Chabad Lubavitch, the synagogue of Satan

Chabad Satan Part 5

The Illuminated Controllers of Satan's synagogue

Everything you need to know about the son of perdition

As you read the fear mongering they place in their great ruse, understand the plot and the characters. Understand the Thesis, then the anti-Thesis and their final capstone Synthesis, "ordo ab chao" to bring their long desire to have their god, Lucifer rule their flesh kingdom, their Olam Ha Ba of their false Messiah, Moshiach ben David. Yes the Jews will bring the one who will hate all mankind, for it is the purpose of God which he hath purposed to break the yoke of Satan from mankind, and that is why God the Most High created Mankind, to testify against the ROBBER and give witness to the Creator Christ Jesus the Word which hath created everything created. TheTalmudic Jews rejected that for which they were "Chosen" and accepted another, and he will come in his own name. The Lord "Chose" his the seed of Abraham through faith in Christ Jesus.

They continue........

In simple terms, we are at war. It is not a struggle merely for power, wealth, or some other material advantage; it is a titanic clash over the future of world civilization. The world must now choose, for all time, between the eternal holiness of the Messianic kingdom--for which Jews have tirelessly worked for thousands of years--and the utter nihilism of the darkest evil ever to threaten the planet. This war has already spread into every nation, every social institution, every human activity. It has thus become a world war in the ultimate sense.

The Jewish people have the unique power of victory, to liberate the world from its current road to complete self-destruction. Since we are now in the last generation of the Jewish exile and the first generation of Moshiach, our actions are guaranteed to produce miraculous success. No longer must we labor without visible achievement, in the face of powerful opposition and persecution, today, even the smallest actions performed within the physical world will yield staggering results far beyond the laws of nature. Actions that would previously have required decades for success can now yield victory within months. But we must act.

and Act they do, this moment, and act in Iraq in the Iraq Attack they are, and the apostates of the world have forgotten, fade out the face of Usama ben Laden for the new enemy, the two minute hate enemy, Sadam Hussein. And they will cry.... Alas Babylon is fallen is fallen, when Babylon will indeed stand again with the whore, Jerusalem where the Prophets of our Lord, and our Lord was slain and crucified.

Now understand the double speak of the creators of George Orwells fictional novel brought to life in these last days.....and understand that these Illumined evil bastards of the seed of the serpent penned the "Protocols" and are following the plan of their god to the T. It is they who are creating the terror to have complete control while they accuse others, and they will have their global coup, temporary though it will be.

Keep in mind it is these same people, these Talmudic Sofiet Bolshevik Jews in the order of Trotsky and Lenin of Chabad of Lubavitch Russia who are in control, then you will be able to see and understand how they are the true Illumined of Satan orchestrating the deception to destroy.

The rabid rabbi's continue in the name of their un-named god.......

Meanwhile, the world is tumbling into chaos, confused and frightened by the largest, most daring web of lies in history. Until we choose to exercise our incredible potential for Divinely-assured victory, we can expect to see the following developments unfold (H"V):

Their divine leader of the sole last superpower: George Bush the man of Dan and the heir to the kings of the earth.....until the coming of the Lord, Jesus Christ...that is...

"Liberation" ©2003 James Neff

1) The re-emergence of overt Communist control over the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.

2) Escalating revolutionary violence in both Northern and Southern Ireland, leading to their integration as a Communist state with Soviet military bases.

3) Increasing political unification of Europe, including "former" Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, followed by a wave of economic crisis throughout Western Europe, and accompanied by labor strikes, civil unrest, and terrorist attacks.

Excerpt from the "Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of False Zion"

PROTOCOL No. 2

1. It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our predominance, and this state of things will put both sides at the mercy of our international AGENTUR; which possesses millions of eyes ever on the watch and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves.

 3. Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the GOYIM.

PROTOCOL No. 3

1. To-day I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path we have trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the Symbolic Snake, by which we symbolize our people. When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be locked in its coil as in a powerful vice.

2. The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The GOYIM are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots - the kings on their thrones - are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power. This power they owe to the terror which has been breathed into the palaces. As they have no means of getting at their people, into their very midst, the kings on their thrones are no longer able to come to terms with them and so strengthen themselves against seekers after power. We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart.

6. The people, under our guidance, have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their one and only defense and foster- mother for the sake of their own advantage which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people. Nowadays, with the destruction of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grinding scoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers.

7. We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces - Socialists, Anarchists, Communists - to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our SOCIAL MASONRY. The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labor of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy, and strong. We are interested in just the opposite - in the diminution, the KILLING OUT OF THE GOYIM. Our power is in the chronic shortness of food and physical weakness of the worker because by all that this implies he is made the slave of our will, and he will not find in his own authorities either strength or energy to set against our will. Hunger creates the right of capital to rule the worker more surely than it was given to the aristocracy by the legal authority of kings.

9. WHEN THE HOUR STRIKES FOR OUR SOVEREIGN LORD OF ALL THE WORLD TO BE CROWNED IT IS THESE SAME HANDS WHICH WILL SWEEP AWAY EVERYTHING THAT MIGHT BE A HINDRANCE THERETO

11. THIS HATRED WILL BE STILL FURTHER MAGNIFIED BY THE EFFECTS of an ECONOMIC CRISES, which will stop dealing on the exchanges and bring industry to a standstill. We shall create by all the secret subterranean methods open to us and with the aid of gold, which is all in our hands, A UNIVERSAL ECONOMIC CRISES WHEREBY WE SHALL THROW UPON THE STREETS WHOLE MOBS OF WORKERS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN ALL THE COUNTRIES OF EUROPE. These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose property they will then be able to loot.

13. We have demonstrated that progress will bring all the GOYIM to the sovereignty of reason. Our despotism will be precisely that; for it will know how, by wise severities, to pacificate all unrest, to cauterize liberalism out of all institutions.

Now continue on  with the prophets of Baal's false Prophesying of their plan of Olam Ha Ba and satan their god, who they will attempt to seat on the Throne as David

4) Occupation of Germany, France, Spain, Italy, England, and the rest of Western Europe by Soviet military forces, all in the name of "restoring order" and "protecting" Europe.

5) Similar outbreaks of terrorism, insurrection, and seizure of power by Communists throughout the continents of Africa, Asia, and Latin America--particularly in the wake of economic crises.

Excerpt from the "Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of False Zion"

15 Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favor of that KING-DESPOT OF THE BLOOD OF ZION, WHOM WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE WORLD.

Ribbeye of noahide...CHABAD

6) Orchestrated "democratizations" of other Communist regimes to help disguise the accelerating international revolution, most likely in Cuba and China and possibly including Vietnam, Iraq, and North Korea.

7) The illusion of a "war" or conflict between China and the newly re-established Soviet Union, even as they quietly assist each other in spreading revolution.

8) Increasing military aid from the Soviet Union and Communist China to the Marxist governments of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Yemen, etc., and an accompanying buildup of PLO forces; a generally increasing Soviet presence in the Middle East.

9) The radical expansion of violent revolutions in Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Morocco, leading to the collapse of those governments and the appearance of newly hostile regimes giving aid to the PLO.

16) An escalation of terrorism within the borders of the United States, along with debt-fueled inflationary economic crisis and urban riots; a general breakdown of law and order, followed by police state measures that will deliberately fail to restore order; rising confusion and panic amongst the population, with no one being able to identify the cause.

Excerpt from the "Protocols of the Illuminated Elders of False Zion"

18. It is explained by the fact that these dictators whisper to the peoples through their agents that through these abuses they are inflicting injury on the States with the highest purpose - to secure the welfare of the peoples,

George W. Bush on the aftermath of the WTC destruction, 

"Out of this Evil will come a great good"

The strain which results from freedom of actions saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures. BY ALL THESE MEANS WE SHALL SO WEAR DOWN THE "GOYIM" THAT THEY WILL BE COMPELLED TO OFFER US INTERNATIONAL POWER OF A NATURE THAT BY ITS POSITION WILL ENABLE US WITHOUT ANY VIOLENCE GRADUALLY TO ABSORB ALL THE STATE FORCES OF THE WORLD AND TO FORM A SUPER-GOVERNMENT

and the Rabid dogs of Satan, the Chabad Lubavitch continues with their miraculous prophecies....

17) The outbreak of a world war, spreading throughout every continent on the globe, but culminating in an all-out invasion of Israel by Communist armies from the Soviet Bloc, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and perhaps China.

The Rabid Ribbeyes are now to come in for the Kill....

On the other hand, none of the above scenarios need happen at all. It is not a strategy based on force or strength, but rather on weakness and parasitic helplessness hidden behind a wall of lies and illusions.

Now they will give the double speak.....and then....of course the Talmudic solution of their moral laws, thus changing the Law of the Lord and the time. Follow closely, for it is them who can either make these things happen or the world can submit to their Olam Ha Ba, their Moshiach and their Noahide laws of satan. And the world will submit and reject Jesus Christ from absolute fear that is falling upon them, save the saints who will stand firm. Which side will you stand? For the ROBBER or the Giver, Christ Jesus?

Ribbeye saith.......

Only through the most spectacular psychological deception in world history can the Communists hope to realize even a small part of their evil ambitions. Their success depends entirely on the growing confusion, religious disintegration, and moral decay of gentile (especially American) society, as well as on strife and division amongst the Jewish people. Their strategy for revolution, in fact, consists largely of pitting people against each other, igniting hatreds through every imaginable form of class warfare.

In reality, neither the Jewish people nor the gentiles support the betrayal of Israel, and essentially all six billion gentiles are quite ready to ask the Jews for spiritual leadership in these times of darkness. The whole world has a common desire to eliminate the source of the growing anarchy, but very few people have any idea where to find the source of the problems--or the answers.

What, then, could possibly be the reason for this crisis?

The destruction of Christianity who they call Amalek, the last opposition......

The ancient nation of Amalek is condemned in the Torah as the ultimate personification of evil, a nation so full of hatred toward G-d and the Jewish people that it cannot be transformed into good, but must be utterly destroyed along with all traces of its influence. Rather than simply being ignorant of G-d, Amalek has a clear knowledge of its Creator, yet chooses to rebel against Him without any reason--not even for power, pleasure, wealth, or any other conceivable benefit. In this way, Amalek stands clearly apart from the other seventy gentile nations who, despite idolatry, immorality in general, and even anti-Semitism, nevertheless have the potential to be influenced by the Jews to become righteous gentiles who follow the Seven Noachide Laws.

The scattering......

Amalek represents the ultimate barrier to the revelation of G-dliness within the physical world. Its descendants have, for thirty-three continuous centuries, carried on their scheming and machinations to rid the world of Jews and Jewish influence. The very presence of Torah in our realm represents an influence that refines and elevates the gentile nations and all physical elements, preparing for the day when Moshiach arrives to lead a purified world. The Amaleki conspire to send the Torah back into the heavens and reduce the world back to the darkest, most primitive state of idolatry and evil.

But they mean Talmud Bavli, for they reject the WORD and make it void with the oral tradition of the Pharisees

And they shall deliver you up to be afflicted and slain.........

But be of great comfort these who SAY they are Jews but who do lie and are no seed of Abraham in faith through the Blood of the Everlasting and Holy Covenant are defeated since the foundation of the world.

continues the Rib.......

In comes the Justification....Purim of the apocryphal book of demons inserted into the Books of the Lord God Almighty, which justifies the soon murdering of the Gentile who oppose the Olam Ha Ba and their false Messiah.....

But there is one major problem: Amalek has always been far too small and weak to defeat the Jews directly. It has suffered painful defeat in every battle it has fought openly against Israel.

This forces Amalek to mobilize other gentile nations, who do not themselves bear an intrinsic hatred of the Jews, to wage war on his behalf. When the Jews were on their way to Mount Sinai from Egypt, Amalek staged a surprise attack, knowing full well it could not win, but hoping to incite surrounding nations to join in the battle. Some nine centuries later, at the apex of the Persian imperial power, the Amaleki descendant named Haman quietly persuaded Emperor Achashverosh to mobilize Persian forces against the Jews: Achashverosh was motivated by ego and greed, which Haman played upon for his own reasons.

Thus we readily see that Amalek's attack on the Jews requires secretly manipulating unsuspecting gentile nations, using their own weaknesses, to set them against the Jews. More importantly, the Amaleki can only prey upon those gentiles who have not yet chosen actively to side with the Jewish people, the Torah, and the Seven Noachide Laws. But those gentiles who have consciously chosen to follow Torah halacha as it applies to them (without actually converting to Judaism) simply cannot be mobilized by Amalek.

And they are already calling the true saints of the Lord Jesus Christ whom they in their satanic verses of Talmud Bavli call a bastard and the son of a whore and a Roman soldier.........Remember you are a chosen nation a Royal Priesthood, a peculiar people chosen through faith in Christ Jesus and are the seed of Abraham, the True Israel of the ONLY Creator, the WORD are ye Priest and Kings unto God and His Father, what these lying Chabad are doing is reversing the True Children of the Lord Almighty to set themselves up as the little gods of the earth and all the earth to be their slaves...the self chosen master race of flesh and are no spirit or children of God the Most High, for they choose instead the covenant with Death, their god, Baal, O" Lucifer.....Judaism is no Torah, for they depend solely upon the oral tradition of Talmud Bavli and Qabalah and Zohar the mystical books of the worship of Satan their lord. They only refer to Torah in the sense of the oral tradition which makes null the WORD of God the Most High, yet they shall be destroyed by the double edged of the Lord Jesus Christ. But at the sixth trumpet sound, many in Jerusalem shall fall down and give the Lord, Great Glory, praise the Lord God almighty, for these children came out of the whore's deception at the last moment, will you?

The Torah also teaches us that Amalek's methods involve pure deception and psychological warfare; only when the Jews are fooled can Amalek actually launch a physical blow. Several specific examples of Amaleki tactics are illustrated in Torah: (Talmud oral Mishnah)

1) Amalek always begins by attacking those who are weakest--spiritually or physically--as when it attacked the Jews from behind on the way to Mount Sinai.

2) In order to influence gentile nations, and to disrupt the Jewish people from within, Amaleki agents infiltrate the ranks of governments and elsewhere. These spies secretly influence the king, as in the case of Haman; others stir up "spontaneous" mob actions in the streets to provoke further confusion, as several of Haman's sons did in Jerusalem, thereby causing King Achashverosh to suspend the building of the Temple.

It is illegal to preach the Gospel in Jerusalem to Jews

3) At all times, Amalek desperately hides itself to prevent effective retaliation. When the Jews first approached the land of Israel after forty years of wandering in the desert, the Amaleki attacked in the guise of Kena'anim. Their intent, as Rashi explains, was to reader ineffective the Jewish prayers asking G-d for victory over " Kena'anim." The Jews, detecting a trap, won by asking G-d for success against "this people." Amaleki are not Russians, Germans, Chinese, or Arabs, but they disguise themselves behind many nationalities and movements in order to misdirect Jewish counterattack against the wrong target.

These are double speaking for the seed of Abraham the children of Israel is of the seed of faith. These themselves are Amalekites, you are circumcised in the heart through faith in Christ Jesus and are grafted into the vine, for they of the flesh who SAY they are Jew are just that flesh and of no spirit of the Holy Spirit, Christ Jesus......

4) As the Lubavitcher Rebbe (Schneeeeeeeerson) has explained, the gematria (numerical equivalent) of "Amalek" is the same as the Hebrew word for "doubt," signifying that Amalek uses every possible method to create uncertainty, confusion, paralysis, and despair. Amaleki propaganda and deceit is designed to immobilize the Jewish people and induce compromise and surrender. But no amount of negotiation ever appeases the Amaleki, who simply exploit every sign of weakness to step up the attack.

This is why the Pharisees crucified Jesus Christ, and sealed their fate by the blood that is on their hands, and are responsible for all slain up[on the earth..... 

Torah (Mishnah)  teaches us that the literal descendants of Amalek have survived to the present day, hidden amongst the gentile nations, and that the passage of time has by no means weakened their hatred or their intent to erase Jewish influence from the world. They have been forced to bide their time, waiting for an opportunity to strike again; only Moshiach will be able to annihilate these wicked people.

And they have already told you that their mere man messiah, will be revealed when Babylon falls (Iraq) and he shall destroy wonderfully......and they know the opposition will be great, for many shall know the truth...........

The Tanach prophets and the oral traditions speak of Amalek's resurfacing in the days shortly before Moshiach arrives. The Amaleki would be empowered by G-d to spread their subversive influence secretly throughout the nations and governments of the world, involving them in a series of three world wars known as the "wars of Gog and Magog." (George from George) The unsuspecting gentile nations would fall prey to the growing confusion and allow themselves to be mobilized against the Jewish people. In the third and final of those wars, Amalek (tentatively identified with "King Gog" (King George) in the oral traditions) would lead those forces to invade Israeli soil and lay siege to Jerusalem; the traditions also refer to numerous spies in Jewish ranks, attempting to betray Israel to the enemy. Unable to take the city, the forces under Amaleki control would suddenly panic, slaying each other in the process, for evil always self-destructs in the end. At that moment, Moshiach would be revealed.

Has nothing to do with Armageddon or Christ Jesus whatsoever but a fable of the Jews who are contrary to all men.....

Obviously, these prophetic traditions are being fulfilled today, down to the most precise detail, by the international Communist conspiracy and its well-placed allies in Western governments. (Note: Individual Amaleki cannot be identified until Moshiach appears. However, Communism undoubtedly represents the external organization into which Amalek recruits members of all the nations to implement its schemes.)

And when the nations think to do God a service when they put us to death, they will call US the HATERS, the COMMUNIST and the TRAITORS.....the perfect double speak and the 70 million Judeo-Churchizionianfreemasons will hate us for our opposition against King George.

But what can be the meaning of this strange series of events? In essence, the Torah is showing us that Moshiach cannot come until tile entire world--including the gentile nations--is ready. On the other hand, the gentiles are essentially ready now, requiring only a small Jewish effort to complete the task. The Jewish people and Amalek are waging a final struggle over the future of the gentiles; those whom the Jews fail to teach the Seven Noachide Laws will automatically fall into the hands of Amalek and its world revolution.

The saints who stand firm for the Testimony of Jesus Christ the ONLY LORD GOD ALMIGHTY

Therein lies the key to reversing the "peace" process. The war, contrary to popular opinion, lies not in the land of Israel itself, but rather in the United States and other gentile nations. G-d is giving the Jewish people a tremendous opportunity to perform mitzvos (LAW)  and carry out a primary goal of Torah:(Mishnah)  To elevate and bring holiness into the gentiles, preparing them for the Messianic era when "on that day Hashem will be one and His name one"--meaning that all other religions will disappear, and the entire world will learn G-d's wisdom from the ingathered Jewish exiles in Israel, with Moshiach as the world's king.

No Christians. The Judeo-Churchizionist of the Scofield Mystical false Jesus will not stand for the WORD for they already belive the Lie and are Proslytes and now twice the children of Hell.

Now here is all you have to do, to be guarenteed a part of Moshiach's Olam Ha Ba....

Judaism has always been a conquering religion, not for the purpose of converting gentiles to become Jews, but rather with the mission of returning the world to the universal covenant between G-d and Noah. For halachic reasons too numerous and detailed to list here, gentiles today who follow Christianity, Islam, or other religions are not, for the most part, "righteous gentiles" who inherit the World to Come. That status belongs only to those gentiles who carefully observe the Seven Laws of Noah, including following the halachic authority of the oral Torah and the rabbis.

Become obedient to the mandated Congressionally, President decreed Public Law 102-14 HJR 1991 and reject Jesus Christ

(For those who find the concept confusing, we hasten to point out that this is not part of a conversion to Judaism, nor even a step in the process. The Children of Noah have their own, independent role to play in assisting the Jewish people and refining the world. Those individuals who wish to convert may do so, but there is no such requirement. In the Messianic era, these righteous gentiles will worship in the Jerusalem Temple and celebrate certain Torah holidays, but will maintain a separate court system and not intermarry with Jews. Today, such Noachides also assist in bringing non-observant Jews back to Torah, among other functions.)

For they, and they alone according to their books of Satan are heirs to the World, little gods and you are to be a servant to their godhood, obedient Goyim animals, Noahides.

During the time of the first Temple, the dream of eventually refining and transforming the gentiles was reflected in the presence of ten menorahs in the Temple sanctuary--for a total of seventy lights--representing the elevation of the seventy gentile nations. But when the Temple was destroyed, the Jews had to influence the gentiles in a more quiet, gradual manner. Although causing the gentiles to observe the Seven Noachide Laws is itself one of the 613 mitzvos of the Torah, the exile at times sank to such depths of harshness and oppression that Jews simply could not fulfill this mitzvah for fear of death. In such times, Judaism was forced to adapt itself to mere survival; conquest was simply out of the question.

Because they seek to kill and enslave all gentiles, and for their own actions of Bigotry and hatred, they have always managed to bring their curse upon themselves, for they are wretched and poor and blind and are reprobate silver with out the Lord Christ Jesus who they slew.

That situation has completely reversed itself today. The very fact that Amalek can stir up such chaos in the world is proof that gentile society no longer presents true opposition to Jewish teachings. One now sees anti-Semitism only where Amalek is provoking trouble, which is precisely where gentiles are the most desperate for guidance. As Christianity spirals downward into strife and theological confusion, it becomes a vacuum unable to defend itself against either the lies of Amalek or the truth of Torah. Amalek can exploit the worldwide collapse of Christianity only by default--that is, only when the Jewish people do not seize the unprecedented opportunity.

Thus the beast has been given the power to overcome the saints of God and slay them, and the saints of the Lord Jesus will be hated of by all nation for his name sake. Synthesis.

And as the Lubavitcher Rebbe has explained, by transforming the gentiles we can quickly create a vast army of supporters who will help us reveal Moshiach and bring all Jews back to the Torah. Specifically, the Rebbe has emphasized that the "peace process" in Israel will be defeated only through our influence on the gentiles--especially through the campaign to teach the Noachide Laws (see Sichos in English, vol. 16, [19 Kislev 5743]).

And George H.W. Bush and the Lubavitcher Schneeeeeerson set up the Noahide Laws, and the reebe Schneeeeeerson arranged it so that George W, Bush could begin the last phase of the wars of their god hashem, and George Bush will be there when they wail Oh Babylon Oh Babylon is fallen the false Babylon, and George Bush is worshipped on the borderline of Apotheosis, and George Bush is deceiving the World, and George W. Bush is heir to the Kings of the Earth and from the tribe of the Danites, and George Bush has made a covenant with death through the Mystery Babylon Religion of the Skull and Bones, and George W, Bush has folled the "Protocols of the Illumined Elders to the exact script, and has taken the constitution of the United States away and ground them to pulp, and George W. Bush is destroying wonderfully, and George W. Bush has set up the enabling act "Patriot AKT" and George W. Bush is chemtrail spraying our skies, and George W. Bush often give the sign of the hand of Lucifer, and George W, Bush is a CFR, and George W. Bush sat while the second Jumbo Jet struck the symbolic Twin Towers with out even a facial squint, and George W. Bush has said publicly over ten times how much "Easier it would be if he were a dictator" without reaction of the Peoples, and the Liberal Demoncrats are destroyed on Que, and it is just about finished. For Amerika is now the territory of Talmudism of Satan.

Our most pressing task, to put it simply, is to launch an international Noachide revolution without delay. The process has already begun, with dozens of tiny Noachide communities having appeared throughout the United States, generally composed of former Christians who have abandoned that religion. The task of organizing the revolution can be divided into two broad stages:

I) We must first create a new Noachide society as an international network of communities and organizations functioning inside, but separately from, the surrounding society (based on halachic requirements and directives, Noachide institutions function quite differently from their Christian and secular counterparts).

This starts with an aggressive outreach program, by Jews and Noachides alike, to teach gentiles about their responsibilities according to Torah. (Talmud Bavli Toarah Mishnah)

Simultaneously, we must organize functioning programs and institutions that are prepared to absorb these vast numbers of ex-Christians and immediately involve them in efforts to bring Moshiach. The Noachide communities require schools for their children, modeled after the Jewish yeshiva programs; Torah study groups geared for their specific needs; coordinated celebrations of appropriate Torah holidays; family services for marriage, support for the elderly, and burial; courts of justice, led by rabbinically trained righteous judges, which will function similarly to Jewish batei dinim; and tzedaka programs to assist the needy, to build new Noachide schools, and to support Jewish settlements in Israel and synagogues throughout the diaspora.

George W. Bush has set up "Education Day" USA as the fron for the Talmudic Noahide Laws and the "No Child Left Behind Act

2) In the second stage, the growing Noachide movement will seize political power--using only peaceful, lawful means--in the capitals of the Western nations. 

The Freemason Courthouses display their Freemason Historacle markers boldly now, and most of the Judges and court reporter Liars (Lawyers) are Freemasons of Talmud in the tradition of apostate Solomon in the order of Nimrod (Moloch) 

This, of course, will not take place until the Noachide society has grown to some threshold size. We do not know how large this needs to be nor which nations will join the revolution first, although the United States, as a fairly religious, conservative nation, certainly tops the list of prospects.

and Judaism is Communism and Talmudism and Socialism and conservatism

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. 

The coup d'Etat of 2000, when the King stood up but not for his posterity...(Daniel)

All economic and technological aid to the Communist Bloc, including the PLO, will be terminated immediately. Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. 

Done according to plan

Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. 

the little gods are above their laws they make but will not lift a finger to move, these are of their father the serpent

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts (Freemasons) will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha; in the United States, the emphasis will be on restoring the authority of the Constitution and abolishing all unconstitutional government programs and agencies. (New Republican Constitution as per conservative interpretation) The national debt will be foreclosed, probably by paying off creditors with government land holdings, thus averting economic disaster.

Giving the lands to the Talmudic bankers of the satan mammon system

Do not think you can hide in these national parks.

 And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.

Homeland Security, concentration camps and Patriot AKT II

Almost as soon as aid to the Communist Bloc stops, the international Communist revolution will plunge headlong into crisis. The captive peoples, seeing their liberation at hand, will genuinely rise up to throw their brutal dictators out of power, and the armies of Gog and Magog--ranging from the Soviet Communists to the PLO--will self-destruct before the eyes of the entire world.

Naturally, Amalek's agents will scream hysterically to intimidate Jews from carrying out the above campaign, hoping to delay this victory. They have no power, however, to prevent our successful action; they can only try to create doubts and hesitation.

Hahahahahahehehehehahahahahahohohohohohohoh....we will shout out upon the roof tops, and many shall be lead into the Righteousness of our Lord Jesus Christ, and there were before the throne in heaven in white robes ten thousand times thousands and thousands, and they stood firm for the testimony they helf for the Lord Almighty, the Lamb Christ Jesus, and they watched as the Lord poured out his great wrath upon the worshippers of that beast Moshaich and his prophet. 

As the world plunges headlong toward the imminent revelation of Moshiach while the last walls of the exile disintegrate, the number of confused gentiles ready to change is rising exponentially. If the Jewish people immediately begin preparing adequate structures for the Noachide movement, this tide will be channeled directly into a glorious revelation of Truth. But if we allow ourselves to be caught unprepared, this same overwhelming force for social change can, G-d forbid, be diverted to empower Amalek's final assault on holiness. It is not a matter of whether gentile society will explode in the face of the growing crisis; this event is an inevitable, and fast-approaching, reality. We do not want to miss this incredible opportunity to provide light in the final moments of darkness.

 And thus as it is written they shall set their selves against the Everlasting and Holy Covenant and they shall scatter and destroy the Holy People the saints of our Lord Jesus Christ, but this is the first death and these are given white robes as a reward, and the Lord Jesus Christ will come in the clouds with great glory and the saints death are precious in the eyes of the Lord, and these who reject Jesus Christ shall be rejected to the Father in Heaven, and they shall be cast into the winepress of the Lord's Wrath where they shall be in torment for ever....amen.

The world has reached its ultimate point of decision, and the power to succeed belongs entirely to the Jewish people. We can wait until Moshiach comes on his own, following a world war, or we can bring him through our own actions, as the Lubavitcher Rebbe has stated is our mission. The choice is ours.

There is not a minute to waste. Jews everywhere, unite!

Dig into the wall and look at the Abominations the Illumined Elders who have stolen the seat of Moses do......

http://www.shmais.com/chabad_Detail.cfm?ID=460

The Baal Haturim says (on the last verse of Parshas Chayei Sarah) that Yishmael has to fall before the coming of Moshiach: "When Yishmael will fall at the end of days, the son of David will rise up."

For Sadam and the seven nations they have named will fall and then the Laws enforced

watch when their wars of hashem their un-named g-d, continues for three months in their carefully orchestrated plan to reveal their false messiah, this Moshiach ben Perdiotn will be REVEALED. Code Red instituted, Marshal law tactics under Patriot Akt II, a false Babylon is fallen....Babylon is fallen, then the courts of Justice under Public Law HJR 102-14 enforced and backed by the Talmudic Supreme Court. Pray for your families if these things occur in the next 3-6 months, when the media cries that that evil Sadam Hussein and Babylon is fallen, for this is the greatest ruse of deception ever brought into the world.  The prohets of Baal are now declaring that,... see we have told you that Jesus of Nazareth was a hoax, and our prophecies are come true. The sleeping apostate Judeo-Churchizionist will rush to embrace this Olam Ha Ba out of complete fear. Pray ye daily that you are not deceived and stand firm for the testimony of the Lord, Christ Jesus.

Terror Code Red Would
Trigger Virtual Lockdown
By Michael Collins
Scripps Howard News Service
3-31-3

WASHINGTON -- National landmarks such as the Washington Monument, Ellis Island and the Gateway Arch in St. Louis could be shut down.

 

Planes could be grounded, trains could stop running, and bridges and tunnels could be closed. U.S. borders might be sealed off, and roadblocks might be set up on interstates and other major highways.

 

The United States is prepared to go into lockdown mode if the government should raise the nation's terror alert to Code Red, the highest threat level for terrorism. Code Red means there is a severe risk of terrorist attack, or that an attack is imminent or may already be under way.

 

"It essentially means you stop doing everything except protecting yourself," said Dave McIntyre, deputy director of the Anser Institute for Homeland Security, a nonprofit research group in Arlington, Va.

 

Homeland security officials have put Americans on notice to brace for the possibility of terrorist attacks while the country is at war with Iraq. The threat level was raised to orange, the second highest, just two days before the war began March 19.

 

"There are no plans, nor have their been any discussions, about elevating the threat level to Code Red," said Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security.

 

To trigger such an alert, U.S. intelligence would have to be "very specific, credible, corroborated [and] provide us with information such as time, date, location" of a possible attack, Johndroe said.

 

Still, federal, state and local officials across the country are going over emergency plans to be prepared in the event that the terror level should be raised to red.

 

Homeland security officials have been vague about what protective measures might be taken under Code Red.

 

But Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge has said such measures might be similar to those put in place Sept. 11, 2001, which means planes could be grounded, borders closed, government buildings shut down and road and rail traffic curtailed.

 

The specific response would depend on the nature of the threat.

 

It's doubtful that the entire country would be placed under a Code Red alert, McIntyre said. A more realistic scenario is that a red alert would result from a specific threat to a particular region or industry.

 

If, for example, there were a terrorist threat against the trucking industry in the Southeast, truck traffic might be temporarily halted in that region but be allowed to continue elsewhere, McIntyre said.

 

Code Red wouldn't mean automatic closure of the Washington Monument and other national landmarks. But superintendents at national parks have been advised that shutting down the facilities is an option at their discretion, said David Barna, a spokesman for the National Park Service.

 

Security was tightened at eight high-profile landmarks, including the Washington Monument, the Liberty Bell pavilion and the Statue of Liberty, after Sept. 11 because they are symbols of democracy and are thus potential terrorist targets, Barna said.

 

Visitors at those landmarks now face airport-security type measures, such as metal detectors, bag searches and checks for explosive devices. Patrols also have been stepped up since the terror alert was raised to orange.

 

But Barna said the landmarks would remain open if possible because they are places of solace that should be available to the public in times of war.

 

A Code Red alert also serves as an advisory to state and local officials, who then must decide whether to put in place protective measures. Emergency plans will vary with each community, but might include calling up the National Guard, closing government buildings and shutting down key roads and bridges.

 

Some schools have plans to lock down their facilities during Code Red and already have begun advising parents not to rush to pick up their children.

 

Residents would be advised to stay away from gathering places, such as sporting events, and listen to the radio or television for instructions. They should be prepared to leave if necessary, but should remain in their homes or offices until they are instructed to leave, McIntyre said.

 

"The worst thing you can do is to flee without reason," which could create gridlock on the streets and keep emergency vehicles from getting through, he said.

 

Emergency measures taken under Code Red would be expensive and aren't intended to remain in effect for extended periods, McIntyre said.

 

http://www.post-gazette.com/nation/20030330codered0330p6.asp

 Could it be, that their wars are according to their satanic plan for Chaos? Could it be that this is indeed the plan of the WWIII? Could it be that the kings of the earth are all drunk of the wine of the Whore's indignation and the very same Marxist Arm and Hammer of Talmudic Judaic Communism control both China and Russia and N. Korea as well as all the rest of the kings of the earth, including the AIPAC Chabad Lubavitch controlled whitehouse since their Coup 2000? The coup that in the Rabid Chabad's own admission that the Lubavitcher Reebe Schneerson somehow managed to have George W. Bush elected to finish what his father did not accomplish? In the hotbed of Talmudic Chabad influence of Broward County Florida and backed by the Talmudic Supreme court justices? By the  college electorate of Ordo Templi Orientis? The king rose up but not to his posterity and dominion but for other besides those? And this Persian who is far richer than the others, Sadam Hussein will stir the Moslem Arabic realm against this king, Bush? I say that it is indeed the fulfillment of the Spirit of True Prophecy, Jesus Christ the Lord.

Do not be deceived, your children are sent to fight a war for the false Christ, their Moshiach ben Perdition to be revealed. The wars of their un-named god hashem will not stop at Basra and BaghDad, but will continue until all the nations of the earth are brought into the fray, much like WWI and WWII, chaos....then like the League of Nations brought WWII and set up their Bogey Government the United Nations, the United Nations will be abolished and moved aside for Phase Three, their Supra Government of their Moshiach the Olam Ha Ba and the cleansing or purging of the true opposition, those who will stand firm for the testimony of the CREATOR, Christ Jesus.

Iran, Syria get grave warning
Concern mounts as Tehran nears nuclear capability; Syria faces 'critical choice,' Powell says

OLIVIA WARD

JERUSALEM—While American and British forces are battling for victory against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, the next targets are already flickering across the diplomatic radar.

Israeli strategists are hoping that one of the first will be Iran, and they are urging the United States to take measures to rein in Tehran's nuclear ambitions and its sponsorship of militants hostile to Israel.

This weekend U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld accused Iran of sponsoring hundreds of exiled Iraqi Islamists who have been travelling over the Iranian border to fight against Saddam in Iraq.

_________

Syria's Assad - 'We Will Not
Wait' To Be Bush's Next Target
Special To World Tribune
3-30-3

NICOSIA ÷ Syria, alarmed by the impending collapse of its neighbor and ally, has called for suicide missions against U.S. forces in Iraq.

 

Syrian President Bashar Assad also called on Arab regimes to oppose the U.S.-led war against Iraq. He warned that Syria could be the next target of Washington.

 

Assad said in an interview with the Beirut-based A-Safir daily that Damascus would not wait until the United States attacks Syria, Middle East Newsline reported. He did not elaborate.

 

"We will not wait until we become the next target," Assad said.

 

The mufti of Syria, appointed by the regime, called on Muslims to launch suicide attacks on coalition forces in Iraq. The statement came amid concern expressed by the Syrian regime over the U.S. advance on Baghdad.

 

"I call on Muslims to use all means possible to thwart the aggression, including martyr operations against the hostile invaders," Sheik Ahmad Kaftaro, the mufti, said in a statement on Thursday. "This is the obligation of all Muslims."

 

Kaftaro said the obligation to fight coalition forces begins with Muslims in Iraq. He also called on Westerners to protest the participation of their governments in the war against Iraq.

 

Western intelligence sources said Syria has increased preparations of its military amid the war in Iraq. They said Assad has ordered accelerated production of the medium-range Scud C and D missiles, which have a range of 550 and 700 kilometers, respectively.

 

Assad said he expected an Israeli attack. He said Syria would remain under threat as long as Israel exists.

http://www..worldtribune.com/worldtribune/front_2.html

________

If your gonna get "Secretly Mystically Talmudically Babyloneously Scofielditely Ejected outta here, to Scofield Utopia,  you better hurry, or you better embrace Christ Jesus the Lord of Lords and Trust the Lord with all of your heart and all of your soul, because in comes false Christ soon, Moshaich Ben Satan in the guise of the Judeo-Churchizionist Freemason little god he is. 

Practice To Deceive:

Chaos In The Middle East Is Not
The Bush Hawks' Nightmare

Scenario - It's Their Plan
By Joshua Micah Marshall
The Washington Monthly
3-30-3

Imagine it's six months from now. The Iraq war is over. After an initial burst of joy and gratitude at being liberated from Saddam's rule, the people of Iraq are watching, and waiting, and beginning to chafe under American occupation. Across the border, in Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, our conquering presence has brought street protests and escalating violence. The United Nations and NATO are in disarray, so America is pretty much on its own. Hemmed in by budget deficits at home and limited financial assistance from allies, the Bush administration is talking again about tapping Iraq's oil reserves to offset some of the costs of the American presence--talk that is further inflaming the region. Meanwhile, U.S. intelligence has discovered fresh evidence that, prior to the war, Saddam moved quantities of biological and chemical weapons to Syria. When Syria denies having such weapons, the administration starts massing troops on the Syrian border. But as they begin to move, there is an explosion: Hezbollah terrorists from southern Lebanon blow themselves up in a Baghdad restaurant, killing dozens of Western aid workers and journalists. Knowing that Hezbollah has cells in America, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge puts the nation back on Orange Alert. FBI agents start sweeping through mosques, with a new round of arrests of Saudis, Pakistanis, Palestinians, and Yemenis.

 

To most Americans, this would sound like a frightening state of affairs, the kind that would lead them to wonder how and why we had got ourselves into this mess in the first place. But to the Bush administration hawks who are guiding American foreign policy, this isn't the nightmare scenario. It's everything going as anticipated.

 

In their view, invasion of Iraq was not merely, or even primarily, about getting rid of Saddam Hussein. Nor was it really about weapons of mass destruction, though their elimination was an important benefit. Rather, the administration sees the invasion as only the first move in a wider effort to reorder the power structure of the entire Middle East. Prior to the war, the president himself never quite said this openly. But hawkish neoconservatives within his administration gave strong hints. In February, Undersecretary of State John Bolton told Israeli officials that after defeating Iraq, the United States would "deal with" Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Meanwhile, neoconservative journalists have been channeling the administration's thinking. Late last month, The Weekly Standard's Jeffrey Bell reported that the administration has in mind a "world war between the United States and a political wing of Islamic fundamentalism ... a war of such reach and magnitude [that] the invasion of Iraq, or the capture of top al Qaeda commanders, should be seen as tactical events in a series of moves and countermoves stretching well into the future."

 

In short, the administration is trying to roll the table--to use U.S. military force, or the threat of it, to reform or topple virtually every regime in the region, from foes like Syria to friends like Egypt, on the theory that it is the undemocratic nature of these regimes that ultimately breeds terrorism. So events that may seem negative--Hezbollah for the first time targeting American civilians; U.S. soldiers preparing for war with Syria--while unfortunate in themselves, are actually part of the hawks' broader agenda. Each crisis will draw U.S. forces further into the region and each countermove in turn will create problems that can only be fixed by still further American involvement, until democratic governments--or, failing that, U.S. troops--rule the entire Middle East.

 

There is a startling amount of deception in all this--of hawks deceiving the American people, and perhaps in some cases even themselves. While it's conceivable that bold American action could democratize the Middle East, so broad and radical an initiative could also bring chaos and bloodshed on a massive scale. That all too real possibility leads most establishment foreign policy hands, including many in the State Department, to view the Bush plan with alarm. Indeed, the hawks' record so far does not inspire confidence. Prior to the invasion, for instance, they predicted that if the United States simply announced its intention to act against Saddam regardless of how the United Nations voted, most of our allies, eager to be on our good side, would support us. Almost none did. Yet despite such grave miscalculations, the hawks push on with their sweeping new agenda.

 

Like any group of permanent Washington revolutionaries fueled by visions of a righteous cause, the neocons long ago decided that criticism from the establishment isn't a reason for self-doubt but the surest sign that they're on the right track. But their confidence also comes from the curious fact that much of what could go awry with their plan will also serve to advance it. A full-scale confrontation between the United States and political Islam, they believe, is inevitable, so why not have it now, on our terms, rather than later, on theirs? Actually, there are plenty of good reasons not to purposely provoke a series of crises in the Middle East. But that's what the hawks are setting in motion, partly on the theory that the worse things get, the more their approach becomes the only plausible solution.

 

Moral Cloudiness

 

Ever since the neocons burst upon the public policy scene 30 years ago, their movement has been a marriage of moral idealism, military assertiveness, and deception. Back in the early 1970s, this group of then-young and still mostly Democratic political intellectuals grew alarmed by the post-Vietnam Democrats' seeming indifference to the Soviet threat. They were equally appalled, however, by the amoral worldview espoused by establishment Republicans like Henry Kissinger, who sought co-existence with the Soviet Union. As is often the case with ex-socialists, the neocons were too familiar with communist tactics to ignore or romanticize communism's evils. The fact that many neocons were Jewish, and outraged by Moscow's increasingly visible persecution of Jews, also caused them to reject both the McGovernite and Kissingerian tendencies to ignore such abuses.

 

<https://www.kable.com/pub/wmth/subscribe.asp> In Ronald Reagan, the neocons found a politician they could embrace. Like them, Reagan spoke openly about the evils of communism and, at least on the peripheries of the Cold War, preferred rollback to coexistence. Neocons filled the Reagan administration, and men like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, and others provided the intellectual ballast and moral fervor for the sharp turn toward confrontation that the United States adopted in 1981.

 

But achieving moral clarity often requires hiding certain realities. From the beginning, the neocons took a much more alarmist view of Soviet capacities and intentions than most experts. As late as 1980, the ur-neocon Norman Podhoretz warned of the imminent "Finlandization of America, the political and economic subordination of the United States to superior Soviet power," even raising the possibility that America's only options might be "surrender or war." We now know, of course, that U.S. intelligence estimates, which many neocons thought underestimated the magnitude and durability of Soviet power, in fact wildly overestimated them.

 

This willingness to deceive--both themselves and others--expanded as neocons grew more comfortable with power. Many spent the Reagan years orchestrating bloody wars against Soviet proxies in the Third World, portraying thugs like the Nicaraguan Contras and plain murderers like Jonas Savimbi of Angola as "freedom fighters." The nadir of this deceit was the Iran-Contra scandal, for which Podhoretz's son-in-law, Elliot Abrams, pled guilty to perjury. Abrams was later pardoned by Bush's father, and today, he runs Middle East policy in the Bush White House.

 

But in the end, the Soviet Union did fall. And the hawks' policy of confrontation did contribute to its collapse. So too, of course, did the economic and military rot most of the hawks didn't believe in, and the reforms of Mikhail Gorbachev, whom neocons such as Richard Perle counseled Reagan not to trust. But the neocons did not dwell on what they got wrong. Rather, the experience of having played a hand in the downfall of so great an evil led them to the opposite belief: that it's okay to be spectacularly wrong, even brazenly deceptive about the details, so long as you have moral vision and a willingness to use force.

 

What happened in the 1990s further reinforced that mindset. Hawks like Perle and William Kristol pulled their hair out when Kissingerians like Brent Scowcroft and Colin Powell left Saddam's regime in place after the first Gulf War. They watched with mounting fury as terrorist attacks by Muslim fundamentalists claimed more and more American and Israeli lives. They considered the Oslo accords an obvious mistake (how can you negotiate with a man like Yasir Arafat?), and as the decade progressed they became increasingly convinced that there was a nexus linking burgeoning terrorism and mounting anti-Semitism with repressive but nominally "pro-American" regimes like Saudi Arabia and Egypt. In 1996, several of the hawks--including Perle--even tried to sell Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the idea that Israel should attack Saddam on its own--advice Netanyahu wisely declined. When the Oslo process crumbled and Saudi Arabian terrorists killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11, the hawks felt, not without some justification, that they had seen this danger coming all along, while others had ignored it. The timing was propitious, because in September 2001 many already held jobs with a new conservative president willing to hear their pitch.

 

Prime Minister bin Laden

 

The pitch was this: The Middle East today is like the Soviet Union 30 years ago. Politically warped fundamentalism is the contemporary equivalent of communism or fascism. Terrorists with potential access to weapons of mass destruction are like an arsenal pointed at the United States. The primary cause of all this danger is the Arab world's endemic despotism, corruption, poverty, and economic stagnation. Repressive regimes channel dissent into the mosques, where the hopeless and disenfranchised are taught a brand of Islam that combines anti-modernism, anti-Americanism, and a worship of violence that borders on nihilism. Unable to overthrow their own authoritarian rulers, the citizenry turns its fury against the foreign power that funds and supports these corrupt regimes to maintain stability and access to oil: the United States. As Johns Hopkins University professor Fouad Ajami recently wrote in Foreign Affairs, "The great indulgence granted to the ways and phobias of Arabs has reaped a terrible harvest"--terrorism. Trying to "manage" this dysfunctional Islamic world, as Clinton attempted and Colin Powell counsels us to do, is as foolish, unproductive, and dangerous as dtente was with the Soviets, the hawks believe. Nor is it necessary, given the unparalleled power of the American military. Using that power to confront Soviet communism led to the demise of that totalitarianism and the establishment of democratic (or at least non-threatening) regimes from the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea to the Bering Strait. Why not use that same power to upend the entire corrupt Middle East edifice and bring liberty, democracy, and the rule of law to the Arab world?

 

The hawks' grand plan differs depending on whom you speak to, but the basic outline runs like this: The United States establishes a reasonably democratic, pro-Western government in Iraq--assume it falls somewhere between Turkey and Jordan on the spectrum of democracy and the rule of law. Not perfect, representative democracy, certainly, but a system infinitely preferable to Saddam's. The example of a democratic Iraq will radically change the political dynamics of the Middle East. When Palestinians see average Iraqis beginning to enjoy real freedom and economic opportunity, they'll want the same themselves. With that happy prospect on one hand and implacable United States will on the other, they'll demand that the Palestinian Authority reform politically and negotiate with Israel. That in turn will lead to a real peace deal between the Israelis and Palestinians. A democratic Iraq will also hasten the fall of the fundamentalist Shi'a mullahs in Iran, whose citizens are gradually adopting anti-fanatic, pro-Western sympathies. A democratized Iran would create a string of democratic, pro-Western governments (Turkey, Iraq, and Iran) stretching across the historical heartland of Islam. Without a hostile Iraq towering over it, Jordan's pro-Western Hashemite monarchy would likely come into full bloom. Syria would be no more than a pale reminder of the bad old days. (If they made trouble, a U.S. invasion would take care of them, too.) And to the tiny Gulf emirates making hesitant steps toward democratization, the corrupt regimes of Saudi Arabia and Egypt would no longer look like examples of stability and strength in a benighted region, but holdouts against the democratic tide. Once the dust settles, we could decide whether to ignore them as harmless throwbacks to the bad old days or deal with them, too. We'd be in a much stronger position to do so since we'd no longer require their friendship to help us manage ugly regimes in Iraq, Iran, and Syria.

 

The audacious nature of the neocons' plan makes it easy to criticize but strangely difficult to dismiss outright. Like a character in a bad made-for-TV thriller from the 1970s, you can hear yourself saying, "That plan's just crazy enough to work."

 

But like a TV plot, the hawks' vision rests on a willing suspension of disbelief, in particular, on the premise that every close call will break in our favor: The guard will fall asleep next to the cell so our heroes can pluck the keys from his belt. The hail of enemy bullets will plink-plink-plink over our heroes' heads. And the getaway car in the driveway will have the keys waiting in the ignition. Sure, the hawks' vision could come to pass. But there are at least half a dozen equally plausible alternative scenarios that would be disastrous for us.

 

To begin with, this whole endeavor is supposed to be about reducing the long-term threat of terrorism, particularly terrorism that employs weapons of mass destruction. But, to date, every time a Western or non-Muslim country has put troops into Arab lands to stamp out violence and terror, it has awakened entire new terrorist organizations and a generation of recruits. Placing U.S. troops in Riyadh after the Gulf War (to protect Saudi Arabia and its oilfields from Saddam) gave Osama bin Laden a cause around which he built al Qaeda. Israel took the West Bank in a war of self-defense, but once there its occupation helped give rise to Hamas. Israel's incursion into southern Lebanon (justified at the time, but transformed into a permanent occupation) led to the rise of Hezbollah. Why do we imagine that our invasion and occupation of Iraq, or whatever countries come next, will turn out any differently?

 

The Bush administration also insists that our right to act preemptively and unilaterally, with or without the international community's formal approval, rests on the need to protect American lives. But with the exception of al Qaeda, most terrorist organizations in the world, and certainly in the Middle East, do not target Americans. Hamas certainly doesn't. Hezbollah, the most fearsome of terrorist organizations beside al Qaeda, has killed American troops in the Middle East, but not for some years, and it has never targeted American civilians on American soil. Yet like Hamas, Hezbollah has an extensive fundraising cell operation in the States (as do many terrorist organizations, including the Irish Republican Army). If we target them in the Middle East, can't we reasonably assume they will respond by activating these cells and taking the war worldwide?

 

Next, consider the hawks' plans for those Middle East states that are authoritarian yet "friendly" to the United States--specifically Egypt and Saudi Arabia. No question these are problem countries. Their governments buy our weapons and accept our foreign aid yet allow vicious anti-Semitism to spew from the state run airwaves and tolerate clerics who preach jihad against the West. But is it really in our interests to work for their overthrow? Many hawks clearly think so. I asked Richard Perle last year about the dangers that might flow from the fall of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. "Mubarak is no great shakes," he quipped. "Surely we can do better than Mubarak." When I asked Perle's friend and fellow Reagan-era neocon Ken Adelman to calculate the costs of having the toppling of Saddam lead to the overthrow of the House of Saud, he shot back: "All the better if you ask me."

 

This cavalier call for regime change, however, runs into a rather obvious problem. When the communist regimes of Eastern and Central Europe fell after 1989, the people of those nations felt grateful to the United States because we helped liberate them from their Russian colonial masters. They went on to create pro-Western democracies. The same is unlikely to happen, however, if we help "liberate" Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The tyrannies in these countries are home grown, and the U.S. government has supported them, rightly or wrongly, for decades, even as we've ignored (in the eyes of Arabs) the plight of the Palestinians. Consequently, the citizens of these countries generally hate the United States, and show strong sympathy for Islamic radicals. If free elections were held in Saudi Arabia today, Osama bin Laden would probably win more votes than Crown Prince Abdullah. Topple the pro-Western autocracies in these countries, in other words, and you won't get pro-Western democracies but anti-Western tyrannies.

 

To this dilemma, the hawks offer two responses. One is that eventually the citizens of Egypt and Saudi Arabia will grow disenchanted with their anti-Western Islamic governments, just as the people of Iran have, and become our friends. To which the correct response is, well, sure, that's a nice theory, but do we really want to make the situation for ourselves hugely worse now on the strength of a theoretical future benefit?

 

The hawks' other response is that if the effort to push these countries toward democracy goes south, we can always use our military might to secure our interests. "We need to be more assertive," argues Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, "and stop letting all these two-bit dictators and rogue regimes push us around and stop being a patsy for our so-called allies, especially in Saudi Arabia." Hopefully, in Boot's view, laying down the law will be enough. But he envisions a worst-case scenario that would involve the United States "occupying the Saudi's oil fields and administering them as a trust for the people of the region."

 

What Boot is calling for, in other words, is the creation of a de facto American empire in the Middle East. In fact, there's a subset of neocons who believe that given our unparalleled power, empire is our destiny and we might as well embrace it. The problem with this line of thinking is, of course, that it ignores the lengthy and troubling history of imperial ambitions, particularly in the Middle East. The French and the English didn't leave voluntarily; they were driven out. And they left behind a legacy of ignorance, exploitation, and corruption that's largely responsible for the region's current dysfunctional politics.

 

Another potential snafu for the hawks is Iran, arguably the most dangerous state in the Middle East. The good news is that the fundamentalist Shi'a mullahs who have been running the government, exporting terrorism, and trying to enrich their uranium, are increasingly unpopular. Most experts believe that the mullahs' days are numbered, and that true democracy will come to Iran. That day will arrive sooner, the hawks argue, with a democratic Iraq on Iran's border. But the opposite could happen. If the mullahs are smart, they'll cooperate just enough with the Americans not to provoke an attack, but put themselves forth to their own people as defenders of Iranian independence and Iran's brother Shi'a in southern Iraq who are living under the American jackboot. Such a strategy might keep the fundamentalists in power for years longer than they otherwise might have been.

 

Then there is the mother of all problems, Iraq. The hawks' whole plan rests on the assumption that we can turn it into a self-governing democracy--that the very presence of that example will transform politics in the Middle East. But what if we can't really create a democratic, self-governing Iraq, at least not very quickly? What if the experience we had after World War II in Germany and Japan, two ethnically homogeneous nations, doesn't quite work in an ethnically divided Iraq where one group, the Sunni Arabs, has spent decades repressing and slaughtering the others? As one former Army officer with long experience with the Iraq file explains it, the "physical analogy to Saddam Hussein's regime is a steel beam in compression." Give it one good hit, and you'll get a violent explosion. One hundred thousand U.S. troops may be able to keep a lid on all the pent-up hatred. But we may soon find that it's unwise to hand off power to the fractious Iraqis. To invoke the ugly but apt metaphor which Jefferson used to describe the American dilemma of slavery, we will have the wolf by the ears. You want to let go. But you dare not.

 

And what if we do muster the courage to allow elections, but the Iraqis choose a government we can't live with--as the Japanese did in their first post-war election, when the United States purged the man slated to become prime minister? But if we do that in Iraq, how will it look on Al Jazeera? Ultimately, the longer we stay as occupiers, the more Iraq becomes not an example for other Arabs to emulate, but one that helps Islamic fundamentalists make their case that America is just an old-fashioned imperium bent on conquering Arab lands. And that will make worse all the problems set forth above.

 

None of these problems are inevitable, of course. Luck, fortitude, deft management, and help from allies could bring about very different results. But we can probably only rely on the first three because we are starting this enterprise over the expressed objections of almost every other country in the world. And that's yet another reason why overthrowing the Middle East won't be the same as overthrowing communism. We did the latter, after all, within a tight formal alliance, NATO. Reagan's most effective military move against Moscow, for instance, placing Pershing II missiles in Western Europe, could never have happened, given widespread public protests, except that NATO itself voted to let the weapons in. In the Middle East, however, we're largely alone. If things go badly, what allies we might have left are liable to say to us: You broke it, you fix it.

 

Whacking the Hornet's Nest

 

If the Bush administration has thought through these various negative scenarios--and we must presume, or at least pray, that it has--it certainly has not shared them with the American people. More to the point, the president has not even leveled with the public that such a clean-sweep approach to the Middle East is, in fact, their plan. This breaks new ground in the history of pre-war presidential deception. Franklin Roosevelt said he was trying to keep the United States out of World War II even as he--in some key ways--courted a confrontation with the Axis powers that he saw as both inevitable and necessary. History has judged him well for this. Far more brazenly, Lyndon Johnson's administration greatly exaggerated the Gulf of Tonkin incident to gin up support for full-throttle engagement in Vietnam. The war proved to be Johnson's undoing. When President Clinton used American troops to quell the fighting in Bosnia he said publicly that our troops would be there no longer than a year, even though it was widely understood that they would be there far longer. But in the case of these deceptions, the public was at least told what the goals of the wars were and whom and where we would be fighting.

 

Today, however, the great majority of the American people have no concept of what kind of conflict the president is leading them into. The White House has presented this as a war to depose Saddam Hussein in order to keep him from acquiring weapons of mass destruction--a goal that the majority of Americans support. But the White House really has in mind an enterprise of a scale, cost, and scope that would be almost impossible to sell to the American public. The White House knows that. So it hasn't even tried. Instead, it's focused on getting us into Iraq with the hope of setting off a sequence of events that will draw us inexorably towards the agenda they have in mind.

 

The brazenness of this approach would be hard to believe if it weren't entirely in line with how the administration has pursued so many of its other policy goals. Its preferred method has been to use deceit to create faits accomplis, facts on the ground that then make the administration's broader agenda almost impossible not to pursue. During and after the 2000 campaign, the president called for major education and prescription drug programs plus a huge tax cut, saying America could easily afford them all because of large budget surpluses. Critics said it wasn't true, and the growing budget deficits have proven them right. But the administration now uses the existence of big budget deficits as a way to put the squeeze on social programs--part of its plan all along. Strip away the presidential seal and the fancy titles, and it's just a straight-up con.

 

The same strategy seemed to guide the administration's passive-aggressive attitude towards our allies. It spent the months after September 11 signaling its distaste for international agreements and entangling alliances. The president then demanded last September that the same countries he had snubbed support his agenda in Iraq. And last month, when most of those countries refused, hawks spun that refusal as evidence that they were right all along. Recently, a key neoconservative commentator with close ties to the administration told me that the question since the end of the Cold War has been which global force would create the conditions for global peace and security: the United States, NATO, or the United Nations. With NATO now wrecked, he told me, the choice is between the Unites States and the United Nations. Whether NATO is actually wrecked remains to be seen. But the strategy is clear: push the alliance to the breaking point, and when it snaps, cite it as proof that the alliance was good for nothing anyway. It's the definition of chutzpah, like the kid who kills his parents and begs the judge for sympathy because he's an orphan.

 

Another president may be able to rebuild NATO or get the budget back in balance. But once America begins the process of remaking the Middle East in the way the hawks have in mind, it will be extremely difficult for any president to pull back. Vietnam analogies have long been overused, and used inappropriately, but this may be one case where the comparison is apt.

 

Ending Saddam Hussein's regime and replacing it with something stable and democratic was always going to be a difficult task, even with the most able leadership and the broadest coalition. But doing it as the Bush administration now intends is something like going outside and giving a few good whacks to a hornets' nest because you want to get them out in the open and have it out with them once and for all. Ridding the world of Islamic terrorism by rooting out its ultimate sources--Muslim fundamentalism and the Arab world's endemic despotism, corruption, and poverty--might work. But the costs will be immense. Whether the danger is sufficient and the costs worth incurring would make for an interesting public debate. The problem is that once it's just us and the hornets, we really won't have any choice.

 

Joshua Micah Marshall, a Washington Monthly contributing writer, is author of the <http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com>Talking Points Memo.

 

This site and all contents within are Copyright © 2003

<http://www.washingtonmonthly.com>The Washington Monthly

733 15th St. NW Suite 520 Washington DC. 20005.

Comments or questions ...

please email Christina Larson by clicking <mailto:christina@washingtonmonthly.com>here

 

http://x3.extreme-dm.com/z/?tag=nickt&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonmonthly.com

%2Ffeatures%2F2002%2F0304.marshall.html&j=

______

Turkey Warns
US Over Iraq
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
3-29-3

Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has warned the United States the country would make up its own mind on whether to send troops into northern Iraq as Kurdish groups controlling the breakaway region advanced on the oil-rich city of Kirkuk.

 

Defying international criticism, Turkey has announced contingency plans for strengthening its military presence in northern Iraq, fearing local Kurds may declare an independent state and set an example for their restless cousins in Turkey's south-eastern corner.

 

But it has so far failed to convince Washington, which has repeatedly called on Ankara to stay out of northern Iraq, fearing that a massive deployment of Turkish troops would complicate its own military campaign against Baghdad.

 

Meanwhile, Iraqi Kurds have threatened to fight the Turkish army amid worries Ankara will seek to curb the autonomy they gained at the end of the 1991 Gulf War when the region was taken out of Baghdad's control.

 

In an address to Parliament, Mr Erdogan said Ankara was willing to listen to its key ally as long as its security interests were not undermined but hinted that Turkey would act on its own if it perceived a threat.

 

"It is natural for Turkey to respond positively to demands from its allies, as long as its sensitivities are protected," Mr Erdogan said

 

"We do not want to doubt that our sensitivities would be taken into consideration by our allies, but no one should doubt that we will do what is necessary as an independent and sovereign state if a situation which hurts our sensitivities emerges," he said.

 

He underlined Turkey did not intend to invade Iraqi territory.

 

His warning came as Turkish diplomats and US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, just back from meeting Iraqi Kurdish leaders, resumed talks to gap differences over Ankara's plans for northern Iraq.

 

The talks have taken on renewed urgency as Iraqi Kurds, with the help of US forces, edged closer to Kirkuk, which Ankara has repeatedly warned them to stay out of.

 

Iraqi troops were forced to abandon their frontlines and retreat towards Kirkuk for the second time in recent days and fighters from the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) advanced at least seven kilometres towards the town, an AFP correspondent said.

 

Militiamen from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) consolidated their positions within 16 kilometers of Kirkuk after government forces retreated.

 

Iraqi Kurds have said they want Kirkuk for their "capital", but under US pressure have pledged not to declare independence.

 

On Friday local time, Turkey's National Security Council appealed to the United States to take into account Ankara's security concerns in northern Iraq, adding Turkey stood ready to send its own troops into the region.

 

Earlier in the week, the head of Turkey's influential army, General Hilmi Ozkok, announced the army would send troops into northern Iraq in coordination with US forces if a small Turkish force already there was unable to deal with security threats.

 

Turkey, the only Muslim member of NATO, has maintained a military presence in northern Iraq since 1997 to hunt down Turkish Kurdish rebels hiding in the region.

 

Turkey says extra troops might be needed to deal with a wave of refugees or to stop Turkish Kurdish rebels crossing into its territory.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/justin/nat/newsnat-30mar2003-34.htm

__________

 

Perle Already Starts Lobbying
For US Arch Enemy China
By Jim Lobe
Asia Times
3-29-3

WASHINGTON -- Is civil war about to break out among the neo-conservatives who have championed the imperial trajectory of the Bush administration's foreign policy?

 

It's still too early to tell, but analysts are raising eyebrows over news that Richard Perle, the single most powerful hawk outside the administration, has been retained by Global Crossing to help ensure that Hutchison Whampoa, widely regarded by his fellow hawks as a front for China's People's Liberation Army, can buy a majority share in the bankrupt telecommunications company.

 

It's the latest in a series of revelations of Perle's business dealings that, at the very least, make clear why he decided against taking an official position in the administration of President George W Bush. It seems that Perle, for all his hawkishness, wants to get rich in ways that government service may not permit.

 

Those business dealings, which include interests in companies selling advanced computer eavesdropping systems and other "homeland security"-related systems to foreign intelligence and security agencies, have raised ethical questions about whether he is using his unpaid position as chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board (DPB) for personal gain. While the latest disclosure about his relationship with Global Crossing also raises ethical issues, the fact that China is involved - Beijing being considered by most neo-cons the power most likely to challenge US regional dominance in Asia - makes the case even more remarkable.

 

According to a notice submitted by Global Crossing, Perle would be paid US$726,000 by the company, including $600,000 if the sale goes through. Whether it will remains unclear, however. Both the Defense Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have raised some "national security" problems with the deal because it would put Global Crossing's global fiber- optics network, which is used by the Pentagon itself, under Hutchison Whampoa's control.

 

What is particularly remarkable - not to say mind-boggling - is that one of Perle's closest neo-conservatives proteges, soulmates and veteran collaborators, Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy (CSP), has been screaming about the dangers posed by the Hong Kong-based company to US national security ever since Panama awarded it a 25-year renewable contract to lease and operate the ports at both ends of the Panama Canal Zone in 1997.

 

Gaffney began working for Perle way back in the 1970s when they were both on the staff of Washington state senator Henry M "Scoop" Jackson, the "Senator from Boeing", devoted to derailing detente with the Soviet Union. Their bureaucratic machinations with then defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld and another Perle protege, Paul Wolfowitz, to frustrate a new arms-control agreement negotiated with Moscow by secretary of state Henry Kissinger earned Perle his famous nickname, the Prince of Darkness.

 

Under president Ronald Reagan, Perle became an assistant secretary of defense and named Gaffney as his deputy. In the 1990s, they worked hand-in- glove - Perle at the neo-conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and Gaffney at CSP. Perle serves on CSP's board of advisors; they serve together on the boards of the US Committee for a Free Lebanon and the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, and several other neo-conservative-dominated interest and lobby groups.

 

Gaffney, who warned that the Panama leases would put Beijing in a position to cut off the canal to US warships, if not take control of the strategic waterway altogether, led a bizarre campaign backed by extreme right-wingers in Congress and former defense secretary Caspar Weinberger to force the Panamanians to cancel the deal before the canal reverted to Panamanian sovereignty on January 1, 2000.

 

As recently as last August, Gaffney was insisting that Hutchison, which is owned by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, is simply a cat's paw for China to further its strategic designs against Washington. In addition to the Panama Canal leases, he wrote in the Washington Times, Hutchison "is currently hard at work acquiring a presence for China at other strategic 'choke points' around the world, including notably the Caribbean's Bahamas, the Mediterranean's Malta, and the Persian Gulf's Straits of Hormuz. At a moment inconvenient to the United States, such access could translate into physical or other obstacles to our use of such waterways."

 

But while these geostrategic maneuvers were worrisome enough, the main point of Gaffney's article last October was precisely to point out the threat posed by Hutchison's purchase of a 61.5 percent majority interest in Global Crossing, the winner of a 10-year, $450 million contract to operate a high- speed classified research network for Pentagon scientists.

 

Gaffney had a message for those who would support the deal going through. "Trade uber alles means, by definition, subordinating national- security considerations to the ambitions of those who seek profits through commerce. In a time of war like the present," he warned, "we simply cannot afford to pursue such a policy to its illogical, and potentially highly destructive conclusion."

 

Yet it appears that Perle has been retained to achieve precisely that result.

 

The deal adds to the growing perception that Perle is using his position as DPB chairman, and possibly his longtime friendship and influence with Rumsfeld, to further his own financial interests. Rumsfeld appointed him to the post within a few months of the administration's inauguration, and he has used it as a platform for almost continuous public exhortation for Washington to invade Iraq as a first step in transforming the entire Arab Middle East.

 

Perle's private interests first came to light in a controversial New Yorker article this month by veteran investigative reporter Seymour Hersh. He reported that Perle met with Saudi businessmen, including Adnan Khashoggi, in Marseilles two months ago as part of an effort to raise investment cash for Perle's Trireme Partners LP, a company specializing in homeland security and defense. Perle denied that the conversation had anything to do with Trireme and called Hersh a "terrorist".

 

Last week, The Guardian of London reported that Perle was also a director of a UK-based company, Autonomy Corp, with an option on 75,000 of the company's shares. The company, according to the Guardian account, is selling advanced computer eavesdropping systems to intelligence agencies around the world. Perle told the newspaper that he advises the company on market opportunities but that he has no input into specific procurement by US agencies, a point he also made with respect to the Global Crossing arrangement, which was reported by the New York Times on Friday.

 

The Times also reported that Perle participated last Wednesday in a conference call sponsored by Goldman Sachs on the subject of "Implications of an Imminent War: Iraq Now. North Korea Next?" which apparently discussed investment opportunities. It did not disclose whether Perle was paid for his participation or made specific recommendations about companies in which he has an interest.

 

As DPB chairman, Perle is not formally part of the US administration, and is thus not required to divest himself of commercial interests. But his influence and power with the administration are well known. Not only does he have a long-standing relationship with Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, but he also has worked closely as a lobbyist for Turkey and the Israeli arms industry with Douglas Feith, the Pentagon's Undersecretary for Policy, as well as other senior Pentagon officials.

 

Perle himself has strongly denied that he was using his influence as DPB chairman to help Global Crossing. He told the Financial Times that he was only advising the company on the approval process and not lobbying on its behalf.

 

But a number of analysts say the contract's fee contingency, which is unusual in the Washington legal community, suggests that lobbying is precisely what Global Crossing had in mind. "The fee structure is especially smelly because $600,000 of the windfall is contingent on government approval of the sale," wrote the Times' Maureen Dowd on Sunday.

 

"This is a conflict of interest," Larry Noble, director of the Center for Responsible Politics, told the Financial Times. "He's using his position on the board to win business."

 

But to Gaffney, who has yet to be heard from on the issue, and his fellow members of the anti-China "Blue Team", Perle's role in expediting the sale of Global Crossing to Hutchison must come as a major disappointment, to put it mildly.

 

After all, it was only three years ago that Perle joined with Gaffney and 15 other anti-China hawks from the Project for the New American Century in calling for unequivocal support for Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack.

 

And in another public statement that could have been written by Gaffney, Perle charged that Beijing "is laying the foundations for an aggressive claim to preeminence in the Pacific. It ought to be very clear that this is a catastrophe for all of us, and could foreshadow a Cold War as bad as the last."

 

Of course, this is the same Richard Perle who recently called for Washington to pursue a strategy of "containment" against France but has no intention of giving up his summer home there.

 

(©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)

http://atimes.com/atimes/China/EC25Ad04.

_____________

 

Olamha ba ooomba ha. Olamha ba ooomba ha  here come Mooshiyuck lalalala