jewish people. Moshe's personality was extremely well-balanced,
but it was the "Netzach" aspect of his being that gave him the
strength of character to stand up to the likes of Korach and other would-be
rebellers. Moshe was the "humblest man on earth," but he also could
rise to the occasion and was not intimidated, and even argued with G-d over the
future of the Jewish people (Shemos 32:1).
The Prophets of Baal's and their timing events
The prophet, Joel, depicts the signs preceding the Second
Coming
of Christ and The Day of the Lord when he writes, "And I will shew
wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars
of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into
blood, before the great and terrible day of the Lord come."
And the Prophets of Baal,
the Illuminated Elders of false Zion used their man, C I Scofield to propagate
the fatal deception, financed by that same man who raised the ilk of
America to get involved in WWII, that Talmudic Balfour Zionist Talmudic son of
the synagogue of Satan, Samuel J. Untermier. Listen and understand how many are
deceived with their dispen-Satan-alism and their false treaties, and their false
temples and their false Christ ben Satan the Moshiach of the Talmudic flesh
"SAYERS" who are not the seed of Abraham in faith of Christ Jesus
the first night of Pesach is a tremendous gift. It is a taste of
spiritual perfection, of closeness to G-d so intense that the yetzer hara is
completely neutralized by awe of G-d. It is a night on which one can, if taken
seriously, gain a taste of the final and eternal redemption, when the yetzer
hara will be no more and mitzvos will be performed purely out of love for G-d
and Torah. Then, by the next morning after the Seder, G-d gently returns us
back to our former realities, with the commandment to count the Omer on the
following eve, in order to build for ourselves what was given to us for free
the night before. After forty-nine days of Omer-Counting, on the fiftieth day
and on holiday of Shavuos
itself, we are supposed to have risen back up to the level of Leil Seder.
However, since we have earned it this time, it is a higher experience than
what we underwent then without making an effort. 1
Had Israel not sinned with the golden calf, Shavuot may well have been the
"last" of the Feasts, and we quite possibly would have had the
ushering in of the Kingdom. That was not the case however, nor did any future
generation of Israel merit the coming of Messiah and Kingdom of God being
established. Although there were some highlites (the time of David, Solomon and
the Temple), the people continually fell away, to the point of being exiled in
Babylon, at the time of the prophet Daniel. This brings us to a critical time,
as Daniel is key to understanding the book of Revelation.
Daniel's famous prophecy of the "seventy weeks," is directly
associated with the fall feasts and coming judgment. These "weeks" are
counted as shemita cycles, each one being a period of seven years.
Thus, Daniel is speaking of a time frame of 490 years.
April 27th Sunday 9:30-12:30pm > > JEWISH HEALING >
with Rebbetzin Channah Schafer > > Temple Sinai 100 Ames St., Sharon, MA
> > A workshop experiencing our wondrous tradition of healing our souls
> with: learning, storytelling, meditation, hands-on techniques, song and
> dancing as we prepare to cross the Red
Sea > > RSVP to Terry Greenstein (617) 784-4357 > or e-mail to
schafer@juno.com
Evil to the sons of Satan's synagogue
are True Christians of Jesus Christ
The word for "man" in Hebrew is "adam" --
alef, dalet, mem. Now "mo'od" in Hebrew -- mem, alef, dalet means
"very". Everything that comes from the same letters comes from the
same root. So before Moshiach
comes, a good man will be very good and an evil man will become very evil. When
we open the door for Elijah the Prophet during the second part of the seder we
say words which sound horrible. First we say holy words of love and peace, and
then we say, "Pour out your anger at the world." The world needs a
little cleaning out. We are begging G-d, "Would you please do the
cleaning?" When we open the door for Elijah, who will come to announce the
Meshiah, we are on the level of saying we don't want to do the cleaning. There
are a lot of people who are so eager in fighting evil, it's the greatest thing
in their lives. At the seder we say to "If there has to be some wiping of
evil, please, You do it."
Job:1:7:
And the LORD said unto Satan,
Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and
fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
And the Lord said unto
Moshiach
This answer is both heartening and disheartening. It is
wonderful to know that Moshiach
is walking the earth in every generation, at least in potential. It is difficult
to accept, however, that so many generations have come and gone and still, Moshiachhas not revealed himself. Why should it be
any different in our generation?
3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not
come, except there come a falling away first, and that
man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
Their wars of their un-named
Illuminated god, has begun, George from George, Gog MiGog
There are, in general, three stages to the war of Gog
U’Magog. The first two have already been completed through the Shoa
and the Gulf War. According to everything I
have seen, the third stage is when Moshiach ben David, Eliyahu HaNavi, Moshe
Rabbeinu, Aharon HaKohen Gadol and the other eleven anointed of Israel will be
resurrected at the beginning of the days of Moshiach.
Melech HaMoshiach is obligated according to halacha
(i.e., according to the plain meaning of things) to fight and win the war
against Amalek.(True Believers of Christ Jesus)
The remnant of the original inhabitants of Israel are supposed to be returned to
the land of Israel by G-d specifically for this purpose. The rashayim
from among the non-Jews (specifically the hollalim, as mentioned in T’hillim
5:6; 75 and 76) are supposed to be aligned in this war with the remnant of
Amalek. (saints scattered) Likewise, Armilus
HaRasha (the secular Jewish leader) is also aligned with them.
The hollalim are described as so completely evil that
they are considered insane. If you look at the targum of the word "hollalim,"
you will discover that it is "talibanim" (the actual verb form
is "m’talevin" or "m’talevun").
The commentaries of the Radak and the Meiri on the two
chapters mentioned above discuss the conclusion of the war of Gog U’Magog.
They mention that the hollalim will reside in fortified mountain
strongholds. Interestingly, the MeiAm Loez, commenting on the Song at the
Sea of Reeds, mentions in passing that these people (whom he identifies as the
nation of Magog itself) were defeated and imprisoned in this region by Alexander
the Great, and that they won’t escape from there to wreak havoc on the world -
until the time of the Redemption.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the Tur, Orach Chaim: 490,
in the name of Hai Gaon, that the war of Gog U’Magog will break out during
Chol HaMoed Sukkos, and the resurrection of the dead will be in Nissan. Isn’t
it amazing that according to the book Chesed L’Avrohom, the
resurrection of the dead would follow on the heels of the year 5760? The book
relates this whole process to the idea of the filling of a mikva, and
says this will be the process of "removing the tuma" from the
world.
It is no surprise that the actual war started (the bombs
started to drop) in Afghanistan at 9:30 p.m. on the night of Hoshana Rabba, the
time when the final judgment on the nations of the world is sealed and
execution (Perpetual
Purim) begun. It is also worth noting that the Radak is specific in
referring to this as "Gog MiGog" (Gog from Gog) and not "Gog
U’Magog" (Gog and Magog). It is also worth noting that Gog is a
leader, described by the Radak as the Nasi of Meshech and Tuval.(Man
of Dan) These two roots refer to extreme attraction (as in hamshacha
to materialism and incredible material wealth (like teval). In other
words, Gog MiGog is the leader of the most
materialistic and wealthy nation on earth. Is there any question what nation
that is?
USA
In a broader context, the WTC
disaster that precipitated the war occurred during the days of "cheshbon
ha’nefesh" at the end of the month of Elul. In Elul, the last 12 days
of the month correspond with one month of the year. The first day of the 12
corresponds with Tishrei, the second with Cheshvan, and so on. These days are a
time of reflecting on what was lacking in our avoda the previous year and
what we will correct in the coming year.
Just as we perform this mitzva,
so does Hashem. This is in keeping with the verse, "He tells His words to
Yaakov and His judgments to Yisroel." The commandments are not only ours to
fulfill, they are Hashem’s, too.
The attack on the WTC happened on the 6th day during these 12
days of cheshban ha’nefesh, which corresponds with the month of Adar. This
is an allusion to the Gulf War, which concluded in Adar (5751/1991) on
Purim. At that time, President Bush, Sr.
didn’t finish the job. Loose ends were left that developed into the
current situation. In spite of this, President Bush, Sr. recognized that as a
result of that war, the entire world order had been changed.
The period of the Gulf War coincided with what is referred to
in Torah, and in particular, in the Maamer HaGeula of Rabbi Moshe Chaim
Luzzato, as the Pekida. The Pekida is a
glimpse of how the final Redemption will unfold. The first stage is
temporary, and the final and complete Redemption follows later in the final
stage, which is called the Zechira.
Purim Saddam Part Two, Bushka II,
wars of Hashem Part II
I
The son of President Bush George
from George is picking up where his father
left off. Most of the players in the first
administration are the actual players in the current situation. It is
important to note that the President and most of the world (including the
gentile nations) turned to Hashem (SATAN) in
prayer and repentance following the WTC attack. It is also worth noting that it
was exactly 26 days from the WTC attack to the beginning of the war on Hoshana
Rabba. This number, 26, is an allusion to Whom is making the judgment. The
judgment is coming from Hashem directly (the numerical value of G-d’s name is
26). The chapters of T’hillim cited above state that the judgment will
come from Hashem.
I presume you have also heard about the Zohar (Parshas
Balak 3:212b) that is creating so much commotion. This is a free rendering of
the text:
"On the sixth day, there will be seen a comet"
[which is discussed in the paragraph in the text that precedes this quote.
Commentaries explain it is not really a comet, but a
fireball that will explode in mid-air, heralding 1) the fall of the dominion of
the gentile nations, and 2) the transfer of authority to King Moshiach,
who is about to be revealed], "on the
25th day of the 6th month" [the 25th of Elul (September 13th in the year
2001)] "and this will conclude on the 7th day, at the end of 70 days"
(the implication is that we should watch for something on or around Thanksgiving
Day of this year). [Note: As of Thanksgiving Day, news reports revealed that the
Taliban began to surrender; since that day there has been a growing sense of
imminent triumph on the part of the Americans.]
"The first day [of this event] will be seen in a great
(or high) city. Three high walls from this great city will fall on this day, a
great palace will fall, and the dominion of this city will be nullified.(Baghdad)
Then this comet [meaning its result] will be seen to spread
throughout the world, and in this time harsh wars will break out in all four
corners of the earth. Faith will not be forgotten through them."
Their planned Satanic and Prophets of
Baal's son of the synagogue of Satan (SOS) WWIII
It goes on to explain that this process concludes when King
Moshiach (Lucifer)
arises (the actual expression is "grows") from a cave in the
land of Israel to be king over the entire world.
Some people don’t like to look at the Zohar as literal or physical, but
concerning this particular section, Rabbi Moshe Cordevero, in his commentary, Ohr
Yakar, says that all of these events happen on a spiritual level and a
physical level. All the commentaries I have seen refer the reader to other
sections explaining the resurrection for additional details about what takes
place.
As is discussed in many places within the Torah, and in
particular, in the first Chassidic discourse given by the Rebbe Rayatz, "Reishit
Goyim Amalek," (True Christians of faith in
Christ Jesus)once the head of the nations, Amalek, is defeated, the
rest of the nations will be uplifted. The conflict, the opposition to G-d’s
Will, and the establishment of His kingdom in a complete fashion, depends solely
on Amalek and those connected to Amalek. We learn from Yehoshua in the
second paragraph of Aleinu that in the end we will all serve Hashem
together, and on that day, the L-rd will be One and His Name One.
False Christ
Rav Chanan bar Tachalifa sent a message to Rav Yosef: I met a man who
possessed scrolls written in Assyrian script and in the holy language. When I
asked him how he obtained it, he answered, "I sold myself to the Roman
army and among the Persian treasures, I found it." And it is written in
it that the world will remain like an orphan for 4,291 years after creation;
many years in which there will be wars of large creatures, and many years in
which there will be the war of Gog and Magog; the remainder of the days will
be of the Moshiach.
(Sanhedrin 97b)
In the Time-to-Come, The Holy One, Blessed is He, will bring the yetzer hara (One
who has not accepted Moshiach and accepted the Universal Noahide Laws, One who
has not been tamed) and slaughter him before the righteous and the
evil ... (Succah 52a)
With no yetzer hara,(false zion
opposition) peace on earth can finally reign. This information is
also important for understanding the difference of opinion as to whether or not
mitzvos will still be performed in Moshiach's
time
Further yet, there is still another condition mentioned that
must be fulfilled before the coming of Moshiach,
and that is, the infamous and fearsome war of Gog and Magog
Many hold that World War II was also such a war. It certainly
had all the conditions for a war of Gog and Magog, for Hitler himself claimed to
be at war only with the Jews. From Hitler's point of view, the Holocaust was not
about World War II, but World War II was about the Holocaust.
Oh they do have to have their third
WW, they must sacrifice as many Goy and saints of Jesus as Possible to invoke
their g-d, Lucifer
If so, then we can take some solace in the fact that two out
of the three prophecized wars of Gog and Magog have passed; however the solace
quickly evaporates if we cannot find a third one that has already happened
If so, that leaves the third and final war of Gog and Magog
hanging in the air, unless you conclude, as some do, that the final battle is
not a physical one, but an ideological one (Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch).
There is historical precedent for such an idea, and the intellectual onslaught
of Western culture that has "stolen" the minds of millions of Jews
since World War II alone could support such a theory.
And of course their cries against
satanic opposition must be anti-Semitism for the management of their brethren
the "Lesser Jews"
However, the present political climate in the Middle East and
the United Nations suggests that there is more to come. One-by-one, the Jewish
people have watched their friends become less friendly, and their sense of
security become weakened. As a people, we have less to depend upon, fewer
"saviors" to turn toward. It seems as, no matter what we say or do, it
always comes out wrong in the eyes of the nations of the world. Are we en route
to becoming "kotzer ruach"?
Making Moshiach come
How long will G-d accept the profanation of His palace, the
holy land of Israel? Can he put up with such sneering and ridiculing of His holy
Torah and its followers? The balance of power is shifting quickly in favor of
the Arabs; is this the beginning of something big ... of a Divine response ...
of the coming of Moshiach?
They must have their final Aliya,
their Exod-US
Given all the events of current times, the messages of the
Torah, the hints of the midrashim, one must conclude that it is unsafe to
"drift" aimlessly any longer on the current on Western history, which
denies any sense of urgency. There are many more such statements from the Talmud
and Kabbalistic literature to learn and contemplate; this has been a very
superficial discussion of a major concern of the Jewish nation
Saddam defeated Pesach, Final
Redemption "Liberation", but Oh no it was not Iraqi Liberation, but
the Talmudic Chabad Jews Liberation, then comes Shavuos June 5, 2003
The Talmud teaches that the Jewish people were freed from
Egypt in the month of Nissan, and that they will eventually be redeemed for good
in the same month (Rosh Hashanah 11a). The Kabbalists teach that this is true
inasmuch as the redemption will begin with Pesach; however, that process will
end on Shavuos.
How fitting it is then that on Shavuos,
the day of receiving the Torah, we also read about the roots of Moshiach
and the final redemption. After all, the rabbis did write:
May this Shavuos
not only witness the reception of Torah, but the end of history's best kept
secret: Moshiach and the
Final Redemption. Amen
Ten years
passed. On the one hand, world-wide terror increased. On the other hand, the
world continued to progress towards the time of the Rebbe
Mendel
Menachem Schneerson's revelation. Somehow,
the Rebbearranged
it so that Bush’s son would become president too and complete what his father
left unfinished.
By Rabbi
Naftali Estulin
Let's
innoculate the masses first, then lets kael them ah ha useless eaters ah
ha amen , gimme aen ameeeeean Brutha
POLICE could be forced to shoot members of the public to
maintain order in the event of a terrorist "dirty bomb" or
biological attack on Britain, it was claimed yesterday.
The Police Federation annual conference in Blackpool was told that so few
officers have been trained to deal with a chemical, biological, nuclear or
radiological strike that they would have to resort to "very unsavoury but
necessary" crowd control.
Bob Elder, the chairman of the constables’ central committee, did not refer
specifically to officers firing on civilians, but sources within the
organisation said it was clear police could have to resort to firearms to stop
contamination being spread by fleeing victims.
The government had failed to explain how important it would be to keep the
public inside a cordon after such an atrocity, Mr Elder said.
"This is not about creating mass hysteria," he said. "This is
about the opposite. The public has a right to know.
"The natural reaction from the public caught up in such an incident will
be to get as far away from the scene as possible. This could, of course, only
extend the problem."
In another reference to the possible use of firearms to keep control of an
area, Mr Elder added: "We will be the ones who would have to carry out
that containment and we would be the ones held responsible for our actions -
whatever those may be."
Asked if he could foresee officers firing on civilians, he said: "It’s
an option the government is going to have to consider. We haven’t got enough
cops trained to deal with full-scale containment and it’s putting everyone
at risk."
A spokesman for the Home Office insisted police would not have powers to shoot
the public to enforce a cordon in the event of a chemical, biological, nuclear
or radiological strike attack.
"Police have the right to detain people if they present a risk to the
public," he said. "There are no circumstances in which police could
operate some kind of shoot to kill policy under the law."
______
Innoculate
them, then dispose of them saith the Robber
Notice a pattern yet? If not, keep watching the news and you will.
By Diana Rogers
05/13/03: (Information
Clearing House) For months Americans have been kept in a whipped frenzy
with daily bombardment of intense and stressing news: SARS, the unstoppable
disease, the gut wrenching war on Iraq, and Israel’s usual slaughter of
Palestinians. But the past three days, the American media has been ominously
silent. They’ve carried only a few brief reports on SARS and no mention at
all of our loved ones still in Iraq, or even Israel’s slaughters. Did the
unstoppable disease of the century suddenly stop? Is the war on Iraq over and
they simply forget to send our loved ones home? Or is this a calculated
reprieve to set the stage for Phase Two: the whipping of the masses to support
a war?
For answers look to the news reported and the men who are making it.
For several days Colin Powell’s itinerary has subtly dominated the news.
His location and next stop was so fastidiously reported Americans knew his
schedule better than their own. Yet in stark contrast, not one report of
Donald Rumsfield, who was dispatched to the Middle East a week ago and
promptly disappeared. Had he fallen in a middle eastern black hole or is it
simply the powers that "would be" wanted all eyes on Colin Powell,
and the very coincidental bombing that occurred just as he arrived in Saudi
Arabia?
What a golden opportunity to reaffirm the war on terrorism, but more to REINTRODUCE
Americans to the elusive and almost forgotten Al Queda. And to make sure we
get it; Powell immediately goes on record as outraged "Secretary of State
Colin Powell said the attack, which killed at least 29 people, had "all
the fingerprints of an al Qaeda operation." http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=2733927
.
President Bush promptly followed his lead, and to really make sure we got
it Ari Fleischer reinterated:
"White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Bush was angered by the
attack.
"He is angry. Terrorists attacked our fellow citizens and took
innocent lives. This is a war against terror and he is determined to wage
it," Fleischer said.
Fleischer said the United States was satisfied with Saudi cooperation and
that an FBI team was being dispatched to Saudi Arabia.
"We'll be on the hunt and we'll find them and they will be brought to
justice," Bush said before flying to Missouri -- the home state of
Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Richard Gephardt -- to inspect damage by
tornadoes in Pierce City."
Notice a pattern yet? If not, keep watching the news and you will. And
brace yourself! Because I doubt it was coincidence that the one
"reported" place in the world that warned more 9/11 attacks would
occur in the US was itself bombed. And bombed seven days after the American
media conveniently ran stories of Saudi Arabia not only warning us of this but
also foiling several US- aimed terrorist attempts in their country. Proof
positive that terrorism was not only alive and well but still very active and
working to get us. Yet somehow this same country that was so on top of it 7
days ago suddenly lagged enough to be bombed itself. And not just bombed by
some errant or unknown terrorists but Al queda with a renewed vigor to get the
US. Could the connection be more perfect? Could the swift assignment of blame
be more planned? And by the very players who had assigned the same swift blame
to 9/11. It seems we’ve been this way before, only this time in reverse. But
then it wouldn’t do to have those nasty, lingering questions hampering the
next phase as it did the last.
"Wasn’t there foreknowledge? Why didn’t they act on it?"
This time they can safely say they did.
Diana Rogers
Is it
almost time for "Purim Robert" and "Purim samliquidation"?
for my opposition of Satan's minions and their attempt to establish their vision
of seating Lucifer ha Mashiach upon the throne of false Zion?
Adrian Humphreys
National Post
Tuesday, May 13, 2003
CREDIT: Glenn Lowson, National Post
Ernst Zundel
A large U.S. Internet service provider has pulled the plug on Ernst
Zundel's controversial Web site after the Canadian Human Rights Commission
warned the site contained hate literature.
In a March 27 letter to the chief executive officer of QWest
Communications, a Denver-based company with 25 million customers, the
commission brought the Zundel site to the Internet giant's attention.
"We have an acceptable use policy and when the Canadian Human Rights
Commission (Talmudic Jews) brought
to our attention that Mr. Zundel was publishing hateful material we worked ...
to see it was removed," said Claire Maledon, spokeswoman for QWest.
QWest's policy prohibits distribution of material that is hateful, obscene,
abusive or excessively violent. (Allows plenty of
Porno)
Daniel Lavoie, spokesman for the commission, said Mr. Zundel's return to
Canada in February after his deportation from the United States revived the
commission's interest in the ruling that the Zundel site was spreading
material inciting hatred against Jews, a
violation of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
The site, however, re-emerged yesterday on another U.S. host server.
Mr. Zundel is in detention in Canada pending a Federal Court review of the
government's declaration that he is a threat to national security, an order
requiring removal to his native Germany.
He lived in Canada for decades, drawing criticism for his Holocaust denial
and for publishing the views of neo-Nazis and white supremacists.(Which
I do not adhere) Some of the material placed on the Zundel site
brought public complaints to the commission in 1996.
It sparked a lengthy case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.
Hearings started on May 26, 1997, and ended on Feb. 28, 2001. A decision was
rendered on Jan. 18, 2002.
By the time the decision was filed, Mr. Zundel had left Canada for
Tennessee and the Zundel site was moved from a Canadian-based Internet server
to one in the United States.
Jewish groups were pleased the
commission is aggressive in enforcing the tribunal's ruling.
"It is important that all effective means be
used against any individual who would support or spread hate.
Yet they fully intend to purge by
decapitation all true Christians
The content of the Web site he was found responsible for continues to
contain much of the original material," said Anita Bromberg, in-house
counsel for B'nai Brith Canada, a group accepted as an interested
party in the original complaint against the site.
The actions of the commission drew the ire of Ingrid Rimland, Mr. Zundel's
wife, who called the tribunal that ruled against her husband an "obscene,
Marxist-flavoured outfit."
In an e-mail to supporters, she said: "An administrative Canadian body
with no enforcement powers of their own -- recently described by Ernst as a
'hick tribunal' that had ruled that historical truth not be allowed as a
defense -- is telling an American communications giant like QWest to 'cease
and desist' -- or have its employees face arrest at the northern border! And
the giant falls to his knees and gives in."
Ms. Rimland did not return phone calls yesterday.
Mr. Lavoie and Ms. Maledon said no such threat against Qwest employees was
ever made.
Meanwhile, Mr. Zundel's U.S. lawyer, Boyd W. Venable III, who lived near
Mr. Zundel and his wife in Pigeon Forge, Tenn., said he was filing suit in
U.S. court claiming Mr. Zundel's deportation to Canada was illegal.
"Zundel had been living with his wife peaceably in Tennessee for
almost three years, awaiting immigration processing. He posed a threat to no
one," Mr. Venable said in a written statement.
He said U.S. immigration authorities were sent written notification by Mr.
Zundel's immigration attorney of a need to change a scheduled court appearance
in Mr. Zundel's bid to be granted status in the United States. Despite that,
when Mr. Zundel did not appear in court he was deemed to have abandoned his
claim and was immediately deported to Canada, Mr. Venable said.
______________
Ari the Chabad Lubavitcher
Illuminated Fleisher to resign?
Bush Press Secretary
Fleischer Resigns
By RON FOURNIER
The Associated Press
Monday, May 19, 2003; 11:20 AM
WASHINGTON - White House press secretary Ari Fleischer, the public face of
the Bush administration through two wars and a terrorist attack, said Monday he
will resign in July to enter the private sector.
And do what? Help rule in the Olam Ha
Ba with the False Messiah, Moshiach ben Dovid and enforce the Noahide Laws,
Perhaps?
Celebrating the Long dead Illuminated
Master reebe Schneerson's Birthday?
Ari Fleischer:
Reform Lubavitch, by James Besser,
Baltimore Jewish Times, 10/26/2001, V.262, N.8, p.
30
"Like that of most high-ranking White House officials, press secretary Ari
Fleischer's
life has been an exhausting blur since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But he
took a few hours off last week to pick up an award from American Friends of
Lubavitch, and to help boost the group's extensive Jewish outreach efforts on
Capitol Hill -- efforts that Mr. Fleischer,
a former congressional staffer, has supported from the beginning. He was given
the group's Young Leadership award and Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) was
the night's honoree at a dinner that drew hundreds of Washington political
bigwigs, Capitol Hill staffers and Washington money people. Mr. Fleischer
was an early leader and co-president of Chabad's
Capitol Jewish Forum, which brings together lawmakers and congressional and
administration staffers for Jewish events study ... In a show of
bi-partisanship, both Mr. Fleischer
and Mr. Lieberman lavished praise on the active Chabad
effort that emphasizes the army of young staffers in government and political
jobs."
Official White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in
the Jewish community, some reports state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer
is closely connected to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad
Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Qabala, and hold very extremist and insulting
views of non-Jews. Fleischer
was the co-president of Chabad's
Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership Award from the American
Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001.
_________
Getting ready for the Serpent?
Monday, May. 26, 2003
Speaking with a forked tongue used to be a bad thing. Now it's apparently a rad
thing among those who aren't content merely to pierce their tongue, eyebrows,
nose, lips, nipples and other, more delicate body parts. Yes, a small number of
thrill seekers and rebels — estimates range from 500 to 2,000--have slashed
their tongues to try to give them a more serpentine
appearance. And that has more than a few doctors and dentists
worried.
Piercing the tongue is dangerous enough; splitting it is even more so and has
the added disadvantage of being difficult to reverse. The major risks are
infection — which can spread to the jaw and throat — and uncontrolled
bleeding. You also have to learn to talk all over again. Proponents say it's no
different from having a tummy tuck or a face-lift, but even professional
piercers are not convinced. Legislators in Illinois are considering a bill that
would require tongue splitting to be performed by a medical professional. So
far, few doctors or dentists have signed up to do it.
Bush family funded
Adolf Hitler 13.05.2003 [14:40]
Have you ever wondered how Adolph Hitler – a mediocre painter of
Austrian origin – transformed himself into Germany’s Fuhrer during the
1930s and 1940s?
The Nazi phenomenon was no historical coincidence, and far less a
philosophical whim made real by just one man. Nazism had its followers, many
of them exceptionally wealthy, veritable alchemists of the financial world
back then.
According to research carried out over the last few years, Wall Street bankers
(amongst others) financed Hitler’s rise to power whilst making large profits
at the same time. What is yet still more deplorable is the fact that relatives
of the current U.S. president were amongst this group of individuals.
U.S. authors Webster G. Tarpley and Anton Cheitkin reveal in the recently
published George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography that Prescott Bush (George
W. Bush’s grandfather) and other directors of the Union Banking Company
(UBC) were Nazi collaborators.
The book relates how in 1922 – when national socialism was emerging –
railroad impresario W. Averell Harriman traveled to Berlin and interviewed the
Thyssen family with a view to founding a German-U.S. bank. The Thyssens were
already behind-the-scenes owners of several financial institutions that
allowed them to transfer their money from Germany to the Netherlands and from
there onto the United States.
The banks in question were the August Thyssen Bank whose headquarters were
located in Berlin; the Bank voor Handel (Netherlands) and the Union Banking
Corporation (New York). At the beginning of the 1920s, one of the members of
this family, Fritz Thyssen – author of I Paid Hitler – contributed some
$25,000 USD to the recently formed German National Socialist Workers’ Party,
becoming the prime and most important financier of the Fuhrer in his ascent to
power.
According to the book’s authors, Thyssen was fascinated by Hitler, citing
his talent as a public speaker and his ability to lead the masses. However,
what impressed him most was the order that prevailed at his rallies and the
almost military discipline of his followers.
And so, in 1931 Thyssen joined the Nazi party, becoming one of the most
powerful members of the Nazi war machine.
At that time, the magnate presided over the German Steel Trust, a steel
industry consortium founded by Clarence Dillon, one of Wall Street’s most
influential men. One of Dillon’s most trustworthy collaborators was Samuel
Bush: Prescott’s father, George Senior’s grandfather and great-grandfather
of the current U.S. president George W. Bush.
In 1923, Harriman and the Thyssens decided to set up a bank and appointed
George Herbert Walker – Prescott’s father-in-law – as president. Later,
in 1926, they established the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) with Prescott
Bush at the helm. That same year, he was also named vice president and partner
at Brown Brothers Harriman. Both firms allowed the Thyssens to send money to
the United States from Germany via the Netherlands.
U.S. economist Victor Thorn has noted that although a large number of other
corporations aided the Nazis (such as Standard Oil and Rockefeller’s Chase
Bank, as well as U.S. automobile manufacturers) Prescott Bush’s interests
were much more profound and sinister.
Thorn adds that UBC became a secret channel to protect Nazi capital leaving
Germany for the United States via the Netherlands. When the Nazis needed to
retrieve their funds, Brown Brothers Harriman sent them directly to Germany.
In this way, UBC received money from the Netherlands and Brown Brothers
Harriman sent it back. And who was on the executive of both of these
companies? Prescott Bush himself, the Nazis’ first money launderer.
In their book, Tarpley and Cheitkin explain that in this way a significant
part of the Bush family’s financial base is related to supporting and aiding
Adolph Hitler. Therefore, the current U.S. president, just like his father
(former CIA director, vice president and president) reached the peak of the
U.S. political hierarchy thanks to his great-grandfather and grandfather and
generally his entire family, who financially aided and encouraged the Nazis.
Some time later, in October 1942, the U.S. authorities confiscated Nazi bank
funds from the New York UBC, whose then president was Prescott. The firm was
condemned as a financial and commercial collaborator with the enemy and all
its assets were seized.
Later, the U.S. government also ordered the seizure of the assets of a further
two leading financial agencies directed by Prescott through the accounts of
the Harriman banking institution: the Holland-America Trading Corporation (a
U.S.-Dutch commercial firm) and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation.
Then on November 11, 1942, an embargo was imposed on the Silesian-American
Corporation – another firm headed by Bush and Walker – under the same
Trading with the Enemy Act.
However, in 1951, the embargo was lifted and the enterprising businessman
recovered some $1.5 million USD, earmarked for new investments largely to
swell the Bush family’s patrimony.
To this should be added a resumé of files belonging to Dutch and U.S.
information services confirming the direct links between Prescott Bush, the
German Thyssen family and the blood money of a group of rich U.S. families
from the Second World War.
Tarpley and Cheitkin affirm that the great financial crash of 1929-1931
affected the United States, Germany and Britain, weakening their respective
governments. At the same time, Prescott Bush became even more diligent, still
more desirous of doing everything that was necessary to safeguard his place in
the world. It was during this crisis that some members of the Anglo-U.S
wealthy class supported the installation of Hitler’s regime in Germany.
To sum up, the authors categorically state that the Bush family’s fortune
arose as a result of its unconditional support for Adolph Hitler’s political
project.
The UBC, under Prescott Bush’s direction and with the long-term cooperation
of Fritz Thyssen’s German Steel Trust participated in the emergence,
preparation and financing of the Nazi war machine through the manufacture of
armored vehicles, fighter planes, guns and explosives.
The Bush family’s habit of dominating territories and wealth is nothing new.
Their fascist genes were generated during the 1930s. Therefore defining the
occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq and the threats to other countries as a
continuance of blitzkreig offensives as fascist is no blunder. Neither is
convening an anti-fascist front is a rhetorical exercise.
_____________
The Churchizionist
Bushkikeyids will fall for anything but the Truth
US POW Jessica Lynch
Rescue Was 'Stage-Managed'
The Times Of India
5-19-3
NEW DELHI -- The dramatic
rescue of US soldier Jessica Lynch on April 2 from an Iraqi hospital made
headlines everywhere, including in this newspaper.
The whole world saw dramatic footage - conveniently filmed
by US Army night vision cameras - of helicopter-borne American special
forces kicking down doors and firing their guns, apparently at Iraqi
soldiers.
The rescue of the young POW boosted morale on the US home
front at a time when the invasion of Iraq had appeared to run aground.
"It was a classic operation done by some of our nation's finest
warriors, who are dedicated to never leaving a comrade behind", US
brigadier general Vincent Brooks declared. And the entire media breathlessly
retailed this story.
There was only one problem: the story simply wasn't true.
The dramatic rescue was a well-prepared 'infowar' operation staged for the
cameras. The purpose being to shift media focus away from the killing of
civilians by the US bombardment of Iraq and on to the 'heroism' of US
forces.
Interviews conducted by the Toronto Star and BBC at the
hospital in Nasiriya where Lynch was being treated have revealed the
following facts about the entire affair:
All Iraqi troops and fidayeen had withdrawn from the area
two days before the 'daring' rescue.
The hospital staff had driven Lynch to a US checkpost in
an ambulance a day earlier in an attempt to hand her over but were fired
upon.
US soldiers involved in the rescue fired blanks to create
the impression that they had to fight their way in.
"It was like a Hollywood film", Dr Ammar Uday
told the BBC, "They cried 'go, go, go', with guns and blanks without
bullets and the sound of explosions. They made a show...".
"The most important thing to know", Dr Harith
Houssona told the Toronto Star, "is that Iraqi soldiers and commanders
had left the hospital almost two days earlier".
He said that the night they left, his colleagues moved
Jessica Lynch out of intensive care and into an ambulance. "We began to
drive to the Americans, who were just 1 km away. But when the ambulance got
within 300 metres, they began to shoot".
The BBC, whose documentary on the stage-managed 'rescue'
will be telecast on Sunday, said the Pentagon "had been influenced by
Hollywood producers of reality TV and action movies, notably the man behind
Black Hawk Down, Jerry Bruckheimer," whose advice "was taken on
and developed on the field of battle in Iraq".
The Vision Established
except for the Illuminated Moshiach?
Israel In Charge Of
The US Military Dictatorship Opinion
By Tariq Al-Maeena
5-18-3
If "Terror" attacks were to stop, then Israel
would lack any viable excuse to continue killing Arabs. The bulldozers would
fall silent. For Israel, that would be the worst thing that could happen.
Even worse than the so-called "Road Map." In America, the
Religious Right mandates Bush that the "Holy Land" must be purged
of all Muslim Arabs. They cite that act as a Christian Religious Edict,
supported by their interpretation of Biblical Scripture. Bush cannot be
reelected without their support, nor can he be reelected without Jewish
support.
Ariel Sharon is not a Religious man, and he has stated
that he would not form a Government if he had to form a coalition with
Orthodox Religious Jews, or any other Jewish Religious groups. Obviously,
Sharon is ruthless, controls Israeli Intelligence, and that Service readily
admits it has "operatives" inside all Arab Organizations. Israeli
Intelligence is rated the best in the world, with complete! access to
American Intelligence, and they are not shackled by any sort of morality.
The time has come to put 2+2 together and understand where
"World Terrorism" is originating or being exploited, and the
purpose it serves. Bin Laden may have started this process, but Israelis
understand how to use it to further their ambitions. Suicide bombers can be
either manipulated, or used as "scapegoats" for any explosion. (
Israelis claimed the last Bus bombing was caused by a bomber entering the
front of the Bus, yet the photographs show the roof of the Bus pealed back
from the rear, where the charge was set) Their first step was to equate
Palestinian resistance, doubted "Terrorism" to 9-11 as being a
"Terrorist" act, rather than its actual purpose of being an act of
retaliation for America's support of years of Israeli Atrocities.
Bin Laden gave the Israelis, unwittingly, exactly what
they needed, to expand their naming of "Terrorism" to include
9-11, as well as Palestinian resistance. With most Americans unaware of
Israeli atrocities against Palestinians, Israeli theft of Palestinian homes
and farms and only understanding Palestinians only as
"Terrorists," rather than in a Resistance Movement. The stage was
set.
The War against "World Terrorism," as it is now
called, had the flags flying, and the full support of the American People.
For Americans, Pearl Harbor was back. Not many Flags for Iraq, are people
catching on?
Sharon was left with the simple task of mobilizing a
simpler-minded Bush into an all-out Christian Crusade: First Afghanistan,
then Iraq, now on to Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and finally Iran.
"Terrorism" could have been stopped in its tracks by reining in
Israel, and although Bush did try, Sharon is far too clever and powerful
vs-a-vis Bush Jr. Just to teach Bush a lesson, Sharon made him cough-up 10
billion, a 400% increase in US aid to Israel.
Israel's stock-pile of Nuclear Weapons may not be needed
after all. "World Terrorism" has caused the United States to form
the Office of "Homeland Security" which allows the US Government
to suspend all civil rights and Constitutional Protections of American
Citizens. At that point, the United States has become a Military
Dictatorship, and with the Zionists in control of American Politics, Israel
becomes, de facto, the World's only Superpower. The worst thing, that could
happen, is happening.
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole
responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.
editor@aljazeerah.info
___________
First Make the Bible hate
Literature against Homosexuals, then anti-Semitic Gospel of Christ Jesus, and
any who stand firm for the Lord of Host
Is The Bible Hate Literature?
By Randall Palmer
5-17-3
OTTAWA (Reuters) - An
attempt to broaden Canada's hate-crimes laws to include protection for
homosexuals has sparked a fierce debate in Parliament over whether the Bible
and the Koran could be branded as hate literature.
It centres on a bill from gay Member of Parliament Svend
Robinson that would make it a crime, punishable by up to two years in
prison, to incite or promote hatred against homosexuals.
But his attempt to end gay-bashing has brought warnings
that pastors or imams could be thrown into jail for preaching homosexuality
is evil and that their scriptures could be banned or confiscated.
Robinson, a member of the minority New Democratic Party,
dismissed the fears as unfounded.
"There's not an attorney general in the country
anywhere at any level who would consent to the prosecution of an individual
for quoting from the Bible," he told a House of Commons committee
examining the bill.
"An attorney general who tried something like that
would be run out of town on a rail."
Opponents of the bill point to the Owens court case in
Saskatchewan five months ago involving the right to quote the Bible in an
newspaper ad against homosexuality. The judge ruled that a Biblical passage
in Leviticus "exposes homosexuals to hatred."
Even though the Owens case dealt with human rights
legislation, critics said that sort of ruling could just as easily be
applied in a hate-crimes case under the criminal code.
"I'm concerned about the chilling effect of this kind
of decision," said Vic Toews of the official opposition in Parliament,
the Canadian Alliance.
The gay-rights lobby group Egale suggested the courts
would eventually insist on including sexual orientation in the current
hate-crimes legislation, which prohibits hatred on the basis of colour,
race, religion or ethnic origin.
"I would suggest to this committee that the
legislation as it stands, by being under-inclusive, by failing to protect a
group equally needing protection, is unconstitutional," Egale's John
Fisher said this week.
He said gays were more likely to be attacked than
heterosexuals.
Pat O'Brien, a legislator from the governing Liberal
Party, recalled an incident in which Robinson himself had confronted a Roman
Catholic priest on Parliament Hill who was protesting homosexuality, and
Robinson threw one of his signs over the embankment he was standing on.
"I have concerns whether somebody like that is going
to be able to carry out his freedom of expression," O'Brien said.
Because Robinson's bill has prompted an avalanche of
e-mails and letters to members of Parliament, it has become hot potato that
the Liberals appear unsure how to handle.
Liberal Justice Minister Martin Cauchon told the House of
Commons on Thursday he supported the bill. But socially conservative members
of the Liberal Party were put on the committee on Wednesday when a motion
was made to shelve it.
Robinson successfully delayed that motion, and both sides
are now looking to a final committee battle on May 26 or 27 that is likely
to determine whether the bill will die or proceed to broader consideration
by Parliament.
________
'Should We Allow
Israel To Exist?'
By Peter Leopard
Petertheleopard@aol.com
5-17-3
Zionists and Christian Zionists maintain that God backs
everything that the State of Israel does, and therefore we must support
them, right or wrong. But who gave them the authority to proclaim this
belief?
God didn't. Both groups say the Bible is the source of
their claim. Yet, nowhere in the Bible does God say we must support the
State of Israel. Nowhere does it say that the secular political group known
as 'Zionists' are the 'chosen ones.'
The Ayatollahs of Iran and the Fuhrer of Nazi Deutchland
also believed that they were the elect of God, the chosen ones, the masters,
and their people briefly put faith in them, right or wrong - but eventually
both peoples came to their senses.
Now we see yet another fascist pagan movement proclaiming
Divine backing, and chosen status. When will people learn?
The Old Testament of the Bible is merely a foreshadowing
of the New Law and New Testament to come. All future tense references to
Israel, Jerusalem, and Jews refer to Christianity.
Today's fleshly Jews believe in a mystical pagan religion.
The fleshly Jews were at one time God's servants, but only insofar as they
were required to carry out their duties in preparing the way for
Christianity. The Old Hebrew law was a flawed, bloodguilty law, given in a
savage world, to prepare them for a pure law that was to come.
In the Old Testament there are some three hundred detailed
prophecies of the coming Messiah, and when Christ came to Earth for his
brief stay he fulfilled all the prophecies regarding this time - so
according to the Jews own books, there can be no other Messiah besides
Christ.
The majority of Jews rejected the Christ and rejected the
New Law, so God rejected them. Today's fleshly Jews are apostates, and are
tools in the hands of the devil.
The Bible uses the future meaning of the word 'Jews' to
indicate 'anybody who does God's will'- not a race of people.
'Israel' is refered to as the spiritual tabernacle of
Christianity, not a physical place, but a spiritual fellowship.
'Jerusalem' has many meanings, one of which refers to an
actual city that will be built after the resurrection of billions of humans
takes place, and this city will come down from Heaven, made by God.
'Israel' is described as being attacked by certain
nations. This is a prophecy for a time after the resurrection, when people
from ancient times, like Vikings, Scythes, Romans, Medes, and other peoples
are brought back to life. The 'Israel' they attack is not the pornographic,
murderous, and decieptful State of Israel that exists today, but rather, it
is a future community of Christians who come from 'every race' on Earth. At
that time, the warfighters will be destroyed by God - not by American
military might or by Israeli snipers, since America and the State of Israel
will have already been destroyed by God's wrath many centuries before this
event takes place.
This begs the question 'Should We Allow Israel To Exist?'
Like all other peoples, they have the right to exist and
be tolerated - but it would be unethical to give moral and financial support
to the corrupt State of Israel. They are not a democracy as some scoundrels
keep harping. They are an occult state under demonic powers, thus we see
demonic scorn of the rule of law at every twist and turn of the Israeli
saga. Jews themselves despairingly refer to Jerusalem as the 'cursed' city.
Their nation should be controlled by America - which is
inevitable once Christians understand that Jews are materialistic paganists
and mystics, not chosen ones. Their serial killers must be handed over to
Arab nations for punishment in order for the bloodguilt to be assuaged.
Their military arsenals must be destroyed. The entire Central Asian Region
must become a place of freedom of religion, in order to allow for
Christianity to sprout and fluorish among the various races and nations in
that area, and eventually all around the world. Talmuddism and Christianity
cannot exist together, since one is evil and one is good.
God is calling the Jews back to Israel, but what He is
calling are the Christians (anybody who does God's will is a 'Jew') to a
pure and wholesome spirtiual tabernacling (a feature refered to as
'Israel'). That's what that scripture means.
It's also possible that after the world (not the physical
earth, just the human world system) is destroyed (remember, God says that He
created the Earth to last forever), God may give the physical land of Israel
to Abraham, Moses, and other faithful servants to live on, but at that time
the land will be vacant anyhow and there won't be anything less than
peaceful conditions worldwide.
No sensible person should concede to the State of Israel
the right of self-determination. They simply don't have the wisdom or
ability to maintain a civilized humane society.
Makow - The Other Side
of Holocaust Denial
Freedom As Hate Crime By Henry Makow, Ph.D
5-19-3
Although
I am the grandson of Holocaust victims, I am embarrassed by some Jewish
organizations that want to make the Jewish Holocaust the defining event of
World War Two.
This is seen in the boom in Holocaust Studies Programs,
Holocaust Museums and Hollywood movies like "The Pianist."
Canadian Media mogul Izzy Asper is behind a new $200
million dollar "Holocaust and Human Rights Museum" in Winnipeg.
The very title equates Jewish persecution with all "human rights."
The Second World War was a human calamity. Over 55 million
people died. Why focus on the Jewish experience? This is the cause of anti
Semitism in the first place. Jewish power brokers are perpetuating a vicious
cycle.
I am also troubled by the attempt to classify people like
Ernst Zundel as a "hate criminal." Zundel's website claims only
one million Jews were murdered, there were no gas chambers, and Hitler
didn't intend genocide. Zundel's claims are repugnant, but he has a right to
be wrong. Society needs people who dispute the historical record. One may be
right. If spreading false information is a crime, shouldn't we also lock up
Tom Brokaw?
Canada has locked up Ernst Zundel. According to his wife,
he is being mistreated in prison. He risks deportation as a "security
risk." Bernie Farber of the Canadian Jewish Congress concedes Zundel
doesn't "actually wield the stick" but "provides oxygen"
to extremists. That definition would curb everyone's freedom of speech.
When questioning the truth becomes "hate", we
have entered the1984 era of thought crime. Don't kid yourself. This is the
slippery slope to tyranny and Jewish organizations are partly to blame. We
must stand up in defiance.
The charge of hate is used selectively to disarm
legitimate opposition. The definition of "hatred" is very
selective. For example lesbians spew hatred of men but they are never
arrested. Feminists teach impressionable girls that all males are
potentially violent sexual predators. That's OK. The Talmud is full of
hatred against Christ and Christians, but that doesn't count either.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/talmud1.htm
Canadian MP Svend Robinson wants to make "gay
bashing" a hate crime. He isn't talking about violence against gays,
which is a genuine crime. He would prevent society from defending itself
from activists who teach children heterosexuality is not natural but
homosexuality is.
"Hate" is a bogus charge anyway. Many so-called
"Anti Semites" have written me and most are not hateful or racist
in the least. They are trying to defend their legitimate interests from a
real and insidious attack. The arch anti-Semite Henry Ford, author of
"The International Jew"
(http://www.jrbooksonline.com/Intl_Jew_full_version/ijtoc_.htm) employed
thousands of Jews in his factories. He worked closely with a Jew, Mme.
Rosika Schwimmer on his Peace Ship Crusade. Ford's Jewish architect Albert
Kahn designed hundreds of buildings for him.
Jewish powerbrokers use anti Semitism to disarm opposition
to their political agenda. The promotion of the Jewish Holocaust maintains
the Jews' status as the world's premier "victims." This gives them
immunity from criticism. It makes people feel more favourable to Jews and
more willing to accede to their direction and influence. (The same strategy
is used with homosexuals and feminists, the other out-groups used by the
elite to subvert society.)
The Holocaust is also a defining event for Jews. Jewish
power brokers use victim status to manipulate Jews and extract donations.
Victimhood turns Jews into moral zombies. For most of my life I didn't give
two cents for the right of Palestinians to their homes. "We suffered,
we deserve a homeland," the logic goes.
The Holocaust also serves their New World Order agenda. It
is a constant reminder of the pitfalls of nationalism or racial
consciousness, two things the financial elite is trying to bury, with the
exception of Israel.
"ALSO RAN" HOLOCAUSTS
To maintain victim priority, it's necessary for the Jewish
establishment to practise "holocaust denial" when it comes to
other people.
In his book "Crimes and Mercies" (1997) James
Bacque describes how he confronted New York Times reporter Drew Middleton
with evidence that after the war the US starved to death over one million
German POWs. "What Middleton told me basically was that, yes, he had
lied in 1945 and no, it did not matter to him or the New York Times if I
exposed this." (183)
"Middleton's sense of security, his sense of the New
York Times' power, took my breath away," Bacque writes. "But worse
than that, Middleton did not care about this atrocity... the New York Times
witnessed it, then denied that it happened. And has gone on denying it into
the 1990's." (184)
Bacque estimates that during the Allied Occupation
(1946-1950) an additional eight to twelve million Germans were deliberately
starved to death. The war did not end in 1945. For five additional years,
Germany was subjected "physical and psychic trauma unparalleled in
history." (93)
Red Army soldiers raped up to two million German women
during the last six months of the Second World War, around 100,000 of them
in Berlin. They also raped Russian women released from German labour camps.
We live in a feminist era. Have you seen any movies about these women?
At Potsdam, the Allies ratified the 1939 Soviet-Nazi Pact
that gave USSR half of Poland. Poland was compensated with the eastern
quarter of Germany, in effect another gift to the Russian empire. This
required the expulsion of about 12 million Germans, the largest forced
migration in history.
Jews were prominent in the Polish Communist regime. In a
stunning role reversal, Jewish policemen ordered Germans out of their homes
and into cattle cars. In his book, "An Eye for An Eye" Jewish
writer John Sack relates that about 1.5 million of these Germans died in the
removal. He quotes a German woman from Gleiwitz: "What happened to the
Jews was sad. But there was another Holocaust too." (138)
According to Sacks, Jewish Communists extracted another
cruel revenge. They filled 1250 Nazi concentration and labour camps and
brutally tortured and murdered tens of thousands of Germans. (101 ff.)
Have you seen a movie where concentration camp guards and
commandants were Jews? Since 1948, the American Jewish Committee and the
Anti Defamation League have censored all Hollywood scripts involving Jews.
Since these bodies are extensions of Jewish finance, what other topics have
they censored? (Gabler, An Empire of the Own: How Jews Invented Hollywood
1988,p.303)
In his book, "Victims of Yalta", Nicholai
Tolstoy documents "Operation Keelhaul," the Allies' forced
repatriation of two million Russians who were German slave labourers,
prisoners of wars, or soldiers. These people were sent to the Gulag and
liquidated. Where is the museum dedicated to them?
The mass media is unusually coy when it comes to reporting
Communist atrocities. Nine million people died in the Russian Civil War
(1917-1922). The Communists targeted czarists and Christians in particular.
Stalin's purges and famines accounted for 20 million more deaths. In China,
Mao ZeDong is blamed for a similar number. More recently, let's not forgot
Tibet, Cambodia and Rwanda. (See Twentieth Century death tolls at
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm )
In "The Holocaust Industry" (2000) Norman
Finkelstein describes how Israel helped its ally Turkey deny the massacre of
one million Armenians in 1915. "Acting at Israel's behest, the US
Holocaust Council practically eliminated mention of the Armenians in the
Washington Holocaust Memorial Museum, and Jewish lobbyists in Congress
blocked a day of remembrance for the Armenian genocide." (p.69)
CONCLUSION
Jewish organizations dishonour Holocaust victims by using
them for political purposes. It is tasteless to cast Jews as the world's
premier victims. Humanity is one family and no genocide is more important
than another.
To use "hate" to disarm opposition to the
Zionist agenda is also repugnant. It leads to tyranny and more anti
Semitism.
For Ernst Zundel to deny or understate the Jewish
Holocaust is grotesque. But it is not a crime. In these questions, only the
truth matters. Let the truth speak for itself. Let the truth judge Zundel.
Let me close with an anecdote. In 1961 when I was 11, my
family was travelling in Germany. We stopped at tavern-restaurant where some
workmen were having a loud conversation. They looked at us (a young couple
with three children) and said, "We'd better shut up. There may be Jews
present."
My family felt threatened. We ate and quickly left. But I
realise now those workmen might have been afraid of us. Germany had just
endured a gruelling occupation.
Hate is born out of fear. Let us expose the forces that
make us fear each other for no reason.
---------
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the board game
Scruples and author of "A Long way to go for a Date." His articles
on feminism and the new world order are found on his web site
www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments at henry@savethemales.ca
________
Gee, Thanks Mr. Tommy
Thompson, for your contribution to the next level of propagated fear. And of
Course Mr. Tommy Thompson is a friend of the Illuminated Chabad
"Masters"
April 13, 1997Milwaukee might as well have been called Marty Stein-ville on
April 5, when the community turned out to wish the founder and head of Stein
Optical and noted philanthropist a happy 60th birthday.
Marty may have been the honored guest, but the party bore the unmistakable
touch of his creative wife, Barbara. With a photo montage of Marty since
childhood, a lavish spread -- all kosher -- from Design Decor, Sweet Bouquet
loot bags for the kids and strolling string musicians, she designed an evening
to remember for the next 60 years.
Even the location, the Betty Brinn Children's Museum, couldn't have been more
appropriate. "Marty's always been a kid at heart," said longtime
friend Sidney Lieberman. And since the party was also a fund-raiser, the museum
was one of the beneficiaries, along with Chabad's
Children of Chernobyl.
Dan and Larry Stein were in town with their families to join their parents
for the happy occasion. The other 500 well-wishers included Isabelle Polacheck,
Linda Grunau, Patti and Jack McKeithan, Sharon and Bob Kliegman, Linda and John
Mellowes, and Mary and Ted Kellner. Others were Irina Fiveysky, Betsy and Bruce
Axelrod, Corliss Wood, Andy Potos, Judy and Al Kaplan, and Carrie Branovan,
whose photographs of the children of Chernobyl were on display.
And what was the birthday boy's present? Something that will be purchased in
Israel, says Barbara, where the Steins are accompanying Gov. Tommy
Thompson on a trade
mission.
SARS Set To Move
Worldwide Soon
5-20-3
BRUSSELS -- The SARS virus
is likely to kill people all over the world by later this year, even if it
levels off for the moment, US secretary for health Tommy
G.Thompson warned Tuesday.
He also warned that international airlines may face more
bad news if the virus continues to spread.
"Even though it may level off now it could come back
in the fall, and then you can I think anticipate that you will have deaths
in all the continents, or a lot of the continents," he told reporters.
Sounds like good planning to me
Asked how confident he was that United States and Europe
could avoid SARS deaths, he said: "I'm not
confident at all. I think you will see them."
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus has so
far hit China and Hong Kong worst, but most major outbreaks appear to be
easing, except in Taiwan.
Asia has had by far the biggest number of deaths - over
600 by the latest count - and the only other deaths have occurred in Canada.
Europe, the United States, Africa and Latin American have all had confirmed
spaces, but no one has died.
The US Secretary of Health and Human Services, who was
speaking after meeting EU officials in Brussels, said airlines should brace
for possibly more bad news.
The SARS virus has hit the airline industry hard, just as
it was hoping to pull out of a post-September 11 slump. The industry's top
group IATA warned this month that worldwide airlines were set to lose
another 10 billion dollars this year.
"To the airlines I'd say that I'm sorry but my job is
to protect the public health of Americans," said Thompson. "But if
the epidemic continues there will be more countries that we will have to put
a travel advisory on, which will hurt the airlines even more," he said.
He underlined the importance of avoiding countries
currently subject to US travel advisories - China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
"I would strongly recommend that you don't travel,
unless it's absolutely necessary, to those countries at this point in time,
until the epidemic is brought completedly under control," he said.
The US official, who was lobbying European officials in
Brussels for more money for the global fight against AIDS, had addressed the
SARS problem at the World Health Organization's annual assembly in Geneva on
Monday, he said.
Specifically he said the US had earmarked 20-25 million
dollars to set up an early warning system for SARS and other new infectious
diseases.
He said a major initial problem had been in persuading
authorities in China, where the disease has hit hardest, to be open about
the problem and to hand over medical samples of the virus to be studied.
But he was not optimistic about the chances of keeping
SARS out completedly.
"With the tremendous transit populations we have
right now, you've got to assume that somebody from Europe will pick it up in
one of the affected countries and bring it back," he said. "I
don't think SARS is going to go away," he added.
But of course Tommy boy is
an obedient apostate solomonic Goyim Freemason Churchizionist
The Psychology of Fear
SARS fears grip Beijing,
leaving many near hysteria
Some anxious residents microwave money to disinfect it,
others abandon pets because of rumours they transmit virus
By GEOFFREY YORK
Monday, May 19, 2003 - Page A3
BEIJING
-- For a month now, Beijing businesswoman Xue Ping has not dared to
venture anywhere except her home and a nearby park. Consuming nothing but
ginseng water and hoarded food, she disinfects every room of her home
every day in a fearful bid to protect herself from SARS.
Last week, as the outbreak finally appeared to be easing, the
36-year-old woman made her first trip to a bank to pay a bill and then
quickly rushed home to shower and wash all of her clothes.
"Some people were standing closer than a metre to me and I felt
very nervous," she confessed later.
"I know I shouldn't stay at home, but I don't want my family to
worry about me and I don't want to give them a virus. It's terrible, it's
not like any other disease."
Even as the number of new cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in
Beijing begins to decline, many people here remain in the grip of fear and
anxiety -- the emotions that have dominated this city ever since Chinese
authorities admitted the scale of the disease last month.
Much of the reaction has verged on hysteria. Some people were convinced
that a microwave oven was the best way to sterilize anything that could
carry the virus. So they began putting their cellphones and face masks in
their microwave. One man put a passport into his microwave to try to
sterilize it. A woman put 3,000 yuan (about $500) in her microwave and,
according to a Beijing newspaper report, ended up destroying most of the
cash. The report was unconfirmed, but it illustrated the psychology
of fear in the city.
In yet another bizarre reaction to the disease, a growing number of
Beijing residents have abandoned or killed their
household pets because of an irrational belief that dogs and
cats could transmit the virus.
And while the hysteria has faded a little in the past week, it has not
disappeared -- a poll earlier this month found that one in 10 Beijing
residents feel helpless, panicky or in pain because of SARS fears.
Another recent poll found that 70 per cent of Beijing residents were
cutting back on contact with friends and relatives. Half were refusing to
shake hands with anyone, 47 per cent were reducing physical contact such
as kissing and hugging, and some families were even refusing to eat or
sleep in the same room.
Some people are bowing instead of shaking hands. Many people prefer to
keep in touch through the Internet, causing a dramatic growth in the
popularity of chat rooms on Chinese Web sites.
At least three people in Beijing and Hong Kong have committed suicide
or tried to commit suicide because of a fear that they had the SARS virus.
The Beijing city government has been forced to create 24-hour telephone
hot lines for counselling people who fear the disease.
In reality, the chances of dying from SARS in China are tiny -- less
than one in 90,000 in Beijing, the worst affected city.
Yesterday, the government reported only 28 new infections and two
deaths from SARS in the entire country, the lowest daily total in a month.
Only 17 new cases were reported in Beijing.
Yet health experts say the fear of SARS is itself causing stress and
tension that is lowering the immune system and leaving people more
vulnerable to illness.
Some doctors are calling it SARS terror syndrome: a feeling of
depression and sleeplessness because of anxiety over the disease.
One Chinese Web site, http://www.sina.com,
described a typical case. "Even when he stays at home, he still feels
uneasy and washes his hands three times in half an hour. Whenever he
touches something, he washes his hands. If he sees somebody spit, he
thinks he will be infected with SARS and he feels worried and desperate.
He doesn't dare to meet people, and he feels very nervous when he meets
strangers. He doesn't let his child play with other children and he
doesn't dare to invite friends to his home. Whenever he sees terrible news
on a Web site, he immediately forwards it to others."
The emotions stirred up by the SARS panic are causing physical
reactions such as fatigue, sore throat, diarrhea, low-grade fever and
discomfort, the Web site says. "When they have these symptoms, people
think it's like the symptoms of SARS and they feel scared," it says.
"The more they feel frightened, the more their symptoms are like
those of SARS, which causes a vicious circle. The SARS virus only infects
a small number of people, but the psychological panic attacks thousands of
people."
Orchestrated Global Chaos
Taiwan Considers
Nationwide Shutdown
Over SARS By Michael Taylor Asia Times
5-19-3
The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in
Taiwan has continued
to worsen in recent days. On Saturday, a record 34 people
were added to the
list of probable SARS cases, followed by another
record-setter on Sunday
- 36 new probable cases and five more deaths. The new
totals stand at 344
probable cases and 40 deaths from the virus since it was
first identified
in Taiwan in mid-March. That might not sound like an
extremely virulent epidemic,
given that there are more than 22 million people in Taiwan
and the population
density is second only to Bangladesh. But the public's
sense of fear, fueled
by local television media's apparent inability to report
on anything else,
has reached new heights.
Meanwhile, the inability of the various levels of
government to coordinate
anti-SARS efforts gives little room for optimism that it
will contain the
disease quickly. Even some business leaders are now
calling for a nationwide
shutdown, and gauging the impact of SARS on the nation's
economy has become
more difficult than ever. This has not stopped various
government agencies,
multilateral institutions and private think tanks and
research houses from
doing so, yet with the following fairly obvious caveat:
the extent to which
SARS dents Taiwan's economic growth depends entirely on
how bad things get,
and how long they remain that way.
SARS has highlighted many of Taiwan's trends and
characteristics, and perhaps
chief among these from an economic standpoint is the
nation's interdependence
with China, which is more than just the birthplace of the
virus that has
now spread across Taiwan. Attempting to assess accurately
the impact of SARS
on Taiwan's economy would require knowledge of how bad the
outbreak has become
in China, particularly the Shanghai/Yangtze River Delta
area, and Fujian
and Guangzhou provinces, which in recent years have become
manufacturing
centers - and increasingly, development centers as well -
for Taiwanese companies.
Unfortunately, accurate information on China is not
forthcoming. Taiwanese
sources in Shanghai report rumors ranging from "the
situation is completely
under control" to "it's 30 times worse than the
government admits". Yet these
sources admit that their intelligence is based on rumor,
and that they are
mainly in the dark about the true extent of the outbreak
in China.
So far, despite the alarming rumors, sources in Taiwan's
key technology sector
report no interruptions in their chains across the Taiwan
Strait. That said,
many do note that downstream customers in the United
States and Europe have
requested that they stock up on inventories to prepare for
possible SARS-related
interruptions. And some have even been asked to move their
manufacturing
bases to Southeast Asia, which seems to have contained
outbreaks of SARS,
or to Latin America. Indeed, companies that have always
maintained geographically
diversified production sites for reasons of market access
(such as in Mexico,
which offers both NAFTA access to the US market as well as
somewhat cheap
labor) report increased orders. Such companies are seen as
benefiting from
the SARS outbreak.
It seems unlikely, but SARS has a slight chance of
accomplishing what a decade
of former president Lee Teng-hui's "Go slow, be
patient" and "Go South" policies
could not - forcing Taiwanese industrialists to set up
their manufacturing
operations in cheap labor markets other than China. The
idea behind these
policies, which are supported by the current
administration but not by most
industry leaders, is to steer Taiwan away from economic
interdependence with
China and thereby maintain its political separateness and
effective sovereignty.
Yet economic interdependence is a fact, and if China
sinks, Taiwan is likely
to have a very difficult time detaching itself and
regaining the surface.
While moving labor-intensive sweatshops to other
impoverished yet SARS-free
nations might be tenable, many Taiwanese companies
operating in China are
in capital-intensive sectors, making further migration
unfeasible - even
in the face of reduced export orders from customers who
are increasingly
wary of suppliers' ability to fulfill their needs amid the
SARS outbreak.
This drop-off in downstream customers' confidence is
precisely what is now
happening, according to Wang Yung-ching, chairman of the
massive Formosa
group, the core businesses of which revolve around basic
materials such as
plastics and rubber - and which is heavily invested in
hard-hit southern
China. Just a few weeks into the outbreak in Taiwan, Wang
said that he expects
"a severe blow" to his companies in terms of
weakened orders from overseas
clients who are fearful that the spread of the disease
might impact Formosa's
ability to fulfill the orders in a business environment
that requires minimal
inventory to remain competitive.
Furthermore, unlike the majority of foreign-invested firms
operating in China,
Taiwanese are not only focused on manufacturing for
export, but also on internal
Chinese demand. Exactly how bad Chinese consumption has or
will be hit by
SARS is a guessing game, as Beijing's official figures are
widely disbelieved.
Certainly, weakness is likely in the areas known to be
hardest hit, most
famously Beijing, but also Guangdong and Nanjing. Consumer
demand in the
Shanghai region, which Beijing claims has avoided SARS
almost entirely, is
also in question. But given that reported sales in China
during the first
quarter were generally in line with corporate
expectations, it seems that
the real impact of the outbreak has yet to be felt.
In Taiwan itself, the major impact of SARS has, not
surprisingly, centered
on the hospitality, travel and tourism industries. In
large part, this is
due to a dearth of business travel after foreign companies
have postponed
or canceled plans for employee travel to Taiwan and other
SARS-affected nations
as standard corporate policy. Meanwhile, the normal flood
of tourists from
Japan, by far Taiwan's main source of incoming tourism,
failed to materialize
during the recent weeklong series of Japanese holidays.
Despite cut-rate
deals on luxury hotels, occupancy rates in Taipei and
elsewhere are at or
near rock-bottom. Meanwhile, domestic tourism, which
accounts for the bulk
of the industry, has melted away as Taiwanese avoid public
transit and air
travel.
Taipei hoteliers could hardly have been cheered by the
recent indefinite
postponement of Computex, Taiwan's most important industry
convention and
the third largest IT show in the world after CeBIT in
Hannover and Comdex
in Las Vegas. Originally scheduled for early June as it is
every year, the
show's organizers postponed it, citing the unwillingness
of registered exhibitors
to attend. Computex has been put on indefinite hold, with
organizers promising
to hold the convention in autumn - if the SARS outbreak
has been brought
under control by then.
Last week, business leaders began calling for what had
heretofore been unthinkable
- a nationwide quarantine of 10 days. Backed by the ROC
(Republic of China
- Taiwan's official name) Chamber of Commerce, one of the
nation's most powerful
business organizations, the quarantine would mandate the
closure of all non-essential
businesses and government agencies, in order to find
people who have been
infected with SARS and isolate them. The imposition of
such a nationwide
quarantine seems exceedingly unlikely, given that Taiwan
authorities proved
incapable of even quarantining Hoping Hospital effectively
in April. Moreover,
it does not enjoy extremely widespread support, and the
Presidential Office
on Friday canceled a scheduled discussion of the issue,
thereby managing
to sidestep it for now.
However, the fact that such a drastic policy is even being
considered (estimated
cost to the nation's IT industry: US$290 million) reflects
the growing exasperation
with the government's inability to rein in the disease.
More ominously, it
is an indicator of the potential economic risks that
Taiwan faces from a
long, drawn-out series of SARS outbreaks.
(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights
reserved. Please contact
content@atimes.com for information on our sales and
syndication policies.)
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/EE20Ad01.html
Orchestrated Global Economic
Crash soon
Top
Worldwide
Dollar Falls on Snow Comment, Pushing Euro to Four-Year
High
New York, May 19 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar plunged, sending the euro above
the level where it was introduced in January 1999, after Treasury Secretary John
Snow suggested the U.S. is content with the U.S. currency's 22 percent decline
the past year.
Also, the yen declined to a record low against the euro and fell against the
dollar on investor speculation the Bank of Japan was selling yen to slow its
advance.
Snow said Saturday the dollar's losses are ``fairly modest,'' and signaled
the U.S. is concerned more about investor confidence in the dollar than its
level against other currencies. Investors and traders said Snow has departed
from the so-called strong dollar policy of past Treasury officials and will let
the currency slide in an effort to boost exports and the economy.
``You've got U.S. authorities now intimating for the first time in years that
they're comfortable seeing the dollar continue to go down,'' said Robert
McHenry, who oversees $2.5 billion of international investments at Hartford
Investment Management Co. in Hartford, Connecticut.
The dollar fell to $1.1683 per euro at 11:54 a.m. in New York from $1.1536
late Friday. It reached as low as $1.1737. The dollar's decline took the
European single currency to its highest since Jan. 15, 1999, and above its rate
of $1.16675 when it was introduced at the beginning of 1999. McHenry expects the
dollar to fall to $1.40 per euro in the next six months.
Asked after a meeting of finance ministers from the Group of Seven major
industrial countries in Deauville, France, what he means by a ``strong dollar''
Snow replied ``What you want to be strong is you want people to have confidence
in your currency.'' That means it is accepted by people, is a story of value and
is hard to counterfeit, he said.
Yen Drops
The yen declined to 136.22 per euro, and to 116.58 per dollar. The Japanese
currency earlier climbed as high as 115.07 per dollar, raising speculation the
Bank of Japan sold yen to stem a rally in the currency. The dollar has fallen
more than 8 percent versus the yen in the past 12 months.
``It looks like it could have been intervention in dollar- yen,'' said Lee
Ferridge, head of global currency strategy at Rabobank, in London. ``It's got
all the hallmarks of it.''
Officials at Japan's Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan in Tokyo and New
York declined to comment. European Central Bank and Federal Reserve officials
also declined to comment.
The Bank of Japan has spent more than 4 trillion yen ($34.6 billion) this
year in the currency market, more than all of last year, to keep its currency
from strengthening further than 115 yen, Nikkei English News reported, citing
people it didn't identify. Economists at Lehman Brothers Inc. estimate the
Japanese central bank spent about $50 billion last week to stem a rally in the
yen.
A rising yen hurts Japanese exports, which account for 11 percent of the
economy. The yen has gained 4.4 percent against the dollar in the past 3 weeks.
Profit Hurt
A weaker dollar helps companies such as Eastman Kodak Co., which was saved
from a first-quarter loss by the dollar's decline. The European Union and
Japanese economies stagnated in the first quarter as their currencies advanced
against the dollar. Honda Motor Co.'s annual operating profit drops about 20
billion yen for every 1 yen the local currency appreciates against the dollar.
The U.S. ``has to ensure that growth comes from somewhere'' and it seems
they're relying on foreign buyers to help, said Adrian Cunningham, who helps
manage $22 billion at Abbey National Plc in Glasgow. ``The dollar appears to be
heading towards $1.20'' to the euro.
European stocks fell on concern the dollar's plunge will erode profit at the
region's companies. Europe's $8 trillion economy ground to a halt in the first
quarter, partly because the dollar's decline. Reports last week showed the
German, Italian and Dutch economies, shrank in the first quarter.
Germany's benchmark DAX Index fell 4.7 percent today and France's CAC 40
index dropped 4.3 percent. Stocks also fell in the U.S., with the Standard &
Poor's falling 1.9 percent.
New Mantra
Snow distanced himself over the weekend from previous Treasury Secretaries
Robert Rubin and Paul O'Neill in how he defined a strong dollar, analysts said.
Lloyd Bentsen, President Bill Clinton's first Treasury secretary, introduced
the strong dollar policy in 1994 and his successor, Rubin, a former trader with
Goldman, Sachs & Co. refined it. Rubin and his successor, Lawrence Summers,
formulated with robotic precision the statement that a ``strong dollar is in the
U.S. national interest'' because it tempers inflation and interest rates,
underpinning confidence in U.S. stocks and bonds.
``I don't know how (Rubin) defined it,'' Snow told reporters Saturday. ``I've
never had that conversation with Paul.''
``It's the final nail in the coffin for the strong dollar policy,'' said Neil
Jones, director of foreign exchange at Nomura International Plc. ``I would avoid
buying the dollar.'' Jones sees the dollar falling as low as $1.20 in the next
few weeks.
The U.S. supports a strong dollar, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told
reporters today. ``The dollar policy is unchanged,'' Fleischer said at a White
House briefing. ``The government supports a strong dollar. There is no change in
policy.''
Two-thirds of the 30 traders, analysts and investors surveyed by Bloomberg
News on Friday recommended buying or holding euros against the dollar.
Gain Welcomed
French Finance Minister Franc de Mer said the euro's advance is welcome.
``It's much better to have a strong currency than a weak one,'' he said in an
interview on radio station France Inter.
The U.S. currency is likely to extend a 10 percent drop against the
12-country euro this year as slowing capital inflows from overseas make it more
difficult for the U.S. to finance its current account deficit, economists said.
``What investors get for their money in the U.S. is less than they get
elsewhere,'' said Paul Samuelson, a Nobel laureate and professor emeritus of
economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Interest rates ``will remain low, and the U.S. has a current account deficit
to finance while other countries are still digesting a surplus,'' said
Samuelson. ``It doesn't take much to figure out the dollar will continue to
fall.''
Last Updated: May 19, 2003 11:57 EDT
Here come Mooshiyuck...here
come mooshiyuck, marching down mooshiyuck lane...he would do ooh..ooh...ooh,
anything to be king...lalalalalalala-lalalalala..lalalalalalala-
lalalalala
Temporary and unblessedly
damned he be....
He's dead, no..he is
alive...no he is dead I'm Tellin ya, Why I saw him driving an eighteen wheeler
in Tennesee. Who? Osama...No Saddam...No it's not it is Adolf Hitler...no it
aint, why, it's Elvis
U.S. Terror Alert at
2nd-Highest Level
By JOHN J. LUMPKIN
The Associated Press
Tuesday, May 20, 2003; 3:31 PM
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration raised the national terror alert level
to orange Tuesday amid fears a wave of terrorist attacks overseas will spread to
the United States.
Department of Homeland Security officials initially provided few specific
reasons for the alert, which will set in motion a series of security measures
around the federal government. It also advises cities, states and businesses to
take extra security measures.
Clickit or Ticket Raod Blocks to begin Nationwide
May 19th 2003, SOS state Terrorist
Chief spokesman Ari Fleischer said President Bush's homeland security council
decided to raise the terror alert warning during a meeting at the White House.
After their session, Bush was informed of the council's decision - which is
binding and takes immediate effect - by chief of staff Andrew Card at 1:50 p.m.
EDT.
The alert was raised after top administration and counterterrorism officials
reviewed intelligence reports suggesting domestic
terrorist attacks were possible.
The new level, orange, marks a high threat of terrorist attacks. It's the
second highest level on the five-color scale. The previous level, yellow, marked
an elevated risk.
Counterterrorism officials had previously described the bulk of the terrorism
intelligence as pointing toward attacks overseas.
Officials believe al-Qaida (Eurasia)
has launched a series of strikes, loosely coordinated by the organization's top
leadership, aimed at demonstrating al Qaida is still viable. They believe
attacks in Morocco and Saudi are part of this.
The administration has raised the terror alert level one notch three times
previously, setting off a flurry of increased security measures by cities,
states and businesses. Each time, the level was lowered back to yellow after a
few weeks.
During the alerts, no domestic attacks were apparently attempted, leading
some to question whether the orange alerts do anything more than frighten
the public and cost taxpayer dollars, particularly in parts of the
country where terrorist attacks are unlikely.
However, Homeland Security officials say heightened security can stop attacks
without authorities realizing it - a would-be terrorist may pass on striking a
target when he sees the extra guards.
The last time it was raised was during the Iraq war. It went down after most
hostilities ended.
Speaking to reporters while administration officials were considering raising
the level, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner, R-Va., said
"I think Americans should give heed and pay attention to what they
decide."
"We do not know the specificity of where a strike could or could not
come, but I think prudent measures are being taken by the president on down, by
his administration," Warner said.
The alert system is designed to guide law enforcement agencies, businesses
and the general public in their security decisions, and it is mostly up to local
governments and companies to decide what measures to enact.
It is driven by world events and information gathered by U.S. intelligence
agencies, such as monitored communications between terrorists. This
"chatter" sometimes spikes before an attack.
Washington Chatter?
Officials say they want to take the alert level to orange only after
receiving specific, credible information that attacks are planned.
"We have concerns about whether or not there are threats that go beyond
Saudi Arabia," Fleischer said earlier. "These matters are being looked
at as we speak. We do have concerns about terrorists doing what they can to
continue to inflict harm."
The FBI, in an advisory sent Friday to state and local law enforcement
agencies, had said the al-Qaida terrorist organization remains active and could
hit U.S. and Western targets overseas as well as those on American soil.
The agency sent out another version of the bulletin earlier Tuesday. It
repeated the same warning, but also said FBI has reason to believe the
"Saudi Arabia and Morocco attacks (are) a possible prelude to U.S.
attacks," according to law enforcement officials speaking
on condition of anonymity.
Secrets of Satan's anonymity
The FBI is assisting Saudi authorities in the investigation of the bombings
on three Saudi housing compounds that killed 34 people, including eight
Americans. Al-Qaida also is suspected in another series of bomb attacks Friday
in Casablanca, Morocco, that killed 41 people.
The bulletin says the Saudi attacks featured "traditional hallmarks of
al-Qaida operations" such as precise planning, surveillance and
coordination among several teams. Each bombing involved a sedan followed by a
truck or sport utility vehicle laden with explosives, with gunmen used to attack
guards and overcome security measures.
Towards the end of the Mishneh Torah, the Rambam dedicates two
chapters to the topic of Moshiach. He writes that the exact details of
the coming of Moshiach are very unclear, and are at present not that
important. A tendency to dwell on t hese details will lead one to neither a
greater love for G-d, nor a greater fear of G-d. The
important point is that we believe in the principle of the coming of a human
being, who will be a descendent of King David. In another essay the Ram bam
points out that the Moshiach will be highly intelligent, a tremendous
prophet, and admired and respected by all. He will be an unknown figure until
the time he is "revealed", and his debut will take place in Eretz
Yisroel.
The Ten men of authority to anoint the false king of
false zion are prepared in the seat of Moses of the Sanhedrin to become kins in
one hour with the beast and they shall hate the everlasting and Holy Covenant,
Christ Jesus
For these ten colleagues [of Rebi Shimon bar Yochai], all the
secrets of Torah were
revealed and explained to them without any suffering. This will not occur again
until the Generation of Moshiach,
as mentioned in the Zohar in many places. (Sha’ar HaGilgulim, Chapter 39)
Thus, events are occurring, and have been occurring now for hundreds of years
that clearly indicate, according to the great Torah
leaders and Kabbalists of the past, that the Final Redemption is well in swing.
Indeed, only to the untrained eye do the events we are witnessing seem as just
merely events in an on-going, never-ending history, having nothing to do with an
incipient redemption process. Therefore, the question is not, "Are we in
transition?" but rather, "At what stage of transition are we?"
These sons of the synagogue
of Satan have been planning this False Zionist coup d' Etat and their Moshaich
ben Satan for 212 years or 1791 in this USA
So when the Baal Shem Tov came
along, it was the year 5550,(1791) and that’s when the idea of tzaddik was
introduced into the world. And that also became the preparation for Moshiach.,
because that’s what all of Chassidus is - basically a preparation for Moshiach,
which is the same as saying preparation for Shabbos, because when Moshiach
comes, it will be a permanent Shabbos of sorts.
So when the Baal Shem Tov came
along, it was the year 5550, and that’s when the idea of tzaddik was
introduced into the world. And that also became the preparation for Moshiach.,
because that’s what all of Chassidus is - basically a preparation for Moshiach,
which is the same as saying preparation for Shabbos, because when Moshiach
comes, it will be a permanent Shabbos of sorts.
The Planting of
Satan's seed for Thee thousand years
Dan:8:23:
And in the latter time of their
kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce
countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
Moshiach
is not going to introduce a whole new Torah,
or a whole new G-dliness, he is simply going to bring it to the surface. But the
G-dliness is what we accomplished in three thousand three hundred years of doing
mitzvas, all that accumulated holiness that we’ve planted, the seeds that
we’ve planted in the earth, will finally produce their fruit and come out,
will finally express itself. Moshiach’s
main contribution is that he brings to the surface that which we have been
planting for three thousand years.
These Illuminate sons of the
synagogue of Satan are more than willing to destroy the Jews who refuse Aliya to
the Robber
And, most of them live abroad in a land — America — that
just happened to be nicknamed "Midbar" — Desert — by the rabbis of
the previous centuries. Ironically, it was first called "Midbar"
because it was, at the turn of the previous century, void of Torah
Judaism. However, by the end of that century, it came to resemble the midbar of
the Jews who left Egypt: a comfortable and self-sustaining environment in which
to learn Torah that led
to their rejection of Eretz Yisroel!
Is this what Rava predicted in the Talmud over 1,000 years ago about the time of
Moshiach?
It was taught in a brisa: Rebi Simai said, "It says, ‘I will take you to
Me as a people’ (Shemos 6:7), and it says, ‘And I will bring you to the
land’ (Ibid. 8). Just as the coming to the land was with two of the 60 myriads
(1 myriad equals 10,000 people), so too was the leaving of Egypt with two of the
60 myriads."
LEAVING EGYPT . . . TWO OF 60: From all the 60 myriads that were in Egypt, only
two remained from them and they went out . . . and the rest died in the three
days of darkness. (Rashi)
Rava said, "It will be likewise in Yemos HaMoshiach, as it says, ‘She
will dwell there as in the days of her youth, and as on the day of her ascent
from Egypt’." (Sanhedrin 111a)
LIKEWISE IN YEMOS HAMOSHIACH: From all the 60 myriads, only two will survive.
(Rashi)
No one seems to argue the point either. On the contrary, Rabbi Yechezkel
Levenstein, zt"l, built upon it and warned:
"The exodus from Egypt liberated only one out of five Jews — and some say
one out of every fifty — because all those who were bound to Egypt and did not
want to depart died in the three days of darkness and were
not privileged to leave. That is, only those who desired redemption with all
their hearts were redeemed. The Final Redemption, likewise, depends upon our
yearning." (Ohr Yechezkel, "Emunas HaGeulah," p. 288)
For, once we accept that the souls powering the bodies and
minds of the generation at the time of Moshiach
will be those of the Jews from the time of the going out of Egypt, we can also
accept that history, then, will repeat itself in one way or another, though we
may be unable to recognize this at the time. This is crucial for free-will and
tikun.
____
Enforcement of Public Law
102-14 Universal Noahide Laws of Bush-ka and Schneerson fourth reich. The
Killing of the Goyim, but not for the Jew.
Volume 26 Number 82
Produced: Sat Jul 26 23:37:01 1997
From: Chana Luntz <heather@luntz.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat,
5 Jul 1997 23:51:09 +0100 Subject: Jewish
View of Capital Punishment Eli Clark <clarke@HUGHESHUBBARD.COM>
writes: >My own view is an intermediate one. Rabbi Bleich is no doubt correct
>that one cannot make facile analogies from one justice system to
>another. One who concludes that the death penalty is justified in, >e.g.,
U.S. courts (or state courts) because "the Torah says so," is
>plainly being simplistic. At the same time, as Mr. Vanderhoof notes, >Noahide
courts are themselves enjoined to enforce the death penalty. >Rabbi Bleich
notwithstanding, I am somewhat dubious that every Noahide
>court is required to adopt every relevant halakhic principle in carrying
>out its duties. Eli has openned up discussion on the subject of whether we
ought to support a completely non Jewish society adopting capital punishment.
But there is also another issue to be considered anywhere that is not a pure non
Jewish society (and the only society that springs to mind that is truely
Judenrein is Saudi Arabia). In a country such as the US, one has to consider the
fact that if one supports the death penalty being applied to non Jews, then, as
the laws are applied equally, one is by definition also supporting the
application, by the non Jewish state and the non Jewish courts, of capital
punishment being applied to Jews. This issue is related to one that is discussed
extensively in the poskim. The Yerushalmi (Trumos 8:4) brings the case in which
a group of Jews are surrounded by non Jews, and the non Jews demand that they
surrender one of their number, or all will be killed. And the gemorra states -
that even if all of them will be killed, they should not hand over one soul in
Israel. But if one of them is a person like Sheva ben Bichri(II
Samuel (20:1) relates that a man by the name of Sheva
ben Bichri
rebels against David's kingship: Rebels against Moshiach ben Satan)
they can hand him over and not be killed. Resh Lakish says: only if he is liable
for death like Sheva ben Bichri, but Rav Yochanan says even if he isn't liable
for death like Sheva ben Bichri.
Now,the basis for this dicusssion centres around the situation
where a person's life is threatened if they do not hand over the malafactor to
the non Jewish authorities. A more complicated question is whether one can hand
over a Jew to be put to death by the non Jewish authority if one's life is not
being threatened by that authority (there is a fair amount of discussion in
this, cf the Taz for a view which may permit such a handing over).
But it seems to me that getting back to the issue at hand, if
one were actively to support capital punishment in, say, the US
where lots of Jews live, we are combining the worst of these
scenarios. Say, for example, one were to vote to bring in capital punishment,
and then a Jew was arraigned for trial under this law. Would not every Jew who
had so voted be liable for having handed over this other Jew to be killed by the
non Jewish authority? Without there being any question of threat to one's life?
And even if you hold that it is permissible, l'chatchila, to
hand over a Jew who is guilty of a crime to the non Jewish authority - what
everyone seems to agree is that it needs to be a crime that is as clear as that
of Sheva Ben Bichri. Given that the non Jewish system is not as careful about
evidence (using circumstantial evidence etc) as halacha - one has to allow for
the fact that a certain number of people are going to be wrongly accused and
convicted, and in a society that includes Jews, that is going to include Jews.
Dinnei Mamonos this is not a problem, because it is accepted that under Dina
D'malchusa Dina, a non Jewish authority has authority over monetary matters. And
likewise imprisonment would seem to be within their power. But the power to
kill? That seems to be exactly what is not permitted (on pain of one's own self
being killed) in the above sources, unless it is absolutely clear that the
person in question is liable for death under our laws in any event.
The only argument I can see against this line of reasoning is
that at the time one votes or acts to bring in the death penalty, the crime for
which the penalty is being imposed has not yet been committed - and the Jew who
is killed for that crime might not even be born (and certainly not known to the
person doing the act). ie maybe the result is too remote from the action.
However, the handing over of someone so that they might be killed is also
causative - so it is not clear to me where that causative chain ends (telling
the authorities where a particular person is appears to be another aspect of the
matter - see the discussion in the Beis Yosef). And if in fact it is forbidden
for a non Jewish authority to put to death Jews in circumstances where such Jews
could not be put to death under halacha - presumably the matter can also be
classed as lifnei iver (lifnei iver applies to non Jews) which by definition is
causative (and if it is your vote that is needed to bring in the law then
presumably it can be classed as the opposite side of the river for lifne iver
purposes?).
Eli Clark <clarke@HUGHESHUBBARD.COM>: > It is safe to
say that there are at least two views (on the > Jewish view of capital
punishment for non-Jews by non-Jews). > Mr. Vanderhoof suggests that capital
punishment may be "a fulfillment > of the non-Jews' obligation, under
the seven commandments of the > descendents of Noah, to establish just courts
and to enforce the > prohibition of murder, which applies to non-Jews and is
punishable by > death (according to the 7 commandments)." > >
(Rabbi J. David Bleich rejects this view altogether.) He claims > that the
halakhic sanction for capital punishment cannot be >
divorced from the halakhic justice system.
I was going to cite halacha's exception in that a king may put
individuals to death without consulting a Bet Din during times of great
lawlessness, but then I suppose Rabbi Bleich would say that this would only hold
in a kingdom run according to the Rambam's halacha wrt Jewish kings. Still, I
have a number of questions about Rabbi Bleich's interpretation.
If halacha doesn't sanction the death penalty in secular
courts, then which secular laws divorced from the halachic justice system _do_
receive halachic sanction? What should be a Jew's response to _any_ proposed
secular law in a court divorced from the halachic justice system? Should each of
us do what appears right in our own eyes, individually, wrt such issues? Or
should Jews refuse to get involved in secular political issues in general? If
halacha doesn't sanction our support for the death penalty, does it sanction our
_opposition_ to gentile enforcement
of the Noachide laws? If so, should we oppose _any_ secular law that is divorced
from the halachic justice system (and become anarchists until the coming of Moshiach)?
Satan says that the Ten
Commandments are not for the Goyim and they must go. The Noahide Laws unto him,
are for all Goyim. They who are aginst us ems are not with us ems according to
the Obedient Goy Freemason Noahide Bushka whose Father George H. W. Bush-ka,
made Public Law the Universal Noahide code. The very reason for Perpetual Purim
after "Purim Saddam" Chaos and the coming Satanic False Christ
Moshiach, the Robber false Christ.
these ten commandments were the seven laws of Noah, the
Sabbath laws, dinim, and respect for one's parents. Why did the Jews need
to be commanded again [on the seven Noachide laws] since Jews were already
commanded from the time of Adam and Noah...Since we conclude that commandments
that were given prior to Sinai to Noachides, and not repeated at Sinai, are
obligatory only for Jews, the seven commandments had to be repeated at Sinai to
obligate Noachides Based on this Rashbash, the assertion of Maimonides that
"Moses, our teacher, only willed Torah and mitzvot
to the Jewish people, since it states 'An inheritance to the community of
Jacob.'"
even though Gentiles were already commanded, was done to make
Noachides obligated in the mitzvot even now
Certainly in the diaspora there are few such communities of
Noachides; although if there were, and they could not see fit to enforce the law
themselves, a Jew should guide them
"a person that is capable of forcing compliance,
must."
Do not for one moment think
that the United States Government is NOT under Jurisdiction of Talmudic Satanic
Jews, for It has been Made enforceable House Joint Resolution, that Universal
Noahide Laws and Talmudism is the Law of the Land, PuBlic Law 102-14-1992 102nd
Congress
The rule is as follows: In all that the nations are commanded,
any time they are under our jurisdiction, it is incumbent upon us to judge them
when they violate the commandments
We cannot, now, kill a person." While one could
understand this assertion as merely practical, it is more likely that Ravad is
limiting the juridical power of the Jewish community in punishing Noachides for
violations of the Noachide code. Under this analysis, it would, according to
Ravad, take an authorized beit din (Jewish court) of 23 functioning when
the Sanhedren is legally empowered to impose capital punishment, to kill for
violations of the Noachide code
"Purim Saddam"
Noahide Iraq
Similarly, Nachmanides agrees with Ravad and does not require
the imposition of the Noachide commandments as part of a negotiated peace
between Israel and its Noachide neighbors. He indicates that it is the military
goals alone which determine whether peace terms are acceptable. According to
Nachmanides, Jewish law would compel the "victor" to accept peace
terms which include all of the victors' demands except the imposition of
Noachide law on the defeated society; Maimonides would reject that rule and
permit war in those circumstances purely to impose these laws on a Gentile
society. This indicates that Nachmanides too does not require the imposition of
Noachide law by a Jewish government.
Thus, while Maimonides is relatively clear that when possible Jews must impose
Noachide law, one could reasonably conclude that the weight of the rishonim
and codifiers disagrees with that conclusion and assert that there is no
obligation for any individual Jew to compel a Noachide to cease violating the
Noachide commandments or that the obligation is limited to messianic (Moshiach
ben Satan) times or to resident aliens.
But, and, and Jesus said"
Matthew 24:3-30
3: And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came
unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall
be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
4: And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
Wolves in Sheeps Clothing sanction by
the state
5: For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Oh yes, they do say, Jesus is Lord,
Oh and how they deceive
6: And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled:
for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
Rumor war on Terror and wars and
their wars of Hashem that un-named god, who is no God
7: For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there
shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
WWIII, They control all food sources,
they control all disease spread, they control pestilence and Haarp
8: All these are the beginning of sorrows.
Has Begun
9: Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye
shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
To their Beth Dins and their apostate
Solomonic Noahide Freemason courts of justice which has no justice
10: And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall
hate one another.
Fearful of the Jews and offended in
the Name of Christ Jesus, they shall deliever their own families to save their
flesh, for they did not get "Secretly rescued"
11: And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
They are doing by the thousands. Turn
the Tellytubby televangelist need of seed greed creed crews, boob tube on and
see.
12: And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
Iniquity is SATAN WORSHIP
13: But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
Stand Firm in Jesus Mighty Name
14: And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a
witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
By the Lord's Angel at the sixth
Trumpet, has nothing to do with the Crouching Crouch's
15: When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by
Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him
understand:)
Lucifer
16: Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
Those who understand the WORD of
CHRIST JESUS who are in Judaea
17: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his
house:
18: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
19: And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those
days!
20: But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath
day:
21: For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of
the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
There is no seven years of
Tribulation and there is no three and a half years of tribulation, THERE IS,
that great day of the Wrath of the Lord Jesus Christ. The saints will simply be
slain in flesh, for they are alive in Spirit of the Lord.
22: And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved:
but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
Blessed are they who cometh and
waiteth unto the 1335 days (Daniel)
23: Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it
not.
24: For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew
great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive
the very elect.
25: Behold, I have told you before.
26: Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not
forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
He is not the Moshiach ben Satan who
they will anoint as king of Israel in the Chamber of Hewn stone on the mountain
of the Mosque, in the Sanhedrin
27: For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west;
so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Just as the Lord Left
28: For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.
And the wicked will be slain, and the
birds will be invited to the wedding supper of the wrath of the Lord Jesus
Christ in Jerusalem the whore.
29: Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened,
and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and
the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall
all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in
the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
Praise his Mighty Name, Fear not
these sons of satan and their mere man, Lucifer the Moshaich ben Dovid and their
Noahide Laws and their Guillotines, for he can only destroy the flesh but cannot
steal the soul which belongs to the Lord God
This paper addresses the scope of Jewish law's mandate upon Jews to enforce the
Seven Noachide commandments, as well as any other rules Jewish law mandates that
Gentiles should keep. Part One of this article outlines what are the Noachide
commandments, and their place in a halachic system. Part Two discusses the
obligation of both Jews and Noachides under the rubric of the commandment called
dinim (literally: "laws" or "justice"). Part Three
reviews the various opinions on the obligation of Jews to enforce the Noachide
commandments. Part Three will consider not only whether enforcement must be
sought, but in situations where enforcement is not possible, whether Jewish law
mandates Jews to seek to persuade Noachides to obey their commandments. It will
also consider whether -- when such persuasion fails -- Jewish law, at the
minimum, requires that one may not assist a Gentile in violating the Noachide
commandments.
Satan's Greatest Trick was to get
his, the robbers Chosen to deceive the entire world
This article concludes that notwithstanding a minority opinion to the contrary,
Jewish law accepts that Gentiles are obligated to keep the Noachide laws, and
they are obligated even for unintentional violations. So too, Jewish law
recognizes that Gentiles are obligated to create a system of laws designed to --
at the minimum -- enforce the Noachide laws.
Finally, while Maimonides appears to accept that Jews as well as Noachides (Freemasons)
are obligated to enforce the Noachide laws, many authorities, early and late,
reject this rule of Maimonides and deny that there is a halachic obligation on
individual Jews to compel Noachides to observe their laws. Finally this article
noted that whether there is (or is not) a halachic obligation to affirmatively
enforce the Noachide laws, it is nonetheless still biblically prohibited to
enable or entice a Noachide to violate the Noachide laws (if absent a Jew's
assistance, the law would not be violated). However, in a situation where the
Noachide is able to violate the law without the assistance of any Jew, many
authorities rule that there is no obligation to prevent a Noachide from sinning
and thus one may even assist the Noachide in sin.
See all Iniquity which is endorsed
and manufactured by Jewish entertainment
This paper will address the scope of halacha's mandate upon Jews to enforce the
Seven Noachide commandments, as well as any other rules Jewish law mandates that
Gentiles should keep. It will do so from a purely theoretical perspective,
without any attempt to apply the rules developed to
America in the 1990's(HJR PUBLIC LAW
102-14) or any other particular (factual) setting. Rather, the
purpose of this article is to determine which options concerning enforcement are
halachically acceptable. In the field of "Jewish
public policy" the first question that must be asked is which
(if any) of the theoretical options are, in fact, prohibited by Jewish law.
After that question is answered, then one can consider which of the remaining
options most closely accomplishes whatever Jewish goal
is sought.
Part One of this article outlines what are the Noachide commandments, and their
place in a halachic system. Part Two discusses the obligation of both Jews and
Noachides under the rubric of the commandment called dinim (literally:
"laws" or "justice"). Part Three reviews the various
opinions on the obligation of Jews to enforce the
Noachide commandments. Part Three will consider not only whether
enforcement must be sought, but in situations where enforcement is not possible,
whether Jewish law mandates Jews to seek to persuade Noachides to obey their
commandments.
Before one can explore the obligation upon Jews to enforce Noachide law, it is
necessary to determine if Jewish law accepts that these commandments are still
binding on Noachides. The talmud (Oral
Laws of Mishnah Torah which Jesus said made the Laws of God of none effect)
recounts, as one possible resolution of an unrelated tort law problem, that:
So you understand Tort Laws now?
God observed the Gentiles of the land -- What did He see? He saw that the
seven commandments He gave the Noachides were not observed and thus He
permitted these seven commandments to them.
This is strictly in Talmud Bavli
the oral tradition of the Pharisees and in no wise was upheld by Jesus Christ.
The Jerusalem Council the Illuminated Rabid Rabbi's of the sanhedrin did
however deceive James in Acts 15 to accept the Noahide laws and impose them to
unsuspecting Christians, thus Paul warned that Iniquity was already at work.
This is how soon, they will convince apostate Judeo-Churchians, that Jesus was
not authority, but that his very own disciples gave way to this Talmudic
doctrine of demons. Thus the anti-Semitic Gospel will become outlawed and any
who stand firm for the Testimony of Christ Jesus will be purged from this
"Master Race" scheme of their vision to seat the Robber that they
chose on the Throne of the World.
Most authorities reject this insight and accept that the Noachide commandments
are fully binding. They argue that it is difficult to accept that all of the
talmudic discussions concerning Noachide law are predicated on the unstated
assumption of the abrogation of the Noachide obligation or even the
abrogation of the biblical obligation. Indeed, this position appears to be
rejected by every single one of the early authorities (rishonim) who
codified the Noachide laws] and the
numerous later authorities (achronim) who did so. Thus, it is safe to
state that Jewish law treats the Noachide laws as binding,. Indeed, there are
numerous discussions within the Shulchan Aruch and its commentaries which simply
assume that the Noachide laws are fully binding.
A second preliminary issue is whether the unintentional violation of one of the
Noachide commandments leads to legal culpability in Jewish law. Based on a
statement of Maimonides, Minchat Chinuch rules:
When is it prohibited to hand a Noachide something forbidden to him? This is
only when he knows that it is prohibited; but when he does not know that it is
prohibited, there is no prohibition, since in this case there is complete
un-intentionality (lit: shegaga gemorah) and a Noachide violates no
rule when his violation is completely unintentional.
But the good Judeo Churchizionist,
who believe that the Flesh Jews, the "SAYERS" who are not the seed
of Abraham in faith to Christ Jesus and who are apostate and complacent and
rich and in need of Nothing, the mammonizers of the need of seed greed creed
voted into the Congress their representation, and that representation has made
the Jew "SAYERS" the Master Race of Ultimate Bigotry and Hatred of
True Christians and Christ Jesus, and they passed into Law, fully accepted by
the People the Notice, therefore none are ignorant for they have voiced their
acceptance.
Many authorities disagree with the Minchat Chinuch and limit the permissive
ruling to a situation where the Noachide recognizes the category of activity as
prohibited, but merely does not recognize this particular action as in
violation. However, when the Noachide does not recognize the whole category of
activity as prohibited, his actions still rise to the level of legal
culpability. Others simply reject the whole insight of the Minchat Chinuch and
base their view on an explicit Tosafot that appears to do the same. These
authorities rule that Noachides are always obligated to obey the law and culpability
is thus always present. Thus, it is well established that Gentiles
benefit from being taught the Noachide laws.
Having established that the Noachide commandments are binding on Gentiles, and
that lack of knowledge does not excuse obligation, it is necessary to explore
what the commandments are. The talmud recounts seven categories of prohibition:
idol worship, taking God's name in vain,(Their God is
not the Creator God, Christ Jesus, but Satan and their mere man god is Moshaich
ben Satan) murder, prohibited sexual activity, theft, eating flesh
from a living animal, and the obligation to enforce laws. As is obvious from
this list, these seven commandments are generalities which contain within them
many specifications -- thus, for example, the single categorical prohibition of
sexual promiscuity includes both adultery and the various forms of incest.(There
are 36 actual laws and many sub laws)(Has nothing to do with faith of Christ by
the Grace of God) As has been noted already, these Noachide laws
appear to encompass nearly 60 of the 613 biblical commandments incumbent on
Jews, which is nearly one in four of those biblical commandments generally
applicable in post-temple times. What might make the practical application of
the Noachide laws sometimes difficult is the frequently wide divergence of
opinion found within the various Jewish authorities concerning details of many
Noachide laws. A simple example illustrates this:
Confusion in the House of Satan
The Jerusalem Talmud recounts that there is no formal divorce according to
Noachide law. The rishonim understand this in three completely different
ways. Some claim that this means that divorce is legally impossible for a
Gentile and once married there is no way to end the marriage. Others maintain
that the Talmudic passage means that there is no formal process of divorce, and
either spouse can end the marriage by simply leaving the family unit. Yet other
authorities insist that in Noachide law a man may never divorce his wife -- but
she may divorce him at will. Similar disputes touch many core areas of Noachide
law, leaving the resolution of many hard cases very difficult to determine.
Indeed, before one seeks to apply the details of Noachide law to issues in
current society, it is necessary to determine what precisely is the Noachide
obligation.
But the Truth said
"
Mt:5:31:
It hath been said, Whosoever shall
put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:
Mt:5:32:
But I say unto you, That whosoever
shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to
commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth
adultery.
The final commandment in the Noachide code is dinim, commonly translated
as "laws" or "justice". Two vastly different interpretations
of this commandment are found among the early authorities. Maimonides rules that
the obligations of dinim require only that the enumerated Noachide laws
be enforced in practice. Maimonides states:
How are [Noachides] obligated by dinim?. They must create courts and
appoint judges in every provence to enforce these six commandments . . for
this reason the inhabitants of Shechem [the city] were liable to be killed
since Shechem [the person] stole[Dina], and the inhabitants saw and knew this
and did nothing.
See your Local
Freemason Court House in anycounty USA
According to Maimonides it is logical to assume that other types of regulations
that society might make are subsumed under the rubric of either "laws of
the land" or "laws of the king." Their binding authority is quite
different.
However the King of the United
States, George Herbert Walker Bush-Ka the 33rd Degreed Freemason in the Order of
apostate Solomon unto their god Moloch and of their star of their god that they
made with their hands, that star of Moloch or the star of his nbame Moshaich ben
David, the false Christ, which they call the star of david, but had nothing to
do with david, but was Solomon's shield in apostasy, Bush whose father Prescott
who was a freemason and a skull and bones and who was in the same order of the
illumined Theosophist Hitler who was to put to hire by these Pharisees to create
the fear and terror nessesary to create the Exodus Europe to the Illumined
Herzl's and Balfours false Zion. And now to finish the task, George W. Bush.
Remember it was Bush SR. and the Sofiet Bolshevik Rabid Chabad illumined snake
Schneerson who put the Laws into effect 1991.
Ten years
passed. On the one hand, world-wide terror increased. On the other hand, the
world continued to progress towards the time of the Rebbe
Mendel
Menachem Schneerson's revelation. Somehow,
the Rebbearranged
it so that Bush’s son would become president too and complete what his father
left unfinished.
Nachmanides argues with this formulation and understands the obligations of dinim
to be much broader. It encompasses not only the obligations of society to enforce
rules, but it also obligates society to create general rules of law
governing such cases as fraud, overcharging, repayment of debts and the like.(Why
Congress is attempting to do away with national bankruptcy protection)
Within the opinion of Nachmanides there is a secondary dispute as to what
substantive laws Noachides are supposed to adopt. Rama, writing in his responsa,
states that according to Nachmanides in those areas of dinim where
Gentiles are supposed to create laws, they are
obligated to incorporate Jewish law into Noachide law unless it is
clear contextually that it is inappropriate. Most authorities reject this
interpretation and accept either Maimonides ruling or that according to
Nachmanides those rules created under the rubric of dinim need only be
generally fair, and need not be identical to Jewish law. This author cannot find
even a single rishon who accepts the ruling of Rama, and one can find many who
explicitly disagree.
Indeed, as noted by Chazon Ish, Jewish law requires respect of the Noachide
legal pronouncements even in a situation where the Noachide judges themselves do
not fully observe Noachide law.
Mt:23:4:
For they bind heavy burdens and
grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will
not move them with one of their fingers.
] Chazon Ish was asked concerning
the obligation to accept legal pronouncements from a Noachide court that does
not generally observe (or enforce) all of the seven commandments, but
"observes the law concerning sanctity of life and theft of property."
Chazon Ish replies that if they are enforcing even a section of the Noachide
laws properly, it is halachically necessary to respect those pronouncements.
However, respect does not necessarily mean that full participation is mandatory.
In sum, there certainly is an obligation upon Noachides -- at the minimum -- to
create a legal system designed to enforce Noachide law.
Jews have an obligation to recognize and respect this system, even if it is
incomplete in its observance of Noachide law. According to many, there would
appear to be a residual impact of Noachide law in Jewish law.
1: Then spake Jesus to the
multitude, and to his disciples,
2: Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
3: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do
not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
4: For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's
shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5: But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their
phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
6: And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the
synagogues,
7: And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
8: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye
are brethren.
9: And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is
in heaven.
10: Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
Moses, our teacher, only willed Torah and mitzvot to the Jewish people,
since it states "An inheritance to the community of Jacob.". . One
[who is not Jewish] who does not wish to, we do not compel to accept Jewish
law. So too, Moses our teacher was commanded by God to compel the
commandments to the Noachides. All who do not accept
are killed. One who accepts them [voluntarily] is called a ger
toshav [literally: resident alien]. .
Melakhim, ch. 9, 10). One additional element of greater
severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws
subjects the Noachide to
capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).
So, too, Maimonides recounts that:
A Jewish court [beit din] is obligated to appoint judges for ger
toshaves [literally: resident alien] to judge
them in order that the world not be destroyed. If
the Jewish court wishes to appoint judges from within their midst, it may; if
it wishes to appoint judges from the Jews, it may.
Remember, your
representatives have officially made the Pimp of that whore Jerusalem an annex
of Israel under talmudic Judaic Jurisdiction by Public Law
Finally, Maimonides rules that:
One who takes an adult slave from an idol worshiper, and the slave does not
wish to be circumcised one may delay up to twelve months . . If one agreed
concerning this slave with his previous owner not to circumcise him, it is
permitted to keep the slave uncircumcised; however, the slave must keep the
seven commandments obligatory on Noachides and if not, he
is killed immediately.
This article will address three basic issues that flow from the formulation of
Maimonides. They are:
(1) Is there an obligation upon each individual Jew to coerce compliance; or
is the obligation only on beit din and if so, which court; or perhaps
classical halacha rejects this ruling of Maimonides.
(2) When a Noachide will violate these rules no matter what posture Jews take,
may Jews assist in the sin or at the least must a Jew decline to assist in a
violation of Noachide laws.
(3) Is there an obligation to induce or persuade a Noachide to comply with the
Noachide laws, or even to teach Noachides about their obligations, or (if
there is an obligation) is it limited to the obligation to coerce (lekof).
Indeed, the answer to each of these three inter-related questions is in dispute,
and each of these disputes is quite central to many of the issues raised in this
paper.
There were no "JEWS" during
the Life of NOAH, but then again they are "SAYERS" and are of their
father the father of Lies the serpent, Satan the deceiver
A simple reading of the rules of Maimonides' would indicate that Jews or a
Jewish court are obligated in (at the minimum) coercing Noachides to observe
their laws. Such is not the only way, however, to interpret Maimonides'
statements. Maharatz Chayut in his responsa
seems to adopt a formulation of Maimonides ruling that makes this law a mere
historical recounting of facts. He states (quoting the Rashbash):
Sanhedren 56b recounts that the Jews were commanded in ten commandments at Marah
these ten commandments were the seven laws of Noah, the Sabbath laws, dinim,
and respect for one's parents. Why did the Jews need to be commanded again [on
the seven Noachide laws] since Jews were already commanded from the time of
Adam and Noah...Since we conclude that commandments that were given prior to
Sinai to Noachides, and not repeated at Sinai, are obligatory only for Jews,
the seven commandments had to be repeated at Sinai to obligate Noachides.
Based on this Rashbash, the assertion of Maimonides that "Moses, our
teacher, only willed Torah and mitzvot to the Jewish people, since it
states 'An inheritance to the community of Jacob.'" ... and his assertion
that 'Moses our teacher was commanded by God to compel the commandments
obligatory to the children of Noah' appear logical. Why was Moses also the
messenger to the rest of the world to compel observance of the seven
commandments, perhaps they are obligated by Adam or Noach? Rather we see that
Moses being commanded at Marah on the seven Noachide commandments, even
though Gentiles were already commanded, was done to make Noachides obligated
in the mitzvot even now.
These Illuminated Rabid Chabad are
Lying Bastards from hell, make confusion their Lord and Master
Thus, according to Maharatz Chayut, there is no obligation for any specific Jew,
in any circumstance to compel observance by a Noachide. Rather Maimonides is
merely explaining the jurisprudential basis for the obligation of Noachides to
their seven commandments -- absent Moses' re-commandment at Sinai, only Jews
would have been obligated in Noachide law. The most that one could claim
according to Maharatz Chayut is that perhaps Moses himself was obligated to
compel observance of the Noachide laws; Jews currently are not -- apparently
neither in the context of a beit din nor in the context of any specific
individual. Maharatz Chayut would then limit Maimonides' rule obligating Jews to
establish courts and appoint judges to those Noachides who formally accept the
obligations of a ger toshav (resident alien) and who live in the Jewish
community (USA) and who are dependent on it
for law and order "lest the world be
destroyed".
Certainly in the diaspora there are few such
communities of Noachides; although if there were, and they could not
see fit to enforce the law themselves, a Jew should
guide them. Similar claims that Maimonides' rules do not create a
practical legal obligation can be found in Aruch Hashulchan, the writings of
Rabbi Yehuda Gershuni, Rabbi Shaul Yisrali and Rabbi Menachem Mendel Kasher, the
author of Torah Shelama, all of whom assert that the opinion of
Maimonides itself is to be understood as limited to yemot hamashe'ach (or
perhaps less ideally, full Jewish law in Israel).
However, all of these explanations of Maimonides' ruling are difficult and the
simple understanding of Maimonides is that (at the least) a person that is
capable of forcing compliance, must. Indeed, while Rabbi Karo does appear to
limit the application of Maimonides somewhat, he clearly understands Maimonides
as requiring compulsion whenever possible, even by an individual. This is
similarly understood to be the opinion of Maimonides by Tzafnach Panaich, in his
lengthy discussion on this topic. A ruling similar to Maimonides' is found in
Chinuch 192, where it states:
The rule is as follows: In all that the nations are
commanded, any time they are under our jurisdiction, it is incumbent upon us
to judge them when they violate the commandments.
And the United States is now a
Jurisdiction of the Whore Jerusalem who is responsible for all who are slain
upon the earth. That spiritual Sodom and Egypt where our Lord Jesus was
crucified by these same Illuminated demons of Satan's fold.
B. The Approach of Ravad, Nachmanides, Tosafot and others
A large number of rishonim appear simply to disagree with the opinion of
Maimonides, and rule that there is no obligation upon an individual Jew to
impose Noachide rules on Gentiles. Included in this group is at least Ravad,
Nachmanides, Tosafot and perhaps Rashi and Rashba. Ravad, in disagreeing with
the rulings of Maimonides that a slave who refuses to accept one of the seven
commandments ought to be killed states] "the
slave should be sold. We cannot, now, kill a person." (Not
until the Laws are enforced) While one could understand this
assertion as merely practical, it is more likely that Ravad is limiting the
juridical power of the Jewish community in punishing Noachides for violations of
the Noachide code.] Under this analysis, it would,
according to Ravad, take an authorized beit din (Jewish court) of 23
functioning when the Sanhedren is legally empowered to
impose capital punishment, to kill for
violations of the Noachide code. Thus Ravad disagrees with
Maimonides, and at least limits the obligation of Jews to impose law on
Noachides to situations that do not now (and will not in the pre-messianic era)
exist.
But will exist when they REVEAL the son of Perdition
Moshaich ben Satan. Soon....very soon. and the Judeo Churchizionians of
Scofieldism never even saw it coming for they were rich and in need of nothing,
complacent waiting in their cowardly bunkers for their "Secret Escape, that
Secret rescue of the Talmudic Scofield god and a false seven year peace treaty
when there shall be no peace until Jesus Christ comes and rules this earth with
a rod of Iron.
Proof that this is in fact the approach of Ravad can be derived from his ruling
in Malachim 6:1 which allows the subjugation of Noachides to a
Jewish nation in war time without the
imposition of observance of the Noachide commandments, as Maimonides requires.
This would make the positions of Maimonides and Ravad, in their writings in
Milah and Malachim consistent on this issue.
Similarly, Nachmanides agrees with Ravad and does not require the imposition of
the Noachide commandments as part of a negotiated peace between Israel and its
Noachide neighbors.(Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Turkey,
Saudi Arabia and Jordan He indicates that it is the military
goals alone which determine whether peace terms are acceptable. According to
Nachmanides, Jewish law would compel the "victor" to accept peace
terms which include all of the victors' demands except the imposition of
Noachide law on the defeated society; Maimonides would reject that rule and permit
war in those circumstances purely to impose these laws on a Gentile society.
This indicates that Nachmanides too does not require the imposition of Noachide
law by a Jewish government.
A similar approach is found in Hagaot Ashrei, which state:
A Noachide, even though he violates the seven Noachide commandments, and his
warning is his execution and he does not need formal
witnesses and warning, nonetheless every moment
prior to his conviction in beit din, he is not liable for
the death penalty and it is prohibited to kill him.
Under Jewish Law, the Pharisees neither had the
authority to Murder Jesus Christ, but then again they are of their father, the
father of Lies. Do not be deceived.
This source clearly disagrees with the opinion of Maimonides discussed above and
limits the obligation to punish Noachides to beit din.(Freemason
Temples and Freemason Judges) Indeed, it would seem logical
that the beit din needed for this punishment is the same type of beit din
needed to execute Jews, which has not been extant since prior to the destruction
of the Second Temple. This approach would make the comments of Hagaot Ashrei
identical with Ravad. Even if this opinion is not accepted, and any regular beit
din (Synagogue)can function in this
role, it is clear that no obligation is imposed upon individual Jews to punish
Noachides for violations.
Mt:10:17:
But beware of men: for they will
deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues;
Jerusalem that great Harlot
of Babylon
The Revelation of Jesus
Christ 18:2-13
2: And he cried mightily
with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is
become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage
of every unclean and hateful bird.
3: For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and
the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of
the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
4: And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people,
that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
5: For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her
iniquities.
6: Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to
her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
7: How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment
and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow,
and shall see no sorrow.
8: Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine;
and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who
judgeth her.
9: And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived
deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see
the smoke of her burning,
10: Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that
great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
11: And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man
buyeth their merchandise any more:
12: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and
fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all
manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of
brass, and iron, and marble,
13: And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and
oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots,
and slaves, and souls of men.
In the two areas where this issue is codified into the halacha, the obligation
for Jews to compel observance by Noachides is clearly left out. In the laws
relating to keeping slaves, there is an intricate discussion of the rules
relating to the circumstances in which a Jew may keep a
Gentile slave who does not undergo (partial) conversion. This matter
is fraught with disagreement beyond the scope of this paper. However, one thing
is clear: neither Tur, nor Rama nor any of
the classical commentaries on Shulchan Aruch quote the obligation to impose
Noachide law upon Gentiles living -- either as a conditional slave or as an
employee -- in the house of a Jew (and over whom presumably one could have
considerable influence). This is true even though the whole area is generally
subject to codification, and Tur and Rama do quote and agree with the various
other assertions of Maimonides found in Milah 1:6, but yet do not cite this one.
Indeed, the notes to Rama clearly indicate that he accepts the rulings of Ravad
on this matter. The fact that Maimonides quotes an obligation to compel
observance by Noachide slaves which is deleted by the later authorities is
indicative that his opinion is not considered binding according to halacha.
So too, in both Tur and Shulchan Aruch when discussing the obligation to
save Gentiles who do not observe the Noachide laws from life-threatening
dangers, indicate that there is no obligation to punish violators of Noachide
rules. For example, Beit Yosef states that there is no obligation (mitzvah)
to kill Gentiles who do not obey the Noachide laws; similar sentiments can be
found in Tur, Bach and Drisha. (Maimonides, in the sources cited above, clearly
rejects this.) Rama, in Darchai Moshe He'Aruch adopts this posture also.
Shulchan Aruch explicitly incorporates this rule. So too, Shach states
"There is no obligation [mitzvah] to kill Gentiles even if they
violate the Noachide laws" and Taz agrees with this assertion. This ruling
-- not mandating the punishment of Gentiles for violating Noachide law -- stands
in clear contrast to the assertion in Shulchan Aruch encouraging and certainly
permitting the punishment (and even killing) of one who (is Jewish and)
intentionally defies Jewish law It is thus clear that Shulchan Aruch and the
other various commentaries rule (contrary to Maimonides' assertion) that
Gentiles need not be punished by Jews for violating Noachide law according to
Jewish law.There is no obligation or duty to compel observance of Noachide
law by Gentiles.
On the other hand, even these authorities who reject the obligation could accept
the assertion of Sefer HaChasidim, that it is a meritorious thing to do which
imitates God's conduct towards the Noachides at Ninveh. Absent other factors, it
seems obvious that it is laudatory to instruct a Noachide of his obligations,
both for reasons mentioned by Rabbi Yehuda Hachasid, for those mentioned by
Maimonides in Malachim 10:11 and for those discussed in the Postscript.
Thus, while Maimonides is relatively clear that when possible Jews must impose
Noachide law, one could reasonably conclude that the weight of the rishonim
and codifiers disagrees with that conclusion and assert that there is no
obligation for any individual Jew to compel a Noachide to cease violating the
Noachide commandments or that the obligation is limited
to messianic (Moshiach false Christ)
times or to resident aliens.
3. The Responsa of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
When a Jew contemplates violating Jewish law, there is an obligation upon Jews
not only to prevent him (physically if necessary and possible) from violating
the law, but also there are obligations to teach him or her about the law and to
induce or persuade compliance. Indeed, in a
post-emancipation society, limiting Jewish sinning rarely is done with coercion
and force, and is typically done through persuasion and teaching. As noted
above, in this author's opinion, the halacha as generally understood by most
authorities rules that there is no obligation to persuade and teach Noachides
about the Noachide law. None of the classical commandments designed to deter
sinning by Jews (except the biblical prohibition of lifnei iver, which was
discussed in part 2 of this section) is generally thought to applicable to
Noachides. Thus, there is no obligation of tochacha (to rebuke) a
Noachide who sins, there is no notion of arvout (cooperative activity)
that compels collective responsibility, and no obligation to separate a Noachide
from sin.
One modern responsa stands out as advocating an approach completely different
from that generally accepted by Jewish law. The strongest case that a Jew is
obligated to teach and persuade a Gentiles to keep the seven commandments is
found in the writings of Rabbi Menachem Mendel
Schneerson of Lubavitch, in one of his classical responsa. After
quoting Maimonides, Malachim 8:10 discussed in part one, Rabbi Schneerson
states:
It is obvious that this obligation [found in Maimonides, Malachim 8:10] is
not limited only to a Jewish court, since this commandment is
unrelated to the presence of a ger toshav (resident alien), and thus
what is the need of a beit din. . . . Thus, this obligation is in place
in all eras, even the present, when no gera toshav can be accepted and
it is obligatory on all individuals who can work towards this goal. So too, this
commandment is not limited to using force -- where,
in a situation we cannot use force, we could be excused from our obligation
-- since the essence of the obligation is to do all that is in our power to
ensure that the seven Noachide commandments are kept; if
such can be done through force, or through other means of
pleasantness and peace, which means to explain [to Noachides] that they should
accept the wishes of God who commanded them in this rules. This is obviously
what is intended by Maimonides.
* * *
In Responsa Tashbetz (3:133) it states that even in a case where there is no
prohibition of lifnei iver, such as two sides of the river, still it is
prohibited to assist Noachides who wish to sin, since "we are obligated to
separate them from sin." In reality, we have no source for the obligation
to separate a Noachide from sin, if it is not derived from the remarks of
Maimonides discussed above [Malachim 8:10] that we are obligated to coerce
them into accepting commandments, and thus, of course, we may not
assist them in violating them.
Rabbi Schneerson concludes by stating:
From all of the above, it is clear that anyone who has in his ability to
influence, in any way, a Noachide to keep the seven commandments, the
obligation rests on him to do so, since that was commanded to Moses our
teacher. Certainly, one who has connections with Noachides
in areas of commerce and the like, it is proper for him to sustain
the connection in order to convince and explain to that person, in a way that
will reach that persons heart that God commanded Noachides to keep the seven
commandments...
God ? Jesus Christ the Expressed Image of the
Invisible God, the Alpha and the Omega, the IAM, the God of Abraham, Issac and
Jacob? The Law fulfilled? The Word which hath Created everything Created? The
First and the Last? The Redeemer, The Savior, The Lamb? That God? Oh no, not
that God, that God, Christ Jesus has already told you they make none effect
the Laws of God by these oral traditions of Satan. Yes, their god, and the
Judeo Churchizionain Babylonain mere flesh g-d, Satan may say it, but the
Creator has never given but Two Commandments...
Matthew 22:36-40
36: Master, which is the great
commandment in the law?
37: Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart,
and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38: This is the first and great commandment.
39: And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
The Whole of the fulfilled
Law
In this author's review of the literature, the weight of halachic authority is
contrary to this analysis, although it certainly is morally laudatory (all other
things being equal) to convince Noachides to keep and observe the Noachide laws.
Three proofs can be adduced which indicate that the ruling of Rabbi Schneerson
is not accepted by most authorities. First of all, as he himself notes, his
position assumes that there is an obligation to separate a Noachide from sin. As
noted in detail in part 2 of this section, nearly all authorities reject that
assertion. Second of all, it assumes the halachic correctness of the opinion of
Maimonides concerning the general obligation to compel
observance by Noachides; this author suspects that the normative
halacha is codified in favor of those who disagree with Maimonides and thus
rejects the rulings found in Maimonides 8:10.Finally, it
assumes that even within the position of Maimonides the obligation to compel
observance includes within it the obligation to persuade. No support is advanced
to that proposition, and by analogy, one could easily assert that merely because
compulsion is mandatory (when possible) to prevent a
violation, persuasion need not also be mandatory. In addition, proof
that there is no obligation upon any individual Jew to teach Noachides their
laws can be found in the many responsa that permit the teaching of
Noachides about their laws: these many responsa all permit this activity
-- but none rule it obligatory or compulsory.
In addition, this author believes that systemic jurisprudential concerns within
halacha for reciprocity (which are constantly present and which are beyond the
scope of this paper) mandate symmetry of obligation between Noachide and Jew. Jewish
law certainly does not compel Noachides to enforce their legal system on Jews
and certainly does not authorize Noachides to punish Jews for violations of
Jewish law. To impose an un-reciprocal obligation upon Jews would
violate jurisprudential norms found in Jewish law, where systemic obligations to
act for the benefit of others is typically only imposed when those others are
obligated to do the same were the situation reversed. Noachides are not
obligated to enforce Jewish law; Jews thus are not obligated to enforce Noachide
law.
This article started by reviewing the halachic obligation of Gentiles to obey
the Noachide commandments, and concluded that notwithstanding a minority opinion
to the contrary, halacha accepts that Gentiles are obligated to keep the
Noachide laws, and they are obligated even for
unintentional violations. So too, halacha recognizes that Gentiles
are obligated to create a system of laws designed to -- at the minimum -- enforce
the Noachide laws and punish Noachide violators. This article then
continued by noting that Maimonides appears to accept that Jews as well as
Noachides are obligated to enforce the Noachide laws; however, many authorities,
early and late, including Rama, reject this rule of Maimonides and deny that
there is a halachic obligation on individual Jews to compel Noachides to observe
their laws. Indeed, Rabbi J. David Bleich states without any equivocations
"Jews as individuals are not required to secure compliance with the
Noachide Code on the part of non-Jews."
Finally this article noted that whether there is (or is not) a halachic
obligation to affirmatively enforce the Noachide laws, it is nonetheless still
biblically(Bible has nothing to do with it, it is
Talmud Bavli's perversion) prohibited to enable a Noachide to violate
the Noachide laws (if absent a Jew's assistance, the law would not be violated).
However, in a situation where the Noachide is able to violate the law without
the assistance of any Jew, nearly all authorities rule that there is no
obligation to prevent a Noachide from sinning and thus one may even assist the
Noachide in sin. (Hollywood-Porno-Abortion-Gay Rights,
etc., etc.) Clearly then, classical halacha does not compel a Jew to
persuade or entice a Noachide to observe the law. Rama rules that one may
assist, but pious people should abstain from this activity.(selfrighteous)
Shach indicates that even pious people need not abstain from this activity.
Rama's assertion that pious people should abstain from this activity can be
supported both as a minority opinion within halacha, and as the ethical
direction of Sefer Hachasidim with which this paper opened.
It is the conclusion of this paper that generally halacha sees no technical
obligation in most situations -- even as it is morally laudatory -- to insure
that Noachides obey their laws. Two observations need to be made.
Initially, as with all issues, the outer parameters of that which is
halachically permissible do not establish that which is morally laudatory
(or perhaps even halachically encouraged). Thus the words of Perkai Avot need to
be quoted:
[Rabbi Akiva] used to say, Humanity is precious since people were created in
God's image.
People according to Talmud Bavli are only Jews,
Gentiles are Goy animals a little higher than other animals to be tamed
The remarks of Tosafot Yom Tov are also relevant. He states:
Rabbi Akiva is speaking about the value of all people...He wished to benefit
all people including Noachides...Rabbi Akiva seeks to elevate all inhabitants
of the world...
by making them obedient Noahide Goyim Slaves unto
the Master Race of Little gods
For they themselves in their laws that they
themselves made of the Oral tradition of the elders who sat upon the seat of
Moses, which makes none effect the Laws of God, who is the Alpha and the
Omega, the Word who was made flesh, Christ Jesus, said that HE called them
gods, when HE, Christ did not.
John 10:33-38
33: The Jews answered him,
saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that
thou, being a man, makest thyself God.
34: Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
35: If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture
cannot be broken;
36: Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world,
Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
37: If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not.
38: But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may
know, and believe,that the Father
is in me, and I in him.
as are the remarks of Rabbi Yehuda Hachasid, with which this paper opened
Indeed, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik continues the theme of Sefer Hachasidim
concerning Ninveh when he states:
There may be an additional reason for Jonah's association with Yom Kippur ...
Ninveh was the capital city of pagan Assyria ... It was a country which would
later, under Sennacherib in 722 B.C.E. besiege Jerusalem and exile the ten
tribes. Yet God's compassion embraces all of humanity ... It is, therefore
characteristic of the universal embrace of our faith that as the shadows of
dusk descend on Yom Kippur day ... the Jew is alerted ... that all of humanity
are God's children. We need to restate the Universal dimension of our faith,
especially when we are sorely persecuted and are apt to regard the world in
purely confrontational terms.
And once Satan has them snared,
then will he destroy them in their deception
In a similar vein are the remarks of the Kuzari, which indicates that the
moral relationship of the Jews to the nations of the world is similar to that of
the heart to the rest of the body.
1Cor:12:27:
Now ye are the body of Christ, and
members in particular.
Eph:4:12:
For the perfecting of the saints,
for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
Thus, there are many theological or halachic reasons why it might be proper to
teach Noachide laws generally, and indeed, a claim can be made that halacha
obligates a truthful response to an honest query from a Noachide concerning his
obligation under the Noachide code.
Secondly, this paper has left unexplored many other rationales for seeking
enforcement of Noachide law. The words of Maharam Schick should be
quoted:
[I]t appears that any situation that involves judging
violators, even if they are Noachides, is a Jewish people's concern, for
others will learn from any wrong done in public and will follow suit and, in
the least,(For the fear of the Jews)
the sight of evil is harmful to the soul. Thus, it is our concern. In any
case, it is inconceivable that any person living
among the residents of a given city be beyond the jurisdiction of the court.
Rabbi Bleich puts it a little differently. He states:
Despite the absence of a specific obligation to influence non-Jews to
abide by the provisions of the Noachide Code, the attempt to do so is entirely
legitimate. Apart from our universal concern, fear lest "the world become
corrupt," as Maimonides puts it, it is also very much a matter of Jewish
concern and self-interest. Disintegration of the moral fabric of society
affects everyone. Particularly in our age we cannot insulate ourselves against
the pervasive cultural forces which mold human conduct. Jews have every
interest in promoting a positive moral climate.
Their obedient Noahide Slave
enviroment to their godhood status of the "Master Race"
Thus, there might be many practical reasons why it is a wise idea to teach
vigorously the Noachide code, or selective parts of it, to Gentiles.
On the other hand, the apparent absence of a general halachic obligation upon
Jews to increase observance of the Noachide code by Gentiles allows for a
balancing of Jewish interests to occur. The possibility that there might be
circumstances where the unfettered teaching of the Noachide code in the United
States, where distinctions based on religious affiliation cannot be
governmentally defended, could be deleterious to the observance of halacha by
Jews is not to be dismissed. So too, the possibility that a clearly Jewish
attempt to seek enforcement of Noachide laws could result in vast antagonism and
backlash toward Judaism from those groups whose conduct is categorically
prohibited by Noachide law is not to be dismissed. Long term damage to broad
Jewish interests might occur.
They already know when this nation of
True Israelites in faith of Christ Jesus wake, they will be held accountable, by
the wrath of Christ Jesus.
All of the concerns -- on both sides of the issue -- are real. How to weigh the
likelihood of each of these scenarios and there consequences, is beyond the
scope of this paper and perhaps varies from issue to issue and case to case --
although once it is established that no technical halachic obligation is
present, a broad variety of realpolitik factors comes into play, each
attempting to evaluate what will be in the long term best interest of the Jewish
people. These political factors are much less relevant when technical halachic
prohibitions are on the line, but are certainly significant when discussing the
advisability of undertaking discretionary conduct.
On a condition of anonymity
Prepare in the Mighty Name of Jesus, it is he whom they
fear, and they fear any who stand firm in the Testimony of Truth of the Lord.
Therefore they shall attempt to slay you, but they cannot touch one hair of your
head unless the Creator allows it, then even so, what great gain, the Robes of
white washed in the Blood of the Lamb, and they will worship at your feet on
that great and terrible day of our Lord Jesus Christ.
_______
The Communist Threat By Dariusz Rohnka
5-21-3
Today, I do not seek to convince anyone about the
existence of Communist provocation. I do not seek to convince anyone
that the year 1989 was, in Poland, in Hungary and in Bulgaria, pure
fiction; that the velvet revolution in Prague was humbug, that the
political transformation in the German Democratic Republic was a media
stunt on the part of the Stasi and the licensed domestic opposition. I
do not intend to prove that the revolutionary events in Romania and the
murder of the Ceausescus was an exercise in operational skill on the
part of the KGB. I do not intend to open the eyes of blind diehards, or
to wake people who are in a deep sleep. If someone wants to believe the
farce of the Moscow coup or the heroism of Yeltsin, disseminating his
truths from the top of a Soviet tank, they may feel free to do so.
Until recently, the world stood on a precipice; now it
is falling off. Communism is raising its head. Ever more boldly and
shamelessly it dispenses with its mask of ideological transformation.
Its time, or so it would seem, has come.
Across the entire world the Communists openly define
their political aims, their ideological roots and their enemy. They
openly admit to allying themselves with the sinister system of Lenin,
Stalin, and Mao. More audaciously and more zealously they attack the
deadly enemy - anti-Communism.
"The struggle against the anti-Communist smear
campaign must expose its rotten class character and reactionary
purpose" [1] - it is possible to hear such words today at the heart
of the old, allegedly civilized, Europe.
This is not some isolated voice. In Europe herself
there are now dozens of organizations operating under the banner of
Communism. The same is true of the rest of the world. The aftermath of
Communist propaganda bears fruit in the most, one would have thought,
unyielding regions of the world. Even in South Korea, subject to
unremitting Communist aggression for fifty years, it is possible to
encounter "scientific" studies, perceiving anti-Communism as
the only obstacle on the road to peaceful unification with Communist
North Korea. [2]
It might be possible to conclude that the existence of
a number of Communist parties does not constitute a particular threat to
freedom in individual countries. These are mostly politically ephemeral
and devoid of wider social and political support. Yet one should
remember that official Communist organizations are just the tip of the
iceberg. Established Bolshevik practice insists upon the use of all
accessible resources, methods and skills. It does not matter whether
these are, at any given moment or place, anti-Fascist people's fronts,
congresses for peace, national independence movements or anti-war
marches - the aim is unchanged. Even during periods of utmost stability,
in the Soviet Union itself, as in neighboring countries, the building of
alternative structures: political, social, even denominational, was
never overlooked. They took care not only of the Communist parties but
also of the opposition. The first so-called non-Communist Prime Minister
in Eastern Europe in the year 1989, Tadeusz Mazowiecki, was not only a
long-standing opposition activist, but also a member of the Communist
parliament as far back as the Fifties and Sixties, when internal
opposition within the Communist bloc was unheard of.
The creation of the so-called non-antagonistic, i.e.
fully loyal, opposition, did not exhaust the ambition of the Communists.
They also took care to develop organizations or movements unambiguously
hostile to them. The historically best known is the so-called TRUST
operation, of which one of the most essential threads was the
infiltration, and even the creation, of anti-Bolshevik organizations in
the Soviet Union and in the West. The Solidarity movement in Poland
prompts a similar conclusion.
In the West, activities which could be classed
generally as infiltration were and remain a counterpart to the
opposition movements in the Soviet bloc. In these matters the Communists
again demonstrate far-reaching flexibility. Infiltration is carried out
not only via secret organizations, but also via agents of influence or
people who are usually labeled with the ugly term "useful
idiots." Such techniques do not only protect Bolshevik ideals but
also drive the activities of potential enemies.
At any rate the evidence of the effectiveness of this
tactic which has been in use for decades is perceptible to the naked
eye. It is no accident that the previous American president, Bill
Clinton, was regarded by some of his fellow-citizens as
crypto-Communist. Among leading European politicians the percentage of
those involved in Communist, pro-Communist, leftist or even terrorist
activity is shocking. Socialist (to say the least) rites are reflected
in political correctness. Membership in the Communist Party or of a
terrorist organization is no obstacle to the highest positions and most
prestigious honors. A clear sign of the times. It is hard to imagine
President Eisenhower calling Nikita Khrushchev "a man with whom he
could do business." And how, by comparison, could one explain the
declaration of President of the United States George Bush, regarding the
Soviet Chekist, now holding the office of President of the Russian
Federation, Vladimir Putin, that he is a man worthy of esteem?
Times change, methods remain, and sometimes only forms
undergo minor amendments. In translation into practical language this
means, in the case of the Communists, less worry about the workers and
more commitment to universal affairs. Feminism, ecology and
permissiveness are the proper concerns of modern Bolsheviks. Sometimes,
however, it is convenient for them to employ old and tried slogans, of
which the most effective, established and proven is that of peace.
Peace, for which countless hosts of Bolsheviks fought throughout an
entire century, is again becoming the motive power of the Communist
movement today. Across the world, hundreds of thousands of people take
to city streets in an impressive display of unity, venting their
anti-American, anti-imperialist frustration. Justifications vary, and
paradoxes easily arise. In addition to the dedicated leftists, bearing
colorful flags and slogans, it is possible also to encounter skinheads,
for whom anti-war excesses constitute an excellent opportunity for
expressing racial hatred. The Communists know well how to exploit such
feelings.
In Great Britain, at the head of the Stop the War
Coalition, organizing the largest anti-war demonstrations in the
country's history (hundreds of thousands strong), stands Andrew Murray,
the British Communist Party activist and, in the 1980s, the
correspondent of the Novosti Press Agency. [3] As an undoubtedly
experienced Bolshevik activist, Murray knows perfectly well what such
mass support can mean in practice; he also knows what the stakes are.
His written words leave little doubt:
The international crisis is proving historic in other
respects, too. It is provoking the collapse of not one but two world
orders at the same time. Firstly, it is putting the institutions which
have embodied the post-World War Two world under unprecedented strain,
both those, like the United Nations, in which humanity has invested
considerable hopes, and those like NATO and the European Union which
have expressed more specifically the interests of imperialism alone. And
the crisis also marks the end of the 1991 'new world order,' the
illusion of a peaceful and stable domination of the world by a
consortium of big powers, under the benevolent hegemony of the United
States.
Such diagnosis permits the formulation of much bolder
hopes: deepening economic problems for all the major capitalist powers
and conflict between capitalist countries. Murray does not hide his
satisfaction: a crisis within capitalism, quarrels between the great
powers - has it ever been possible to want more? Never has an anti-war
movement had so much political potential as this. Comparison with the
ideas of a "people's front," which Murray draws, seems to be
appropriate.
The situation in Great Britain is not very different
from the worldwide norm. Elsewhere matters may be worse, and certainly
no better. Let us spread the map of the world and take a cursory look.
States openly or secretly adhering to Communist ideology predominate in
many regions of the world. In Asia, in Europe, over large areas of
Africa. On the American continent matters look no better. Seemingly
alone until now, Cuba gains new, powerful allies. Hugo Chavez in
Venezuela and Lula da Silva in Brazil are not only close allies of Fidel
Castro, but also avowed Communists - nor does either hide his
far-reaching aims. Both states, incidentally, possess great strategic
significance - Venezuela is prominent with regard to oil production, and
Brazil, in terms of populated areas and population numbers, is the fifth
largest state in the world.
And yet it is not Communism which keeps the world's
magnates awake at night. Not Communism, but rather world terrorism and
recession worry the American President. Perhaps this is skillfully
applied "salami tactics": the elimination, one after another,
of increasingly serious political threats; perhaps this is only a
symptom of classic blindness toward Communism. Unfortunately there is
much to support the latter supposition. And yet not even bin Laden, not
even Saddam, or other figures with similar ambitions constitute a real
threat to American or world freedom, as one or more serious terrorist
incidents will not destroy American potential. The real enemy, the truly
dangerous adversary, has at his disposal a different arsenal of
resources, not merely the military. Is anyone in the White House aware
of this?
What do they know about the actual missile resources
of the "former" Soviet Union? What do they think of the
coordinated test missile firings carried out last autumn by the Russian
Army? How do they estimate the missile potential of this
"ally," whose military budget is allegedly one fortieth of
that of the Pentagon, and who is nevertheless still able continually to
update his missile technology? Does information of this nature stimulate
them to reflection? And what reaction can we expect in the face of the
alliance, formed some years ago, between France, Germany and Russia?
Against whom, in other words, was this alliance assembled? Is the
American government well-disposed towards it? Does it perceive it to
constitute a threat?
Recently, I heard an American colleague give his
opinion that it is proper to put everything on Bush: that, indeed, he
knows nothing about Soviet long-range strategy, but that he is,
otherwise, the only American politician with the courage to take
difficult decisions, and that he is also blessed with political
instinct. And I would like to agree with such an opinion. Unfortunately,
I have no facts which could justify such optimism. Passion in the
pursuit of Islamic terrorism is too little on which to base such
conclusions. Even if Bush does not realize it, there are much more
serious challenges in front of him.
Notes:
1. "Anti-Communism Today and the Struggle against
It," from the International Bulletin of the Workers' Communist
Party of Denmark (APK), No. 3, March 2001.
2. Hyuk-Bum Kwon, "Anti-Communism of Korea -
Semantic System and Its Political and Social Function," Political
Science and Diplomacy, Taejon University.
3. Andrew Murray, Political report - March 2003
Executive Committee meeting, www.communist-party.org.uk.
Dariusz Rohnka lives in Poland and is the author of
The Fatal Fiction: The New Face of Bolshevism -- An Old Pattern.
http://www.jrnyquist.com/rohnka_2003_0515.htm
______
Fear Factor-Fear Factor-Fear
factor-Fear Factor
2
more farms quarantined in mad cow probe Last Updated Wed, 21 May 2003 19:24:16
OTTAWA - Two more farms in Alberta are under quarantine as
agriculture officials trace the life of the country's first case of mad cow
disease in a decade.
INDEPTH: Mad Cow Disease
Dr. George Luterbach, an animal scientist with the Canadian Food
Inspection Agency, told CBC Newsworld on Wednesday that inspectors had found
at least one farm, and maybe another, where the infected cow had spent some
time.
"We will, as a matter of course, quarantine any farm where this
animal has been," he said.
Federal and provincial officials announced on Tuesday that a single cow
from a farm in northern Alberta had tested positive for bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE), the brain-wasting disease commonly known as mad cow
disease.
Since then, investigators have been working to find out how and where the
animal got the disease.
Federal agents loaded up the rest of the herd, at a farm near Fairview,
Alta., on Wednesday morning.
Four trailers were loaded up and taken to a slaughterhouse in Lethbridge.
The entire herd will be killed and tested for the disease. The same could
happen at the other two farms, but Luterbach said the investigation hasn't
reached that stage yet.
The investigation is being complicated by the cow's age. Born eight years
ago, and having spent the past few years at a single farm, it wasn't entered
into a new database created in 2001 to track the movement of cattle.
Investigators are having to use bills of sale and branding records to map
out the life of the infected cow.
Luterbach said they were close to finding out where the cow was born.
Japan Could Face Financial
Crisis 'At Any Time'
5-21-3
TOKYO (AFP) - Bank of Japan
governor Toshihiko Fukui said the country could suffer a financial crisis
"at any time" unless its near crippled financial sector is fixed,
with the banks becoming more and more vulnerable to shocks.
The warning came after the BoJ downgraded its assessment
of the economy for the first time in six months on fears about the impact of
SARS (news - web sites), a weak dollar and risks at home after the
government decided to bail out a major bank.
"If appropriate solutions to the problems of
financial institutions are not carried out, we have to say Japan faces a
situation where a so-called financial crisis could be triggered at any
time," Fukui said Wednesday.
"Financial institutions are making efforts to
overcome the bad-loan issue and at the same time are seeking to create more
highly profitable systems to strengthen their health," the governor
told a parliamentary committee.
"Against this background, we have to say that
financial institutions still have difficult hurdles to overcome," Fukui
noted, adding this meant their fundamentals remained weak.
The government has instructed banks to halve the ratio of
bad loans on their books -- cited as a root cause of Japan's economic slump
-- by March 2005.
Lenders must also evaluate their assets using stricter
standards, which have eroded their capital base.
Japan's fifth largest bank, Resona Holding Inc., on
Saturday was forced to ask for government help after admitting its capital
adequacy ratio had fallen below the required level of four percent.
Fukui told lawmakers the banks were not yet in crisis but
their resistance to shocks was declining.
"Therefore, if their problems cannot be solved in an
appropriate way, difficulties at a single bank, for example, may spread to
other financial institutions, triggering major fears," he cautioned.
Analysts, however, felt the authorities would prevent any
crisis as demonstrated by their decision to inject funds into troubled
Resona.
"We are likely to see the government and the Bank of
Japan continuing to take action," said Paul Sheard, chief economist in
Asia for Lehman Brothers.
Economic and Financial Affairs Minister Heizo Takenaka
admitted Tokyo may end up spending 2.3 trillion yen (19.7 billion dollars)
to bail out Resona Bank, the holding group's core banking unit.
Although an imminent financial crisis was unlikely,
Japan's economy remained riddled with problems, analysts said.
An economic recovery "has come to a standstill and
over the next quarter or so things will start to turn down," Sheard
predicted.
"The weakness in the economy, serious deflation and
at the same time weakness in the financial system ... is a slightly
disturbing cocktail."
Deflation was one of the triggers prompting the BoJ to
downgrade its monthly economic assessment for May.
The announcement came a day after the central bank eased
monetary policy in a bid to support the economy and steady financial markets
hit by fears about the spread of the deadly SARS virus and planned rescue of
Resona.
"Financial institutions cannot be revived unless the
economy itself recovers," said Hisashi Yamada, senior economist at
Japan Research Institute.
Lawmakers are calling on the bank to adopt more radical
measures, such as an inflation target, to reverse deflation and boost
economic growth.
Therefore Tuesday's decision by the BoJ to raise liquidity
in the financial system was largely ignored by the markets, while analysts
described the move as more of the same and ineffective.
And his power shall be mighty, but
not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and
practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
Two wounded patients who were being transferred to an other
hospital, when their ambulance allegedly came under attack from U.S. tanks.
U.S. Charged With War Crimes
The Evidence File
In ah ha the ah ha
name ah ha of ah ha Jasoose....gimme aen amaen brothers an sisters...ah ha
Pictures # 5 : the use of cluster bombs
This little creature of our Lord and savior Christ Jesus is
dead. No, sorry Judeo Churchizionians who are become obedient Noahide's of the
Master Race self chosen and are now anti-Christ who deny that Jesus is Lord over
all, this one did not get Scofield "Talmudically Secretly Rescued, why that
is only for your smug mammonized seed of need creed of Greed bunch. But alas the
"Liberation", but who's liberation was it, only the Liberation of the
Jews who their chooser is calling "Let my Children go" saith the
Robber they chose. Damn you all to hell who partake with them in their vision of
False Zion.